Union shafted over condoms
Transcription
Union shafted over condoms
THURSDAY The CambridgeStudent Lent 2008 Issue 2 Union shafted over condoms Debating society forced to prove condoms do not pose a threat to student health Alexander Glasner Deputy News Editor The Cambridge Union Society has come under fire for its distribution of condoms to students at the freshers’ fair – condoms which the Cambridge University Students’ Union (CUSU) have claimed to be unsafe and unprotective. CUSU sent an emergency email through all the College JCRs telling students explicitly not to use the free condoms the Union had been given out on Tuesday. CUSU’s Welfare Officer, Andrea Walko, told The Cambridge Student (TCS) that although the condoms have a CE mark, they lacked a Kitemark symbol – a sign that certifies the products have been safety tested. The Kitemark symbol means that a product has met rigorous standards from frequent testing. The tests involve the strength, durability and size and must be carried out by independent assessors - unlike the CE certification. Both certifications symbols are legal to be sold in the UK. In spite of this, Welfare Officer Andrea Walko has said that she would “only sell condoms with a Kitemark.” She has also said that CUSU were offering everyone with a Union condom a replacement condom for free with lubrication and a safer sex guide. The Union had produced the condoms, which have the Union’s insignia as well as the phrase, “for a more perfect union” emblazoned upon it, in order to increase interest in the society. But despite the Union’s desire for greater student interest in the News society, one source suggests that the Union’s reponse to student welfare was less than interested. The source, who wished to remain anonymous, told TCS that when confronted at the Fresher’s Fair the Union said they did not expect anyone to use them – and that if they did, they should use it on top of another condom. CUSU has strongly criticised this advice, saying that wearing two ‘Anyone who took that as serious health advice shouldn’t be looking after student welfare’ condoms is extremely dangerous. They have said it “is a hundred times more unsafe” than just using one as it often results in the condom splitting. The story has attracted so much attention that The Sun newspaper will be running a story on the subject. The Union has been quick to defend its position. In a statement to TCS, the President of the Union, Adam Bott, said: “Anyone who said that was not speaking in an official capacity. And anyone who took that as serious sexual health advice >>03 interview >>14 CUSU has warned students not to use the Union condoms Image: rubberpaw should not be looking after the welfare of the students,” he added. The Union has further stated that the condoms are completely safe, sending TCS a copy of the safety certificate which they were given when they bought the batch. President Adam Bott was also critical of CUSU’s handling of the situation saying that CUSU sent out the emails to JCRs before contacting the Union about the alleged problems. Bott told TCS: “The condoms are perfectly safe. Although they do not have the BSI Kitemark, they do carry the CE mark, so they are safe – and, in fact, they are a brand used by the NHS. We deeply regret that CUSU published scare stories before checking with us. CUSU’s claim that condoms without the kitemark are dangerous is completely false. “The Union takes the health of its members seriously – and their sexual satisfaction.” However, Richard Barnes, University HIV and Sexual Health Committee Chair said: “I think the use of the Union condoms would indeed be unwise.” theatre Sport This week’s supplement: >> 21 >> 32 AY THURSD ’s second chats le alum ognisab cer mpic fen us up most rec rs r Cambridge r classicist and Oly bridge over the yea stern world yea Cam We l Winne Michae nnell Is a third- re their memories of ween Islam and the Co Alex O’ stories Porters sha to collaboration bet rs’ nument Porte bra A mo m ha Al The Come Glide with Me Michael Winner er ADC Reopens Winn Michael Peter Tatchell tesy of Image cour Libraries Shake up ay 9th Oc sponsored by: Thursd s 2008 haelma e 2, Mic tober, Issu 02|News News in Brief Research Nobel Prize for Caian Professor Roger Tsien, a former Caius fellow, has won this year’s Nobel Prize for Chemistry.s Tsien is being recognised for his “discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein, GFP”, a substance found chiefly in jellyfish. The $1.4 million prize will be shared with two other scientists. GFP has transformed biological research by allowing scientists to monitor the activity of cell molecules that would otherwise be too small to observe. It is particularly valuable in the field of disease research. Celebrity Gossip Lily Cole papparazzied The Lily Cole Circus rumbles on with numerous publications attempting to obtain pictures of the model in and around Cambridge. Cole, who embarks on a History of Art course at King’s this year, was most recently snapped stocking up on toiletries in Boots with her mum. She has not yet been seen in Marks & Spencer’s, but given her reputed £11 million contract with the chain, they might hope that she’ll send some of it back their way via the food department. Celebrity Gossip A study conducted by the Cambridge Autism Research Centre has found that the same genes thought to be responsible for the condition can also lead to an increased aptitude for mathematics, music and other intellectual disciplines in people who do not demonstrably suffer from the disability. A group of 378 Cambridge maths students contained seven times as many autistic cases as the control group, prompting Dr Simon Baron-Cohen, the director of the study, to conclude that “it seems clear that genes play a significant role in the causes of autism and that those genes are also linked to certain intellectual skills” THURSDAY Image courtesy of Michael Winner Michael Winner Cambridge’s second most recognisable alum chats us up Alex O’Connell Is a third-year classicist and Olympic fencer Porters’ stories Porters share their memories of Cambridge over the years The Alhambra A monument to collaboration between Islam and the Western world sponsored by: Thursday 9th October, Issue 2, Michaelmas 2008 Hob fire at King’s Traffic cone prank put the university’s most famous college at risk Caroline Organ Deputy News Editor King’s College students have been shocked by a fire that broke out in a kitchen on Sunday morning. The fire broke out at 4am in King’s New Garden Hostel after two students reportedly placed a traffic cone on a hot hob after a night out. The blaze was only discovered when two other student noticed an “orange glow” coming from one of the kitchens. When he went to investigate it became immediately obvious that one of the hobs had caught fire. As the flames rose to the height of the cupboards, the kitchen filled up with thick black smoke. The two male students who discovered the fire characterised it as a “small blaze”, and said that they quickly went to work to put it out. They grabbed a fire extinguisher to keep the flames at bay and finally used a fire blanket to put it out completely. The students, who wished to remain anonymous, said: “The smoke detector didn’t work so we broke the alarm and began the evacuation.” In spite of this some students still slept, telling The Cambridge Student (TCS) that they did not hear the alarm. Another eyewitness, who also wished to remain anonymous, commented that the students who caused the fire to break out were: “wasted – they should be sent down for starting the fire.” The College Dean, the Revd Ian Thompson, sent out an email to all King’s undergraduates the following day reminding students of the fire safety procedures and expressing his relief that the fire was dealt with “speedily and without anyone being hurt”. The flames rose to the height of the cupboards In his email he stated: “I will be investigating the cause of the fire but the fact that this happened on the first night many of you were back in College leads me to reiterate again the need for each of us to take extreme care as far as fire and potential causes of fire are concerned. “We are each reponsible for the safety of those with whom we live and work and so each of us must ensure that we do nothing that might put others, or the fabric of the College at risk.” The fire at King’s College comes only months after the hobs were restored to College kitchens following a massive student campaign – the hobs were initially removed following college officials’ fears that they would prove a fire risk. Photo: Monkey leader Mathmo Autism link The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 Cambridge celebrates 800 years in style Pete Jefferys Comment Editor New York’s Empire State Building will turn blue for 48 hours in December 2009 as part of the 800th Anniversary celebrations for Cambridge University. In a recent announcement on the University website the event, which will see the landmark coloured ‘Cambridge Blue’, was described as “great news” by organisers of the celebrations. The 77 year old Empire State Building, which held the record as tallest building in the world for over 40 years, is one of the most recognisable modern structures. Its temporary transformation will take place between the 4th and 6th of December 2009, towards the end of the anniversary celebrations The University has recently announced a series of other spectacles, to mark Cambridge’s 800th an- niversary year, beginning later this month with the Festival of Ideas. The Festival, which will run from October 22nd until November 2nd, will take place at venues across the city and features more than 200 events. Organisers believe it is the first Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Festival of its kind to be held in the UK. The programme, which will include lectures from Evan Davies and David Reynolds, and a language-oriented talent contest, based on the TV series ‘Britain’s Got Talent’. The lecture series is described as “striking a balance between academic achievement and celebration, respecting the past, celebrating the present and leaving a legacy for the future”. Vince Cable of the Liberal Democrats and former Conservative leader Michael Howard will be adding some political interest, speaking at an event entitled “What are the limits of European integration?” on October 27th. Organisers have also stressed the diversity of the Festival, which will include a family day for children, Chinese Calligraphy and a debate on the social and economic implications of Facebook. Many of the events will be held in colleges and University lecture halls, including facilities at Anglia Ruskin University. Additional highlights will include performances from the Endellion String Quartet and the Cambridge University Musical Society late this month. On a very different note, the CU Spaceflight Organisation, a student- run group, have announced a competition for 14-18 year-olds to design a scientific experiment for the anniversary, which they will launch to the edge of space as a payload on one of their rockets. The team of undergraduates has made headlines in the national press with their rockets launched from high altitude balloon platforms and are the current holders of the UK balloon altitude record, now standing at over 100,000 feet. The team hope that the competition will be “a fun and inexpensive way of expanding science education and inspiring the next generation of scientists and engineers”. This proposal fits in very well with the anniversary event organiser’s aims to provide “a springboard for the future” in the University’s 800th year. The celebrations are being supported by the presence of the unofficial mascot “Octo”, a white 800 which has been photographed in locations across Cambridge. The organisers have invited the public to suggest other potential Octo” images, to be used throughout its publicity material. The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 News|03 Library shake-up causes concern Fears that smaller subjects might suffer under the new proposals Centralisation could save money Alex Coke-Woods Associate Editor ‘This proposal needs to be thought about very carefully’ “Budget concerns mean that libraries are evaluating what services they can provide and Arts and Humanities in particular are feeling the squeeze, which might be contributing to their anxiety,” Bagshaw continued. Indeed, other faculty librarians, such as David Wills of the Squire Law Library, have welcomed the proposals. “This review was an extremely positive exercise in my opinion and will help to ensure that the University continues to focus and deliver information, materials and library services in the most appropriate form for the 21st century Cambridge scholar,” he told TCS. English Faculty Librarian, Elizabeth Tilley, agreed that “to get the best value that we can for that we can for journal licenses, we have to purchase those on an institutional basis, rather than on an independent faculty basis” But, she added, centralisation isn’t necessarily the best course of action. “It can increase committees and increase hierarchy; management can tend to lose track of what’s going on at the issue desk,” she explained. “You risk losing local support and subject specialists, particularly if you start to amalgamate libraries, which may be on the cards in the future,” she added. “These proposals have to be thought through very carefully.” At present, the plans are still at the drawing board, and some are uncertain as to the full extent of their implications. The proposals as they stand recommend the creation a new ‘Director of Library Services,’ who would “oversee the broader support of all the University libraries in pedagogic support.” A similar system has already been introduced at Oxford and Edinburgh universities. “The Board have emphasised electronic resources, such as journals, as the key rationale for centralisation. But it’s completely unclear as to what would happen with anything else, like fines for example,” the English Faculty Librarian told TCS. But, she continued: “I welcome the initiative and think that there is room for a unique model of balance that need not repeat the mistakes of Oxford and Edinburgh.” A spokesman for the General Board emphasised that, while it was true that libraries had not been consulted prior to the publication of the review’s recommendations, “consultation is ongoing.” Each School will now submit a response to the proposals by November 7th, although the final decision will rest with the Board. Photo: Nick in exsilio New plans to give control of departmental and faculty libraries to Cambridge University Library (UL) have raised concerns among some faculty librarians, anxious for the future of their institutions. A review of University teaching and learning support, undertaken by the General Board, has recommended that steps be taken to centralise the administration of faculty libraries, which are currently independent. The Board, which advises the university on educational policy, recommends that, “the UL should be given a more pro-active role in the organisation of faculty and departmental libraries… with the aim of providing cost-effective, high-quality delivery of library and e-information services.” While some librarians have welcomed the proposals, others are worried that the loss of faculty library independence could be bad news for their students. “Smaller subjects could suffer in a centralised budget, because they don’t have the student numbers,” said Faculty Librarian of Classics Lyn Bailey. Despite the far-reaching implications of the proposed reforms, Bailey complains that “no department or faculty librarians were involved or even consulted,” during the review process. “It’s a bit of a shock when you come back from your holidays and find this document potentially threatening your whole library,” Bailey said. “Presumably it’s a costcutting exercise, but we’re not sure where the benefits are coming from - unless they’re going to shut the libraries,” she added. But these worries are completely unfounded according to CUSU Education officer Ant Bagshaw, who sits on the General Board as one of its student members. “Nothing in the review suggests that library closures are even on the cards,” he told The Cambridge Student (TCS). He added that although cost-cutting was one of the Board’s goals, a large part of these savings would be made through the centralisation of journal licenses. “The General Board will be looking to make savings that aren’t at the cost of provision,” he said. Now there are no more excuses for missing lectures Katie Spenceley News Editor Lectures given by Cambridge University experts can now be downloaded onto computers and iPods in the form of a podcast. Now available on iTunes U, which is a section of the iTunes Store dedicated to offering free educational content, Cambridge University will provide users with free access to material from some of the University’s leading academics as well as other world experts on demand. Over 300 lectures, including talks by historian David Starkey, along with interviews with some of Cambridge University’s Nobel Prize winners, will be available to both students and the general public as a result of the university-run scheme. Cambridge on iTunes will also feature the opportunity to download an analysis of the Enron scandal, a guided tour of the exhibitions at the Fitzwilliam Museum by leading experts, and Dr Chris Smith’s popular show ‘The Naked Scientist’. Their popular podcast currently occupies the number one spot on the science download charts in the US, as well as hovering in the top 20 science downloads in the iTunes Store for most of the rest of the world. ‘Cambridge ideas - now they’re on your desktop!’ Wolfson College Fellow and Observer columnist, John Naughton said in a statement about the launch: “The old adage that ‘Cambridge ideas change the world’ has just received a new twist: now they’re on your desktop.” Students hoping to apply to Cambridge will also be able to download videos to aide them through the application and interview process. All the content will be available to users of Macs and PCs and can also be downloaded to an iPod or iPhone. The new online archive allows visitors to the iTunes Store a chance to view all of Cambridge’s stock of recorded material for the first time in one accessible place. To find out more, log on to http:// www.cam.ac.uk/itunesu The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 04|News ADC reopens after £2.2m revamp New dressing rooms, soundproofed rehearsal spaces and seating installed during six month closure Anna Croall Deputy News Editor The ADC reopened its doors this Tuesday after a six-month closure, marking the end of 5 years of redevelopment. The project, intended to update the theatre’s aging facilities, has needed £2.2million in funding since beginning in 2003, and is hoped to transform the theatre for both audiences and performers. The funding came from a combination of donations from the university, charitable funds, and several notable alumni. £1million of this went into the most recent stage of the uplift, which has seen the improvement of seating, and the creation of an entirely new space, the Larkum Studio. Renovation has been on the cards at the theatre since the early nineties, when many involved with the theatre began to suggest an update of the facilities. It is hoped that the completion of renovations will make the theatre, whose boards have been trodden by such notable figures as Stephen Fry, Emma Thompson and comedy duo Mitchell and Webb, more effective as a performance and re- hearsal space for all involved. The theatre, which was established in Park Street as the centre of University drama in Cambridge in 1855, has been through many changes since first being created in a rented room at the Hoop Inn. It was in 1882 that the Amateur Dramatics Club actually bought the space, and it remained under student control until it ran into financial difficulties in 1973. Since then the theatre has been run by the University as a department, with a staff of four, attracting audiences from across Cambridge, including significant support from outside the student population. The theatre retains, though, a very close association with both CUADC and Footlights, and remains, in term time, primarily a centre of student drama and comedy. Despite changes in its administration, the theatre retained many of its traditions, including a ban on female performers until 1995. The recent redevelopment has begun to update some of the theatre’s less appealing features. In particular, the theatre’s new seating has been welcomed by audiences, whose experience of the uncomfortable seating in the past was a common criticism. The new seating has also been created to maximise the audience’s view of the stage itself, aiming to be pleasing on an artistic level as well. The theatre has also improved its performance and rehearsal spaces with the creation of the Larkum Studio. The sound-insulated space is intended to provide a much-needed rehearsal and audition area for the theatre’s many productions. Theatre manager James Baggeley expressed hope that audiences would appreciate the improvements, and added, “What they won’t see is just as remarkable - refurbished dressing rooms with showers, greatly expanded wing-space and new production and workshop facilities. “We hope our audiences love the changes as much as we do.” The new season kicks off with a Cambridge American Stage Tour production of Henry V as a main show