10/28/2013
Transcription
10/28/2013
10/28/2013 The Challenge Connecting the Dots: Writing IEPs Aligned to Common Core ODSS Fall 2013 Conference October 25,2013 Carol Kosnitsky ckosnitsky@comcast.net The Challenge • Shifts in public policy & legislation require alignment of general and special education systems. IDEA - 1997 Commission on Special Education - 2002 No Child Left Behind - 2001 IDEA - 2004 MTSS (RTI) - 2004 CCSS - 2010 The Challenge The “I” in IDEA and The “all means all” in Standards Carol Kosnitsky 1 10/28/2013 Intersection of General and Special Education Universal Design General Education • Curriculum • Instruction • Assessment • MTSS Collaborative teams working interdependently to ensure access to the curriculum for all students. “Consider the needs of the broadest range of possible users from the beginning.” Ron Mace, Architect Special Education • Adaptions to – Methodology – Delivery of Instruction – Curriculum Critical for some, good for all! • Assistive Technology Adapted from Scarborough Universal Design A conceptual change: From retrofit to redesign From “one-size fits all” to flexible Carol Kosnitsky 2 10/28/2013 Universal Design for Learning “the myth of average” • Variability and difference constitutes the norm from student to student even among those who seem to share similar characteristics of age, culture, level or success, race. Variability is the rule, not the exception. “systematic learner variability” (Hall, Meyer, Rose, 2012) Universal Design for Learning 2 decades of research into the nature of learning differences and the design of supportive learning environments. • individual qualities or abilities are not static and fixed; • they are continually shifting, and • they exist in relationship to the environment including the classroom. (Hall, Meyer, Rose, 2012) Universal Design for Learning UDL is framework for organizing instruction based on 3 groups of brain networks. UDL: Three Primary Networks Recognition Strategic • Recognition network – specialized to receive and analyze information (the “what” of learning). Affective • Strategic network – specialized to plan and execute actions (the “how” of learning). • Affective network – specialized to evaluate and set priorities (the “why” of learning). CAST 2012 Carol Kosnitsky 3 10/28/2013 • http://www.udlcenter.org Access to the General Education Curriculum Appropriate and relevant IEPs: • Identify barriers and recommend accommodations that minimize or eliminate curricular, instructional, or assessment barriers (access), and • Identify areas of need, and based on relevant present levels of performance and measurable goals, recommend specially designed instruction that meets the unique needs of the student. Carol Kosnitsky Special education has been defined as adapting, as appropriate, to the needs of an eligible child… – the content, – methodology, or – delivery of instruction to address the unique needs of the child that result from the child’s disability, and, to ensure access of the child to the general curriculum. 4 10/28/2013 Delivery of Instruction: Methodology: • Are the adaptations to the delivery of instruction beyond those what are typically used in the classroom? Are the adaptations to the methods of instruction beyond those what are typically used in the classroom? • For example, the student may require an individualized crisis management plans; a high degree of 1-to-1 instruction; or the use of alternative settings, etc. For example, the student may require preteaching of lessons beyond that typically used in classroom to activate prior learning; a specialized system for cueing or prompting beyond those typically used in classroom; or the need for discrete trial training, etc. Definitions Content: • Does the student require changes to the content or scope of the general education curriculum (Standards)? • For example, a student may need the same curriculum but less of it; same curriculum but at a lower level; or a different curriculum. Align to get or fall into line; to be in…correct relative position. Access freedom or ability to obtain or make use of something. Accommodation the providing of what is needed. Webster-Merriam Dictionary Carol Kosnitsky 5 10/28/2013 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) • The purpose of the CCSS is to provide a framework to prepare all students for college and the workforce. Includes rigorous content and application of knowledge through high order skills Informed by other top-performing countries Application for Students with Disabilities In order to participate with success in the general curriculum, students with disabilities, as appropriate, may be provided additional supports and services, such as: – Instructional supports for learning – UDL • Based on what is considered to be “college and career ready,” the CCSS used a backward design to determine what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. – Instructional accommodations – Assistive technology National Governors Association and CCSSO – Application to Students with Disabilities 2010 Common Core State Standards & OK Academic Standards OK Academic Standards CCSS ELA – – – – OAS Reading Writing Speaking & Listening Language – Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (Reading/writing) Mathematics Carol Kosnitsky 6 10/28/2013 Common Core State Standards English Language Arts • College and Career Readiness Standards (K-12) • Standards for English Language Arts (K-12) • Standards for Literacy in History, Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects (6-12) College & Career Readiness Standards College & Career Readiness Standards College & Career Readiness Standards College & Career Readiness Standards Reading Writing Listening & Speaking Language Writing (K-12) Speaking & Listening (K-12) Language (K-12) • Comprehension & Collaboration • Presentation of Knowledge & Ideas • Conventions of English • Knowledge of Lang. • Vocabulary Acquisition & Use ELA (K-12) •Foundation Skills (K-5) •Literary Text (K-12) •Informational Text (K-12) • Argument • Informative • Narrative Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (6-12) Reading & Writing ELA – Vertical Alignment College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Reading Key Ideas and details 1.Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. 2.Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. 3.Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text. Carol Kosnitsky 7 10/28/2013 ELA – Vertical Alignment Carol Kosnitsky 8 10/28/2013 English Language Arts Major Instructional Shifts – ELA • Appendix A – Research Supporting Key Elements • Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic vocabulary. • Appendix B – Text Exemplars and Sample • Knowledge: Building knowledge through content-rich informational texts across the curriculum. • Appendix C – Writing Exemplars and Annotations • Evidence: Reading, writing, and speaking/listening grounded in evidence from the text, both literary and informational. of the Standards Performance Tasks Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Staircase of text complexity Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic vocabulary. Staircase of Text Complexity Academic and Domain Specific Vocabulary Appendix A - Provides information on text complexity • Quantitative dimensions of text complexity • Qualitative dimensions of text complexity • Reader and task considerations Appendix B -Text Exemplars & Sample Performance Tasks Carol Kosnitsky 9 10/28/2013 Appendix B: Grade 4-5 Exemplars for Text and Sample Performance Tasks Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Appendix B: Grade 4-5 Exemplars for Text and Sample Performance Tasks Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Carol Kosnitsky Appendix B: Grade 4-5 Exemplars for Text and Sample Performance Tasks Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Appendix B: Grade 4-5 Exemplars for Text and Sample Performance Tasks Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 10 10/28/2013 Major Instructional Shifts– ELA Acquiring Vocabulary • Tier 1 Vocabulary – (everyday language). • Tier 2 Vocabulary - (general academic vocabulary) . Appear in all sorts of texts and frequently; not unique to specific discipline, yet used in many disciplines. • Tier 3 Vocabulary - (domain specific vocabulary). Specific to field of study; close ties to content knowledge; explicitly defined by author or teacher. Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Knowledge: Building knowledge through content-rich informational texts across the curriculum. Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Balance of Informational and Literary Text Balance of Literary and Information Text Knowledge in the Disciplines Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Carol Kosnitsky 11 10/28/2013 Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Major Instructional Shifts – ELA 6-12 Knowledge in the Disciplines • Emphasis on increased reading of informational text in the disciplines. • All teachers have a responsibility to be “reading teachers”. Evidence: Reading, writing, and speaking/listening grounded in evidence from the text, both literary and informational. Close Reading Balance in writing genres • Different approaches are required to read different types of text. Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Text-based Answers – Close Reading • Students need to develop the ability to engage in rich, evidence-based dialogue about a text they read. • Rather than the quicker connections between text and self, teachers must train students to stay in the text, to draw conclusions and make arguments about the text. Teachers will be asking: Let’s take a look. www.youtube.com • Where do you see that in the text? • What paragraph? • What sentence? Carol Kosnitsky engageNY 12 10/28/2013 Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Writing from Sources Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Writing Appendix A - Provides information on expectations for writing including: • Argument • Informational/explanatory writing • Narrative writing Appendix C – Samples of Student Writing Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Appendix C: Samples of Student Writing Appendix C: Samples of Student Writing Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Carol Kosnitsky 13 10/28/2013 Appendix C: Samples of Student Writing Major Instructional Shifts – ELA Speaking and Listening Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Challenges & Opportunities • What challenges and opportunities may the Common Core State Standards provide to certain students? Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Common Core State Standards Mathematics – K-12 Standards for Mathematical Practice Standards for Mathematical Content Carol Kosnitsky 14 10/28/2013 Major Instructional Shifts – Math Mathematics Shifts in Mathematics • Focus: Focus strongly where the standards focus (key conceptual areas). • Coherence: Concepts logically connected from one grade to the next and linked to other major topics with the grade. • Rigor: Pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application in various contexts with equal intensity. Focus • Shift from “a mile wide” to “go narrow and deep”. • Spend more time thinking and working on fewer concepts. • Integration: Mathematical practices are standards that will be taught and assessed. engageNY.org Topic Placement in Top Achieving Countries Schmidt, W.H., Houang, R., & Cougan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of Mathematics. American educator, 26(2), 10-26, 47-48.] Carol Kosnitsky Topic Placement in the U.S. Schmidt, W.H., Houang, R., & Cougan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of Mathematics. American educator, 26(2), 10-26, 47-48.] 15 10/28/2013 Major Instructional Shifts – Math Coherence • Coherence is about the scope and sequence of priority standards across grade level bands. • Build on knowledge from year to year in a coherent learning progression – connect the threads of math focus areas across grade levels. engageNY.org Major Instructional Shifts – Math Rigor Procedural and conceptual fluency Students can apply math in other content areas and situations. Students will choose the right math concept to solve a problem when not necessarily prompted to do so. engageNY.org Major Instructional Shifts – Math Math Resources Integration Standards for Mathematical Practice Common Core Standards for Mathematics 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. • Glossary 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. • Tables 1, 2 and 3 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Carol Kosnitsky 16 10/28/2013 Challenges & Opportunities • What challenges and opportunities may the Common Core State Standards provide to certain students? Common Core State Standards (Mathematics). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. 2010 Tips for looking at the Standards Look for the nouns and verbs (the what and the how). Look for the cognitive process (complexity). Tips for looking at the Standards Look for prerequisite skills. Look for vocabulary. Look for vertical alignment and point of access. Carol Kosnitsky 17 10/28/2013 Process to Develop Standards-Based IEPs IEP - Standards Connection 1. Identify long-term outcome for the student. Long-term Outcome - Essential questions 2.Identify present levels of performance (define needs). Begin with the end in mind 3.Based on student’s areas of need, analyze and select appropriate standards to guide instruction. 4.Determine if student can demonstrate standard with accommodations. 5.Determine what specially designed instruction is necessary to move the student from PLAAFP toward grade level expectation (goal). Carol Kosnitsky 1. What does the student expect to be doing in the next three, five or 10 years? 2. What is the student’s desired postschool outcome? 3. What skills, knowledge and behaviors are needed to achieve this outcome? 18 10/28/2013 IEP - Standards Connection Long-term Outcome Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors • • • IEP - Standards Connection Present Level of Performance - Essential questions 1. What are the student’s strengths? 2. What level of skill does the student independently demonstrate? 3. What supports are necessary for the student to demonstrate the skill? 4. What challenges does the student experience in this area? IEP - Standards Connection Long-term Outcome Present Level/Needs Skills, knowledge, and behaviors student demonstrates • • • Carol Kosnitsky Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors • • • IEP - Standards Connection Analyze Standards – Essential questions Given the student’s greatest areas of need, consider: 1. What skills and knowledge are necessary to meet this standard? 2. What cognitive processes (depth of knowledge) are necessary to demonstrate this standard? 3. Given student’s desired post-school outcomes, what connections can be made to this standard? 19 10/28/2013 IEP - Standards Connection Progress Over Time Long-term Outcome Long-term Outcome Present Level Skills, knowledge, and behaviors student demonstrates • • • Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors • • • Common Core Present Level Skills, knowledge, and behaviors the student will learn and be able to do Progress Over Time Present Level . Carol Kosnitsky Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors Common Core • • Skills, knowledge, and behaviors • the student will learn and be able to do • • • Annual IEP with accommodations and measurable goals Common Core Skills, knowledge, and behaviors the student will learn and be able to do Annual IEP with accommodations and measurable goals Progress Over Time Long-term Outcome Skills, knowledge, and behaviors student demonstrates • • • Skills, knowledge, and behaviors student demonstrates • • • Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors • • • Long-term Outcome Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors Present Level Common Core • • Skills, knowledge, and Skills, knowledge, and behaviors • behaviors student the student will learn and be able to do demonstrates • • • • • • Annual IEP with accommodations and measurable goals 20 10/28/2013 Progress Over Time Consider: Long term Outcome Necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors Present • Level • • • • • IEP - Standards Connection Can the student meet this standard? Common Core Annual IEP with accommodations and measurable goals IEP - Standards Connection Yes, this is new content and student has pre-requisite skill(s). Yes, this is an area of strength for the student. Yes, with the following accommodations: Access to the General Education Curriculum Consider: Are goals needed? Yes, based on the student’s present level(s) and area(s) of need, the student requires additional skills/knowledge to move toward grade-level standard? Yes, based on the student’s present level(s) and area(s) of need, the student requires additional skills/knowledge to meet their unique functional needs. Carol Kosnitsky Appropriate and relevant IEPs: • Identify barriers and recommend accommodations that minimize or eliminate curricular, instructional, or assessment barriers (access), and • Identify areas of need, and based on relevant present levels of performance and measurable goals, recommend specially designed instruction that meets the unique needs of the student. 