Pathway Network for Canada`s Capital Region 2006 Strategic Plan

Transcription

Pathway Network for
Canada's Capital Region
2006 Strategic Plan
Public Consultation Report
June 2006
Table of Contents
1. Context............................................................................................................. 1
2. Public Consultation........................................................................................... 2
3. Analysis of Comments, Summary and Responses........................................... 4
3.1 Analysis of Comments ................................................................................ 4
3.2 Network Vision............................................................................................ 4
3.3 Most Frequently Mentioned Positive Aspects of Pathway Network ............ 6
3.4 Most Frequently Mentioned Aspects Needing Improvement ...................... 6
3.5 Services ...................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Design Standards ....................................................................................... 9
3.7 Safety ....................................................................................................... 10
3.8 Signage .................................................................................................... 12
3.9 Tourism and Marketing ............................................................................. 12
3.10 Existing Pathways or Pathways Proposed in Strategic Plan................... 14
3.11 Missing Network Links or Sectors Needing Improvement....................... 15
3.12 Links or Pathways Needing Improvement .............................................. 20
3.13 Miscellaneous ......................................................................................... 23
4. Comments from Interest Groups and Municipalities....................................... 24
4.1 Dow’s Lake Residents’ Association .......................................................... 24
4.2 Greenspace Alliance of Canada’s Capital ................................................ 24
4.3 Transport 2000 ......................................................................................... 25
4.4 Municipality of Chelsea............................................................................. 25
4.5 Municipality of L’Ange-Gardien ................................................................. 27
5. Media Coverage ............................................................................................. 28
6. Next Steps and Conclusion ............................................................................ 30
Appendix 1: Workshop Report ........................................................................... 32
Appendix 2: Public Notice .................................................................................. 33
Appendix 3: Press Releases and Media Coverage ............................................ 34
Appendix 4: Questionnaire ................................................................................. 35
Pathway Network for Canada's Capital Region | 2006 Strategic Plan
1. Context
Since 1970, the National Capital Commission (NCC), in collaboration with the
Cities of Ottawa and Gatineau, has constructed over 170 km of recreational
pathways to link the various points of interest in Canada’s Capital Region. The
existing network is recognized as an important National Capital asset and
contributes to the creation of a distinct image for the region.
In 1994, a study was conducted on the planning and implementation of an
integrated pathway network for Canada’s Capital Region. This study is in
continuity with the Gréber Plan (1950) and the Capital Plan (1988), two important
plans identifying the directions and development priorities the NCC has devised
for Canada’s Capital Region.
In 1994, the recreational pathway network was defined as a multi-use network
primarily meeting the needs of recreational users and showcasing the region’s
environmental, historical, cultural, heritage, recreational and urban attractions by
making them more accessible to tourists and the region’s residents. The network
creates a link between the various points of interest and urban, heritage,
historical, environmental and recreational activities in the National Capital
Region. The network is also an essential tool to reinforce the region’s “Green
Capital” image.
The definition, context, user needs and expectations regarding the network have
evolved over the past ten years. Among other things, increasing numbers of
visitors are using the pathway network; there is greater diversity in terms of
usage, such as rollerblading, and the network is increasingly being used for
transportation and recreational purposes. In addition, it is standard practice at the
NCC to review major plans on a 10-year cycle. The NCC, therefore, began the
process of updating the 1994 plan in September 2004 in collaboration with the
Cities of Ottawa and Gatineau.
p. 1
2. Public Consultation
Wishing to underline the significance of public participation in the direction of this
important study, the NCC and the Cities of Ottawa and Gatineau organized
several public consultations for both the public and interest groups.
Two workshops for interest groups were held on November 17 and 18, 2004.
Over 80 groups from various fields were invited to participate. The objectives
were as follows:
•
To present a draft of the work carried out to date as part of the study;
•
To pinpoint the users’ vision for the future and the evolution of the
recreational pathway network;
•
To identify user priorities for aspects of the recreational pathway network
such as role, use, development, promotion and tourism.
According to workshop participants, an ideal network in 2014 would have the
following characteristics: it would be multi-use, integrating recreational/tourist and
utilitarian roles and interconnected with other transportation networks by
intermodal links. It would be free to users and would offer a stimulating
landscape experience in urban as well as rural areas. It would be linked to
peripheral regional networks. It should offer a wide variety of easily accessible
services while promoting the protection of natural areas. User awareness and
education to promote respectful, tolerant coexistence would make it a safe
network (see Workshop Report in Appendix 1).
Two public consultation sessions were held on November 23 and 24, 2005, at
the Government Conference Centre and the Relais plein air du parc de la
Gatineau. The consultation objectives were as follows:
•
To present a draft of the Strategic Plan to recreational pathway network
users, various partners and agencies of the affected areas and the general
public;
•
To provide an opportunity for participants to ask questions and express their
opinion and expectations regarding the study’s overall vision;
•
To present the decisional process and major steps to be taken with regard to
this study.
p. 2
Notices announcing the public consultations were published in the region’s
newspapers (Le Droit, La Revue, The Ottawa Sun and The Ottawa Citizen; see
notices in Appendix 2), messages were broadcast on the region’s various radio
stations, and e-mails and letters were sent to individuals and interest groups
most likely to be interested in the project. All information was posted on the NCC
Web site as of November 11, 2005.
A media briefing was held on November 14, 2005, to inform the media
community about the contents of the study and the upcoming public
consultations. Finally, a press release was issued to inform the media about the
public consultation (Appendix 3).
Public meetings took place between 4 pm and 8 pm, beginning with an openhouse session during which participants were able to learn about the project by
consulting documents and information panels, and discussing the project with
employees from the NCC, and the Cities of Ottawa and Gatineau.
A presentation of the project took place at 7 pm, stating the vision and objectives
and indicating the pathways proposed in the Strategic Study. Participants
expressed their opinions during the ensuing question and comments period.
Over 60 individuals took part in the meetings.
Members of the public interested in sharing their comments on this project were
asked to do so before December 23, 2005. In addition to the questionnaire
available on line and on the evening of the public meeting (see Appendix 4),
participants were able to forward their comments by mail, e-mail and fax.
Interventions during the public meeting were also taken into consideration,
whether they took place during the open-house period or the comment session
that followed the project presentation.
Approximately 30 interventions were made as part of the question and comments
period during the public consultations, 30 comments and over 20 questionnaires
(a transcript of the comments and questionnaires is available upon request) were
subsequently sent by mail, e-mail or fax. All comments were analysed as part of
this report and will be considered in the development of the final Strategic Plan.
p. 3
3. Analysis of Comments, Summary and Responses
All comments received in the context of the public consultation were
summarized, analysed and considered during the development of the final draft
of the Strategic Plan. This report constitutes an analysis of the comments, and
then a summary of the comments grouped by theme, and includes clarification
points and replies from the NCC and municipal partners.
3.1 Analysis of Comments
In general, the public consultation participants have a positive opinion towards
the vision, objectives and proposals identified in the 2006 Strategic Plan for the
Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region.
The majority of participants favour an exclusive (off-road) pathway network that
encourages recreation and utilitarian use, that is integrated, accessible and in
harmony with nature. The surface should be sufficiently wide and smooth to
encourage multiple uses.
The positive aspects most often mentioned are the expanse of the network, its
proximity to nature and waterways, the numerous routes available, its cleanliness
and the beauty of the scenery and landscapes.
When asked about the network in general, the highest ranked priority by
participants is by far the completion of missing links in the current pathway
network in order for users to benefit from a continuous network. Participants also
favour the rehabilitation and restoration of the actual network in order to maintain
or enhance the quality of the user experience, with an equal mention for the
construction of new pathways in order to expand the network throughout
Canada’s Capital Region.
With regard to design and maintenance standards, participants favour first and
foremost the improvement of the maintenance and rehabilitation program for the
network. The expansion and improvement of user services was ranked second
and finally the review and improvement of present design standards to ensure
user safety was ranked third.
3.2 Network Vision
3.2.1 The majority of respondents favour an exclusive (off-road)pathway
network, encouraging recreation and utilitarian use, that is integrated, accessible
and in harmony with nature. The surface should be sufficiently wide and smooth
to encourage multiple uses.
p. 4
3.2.2 Some users, however, would prefer that the pathway network give priority
to utilitarian uses. Some suggested separating the different uses by establishing
a parallel network to meet the needs of pedestrians and reduce conflicts.
Response:
The vision presented in the Strategic Plan promotes a multi purpose
network that supports both recreational and non-motorized utilitarian
vocations, that is accessible and safe, that ensures connectivity with
local cycling routes and national/regional trails and that is in harmony
with nature where the quality of experience is optimized.
Pathway standards are established to create continuous, uniform and
safe pathways throughout the network. Asphalt is the surface material
of preference as a means of ensuring and promoting universal access
to the pathways. Stone dust surfaces are recommended in certain
settings such as the Greenbelt Pathway in order to ensure that the
pathway is in harmony with the rural character and natural setting of
the Greenbelt.
Pathway widths are established to optimize user safety while
minimizing the physical and environmental impacts on the natural open
space corridors. Minimum pathway widths of 3.0 meters are proposed
with widths of up to 4.5 meters recommended along heavy use areas
within the Capital Core. Parallel or segregated networks are not
