Analysis of Pharmacists` Attitudes Toward a Distance
Transcription
Analysis of Pharmacists` Attitudes Toward a Distance
Analysis of Pharmacists’ Attitudes Toward a Distance Learning Initiative on Health Screening Jane Whiteman, Eileen M. Scott and James C. McElnay The Pharmacy Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, The Queen’s University of Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland A questionnaire was developed to investigate pharmacists’ attitudes to distance learning (DL) as a vehicle for continuing education (CE). It was included in each of a two part DL course on Health Screening. Part One was mailed to all community pharmacists in England (16,400) and returns were received from 1487. The questionnaire in Part Two was returned by 436 pharmacists. Attitude statements were scored using a fivepoint Likert scale. The mean response to all attitude statements was positive. Participants were significantly more satisfied than non-participants with DL in general and the DL course studied (P≤0.05). Over 80 percent of respondents completing the course found DL to be enjoyable and more suitable than other CE methods. More females and less males than expected (based on registration statistics) requested (P≤0.001) and completed the course (P≤0.001). Pharmacists of all ages participated, although those recently qualified showed greater interest. INTRODUCTION Continuing post-qualification education and training is required by pharmacists wishing to remain up-to-date within a changing and evolving profession(1,2). Although continuing education (CE) is not mandatory in the UK at present, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB) has recently recognized the need for CE by adopting a national curriculum and advising pharmacists to participate in at least 30 hours of CE per year(3). The requirement for pharmacists in the UK to remain up-to-date has been addressed in the code of ethics(4), which states “a pharmacist must keep abreast of the progress of pharmaceutical knowledge in order to maintain a high standard of professional competence relative to his sphere of activity”. The need for pharmacists to participate in CE has been highlighted by the fact that even though pharmacists view their advisory function as a major part of their role, some have not always performed adequately in this area and do not always transform knowledge into practice(5-8). Pharmacists cite job constraints and lack of time to attend formal courses as reasons for nonparticipation in CE(1,9,10). Distance learning (DL) overcomes many of these problems and specially designed DL courses are becoming increasingly attractive to busy community pharmacists in the UK. Although DL has only recently been introduced as a means of providing pharmaceutical CE in the UK, historically DL has been utilized more frequently in the USA. For example, in the years 1981, 1983 and 1985, samples of pharmacists in Michigan USA were investigated for the types of CE courses used to fulfil mandatory CE requirements. Correspondence courses were the dominant form of CE and about 30 percent reported that they obtained all of the required credits in this way(11). As well as satisfying the needs of CE in general, DL is used to educate pharmacists towards certain defined goals including diplomas and certificates (12,13). A number of UK universities have recently introduced DL in postgraduate professional courses for both hospital and community pharmacists. 300 The work presented in this paper describes the evaluation of a DL course, Health Screening for Health Promotion, which was written to update pharmacists in this important area of pharmacy practice. The need for such a course was identified in a joint report of the RPSGB and the Department of Health on the future of community pharmaceutical services in the UK(14). This latter report suggested that community pharmacies should consider providing a number of additional services including diagnostic and screening services and that completion of additional training or demonstration of appropriate knowledge should be a prerequisite for pharmacists providing these services. The aim of this study was to determine community pharmacists’ attitudes to distance learning in general and to the Health Screening for Health Promotion DL course in particular. A further aim was to assess the influence of certain characteristics upon pharmacist involvement in distance learning. Differences in attitude between participants and non-participants was also examined. METHODOLOGY The Pharmacy Practice Research Group in the Queen’s University of Belfast (QUB) was commissioned in 1990 to produce a written DL course entitled “Health Screening for Health Promotion”. The course was designed in two parts: Part One provided a general introduction to the topic and highlighted opportunities for pharmacists to become involved in health screening; Part Two consisted of six Core Units which discussed a range of screening and monitoring services, namely: (i) general aspects of screening; (ii) screening for coronary