Included in 4/1 PC/HLB packet

Transcription

Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
C J Avis [cjavis@att.net]
Friday, March 06, 2015 11:55 AM
Lilly Schinsing
GGBD / Sausalito
Sausalito is a quaint, small, charming town.
The design/scale should reflect the wishes/needs of the community and not of the GGBD.
It seems the present ferry landing operates/accommodates without any issues.
Thanks for your time!
C J Avis
Member SYC
1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Craig Robbins [craigr@rcn.com]
Saturday, March 07, 2015 9:52 AM
Lilly Schinsing
Feedback on the planned new Sausalito Ferry Terminal
Hi Lilly, My wife and I agree that the proposed new pier and new float seem to be necessary and a good design and we support that portion of the design. We STRONGLY detest the proposed gate. Our initial impression in looking at the picture/rendering of the gate on the door handle flyer was that it looks like: THE ENTRANCE TO A PRISON. I understand the need for security but there must be a more creative way to do this without it looking so foreboding. Thank you for taking our feedback. Sincerely, Craig & Susan Robbins 195 Santa Rosa Avenue 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Georgette [gette@gette.com]
Saturday, March 07, 2015 4:43 PM
Lilly Schinsing
Ferry Landing Comments
Dear Lilly Shinsing, I am a long time resident. My name is Georgette Osserman, and I am an artist with a studio at ICB. I can not be at the study meeting. I have looked at the drawings and photos, these are my questions. Could the simplest smallest dock be built? The current designs seem oppressively large for the surroundings, and out of scale with modest nature of our town. We have been careful over the 25 years that I've lived here to maintain both a simple and elegant design foot. I hope we can continue this direction. I believe the beauty of downtown is the views of the water and I'm loath to give up that much of it to a dock and bridge. Yours Sincerely, Georgette Osserman 370 Sausalito Blvd. Sent from my iPhone 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Flavin Kate [kflavin129@gmail.com]
Lilly Schinsing
New Ferry Landing Comment
Dear Lily, I strongly object to the replacement of the Sausalito Ferry Landing. I suspect the transportation of tourist bikes is the reason for this planned monstrosity. Why not require the bike rental companies be responsible for returning their bikes to San Francisco instead of destroying the gateway to our historic town? After all, the bike companies profit handsomely, not Sausalito. Sincerely, Kate Flavin 129 Prospect Ave 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Vicki Samo [vickisamoster@gmail.com]
Sunday, March 08, 2015 6:11 AM
Lilly Schinsing
Planned Sausalito Ferry Terminal
Hello, I would like to express my dislike for the proposed terminal. It is ugly and industrial looking, and leaves a bigger footprint than does the current version. Thank you, Vicki Samo 86 Stanford Way Sausalito Sent from my iPad 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sandra Macleod White [fashion_focus@yahoo.com]
Lilly Schinsing
My issue with the Ferry Landing is: 1). The renderings are unbelievably ugly and inappropriate for a tiny town like Sausalito. 2) As a ferry commuter for over 20 years, where is the shelter from rain, high winds, cold fog, and hot sun for the passengers?? I spent years of getting soaked in the rain while waiting for the ferry ‐‐ or thinking I would faint from the hot sun. Every other Bay Area ferry terminal have passenger shelters except Sausalito. Sent from my iPhone 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
David Suto [davidksuto@gmail.com]
Monday, March 09, 2015 8:56 AM
Lilly Schinsing
Lilly,
I have posted an album of pictures and short video of the ferry landing during the storm on Feb 6th, 2015. They
are located on my google+ account at:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/100747260424175345603/posts/c2e5h52Fbmt?pid=6122166720692606386&oid=1
00747260424175345603
They should be freely viewable and downloadable by anyone who would like to use them as reference in our
conversation about the ferry landing improvements.
Regards,
David Suto
1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
FW: Proposed ferry landing expansion
Begin forwarded message:
From: Melissa Mooney <lis_mooney@yahoo.com>
Date: March 7, 2015 at 11:43:28 AM PST
To: "dcastro@ci.sausalito.ca.us" <dcastro@ci.sausalito.ca.us>
Subject: Proposed ferry landing expansion
Reply-To: Melissa Mooney <lis_mooney@yahoo.com>
Dear Mr. Castro,
I just reviewed the planning documents available in the library and I am
writing in protest of the proposed ferry landing expansion.
The proposal strikes me as entirely incompatible with the current look and feel
of Sausalito that residents cherish so much.
For example, the "view corridor" as identified in the plans fails to take into
consideration the views from the Sausalito Yacht Club all together.
The photographs included in the materials in the library identified as a view
from The Sausalito Yacht Club were taken from the parking lot in front of the
yacht club. The members of the yacht club do not currently enjoy the views of
the Bay and the City skyline from the parking lot, they enjoy those views from
the deck and the cocktail lounge. In fact, the yacht club replaced a solid wall
on the south side of the building with a glass wall in order to open up the view
of the Bay and the City skyline to it's members and guests.
Granted, the Sausalito Yacht Club is a private club, but as a long time tenant
of the City of Sausalito the impact of the proposed ferry landing expansion on
the club should be more carefully evaluated in the course of the consideration
of the GGBHTD plans.
Finally, as a former ferry commuter I believe the proposed expansion far
exceeds what may be necessary to make the existing ferry landing more
structurally sound.
Sausalito is not Larkspur and for the City to grant the GGBHTD to build the
greatly expanded ferry landing would be a slap in the face to the residents of
Sausalito.
The residents of Sausalito rightfully should be the highest priority when
considering a ferry landing expansion, not the transient bicyclists who
arguably could care less about such an expansion, nor the GGBHTD whose
primary interest in this proposal could reasonably be inferred to be increased
revenue from increasing the capacity for the transient bicyclists.
1
Kind regards,
Melissa Mooney (16 year resident of Sausalito)
Juris Doctor candidate
2
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
RE: Ferry landing plans
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Evie LaHaie [mailto:evielahaie@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 8:33 AM To: Adam Politzer Subject: Ferry landing plans Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to voice our opinions regarding this matter. My husband and I have been Sausalito residents for 43 years. We have seen many City issues presented with the "sky is falling, Armageddon" cry of disaster for our City. Example: closing the Vina del Mar park for 30 years to keep hippies from having sex amongst the flowers. I am rather annoyed with the portrayal of the plans for yet another improvement. The literature makes the Ferry Landing improvements seem like the worst possible outcome for the City, it's residents and visitors. On the contrary, I am in total agreement with what the plans (albeit presented in the slanted negative light) have to offer. The Landing needs improvement, badly. Anyone taking the ferry has to honestly say there has to be a better way enjoy this fabulous public convenience used for business and pleasure. Tourists are our business and financial lifeline (unless there is a manufacturing plant/shopping center coming to town with tax revenue, this is how we make our money). Bikes are also a welcome way of life, but that is another story. These bikes and the people riding them need to be welcomed to town in safe and managed ways. Restructuring the Ferry Landing for managing their arrival and departure makes total sense for their safety and for Sausalito businesses. Sadly, those with disabilities have a very difficult time maneuvering the current structure. I understand the need to look at all of the details of the plans. However, saying no to any progress/improvements just because we can, makes no sense. There are some that just equate the word change with disaster and continue with their obdurate thinking. I will try to make as many meetings as possible. Thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion via email. Regards, Evie LaHaie 83 Marin Av. 1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
FW: No monster dock
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Lynda Barber [mailto:lyndabar08@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 8:29 PM To: Adam Politzer Subject: No monster dock Dear sir: I am in AZ caring for my dying mother, but this issue is important enough for me to write you. This plan is too big and not supported with the current limited ferry service or the size of our village. This will stress Sausalito resources and ruin the charming ambiance which is the draw for tourists and residents. You need to scale this back and get a firm commitment from the ferry lines for better (late nights and weekends) so residents can use the ferry more easily without expanding physical dock space. The traffic congestion on the southern section of the 101 (because all local access between towns has been eliminated) means that ferry expansion of this magnitude needs to be directed to Larkspur where more space is available for infrastructure and other support functions. Sausalito is already too crowded! If we wanted SF style congestion we'd live in the city! Respectfully, Lynda Barber 32 Sunshine Ave Resident since 2008 Sent from my iPhone 1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
FW: Proposed Monster Ferry Landing
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: thomas tawa [mailto:tttt4@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 3:05 PM To: Adam Politzer Subject: Proposed Monster Ferry Landing I am outraged at the monstrosity Ferry Landing being foisted on the residents of Sausalito. And all attempted quietly and secretly from us. Please forward to the city council. Tom Tawa, 83 Monte Mar Dr. 1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
FW: New ferry landing
From: Nancy Bohnet [mailto:njbohnet@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Adam Politzer
Subject: New ferry landing
I am not in favor of this new ferry design. Please forward my dissatisfaction to the city council.
Nancy Bohnet
Sausalito resident
1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Nancy Osborn [nj-osborn@att.net]
Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:07 AM
Lilly Schinsing
For PC tomorrow night
Hello again Lilly, It's now midnight and I've been going thru emails for an hour...and just now realized tomorrow night's meeting includes the HLRB. Please forward my message to them also (I've edited it to include them). Thanks so much! Hello Lilly, I've been ill, followed by a trip returning yesterday and now am committed to an event that won't allow my attendance. Thus my tardiness but hope the following can still get to the PC members. (PLUS HLRB) Thanks. Nancy Dear Planning Commission and HLRB Members: The following is from a close friend and Sausalito property owner who has closely followed the Ferry Landing proposal while recently in Sausalito. I believe he sent it to the Council, but at this late moment I can't improve upon his views which my husband, Jim & I agree with completely: I¹m writing to you to express my complete objection to the potential expansion of the Sausalito Ferry Terminal as it is currently proposed. As a concerned resident of Sausalito, I am not against improvements to our lovely town. However, this potential expansion of the Sausalito Ferry Terminal will not enhance the city¹s character and charm in any way, nor will it permanently solve visitor circulation problems. This proposal will only provide significant detriment to what we, the residents, have always enjoyed and respected. In brief, my objections are based upon the following facts / concerns: 1. the proposed gangway is 3 times larger than the existing gangway, the access pier is over 3 times larger than the existing access pier, covering a significantly increased area of existing open bay, and the entire project represents more than double the amount of bay fill compared to the current ferry landing, 2. the proposal¹s definite negative impacts to the aesthetics of the valued Sausalito Waterfront Ambience, 3. the increased potential congestion to the adjacent surrounding street, sidewalk, and parking areas, 4. the potential eyesore and noise pollution/commotion of the proposed new access pier (see point 1 above) extending into the existing open bay area, with its unrestricted public access 24 hours a day, 5. the open water area belongs to the city and people of Sausalito, and the bay views should not be obstructed with further large gates/security divisions per the proposed expansion, and 6. the entire ferry design proposal process has not been transparent, nor has it gone through a full public review process for both the landside and the ferry landing designs. I certainly add our pleas to his, to find this design is not good enough for Sausalito, especially in its Historic District...nor is the plan to evidently make it easier to accommodate more bikers AND THEIR BIKES a way to make residents feel Sausalito will be a better place (or even as good as it is now) for them as well as visitors, if the plan is approved and carried out. Thanks for your consideration of my views as well as my husband's. Nancy Osborn 2 Kendell Ct. 1
Sausalito 2
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
kristen wolslegel [kristenwols@gmail.com]
Lilly Schinsing
I support the new ferry landing
Hi Lilly,
I can't attend the meeting tonight, so I am writing to express my support for the new ferry landing. This is an
important public infrastructure project and I am dismayed at my fellow residents who are upset about the
proposal. I feel that they are letting their fear of "tourist creep" get in the way of making a smart decision.
I looked at the plans in the library, and the proposed landing does not appear too large to me. The attached
image, taken from the plans, accurately reflects the scope of the project. I hope we are able to convince
residents that this is an important plan for our future - perhaps showing these images side-by-side will help in
that endeavor.
I appreciate your efforts, and all the best.
Kristen Wolslegel, 101 Edwards
1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Susan Shea [sshea123@outlook.com]
Lilly Schinsing
Hey Lily just for the record I am against the current proposed designs of the ferry landing and hope that we can all work together to find a safe and good looking alternative to this “Disney land” approach. Thanks and see you tonight Susan Shea 1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: A potential solution re: the Ferry Terminal Expansion
ATT00001.htm
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Craig Severance" <cseverance@gmail.com>
To: "Adam Politzer" <apolitzer@ci.sausalito.ca.us>
Cc: "Tom Theodores" <ttheodores@ci.sausalito.ca.us>, "Jill Hoffman"
<jhoffman@ci.sausalito.ca.us>, "Linda Pfeifer" <lpfeifer@ci.sausalito.ca.us>, "Herb Weiner"
<hweiner@ci.sausalito.ca.us>, "Ray Withy" <rwithy@ci.sausalito.ca.us>
Subject: A potential solution re: the Ferry Terminal Expansion
Hi Adam I am not able to attend tonight's meeting, but wanted to share my point of view. Basically, I am
in agreement of the short, medium and longer term goals articulated within the Imagine Sausalito
Final Report from the Harbor and Downtown Action Committee attached below for your
convenience.
As we all know, the area stretching south from the Spinnaker Restaurant to the Inn Above Tides
encompasses some of the strategically most important pieces of real estate owned by the city
held, of course, for the benefit of its residents (both current and future). Other groups also have
interests in this part of town (i.e. cyclists, Golden Gate Transit), however, their interests should
be subordinate to the interests of Sausalito's residents. Because this part of Sausalito is
encumbered by long term ground leases, the most we (as a town) can hope to accomplish (until
the expiration of the ground leases) is to NOT make matters worse and to attempt to relocate the
two view blocking users (1) the Yacht Club whose pilings need replacement anyway and whose
views already suffers from its proximity to the ferries and 2) the Ferry Terminal) in such a way
to improve public view lines of the Bay. This goal is well articulated in the attached Imagine
Sausalito document.
Here's an idea that would address most of these issues. Because the bicycle problem was not
anticipated when the Imagine Sausalito Report was compiled (six years ago), we must recognize
that the presence of so many bikes in downtown Sausalito is the primary reason for the suggested
expansion of the Ferry Terminal. My idea: motivate Golden Gate Transit to construct a Ferry
Terminal at Cavallo Point.
Cyclists who have rented their bikes to visit Sausalito can prepay for this ferry service when they
rent their bikes which, for them, would appear to be free. From the point of view of a tourist,
Cavallo Point provides wonderful views of the city and food/beverage choices. There is a huge
lawn on which the cyclists could relax. It is a short bike ride from downtown for that subset of
cyclists who really want to visit downtown (many of them wouldn't make the extra effort). The
Cavallo Point Ferry could cater to cyclists. The existing Sausalito Ferry Terminal could relax
back to ridership levels in existence BB (before bikes :-) Sausalito residents could reclaim an
important part of the reason we all live here. As downtown merchants will attest, visiting
cyclists do not spend much money downtown anyway. In other words, the ROI (defined as the
Return downtown merchants harvest on the Investment we residents make in enabling the
1
invasion of cycling tourists to downtown) is low. This is a lose/lose proposition.
This email describes an imaginative way to address several important goals simultaneously for
the benefit of all interest groups.
In short, I am opposed to the Ferry Terminal expansion (but wanted to counter with a positive
idea).
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Craig Severance
415-794-8459
2
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dan.Sooy@kp.org
Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:56 PM
Lilly Schinsing
New Ferry Landing is unnecessary. Unneeded :bay fill, cost, and crowds that will not spend a
significant amount of money in our town's business
Ms Schinsing
As a home owner ( 202 South street, unit #16) I feel very strongly that a new ferry landing is unnecessary.
Unneeded :bay fill, cost,, and crowds (that will not spend a significant amount of money at our town's business).
Daniel Sooy, M.D.