generally recommended due to high physical and environmental
impacts, management concerns and cost. Some exceptions could be
considered in very high traffic areas as outlined in the Strategic Plan.
3.2.3 Year-round use is often mentioned, although the proposed winter uses
vary: on the one hand, snowshoeing, hiking and cross-country skiing (that do not
require snowclearing) and on the other, winter utilitarian cycling (that requires
snowclearing and more complex maintenance).
Response:
Promoting the use of the pathway corridors during winter months
supports the objective of bringing residents and tourists to the Capital’s
unique linear open space network and enjoy their countless benefits
year round. Although a portion of the pathway network along the
Rideau Canal is cleared during winter months to service winter
programs such as the Rideau Canal Skateway and Winterlude to ease
access to the Rideau Canal, the winter network shall support popular
activities such as cross country skiing and snow shoeing. Having
facilities to enjoy such winter activities within the urban core of
Canada’s Capital is considered a valuable asset.
p. 5
However, there are agreements with the municipalities to clear certain
sections that are essential for pedestrian traffic in winter.
3.2.4 It was mentioned that in the long term, motorized vehicles should not use
the pathways.
Response:
Motorized vehicles, with the exception of motorized wheelchairs, are
not permitted on the pathway network. Regulations and mechanisms
exist, and will be improved upon where required, to ensure that
unauthorized vehicles are kept off the pathway network. However,
pathways are occasionally used by emergency and maintenance
vehicles.
3.2.5 All users agreed that the pathway network should offer a safe experience.
Ways to achieve this are discussed below, under the theme “Safety.”
3.3 Most Frequently Mentioned Positive Aspects of Pathway Network
3.3.1 The positive aspects most often mentioned are the expanse of the network,
its proximity to nature and waterways, numerous possibilities for routes,
cleanliness and the beauty of its scenery.
3.4 Most Frequently Mentioned Aspects Needing Improvement
3.4.1 Routes identified as bicycle paths and their shoulders should be sufficiently
wide and paved. The shoulders and road trails should also be rigorously
maintained to remove small stones during the summer and snow in winter.
On-road cycling networks are managed by municipalities.
Response from City of Gatineau:
These operations are part of the City of Gatineau roadway summer
maintenance program.
Response from City of Ottawa:
The City of Ottawa, through its Cycling Plan, is reviewing and
developing designs and standards for cycling lanes in the City.
Through the implementation of the Cycling Plan, the City of Ottawa
will review its maintenance standards for cycling which form part of
the overall roadway maintenance standards.
3.4.2 The establishment of service and catering areas along the network is
frequently mentioned as an aspect to be improved.
Response:
p. 6
The Strategic Plan offers recommendations to improve user
services and amenities, such as benches, washrooms and signage
along the pathway network. Rest areas are also proposed at
regular intervals along the network. The Strategic Plan also
recommends that the network’s wayfinding system be updated to
orient users better and to inform on services available such as
washrooms.
3.4.3 A number of users recommend lighting the network to encourage utilitarian
use in the evening during the fall, winter and spring, when darkness falls quite
early. Users questioned the network management’s position on this issue.
Response:
The Capital Pathway Network is generally intended to be used from
sunrise to sunset. The Strategic Plan does, however, propose that
lighting be considered in priority sectors of the Capital Core and
possibly in specific areas of the urban/suburban ring where
pathways are identified as part of a pedestrian circulation network
providing access to destinations such as schools, community
facilities, transit stops, etc.
3.4.4 Users recommend that the network be extended beyond the Capital Core
and that standards for these areas be similar to those of the Core.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies a regional structure comprising of 3
conceptual rings expanding from the Core to the outskirts rural area
of Canada’s Capital Region. The Strategic Plan recommends that
minimum construction standards for pathways be consistent across
the network. The minimum pathway width of 3.0 meters which
applies to the Capital Core and urban/suburban rings, could be
increased along certain segments in the Capital Core in heavy use
areas.
3.4.5 Gatineau Park should have more pedestrian pathways. The population is
ageing and needs other options besides cross-country skiing.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies and addresses the existing and
proposed multi-use pathway network across Canada’s Capital
Region including Gatineau Park. Pedestrians are welcome to utilize
the recreational pathways during winter for walking, except in
designated Gatineau Park and Greenbelt ski trails. Several
pedestrian winter walking trails have also been implemented in
Gatineau Park.
p. 7
3.4.6 Users consider it important to have a smooth, well-maintained surface
without holes or cracks.
Response:
The NCC and the Cities of Gatineau and Ottawa have
implemented regular maintenance programs supplemented by
patrol services that ensure surveillance of pathway conditions.
Users are encouraged to report their observations and
dangerous situations by telephone or via the internet.
3.5 Services
3.5.1 The majority of participants in the public process are satisfied with the level
of services offered on the pathway network. However, the addition of public
washrooms (also in winter) and drinking fountains would be desirable.
Response:
The Strategic Plan offers recommendations to improve user
services along the pathway network. Improved services could
include the installation, where possible and feasible, of drinking
fountains and washrooms and/or directing users to such services
available adjacent to the network.
In general, services are provided in Gatineau when a pathway
borders or passes through a public park (e.g. Moussette Park,
Leamy Lake Park, Aylmer Marina).
3.5.2 Some participants mentioned the addition of rest areas, picnic tables,
benches and public telephones. It was suggested that bicycle racks be installed
at Petrie Island.
Response:
Improving user services, including rest areas and benches, is
identified in the study recommendations. Bicycle racks will also be
considered in strategic locations. Directing users to existing public
telephones located adjacent to the pathway network may also be
considered in addition to the cell phone loan program initiated by
the National Capital Commission in 2004 as part of the Pathway
Safety Action Plan.
3.5.3 Participants welcomed the proposal to install rest areas at two-km intervals
in the Capital Core. Some users feel that three-or four-km intervals would be
sufficient.
3.5.4 Globally, participants welcomed the improvement of services, but, in the
long term, user fees should not be introduced.
p. 8
3.5.5 It was noted that certain respondents tend to give priority to use by
commuters who require less services, such as network expansion or repairs,
than recreational users.
3.6 Design Standards
3.6.1 The majority of respondents favour a multi-use network. Some suggest
widening the pathways to better accommodate in-line skaters.
Response:
The Strategic Plan recommends that minimum multi-use pathway
widths be established at 3.0 meters and that the pathway clearance
zone be established at 6.0 meters. Pathway widths along heavy
use areas in the Capital Core could be increased to 4 or 4.5 meters
to permit safe shared use of the pathway surface.
3.6.2 The construction of pathways with steep slopes or sharp curves should be
avoided.
Response:
The Strategic Plan recommends that slopes, wherever possible, not
exceed 5% in order to respect universal accessibility requirements.
Sharp curves are also avoided wherever possible as a means of
ensuring clear sight lines for users. Where sharp curves are
unavoidable, signage is installed and vegetation clearing
undertaken to improve sightlines.
3.6.3 Most respondents favour well-maintained asphalt pathways. However,
some prefer a stone dust surface, which is softer than the asphalt surface.
Response:
The Strategic Plan recommends the use of asphalt as the preferred
surface for pathways due to its qualities as a universally accessible
surface material for mobility impaired users, strollers and in-line
skaters, its durability and comfort for cyclists. Certain pathways in
rural areas, such as the Greenbelt Pathway, are surfaced in stone
dust in consideration of its rural and natural setting. In many areas,
runners can use the softer shoulder section of the paved pathway
corridor.
3.6.4 Three-meter pathways are too wide for very natural areas.
Response:
p. 9
The Strategic Plan recommends that minimum multi-use pathway
widths be established at 3.0 meters in order to ensure the safety of
all users.
3.7 Safety
3.7.1 A number of respondents suggest improving lighting on the network to
make it safer.
Response:
The Strategic Plan proposes that lighting be considered in priority
sectors of the Capital Core and possibly in specific areas of the
urban/suburban ring where pathways are identified as part of a
pedestrian circulation network providing access to destinations
such as schools, community facilities, transit stops, etc.
3.7.2 Increased surveillance is needed on the network and offenders should be
punished for their behaviour. Speeding by some cyclists is often mentioned as a
problem.
Response:
The Strategic Plan supports the extension of the existing volunteer
pathway patrol program to other segments of the network as well
as the increased/continued promotion of the pathway code of
conduct to emphasize pathway sharing and promote shared
pathway awareness.
It should be noted that the NCC, in partnership with local
municipalities and various key stakeholders, has established a
comprehensive Safety Action Plan and program for the Capital
Pathway Network which includes increase surveillance by volunteer
pathway patrollers and local police services.
3.7.3 Several comments concerned Colonel By and Queen Elizabeth Drives.
Pedestrians wishing to access the pathways along the Rideau Canal have
problems crossing them, especially during rush hour. It is suggested that
pedestrian crossings (flashing lights or traffic lights) be installed at certain
strategic locations.
Response:
The NCC parkways are panoramic routes developed for the
discovery and enjoyment of the green corridors. Traffic control
mechanisms are reduced to a minimum.
p. 10
Such improvements will be considered, where possible, as part of
future NCC and municipal roadway improvement initiatives.
It should be noted that the new Rideau Canal Pedestrian Bridge,
presently being completed, will greatly improve pedestrian and
cyclist circulation and safety along the Colonel-by and Queen
Elizabeth corridors.
3.7.4 The volunteer pathway patrol should be extended to the entire pathway
network. Students could perform patroller duties during the summer. The
bilingualism requirement for volunteers is a significant constraint that reduces the
number of potential candidates.
Response:
The Strategic Plan supports the extension of the existing volunteer
pathway patrol program to other segments of the network and the
network as a whole. Requirements for volunteer patrollers will be
standardized and reviewed to ensure volunteers can appropriately
fulfill their responsibilities and promote a higher participation rate.
While bilingualism is encouraged for the volunteer pathway
program it is not a mandatory requirement.
3.7.5 It is suggested that the NCC collaborate with the Women’s Initiatives for
Safer Environments (WISE) to organize safety audits on certain network sectors.
Response:
Several safety audits were conducted on the pathway network
through the Women’s Initiatives for Safer Environments (WISE) in
recent years, notably since the new Action Plan for enhanced
safety was brought forward by the NCC and its partners.
Recommendations made as part of these audits are considered as
part of maintenance, management and improvement initiatives.
The benefits of conducting similar audits on a periodic basis and at
strategic locations across the network warrants pursuing this
initiative.
Furthermore, the City of Gatineau has a network safety working
group since January 2006. The members of this group are from