21 10/28/2013 Present Level of Performance Present Level of Performance (Current Assessment Data) 1. Describe the skills/behaviors the student demonstrates (consider using skills described in the standards at the level the student is performing). 2. Describe the student’s performance compared to expectations/skill in the general education curriculum (consider using skills in the standards at the level of the student’s grade placement). This is where alignment begins! Disability/Affect on Student Learning 3. Describe the skills the student needs to learn this year in order to narrow/close the gap (needs and goal priorities). 4. Provide baseline data. Carol Kosnitsky 22 10/28/2013 Objective Statements Describe how the student’s disability affects their involvement and progress in the G. E. curriculum. Objective Statements Current Performance • Weaknesses in ________ impact student’s ability to ________. – Provide statements that directly demonstrate the correlation between disability and content. • Deficits in the areas of ________ and ________ make it challenging for the student to ________. – Describe what scaffolding will be necessary for the student to participate and progress in the curricular areas. • Supports in the area of ________ helps the student to independently be able to ________. Susan Fisichella Objective Statements Weaknesses in phonemic awareness and phonics affect Juan’s ability to efficiently decode much of the vocabulary he will encounter in grade level text. He is still learning that letters are symbols of sounds and there are rules that can be used to determine the word. The effort he needs to decode unfamiliar words reduces his ability to Strengths, Interests & Preferences comprehend the meaning of the text. Asking Juan to independently read for the purpose of gaining new knowledge at this frustration level is a barrier to him having meaningful interaction with the material. Given significantly stronger auditory comprehension skills, Juan should be provided access to books on tape and/or digital text that can provide auditory supports when being asked to read independently. Carol Kosnitsky 23 10/28/2013 Present Level of Performance Strengths, interests and preferences – Describe student’s strengths – use strengths to support the student’s access to the curriculum – (e.g. - has strong listening comprehension – pair written with verbal cues). – Describe the student’s interests and preferences to promote engagement and motivation. Neurodiversity Strengths Checklist Personal Visual-Spatial Communication Physical Social Dexterity Emotional Musical Cognitive Nature Creative High-Tech Literacy Cultural Logical Other Neurodiversity in the Classroom. Thomas Armstrong. 2012 ASCD Present Level of Performance Needs Needs • Describe areas that will require specially designed instruction and/or related services. • Describe the areas of focus for the upcoming year rather than describing services/location (direct instruction in place value; explicit instruction in summarizing and inferring). Carol Kosnitsky 24 10/28/2013 Develop SMART Goals • Specific — based on the student’s present level of academic achievement and functional performance. • Measurable — progress is objectively determined at frequent data points. • Achievable — challenging yet attainable - related to the most critical needs. • Results-oriented — developed with a standards outcome in mind. • Time-bound — has clearly defined beginning and ending dates. Develop SMART Goals Develop SMART Goals Select Target Skills & Behavior: If we can observe something, we can count it. If we can count it, we can come back after a period of time and count it again. To help identify a target skill or behavior to count, ask the following: “What specific skill do I want to see this student do differently by the end of the IEP cycle?” Carol Kosnitsky Instead of: (non example) • Improve social skills. • Improve comprehension Define it as: (example) • Join in cooperative play activities with peers. • Answer “w” questions. • Improve writing • Cite evidence in text. • Improve expressive • Write complex sentences language with adjectives and conjunctions. 25 10/28/2013 Baseline Develop SMART Goals Essential Questions: Template for Baseline Goal Template for Goal 1. What is the targeted skill/behavior? • Timeframe • Timeframe 2. What dimension of the targeted skill or behavior will be changed? • Conditions • Condition • Student • Student • Target skill or behavior • Target skill or behavior • Level of performance • Level of performance 3. What tool or methodology can quantify that dimension? 