May 15, 2006 Public Hearing/Work Session CITY OF ACWORTH

May 15, 2006
Public Hearing/Work Session
CITY OF ACWORTH GEORGIA
4415 SENATOR RUSSELL AVENUE
ACWORTH, GEORGIA 30101
MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN
PUBLIC HEARING/WORK SESSION
6:30 P.M. BOARD ROOM
MONDAY, MAY 15, 2006
1. Call to Order
2. Consideration of preliminary plat approval for Acworth Northside, a 35-lot singlefamily residential subdivision at the end of Northside Drive. (Currently zoned R-2,
Single Family Residential).
3. Consideration of QuikTrip Corporation’s request to amend an approved concept
plan for the Wal-Mart Supercenter near the intersection of Cobb Parkway and
Route 92.
4. Discussion of a Redevelopment Incentive Program for the DDA district.
5. Discussion of Facility Use Regulations.
6. Discussion of Football Facility Improvements.
7. Adjournment
The public may address the Mayor and Board of Aldermen during a Public Hearing. The following rules shall apply:
1. No comment or participation while another speaker has the floor.
2. There will be a 5 minute speaking limit per person.
3. A spokesperson for a group is encouraged, where possible.
4. If someone has already made your point, move on to a different point.
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
AGENDA ITEM BACKGROUND SHEET
DEPARTMENT:
Economic Development – Planning & Zoning
ITEM/AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Consideration of preliminary plat approval for Acworth Northside, a 35-lot single-family
residential subdivision at the end of Northside Drive. (Currently zoned R-2, Single
Family Residential).
AGENDA DATE:
5/15/06 & 5/18/06
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with stipulations, including approval
of a variance from the City’s stream buffer requirement surrounding the easternmost
stream buffer and a rear setback variance for two lots (6 and 7).
BACKGROUND:
At the Board’s May 1 work session, this item was tabled because there were several
revisions needed on the plan. Staff has reviewed the re-submitted drawings, and all
requested revisions have been completed.
In February 2005 the applicant first presented this development to the City for
preliminary plat approval. The request was tabled pending further review by staff due to
concerns regarding (a) a portion of the development being in Bartow County, (b) possible
state waters and (c) the substandard width of Northside Drive. The applicant has since
revised the plat by proposing to develop only property within Cobb County and
indicating state waters and appropriate buffers on the preliminary plat. The developer has
also purchased additional property at the entrance to the development to aid in the
proposed improvements to Northside Drive. The developer has also requested a variance
from the stream buffer requirement surrounding the easternmost stream delineated on the
plan and a variance from the rear yard setback.
The proposed development was discussed at the April 3, 2006 Board of Aldermen
meeting. At that meeting, the board asked for more detailed information on
improvements to the Northside Drive right-of-way and asked that staff notify residents in
the area surrounding the development. Drawings have now been presented that call for a
22 ½ foot street width (from face of retaining wall adjacent to the railroad to proposed
face of curb) and sidewalk from the subject property to McLain Circle. Staff has prepared
a draft stipulation letter (see attached) outlining requirements for this development.
A revised subdivision plat and plans for the Northside Drive improvements were
presented at the Board’s April 17 work session. A number of residents in the area spoke
at that work session. Also at this meeting the developer discussed the possibility of
seeking a variance from the City’s stream buffer requirement to allow two additional lots.
In the time between that Monday work session and the Thursday night meeting, staff
reviewed the plans and requested several revisions prior to approval by the Board.
Consideration of the subdivision plat was tabled on Thurday, April 21. Staff, the
developer, and a number of residents of Northside Drive walked the property on
Wednesday, April 20 to point out the specific improvements proposed and how these
improvements would affect private property.
As shown on the most recently revised subdivision plans, the developer is requesting a
variance from the City’s stream buffer requirement surrounding a stream on the eastern
part of the property to allow two additional lots. However, because lots cannot include
the state stream buffer area, the developer is also seeking a rear yard setback variance (30
feet instead of the required 40 feet) to make these two lots (6 and 7) buildable.
