Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a
Transcription
Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a
Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015, pp. 112-118. A Publication of the International Microwave Power Institute Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide at Microwave Frequency using FEM Abubakar Yakubu, Zulkifly Abbas Departament of Physics, Universiti Putra, Malaysia Nor Azowa Ibrahim Department of Chemistry, Universiti Putra, Malaysia Received: January 9, 2015 Accepted: June 1, 2015 ABSTRACT Presented in this work is an essential and basic approach to compute the attenuation of electromagnetic waves propagating through a rectangular waveguides with lossy material sample placed inside the waveguide. The rectangular waveguide (WR 90) technique is used to theoretically calculate the attenuation of electromagnetic wave as it interacts with ZnO-PCL nanocomposites of different sample thicknesses from measurements of transmission /reflection coefficients in the X-Band. Finite element method (FEM) was also used to calculate attenuation for the same sample thicknesses at X-Band. Comparison of the attenuation results obtained from experiment and FEM were analysed. Among other findings, it was found that the composite with 6.8 mm thickness gave the highest attenuation within the frequency range measured. The comparative study between the techniques showed close measurement system agreement. The value of attenuation for the different thicknesses measured showed that the composites is a good material for microwave low absorption. This material composites can be applied to mobile communication devices as thin layer circuit board for electromagnetic wave absorption. KEYWORDS: Rectangular waveguide; transmission coefficients; attenuation; nanocomposites. INTRODUCTION Induced currents flowing in the metal walls of waveguides produce losses which can be calculated from formulae derived on the assumption that the surfaces are perfectly smooth [Benson and Stephen, 1963; Pomeroy and Suarez, 1956]. This analogy, can be ascribed to a sample placed inside a rectangular waveguide such that the radiation flowing into the sample produces losses and the losses can be calculated assuming the sample surfaces are smooth and placed parallel to the port surface without any air gap. Rectangular waveguides are employed extensively in microwave and millimeter wave receiver since they are much easier to manipulate than circular waveguides and also offer significantly lower cross polarization component [Withington et al., 2003]. The approximate power-loss method has been widely used in analyzing wave attenuation in lossy rectangular waveguides as a result of its simplicity when the frequency of the signal 112 International Microwave Power Institute Abubakar Yakubu et al., Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide ... is well above cutoff frequency [Seida, 2003]. In this method, the field expressions are derived assuming perfectly conducting walls, allowing the solution to be separated into TE and TM modes. To calculate the attenuation, ohmic losses are assumed to exist due to small field penetration into the conductor walls. The power-loss method however fails near cutoff frequency, as the attenuation obtained using this method diverges to infinity when the signal frequency approaches the cutoff frequency. Bladel [1971], and Robson [1963] reported degenerate modes propagation in lossy rectangular waveguides, but neither of them was able to compute the attenuation values accurately near cutoff. Like the power-loss method, their theories predict infinite attenuation at cutoff. An expression valid at all frequencies is reported by Kohler and Bayer [1964] which was later re-reported by Somlo and Hunter [1996]. This expression however is only applicable to the transverse electric (TE¬10) dominant mode. However, no report has been published on analyzing the guided propagation of electromagnetic signals through Lossy substrates of different thicknesses close to the cutoff frequency. The three principal factors which affect the attenuation of samples placed in a waveguide are the internal dimensions of the waveguide, and the effective resistivity of the conducting surfaces and size of the sample used [Abbas, 2001]. The effective losses depends on the roughness of the conducting surfaces of the sample, the radiation, resistivity of the sample, and the nature of the sample at the excitation surfaces of the rectangular waveguide. The roughness of the conducting surfaces is important because of the increased path length due to the roughness, since radiation at microwave frequencies travels essentially on the surface [Sadiku, 2008]. For this paper, the authors are interested in investigating the effect of sample thickness on attenuation close to the cutoff frequency. We shall in addition show the effects of sample