Chief Emeritus
Office Phone 707 393 4265
Email to: dan.sooy@kp.org
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its
contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments
without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
FW: the proposed Ferry Landing plans
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: cottoncarol [mailto:cottoncarol@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:43 PM To: Adam Politzer Subject: the proposed Ferry Landing plans Hi Adam, Will you please forward this input to the City Council for meeting on the March 11th. Thanks. Dear Council Members and Planning Commission, I am completely opposed to the planned expansion of the ferry landing. It is an outrageous plan not suitable to our Sausalito. The amount of congestion and blocking of views and dominance of our small town it will bring is totally unacceptable. Please halt this project as opposed to simply reviewing it. Thank you, Carol Cotton 1001 Bridgeway #235 Sausalito resident of Sausalito currently for 15 years and formerly resident in the 1960's for several years 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Helen Babalis [dreamitdoitproductions@yahoo.com]
Lilly Schinsing
ferry expasion in our Sausalito
Hello Ms. Schinsing,
Before attempting to create a bigger, more "lockdown", and possibly more efficient ferry terminal here
in our little town, perhaps looking more closely at two things is more important:
1. the actual state and safety of these old rusting out ferries, and maybe even their size...the age of
them is paramount as I have taken a close look at the condition of these boats
2. the number of ferries and the schedule
As it is, the ferries are old and decrepit. Please do not wait until one sinks or other emergency to take
action in asking for money for new ones, or newer ones.
The schedule doesn't serve us locals at all.
The gaps are too big, and the last ferry is too early, especially on the weekend to return from the city.
Tourists bicycling around cause havoc, and the accidents of these novice and lost people could
cause them their life. There was an accident just a few days ago on Bridgeway. The local cyclists with
their "racy" garb need to be addressed too. Their aggressivity causes stress to the road flow....drivers
in cars/buses have to avoid them, and they have no concern for anyone's right of way, including us
pedestrians who risk our lives to cross the street. Perhaps a new paved bicycle path that can lead the
speedsters and slow novices to the bridge and back is necessary for everyone's safety....away from
vehicles.
Thank you for reading all the emails and taking into consideration each one.
A concerned local,
Helen Babalis
1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wren Herring [wren@svwren.com]
Danny Castro; Lilly Schinsing
Sausalito Ferry Landing
Dear Mr. Castro and Ms Schinsing, I am writing to support protecting the village of Sausalito from a ferry landing remodel which is too large for this town of 7300 people. I reviewed the plans at the library. The float is too large, the loading ramp rails too high to blend in with the setting of a small waterside village. There are no photos showing the proposed dock with a docked ferry. The view corridor looking south is from a parking lot. The view from public and private spaces is not shown, because it will be blocked. In this town the view and the charm are rare and must be protected, as it has been in the past when a freeway on Bridgeway was proposed or the large public safety building improvement. Please request a smaller less intrusive plan that blends in. Thank you, Wren Herring wren@svwren.com 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Doug [DrsKerr@pacbell.net]
Lilly Schinsing
Doug
New dock
The proposed new loading dock for the Sausalito Ferry is out of scale. Its excessive, industrial style bulk will damage the visual aesthetics of Sausalito which are highly valued by the residents of Marin. The design appears intended to maximize a solution to a logistical Ferry on‐boarding problem, while giving no consideration, or unskilled consideration, to maintaining the small town character of the most historically significant and unique area of Sausalito. Please reject the proposed design. Dr. Douglas Kerr DrsKerr@pacbell.net 19 Monte Vista Avenue Larkspur, CA 94939 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
david suloff [davidsuloff@hotmail.com]
Lilly Schinsing
FERRY TERMINAL
THE GATE AS SHOWN IN THE FLYER BELONGS IN NEWARK NJ OR STOCKTON CA. WHY NOT AN ORNEMENTAL ARCH OF CAST IRON OR COPPER WITH A DESIGN LIKE ANTONI GAUDI/ MAYBE HAVE A COMPETION FOR THE DESIGN 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tammy Blanchard [tammyblanchard@gmail.com]
Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:22 AM
dcox@bwslaw.com
Lilly Schinsing; Bill Werner
Fwd: Please submit to Sausalito Planning Commissioners Regarding Ferry Landing
Expansion
comments_3 4 2015.pdf; signatures_3 4 2015.csv; petition signatures Kate group.pdf; BCDC
Petition Wet Signatures.pdf
Good morning Joan,
For the recored, I am not apposed to the ferry landing being repaired with some expansion, however, I and the
approximately 1000 concerned residents that have signed my petition are adamantly apposed to the GG
Districts proposed Design. The size, scale and design of the current plan do not reflect the the quaint village
feeling that we want to preserve. changing the color, cutting the top off the tresses off and 4' off the width pier
are not enough to placate us. The Concerned Residents and Friends of Sausalito are prepared to do whatever it
takes to stop this huge monstrosity from being built in the middle of the historic downtown.
Another big concern is, we have no plan for the land side to deal with the continued growth of tourism
including pedestrians, cars or Bicycles. How can we ask for more when our stomachs and plates are full?
- Lilly, I sent the email below on March 5, it does not appear that you received it . This email was in my sent
folder, but has no "to:" address. I have no idea what happened.
Sincerely,
Tammy Blanchard
Concerned Resident and Friend of Sausalito
SIGN OUR PETITION to stop the massive Sausalito Ferry Expansion by clicking this LINK
Website: www.Sausalitoferryproject.org
---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Tammy Blanchard <tammyblanchard@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:53 PM
Subject: Please submit to Sausalito Planning Commissioners Regarding Ferry Landing Expansion
To:
Hi Lilly,
Please submit the attached signed petition and pubic comments to the Sausalito Planning Commissioners and
Historic Landmarks Board for review, prior to the March 11 meeting regarding the Sausalito Ferry terminal
expansion.
1
Thank you
Tammy Blanchard
(831) 332-7744
-Regards,
Tammy Blanchard
(831) 332-7744
2
Recipient:
BCDC Commissioners
Letter:
Greetings,
Deny Permits for the Sausalito Ferry Terminal Expansion
Comments
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Patricia Zuch
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-07
Huge and ugly. Certainly not a "solution" to downtown congestion - quite likely
the opposite. And the Bridge District has never justified the need for a 2x
terminal. Why not just add a couple of boats during peak weekends?
TB
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-07
the current plan for the new terminal is overwhelming in size and looks like a
prison cell and Bay Fill of an additional 6,057 square feet is crazy! check this
out <a
href="http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/meetings/commission/2014/1204SausalitoFerryE
x.pdf"
rel="nofollow">http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/meetings/commission/2014/1204Sausali
toFerryEx.pdf</a>
Jim Vandegrift
Santa Cruz, CA
2015-01-07
I have a good many very close friends who live in Sausalito and they oppose
this proposed ferry landing
Kay Mitzel
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-07
The project is simply too massive for our small town of 7000+ residents. Our
downtown will be negatively impacted.
Leslee Maggiora
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
on public input
Joan Cox
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I agree that the proposed Ferry Terminal Expansion project has not been
properly vetted and reviewed by Sausalito's Planning Commission and City
Council and residents have not had adequate opportunity to provide valuable
feedback.
Adrianna Dinihanian
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
The proposed terminal belongs perhaps in the Port of Oakland, huge and
industrial. Not in our little picturesque town.
Gail Grossman
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I'm signing the petition as I am against the design and the size of the
expansion for the Sausalito Ferry terminal. This expansion is just too large for
our city of under 10,000 residents.
Gill Causey
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Tourist cities like Sausalito should not be overly burdened by increased density
that stresses the infrastructure and the residents.
Ann Jones
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Sausalito is under constant danger of being overdeveloped and changed. We
cannot let this happen. It is the jewel in the crown of the bay area and it must
be protected.
Nancy Osborn
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I object to the amount of Bay Fill, to the proposed design that doesn't relate at
all to the Historic District of Sausalito and the encouragement of more bikers
with the negative impact they have on the City.
Also, the Larkspur Ferry should be a top priority with the proposed connecting
train and its location in Central Marin where it serves many more residents'
needs than does Sausalito--also it's been shown that the latter can become
totally inaccessible under certain rain/tide level conditions.
Edward McCann
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
To deny Sausalito Residents its rights to due process is abhorrent and
represents a serious miscarriage of justice by those claiming to represent our
interests at City Hall.
That the GG Ferry District pays only $600 rent annually for this piece of
property is also absurd, despite the fact that this has been going on for so long.
I would think the City should be obligated to generate rent related to the value
of the property, or operate a percent of revenues like the other City tenants.
Kare Anderson
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I strongly oppose the proposed plan to more than double the size of the
Sausalito ferry landing and surrounding area
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Camara Scremin
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I do NOT think the size of this project is appropriate. While I support
improvements it is too big as proposed. Much more public input needs to occur
before anything on the waterfront is approved.
LINDA PFEIFER
SAUSALITO, CA
2015-01-08
The Bridge District has never justified doubling the size of the existing ferry
terminal, and the people of Sausalito have not been given the opportunity to
fully review and approve these plans.
Linda & Robert Rames
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-08
This is an overkill project. There is more to Sausalito than tourist business.
This increase in size would make street traffic even more unbearable than it
already is. BCDC is mandated to not allow bay fill unless absolutely necessary.
This project is not necessary and would be a detriment to the town.
Lynda Barber
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Residents have the right to say when changes that affect us are implemented.
Those who benefit should pay. We should require later ferry service in
exchange for any expansions.
Ann Watson
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Not only will this fill in more of the bay, it will also allow for more tourists to flood
into Sausalito when we are already way above critical mass. This will also
create even more critical traffic congestion and related pollution from buses
using the ferry as a feeder to Muir Woods.
Lynn Keller
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I am opposed to the amount of Bay Fill and the doubling in size for our small
community. Sausalito residents need proper review and time to comment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Patricia Shea
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
The project is out of scale, and the amount of fill is unconscionable.
Cynthia Montes
San Francisco, CA
2015-01-08
I oppose this because it has not been properly vetted nor do I think t-the Ferry
Terminal needs to be doubled in size? Base on what facts?
Mary Lou Bryant
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I completely agree with the stated petition to Deny Permits.
Miriam Browne
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
"It is Unconscionable that a project of this scale should be proposed by the
Bridge District WITHOUT the review and approval of the residents and friends
of Sausalito" This not only a power play by the Bridge district to Sausalito but
all of Marin County residents who love our bay!
Terence Fergus Moran
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I am signing this petition because it doubles what is virtually 'Bay fill' without
amelioration or approval. Should require a referendum of Sausalito citizens
among other objections. High-handed and insulting.
Colin Drake
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
C'mon - Sausalito is better than this. We can do much better in how we plan for
this and what the final design is.
Fay Rudio
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
this project is overkill for the City of Sausalito...those that live here should be
considered too. And filling in the Bay to this extent makes no sense.
Dennis Green
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I don't want an extended ferry terminal. We already have too many visitors.
Kay Mitzel
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
There are too many tourist and bikers already in our small congested little city.
It is increasingly impossible to drive down town or even walk on the side walks.
I do not want any expansion in the Sausalito Ferry, which just brings more
tourist and their bikes to our little downtown.
Paula Tompkins
Christine Zecca
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Sausalito needs to retain its small town character. This new terminal looks out
of place
susan cullen
sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
this structure is inappropriate
Lore Phillips
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Public review of this project by Sausalito residents should be solicited. BCDC's
role in this review process should be clarified.
cindylu janisen
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-08
This seem like a huge expansion. What is the reasoning?
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Patricia Blanc
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I want the ferry terminal to stay the same.. No need for expansion, more boats,
more noise and bigger crowd . Keep Sausalito the way it is: beautiful!
Christine Kelly
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Our small town does NOT need this expansion. The terminal we have is
appropriate for Sausalito.
Aaron Cody
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
fix the real problem - curb the bike rental companies .. the easier we make it for
them, the more they will send over...
PJ Post
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Sausalito's main road, and only road is already overcrowded. It is often closed
due to flooding, and evacuation routes are already cut off in case of any
disaster (quake, fire, landslide). As a person who cannot hike up the mountain
to reach the freeway, I am dependent on this. I never go to my own downtown
because of traffic and especially bicyclists already. Mill Valley, the next town,
where I go for all my own shopping needs, is having access problems itself.
Expanding the use of the ferry would put my life in jeopardy. And I am also
opposed to any more Bay Fill in the downtown area. Most of our land is already
Bay Fill, and subject to quake problems. In addition, even Gate Five Road is
closed due to flooding during high tides and heavy rains. So there is no way out
of here.
Catherine Smith
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
The design is ugly and inappropriate to the beautiful historic surroundings and
the size is ridiculously large and out of proportion to this lovely little town.
Wren Herring
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Sausalito is a living village, not Disneyland
Darcy Sears
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I think this issue should be voted on in an election format by the citizens of
Sausalito
Neil Gibbs
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
This project does not seem needed and should have the approval of Sausalito
residents.
r j higgins
sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
We need an expanded ferry schedule first.
Robert Vallandigham
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
The proposal has been pursued in an underhanded, back door, manner with no
transparency.
Renee Linde
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
This expansion is out of scale for the location and greatly impacts open space
views of the bay from the surrounding land based areas
Shelah Peters
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
OPPOSED to more BAYFILL !!!
OPPOSED to enlarging Ferry Terminal!
Rosita Bras
bergen op zoom,
2015-01-08
Netherlands
Chris Blanchard
Pacifica, CA
This Bridge is as 'The Bridge' worldwide known by million and million people.
I've been there, love this Bridge....
2015-01-08
Preserve Sausalito. This terminal expansion is far too large for this little coast
side community. The residents do not want this.
Alexandra Maguire
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-08
Deny permits for the Sausalito ferry terminal expansion!
Burt Drobnis
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
The proposed expansion will negatively impact the downtown area of Sausalito
and is also out of character with the charm of the city's waterfront.
Pamela Henry
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I don't want toruin the waterfront. To preserve our town.
Don Wieneke
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Concerned about the expansion of the Ferry Terminal and the loss of view and
small town feel of our waterfront. Also concerned about the increasing parking
lot needs a larger ferry terminal will bring. Who really needs this?
Liz MacDonsld
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I have lived in Sausalito for 43 years and watched it turn from a small,
interesting and welcoming town into a gigantic tourist mill! So many things have
changed without residents truly having a say that I am taking the opportunity to
voice a resounding NO!
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Morton Weinress
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Anyone who frequented downtown Sausalito last year saw how the people
piling off the ferries and riding in on bicycles and tourist buses virtually
paralyzed our village and made it very difficult for residents to access. It seems
that the GG Bridge District wants to encourage gridlock for reasons that I
cannot fathom.
Kathleen Andreson
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
Our current ferry terminal is perfectly adequate for residents and commuters.
Sausalito is already faced with too much impact from tourism. BAY FILL IS
NOT OKAY!
Sallie Rowe
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-08
I am signing this because of the proposed square footage and lack of input
from residents.
john farnsworth
Santa Clara, CA
2015-01-09
This eyesore will block some awfully nice bay views, including the one from
Sausalito Yacht Club. Why? To squeeze more rental bikes into ferries so that
tourists don't have to ride back up the hill to return to San Francisco. Since
when is that a rationale for bay fill?
Janet Dean
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
This massive project is environmentally irresponsible and inappropriate for our
small scale historic district.
sonja Hanson
sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
An ever increasing number of land use decisions are being made with little or
no local participation. The Sausalito Ferry Terminal expansion is yet another
example. It is time the locals have some say in how our town changes.
Maria Ysmael
Los Angeles, CA
2015-01-09
I'm signing because my niece who lives in Sausalito with her husband on their
boat.... The expansion will encroach on their privacy and make Sausalito over
saturated with tourists!