If approved, the applicant will submit civil site construction plans (including a plan for
improvements within the Northside Drive right-of-way) for review by City staff and the
City’s consulting engineer. The developer has indicated that he intends to formally
request abandonment of the north 280 feet of the Northside Drive right-of-way. If this
right-of-way is abandoned and can be incorporated into the subdivision, the developer
plans to plat three additional lots in that area. The plan before the Board is only for 35
lots. Staff has reviewed the preliminary plat and finds that it meets all lot size, width, and
frontage requirements as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The subdivision was
reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their March 28, 2006 meeting, at
which they recommended approval on a vote of 8-yes, 1-no.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
The supporting documents are available to view on the intranet on the council packet
page. The documents are labeled as below:
Acworth Northside Aerial
Acworth Northside Aerial 2
Subdivision Plat
Proposed Northside Drive 1
Proposed Northside Drive 2
Proposed Northside Drive 3
Acworth Northside Draft Stipulation Letter and Preliminary Plat Staff Report attached below:
Stipulation Letter granting approval of a preliminary plat for Acworth Northside
subdivision, a 35-lot single-family residential subdivision located at the end of Northside
Drive.
May 18, 2006
The preliminary subdivision plat is approved, subject to the following stipulations:
1. House plans, elevations and materials shall be consistent with those shown on the preliminary
plat dated January 12, 2005.
2. The preliminary plat is approved with a variance from the City’s stream buffer requirements
for the easternmost stream delineated on the plat in order to create two additional lots. The plat
is also approved with a variance from the City’s rear yard setback on these two lots (6 and 7)
for a rear setback of 30 feet instead of the 40 feet ordinarily required.
3. The developer shall provide to City staff for review and approval a detailed engineered
construction plans for the widening of Northside Drive and other improvements within the
Northside Drive right-of-way that shall meet the City’s standards for street construction (the
same standards required for new residential subdivisions). The plan shall include the footprint
(front edge) of existing dwellings along Northside Drive and the front and side boundary lines
of all lots having frontage on Northside Drive from the subject property to McLain Circle. The
developer acknowledges and agrees that the plan shall include the following improvements to
Northside Drive:
a) Northside Drive shall be widened to a minimum of 22 ½ feet (from face-of-curb(wall) to
face-of-curb) from the subject property to McLain Circle
b) A sidewalk, no less than 4 feet in width, shall be constructed from the subject property to
McLain Circle.
c) The required widening of Northside Drive shall include installation of curb and gutter and
required engineered stormwater controls and shall be included in the development’s hydrology
report.
d) Electric, telephone and cable television lines that are currently overhead shall be placed
underground as part of the street improvements from Fowler to the subject property. Fowler to
McLain may or may not be placed underground, however utilities, including poles, may need
to be relocated to accommodate proposed lane widths. Developer acknowledges that he shall
be responsible for these costs.
The construction plans for right-of-way improvements shall be approved by the City prior to
the issuance of an LDA permit for subject property. All construction within the right-of-way
shall be completed according to the approved plan unless the City expressly approves
amendments. Any City approval is conditioned upon approval by other affected utility
providers. The developer further acknowledges that the improvements to the Northside Drive
right-of-way described above shall be complete prior to issuance of occupancy permits within
this subdivision.
4. Additional documentation regarding the presence of state waters on the subject property shall
be submitted to the City and approved prior to issuance of an LDA permit.
5. The development shall adhere to the stipulations set forth in Section 69.4.[B] of the City of
Acworth Zoning Ordinance (residential development standards).
6. The development shall meet all City of Acworth Codes and the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations unless specifically approved by the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen. Specifically, anticipated roadway improvements on Northside Dr. (profiles,
subgrade, compaction, etc.) shall meet all applicable development standards. Construction
drawings and hydrology reports will be adhered to unless so revised and approved prior to
construction. If, during construction, Northside Dr. is damaged, developer shall repair to
current standards. The developer shall maintain traffic through this area to accommodate
residents during construction. Developer also stipulates that once construction is started on
Northside Drive, it will be completed with all due diligence so as to not impact private
property or unduly impact residents’ ability to access their property. Developer also stipulates
that driveway throats and pedestrian connections off proposed sidewalk will be provided to
residences as will correction of grade behind sidewalks/walls to ensure proper stormwater
control on/off resident’s properties.