at 7.30pm and the Footlights Edinburgh show ‘Devils’ on as the late show at 11pm. Both shows will be running until Saturday. Police whistles make a comeback Initiative aims to clamp down on behaviour of “anti-social” cyclists Alex Glasner Deputy News Editor Whistles have come back into fashion with police on Cambridge’s streets. In an attempt to clamp down on illegal cycling, police officers have taken to using whistles to deter anyone they see committing traffic offences. University students had already been aware of a heightened police presence on Trinity Street, amongst others, but now the police will no longer have to lose their voices, instead they can rely on whistles to stop cyclists. The police have said that they are trying to make the centre of Cambridge “a better place for all concerned.” The aim, they say, is to stop cyclists from cycling where “they shouldn’t be... such as pavements.” Foreign students ‘are not aware of the traffic laws here’ The move has come just in time for the start of term, and many residents “have applauded its use,” PC Steve Hinks told Cambridge News. Such “anti-social” cyclists are a “huge problem” and take up much police time. PC Hinks said that some of the problem was due to the foreign students, who “are not aware of traffic laws here.” This is the first time that whistles will have been used by police on Cambridge streets for 30 years, despite having graced the roads for 200 years before. It seems that prior to this, there were many who flouted these laws. Classicist Rosie Coombs has told TCS, “I don’t want to be late for lectures, so I have to cut corners. I don’t know what I’ll do now.” Constance Daggett, a second year Girtonian, told TCS, “I was fined thirty pounds in my first week for going down a wrong way street, but I didn’t even know it was wrong at the time.” But she added that it might “bring discipline to our roads.” One student, who wanted to remain anonymous, claimed he would be prepared if police tried to fine him. “If they catch me,” he said, “I’ll just claim stupidity.” The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 News|05 Downing staircase sealed in asbestos scare Owen Kennedy Deputy News Editor Charles Brown’s helicopter descends on Downing Photograph: Richard Taplin The staircase is to be sealed for three weeks Photograph: Dina Verkhratratska Asbestos has been discovered at Downing College, forcing the closure of a staircase used to store the belongings of international students. In an email to the student body, Downing Senior Tutor Dr. Graham Virgo announced that “a small amount” of the toxic substance had been found in the basement of a staircase on the main college site. The basement will now be closed for at least three weeks until it is safe to use again. The staircase in question was a fellows’ staircase, so no students have been forced to move out. But the basement where the asbestos was found was also home to the JCR office and a luggage storage room, both of which will be inaccessible while the staircase is out of use. The luggage room, which currently remains off limits, is used by international students to store possessions over the summer, many of whom are unable to take them home. The discovery of asbestos has therefore seriously inconvenienced them as they return after the summer vacation. Dr. Virgo advised those affected that they “may wish to bring additional clothing etc to cover this period”, but promised that the college would be able to provide bedding for any student that needed it. The Bursar of Downing, Dr. Susan Lintott, told The Cambridge Student (TCS): “A piece of asbestos boarding was discovered in debris in a service void, accessed through a door adjacent to the International Students’ Luggage Store. “The College decided to evacuate the entire staircase until documentary proof was obtained that the residential area was safe. To satisfy the College’s concerns, on Saturday morning further air testing was carried out in the main staircase, which gave the College the ‘all clear’ for the residents to move back in. The basement, however, remains sealed off prior to the removal of any contaminated material...It is anticipated that the decontamination process will take 5 days under controlled conditions.” “At present, no asbestos has been found in the International Students’ Luggage Store nor in the adjacent rooms. However, because of the theoretical risk of cross contamination, the entire basement is sealed off and regrettably students will be unable to access their belongings for at least three weeks.” Downing JCR President Daniel Chapman said that he did not expect students to be too inconvenienced by the staircase being quarantined: “In total about 20-30 students keep their belongings in storage over the vacation, and most of what they store are non-essential items. For those who are missing the essentials, such as duvets and linen, the College have provided a linen pack, containing bedding and towels etc. We’re keeping students updated on developments, and hopefully the problem will be resolved before too long.” This is not the first time that asbestos has caused problems in the university. In March of this year King’s was fined £16,000 by Cambridge Magistrates’ Court for breaching safety regulations after it emerged that painters working at the college in November 2006 had been exposed to the substance. Asbestos, once prized for being extremely heat resistant, has been used in the past for everything from brake pads to fireproofing in buildings. But its use is now strictly controlled, after it was discovered that exposure to asbestos fibres can cause lung cancer, plaques (scarring) and asbestosis, a chronic breathing disorder. There are estimated to be anywhere between 3500 and 5000 asbestos-related deaths per year in the UK. Cambridge in new admissions shake-up Shane Murray Interviews Editor The University Admissions office has unveiled a raft of new initiatives to increase the rate of successful applicants from state schools to the university and to encourage more students from non-traditional backgrounds to apply in the first place. Chief amongst the reforms was the appointment of the university’s first director of undergraduate re- cruitment, Jon Beard, who is himself a former state school pupil. Having previously worked as the Head of the Admissions and Outreach Office at the University of East Anglia, Mr Beard has been charged with further increasingdiversity after this year’s rise in successful state school applications from 55 per cent to 59 per cent. One part of the plan to increase state school applicants is through the use of new media, including social networking sites like Facebook, SMS messages, podcasts and viral marketing campaigns. In addition to this, Cambridge has also introduced a plan to offer one year foundation courses for pupils who fail to get their place because they did not get the required ALevel grades. The courses are designed to help give a second chance to those pupils who the university thinks have potential, but have missed out on their grades for some reason. The courses are designed to give educational and financial sup- port, if necessary, to the pupils for their re-takes. The courses are said to be aimed at state school students who are unable to fulfil their promise because of adverse circumstances at their school, but there is not currently a set of qualifications for the courses. The university also plans to expand its Area Links scheme, through which every Cambridge college is linked to a local authority and works with them to provide students with the chance to visit Cambridge, as well as providing mentoring to particularly bright pupils. In addition the university’s summer school programmes are to be expanded. The schools work with pupils from years 7-10 to identify intelligent students early on through a pilot programme. Finally, the University will be holding a conference in April with teachers from the state sector to discuss how changes to the education system should affect the Cambridge admissions process. The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 News|07 Wine ban protests continue Carly Hilts Deputy News Editor A campaign to reinstate the right of Johnians to bring wine into formal hall is ongoing. Last week returning members of St John’s received a letter informing them that they would no longer be allowed to provide their own alcohol. Instead, junior members will be served two glasses of college wine with their dinner if they buy a new, more expensive drinking ticket. Non-drinking tickets will cost £4.36. Drinking tickets are £6.97. This means that students will be charged £2.67 for two glasses of College wine. A Facebook group, ‘St John’s Has Banned Us Taking Wine To Hall!’ has been set up to protest these changes. The group argues that the new ticket prices are unfair, saying that this is ‘cheap by pub standards but much more expensive per glass than being able to buy a £4 bottle from Sainsbury’s.’ Many students have voiced their dismay at the new rules. Fourth year Mathematician Jonathan Nelson told The Cambridge Student (TCS): “This is another example of St Johns failing to understand its students. The vast majority are adults who drink responsibly and will only find their freedoms restricted by this new measure, and will justifiably backlash against it.” Fourth year Engineer Jack Yelland added: “I find it odd that at one end of the scale college are encouraging us to think independently and innovatively in our learning whilst in hall they treat us like children who are not responsible enough to decide what or how much we drink.” It has been suggested that these new measures are because of St John’s consistently low position in the Tompkins Table (currently 20th). However, Selwyn, currently top of the table, has no restrictions on how much wine students can bring to hall. A meeting to discuss the issue was held last Monday in St John’s JCR, where the JCR Committee agreed to call an open meeting at a later date. In the meantime, many students are debating the best course of action. The College has tried to entice Johnians to continue coming to hall by offering all junior members two free tickets. Many have called for students to return them with a letter to the Master, and to boycott formal hall altogether in protest. Others argue it would be better to use the free tickets and then not go to hall again. In a bulletin for Johnian grads sent out last week, SBR President Eva-Marie Hempe said: “I encourage everyone to voice their reservations about those new rules…directly to the people in charge (the Master, Senior Tutor and Tutor for Graduate Affairs). I tried hard. It’s now up to you to show you care.” St John’s College Bar Students at St John’s are campaigning for the right to bring their own wine into hall to be reinstated Photograph: Sven Palys The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: comment@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 Grow some balls, Tories Comment|09 Seeking to appear statesmanlike, the Tories are too quick to support untested government policies Dan Heap & Matt Horrocks TCS T what is known now. However, this attempt to gain political traction with the benefit of hindsight speaks more to their attempts to curry favour with a jaded electorate than to their concern for the national interst. Only the Liberal Democrats had the balls to stand up to the government and expose the war for the disaster that it was always going to be, and was. Both parties never shut up about how much they want to have ‘a national debate’ over key issues, but HM Opposition frequently shirks its duty to scrutinise government policy in order to win a few extra Brownie points for appearing to be the nice guys. At the time of the vote on the Iraq war, the Conservatives were languishing in the polls and were convinced by a misleading dossier that support for military action was merited. Their mistake is justifiable. When they agreed, without significant debate, to allow the nationalisation of Nortern Rock, they were again down in the public’s estimation. This is no longer the case. Cameron has recently pledged to support the Government’s proposed rescue of the national banking system. We do not seek to oppose the rescue here, as it appears to be a neceassary step to save our small corner of the financial world. What one must take issue with though, Photo: Blue Cross he past 15 years of British politics have been marked by a political consensus that echoes that much debated ‘post-war consensus’ of over half a century ago. Both parties generally agree on almost all the fundamentals. The Conservatives now agree with New Labour on most social issues, and have committed themselves to spending similar amounts on public services. Issues such as abortion law and homosexual rights are decided more by the ethical convictions of individual MPs than the party line. Politicians may strut around with different coloured rosettes, but any semblance of genuine political conflict has long since been lost. Time after time, Cameron has saved Blair and Brown when Labour backbenchers might otherwise have caused a government defeat. There are, however, two ways in which they go about affecting this consensus. In the first instance, agreement on matters of social and economic policy comes about due to the convergence of both parties on the centre. Labour has occupied this ground since 1994. For many members of the Conservative Party elected since 1997, New Labour’s policies are acceptable positions and the ones that their constituents would want them to pursue. We are a centrist nation and one cannot fault the Tory MPs for voting with the Government when they agree. This has been evident in the debate over top-up fees. It is an entirely respectable right-wing position to support students paying for their unbiversity education out of their future wages. That they voted with the Government and therefore saved it from defeat at the hands of Labour rebels is not their fault. So far, so commendable. Howev, it is over more important matters that the Conservative party reveals its cowardice. In times of national urgency, the Tories have too often elected to trust in the Government rather than challenge it. Their leaders have fallen over themselves in their desire to look bipartisan and statesmanlike. The Tories do this to foster the impression that they have the national interest at heart, but more often than not they end up doing themselves more harm than good. In the aftermath of 9/11, they took the Labour government at its word and happily supported the decision to go to war in Iraq. The Tories were quite content to criticise it after the event, but wouldn’t stand up to the Government when it mattered, when it would have made a difference. Iain Duncan Smith has since said that his party would not have supported the war had it known is the Tories’ easy acquiesence. The public cannot tell whether or not the Government’s proposal is sound until it has received a thorough going over in the highest deliberative body in the land. Far from being in the national interest, it is frankly irresponsible of the oposition not to question, probe and tweak the proposed legislation. The stakes could not have been higher when Republicans and some Democrats voted down the first Baill-out package last week. The world was watching, but they didn’t allow themselves to be pressured into making a snap decision. They knew that debate is essential and good. They forced it back to the drawing-board and the bill, now passed, seems to be a better one for the American people. The Conservatives must do the same. Their party has sufficient strength; it is their leader that lacks confidence. Dan Heap is a 3rd year SPSer at Fitzwilliam and TCS Comment Editor. Matt Horrocks is a 3rd Year Historian at Jesus and Editor of TCS. made some fair points, and gave out free food, so I too am now a (nominal) Sparrowist. Whether you’re a thespian, Pastafarian or egalitarian the Societies fair is where the Cambridge experience truly begins. University is a place in which you can define yourself, reinvent yourself or just be yourself and how better to do this than by joining or founding a society which celebrates the things you most enjoy? On the Labour stall I encountered those who were angry with my party or worse, apathetic to it all, but this was easily reconciled by the many people who took a genuine interest in what we were about and how they could get involved. Equally the TCS stall had a constant flow of those willing to put themselves forward as writers, journalists and photographers. The societies fair may be an odd introduction to (at least) three years of University life, but it is certainly an enjoyable one. It is a necessary means of engaging students with prospective groups and organisations; even the crowded hall and stuffy atmosphere can be tolerated when at every corner you meet interesting and diverse societies. Around the Labour stall there were drama groups, activist organisations and those advertising transcendental meditation. A testiment to the varied and (mostly) worthwhile pursuits of Cambridge students. When the emails start to flood ceaselessly into your inboxes, don’t “expunge” too hastily. Be sure to consider the opportunities presented by the societies you spoke to, Sparrowist and Labour alike. Pete Jefferys is TCS Comment Editor. Ahoy ye Freshers! Pete Jefferys Pembroke W herever I look the words ‘I Love Vodka’ scream up at me. Everyone at the Freshers’ Fair is, it seems, enamoured of watered down ethanol. At least this is the message that I am gleaning from the plastic carrier bags, handily provided by those connoisseurs of fine drinking and socialising, ‘Vodka Revs’. I somehow doubt that the Freshers’ taste for Russia’s favourite beverage will last past the weekend, however, when many of them will be curled over, spewing their love onto the cobbles of St Andrews Street. But it’s nice for them to gain social kudos; for now at least. The Societies Fair is often the first flirtation Freshers have with Cambridge as an institution, rather than just their own college. It is also the best opportunity for many returning students to sample the wares of some of our strangest, and best loved, societies. It seems all you need to do to get sheet after sheet of email sign-ups is hand out free pizza, offer juggling tuition or dress up as a pirate. The latter is, of course, a reference to perhaps the weirdest named of all Cambridge societies – the ‘Pastafarian Sparrowists’ (they give out pasta and dress as Captain Jack Sparrow). I was actually quite pleased when I found out that the stall I would be manning, that of CULC (Cambridge Universities Labour Club), was opposite that of the Pastafarians. I assumed that a man waving a Jolly Roger and bearing a passing resemblance to Johnny Depp would draw a crowd from which we could entice at least a few budding socialists. This backfired spectacularly, however, when Jack Sparrow himself started heckling us about climate change. To be To be lectured on global warming by a pasta eating pirate was a real low lectured on global warming by a man whose club runs with the aim of ‘making the world more piratey’ was a real low. But he The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: comment@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 10|Comment Keynes: the comeback kid? We need to look backwards to the era of Social Democracy to escape the Credit Crunch crisis George Owers Jesus G eorge Santayana’s oft-quoted remark that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” has never seemed so relevant. As the extent of the world financial crisis has become ever more apparent, lazy journalists and politicians have attributed its origins to the incompetency and greed of the self-styled We allowed the neoliberal nutters to prepare the ground for a fall from grace ‘masters of the universe’ who have been running our financial system. This analysis ascribes the economic situation to the failings of flawed individuals within the context of basically sound system. In contrast, the truth is that history shows that the sort of unregulated, laissezfaire turbo-capitalism that has prevailed since the intellectual terrain shifted in favour of the neoliberal right in the 1970s is doomed to instability, slump, and disaster. The basic problem of laissezfaire capitalism is that what is rational for the individual corporation is collectively irrational. For example, capitalists need to drive down wages from the perspective of their individual self-interest, because this increases profit margins, but they simultaneously want every other firm to actually increase wages. For unless working people have a reasonable level of purchasing power, the level of demand in the economy will depress each firm’s output and profits. Obviously, however, it is impossible for every firm to simultaneously pay the low wages needed for profitability and the high wages needed to maintain a decent level of real demand in the economy. Laissez-faire capitalism thus depresses demand by the inequality of wealth it creates, which makes it spectacularly self-defeating. Unless the state intervenes to regulate markets and re-distribute wealth downwards, then capitalism cannot but succumb to a cycle of eye-watering booms and slumps. This was the fundamental lesson of the 1930s. The pioneering work of J.M Keynes showed how governments, by the skilful manipulation of fiscal policy, intervention to stimulate demand, and regulation to prevent the excesses of market fundamentalism becoming