municipal services, public agency partners, including the NCC and
network users.
3.7.6 Tools such as red emergency telephones and surveillance cameras could
be installed at strategic locations.
p. 11
Response:
The installation of surveillance equipment could be considered for
high risk locations such as the entrance of long underpasses.
The NCC and its partners are assessing the feasibility of these
mechanisms used in other North American cities.
3.8 Signage
3.8.1 Recent improvements to network signage are highly appreciated. It is
suggested that the scope of maps illustrating the entire Capital Region be
reduced and that the emphasis be placed on the sector in which the user is
located. It is also suggested that neighbourhoods or key destinations be
identified rather than streets when appropriate, as this would provide greater
precision, for example, in the case of very long streets.
Response:
The improvement of regulatory, wayfinding signage and information
to users is an objective which is addressed within the Strategic
Plan.
3.8.2 The comments concerning signage focus primarily on orientation, the most
frequent suggesting improved signage to help users identify their location, or to
identify the distances separating them from main attractions or destinations.
Response:
The improvement of wayfinding signage across the network is an
objective which is addressed within the Strategic Plan.
3.8.3 It is also suggested that users receive better information during
construction work by posting signs well in advance. In addition, it was suggested
that flooded areas or those prone to flooding in springtime be identified.
Response:
The improvement of temporary signage and communication
initiatives to inform users of upcoming and ongoing construction
initiatives has been and will continue to be addressed by the NCC
and the Cities of Ottawa and Gatineau for all pathway construction
projects.
3.9 Tourism and Marketing
p. 12
3.9.1 It is mentioned that the Capital Pathway network should be integrated into
the region’s existing networks such as the Trans Canada Trail, the Route verte
and the Ontario Trails Network. The Ottawa Cycling Plan should also be
compatible with the Strategic Plan.
Response:
The Trans Canada Trail, la Route Verte, the Ontario cycling route
as well cycling routes of the Cities of Ottawa and Gatineau are
considered and integrated as part of the Pathway Strategic Plan
mapping. NCC recognized National and Provincial trail networks
using part of the Capital Pathway will be signed and their routes
identified on all maps.
The Pathway Strategic Plan complements the Ottawa
Comprehensive Cycling Plan as well as the Gatineau “Plan de
développement des sentiers récréatifs”.
3.9.2 A proposal was made to design loop pathways for visitors to promote
tourism on both sides of the River. In addition, a four-season pathway linking
Gatineau, Chelsea and Wakefield, a pathway taking in north Gatineau as far as
Poltimore, passing through Buckingham and Perkins, and another linking Aylmer
to the Pontiac Cycloparc would contribute to the Capital’s tourist potential.
Response:
The Strategic Plan recommends the development and promotion of
tourist as well as thematic routes and circuits across the region. As
the suburban and rural network is expanded, larger circuits through
rural villages and towns will be possible.
Some itineraries have already been identified on the Gatineau side.
Documents concerning proposed itineraries and loops for long
distance excursions are available at the Maison du tourisme in
Gatineau.
3.9.3 The pathway in the southeast sector of the Ottawa airport beyond the golf
club should be incorporated into the Strategic Plan.
Response from the City of Ottawa:
The Pathway Strategic Plan does include a proposed pathway
along an abandoned rail corridor adjacent to the Ottawa Airport,
along the south side of the Light Rail Transit corridor to the rural
area. This Pathway is also identified in the Ottawa Official Plan.
The abandoned rail corridor runs from the Ottawa airport to
Osgoode Village. Along the way, it does pass two golf courses and
many near-by outdoor recreation and community destinations. The
objective is to enhance accessibility to outdoor leisure areas
p. 13
located adjacent to the multi-use pathway and enhance the overall
leisure experience for residents and visitors.
3.9.4 The pathway map could identify service points and bicycle shops in the
region.
Response:
This recommendation will be considered in the development of the
next pathway map.
3.10 Existing Pathways or Pathways Proposed in Strategic Plan
3.10.1 A comment indicated that the tunnel underneath Wellington Street near
the Museum of Photography opens too late in spring and closes too early in the
fall to be useful to commuters. This pathway should be added to the Strategic
Plan.
Response:
The seasonal passage under Plaza Bridge will be identified as part
of the Pathway Strategic Plan. Extending the season where the
passage is kept open may be explored as part of the Core Area
pedestrian and cycling linkage strategies.
3.10.2 An issue was raised concerning the proposed link in Brewer Park near
Carleton University. This sector is ecologically fragile; it is a flood-prone area and
permits dogs off-leash. Have these factors been considered?
Brewer Park comprises many diverse outdoor leisure facilities and
a waterfront along the Rideau River that has been carefully
restored by the community. A pathway is proposed to link the
community to Carleton University under the Dunbar Bridge and to
the future Light Rail Transit Station. The location of any proposed
pathway must address the existing patterns of public use and the
environmental integrity of the area. Consultation with the local
community, and in particular ECOS (Environmental Committee of
Ottawa South), is essential for the success of this proposed
pathway.
3.10.3 It has been said on a number of occasions that the Prince of Wales Bridge
should keep its railway track. The proposed pathway should not use the railway
right-of-way, and should instead be cantilevered.
Response:
The integration of a pedestrian and cycling facility on the bridge
structure, linking Ottawa with Gatineau while preserving the railway,
forms part of the recommendations of the Strategic Plan.
p. 14
3.10.4 In the Plan’s maps, on Map No.1, the yellow lines west of the Lièvre and
Gatineau Rivers should be dotted.
Response:
The map will be altered to reflect the current situation in this sector.
3.11 Missing Network Links or Sectors Needing Improvement
3.11.1 Numerous comments proposed improving the links between south Ottawa
communities, such as Findlay Creek, South Keys, Greenboro, Bank Street,
Albion, Conroy and Hunt Club Roads, etc. and the Capital Core.
Based on requests received during the Capital Pathway Study and
the Ottawa Cycling Plan, City staff will be exploring the provision of
paved shoulders along Bank Street and Conroy Road between
Hunt Club and Findlay Creek Roads as part of roadway
reconstructions or renewals. Through the refinement of the
Pathway Strategic Plan, City staff in consultation with the NCC will
evaluate the proposed east-west Greenbelt Pathway alignment and
consider the integration of north-south pathways towards the
Leitrim Community. Pathways are proposed in the Sawmill Creek
Corridor to help link the southern area of Ottawa to the Capital
core.
3.11.2 Consideration should be given to a cycling link along Lees Avenue,
through Brantwood Park as far as Windsor Park.
A pathway connection from Brantwood Park to Windsor Park along
the Rideau River is already proposed in the Pathway Strategic
Plan. Many segments are already in place. These segments use a
combination of pathways and quiet local streets to complete the
connections. Missing segments would have to be constructed as
part of an overall program to implement the recommendations on
the Pathway Strategic Plan.
3.11.3 A pathway should be developed in the rail corridor between Gatineau,
Chelsea and Wakefield, in partnership with these municipalities.
Response:
A proposed pathway within the Gatineau - Wakefield rail corridor
which follows the Gatineau River is identified in the Pathway
Strategic Plan.
p. 15
3.11.4 Improvements are needed to the cycling links between Chelsea and the
Capital Core, via the 105 and Mine Road.
Construction of a pathway along Cité-des-Jeunes Boulevard,
between Hautes-Plaines Boulevard and the Gatineau Park
Pathway (Leamy Creek), is included (medium term) in the City of
Gatineau pathways development plan. Construction of a pathway is
also planned along Saint-Joseph Boulevard between the Leamy
Creek pathway (Freeman Road) and Alonzo-Wright Bridge.
3.11.5 A recreational link should be considered between the pathway bordering
Saint-Raymond Boulevard and the Voyageurs Pathway.
The construction of a pathway between Alexandre-Taché
Boulevard and the Voyageurs Pathway, in the Saint-Raymond
Boulevard axis, is planned (medium term) in the Gatineau pathway
development plan. The link to the Voyageurs Pathway will be
constructed as part of the Place Champlain housing project.
3.11.6 Consideration should be given to a new cycling link leading to the Alonzo
Bridge.
Construction of a pathway between the Leamy Creek pathway
(Freeman Road) and the Alonzo-Wright Bridge is included (medium
term) in the City of Gatineau pathway development plan.
3.11.7 Consideration should be given to expanding the existing recreational
pathway bordering the Light Rail corridor near Carling Avenue and Young Street
toward Highway 417 as far as Gladstone Avenue.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies a proposed continuous pathway within
the Champagne corridor from the Ottawa River south along the
proposed North-South Light Rail transit corridor.
3.11.8 A new recreational link should be considered along Springhurst Park
behind Saint Paul University.
A Pathway is proposed along the Rideau River behind Saint Paul’s
University from Springhurst Drive to Brantwood Park. This pathway
is shown in the Pathway Strategic Plan and in the Ottawa Official
p. 16
Plan. The implementation of this pathway will require the
permission of the institutional landowner and partnerships with the
community. This segment of pathway would contribute to the
implementation of a continuous pathway from Sandy Hill to Colonel
By Drive (adjacent to Carleton University) along the western shore
of the Rideau River.
3.11.9 Recreational links to Orleans should be improved. The existing link with
the Aviation Parkway and Rockcliffe toward the Capital Core is dangerous.
Response:
The National Capital Commission is proceeding, in 2006, with the
improvement of the Ottawa River Pathway link between Acacia and
the Rockcliffe Boathouse.
3.11.10 Consideration should be given to a link along the Ottawa River passing
through Andrew Haydon Park.
There is an existing Pathway in Andrew Haydon Park. The Pathway
runs adjacent to Carling Avenue, along the perimeter of the park to
reduce conflicts with park users.
3.11.11 Consideration should be given to a recreational link between the
Voyageurs Pathway and the path bordering the autoroute de l’Outaouais.
Construction is planned for a pathway between the Voyageurs
Pathway and the Outaouais Boulevard (Pioneer Pathway) in the
Allen Road axis (medium term) and the future Deschênes
Boulevard (long term).
3.11.12 The north-south links to Ottawa, especially in the Sawmill Creek and
LeBreton Flats sectors should be improved.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies proposed pathways within the Airport
Parkway corridor (Sawmill Creek pathway) and within the proposed
North-South Light Rail Transit corridor. The pathway within the
North-South Light Rail corridor is proposed to the Ottawa River
(through the Champagne corridor), which, once completed, would
connect to the Ottawa River Pathway just West of LeBreton Flats.
3.11.13 A pathway along the Ottawa River from 10th Line Road to Petrie Island
should be considered.
p. 17
A pathway along the Ottawa River from 10th Line Road to Petrie
Island has been recently completed. The facility was constructed as
a service road for the recently completed waterworks and was
designed to accommodate public use as a pathway. Further
refinements will be required to facilitate easy use by a diversity of
pathway users.
3.11.14 Consideration should be given to a pathway from Jacques-Cartier Park
toward Hurtubise Boulevard.
Construction of a segment of the Voyageurs Pathway in
Sanscartier Park and development of a designated roadway
(signage) are planned in 2006. They are part of the Route verte
development on City of Gatineau territory.
3.11.15 Consideration should be given to a pathway from Grandview Drive