heart disease; (iii) diabetic screening; (iv) monitoring of asthma patients; (v) pregnancy and ovulation tests; and (vi) further screening options. In November 1990 Part One was mailed to all community pharmacists in England (N = 16,400) using address labels provided by the RSPGB. Part Two was only issued upon written request from pharmacists. The closing date for requesting Part Two was three months from receipt of Part One. Both Part One and Two contained multiple-choice question assessments American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fall 1994 that participants were invited to complete and return to QUB for individual assessment. These assessment papers were marked and returned to participating pharmacists together with their score, the correct answers to questions and explanatory notes. This was intended to allow participants to assess their understanding of the course and to provide a sense of achievement at having completed the course assessments. Return of these assessments was taken as an indication of having studied and completed that part of the course. The project was sponsored by the Department of Health as part of their remit to provide continuing education for graduate pharmacists in England. Both parts of the course and the individualized assessments were provided free of charge to participating community pharmacists. A questionnaire on attitudes to DL in general and the DL course studied was included in both parts of the course. Pharmacists were requested to return these questionnaires to QUB for analysis. Sociodemographic data were also requested in a section of the questionnaire. This paper reports the results obtained from returned questionnaires. A cover letter was included in Part One explaining the purpose of the DL course, emphasizing the importance of evaluating this new educational method in the UK and therefore requesting the return of the attitude questionnaire so that pharmacists’ views on the course could help to improve the provision of future DL material. Pharmacists’ cooperation was requested even if they did not wish to receive Part Two of the course. It included a promise of confidentiality and an expression of gratitude. A five-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly agree (scored as one point) to strongly disagree (scored as 5 points), was employed in this questionnaire. The following sociodemographic details and current practice data were requested: sex, employment in community pharmacy (part-time/full-time), year of registration, type of pharmacy (independent versus multiple/chain), diagnostic services provided in place of work, diagnostic services planned for place of work, and reasons for nonprovision of diagnostic services (if applicable). Attitude responses and sociodemographic details were entered into a Borland Paradox® database with an identification number that was assigned to each questionnaire as it arrived back at the study center. A separate database file linking identification number to name and address details was also maintained. To maintain confidentiality, this information was password protected. The results presented in this paper are based upon information obtained from three separate groups of pharmacists: Group 1 (not requesting) was those pharmacists who returned the attitude questionnaire contained in Part One but did not request Part Two. Group 2 (requesting) was those pharmacists who returned the attitude questionnaire contained in Part One and requested Part Two. Group 3 (completing) is a subgroup of group 2 and was those pharmacists who completed the course. This group also returned the same attitude questionnaire included in Part Two of the course, but unless otherwise stated, data from the first questionnaire were used in the analyses. Data was analyzed using SPSS/PC® software. For continuous dependent variables f-tests and ANOVA (followed by Student-Newman-Kiiel’s multiple range test) were employed. Discrete variables were analyzed using chi square Fig 1. The percentage in each five-year band of the total number (N=1,485) of communitypharmacistsparticipating in distance learning compared with the percentage in the same band of community pharmacists in Great Britain according to RSPGB register, 1990 (N=20,787). procedures (with Yate’s correction for any two-by-two analyses). RESULTS Response Rates Part One of the course was sent by post to 16,400 community pharmacists registered in England. Two hundred copies of this did not reach the addressees and were returned to QUB. The number of pharmacists in each of the three designated groups were as follows: Group 1 (not requesting) 117; Group 2 (requesting) 1487 of whom 1485 returned the attitude questionnaire; Group 3 (completing) 520 of whom 436 returned the attitude questionnaire contained in Part Two of the course. This represents a response rate of nine percent of community pharmacists to whom the course was mailed and a completion rate of 35 percent (i.e., 520 of 1487) of those who requested Part Two of the course. Factors Influencing Participation