Leslie Hail
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
It is an ill conceived structure without regard for the waterfront, the very small
downtown area of Sausalito, the view so treasured and limited already by
people, bicycles, cars and structures. Why has the ferry area not been
maintained all these years to the point now that it is a danger? Why put in a
huge boilerplate design with no thought to our small village. The ferry's are old,
spew fuel into the air, have asbestos and rust, noise, etc. Creating pollution in
& falling into the bay, are safety hazards to the area, which children and small
craft barely visible. The entire project needs to be re thought, re drawn, and
implemented with the environment, pollution, the village and what it can handle
and a vision the goes out 50 years - not TEN as suggested. The entire
committee has not looked into the future - there focus has been to get what
they term free money and do a short term fix to a long term need in
transportation. Perhaps smaller newer more fuel efficient boats would be better
and even less expensive to maintain. This is also an eyesore that will ruin
property and the reasons people live here.
Susan Shea
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
All we are asking is that there be citizen input about this huge project. We have
had ZERO input about this.
Elaine Conley
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
I am doing the right thing.
Angelina Gamache
South Boston, MA
2015-01-09
I am signing because I have visited Sausalito many times and I would hate for
this expansion to go in and ruin such a beautiful piece of land.
Marv Hovatter
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
Too big, too much!
Katherine Argilla
San Anselmo, CA
2015-01-09
I am signing because I love Sausalito and do not want a large ferry terminal to
ruin its charm!
Susan Post
Sacramento, CA
2015-01-09
We need to preserve the historical center of Sausalito as well as to prevent
more Bay Fill. The residents of Sausalito should be allowed to voice an opinion
before this project goes forward.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
sarah shea-smith
Burlington, VT
2015-01-09
I have visited Sausalito many, many times and absolutely love your city. The
ferry landing as is seems to me to be perfect. I have never had a problem with
long lines or tooo many visitors at any time. I feel with this expansion the
things that people love about your quaint little city would be lost. Congested
sidewalks and long lines to say nothing of the size and expense!!!!
Liz Girvn
San Anselmo, CA
2015-01-09
Because I LOVE Sausalito the way it is!! Also no more traffic or construction is
needed!!! Probably best to deal with the parking in Larkspur first.
Carolyn Morton
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-09
The structure is too large for the setting, and the project is not in the interests of
the residents of Sausalito
david dibernardo
sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
"It is Unconscionable that a project of this scale should be proposed by the
Bridge District WITHOUT the review and approval of the residents and friends
of Sausalito"
Joan Procter
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
i'm aghast at the huge size & industrial look of the proposed terminal area.. A
smaller, gentler & more inviting terminal must be presented to the residents for
opinions.
Linda Milark
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
I feel the whole design overwhelms the waterfront and takes away the charm of
a small town of Sausalito.
It's an eye sore.
Please propose something more in keeping with the Sausalito charm.
jane downing
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-10
Sausalito is already over run with day visitors, traffic, bikers to the point of
traffic gridlock. Also the shoreline ecosystem will be harmed by the dredging
and double the number of
people throwing trash into the water at the shoreline. This is an added burden
on a small town's resources and traffic management. Vote NO on this
expansion.
Jan Hodgson
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
In the late 1970's and in my early 20's my husband Dave and I worked with a
handful of folks to establish the Sausalito Downtown Historic District.Fastforward 34 years and the district is slowly being chipped away by
modernizations that are not needed or wanted for that matter.The ferry landing
can be modernized in a way that works for commuters and holds with the
1900's look of the area.
Horace Giannini
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
Keep Sausalito small, as it is.
Lauri Flynn
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
I think the residents os Sausalito should have some input into the design of any
upgrade since it is located in our historic downtown area.
John Tompkins
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
Any growth in tourism or resident population is detrimental to Sausalito. Don't
expand the capacity of the ferry dock. We don't want it to be possible for the
dock to accomodate more or larger ferries.
Bryan Lawton
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
Keep the quaint small town environment and protect the water view .
Kathryn Atkins Page
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
Keep authentic fishing , Med village feel
Peter Erin
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
The ferry brings enough tourist to town. This isn't disney world. There are
significant external consequences of more tourists. This need to be considered
before we drop them off with bikes!
Alain Poulenard
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-10
It is big and ugly as it is, the daily tourist invasion doe not need to get any
bigger,
it would also spoil the view from the yacht club including the hotel.
Dana Bialashewski
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-11
Do not want such a large dock. Being made just for the tourists.
Laurie Tandy
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-12
I think that the citizens of Sausalito should have a voice in the plans for the
development of the new ferry terminal.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
jayne reichert
sausalito, CA
2015-01-12
I don't believe the expansion is necessary and also feel that it is being rushed
through
Krystiana Yang
Oroville, CA
2015-01-13
Againts
Andrew Fecskes
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-14
Please do not subordinate the town's needs because somebody's renting lots
of bikes. There are better solutions all the way around. Anyway, the seas will
rise and the bikes will be gone.
Grover Dear
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-14
This proposal destroys the current character & ambiance of Sausalito, and the
proposal has not had a proper review by the concerned public and Sausalito
residents affected.
Nancy Phillips
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-14
This design is not appropriate for the ambiance of Sausalito and it is being
pushed through without residents knowing.
Zamira Solari
San Anselmo, CA
2015-01-14
This will greatly change the face of Sausalito!!!!
Michael Magruder
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-14
This project is a disaster for Sausalito. To many people, to many cars, to many
bicycles. Send the Ferry to Corp of Engineers. Keep Sausalito's heart free of
transit and bicycles.
Judy Belding
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-14
Too big for town
steve fabes
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-14
The design is excessive in mass and is NOT what residents and property tax
payers of Sausalito want. We live here, you don't. Stay small, conform to our
town, small and quaint.
Eric Chipps
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-15
As a long term member of SYC, I believe this development will diminish many
qualities of my beloved Sausalito
Dennis Burkell
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-15
I object to size and lack of resident review
MARIA DRISCOLL
sausalito, CA
2015-01-15
I have lived here for 17 years, I want it to stay the sweet and charming
Sausalito, it has changed a lot already and this would distroy it
Stephanie Magruder
Big Pine Key, FL
2015-01-16
I'm a long time Sausalito resident and this project is too big and not well
planned. Start over with a smaller plan
Patricia Hogan
Port Washington, NY
2015-01-16
Residents should be allowed to review the proposal.
Marjorie Baylor
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
2015-01-16
I'm signing because I want to keep the quaint charm of Sausalito and not a
major transit hub for tourists!!!
Julie Mitzel
West Linn, OR
2015-01-16
I've been visiting Sausalito for 38 years, please, please do not take away from
the charm of the waterfront by putting a very utilitarian, oversized eyesore ferry
terminal at that location.
Douglas Webb
Tybee Island, GA
2015-01-16
Have good friends in Sausalito and visited there this year. Extra building and
traffic in that area of Sausalito would cause the city to lose much of its
character andbeauty.
MJ Roney
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-16
Sausalito is known for its lovely views and "small town" setting. This is just
another example of the urbanization of Marin County. The residents do not
want a mega-terminal to accommodate the flood of tourists who clog our
sidewalks and streets, and fail to promote local businesses.
ROBERTA MASSON
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
2015-01-16
I oppose the expansion.
Mary Goff
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-16
It will ruin our city
Wayne & Carolyne
Orinda, CA
2015-01-17
Sausalito is one of our favorite spots to visit because it is so "small town", even
Hudson
given the tourists. It would be a shame to see it become more commercial.
Brian Durnian
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-17
That's way too big for our small town
Deniz Ince
San Rafael,, CA
2015-01-17
I care about being fully informed about changes in any part of Marin county.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Jim deRemer
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-18
No transparency regarding the Sausalito residents. Sounds like they have
money to spend. Perhaps we should ask who is asking for this expansion.
Tom Upton
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-19
This expansion far greater than necessary and will irreparably harm the unique
Sausalito waterfront. It has not received proper review, given its scale, and
should be voted on by Sausalito citizens.
Barbara and Tom Day
Marblehead, MA
2015-01-19
We are signing because we have visited Sausalito many times and we have
friends that live in that beautiful town. The scope of this project does not make
sense. Residents need time to review & comment on this.
Kenneth Johnson
Highland Park, IL
2015-01-20
The proposed expansion and permits should be denied and future discussions
involve input from the residents of Sausalito.
Teresa Holt
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-22
This huge development would make Sausalito's crowds a complete nightmare,
much worse than it is now. Poor planning---put it somewhere that won't impact
the residents so unfairly.
Alexia Cloutier
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-23
duh...I don't want you to ruin our Sausalito small town waterfront...there are
enough tourists already...we cannot handle the additional traffic flow.
John Mount
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-23
This needs to be approved by Sausalito residents and the City Council. There
is NO reason to urbanize downtown Sausalito, we can find other ways to cope
with the tourism. The amenities of our town will be degraded and lost if the
Bridge District is allowed to expand its terminal.
Peter Sapienza
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-25
I think the proposed increase in size for the ferry terminal is excessive and
needs to be further discussed and reviewed by the residents of Sausalito.
Robert Iles
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-25
Prefer to keep the current look and feel of the downtown area.
Dulce Shafer
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-25
The Sausalito waterfront belongs to the people of Sausalito and retaining the
appearance of the waterfront is important to all of us in Marin County.
Robert Bower
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-25
I have been a member of the Sausalito Business Community since 1989 and
have always enjoyed the wonderful feel of our small town and very much wish
for it to continue in that vein.
Carol Martin
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-25
The Ferry Landing Project should not move forward without Council consent as
stipulated in the lease between the City of Sausalito and the Golden Gate
Bridge Highway and Transportation District.
Carol Martin
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-25
The Ferry Landing Project should not move forward without Council consent as
stipulated in the lease between the City of Sausalito and the Golden Gate
Bridge Highway and Transportation District.
Dave Smith
Santa Rosa, CA
2015-01-25
The congestion in Sausalito has long since reached critical mass. There is no
reason to expand the capacity to create more congestion.
Gary Wilkinson
2015-01-25
The plan as presented is unsightly and not in character with the Sausalito
shoreline.
Andy and lisa Eggler
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
I think the ferry expansion is horrible
Randi Harry
Fairfield, CA
2015-01-26
The design is completely out of character with the charm of Sausalito, there is
no justification for such a huge expansion, and the decision process has been
secretive.
Daniel Engel
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-26
I am signing the petition as a SYC member (#1120) who does not want to see
that sort of development on the Sausalito waterfront.
Dan Engel
robert wilkins
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
Horrible design
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Pippa Anderson
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-26
I was previously a resident of Sausalito. This expansion is NOT good for the
Bay nor for Sausalito residents and friends, not to mention the abject lack of
appropriate consultation and collaboration with said residents and friends.
Deepa Thomas
San Francisco, CA
2015-01-26
I'm signing this is NOT in Sausalito's interest.
Andrew Mould
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
I feel the design overwhelms the waterfront and diminishes the charm of the
town. The whole process is being conducted without proper regard to the
wishes and needs of the residents of the immediate and surrounding
communities.
Carol Avis
Fairfax, CA
2015-01-26
Keep Sausalito the town that it is known for...a small, quaint town! Need a
building moratorium (again) in Marin!
marlo seligman
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
I am against this Expansion. It looks ugly.
Carolyn Zaroff
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
Too much congestion will be generated by making this a major traffic hub
Robert Obrien
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
We need accountability in our city planning and leadership with a clear vision of
our future.
Paul Springston
Springdale, AR
2015-01-26
As a former resident and frequent visitor to Sausalito, I believe the people of
Sausalito deserve to determine for themselves what is acceptable regarding
significant changes to their environment.
Melinda Meitz
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
This proposal will change the town we live in and love, encouraging more
cyclist who are a danger to our streets and whose presence do not help the
local economy and only deter the visit of those who have been coming to shop
and dine and appreciate our lovely town for years. The existing ferry terminal is
efficient for the visitors and commuters who use the services year round.
Alice Cochran
San Rafael, CA
2015-01-26
I'm a member of Sausslito Yacht Club and Sausalito Presbyterian Church
Michael Whelden
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-26
The congestion needs to be subdued.
Sandra BUSHMAKER
Tubac, AZ
2015-01-26
There is no demonstrated need. City owns the land. Needed upgrades were
made in 1998. Visual blight. Unnecessary landfill. Too big for area and
demand. Legal necessity questionable. Legal process not transparent to public.
jim michaelsen
Santa Rosa, CA
2015-01-27
The City of Sausalito if too congested as it is now, the last thing we need is a
larger ferry Terminal to bring in more people.
Grace Knight
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
Huge, negative impact on Sausalito. UGLY!
Jann Johnson
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
This is an outrageous amount of infill for the Bay in prime fish and bird habitat.
The residents of Sausalito do not need or want this.
Robert Hobart
Colfax, CA
2015-01-27
I think the existing facilities are adequate for the services they provide.
Michele Benjamin
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
Too big for Sausalito - a nightmare!
Jack Walker
Portola Valley, CA
2015-01-27
I feel the plans I have seen do not fit with the quaint feeling of Sausalito, too
industrial and too large. Improvement may be needed but that is overkill
Betty Thomas
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
Our yacht club will be directly affected by this expansion.
Phillip Berry
Placerville, CA
2015-01-27
I am signing this petition because I am a frequent visitor to Sausalito. I feel that
the proposed modifications to the ferry terminal are out of character for
historical downtown Sausalito
Christopher Debelius
Rio Rancho, NM
2015-01-27
I’m appalled at the rapidly declining wildlife habitat in the Bay, brought on no
doubt, by the unrestrictive migration and oppressive human movement that
encroaches into an environmentally sensitive, arid area. Expansion of the ferry
terminal in Sausalito will further worsen the quality of life in the Bay and the
way of life in Sausalito as we now know it.
Stuart Riddell
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
This is unacceptable.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
MICHAEL MORROW
SAUSALITO, CA
2015-01-27
The current ferry terminal works just fine. Why waste taxpayer dollars to create
an oversized structure that is not needed?
Douglas Lloyd
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
I am both a regular ferry rider and a member of Sausalito Yacht Club. Some
modest expansion may be warranted to accommodate current ferry ridership
but the proposal is far too massive and out of scale and character with the
Sausalito community.
Lisa Simon
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-27
Not enough research has been done and the community needs to be part of
these decisions. We already have issues with traffic, pollution, marine life, bike
issues..
John Kibler
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-28
it is a monstrosity and would impact the natural wonder that is Sausalito
ND Koster
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-28
In an effort to safeguard the small-town character of Sausalito, and protect it
from becoming a bloated, overrun amusement park.
Jean Comerford
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-28
I believe the project need further review and approval with the citizens of
Sausalito.
Patty Bacon
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-29
Project is too big and commercial for Sausalito.
cris Hammond
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-29
From Linda's email, I can conclude that someone in City Staff should be, at
minimum, reprimanded, and at maximum, fired. Since 2009 Staff has been
denying the existence of a lease between Sausalito and the Bridge District. It
takes a phone call from an unamed citizen to move Staff to get off their butts
and produce it. This is worse than incompetence. If, by hiding that lease, the
City had been forced into accepting that ferry expansion, we the citizens would
have been the victims of a fraud.
Fire Adam Politzer!
Steve Fugsro
Mill Valley, CA
2015-01-29
Have attended Sausalito Presbyterian Church for 25 years and am very
concerned about the impact of the revised ferry dock on the town of Sausalito
and the community.
JEFFREY COHEN
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-29
ANY PROJECT OF THIS SCOPE SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO EXTENSIVE
PUBLIC REVIEW AND INPUT PRIOR TO APPROVAL.
caren van den bosch
sausalito, CA
2015-01-29
this will totally be a nuisance in sausalito.
Russell Croce
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-30
A public review by Sausalito residents should be required for such an extensive
project.
Susan Moritz
Sausalito, CA
2015-01-30
Will be an eyesore.