through the Greenbelt to Shirley’s Bay.
A short Pathway segment from Grandview Drive to Shirley’s Bay
would be an asset. Consideration will be given towards adding such
a link within the Pathway Strategic Plan as a proposed pathway.
3.11.16 Consideration should be given to a pathway from Mooney’s Bay along
the Rideau River beyond Hunt Club.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies a proposed pathway along the Rideau
River (East side) from Hunt Club to Revelstoke Drive. From there,
cycling facilities are proposed along Revelstoke Drive and a short
distance along Riverside Drive to Mooney’s Bay.
3.11.17 Consideration should be given to a new pathway bordering Strathcona
Park north, along the Rideau River.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies a proposed pathway within the corridor
in question.
3.11.18 Include a new pathway along the Light Rail corridor to the University of
Ottawa.
p. 18
The Light Rail corridor through the downtown core will be within the
roadway surface. Separate multi use pathways are not possible on
downtown streets, but cycling routes, as well as sidewalk
improvements, are identified for the downtown core.
3.11.19 Consideration should be given to a new pathway along the Alta Vista
corridor.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies a proposed pathway within the corridor
in question.
3.11.19 Improve pathway connectivity along the west side of the Rideau River.
The Pathway Strategic Plan identifies a continuous proposed
pathway along the west side of the Rideau River south to Baseline
Road and further segments south of the Greenbelt. There are several
existing segments, as well as longer segments that need to be
constructed. The approach is opportunistic. The key will be to work
with private and institutional landowners, and to coordinate with
public works and rehabilitation projects, to create opportunities which
would allow us to address such proposed initiatives.
3.11.20 Improve links and pathways in the eastern and southeastern sectors of
Ottawa.
Response:
The Strategic Plan identifies a number of proposed pathways within
the Eastern and South-East sector of Ottawa including the
Greenbelt pathway, the pathway towards Prescott Russell
Township along the Via Rail corridor, the North-South Light Rail
Transit corridor pathway and the New York Central Pathway
towards Russell and Embrun.
3.11.21 Install connector spiral staircases from bridge surface sidewalks to the
recreational pathway network, at Bank Street and Bronson Street to link to the
Canal Pathways, at Bronson Street and Dunbar Bridge down to the Rideau River
Pathway.
Response:
The idea of improving connections to and from the bridges and the
pathways is good. Increasing the connectivity between various
pathways throughout the network and with the communities is an
objective of this study. This idea will be considered by the partners
of the study.
p. 19
3.12 Links or Pathways Needing Improvement
3.12.1 Participants noted that the Smyth Road bridge over the Rideau River
needs work to widen the cycling lane right-of-way.
Cycling routes along Smyth Road are proposed in the draft Ottawa
Cycling Plan. The existing bridge platform, crossing the Rideau
River, is too narrow to accommodate vehicle and cycling lanes.
Unfortunately, the implementation of cycling facilities can only be
addressed as part of a major bridge platform renewal. This makes
this potential approach a long-term solution.
3.12.2 Bicycle lanes on Prince of Wales Drive present a danger for pedestrians
and cyclists in the traffic circle sector near the Experimental Farm.
Traffic circles have unique vehicle movement patterns. In general,
dedicated cycling lanes or paved shoulders, are terminated as they
arrive at the traffic circle and are continued on the opposite side.
The intent is that in the circle, all traffic is mixed. The Prince of
Wales Drive and its traffic circle are very old. Improvements are
needed to better address pedestrian and cyclists in this area.
These will be addressed as part of future roadway reconstruction in
this area.
3.12.3 A suggestion was made to widen the existing pathway on Johnston Road
between Albion Road and Zaidan Drive.
Presently there are on-road cycling facilities on segments of
Johnston Road. Any improvements to these will be addressed as
part any future overall roadway improvements. Separate off-road
pathways exist in the Greenboro linear open spaces.
3.12.4 There are problems with the link between the Government Conference
Centre and the National Art Gallery.
Response:
A passage under Plaza Bridge was recently implemented linking
the pathway along Colonel By with Major’s Hill Park.
3.12.5 Improve the links behind the National Arts Centre.
p. 20
Response:
An interim link along the Rideau Canal Promenade between the
Mackenzie King and Plaza Bridges was implemented in 2005. An
improved link, on National Art Centre property is proposed.
3.12.6 Improve the pathways in the University of Ottawa sector, and along
Colonel By Drive vis-à-vis the National Arts Centre.
Response:
The new Somerset pedestrian bridge presently under construction
across the Rideau Canal will greatly improve linkages to and from
the University of Ottawa and the existing pathways along Colonel
By Promenade. The Rideau Canal promenade across from the
National Art Centre will be improved as part of future life cycle
rehabilitation initiatives.
3.12.7 Improve the links between Elgin Street / Laurier Avenue and Sussex
Drive. Add a bicycle path on Sussex Drive, which would replace the barricades
around the United States Embassy.
Cycling facilities have been implemented by the City of Ottawa
along Elgin Street North of Laurier as well as Laurier Avenue
across the Rideau Canal. Bicycle lanes are proposed along
Sussex Drive from Boteler Street towards Green Island. Wide
shared lanes are proposed along Sussex Drive from Rideau Street
to Boteler Street.
3.12.8 Correct the railway crossing near Leamy Lake on the Gatineau River
pathway.
Response:
Improvements required to the existing rail crossing will be
undertaken by the NCC in consultation with the owners of the rail
line.
Improvements which could potentially reduce the slopes leading to
the railway crossing should be evaluated as part of the proposed
plans to utilize the rail corridor for STO’s Rapibus project. A
recreational pathway, within the rail corridor, is proposed as part of
the Rapibus project. The proposed pathway is identified within the
Strategic Plan.
p. 21
3.12.9 Improve the St-Joseph tunnel on the Gatineau River pathway.
Response:
Improvements to the tunnel will be considered as part of life cycle
rehabilitation initiatives.
3.12.10 Improve the pathway along the Gatineau River between Lady Aberdeen
Bridge and the bridge to be used by the Rapibus.
Response:
The pathway segment North of Lady Aberdeen Bridge will be
reconstructed during the summer of 2006 as part of the NCC’s life
cycle rehabilitation program. Improvements to the railway crossing
should be evaluated as part of the proposed plans to utilize the rail
corridor for STO’s Rapibus project and associated pathway.
3.12.11 Improve conditions for cyclists on Main Street, especially toward the
north.
Main Street is a difficult environment. There are many demands on
this corridor and there may be insufficient right-of way width to
satisfy all interests. The Ottawa Cycling Plan proposes cycling
route for this area. The Pathway Strategic Plan, and the Ottawa
Official Plan proposes a continuous pathway along the west bank of
the Rideau River in this area. Such a pathway might provide a safer
alternative to on-road cycling. More detailed cycling and pathway
opportunities could be addressed as part of detailed community
planning for the area.
3.12.12 Improve the Ottawa River pathway in the Richmond Road, Woodroffe
Avenue and Westboro sectors.
Response:
The recreational pathway along the Ottawa River was
reconstructed in recent years. The pathway located South of the
Ottawa River Parkway will be reconstructed in future years as part
of the NCC’s life cycle rehabilitation program.
3.12.13 Improve pathways in the Hartwell Locks to Experimental Farm sector.
Response:
Consideration will be given to improving the pathway link located on
Parks Canada lands adjacent to Hartwell locks. The pathway
p. 22
segment from the Arboretum to Dow’s Lake was reconstructed
several years back.
3.13 Miscellaneous
3.13.1 A question was asked about the possibility of having developers of new
neighbourhoods make a financial contribution to pathways within these
neighbourhoods.
At the present time, promoters and developers do not make a direct
contribution to fund the development of the pathway network in the
City of Gatineau.
Response from City of Ottawa:
Developers are not required to directly contribute towards
pathway construction in the City of Ottawa; however, in certain
circumstances indirect contributions can be obtained through
development charges. In addition, where proposed pathway
corridors have been established and formalised prior to land
parcel development, certain pathway features can be negotiated
between the municipality and the developer.
3.13.2 It is suggested that mountain bike trails be included on the recreational
pathway map, and on the Capital pathway network. It is also proposed that trails
be added, especially between the fire tower and trail #61.
Response:
Maintaining a distinction between mountain bicycle trails and the
multi use Capital Pathway Network is deemed important in order to
ensure the safety of users on the Capital Pathway as well as
promoting a clear understanding and respect of the multi-use
pathway code of conduct. Mountain shared trails are identified on
the Gatineau Park summer trails map.
3.13.3 A comment suggested highlighting the old stone bridge in the Green’s
Creek sector by having the pathway pass closer to the bridge.
Response:
The Greenbelt Pathway segment in question was constructed a
safe distance from the existing stone structures due to unsafe
slopes and unstable soil conditions.
Pathway managers will strive, wherever possible, to protect and
highlight existing landscape or heritage features along the pathway
routes.
p. 23
4. Comments from Interest Groups and Municipalities
4.1 Dow’s Lake Residents’ Association
It is possible that incorrect numbers in this statistical analysis are inadequately
representing pedestrian demand?
Response:
The statistical information provided within the Strategic Plan will be
reviewed and corrected if deemed inaccurate.
The paths within Commissioners Park should be identified as a missing part of
the network.
Response:
Paths located within Commissioner’s Park proper are designed and
intended for pedestrian traffic. Pathways located along the Rideau
Canal Western Pathway immediately adjacent to Commissioner’s
Park form part of the Capital Pathway Network.
It would be wise for the safety recommendations to state the importance of eyes
and bodies on the paths.
Response:
This recommendation will be considered by the pathway safety
committee.
4.2 Greenspace Alliance of Canada’s Capital
The Alliance subscribes to the principles of the Strategic Plan, namely that the
network is an integrated, multi-purpose network of dedicated pathways that
encourage interpretation and offer a quality user experience. The move away
from “Recreational Pathways” to “Pathway Network” is applauded.
The different jurisdictions should present the user with an integrated network,
including on-road paths.
The establishment of a volunteer group is to be applauded, it should be done in
collaboration with interested volunteers, including the advisory committees of
Ottawa Council.
About marketing and communications, would like to see a commitment to
producing an integrated map of all pathways in the region.
There should be further discussions on the notion of themed pathways.
p. 24
The utility of plowing certain pathways for use by winter cyclists should not be
forgotten.
Response:
The NCC maintains pathways that are servicing NCC winter
programs such as the Rideau Canal Skateway and Winterlude. The
NCC encourages the use of pathways for winter activities such as
cross-country skiing and snowshoeing.
In Chapter 8, mention the Rideau Trail under Related regional networks.
Response:
The Rideau Trail is not referenced since it is promoted as a hiking
trail and not a multi use trail.
We are skeptical about the wisdom of constructing pathways in floodplains.
The Alliance is pleased to note that the Canadian Poets’ Pathway remains fully
congruent with the pathway network.
4.3 Transport 2000
There is a need for a more coherent approach in communicating the connections
between the recreational pathways, the on-road cycling lanes and transit routes.
