we the people - American Institute of Architects

Transcription

CONNECTION
THE ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN JOURNAL OF THE YOUNG ARCHITECTS FORUM
This issue focuses on the topic of ADVOCACY
Featuring architects, designers, and emerging professionals serving
as advocates in the community, in politics, and for the profession.
This issue is a follow-up to the Emerging Professionals Summit held
in January and a lead-up to AIA Grassroots in Washington DC (March
19-22), the annual AIA conference for leadership and legislation.
March 2014
VOL 12 ISSUE 02
WETHEPEOPLE
CONNECTION
ON THE COVER:
Entourage
by Wyatt Frantom
AIA Board Representative
College of Fellows Representative
AIA Staff Liaison
AIA Contributing Staff
AIA Contributing Staff
Wendy Ornelas, FAIA
John Sorrenti, FAIA
Erin Murphy, AIA
Ashley Respecki, Assoc. AIA
Alyssa Franco, Assoc. AIA
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
P 800-AIA-3837
www.aia.org
1735 New York Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20006-5292
CONNECTION is a the official bimonthly publication of the Young Architects Forum of the AIA.
This publication is created through the volunteer efforts of dedicated Young Architect Forum members.
Copyright 2014 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved.
Views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors and not those of the American Institute of
Architects. Copyright © of individual articles belongs to the Author. All image permissions are obtained by or
copyright of the Author.
06
2014 EP SUMMIT
10
by Jennifer Workman, Jon Penndorf, , Virginia Marquardt, Jeff Pastva and Corey Clayborne
CULTURAL ADVOCACY
The AIA Trust is a free risk management resource for AIA members that offers valuable benefits to protect
you, your firm, and your family. For more information on all AIA Trust programs, visit www.TheAIATrust.com
???
18
by Lorena Toffer AIA, Clemente Jaquez AIA, and Jorge Gonzalez AIA
THE PLAYERS
DESIGN AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST
by Bryan Bell, Steven A. Moore, Sergio Palleroni, John Folan
UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS
INSTRUCTORS
MAYORS' INSTITUTE ON CITY DESIGN
an interview with Trinity Simons
THE ISSUES
22
COMMUNITY
ETHICS
26
COMMUNICATION
28
RISK OF NO IRB
32
#aiachat
36
Using the SEED evaluator to
standardize the IRB process for
studio projects eliminates the
time-consuming process of
applying for approval and allows
for more time for
communication with and
feedback from the community
prior to design and
implementation of a proposal.
LEADERSHIP PROFILE
RICHARD SWETT
42
COFFEE WITH AN ARCHITECT
44
RESEARCH
COMMUNITY
DEFINE
IDEAS
IDENTIFY
(CONVERSATION)
CONFIRM
(SURVEY)
ANALYZE &
CATEGORIZE
IMPACT
Working without an IRB risks the
use of unveatted and unrigorous
research techniques and
inadvertently unethical behavior,
including the imposition of values
and objects without the consent
of a community, which can result
in disatisfaction, resentment or
other strain on the relationship of a
community and the students,
instructors, and/or university
responsible for the project.
30
by Jody Brown, AIA
TIME
THE PROCESS
THE SEED
EVALUATOR
THE
ROSE ISCENTER FOR PUBLIC LEADERSHIP
an interview with Jess Zimbabwe
A TOOL “FOR DESIGNERS,
STANDARD IRB
Using a standard IRB process
PROJECT DEVELOPERS,
involves multiple steps that ensure
COMMUNITY LEADERS
the ethical treatment of
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS
communities studied. by requiring
AND OTHERS WHO
an interview with Katie Swensonthe “informed consent” of all
participants. Yet these steps are
DESIRE A COMMON
time-consuming and reduce the
students’ and faculty members’
STANDARD TO GUIDE,
to perform thorough
#aiachat ability
research, explore multiple
MEASURE, EVALUATE
by Evelyn Lee, AIA
schemes, and develop precise
AMD CERTIFY THE
implementation strategies.
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND
publicinterestdesign.org
EVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
an interview with Katie Crepeau
OF DESIGN PROJECTS.”
SEED AS IRB
SEED EVALUATOR
DEFINE
GOALS
SS TT AA KK EE HH OO LL DD EE RR SS AA SS SS EE TT SS &
& CC HH AA LL LL EE NN GG EE SS GG OO AA LL SS
CONNECTION is sponsored in part through the generous support of The AIA Trust.
QUICK
CONNECT
A BETTER PROCESS: THE SEED EVALUATOR FOR COMMUNITY-BASED SCHOOL PROJE
IRB : INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD : ETHICS COMMITTEE
Jon Penndorf, AIA
Virginia E. Marquardt, AIA
Brad Benjamin, AIA
Lawrence J. Fabbroni, AIA
Wyatt Frantom, AIA
Robert Barfield, AIA
Joshua Flowers, AIA
Evelyn Lee, AIA
NEWS AND RESOURCES
by Beth Mosenthal, Assoc. AIA
“AN IRB IS A COMMITTEE THAT PERFORMS ETHICAL REVIEW OF PROPOSED RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS”
2013 YAF ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Chair
Vice Chair
Past Chair
Advocacy Advisor
Communications Director
Community Director
Knowledge Director
Public Relations Director
04
SEED EVALUATOR
CONNECTION EDITORIAL COMMITTEE
Editor-In-ChiefWyatt Frantom, AIA
Guest EditorLawrence J. Fabbroni, AIA
Senior Editor, Design
Nathan Stolarz, AIA
Senior Editor, Content
Jeff Pastva, AIA
Senior Editor, News
Beth Mosenthal, Assoc. AIA
Contributing Journalist, News
Marcus Monroe, Assoc. AIA
Contributing Journalist
AJ Sustaita, AIA
Contributing Journalist
Nicholas Banks, Assoc. AIA
EDITOR’S NOTE
by Wyatt Frantom, AIA
DESIGN
RESPONSES
INITIAL
PROPOSALS
REFINE
& TEST
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DESIGN
DESIGN
IDEAS architecture + angst
IDEAS
PP RR OO PP OO SS AA LL SS
March 2014
VOL 12 ISSUE 02
WETHEPEOPLE
DEVELOP
FINAL
PROJECT
SS OO LL UU T
EDITOR’S NOTE PROVOCATIONS
THE ROAD TO SALVATION
WE THE PEOPLE AND THE PATH OF HEROES
The drive into the desert was, as always, an act of liberation – a
mental emancipation from the city, as much a physical one; and
with each mile-tick of the odometer, a curative release; the work
week toils dissipating like an asphalt vapor in my rear view mirror.
My daycation destination was Salvation Mountain, an art
installation in Niland, California, three-hours east of Los Angeles
and into the remoteness of the Colorado Desert. Begun in the
1980s by Leonard Knight, an Army veteran of the Korean War,
the installation is more mound than mountain; composed of strawreinforced adobe dutifully slathered across one side of a desert
berm and happily painted with the vivid colors of flower-power.
It's impact on the otherwise visually muted landscape, however, is
mountainous. And climbing to the top ["STAY ON THE YELLOW
BRICK ROAD PLEASE"], offers an impressive vantage – as if
you’d found the end of the rainbow and were standing where it’s
pigment saturated the earth.
In going under the dome of the sanctuary hillock, a part
of the complex known as the hogan, one encounters an
ad hoc assemblage of found tree branches, adobe-fixed
as structural buttressing and kaleidoscopically painted to
express the unmistakable illusion of movement – as if one
were meandering among the firing synapses of the mind.
Taken apart from its unmistakable religious iconography, however,
Salvation Mountain is more remarkable for its actual execution
– a constructed manifestation of one man’s vision, grown from
a random plot of sand to serve as landmark to an idea. In the
middle of nowhere -- and literally making something from nothing,
it has become a pilgrimage destination for art enthusiasts as much
as religious devotees; being declared as a “folk art site worthy of
preservation and protection” by the Folk Art Society of America.
And while it had been envisioned by one man and appropriately
recognized as his gift to the world, others have lent a hand, if not a
bucket of paint, over the years to bring that vision to life. Not unlike
Gaudi’s La Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, if only a poor man’s version,
the call to maintain the work becomes all the more necessary with Mr.
Knight’s passing last month.
What struck me most about Salvation Mountain though is that it was
the daily effort of this man over the course of some thirty years -- it is
both amazing and inspiring that one life might be so prolific and those
daily efforts, the simple strokes of a brush, might add up to touching
so many other lives.
In my editorial of the January issue of Connection, I encouraged
readers to be a guiding proponent of the transformative changes
occurring in our profession. In this issue, we’ve featured architects
and design professionals that are leading change through a variety
of advocacy roles; engaging civic policy and development financing,
supporting human-centered and sustainable community building,
and functioning as citizen architects to represent the values of design
to the public.
As the Communications Director of the YAF, and as Editor-in-Chief
of this publication, I have the privilege of representing a constituency
now nearing 25,000 recently licensed AIA members -- that’s 28% of
all AIA membership and 40% of all AIA Architect members.
Imagine now, in the context of those
numbers, if each of us were prolific enough
to leave a legacy that survives us …
imagine the heroic impact that we might
have on the industry if we were collectively
prolific.
Perhaps taken together, our own daily efforts might serve as salvation
for our profession. ■
Wyatt Frantom AIA
Wyatt is the 2013-2014
Communications Director of the
Young Architects National Advisory
Committee of the AIA, the Editorin-Chief of YAF CONNECTION and a
Senior Architectural Designer and
Associate with Gensler Los Angeles.
04
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
05
QUICK
CONNECT
NEWS FOR ARCHITECTS ON-THE-GO
by Beth Mosenthal
headlined
reviewed
in the community
2014 EMERGING PROFESSIONALS SUMMIT
SITING SOUND
TEAM BETTER BLOCK
by Beth Mosenthal
by R. Tyler King, Community Designer (with a side of Writing/Curating)
featured
by Marcus Monroe
Founded by Jason Roberts and Andrew Howard, Team Better Block
(TBB) works with local stakeholders to temporarily re-imagine underused urban areas.
Through rapid street changes and an assortment of community
revitalization ideas, TBB creates quick and inexpensive changes
that show the true potential of a street; having been deployed in over
thirty cities including New York, San Antonio, Tehran, and Sydney.
A SNAPSHOT OF TWO
TRANSFORMATIONAL, TEMPORAL
PROJECTS AIMED AT COMMUNITY
REVITALIZATION
OAK CLIFF TYLER AND DAVIS
BETTER BLOCK PROJECT
Dallas, Texas
Anderson, 2014
2014 Emerging Professional Summit: Welcome. Image courtesy of the AIA.
The 2014 AIA Emerging Professionals Summit was held in
Albuquerque, NM from Jan. 24-26th. Comprised of 72 emerging
professionals from a wide spectrum of roles within the field of
architecture (from students to interns to executives from the ACSA,
AIA, AIAS, NAAB, and NCARB), the three days were filled with
discourse regarding key issues that affect emerging professionals,
as well as a charge to create an action plan meant to support
the next group of emerging architects. As reported by William
Richards, “Addressing the needs of emerging professionals and
engaging their collective energy and passion is one of the central
priorities of the Repositioning the AIA Initiative." To learn more
about the Summit and its outcomes, CLICK HERE.
observed
SNAPSHOT FROM JAPAN
photo and text by Darren Poon, an Architect based in Chicago
NELLY KATE ANDERSON SAMPLES RICHMOND SITES AT BLACK IRIS
GALLERY’S LOW FREQUENCY TRAVEL AGENCY
The first Better Block Project aimed at
transforming a neighborhood with an
old cluster of deteriorating buildings.
Impacted by outdated ordinances
that prohibited fruit stands, stopped
crowds gathering on the sidewalks,
and charged a minimum of $1,000
to put café seating out, the Better
Block Team transformed the block
in a single weekend. Ignoring the
ordinances, the team built the street
they had imagined. In order to do so,
they painted bike lanes, brought in
historic lighting, created café seating
and temporary coffee shops. The
community enjoyed the change and
the city realized these issues needed
to be addressed. The zoning was
changed, the team’s bike infrastructure
became part of the Dallas Bike Plan,
and $500,000 was dedicated to
infrastructure improvements.
In collaboration with Benjamin Thorp, curator and programmer at Black
Iris Gallery in Richmond, VA, emerging sound artist Nelly Kate Anderson
composed six site-specific sound pieces, which together form the Low
Frequency Travel Agency. A map of Richmond embedded inside of a
green hardside weekender suitcase guides users through the ongoing
interactive exhibit; where, upon simply making an appointment, the
experience is yours for the day. Arrive at a site, open the case, press a
magical red button, and a site-specific sound piece soars out of a small
powerful amp.
According to Anderson, who releases albums and performs as Nelly Kate,
the Low Frequency Travel Agency began as an attempt to synthesize
“emotional and literal maps” of dead urban space while encouraging
users to actively experience their surroundings, as well as music. This
invitation is, in fact, explicitly extended in the conclusive verses of the
first piece through a playful, if at first patronizing, enumeration of urban
features, woven into a clanky and dissonant soundscape evocative of
the mechanical workings of the city: “These are your corners, these are
your sidewalks, these are your alleyways, your manholes, your medians/
These are your projects, and these are your highways, and these are
your volunteers and dumpsters and driveways.”
The content of other pieces is less direct, like one composed for Kanawha
Plaza—home to many of Richmond’s homeless and ground zero of the
Occupy Movement. Progressively ascending and descending vocals
reveal a sense uncertainty about the site, achieving what Anderson
describes in the project’s companion guide as “the racket and inevitable
shadow of an impending high rise.”
COMPLETE STREETS INITIATIVE
San Antonio, Texas
As part of the Complete Streets
Initiative, TBB was asked by the City of
San Antonio to assist with a community
revitalization
effort
that
would
temporarily transform vacant buildings,
overly wide streets, and an empty
park into an active neighborhood.
With the support of the city and local
community, the Better Block project
produced pop-up shops, art spaces,
bike lanes, landscaping, and even a
beer garden. The community helped
transform the park with an inexpensive
solution: tire swings. By activating
the park with this solution, the team
of volunteers provided an inexpensive
asset to the community.
An initial criticism of the project is that the proximity of the sites are
scattered in a way that favors traveling between them by car in a city that
is working towards better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. But for
Anderson, the relative space between these sites reveals a psychological,
not infrastructure-related hang-up that Richmonders’ may have about
walking or biking.
Thousands of passengers revolve through the Iidabashi Station
each day. An infrastructural cog in the underground Tokyo Metro
machine, passengers clad in the black and white business attire
move swiftly through the system. Throughout, colors and forms are
applied pragmatically for wayfinding and precautionary purposes.
Here, architect Makato Sei Watanabe leads passengers from the
surface, reveals the hidden and captures their attention.
To share your photos, send Beth a tweet: @archiadventures.
06
CONNECTION
Anderson’s process stretches the limits of the interaction between
heads-down studio time and the ways in which we investigate urban
environments. She believes that perhaps the same could be applied
to architectural practice. “I hope that architects can always be sort of
heartened by the fact that there are opportunities everywhere for their
ideas to blossom and be a part of the community—that it doesn’t always
have to be a building. Other interventions can be just as important and
valuable to the experience of your city. And I am trying really hard to
draw anybody to that conclusion, whether they’re another musician, or a
gardener.”
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
Lawrence Fabbroni, AIA
is an Ithaca-based architect
with Fabbroni Associates, as
well as the AIA YAF’s Advocacy
Director; a new role for the AIA
that he is helping to shape.
Here’s what he says about
advocacy and getting involved
as a young professional:
What organizations are you involved in as an emerging
professional?
Beyond the YAF, I also serve as the Vice-Chair of the City of
Ithaca Parks Commission, and as a member of the AIA Board
Advocacy Committee. Previously, I had been involved in the
Municipal Art Society of New York, the AIAS, and ArchVoices.
I think the most important organization to get involved in as
an emerging professional is the one you build through your
own personal network, centered around where your passions
intersect with your values – that’s when really interesting
things happen, and that’s where the most creative thinking
almost always comes from.
What are your responsibilities as the AIA YAF’s Advocacy
Director? What spurred your interest in this role?
The Advocacy Director position was new to the YAF when I
was appointed, so the “role and responsibilities,” are part of
what I am working to define with the rest of the YAF leadership.
Our goal is to ensure that the voices of young architects are
at the forefront in discussing the future of the AIA, and to help
shape the future agendas of the profession through increasing
the dialogue and partnerships between different generations
of leadership in the profession.
As a student, I was heavily involved with the AIAS and many
of the mentors I had are still active participants and leaders in
the AIA. These people built strong beliefs in the possibilities
that architects have at our disposal when we develop a
collective vision and commitment. I view my role as helping
Young Architects become champions for a great profession
and ambassadors for good design as a tool for advocating
larger ideas.
What are some of the important issues that Young Architects
face in today’s industry?
The conversations that I keep hearing are about how we
maintain relevancy, and I think the sentiment may be correct,
but the conversation has to go beyond protecting scope
and services. Today’s Young Architects need to help the
profession maintain a forward-looking approach, rather than
the protectionism architects tend to rally around. Tomorrow’s
architect needs to be a Master Collaborator, rather than a
Master Builder - the essential member of an interdisciplinary
