cp.exercise-editor - Google Docs
Transcription
cp.exercise-editor - Google Docs
Exercise instruction This exercise contains two components. 1. cp.first aid—a guide on internal writing style 2. article—intelligent manufacturing clusters Please read both documents carefully and correct the article ‘intelligent manufacturing clusters’ using a clear and presentable method based on the guidance shown on cp.first aid. cp.first aid 1.use Australian spelling 2.‘percent’ (one word) not %; ‘and’ not & 3.single quotes (‘like this’) only use double quotes for inside single quotes (‘like “this”’) 4.dates: 12 December 2014 or just 12 December, never December 12. Never use ‘st’, ‘th’, or ‘rd’ 5.no double-spaces after full stop or colon 6.no bullet points; use hyphen 7.always use Chinese characters after a name in pinyin e.g. Xi Jinping 习近平 8.titles written in lower case (unless a proper noun) 9.affiliations largest to smallest, no comma in between e.g. NDRC Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau do not send a document without checking this list cp.spelling guide -ize -ization -er -or -og = = = = = -ise -isation -re -our -ogue programme=program license =licence defense = defence judgment = judgement sulphur = sulfur cp.survival guide Learning our style and our spelling is an important first step to integrating into the office. It demonstrates your attention to detail and understanding that we are first and foremost communicators in writing. We believe the fewer the marks on a page, the cleaner and clearer the document. cp.format wording - paragraph spacing: 6 pt - spacing after paragraph heading: 3 pt - paragraph alignment: left-hand justified - heading/sub-heading: helvetica neue light, cp.green - external docs: font en: helvetica neue light; font cn: STHeiti light; colour: dark grey - internal docs: font en: century gothic; font cn: songti; colour: dark grey - use active verbs - use the simple past/ present continuous - avoid: for example, of, significantly, going forward - avoid ending sentences with a preposition titles and names punctuation - include full name before using acronym - introduce people with: name, organisation, position - organisations are from BIGGEST to SMALLEST, and do NOT need commas in between - no ‘the’ in front of organisations - Chinese names: surname in all caps, first name capitalised - no spaces or hyphens (exceptions: Sun Yat-sen, Chiang Kai-shek) - always list Chinese characters after listing person’s full name - use sentence case for titles - use sentence case and single quotes for government documents - punctuate only when absolutely necessary - no double-spaces - no periods at end of titles or subtitles - single quotes - no contractions or superscripts - percent NOT %, and NOT & - only original punctuation included in quotes - long m-dash—with no spaces - apostrophe for pinyin syllables starting with a,e,o (Yu’ebao) - ALWAYS put a space after an ellipses (whether at beginning, middle, end of sentence) currency - C¥ NOT rmb/yuan - no space between currency and number e.g. C¥370 - million should be written out - billion can be written as bn, trillion as tn numbers - commas separate sets of three zeroes - write out ten and below, use numerals for 11 and above - round numbers to no more than two decimal places - no ‘the’ before sources - et cetera=etc. - in order to=to - facilitate=ease, assist, help improve - establish=set up - maintain=keep up - participates=takes part dates - from yyyy to yyyy - d month yy - 2014-20 NOT 2014-2020 - no ‘th’ or ‘rd’ after numbers - jan, feb, mar, apr, may, jun, jul, aug, sep, oct, nov, dec intelligent manufacturing clusters signal MIIT’s 23 July plan to build 100 technologicaly-advanced SME clusters around well set-up firms encourages SMEs as innovators and manufacturing hubs in their own right. The plan marks MIIT’s debut as driver of macro-policy, but reveals its limitations. Securing funds—SMEs’ biggest constraint—lies beyond MIIT’s remit or political clout. intent ● improve top-down coordination to ensure subsidies impel coordination between industries, rather than just encourage them to co-locate. ● align with ‘Made in China 2025′ and ‘Internet Plus’ plan to propel shift from low-end manufacturing to innovating high-end IT knowledge economy ● promote “going global” via training, research and technology, and personnel exchanges with international counterparts ● support SME innovation, transferable to the state-owned secter ● set national and local standards from local platforms: strengthen standards to international levels in tech, quality, energy saving, environmental protection, health/sanitation ● Encourage R&D, IP exchange between research institutes and industry ● embrace technology at every juncture of the supply chain: fibre optics and mobile network infrastructure, cloud computing and big data, real-time diagnostics ● focus infrastructure upgrades on energy- and water-saving technologies, and waste recycling; third-party audits to identify energy waste areas ● form IP allianses and industrial associations that will share resources and IP protection costs ● encourage training and professional development in new technologies ● create a national registry, enhance trademark protection and improve reputation and risk managment to build national and regional brands context 26th apr 2012: State Council unveils multi-pronged approach to spur SME growth, including tax cuts, fiscal transfers, and a 15 bn yuan national fund for start-ups and SMEs 8 apr 2014: MoF, SAT renew preferential taxes to 2016 for SMEs 23 sep 2014: Caixin reports the C¥15 bn development fund has not materialized, and much of the 2003 SME Promotion Law was not implemented 24 sep 2014: State Council approves another raft of SME tax breaks. SMEs still face disproportionate tax burden. 