Response:
The NCC has added many new signs on the Capital Pathways
directing users to the road network and in some cases transit
stations, for example Hurdman Station. The City of Ottawa has
identified a need to review the signing of the new cycling network
including the off-road facilities in the network. Once staff and
budgetary resources are in place, a network signage study will be
initiated as a follow up to the approval of the new Ottawa Cycling
Plan. The study will recommend, among other things, an
implementation strategy for on-road and pathway network signage.
4.4 Municipality of Chelsea
This questionnaire was completed by the Director of the Service des loisirs et de
la culture of the Municipality of Chelsea. To view the questions, please consult
the questionnaire in the Appendix.
1.
We participated in interest group workshops organized by the NCC on
November 17 and 18, 2004. We support the vision statement on page 1 of the
Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region Strategic Plan, November 2005.
However, since we are far from the centre of the Capital, points of interest
relating to Chelsea’s history, heritage and natural environments would be
highlighted. This network would be free and would offer a stimulating landscape
p. 25
experience in urban and rural areas alike. A code of ethics will need to be
developed and should include, as a minimum, the values of tolerance and
courtesy, and promote prudence and safety.
2.
(a) The opportunity for outdoor physical activity nearby. The pleasure of
having access to beautiful natural scenery and quality cultural attractions.
Cleanliness and a certain level of safety.
(b) Expanding the network to rural areas and the Capital periphery. Efforts in
recent years were concentrated on developing the east-west Route verte; many
users now feel there is a need to develop a north-south corridor to join this
network.
Please refer to our response to the first question.
3.
3 – 1 – 2 Missing links: linking Gatineau to the NCC Visitor Centre in
Gatineau Park, to Meech Valley and the Wakefield Mill.
4.
We agree with such services. We believe that a financial plan grouping
several partners as well as various levels of government is required to develop
such a network.
5.
3 – 1 – 2 We agree with the construction standards proposed for the
Capital Core. Installing rest areas at two-km intervals seems somewhat
excessive. A five-km distance could be considered.
6.
For the urban sector, and at certain locations in the rural sector, the
concept of appealing to citizens to adopt a tract of the pathway (1 or 2 km) could
be considered. These citizens would be responsible for checking on their
pathway segment at certain intervals and would report any anomalies to the
pathway manager.
7.
No comment.
8.
We agree with the route identified on the territory of the Municipality of
Chelsea containing different roads and the rail corridor right-of-way.
9.
The Municipality is very enthusiastic about and interested in the
development of bicycle/pedestrian paths. However, we are unable to defray the
development costs on our own. The development of a financial plan grouping
several partners is desirable and necessary. For your information, since 2003,
we have developed 5 km of paved road shoulder bicycle path over a 2.5 km
distance. As we are in a rural area and along roads, we advocate a unidirectional
bicycle path approach with a minimum width of 1.5 m.
The use of the rail line right-of-way to develop a multi-use pathway has excellent
potential. However, this concept would require an in-depth feasibility study.
p. 26
We suggest adding the Meech Valley covered bridge to the points of interest list
in Table A2-1.
10. We advocate the implementation of projects that conform to sustainable
development principles and comply with the environmental laws and
regulations in effect within various governmental jurisdictions.
4.5 Municipality of L’Ange-Gardien
The Municipality of L’Ange-Gardien wishes to develop new pathways on
Municipality territory, especially along River Road, as well as a project for a
bridge over the Lièvre River.
Response:
The proposed link will be added to the Strategic Plan.
p. 27
5. Media Coverage
Technical Briefing for the Media – November 14, 2005
On November 14, 2005, the NCC, in collaboration with the Cities of Ottawa and
Gatineau, held a technical briefing session for the media to present the Pathway
Network for Canada’s Capital Region Strategic Plan, and to promote the public
consultations scheduled for November 23 and 24, 2005.
The briefing aroused considerable media interest. The majority of the regional
media were present at the event: CJOH-TV, CBOT-TV (CBC), CBOFT-TV,
CHOT-TV, The Ottawa Citizen, Le Droit, Metro Ottawa and CJRC. Two prerecorded interviews with radio stations CJRC-AM and Énergie were organized
before the technical briefing.
The Strategic Plan was generally well received by the media. Some questions
raised during the briefing focused in particular on the following issues: the
amount of money to be invested by the parties concerned, the time frame for the
Plan, the new links that will be created over the coming years, the possibility of
introducing a new traffic system on the pathways (pedestrians to the left and
cyclists to the right) to ensure better user coexistence, and transformation of the
Prince of Wales Bridge to a bicycle path.
Media coverage following the briefing was very positive. Most articles or
interviews launched an appeal to the public, that is, to attend the public
consultations in order to submit comments and suggestions on the Plan. In other
respects, the construction of the Greenbelt Pathway and the creation of a
pathway on the former rail lines in the Prescott and Russell region to create an
Ottawa/Montreal link were reported positively in Le Droit and The Ottawa Citizen.
The Metro Ottawa also underlined the importance the NCC attributes to safety on
the pathways and the amount of money it will pay the region’s volunteer
patrollers for the 2006 season.
Public Consultation – November 23, 2005, Ottawa
A journalist from the Centretown News, a community weekly newspaper,
attended the public consultation and conducted several interviews with NCC
representatives.
Public Consultation – November 24, 2005, Gatineau
A journalist from Le Droit attended the public consultation. The tone of the article
published the next day was fair, and the content was very factual. Briefly, the
article discussed the questions asked by interest group representatives. The
following subjects were addressed in the article: transforming the Prince of Wales
Bridge to a bicycle path, maintaining a number of pathways during the winter,
constructing missing links and installing cameras at certain locations to heighten
security for network users.
p. 28
CBOFT-TV sent a camera operator to film during the public consultation. The
pictures were then replayed during the studio interview with François Daigneault
for the noon program. The interview was generally positive with questions on the
Plan’s priorities, comments from the public and pathway safety.
p. 29
6. Next Steps and Conclusion
The National Capital Commission anticipates approving the Pathway Strategic
Plan in June 2006. The revised strategic plan will serve as a management tool
for the sustainability and development of the Capital Pathway network for the
next ten (10) years.
The municipalities of Ottawa and Gatineau also plan to approve the study during
the same time frame. Key recommendations of the Strategic Plan as well as the
proposed network expansion will be inserted within the City of Ottawa’s Official
Plan and the City of Gatineau ’s Plan Cyclable.
The development and sustainability of the pathway network will depend largely
on the creation of effective tools for the Strategic Plan’s implementation. The
following are envisioned as priorities:
Steering Committee:
Following approval of the 1994 Strategic Plan, a committee was
established to assist in the development of the network. The Strategic
Plan Update proposes the creation of an inter-agency steering committee
to support the promotion and development of the network. The
establishment of such a committee will form part of the initial
recommendations to implement following approval of the Plan.
The Steering committee will liaison with the safety committee established
by the NCC in 2004 as well as the “Groupe de travail sur la sécurité des
sentiers” established by the City of Gatineau and City of Ottawa Advisory
Committees.
Volunteer involvement:
Committed volunteer involvement will continue to be essential to the
success of Capital Pathway initiatives. To this the Strategic Plan
recommends the creation of a volunteer group dedicated to contribute to
the network’s safety, aesthetics and maintenance activities. The volunteer
group could collaborate with the inter-agency committee.
Funding and partnerships:
Multi-year budgets will be established and identified by agencies
responsible for the network in order to ensure its sustainability,
appropriate management and required future development.
Partnerships in the development, programming and promotion of the
Capital Pathway Network will be explored in order to assist in the funding
of key initiatives and heightening the Network profile.
p. 30
Protection of identified corridors:
The development of management strategies to ensure the protection of
tracts of land required to ensure network expansion.
Finally, public consultation will be held by the various agencies involved in the
management and development of the Capital Pathway Network relative to all
important future initiatives which impact the network.
p. 31
Appendix 1: Workshop Report
p. 32
Integrated Network of Recreational Pathways for the NCR
Strategic Development Plan Update 2004
Study Context
Since 1970, the National Capital Commission (NCC) has developed more than 170 km
of recreational pathways linking various points within the NCR. This existing network
has been recognized as one of the Capital’s significant assets, and has contributed to
creating a distinct image for the NCR. The cities of Ottawa and Gatineau, and their
former member municipalities, have also built segments within this larger network.
In 1994, a study for the planning and implementation of an integrated network of
recreational pathways for the National Capital Region (NCR) was completed. The
Integrated Network of Recreational Pathways was defined as a multi-purpose network
that caters primarily to the recreational user and enhances the potential of natural areas
and heritage, cultural and urban sites by making them more accessible to both visitors
and residents of the NCR. This function contributes to the development of the National
Capital as a common symbol of national pride.
The definition, context, and user needs as well as the expectations of the pathways network
have evolved in the past ten years. The 1994 Plan is now 10 years old and needs to be
updated. This process was initiated in September of 2004 by the NCC in collaboration with the
City of Ottawa and the City of Gatineau.
Workshop context and objectives
One of the first steps in updating the Strategic Plan was to organize workshops in order to
gather input from Interest Groups. Two workshops were organized, one in Ottawa (primarily in
English) , and one in Gatineau (primarily in French). More than 80 Interest Groups from various
fields of interest were invited to the workshops held on November 17 and 18, 2004.
The primary objective of the workshops was to seek the assistance of Interest Groups in
identifying key issues and challenges which must be addressed in the Strategic Plan update as
they relate to key themes such as network vocation, design standards, user needs, promotion,
etc. The workshop was preceded by a visual presentation which briefly outlined key features the
pathway network, the objectives and recommendations of the1994 Strategic Plan, key
realizations since 1994 as well as the current challenges and issues.
The group was then invited to participate in a visioning exercise followed by a breakout session
where various themes were discussed.
Next Steps
Key recommendations of the draft Strategic Plan update will be presented to the public during
the winter of 2005. The study will be completed in the Spring of 2005.
1
Workshop Results1
According to the workshop participants, an award winning recreational network would have the
following characteristics in 2014: it would have a mixed use vocation including recreational,
tourist and utilitarian uses as well as links to other modes of transportation. Use of the network
would be free of charge and it would offer a stimulating user experience in the urban and rural