The influence of gender and employment profile on participation in DL was investigated using chi square analysis to compare the details of pharmacists in Group 2 (requesting) and Group 3 (completing) with data for all community pharmacists on the RPSGB register in 1990 for Great Britain (i.e., England, Scotland and Wales, N = 20787) (Table I). Results indicated that a higher than expected percentage of females versus males requested (P≤0.001) and completed (P≤0.001) the course. Based on the information available, the numbers of part-time and full-time pharmacists requesting the course was not significantly different (P>0.05) from the number of part-time and full-time community pharmacists on the register, although it was observed that 10 percent of pharmacists failed to identify whether they were working full- or part-time. Significantly more part-time pharmacists completed the course (P<0.05). Analysis of Group 2 (requesting) by year of registration indicated interest by pharmacists of all ages. For comparative purposes, these results were grouped into five year bands and presented as a percentage of the total numbers of Group 2 pharmacists (N-1485) compared with a similarly banded age profile of all community pharmacists on the RPSGB register (N= 20787) (Figure 1). The RPSGB’s data available for the years 1987-90 was not complete and did not American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fall 1994 301 Table I. Influence of gender and employment profile on participation in the DL course. Community Participants pharmacists on (percent)a register (percent)b N=1485 N=20,787 Group 2: Requesting Part Two of DL course Group 3: Completing Part Two of DL coursee Significancee Male 747 (50) 12257 (59) P<0.001 Female 733 (49) 8530 (41) Full-time 927 (62) 14562 (70) Part-time 410 (28) 6102 (29) NSd Male 191 (44) 12257 (59) P<0.001 Female 228 (52) 8530 (41) Full-time 271 (62) 14562 (70) Part-time 143 (33) 6102 (29) P<0.05 a where % values do not add up to 100%, this was due to incomplete data available Data was obtained from RPSGB register, 1990 for Great Britain c All comparisons were carried out using chi square analysis d NS - not significant e return of course assessment form was taken as evidence of completion b Fig 2. Attitudes of pharmacists to the statement, distance learning is more suitable for me than other continuing education methods” related to whether they did not request, did request, or completed the course. include new graduates coming onto the register in 1990. Other demographic details of participating pharmacists are shown in Table II. Approximately 74 percent of Group 3 (completing) pharmacists already provided, or intended to provide, screening services. Pregnancy testing (53 percent), blood pressure monitoring (13 percent) and cholesterol measurement (five percent) were the main services provided. In all three groups the main reasons for not providing diagnostic services were lack of time, no demand, lack of staff and poor financial return; it can be inferred that the majority considered that diagnostic tests were of value and that provision of diagnostic services would improve job satisfaction. Attitudes to Distance Learning The attitude statements presented in the questionnaire are shown in Table III. The mean response to all statements 302 Fig 3. Attitudes of pharmacists to the statement, “this method of learning was enjoyable” related to whether they did not request, did request, or completed the course. was better than “neutral” (mid-point score = 3) whether a positive response to an individual statement required an agree or disagree answer. Attitudes to DL in general were assessed by two statements, namely, “distance learning is more suitable for me than other continuing education methods” and “this method of learning was enjoyable” and a detailed breakdown of the responses obtained are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. Approximately 80 percent of Group 3 respondents believed that DL was more suitable for them than other CE methods. The relationships between demographic details and these statements are summarized in Table IV for Group 2 (requesting) and Group 3 (completing) participants and were analyzed utilizing a t-test, treating the data as ordinal. In Group 2, females reported DL to be more enjoyable than males (P<0.05), and those employed part-time found DL more enjoyable than those employed full-time (P<0.05). In this same group DL was also found to American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fall 1994 Table II. Demographic details of pharmacists not requesting (Group 1), requesting (Group 2) and completing (Group 3) the DL course. Numbersa and (percent) of pharmacists Demographic variable Type of pharmacy Independent Multiple/Chain Diagnostic services provided Type of services pregnancy testing blood pressure cholesteroi other Intending to provide services Reason for not providing services Lack of time Poor financial return Tests of no value Does not improve job satisfaction Lack of Staff No demand Other a Group 1 N = 117 