self-defeating, can reform and humanise capitalism. For the past thirty years, economic policy-makers have been in thrall to a brand of Neanderthal capitalism which has completely disregarded the intellectual legacy of Keynes. We merrily forgot his lessons and allowed the neoliberal nutters to prepare the ground for a spectacular fall from economic grace. In order to plug the gap between the demand needed to fuel economic growth and the level of wages and benefits most conducive to profitability, a huge system of debt and credit, both in personal and institutional terms, was created, without any consideration being given to the potential for disaster when credit dries up. Now this system’s instabilities and internal contradictions are manifesting themselves in financial bedlam, where do the previously super-liberal ideologues of laissez-faire turn? But we must not allow the state to merely bail out the current managers of this unsustainable system and then allow it to go back to business as normal. A re-assertion of the potential of the state to intervene to ensure that economic processes work sustainably for the majority rather than the tiny economic elite who have benefited disproportionately from the salad days of capitalist aban- John Maynard Keynes Image: businessweek.com don is badly needed. In short, we need a resurrection of the intellectual legacy of Keynesian social-democracy. However, in the short-term any such intellectual vindication will not help the millions of ordinary people who stand to lose most spectacularly. As always, the biggest victims will be the working and lower-middle class. The economic decline of these classes can have potentially disastrous political consequences. The Great Depression of the 1930s was a crisis that only the Left had any real solutions to, but it was a situation exploited, more often than not, by radicals of the Right rather than of the Left. The desperate and the dispossessed are vulnerable to the demagoguery of the racist, irrational politics of the far-right to a worryingly high degree—one only has to witness the triumph of the right-wing in the recent Austrian elections to see the truth of this assertion. Only by articulating and enacting a realistic politics of socialdemocratic reform can we avoid this and correct the practical and moral failings of the world order. In short, as in the aftermath of the Great Depression, we need the Left to intervene to help save capitalism from itself. So, what practical steps can be taken in this direction? What are the 21st century social-democratic solutions? The problem is not one that can be dealt with on a national level alone, although national action is very much part of the solution. New international institutions of economic governance need to be set up and enforced with a mandate of co-ordinating regulatory efforts, in order to enforce an ethic of responsibility in financial markets – in short, a new BrettonWoods system, closer to Keynes’s original vision, is needed. The whole market for credit has to be reformed and re-regulated at both a national and international level to ensure responsible lending. Governments need to recognise that the levels of personal and institutional debt that have been amassed in order to maintain the levels of demand required for economic growth are not sustainable. Instead of maintaining demand by the reckless policy of encouraging irresponsible lending, governments need to do so by a greater level of state intervention; that is, by sensitive demand management via fiscal policy, and more emphasis on using monetary policy to stimulate growth, rather than the unhealthy obsession with controlling inflation engendered by neoliberalism. Furthermore, and possibly most importantly, the incredible levels of economic inequality created by unrestrained capitalism need to be tackled by a greater political willingness to re-distribute wealth downwards. Not only is this a moral imperative, it will also increase the sustainability of the economic system by boosting the purchasing power of ordinary people. However, this can only happen in a context of much stricter global economic regulation that ensures that national policy cannot be dictated by flights of capital and attacks We need the left to intervene to save capitalism from itself by speculators. Such reforms can roll back the moral and economic chaos of the past thirty years, because they can humanise capitalism, making it more moral and less dangerously volatile. Capitalism is extraordinarily good at using the political system to further its interests, and countless times the people’s representatives side with the bosses and not those who they are chosen to represent. The big question is whether the political will exists to do what the people need, and not continue with the wishes of the interests that have got us into the hole we’re in at the moment. George Owers is a second year studying SPS and is the editor of CU Labour Club’s ‘Red Letter’. The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: comment@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 Comment|11 What’s wrong with winning? New Labour has fostered an unhealthy and potentially disastrous anti-competitive culture in our schools Victoria Watson A Jesus got an opinion? email comment@tcs.cam.ac.uk disturbing trend is threatening our society. That trend is the increasing propensity of the education system to create a false sense of equality amongst young people. Nobody is allowed to fail; an illusionary culture and one which is unhelpful as preparation for entry into the competitive labour market. The most recent example of this is the impending abolition of oral examinations for GCSE languages since, according to Lord Dearing, many people remembered their orals as a “stressful experience.” It is not so much the fact that an oral aspect appears essential to any meaningful language examination, but rather the principle behind its abolition which is problematic. Examinations are, by their very nature, stressful, and overcoming stress is an ability in itself which should be rewarded. The idea that the stress factor unjustly divides pupils according to ability has also led to the excessive use of coursework assessment for GCSEs and A-Levels; a development which has made it increasingly difficult to separate the men from the boys. New Labour seems to think it is unfair to select for academic ability, which means that pupils are artifically levelled round an average, which means that the brightest are not stretched. So keen is the Government that no pupil should leave school a dissatisfied customer, that they even allow exams to be retaken an infinite number of times in order that pupils might eventually gain the grade they desire. This system is grossly unfair to both the apparent winners and the losers. The obvious losers are the best pupils whose superiority is not reflected in examination results when the same grade can be achieved by pupils of considerably weaker intellect. Furthermore, the UCAS form does not require overall UMS scores to be stated, and so pupils bordering 100% are grouped in the same category as those who scored 80%, meaning that the greater achievement goes completely unnoticed, thereby corrupting the university admissions process. While sporting and musical achievement is celebrated, rosettes distributed and applause given, those with academic talents are frequently denied recognition and their achievements confined to an examination certificate. An additional problem is that there is little incentive for such pupils to develop those talents for they are aware that they can achieve the required grades without stretching themselves and without truly engaging with their subjects. Enterprise is suppressed, ambition quelled and potential unrealised. The obvious winners at first glance are the average pupils who can lead a comfortable, stress-free school existence and emerge with a string of good grades. But the unnatural elevation of pupils and their protection from failure is unhealthy and will cause problems when they enter the the cut-throat workplace. Competition is a natural part of life and to try and manufacture uniformity is unwarranted and unhelpful for pupils in the long term. Gone are the days when exam results were posted on the wall and the knowledge that your grades would be visible to others a motivator to work hard. Academic achievement must remain shrouded in secrecy, as though guilt should be a natural reaction to demonstration of talent in this field. The theorist Thomas Hobbes postulated that “if all things were equal in all men, nothing would be prized”, the point being that things are unequal and therefore that excellence should be prized in all fields, including academia. The 11+ exam still stirs up controversy more than 60 years after its inception. One of the main arguments against it is the fear that the psychological effect of failing them might permanently scar the developing young mind. This seems to be an unjustifiable conclusion to reach since, by this age, children should be able to cope with such disappointments and there is the facility for the most able children to move to such schools later if they prove worthy of a place. Competition is natural, it means winning and losing and it means learning to accept either outcome, treating the imposters of triumph and disaster just the same, to quote Kipling. It is ironic to hear Gordon Brown proclaiming in his Spring Conference Speech that we live in “an age of ambition” since, within the system of ‘school socialism’ de- Many children are unprepared for the harsh realities of life outside school veloped and nurtured under New Labour, it is exactly ambition which is being lost and a tendency to simply do the minimum encouraged. Already leading universities are complaining about the quality of modern undergraduates whose school careers have insufficiently prepared them for study at the higher level. With one in four A Level entries being awarded an A in 2007, it is clear that the examinations are no longer capable of adequately separating pupils according to ability and that grades are falsely inflated. The naive view would be to attribute these results solely to the apparent success of educational establishments and to the children themselves, as well as seeing the state’s creation of generation after generation of happy school children as benevolent engineering. Many children are left unprepared for the harsh realities of competitive life outside school while others are not rewarded for their talents and not motivated to pursue excellence. Civilisation will pay. Victoria Watson is a 2nd year SPSer. The Cambridge Student |09/10/08 Email: international@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 12|Bursting The Bubble Afghanistan ‘Afghanistan’s bravest woman’ has won an award for her tireless campaign for women’s rights. Malalai Joya, 30, who has faced multiple death threats and assassination attempts, became the second winner of the annual Anna Politkovskaya Award last Tuesday. The award, named after the Russian journalist and campaigner who was murdered two years ago, was presented by RAW in War, a human rights group focussed on preventing violence against women in conflict situations. India Fighting in the North-East Indian province of Assam.has left 47 dead and tens of thousands homeless. Over 85,000 are now living in government camps, having lost their homes in clashes between Hindu tribesmen and Muslim Bangladeshi settlers. 500 federal police and hundreds of security forces have been deployed in the region, with helicopters patrolling remote areas to track mob movements. Kenya A US author was arrested and deported from Kenya before the launch of his controversial book about Barack Obama. Jerome Corsi, arriving to promote The Obama Nation, was intercepted by immigration officials and taken to the airport by police. Local organisers of the book launch said Corsi had broken no immigration rules but was considered an embarrassment. His book implies that Obama uses drugs and is a Muslim. A recent poll found that 89% of Kenyans want Obama, who has ancestral roots there and is seen to represent Africa on the global stage, to win the US elections. Japan A UK-Japan team of scientists have discovered the “deepest ever” living fish. Remote-controlled landers designed to withstand immense pressures filmed a shoal of 17 pseudoliparis amblystomopsis at 7.7km (4.8miles) in the Japan Trench in the Pacific. The previous record for any fish found alive was 7km (4miles). Monty Priede of the University of Aberdeen called the 30cm fish ‘surprisingly cute’. Thailand Troops have deployed in Bankok after police failed to disperse antigovernment protesters. The protesters are besieging the parliament building in the capital. Prime Minister Somchai Wongsawat fled by helicopter after climbing over a fence to escape. Russia begins Georgia withdrawal Photo: onewmphoto World News Alex Glasner Deputy News Editor Russia will withdraw its troops from buffer zones outside breakaway regions of Georgia by this Friday, a senior Russian military official has said. As part of a ceasefire agreement brokered by France, on behalf of the EU, Russia has until tomorrow to complete the process, begun last Wednesday, of pulling troops out of the ‘security zones’ it set up around the controversial territories of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Marat Kulakhmetov, commander of Russian peacekeepers in the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict zone, said last Tuesday: “Tomorrow, in the first half of the day, the pullout will occur of all six Russian peacekeeping checkpoints from the south of the security zone.” Russian forces were originally stationed in the breakaway regions last August after the Georgian government moved to retake the territory from pro-Moscow separatists who had controlled the area for over 10 years. Russia responded by sending troops into Georgia, claiming that they were necessary to prevent further attacks. Europe and the US have condemned Russia’s ‘disproportionate response’, stressing the need for ‘Georgia’s territorial integrity’. Until now, though, Russian President Dimitri Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have opposed Western pressure to withdraw. Even so, the current fledgling peace process has not been straightforward. Hopes for a ceasefire seemed doomed when a blast killed Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia last week. Eight Russian soldiers, including a senior peacekeeper, and three civilians died when a car exploded close to a military base in the capital, Tskhinvali. Both sides blamed the other for the explosion; Georgia said that it was organised by the Russians who wanted to delay their withdrawal from the region, while Russia accused Georgians wishing to disrupt the ceasefire. Russia plans to maintain 7600 troops inside the rebel regions, which it considers to be independent states, to prevent further hostilities. At an international security conference in France, President Medvedev said that Russia also wanted 200 EU observers to be stationed in the area ‘to act as guarantors’. He said: “This is a European Union matter. We trust them..” However, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters at a news conference in Moscow that the EU monitors would not be allowed inside the two breakaway regions. Georgian Minister for Re-integration Temar Iakobashvili said that Georgia would not consider the pullout complete ‘as long as there are remnants of Russian forces’. Analysis: Russia- the new colonial power? iWitness: Russia Caroline Organ Deputy News Editor Anna Grigorieva Moscow Russia is the country that the British press love to hate. The conflict with Georgia was portrayed as a flagrant attempt by Moscow to extend its borders, targeting small defenceless former satellite states in its quest for European (and if you are to believe some of the scare-mongering, world) domination. Is this a plot from a generic spy novel or a genuine depiction of the situation? In the West, Russia’s invasion of Georgia was condemned as aresponse to Georgia’s attempt to secure its borders; in Russia it was hailed as a victory for the principal of self-determination over imperialism. The breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia are arguably Russian. The majority of their 70,000 residents are ethnically distinct from Georgians and speak their own language related to Farsi. The region had broken away from Georgian control long before the recent clashes, in a war between 1991 and 1992. A peace-keeping force com- prised of 500 members each from Russia, Georgia and North Ossetia, kept relative stability, though sporadic bloody skirmishes continued. Georgia contains the only two pipelines for oil and gas that can carry it from the Caspian Sea to the West that do not go through Russian territory. Thus it is a country that Europe needs to keep on side in order to minimise dependency on wavering Russian cooperation. Is Moscow attacking a small nation that could undermine their attempts to exert the international power that they have gained through prolific energy production? Foreign policy under Putin and Medvedev has been characterised by an almost primal aggression, notably Moscow’s stark warning to the Ukraine that its economy could come grinding to a halt with a flick of a Russian switch. Then again, could this have been an example of an aggressive Georgia attempting a quick territorial gain, hoping that Russia would be unable to intervene? This theory seems equally plausible. Is it fair to assume that alleged Russian support for the separatists is entirely self-serving? It seems not. The population have on the whole chosen Russian passports, affiliating themselves directly with Russia and not Georgia. Further, in the current peace deal, Russia vowed to withdraw its troops from the centre of Georgia, a promise it is honouring, in direct contrast to the Cold War experience of satellite states when Russia would “send in the tanks” and they would stay there for good. It is impossible to know the true motives behind this conflict, but why do we still immediately jump to point the finger at Russia? Rather than a situation where blame should be placed on one nation, it seems simply that once again politicians drawing national borders on a map cannot allow for the essential principal of selfdetermination. The Georgia crisis mirrors the turmoil post-WW1; bloodshed was curbed temporarily, but ultimately discontent grew as people were artificially crammed into national borders with which they did not identify. This, not Russia, it seems is the problem. When a ‘Southern’-looking old woman and a boy got on a bus in Moscow, a Russian 9-year-old asked his own granny: “They’re Georgians, right? Enemies? There’s a war on, right?” She answered: “Yes, maybe... but not so loud.” The closest I came to witnessing the war is watching emergency rescue planes take off near Moscow. Otherwise there were no solid facts; Russian TV churned out hours of propaganda, the radio was full of confused and conflicting information, and BBC online was being disappointingly one-sided. ‘What should we do about Russia?’ (Have Your Say topic of the day) isn’t an invalid question, but it precludes the possibility of ‘doing something about’ Georgia, Ossetia, and Abkhazia too. For the media here, taking a stance against Russia’s scary imperialism is easier than getting lost in a mess of ethnic relations and the history of a conflict hundreds of years long. I’ve never seen the phrase ‘the first casualty of war is the truth’ illustrated so clearly. The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: international@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 Bursting The Bubble|13 New nuclear treaty Escalating crisis in Turkey Anna Croall Deputy News Editor The US Senate has ratified an historic nuclear treaty with India, more than 3 years since President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh first agreed on the principles of the deal. The agreement, which passed by 86 votes to 13, marks a reversal in previous US policy towards India’s nuclear development, after 34 years of consistent opposition to cooperation with the country. India’s refusal to sign the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and its position as a nuclear state testing new weapons in 1974 and 1998, have long deterred any consensus over cooperation over or supply of nuclear materials to the country. Since its inception, the deal between India and the USA has had to clear passage by the US Congress and Senate, agreement from the International Atomic Energy Agency and the approval of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, an assembly of nations exporting nuclear materials. India will now be open to contract bids from American and European nuclear corporations to build $27 million-worth of nuclear reactors, between 18 and 20 plants. Currently nuclear energy provides no more than 7% of India’s power, but is hoped now to help plug the energy deficit in India’s fast-growing economy. According to the Uranium Information Centre, nuclear power is expected to provide 25% of the country’s electricity by 2050, fuelled largely by their high stocks of Thorium, 25% of the world’s supply of which being located in India. This deal not only opens the way to greater use of nuclear resources in energy-production, but will also Frances Winfield TCS Reporter the Kurdish language were allowed, although these remain limited. Nonetheless, despite making up an estimated 20% of Turkey’s population of 70 million, many Kurds feel that they are being oppressed. The largely Kurdish south-eastern regions of Turkey are impoverished, increasing recourse to violent organisations like the PKK. The Turkish government has recently promised to increase spending in infrastructure and irrigation in the region in an attempt to lessen extremist support, but this may take years to achieve results. Ankara is under increasing international pressure regarding its response towards the PKK, which has been linked to civilian casualties, including a series of blasts last July in residential areas of the country’s largest city Istanbul. Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan has promised to increase Turkish retaliation against the rebels. Last Tuesday Turkish warplanes bombed 23 suspected rebel bases both inside the country and over the border in northern Iraq. This was the fourth such strike against the PKK in retaliation for the attack last Friday, but such a response risks alienating members of the international community. In line with US and EU thinking, Ankara regards the PKK as a terrorist organisation, but there are fears in Washington that any escalation of the conflict will provoke further instability in the Middle East. Many suspected rebels are based in Iraq, and should the Turkish military decide to invade, the consequences could resonate throughout the wider area, prolonging the decades-long conflict further. These concerns were sparked by George Bush’s latest comments about the deal, in which he implied that his government had made a ‘political’ but not ‘legally-binding’ commitment. As a political move, the deal has several important implications. In particular, it has severed the often automatic association of India and Pakistan as nuclear states. wBoth Indian and U.S officials have been keen to point out the merits of the agreement as a recognition of the distinctions between the two states. The treaty has also re-sparked comparisons between India and China as centres of economic growth. Many pushing for the deal on the Indian side suggested it could go some way to rectifying limits on imports imposed on India, where none existed in China, such as uranium and other sensitive materials and technology. From the USA, the message has been that this deal will signal America’s support for India to China, making clear that they have other options for investment in Asia. Wherever the compromise may be, this deal is widely acknowledged to be a landmark in US relations with India. KENYA Goat contraceptives Germany Dead poet fined Japan Skinny-dipping Israel Skunk bomb Netherlands Jet-set cat Maasai herders have introduced contraceptives to their goats to protect them from an ongoing drought. The ‘olor’, made from cowhide or plastic, is tied around the belly of a male goat like an apron to prevent them from mating with female goats. The device is intended to prevent goat populations from growing too big while the land they graze on is too barren to support them. Bucks without an olor who impregnate another herder’s doe could earn their owners a hefty fine. Germany’s favourite poet has been sent reminders to pay his TV license fee, despite being dead for over 200 years. Friedrich Schiller, author of ‘Ode to Joy’, was mistakenly registered as a houseowner with the German fee collection agency GEZ, and letters addressed to ‘Mr Friedrich Schiller’ were sent to a primary school named after him in the eastern town of Weigsdorf-Koeblitz. With the annual 200-euro (£157) fee unpaid since 1805, Schiller would now owe over 40,000 euros. GEZ have since apologised. A Spanish tourist has been arrested after swimming naked in the moat of the Tokyo Imperial Palace, one of Japan’s most sacrosanct sites. The middle-aged man dived into the water and swam across the moat, before climbing the palace wall and splashing water at Japanese police trying to catch him from a rowing boat. In front of a gathering crowd, he then charged at the police armed with a pole and a rock. He was finally detained after a chase lasting over two hours. Israeli police have deployed a new crowd-control method, called a ‘skunk bomb’, for the first time. The device sprayed a foul-smelling liquid at Palestinian protesters at a security barrier in Naalin, dispersing the crowd. The spray’s smell has been compared to that of sewage, and is hard to get rid of, even after showering. It was developed by Israeli defence scientists analysing the liquid squirted by frightened skunks. Israeli officials say medical and legal authorities have approved the weapon. A three-month-old kitten travelled unseen to Amsterdam after stowing away in a suitcase. Owner Helen Wilmore, saw Beauty sleeping on her bed while she was packing for a weekend break, but could not find the cat upon leaving her house in Bradford. She discovered the kitten, alive and well, 21 hours later. However, Beauty may not be able to return home due to the cost of required injections, rabies checks, passport and airfare. Mrs Wilmore has bought a new kitten called Cuddles. Photo: Flokru allow India to participate in international nuclear commerce and research. It has also been suggested that the deal automatically wins acceptance for India’s nuclear weapons. Nevertheless, India remains bound by several conditions, including a commitment against proliferation and the testing of any new nuclear weapons, and agreement to International Atomic Energy Agency inspections on civilian nuclear reactors. On first signing the legislation in December 2006, US President Bush said: “The bill will help keep America safe by pacing the way for India to join the global effort to stop the spread of nuclear weapons… India will now operate its civilian nuclear energy programme under internationally-accepted guidelines and the world is going to be safer as a result.” But many of those opposed to nuclear proliferation, especially in the USA, worry that the treaty will not sufficiently deter India from testing nuclear weapons. On the Indian side, there is anxiety that the Bush administration’s commitment to the new arrangement might not be sincere. Seventeen Turkish soldiers and 23 rebel fighters were killed in an ambush last Friday, increasing the death toll of a 24-year struggle. The attack, which is one of the deadliest attributed to the separatist movement Partiya Karkarên Kurdistan (Kurdish Workers’ Party, PKK) so far this year, occurred in the area of Semdinli on the Turkish borders with Iraq and Iran. Rebels blew up a bridge near the Iraqi border as a military convoy crossed. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said: “We are determined to respond to these events in a level-headed manner. What must be done will be done… We are very angry at the moment.” Turkey has experienced internal conflict since the beginning of the PKK’s armed campaign for greater Kurdish autonomy in 1984. Much of the fighting, which has caused over 40,000 deaths, has been in the southern and eastern regions of the country which are largely Kurdish-inhabited. The Kurds have been a displaced people for years, suffering systematic persecution by Saddam Hussein’s forces in Iraq, which some claim amounted to attempts at genocide. There were concerns that Kurdish human rights were ignored by the Turkish military in the 1980s and 1990s. However, June 2004 saw the Turkish authorities beginning to relax certain cultural and linguistic restrictions: the very first state television and radio broadcasts in Mad World The Cambridge Student |09/10/08 Email: international@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: international@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 Bursting The Bubble|15 Iceland faces economic meltdown 15% respectively. This crisis has come as a shock to Icelanders, who have enjoyed over a decade of exceptional prosperity. Although at £7.53billion its economy is relatively small, Iceland has seen rapid generation of wealth since the 1990s. Once reliant on fishing, the economy expanded following radical deregulation of the domestic financial market which fuelled a stock market boom and encouraged large-scale investment in foreign companies by Icelandic entrepreneurs. The Icelandic Stock Exchange (ICEX) was Europe’s top-performing exchange in 1994, and 2003 saw a boom in foreign investment in aluminium production. The Icelandic banking sector subsequently expanded, dwarfing the rest of the economy with assets totalling over nine times the annual GDP. The average Icelandic family’s wealth increased 45% in five years, and in 2007 Iceland topped the UN’s seen outside banks as Icelanders rushed to move their savings. There have also been reports of shoppers panic-buying food following an announcement from a supermarket spokesman last Friday that his company could no longer pay the foreign currency advances needed to import commodities such as pasta and olive oil. Analysts have suggested that Iceland should join the euro currency, but Prime Minister Haarde is resistant to this idea. Instead, Iceland is seeking a 4billion euro (£3.23billion) loan from Russia. Russian Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin said that Russia viewed Iceland’s request ‘positively’. In the long term, Iceland hopes that its growing hydropower and geothermal energy industries will carry them back to economic stability. However, it is feared that if Iceland’s banks collapse, the shockwaves will resonate worldwide. Over 150,000 Britons bank with Landsbanki’s UK subsidiary Icesave, while Iceland’s biggest bank, Kaupthing, has spent over £3billion financing deals in Britain. It holds investments in businesses including Costcutter, Somerfield and the Laurel Pub Company, which manages the Slug and Lettuce chain. Any collapse could take down many British high street chains, in which Icelanders invested huge amounts of money in the 1990s. Baugur, an Icelandic investment company, is Britain’s largest private company. Founder Jon Asgeir Johannesson’s £1.5billion portfolio includes Karen Millen, Coast, Oasis, Hamleys and the House of Fraser, among others. Companies in which Baugur has a stake, such as the Iceland supermarket chain and Debenhams, employ 55,000 people in Britain. Euler Hermes, one of the UK’s biggest credit insurers, recently withdrew cover for suppliers to several of the retailers run by Baugur. Nevertheless, Baugur’s CEO, Gunnar Sigurdsson, denied that the company was in real danger, saying: “Baugur would like to state for clarity that its assets are based in the United Kingdom, Scandinavia and the United States, and as such have no exposure to the Icelandic economy.” The wider consequences of Iceland’s economic problems remain to be seen. the question. Biden was judged by most to have won the debate easily, though Palin did succeed in surpassing the chronically low expectations that the media had for her before the debate. The second of three Presidential debates was held on Tuesday night in a townhall format. Obama and McCain took questions from the audience and were allowed to roam around the stage answering them. Obama was judged by most pundits to have narrowly won the debate. Instant polls from two major news networks showed a plurality of viewers to be impressed with him over McCain. Voters continue to be more comfortable with Obama, previously a somewhat unknown quantity, the more they see of him. The two debates thus far have been effective in reassuring the public that Obama can be trusted to lead the nation. Obama continues to lead the polls in several key swing states. At the time of going to print, the RealClearPolitics.com average of trusted polls had the following net leads: Ohio: Obama +4.0% Florida: Obama +3.0% Colorado: Obama +4.0% Virginia: Obama +4.8% Indiana: McCain +2.5% Missouri: Obama +0.3% The same website calculated that were the election decided according to these poll averages, Obama would win by 364 electoral votes to 174. The three debates so far have failed to change the state of the race for McCain. The continuing bad news regarding the economy prevents him from getting an effective message out. It focuses the public’s attention onto economic concerns, where Obama has a significant lead in trustworthiness. The financial problems and rising unemployment have created new battleground states for the Democrats such as Virginia and even North Carolina. McCain needs to hold both of these, along with Florida and Ohio to have a chance of winning. Currently, it looks doubtful. Iceland’s economic crisis has worsened as another of its major banks has been taken over by the government. The small country, with a population totalling around 320,000, has been hit harder than most by the international credit crisis. Last Friday the Icelandic government bought a 75% stake in Glitnir, Iceland’s third-biggest bank, for 600million euros (£478million), following rescue talks. Central Bank governor David Oddsson told a news conference: “Without this intervention, Glitnir would have ceased to exist within the next few weeks.” Following this nationalisation, foreign credit agencies downgraded Iceland’s financial institutions, rating them as the least credit-worthy in Europe. Now Iceland’s second largest bank, Landsbanki, has gone into receivership after the government used emergency powers hurried through parliament last Monday to dismiss the board of directors and replace them with members of Iceland’s Financial Supervising Authority (IFSA). IFSA released a statement announcing ‘business as usual’. The emergency bill was passed by a unity government of the ruling alliance and opposition parties. It allows the state to dictate banking operations, including forcing mergers or requiring a bank to declare bankruptcy. Iceland’s Prime Minister Geir Haarde said in a national address last Monday: “We were faced with the real possibility that the national economy would be sucked into the global banking swell and end in national bankruptcy.” Iceland’s economic woes are compounded by the fact that the króna is in freefall, at its lowest level against Photo: 1541 Carly Hilts International News Editor the US dollar since 1992. Having lost more than half its value since last summer, the beleaguered currency is now rated just ‘A real possibility of national bankruptcy’ above those of Zimbabwe and Turkmenistan. The downturn was partly triggered by speculation that the central bank, with only 4billion euros (£3.09billion) in liquid foreign assets, will be unable to bail out any more failing commercial banks. Collectively the country’s three main state-owned banks have a debt of £120billion, and inflation and interest rates are soaring at 14% and US Election Digest Matt Horrocks Given the risk of drowning our readership in coverage of the American Presidential election in 2008, TCS has elected to condense its coverage into this weekly section, for your convenience. We’ll be doing the same until the issue before the election in a few weeks time. We had two debates this week. The first, the only Vice-Presidential debate to be held this cycle, was one of the most highly anticipated in history. The enthusiasm can be put down to interest in John McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin. The Republican governor attracted right-leaning viewers, keen to see more of their new darling, and liberals, looking for a train wreck. In the end it was somewhat of a let down. Palin didn’t trip over herself on the way to the podium, and save a few factual slip-ups she acquitted herself quite well. Her failing was in the lack of detail to her answers, an area in which her opponent, Senator Joe Biden utterly outclassed her. On many occasions she also entirely failed to answer ‘best country to live in’ poll, but this growth left Iceland vulnerable to global credit problems. Last week long queues could be ‘Glitnir would have ceased to exist within weeks’ The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: interviews@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 16| Interview The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: interviews@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 Interview|17 The Power and the Fury Who wants more money? ‘In the end, I do what I believe to be right. I might be wrong, but I follow what I believe in’ as varied as beauty contests, Australia’s treatment of Aboriginals and the Iraq War. In both defying and attempting to direct public opinion he has frequently been criticised - even by his ideological counterparts - for expressing extreme, and non-mainstream views. I began by asking him about his forthcoming talk at the Cambridge Union, a talk in which Tatchell hopes to convince the student body that there is an desperate need for a new ‘sexual revolution’. “I know we live in a period when the right wing keeps on saying that the sexual revolution has gone too far, but what I’m trying to say is that I don’t think it’s gone far enough,” he tells me. “Since the 1960s, there’s been great progress in terms of extending sexual freedom. There was the liberalisation of the laws on divorce, abortion and homosexuality. In the last decades, there have been some Peter Tatchell talks to Katie Spenceley Photo courtesy of Peter Tatchell improvements in sex education at schools - although the education given to young people is still pretty poor. And this is what I think needs to change. The information pupils receive is still about biology and reproduction - not about actual sex or relationships.” Tatchell can surely hope to provoke more traditionalist wrath with his argument that the age of consent should be lowered to 14 years. Is the lowering of the age really necessary, I ask him? “The age of consent of 16 is completely unrealistic; it’s out of touch with young people’s sexual experience. Whether we like it or not the average age of first sexual contact is around 14.” “Most of that contact is between young people of similar ages where no one is a victim and no one is abused, yet in the eyes of the law they are criminals.” But is it the job of the law simply to fit in line with people’s behaviour? Tatchell claims that his views are neither about approving nor disapproving of people’s sexual behaviour, merely about protecting young children against harsh legal punishments: “In the Sexual Offences Act of 2003 - and for the first time in British law - consenting relations between young people under the age of 16 was explicitly criminalised. And consenting relations can mean any form of sexual contact - even mere kissing and cuddling. The maximum penalty is five years’ imprisonment. That’s not protecting young people: that’s child abuse.” Peter Tatchell is similarly opposed the government’s proposed Extreme Porn Bill, a bill that he says will restrict the rights of individuals and criminalise the innocent: “Still, nowadays, consenting sado-masochistic relations between adults is criminalised in certain circumstances - even if no-one complains and no-one is harmed. Parliament’s new bill will criminalise images of sexual acts which are in themselves perfectly lawful. It’s complete madness.” At this point, I ask him what effect he thinks the trial of Formula 1 boss, Max Moseley has had on this area of his campaigning - has the trial made people more sympathetic to Tatchell’s views? “People might have become more sympathetic, but the coverage tended to be quite lurid and sensationalist. I think the effect on many people was to turn them off. “On the other hand one gets the feeling that quite a sizeable proportion of the population did concur with his view that what consenting adults do in private is no business of the state. I think the tabloids will be a lot more circumspect about their intrusions into people’s private lives in future. That at least is a good and positive thing.” But of course, it is not just private lives that are scrutinised by the media. One of the most striking things about Tatchell as a political and public figure is that he seems to be a magnet for criticism from the media from both ends of the political spectrum. He tells me with a wry smile that this is something that can get a little tiring: “Yes, I seem to get it in the neck all the time. Some on the left say I am a racist, neo-con apologist, while the neo-cons, the racists, the rightwing say I’m a left-wing patsy. “In the end, I do what I believe to be right. I might be wrong, but I follow what I believe in. That’s all anyone can do. I do take comfort from the fact that over the years the issues that I’ve been criticised the most in have ultimately become mainstream majority issues - like lesbian and gay human rights, like Zimbabwe, and like the lies over the war in Iraq.” So, I ask him, is it better to be outside the mainstream political system? Not necessarily, he tells me: “It’s always preferable to be able to sit down with someone over a cup of tea and agree a resolution to an injustice. You know, for instance, it wasn’t my first option to interrupt the Archbishop of Canterbury in his Cathedral. I only did that with my Outrage colleagues because he refused to have any kind of dialogue with the LGBT community over his support for homophobic discrimination. He wanted the law to discriminate against citizens of this country who happen to be gay. That’s wrong. I wanted to have a discussion with him. It would have been nice to have gone to Lambeth Palace and have tea and cakes with Dr Carey but he didn’t entertain that. Direct action is always a last resort but it’s often a necessary resort. Those in power are so often resistant to change and ignore pleas for