Block the most beautiful Sausalito
water views. Is totally a big mistake!
imok cha
sausalito, CA
2015-02-01
I am signing here because I want the sausalito waters to be protected from
agressive comercialization happening all over the bay area in the name of
"Good for business" while killing the environment that we rely on for our lives. I
oppose with all my heart and sole.
imok cha,
Sausalito resident
joan procter
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-02
i support the motion to DECLINE approval of the current massive design &
scale for our
Sausalito ferry terminal. Something more modest & aesthetic in keeping with
the spirit of our seaside village needs to be developed with in-put from
residents, then review & approval our planning commission & Council.
yves castel
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-05
We don't need a bigger Ferry terminal.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Wendy Jawor
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-05
It's in inappropriate and out-out-proportion project. It doesn't fit in with our
town.
Valerie Shore
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-06
I do not like this plan
Patricia Ter Heun
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-06
We need a better solutions and need to keep with the quaint character of the
town of Sausalito the many of us grew up on or nearby. We do need more bay
fill. Any project like this needs to go before a review board of the residents and
friends of Sausalito!
PJ Post
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-08
Sausalito's single main road is already so packed that I rarely go to downtown
Sausalito. The bicyclists are a continuous hazard, even at this level. They are
mostly rented bicycles coming via the ferry.The car and bus traffic is mostly
from the use of this road as an alternate to the freeway. This road needs to be
kept *more* clear for residents to leave quickly in case of flood, landslide,
earthquake, urban fire, etc for public safety reasons. Expanding ferry access to
the small hill town does not make sense.
Raymond Swanson
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-09
I honestly see no problem with the present setting. Sure, sometimes the line of
tourists waiting to get on stretches onto the parking lot, but is this really a
problem? This does no harm. If the BCBD has money to spend, I suggest it
be done on the Spencer-101 bus stop parking; there are ~ 20 spaces for 150
cars every morning, and it is a dangerous walk for those who do not get a
parking space.
joan werner
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-09
I think the plans are utterly ridiculous and there is no reason for us to more
than DOUBLE the exisiting terminal.
Joseph gaul
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-10
I live in Sausalito. We are not the gateway to the Federal Government's
(bridge District) entry into greed. Who benefits? Not the citizens.
James Kyle
Sausalito, CA
2015-02-14
Present plan is unsightly and too ambitious.
Elaine Thorne
Mill Valley, CA
2015-03-02
I'm signing because the size of the structure and the design more suited to a
modern cargo terminal rather than a small city ferry landing..
kRISTINE MOORE
Santa Rosa, CA
2015-03-02
We value our waterfront and views associated with it. This new terminal will
ruin our small town atmosphere. It is an environmentally unsound plan.
Russ Frederickson
Sausalito, CA
2015-03-02
While the bicycle mess went unquestioned until we find streets closed to
accommodate bicycle parking and crossing the street a dangerous exercise,
this expansion would likely lead to larger ferry boats at some point in time.
Enough with the unquestioned and uncontrolled growth in a lovely small town.
Joseph Dunnigan
San Anselmo, CA
2015-03-02
Deadly to that area of our beautiful Bay !!!
Nanci Croy
Sausalito, CA
2015-03-02
Would like to keep the small and quaint atmosphere of Sausalito.
Susan Brubeck
Sausalito, CA
2015-03-03
This project is overkill for the problems it purports to solve. No reasonable
answer has been given as to why such a huge project is needed. It's a great
way to alienate all the residents of Sausalito against the Bridge District
Blair roman
Mill Valley, CA
2015-03-03
as a previous 2 time property owner in Sausalito from 1981, I have been totally
dumbfounded by the ridiculous excessive tourist growth. I can't believe anyone
in their right mind can see anything positive from this proposal happening for
the locals and current property owners. It's already impossible to park and shop
in town, no less hop a ferry to the city! Sausalito can not handle any more
growth in tourism. Enough is enough. This doesn't even take to account what it
would do to our gorgeous unspoiled waterfront...which is why people flock to
town in the first place. Reflect people...
Name
Location
Date
Comment
BARBARA H KNOWLES
Sausalito, CA
2015-03-03
We need a charming ferry landing not another pier 39 in appearance. The
European charm brings thousands of tourists and those that live here dont
want to feel like we live in the city we want the charm of the small town ferry
area.
If this is not satisfactory then move the ferry landing to another spot in
Ssausaltio dont ruin our beautiful town with this oversized mammoth ferry
landing plans.. thanks Barbara Knowles
Penelope Hammond
Sausalito, CA
2015-03-03
I lived on Main Street for over 12 years and have lived in marin city for 15 years
As a property owner and person who loves Sausalito we need a charming ferry
not a pier 39 in our back yard
Barbara Kavanagh
Mill Valley, CA
2015-03-03
I believe ferry terminal project was not vetted and needs more review.
Name
Residents and Friends of Sausalito
Jeffrey zarwell
Pat Zuch
Tammy Blanchard
Patti Bott
tony badger
Sam Chase
Robert Marotta
Madalynn Thomas
Nancy Novack
Jessica Cohn
James Vandegrift
kayla kahn
Jean Patterson
Kay Mitzel
Kate Flavin
Sue Dunlap
vincent maggiora
Joan Cox
Adrianna Dinihanian
John Philipp
Gail Grossman
Jack Flavin
Gill Causey
Ann Jones
Nancy Osborn
thomas tawa
michael snowden
Edward McCann
Kare Anderson
JOHN & MELODY MAGGIORA
Susan Samols
Michael Samols
Carolyn Ford
Joan Saxton
CHARLIE MARTIN
Blaise Simpson
vernel Larnerf
Ross Blanchard
Camara Scremin
Denise Ward
Linda Pfeifer
Karin Williams
Katherine Green
Anne Teller
sarah stout
City
State
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Santa Cruz
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Anselmo
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Zip Code Country
Signed On
United States 1/7/2015
94965 United States 1/7/2015
sausalito United States 1/7/2015
94965 ‐ 23United States 1/8/2015
Lucinda Powers
Linda Rames
Paula Fancher
Gerry Fait
Lynda Barber
Patricia Pigman
Ann Watson
Lynn Keller
Patricia Shea
Britta Meyer
William Patterson
Kat Lusher
Jeffrey Koll
Cynthia Montes
Jill Thomas
Mary Lou Bryant
Miriam Browne
Erin Kane
Ingrid Hayden‐Chase
Fergus Moran
Oz West
Ken Horiszny
Craig Thomas
Colin Drake
Fay Rudio
Dennis Green
Julie Cox
Charles Green
Christine Zecca
Marilyn Weinberg
Rebecca Schaffer
CJ Spady
susan CULLEN
Marty Allen
Nidia Koll
Lore Phillips
cindylu janisen
Patricia Blanc
sharon smathers
Rich Vasquez
Christine Kelly
Aaron Cody
Florette Camarata
Bradley Obrien
Jennifer Hinkel
L wright
Daniel Crespo‐Dubie
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Francisco
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Rafael
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Francisco
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Rafael
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
94965 United States
94941 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94105 United States
94941 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94903 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94115 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965‐252United States
94941 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94901 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
Jenny Mantalvanos
PJ Post
Annie Porter
Catherine Smith
Wren Herring
scott herring
Catherine Harper
Susan Haas
John Flavin
Dawn Morf
Darcy Sears
Gibbs Neil
kyle ferraro
robert higgins
sandra evans
Lisa Nunn York
Robert Vallandigham
Renee Linde
sarah miller
Marika Edler
NANCY MAHL
Shelah Peters
Eric Woodhouse
Rosita Bras
Tim Prouty
Bob Mitchell
Chris Blanchard
Alexandra Maguire
john farnsworth
Burt Drobnis
DONALD B. HOLDEN
Pamela Henry
Karen Van Paris
Don Wieneke
Amy Blanchard
Liz MacDonald
Morton Weinress
Kathleen Andreson
Sarah Brown
Sallie Rowe
Sandy Cross
Holly Stewart
Anthony Brau
sarah johnson
Innes Stroud
Richard Mayr
Efthimia Angelopoulos
Dublin
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Beach Haven New Jersey
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
San Rafael
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
bergen op zoom
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Pacifica
California
Mill Valley
California
Santa Clara
California
Sausalito
California
Santa Rosa
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
San Anselmo California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Benicia
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Valley
Nebraska
Athens
Georgia
Germantown New York
Flushing
New York
Ireland
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
8008 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94901 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94941 United States
4611SL Netherlands
94965 United States
94965 United States
94044 United States
94941 United States
94965 United States
95404 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94960 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94510 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
68064 United States
30606 United States
12526 United States
11358 United States
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/8/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
freddy hernandez
Maya Kowitt
Pamela Sterling
bob marley
Zaida guzman
Malak Kanan
jason schacke
June Stuner
jojo jojojo
Rafael Melendez
crystal blue
katrina carter
sebastian maslon
karol mooshe
Justin Lagios
Caroline Fabre
mariam chakchay
Daniel Camacho
Mariela Pena
carla plascencia
alec honthy
Ben Dallek
Vinh To
Rosemary Fernandez
emilio lagunas
Bianca F
Miguel rivera
mayta moreno
Maritza Martinez
Violet Sackett
Kiara Lewis
Jor‐El Santos
Alexandria Falco
Amanda Styrczula
Waylan Mui
Crispina Ramos
Riley Williams
Milica Devura
saul bernal
Amanda Vantreeck
patryk tadel
Perla Marin
Andrea lopez
Grace Shi
carlos soto
Janet Dean
Robert Sass
Chicago
Glenview
Houston
salt lake city
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Winchester
Chicago
Chicago
Saint Louis
perth
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Canfield
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Wilmette
Queens
Nampa
Chicago
Chicago
Bainbridge
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Essex
Chicago
Chicago
Oshkosh
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Chicago
Sausalito
Sausalito
Illinois
Illinois
Texas
Utah
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Wisconsin
Illinois
Illinois
Missouri
Washington
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Ohio
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
New York
Idaho
Illinois
Illinois
Ohio
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Wisconsin
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
Illinois
California
California
60647
60025
77049
91532
60609
60641
60618
54557
60631
60639
63139
6056
60634
60659
60640
60625
60659
60632
60646
60617
44406
60657
60625
60623
60632
60091
11435
83686
60634
60630
45612
60608
60609
60638
60609
60608
60935
60657
60618
54901
60656
60629
60632
60632
60623
94965
94965
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
Heidi Snowden
Andy Eggler
sonja hanson
Maria Ysmael Prunali
Dorothy Cournale
Michael Walker
Leslie Hail
Pam Boland
Brooks Haden
Diane Sidjakov
Lauren Johnson
Maria Hildebrand
Steven Flahive
Pat Milligan
susan shea
Amy Novesky
Elaine Conley
Angie Gamache
Marv Hovatter
Mary Chase
Katherine Argilla
Annette De agero
Susan Post
sarah shea‐smith
Susan Goigh
PAUL RONAN
Melissa Polick
Liz Girvn
Joe Gamache
dane faber
Carolyn Morton
Barbara Finnegan
David Post
Sharon Bobrow
Oleg Harencar
david dibernardo
Ava Solari
Janet Bonanno
Joan Procter
THOMAS FUNKHOUSER
Bonni Funkhouser
Steven Kesten
Karen Aiken
Linda Milark
Kathleen Ford
jane downing
Eric and Elizabeth Risberg
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Los Angeles
Sausalito
San Carlos
Sausalito
Grovetown
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Boston
Sausalito
San Francisco
San Anselmo
Sausalito
Sacramento
Burlington
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Mill Valley
San Anselmo
Winooski
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sacramento
San Francisco
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Anselmo
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
San Rafael
Sausalito
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Georgia
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Massachusetts
California
California
California
California
California
Vermont
California
California
California
California
Vermont
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
94965
94965
94965
90015
94965
94070
94965
30813
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
2127
94965
94114
94960
94965
95864
5408
94941
94965
94941
94960
5404
94965
94965
94965
95864
94131
94965
94965
94960
949654
94965
94965
94941
94965
94965
94965
94965
94913
94865
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
Suzanne Tucker
Patricia Giannini
Orah Krug
Jan Hodgson
Horace Giannini
Lauri Flynn
John Tompkins
Bryan Lawton
Chris Maggiora
Kathryn Atkins‐Page
Peter Erin
Alain Poulenard
Martin Gustavson
Stephen Gustavson
Dana Bialashewski
Peter Montagne
Denise O'Brien
Traci Phillips
Irwin Gubman
Laurie Tandy
Michael Henry
Krystian‐Nathan Dawson
Sandra wilkinson
Ayesha Ahmed
James Mapes
Danilo Manabat II
Cristine Garner
clara goossens
Saidah Castle
jayne reichert
Michelle Alford
Carol Dorn
Angelina Orduno
SALVAR CENTO
AVON MAXWELL
Erica Romeo
Alli Richards
Jolan Truan
Angela Contino‐Storms
Aurelia Serbia
Joseph Mendelsohn
Rita Wooten
Jonathan Orduna
Justin Spradling
Camille Bautista
wyneisha thorn
Elizabeth Montgomery
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Nicasio
Nauvoo
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Washington
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Alabama
California
California
California
District of Colum
San Jose
California
Napa
California
012 San roque pandi bulacan 30
Scottsboro
Alabama
Hemet
California
Los Angeles
California
Sausalito
California
Bklyn
New York
Beaver
Pennsylvania
Los Angeles
California
Brooklyn
New York
Charleston
South Carolina
Enfield
Connecticut
Mingo Jct.