STAFF REPORT AND IMPACT STATEMENT:
March 22, 2006
To:
City of Acworth Planning and Zoning Board
From:
Christine Dobbs, Zoning Administrator
Subject:
The consideration of a preliminary plat to subdivide a parcel of land located at the
end of Northside Drive allowing for a 35 lot single family residential development
on 19.88 acres of land currently zoned R-2 (Single Family Residential) in the City
of Acworth.
Background: As you may recall, in February 2005 the applicant first presented this
development to the City for preliminary plat approval. The request was tabled pending further
review by staff due to concerns regarding the development crossing over county lines (into
Bartow County) as well as possible state waters and safety issues regarding the width of
Northside Drive. The applicant has since revised the plat reducing the number of lots from 38 to
35 and incorporated the state waters with the appropriate buffers. The developer has also
purchased additional property at the entrance to the development to aid in the proposed
improvements to Northside Drive.
In accordance with section 69.4, B, 3 of the City of Acworth Zoning Ordinance, “The Planning
Commission shall review all Preliminary Plats for subdivisions of 5 units or greater and shall
make a recommendation to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen.” The applicant is requesting the
subdivision of a lot containing 19.88 acres to create 35 single family residential lots. Due to the
changes in the preliminary plat, this is now returning to the Planning & Zoning Commission for
a re-review prior to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen consideration.
The property is currently zoned R-2 within the city limits of Acworth. This zoning allows for
single family residential lots with a minimum of 12,000 square feet in size. The property
contains 19.88 acres within the City of Acworth.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request with the following stipulations:
1. House plans, elevations and materials shall be in character to those shown on the
preliminary plat dated January 12, 2005.
2. The developer shall work with City staff to provide a survey of properties fronting
Northside Drive between Fowler Street and the subject property. Once the surveys are
reviewed by City staff, the developer shall work with the City to provide appropriate road
improvements, including but not limited to additional road pavement, curb and gutter or
other necessary improvements to widen Northside Drive from Fowler Street entering into
the subject property. All proposed right-of-way improvements and surveys shall be
approved by the City prior to the issuance of the LDA permit on-site.
3. The development shall adhere to the stipulations set forth in Section 69.4, [B] of the City
of Acworth Zoning Ordinance.
4. The development shall meet all City of Acworth Codes and the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations unless specifically approved by the Mayor and
Board of Aldermen.
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
AGENDA ITEM BACKGROUND SHEET
DEPARTMENT:
Economic Development – Planning & Zoning
ITEM/AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
QuikTrip Corporation’s request to amend an approved concept plan for the Wal-Mart
Supercenter near the intersection of Cobb Parkway and Route 92.
AGENDA DATE:
5/15/06 & 5/18/06
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the request to amend the approved concept plan for WalMart.
BACKGROUND:
QuikTrip, the new gas station and convenience store at the corner of Cobb Parkway and
Route 92, has requested (with co-signature by Wal-Mart) to amend the approved WalMart site plan. Specifically, QuikTrip is requesting to replace a 5-foot landscape berm
and row of Leyland cypress trees (which are required by stipulation) with willow oak and
yoschino cherry trees. QuikTrip is making this request to improve the visibility of their
store from northbound traffic on Cobb Parkway. As part of their request, QuikTrip also
proposes to plant additional trees on surplus property north of QT that fronts Highway
92.
This item was previously on the April 17, 2006 Board of Aldermen work session but was
requested to be tabled by the applicant. Since that time, the applicant has submitted three
new renderings, which are included. One shows the existing Quik-Trip store. The other
two show the approved plan (with the berm and row of cypress) and the requested plan
(willow oaks and ornamental cherry trees).
On June 6, 2005 the Mayor and Board of Aldermen approved a conceptual site plan for
Wal-Mart and Stipulation Letter 2005-16. The approved plan included a 5-foot berm and
continuous row of Leyland cypress tress to screen view of the south side of the Wal-Mart
building, which includes a trash compactor and service drive. A “visual corridor”, which
reserves area that kept relatively clear of trees or other objects that would obstruct the
view of QuikTrip from Cobb Parkway is included on the site plan. “See attached image
labeled “approved concept plan”.