team. Rather than thinking we have all the answers, we need
to be the best at asking the right questions and identifying who
actually has the best answer.
MARCH 2014
07
600m :
2400 m :
QUICK
CONNECT
NEWS FOR ARCHITECTS ON-THE-GO
by Beth Mosenthal
alternative practice(s)
FROM SYNTAX OF
SPACE TO SPATIAL
DNA
AN INTERVIEW WITH
ALAIN CHIARADIA,
LECTURER AND EXPERT ON
"SPATIAL ECONOMICS AND
MORPHOMETRICS"
connected
AC At Cardiff University School of Planning and Geography, I have been
appointed to “replace” Prof. John Punter who is retiring. John was the
lead author of the pivotal Design Dimension of Planning (1997, 2007) with
Matthew Carmona, now at UCL. This work was influential and a major
contributor to “By Design” (2000,) the UK national guidance on design.
In the UK, the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
(CABE) was seminal in initiating research and publications on the values
of urban design. My research interest is to pursue this line of investigation
by bringing design in spatial economics and economics into urban design.
Spatial economics deals with the advantage of the city as a whole, with
a consideration of the impacts of the local and urban economy. Spatial
design analyses enables spatial design economics i.e. the understanding
of value formations at different spatial scales. One of the main challenges
for spatial economics is that it lacks a theory of proximity. It seems that the
combination of social network analyses and spatial design analyses should
help with this challenge. I call these investigations “spatial urbanism” that
helps inform designing urban transformation.
AIA’s Young Architects Forum
YAF's official website
CLICK HERE
Automobile Network Analysis of SQY, Courtesy of Cardiff University/Chiaradia, 2014
If urbanization is also spatial design meant to coordinate bringing people
closer together while maintaining a high quality of life, it seems that very
Chiaradia, 2014
large cities in China have to also deal with the opposite issue: how to NOT
end up producing over concentrated, overcrowded urban areas. What I
BRM What is your background, academically and professionally,
have learned is the complex interplay between what is often called “first,
and how did it get you to where you are now?
second and third nature:” the “natural” environment, the built environment
and the institutional/political/legal environment. These environments have
A
prominent
and
contested
example
of
the
values
of
urban
design
is
the
AC I studied architecture at the Ecole Nationale Superieure
been designed for hundreds of years; what can we learn can be both
relation between Cities design and the Creative Classes (Florida 2005). It
selective and to some extent, non-transferable. Spatial urbanism is more
d’Architecture de Marseille (France), in the Paul Nelson studio, at
is a complex area of research because there are positives and negatives
limited in what it can accomplish than design planning policy. Yet there is a
Architecture Intermundium in Milan (Italy) with Daniel Libeskind
depending for whom they are designed. ‘‘People often need reminding that
certain lack of satisfaction from what can be achieved by design planning
and at the Architectural Association in London (UK).
Afterpiéton
a threeIntermediarité
( 600 m ) sur l’agglomération de SQY
Intermediarité véhicule ( 2 400 m ) sur l’agglomération de SQY
policy. Navigating these circumstances requires continuous learning and
everything around [them] is designed and that design decisions impact on
year stint as project architect, I started to teach at the Architectural
re-learning.
nearly
every
part
of
our
lives…’’
(Design
Council
2006).
While
the
value
of
Association and work with the architect Raoul Bunschoten. We
SECTEUR TYPE
SECTEUR TYPE
design
is
easier
to
grasp
in
forms
such
as
product
design,
it
is
more
political
founded Chora, a master-planning, architecture and research office.Réseau primaire.
BRM What
are
theInter-secteurs
most important considerations for cities’ to consider in
Réseau
primaire.
andInter-secteurs
contested when it addresses the diverse factors of designing for urban
regards to Réseau
urban
design over the next 20 years?
Working simultaneously on urban projects, architecture, and urbanRéseau secondaire.
Intra-secteurs
secondaire. Intra-secteurs
transformation.
research while also teaching became a defining behavior that I stillRéseau tertiaire. Local
AC They Réseau
are tertiaire.
well Local
known global issues like population increase, climate
pursue today.
change science and politics, inequality, food security and energy, the
environment and what technology can achieve. Less is known about how
Shortly after I became an associate professor at Ecole Nationale
UNE NOUVELLE VILLE SICI
great change can be achieved by behavioral changes where social media
QY : les liaisons d’une ville nouvelle
© dEp & BRS 2013
86
Superieure d’Architecture de Grenoble (France). In 1999, I led
might play an important role. At the moment individual information via
smart phone or web use is centralized for the benefit of providers. What
and won a research project bid on spatial urbanism/urban social
would happen if it was decentralized and aggregated at multiple scales
mix from the French ministry of housing and infrastructure (in
for the use of different localized communities? Bringing together crowd
collaboration with Prof. Bill Hillier). In 2000, I was invited to work at
finance, crowd spatial urbanism and crowd planning? A lot of media and
the international urban design consultancy Space Syntax limited.
techniques are converging with location-based services. How existing and
I became an executive and board director in 2005 with two main
future spatial urbanism will adapt and harness these changes is key.
roles: project and operational research director.
Thanks Alain!
(And congrats on being a recent winner with Cardiff students/faculty on this
Space Syntax analyses is a set of spatial design analyses, a subset
competition: http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/isolve/)
of environmetrics and, more precisely, a set of morphometrics.
This is important for design as it helps differentiate spatial design
options. What is fascinating is that at the core of these spatial design
upcoming
analyses are the principles of social network analyses and the new
science of networks.
by Beth R. Mosenthal
?
In 2008, just before the recession I was leading a large operational
research project (UrbanBuzz – iValul), completed in 2009, with a
large partnership on exploring the potential of monetizing the values
of spatial urbanism using morphometrics.
The recession, the change of the UK government/UK national
planning policy and a growing interest in the economic value of
urban design led me to a major career change. I became a full time
academic and researcher in 2010 while doing consultancy on the
side. At Cardiff University, working with a new team, we produced
new software that embraces standards and expands what was
possible previously [in regards to the study of spatial analyses]. For
more information, visit. www.cardiff.ac.uk/sdna
BRM Your work and teachings center around many different lenses
for analyzing and understanding urban design, including “spatial
economics, spatial design economics, and spatial design analyses.”
Can you elaborate on these terms and how they relate to urban
design and planning?
08
CONNECTION
Excerpt from the “SQY” New Town Liaisons analysis, proposing urban design improvements for Saint Quentin
en44 Yvelines, a new town in the Southwest suburbs of Paris. Courtesy of Cardiff University/Chiaradia, 2014.45
SQY : les liaisons d’une ville nouvelle
© dEp & BRS 2013
BRM You are currently lecturing at Cardiff University but have also taught
at international institutions such as Tongji University in Shanghai and the
Architectural Association, among many others. What have you learned
from teaching urban design, and how does it inform your projects?
AC London is a fairly large capital while Cardiff is nicknamed the “big”
small capital of Wales. Because industrialization started in the UK, followed
much later by de-industrialization, with the rise of service and information
industry London is an inspiring urban conurbation to learn from. It is
miraculous that given the rapid growth rate of London, the city’s urban
form has been resilient and remains highly valued. Visiting and staying
in China’s main large cities (Shanghai, Chongqing, Beijing), on the other
hand, has made me aware of the sheer intensity, speed of change and size
of these cities, not to mention the dynamism of their people. If anything,
this is the current place in the world to experience what it might have been
like when industrialization and urbanization started in the UK and London.
YAF KnowledgeNet
A knowledge resource for awards, announcements,
podcasts, blogs, YAF Connection and other valuable YAF
legacy content ... this resource has it all!
CLICK HERE
The Architect’s Newspaper and Enclos present
facades+ PERFORMANCE
April 24th & 25th, 2014 Symposium & Workshops, NYC
Co-Chair: Neil Thelen, Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Andrew Lyon, Enclos
Keynote: Gordon Gill, AS+GG one of the world’s leading exponents of performancebased architecture.
Are you a member of the AEC community: an architect, engineer, or other design
professional or student? Do you want to cut through the jargon and consider the
heart of high performance building envelopes? Join a broad consortium of your
peers for two days this April at facades+ PERFORMANCE, where experts in the
industry will analyze, discuss, and dispute the development, implementation, and
maintenance of high-performance building enclosures.
Registration now open! For more information, CLICK HERE.
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
Architect’s Knowledge Resource
The Architect's Knowledge Resource connects AIA members
and others to the most current information on architecture,
including research, best practices, product reviews, ratings,
image banks, trends, and more. It's your place to find
solutions, share your expertise, and connect with colleagues.
CLICK HERE
AIA Trust
Access the AIA Trust as a free risk management resource for
AIA members. www.TheAIATrust.com
87
Know Someone Who’s Not Getting The YAF Connection?
Don’t let them be out of the loop any longer. It’s easy for AIA
members to sign up. Update your AIA member profile and
add the Young Architects Forum under “Your Knowledge
Communities.”
• Go to www.aia.org and sign in
• Click on “For Members” link next to the AIA logo on
top
• Click on “Edit your personal information” on the left
side under AIA members tab
• Click “Your knowledge communities” under Your
Account on the left
• Add YAF
Call for ‘QUICK CONNECT’ News, Reviews, Events
Do you have newsworthy content that you’d like to share with
our readers? Contact the News Editor, Beth Mosenthal, on
twitter @archiadventures
Call for ‘CONNECTION’ Articles, Projects, Photography
Would you like to submit content for inclusion in an upcoming
issue? Contact the Editor, Wyatt Frantom at
wyatt_frantom@gensler.com
MARCH 2014
09
PR
O
FE
SS
IO
N
A
LS
FEATURE
20
EM
SU E
M RG
M IN
IT G
14
INTRODUCING THE
COUNCIL OF EMERGING PROFESSIONALS
Following my term as Chair of the Young Architects Forum
in 2013, the AIA President appointed me to Chair the Council of
Emerging Professionals (CEP). The CEP is a council made up
of members who head the American Institute of Architecture
Students (AIAS), the National Associate Committee (NAC), and
the Young Architects Forum (YAF). It is tasked with responding
to and advancing the member needs of architecture students,
architectural interns, and architects licensed for ten years or less.
Prior to my role as Chair, the CEP focused mostly on advancing issues
within the AIA Board of Directors. In March of 2013 at Grassroots, the
AIA publicized its efforts to reposition the Institute and one of the top
priorities was the need to focus on engaging emerging professionals.
AIA Leadership’s response to engaging the emerging professional
was to hold an Emerging Professionals Summit which the CEP was
tasked with organizing.
In January, the AIA brought together
thought leaders from across the
profession to address how practice
culture can be shaped to prepare
current and future architects for their
role in society.
Participants included students, emerging
professionals, business leaders, firm owners,
academics, entrepreneurs, and collateral
representatives.
With the help of staff from the AIA Center for Emerging Professionals,
the CEP planned a three-day Summit. It brought together over 65
individuals who were students, young professionals, business leaders,
firm owners, educators, entrepreneurs, and key representatives
from important collateral organizations: Association of Collegiate
Schools of Architecture (ACSA), the National Architectural Accrediting
Board (NAAB), the National Council of Architectural Registration
Boards (NCARB), as well as prominent leaders within the AIA. Our
agenda was to develop future direction and action items in four key
areas: Education, Licensure, Firm Culture and Practice, and Career
Development. In late January we met in Albuquerque, New Mexico
with the common goal of committing to the success of those entering
the profession.
The Summit would expand upon the AIA
Emerging Professionals strategic initiative
to develop action plans for the Institute and
identify additional stakeholders to respond
to the shifting education, professional
development, career path, and societal role
of architects.
On the first night, we introduced ourselves and commented on the
topic of the evening – ‘What inspires you’? The people there were
inspiring: such as Rosannah Sandoval, the youngest architect in the
US at 23-years of age; Ian Harris, a director of Archiculture - a movie
that takes a thoughtful yet critical look at the architecture studio; Marc
Kushner AIA, a co-founder of Architizer - one of the world’s most
popular architecture websites; and Tamarah Begay AIA, one of the
few licensed Native Americans -- just to name a few. It was clear to
us that evening that we had a lot of work to do that weekend but
were all there looking forward to making a genuine difference in the
profession. ■
Jennifer Workman, AIA
is an architect and Associate at Good Fulton
& Farrell Architects in Dallas and has worked
on notable projects such as Morphosis’ Perot
Museum, Foster+Partners AT&T Box Office, and is
leading the team for a Dallas high-rise residential
building. She became engaged in the AIA to give
emerging professionals a voice on committees and
has served at the local state and national levels in
many capacities.
10
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
11
FEATURE
FACILITATING
CAREER ADVANCEMENT
SHAPING
FIRM PRACTICE AND CULTURE
or, Dancing to Flo Rida at a club in Albuquerque with
Bill Stanley, FAIA and John Padilla, FAIA at 2am
As the facilitator for the Career Advancement working
group, I had a slightly different vantage point for the Summit. Along
with the three other facilitators, I had assisted in the planning of the
event for the three months leading up to it. The facilitator groups
developed the background materials for each topic area, provided
input on the Summit agenda, and contacted participants in the
weeks leading up to that weekend. While we had prior knowledge
of how the weekend would be shaped, we had no feeling of where
the conversations with the participants would take us.
On a wider level, the Summit to me was an experience that was
unique – the attendee list represented all stops on the career path,
from undergraduate students to Fellows of the Institute. Leadership
from all five collateral organizations (AIA, AIAS, NAAB, ACSA, and
NCARB) were present, and all agreed each organization would
need to work with the others to accomplish the bold goals set forth.
Informally, the conversations were rich and inspiring. It isn’t every
day you sit at lunch with a group of forward thinking individuals,
each creative and passionate about supporting emerging architects.
The momentum for change built slowly over the weekend, with
impassioned dialogue and calls for bold moves leading to a fastpaced Sunday morning of brainstorming action items for the coming
years.
The Young Architects Forum has been talking
about the importance of career development since
the YAF Summit20 in 2012, and chose to focus on
it as a key area in the years following that Summit;
recognizing the need to provide a wider array of
“soft skills” to recently licensed architects who may It will take AIA and the other organizations a bit of
have aspirations of firm management or starting a time to sort through the lists of ideas, prioritize, and
move forward. Some ideas may falter, or be found
new practice.
to be more challenging than expected while others
Career Advancement, in that context, was will gain support quickly and will start to change
defined as the ability to make educated choices the course of professional life for an architect
and have the skills required to advance one’s (hopefully for the better).
career in whatever direction was elected.
The Emerging Professionals Summit working group for Career
Advancement broadened the discussion further, talking about
making the Institute more relevant and valuable to traditional
and non-traditional career architects. The group also sought an
overhaul of the idea of continuing education, not just in content but
in delivery as well. Indeed the small group worked hard, sharing
creative ideas and honest opinions to come up with some bold
action items for the coming years.
The YAF is uniquely positioned to take on some of
these changes as they relate directly to recentlylicensed architects. I’m excited to see – and be a
part of – the change that comes. ■
I was honored to be chosen as one of the emerging
professional attendees and to represent YAF at the Emerging
Professionals Summit this past January in Albuquerque, New
Mexico. This opportunity allowed me to provide a voice for young
architects and to be an active participate in shaping the future of our
profession. In preparing to attend the EP Summit, I asked myself a
number of questions --- Where do I see myself in 20-years?, Where
do I see the profession in 20-years?, How does the profession
need to change to remain relevant?, Why are architects great
leaders?, What are some fundamental shifts in beliefs that we have
to overcome to be successful?, What do we have to do to get
out of our own way?, As a profession, what are our strengths,
weaknesses, obstacles and opportunities?, and What can I