Ohio
Prescott Valley Arizona
Gainesville
Florida
Chicago
Illinois
Norwich
Connecticut
Lubbock
Texas
Brownsville
Texas
Dunbar
West Virginia
Clatyon
North Carolina
marshall
Missouri
Norwalk
Connecticut
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94966
94965
94965
94946
35578
94965
94965
94965
20001
2148
95125
94559
3014
35768
92545
90061
94965
11212
15009
90028
11234
29414
6082
43938
86314
32604
60637
6360
79403
78520
25064
27527
65340
6851
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
Australia
United States
United States
Philippines
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/10/2015
1/11/2015
1/11/2015
1/11/2015
1/11/2015
1/11/2015
1/11/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
1/12/2015
Paul Ayers
Michael Klausing
Patty Peterson
Russ Earnest
linda turbide
rocky randy
Sherry Mitchell
Cheryl Weiss
jace wang
cheryl baird
william mcfadden
ada lundy
Camille Stevens
Susan Crismor
Kevin King
Marco Leal
Kevin Zheng
Simeon Rosenbaum
Tom Willis
Rebecca Davidson
Raysa Tapia
William Woods
Terry Young
Kathy Clark
Ramon Garcia‐Tamaran
Denise Hamilton
Richard Welles
Alexis Cochrane
Michelle Ford
Magy Yasin
Sheena Chamberlain
Kim Cooke
James Jennings
Tammy LeMaster
Sayuri Abreu
Bradley Homer
stephanie cook
R Walter
Sharon Webb
Jacob Parker
Rev. Brian Hutchison
Christina Butler
Michael Gottschalk
Leslie Schiff
Krystiana Yang
Richard Yang
Marjorie Grannan
Madison
Mississippi
Nitro
West Virginia
Saint Louis
Missouri
Chadds Ford Pennsylvania
east granby
Connecticut
gelderland
Nebraska
nederland United States 1/12/2015
Morgantown West Virginia
Granite City Illinois
shawnee
Kansas
Vienna
Virginia
Savannah
Georgia
Tallahassee
Florida
Branford
Connecticut
Cleveland
Ohio
Bloomfield
Connecticut
Covina
California
Natick
Massachusetts
Sarasota
Florida
Sutton
West Virginia
Long Beach
California
Boston
Massachusetts
San Diego
California
Elkview
West Virginia
Bellingham
Massachusetts
Bloomington Indiana
Apple Valley California
North Chesterf Virginia
Stone Mountai Georgia
lynn
Massachusetts
Bayonne
New Jersey
San Antonio Texas
Silver Spring Maryland
Bluefield
West Virginia
Grayson
Kentucky
Miami
Florida
Coconut Creek Florida
montclair
New Jersey
Caldwell
New Jersey
Corinne
Utah
Somewhere Connecticut
Turtles United States 1/12/2015
New Haven
Connecticut
Waldorf
Maryland
Green Bay
Wisconsin
Rochester
New York
Oroville
California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
Elizabeth Dupar
Andrew Fecskes
Grover Dear
Stephanie Silen
Margaret Collard
Nancy Phillips
stephen buckley
Zamira Solari
Michael Magruder
Jill Fugarp
Judy Belding
steve fabes
Eric Chipps
Kathie Burkell
Timothy Coffing
Gary Ferber
Maria Driscoll
Kimberly Harney
Virginia Price
Kara Flavin
Anthony Collard
Stephanie Magruder
jasmine castro
Todd Wheeler
Mary Richardson
Susan Kirsch
Edw Lee Hammack
Patricia Hogan
Matthew Reid
Amber Grund
Marjorie Baylor
Candy Wilson
Julie Mitzel
Douglas Webb
MJ Roney
ROBERTA MASSON
Cahill Cahill
Mary Goff
Wayne & Carolyne Hudson
Brian Durnian
Thomas Quinn
azah borham
Deniz Ince
James deRemer
TIMOTHY THIEL
Barry Brimmell
Tom Upton
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Menlo Park
California
Greenbrae
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Big Pine Key Florida
San Francisco California
Belmont
California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
Port WashingtoNew York
Calistoga
California
Minneapolis Minnesota
Belvedere Tibu California
Sausalito
California
West Linn
Oregon
Tybee Island Georgia
Mill Valley
California
Mill Valley
California
Sausalito
California
Orinda
California
Sausalito
California
Baltimore
Maryland
San Rafael
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
94965
94965
94965
94966
94965
94965
94965
94960
94965
94941
94965
94965
94941
94965
94965
94965
94965
94025
94904
94965
94965
33043
94115
94002
94965
94941
94110
11050
94515
55416
94920
94965
97068
31328
94941
94920
94941
94965
94563
94965
21212
94116
94901
94965
94109
94109
94965
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
1/13/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/14/2015
1/15/2015
1/15/2015
1/15/2015
1/15/2015
1/15/2015
1/15/2015
1/15/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/16/2015
1/17/2015
1/17/2015
1/17/2015
1/17/2015
1/17/2015
1/18/2015
1/19/2015
1/19/2015
1/19/2015
Barbara and Tom Day
Mitchell Brown
James McKibben
Kenneth Johnson
John Ferrell
Marcy Webb
Kathy Essick
Teresa Holt
Phillip Fleishman
Alexia Cloutier
John Mount
elly gibbs
Sarah Slaughter
Loey Montagne
Jane Dirkes
Peter Sapienza
Story Rafter
Mary Ann Levitt
Robert Iles
Marcy Pattinson
ralf nielsen
Mary Lyons
Robert Ferri
Herbert Verse
Mark Shafer
Marie Christine Kollock
Robert Bower
Vinton Freedley
Hannah Ellis
caroline leibert
Ellen Riaboff
Carol Martin
Stephen Berg
Marten Mejstrik
Shirley Ellis
David Smith
Cyndi Wheeler
Gary Wilkinson
Amaury Gallisa
William Brown
Patricia Brown
Creazzi Marjorie
Andy and lisa Eggler
Randi Harry
missy johnson
Elaine Sorensen
Jamey Harrison
Marblehead Massachusetts
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Highland Park Illinois
Sausalito
California
Calistoga
California
Mill Valley
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Greenbrae
California
San Mateo
California
Mill Valley
California
Mill ValleyUnited States 1/25/2015
Sausalito
California
San Carlos
California
San Rafael
California
Mill Valley
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Redwood City California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
San Rafael
California
94903‐103United States 1/25/2015
Sausalito
California
Santa Rosa
California
Sausalito
California
Corte Madera California
Damas
Oregon
San Clemente California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
connellsvile
Pennsylvania
Evanston
Indiana
Gadsden
Alabama
Tina Marie Szopinski‐Rubin
Rhonda Graves
Ashley Figueroa
Amy Smith
Daniel Engel
ryan hebert
Matthew Pearce
Ashley Hamner
paula sulls
GARY & RUTH THOMPSON
Roland Kelly
Melissa Middleton
mario Leon Castañon
Donna Roberson
terrence Mccarthy
Rachel foster
Suanne Weber Kiss
ANGELENA OPIE
Julia Dyll
Jessica Wells
Pamela Joyce
Jennifer Bondarevich
Teresa Garcia
YAJAHRA VARGAS
Robert Wilkins
Chris Ingalls
Ronan Noonan
Rosa Quijandria
Jake Sally
Penny Parish‐Brown
Larry McClendon
Kay Thomas
Laura Flowers
Andrea Higgins
david thomas
Marcia F. McGuire
Dr. Douglas Kerr
Sandra Anselm
Karen Friedrichs
Linda Censorio
Gia Abbinanti
Linda Anderson
Jayne Grine
Mike Toppi
Marion Lent
Jordan Brazie
Pippa Anderson
Scottsdale
Arizona
Fort Worth
Texas
Paterson
New Jersey
Portland
Oregon
San Rafael
California
broussard
Louisiana
Edgewood
New Mexico
Fargo
North Dakota
Warsaw
Missouri
CHINO
California
Avery
Texas
Pennington Ga Virginia
Mesquite
Texas
Lake Alfred
Florida
Fort Worth
Texas
Trussville
Alabama
Huntsville
Alabama
LAKE HAVASU CArizona
Buffalo
New York
hudson
Indiana
Houston
Texas
Three Rivers Michigan
Timberville
Virginia
BUFFALO
New York
Sausalito
California
San francisco California
Dallas
Texas
West Palm Bea Florida
Los Angeles
California
Hubbard
Ohio
Saint Louis
Missouri
Twinsburg
Ohio
Dearborn
Michigan
Mill Creek
Washington
granbury
Texas
Mira Loma
California
Larkspur
California
Westland
Michigan
San Diego
California
Attleboro
Massachusetts
Chicago
Illinois
GLASTONBURY Connecticut
Fremont
Ohio
Philadelphia Pennsylvania
Amenia
New York
Dayton
Ohio
San Rafael
California
85250
76110
7503
97220
94901
70518
87015
58078
65355
91710
75554
24277
75187
33850
76126
35173
35810
86406
14227
46747
77043
49093
22853
14211
94965
94122
75206
33406
90027
44425
63115
44087
48124
98012
76048
91752
94939
48185
92117
2703
60630
6033
43420
19145
12501
45415
94901
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
Fred McClaine
Deepa Thomas
Andrew Mould
Jack Mullin
Carol Avis
marlo seligman
Stan Sherman
Carolyn Zaroff
Mary Henry de Tessan
James McCarty
chris armitage
Shelley Markov
William Cross
Gerald St. Germaine
Florence Oliver
Mary Esterline
Ell Umbra
Chrystala Louchios
bridget rodasky
Rocky Wave
DeShunda Mitchell
theresa matthews
Ann Lynch‐Oasen
Christopher Sibley
James Rice
jessy kadmaer
Ron Reeberg
Jen Cranne
reina lichtman
Kyle Shope
kari mathias couch
Nelda Percival
Danielle Dishy
Gina Drake
Linda Linderman
Greg Brockway
Patricia Thomas
LuCy Johnsen
Ador Escobal
irena kleiner
Debbe Espejo
Charles Woodliff
Eri Oura
Cindie Tashima
Barbara Vieira
erve miller
Phyllis Huang
94966 United States
94108 United States
Sausalito
California
94965 United States
Sausalito
California
94965 United States
Fairfax
California
94930 United States
Sausalito
California
94965 United States
Greenbrae
California
94904 United States
Sausalito
California
94965 United States
Sausalito
California
94965 United States
Lafayette
California
94549 United States
Midvale
Utah
84047 United States
Scottsdale
Arizona
85254 United States
Dayton
Ohio
45434 United States
El Paso
Texas
79901 United States
Pearl City
Hawaii
96782 United States
Lykens
Pennsylvania
17048 United States
Waskom
Texas
75692 United States
Chicago
Illinois
606047 United States
kennewick
Washington
99338 United States
Encinitas
California
92024 United States
Columbia
South Carolina 29223‐861United States
Golden Beach Virgin Islands
3851 United States
Madison
Wisconsin
53716 United States
Los Angeles
California
90056 United States
Ball Ground Georgia
30107 United States
Hoogwoud
New Hampshire 1718 mn United States
Rio Linda
California
95673 United States
Los Angeles
California
90048 United States
spring Valley New York
10977 United States
Egg Harbor TowNew Jersey
8234 United States
Thornton
Colorado
80229 United States
Roach,
Missouri
65787 United States
Springfield
New Jersey
7081 United States
Ventura
California
93003 United States
Phoenix,
Arizona
85051 United States
Los Lunas
New Mexico
87031 United States
Yacolt
Washington
98675 United States
Los Angeles
California
91306 United States
Cerritos
California
90703 United States
SCHWEIZ
South Carolina
8867 United States
Chicago
Illinois
60625 United States
Cornelia
Georgia
30531 United States
Honolulu
Hawaii
96818 United States
SAn Anselmo California
94960 United States
Staten Island New York
10312 United States
washington
District of Colum
20020 United States
Lafayette
Louisiana
70506 United States
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
1/26/2015
Karen Redd
Amir Fogel
CAROL PETERS
lara sikora
elie khoury
Sharolyn steinberg
Eduardo Cozano
JOSE A. GIL
gavin higgins
Gina Okolisan
Arielle Bernstein
Jesse Taylor
Ashley c
Debbie Rinaldi
William Nietzold
Mary Nelson
Olivia Booth
Tia Byrd
Marisa Bassin
MARIA LUZ WILHELM
Shirley Bates
Robert Obrien
Paul Springston
Christi Graham
Melinda Meitz
Donald Krohn
Bruce Belding
William Beling
Alice Cochran
Regina Viets
Sarah Petrilla
claudia kelly
eugene gillis
Michael Whelden
Sandra Bushmaker
Katherine Doran
jim michaelsen
Grace Knight
Jann Johnson
Robert Hobart
Linda Antonini
Michele Benjamin
ELAINE MROBINETTE
Jack Walker
Betty Thomas
Phillip Berry
Patricia Hostetler
Little Rock
Arkansas
amherst
Massachusetts
Riverside
California
concord
Ohio
Greenbush
Virginia
Waverly
New York
Los Angeles
California
West Haven Connecticut
Middleburg
Florida
Leonidas
Michigan
Playa del Rey California
Franklin
Massachusetts
Los Angeles
California
Bedford
New York
Blacksburg
Virginia
Virginia Beac Virginia
New York
New York
NEW SMYRNA Florida
Royal Oak
Michigan
santiago
Mississippi
I dont hav United States 1/26/2015
Walnut Creek California
Sausalito
California
Springdale
Arkansas
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Petaluma
California
San Rafael
California
Sausalito
California
Ross
California
Sausalito
California
Mill Valley
California
Sausalito
California
Dallas
Texas
75204‐340United States 1/26/2015
Sausalito
California
Santa Rosa
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Colfax
California
Sausalito
California
Novato
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Placerville
California
Canton
Ohio
44705‐445United States 1/27/2015
Veronica Bossart
Sylvia Supe
ashley hansford
Calvin Brown
paul gagie
Jacqueline Plevier
karen donofrio
Brian Reynolds
Leslie Shatkin
Cassandra hester
Brenda McCants
Kelley Kobey Webster
aastha arora
judy melchor
MICHAEL TOOBERT
nikki woolums
michele flanagan
Darla Hassanein
mike cowley
Amy Perrin
Dallas Kadel
Jess b
jackie Mitchell
Lola Schiefelbein
Tara Cimini
dan cappello
Rebecca B. Reeves
carrie bailey
Rosemary J. Stanek
Kari Patrick
Ann Reck
bhawana pandey
Annette Figueroa
Ashley Lane
Charisa Couch
Stephanie kalka
Wendy Shuman
FRANKLIN MCINTYRE
homer myers
Jennifer Nolan
Christopher Debelius
Brenda 5
Emily Riddell
Dennis Gagarin
Stuart Riddell
Michael Morrow
Doug Lloyd
Las Vegas
Nevada
Cincinnati
Ohio
Hampton
Virginia
Wilmington
North Carolina
montrose AnguColorado
Almere
Nebraska
Philadelphia Pennsylvania
Atlantic City New Jersey
Buffalo
New York
Newark
New Jersey
detroit
Michigan
Decatur
Georgia
delhi
Delaware
Freeport
Illinois
GRASS VALLEY California
muncie
Indiana
Hendersonville Tennessee
Tulsa
Oklahoma
edinburgh
Hawaii
Claremont
New Hampshire
Minneapolis Minnesota
Portland
Oregon
Rutland
Ohio
Richland
Washington
Providence
Rhode Island
lawrence
Pennsylvania
Columbia
South Carolina
Mount Joy
Pennsylvania
Tenants HarborMaine
Spotsylvania Virginia
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
Phoenix
Arizona
largo
Florida
King
North Carolina
Harpster
Ohio
Abingdon
Maryland
Columbia
Pennsylvania
EPPING
New Hampshire
Columbus
Georgia
Newtonville Massachusetts
Rio Rancho
New Mexico
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
Sausalito
California
89120 United States
45255 United States
23669 United States
28401 United States
32458 United States
1335TP United States
19104 United States
8401 United States
14221 United States
7105 United States
48228 United States
30032 United States
88 United States
61032 United States
47303 United States
37075 United States
74128 United States
eh6 7bg United States
3743 United States
55407 United States
97219 United States
45775 United States
99352 United States
2909 United States
15055 United States
29223 United States
17552 United States
22553 United States
15217 United States
85083 United States
33771 United States
27021 United States
43323 United States
21009 United States
17512 United States
3042 United States
31904 United States
2460 United States
87174 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
Lisa Simon
William Wamsley
John kibler
Darin Koster
Jean Comerford
Patty Bacon
Cris Hammond
Linda Hammond
Steve Fugsro
JEFFREY COHEN
caren vandenbosch
Crickett Weaver
Laura Wais
Russell Croce
laura roebuck
William Meehan
Susan Moritz
Barbara Rich
imok cha
joan procter
Sela Seleska
carnet williams
Alfred Nucifora
wendy jawor
DelRae Roth
Valerie Shore
Dunya Fraser
Joe Paulino
Patricia Ter Heun
Kate Firestone
Raymond Swanson
Doug Searson
Joan Werner
Joseph Gaul
Thomas Hofmann
James Kyle
Janet Chapman
JEAN‐LOUIS VANDENBOSCH
Elaine Thorne
George Cneh
Kristine Moore
mary sherman
Temple Stuart
Russ Frederickson
William Wamsley
Joseph Dunnigan
Nanci Croy
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
소살리토
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Novato
Sausalito
Greenbrae
Sausalito
Sausalito
Mill Valley
San Anselmo
Sausalito
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
94965
94941
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94941
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94941
94965
94965
94965
94965
94941
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94965
94966
94965
94965
94965
94941
94949
94965
94904
94965
94965
94941
94960
94965
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
1/27/2015
1/28/2015
1/28/2015
1/28/2015
1/28/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/29/2015
1/30/2015
1/30/2015
1/30/2015
1/30/2015
1/31/2015
2/1/2015
2/2/2015
2/3/2015
2/5/2015
2/5/2015
2/5/2015
2/5/2015
2/6/2015
2/6/2015
2/6/2015
2/6/2015
2/7/2015
2/9/2015
2/9/2015
2/9/2015
2/10/2015
2/10/2015
2/14/2015
3/1/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
Meeta Holla
Anthony Cameron
jeannine bray
Linda Burgess
Brook Smith
Shelley Williams
Kim Stewart
GRANVILLE ELAM
Kate Ireland
Steven Gibbs
Michael Moss
SANDRA CHAPMAN‐BURSON
Douglas Ward
Diane and Jerry Tabbott
Barbara Zdarsky
Chris Drumright
Eric Edwards
Jay Rice
Tara Verbridge
Gary Gilardi
Henry Weinberg
Constance George
Joel Finley
Debra Armani
Linda Umans
jody newman
Gayle Edelman‐Tolchin
Marnie Gaede
Ruth Olafsdottir
Jaszmene Smith
Maryann LaNew
Raquel Vargas
Clifford Terry
gloria hanson
kelly Henley
Susan Brubeck
Blair roman
BARBARA H KNOWLES
Penelope Hammond
Barbara Kavanagh
Sausalito
Sausalito
felton
Santa Monica
Pekin
Endwell
LA
Tiptonville
Mount Shasta
Sugar Land
Warren
Humble
Gloversville
Jacksonville
Anoka
Murfreesboro
West Chicago
Novato
Windsor
Hood River
Santa Barbara
New York
Ogdensburg
Los Angeles
New York
Durango
Boca Raton
La Canada
Santa Monica
Millville
San Clemente
Elizabethport
Knoxville
burbank
Pevely
Sausalito
Mill Valley
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
California
California
California
California
Illinois
New York
California
Tennessee
California
Texas
Michigan
Texas
New York
Florida
Minnesota
Tennessee
Illinois
California
Oregon
Oregon
California
New York
New York
California
New York
Colorado
Florida
California
California
New Jersey
California
New Jersey
Tennessee
California
Missouri
California
California
California
California
California
94965 United States
94965 United States
95018 United States
90409 United States
61554 United States
13760 United States
90029 United States
38079 United States
96067 United States
77479 United States
48091 United States
77396 United States
12078 United States
32211 United States
37130 United States
60185 United States
94947 United States
47734 United States
97031 United States
93110 United States
10001 United States
13669 United States
91423 United States
10025 United States
81301 United States
33498 United States
81011 United States
90403 United States
8332 United States
92637 United States
7206 United States
37928 United States
91505 United States
63070 United States
94965 United States
94942 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
94965 United States
3/2/2015
3/2/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
3/3/2015
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tammy Blanchard [tammyblanchard@gmail.com]
dcox@bwslaw.com; Lilly Schinsing; Bill Werner
Fwd: Current ferry landing in disrepair
IMG_3611.JPG
Hi all
this is the other email that I sent on the 5th...no idea why these did not go through
This Photo was taken from the deck of the Sausalito Yacht Club of which I am a member. To my knowledge,
the GG District has never contacted the SYC to discuss the impact that this project will have on the view and
privacy of the club.