sectors of the NCR. There would be links between the recreational network and other regional
networks. The network would offer a wide variety of services that co-exist harmoniously with the
protection of the surrounding natural areas. Safety would be ensured by way of education and
an awareness of the co-existence of different types of uses within the network.
Vocation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
Recognition of the multi-use characteristic of the network;
The recreational use of the network is sometimes poorly viewed by the public, whereas
the concept of a multi-purpose network which encourages a healthy lifestyle, recreation
and non-motorised transportation is better perceived;
There is a lack of links between the network and the municipal pathways as well as
between the network and residential communities and employment centers;
A long term vision for the network must be developed, based on the concepts of green
corridors, the integration of cultural landscapes and non-motorised transportation;
There is an interest in developing major regional corridors which would highlight rural
attractions and heritage features as well as reduce user traffic on the urban network;
Evenly develop the network so that all sectors of the NCR have access to the network:
i.e. the Gatineau sector (within the city of Gatineau) is quite under developed compared
to the other sectors in the NCR;
The characteristics of the network that are valued by the public are: its beauty, and its
pleasant and safe use. The quality of the user experience distinguishes the network from
on-road pathways;
Access to the waterfront and environmental features of interest such as wetlands,
woodlands, geological formations, etc should be highlighted without putting them at risk.
The creation of official recreational pathways in these areas will discourage and limit the
spread of informal pathways which are harmful to these ecologically sensitive areas;
A change of name from “recreational pathways” to “Capital Pathways” would evoque a
more global image of the network which integrates commuter and recreational use. This
will also distinguish the Capital Pathways from other pathways in the NCR. As a result of
this distinction, the network would be easily associated with the image of the National
Capital;
The recreational pathway network should be made up of a combination of multi-use
pathways (commuting, recreation, sports/training, health, landscape appreciation and
experience, etc.) and of pathway loops that have more specific uses (cycling, hiking,
others);
See appendix for complete transcripts of the meetings.
2
•
There is an interest in winter maintenance of certain pathways in order to create a
consistent use of these pathway segments during this season and in lighting certain
pathway segments.
Use
•
During the last two decades, many new user types have shown up in the recreational
network, and it is expected that diversity of user types will continue to grow in the future.
This wide variety of users have different behavioural habits (speed of travel, loitering,
users who travel alone, users who travel in groups, workout, tourism, delinquents, etc.).
This variety of users raises the risk of conflicts between the different user types and their
behaviours. The wider the variety of users, the higher the risk of conflict. Today, conflicts
are noted particularly among rollerbladers, skiers with poles and dog walkers;
•
Despite the large diversity of users, it does not seem necessary to segregate each user
type within the network;
•
Forceful rule enforcement is difficult to apply due to limited resources and to the fact the
those responsible for rule enforcement (volunteer pathway patrol) do not have much
power. Given the limited resources and the scope of the network, it would be more
realistic to focus on user education and raising awareness to promote harmony among
the different uses and users. The development of an ethical code is recommended:
-
Share the pathways, tolerance and courtesy
Encourage prudence
Basic safety notions: stopping distances, hand signs, use of bell, etc.
Encourage favoured behaviour;
Promote use of on-road facilities for high speed commuter travel.
•
On-road facilities are an efficient alternative for commuters. They also alleviate traffic
and the risk of user conflicts on the recreational pathways. When the recreational
network is to heavily used, commuters tend to choose on-road facilities for high speed
travelling. These users prefer the recreational pathway when their trip purpose is
recreational and when they want to take advantage of the experienced offered by the
recreational network;
•
It is suggested that single use loops should be developed to meet the needs of a
particular user type. These loops would limit user conflicts. For example a loop that is
dedicated to beginner rollerbladers, training or pedestrians;
•
Certain sections of the pathways could be targeted to senior users. These sections
would provide services and experiences for this specific clientele. For example: short
distance loops which favour social interactions and the development of particular events
close within a residential neighbourhood.
3
Implementation
•
Asphalted surfaces favour multiple uses and are easy to maintain. Stone dust surfaces
can limit uses where desired. Asphalt paving is appropriate for urban zones, whereas
stone dust can be used in the rural areas. One issue that needs to be addressed is the
transition between these two surface types;
•
In certain areas, according to the user traffic and location of the pathway, it would be
beneficial to develop two parallel pathways to increase their user capacity. Design
standards should be flexible and should be adapted to each distinct situation. For
example: two 1,8m lanes could be appropriate instead of on 3m lane;
•
The beginning and end of each pathway should be clearly identified, as well as each
intersection.
Promotion and Tourism
•
Develop a program which would offer guided visits to tourists;
•
Favour regional as well as local cycling;
•
Tourists who visit for long periods of time should also be considered as utilitarian users
of the network, especially in the urban ring;
•
Develop or guide users to services such as washrooms, parking lots, equipment rental
sites, hotels, snack bars/restaurants, etc.. Such services will have a positive impact on
tourism;
•
Develop a visually accessible signage system which identifies the National Capital’s
attractions;
•
In the recreational network map, include complementary information such as the public
transportation network;
•
Consider “theming” certain recreational pathway segments;
•
Funding:
-
Via private businesses in exchange for recognition of their company on signage;
An additional tax on the price of gasoline.
Future Challenges
•
The development of the network in sectors that are not well serviced and linking both
sides of the Ottawa River;
•
Complete and highlight the existing network: Safety features, maintenance, links and
solutions to punctual problems;
4
•
Improve the existing product by offering new services;
•
Develop the network so that it offer an unforgettable experience to visitors as well as
residents;
•
The development of the network should take into account the different user types and
the possibility of winter use;
•
The NCC/municipal funding capabilities for the development and maintenance of the
network;
•
The roles and responsibilities of the appropriate partners in the development and
maintenance of the network;
•
The multi-use aspect of the network is still a large challenge.
5
Appendix: Notes of the meetings
Minutes of Workshop - November 17, 2004
Richmond Room, Ottawa City Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa
Visioning Exercise
Question: In 2014, the Capital Pathway Network wins first prize for the best integrated network
of pathways in North America, Why …
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Mixed-use:
- Commuting, fitness,
pedestrian use, cycling, etc.
User friendly
Reliably opened
Integrated with other transportation
systems: Bike, walk, bus, and train
Beautiful scenery
Accessibility – meets min. standards
Extended network outside core
Complementary road system. Less–
traffic on pathways
Accessibility
More attractions close to path
3x more commuters on pathways
5 % + utilitarian – cycle walk to work
Connectivity – strategically
Year round access
Adjacent amenities & services,
coffees, not only beavertails
Bike services in proximity
More commercial services and more
attractive. Would attract more
people.
Pathways within natural area
Washrooms
Policy for remote rural paths
Bike rentals. Don’t have to be close
to path – use signage to direct users
to services
Safe network
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Well patrolled paths
Well educated users
Enforcing mix-use vocation
No stairs in middle of paths
Excellent signage
Signage is more visible
Reasonable use of technology –
GPS
Paths with themes – help tourism &
visitors Ex.: Forest pathways
/national/poets
Less intrusive signage
Pathways in good condition
Paths are well located
Paving not great for runners parallel systems for runner
Consistent quality in pavement
Diversity
Crushed stone pathways
Vegetation is more present
Buffers on both sides of pathways
Access to pathways is improved (i.e.
Greens Creek pathway is not easy
to access & should have smoother
entry)
Pathways connect with other
communities (i.e. Prescott & Russell
/ Embrun)
Improved seating concept – benches
too close to path. Placed closer to
river or attractive views.
6
Breakout session results (by themes)
Vocation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Multi use is a big challenge
Developers should build new paths in new areas, linking communities
Need for a long-term – vision & green corridors
Should be multi use not only recreational
Better links between paths
Some urban areas are isolated from the system need to be connected.
Connect large population centers in rural areas
More people moving to villages outside - a market is growing there
Abandoned rail corridors usually connect towns in rural area good for linking
destinations
Need small pedestrian loop trails on the main pathway – around local features
City is doing a study of cultural landscapes. Cultural landscapes should be
considered in development of network.
Look at Niagara River system
Shift in NCC thinking would be required from recreation to more sustainable
transportation
From more superficial “green” to more fundamental “green”
Pathways integrated with sustainable transportation
Experience is what distinguishes pathway from roads
Pathways are multi-functional
They should lead to somewhere (i.e. a destination)
Use
•
•
What the paths are used for:
Lots of commuters “active transportation”
Commuting by bike (is not always a choice)
Greater picture / broader perspective – on-road, paths
Multi-use = commuters = speed
Paving = more cyclists
Mandate
Lots of NCC lands have potential for paths
“recreation” gives a negative perception
Multi-use = health, leisure, transpsportation
Realistic about resources: educate
7
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Issues with frequency of snow removal – provide alternative routes & inform
users of closings
Users
Functional users will use pathways at different times - fewers conflicts
Dedicate portions of pathway as “senior pathways”, shorter trips, daytime,
looking for social contact, tie to senior’s social events, neat their residences
Considerer altering the design of pathway in those sections (eg., lower
speeds, 3 wheeled vehicules )
On-road commuter cycling lanes would complement these “seniors
sections”
Users (kids/seniors - together can use a lot pathway space) – conflicts with
other users.
Education can avoid construction of super wide pathways or parallele
pathways
3-4 m is not enough if multi-use
Design pathway to manage the kind of loads/users they carry (flexible standards
– in some areas consider parallel pathways)
Users feel safer on the pathway when there are many people present
In conjunction with on-road bike lanes
Too many commuters. Capital pathways should be narrower
As roadway congestion increases, more people will turn to cycling and may over
whelm the system
Inline skating has dramatically increased e.g., Sunday “bike day” on Colonel By
Some users may have only emerged on the past 20 years. Types of users:
Walkers
Scooters
Wheelchairs
Runners
Strollers (baby)
Cyclists
In-lineskater /skateboarders
Roller skis
Dog walkers
Cross country skiers
Sightseing (naturalists, tourists, etc)
Scooters
Police cars, maintenance vehicles
Users In future