The final site plan for Wal-Mart was approved by staff on January 12, 2006. This plan
includes the 5-foot landscape berm, row of Leyland cypress trees and a 6-foot high wood
fence. See attached images labeled “final landscape plan” and “final grading plan”.
QuikTrip presented a conceptual plan with their request to annex and rezone their site,
which was approved on October 3, 2003. QuikTrip recently completed construction and
opened their business.
Staff recognizes that QuikTrip’s proposal would improve the visibility of their store.
However, the berm, Leyland cypress row and fence included on Wal-Mart’s final plan
screen Wal-Mart’s side wall, a service drive and the store’s trash compactor area. The
applicant does offer to replace the row of cypress trees and the fence with willow oak and
yoschino cherry trees, which would provide landscaping along this area. However, in
staff’s opinion, the Leyland cypress row and fence provide better screening.
It should also be pointed out that the applicant’s original offer to plant additional trees on
surplus property near the Quik-Trip on Route 92 is no longer a factor since these
plantings were required on the approved Quik-Tip landscape plan. This change required
because one proposed landscape area had to be eliminated due to a power easement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
The supporting documents are available to view on the intranet on the council packet
page. The documents are labeled as below:
1) QuikTrip letter of request
2) requested plan amendment
3) approved concept plan
4) final landscape plan
5) final grading plan
6) supplemental QT letter
7) rendering- Quik-Trip
8) rendering- approved plan
9) rendering- requested plan
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
AGENDA ITEM BACKGROUND SHEET
DEPARTMENT:
Economic Development
ITEM/AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Discussion of a redevelopment incentive program for the DDA district.
AGENDA DATE:
5/15/06
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends review and discussion of staff’s proposal for a redevelopment
incentive program.
BACKGROUND:
At the May 1 Board work session, staff presented a redevelopment incentive program in
which staff proposed offering (a) a new façade grant with a maximum award of $5,000,
(b) a discounted power rate, (c) up to a five-year exemption from business license fees,
and (d) an exemption from building permit fees as incentives for major redevelopment
projects in the Downtown Development Authority area and the Cherokee Street corridor.
There was consensus among the Mayor and Board that the goal of the incentive program,
to encourage redevelopment of older commercial areas in Acworth, is important. Further,
the Board seems supportive of the concept of the program. There were concerns raised by
the aldermen relative to budgetary constraints that might prevent awarding the higher
façade grant amounts and the fiscal impact of the discounted power rate. There was one
question raised about whether to restrict the program to the target area or have it apply
City-wide. Staff agreed to refine the program and return the item for discussion.
Staff has now revised the program in three key areas. First, the power discount has been
removed. This simplifies the program in several ways. The two new incentives included
in the program are fee exemptions (business license fees and building permit fees), which
do not have the same fiscal impact as the power discount.
The second key revision is that all three incentives are now being tied to the DDA’s new
architectural design grant program. In the program, it is now proposed that the $5,000
maximum façade grants, the business license fee exemption, and the building permit fee
exemption be awarded only to those projects that have received an architectural design
grant through the DDA. As was mentioned at the May 1 board meeting, the new DDA
program would offer matching $1,000 grants for design of exterior renovations that
restore or create a façade consistent with the historic style of downtown Acworth.
The third revision is to the business license fee exemption. It was originally proposed that
a one-year exemption be granted for exterior-only renovation project. Major interior
renovations could receive up to a five-year exemption. Because all benefits to be received
are now offered only on those exterior renovation projects that have been awarded DDA
design grants, the two- to five-year exemption is no longer included.
In response to questions about the status of façade grant funds, staff has confirmed that
$7,808 is now available in the fund. The board can adopt the proposed incentive program
with its maximum façade grant of $5,000 for projects that have received the DDA design
grant without transferring additional funds to the 2006 façade grant fund budget. Façade
grant funds might become depleted in 2006 to the point that a $5,000 grant cannot be
awarded, but at least the Board will have the ability to award a grant through this new
incentive program.