compassionate justice. The suffragettes found that, so did the black Civil Rights marches in the United States, so did the millions of people who refused to pay the Poll Tax.” And what about this word that seems to circle Peter Tatchell like a tabloid reporter - “controversial”? ‘The age of consent of 16 is completely unrealistic; its out of touch with young peoples’ sexual experience’ “I neither like it nor dislike it being called “controversial”. Just because you are controversial doesn’t mean you are right. It’s always very gratifying when, occasionally, even some of the right-wing press express grudging admiration and endorse some of things I’ve said - their motives may be suspect - but it’s a sort of endorsement which is pleasing after all the stick I’ve taken from the tabloids. “I think what I’ve managed to achieve is that, because of my sheer bloody-mindedness and consistency, even my critics have come round to a kind of grudging respect. They’ve often ended up endorsing my views, or if not have eventually acknowledged that I’ve got a respectable viewpoint. “It would have been very easy for me to cosy up to the establishment. I could have got a high-paid and wellrespected job - but I’m doing what I believe to be right, and some times that puts me in the mainstream, but at other times that takes me away from the heart of power and I’m on the fringes. The response I get is always very mixed. Some people love me, others hate me.” Peter Tatchell will be appearing with Abby Lee at the Cambridge Union to debate the motion “This House Calls For a Sexual Revolution” today at 7.30pm. T he Taxpayers‘ Alliance is a think-tank and grass roots campaign group that was set up in 2004 by a group of libertarian Conservatives. Having become disillusioned with the Conservative Party because it abandoned the tax-cutting agenda, they have since sought to influence opinion through the media to create public demand for lower taxes. With what’s come out of the Lib Dem conference about cutting taxes and the Conservatives talking about a spending freeze, do you think the tax-cutting agenda’s time has come or this just a blip while we’re going through hard times? I think people are definitely more receptive than they were. What we’ve seen in the credit crunch is a major shift in the polls. Tax has gone as high as number two in people’s priorities; it used to be education or health. It just shows how perceptions have changed and focus groups are saying we’re having to tighten our belts; so should the government. I think our time has come. ‘We’re having to tighten our belts; so should the government’ Even if the economy recovers in a year, and that’s optimistic, we’ve got a three year opportunity to make real advances. Maybe after we recover we’ll see a return to people being willing to put an extra penny in for education, but not yet. People don’t like their post offices or GP’s surgeries being closed, services which aren’t necessarily profitable but are popular. What do you make of Post Offices in Essex being re-opened by the council? I think that’s very good populist politics and not very good economics. I don’t think the government should prop up Post Offices. I’ve been doing a lot of travelling in the Middle East recently and, in Libya, they don’t have letterboxes in their homes, they all have PO boxes. They’ve almost fast-forwarded to a place where the state’s said, “No, we’re not going to subsidise a whole postal network”. It’s similar with the cell phone networks, in that they skipped the landline stage. Gaddafi’s bringing in WiMax in Tripoli as well, we haven’t even got that in London. Going back to Post Offices, in the sort of village I’m from, it’s the heart of the community... In that case, people should use it more often. People just don’t use them, in the same way they drive to Sainsbury’s instead of using local shops. I think there was a time when people got their pensions and benefits from the Post Office, but that’s long gone. Benefits and pensions are paid by direct debit now, so I take quite a hard-nosed view. I just see the head of Post Office being the highest-paid person in the public sector. I find it astounding that he can be paid so much and do such a bad job. We publish the Public Sector Rich List and Local Government Rich List every year and the point we always make is that we don’t mind people being paid highly for doing a good job. Top of the Local Government Rich List is the Chief Executive of Wandsworth Council and he’s doing a very good job: low council taxes, 5* rating for the Council. In Tower Hamlets, which has a 1* rating, they have six people on six figure salaries, the most in the country. I quite liked Vince Cable’s idea of getting all public sector workers with six figure salaries to reapply for their jobs. Do you think the profit motive should be in the NHS? I have some quite radical ideas and the NHS is as close a thing we have to a national religion. I think that’s changing now and people are waking up to the fact that actually it’s not so great. People don’t want the US system, with Ken Livingstone’s image of you needing to get your credit card out before the ambulance takes you away. I think people are much more open to social insurance, as they have on the continent, which would also be about the same cost to the taxpayer. The NHS and resource management is a very emotive issue and I wondered if you had a position on cancer drugs, for example? That’s interesting because we get a lot of calls from people representing drugs companies and they want us to say, “Isn’t it disgraceful that drug X isn’t available on the NHS” and we turn them all down. I think if you have a state healthcare system, you can’t have a situation where patients can get any drug or the bill will be endless. Putting it crudely, Shane Murray talks to Matthew Elliott, the head of the Taxpayers’ Alliance the NHS has a metric of how much a life is worth and if the cost of drugs goes over that, they won’t pay. I think there is room for changing priorities however. If you ask the man on the street, would you rather have cancer drugs for wife or that your sister got a boob job, I know what people would want. I think this is one of the problems of a state run health care system. If you had an insurance system, where the government said you had to be insured for a certain minimum amount, but if you want to pay for better treatments, you can pay more. Give us twenty years and I think people will be more open to having their own pot of money from the government, rather than a centralised system open to abuse. How much of your ideology do you think gets across, as your taxcutting message is in the media but you also have a libertarian agenda that isn’t discussed. I wanted to set up a classical liberal group, as a grass roots group that could produce change, but I knew we’d get zero press coverage. Using the taxpayer platform, it gives us an opportunity to talk about libertarian ideas and I certainly think our supporters know that we’re radical, but it’s harder to get this across to the media. I don’t think the public are just being greedy, because I think for too long politicians and civil servants have been greedy and they haven’t delivered. It’s not greedy for taxpayers to want their money back. Photo: Taxpayers Alliance P eter Tatchell is no stranger to controversy. The former Labour, gay-rights, human rights and green party activist is used to provoking strong, and very often divided, opinions. In the past, he has attracted attention by attempting to perform a citizens arrest on Robert Mugabe and by threatening to out several Anglican bishops and MPs during the 90s. He was one of the founders of the gay rights pressure group Outrage! and has campaigned against issues Surely a problem is that it comes across as a cynical view not only of politics, but of government as well, with the image of greedy, wasteful civil servants? I think they lay themselves open to that charge. For example, Dfid is the only department in which civil servants automatically fly first class, which is because the UN does the same and they supposedly have to attract the best and brightest. I think ten years ago public servants got a worse deal than private sector workers, but it’s gone too far now. Public sector workers now get paid more, get more holidays and get a final salary pension, which is unheard of in the private sector. I wouldn’t call them greedy, they’re just being rational. The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 18-19|Editorial and Letters The CambridgeStudent Stop worrying about us Volume 11 Issue 2 Old Examination Hall, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF Tel: 01223 761685 This seems to be a week for worrying about student well-being. The Union is giving away allegedly suspect condoms, Downing is insulated in part with asbestos, and King’s College is burning down. Not bad for Freshers’ Week. Of all of these, there is not much cause for concern. For all of the uproar generated around Cambridge on the Welfare emailing lists, and in the national tabloids, there seems little to worry about. The Union were foolish undoubtedly in distributing condoms that CUSU and a wide variety of sexual health organisations have advised and continue advise against using. They have embarrassed themselves as a result. TCS joins CUSU in urging you not to use them. But the condoms appear to have been deemed safe by EU standards and it would be hysterical to reprimand the Union too strongly. The same can be said of the asbestos at Downing and the fire at King’s. The problems were in both cases very contained and do not seem to have harmed anyone’s health. One can find something to be cheerful about, since these incidents ought to pre-empt a more serious incident in future. If you want something to get worked up about, take the examples of certain authorities worrying too much about our well-being. The wine ban at John’s formal is at once both outrageous and ridiculous. The college will not markedly improve its academic performance by limiting students only to wine administered by the serving staff. They will only succeed in alienating their students by appearing to limit their enjoyment while at the same time making a profit out of it. TCS intends to continue following the progress of the campaign at the college to have the previous wine rules reinstated. Outrage at the decision of John’s college is one thing. It is quite another matter that policemen are being deployed on the streets of Cambridge with whistles to halt cyclists infringing the traffic laws. This editor has always defended his penchant of cycling the wrong way down one-way streets and through red lights. While not encouraging others to do the same, he will continue to do so to ensure he gets to the office on time to produce the newspaper. Until a policeman whistles at him. Your Letters Crossword Send your letters to letters@tcs.cam.ac.uk Palin problems Dear Sir, By Cherbury Answers in next week’s edition Across 8. He lusted after 11 (8) 9. Troupe has chlorine in its possession (6) 10. Need a drink? Starting to shake? Apply to Alcoholics Anonymous for information (4) 11. Apostle solves crime using his head (4, 6) 12. Little whale beached on Mediterranean island (7) 13. Sounds like a requirement for making bread (5) 16. Paint for perspex (7) 17. Queen in a pickle: cavorting, she solves the problem (7) 20. Buttresses supporting Brideshead and other stately homes (5) 22. Acoustics on recent release of ‘Handbags and Gladrags’ are strange: perhaps it was only recorded in mono? (7) 25. Means of transport for a theatre director (10) 26. Anastasia uses stun-gun, not drug, to find her father (4) 27. One of the benefits of a haircut? (6) 28. Display location of Janet Leigh’s murder, without hesitating (8) Down 1. Lisa has a new name (5) 2. Daring place to listen to music, perhaps (8) 3. Euphoric, after poetry recital in Bohemia (9) 4. Adjective describing cut: new addition (7) 5. Endearing accent that’s not at all serious (5) 6. Musicians performing The Archers’ theme tune? (6) 7. Closing the book on online sale: vendor may have made other arrangements, or not (9) 14. Dead saint offers remedy: it’s all about the Good Book (9) 15. Monk’s cowl (9) 18. Endlessly create tea, and all the rest (2, 6) 19. We hear Chinese poodle can give a Japanese massage! (7) 21. Gordon’s heading E/NE with Thomas (6) 23. Chamber group performs this month and next (5) 24. Rooster wearing headgear? (5) Last week’s solutions: Across - 5. Batman, 6. Ascend, 9. Chilli, 10. Eardrums, 11. Gnat, 12. Harassment, 13. Touchstones, 18. Astronomer, 21. Prop, 22. Vacation, 23. Footsy, 24. Seesaw, 25. Tsetse. Down - 1. Stiletto, 2. Vanish, 3. Espresso, 4. Redrum, 5. Behind, 7. Domino, 8. Refreshment, 14. Cannibal, 15. Exploits, 16. Essays, 17. Mousse, 19. Reaper, 20. Refuse. Pete Jefferys goes wildly over the top in describing Sarah Palin as a “not qualified amateur” with an “unsubstantiated CV” because she is only “governor of a state”. Has Mr Jefferys seen the CVs of George W Bush, Bill Clinton, George HW Bush, Ronald Reagan or Jimmy Carter before they took the presidency? A governorship is good preparation. Or do you have to be a male governor to count? He then tells us Michelle Obama is the one “shattering the glass ceiling”. Quite right -- it’s about time we had a woman as the president’s wife. Corrections & Clarifications Page 8 of last week’s issue (Vol. 11, Issue 1), advertising CUSU Ents nights was printed in error. The correct CUSU promotion nights are advertised on page 14 of this issue. We apologise for the error and any confusion caused. The Cambridge Student endeavours to be as accurate as possible in its reporting. It is possible for inadvertent errors to creep in and we are very happy to issue corrections. Please e-mail us at editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk. Jonathan Birch (Clare) The Team Editor Matt Horrocks editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk Thursday Editor Ryan Roark thursday@ tcs.cam.ac.uk Associate Editor Alex Coke-Woods associate-editor@tcs.cam. ac.uk Subeditors Jess Touschek and Leah Holroyd subeditors@tcs.cam.ac.uk News Editor Katie Spenceley news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Deputy News Editors Alexander Glasner, Caroline Organ , Owen Kennedy and Anna Croall International News Editor Carly Hilts international@tcs.cam.ac.uk Design Editor Dan Strange design@tcs.cam. ac.uk Design Dmitriy Myelnikov design@tcs.cam.ac.uk Comment Editors Daniel Heap and Peter Jefferys comment@tcs.cam.ac.uk Investigations investigations@ tcs.cam.ac.uk Interviews Editor Shane Murray interviews@tcs.cam.ac.uk Theatre Editor Dan Grabiner theatre@tcs.cam.ac.uk Film Editors Nicholas Day and Emma Dibdin film@tcs.cam.ac.uk Music Editors Kristina Ooi and Saul Glasman music@tcs. cam.ac.uk Sport sport@tcs.cam.ac.uk Puzzles Simon Jackson puzzles@tcs.cam. ac.uk Photo Editor Dina Verkhratska Features Editors Ploy Radford and Korlin Bruhn features@tcs.cam.ac.uk Fashion Editor Amy Mulvenna fashion@tcs.cam. ac.uk Fashion Charlotte Bearn and Max Lozinski fashion@tcs.cam.ac.uk Science Editors Philip Ashworth and Kate Crowe science@tcs.cam.ac.uk Arts & Literature Editors Harriet Wragg and Tom Lyttelton arts@tcs.cam.ac.uk Food & Drink Editor Hannah Thompson food@tcs.cam.ac.uk Board of Directors Amy Blackburn (Chair), Mark Curtis (Business), Adam Colligan (CUSU Coordinator), Matt Horrocks, Sven Palys and Catherine Watts tcs-directors@tcs.cam.ac.uk NEWSPAPERS SUPPORT RECYCLING Recycled paper made up 80.6% of the raw material for UK newspapers in 2006 NEWSPAPERS SUPPORT RECYCLING The Cambridge Student is published by Cambridge University Students’ Union. All copyright is the exclusive property of the Cambridge University Students’ Union. The Cambridge Student also publishes the magazine THURSDAY. Although The Cambridge Student is affiliated to the University Students’ Union (CUSU), we are editorially independent and financially self-sufficient. No part of this publication is to be reproduced, stored on a retrieval system or submitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 My Most Curious Cambridge Interview A poem by Jenny Stark F ools are my theme; let satire be my song, To whip the gowns off measly Cambridge dons And pounce on clever wits who, insincere, Without sneering, teach the rest to sneer. Beware! Young reader, this fiery unloved column Concocting crude delight through red poison That seeping through the page with tongues like swords, Will, with mere raspberries, enemies floor. I’ll pull the confines of convention, with merry laugh upon the lip, I’ll wither upstarts with a whim, then set them quailing with a quip I’ll profess amour; then call them whore: I’ll ridicule them evermore. From great heights great men tumble and fall, That heed the satirist’s bittersweet call. I sing of Quayside and of the river Styx, On which with turbulent mind I stare transfixed, It glitters gold, as Orion fierce and bold, Doth sink into His wintry underworld. I pray that riddling Sybil in her sadness Indulges safety in this labour of madness. And so I go, a fluttering, quivering shade To have my future made. Charon, selfless guide, once paid ten pounds Doth punt me across the Cam to college grounds. Now crowds on crowds of tourists around me lie And swarm the Bubble like a plague of flies. Not closer, orb in orb, conglob’d are seen The buzzing bees around their dusky Queen. Like buoys that never sink into the flood, On England’s surface they but lie and nod. There moves Monsieur with a superior air, His stretch’d-out arm displays a guidebook fair; He points with upturned nose unto the right Whilst left, his wallet walks off with a sprite. Regard: there Lady Greer struts in sexless dress A ballsy lass, so manly till undressed. There’s Einstein on a bench with a squabbling pair E turns and says to M.C. “be not a square!” Lo! Crick and Watson prance like stately queens They flex their legs to reveal designer genes. There! The poet Ovid! Wigged and draped, In silky garters fatly sits and apes, Once lean and tall, a scintillating god, Now metamorphosed into a fat sod; So, sulking to his Dry Den, he cowers away Too nobly changed by light of this new day. Thick and more thick the black blockade extends, A hundred heads of Satire’s old friends. But now, my task doth call from yonder plain And I must venture on in good or vain. So with bold step I cross the darkened veil That draws with beckoning finger into this tale That skims the edge of credibility’s cup From purpose to despair it doth gallop. And now I swap embracing light for gloom In Imagination’s sweaty laundry room. Before me, sunlight’s gilded rays decay, And nightly pipistrelles flitter far away. Courage shoots in vain its momentary fires, The meteor drops, and in a flash expires. Thrice I rat-tat-tat the oaken door Three mighty echoes that through Benson roar. A clichéd pause ensues; then iron bolts Are thunderously drawn like frisky colts And stood before me, framed in melting mist A tow’ring servant glares with eyes like fists; A head of greying locks doth shield his face, “’Tis Pepys”, he grunts, with neither charm nor grace. Of all the hideous spectacles I have seen, Those perched on this man’s nose were most obscene My eyes, ravished, smouldered in their sockets; I fumbled for a ’chief within my pockets. Then, limping loudly through Cimmerian gloom Pepys echoed my way towards the Interview Room. Now, I must explain that malice is not my aim: For only a Fool would sharply smart with pain When hairs and pores are examined bit by bit Under the critic’s microscopic wit. Bound in chagrin, the Target groans in chains, Their Wit dreads exile, penalties and pains. But, like a razor licking a lady’s thighs Satire exposes less than it implies. Often tickling; occasionally cutting deep, These bleeding wounds heal quickly after sleep; Thus – Barber Satire, cutting his layer of hair Exposes fair Nymphs from Insecurity’s lair. So in the Room I stumble, weak and weary My mind a-whirling and my eyesight bleary The musky night is dark; the half-moon grins “Sit”, a voice chimes, wispy as the wind. Red eyes gaze in concentrated spasm Pallid fingers reach from nightly chasm, Clasp my hands in a watery handshake Then swiftly shoot back into the opaque. “What is satire?” Asks my adversarius. Poised on a couch in a manner precarious, I say: “It is a glass, wherein is shown, The face of every creature but thy own; It mirrors all – the poor fool and the great, For knaves are silly knaves in every state. “And why should you come here?” asks fair signor In dulcet tones like one famous Dumbledore. “I…because I am a worldly soul A witty, curious lass of good parole Who wryly smiles at man’s Achilles heel And to corrective senses thus appeals.” With that, I raised my weary head and peered At my interviewer, but he had disappeared! And in his place, Apollo’s rays shone bright Upon some fangs that twinkled in delight Then, suddenly, heard I a cackle by the door; I ran with all my might across the floor; But saw him nevermore. THEATRE Opening night: An ADC marathon The Cambridge Student |09/10/08 Email: theatre@tcs.cam.ac.uk As the ADC reopens its doors following an extensive redevelopment project, TCS Theatre checks out the first offerings of the year and finds out what’s changed. The ADC Andy Ryan & Yamez Collopy A century and a half after the lifting of the university ban on student theatre and the consequent founding of the ADC, the theatre company has completed the final phase of its redevelopment program. Over the past few years, renovations