---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Tammy Blanchard <tammyblanchard@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:00 PM
Subject: Fwd: Current ferry landing in disrepair
To:
Hi Lilly
please forward this email and the attached photo to the Sausalito Planning Commissioners and Historic Landmarks Board for
review, prior to the March 11 meeting regarding the Sausalito Ferry terminal expansion.
Dear commissioners and Board Members,
Please consider that the photo attached is of the current ferry landing which is only about 17 years old. It is in terrible disrepair and speaks to
the lack of care and maintenance given to this important GG asset.


Can you imagine what the proposed new HUGE ferry terminal will look like in just a few short years?
do we really want a huge deteriorating ferry terminal like this in the middle of our lovely quaint down town?
-- concerned,
Tammy Blanchard
(831) 332-7744
-Regards,
1
Tammy Blanchard
(831) 332-7744
2
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Thomas E. Pallante [tompallante@sbcglobal.net]
Lilly Schinsing
Proposed new ferry dock
Ms. Schinsing,
My wife and I were at the meeting last evening, but did not get a chance to ask any
questions and had to leave at 8:30pm. We have at least one question.
Why is the concrete dock double sides (ferries can dock on either side as we saw it), if
only one ferry can unload at one time any way? Seems to us that dock could be made
smaller by eliminating one docking side. Also ferries are planned to have two larger
doors on both sides, so ferry could be docked bow in or stern in at any time.
Thank you,
Tom Pallante
1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
TOM RICHARDS [trichards0445@me.com]
Friday, March 13, 2015 7:32 PM
Lilly Schinsing
I commute to and from the city daily using Golden Gate Ferry. The ferry landing is frequently very crowded and seems small and inadequate. I am in favor of an improved ferry landing. Sent from my iPhone 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Neil [items123@gmail.com]
Saturday, March 14, 2015 4:08 AM
Lilly Schinsing
Fwd: Two things as I start. 1. These 2 Committees are 80% uninformed of what the
constituents ofl Sausalito's Public think. 2. Your all talking as if this is a done deal! We need
to slow this all down and ask ourselves.... Do we need and want this? New...
c/o Lilly Schinsing, for the Joint Historic Landmarks and Planning Commission Boards
It has been suggested by Vicki that I forward my comments to you to be included in the
joint board members packets. Unfortunately I only got through speaking half of my
notes written during the March 11th joint board meeting in the 3 minutes allotted to me.
This is my complete set of talking points written on my smartphone during the meeting.
Time flies when your having fun.
To: The Joint Historic Landmarks and Planning Commission Board Members and the
Public.
Two things as I start
come to mind.
1.
In the poll of Commissioners as to prior Public contact regarding these issues, I find
t
he
two
Committee
's
members
are 80% uninformed of what the constituents of Sausalito's Public think.
2. Your all talking as if this is a done deal! We need to slow this all down and ask ourselves.... Do we need
or even
want this New Ferry Terminal
?
I'm amazed at how similar this is to the beginnings of the New Public Safety Building way back in time.
Mauro Dosolini
, former Founder of Cafe Divino, current Founder and Owner of Sausalito Seahorse
and I started
1
Proposition N
O ON B to block the ugly monstrosity that a small committee,
out of touch with the Residents wishes
,
wanted to implement for a new Public Safety Building.
By Public poll of the 10 Commissioners at the start of this meeting, it became painfully
obvious that only 2 of the 10 Commissioners had more than a modecum of interaction
with the Public on these issues. To my eyes, that is shocking! How on Earth can a
Public Committee aid the People to govern Sausalito if they are 80%
uninformed of the Citizen's wishes?
My feeling is, that like the earlier Public Safety Building fiasco, this proposed
structure is
[
1
] Too big
[
2
] Too ugly
[
3
] Too expensive
1. Too Big. Sooner or later, somehow someone will bring in more and bigger passenger boats with 3 times as (3
million) many tourists and 3 times as many bicycles.
2.
Too Ugly. Just like the Public Safety building was ugly and didn't fit the Beauty of Sausalito, so too is this
structure.
3.
Too expensive. When you spend this kind of money, and have this kind of size, sooner or later the container
Will be filled.
Filled with what? Millions of more Tourists!
Do you want to live in Sausalito if the Tourist population goes to 3 million, to 5 million, to 15 million
Tourists per year? ?
If we need to have another NO on B type issue then so be it! We've done it before and we'll do it again but we'd
Really rather our Elected Officials through these 2 Committees fulfill the wishes of the Residents, those
that vote them in or out of Office, and not just the Downtown merchants who do pay their share of tax, but
don't Govern the town.
2
WE THE PEOPLE GOVERN SAUSALITO AND DON'T EVER FORGET THAT!!!
Sincerely,
Neil Whitelaw
408 Bee Street, Sausalito, CA
Resident, Voter, Philosopher of 48 years come April 1, 2015 in Sausalito
UNCONDITIONAL HAPPINESS is but a State of Mind.
You Could Choose to be Joyous and Happy this very Moment, and not wait until tomorrow.
It's Entirely your Choices of the way you Think, Act and has nothing to do with external events. It's Entirely in
Your hands.
Be Quietly Joyous at All Times. Be Harmless in All Things.
more good things happen at:
www.creativegroup.org
3
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Patty Bacon [pbacon@pacbell.net]
Sunday, March 15, 2015 7:38 PM
Lilly Schinsing
Proposed Ferry Landing - Critical Next Step: Landside Plan Integration
Dear Ms. Schinsing, Essential Integration of Water and Land Side Plan Now After learning at the March 11th meeting that ferries will be modified to go from one 4 foot door to two 8 foot doors, quadrupling the number of people disgorged into the parking lot, it is mind boggling that an integrated water and landside plan has not been presented. The current egress condition is a tangled mess. How can four times the number of people coming off the dock be a solution to anything? This must be addressed now before going further. The commercial design of the dock of course remains an equally high priority. Proper Public Meeting Space The City must provide proper meeting space such as the Bay Model, so all residents can hear and provide comments – last week’s conditions were unacceptable in spite of an extremely well‐run meeting. Would you please pass on these comments to the Historic Landmarks Board, Planning Commission and City Council? Thank you. Sincerely, Patty Bacon 17 Sunshine Ave. Sausalito, CA 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Barry Hoffner [barryh822@aol.com]
Lilly Schinsing
Re: Ferry Landing Project Update
As a longtime resident of Sausalito, I am still very disappointed on how the discussion has focused, almost entirely, on the actual design of the new Ferry Landing, versus the rational and justification for the Ferry Landing in the first place... I cannot support any new design whatsoever until the City Council first deals with the "elephant in the room", all the bicycle traffic and possibly more in the future.... Otherwise, I feel like the City is trying to ram a new Ferry Landing down our throats, which has the potential to permanently change the character of our town...If more thought, info and data would be put into the reasons and justification for a new Ferry Landing and how to deal with the bicycle traffic with/without a new design, I would then be willing to listen to new ideas for the design. Barry Hoffner Resident of Sausalito since 1992 On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Lilly Schinsing wrote: Below you will find a link to this week's Sausalito Currents in which the first article will bring you up to date on
the status of the Ferry Landing Project. If you have any questions regarding this topic, please contact Lilly Schinsing at lschinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us. Click the link to read the Currents article: For more information on the Ferry Landing Project please visit www.sausalitoferrylanding.org (and if you enjoy
reading the balance of the Currents, please remember that you can sign up and receive this information on a
weekly basis - the link to signing up for the Currents can be found on the City's homepage www.ci.sausalito.ca.us) Lilly Schinsing Administrative Analyst Administration Department City of Sausalito | 420 Litho St. Sausalito CA 94965 phone: 415.289.4134 email: LSchinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Joe Paulino [joe@4joe.com]
Monday, March 16, 2015 7:05 PM
Lilly Schinsing
New Ferry Landing Proposal
Dear Ms Schinsing, I have seen the design for the new Sausalito Ferry Landing as proposed by the Bridge District. It is so obvious to me that the designers of this massively out‐of‐scale proposal will not be having to live with it in their backyard once the construction is completed. I don't think I need to remind you or our City Council that Sausalito is a SMALL TOWN! In a place like ours, SIZE and SCALE MATTER! The proposed construction looks like they took the large, Industrial Strength landing at McCovey Cove at AT&T Park and without any thought, concern, or imagination, simply grafted it onto our shoreline. To me this is both wrong and ridiculous. But then, I just live here, and have for over 20 years. I am shocked and offended at what I have heard about how both our Council and the District want to limit resident input about this proposed expansion. I do not believe that the new design is good for the City or for those who live here. To me, it is enabling the destruction of the very character of this city that brought many of us here in the first place. I have used the current landing many times over the years, and simply do not believe that an expansion of this scale is necessary or desirable. I ask that the powers that be strongly reconsider the size and scope of this proposed Ferry Landing, and respect what this city stands for enough to come up with a design that is more in keeping with the small‐town feel and character of the city and its waterfront. Thank you for your consideration. Joe Paulino 1
Lilly Schinsing
Subject:
FW: Ferry Landing Project /BIKES - THE DANGERS OF RIDING IN SAUSALITO FOR 5-10
YEAR OLDS.
From: Margaret Collard [mailto:iapsf@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:30 PM
To: Lilly Schinsing
Cc: Barry Hoffner; Grover Dear; Margaret Collard; Navone George; Glynn Phillips; Anthony Collard
Subject: Ferry Landing Project /BIKES - THE DANGERS OF RIDING IN SAUSALITO FOR 5-10 YEAR OLDS.
Dear Lilly,
A dangerous issue re: 5-10 year old on bicycles on South Street , should be restricted to 12 years and up -this
will eliminate quite a number of bikes.
Really scary to see these small children riding down the curvy hills . I am sure parents are not aware of the
dangers when renting bikes from San Francisco.We are all uncomfortable driving through Sausalito during the
day , afraid to hitting the bikers so we don't shop or enjoy our City.
Thank you for working with the residents of Sausalito, we appreciate your cooperation.
.
Regards,
Margaret Collard
p.s. also need to discuss the high cost of the renovation of the ferry terminal - potential hike of
$10.00 for bridge toll ? any excuse to raise the toll by the Golden Gate Bridge Board ( most
live in the City - is it true they all have free passes...why??? we would be prisoners in Marin if
the toll gets any higher )
67 San Carlos Ave
Sausalito.
1
From: Barry Hoffner [mailto:barryh822@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 9:29 PM
To: Lilly Schinsing
Subject: Re: Ferry Landing Project Update
Lilly:
Further to my point below on the "elephant in the room" being the massive
influx of bicycles being a big part of the supposed need to increase the
size and scope of the Ferry Landing project....an issue which should
be prioritized for resolution above and beyond the Ferry Landing itself...
Yesterday, on my way back from a bike ride from our lovely town of
Sausalito to the Marin headlands, I was stopped by a firetruck
and two police cars which were dealing with a bicycle accident for
the second day in a row....I saw that the bikes, on both days, were
rental bikes...ie. likely tourists coming from SF.....It would be nice
to know how much of our town's expenses go to dealing with
issues like and this....and if the Ferry Landing is increased in size
and scope, how many more of these accidents our small town
will have to deal with.
Barry Hoffner
Longtime Sausalito Resident
On Mar 16, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Lilly Schinsing wrote:
Thank you for your correspondence. It will be included in the public record for this project. I’ve ensured you
are on my e-distribution list where you’ll receive notifications from me regarding upcoming meetings and how
to submit comments. In the meantime, you can find more information at www.sausalitoferrylanding.org.
Sincerely,
Lilly Schinsing
Administrative Analyst
Administration Department
City of Sausalito | 420 Litho St. Sausalito CA 94965
phone: 415.289.4134
email: LSchinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us
From: Barry Hoffner [mailto:barryh822@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:42 AM
2
To: Lilly Schinsing
As a longtime resident of Sausalito, I am still very disappointed on how the discussion
has focused, almost entirely, on the actual design of the new Ferry Landing, versus the
rational and justification for the Ferry Landing in the first place...
I cannot support any new design whatsoever until the City Council first deals with
the "elephant in the room", all the bicycle traffic and possibly more in the future....
Otherwise, I feel like the City is trying to ram a new Ferry Landing down our throats,
which has the potential to permanently change the character of our town...If more
thought, info and data would be put into the reasons and justification for a new
Ferry Landing and how to deal with the bicycle traffic with/without a new design,
I would then be willing to listen to new ideas for the design.
Barry Hoffner
Resident of Sausalito since 1992
On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Lilly Schinsing wrote:
Below you will find a link to this week's Sausalito Currents in which the first article will bring you up to date on
the status of the Ferry Landing Project.
If you have any questions regarding this topic, please contact Lilly Schinsing at lschinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us.
Click the link to read the Currents article:
For more information on the Ferry Landing Project please visit www.sausalitoferrylanding.org (and if you enjoy
weekly basis - the link to signing up for the Currents can be found on the City's homepage www.ci.sausalito.ca.us)
Lilly Schinsing
Administrative Analyst
Administration Department
City of Sausalito | 420 Litho St. Sausalito CA 94965
phone: 415.289.4134
email: LSchinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us
3
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Barry Hoffner [barryh822@aol.com]
Tuesday, March 17, 2015 6:29 AM
Lilly Schinsing
Re: Ferry Landing Project Update
Lilly:
Further to my point below on the "elephant in the room" being the massive
influx of bicycles being a big part of the supposed need to increase the
size and scope of the Ferry Landing project....an issue which should
be prioritized for resolution above and beyond the Ferry Landing itself...