personally do to ensure future success for our profession?
We then identified three bold priorities / initiatives to achieve over
the next twenty-years. Our top priority is to advance the profession
and grow strong firm culture & practice. We acknowledge that
architectural firms need to take a better active role in training and
mentoring our next generation of architects, through “teaching
firm” with required residency. In order to work towards this priority
we believed a train-a-trainer program will need to developed, to
provide guidance on how to teach, and create a challenge for “firm
excellency” with practice-based academies.
Upon arriving, I was excited to find out that I was collaborating with
the Firm Culture & Practice working group. (Man, did this team
include an impressive list of professionals, led by Sean Sheffler.)
For me, as a young architect and where my passion lies in the
profession, this was a perfect group and area of focus to participate
-- one in which I felt that I could truly contribute, provide insight and
make a difference.
Our third priority is to encourage architecture firms to offer a broader
range of services beyond building design, capitalizing on our skill
set and positioning the architect as a facilitator (similar to a “movie
producer”). Architects need to stop being afraid of risk, and instead
embrace and be better managers of risk.
During our two-day discussion, our conversation centered on
what will need to occur for the architectural firm and profession
to survive, and to propel us to the next level. First, we agreed
architects are to remain the conductor of the orchestra. Second, in
general, architects need to become more entrepreneurial and not
risk averse. Third, we discussed what the elements of a strong and
promising firm are and vice versa, how a firm’s practice is directly
related to their culture. Fourth, we discussed the types of skills
architects will need to acquire -- business / finance, communications
and psychology.
Second in terms of priority is to enable architects to lead by
developing and offering leadership programs, and having architects
continue to be leaders in their communities --- acting as “citizen
architects.
Our Firm Culture & Practice working group left the EP Summit
feeling encouraged and excited about our bright future. We know
there is much work left ahead to realize these bold initiatives.
The immediate next step is having you, the
emerging professionals and young architects
that will shape our shared future, get involved
in the conversation as we continue to refine
and develop actions plans to achieve these
bold initiatives. ■
Jon Penndorf AIA
is a Project Manager and Sustainability Leader
in the Washington, DC office of Perkins+Will,
the 2013 Vice-Chair of the YAF, has served as
the 2012 President of AIA|DC, and received the
2012 AIA Young Architects Award.
Virginia Marquardt, AIA
is the 2014 Vice Chair of the YAF National
Advisory Committee of the AIA and an Architect
and Senior Associate with DLR Group in their
Santa Monica, CA office.
Photo credit - DLR Group
12
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
13
FEATURE
LEARNING TO
BRING THE BOLD
“Roads? Where we’re going, we don’t need roads.”
I couldn’t have said it any better myself Doc, but how does one
think that far out of the box when you’re focused on solving a
problem incrementally? Or rather, how do you ensure that you
remain relevant in the future that you are predicting? If we are truly
thinking boldly enough, the future may be one that doesn’t actually
include architects -- or at least not in our current roles.
During the last weekend of January 2014, I was privileged to attend
the AIA’s Emerging Professionals Summit in Albuquerque, New
Mexico. It was a consummate collection of minds and motivated
individuals that spanned from the impressionable student to the
top brass of each collateral organization. Our goal was to envision
the future of architecture in 20-years as well as create action plans
for four different aspects of the architect career path: Education,
Licensure, Career Development and Firm Culture & Practice. We
drew proverbial straws and I was assigned the task of tackling
licensure. Behind closed doors, spirited debate ensued.
Opinions were particularly strong from those currently working
on an independent task force to provide a solution to the state
of architectural license. But while this expertise was a welcome
perspective, we questioned if the ideas were truly bold enough.
What if, for example, a license to practice isn’t necessary in twenty
years? I’d like to think licensure will remain relevant because
is central to the identity of architecture and its practitioners.
Whether it’s the actual title of “architect” (or some derivative), sole
proprietorship or admission to the AIA, each instance requires that
the individual attain a license. However, there are many forces
at work that threaten to circumvent the traditional process. For
example, the world is experiencing a manufacturing renaissance
that could see buildings 3D-printed or completely fabricated on an
assembly line. In this "brave new world" of prefabrication, I question
whether the architect loses the collective grip on health, safety and
welfare to the point that he or she becomes a procedural hurdle?
PREPARING TO
TAKE THE FIELD
I believe the topics covered were very relevant to streamlining the
career paths of future architects, but one topic was conspicuously
absent: the market. As the discussion's 500-pound gorilla, the
market can dictate everything from the services an architecture
firm must offer to stay competitive, the fees they command and/or
the diversity of project type. And if the market completely changes
(read The Great Recession), it could annul efforts to revamp the
licensure process by trivializing it.
Bold ideas were central throughout the weekend and we were often
reminded to think outside our comfort zone in order to create them.
However, most participants envisioned the future as if we wrote
it: architect as CEO of a major corporation, architect as POTUS,
architect “ruling the world”, etc. While a tad optimistic, it was the
kind of big idea we needed because the theme of “architect as
something else” could be the perfect hedge to stay relevant in an
uncertain market.
As a profession, I believe we are in agreement
that the architect’s creative problem-solving
training is not only of value, but can readily
translate into non-traditional roles and careers.
So, architect as President? Maybe not now, but
let’s start with architect as councilman, architect
as Director of Development, or architect as Chief
Innovation Officer and keep in mind the importance
of adaptation and diversification. In twenty years,
licensure may well be obsolete, but we would
have gotten ahead of the process to make the
obsolescence irrelevant. ■
This historical collaboration brought together engaged
students, young professionals, business leaders, firm owners,
educators, and entrepreneurs from all over the country in
collaboration with representatives from the collateral organizations.
The Summit focused on four key areas of the profession: Education,
Licensure, Firm Culture, and Career Development. I was invited to
participate on the Education team. Placement on this team was
fitting since I currently volunteer on NCARB’s Education committee.
I humbly accepted my invitation to participate. Ultimately, all we
want to do is leave a legacy.
In my first break-out group, we discussed what we thought the
profession would look like in twenty years. Our discussion resulted
in the following two observations:
1. The faces in the profession’s leadership are looking
different. The “good-ole-boy” regime is slowly dissolving and
the faces of the profession’s leadership more closely resemble
the diverse faces of the clients that we serve. This is evidenced
by our current AIA President and President-Elect positions
being held by tremendously successful women.
2. The architect becomes the Trusted Advisor to all areas of
business. Our skill-set enables us to be great decision makers,
facilitators, and resource managers. In November 2013, the
U.S. Senate confirmed Debra Brown for a federal judge post.
She is not only the first black woman to serve as a U.S. district
judge in Mississippi, but she is also an architect.
My second break-out group focused its energy on identifying
the existing challenges in education, the resources necessary to
overcome these challenges and began to develop the initial steps
of a high-level action plan. The following three items define our
direction:
Jeff Pastva, AIA
is a project architect at JDavis Architects in
Philadelphia, PA. Pastva serves as a Senior
Editor to YAF Connection, is the immediate Past
Chair of YAF Philadelphia and is the YARD for
Pennsylvania.
14
CONNECTION
1. The academy and practice must stop blaming each other
for hindering student advancement within the profession. We
recommended that there be a proportional relationship that
suggests firms have a responsibility in architectural education.
Architectural education has the responsibility of preparing
students, to some acceptable degree, for practice. The
University of Minnesota, for instance, has developed a model
for licensure upon graduation in order to start that conversation.
2. Once one graduates high school, the path to becoming an
architect is convoluted. We must clarify the different degree
options and align them with employer expectations. The
guardians and guidance counselors of high school students
must be trained and knowledgeable about these options. The
price of higher education is too great to make the wrong first
move.
3. Changing the value proposition. What happens when the
payback period on an education investment is too great? This
is a two-part challenge. The truth is that salaries are low in the
profession for the financial investment required for education.
And architect candidates are interns for far too long. The
reality of this is that the profession could be extinct if certain
dynamics aren't changed. The AIA is working on legislature
which could facilitate alleviating the pressures of student loan
debt. The second part to this challenge is educating the public
on what we do as architects. People will not pay for value if
they don’t perceive what you do as valuable.
We left the conference inspired and ready to change the world. In
order to see this change implemented, this conference was only
the kickoff. We are still in the first quarter of a four-quarter game.
We need all hands on deck to give our profession a chance to win.
Emerging professionals – take the field!
R. Corey Clayborne, AIA
is a Project Manager for Wiley|Wilson in
Richmond VA, former Young Architects Regional
Director for Virginia and currently serves as
the state’s IDP Coordinator, Vice President
of Government Advocacy for Virginia Society
AIA, and volunteers on NCARB’s Education
Committee.
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
15
O
F
To
CL lea
IC rn
K m
HE o
RE re
!
4
Vi
C sio
H
IT ns
EC fo
TU r th
R e
E
R
A
03
-2
N
SI
O
FE
S
O
PR
g
gin d
er re
m lur ce
e e b cti e
th e ra W d th p s: ver
an ces the ath o ate n
p e n
,
rc – op ts al
hi i e a
te t rt t
ct is y
! a
t,
aN
E
le
vil
M
A
tI
L
us e
r
di to gin
o sc
s g
w ur w iplin tar pro
e
W
o e t t fe
- C e’r spe rld, s, a he ssi
hr e re ak bu nd co ona
is a to t w w nv ls
tia dy t e e’ er w
n to he ca re sa ill
H d p n’ so tio b
in o ub t d c n e
to ou li o ial n ru
l
n r c
o
/ C pa in it un y e w. nnin w
n
ha rt. lan til ga W g ith
pe Le gu we ge e’r the
l H t’s ag ra d. e
s s
ill be e dic W col ho o
N s th a e lab w lu
C u at lly ha o in
re
t
r
th doe mo ve ativ 20 io
ey s di a
e 33 n
kn ju fy o pas , w a s.
s
ow tic ur si e nd
T
o
it. e t voc n f wor it’s od
a
o a or k
ou bu b ac up y’s
r lar ett ro to
co y er ss
nv – u in
ic nt g
tio il
n.
ah
er
om
/S
em
kP
ea
rs
o
n
/M
tP
ec
ro
sp
M
gr ega
o
w w
co ill ing citi
u ns be r e
as ses truc c apid s
an ke fo tio on ly w
an d i d to r it n soli w ill
an da hil c
im d nfr re .
pr ag tec ast trofi Ar d ting e s onti
ub nu
a oje ina hn ruc t e chi fin
to nd a cts ble olo tur xis tec din exis urb e
gie e w tin ts g tin s
- de rc w .
Ha Chr al w hite ill The s n ith g bu wil new g
ck isto it cts be c ev ne ild l b
o e w in e
ett p h
sto he thi mus mu mp r b us gs
l
r
s
c
t
w D .
-B
be h exit efor es
n eP
ar
g
y e
NJ a
p
r
tlo
e
re a of
lm
p
t
m
a
e
a
ie
re r
/
j
d
As
im a
be p p
of co era ro
. ing cu lic uild cat icks lic d n
“a m ti fe
ou pan fin ing e t an adv ot
r c ts an s p ho d oc jus
da e ve ss
om an ce re ug mo at t w
i
a
m d c prio tty, h w rta es t ai
o
pti p fo n
itm o r b o r" ha t
en mm ities ut t rds in t
,
r
W
ve ro
t t un , i ha an a
o iti nd t w d
e’
pr e u
re
ex fe us it is
ot s, ce e
ec an d
s
a
tt d
p
he
t
s
pr
o
e
i
of
rts on
es
si
”.
on
ar
Sa
pe
ta
/K
ee
It
yo 's t
sim urs he
ar ila elf ye
e
r
a
an res an r 2
p o a 03
en n rch 3
-S
gin se it ha
w
ee to ect to
na
r
u
i
Ha nd e ; i cla so pro
m o sti ne imi lici fe
m f
s
n t
on a on vit g s a s
y
r
a
d
/ R ch wi bl ou
al ite ll
ei
b y,
gh c t e
NC ?"
ne
NH
T
cr oda
i
o tic y
D f b al the
e
s s ec po de
th ervi ign om int. sig
v e p ce is ing W n
to isio ub . It m a e a pro
o c n lic ha or te re fes
gr f w han of o . W s u e t ch on sio
- S ea ha ge ur e n niq ha nic th n i
te ter t w th sel ee ue n a al e v s a
ve c e e ve d wa
s
e t
n om ca pu s to ys tec erv rge a
fi
i
A m n
h
c
b rs h to n ce
la
no on con lic t. W an se ica .
g
/ A go trib per e e o rve l
c
o
n
lb d ut e e ur
uq . e p e
to tio d
ue
rq
th n
ue
e
N
M
O
bu ver
s s
t
an cho ine he
s
e d o s n
of nte c ls o an ext
te b r t ro f d
t
- K chn usi he ss- arc pr we
o
d
n
p
h
o
ris lo es ro is it fe nty
ta gy s fes cip ec ss y
Ph m pr si lin tur ion ea
ill an act on ar e-m al rs,
ip ag ice w y
s e , ith l or pra we
/ A m la a ea e c
nc en w, b rn op tic wil
a in p e l
ho t s
ra pe hum lan g ort co rea
ge cifi a ce - un ur liz
AK c t n d a ar ity sew e
o re n ch f o m
de so d
i o r o
si ur ba tec r d k w re
gn ce s tu u
r
.
s ic re al ithi ob
u
us
d
n
an n g e
d de rad gr th t
in rst ua ee e
fo an t s
rm d es
at ing
io
n
lA
ae
ich
m
l
sa
es
Cr
..
of . wi
ll c
c
re
th om
a
p
i
ar nk re d te a
i
e
l
e h ig fu
in
- J an cap rs ens en tu
Ar
H en y ab an iv t, re c
fo chi
am n ci le d e
om
pt ife rcu o d an
bu r it tec
m
r
e
o
f
d
c
m
n B
di ild to ts
st se sig a rea un
e
B
g
n
i
r
l
n
n
ay n an vi ne tr ti ity
a it
g ha e
s et ce ng rs uis ve
ca ctio al w s c pp ed
N t
a
e
t
n
n
Y / .
pe th tic ,
po r th or n n. o
op at
l
he ve esp at d. be W be
le
r
t
m
e he
pu al ty on ou W
o
n
r w e n re e l
- M b th , r d
att lic h e e eso to t or ee th ed ead
d an to er
he e nv ur he k
t
w alt iro ce h is
s
Be h
ar no o b anti be of
n
s
,
nn s m
c d t e
q th t
ett afe en arc est me ab ua e he
/ G ty t, w ity pr re le ted pas re
o ly to
ra , an h ),
an sio volu
nd d ile in ble to
c
o
a na ti
Isl w in sp m m
ire s ( ak mm log te on,
an e
c
" p
p e
d lfa re
NE re as oc ub b uni br ub an
ur
f o es
s o ac n,
rd sp ar e
wa the r, le w e
ste e e le th
e nc ov ro e, lish
th ie sc e
e er , di th tim mp
ll b xp ay of ver cco
o a
sti e e pl e
ill w rk, os lly to
s w ow o rp ca e
ct g h e w pu asti us
r e
ite in w e
ch ap ch or e d w
ar h hi c g es
s, t, s w is an gi g. A
ar n in th ch te in M
ye me t) le ot stra volv ge
ty on ou hi n
e id
en vir d W ay nd ly br
tw en an ct. m y a nt am
In uilt ors nne iety log nsta / C
b do co oc no co bo
(in d in s ech re um
an ay , t ls a al
pl ols oa en P
to r g h
ou Step
-
-M
/
er
h
rc
en
be te
e ui ”
rs s q ed
ou i d to
sc it un es
di nd d f m
al . A w co .
ur ly ro it ife
ct nt “c en ly l
ite rre y,” h ai
ch u ilit w d
ar is c ab rms e in
of s it tain te rol
ce a us ble ’s
en on “s ta re
al ic ,” e ctu
ev lex cy ffe te
pr ’s en co chi
r
e ty ili
th ie es ow t a
s oc “r ll n u
ha f s hat e a abo
re t o t ar s
fo r me ” on
a
be a p ssu rian sati
r
a a r
ve ch o it ve
t
n
u
Ne m c a on
ti
c
m
NY
as lis u ld
n
h
a
kly
re “ ho
d
e
oo
an ous
Br
h
-M
d n ly nd O
TX
n
ur a you t on rs a iller /
o
sto
to
no ade M
ou
d, t le - Ross
/H
n
s, e
o
t
to
b
o
c
ng
en ,
g
di
te
rt t
Do
hi ill e ve as er
d
c
w
ar
th ad e p rth e.
dw
ar
-E
in th r fu ang res ,
ty
i
s ri ve e
A io er th of fo ch qu ge l
pr res air e ide d re led ocia
g
w
s
th o
y p p a ov an s o
H
of n t g
el , re m r
O
hi n d
k
p
t
n
a
h
le io tin f
nd
tiv e
v
t
a
d
d
i
g
c
ro n t o
,
u
u
la
l
n
e a rc d ce
ve
e a lly rati s to , an ow of al kill,
th of e ee a ill
le
o
p
b
r
s
t
w
a
c
C
c
nd p
ge ion u s ble at bli
ill loc ollab men oject RN g ll
ni s y. y /
s
c
w
an at e e a th u
A
n
r
t
A
ch n it kacs
ch cre uc th on s h p
g
ts e e - ver t' p LE tec
v
i
i
w
e
c
t
as ge t
d e ed
dg go en to hi
t
s
i
Lu
ul th , r ow re n bo
e
s
ite re g e al ci nd arc
n
co t is ay sl re cha in
d
n
ch he ttin loc -effi G, a ng
t
o
t
so
p
e
,
c
r
d
u
ve I ci
J
lli
s
ha te e g m w ec
.
i
t
f a , w he c s an ecti am B racti
W ch ov din o a la hi rs y N
-A
ar pr id s t ute arc cto tle
e o on n t hip 'eff re p
im f b ect stit e se Nu
ol ati e o ers hly to d me
/
j n th e
o
t
o
i
e r uc ill b rtn hig nts eco
t
pr d ect va eis
th ed ts w ic pa lete ude nd b
an ot pri P
33 lic itec ubl mp r st s, a
pr d on
20 ub rch te-p co owe ker
an Jas
ar p . A iva and mp hin
ye in lay s, pr ent at e nt t C
-
14
fro
EM
m
SU E
th
e
M RG
M IN
IT G
Es PR
sa O
F
y
Su ES
bm SI
is ON
si
on AL
S
s
pt
s
Ex
ce
r
20
e d p l m h ge
S
ms
ia
th e d o o le s t er
p
h
v
e
v
b
m
In vol k an lic sc p, im olici be di
fro ct d
lu
i n r ub elo d p o h. C o
s ite se r
t
s
/
o
w ith p dev s an ow wi er
ar ch pri ste e
r
e
w an, am h so rgn
a
y
re ma th on, ,
pl rogr and they Me
y
n
p y d
a
l
t
h
e s gh ati ce l
w ou isti
en
av e a ou or cti ica
sh hr
w
-C
w h ol thr lab pra log S
T
o
M
no ill r r r ol
w hei ilde f c ted chnnts.rkville
e
o
t
a
bu se egra t emery / St
u t
o
in nd ancGreg
a v s
ad Alexi
e
e
ati
-K
s,
ct r,
e
Th cs,
i
ite he ng
th ce
s
, e on n
ch ot ki n
ce e ea ur
an s w m e o
ar y or o ter
rm a ork sur
rfo ch w en
of an w re greatheseace
pe mu ur at
o
o
d
r
ue s r th
en of b an ,
n
s
r
al a fo rs e.
be ge em s, ess e
m
n
o
e
o v lity es to m
c r
to y
a o
a
er nt d t rie uc a e
v
g t ta v ac co
ti
l
in vi oti e f to
tra ad e
ev a e a s ey th
d
d
v
e
h
a
n
a
n
d
n
nn e m th s
th o
e
l
t
a
es lre u o
l
n
r
i
gi ur al o on
ou be t als s.
e
s
a
e
be fut tic g t ati
ch a tin h
av ke s w b To ha t ct
t
a
u
t
n
r
h
e
n
t
i
w
s
re r ore in ner
e
e a fo e nd e
s o ha co s
en re em s es to hitec the gies. cept ts, b proj
c
c
ti
c
w rn th po r g
o
g
ni er ar ush olo t a je ose
g
