- NHS Hammersmith and Fulham Clinical Commissioning
Transcription
- NHS Hammersmith and Fulham Clinical Commissioning
North West London collaboration of clinical commissioning groups Collaboration board meeting 28 August 2014 Summary update to NWL CCGs’ governing bodies Author: Emma Taylor, collaboration governance manager, NWL CCGs The collaboration board met on 28 August 2014 to consider strategic issues for discussion at the future governing body meetings that our CCGs have a shared interest in. This update is designed to provide an overview of the key discussions within their wider context and to let governing bodies know what is expected to be discussed at subsequent meetings. Its objectives are to safeguard transparency and to give some colour to the way in which we are working together across our individually sovereign CCGs. Commissioning support services transition The board reviewed the progress made since it last met on 17 July 2014. Significantly, the staff consultation for bringing commissioning support services in-house would be drawing to a close by 5 September 2014. After this date, role matching into the finalised post-transition structures will be undertaken for all staff affected by change (i.e. permanent staff employed by NWL’s Commissioning Support Unit until the contract ends on 30 September 2014). A finance working group has been set up to oversee the relevant payroll changes. Any unfilled vacancies will be recruited to once role matching has been completed. It was noted that expressions of interest for post-transition roles have been received in response to online advertising with HSJ jobs in advance of this. Giving space to strategic organisational development has been recognised as a top priority. As part of this a special welcome event will be held in October to mark the new chapter of shared services being brought in-house. Business intelligence data hosting NHS England has provided a letter of support endorsing proposed contractual arrangements with SECSU for the hosting of NWL CCGs’ business intelligence data. The arrangements will recognise the mutual benefits to be carried over to the Hitachi business intelligence (BI) platform, plus the strong synergies that will come into play when McKinsey’s whole system data warehouse is brought in. It was noted that BI staffing and testing plans were being reviewed. The board agreed that first and foremost our CCGs’ GP leads for the joint management and development of BI will need to bring to bear their strategic thinking as well as being IT-savvy technicians, in order to steer how the intelligence is developed to align with and support the strategic agenda. A working group of GPs will therefore be engaged to give direction to the way in which the platform should evolve. One objective will be to demonstrate functionality regarding specific patient information tracking before it is scaled up. 1 Consideration was given to the shared delivery resource between all the parties; weekly meetings were being held on Fridays. The outcome of ASH accreditation for Brent would not impact staff operationally as secondment to SECSU would be one way of protecting the model. The board agreed that the costing proposal from the CSU for this was too high and further negotiation was needed. It was agreed that the Hitachi contract would be managed on behalf of NHSE with SE CSU. Chairs actions were taken to delegate authority to the director of informatics to proceed to agreement of a contract with SE CSU which reflects the conditions of the main contract that is based on the agreed Heads of Terms. Primary care co-commissioning progress NWL CCGs had responded to the offer by NHSE earlier in the year to pursue options for primary care-commissioning. A joint expression of interest was submitted in May 2014 which incorporated stakeholder engagement and support from the LMC. Every other CCG in London had similarly expressed an interest to explore collaborative arrangements for co-commissioning. It is anticipated that shadow arrangements for co-commissioning could begin as early as November 2014 and go live in April 2015. Summary proposals will be discussed at CCGs governing bodies’ public meetings which set the stage for developing the detailed governance arrangements that will underpin it, including appropriate means to avoid conflicts of interest. This important item will also be discussed at our next round of our councils of members. The board reflected on how primary care co-commissioning will open up new opportunities to strengthen the delivery of CCGs’ out-of-hospital strategies and considered how it would relate to whole systems integrated care. There is high level agreement in the health care economy as to what the key problems and challenges are, and co-commissioning will allow us to develop solutions jointly with CCGs’ partners. It was clear that effective co-commissioning will have to be multilateral and inclusive in ethos and structure. The board was supportive of the direction of travel described. Strategy and transformation programmes update A comprehensive report was presented on the key support contracts let against the outcomes achieved. This was in response to the request to see demonstrable value for money vis-à-vis consultancy spend based on outcomes. The purpose of the exercise was to understand the typical sequence of resource utilisation relative to the core skillsets in place. The board requested further analysis is distilled and summary context provided. National clinical standards for 7-day services A detailed baseline self-assessment has been completed across NWL against the clinical standards. The next step is to agree the sequence by which outstanding standards can be met to against the core criteria of impact, achievability and affordability, in addition to the 2014/15 commissioning priorities set (e.g. diagnostics and consultant cover). Specialist commissioning The board considered specialist commissioning (a responsibility and function of NHS England) and where further alignment is required to support Shaping a Healthier Future. It was noted that NHSE is seeking to ensure the right influences are in place to inform and shape specialist commissioning decisions. In future this is likely to see increased external engagement and a strategic approach to common large providers and understanding the drivers for annual growth (5-7%) in specialist spend. 