23 mar 2015: State Council Opinions seek to reduce costs of IP litigation, increase research personnel mobility, break monopolies and local protectionist policies and provide financial support for innovative industries 19 may 2015: Made in China 2025 lays out goals for upgrading manufacturing, mimicking Germany’s ‘Industrie 4.0’ and US ‘Industrial Internet’ policies 16th June 2015: ‘Opinions on mass innovation’ reiterates earlier tactics to increase entrepreneurship 26 jun 2015: State Council releases timeline for implementing innovation and employment policies 4 jul 2015: Internet Plus policy pushes use of internet in production processes, not just as a platform for consumption outlook–weak ● top-down coordination likely to encourage companies to relocate to take advantage of subsidies but intended coordination and cooperation/economies of scale unlikely to happen ● SOE reform needs solutions before a programme like this one is likely to have impact ● poor access to funds, barely addressed in plan, means SMEs will struggle to participate competitively ● expect IT infrastructure roll-out will advance further growth of mobile internet, application of big data for credit rating and precision marketing, hardware/software localization and information security ● pooling IP protection and litigation costs within clusters could enhance enforcement since high IP enforcement costs borne by the plaintiff can deter legal action ● few actual measures to encourage public service capacity, R&D coordination, brand development ● coordination will be difficult without consistent standards of progress, yet metrics must also be industry and locality specific to be effective ● take up of new technology hinges on personnel training, to be borne in part by industrial associations, but largely dependent on the roll out of Ministry of Education’s vocational training initiative roundtable MIIT issues Guiding opinions to push industrial cluster development for the first time Zheng Xin 郑昕 | People’s Daily Online Current clusters are too few in number, poorly coordinated, low-tech and show little innovation. Industry clusters plan focuses on creating an attractive business environment by coordinating upstream and downstream activity, rather than picking individual champions. MIIT’s guidelines are a step toward realizing higher goals set out by the State Council: “Made in China 2025”, ‘Mass Innovation and Entrepreneurship’, and ‘Internet Plus’. SMEs are still somewhat off the radar in terms of China’s statistics gathering and economic monitoring. Better integrating them requires more rigoras data gathering and analysis. Clear industry-specific standards developed for local conditions are necessary for the Government to guide clusters, and robust training resources will help workers stay abreast of technology upgrades. unleashing clusters industrial advantages, upgrading SMEs Wang Yuanzhi ⺩远枝 | China Industry News Despite policy support, SMEs face an uphill challenge in the economic slowdown. Without ‘intelligent clusters’, broader structural transition will be hard to affect. Currently, industrial clusters are in a very rudimentary phase. Companies tend to locate in clusters to take advantage of policy benefits, without collaberating or innovating. Backbone Enterprises have not taken a leadership role. The government must oversee integration, and companies should focus on engendering corporate culture and improving manufacturing effeciency with technology. 20 articles on industrial clusters release, next step in Made in China 2025 ye tan 叶檀 | China National Radio Clusters bestow multiple agglomeration benefits: lower operating costs, scale economies in infrastructure construction, and potential windfall dividends from spontaneous collaboration between innovation-oriented enterprises, especially those tapped in the Internet Plus plan. The state must not go down the same road it has in the past however, where guidelines are not developed in accordance with market principles. Backbone enterprises like Changchun Auto and Shenyang Machinery have remained stunted because of poor coordination with smaller enterprises. in the spotlight Zheng Xin 郑昕 | MIIT Small and Medium Enterprise Department Working in MIIT’s SME department since its 2008 creation, Zheng consistently draws attention to the fact that SMEs account for the majority of China’s production, innovation and employment; but do not have easy access to the financial system. The ‘new third board’, the over-the-counter market promoted by Li Keqiang 李克强 as an alternative finance vehicle for innovative SMEs, must be complemented by banking reforms that provide SMEs access to credit. The cluster plan’s success hinges on training personnel to keep up with new technology and enlisting Local Government to develop effective evaluation criteria, especially where national standards are to broad. Wang Yuanzhi ⺩远枝 | All-China Private Enterprises Federation Long-time head of NDRC’s small and micro enterprise department, and industrial planning and innovation expert. Believing SMEs should drive innovation policy, he has been frustrated by 2014 fiscal policies that led to SMEs y-o-y slow growth and a 10% rise in operating costs. He is cautiously optimistic about MIIT’s current cluster plan. The state needs to facilitate coordinating the science and technology industry with SMEs in order to commercialize research. MIIT ⼯信部 Formed in 2008 from several industrial policy organs, including NDRC Industrial and Information Technology Department and the National Defence Science and Technology Committee as part of the 2002 ‘New Approach to Industrialisation’, MIIT was supposed to better cordinate industrial adjustment. In reality, it has been politicaly marginalised by NDRC, which uses its own levers to advance industrial policy goals such as ordering restructuring of the telecom industry in 2011 via the Anti-monopoly Law. Nonetheless, MIIT has exerted considerable technocratic expertise, enacting ambitious plans to solve overcapacity in rare earth and PV industries that essentially involve cleaning up after other failed industrial policies. MIIT can take credit for the industry cluster plan, and will also help to implement ‘Made in China 2025′ and the ‘Internet Plus’ plan, but its capacity for implementation is limited by systemic issues that require reforms well beyond the purview of MIIT and industry policy. SME development depends foremost on funding which awaits financial reforms, and the industry cluster plan also relates to initiatives across policy portfolios, including Li Keqiang’s push for innovation and MEP green infrastructure goals. Copyright © 2015 China Policy, All rights reserved.