t a s ll nt ed om
h
at e e es fo
o
d
c
u
n
s
r
r
s
p
t
h
n
t
th n ich r ty
t
i
m
ch u p f t
ec ue i de olv ec
or o tie
;
f
w
i
m
t
ct co n re ie
x
pp in un on te ts s o s o
d
fa d ed e a oc
tu nv b
hi iss
t
O
l
d
e
d
r
s
ati ew c r er
an lu w o s
i
rc al nd s i rts
an o iz n te ne g
i
l
a
p
va hat e t
g
op loba t to arch esi an
t lu
e a ci a as tly ffo
e n ap fin u
m
p
d
b
va
g
a
g
Th so n w en n e
Th rh t n
of gu ro rr ria
be g cu ita .
pe igh o y.
o
t
e an ts
m ss eg
ar m tec
hu chi
le at
r
ar
st
Th
wo e
d rk D
ar igita ing iam
e
l w to on
th
th e i perc or get d
th eir mm ei k f he Ag
of e b in en ved or o r to e
n
o
m adv uilt ova se v by the lea f
d Ar
at
r
a
ti
a
a
s
fi e n en o lu ll t by c
in rst rials; a ced d vironns in e gai humao bui mak hitect
th co “A s su igita men coll ned nity ld u ing a ure:
t e m rc ch l t ab fr a po cc
gr hey tran e fe hit , US techn infor oratioom e s inst n and essibArchit
e A olo ma n, ffic rum im le t ect
-D e
av at ha sf e p ct
s' ha gies tion, stew iency ent prov heir s
id d v er
a
W a e
o id cu s e and an ard du al fo e,
ay y
s/ t w fa
t t ar ne d m ship e to r
Br o or ny o a ”,
ad b
ke R rc a r ne w su aster of
en e
ea hi es d t per y
to a d
n n
o
FL a
n l Pr tec idu he -
Th
lo e"
co ng st
rp liv ar
or e ch
ati th ite
on e " ct
". sta "is
rc de
hi a
d
t
th
e
;
e
"W n
c
ha ex
t
tk t q
ill
w d
s e
ct bre the .
ite g n try t
ch in hi s ha
ar and wit ndu s t of
e
,
i
33 xp rs on rie ns th e
20 e e ge cti iona utio to lud ed
ar th na tru is ol ms inc w d
ye t of ma ns e v s ble at ene an
-
a
a
o
A
th r
e r
e
h
t
o
,
ou br lds al ssiv alie e c t
C
th pa jec d c e t icat pr ys a cal
u
lay em fie enti sse nd w
po
p
s
In a ro an b un s' wa ugh mi
o rs ign ot po , a or bo nd e
bi
t
'
p
e
s
,
t
a
O
a
be p gn ill m itie te ro no
l
ue ign de o ur ec ns
s
of si w om un ica t th co
ro rs
ui
tin es n tw o hit sio is s
e
on f d ee es to rc es
ll r e s
de ey c m tr or
y. n L
s c o tw ac ng 'a of re a u gn e
r
i
e
om in pp l, ilit Sa
Th
n
a
n
c
b
nd on b e f cl ord p u w o si liti
/
ca ur lic i su ent nsi in
e e a
tre rati ies tur to w ign ct
o w
o b g
As e ar ec e he es te n ac d u t.
n
d
m
t
d
n
t
d
u
p
ge un rchi tin of he
pu llyi on es oo
hi ha br ive al q en
o
n
t
c
a
b
o
ra vir l r w G
on t r
em ns nti nm
of n c cti of a
en ocia dre
ca rote rest that re d he ie iro
o n
s n
r
IL
p
-A
he pt m a re pe nv go
t
,
ce
ac r
rs p x t e hica
fa oo come e uil a / C
fl
h b h
as f t the s Klec
o
le
of Char
17
16
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
CULTURAL ADVOCACY
LATINOS IN ARCHITECTURE
In February, 2010, two friends decided to start a group of Latino
architects that would focus on community involvement, professional
networking and educational outreach. Their reasons: the growing
Hispanic population in communities across the US; and with it,
a lack of leadership, connective networking and recognition of
Latino architects and their contributions. Approaching their firm
leadership, and finding supportive mentors along the way, the
group established a committee of the AIA Dallas chapter six short
months later: Latinos in Architecture (LiA), the first committee of its
kind in the nation.
The mission, then, of the AIA Dallas Latinos in Architecture
Committee is to serve and support the local communities,
strengthen relationships and networks between professionals in the
field of architecture and to promote the work of their constituents.
The committee will also provide opportunities for members to
volunteer and get involved in community issues and will serve as a
positive influence for Latino youth who aspire to become architects
by providing guidance, expertise, and participation in mentoring
programs.
Already, in the short time since its inception, the committee has
acquired a membership of close to 250 AIA Associates and AIA
members who see LiA as an extension of their profession and their
diverse heritage.
LiA’s mission targets three specific goals to offer programs of value
to their members: Education, Community and Profession. These
are the backbone for every event and involvement opportunity
that they pursue. As a result of the strong leadership of the LiA
chairpersons, the vision of AIA Dallas Executive Committee and an
overwhelming volunteer participation, the Latinos in Architecture
group has made significant contributions to these mission goals. In
fact, LiA's accomplishments have been so notable, they the group
was recognized as the recipient of the 2012 AIA National Diversity
Recognition Award.
18
CONNECTION
Since its inception, however, Latinos in Architecture has become
more than a mere committee – it has evolved to become an
advocacy platform by which its leaders and members are making
true impact on their local community, giving exposure to the notion
of citizen architect. In this way, Latinos in Architecture has become
a movement. Below are just a few stories of the programs and the
people that are shaping LiA.
LiA AS A PLATFORM FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
In spring of 2011, LiA Dallas collaborated with the community of
La Bajada in West Dallas in an effort to protect the neighborhood
which is in the midst of a gentrified conversion to high-rises, town
houses and office complexes as a result of the opening of the
Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge (by Santiago Calatrava) across the
Trinity River in Dallas; diminishing the authentic character of the
community. In response, LiA Dallas gathered a group of volunteers
who took the task of documenting about three-hundred homes in
order to determine the average height in the neighborhood. The
value of more than thirty Spanish-speaking architect volunteers
proved critical to the success of the program as the residents
gladly opened their homes to the group.
The West Dallas Community Center (WDCC) is an eighty year old
non-profit organization that intends to re-invent itself by expanding
the programs that it offers and becoming a greater resource to the
community. To accomplish this, the center plans to maximize the
use of their Bataan site. A volunteer effort is taking place as part
of AIA Dallas Latinos in Architecture community outreach projects
that involves developing the center’s visioning, rebranding and
updating the center's website, setting master plan goals, and
developing a site master plan for WDCC development.
The West Dallas Community Center is located off of Bataan
Street, two blocks south of the Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge with a
spectacular view of downtown Dallas. Its location at the heart of
the community makes it an ideal location for the services that it
offers and its goal of reaching out to serve other members of its
community.
A site study and schematic site plan have been created by a group
of LiA members to assist WDCC as they work with the City of
The mission of the WDCC is Helping Youth Excel! by guiding youth
in developing dignity, self-respect and meeting life’s encounters
with a positive attitude and manner. They also communicate to the
youth that they can make an impact in their community and with
their lives. They train youth to practice acceptable social skills with
a self-worth that will enable them to become productive citizens
of society.
Dallas in the rezoning of the property -- capturing present services
rendered and future service growth. The plan and its proposed
initiatives were presented to members of the community a few
weeks prior to this article and all involved were moved by the
passion and aspirations that the La Bajada residents have for their
neighborhood.
The joint efforts for La Bajada have paid off. The City Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval of an urban
framework plan that calls for the creation of dense urban
neighborhoods south of La Bajada in an area cluttered with
industrial buildings, warehouses and dilapidated buildings. The City
Council reviewed the plan and approved what is now La Bajada
Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay, a zoning mechanism that
limits the maximum height for construction within the boundaries
of the neighborhood.
As an outcome of the effort for La Bajada, Robert Rodriguez
– Executive Director of the West Dallas Community Center
approached LiA with the intention of creating a partnership in order
to bring awareness and change around his community-driven
institution.
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
19
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
LIA AS PLATFORM FOR DESIGN ADVOCACY AND CULTURAL
RELEVANCY
If we take a step back and try to understand the importance of our
role as architects and the impact that we can make, demographics
offer a poignant lens, whether at the national, state or city level.
The U.S. 2010 Census Defined Populations projections for future
decades shows a continuing majority shift with far-reaching
impacts on urban development at both national and state levels.
This is continuing evolution to a White minority, with significant
growth in Asian, Black and particularly Hispanic populations.
The Hispanic population is one of the fastest emerging groups in
the nation’s immigration-driven history. Texas, for instance, is now
19% Hispanic and growing rapidly. However, the potential positive
impact of this group may be derailed with educational and income
disparities between Hispanics and other major groups.
Without a properly educated workforce, Texas stands to lose jobs
in industries that require higher education and greater skill sets;
challenged, as it is, with matching the looming Hispanic population
with educational resources to ensure a strong economic future.
Hispanic Demographics now show a transition in generations.
No longer dominated by foreign-born immigrants, the Hispanic
population is now a majority of native-born. This is a new force for
urban growth as foreign-born immigrants tended to settle in older
neighborhoods near city centers, mimicking their homeland way
of life, while native-born generations tend to desire a suburban
experience, perhaps in search of the “American Dream”.
20
CONNECTION
These new generations have given birth to the term “Drive to
Qualify” wherein the household head drives out further from the
city center to find an affordable mortgage. But a return to more
walkable and livable communities could have strong appeal to the
Hispanic population. Given open space amenities and enhanced
education options, especially for children, this new group could
have a significant impact if even a small percentage chooses an
urban lifestyle.
But to all of these questions and concerns, the resounding answer
was YES! Yes, Architecture can respond and adapt culture to the
changing environment of today, but understanding goes beyond
what might be found in textbooks and Google searches. Rather,
architects need to engage the communities within which they
practice in order to express culturally significant values through
architecture.
On that topic, and to reinforce the significance of a Hispanic
population, AIA Dallas Latinos in Architecture hosted an evening
reception at the Latino Cultural center and discussion with Spanish
Architect Miguel Roldan (partner of Roldan+Berengue Architects)
who had been visiting for a lecture hosted by Corgan Associates.
Also present were past AIA National President Jeff Potter, FAIA,
past AIA Dallas President David Zapotek, AIA and Texas A&M
Professor Marcel Erminy.
It is hard to conceive, in light of such an anecdote, that architecture
could become so disenfranchised from place that it creates a
homogenous language across the world, devaluing the richness
of context and the unique experience of the cultures that served to
found an area's civilization.
The intent of the evening was to discuss cultural relevance in design
and innovation. As our guest of honor, Miguel Roldan discussed
those projects of his firm that evoke a sense of relevance beyond
the necessary programmatic function of the building towards a
heightened physical, social or community relevance that engages
with its place and its people. Even the dynamics of economy, and
means of construction offer unique opportunities to encourage
cultural trends in society.
Some values and aspects of culture are simply intangible, but
like a great family recipe passed down from generations, they are
worth tapping into -- not only enhancing our identity as a society ,
but as individuals. ■
During the discussion, there were a number of topics that
generated great debate and even questioned the value of our
profession. Recognizing the value in architectural innovation at a
global scale, how does one apply that knowledge to projects in a
deeply rooted culture? Or conversely, how can architects translate
cultural tradition and customs into our contemporary world? Words
like sophisticated, strategy and performance may not be as fitting
in the context of some community's own aspirations.
◄
Lorena Toffer, AIA
◄
Clemente Jaquez, AIA
◄
Jorge Gonzalez, AIA
Toffer is a Project
Architect and Lead
Designer with Corgan
Associates (Higher
Education) and currently
serves on the AIA Dallas
Board of Directors.
Jaquez is an Architect
and Designer with RTKL
(Healthcare) and currently
chairs AIA Dallas Latinos
in Architecture.
Gonzales is an Architect
and Associate with
Corgan Associates
(Corporate) and currently
leads the community
programs for AIA Dallas
Latinos in Architecture.
Clemente loves to travel, having been to Europe, Asia and the
Americas. One of his dearest memories is of his Grandpa’s town
in the Mountainous regions of Chihuahua, Mexico. There, a small
village can only be accessed through a small winding, unpaved
road. Dangerous you might say? Yes! But genuine and unique to
the way people live there. As you enter the ranch, you access a
different world. Many houses are still made of Adobe Clay bricks
and timber, there are no paved roadways, and everyone in the
town knows each other. The house sits atop a hill overlooking the
town, and a rock trail from the house leads you to a crystal-clear
stream just two-hundred feet away. The air is fresh and the sun
embraces you with light and warmth. There is something very
innocent about this place that words such as innovation, progress,
and technology would be a detriment to.
Census and Demographics Sources: UT Arlington Center for Metropolitan Density 2012 Research
Journal
In 2012, LiA was the recipient of
the 2012 AIA National Diversity
Recognition Award.
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
21
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
DESIGN AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST
SOCIAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (SEED)
In one well-versed statistic, it is suggested that only two-percent of
In the end, the lawsuit was dropped, noting that a filed suit and
potential liabilities would have dissuaded other schools of architecture
from undertaking such important projects in their own communities.
But this case represents a broader, more fundamental problem for
our industry. It is problem that is rooted in a lack of responsibility,
accountability, and respect. And it is a problem that can be prevented
in the future by providing a design process centered around the
greater public interest.
homebuyers actually work with an architect to design their house --
The environmental design agendas, while always well intentioned
however, don't always account for the economic and social
challenges of a project's specific locale. But this too is changing.
Samuel Mockbee, one of the early champions of this message, called
architects “lapdogs of the rich". The conference was titled Design for
the 98% Without Architects and recognized that while it had, perhaps
One mechanism that has long been implemented by universities to
protect that public interest is the Internal Review Board (IRB) process.
In its current form, the SEED process gives a step-by-step
This process of review is rigorously applied more specifically in fields
could better benefit society as a whole.
such as medicine and the social sciences for any projects that involve
method for undertaking community-based design and may serve
human subjects. And while this review process has proven effective
as a third-party review process for schools that provides for the
Public Interest Design, to follow this view, is design that strives to
for those disciplines, it has proven ill-suited to the review process in
involvement of the client community. As an embedded incentive,
THE
SEED EVALUATOR
FOR COMMUNITY-BASED
SCHOOL PROJECTS
address all public needs -- that is, the needs of the one-hundred A BETTER PROCESS:
architecture
schools
-- with the primary
challenge being time.
the process models a grant application for the benefit of projects
percent. This is design with a different value proposition, that is not
and their clients.
An IRB process can take six months or longer even for small-scale
only beautiful, but for the good of the public -- and communities are
projects; making
it difficult, if not impossible, to
implement
THE
ISSUES a designTHE PLAYERS
recognizing that designers can help them address critical challenges.
The SEED process also provides good community service training
build program under this most stringent of review processes. This,
for the students involved and aids in consensus-building for
then, is part of the disparity in implementing study-driven designpartnering clients. Certainly learning an ethical design methodology
build projects in our communities: there is either no review process
In 2005, Bryan Bell was asked to be an expert witness when a state
in school will provide the additional benefit of having suitably trained
or schools
employ
the cumbersome
IRB
UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS
INSTRUCTORS
COMMUNITY
ETHICSprocess.
COMMUNICATION
TIME
IMPACT
board of architecture licensure was suing a design-build professor
professionals who better serve, involve, and protect the rights of
for unprofessional conduct. The professor was conducting a series
the communities they serve. Referring to the 'SEED Evaluator for
of semester-long design-build studios for a client that was a nonTHE PROCESS
Community-Based School Projects' process diagram on the next
profit organization providing community services. TheTHE
organization,
page, communication and mutual understanding are critical to
SEED EVALUATOR IS
THE SEED EVALUATOR
DESIGNERS,
in this instance, felt as though they had been treatedA TOOL
like “FOR
a guinea
any project's success -- skills that students will later transfer to
STANDARD IRB
RISK OF NO IRB
ENCOURAGES A
PROJECT
DEVELOPERS,