of the bar and the foyer have been completed, as well as considerable unseen structural work. This summer’s developments have arguably been the most significant. Stuart Cuthbertson, marketing manager of the ADC, is sure that the audience will benefit from changes to the auditorium. “The majo-r thing is that there’s now a constant slope from the front to the back, whereas previously it was flat at the front and then just sloped at the back. Now everybody, no matter where you’re sitting, gets a much better view.” Much of the work has taken place backstage. “The bulk of the work has been a new block on the side of the building which comprises a new rehearsal room called the Larkham Studio, new dressing A Devils Yamez Collopy ADC Theatre 7th Oct - 11th Oct Footlights £4 - £6 fter an ambitious summer tour through a host of venues along America’s East Coast, CAST’s Henry V arrived at the ADC this week. An actor playing Henry V is destined to be judged on the play’s trademark rallying speeches. Rob Carter was strong on these, delivering a fiery St Crispin’s day address, and his Henry succeeded in being more than a rhetorically-gifted general. Henry is growing up and Carter captured his struggle to manhood. Whether wracked by responsibility on the night before battle or clumsily courting Katherine, this other side of Henry was a joy. Some small characters made big impressions. Patrick Walshe McBride gave an enjoyable turn as Canterbury. The explanation of Henry’s claim to France has the potential to be extremely tedious but it became an amusing lesson by an eccentric history teacher. Lucy Evans and Greer Dale-Foulkes rooms, a green room, showers, toilets, and generally better facilities for everybody backstage.” The ADC has ambitious plans for the Larkham Studio. “We’re trialling different things. We’ve got a couple of studio smokers in there which are following the exact same format as our normal smokers but they obviously seat forty people. It’s great for more intimate stuff.” He is content with the theatre’s capacity. “It’s always going to be a trade-off because we run some shows that could quite easily squeeze in twice the capacity, but then as a student complemented each other superbly as Katherine and Alice. Peter Piercy merits praise for the way he eased from Bardolph to Cambridge to the King of France in successive scenes. While picking up plenty of laughs, the portrayal of the French was a weakness. The script does demand a clear contrast between English seriousness and French arrogance and frivolity, but by pushing it too far, the English got an enemy of caricatures instead of characters. The two major directorial gambles were the dance before the English invasion and the pole-wielding display of the battle. Both were brave and innovative and effective. The dance simmered with the energy of an army on the march while the battle scene’s choreography had the thrill of combat while being an aesthetic triumph. In her director’s notes, Marieke Audsley bemoans the neglect of Shakespeare’s history plays. This production displays much of what is best about them. theatre it’s also very important for us to cater for really interesting stuff that might not sell as well to the public but that is artistically really interesting. It’s just about the perfect size because even when you don’t turn a full audience it doesn’t feel empty in the same way a much bigger auditorium would”. As the theatre reopens, the ADC is confident that it is equipped for a successful future. “This is the final phase. The original plans ran up to this point. This is a finish as far as we’re concerned for the 21st Century.” Henry V Andy Ryan ADC Theatre 7th Oct - 11th Oct Cambridge American Stage Tour £6 - £9 T his year, their 125th anniversary, Footlights return to Cambridge with the final run of their 2008 national tour show. Performed by a select few of the group, Devils represents not only the climax of the Footlights year, but also raises the bar for all shows to come. The show contained a distinct lack of dud sketches which are so often accepted as an inevitable part of any sketch show, be it Flying Circus or That Mitchell and Webb Look. There was also a welcome shift away from those deliberately unfunny jokes that have tainted footlights over the last few years; sketches thankfully now end with a laugh, rather than a groan, from the audience. The small cast is also pleasantly familiar with instantly recognisable faces such as Alastair Roberts, who many will remember as Romeo from last year’s ADC production of Romeo and Juliet, and Jack GordonBrown who appeared in the last Footlights pantomime, Once Upon a Time. The group’s performance was impeccable, but the individual talent of each member of the cast was equally apparent, most notably Alastair Roberts who seemingly managed to conjure up as many laughs from his perfectly timed pauses as from his expertly delivered words. In a way that few can, Devils hilarious- ly mocks not only those absurd characters we all seem to encounter every day, but also those small parts of ourselves that we shamefully see presented before us on stage. Seeing bits of my own character portrayed to me by the cast of Devils, I am sure I have never before been quite so funny. |20-21 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: theatre@tcs.cam.ac.uk Branagh excels as Ivanov Grandage’s delicately balanced production is an all-round hit Joe Bannister I t is interesting to note how varied people’s reactions are when the name Kenneth Branagh is mentioned. Some see Branagh as one of the finest actors of his generation, responsible for almost singlehandedly introducing Shakespeare, through the medium of film, to a much wider and less elite audience. Others, however, see him as an overrated, arrogant, and self-indulgent actor who uses his unwarranted fame to cast himself as whichever great classical role he fancies playing. Whatever your opinion of Branagh, it cannot be denied that he has accomplished a great deal in his career. At the age of twenty-seven he had completed three years at RADA (winning the Bancroft Gold medal for acting in his final year), won the Olivier best newcomer award for his performance of Judd in a West End production of “Another Country”, become the youngest ever Henry V with the RSC, started his own theatre company (“Renaissance Theatre Company”), and directed himself in the title role of Henry V, for which he was to be Academy Award nominated in both acting and directing categories. It was at the same age, twenty-seven, that Chekhov wrote “Ivanov”, Branagh starring in a new version of the play by Tom Stoppard which opens I the Donmar’s season at the Wyndham’s Theatre. When first performed in 1887, its unusual nature earned it a mixed reception. Chekhov, in a letter to his brother, wrote of the play “I wanted to be original ... I did not portray a single villain or a single angel ... did not blame nor exculpate anyone.” Audiences found the play hard to deal with as the protagonist was not wholly sympathetic and the seeming villain of the piece, Lvov, argues for what seem like positive virtues. It is this uncertainty in the characters, this ambiguity that Michael Grandage’s production portrays so successfully, hitting notes of comedy and tragedy simultaneously. As we see the story of Nikolai Ivanov unfold, a thirty-five year old (played as a forty-something in this production) landowner who loses his way, Grandage is exploring this boundary between almost farcical comedy and tragedy found within Chekhov’s first full-length play. Indeed, there are moments when one is derived from the other. In the final act for example, what could be described as the tragic climax sees Ivanov pour out all of his confusion and concerns about his miserable life. He no longer loves Grab On! Dan Grabiner Theatre Editor his wife who is dying of tuberculosis, and cannot bear to be with her, preferring instead to spend nights at the house of his friends the Lebedevs. His land is badly kept and he has fallen deeply into debt. At the same time however, the audience is encouraged to laugh at the reaction of Lebedev (Kevin R McNally) who hovers awkwardly, unsure of how to deal with this obviously broken man. At one point he even goes so far as to exit, returning to find to his great annoyance that Ivanov is still pouring out his soul. Poking fun at the literary cliché, or as Ivanov puts it, the “hand me down Hamlet”, brings the play down to earth and is exactly what Chekhov intended. This production understands Chekhov’s intentions, and skilfully deals with the blend of comedy and tragedy. Performed by a flawless and superb ensemble cast which doesn’t put a foot wrong, “Ivanov” is one of the best things I have seen in a long time and would recommend that anyone who can get a ticket should do so. Dir: Michael Grandage Wyndham’s Theatre (Donmar) Until November 29th www.wyndhams-theatre.com A s two of our most resilient and robust reporters make it through a marathon evening at the ADC and the public get their first glimpse of the new and improved facilities, we have much to look forward to, the new Larkham Studio especially providing an intimate, versatile addition to the list of spaces in Cambridge. In London, Branagh woos audiences and critics alike with his latest performance, setting the bar exceedingly high for Twelfth Night, Madame de Sade and Hamlet, pro- Week One ’m slouched, feeling rough as a badger, on the front steps off the Esteemed Dramatic Institution polishing off a medicinal Gauloises at 9.28am before the first three-hour movement class … and I don’t feel like moving. Watching my fellow classmates bound up the stairs as if they were auditioning for the Wizard of Oz is slightly less mortifying than the appearance of my new best friend: Miss Keen Bean. Oh, and today (bless her) she’s wearing the EDI stash - hoodie and t-shirt (the latter exposed when the former removed). Who could find time to buy the college ‘sweats’ before week two? I want to trip her up. I realize that I’m late and dribble in after her. My head aches. God. Stairs. I wheeze up, jeans straining against my aching knees, Miss K.B bounding ahead: all black pumps and ‘sweat pants’. I hate that expression. What’s wrong with good, old-fashioned tracksuit bottoms? That’s what they were called at my school anyway. That and pleated gym skirts and green flash. Sweat pants? That’s both too coy and too graphic. The day was saved by the teacher. The most extraordinary, exquisitely unexpected man with something of a gut - a man of the trade who also likes a pie! A fellow soldier on this battlefield of the wan, the thin and the healthy! Hurrah! He told us about a technique Grotowski submitted his students to which allowed them to discover the power of their own bodies. He would deposit them in an isolated forest, forcing them to fend for themselves for weeks on end, one of these experiments resulting in a student’s death. I try to blot out the image of a bloodied and mangled K.B. as we begin to dance. Well, some people danced. They did. I shuffled and stumbled and breathed heavily down people’s necks – a heady mix of espresso, fags, last night’s Rioja and Listerine. Mmm. It was a kind of early morning madness that seemed suddenly absolutely right and exactly what everybody should be doing at 9.45 in the morning: throwing themselves around a studio to Bach and Beyonce, whirling dervishes, waltzing and jiving and swirling, curling, curving, the room, me, the others, life! Carpe Diem! I wanted to bellow out the windows: “what the fuck, you pedestrians, you land lubbers, you CIVILIANS, you slugs of the pavement! Look at us; we are the SOLDIERS OF THEATRE.” At this point I had to face the fact that I was still drunk from the night before and my whirling dervishness came to an abrupt halt as I bolted for the bathroom and vomited furiously. Feeling much refreshed I returned, realizing with some triumph and not a little amusement, that I am turning into Peter O’Toole in the latter stages of his career at the very beginning of mine. Chin chin! ductions still to come as part of the Donmar’s year at the Wyndham’s Theatre, and our resident cynical thesp sees the light in a movement class. Or is it just a hangover? This week there’s plenty to keep you from falling into the routine of typing “Palin blunder” into YouTube (just in case she has indeed spoken again), my top pick being the last performance of “Stoning Mary”, the critically acclaimed, fresh from the Fringe production which tackles the issue of development head-on (New Cambridge Theatre Company, 7.30, Friday 10th October, Judith E. Wilson Drama Studio, English Fac- ulty). Or if you fancy something less studenty, why not try Hoipolloi’s production of “The Doubtful Guest” at the Cambridge Art’s Theatre (Wednesday 15th – Saturday 18th October). Coming up next week, reviews galore, including a preview of “Hero”, the CUADC musical at the ADC’s gala opening. If you are interested in joining the TCS theatre team, send an email to theatre@tcs.cam.ac.uk. |22-23 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: film@tcs.cam.ac.uk Cinema’s summer of love Looking back on a surprisingly rewarding blockbuster season Emma Dibdin After 2007’s vaguely soul-destroying summer of bloated threequels and ill advised television spin-offs, any discerning filmgoer could be forgiven for feeling a sense of trepidation upon entering this year’s popcorn-scented fray. Between Edward Norton’s disappointing reincarnation of the terminally unsuccessful Incredible Hulk franchise, and M Night Shymalan’s environmentally aware sci-fi The Happening which combined the traits of being unintentionally hilarious and genuinely painful to watch, it looked as though our worst fears would indeed be realised. The cinematic summer would pass in a haze of overzealous CGI and doggedly uninspired scripting; the sole discernable pleasure to be had from new releases would be listening to Mark Kermode affably tear them to pieces a few days later. The first hint of greater things on the horizon came with hardboiled action thriller Wanted, featuring an unexpectedly buff James McAvoy and this summer’s hardest working actor, Morgan Freeman. It was loud, crude, brainless and largely heartless fun, but fun nonetheless, and a brand of gory, 18-certificated fun that at least stood it apart from its watered-down genre contemporaries. Then again, it was heavily ripped off from The Matrix and any film that pivots on a concept as hokey as the “Loom of Fate” is difficult to fully get behind. With Will Smith’s alcoholic liability of a superhero in Hancock failing to live up to what seemed a potentially brilliant satirical premise (just who does pay for all the real estate routinely destroyed by superheroes and their nemeses?), things were looking up only very marginally. It was, if you like, a cinematic credit crunch rather than the full-blown recession witnessed last year; bleak, but not as bleak as it could be. Then came the strange phenomenon of Mamma Mia! The characters are one-dimensional, the dialogue makes Shymalan look like Shake- speare, and there’s a special circle of hell reserved for whoever’s idea it was to let Pierce Brosnan sing. And yet, there was something about it. People’s response went beyond a tongue-in-cheek “so bad it’s good” appreciation; it was as if they’d put something in the popcorn. From all across the nation came reports of audiences standing up and joining in, aisles filled with jubilant, starryeyed viewers singing along to Abba’s endless back catalogue. A bizarrely compelling guilty pleasure, then, but not enough to save summer. True salvation came towards the end of July, in the critical doublewhammy of WALL-E and The Dark Knight. With a first hour that contains almost no dialogue and a bleak, post-apocalyptic premise, it was all the more remarkable that the former emerged as a moving, visually astonishing instant classic. Its robotic love story, moreover, is without doubt the most emotionallly resonant romance of the season. Scaling up from its character-focused predecessor, The Dark Knight encompasses the entirety of Go- tham city, its police force, its politicians, its lawyers and television anchors and, in the now-infamous “two ships” set piece, its citizens – not to mention Heath Ledger’s incandescent Joker, Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, and a host of other compelling secondary players. This was the year of the thinking man’s popcorn flick Where Batman Begins was a character study, this is an ensemble piece, and while that intimacy and focus is missed here (Bale is all but entirely lost), human struggle is still very much at the forefront of Nolan and co’s vision. This is a genuinely intelligent blockbuster, whose philosophical musings on justice, chance, duality and the human condition never get in the way of the pure, adrenaline-pumping thrills of moments like the truck-flip, the opening heist, or the Joker’s creatively violent use of a pencil. It is, quite simply, a flawed masterpiece. As August drew to a close with Hellboy II, it became clear that this was the year of the thinking man’s popcorn flick. Mexican visionary Guillermo del Toro combines unbridled imagination with vivid characterisation and, here, sly humour to create his eclectic, fairy tale world, and while there’s a danger during the more creature-heavy moments of it all turning into the Star Wars cantina, it’s a breathtaking world to spend a couple of hours in. The latter part of summer wasn’t without its low points – Adam Sandler’s latest creepfest You Don’t Mess With The Zohan and another of those ill advised TV spinoffs, Get Smart, to name a couple. But going into autumn, as the pre-Oscar releases begin to emerge in all their thought-provoking, thematically sophisticated glory, there is a sense that for once, they have something to live up to. FILM The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: film@tcs.cam.ac.uk A Streetcar Named Desire beginning with an odd phone call, continuing with a topless woman whom he follows into the woods, and climaxing with an attack from a mysterious man swathed in bandages. Escaping to a scientific facility, Hector inadvertently travels back in time and finds himself caught up in a strange and increasingly disturbing journey of (literal) self-discovery. The script is the film’s greatest asset: sharp, economical, constructed with a razor-edged precision that allows for admirable clarity throughout, in spite of the potentially convoluted plot. The small cast is used effectively and Elejalde is superb in his lead role, developing from a largely comedic simpleton into a much darker, more desperate presence. Shrewd, well-constructed cinema, a reminder that more often than not science-fiction films are all the better for a small budget. Director: Nacho Vigalondo Presented here in a brand new print, this beloved adaptation of Tennessee Williams’ classic play has lost none of its visceral impact. The conflict between the visiting Blanche and Marlon Brando’s iconic Stanley Kowalski is as compelling as ever, a symbolic clash of ideals intensified by oppressive camerawork and a set that offers curtains in place of walls, allowing for nothing but the illusion of privacy. The setting of New Orleans is lent a new poignancy from a contemporary perspective, given the thematic focus on the breakdown of refinement and old values (symbolised by Blanche) in the face of a brutal and chaotic force (Stanley). While Blanche’s sister Stella has adapted to the new order and even finds herself thrilled by it, Blanche clings to pretences of virtue and superiority in a desperate bid to deny her own tainted past. It seems impossible to discuss Streetcar without mentioning Brando’s career-making performance in the same breath, and with good reason. He is a magnetic, mercurial force of nature, a continual reminder that Blanche is far from the only character walking a fine psychological line. But there is an unfortunate tendency to focus exclusively on him at the expense of Vivien Leigh’s brittle, brilliantly nuanced turn. She is at once fragile and cutting, abstracted and acutely self-aware, naive and depraved, unravelling hypnotically before our eyes, as the schism between her imagined and actual realities widens beyond the point of return. A timeless, mesmerising study of loss, disillusion and psychological warfare. Director: Elia Kazan Summer Photo: image.net Fermat’s Room What do you get if you lock five mathematical geniuses in a room together? Not the latest ill-advised incarnation of Big Brother but a taut, supremely tense psychological thriller with an impressive faculty of character and an unexpected lightness of comedic touch. Said geniuses are brought together by the mysterious “Fermat” in order to solve what he claims to be the greatest enigma known to man, only to discover that their designated location is a trap designed to slowly shrink and crush them. With the walls literally closing in, the fiercely competitive masterminds must work together to solve a series of mathematical puzzles in order to buy themselves time, whilst attempting to uncover Fermat’s identity and motivation. While its 88-minute running time leaves little room for exposition, each character is sufficiently well drawn to ground the film’s Elena Ballesteros depicts an improbably glamorous mathmetician in Fermat’s Room Le Festival de Cam Emma Dibdin takes a look back at a few highlights from the 28th Cambridge Film Festival dark, theatrical premise in some approximation of reality. There isn’t so much a twist ending as a third act