Electrically-assisted bike
Tricycles (i.e. for seniors)
8
•
•
•
•
•
•
Segways
Powered skateboardesand bikes
Calming needed in future
Many different users & behaviours, consider space requirements for bicycle
speeds
How to accommodate: education on safe and courteous pathway behaviour
Encourage different user types at differents times
Reasonable “minimum” design
Education
Ensure the road network also accommodates cyclists (i.e. Motorized,
wheelchairs, etc.)
Even commuters will use pathways – less noise, pollution, and traffic, from
vehicles.
In-line skating – illegal on roads.
Diversity of users can be accommodated with education
Service
•
Provide more services and improve accessibility
Safety
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Walkers should give priority to cyclists more easily
Rules on path….
Separate users when high density – avoid conflicts
Compromise? The Alexandra Bridge
On signage – indicate emergency exit / phones
Lighting – but not too much (light pollution) but keep safety in mind - consider
maintenance
Municipal policies
Grass on path can be dangerous
Cell phones are part of solution
Signage
•
•
•
Consider universal accessibility i.e. tactile paving on pathways to identify
landmarks
Mileage markers - as indicators. Not cumulative but rather for orientation - colour
code like hospitals
More visual indicators to attractions
9
•
•
•
•
•
Next map should show more than recreational pathways – integrated map with
public transit and roads
Plan routes on web with interactive maps
Signage on-street for cycling, pedestrians, etc. Not only for cars.
Safety booths like university
Safety phones like OC-transpo
Implementation
•
•
•
•
Better definition between start/end of path (crossing streets)
Rail corridors – straightness can be boring
2 x 1.8 m pathways instead of 1 x 3 m pathway?
Pathways should cross streets at cross walks. Encouraging riding on the crosswalk is
illegal + conflicts with pedestrians.
Planning and funding
•
•
•
Businesses have signs on paths – funding
Integrate as part of federal transportation tax system (e.g. give NCC ½ ¢/litre gas tax for
pathways) – support Kyoto initiatives
Public right of ways in Britain - commission on integrating right of ways in the transport
system.
Promotion
•
Sunday bike-days “decongest” the pathways
10
Minutes of Workshop - November 18, 2004
La maison du citoyen, mont-bleu room, 25 Laurier Street, Gatineau
Résultats de l’exercice de vision
Question : En 2014, le réseau de sentier de la Capitale gagne le premier prix pour le meilleur
réseau en Amérique du Nord, pourquoi…
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Polyvalence
Inter-modalité
Intégration récré-touristique utilitaire
Rails with trails (partage)
Route verte = Mtl-Gatineau (Qc)
Accès gratuit
Ressemble aux exemples
européens
Utilisation non-motorisée accrue des
promenades : réduction de vitesse
Avant-gardiste
Utilisation pour le patins à roues
alignées
Possibilité de ce rendre au travail à ski
Réseau à vocation unique
Intégration des nouveaux usagers
Vélos motorisés – électriques
Pas de chiens
Autobus remplacés par vélo-bus
Accessibilité aux services
Parc-0-bus / liens récréatif / utilitaire
Amélioration des services –
stationnements & accessibilité facile
Accès aux auberges
HUB de services – relais - pistes,
resto, etc.
Intégration avec le réseau de
Rapibus
Camping (léger) – près du réseau
Toilettes à tous les 5 km
Sécurité, éthique
Tolérance & respect
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Promo sur sécurité (env. +santé)
Centre-ville fermé aux véhicules
Patrouille adéquate sur tous les
sentiers, 3 patrouilleurs par usager
Herbe à puce, éliminée ou identifiée
Réseau sécuritaire
Excellente signalisation
Affichage du code de sécurité
Verdure
40 km de nouveau sentiers
Sect. Gatineau + de sentiers (est)
Sentier jusqu’à Wakefield
Accès à l’île Kettle + tour de l’île
Sentiers longeant Greber/StRaymond, etc.
Liens améliorés entre Ottawa &
Gatineau
Pont récréatif
Portes-vélos sur taxis, bus
Iintégration régionale - grande
région - plus larges & uniformes
1/10 usagé provient de l’ext. de la RCN
Région #1 pour le vélo au Québec
Route 2 voies
Corridors accès résidentiel – réseau
Aménagements cyclables sur toutes
les artères
Aménagement hivernal –ski, marche
Endroits pour familles – débutants
Lampadaire sur sentiers (cité des
jeunes)
Partenariats (public-privé)
11
•
•
Partenariats / collaboration usagers
– partenaires $$
Parrainage de sections par clubs ou
autres
•
•
•
•
•
Implication - services du fédéral
Journée –semaine sans voiture
+ événements + vélo + resto
accessible
Réseau intégré pour écoliers
Promotion de la RCN
Résultats des discutions en sous-groupes (par thème)
Vocation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Manque de connexion
Gestion du développement en zone péri-urbain
Aller au-delà de l’urbain et péri-urbain
Déplacement voiture vers centre + vélo sur sentier, créer pression
supplémentaire
Développer attrait périphérique,
Harmonie environnement hors centre-ville et en zone rurale
Développer grands axes régionaux
Accès à l’eau en tenant compte des zones humides et autres éléments naturels
Utilisation du réseau récréatif ou piste cyclable?
Selon utilisation : entraînement et travail hors sentier = moins de vitesse et
de déplacements rapides sur sentiers
Selon fréquentation
Les sentiers sont plus beau, agréable, sécuritaire
Famille - sentier hors route
Commodité – plus près de destination
Choix selon période, journée ou semaine
Traffic accrue sur rues
Entretien hivernal : créer habitude de vélo hiver
Besoin polyvalence : 4 saisons
Utilisation
•
•
Conflit usage – vélo / patin dans zones fréquentées
Equipements retrouvés sur sentiers :
Marchettes
Marcheurs (souliers)
Vélo – motorisé
Patin roues – avec bâtons
12
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Trotinette – électrique
Planche à roulettes
Carioles
Chiens
Comportement :
Familles, groupes, couples (touristes, travailleurs)
Entraînement
Groupes
Délinquants
Réseaux sur route enlève pression sur réseau récréatif
Alternative pour déplacements utilitaires
Ouverture des promenade aux cyclistes (parc de la Gatineau)
Réserver période pour types d’utilisateurs
Séparer corridors par usages comme sentier de l’Anse à Lévy (qc)
Aménager en consequence de l’achalandage – (5 m. secteurs denses)
Achalandage permissif – sans restrictif avec :
Plan de surveillance
Sensibilisation – courtoisie
Partage
Conflit entre résidents riverain et présence sur les sentiers :
Camping illicite
Vol
Vandalisme
Quatres roues, motoneiges, motos grimpeurs doivent être interdits:
réglementation et application
Conflit usage – promotion vélo sur route sans piste désignée
Développement et circulation plus dense en zone périphérique – problèmes
Service
•
•
•
•
•
•
Toilettes. Partenariats avec commerçants
Meilleure intégration des services connexes (hôtels, cafés) sur carte/outils
promotionnels
Services (eau, toilettes, rives, stationnements) identifiés sur la signalisation
+ attirer les gens, location vélos, services connexes + accessibles, créerait
attraction.
Service intégré vs tourisme
Service équitable dans toutes les régions
13
Sécurité et sensibilisation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fin de sem. = dangereux = + trafic, + usagers
Non-respect des consignes - vitesse, côté
Différents usages :
- Mamans poussettes
- Ski bâtons
- Vélos
- Piétons
On double dans les courbes « déboiser » dans les courbes
Qui est responsable du réseau? CCN, ville ….point central ?
Chiens pas en laisse
Ressources / patrouille volontaire n’a pas beaucoup de pouvoir
Confusion pour règlements sur animaux – villes ? CCN ?
Nombre croissant d’usagers cause des conflits. Besoin d’éducation
/sensibilisation
Certains sentiers sont utilisés comme « l’autoroute de cyclistes »
Prudence
Éliminer l’herbe à puce sur les sentiers. – l’identification et communication de ce
problème aux résidents est un enjeu.
Code éthique des usagers (signes/gestes directionnels) = éducation
Blitz éthique sur les sentiers «une journée »
Partageons nos sentiers
Information
Éducation (comment arrêter en patin, vélo)
Sentiers ne sont pas un centre d’entraînement
Apprendre à tolérer les autres usagers
Patrouille partenaire avec commerces, potentiel privé/public
Enjeux juridiction, sonnette, casques
Intersections aux rues/autos devraient arrêter :
- Priorité aux vélos ?
- arrêts 4 sens
Enjeux intersection avec la rue Belleau (Université du Québec)
Promotion code ethique qui s’adresse a tous :
Pas uniquement pour vélo
Problèmes de comportement des utilisateurs en groupe
Reglementer aussi les pietons, conscientiser vs vélo
Signalisation routière mieux adaptée au traverse piétonnière
14
Aménagement
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Aménagement doit évoluer en fonction des nouveaux clients
Prévoir certains endroits à usage unique
Secteur Aylmer – après Deschênes / il n’y a plus de verdure – résidences
collées sur le sentier. Corridors de verdure plus large (corridors PhilémonWright) sone préférés.
Environnement fragile
Bancs mal placés / trop près des sentiers (Aylmer)
Pas réaliste de faire la ségrégation des usagers
Sentier hiver pour skis – éclairé (Parc Jacques Cartier, Parc du Lac Leamy)
L’asphalte est préférable pour multi-usage et est facilite d’entretien
Surface en gravier permet de limiter les usages dans certains secteurs si
nécessaire
asphalte en zone urbaine
criblure de pierre en zone rurale
Enjeux : traitement de la transition
Environnement
•
•
Réseau assure la protection du milieu naturel en concentrant les visiteurs sur le
sentier
Élimination des sentiers informels
Planification et financement
•
•
Développer le secteur Gatineau – important d’être intégré au réseau existant
Manque de sentiers dans le secteur Gatineau – secteur est sous-développé
comparativement au secteur Ouest
Promotion - Tourisme
•
•
•
•
•
Accompagnateurs (forfaits vélo) pour les visiteurs
Tourisme vélo devient aussi utilitaire en zone urbaine
Route verte reconnue et demandée par touristes :
Conflit avec poids lourds sur rte 148
Problème de connexion avec reste du Québec
Combiner points d’intérêt et sentiers sur route touristique
Prévoir équipement et services pour tourismes – support à vélo (location vélo,
stationnement)
Favoriser le cyclotouriste local et régional
15
Défi
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Compléter le réseau (sect. Gatineau)
Compléter secteurs existants
Sécurité
Interconnexion
Régler problèmes ponctuels
Considérer tous les autres domaines autour de l’offre de sentier
Expérience significative dont les visiteurs se souviendront longtemps
Évaluer types d’utilisateurs
Évaluer secteurs pour activités hivernales
Entretien
Relier les deux rives
Connexion route verte avec le côté Ontario
16
Appendix 2: Public Notice
Pathway Network for Canada's Capital Region | Strategic Plan 2006
p. 33
A National Capital Commission (NCC) Public Consultation on
the Capital Pathway Network
The Capital Pathway network
is an important asset to the
“green Capital” and a significant
aspect of residents’ quality of life.
The NCC, in collaboration with
the municipalities of Ottawa and
Gatineau, would like to receive
your ideas and comments about
the update of the Strategic Plan
on the Pathway Network for
Canada’s Capital Region, regarding the future of the network
over the next few decades.
Two public meetings will take place:
■
■
Wednesday, November 23,
2005, at the Government
Conference Centre,
2 Rideau Street, Ottawa
(Mostly in English)
Thursday, November 24,
2005, at Relais plein air
du Parc de la Gatineau,
397 Cité-des-Jeunes Boulevard,
Gatineau (Hull sector)
(Mostly in French)
4:30 pm Open house (one-onone discussions with employees)
7 pm Presentation to all
participants
7:30–9 pm Questions and
comments
The related documents and
a questionnaire are available
on the NCC website and at the
NCC Library, the Ottawa Public
Library — Main Library, and
the Maison du Citoyen Library
in Gatineau.
Please send your comments,
or the questionnaire, by
Friday, December 23, 2005.
Public Consultation and
Community Relations
National Capital Commission
202–40 Elgin Street
Ottawa ON K1P 1C7
Fax: (613) 239-5039
Tel.: (613) 239-5555 or 1 800 704-8227
info@ncc-ccn.ca
www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca
Appendix 3: Press Releases and Media Coverage
p. 34
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NCCN-05-11-05-MI
November 10, 2005
*** TECHNICAL MEDIA BRIEFING ***
NCC, CITY OF OTTAWA AND VILLE DE GATINEAU PRESENT
THE PATHWAY NETWORK FOR CANADA’S CAPITAL REGION
STRATEGIC PLAN 2005
Canada’s Capital Region — The National Capital Commission (NCC), in collaboration with the City of
Ottawa and the Ville de Gatineau, invites media to attend a technical briefing on the draft of the Pathway