professional
practice.
pig and construction test lab solely for the benefit of the
professor's
MULTI-PHASED
PROCESS
unintentionally, become the purview of the top two-percent, design
???
Particularly, over the course of the last two decades, a convincing
case has been made to show the relationship between
architecture and its environmental consequences. Today, most
of the general public would recognize that the environment is,
in fact, a design issue. No longer a fringe movement, there has
been an almost universal endorsement in "green design"; and
with this fundamental acknowledgement, a proactive embrace by
the architectural community to the point that sustainable design is
part of the curriculum in many of our schools of architecture and
design.
design are exclusive services. At a conference in 2000, the late
Architectural projects have for many years demonstrated that
design goes beyond simply providing formal beauty or iconic
image, but increasingly, projects are having an impact on social,
economic and environmental aspects of our communities. In fact,
this is occurring to a degree, that a new field has emerged to
catalyze and document this work: Public Interest Design. And
while stemming from the field of architecture as a primary social
interface, this movement extends to include work in a number of
other design disciplines, such as graphic design, industrial design
and landscape architecture.
to sit down with an architect -- suggesting that architecture and
COMMUNITY LEADERS
AND OTHERS WHO
knowledge of what was actually going to be built andDESIRE
even
less of
A COMMON
an opportunity to participate in those decisions, evenSTANDARD
to determine
TO GUIDE,
MEASURE,
EVALUATE
whether the design was appropriate. The specific claim of the lawsuit
AMD CERTIFY THE
was lack of "informed consent" citing that no drawings were prepared
for approval by the client.
EVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
the “informed consent” of all
ability to perform thorough
agenda. Over the course of the design process, the client had little
◄
Bryan Bell, AIA
◄
Sergio Palleroni
Bell is the founder
of Design Corps,
focusing on those who
are unserved by the
profession, and is cofounder of the SEED
Network. His current work
includes Public Interest
Design.
Palleroni is a Professor
and Fellow and Director
of the new Center for
Public Interest Design at
Portland State University
CONNECTION
USER EVALUATION.
for more time for
prior to design and
RESEARCH
COMMUNITY
DEFINE
IDEAS
OF UNDERSTANDING A
SEED isCOMMUNITY’S
quickly setting
NEEDS the standard for community-based project
review AND
by VALUES
providing
the needed accountability and transparency
THROUGH
for the MEETINGS,
public. CHARETTES,
Growing from notable example projects to a widely
RESPONSES,
AND approach to design may not only lend
accepted and
systemic
FINALLY,
credibility to the design profession but would help the public work
IMPLEMENTATION
AND
with designers
to envision,
then build, a better future for us all. ■
SEED AS IRB
IDENTIFY
(CONVERSATION)
Certainly learning an ethical design
methodology in school will provide
the additional benefit of having
suitably trained
professionals who
SEED EVALUATOR
better serve, involve, and protect the
rights of the communities they serve.
CONFIRM
(SURVEY)
ANALYZE &
CATEGORIZE
DEFINE
GOALS
SS TT AA KK EE HH OO LL DD EE RR SS AA SS SS EE TT SS && CC HH AA LL LL EE NN GG EE SS GG OO AA LL SS
22
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
DESIGN
RESPONSES
INITIAL
PROPOSALS
DISCUSS
DESIGN
IDEAS
SEED : SOCIAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
How about reducing disease, saving endangered animals, or
reducing crime?
that only a few members of the general public have the opportunity
“SEED MAINTAINS THE BELIEF THAT DESIGN CAN PLAY A VITAL ROLE IN THE MOST CRITICAL ISSUES THAT FACE COMMUNITIES AND INDIVIDUALS.”
Beauty? Accessibility? Affordable housing?
With the purpose of providing a better vehicle for bringing design
to the community, a group of grassroots designers have created
a design process called SEED, an acronym for Social Economic
Environmental Design that provides a standard of accountability
and transparency for the public. The SEED process, as an
online tool, is now in its third version and was initially based on
a judgment process called the Logic Model developed by the
Kellogg Foundation to assess exactly how a community would
benefit from an initiative.
SEED EVALUATOR
What do you see as being today's relevant design issues?
REFINE
& TEST
DISCUSS
DESIGN
IDEAS
DEVELOP
FINAL
PROJECT
BUILD
FINAL
POST-USE
ASSESMENT
SS OO LL UU TT II OO NN SS MM EE AA SS UU RR EE SS
MARCH 2014
23
A BETTER PROCESS: THE SEED EVALUATOR FOR COMMUNITY-BASED SCHOOL PROJECTS
???
STUDENTS
INSTRUCTORS
COMMUNITY
CONNECTION
COMMUNICATION
TIME
IMPACT
THE PROCESS
THE SEED EVALUATOR IS
A TOOL “FOR DESIGNERS,
PROJECT DEVELOPERS,
COMMUNITY LEADERS
AND OTHERS WHO
DESIRE A COMMON
STANDARD TO GUIDE,
MEASURE, EVALUATE
AMD CERTIFY THE
EVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STANDARD IRB
the “informed consent” of all
ability to perform thorough
THE SEED EVALUATOR
ENCOURAGES A
MULTI-PHASED PROCESS
OF UNDERSTANDING A
COMMUNITY’S NEEDS
AND VALUES THROUGH
MEETINGS, CHARETTES,
RESPONSES, AND
FINALLY,
IMPLEMENTATION AND
USER EVALUATION.
RISK OF NO IRB
SEED AS IRB
for more time for
prior to design and
SEED EVALUATOR
RESEARCH
COMMUNITY
DEFINE
IDEAS
IDENTIFY
(CONVERSATION)
CONFIRM
(SURVEY)
ANALYZE &
CATEGORIZE
DEFINE
GOALS
SS TT AA KK EE HH OO LL DD EE RR SS AA SS SS EE TT SS &
& CC HH AA LL LL EE NN GG EE SS GG OO AA LL SS
24
ETHICS
DESIGN
RESPONSES
INITIAL
PROPOSALS
DISCUSS
DESIGN
IDEAS
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
REFINE
& TEST
DISCUSS
DESIGN
IDEAS
DEVELOP
FINAL
PROJECT
BUILD
FINAL
POST-USE
ASSESMENT
SS OO LL UU TT II OO NN SS M
M EE AA SS UU RR EE SS
SEED : SOCIAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
UNIVERSITY
SEED EVALUATOR
THE ISSUES
THE PLAYERS
“SEED MAINTAINS THE BELIEF THAT DESIGN CAN PLAY A VITAL ROLE IN THE MOST CRITICAL ISSUES THAT FACE COMMUNITIES AND INDIVIDUALS.”
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
MARCH 2014
25
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
THE MAYORS' INSTITUTE ON CITY DESIGN (MICD)
Community design initiatives and civic awareness have long
been concepts held in high regard by local, state and national
statesmen. However, it is often the leaders of the smaller scale the local officials - who are able to enact the most direct change on
their communities. So who better to lead a tactical approach to the
design of cities, than the leaders who run them: Mayors. And with
design for the public good seemingly at an all time high, we sought
out the most influential experts on the subject.
As part of that effort, CONNECTION Editor-in-Chief, Wyatt Frantom
and Guest Editor, Larry Fabbroni, YAF Advocacy Director, caught
up with Trinity Simons of the MICD.
The Mayors’ Institute on City Design, or MICD, is a
National Endowments of the Arts (NEA) leadership
initiative in partnership with ‘The United States
Conference of Mayors’ and the American Architectural
Foundation. Since 1986, the Mayors’ Institute has
helped transform communities through design by
preparing more than 900 mayors to be the chief urban
designers of their cities.
Trinity is relatively new to the position, but came
from a strong background that includes degrees in
Architecture & City Planning, numerous non-profit
Board positions and oversight of the prestigious Rose
Architectural Fellowship.
WF: How did your work with Enterprise Community Partners as
Director of the Rose Architectural Fellowship prepare you for your
new role as Director of the MICD?
TS: Enterprise Community Partners is a large real estate services
firm that provides development capital for affordable housing and
community development. They began to see a long time ago that
even though housing is important, the creation of whole “communities
of opportunity” is an essential component to fight poverty cycles.
In line with that, they have departments that look at housing and
community needs in vulnerable populations, senior housing, tribal
housing, and transit-oriented development. During my time there, I
worked in the design initiatives office, where we were charged with
bringing better design to affordable housing. Our flagship program,
the Enterprise Rose Architectural Fellowship, is widely known by
emerging professionals in architecture.
TS: We are still bouncing back from the recession and it has had a
big impact on planning and design in cities. Pre-2007, cities were
talking Big plan, Big vision. We are seeing less of that now, but big
vision planning is slowly starting to come back. Mayors are focused
on leaving their legacy and not just the day-to-day fixing of potholes
and general civic operations. The noticeable change is that in order
to do any big vision planning, small victories must come first. They
are also trying to figure out what they do initially to build momentum
in order to get long-term buy-in.
Transportation and transportation maintenance funding is another
hot button issue. The day of the single solution project is over. Every
major infrastructure project needs to have multiple benefits to pull
together enough funding necessary to do anything. This presents
great opportunities for designers and we are helping to invent creative
ways to extract design out of infrastructure dollars.
In addition to the Rose Fellowship, we had a few other programs as
well: the Affordable Housing Design Leadership Institute (modeled
after the MICD) and one involving pre-development design grants
for community developers. Both of these programs essentially dealt
with building design capacity and fluency in community development
corporations. Leaders of community development corporations are
doing really great, really difficult work in an environment where, all
too often, design is seen as a luxury. At Enterprise, we worked to
demonstrate that a better design process equals a better outcome,
often at little to no additional cost. Those outcomes meant residents
were proud of their homes and had a real sense of pride about where
they lived. This mentality about design -- that design is a process
and isn’t a luxury reserved for a select few, translated naturally into
working with mayors.
WF: Understanding that there are a range of such sessions
nationally each year (six last year, for instance), can you provide a
case study or two that could be spotlighted as an example?
TS: We actually have an awesome video, seen here, that
showcases case studies for our 25th year anniversary. It includes
5 success stories ranging from Miami 21, the city’s first form based
zoning code, to the Louisville waterfront park, which is a project
that spanned 3 mayors.
LF: What have your experiences revealed as lessons for how
young design professionals might effectively advocate for good
design to their local elected leadership? TS: It may seem counter-intuitive, but we don’t go into a city
preaching that design is important. Instead, we strive to show it to
mayors. This involves talking about things such as streetscaping,
how buildings meet the street, and how a building’s design can
directly impact its economic development potential. All of this is
part of design and expanding a mayor’s vision about why design is
important. Many mayors didn’t realize they could even influence
these aspects or that they can then find local experts in their own
community to use as a resource.
LF: With design achieving higher and higher pop-culture status in
recent times, how do you work to ensure mayors are developing a
deeper understanding of the impacts and value of design, rather
than just developing a stronger rhetoric to pay lip service? TS: The inherent nature of what we’re doing really prevents this.
We bring a very small group of mayors together with a small
group of distinguished design and development professionals.
There, the mayors each present a pressing physical challenge
that their city is facing. In getting feedback on those challenges
-- recommendations that range from design to implementation
to removing political barriers -- mayors come to see design as
a process and a valuable tool. The mayor of Baltimore recently
attended an MICD and said the experience was like “getting a new
pair of glasses when I didn’t know I needed glasses. ■
WF: Understanding that the MICD achieves its mission through
organized sessions in which mayors engage leading design experts to
find solutions to the most critical urban design challenges facing their
respective cities, what do you see as the most pressing challenges
for designers to overcome in the years ahead?
Trinity Simons, Assoc. AIA
Simons is the Director of the Mayors’
Institute on City Design and serves on
the Board of Directors of Association
for Community Design. She has
previously served on the Board of
Directors of the NAAB, ACSA, AIAS,
and the DC chapter of the AIA. She has
a Bachelor of Architecture from the
University of Arkansas and a Master of
City Planning from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
The mayor of Baltimore recently attended an MICD and said the
experience was like “getting a new pair of glasses when I didn’t know
I needed glasses."
26
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
27
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
THE ROSE CENTER FOR PUBLIC LEADERSHIP
Design of cities is a very complex issue, and rightfully so. As
designers, we often forget that design is but one of a multitude of
tasks that our local leadership is elected to address. Fortunately,
there are leadership development programs, such as ULI’s Rose
Fellowship, that aim to educate mayors and their staff on historical
solutions and best practices.
In an effort to better learn about this impressive program,
CONNECTION Editor-in-Chief, Wyatt Frantom and Guest Editor,
Larry Fabbroni, YAF Advocacy Director, caught up with the
Executive Director, Jess Zimbabwe.
LF: Can you describe some of the changes you see in mayors and
their staff members after dedicating so much time to a complex
design challenge over the course of their fellowship year, and
beyond? What are the biggest obstacles you see public leaders
struggling with in order to integrate great design into complex land
use and economic development projects?
JZ: Public officials struggle under the sheer pace and intensity of
the questions and issues that come at them. Unlike those of us
who went to design school, mayors aren’t familiar with the intense,
focused attention to a problem that a charrette or studio pin-up
session can have. We give them specific advice on a particular
land use project, but I also like to think that we give them some
new tools and methods for approaching other problems that are
going to come across their desks. Also, our program is based
on the premise that you have to learn by seeing great projects
and by talking to the inter-disciplinary teams that got them built.
There’s a lot of value in kicking the tires on a real development and
hearing the story of teamwork (and sometimes conflict) between
the various actors that got it built.
WF: In your opinion, what are the best ways for architects to
engage their public officials to improve the design of their cities
on a local level? Have you seen any good models of partnership
between the ULI and AIA? JZ: A lot of local AIA Chapters have taken this subject head on and
AIA National has in recent years done an excellent job of lifting up
those best practices to recognize and disseminate them across the
entire organization. The Citizen Architect initiative recognizes AIA
members that run for office, serve on local boards and commissions,
and initiate new and innovative ways to infuse design into the public
dialogue in their communities. Their website has a ton of great ideas
to inspire someone who wants to get more involved in that way.
LF: Does the Rose Center work to engage mayors in cities that have
a serious need for assistance, rather than just those administrations
that already have a keen awareness of the value of the program? JZ: Yes, we try to have a mix of different market types in every class of
4 cities. A few years ago, Houston and Detroit were in the same class,
and many people laughed at the incongruity of those two; Houston
was facing a growth management challenge and Detroit was looking
at steep population losses. But once you peel back the issues of the
built environment, it turns out that Houston was challenged by a glut
of low-cost multi-family housing that was built during the oil boom
of the 1980s. These apartments now have huge vacancy rates and
are sometimes used for illegal activity. Since many of the units are
condominiums, the City had a difficult time taking title because one
complex could have 400 owners. The City of Detroit was very much
ahead of Houston in regards to developing policies and programs to
address nuisance properties, and the fellows from those two cities
spent a lot of time that year comparing notes. I’m not sure the people
who laughed at the beginning of the year would have guessed the
direction of that information flow.
WF: As the former director of the MICD, how has your role changed
with the ULI Rose Center in regards to participating with mayors and
their cities?
JZ: The Mayors’ Institute is a fabulous program. They serve 40 or 50
mayors a year, and with 1200 mayors around the country, it’s great
that someone is out there working at that pace. But we developed the
Rose Fellowship to be a bit of a different model based on experiences
like the MICD. We work with a smaller number of cities (4) for a more
intensive, year-long program. In addition to the mayor, three other
folks from each City also serve as Rose Fellows, so we get further
into the mechanics of how change happens within city government.
Unlike those of us who went to design school, mayors aren’t necessarily familiar
with the intense, focused attention to a problem that a charrette or studio pin-up
session can have. I like to think that we give them some new tools and methods
for approaching other problems that are going to come across their desks.
LF: Given your continued work with mayors, both with the MICD and
ULI, what do you believe have been the most pressing issues facing
our cities today?
JZ: In the short term, cities are going to have to solve a lot of
difficult fiscal crises. Mayors who are currently in office around the
U.S., generally inherited over-extended pension funds for public
employees at the same time as dramatic reductions in property taxes