Finally, the issue of whether to restrict the incentives to the DDA district should be
addressed. The DDA district, which covers areas along Main Street from the north edge
of the City limits to the Sports Complex, includes nearly all of the older commercial areas
in need of redevelopment (one exception is the former K-Mart shopping center). With all
three proposed City incentives now being proposed to be linked to the DDA’s new
architectural design grant program, it makes sense for the program to be limited to the
DDA district boundaries. The proposed program guidelines still exclude the two-block
core downtown area.
ATTACHMENTS:
See attached draft program description.
A map of the DDA district is included in the image folder on the intranet.
City of Acworth/DDA Building Reinvestment Program
Program Goals
The purpose of this program is to encourage redevelopment and revitalization of older
commercial areas in Acworth in need of reinvestment. Specifically the City desires to see
significant renovation of commercial properties in the target area that will improve the exterior
appearance of buildings, thereby attracting businesses to the City, increasing the tax base,
generating employment opportunities, and beautifying and improving the community.
This redevelopment incentive program is part of a joint effort of the City of Acworth and the
Acworth Downtown Development Authority. The City’s redevelopment incentive program will
work in support of a new DDA program that will provide grants to building owners for designing
major exterior renovations.
Target Area
The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) district, excluding the two blocks of Main Street
between Mill Street and Lemon Street.
Exclusion
Any project that has received approvals, including conceptual site plan approval, building
permits, or other City approval may not receive the benefits offered under this program.
Benefits & Criteria
Within the target area, the Board of Alderman may grant a package of redevelopment incentives
for exterior building renovation projects that have been designed through the DDA’s
architectural design grant program. The package may consist of the following benefits
(applications will be judged on the extent of improvement and considered on a case-by-case
basis):
A. Building Reinvestment Grant
The City of Acworth will provide reimbursement on a 50-50 basis for approved façade
improvements up to a maximum grant amount of $5,000 based on the following guidelines:
1.
2.
3.
Only those façade improvement projects that have been designed through the
DDA’s architectural design grant are eligible for the Building Reinvestment
Grant. After the DDA approves the preliminary design plans, an application for
the Building Reinvestment Grant may be submitted for review and
recommendation by Revitalization Grant Committee and approval by the Mayor
and Board of Aldermen.
The grant match is 50-50 (the applicant provides at least 50% of the project cost).
Both material and labor costs may be reimbursed. The applicant must provide two
(2) competitive bids for contractor labor. The grant application must be approved
before any work is started. No later than sixty (60) days after completion of work,
receipts for materials and labor and copies of canceled checks must be submitted
before reimbursement will be made.
4.
The applicant must demonstrate that the project to be funded will result in
extensive improvement to the exterior appearance of the building or its ability to
be used by a business.
B. Business license fee (commercial occupational tax) exemption
The City assesses commercial occupational tax annually. The Board of Aldermen may grant a
one-year exemption of commercial occupational tax for eligible projects. To illustrate this
benefit, a business with gross revenue between $750,000 and $999,999 would normally pay
$472.50 annually for a business license.
The one-year business license fee exemption may be granted for any business located in a
building that has been improved as a result of a DDA design grant. Extensive exterior
improvements must be completed before the business license fee exemption takes effect. The
businesses must apply for and be issued businesses licenses, but the fee will be waived for
projects approved by the Board of Aldermen.
C. Building permit and plan review fees exemption
The City charges $50 plus $5.00 per $1,000 of construction cost (a $20,000 commercial
construction project would require a $150 building permit, not including fees for electrical,
mechanical, or plumbing permits). All permit fees will be waived for approved exterior
renovation projects. The building permit exemption may be granted by the Mayor and Board of
Aldermen for any exterior renovation project to be completed as a result of the DDA design
grant program.
Eligible improvements
Exterior remodeling or renovation projects on building façades (exterior walls visible from the
street) of a permanent nature on commercial buildings within the target area are eligible to be
awarded an incentive package.
The applicant for these redevelopment incentives must demonstrate that the project will result in
a significant improvement of the exterior appearance and/or functionality of the property.
Redevelopment incentives under this program will only be granted to projects approved
through the DDA design grant program. The award of a DDA architectural design grant does
not guarantee City of Acworth approval of incentives under this program.
The following projects are ineligible to receive incentives under this program: interior
improvements routine maintenance work, parking lot or landscaping improvements, and minor
projects consisting only of exterior painting or similar work.