4. Can the tool or methodology be repeated throughout the IEP cycle to determine if student is making progress? Example Writing Standard: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas and information clearly (Gr. 3-5). Baseline: Given an assignment to write informative text, James scored 2 out of 14 on the attached Writing Informative Text Checklist (grade 5). Goal: By June 2013, given an assignment to write informative text, James will score 9 out of 14 on the attached Writing Informative Text Checklist (grade 5) for 3 consecutive assignments. Writing Informative Text Checklist Points 0-2 Essential Elements Qualitative Notes Introduce a topic - clearly provides a general observation and focus. Group related information logically. Include formatting (e.g., headings), illustrations, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. Develop the topic with facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples related to the topic. Link ideas within and across categories of information using words, phrases, and clauses (e.g., in contrast, especially). Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. Provide a concluding statement or section related to the information or explanation presented. Total Points (out of 14) Carol Kosnitsky 26 10/28/2013 Example Reading Standard: • Read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension Baseline: • Currently, given a 3rd grade level passage, Sally read 50 words correct with 10 errors in 1 minute. Goal: • By June 2013, given a 3rd-grade-level reading passage, Sally will read 98 words correctly with no more than 5 errors in 1 minute. IEPs for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities Identify instructional priorities. 1. Self-determination: How can the core curriculum be used to teach self-determination skills? 2. Assistive technology: How can the use of assistive technology enable the student to engage in the task more independently? 3. Personal relevance and functionality: How can real-life activities make the standard meaningful for the student? Courtade, G., & Browder, D. M. (2011). Aligning IEPs to the Common Core State Standards for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities. Verona, WI: Attainment Company. IEPs for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities Analyze Standards – Essential questions 1. Endurance: Will this standard provide students with knowledge and skills that will be of value beyond the present instructional setting? 2. Leverage: Will this standard provide knowledge and skills that will be of value in multiple disciplines? 3. Preparation for next level: Will this standard provide students with essential knowledge and skills necessary for success in the next grade or level of instruction? Reeves, D. B. (2002). The leader's guide to standards: A blueprint for educational equity and excellence. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Carol Kosnitsky 27 10/28/2013 Example Alternate Assessment Dynamic Learning Maps - 2015 Learning Maps model several pathways to academic content. Academic skills Precursor skills Communication skills Attention skills Reading for Information Text (RI. 3.7): Use information gained from illustration and the words in a text to demonstrate understanding of the text (e.g. where, when, why and how key events occur.) Baseline: Currently, after listening to an informational text passage, Tracy could not select a picture from a field of 3 options in response to “who” and “what” questions relating to the article. Goal: By June, 2012, after listening to an informational text passage, Tracy will correctly select a picture from a field of 3 options in response to “who” and “what” questions relating to the article for 4 out of 5 consecutive opportunities. Integrate Information from Illustration (6.RI.7) Integrate Information from Illustration (6.RI.7) Grade level By (date) after reading a text at grade level accompanied by a detailed illustration, (name) will summarize the topic in (3-4) sentences with at least (1) supporting detail referencing the illustration and at least (1) supporting detail referencing the text in (4 out of 5) trials. Intense Support By (date) after listening to a short text at (name)'s independent level accompanied by a detailed illustration, (name) will be able make a poster describing the topic with at least (1) supporting detail referencing the illustration and at least (1) supporting detail referencing the text in (2 out of 3) trials. Goalbook Carol Kosnitsky Goalbook 28 10/28/2013 Special Education Assets • Growth Mindset • Strength-based Pay Attention PARCC Assessment • Assistive technology – Get PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual into teacher’s hands. • Strategy instruction – Develop a plan for Decision Making teams. • Language – Train students on features. • Scaffolding – Inform parents of changes. • Explicit instruction • Engagement Final Thoughts • Standards are useful in framing levels of attainment; students may reach different depths and levels for attainment in each competence. • Standards set common expectations; students may reach them at different times. • Within limits, there should be choice to modify a standard for a specific student. Great Resources • Goals the Make a Difference: An Administrator’s Guide to Improving the Process by Carol Kosnitsky http://www.shoplrp.com/product/p-300279.html • Goalbook www.goalbookapp.com • Some students may not meet standards. However, we can count on that if we do not provide them access. Carol Kosnitsky 29 10/28/2013 Thank You Stop asking me if we’re almost there. For crying out loud, we’re nomads Carol Kosnitsky Carol Kosnitsky ckosnitsky@comcast.net 30