and nearly every other source of revenue for local governments.
The advantage that cities have in rebuilding their economies in this
constrained age of tea party distrust in government is that the more
local a government is, the more in touch the leadership can be with its
citizens. A mayor can take a specific list of projects with real sites and
real, perceivable benefits to the voters to support a bond issuance or
a local option sales tax. Local government and projects can appeal to
voters in a different way than far-off state and federal governments.
WF: Can you provide an exemplar case study (with written
background and photos) of a recent fellowship project? How was that
case study a success?
In the 1980s, the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) began converting Charlotte’s Independence Boulevard
from a commercial arterial into a limited-access highway. The work
to date totals 4.25 miles and has cost over $80 million. NCDOT had
begun obtaining properties for another 1.6 mile segment, which
was expected to cost $172 million, with more than $90 million going
toward property acquisition.
When Anthony Foxx was selected as a ULI Daniel Rose fellow in
2010 he chose to focus on this extraordinarily expensive and timeconsuming state road project, calling into question the value of the
highway project to the surrounding community. Part of the challenge
of Independence Boulevard is inter-jurisdictional. In 2006, the
regional Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) called for
bus rapid transit service along Independence as part of the 2030
Corridor System Plan, which lays out public transit plans and policy
for the entire Charlotte region.
This plan included direction that Charlotte city staff should
“coordinate the design of the highway improvements to protect the
possible construction of bus rapid or light rail transit” in the center
lanes of Independence Boulevard. Having this many separate
transit lanes, in addition to high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes
and three general-purpose lanes in each direction, would yield a
street up to 280 feet wide. A street that wide would be a huge
barrier in the neighborhood.
When land development along Independence Boulevard
proceeded rapidly in the 1950s and 1960s, the large number of
commuters generated demand for cultural facilities, shopping
centers, and copious strip retail development along the roadway.
Over time, property disinvestment along Independence caused
by uncertainty about timing and funding for the road construction
has colored real estate investment decisions along the corridor.
Meanwhile, the surrounding east Charlotte neighborhoods
suffered from physical decline and diminished access to goods
and services.
As part of Charlotte’s participation in the Rose Fellowship, we
recommended that rail transit service, when it is funded, should
run elsewhere in the plan area rather than hold up the planning,
design, and construction of Independence Boulevard with its
funding uncertainty. Also, a streetcar running on a parallel
street would better support mixed-use, neighborhood-serving
commercial development than transit running in the center of a
highway median.
In summer 2011, I helped Mayor Foxx and the Charlotte team
convene a stakeholder task force that met several times to follow
up on the recommendations. The group recommended that Foxx
ask the MTC to change its plans, striking the provision calling
for separate transit lanes in the reconstruction of Independence.
This ultimately state-adopted recommendation represented a
significant change of heart for the surrounding community, but
Mayor Foxx and the Charlotte team had built the neighborhood’s
capacity to change their thinking for a more sustainable future.
That’s exactly the kind of complex land use challenge that this
program is suited to. ■
Jess Zimbabwe, AIA
Zimbabwe serves as founding
Executive Director of the Urban Land
Institute’s Daniel Rose Center for Public
Leadership, was previously the Director
of the Mayors’ Institute on City Design
and served as the Community Design
Director at Urban Ecology. She is a
licensed architect, certified city planner,
and a LEED-Accredited professional.
28
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
29
ARTICLE ADVOCACY
FELLOWSHIPS
REDESIGNING PUBLIC SERVICE
What happens between obtaining an architecture degree and a
practicing license typically goes one of three ways: work, return
to a university for post-grad studies, or abandon the profession
altogether. However, this window of opportunity has the potential
to be much more exploratory, both creatively and professionally.
Coming out of school, graduates are brimming with excitement
and hopes of changing the world one building at a time. Soon
thereafter however, reality settles in and the gravity-defying
3D models draped in mesh surfaces give way to monotonous
drawings of restrooms, elevator shafts, and staircases -- (don’t get
me wrong—service and circulation spaces are some of the most
important elements of a building). But how might someone bridge
the gap between education and practice by continuing creative
interests and grounding oneself in the practicalities of design and
building?
Fellowships have traditionally offered a track for graduates and
young professionals to research and experiment. The Rome Prize,
Wheelwright Prize, and Loeb Fellowship are well-known entities
offering architecture graduates and professionals the ability to
explore thesis topics, perform design research, and experiment
as a supplement to practice. There are also a number of lesserknown opportunities. The Van Alen Institute, for instance, is
one of the longest-standing fellowship programs in the country.
Originally founded in 1894 as the Society of Beaux-Arts Architects,
the fellowship program sent one student each year to study at
the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in Paris to supplement atelier-based
education in the United States. After over a century in operation,
the Institute—renamed Van Alen, after Chrysler Building architect
William Van Alen—has evolved to focus broadly on architecture in
the public realm.
One of the key Van Alen Institute programs that came out of the
evolution was the New York Prize, which ran from 2007-2010. It
focused on research and practices; and according to Director of
Research Jeff Byles, “engaged the public realm and raised interesting
design questions regarding ways to use technology or participatory
processes as tools to bring innovation to design of the public realm.”
Prize awardees, and founders of Kounkuey Design Initiative, Chelina
Odbert and Jennifer Toy spent their fellowship term in 2008 exploring
participatory design and research in Nairobi’s slum community of
Kibera while concurrently building relationships and support networks
in New York. “The fellowship played a strong role conceptually by
advancing their project, but also practically by providing professional
connections and a forum for them to have conversations,” remarked
Byles. Due to the early stage support from Van Alen’s Fellowship,
Kounkuey has developed and installed four public space projects that
continue to thrive in Kibera.
Along with Van Alen’s public realm-focused fellowship, two programs
have sprung up in New York and San Francisco to support public
service design through multi-disciplinary teams and experimental
installations.
Nonprofit Public Policy Lab (PPL) launched their fellowship in 2011
and opened the application process to designers with an interest in
working on public and governmental services—an area of work nearly
unheard of in design and architecture education. “[The organization]
came out of work that my cofounders and I had done in different
design fields while working with public agencies,” explained the
nonprofit’s Executive Director Chelsea Mauldin. “We saw how there
was a need inside of government for design skills of any kind. Then
further, design skills not only had values of creating end products that
were more satisfying for users, but also that a design-based approach
could help agencies figure out new ways to solve problems.”
The fellowship program attracts designers from a wide range of
backgrounds and experiences, including storytelling, user experience
design, urban planning, writing, politics and architecture. For three
to six month terms, teams focus on one of three phases for public
sector projects; participatory research with both employees and end
users, design of ‘real-world mechanisms’ to improve service delivery,
and piloting and evaluation of the new service designs. “We work
with public agencies the whole way through,” remarked Mauldin. “We
won’t just come in at the end and make something look nice.”
One of the Office’s most prominent public space initiatives is the
Living Innovation Zones (LIZ). The model was created for artists
and designers to easily and affordably install urban “hacks”—a term
commonly used for quick, iterative, and often times inelegant, but
effective solutions to everyday problems. The program has opened
up under used public areas as showcase spaces for innovative and
creative installations with sponsorship from private companies and
cultural institutions.
Although the fellowship is centered on service design—an area
that focuses on planning and organizing people, infrastructure,
communication and materials for providers and customers—the
methodology of incorporating customers’ behaviors, needs, and
motivations is being taken up more commonly by designers interested
in public interest work.
In a recent Atlantic Cities article, Innovation Fellow Jake Levitas,
who previously worked in urban planning at ARUP and as Research
Director at the Gray Area Foundation for the Arts, commented on
the unique opportunities created for designers by LIZ. “Normally with
installations, they go through a design-and-engineering review and
then get approval,” said Levitas. “The LIZ program is designed to
allow change over time, so if people don’t like one part or another it
can get taken out.” Due to the multi-disciplinary team of fellows and
staff, these types of iterative and responsive initiatives are providing
new opportunities for designers and the general public to interact and
improve civic life.
As demonstrated in the pilot project, “Designing Services for Public
Housing,” PPL fellows teamed with Parsons Design for Social
Innovation and Sustainability (DESIS) Lab students to spend four
months conducting exploratory research. The clients of the project
included the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and
Development staff, the public, and service providers. Only after this
research phase did they design service options, refine concepts into
a How-to Guide, and implement four pilot projects. PPL continues to
work with the Housing Preservation and Development staff to monitor
the pilot installations and publish evaluation reports. By focusing
design on end users’ behavior, needs, and motivations, success
should be measured by the response to and use of the product,
place, or service.
A year after PPL began in New York City, the City of San Francisco and
Code for America launched the first-ever Office of Civic Innovation
to introduce an entrepreneurial approach to government services.
Under the banner “we keep government accountable, accessible,
and responsive,” the Innovation Fellowship program has attracted
fellows with backgrounds in investment banking, urban development,
communications, crowdfunding, civic engagement, and research.
Additional organizations are providing similar opportunities that
push the boundaries of where and how design is applied, including
the Tipping Point’s T Lab in Oakland, Collaborative Group’s
Challenge Detroit, the Appalachian Transition Fellowship, and
Epicenter’s Frontier Fellowship in Utah. To the credit of nonprofit,
university, and government programs invested in innovative and
experimental ideas, we’re bound to see new roles and types of
design practices continue to sprout up. Here’s to a bright path ahead
for design professionals. ■
Katie Crepeau
Crepeau is an architect and writer
focused on design, social enterprise,
and environmental stewardship. She
is editor at PublicInterestDesign.org,
founder of DesignAffects.com, and
consults on community projects in her
new home city of London, England.
To the credit of nonprofit, university, and government programs invested
in innovative and experimental ideas, we’re bound to see new roles
and types of design practices continue to sprout up
30
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
31
# aiachat
This issue features an #aiachat triple-header!
1,497 Twitter Followers
As we put wraps on 2013, we look back at the October, November and December @AIAYAF tweetups -- a sampling of the best responses transcribed from the live events in case you missed it the first
time!
AIA YAF Monthly Tweet-up
LOOK FOR FUTURE TWITTER CHATS @AIAYAF
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Welcome to the monthly AIA YAF Tweet-up. Today’s chat on DESIGN ADVOCACY will be
featured in Connection. #yaftweet1402
CONNECTION
Theme: DESIGN ADVOCACY
Hashtag: #yaftweet1402
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A3 - find people you want to work with. organize around a passion project. don't accept "no" as an answer
@AIAYAF [Moderator] I’m Evelyn Lee, the YAF PR Director. I’ll be your host for the chat today. Just a note on format:
#yaftweet1402
@architect1122 (Rob Anderson) A3 - strive to be THE resource for issues to decision makers of the built environment
@AIAYAF [Moderator] I will ask a question “Q1”. Please use “A1” or the corresponding number so we can track your
responses. #yaftweet1402
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A3 - listening to others, sharing our design skills, and getting something done. more people will care when they see we do
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q1: What does the term “design advocacy” mean to you? #yaftweet1402
@aiacenterforeps (Ashley Respecki) A3 - designers can start by attending a Hill Day in their state or during AIA Grassroots (#AIAGR14) aia.org/grassroots
@ianmerker (Ian Merker) A3 - participate in the public process. show up to a local design review meeting! send a letter to city planning staff.
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A1 - to me it = both advocating for good design, and using design as a mechanism to advocate for other issues
@falloutstudio (Jamie Crawley) A1 - simply "design matters" always a value assertion for me of process and product
@architect1122 (Rob Anderson) A1 - promotion of the qualitative aspects of our built environment
@aiacenterforeps (Ashley Respecki) A1 - realizing the need for improvement, and speaking up - consistently - to change the profession of architecture
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q4: Is there a business case for a firm being leaders in design related policy discussions?
#yaftweet1402
@falloutstudio (Jamie Crawley) A4 - "relevance" or in SM terms "thought leader"
@pava1316 (Paul Avazier) A4 - if a firm sets their principals and sticks to them they can be a design policy leader, but clients may not always go along
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q2: Do you believe design as a process can drive larger advocacy work? #yaftweet1402
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A4 - true @PAva1316. advancing policy requires a collective will between competing firms - better culture of sharing
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A2 - community based design efforts are great processes to showcase democracy
@architect1122 (Rob Anderson) A4 - it would seem any business not in tune and aligned with advocacy is short of its highest potential
@yafphilly (YAF Philadelphia) A2 - if community members are part of the process, I think it will make advocacy easier to get behind
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q5: How are firms using Design to be advocates in an inspiring way? #yaftweet1402
@falloutstudio (Jamie Crawley) A2 - absolutely. @AIANational RUDAT program etc are testament to institute efforts to highlight process in broad dialogue
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A2 - agree on RUDAT @falloutstudio. advocating THROUGH design can be far more powerful than merely through words
@architect1122 (Rob Anderson) A2 - few advocacy efforts materialize w/o process, so yes, design is both similar and can inform advocacy
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q3: What are ways an individual can contribute or be a design advocate? #yaftweet1402
32
19 February, 2-3:00pm Eastern Time
@wyattfrantom (Wyatt Frantom) A3 - volunteer in your community. advocate for those causes that you feel passionate about and are interested in
@yafphilly (YAF Philadelphia) A3 - every architect & designer can be held accountable, whether they know it or not - so always approach w/ desire to change
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A5 - Cannon's Open Hand Studio is a good example.
qub.me/pB0yNq props to @joliesmash
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A5 - of course all the firms participating in the 1% solution qub.me/
M60RXo are part of a larger advocacy effort
@bkasdan (Ben Kasdan) A5 - good design is the purpose for design. good design inspires, solves, and serves simultaneously
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q6: What tools can support/drive design advocacy? #yaftweet1402
@AIAYAF [Moderator] A6 - Perhaps social media also becomes a tool for engagement. BNIM used it
qub.me/IBp25c
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
33
# aiachat
About the Moderator
Evelyn Lee, AIA
Lee is the Public Relations Director for the YAF AdCom, serves
as Regional Director for California to the AIA National Board, is
the founder of the Practice of Architecture Website, and a Senior
Strategist at MKThink in San Francisco, CA.
@yafphilly (YAF Philadelphia) A6 - volunteer centers that are mission driven for social impact:
@impactdesign @desigNYCnow@bcWORKSHOP @cdesignc_tweets
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A8 - I've heard the same in frustrated musings by many chapter leaders
@hertzlocker (Hertzlocker) A6 - the book "Design Through Dialogue" addresses the idea of transparency and all parties being equally participatory
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A8 - we're going to work on a YAF resource during 2014. avoid the "start from scratch".
@wyattfrantom (Wyatt Frantom) A6 - public visioning sessions are a good tool for advocating design in the community - gaining public support / investment