Process
The owner or prospective owner of a property within the program area (or his or her agent) may
apply for an incentive package consisting of (1) building reinvestment grant (2) business license
fee exemption and (3) building permit/plan review fee exemption. Since these benefits will only
be granted for projects that have received a DDA architectural design grant, the application for
Building Reinvestment Program incentives must document DDA approval of the project.
Applications for the Building Reinvestment incentive package must include a copy of the
preliminary design plans approved by the DDA, specifications outlining the scope of work and
building materials, photographs of the existing property, and project bids or quotes.
A limited amount of funds are available for façade grants. Applicants will be made aware that
not all eligible applications will receive grants or an incentive package. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to demonstrate to staff and the Mayor and Board of Aldermen that his or her project
will result in a significant improvement to the community. Projects that include comprehensive,
long-term structural improvements to properties will be given priority.
Criteria
The criteria for reviewing applications for the Building Reinvestment incentive package will
include the following:
A.
B.
C.
Current condition of the subject property (vacancy, code violations, deteriorated
exterior, obsolete signage, etc.)
Extent of renovation (the degree to which the property is being improved)
The economic and fiscal impact of the project (Will the improvements result in
business expansion, job growth, sales tax revenue, or property tax revenue?)
C:\Documents and Settings\jhayes\Desktop\Targeted redevelopment incentive.doc
May 11, 2006
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
AGENDA ITEM BACKGROUND SHEET
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
ITEM/AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Non Profit Policy
AGENDA DATE: Thursday, May 18, 2006
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consent of Non Profit Policy
BACKGROUND: Monday April 17 meeting the council requested staff to go back and
reevaluate the current policy for non profit use at Roberts School. Staff is prosing a maximum of
40 hours per month for non profit use at no charge, and implementing a multiplier to determine
the hours used.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Policy
Civic Organization and Non Profit Facility Use Policy
All volunteered based civic organizations that serve the City of Acworth and/or are in the
community’s best interest may use Roberts School and pavilions at no charge for a maximum of
40 hours per month and must place the required deposit on the facility. These civic
organizations shall be required to pay the full city resident fee for the Beach House and required
deposit.
All civic organizations that do not serve the City of Acworth and / or are not in the community’s
best interest will be unable to use Roberts School for extended periods of time. One time uses
may be granted if the applicable fee is paid.
The hours will be determined by a multiplier (multiplier: number of times the group uses the
facility per month, times (X) the hours used per use, times (X) the number of rooms used during
each use). A fee of $10.00 per hour will be charged for each hour that goes over the 40 hour
maximum according to the multiplier.
No church shall use any city facility as its primary location for conducting services or use the
facility as its organizational address.
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen shall approve all applications that exceed two meetings per
month. The Parks and Recreation Director shall have the authority to approve applications that
are requesting two meetings a month or less.
The city council shall approve the initial application for use for a maximum of 90 days for
applicants who are requesting to use the facility more than two times per month. The parks and
recreation director shall have the authority to approve the organization’s use in 90-day
increments after the initial approval has been given through the city council.
The city council reserves the right to approve or deny any and all uses of city facilities regardless
of organizational status.
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
AGENDA ITEM BACKGROUND SHEET
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Department
ITEM/AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
Discussion of football facility improvements
AGENDA DATE: May 19, 2006
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Mayor and Board allocate $10,000 of
impact fees towards the expansion of the football practice facilities.
BACKGROUND: The Acworth Football and Cheerleading Association is in the process of
upgrading facilities. The first upgrade will be the expansion of the practice facilities including
but not limited to grading and sod. The second upgrade is a proposed expansion of the
concession stand. The association has allotted $10,000 for the practice facility, and $25,000 for
upgrades of the concession stand. Plans have been submitted to the city.
The concession stand has presented approximately $10,000 in unforeseen costs due to having to
become compliant with Health Department Codes including, but not limited to grease hood vent
cover, three compartment sink, new hot water heater, and an impervious wall around the grill
area.
Staff is proposing that the city use impact fees to expand the practice facilities. By the city
expanding the practice facilities, the association will be able to become compliant with the
Health Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: $10,000
ATTACHMENTS: None