Cigarette smoking and lung cancer – Risk estimates for the
Transcription
Cigarette smoking and lung cancer – Risk estimates for the
Cigarette smoking and lung cancer – Risk estimates for the major histological types from a pooled analysis of case-control studies Benjamin Kendzia1, Beate Pesch1, Per Gustavsson2, Karl-Heinz Jöckel3, Georg Johnen1, Hermann Pohlabeln4, Ann Olsson2,5, Wolfgang Ahrens4, Isabelle Mercedes Gross1, Irene Brüske6, Heinz-Erich Wichmann6, Franco Merletti7, Dario Mirabelli7, Lorenzo Richiardi7, David Zaridze8, Adrian Cassidy9, Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska10, Peter Rudnai11, Jolanta Lissowska12, Isabelle Stücker13, Eleonora Fabianova14, Rodica Stanesan Dunitra15, Vladimir Bencko16, Lenka Foretova17, Vladimir Janout18, Charles M. Rudin19, Jack Siemiatycki20, Javier Pintos20, Maria Teresa Landi21, Neil Caporaso21, Paul Brennan5, Paolo Boffetta22,23, Kurt Straif5, Thomas Brüning1 1 Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of Ruhr-Universität Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany, 2 The Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 3 Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Essen, Germany, Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University of Bremen, Germany, 5 International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 6 Institut für Epidemiologie, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Germany, 7 Cancer Epidemiology Unit, CPO-Piemonte and University of Turin, Italy, 8 Russian Cancer Research Centre, Moscow, Russia, 9 Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, UK, 10 The Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland , 11 National Institute of Environment Health, Budapest, Hungary, 12 The M Sklodowska-Curie Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland , 13 INSERM U 754 - IFR69, Villejuif, France, 14 Regional Authority of Public Health, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, 15 National Institute of Public Health, Bucharest, Romania , 16 Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 17 Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic, 18 Palacky University, Faculty of Medicine, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 19 The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA, 20 Research Centre of University of Montreal Hospital Centre, University of Montreal, Canada, 21 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA, 22 The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA, 23 The International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France 4 The SYNERGY project represents a pooling of data from lung cancer studies from Europe and Canada where the primary objective is to study joint effects of exposure to occupational carcinogens and smoking. Here we analyzed the lung cancer risks of smoking in 13,169 cases and 16,010 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for lung cancer and its major histological subtypes with logistic regression, conditional on study center and adjusted for age. The reference group comprised never smokers of any type of tobacco but included occasional smokers. Regular smoking of cigarettes was defined as more than one pack-year (py). Acknowledgement This study is supported by the German Social Accident Insurance, grant FP 271. Smoking status Squamous cell cancer Small cell lung cancer Adenocarcinoma P-valuea N Median (IQR) N Median (IQR) N Median (IQR) N Median (IQR) 10653 64 (57-69) 4699 64 (58-69) 1733 62 (56-68) 2348 64 (57-69) <0.001 Never smokers 218 62 (55-70) 51 65 (57-73) 22 61 (51-70) 99 61 (54-68) 0.032 Former smokers 3496 67 (62-71) 1585 67 (62-71) 460 65 (60-70) 862 67 (61-71) <0.001 Current smokers 6784 62 (55-68) 3038 62 (56-68) 1249 61 (54-67) 1398 62 (55-68) <0.001 Total P-valuea Total <0.001 2516 <0.001 63 (55-69) 561 <0.001 65 (57-70) 435 61 (53-68) 1007 62 (54-69) <0.001 604 65 (58-71) 96 67 (58-72) 50 65 (58-71) 343 65 (59-71) 0.707 Former smokers 485 66 (58-71) 124 68 (61-71) 60 68 (61-71) 208 63 (55-71) 0.016 Current smokers 1423 60 (52-67) 343 64 (56-69) 331 58 (51-64) 462 59 (51-66) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range of the age distribution a