Yesterday, on my way back from a bike ride from our lovely town of
Sausalito to the Marin headlands, I was stopped by a firetruck
and two police cars which were dealing with a bicycle accident for
the second day in a row....I saw that the bikes, on both days, were
rental bikes...ie. likely tourists coming from SF.....It would be nice
to know how much of our town's expenses go to dealing with
issues like and this....and if the Ferry Landing is increased in size
and scope, how many more of these accidents our small town
will have to deal with.
Barry Hoffner
Longtime Sausalito Resident
On Mar 16, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Lilly Schinsing wrote:
Thank you for your correspondence. It will be included in the public record for this project. I’ve ensured you are
on my e-distribution list where you’ll receive notifications from me regarding upcoming meetings and how to
submit comments. In the meantime, you can find more information at www.sausalitoferrylanding.org. Sincerely, Lilly Schinsing Administrative Analyst Administration Department City of Sausalito | 420 Litho St. Sausalito CA 94965 phone: 415.289.4134 email: LSchinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us From: Barry Hoffner [mailto:barryh822@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:42 AM
To: Lilly Schinsing
Subject: Re: Ferry Landing Project Update As a longtime resident of Sausalito, I am still very disappointed on how the discussion has focused, almost entirely, on the actual design of the new Ferry Landing, versus the rational and justification for the Ferry Landing in the first place... 1
I cannot support any new design whatsoever until the City Council first deals with the "elephant in the room", all the bicycle traffic and possibly more in the future.... Otherwise, I feel like the City is trying to ram a new Ferry Landing down our throats, which has the potential to permanently change the character of our town...If more thought, info and data would be put into the reasons and justification for a new Ferry Landing and how to deal with the bicycle traffic with/without a new design, I would then be willing to listen to new ideas for the design. Barry Hoffner Resident of Sausalito since 1992 On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Lilly Schinsing wrote: Below you will find a link to this week's Sausalito Currents in which the first article will bring you up to date on
the status of the Ferry Landing Project. If you have any questions regarding this topic, please contact Lilly Schinsing at lschinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us. Click the link to read the Currents article: For more information on the Ferry Landing Project please visit www.sausalitoferrylanding.org (and if you enjoy
weekly basis - the link to signing up for the Currents can be found on the City's homepage www.ci.sausalito.ca.us) Lilly Schinsing Administrative Analyst Administration Department City of Sausalito | 420 Litho St. Sausalito CA 94965 phone: 415.289.4134 email: LSchinsing@ci.sausalito.ca.us 2
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Barbara Nelson [tendingrowth@earthlink.net]
Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:49 PM
Lilly Schinsing
Linda Pfeifer; Joan Cox
Ferry Landing Resident Opinion
Dear Lillie, After last night's meeting I have my suggestions to offer: Reduce the walkway by half, Include an artist who understands Sausalito in a re‐design. Use the #3 gate design with the single post (if no one comes up with anything better), Research other good designs of bridges and landings, and/or copy the color and railing design of the Capilano suspension bridge in Vancouver. Explain the necessity of accommodating boats on both sides, especially if this adds to the bulk. And finally, take seriously the idea of a van dropping off cyclists and picking up their bikes before they get down into town. Our little village is tiny compared to most and we can and must require creative solutions for everyone's safety. Thank you. Barbara Nelson a 50 year resident 1
RICHARD GRAEF
300 NAPA ST
03.17.2015
SAUSALITO CA 94965 415 332 9390
Page 1 of 2
Lilly Schinsing
City of Sausalito
Re: Ferry Landing
Hello Lilly,
Thank you and the City for hosting the PC/HLB study session regarding the proposed Ferry
Landing project. It was lively and informative. Following are some of my views based on what
I learned at the meeting:
I agree that the shoreside development should be included in the overall plan for the ferry
landing complex, including locations of ticket vending, bike & vehicle parking etc.
It seems clear that the existing landing needs to be upgraded, generally along the lines
proposed. If the overall size can be reduced without compromising function then it should be.
However, some seating in the queue areas would be an advantage for older passengers or
those with disabilities. Perhaps this could be done somehow without the “belvederes”.
The truss system is probably the most efficient and practical method to span the 90 ft. required.
I favor the lowered curve option but the flat truss might have less visual impact from shoreside,
however it would most likely be denser as was pointed out.
Overall, colors would have much less visual impact if they were relatively dark. That is not to
say that color has to be dull. Golden Gate Bridge red might be an option for the truss.
Galvanized steel color for the truss would most likely have to be painted, as large welded
structures would be difficult if not impossible to galvanize. It could work well for the guardrails
as they can be galvanized in sections. Guardrail treatment should be consistent landside.
I don’t see that there would be much advantage to making the gate perpendicular to the
shoreline nor do I see how that could be done with the current plan. If the curved truss is used,
the gate with the curved top might be appropriate (not the roof version). Otherwise the “simple
gate” approach would be fine. The gates are shown in two different location options. At this
point I don’t have an opinion about that and see it as an operational / public access issue.
The vertical pickets shown for the guardrail seem most appropriate and practical. Rounded top
rails might discourage birds from landing on them.
Blocking of views does not seem to be a major issue from what I see on the drawings and
renderings. There are many splendid views from all around the area.
Looking forward to those “story buoys” . . .
03.17.15
R. Graef
Lilly Schinsing / Ferry Landing
Page 2
Regarding the Historic District, I don’t think any attempt ought to be made to make the landing
look “historic”, whatever that may mean. It is a functional facility and the industrial esthetic
should prevail in keeping with the tradition of our working waterfront. As long as the overall look
and feel of the project is kept straightforward and in good taste I think this facility will be
appropriate for its purpose and will not detract from Sausalito’s village ambiance.
Thanks again, Richard
William Versaci
STUDIO VERSACI
265 Currey Lane
Sausalito
California 94965
bill@studioversaci.com
18 March 2015
Joan Cox, Chair, Sausalito Planning Commission
John McCoy, Chair, Historic Landmarks Board
420 Litho Street
Sausalito, California 94965
Re: Sausalito Ferry Landing Expansion Proposal
Dear Ms. Cox and Mr. McCoy;
I attended the Commission and Board’s joint hearing on March 11 to see the Golden Gate Bridge
District’s presentation, and listen to both your and the public’s comments on the developer’s
proposal to expand the Sausalito Ferry Landing.
I strongly support the developer’s intention to replace the existing deficiently designed, poorly
functioning and shoddily maintained facility. I accept the District’s assumptions about ridership and
turn-around time on which the proposed design is based, however flawed they may appear.
Regardless of whether any of us believes their projections, expansion of the facility is necessary and
it should be designed to handle a maximum capacity for as long a service life as possible, hopefully
well beyond the District’s projected 20-year timeframe, in order to preclude any more expansions
in the foreseeable future. Growth and change are inevitable, particularly with Sausalito’s attraction
to tourists, and must be accommodated and planned for regardless of whether it is desirable or not.
The engineering of the proposed facility and its design are professionally sound based on the
District’s assumptions. Both the existing structure and its proposed replacement are quasi-industrial
transit facilities, and should not be “softened” with inappropriate materials, embellished with false
historicism, or functionally impaired or derailed by NIMBY concerns.
That said, many aspects of the design of the proposed facility are unnecessary or inappropriate to
this setting. Both the proposed design and the District’s process show a disregard and disrespect of
this small community’s legitimate concerns. Many of these issues could easily be rectified without
undermining the functionality or basic design of the proposed structure.
I have personal concerns with, and have some proposed solutions for the most obvious design
deficiencies. All of these were addressed by board members and community representatives at the
hearing. My comments are keyed to the illustrations in the developer’s submission to BCDC on
the following pages, which have not been made available for the Sausalito community to see:
•
Most simply, the superstructure should not be painted white, but should be painted a
neutral color that blends into the background (as shown on the following page) or better,
given the District’s poor maintenance of the existing facility, should be made of unpainted
weathering finishes like the existing galvanized handrails.
1
The gate proposed to BCDC was oriented oblique to the shoreline, but as presented to
Sausalito is directly frontal viewed from the shoreline. Regardless, it should be placed as
District’s proposed white painted color scheme (from BCDC submission)
Same view with neutral gray or galvanized finishes
As close to the shore as possible, where it would blend into the existing background buildings, with
no framing structure, in order to minimize its visibility. It should be noted that the gates are left
open throughout the day and evening, and are unrelated to the control of the passenger waiting
line or egress during the ferries’ hours of operation. There is no apparent reason why the gate
could not be located at the end of the Landside Pier (where it is now), There is no reason why it
should impede public access to the pier in this location if the opening were the full width of the
pier.
Using no grates would make the gate more transparent, but not affect its security. Making each of
the gate openings half the width of the pier, folding flat against the handrails, would facilitate access
2
Issues and Proposed Solutions
1
2
3
4
5
6
Relocate gate, design for transparency, and use neutral color to minimize visibility from Landside.
Remove belvedere from Landside.
Lower and straighten top chords and use neutral color on gangway trusses to minimize visibility.
What will temporary access pier look like and how long will it be there?
Who owns the property under the proposed temporary gangway and float?
What Landside improvements are proposed by the City, and who will pay for them?
Who owns the property where the developer proposes to relocate Landside structures?
Developer’s Proposal (from BCDC submission)
3
Very long-span, lightweight aluminum gangways at a cruise ship terminal
Long-span “H” section steel bridge with handrail-height top chord and cables to provide walkway safety.
Unfinished aluminum marine gangway with round top rails and center truss
4
by both passengers and the public, and reduce the side (and center) supports to poles.
2
The developers claim they provided “belvederes” to answer the concerns of BCDC to
provide pubic access and views. There is no evidence that BCDC requested these, and
they appear to be a preemptive measure. Regardless, they increase the width of the Pier,
which is an overwhelming community concern. They also increase the “shadow” of the
pier, which BCDC considers to be “Bay fill”. The belvedere on the Landside looks back at
the City, not toward the Bay. The size and complexity of this projection has a major
impact on the appearance of the Pier from the shoreline. This could be mitigated by
straightening the pier edge and handrail, and eliminating the benches on the Landside. I
think they should be eliminated on both sides to improve bay views from the shoreline.
3
The arch on the gangway and the depth of its structure appear to be unjustified. There are
many examples of similar gangways in steel or lighter-weight weather-resistant aluminum
with straight top chords (see illustrations above) that contradict the developer’s claim their
truss depth is necessary. It appears that a 7 foot deep truss, extending 3 feet below the
walking surface (as in the current design) and 4 feet above it would be adequate to carry
the live and dead loads. If that depth is not sufficient, Board Member Morgan Pierce has
suggested adding a third, center truss (as shown in the third image) to carry the load.
4
No drawings or description are provided for the temporary pier that will be in service for
an undetermined time. This pier is far closer to the shoreline than the existing or projected
piers, and will have a greater visual impact than either. There is no suggestion of its design
or how long it may be under construction, in use, or being removed.
5
Who owns the property under the proposed temporary gangway and float (which I
assume will be the existing gangway and float relocated)? If it is owned by the City of
Sausalito, it has absolute control over whether or not this project can be built as shown.
6
What Landside improvements are proposed by the City? Who will pay for these
improvements, which are solely for the benefit the developer? Who owns the property
beneath the proposed relocated ferry facilities? What location criteria will be applied?
Many other community members have additional or different concerns, which may even contradict
my comments. In many cases these are the result of a legitimate suspicion of the developer, and a
perception that the City is not providing information because a political deal has already been
struck. I could find no information or illustrations on the project in a Google search or apparently
on the City’s website, including the video of the hearing you said would be available online.
If the Planning Commission is serious about wanting public input (positive or negative), a significant
outreach effort to the community is necessary beyond a small, informed, organized and vocal
opposition group. Without their flyer, I would not even be aware of this project, and would not
have known to attend the sole hearing where any information on the project has been available.
Thank you for your consideration of my concerns and ideas. I look forward to your April 1 hearing.
Sincerely,
cc: Concerned Residents and Neighbors of Sausalito
5
Lilly Schinsing
FW: Ferry Landing Project Update
Subject:
From: Sandra Macleod White [mailto:fashion_focus@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:05 PM
To: Lilly Schinsing
Hello Lilly, I thought I sent you something regarding a passenger/commuter shelter for the last meeting. Please include the following for the records: For 20 years I commuted to San Francisco on the Sausalito ferry, and it is a seriously a horrible experience waiting for the ferry during a storm of any kind: high winds, rain, fog, sea spray, or scorching hot sunny weather. Unfortunately, it's obvious that no one cares that Sausalito's commuters/tourists are the only Bay Area ferry passengers who must endure nature's harsh elements with no protection anywhere. In fact, Sausalito's ferry is the only ferry landing without any shelter in the Bay Area. How can that be? Seriously! I'll try to be at the next meeting. Thanks for responding. Sandra Macleod White Sent from my iPhone 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Juliana Whitten [julie_whitten@comcast.net]
Lilly Schinsing; Terry Sullivan
plans for Sausalito Ferry Terminal
To whom it may concern:
March 22, 2015
Sausalito’s spectacular natural beauty and the architecture which complements the
landscape create a peaceful, majestic atmosphere which calls to both residents and
visitors.
It is my opinion that the proposed entrance to Sausalito is clearly out of touch with
the environment in which it is envisioned. It seems to me at best incongruent for the
gateway to this natural paradise to be an intrusive, concrete, highly technical
futuristic design. It is short sighted.
From a feng sui point of view, it is a disaster which will lower the energetic
vibration of the community. Don’t we owe the future generations the same
magical atmosphere and serene beauty we enjoy today?
Marie Simmons, Sausalito resident for 42 years 1
Commentary on 1st Public Hearing on the Proposed Sausalito Ferry Landing
Summary
The first public hearing on the proposed Sausalito Ferry Landing project indicated that:
1) The Golden Gate Bridge District (GGBD) did a reasonably good job of displaying photos of the
proposed terminal and pointed to a few meaningful statistics regarding recent ridership. Like
any new project, “the devil is in the detail” as to whether such statistics constitute a
justification for proceeding with a new installation. This commentary includes a closer review
of the design parameters that were presented. This more detailed analysis indicates that a new
installation is ill-conceived and has little to no substantive justification.
2) Most residents were rightfully concerned with what they perceive to be a vastly oversized
new facility but were less focused on the justification for the proposed replacement terminal.
This was possibly due to the perception that has been created that this project is moving
forward regardless of clear and compelling rationale, but with some consideration towards
cosmetic appearance. I would hope that our City Council would have the wherewithal to stand
up and say NO to a substantially modified structure if there is inadequate justification for it.
Sausalito owns the land, leases it to the Bridge District, and has the right to approve or
disapprove of a project of this magnitude.
3) Rental bicycle ferry use is obviously not only the primary cause for delayed departures, but is
also the cause of what some residents described as “a giant mess” from their President’s Day
observations. The mess that has overflowed into the parking lot and onto Tracy Way during the
summer months is the result of inaction by some City Council members to stop the flood of
rental bikes from congesting the ferry landing plaza and our public streets and sidewalks.
4) The biggest drivers of this project appear to be: a) the Golden Gate Bridge District’s desire
that the ferry landing facility not constitute a bottleneck for rental bicyclists using the ferry for
returning their bikes to San Francisco, and b) the District’s apparently dogged determination to
utilize federal funds to build a new terminal in Sausalito regardless of whether there is
justification for it or not.
I urge the Planning Commission, the Historic Landmarks Board and the City Council to reject the
project in its entirety and to urgently deal with rental bicycle logistics. The focus should be on
requiring that, without impacting existing public transit of any kind, rental bike companies in
San Francisco be made responsible for trucking bikes back separately for those renters who are
unwilling or unable to ride them back to San Francisco. Any staging area set aside for bicycle
returns needs to be located such that it does not interfere with either resident or tourist access
to public streets and sidewalks. The number of rental bicyclists visiting Sausalito on a daily
basis may also need to be reviewed and even curtailed.