Not requesting 60 (51.3) 39 (33.3) Group 2 N=1485 Requesting Group 3 N=436 Completing 582 (39.2) 705 (47.5) 763 (51.4) 177 (40.6) 227 (52.1) 241 (55.3) 49 (41.9) 49 (41.9) 17 (14.5) 6 (5.1) 5 (4.3) 22 (18.8) 750 (50.5) 179 (12.1) 72 (4.8) 47 (3.2) 343 (23.1) 232 (53.2) 58 (13.3) 22 (5.0) 17 (3.9) 81 (18.6) 34 (29.1) 319 (21.5) 98 (22.5) 20 (17.1) 4 (3.4) 8 (6.8) 15 (12.8) 35 (29.9) 42 (35.9) 161 (10.8) 7 (0.5) 12 (0.8) 174 (11.7) 255 (17.2) 546 (36.8) 64 (14.7) 1 (0.2) 0 (0) 79 (18.1) 86 (19.7) 152 (34.9) Missing values (i.e. no response) are not presented Table III. Attitudes of pharmacists not requesting (Group 1), requesting (Group 2) and completing (Group 3) the DL course on Health Screening for Health Promotion Attitudesa (mean score ± SD) of pharmacists participating in DL course Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 N = 117 N = 1485 N = 436 Attitude statement Not requesting Requesting Completing The material was easy to read 1.7 ±0.9 1.6 ±0.7 1.7 ± 0.7 The material was difficult to understand 4.1 ±1.1 4.3 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 0.9 The standard of presentation was good 1.8 ±0.7 1.8+0.7 1.7 ± 0.7 The in-text questions were not helpful 3.3 ±1.1 3.7 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.0 The self-assessment questions were useful 2.4 ±1.0 2.0 ± 0.8 1.9 ±0.7 The information in the unit was not new to me 2.6 ±0.9 2.9 ±1.0 3.4 ±0.8 This method of learning was enjoyable 2.5 ± 1.0 2.1 ±0.8 1.9 ±0.7 The material was relevant 2.2 ± 0.9 1.9 ±0.7 1.9 ±0.8 Distance learning is more suitable for me than 2.2± 1.2 1.8 ±0.9 1.7 ± 0.9 other continuing education methods a Based on a Likert 5 point scale; strongly agree, 1; strongly disagree, 5. be more suitable by pharmacists working in independent pharmacies than those working in multiple pharmacies (P<0.05). However, these factors were not significantly different in Group 3 participants. As expected the material was found to be significantly more relevant by both groups when they provided diagnostic services in their pharmacy (P<0.05). In all cases the differences in the scores were small and followed similar trends. When dealing with such large numbers of participants, it is possible to achieve significance with small changes in attitude. Also differences may be influenced by response variability. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fall 1994 Differences in Attitudes Between Participants and Nonparticipants A one-way analysis of variance was used to investigate differences in attitudes between participants who completed (Group 3), participants who ordered but did not show evidence of completing (Group 2 minus Group 3, i.e., Group 2*) and nonparticipants who did not request Part Two of the DL course (Group 1). All groups agreed with the statement. “The standard of presentation was good”. The responses to all other statements showed significant differences (P<0.05). A multiple-range test was then used to evaluate which 303 Table IV. The relationship of demographic variables and attitudes by those requesting (Group 2) and completing (Group 3) the DL course. Attitude scoresa (mean ± SD) of pharmacists Requesting (Group 2) Completing (Group 3) b Pb N P N This method of learning was enjoyable Male 2.1 ± 0.8 694 1.8 ± 0.7 186 1.9 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 0.7 255 140 1.9 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 0.7 270 176 1.9 ± 0.8 224 1.7 ± 0.8 186 1.7 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 1.0 226 141 1.7 ± 0.8 1.7 ± 0.9 270 176 1.7 ± 0.9 225 1.8 ± 0.7 238 2.0 ± 0.8 168 0.026 Female Part-time 2.0 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.7 699 399 Full-time Independent 2.1 ± 0.8 2.0 ± 0.8 901 565 0.33 0.013 0.30 0.05 0.08 694 Multiple 2.1 ± 0.8 Distance learning is more suitable for me than other methods 695 Male 1.8 ± 0.9 Female Part-time 1.7 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.9 698 398 Full-time Independent 1.8 ±0.9 1.7 ± 0.9 911 564 1.8 ± 0.9 695 1.9 ± 0.7 741 0.147 0.06 0.44 0.02 Multiple The material was relevant Services provided 0.46 0.015 Services not provided 2.0 ± 0.7 559 0.48 0.02 a Based on a Likert five-point scale: strongly agree, 1; strongly disagree, 5 All comparisons were carried out using unpaired Student r-tests. b Table V. Differences in attitudes to distance learning in participants who completed (Group 3), participants who ordered but did not show evidence of completing (Group 2*, i.e. Group 2 minus Group 3) and nonparticipants (Group 1) who did not request Part Two of the DL course Attitude statement Group scoresa The material was easy to read The material was difficult to understand The standard of presentation was good The in-text questions were not helpful The self-assessment questions were useful The information in the unit was not new to me This method of learning was enjoyable The material was relevant Distance learning is more suitable for me than other continuing education methods a 3 < 2* = 1 1 < 2* = 3 not significant 1 < 2* = 3 3 = 2* < 1 1 < 2* = 3 3 = 2* < 1 3 = 2* < 1 3 = 2* < 1 the mean score for each group was calculated for each statement based on a Likert 5 point scale and the means compared using one-way analysis of variance (P ≤ 0.05) followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls procedure. 