thickness on the transmission and reflection coefficients obtained. In our method, the solution for the attenuation is found by solving logarithm equations derived from transmission coefficients values of the propagating electromagnetic wave through the waveguide walls and interaction of the waves on the surface of the composites placed inside the waveguide. THEORY AND METHOD The attenuation in a rectangular waveguide carrying the normal mode, and having irregularities on its surfaces which are, in general, much greater than the skin depth and closer to the cutoff frequency can be solved assuming having a sample with negligible surface roughness, then attenuation can be expressed as [Khun, 1946; Ajoy and Thyagarajan, 2000]; (1) Where, Rs is the surface resistivity of the waveguide material in ohms per square meter. For a waveguide having nominal dimensions a and b, then the expression is given as; (2) Where, ∂a and ∂b are the fractional tolerances on a, and b. The cut-off wavelength is also affected by a change in b, so, (3) Where, m = λc/λcr and λcr is the nominal value. Substituting the values of Equation (2) and (3) into Equation (1), attenuation α, can be written as; Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015 International Microwave Power Institute (4) 113 Abubakar Yakubu et al., Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide ... Further simplification of Equation (4), will lead to attenuation becoming; (5) Where, αn is the nominal attenuation given as; (6) samples into the waveguide is very essential so as to avoid air gaps. Figure 1 is a photo of both a sample placed inside a waveguide and different sample sizes used in this study. In a transmission/reflection measurement method, the material under test is inserted in a piece of transmission line, and the properties of the material are deduced on the basis of the rejection from the material and the transmission through the material [Bayrakdar, 2011]. This method is widely used in the measurement of electromagnetic properties of materials. Therefore, attenuation would become; (7) In dimensional tolerance, attenuation is given as; (8) In the case of the sample placed inside the rectangular waveguide, the attenuation is given as; (9) Where r is the transmission coefficient measured from the vector network analyzer. Equation (9), can be further simplified to give, [Yakubu et al., 2014]; (10) EXPERIMENTAL Different ZnO-PCL nanocomposite sample sizes were fabricated using the melt blend and cold press technique with a hydraulic press at 5 tonnes. The samples were molded in a mold of dimension of 11.4 mm by 22.8 mm. This dimension is the dimension of the WR 90 (rectangular waveguide used in this study). Precision in the fitting of the 114 Figure 1. Rectangular waveguide filled with ZnO-PCL sample (top) and prepared different samples sizes (bottom). Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015 International Microwave Power Institute Abubakar Yakubu et al., Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide ... Figure 3. Magnitude of reflection coefficient for all samples measured. Figure 2. Scattering parameter measurement set-up. This is because microwave guides have field focusing ability which is possible to make accurate measurements at microwave frequencies. It is important to note that the ZnO nanoparticles used in the synthesis of the composites was prepared via microwave irradiation technique. After successful fitting of the samples inside the waveguides, measurement of the scattering parameter was then carried out via the vector network analyser (VNA), Agilent 8570B as shown in Figure 2. The scattering parameter of the different samples were further used in the calculation of attenuation for each of the samples used in the study. For this study, sample sizes used are 4.3 mm, 4.8 mm, 6.0 mm, and 6.8 mm thick. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The measured S11 and S21 magnitudes using rectangular waveguide for the ZnOPCL nanocomposite for different sample thickness are presented in Figure 3 and 4 respectively. Careful observation on Figure 3 shows that the reflection coefficients decreases with increasing frequency whilst Figure 4 showed that S21 increases as sample thickness and frequency increases. The sinusoidal-like wave form in the profile of the S11 was attributed to the impedance mismatched between the input impedance of the waveguide and the surface impedance of the sample as well as Figure 4. Magnitude of transmission coefficient for all samples measured. the characteristic impedance of the coaxial cable [Pozar, 2009]. While the curve shaped rabbles in the |S21| measurements were due to the internal surface roughness of the waveguide, possibility of air gap between the sample and the internal walls of the waveguide, surface irregularity of the ZnOPCL nanocomposite pellets and certain voids in the sample. In addition, the