comprised entirely of twists; deceptions are exposed, connections revealed, and as the plot begins to unravel, the deadly room becomes a metaphor for the claustrophobic psychological spaces inhabited by the highly gifted characters. Everybody has a secret and, while some revelations ring truer than others, there’s a layered intricacy to the plot that demands a second viewing. Directors: Luis Piedrahita, Rodrigo Sopena Time Crimes Time travel is a well-trodden and frequently treacherous cinematic path. Faced with such conceptually bewildering ideas as paradoxes and time loops, film-makers (without naming any names) more often than not resort to lazy, one-dimen- sional scripting to tell their story, with as much CGI as they can afford to distract from the gaping holes in the plot. It’s all the more impressive then that for his feature debut, writer-director Vigalondo has not only tackled the genre, but has done so with a rare intelligence and flair for psychological detail. Our time-bending hero is Hector, a hapless everyman who’s just moved house with his wife in hopes of a fresh start. What he gets instead is a series of peculiar events, Unfolding in a deftly composed series of static, lingering shots, Summer tells the tender story of two middle-aged childhood friends compelled by current circumstances to reflect on their last days of heady innocence. Chief among these circumstances is the fact that Daz, now in a wheelchair with Shaun as his carer, has been given just eight weeks to live. One of Glenaan and writer Hugh Ellis’ concerns here is the past’s relation to the present and, by extension, the question of whether our actions in the present can redeem or influence those in our past, a juxtaposition emphasised by a breathtaking and frequently seamless visual blending of the two. Shots begin in the present and end in a memory, events in flashback translate directly to the here and now, and in one particularly potent scene the sight of a character’s prone, injured young form is used to embody his death twenty years later. The performances are uniformly excellent, from Rachael Blake’s radiant Katy to Steve Evets’ endearing gallows humour. But none surpass Robert Carlyle’s beaten-down protagonist, whose subtle transitions between grim-faced humour, toothless anger and wistful reminiscence make for a devastatingly convincing emotional reality. The entire process of death as observed here - the final hospital visit and the surreal numbness thereafter - rings painfully true, yet the climax maintains a sense of hope. Plumbing the depths of life’s absurdity and transience without wallowing in its own tragedy, Summer is an agonising, beautifully rendered and ultimately uplifting exploration of friendship and the endurance of the human spirit. Director: Kenneth Glenaan |24-25 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: film@tcs.cam.ac.uk 5 Career suicide How to mistreat audiences and abuse critics... Satires They made us laugh, but it’s laughter in the dark... If... (1968) A film that anyone who attended public school can cherish. Its conclusion of anti-authoritarian violence is sure to remain etched on the memory. If... vividly portrays a deeply reactionary institution: the system of ‘fagging’, the tyranny of the prefects and the dangers of non-conformity. Alternating between colour and monochrome, the film is a helter-skelter indictment of tradition. Photo: image.net Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979) They’ve topped any number of ‘Best of’ polls, most contemporary male comedians cite the troupe as being amongst their biggest influences and, crucially, the Monty Python films are still laugh-til-you-vomit experiences. Any review of their films generally devolves into a recollection of highlights, so I’ll cut to the chase: rent it. A crestfallen Simon Pegg and Jeff Bridges belatedly realise it’s better to read the script before signing on to a project. Robert Stagg How To Lose Friends And Alienate People (15, 110 mins) ★☆☆☆☆ ‘T o describe this film as a piece of crap would be to run the risk of a discourse that would never again rise above the excremental.” So began a particularly withering review of Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11; happily it provides me with an apt summary of this film too. For there is scarcely more to say about a movie that so flagrantly talks out of more than one orifice, before suddenly making a pretence of playing (and telling it) straight. Culled from Toby Young’s memoir of the same title, the movie resembles the book only in its dislocated fabula of a plot. One could add Graydon Carter’s puckering dismissal of Young: “Those who can’t teach, write. Those who can’t write, write about themselves – in Toby’s case, endlessly”. This narcissistic logorrhea leaves its pungent trace throughout the celluloid. For Toby Young is, famously, a one-syllable word that begins with ‘c’ and ends in ‘t’. But lottery funding has its own sense of decorum and doesn’t stretch to financing such outright vulgarity; there’s nothing truly coruscating to be found beneath the film’s polished sheen. So, instead, we have the gormless sight of Simon Pegg stumbling from one car crash scenario to another; a series of tiresome vignettes that have clearly been abbreviated to keep the running time on spec (and, inevitably, are chock full of the most inexpensive variety of humour). The resulting messiness is em- Toby Young is, famously, a word that begins with ‘c’ and ends in ‘t’ barrassingly obvious. Pegg is left to play that most awkward of contradictions: a careworn naïf. The film spasms between the softcore whimsy of a pig running loose in a Hollywood party, to gloomy ruminations on the nature of fame. It rocks queasily on its own axis. In a pandering attempt to keep the audience in stitches, Robert Weide’s film commits a sin Sir Philip Sidney identified five hundred years ago in his Defence of Poesie – that “our comedians think there is no delight without laughter”, whereas laughter itself has “only a scornful tickling”. There is something altogether scornful about the dunghill of a script on which the movie pivots. Halfway through the film, Pegg’s character is described (to peals of laughter in cinemas countrywide) as “our very own idiot savant… without the savant”. There’s something axiomatic in saying that any joke that requires such clarification is either pitched to the wrong demographic or just not very good. Furthermore, the film’s disillusion with its own business is utterly lightweight. The tawdriness it attempts to depict is undercut by the film’s unoriginally pristine aesthetic. And speaking as someone who, after a certain amount of discreet self-prostitution, enjoyed a brief dalliance with the slightly rich and slightly famous this summer, I can tell you that the movie goes no distance towards capturing the dusky glitz and dignified inertia that waft through the glittering halls of the (slightly) famous. Instead, it provides a satisfied poke at itself. This isn’t sharp, and it isn’t satire. It’s the self-indulgence of the unredeemed. Max, Mon Amour (1986) Billed as “the greatest ape romance since King Kong”, this satirical drama concerns the love affair between a British diplomat’s wife (played by Charlotte Rampling) and a chimpanzee. Though probably not an ideal date movie – unless you’re zoologicallyinclined – there’s no denying that its unsensational treatment of the outrageous has real power. The Cook, the Thief, his Wife and her Lover (1989) A wordy title for an articulate film. Impeccably acted by theatre greats such as Helen Mirren and Michael Gambon, the film is a luridly violent and visually gorgeous reimagining of Jacobean drama. Lots of brutality, wit and haute cuisine, the film slyly embodies the excess it inveighs against. It’s saved from brute grotesquery, however, by a startlingly poignant Mirren. Series 7: The Contenders (2001) Released seven years ago, Series 7 has only grown more relevant since. The premise alone suggests this pitch black comedy isn’t for the faint of heart: six people, selected at random by lottery, are forced to fight for survival on a reality TV show. Exploitative TV networks and their voyeuristic audiences have rarely been sent up so chillingly. MUSIC REVIEWS Alternative rock KINGS OF LEON Only By The Night (RCA) Out Sep 22 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: music@tcs.cam.ac.uk Experimental rock DEERHOOF Offend Maggie (ATP) Will Stockdale Out Oct 13 Over the past few years the brothers Followhill and cousin Matthews have gone from the parched throats and the smashed whiskey bottles of late nights in Molly’s Chambers, Nashville, Tennessee, to headlining the greatest music festival on the planet. (That’s Glastonbury - no arguments please.) And having trod those boards without a top 10 hit to their name to rapturous reception, superstardom beckoned. If that performance could just be followed by a huge new album, success would be piled on success, and in an unprecedented move by the Kings, we have before us Only By The Night after just a year’s wait. The opener, Closer, is a tantalising slow-burner with Caleb’s voice ripping through into the foreground and driving the song to its monumental conclusion. Without a pause for breath, Crawl brawls forth; a towering track destined to dominate entire arenas with its bruising, distorted bass line. The real revelation is Caleb’s vocals; from the intoxicated mumblings of early Kings, one of rock’s most distinctive voices now comes with a new confidence. It adds rawness to the louder moments, while his rasp makes his humble claim that he could ‘use someone like you’ on Use Somebody almost catch in his throat; it’s brutal but magnificent. I Want You can be pinpointed as the exact moment the album fails to fulfil its promise. After previous glories, it seems lyrically and musically lazy, and so laid back that the record loses all its drive. Even the soaring chorus of Be Somebody seems like it’s flailing at recapturing the essence of the beginning of the record, not finding its own way. The end, when it comes, seems more of a resigned petering out than the triumphant finale this record deserves. In their stab for fame and fortune Kings of Leon have written only half of the album of the year. Hopefully next year, backed by the adoration of tens of thousands of new fans, they will be given all the time they need to go and write the classic they clearly can. Alternative rock ANBERLIN New Surrender (Universal Republic) Thom Andrewes Out Oct 13 Saul Glasman As any initiate to the music of Deerhoof will know, saying that Offend Maggie sits at the more conventional end of their oeuvre isn’t saying much. All the unmistakeable elements of their multi-coloured style are still very much present, effervescing violently from the core reaction between chaotic, skewed riffs and radiant, candy-coated vocals. It is a testament to the sheer originality of the Deerhoof formula that, after eight full-length albums, they still sound not only utterly unique but also far more modern than anything else around. Offend Maggie picks up where 2007’s fantastic Friend Opportunity left off, the band embracing a more pop-oriented, danceable style whilst easily assimilating these influences into their eccentric aesthetic. Deerhoof have long since eschewed the golden proportions of popular music and yet, here more than ever before, the hoary-headed prog dragon is kept at a very safe distance. Although not as hyperactive as last year’s album, many of these songs place an even greater emphasis on Satomi Matsuzaki’s extraordinary vocal melodies, ducking and winding through deceptive harmonic progressions. Her lyrical weirdness has lost none of its charm either, pitched somewhere between surrealist poetry and playground chants against which the odd line in her native Japanese seems utterly appropriate. The recent addition of second guitarist Ed Rodriguez to the line-up has contributed a richness to the sound which makes many of the most forward-looking tracks stand out against the lo-fi buzz of the band’s older material. Yet the additive rhythms of first single Fresh Born are pure Deerhoof, so effortlessly idiomatic in fact that when the band posted the sheet music for the song on their website and invited fans to submit their own versions, most of the endearingly amateurish recordings captured the spirit of the as-yet-unheard final product exactly. Such an experiment proves the enduring strength of the band’s musical personality. OUT THIS WEEK TCS surveys the albums and singles currently hitting the shelves KEANE Perfect Symmetry MGMT Kids Keane’s latest piece of whatever it is they call what they do raises searching questions, such as ‘Why don’t Keane just fuck off?’ I could record a better album underwater with only a toaster and a pair of elastic bands. GOJIRA The Way Of All Flesh Gojira are one of the most highly-respected death metal bands of today, and The Way Of All Flesh is their best work yet. Themes of mortality and the environment tie together Gojira’s blocks of infernal sound. NITIN SAWHNEY London Undersound The award-winning producer’s eighth studio album will be, we predict, impossible to dislike. Sawhney masterfully elicits a nostalgic glow from his well-pitched ambiences. The third single from the New York duo of synth-pop magicians is a pretty, calliope chunk of danceable candyfloss. Caused a minor controversy in Norway, where it got to the top of the singles chart without ever actually being played on the radio. LUNATIC SOUL Lunatic Soul Lunatic Soul is the acoustic solo project of Mariusz Duda, vocalist with Polish prog-metalheads Riverside. Tastes like an ambient folk metal lollipop with a nice glossy coat of black paint. SNOW PATROL Take Back The City Irrelevant post-Britpop: how much is too much? Mercifully, it only took thirty seconds for my brain to realise this single was less interesting than the hum of my hard drive and tune it out as background noise. Using ‘inoffensive’ to describe a work is a very bad critical habit. At the hands of journalists, the word has inflated into a culturally high-handed way of saying ‘this doesn’t push my buttons’. It’s simultaneously a lazy man’s shortcut to damning with faint praise and a veiled boast of how jaded the writer is, and its entire use as a condemnation seems to be a vehicle for the dubious proposition that nothing is worth doing unless it offends someone. The real reason, however, I’m not going to describe Anberlin’s New Surrender as inoffensive is because if I did, this review might as well be only one word long. Although I’m also going to tell you quite openly and cheerfully how jaded I am: very. In fact, the lapping waves of mediocre music have over the years hollowed out my auditory nerves, through which concentrated bile now flows, and eroded my soul into a black diamond of meanness and antipathy. So there. New Surrender is nothing more than a collage of secondhand sounds. Lyrically, it turns out, the album is uniformly abysmal: Miserabile Visu’s awful account of the biblical book of Revelation is little more embarrassing than Retrace’s silly, bawling lost-love lament. Musically, things are shapelier. Anberlin do know how to play their instruments, and they play them with enthusiasm and vitality. More frustrating, there are occasional peephole glimpses of competence and even creativity. On lead single Feel Good Drag, a promising opening riff is cleft by a monotone chug, never to be seen again, and Disappear actually hits home. On the other hand, some tracks fail so hard that it’s a dire wonder the band even attempted them. Younglife is a clap-happy singalong and a case in point. Anberlin badly want to seduce you with their energy, but it never catches. This album is like a badly produced popcorn blockbuster: you keep hoping to be swept off your seat by swashbuckling, thought-free action, but the acting is too thin and the plot too salted with letdowns, and you can’t keep your disbelief suspended. Punk RISE AGAINST Appeal To Reason (Geffen) Out Oct 6 Kristina Ooi I approached this album expecting not to like it. I don’t harbour prejudices about certain genres of music, but ‘punk’ bands who seem to base their identity around slating Bush and opposing the war annoy me. These are entirely valid ideas; it’s just been done so many times before. The band are all vegetarian and active members of the organisation PETA (People for The Ethical Treatment Of Animals) and as such the packaging of their latest album, Appeal To Reason, is entirely vegan, right down to the vegetarian ink used to print the sleeve notes. OK, maybe these guys aren’t so bad. We could all do with being a bit more green. On an initial listen, it’s pretty standard, formulaic punk rock. The lead single off the album, Re-Education (Through Labor) doesn’t stray from its archetype, but there is no doubt that this band know how to write tunes - I even caught myself humming the chorus. Hero Of War is a simple, honest acoustic track about the war from the viewpoint of one soldier, based on events detailed by a documentary called ‘The Ground Truth’. It’s a refreshing take on the otherwise generic war-bashing, and showcases McIlrath’s beautifully raw vocals to full effect. But I’m not entirely convinced by Rise Against’s latest offering. Perhaps it makes more sense in the context of the band’s ventures outside of their musical efforts, such as the creation of a vegan Vans shoe. There is no doubt the band have a strong message which is clearly conveyed, albeit in a fairly predictable and boring fashion, but this reviewer won’t be burning any flags in the immediate future. |26-27 The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: music@tcs.cam.ac.uk All at sea with British Sea Power B ritish Sea Power have never been a normal band. They have written songs about the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, appeared on Countryfile, curated their very own festival and fought a bear (though only as part of their stage act). However, it would be fair to say that they’ve never quite broken through into the first tier of British rock bands. They have, nevertheless, built a reputation as a first class live band and it was no surprise to find that they had attracted a sizeable crowd to their gig at the Junction on Saturday. I was at the scene in time to take in the set, decorated with a variety of International Maritime Signal flags and the obligatory owls, and the second support act, Film School. Film School’s instrumentation was competent and their drummer was particularly good. Nevertheless, anybody listening to their first two songs without context would assume that they were in fact a My Bloody Valentine tribute band trying out some of their own material. They were almost entirely upstaged by the fifteen minute short on seahorses, their environment and their life cycle, which promised much, and when the band walked onstage a few minutes later the audience was ready for a gig to write home about. Halfway through I forgot the band were actually playing a song The headlining four-piece, now swelled to six by the inclusion of a viola player and a keyboardist/ corneteer, began the night with Something Wicked from their debut album, before seguing into Atom, a song about the splitting of said particle. But although the lyrics are exquisite, there seemed to be a certain listlessness about the band, especially lead singer Yan. Larsen B, their attempt to proposition a collapsing Antarctic ice shelf, marked a slight improvement in their excitement levels and featured a very nice video on the screens, yet the act seemed static and unimpressive. Finally, the band began to light things up. Remember Me, the standout song of the first album, and Waving Flags, their celebration of Eastern European immigration on the grounds of our shared partiality for getting shit-faced on a budget, were played with confident aplomb in a frenzy of strobe lighting. This felt like British Sea Power. This felt like a band mixing a Betjemanesque appreciation of nature with pure musical thuggery. And so, of course, it was followed by The Great Skua. This instrumental is not a bad song and in some ways could even be said to be uplifting. But it is far from energetic and, horror of horrors, it was accompanied by another video. Whilst this kind of multimedia experience might be appropriate in a larger venue, here it felt like an excuse to avoid interacting with the crowd and it certainly led to a distinct dip in the atmosphere. The theory that the videos were a substitute for a compelling performance was confirmed by their performance of True Adventures two songs later. This was entirely outdone by its video, which depicted a rowing boat in trouble in stormy water, watched by the families of the occupants on the shoreline. The fact that it was thoroughly gripping is no excuse for the fact that halfway through I forgot the band were actually playing a song. A somewhat subdued version of Spirit of St Louis was the last of the main programme and the band left the stage. A few minutes later they returned, and guitarist Nolan jumped on me. In his defence, I was standing right in front of the centre of the stage, and it was hard to begrudge him his leap. At least it betokened a little more activity. Finally came British Sea Power’s usual closer, Lately - usually three minutes of song followed by around twenty minutes of climbing the set, throwing owls and playing random stretches of other songs - instead became five minutes of irritatingly slow song and fifteen minutes of random jamming, whilst Nolan alone