2 Month 4 budget report – financial strategy / Shaping a Healthier Future In-year funding pressures required an over-commitment of budget by a total of £1.75m in respect of three areas: further resilience support in respect of service reconfiguration transition following NHSE review (£0.35m); maternity transition – workforce support to enable transition (£0.83m) and Imperial emergency surgery (£0.25m). The board noted the contents of the report which would be presented in detail to governing bodies in September for their approval. Recommendations of NWL’s Policy Development Group The newly established group that has been approved by each CCG’s governing body has now met three times to review detailed proposals. It brought three recommendations for approval to the collaboration board regarding cryopreservation, varicose veins and knee replacement surgery. It was agreed that the process of developing recommendations needed to be refined to include earlier consultation with finance colleagues to take into account affordability constraints of changing or removing specific eligibility criteria for certain courses of treatment. To achieve this, a finance representative will join the group’s membership. The board agreed that before a final decision is taken regarding the proposed removal of BMI>40 for knee replacement surgery the NICE guidelines will be reviewed and the affordability of the proposal in the 2014/15 year will be considered. The board supported the updated policy on cryopreservation, including ovarian stimulation, egg harvesting and storage for up to 5 years to patients undergoing treatment likely to permanently affect their fertility. Re-implantation will be provided in line with the IVF policy. For the treatment of varicose veins, the board supported the removal of the requirement for patients for try six months’ conservative treatment prior to surgical intervention, whilst maintaining the other existing criteria. Service transformation update The A&Es at Central Middlesex and Hammersmith Hospital are scheduled to close on 10 September 2014, with 24/7 urgent care centres and other services retained on both sites. An update was given on the detailed assurance that services can be transitioned safely and the arrangements for close monitoring in the run up to and post-transition of services were discussed. The board was satisfied that the assurance process for safe service transition on 10 September 2014 remains robust. The expected changes to maternity and neonatal services in NWL would be a major item for discussion and decision at the public sessions of CCGs’ governing body meetings in October/November, with the process to be led by Ealing CCG. NWL financial strategy It was reported that NHSE had formally signed off the 5-year strategy and the detailed plans for 2014/15 adopted by respective governing bodies. The planning assumptions for 2015/16 still hold and the detail will be returned to by governing bodies later in the year. The board noted that the necessary financial commitments to enable the mergers between North West London Hospitals/Ealing Hospital NHS Trust and Chelsea and Westminster/West Middlesex would be made by NWL CCGs. The board was supportive of Shaping a Healthier Future hub business cases being brought to CCGs’ governing bodies in due course. 3 Procurement service (private) The procurement Task & Finish group recommended to the board the contracting of SBS to supply clinical and non-clinical procurement services to NWL CCGs after 1 October 2014 subject to further negotiations on price. The collaboration board’s views were sought. Negotiations would proceed to develop Heads of Terms. 4 North West London collaboration of clinical commissioning groups Collaboration board meeting 25 September 2014 Summary update to NWL CCGs’ governing bodies (private) Author: Emma Taylor, collaboration governance manager, NWL CCGs The collaboration board met on 25 September 2014 to consider strategic issues for discussion at the future governing body meetings that our CCGs have a shared interest in. This update provides an overview of the key discussions within their wider context. Its objectives are to safeguard transparency and to give some colour to the way in which we are working together across our individually sovereign CCGs. Primary care standards A paper on primary care standards was being prepared and would be discussed at CCG governing body meetings to help formulate a response to the letter that all NWL CCGs had recently received from NHS England on primary care standards. A top-level response summarising the position of the CCGs following clinical consultation would be led by Thirza Sawtell, director of strategy and transformation. Commissioning support services transition At the time of reporting the matching and slotting in process was substantially complete for CSU staff being re-deployed into roles within CCGs’ respective operational management structures. The next phase to support CCGs’ organisational development and effectiveness is to ensure a strong recruitment drive of substantive staff to the remaining vacancies and a steady reduction of the level of interim staff. Organisational development and on-boarding to welcome CSU staff into the CCGs continues to be a key focus especially over our first 100 days of in-housing support services on 1 October 2014. This would include a Day One welcome letter and an all-staff Launch Event on 9 October with interactive presentations from the leadership teams across the CCGs and an opening talk from lay member on patient care. It was reported that Andrew Burgess, an experienced commissioning colleague, had been appointed as the interim director of contracts and performance, reporting to Rob Larkman, chief officer for BHH. Andrew’s first set of priorities are to oversee the setting up of the annual contracting process for 2015/16 which will gather momentum over the coming months. The contract steering group had begun planning and development together with managing directors / chief operating officers. Practical implications of in-housing were being managed. This included ensuring that a lead CCG (Brent) receives Assured Safe Haven (ASH) formal accreditation on behalf of all NWL CCGs, in line with data protection requirements, as per the same provisions that the CSU has had in place. Other implications involved office moves to ensure the best configuration to accommodate new structures. It was noted that the Transition Management Group (TMG) would continue to meet regularly for a further six months to oversee and refine the necessary detailed operating processes relating to shared support services and to work together to manage the associated shared running costs. Finally, a new procurement service had been jointly procured under the CCGs’ procurement steering group. 