effect of the multiple reflections can be clearly seen in |S21| especially at the lower frequency range but was significantly reduced with increasing frequency where the wavelength is comparable to the sample thickness close to the cutoff frequency. However, from the profiles of both |S11| and |S21|, there was overlapping in the lower frequency ranges, this might due to the close size ratio of the materials used although this overlapping was not observed at the high frequency range. Table I is the summary for the mean values of S11 and S21 of the electromagnetic wave in the frequency range of 8 GHz to 12 GHz for Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015 International Microwave Power Institute 115 Abubakar Yakubu et al., Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide ... Table I. Summary of mean values of S11 and S21. Sample Thickness (mm) S11 S21 4.3 0.587 0.621 4.8 0.570 0.641 6.0 0.518 0.672 6.8 0.407 0.710 the different sample sizes. Increase from 4.3 mm to 6.8 mm of ZnO-PCL nanocomposite pellets corresponds to a decrement in S11 from 0.587 to 0.407 which represents 18 % decrease in reflection coefficient whilst the S21 had a 9 % increment. Based on the result presented in Table I, it is concluded that the ZnO-PCL nanocomposites are good electromagnetic wave absorbing substrate within the frequency range measured. CALCULATION OF ATTENUATION USING MEASUREMENT AND FEM The values of attenuation due to the ZnO-PCL nanocomposites with different thicknesses were calculated using Equation (10). The variation for the different thicknesses is shown in Figure 5 whilst Figure 5. Measured attenuation for all ZnO-PCL nanocomposite samples. Figure 6 is the comparison of attenuation from both measurement and calculation (FEM). Careful observation on Figure 5 showed that the thicker the sample the higher were the attenuation values. It is also observed that attenuation increases as the frequency increases. Liu et al., [2012], reported the increase of attenuation as frequency increases. The results of attenuation obtained from measurement are in complete agreement with the results obtained for the S21 magnitude. The FEM calculated of attenuation was achieved using a COMSOL version 4.3. Figure 6. Comparison of measured and calculated attenuation for all ZnO-PCL nanocomposite samples. 116 Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015 International Microwave Power Institute Abubakar Yakubu et al., Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide ... Table II. Summary of calculated mean attenuation with respect to sample size for ZnO/PCL nanocomposites. Sample thickness (mm) Attenuation (dB) Measurement FEM 4.3 -4.196 -3.619 4.8 -3.917 -3.618 6.0 -3.527 -3.303 6.8 -3.077 -3.042 The software was used to calculate the transmission and reflection coefficients of the different nanocomposite thickness. The result obtained for the scattering parameters are then used as raw data for the calculation of attenuation using Equation (10). Figure 6 is the comparison of attenuation obtained from both the measurement and FEM techniques. Evidence from Figure 6 showed that attenuation is dependent on material sample thickness. As expected for a rectangular waveguide, the attenuation increases as the sample thickness increases for both FEM and measurement techniques. Generally, there was a good measurement system agreement between the FEM and measurement techniques especially at higher frequency range. The mean values of attenuation due to the ZnO-PCL nanocomposite samples were calculated to be in the range of -4.196 dB to -3.077 dB using measurement method (VNA) whilst the mean attenuation of the same samples using FEM is the range of -3.619 dB to -3.042 dB. Table II is the summary of mean attenuation obtained from both techniques for the frequency range measured. Based on Table III. Relative error of attenuation for FEM. Thickness (mm) Attenuation (dB) Relative error Measurement FEM 4.3 -4.196 -3.619 0.13 4.8 -3.917 -3.618 0.07 6.0 -3.527 -3.303 0.06 6.8 -3.077 -3.042 0.01 the results in Table II, it is concluded that attenuation is highest for materials with thickest sizes. As reported by Jurvelin et al., [2014] and Yamasaki et al., [2014], they showed that the increase in attenuation quality of materials increases with sample thickness. The entire result showed that there is a high order of correlation between the two methods as evident in the calculated error analysis tabulated in Table III. Based on analysis carried out, it is suggested that FEM method is also good in the calculation of attenuation of material samples at microwave frequency. CONCLUSION In this work, a simple fast and accurate technique to compute the attenuation of electromagnetic waves propagating through a rectangular waveguide loaded with lossy material was presented. The technique is based on measuring the transmission and reflection coefficients, and