of the band performed to type. Although Ursine Ultra the bear did make a brief appearance five minutes from the end, he appeared particularly tattered, covered in grey masking tape and seemed content mostly to lumber around, perhaps not wishing to destroy the costume. It would be inaccurate to say that British Sea Power left the audience disappointed, yet they could have given so much more. They remain, in the opinion of this humble fanboy, one of Britain’s best rock bands, yet little except for Waving Flags in this gig merited superlatives. Songs alone are not enough to make a live performance great. A little mayhem is also needed and there was none of that here. Photo: Christoph! Edward Carlsson-Browne Antics: British Sea Power onstage Album of the week Britpop OASIS Dig Up Your Soul (Domino) Out Oct 6 Julia Willis W hen I heard that Oasis were going to record their eighth album in Abbey Road Studios, my heart sank. No one in their right mind has any need for another band pretending to be the new Beatles. Thankfully I was pleasantly surprised by this latest recording. It is immediately obvious from the Sgt. Pepper-esque collage cover art that The Beatles’ fingerprints would be all over it, but by some miracle Oasis were able to pay homage without sounding like some terrible tribute band, with a dash of maturity thrown in just to surprise us all. This album certainly finds the band reconnecting with their old penchant for big sounds to be played live in huge spaces. Small venues may have been suitable for Don’t Believe The Truth, but this album is going to demand concert halls, perhaps arenas. The Turning is so lifted by its backing choir that it feels almost apocalyptic, displaying all of Noel Gallagher’s strengths and influences, particularly the fade into acoustic bliss at the very end. Equally, Waiting For The Rapture brings us right back down to earth with the force of John Lennon twinned with the lyricism of Dylan. George Harrison’s ghost apparently possessed the band for To Be Where There’s Life, a sensual assault comparable to being hit over the head with a sitar, and for The Nature of Reality, which manages to create an atmosphere of controlled Orientalism despite its transcendental theme. If I didn’t know better, I’d say that Oasis had gone on some sort of spiritual retreat in India before making this album. The sound won’t just fill arenas, it will fill your brain. While many songs on the album are evocative of earlier Oasis recordings (especially the rather underwhelming single The Shock Of The Lightning, which sounds just like Don’t Believe The Truth’s Lyla but, as it says, struck by lightning), you can truly feel that the band has developed musically between albums. I think the honour for this can be laid partially at the feet of Liam Gallagher, the surprising author of I’m Outta Time, which is a shockingly wistful and sensitive ballad about age and disappointment; not something you’d expect from a singer who slouches on stage in a parka, sings bent at right angles to the microphone and then slouches off again when he’s not needed to halfheartedly wiggle a tambourine. At last, Oasis no longer have anything to prove. The boys have come a long way, as patronising music journalists have been remarking since the release of the album. Perhaps Oasis are finally over their “us v. Art School estuary accents” of the ‘90s. Dig Out Your Soul was a loveable headache, maintaining a delicate balance between old and new influences and huge-scale sounds. True, the album is certainly not all roses, and there are some tracks which will disappoint, particularly the rather humdrum (Get Off Your) High Horse Lady, but I can still see this album becoming perceived as of a similar calibre to Morning Glory. Not a patch on Definitely Maybe, but you can only expect so much - they’re not really The Beatles, after all. LISTINGS 09 Thu 10 Fri 11 Sat 12 Sun 13 Mon 14 Tue 15 Wed The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 |28-29 FILM THEATRE MUSIC OTHER How To Lose Friends And Alienate People. (And audiences.) Henry V - on at the newly opened ADC Dirty Pretty Things are now on their final tour. Photo: iam_photography Tobey Maguire has nothing on this lot! See them dance on Saturday. How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 16:00, 18.30, 21:00 £5 Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:00, 18.45, £5 Henry V ADC Theatre, 19:45, £6/£8 Devils ADC Theatre, 23:00, £4/£5 Original Comic Play Marquee Christ’s College, 21:00 Kano @ The Junction Part of the Furniture Kambar Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:30, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 21:00 £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 16:00, 18.30, £5 Henry V ADC Theatre, 19:45, £6/£8 Devils ADC Theatre, 23:00, £5/£6 Stoning Mary Judith E. Wilson Drama Studio, 19:30, £5/£6 Vessels / Victoria & Jacob / The Last Dinosaur @ The Portland Arms Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:30, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 21:00 £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 16:00, 18.30, £5 Henry V ADC Theatre, 19:45, £6/£8 Devils ADC Theatre, 23:00, £5/£6 A Bit Of Virtually Everything @ Ballare From the same East London ‘grime’ scene that spawned Wiley, Durrty Goodz and Shystie among others, Kano has the star quality to take his witty, insightful street polemics overground. Vessels are one of the most promising post-rock bands of recent times. All the best hits for everyone with DJ Gary Sulter. Smart casual, no trainers. Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:30, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 21:00 £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 16:00, 18.30, £5 Dirty Pretty Things @ The Junction Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:30, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 21:00 £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 16:00, 18.30, £5 David Gest... My Life @ Corn Exchange Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:30, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 21:00 £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 16:00, 18.30, £5 Brideshead Revisited (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 12:30, 15:15, 18.00, 20.45, £5 How to Lose Friends and Alienate People (15) Arts Picturehouse, 13:30, 21:45 £5 I’ve Loved You So Long (12A) Arts Picturehouse, 14:15, 19.30, £5 Formed in 2005 by Carl Barat of Libertines fame, their debut album was a massive success. This is their farewell tour, so catch them while they’re still around. A musical concert extravaganza starring one of the most talked about stars of TV, Davd Gest and starring an incredible line up of legendary artists together on stage for the first time performing their greatest hits. Hero (CUADC musical) ADC Theatre, 19:45, £6/£8 Smoker ADC Theatre, 23:00, £5/£6 Hero (CUADC musical) ADC Theatre, 19:45, £6/£8 Never Mind the Alcock ADC Theatre, 23:00, £4/£5 Fusion @ The Place Presenting the biggest Cambridge LBGT night. Various drinks discounts available all night including Stella, VK Flavours, Corky’s & Vodka Mixers. Admission just £3 before 11pm. Zebrahead @ The Junction Punk / pop from Orange County. Alternative club night featuring rock ‘n roll, reggae, electro, grime, pop, house and drum ‘n bass Friday Lunchtime Concert Kettle Yard 13:10 A free concert by the rising classical music stars of the University Phoenix Dance Theatre Cambridge Arts Theatre 19:45 Classic modern dance £10-£22.50 ‘Taking Liberties’ Cafe Project, Jesus Lane 20:00 Free showing of the acclaimed documentary Acoustic Night The Bun Shop 21:00 Featuring local singer-songwriters and guests from further afield Rock’n’Roll dance Classes Parkside Community College Hall 18:45-9:45 Authentic, modern and acrobatic available Dances of Universal Peace Friends Meeting House 20:00 Holding Hands - touching hearts soulful chanting - dancing towards the One The Cambridge Student | 09/10/08 Email: sport@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 30|Sport Contrasting fortunes of the North While Man City revel in their newfound petro-wealth, Newcastle’s future looks increasingly insecure Comment Stephen Harrison W Robinho has lit up the City of Manchester Stadium Photograph: zawtowers Geordies can and at times do give their team the support they need, but increasingly they merely berate. Players visibly shrink in stature as the crowd get on their back, and on bad days playing at home can have a negative impact on Newcastle. Fans now clamour for Keegan to return, but why? In his last spell he did nothing more than OK. The excuse that he cares about the club, bandied about Tyneside in recent weeks, is not enough. Newcastle need a manger who can get the players passing the ball and organise a team with a seemingly inbuilt tendency to self-destruct defensively irrespective of any links he may or may not have with the club. Most importantly, however, the club needs stability. That won’t happen now until Mike Ashley finds a buyer, but it requires a change in expectations. Newcastle are a decade away from challenging for honours, and a serious period of rebuilding is required. A club is only as big as its results, and it is time Geordies realised this and stopped demanding an instant fix. Clubs like Aston Villa and Everton have demonstrated that progress takes time. Only by a reduction in expectations and a certain amount of patience can the fans allow the stability which in the long run will foster success. Sporting introductions Our weekly foray into obscure Cambridge sports turns to Kendo The Cambridge Kendo society is keeping the martial art of Japanese swordsmanship alive Kendo (literally: the ‘way of the sword’) is practised by millions of people around the world. “Mortal combat?” Of course! The ultimate goal in the sword duel is to deliver a single cut that would finish off your opponent: a cut down the centre of their head; across their torso; or chopping off their sword hand. Kendo practitioners use a sword made of flexible bamboo and protective armor (both of which were originally developed almost 300 years ago). The bamboo sword and armour allow for full force cuts to be made without risking injuring the opponent. Kendo is a very physical activity and a two hour session is a real workout, and the sword and footwork really build up a sweat. Less obvious is the mental discipline kendo develops. A kendo match is equal parts of mind, body, and spirit. As Min Lin (a kendo “black belt”) put it, “I enjoy the mind contact with another player. When you are fighting with someone you are talking; not talking with your voices, but with your swords and actions.” Check out http://www.srcf.ucam. org/kendo or come visit the Kendo Open Day on Monday 13 October at 7:00pm in the Homerton College auditorium. Photo: ErikDesimone hen events take place which shake the foundations of our civilisation we can invariably re- member where we were. On 31st August 1997 I was trying with increasing frustration to watch early morning cartoons before gradually realising that newsflashes on every channel meant something important; Princess Diana had died. On September 11th 2001 I had nipped out of an RE lesson for a toilet break and bumped into an aghast teacher rushing to spread the news that terrorists had attacked the World Trade Centre. On September 1st 2008 I was about to answer a question about Marco Polo on an Itbox in the Firestation Pub in Whitley Bay when I found out that Robinho had signed for Man City. This was staggering. Perhaps it does not warrant comparison with the two seismic events above, yet in footballing terms, the the Abu Dhabi takeover of Manchester City and the Robinho transfer were truly staggering. In strictly financial terms, Manchester City’s new owners make Chelsea’s Roman Abramovich look like a pauper; one suspects that Robinho is only the tip of a very expensive iceberg. Indeed, the manner of Robinho’s transfer, as City made an eleventhhour swoop to take the Brazilian from under Chelsea’s noses, hinted at a change in the power balance of English football. Chelsea were clearly expecting Real Madrid to reduce their asking price to get rid of the wayward star before the transfer window shut, but they didn’t and Chelsea found themselves gazumped. Robinho may not even want to be in Manchester; a slip of the tongue in his first interview suggested that Chelsea were supposed to be the beneficiaries of his toys-out-of-thepram tantrum in Madrid. The fact remains, though, that he is a City player, and we can expect others to join him in January. But amidst the joy of City fans, whose celebrations can hardly be begrudged given the turbulence they have endured over the last ten years, there are nagging doubts. From a national perspective this new investment is worrying. Since Abramovich bought Chelsea they have failed to produce a genuine first-team player of any nationality, let alone an Englishman; the production line at Old Trafford seems to have dried up after a golden generation, as United invest in young foreign talent like Ronaldo, Nani, and Anderson; and at Arsenal holding a British passport seems reason alone for rejection. Yet whilst the top clubs have failed to produce talented Brits, City have to some extent filled the gap: Joe Hart, Micah Richards, Stephen Ireland and Daniel Sturridge are but a few of their hot prospects. If City go the way of Chelsea, one wonders what will become of these youngsters and those coming up through the ranks, and whether another club will be able to fill the void left. The new owners have promised to maintain the club’s faith in youth; only time will tell. More seriously for City fans, one cannot help wondering whether Manchester City’s new owners are serious about the football club or whether it is simply a new toy for rich boys. There is a lingering suspicion that in five years time the investors will find something new and walk away from the club, leaving only memories and mountains of debt. On the subject of irresponsible owners I cannot go any further without mentioning Mike Ashley. I am a Newcastle fan, something I admit with less and less pride as the club lurches from crisis to crisis. Yet I am a Newcastle fan in a minority for - and I must whisper this for fear of being ostracised from Tyneside society - I have some sympathy for our beleaguered owner. Certainly he has made mistakes: his handling of the crisis has been abysmal, and his apparent desire to sell the club has only created yet more unnecessary instability; yet it seems to me that his biggest error was the appointment of Kevin Keegan, a panicked move designed to ingratiate the new management with the supporters. Keegan has always been prone to emotional departures, and he was clearly unhappy with the management structure. This time King Kev cited a lack of control of player purchases as the reason for his departure, but in Gutierrez and Coloccini Newcastle have bought two players of genuine quality for the first time, (an injury-free Michael Owen aside) for nigh on a decade; the board deserve congratulations rather than castigation for their policy. It pains me to say it, but in reality the problems with the club are much deeper than the owner. Newcastle fans pride themselves on their passion, but unfortunately passion alone won’t win anything in the modern game. Sport The Cambridge Student |09/10/08 Email: sport@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 1223 761 685 SPORTS COMMENT: FOOTBALL OF THE NORTH >> 30 Cambridge soar to new heights Cambridge gliders victorious in delayed Varsity clash Peter Gibson T he Cambridge University Gliding Club took to the skies last month and successfully defended their Varsity title. The match had originally been scheduled for June earlier this summer, but had been delayed by poor weather. When the teams reconvened on the 20th September, the Cambridge fliers triumphed with a score of 558 to 396, retaining the title following their hard-fought victory in 2007. Having been held at RAF Bicester, the home of the Oxford University Gliding Club, last year, the 2008 tie was hosted at Gransden Lodge, about twelve miles west of the Cambridge. Gliding is the sport of unpowered flight. Once towed into the air by a conventional powered aeroplane, the glider stays aloft like a bird of prey, riding currents of rising air caused by local terrain or solar thermals. Soaring in this way, gliders can fly hundreds of miles and climb A sunny Saturday in September thousands of metres into the air. Given the importance of the sun in heating the ground and creating the rising currents of hot air needed for a good flight, the weather plays a hugely influential role. However, the weather is sufficiently complex that it is impossible to say that a clear sky equates to good flying conditions, since clouds also play a vital role in creating and shaping the thermals. The match had been scheduled for June, but when the teams assembled, they were met by low clouds and persistent rain. No flying was possible all day, and the fliers were forced to wile away the hours in the clubhouse, waiting for a break in the weather. A few members of each team were able to stay on for an extra day and so a couple of scoring flights were made on the Monday. The tie was postponed with Cambridge on 261, Oxford close behind on 213. Gliding scoring is somewhat esoteric to the sport, but is easy enough to explain. Each team has five fliers and a pair of reserves. They take turns to go up singly in their clubs’ glider, hauled into the air by the tow plane. Once released, they score one point for every minute they stay aloft, and two points for every 100 feet of altitude gained. There is a time limit of 50 minutes for each flight to ensure that there is a fair rotation of all of the team members. Following a series of abortive attempts to reschedule the match over the summer, the teams reconvened on a sunny Saturday in September. The conditions weren’t ideal during the morning, and with Oxford making their check flights, no one was able to stay up for very long. However, as the weather improved throughout the day, so did the length of the flights. Cambridge opened with solid scores from Adam Spikings and Rebecca Ward, who both managed to find a patch of reasonable lift and made the most of it. They were followed by Seb Cassel and Philippa Roberts of Oxford. Cassel, the Oxford captain was particularly impressive, rising to over 3000ft and attaining the highest score of the day to that point. The match remained close until a pair of flights from Cambridge’s Graham Bell and Peter Buchlovsky, the club president, put the light blues into an unassailable lead. Buchlovsky’s flight near the end of the day topped all of the others as he reached an overall height of almost 6000ft. The Cambridge University Gliding Club has existed in various forms and flown from a series of bases since its foundation in 1935 as the Cambridge Gliding Club. It currently has roughly 40 members and for the past two years has competed in the UK Junior National Gliding Championships. A Cambridge glider, heads off into the sunset at the end of a successful day for the light blue team Photograph: Rebecca Ward Mixed success for Cambridge teams in defunct last BUSA league Carly Hilts Cambridge finished first in eight events in the BUCS Total Points league table for 2007/8.Competing against 142 other universities, Cambridge teams took the top position in almost a third of all the events they entered. The winning teams were Women’s UCCE Cricket, the Men’s Fencing first team, the Women’s Football first team, the Women’s Hockey first team, the Women’s Lacrosse first team, the Men’s Table Tennis first team, the Men’s Volleyball first team, and the Men’s Volleyball first team. The tournament was organised by British Universities and Colleges Sport (BUCS), a governing body for university-level sports in the UK. BUCS was formed last June after the British Universities Sports As- sociation (BUSA) and University College Sport (UCS) were merged to form one organisation. Cambridge scored particularly highly in events for the Men’s first teams for fencing and table tennis, each of which gained 50 points. Lacrosse, in which the University also did well last year, was similarly a successful event. The Women’s first team won first place with another 50 points, while the second team also achieved 24 points. Captained by goalie Alex CarnegieBrown, the Blues team gained the distinction of being Cambridge’s most successful team this year. They were unbeaten throughout the season and won their Varsity match with Oxford. Cambridge’s Men’s Football second team gained the University the lowest score, coming fourth with no points. The lowest plac- ings belonged to the Men’s Cricket teams, with UCCE cricket finishing fifth and the first team taking sixth place. Cambridge teams scored 777 knockout points and 708.5 league points. An overall total of 1485.5 points placed the University 14th in the Overall Championship Points league table. This is two places lower than their 2006/7 position, when Cambridge teams collectively scored 1488 points. The table was topped by Loughborough for the third year in a row. Oxford finished ninth, down one place from last year. BUCS manages about 1.2 million students which compete in 3200 teams and 503 leagues across the UK. The organisation is responsible for inter-university sports and representative teams for the World UIniversity Championships and the World University Games. Cambridge fencers celebrate their successful season Photograph: CUFC