Network for Canada’s Capital Region Strategic Plan 2005. The document is being released for public
consultation.
This 10-year plan is a review and update of the 1994 Integrated Network of Recreational Pathways for the
National Capital Region Strategic Plan Development. The Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region
Strategic Plan 2005 outlines the changing environment and new demographic, social and environmental
trends that are emerging on the region’s pathway network. The plan also identifies the vision, the
development of the network and the strategic orientations proposed by the NCC and both municipalities to
enhance the safety and the experience of pathway users, as well as to recognize Canada’s Capital Region as
one of the key destinations in the country for cycling and outdoor recreation.
Media Briefing:
When:
Monday, November 14, 2005
10:15 am to 11:15 am
Where:
National Capital Commission
40 Elgin Street, Room 702
Ottawa
Public Consultation:
Media are also welcome to attend the NCC’s public meetings on the Pathway Network for Canada’s
Capital Region Strategic Plan 2005, which will be held on November 23, 2005, between 4:30 pm and 9 pm,
at the Government Conference Centre (mostly in English) and on November 24, 2005, between 4:30 pm and
9 pm, at the Relais plein air du parc de la Gatineau (mostly in French).
-30Information :
Lucie Caron
NCC Media Relations
(613) 239-5662 (office)
(613) 324-4975 (cellular)
NCCN-05-11-06-MI
November 14, 2005
*** MEDIA INVITATION ***
NCC TO HOLD PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON
STRATEGIC PLAN 2005
Canada’s Capital Region — The National Capital Commission (NCC), in collaboration with the City of Ottawa and the
Ville de Gatineau, is seeking comments and ideas from the public on its Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital
Region Strategic Plan 2005.
This new plan, which is a review and update of the 1994 Integrated Network of Recreational Pathways for the National
Capital Region Strategic Development Plan, outlines the changing environment and new demographic, social and
environmental trends that have an impact on the region’s pathway network. The plan also identifies the vision, the
development of the network and the strategic orientations proposed by the NCC and both municipalities to enhance the
safety and the experience of pathway users, as well as to position Canada’s Capital Region as one of the key destinations
in the country for cycling and outdoor recreation.
The public consultation meetings will take place —
Mostly in English
on Wednesday, November 23, 2005,
at the Government Conference Centre
2 Rideau Street, Ottawa, Ontario
4:30 pm - Open house (discussion with employees)
7 pm - Presentation to all participants
7:30 to 9 pm - Questions and comments
Mostly in French
on Thursday, November 24, 2005,
at the Relais plein air du parc de la Gatineau
397, Cité-des-jeunes Blvd., Gatineau, Quebec
ON-LINE PUBLIC CONSULTATION
The public can now consult the documents and have until December 23, 2005 to submit their comments and ideas
via the on-line consultation at www.ncc-ccn.ca.
For more information on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region Strategic Plan 2005, please contact the
NCC at (613) 239-5555 or 1 800 704-8227, or visit the NCC’s website at www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca.
-30Information:
Lucie Caron
NCC Media Relations
(613) 239-5662 (office)
(613) 324-4975 (cellular)
Marie-Ève Létourneau
NCC Media Relations
(613) 239-5092 (office)
(613) 720-6305 (cellular)
NCCN-05-11-06-MI
November 21, 2005
***REMINDER***
MEDIA INVITATION
NCC TO HOLD PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON
STRATEGIC PLAN 2005
Canada’s Capital Region — The National Capital Commission (NCC), in collaboration with the City of Ottawa and the
Ville de Gatineau, is seeking comments and ideas from the public on its Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital
Region Strategic Plan 2005.
This new plan, which is a review and update of the 1994 Integrated Network of Recreational Pathways for the National
Capital Region Strategic Development Plan, outlines the changing environment and new demographic, social and
environmental trends that have an impact on the region’s pathway network. The plan also identifies the vision, the
development of the network and the strategic orientations proposed by the NCC and both municipalities to enhance the
safety and the experience of pathway users, as well as to position Canada’s Capital Region as one of the key destinations
in the country for cycling and outdoor recreation.
The public consultation meetings will take place —
Mostly in French
on Thursday, November 24, 2005,
at the Relais plein air du parc de la Gatineau
397, Cité-des-jeunes Blvd., Gatineau, Quebec
Mostly in English
on Wednesday, November 23, 2005,
at the Government Conference Centre
2 Rideau Street, Ottawa, Ontario
ON-LINE PUBLIC CONSULTATION
The public can now consult the documents and have until December 23, 2005 to submit their comments and ideas
via the on-line consultation at www.ncc-ccn.ca.
For more information on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region Strategic Plan 2005, please contact the
NCC at (613) 239-5555 or 1 800 704-8227, or visit the NCC’s website at www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca.
-30Information:
Lucie Caron
NCC Media Relations
(613) 239-5662 (office)
(613) 324-4975 (cellular)
Marie-Ève Létourneau
NCC Media Relations
(613) 239-5092 (office)
(613) 720-6305 (cellular)
Appendix 4: Questionnaire
p. 35
Your Opinion Counts!
The Capital Pathway network is an important asset to the “green Capital” and a significant aspect of residents’ quality of life. The NCC,
in collaboration with the municipalities of Ottawa and Gatineau, would like your ideas and comments about the update of the
Strategic Plan on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region, regarding the future of the network over the next few
decades.
Strategic Plan on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region
1. If you were to describe your vision of the ideal pathway network for the next decade, what would it be like?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. If you consider the actual pathway network…
• Which aspects do you prefer?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
•
Which aspects would you like to see improved?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. The proposed vision in the Strategic Plan on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region notably suggests:
• Multi-purpose use
The network covers Canada’s Capital Region, integrates recreational, tourism and commuter uses for a variety of activities such as
cycling, walking, in-line skating, etc.
• Accessibility and Safety
The network is accessible, it links natural and built areas and it offers a wide variety of services. User education and awareness
programs targeting pathway sharing in a respectful manner results in a safe and pleasant experience.
• Connectivity
The network is linked with local cycling networks as well as regional and national trails, and encourages sustainable transportation.
Does the proposed vision meet your vision? Do you have any ideas or suggestions about the proposed vision?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Strategic Plan on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region looks at various key components of the network, identifies
issues and proposes directions for each of them. We seek your opinion particularly on directions for the network in general, on
design and maintenance standards, on safety and signage.
Network in General
4. The network includes several hundreds of kilometers of pathways serving various types of users. Since 1994, approximately 100 km
of existing segments were rehabilitated and 90 km were built. One of the priorities of the Strategic Plan is to complete missing links
throughout the network, particularly in the urban area.
•
Put the following statements in order, 1 being very important and 3 being less important.
Rehabilitate and restore the actual pathway network in order to maintain or enhance the quality of the user experience
Complete missing links to the actual pathway network in order for users to benefit from a continuous network
Build new pathways in order to expand the network throughout Canada’s Capital Region
•
Are there any missing links that you can help us identify? Are there any particular areas that require rehabilitation?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please fill out this questionnaire or send us your comments by December 23, 2005 at:
National Capital Commission, Public Consultations and Community Relations
202-40 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1C7 Fax: (613) 239-5039 e-mail: info@ncc-ccn.ca
This questionnaire is also available on-line at : www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca
Ce document est également disponible en français
5. One of the directions of the Strategic Plan is to increase user services – whether for recreational, tourism or commuter uses – such
as rest areas, interpretation activities, water fountains and access to public restrooms, bicycle racks and year-long use.
What do you think of the proposed services, and do you have other ideas to enhance user services ?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Design and Maintenance Standards
6. The objective is to offer users a continuous, uniform and safe pathway network. Design and maintenance standards are key in
achieving this objective.
•
Put the following statements in order, 1 being very important and 3 being less important.
Review and improve present design standards to ensure user safety
Expand and improve user services
Improve the maintenance and rehabilitation program for the network
•
What do you think of the following design standards for the recreational pathways in the core area ?
o Continuous network on exclusive right of way, minimum width of 3m, asphalt surface, continuous centerline and rest
areas every 2km.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Safety
7. Since the early 1990s, many initiatives to improve safety of users on the Capital pathways were put in place, such as the
implementation of a volunteer pathway patrol program and the Share the Path program. More recently, an action plan on user safety
for the Capital Pathway was implemented. It includes a public awareness campaign on safety, new signage to better orient users, the
paving of sections of the network, the expansion of the volunteer patrols, the establishment of a police liaison committee, the posting
of safety tips across the network, the implementation of a free cell phone loan program for users of the pathways, etc.
Do you have other ideas that would help increase safety on the pathway network ?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Signage
8. Do you have comments about the signage on the pathway network, in terms of wayfinding, interpretation or visitor information ?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
General
9. Do you have any other comments about the Strategic Plan on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. An Environmental Assessment was carried out in conjunction with the Strategic Plan on the Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital
Region. Do you have any comments about this assessment?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your profile
□
□
Male
Ontario
□
□
Female
Quebec
Type of user
□
□
Cycling - recreation
Walking
□
□
Cycling - commuting
In-line skating
□
□
Please fill out this questionnaire or send us your comments by December 23, 2005 at:
National Capital Commission, Public Consultations and Community Relations
202-40 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 1C7 Fax: (613) 239-5039 e-mail: info@ncc-ccn.ca
This questionnaire is also available on-line at : www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca
Ce document est également disponible en français
Jogging
Other _____________

Pathway Network for Canada`s Capital Region 2006 Strategic Plan

Transcription

Similar documents

Article (Author postprint)

Gearing Up for the Re-Hospitalization Journey

OTTAWA CITIZEN FAST FACTS

post show report - Expomedia Expomedia

OTTAWA CITIZEN FAST FACTS - Postmedia Integrated Advertising

connectivity - Pathways to Technology

a Teaching Resource for - Virginia`s CTE Resource Center

to your all access subscription

CPJPO Box 510, Station B, Ottawa Ontario

Community Profile for BARRHAVEN/LONGFIELDS (B/L), OTTAWA

Grade 8 students in Rainbow Schools in Capreol, Hanmer and/or