304 groups had significantly different means (Table V). Responses indicate that participants were more satisfied than nonparticipants with DL in general and the present DL course in particular. Attitudes Before and After the Course The changes in attitudes of the group of pharmacists who completed the course (Group 3) were examined by comparing their responses to statements in the first attitude questionnaire, i.e., before receiving Part Two of the course and the second attitude questionnaire, i.e., after completing Part Two of the course. Two statements were investigated. No significant difference was found for the statement “distance learning is more suitable for me” (mean score: before, 1.72; after, 1.66). There was a significant improvement (P ≤0.001) in the score awarded for the statement “this method of learning was enjoyable” after completion of the course (mean score, 1.86) compared with before (mean score, 2.02) studying Part Two. DISCUSSION This study indicated that more females and less males than expected from the Register’s statistics requested and completed the course (P≤0.001). When employment profiles American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fall 1994 were examined it was found that those requesting the course had similar employment profiles to the total number of pharmacists in community pharmacy. Past research into attendances at CE courses in a region of the UK had identified certain demographic trends(16) in that the percentage of female and part-time pharmacists attending courses was much higher than the actual percentages of these groups residing in the region. In contrast, a recent paper evaluating two DL courses for pharmacists in England remarked upon the fact that two-thirds of participants were male and that over 90 percent of respondents were in full-time employment(17). Major reasons given for this finding were the facts that financial incentives were provided and the courses were focused towards pharmacists who were pharmacy owners with National Health Service contracts. No financial incentives were provided in the DL course evaluated in this study and although significantly more females than males did participate in this DL course, large differences were not found and it would appear that interest from male pharmacists was also comparatively high. However, our study does support the view that DL is a more suitable form of CE for pharmacists in full-time employment. Also, while pharmacists of all ages participated in the DL course, more recently qualified pharmacists showed greater interest and this may also reflect the increasing numbers of females coming on the register. Responses were favorable to the concept of DL, especially in those who completed the course, with approximately 80 percent of this group finding DL more suitable than other CE methods and 90 percent finding DL an enjoyable method of CE. Although Group 1 pharmacists, i.e., those who did not request Part Two of the DL course, were significantly less enthusiastic (P<0.05) about the merits of DL than the two groups of participants, this group still agreed that DL was more suitable for them than other methods of CE. However, it must be borne in mind that fewer than 10 percent of all community pharmacists in England requested Part 2 of the DL course and only one third of those who requested the course showed evidence of completing it by returning the multiple choice questionnaires for assessment. Encouragingly, pharmacists found the DL method of learning more enjoyable after completion of Part Two of the course than before studying it. Past research has identified DL as a preferred method for pharmacists to participate in CE(10,18,19). Experience in Australia. USA and the UK has also shown DL to be an effective, convenient way to educate pharmacists(20-27). The mean Likert scale scores obtained to the attitude questions for all three groups studied were similar (Table III). The possibility of central tendency bias, when respondents avoid the extreme categories of a scale, has to be taken into consideration. The scale does, however, show a tendency for those requesting (Group 2) and completing (Group 3) the course to be more positive towards the course than those who did not request it (Group 1). The questionnaire was designed so that a positive response to some statements required a “strongly agree’’ and others required a “strongly disagree”‘ response. In this way the full range of Likert scale responses were required. The content of any CE course must reflect the needs of the participants. This DL course dealt with health screening services and health promotion activities which are developing areas of community pharmacy practice. Approximately 74 percent of pharmacists completing the course already American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fall 