1 Transformation programmes 1. Business intelligence and informatics: (A) data warehouse and (B) interoperability Two papers were presented for discussion. The first examined the request for data and analytical access to the NWL CCGs’ Hitachi data warehouse (which CCGs are the guardians of) and the second explored key principles that would underpin a business case for interoperability for clinical notes to be established across NWL. On the first paper, the board asked for the NWL CCGs/Hitachi programme board to review the requirement alongside the existing programme to estimate the scope of the work, given the greatest priority is to deliver effectively the system for NWL’s CCGs. The driver behind the request was the opportunity to understand more about healthcare patterns in NWL through the analysis of anonymised data. More information about this would be brought to a future collaboration meeting and patient leadership would be sought. On the second paper, it was agreed that to inform debate a detailed specification needs to be developed that also demonstrates the relevant information governance (IG) considerations including informed patient consent have been managed in the appropriate CCG forums. Members discussed how in the longer term it is anticipated that a greater degree of interoperability will enable new ways of working together to deliver whole systems integrated care (which in turn will inform the informatics needs). Significantly, there is a real spectrum of views in NWL between advocates of single systems and advocates of interoperability between existing different systems. As a consequence there is no clear consensus as to which system may ultimately become a designated platform for a single system (which could be 4-5 years away). In the meantime, mapping the flows of patient information will inform the strategic approach to be considered by CCGs, and this mapping work is underway. A detailed proposal would be brought in due course to a future collaboration meeting and to CCGs’ governing bodies. 2. Embedding partnerships A presentation was given on Embedding Partnerships; a key work stream of whole systems integrated care (WSIC). At its heart it supports lay people to come together with professionals as equal partners and to co-produce policies for integrated care that are fully patient-centred. It has nurtured an exciting arena through which patients are becoming intrinsically involved in the development of Integrated Care Pathways (ICP) which has naturally extended into WSIC and which has focused on achieving joined up care that is closer to home. The board was supportive of this important work being consolidated and further developed so that it helps to shape and guide the work of a range of transformation programmes. It recognised the real value in bringing together all the parts of the healthcare system from acute providers to GPs through patients’ diverse voices and experiences. Mohini Parmar (Chair, Ealing CCG) and Fiona Butler (Chair, West London CCG) both agreed to champion the collaboration board’s relationship with Embedding Partnerships on behalf of NWL CCGs. 3. Mental Health and Wellbeing strategic plan and project initiation document A paper was presented by Fiona Butler (Chair, West CCG). Members considered how reform of mental health nationally is long overdue. Furthermore, the imperative to increase investment in mental health and to bring it higher up the national agenda has cross-party political support. The paper highlighted major themes in priorities for mental health, with an emphasis on the promotion of resilience and wellbeing and on the prevention of mental health issues. In planning for 2015/16, the onus will be on CCGs to put their weight behind mental health through the NWL CCGs’ Shaping a Healthier Future budget, with an estimated pooled funding of £3–5M per annum to deliver a major new programme. 2 It is clear that mental health is a core part of succeeding with whole systems integrated care, which mental health cannot be divorced from. There was strong consensus, together with lay member counsel, that funding of mental health transformation will not only improve the quality of individuals’ lives but will also bring tangible socio-economic benefits to local communities. As such the collaboration board lent its broad support to the principles outlining the case for change. The collaboration board supported the project initiation document and the invitation to tender. A paper will be presented to governing bodies for consideration regarding programme initiation and commencement arrangements. Healthwatch and interpreting services A letter to the chief officers had been received from Healthwatch requesting funding of £60k to assist with a review of the quality and performance of interpreting services in NWL in order for recommendations to be made to provision to contribute to improved patient experience and outcomes. There was some appetite to hear more about this proposal and a suggestion that a presentation could be invited at a subsequent meeting. A question was raised as to whether or not the proposed work already represents a core statutory responsibility of Healthwatch. It was suggested that an externally commissioned approach may support impartiality in the way in which such as review is set up and conducted by Healthwatch. The board concluded that more information was required before the request is taken further. Primary care transformation board The collaboration board noted that the primary care transformation board (which has chair membership) would be re-convened given the considerable work taking place in the transformation of primary care. Shaping a Healthier Future – maternity and paediatrics NWL’s CCGs are continuing to lead the process for maternity transition in NWL and its interrelated services including neonatal transition, given the planned closure of maternity services at Ealing Hospital. An assurance process is to take place between 26 November 2014 and early January 2015 when Ealing CCG’s governing body will formally consider the assurance put into place. This will follow prior consultation with other NWL CCGs and include the use of deep dive, clinically-led workshops, in particular with the most affected neighbouring CCGs. This will be used to test whether it is sufficiently robust to proceed with the planned date for transition (which at the time of reporting has yet to be set). The collaboration board was reminded that neonatal transition is not a decision for the CCGs but for NHS England. It was noted that some CCGs may need to hold additional governing body meetings to accommodate all the necessary elements of the assurance process for maternity transition. All CCGs need to fully engage in the process and to be individually assured that services are safe to be transitioned. A detailed assurance process is being taken to CCGs’ governing bodies for discussion designed to ensure there is robust assurance around the timing of transition. The high degree of public interest in this area was well understood and as such a clear communications strategy would be developed to align closely with the assurance process being followed by the CCGs. 3