If the Sausalito Coalition can come up with a plan to eliminate rental bike returns via any public
transit service, this would decongest ferry loading/unloading and improve turnaround times
while still retaining bike renters as paying ferry passengers returning to San Francisco. The
Golden Gate Transit Bridge District could then use its own or outside engineering expertise to
come up with alternatives to repair and/or retrofit the existing terminal to extend its
serviceable life and reduce passenger loading times if that is deemed necessary. A more
detailed analysis of the new terminal’s design basis follows.
Ferry Schedule and Loading Delays
Apparently someone forgot to tell the GGBD’s representative that the desired ferry boat
turnaround time of 15 minutes already exists with the current schedule and the existing
terminal. It was hard to believe that the GGBD representative wasn’t made aware of the most
fundamental design basis element that was intended to provide a substantial part of the
justification for a new landing. The good news is that the ferry actually does run on schedule
for the vast majority of departures/arrivals. The times that I have witnessed delays have
primarily been attributed to ambling bicycle renters. Not to say that I blame them as they are
here for leisure and pleasure and not business for the most part. They are in no hurry to
embark or disembark a ferry boat which is supposed to be a relaxing, non-hurried experience in
itself for everyone who rides it. Ferry turnaround time is not an issue most of the time, and the
few times that ferry departures are delayed, untimely departures are either made up on the
water or are not a criteria that is vital to ridership enjoyment. If timely departures are
somehow truly deemed to be critical to the GGBD, ridding the ferry of rental bikes should be its
first priority and probably the only step necessary to resume 100% on time departures with the
current schedule.
Ferry Capacity
We currently have plenty of passenger boat carrying capacity as the Spalding class vessels are
capable of carrying ~740 passengers per trip plus a full 13 member crew. Sausalito has 9
departures and 9 arrivals during weekdays and 6 departures and 6 arrivals on weekends and
holidays. So for a weekday, the existing service can handle up to 13,320 passengers. For a
weekend day/holiday, the existing service can handle up to 8,880 passengers. These maximum
passenger counts indicate that on average, the ferry operated at only 14.6% of capacity during
FY2014 weekdays and 31.1% of capacity during FY2014 weekends/holidays. These percentages
are based on what the GGBD presented at the hearing which was an average of 1,944
passengers/weekday and 2,758 passengers/weekend day. Using the GGBD’s unrealistically high
(see comments under ridership growth) growth rate assumption of 4%/year, the existing
passenger boat carrying capacity should be adequate for another 47 years for weekday
operations and 10 years for weekend operations. The bottom line is that the existing service,
including the landing, has plenty of room for ridership growth, be they tourists or residents. If
rental bicycles continue to be allowed on board, the excess capacity that we have today could
be used by running one less round trip/day. This would enable a slightly increased interval
between trips, thus allowing greater flexibility in loading times and likely resulting in the entire
operation more easily adhering to a new set schedule. A five minute increase from 15 to 20
minutes would possibly eliminate most of the delayed departures that we have with current
rental bike loads.
Ferry Main Deck Level Boarding Philosophy
Passengers board the ferry in Sausalito on the Main Deck (lowest level deck) and depart the
ferry in San Francisco on the Upper Deck (middle deck). Bicyclists must currently haul their
bikes from the Main Deck to the Upper Deck to disembark. This specific activity is what takes
time in San Francisco, potentially causing delays. According the GGBD presentation, the new
plan will be to continue to board the ferry in Sausalito on the Main Deck and then also
disembark San Francisco from the Main Deck instead of the current Upper Deck. Although I am
not familiar with the operation of the San Francisco gangways, it appears that this new Main
Deck disembarking plan will require substantial revisions to the San Francisco ferry dock.
Clearly the boarding/disembarking philosophy is oriented around minimal movement of
bicycles between decks. In effect however, it will increase passenger movement between
decks as most of the seats are on the Upper Deck and the Sun Deck (top deck).
ADA Compliance
The GGBD presentation spent a great deal of time telling residents about how the existing
landing did not conform to ADA and that the current landing exceeded a 1 in 12 slope
requirement. Later in the presentation it was mentioned that this ADA non-conformance does
not occur until the low tide reaches or exceeds -1.1 feet. One of the Planning Commissioners
rightfully questioned the frequency of this occurrence and asked if it is more than twice a year.
The GGBD representative advised that it most certainly is more than twice year a year but that
he would have to get back to the City with a definitive answer. After a cursory review of some
on-line tide tables for Sausalito, CA (37.8500o N, 122.4833o W), I found that there are a sum
total of 16 days during 2015 where low tides were at least -1.1 feet or lower. Of those 16 total
days, on only 10 days do the low tides occur during normal operational hours and on only 3 of
those 10 days do low tides occur during disembarking (i.e. require steeper uphill travel) at
Sausalito. The other 7 days of occurrence result in slightly steeper downhill travel while
boarding in Sausalito. In summary, out of a nominal 5,946 ferry boat departures/arrivals per
year, only 10 departures/arrivals per year (0.17%) have ADA non-conformance ramp slope
issues and only 3 arrivals per year (0.05%) require steeper uphill travel. Rising sea levels will
further reduce these numbers in time. My conclusion is that the ADA compliance nonconformance issue is about as worrisome as “a tempest in the teapot” and was most certainly
not worthy of the misleading red flag waving that occurred on Wednesday evening. I suggest
that minor operational adjustments can be made on the few days that are of concern.
Alternatively, modest, but creative design changes could be made to bring the operation into
full compliance 100% of the time. It is also my understanding that there have been no formal
ADA related complaints about the existing terminal which can mostly be attributed to the 1999
ADA compliance efforts as well as the rare instances that non-conformance occurs.
The City of Sausalito has used a Certified Access Specialist named Craig Williams who has done
work for other municipalities on modeling tidal change issues with respect to climate change
and general ADA code compliance. The Department of Public Works Director has knowledge of
his contact information if a more detailed review is necessary.
Safety
Some of the residents who spoke in favor of building the new terminal mentioned a perception
of safety concerns about the existing operation. After nearly 40 years of project engineering
management experience, I have found that people without a detailed understanding of safety
unfortunately use it as the go-to excuse to either build something or not to build something. I
am a firm believer in passenger and worker safety but to wave the safety flag without sound
justification diminishes the importance of a careful safety review before drawing conclusions
and making design changes.
Although this is preliminary speculation on my part, I would not be surprised if the Golden Gate
Transit Ferry operation is one of the safest ferry operations on the west coast of the United
States. Although they have an environmental advantage over other ocean side operations, I
have never seen or heard about a ferry loading/unloading passenger injury incident during my
residential tenure here since 1976. I rode the ferry on a daily basis in the 1970s and 1980s. To
ensure that the existing operation is not prone to passenger or worker safety issues, it would be
interesting to know what the GGBD’s worker incident rate is for the Sausalito ferry terminal. It
would also be interesting to know how many passengers have been injured boarding or
disembarking ferries in Sausalito. Surely if safety were truly an issue we would have heard
some facts and figures during this first public hearing from the GGBD.
Ridership Growth
The GGBD is forecasting an annualized 4% ridership growth over the next 20 to 30 years as
being one of the design premises for the proposed new terminal. To put that kind of growth
into perspective over 20 years, it would mean that 793,192 passengers (FY2014) will grow to
1,737,981 passengers in FY2034. This would be truly astonishing growth. For comparison
purposes I looked at BART’s ridership growth over the past 35 years. By expanding territory
with new stations located in high growth rate suburban East Bay communities and by laying
hundreds of miles of new track, BART has managed to grow at a mere 1.5%/year between the
years 1978 and 2013. See BART growth chart attached. We all know that Marin County is not a
high growth rate county and never will be due to restricted zoning and designated open space.
We also know that the Sausalito ferry service has two main terminals, here and San Francisco
and that there is no option to expand territory to obtain new ridership between the two points.
For BART to achieve the growth in ridership between 1978 and 2013, the annualized population
growth rates for Alameda, Contra Costa and San Francisco Counties were 0.65%, 0.93%, and
0.35% respectively. (See table below.) The annualized projected growth rate for Marin County
for the next 30 years is only 0.41% and most of that growth is in the north end of the county
which would have an insignificant effect on Sausalito ferry ridership. San Francisco County is
forecast to be the fastest growing County at a nominal 1% annualized growth. The GGBD’s 4%
number appears to be an absurdly biased estimation based on the recent growth in Sausalito
ferry passenger ridership in just the past few years.
County
Alameda
Contra
Costa
Marin
San
Francisco
San
Mateo
Total
ABAG's 30Year
Population
Growth
Forecast
(2010 to
2040)
32%
ABAG's
Annualized
Population
Growth
Rate
Forecast
(2010 to
2040)-%
0.93%
1970
Population
1,073,184
2013
Population
1,578,891
1970-2013
Population
Change
505,707
1970-2013
Population
Change-%
32.0%
1970 to
2013
Annualized
Population
Growth
Rate-%
0.65%
558,389
206,038
1,094,205
258,365
535,816
52,327
49.0%
20.3%
0.93%
0.43%
27%
13%
0.80%
0.41%
715,674
837,442
121,768
14.5%
0.32%
35%
1.01%
556,234
747,373
191,139
25.6%
0.53%
26%
0.77%
3,109,519
4,516,276
1,406,757
31.1%
0.63%
29%
0.86%
Guess where that growth came from. It is nearly directly proportional to the number of rental
bikes crossing the Golden Gate Bridge in the past few years. Will Sausalito continue to tolerate
the proliferation of rental bikes into town regardless of how they are returned to San
Francisco? There are plenty of bike-issue-weary residents now and without question most
residents have had enough rental bicycle growth in town, to say nothing of the problems
associated with the use of the ferry service to return bikes. The Sausalito Coalition and the
residents need to urgently make some decisions on rental bike logistics and growth prior to the
approval of any ferry landing expansion project.
Existing Design
Having worked as an engineering manager of offshore, near shore and swamp operations for
nearly twenty years, I can testify that there are a variety of options available for extending the
serviceable life of the existing terminal by component replacements and/or upgrades, including
changing out some of the existing corrosion prone materials. From the lack of discussion about
the existing terminal at the hearing, it is apparent that only a new enlarged terminal has been
considered. In view of what appears to be an extremely poor justification of the proposed new
terminal, a close look at modifying existing operations and replacing components of the existing
terminal should be thoroughly reviewed and presented as one solution for continued
operations.
New Design
After hearing about overblown ADA compliance issues and unrealistically high growth numbers,
it seems abundantly evident that any properly designed replacement terminal can be
significantly scaled down in size from what has been presented. The 4% growth number by
itself, if adjusted to something more realistic, would result in a substantial reduction in both
passengers as well as walkway width to board/disembark.
If the GGBB’s growth rate were reduced to 1% which is still high by any 20-year comparable
growth standard, the annual ridership over 20 years would grow from 793,192 passengers
(FY2014) to 967,845 passengers in FY2034, compared to 1,737,981 passengers in FY2034 with a
4% annual growth rate. This more realistic 1%, but still aggressive growth rate, results in a 44%
reduction in 20-year passenger growth from what the new proposed terminal has been
designed around. Certainly some scaling down of the facility is clearly in order should it ever
become justified.
Conclusion
The GGBD representatives were ill-prepared, uninformed and misleading about the justification
for any new terminal as well as the design details of the proposed new terminal. There was
minimal explanation as to why the current terminal couldn’t be retrofitted to correct any
currently perceived deficiencies or repaired with in-kind or improved components. It would
appear that there is a variety of alternatives for extending serviceable life of the existing
terminal while also reducing ferry loading times.
I urge the Planning Commission, Historic Landmarks Board and the City Council to NOT approve
the proposed project until: a) the issue of rental bicycle logistics is resolved by the Sausalito
Coalition, and b) a highly credible economic and engineering analysis of any proposed project is
completed and presented to the public.
Sausalito is a community that includes residents with expertise in a wide variety of disciplines
including engineering, architecture, finance and management. Residents care very much about
our small city and will utilize these disciplines, as well as the mobilization of strong public
opinion, to ensure the protection of what we view as our town’s very unique character. A
public vote is clearly in order.
Prepared by Sam Chase, Bonita Street resident.
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Joe Paulino [joe@4joe.com]
Lilly Schinsing
New Ferry Landing Proposal
Dear Ms Schinsing, Sausalito City Council, and Planning Commission, First of all, I'd like to thank the city and the Bridge District people for taking the time to put up the Story Buoys to help give us a sense of the scope of the new landing. I must say however that for all that effort, I felt that the demonstration was a bit misleading. On Saturday, we were seeing those ropes, poles and buoys at low tide. It was really hard to get a sense of how much the facade of the new structure will wall off our views come higher tides. Also, I was quite disturbed at the width of the new... what do you call it...? gangway? Sorry ‐ I'm a bit of a Landlubber. As I heard someone mention, it looks wide enough to drive a Sherman tank through. If the Sausalito ferry does indeed boast the 95% on‐time departure rate that I heard it has, I still can't see why a project of this scope is desirable or necessary. It looks more like something suitable for a cargo dock. I really hope that the Council can see past whatever they feel they stand to gain by this construction and realize that THIS NEW LANDING IS NOT GOOD FOR SAUSALITO. Sorry to keep using gossipy phrases like "I heard that..." But, I heard that the Bridge District only pays the city $600 a year for the right to use our shoreline. If that's the case, it smells to me that some members of the Council are selling out that part of the city for $600 a year and what ever pittance Blazing Saddles pays. This city has ENOUGH tourist bicycles on the weekend. They already present ENOUGH of a hazard! A friend of mine just got whacked badly by one who blazed through a red light then tried to blame her! A city that sells itself out for fickle tourist dollars always stands to lose it's soul in the process. The new landing is a BAD IDEA. The old landing is just fine for this city. I don't care how much the plans for the new design cost. WE DON'T NEED IT! Thank you for your your consideration, and see you on April 1! Sincerely, Joe Paulino 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Norman [normwohl@att.net]
Lilly Schinsing
We have been studying the ferry landing as we do walking along the railing and have some thoughts: The railing the color it is now blends nicely, does not attract attention to itself. So, the new railing should all be the color of the existing railing. The landing could be moved to the South and could be somewhat shorter. The gate can be designed after the project is approved and can be a very attractive gate. The ticket booth needs to be moved because it interferes with traffic on the sidewalk (we notice that because we use a wheelchair. Thank you for this opportunity to share our thoughts. Gloria and Norman Wohlschlaeger Sent from my iPad 1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
wacambron@comcast.net
Monday, March 23, 2015 2:47 PM
Lilly Schinsing
Ferry Terminal
As a long-term resident of Sausalito, I strongly object to both the size and design of the proposed
Ferry Terminal. Sausalito is NOT a major terminal on Sydney Harbor but a small, quaint town on the
Bay. The design is too institutional for a gateway to Sausalito and the size too large for the space.
William A. Cambron
69 Monte Mar Dr.
Sausalito, Ca
1
Lilly Schinsing
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Virginia Davidson [virge94965@icloud.com]
Lilly Schinsing
Ferry Landing
Sent from my iPad Sausalito,in my opinion does not need a gigantic ferry landing. The photo proves the point, it would certainly obscure our charm,mess up the yacht club and be totally out of proportion with our small town charm.Lets first find a good solution to the bicycle problem.Ive heard good information from counsel reports. 1

Included in 4/1 PC/HLB packet

Transcription

Similar documents

There`s tons of things to do in San Francisco and incredible

Race: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5K: 8:30am start • Kidz Run 9

Sausalito Village Newsletter 2016.02

1200-1250 BRIDGEWAY

ferry service - Golden Gate Ferry

our book corner shelf - Sausalito Presbyterian Church

SPINN - Sausalito Presbyterian Church Newsletter