P-values of Kruskal-Wallis test of age differences between subtypes or smoking categories Never and current smokers were presented with an earlier age than former smokers. A young age at diagnosis was observed for female active smokers with SCLC or AdCa. Among never smokers, women had a higher age at diagnosis than men. Table 2: Lung cancer risk by smoking status All histologies Smoking status Controls Never smokers 2883 Squamous cell cancer Small cell lung cancer Adenocarcinoma Cases OR (95% CI) Cases OR (95% CI) Cases OR (95% CI) Cases OR (95% CI) 218 1.0 51 1.0 22 1.0 99 1.0 Former smokers of cigarettes 5647 3496 Current smokers of cigarettes 3829 6784 23.6 (20.4-27.2) 3038 45.6 (34.3-60.6) 7.5 (6.5-8.7) 1585 14.7 (11.0-19.6) 200 Squamous cell cancer Small cell lung cancer Adenocarcinoma 100 Squamous cell cancer Small cell lung cancer Adenocarcinoma 100 <0.001 Never smokers P-valuea 200 Odds ratio All histologies observed an OR for lung cancer of 7.5 (95% CI 6.5-8.7) in men and 2.8 (95% CI 2.4-3.3) in women. Similarly to active male smokers, the risk estimates for SqCC and SCLC were higher than for AdCa. 460 10.1 (6.5-15.5) 862 4.2 (3.4-5.2) 1249 45.7 (29.9-70.0) 1398 10.8 (8.7-13.3) Exclusively any other type of tobacco 399 153 5.9 (4.6-7.4) 73 12.6 (8.6-18.4) 29 9.6 (5.4-17.0) 25 2.0 (1.3-3.2) Never smokers 1902 604 1.0 96 1.0 50 1.0 343 1.0 Former smokers of cigarettes 657 485 2.8 (2.4-3.3) 124 4.9 (3.7-6.6) 60 4.2 (2.8-6.2) 208 2.0 (1.6-2.4) Current smokers of cigarettes 691 1423 7.8 (6.8-9.0) 343 13.6 (10.5-17.7) 331 21.7 (15.5-30.1) 462 4.2 (3.5-5.0) Overall, 218 male and 604 female cases reported that they never smoked more than one py. In never smokers, AdCa was the prevailing subtype. SqCC was the leading histological type in male active or former smokers but AdCa was the leading subtype in women. Current smoking of cigarettes was associated with an OR for lung cancer of 23.6 (95% CI 20.4-27.2) in men and 7.8 (95% CI 6.8-9.0) in women. Higher risk estimates in current smokers were observed for SqCC and SCLC than for AdCa. In ex-smokers, we We found a significant trend with increasing dose for all subtypes and metrics of exposure especiallyforSqCC and SCLC. Here we present the results for pack-years in current smokers (Figure 1). ORs for heavy male smokers (> 60 py) rised up to 47.7 (95% CI 38.5-59.0) with risks up to about 100 for SqCC and SCLC. Overall, women were presented with about half of the risk estimates than in men. 1 1 >1-<20 20-<30 30-<40 40-<50 50-<60 >60 >1-<20 20-<30 30-<40 40-<50 50-<60 Pack-years >60 Pack-years Figure 1: Risk of lung cancer by cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke 50 50 ≥ 20 cig/day < 20 cig/day ≥ 20 cig/day < 20 cig/day 40 40 Odds ratio METHODS Table 1: Age at diagnosis of lung cancer by smoking status Odds ratio Lung cancer is a complex set of molecularly distinct diseases. Smoking is a risk factor for all forms of lung cancer. Among active smokers, squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is the predominant subtype. Smoking is also closely associated with the development of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). In never smokers, adenocarcinoma (AdCa) is the most common subtype. We analyzed the lung cancer risks of smoking with a large dataset of pooled studies and explored the risk estimates by histological subtype. RESULTS Odds ratio AIMS 30 20 10 30 20 10 1 1 Current 2-5 smokers 6-10 11-15 16-25 26-35 >35 Current 2-5 smokers 6-10 11-15 16-25 26-35 >35 Time since cessation [years] Time since cessation [years] The risk reduction following smoking cessation was Figure 2: Risk of lung cancer by time since cessation assessed in relation to never smokers (Figure 2). Former male smokers did not reverse to baseline level even when quitting long-term. Also female smokers (> 20 cig/day) did not fully return to baseline. Cessation of 2-5 years already reduced the risk. CONCLUSIONS We found a younger age at diagnosis of lung cancer in never and active smokers than in former smokers. Quitting of smoking reduced the risk already after few years but heavy smokers did not fully return to baseline. Smoking was associated with stronger risks for SqCC and SCLC than for AdCa.