using the data to compute the magnitude of attenuation. The finite element method was also used to compute the attenuation for materials placed in a rectangular waveguide. The results from both techniques were then compared and analyzed. Our calculated attenuation curves are in good agreement with the experimental results for all sample thickness. An important consequence of this work is the demonstration that the attenuation of materials are dependent on the size of sample used. In other words, attenuation is higher in sample with larger thicknesses for electromagnetic waves propagating through a rectangular waveguide. For the materials used in the studies, the attenuation obtained experimentally ranged from -4.196 dB to -3.077 dB whilst for the calculated (FEM) attenuation, the value ranged from -3.619 dB to -3.042 dB. The 6.8 mm thick sample had the largest attenuation in both instances. The calculated attenuation of the different sample thicknesses showed that as the frequency increases, the attenuation of all Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015 International Microwave Power Institute 117 Abubakar Yakubu et al., Effect of ZnO-PCL Nanocomposite Thickness on Attenuation in a Rectangular Waveguide ... the samples also increases in both methods used. The rectangular waveguide method is another technique that can be used to calculate the attenuation of material sample close to cutoff frequency provided that the sample is devoid of surface roughness, air gap between sample and port of the rectangular waveguide. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors wish to thank the Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) for its support and for the provision of enabling environment to carry out this research work. REFERENCES Abbas Z., Pollard R. D., and Kelsall R. W. (2001) “Complex Permittivity Measurements at Ka-Band Using Rectangular Dielectric Waveguide”. IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement, Vol. 50, No. 5 Ajoy G. and Thyagarajan K. (2000) “Fundamentals of Photonics: Optical Waveguides and Fibers”. University of Connecticut. Bayrakdar H. (2011) ”Complex permittivity, complex permeability and microwave absorption properties of ferriteparaffin polymer composites”. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 323, p. 1882-1885. Benson F. A. and Steven D. H. (1963) “Rectangular-waveguide attenuation at millimetre wavelengths”. PROC. I.E.E., Vol. 110, No. 6. Bladel J. V. (1971) “Mode coupling through wall losses in a waveguide”. Electronics Letters, Vol. 7, p. 178 – 180. Jurvelin J., Riekkinen O., and Hakulinen M. (2014) U.S. Patent No. 8,679,019. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Kohler M. and Bayer H. (1964) “Feld und ausbreitungskontante im rechteckhohlrohr bei endlicher leifahigkeit des wandmaterials”. Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Physik, Vol. 18, p. 16 – 22. 118 Kuhn S. (1946) “Calculation of attenuation in waveguides”. J. Instn. Electrical Engrs. 93, Part III A, p. 663. Liu J., Jackson D. R., and Long Y. (2012) “Substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) leakywave antenna with transverse slot”. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 60(1), 20-29. Pomeroy A. F. and Suarez E. M. (1956) “Determining Attenuation of Waveguide from Electrical Measurements on Short Samples”. IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 4(2), 122-129. Robson P. N. A. (1963) “Variational integral for the propagation coefficient of a cylindrical waveguide with imperfectly conducting walls”. Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 110, p. 859 – 864. Sadiku M. N. O (2008) “Elements of Electromagnetics”. 4th Edition, New-York, Oxford University Press, America. Seida O. M. A. (2003) “Propagation of electromagnetic waves in a rectangular tunnel”. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 136, p. 405 – 413. Somlo P. I. and Hunter J. D. (1996) “On the TE10 mode cutoff frequency in lossy-walled rectangular waveguides”. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 45, p. 301 – 304. Withington S., Campbell E., Yassin G., Tham C. Y., Wolfe S., and Jacobs K. (2003) “Beam combining superconducting detector for submillimetre-wave astronomical interferometry”. Electronics Letters, Vol. 39, p. 605 – 606. Yakubu A., Abbas Z. and Hashim M. (2014) “Effect of Material Thickness on Attenuation (dB) of PTFE Using Finite Element Method at X-Band Frequency”. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, ID 965912. Yamasaki J., Mutoh M., Ohta S., Yuasa S., Arai S., Sasaki K., and Tanaka N. (2014) “Analysis of nonlinear intensity attenuation in bright-field TEM images for correct 3D reconstruction of the density in micron-sized materials”. Japan Society of Microscopy, Vol. 63 (5), p. 345-355. Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 49 (2), 2015 International Microwave Power Institute