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q9: What advocacy issues should the AIA be focusing on? #yaftweet1402
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A6 - AIA chapters can be great a mechanism, but often need to work past fear of the taking a stand
@bkasdan (Ben Kasdan) A9 - the value of architecture - both licensure and design
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q7: Is policy the best avenue to advocate for good design? #yaftweet1402
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q10: Within the profession, which issues should the YAF position ourselves as leaders on?
#yaftweet1402
@yafphilly (YAF Philadelphia) A7 - you can't force good design - but you can encourage clients & the public to demand it
@pava1316 (Paul Avazier) A10 - AIA & YAF should be trying to change the mentality of firms to not do things the same as always
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A7 - architects need to be policy-savvy, but most powerful way to engage is to integrate argument with design
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A10 - @PAva1316 In which specific areas do you want to see change in firm culture?
@hertzlocker (Hertzlocker) A7 - policy can be problematic and seem overreaching or supporting egoist ideals. politics can be quite slippery a slope!
@pava1316 (Paul Avazier) A10 - @LFabbroni Any mentality: "well that's the way we've always designed it, so let's do it again" blocks any chance for progress
@pava1316 (Paul Avazier) A7 - policy is a good starting point, but it may place too much restriction on creativity. It can be used to set a base line
@yafphilly (YAF Philadelphia) A7 - agree w/ @PAva1316. policy can provide incentives for compliance, but it can create a "formula" that devs follow to reduce risk
@AIAYAF [Moderator] A7 - @PAva1316 maybe it's time for us to start getting more creative about policy?
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) A7 - agreed @PAva1316. frameworks are good. prescriptive policy and overreaching public sector handcuffs creativity
@lfabbroni (Lawrence Fabbroni) Thanks everyone. Tweet at our YAF account or my account any time with ideas for YAF (and larger AIA) Advocacy
@AIAYAF [Moderator] Q8: How connected to the AIA's advocacy agenda do you feel? Locally? Regionally? Nationally? #yaftweet1402
@ianmerker (Ian Merker) A8 - AIA leadership does good stuff that's not well communicated to members. we waste effort when we neglect to share
@AIAYAF [Moderator] A8 - agreed @ianmerker. we are horrible communicators despite all of our communications
34
CONNECTION
@pava1316 (Paul Avazier) A8 - except for extreme circumstances I feel AIA stays out of advocacy locally and leaves it to other community based groups
@yafphilly (YAF Philadelphia) A8 - agree with sharing resources. if staff support is thin, it can be a daunting task to start from scratch
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
35
DESIGN
ENTERPRISE
ENTERPRISE ROSE ARCHITECTURAL FELLOWSHIP
Katie Swenson
is a national leader in sustainable design for low-income communities, overseeing National
Design Initiatives for Enterprise Community Partners, Inc. and directing the Affordable Housing
Design Leadership Institute and the Enterprise Rose Architectural Fellowship.
Under her tutelage, the fellows are responsible for completing over 7,500 units of housing and 46
community facilities. The program fellows remain leaders in community design, spearheading a
national movement of architects back to community service and social activism.
"We believe that design excellence is both place-based and process-oriented."
Katie holds a bachelor’s degree in comparative literature from the University of CaliforniaBerkeley and a master’s degree in architecture from the University of Virginia.
AJ Sustaita and Lawrence Fabbroni of
YAF Connection submitted questions to
Katie Swenson, VP of National Design
Initiatives for Enterprise Community Partners
located in Wellesley, MA. What follows is her
response to a selection of those questions.
choose a specific fellowship for which they are
most suited. Sometimes applicants apply to
more than one fellowship, but usually there is
a strong interest not just in the Rose Fellowship
program more generally, but in a specific work
plan. After all, a farm worker housing project
in Oregon is a very different environment
than supportive housing in Brooklyn, or
senior housing in Vermont, or transit oriented
development in St. Paul. While all applicants
must have a professional degree in architecture,
many also have degrees, or strengths, in city
planning, landscape architecture, community
engagement, and public policy. They usually
select based on geography and project type. In
the end, it’s the ‘fit’ between the fellow’s skills
and aspirations, and the strengths and goals of
the host organization that make a successful
pairing. Our selection process is layered and
facilitates that great match.
The Enterprise Rose Fellowship is an
outstanding opportunity for young
architects and interns to pursue. What
are the philosophy and/or objectives
behind the fellowship?
The Enterprise Rose Architectural Fellowship
partner’s early-career architects with local
community development organizations for
three year fellowships, where they facilitate
an inclusive approach to development that
brings all stakeholders together to create
green, sustainable, affordable communities.
The fellowship has three primary objectives;
Invest in the next generation of leadership,
invest in non-profit housing organizations
and to cultivate knowledge in the industry.
What kind of responsibilities and/or
opportunities outside of architecture will a
chosen fellow experience during their threeyear term?
When a fellow is chosen they are paired
with a host organization often in another
city, can you explain the process behind
pairing fellows with hosts?
At community development corporations,
fellows are pushed into realms of the
development process that they would not
have exposure to at traditional architecture
firms. This relates both to scale—fellows
learn to think about housing in the context of
neighborhoods and districts more broadly—and
to responsibility within the organization. Fellows
may be asked to apply their design experience
to designing systems, serving as facilitators
and intermediaries between architecture firms,
developers, and community members.
Our process for making the Rose Fellowship
partnerships has evolved over the years of
the program. We first have a competitive
host selection process, identifying strong
groups who have ambitions for advancing
their mission in new way with the help of
a catalytic design fellow. Then we post the
opportunities online, as transparently and
descriptively as we can, and applicants
Lafitte. Image courtesy of Enterprise
36
CONNECTION
Lafitte. Image courtesy of Enterprise.
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
37
DESIGN
STAR
APARTMENTS
Improving the lives of residents, the surrounding community and the city at large.
Homelessness has been a plague to our
Located on an existing site with a one-story
nation for decades. However, in a recent
building, the design team employed an
study conducted from 2011 to 2013 by the
adaptive re-use strategy that would renovate
National Alliance to End Homelessness, there
the existing parking structure and use it as
is evidence that the homeless population of
a base to build the housing above. The final
America is actually in decline. This is due
program resulted in a mixed-use building
in part to service-driven architects and the
which includes 102 units of modular pre-
nonprofit organizations that they team with.
fabricated housing, a community service
One such organization, the Skid Row
Housing Trust (SRHT), was established to
accommodate housing opportunities for low
income, homeless and disabled individuals
in the skid row community of downtown Los
Angeles. SRHT is unique in that it follows
the philosophy of Housing First, which is
the practice of not requiring sobriety before
area. With an aesthetic just as unique as its
program, the Star Apartments incorporates a
Star
Apartments,
renderings
and that
imagesdraws
courtesyattention
of Enterprise.to
dynamic
tiered
design
the neighborhood while also contributing to a
sense of community pride and revitalization.
providing a safe and secure place to live
considered during the design process.
for individuals suffering from addiction, they
The building envelope is optimized by
become empowered to begin and maintain
utilizing factory fabrication to ensure energy
recovery.
efficiency. Renewable sources of energy
along with her host organization (SRHT)
teamed up with architect Michael Maltzan,
FAIA, to design affordable housing that would
spur economic growth for the surrounding
Issues of sustainable design were also
Enterprise Rose Fellow, Theresa Hwang
CONNECTION
track and retail on the ground floor to help
individuals can be placed in a home. By
The Star Apartments housing
development in Skid Row is a
great example of how exemplary
design can improve the lives
of residents, the surrounding
community and even the city at
large.
38
center, a clinic, roof top garden, jogging
are employed to reduce operations and
maintenance costs. Careful selection of
building materials along with commissioning
of the building systems provides healthy
indoor air quality. Recognizing that there is
a lack of open space in the area, roof top
gardens were planted on the tiered roofs
to provide a place of solace and to reduce
runoff attributed to impervious cover. As of
this publication, the project is on target to
achieve Gold certification under the LEED
for Homes pilot program.
account for the larger picture by questioning
After much anticipation from the city of Los
how their building would contribute to issues
Angeles and the neighborhood of Skid Row,
of safety, security, economy, resident health
occupancy of the apartment units began in
and community pride.
November of 2013. - A.J. Sustaita, AIA
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
39
DESIGN
Every fellowship experience is unique and as
our program has matured, so has the field;
we now see more opportunities emerging
for young architects in fields outside what
was once just “affordable housing”. While
affordable housing is still a key tenet in our
work, we see it as an important component of
creating systemic change on a larger scale.
There are many marginalized communities
in our country whose needs must be
considered and addressed separately.
The fields of senior, rural and farm worker
housing, to name a few, are burgeoning in
importance as our society changes. And as
our society’s needs have evolved, so too has
the Rose Fellowship.
How has the network of fellows led to
knowledge sharing beyond the design
projects for host organizations?
We are thrilled to have, as of this year, 50
Rose Fellows deployed across the country
and excited to meet together as a group in
Greenwood, MS in early March for an allfellows retreat. The network is still young
and I hope that as the program continues
to grow, and many of our members achieve
the leadership opportunities we strive for, we
will have more and more influence. We are
already seeing the fruits of the network. Last
week in San Francisco at the Net Positive
Conference of the International Living
Building Institute, we gathered a group of
practitioners to see how to create a pathway
for Affordable Housing to the Living Building
Challenge, the country’s most rigorous and
ambitious green building program to date.
Four of the five groups present had a Rose
Fellow on staff over the years, championing
green, and pushing their organizations
to excel to the point where they could
even have the aspiration to build a “Living
Building.” This kind of leadership does not
happen overnight. Our Rose Fellows were
some of the first to build the Energy Star and
Earth Craft standards in the early 2000s,
then LEED Silver, Gold, and Platinum over
the years. A Rose Fellow also helped to draft
the original Green Communities Criteria,
subsequently countless fellows have
contributed to refining the program over
the last ten years. The fellows have been
sharing, evolving, and challenging green
building strategies actively for more than a
decade. It’s this kind of robust activity that
yields exemplary results.
and mentoring evolving leaders in the field.
Specifically, we worked on guiding them to
become agents of change within their host
organizations. The selection process has
gotten increasingly competitive over time,
but now the process for host selection is also
competitive and we only work with groups who
have demonstrated capacity and ambitious
goals for what they want to achieve through
the fellowship. We are now well positioned
to work on formulating new models. We are
actively developing best practices in the
design for senior housing, the integration of
supportive services into housing, protocol
and best practices regarding culturally
appropriate housing, transit oriented
development and eco-districts to name a
few. We judge our success by the capacity
and stretch of the fellows—indicators that the
host organizations have indeed evolved—
and contributions to the field.
One of the core principals of the Enterprise
Rose Fellowship is design excellence. Is
there a philosophy or standard that guides
the fellows to achieving excellence in
design?
We believe that design excellence is both
placed-based and process-oriented.
The work of the fellowship, and design in
general, is inherently placed-based. Each fellow
relies on the principle that design should build
on the local context, culture, and capabilities of
the communities in which they work. Intentional
design is not a luxury or an extravagance—in
fact, it is practical and efficient on multiple levels.
It involves using natural light and ventilation
to reduce energy costs. Well-designed
buildings anticipate geographic challenges and
incorporate quality and durable materials that
will last.
And, among other things, good design includes
the creation of appealing, accessible public
spaces that promote social interaction, healthy
living and a sense of community.
Though the end product is important, design is
not simply a means to an end. The process
of design and development is critical to the
success of each home, public space and
community center that is built. Rose Fellows
continually engage residents and community
members, using design to spur creative thinking
and encourage these groups to create a vision
for what their homes and neighborhoods could
be. Each process is contextual, unique and
built on trust developed over time. Fellows do
not begin these three-year positions thinking
they know everything. Humility and a desire to
learn and grow allow them to initiate an ongoing,
inclusive design process in their communities.
Design excellence is a result of this placed-based and process-oriented approach. Good
design in affordable housing does more than shelter and starts long before a plan is drawn
up. Beginning with community engagement to empower citizens and identify needs, design
considers a neighborhood’s walkability and connectivity to services as vital to residents’
wellbeing as a proper roof. Most of all, intentional design is holistic: It looks beyond the four
walls of a building and toward the entire community.
What role do architects and architecture serve in the realization of a thriving community?
Architectural design plays a huge role! For many, design becomes a process by which they
can think differently about their resources, and visualize opportunities, bringing possibilities
into a more constructive conversation by being able to see things more clearly. When design
excellence becomes a part of the vocabulary of a neighborhood, aspirations rise. Sunny Fischer,
former director of the Driehaus Foundation, has heard mothers say, “That beautiful maternity
ward that’s been built into a community hospital can't possibly be for us. Where are we having
our babies?” Or when a little kid is being taken to school for the first time—a gorgeous school
that’s been developed in their neighborhood—says, “That’s just for rich people. That couldn’t
be for me.” Community-based design gives voice to a community’s aspiration. Moreover, it has
the intention of providing the absolute best facilities, amenities, open space, and housing, for
people of all income levels. ■
What type of post-occupancy follow-up
are you doing as part of the program?
We have a gathering every year a few
months after the fellowship has ended and
ask the fellow and host to reflect on their
experience. Regarding the program itself,
initially we focused on recruiting, selecting
40
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
41
LEADERSHIP PROFILE
At the age of 32, I decided I was going to run for Congress,
and much to everybody’s surprise I got myself elected
LEADERSHIP PROFILE
RICHARD SWETT FAIA
Richard Nelson Swett, FAIA
Swett was the only Architect in the 20th Century to serve in the US House
of Representatives, or as a US Ambassador (to Denmark). Even more
dramatically, his election to Congress occurred when he still was a Young
Architect.
Ambassador Swett is a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects
and was kind enough to join us to discuss his career, his advice for Young
Architects, and his continued passion for solving the most pressing issues of
our time.
Please tell us a little about your early days as an
Architect.
Had you held any elected offices previous to running for
Congress?
RNS: After graduating from Yale University, I moved out west
and started out at Skidmore Owings and Merrill. As I was
working on architecture, I started realizing that the real control
over the project was not in the hands of the architect but was
“upstream.” At first I thought maybe it’s the contractor, so I
became very interested in design-build. But I then found that
the bankers had a lot to do with how the money was spent, so
I began to think that if I developed the project, I could better
insure the quality of the product. But I came to recognize that
there was a fourth entity, and that is the building code. The
planning and building code officials, much to my chagrin, had
little or no training in design, or the building industry and its
execution. I realized that these were the politicians; they were
holding these positions based on the votes they could collect,
and not based on any professional expertise. So I started
looking into how one gets into these positions.
RNS: My previous elected office was President of my class in high
school. I was involved in the community and in the Democratic Party in
New Hampshire, but I did not hold local elected offices or anything like
that. It was not until the late 1980’s that I saw that there was this more
urgent need of providing this kind of integrated vision in Congress,
and that was paralleled with a local representative who I found to be
very narrow minded, and very destructive. I used my architectural
background as the basis for saying that I had a different approach.
When I moved back to the east coast I became very involved
in the development of renewable energy power plants. I was
trying to build wholly self-sustaining communities that were
drawing their electricity from the local resources in proximity
to these communities, and that were all on central heating
and cooling systems that came from the power plant that was
providing the community with the electricity. But when the
power markets turned negative in the late 1980’s, it was clear
to me that it was going to be impossible to build one of these
communities when the utility companies were not willing to
negotiate for the power because of the recession.
So I turned my eye to a less risky profession and ran for
Congress. I thought we needed people in Congress who
had this kind of vision, who understood the need to integrate
these components in the energy and infrastructure world, and
I didn’t see anybody in Washington that gave me the sense
that this understanding resided in the halls of Congress. At
the age of 32, I decided I was going to run for Congress,
and much to everybody’s surprise I got myself elected.
42
CONNECTION
“Every House Needs a Good Architect” was one of my campaign
slogans. At that point, my perception was that we were moving into
a polarized political environment, though I never dreamed it would
become as polarized as it is today. I used the design process as a
way of describing to people how I thought legislation should be
accomplished. Everyone understands the house they live in, so I
described designing a house. Say you take a family: the architect’s job
is to integrate different family members’ desires into a cohesive and
integrated whole that comes in on budget, is pleasing to everybody
and withstands the test of time. That, to me, was an important way to
describe how our legislative process should be approached and for
why people should support me in Congress. It was compelling enough
that they ended up voting for me.
Do you think that it has become less attractive for architects –
who are process driven by nature – to seek elected office, with
the unwillingness of elected leaders to engage in collaborative
problem-solving?
RNS: I probably ended up losing my seat because I was so process
oriented and the polarization of the political world was moving in a
different direction, where it was product-driven. This new direction was
one where you state as an ultra-conservative or as an ultra-liberal that
“this is the way it’s going to be, and how I get there doesn’t matter, that’s
all that I’m going to support.” That’s where the political dialogue and
debate migrated to, and those of us that were interested in engaging
the public in the process of the legislation fell by the wayside. I think
ultimately that made the whole public arena distasteful to architects
who might consider getting involved.
What would you say to Young Architects who are interested in
becoming engaged as civic leaders?
RNS: You have to be ready to fight the long fight, to slog it out in the
trenches, and it’s not going to be easy. That is not to say that it is
not worthwhile; quite frankly it is all the more important that we do
engage because it only seems to be getting worse without us. That
puts a tremendous amount of responsibility on the shoulders of those
who actually could do something to fix the system. Those people right
now are all standing on the sidelines and until we get a much more
collaborative and cooperative debate going, we’re never going to be
able to implement the best solutions for the problems that our society
faces.
Tell us about your company Climate Prosperity Enterprise
Solutions.
RNS: Our company gets its name from the fact that everything we
do is good for the climate but equally, if not more important, good for
the people it serves. They prosper while the climate is protected. This
is done through the application of “enterprise solutions” which are
economic engines and marketplaces that are developed within this
context and preferably on a zero carbon-footprint basis – but more
importantly, in a way that resources are preserved and economic
activity is promulgated. We’re working in a video game environment that
captures architectural, energy, engineering and operational aspects
of a project and animates it in 3-D. It enables all the stakeholders to
understand what is happening, and to manipulate it by using simple
video game controls.
We have a half-dozen projects that are in various stages of
development. The one that is the furthest along is in Sudan, and it
is the master planning of three separate communities in the Darfur
region. There are tribal rivalries that are causing bloodshed; it has
diminished significantly over the last ten years, but there are still issues
there. We’re master planning a way to create new economies that will
enable these tribal factions to settle and establish secure economic
sustainability. Hopefully that’s going to turn their minds away from
killing each other to cooperating with each other.
We use what we call the 3-P Approach, for Profit, Power and People.
The first thing is the profitable agricultural enterprise, that the majority
of the population participates in, and has ownership in. They literally
have a share that is inalienable, so they can’t buy or sell it to their
neighbors, but they can pass it on to their children. We then provide the
necessary power that connects them to the internet and to each other
by cell phone. That is generated using solar power on rooftops and by
using biofuel and other renewable energy sources that are found in the
locale. Finally, we work with the local population on designing the road
network, the utility systems and ultimately the housing that they will use
- making sure that it addresses their tribal and cultural vernacular and
traditions, but also making sure that it accesses local resources and
modern technologies so it can be sustained over a long period of time.
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
We’re working with several projects here in the US as well. It’s
more challenging because the special interests here are not
as open to this kind of transparency and integration.
In some ways, it seems like you’ve come full-circle with
your career focus. Is there a lesson in there for today’s
Young Architect?
RNS: Five years ago, I decided to do a startup. It’s something
entirely new and different, and it’s a cutting edge technology
application. I thought “here I am 50 years old, I’ve got all of
these global relationships, it’s going to make this go really
easy, really smooth, no problem.” I’ll tell you, doing a startup at 50 is probably the same as doing a start-up at 25. The
difference is that I’m dealing with huge billion dollar projects
where at 25, I would be lucky if I was doing a project that was
worth a million dollars. What I’ve learned is that your age and
experience doesn’t necessarily ensure that you’re going to go
that much faster to success than back when you had very little
age and very little experience.
So what’s next?
RNS: Once I have one of these communities built, then I
will have the ability to say that I have succeeded, and then I
have something to go back to the political world to talk about.
We need people in the public realm who can actually point
to things that they've done that have solved the problems of
society, and that have given people better lives. It’s all about
the quality of life; if we can improve the quality of life of a
neighborhood or of a community or of a city or of a nation, we
have helped that group of people to succeed on a sustainable
basis, where they can are able to realize a heightened quality
of life into the future.
To help someone who otherwise is living at subsistence-level
in the Darfur region of Sudan, who is only worried about how
they put enough food in their stomach to last through the next
day, and to help change their whole perception of their place
in this world, and the possibilities of what the world has for
them ... that is what is exciting about what I am doing. To be
able to create that opportunity, not on my terms, but on their
terms is absolutely the most exciting thing I’ve done in my
life. ■
MARCH 2014
43
«
COFFEE WITH AN ARCHITECT
Today, we, the tired few, the darkly clad champions of
all that is good and balanced, stand together, united
against the forces that threaten our very livelihood,
and the very sanctity of the human condition.
As written by Jody Brown and first published online at www.coffeewithanarchitect.com
architecture + angst
Jody Brown is
just an Architect,
standing in front
of an ideology,
asking it to love
him.
WE, THE ARCHITECTS
Posted from July 3rd
We, the architects,
And instead, we join together, today, on this bright day in July to:
in order to form a more perfect union of rectilinear forms and orderly plans, do, on this day, collectively
Affirm our belief in the possibility of discovery.
(and sometimes individually) declare our independence from the scourge of thoughtless design.
We affirm the potential of our imagination.
Today, we, the tired few, the darkly clad champions of all that is good and balanced, stand
together, united against the forces that threaten our very livelihood, and the very sanctity of
the human condition.
We affirm the purity of creative thought.
We affirm the value of endless questioning, and tireless exploration.
We will embrace the unknown, in search of the possible.
We affirm, and accept, and even revel in the continuous, convoluted process of discovery that is
the essence of all creative endeavors.
We will blindly, and boldly, and belligerently aspire to more than will be required of us.
Today, together:
We will find, an eloquent solution, that surprises, and delights, and inspires us all to be better than
we are.
We stand against the careless planning of miserly profit-mongers pulling the coins out of the
people’s pockets in exchange for shoddy craftsmanship, and lack-luster design.
We stand against the sprawling wasteland of economic development in the name of profit.
We stand against the tyranny of shortsightedness.
We stand against the false facades of short-term prosperity.
We will leave this place better than we found it.
We will describe the breath of our culture, within built form.
We, the architects, will carefully, patiently, meticulously, and skillfully craft the places to define us
all.
We stand against the overly complex.
We, the architects, will give physical form to that which makes us human, and buried inside our
We stand against the over simplified.
work will be a small reflection of our own humanity, and of our hopes for a better world.
We stand against the easy solution, hastily implemented in the name of efficiency, or economy.
We stand against the incoherence in the misguided placement of ill-thought-out programs.
Today, we, the architects declare our independence, from those that would have less than we
We stand against all that misshapes and distorts the form of the city, or the town, or the neighborhood.
could have, and affirm our commitment to aspire to the highest passions of mankind.
We stand against the repetitions of simplified forms clustered along a poor representation of what
we could become.
We stand against form for form’s sake.
Because,
We are the architects.
Jody Brown AIA
Brown is an Architect and principal of Jody Brown Architecture pllc., in Durham, NC. His interests and the
firm's portfolio is focused largely on urban infill, mixed-use, urban design, and urban renewal projects. In
his 18-years of practice, he has built on his passion for planning and urban design; working on enhancing,
adding-to, re-using, renovating, and sometimes creating-from-scratch the places where people meet,
learn, play, and become inspired. His work is grounded in the belief that Architecture can save cities.
When he’s not doing that, he can be found making fun of himself and his profession, and blogging about
his ideals at – Coffee with an Architect. Or, you can find him sipping coffee with someone at a cafe near
you, blathering on-and-on about Le Corbusier, while looking aloof and interesting at the same time.
44
CONNECTION
WWW.AIA.ORG/YAF
MARCH 2014
45
CONNECTION
2014 EDITORIAL CALENDAR
CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS
JANUARY
PLUGGED-IN
MARCH
WE THE PEOPLE
MAY
CHANGE ENGINE
This issue focuses on the theme of
INFORMATICS.
ADVOCACY.
ADVANCEMENT.
Featuring architects, designers and
emerging professionals through
endeavors in computational design
and information or data-based design
solutions (i.e. evidence-based design,
performance-driven design, etc),
building systems and management,
and
digital
technologies
for
prototyping and fabrication that are
redefining our craft.
Featuring architects, designers,
and emerging professionals serving
as advocates in the community, in
politics, and for the profession. This
issue is a follow-up to the Emerging
Professionals Summit held in January
and a lead-up to AIA Grassroots in
Washington DC (March 19-22), the
annual AIA conference for leadership
and legislation.
Featuring architects, designers
and emerging professionals that
are changing the face of the
profession. As a lead-up to the
theme of CHANGE for the National
Convention in Chicago (June 2528), this issue will feature articles on
upcoming Convention programs and
interviews with speakers.
WE ARE CURRENTLY
SOLICITING CONTENT
CONNECTION welcomes the submission
of ARTICLES, PROJECTS, PHOTOGRAPHY
and other design content. Submitted
materials are subject to editorial review
and selected for publication in eMagazine
format based on relevance to the theme of
a particular issue.
If you are interested in contributing to
CONNECTION, please contact the EditorIn-Chief at wyatt_frantom@gensler.com
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
All submissions are required to have the attachments noted below.
Text
Submit the body of your text in a single, separate Word document
with a total word count between 500-1000 words.
Format the file name as such:
[yourlastname_article title.doc]
Images
Submit all images in JPEG format at a minimum resolution of 300
dpi RGB mode. Include captions to all images in the body of your
e-mail transmittal.
All images must be authentic to the person submitting. Do not
submit images with which you do not hold the rights.
Format the file name(s), sequentially, as such:
[yourlastname_image1.jpg]
JULY
SEPTEMBER
NOVEMBER
BACK TO ZERO
Author Bio
Submit a brief, two-sentence bio in the following format:
IMAGE.
GLOBALIZATION.
RESOURCES.
[ yourlastname ] [ AIA or Associate AIA or RA ] is a [ your title ] at [ your
company ] in [ city, state ]. [ yourlastname ] is also [ one sentence
describing primary credentials or recent accomplishments].
emerging professionals working in
materials research, product design,
branding, etc. As a follow-up to
National Convention in Chicago,
this issue will feature articles from
Convention activities, the exhibit
hall and interviews with the Young
Architect Award recipients.
emerging professionals offering a
global perspective through global
projects and articles on global firm
cultures, travel photos, mapping
studies, and speculative articles
on the trends of urbanity, supermega projects and the future of
architecture at a global scale.
emerging professionals acting as
environmental stewards through
initiatives in sustainability and
sustainable development, energy
and global warming, and disaster
recovery and resiliency.
EXHIBITIONISM
TOPO GO>GO
[yourlastname_article title.doc]
Author Photo
Submit a recent headshot in JPEG format at a minimum resolution
of 300 dpi grayscale in RGB mode.
CLICK HERE for past issues of
CONNECTION
[yourlastname_portrait.doc]
WHAT IS THE YOUNG ARCHITECTS FORUM?
The Young Architects Forum is the voice of architects in the early stages of their career and the catalyst for change within the profession
and our communities. Working closely with the AIA College of Fellows and the American Institute of Architects as a whole, the YAF
is leading the future of the profession with a focus on architects licensed less than 10 years. The national YAF Advisory Committee
is charged with encouraging the development of national and regional programs of interest to young architects and supporting the
creation of YAF groups within local chapters. Approximately 23,000 AIA members are represented by the YAF. YAF programs, activities,
and resources serve young architects by providing information and leadership; promoting excellence through fellowship with other
professionals; and encouraging mentoring to enhance individual, community, and professional development.
GOALS OF THE YOUNG ARCHITECTS FORUM
To encourage professional growth and leadership development among recently licensed architects through interaction and collaboration
within the AIA and allied groups.
To build a national network and serve as a collective voice for young architects by working to ensure that issues of particular relevance
to young architects are appropriately addressed by the Institute.
To make AIA membership valuable to young architects and to develop the future leadership of the profession.
This month’s
Leadership
Profile
Richard Swett,
FAIA
Boston, MA
Philadelphia, PA
AIA National
Washington D.C.
San Francisco, CA
Denver, CO
Lynchburg, VA
Raleigh-Durham, NC
Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, TX
Houston, TX
GET CONNECTED PUT YOURSELF ON THE MAP
THIS ISSUE FEATURES CONTRIBUTING ARTICLES FROM THESE MAPPED LOCATIONS.
YAF
GET CONNECTED
1991
2014
YOUNG ARCHITECTS FORUM
CELEBRATING 23 YEARS OF ADVANCING THE CAREERS OF YOUNG ARCHITECTS

we the people - American Institute of Architects

Transcription

Similar documents

Thrislington Cubicles - design management europe award

Architecture – It`s Elementary!

Hopkins Street Masterplan

Play Casino Games Downloading

4Q Leagueline - Architects League of Northern New Jersey

Read Article - Kimberly Williams

AnOther Magazine - June 2013 - Sir John Soane`s Museum

Untitled

Working with an architect for your home

CHILDREN`S RIGHT TO THE CITY