1994 provided or intended to provide screening services. This may simply mean that pharmacists will choose to do courses on topics of particular interest to them. It was also encouraging that the majority of all respondents through inference considered that the diagnostic tests were of value and that provision of diagnostic services would improve job satisfaction. In the absence of a mandatory requirement for practising pharmacists to participate in CE, considerable attention must be given by course providers to make their course attractive and relevant to likely participants. Monetary incentives have not been a feature of CE for pharmacists in the UK but are given to medical practitioners for CE participation. In a study of the response to two separate DL courses where nominal remuneration was given to those who returned completed assessment forms, request rates of 49 percent and 43 percent were obtained, although the completion rate was fewer than 50 percent of those requesting the course (17). In a similar study where no incentives were offered to pharmacists to participate in a DL course, a response rate of 12 percent was obtained(18). One further method of improving motivation is to provide certificates when assessment questions have been completed and returned(17). The DL course in this study was mailed to pharmacists at the beginning of November and the proximity of Christmas may have been a disincentive. Support for this hypothesis is given by the observation that no assessments were returned during Christmas week. The main reasons for not providing diagnostic services were lack of time, no demand, lack of staff and poor financial return. These results are similar to those obtained in the UK National Audit Office’s (NAO) investigation of community pharmacy(28). It was found that 67 percent of pharmacists in England wished to offer more services to the public and the reasons given for non-provision of such services included the need for a second pharmacist (59 percent), insufficient remuneration (56 percent), and inadequate time and resources for further training (50 percent). The Joint Working Party report on the future of community pharmacy in the UK has encouraged the provision of diagnostic services by community pharmacists and the NAO has agreed in its report that the pharmacist’s role should be developed as quickly as possible(14). Against this background it appears that pharmacists would welcome the provision of diagnostic services as part of an extended role but at present feel they are restrained by time and financial considerations. This DL course was prepared using a two-color printing process and a varied page layout to provide an attractive easily read training package. The course was interactive in style and self-assessment questions were included throughout the text so that the participants could evaluate their understanding of the material and measure their progress. Case reports were also used to provide illustrations of points made in the text and to maintain the interactive style. An important aspect of course design is to ensure that having requested the course, participants will be encouraged to study it. The completion rate for this course was 35 percent suggesting that the attention given to presentation was worthwhile. The decision to mail Part One to all community pharmacists was intended to give pharmacists an opportunity to “sample” the course and decide if they wished to continue with the full package. It contained general information on the importance of health screening and health promotion which was of benefit to all pharmacists. However, such wide 305 distribution was a costly exercise in terms of printing and mailing costs. Provided a course is well advertised and the method of requesting the course is kept simple, costs of providing such DL courses can be reduced by keeping the print run and postage costs low. However, it could be argued that the unsolicited approach will capture those pharmacists who are not motivated to apply for DL courses or attend other CE events. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that distance learning is a suitable and enjoyable method of CE. Acknowledgement. The authors wish to acknowledge the Pharmaceutical Contractors” Committee (Northern Ireland) for their sponsorship and support. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 58, 300-306 (1994); received 3/31/94, accepted 7/11/94. References (1) Hanson, A.L. and DeMuth, J.E., “Facilitators and barriers to pharmacists’ participation in lifelong learning.” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 55, 2029(1991). (2) Working Party Report. “A strategy for postgraduate education and training,” Pharm. J., 243, 142-145(1989). (3) Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, “Council sets annual target of 30 hours of continuing education,” ibid., 249, 54(1992). (4) Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. “Medicines, ethics and practice. A guide for pharmacists,” The Pharmaceutical Press, London, No. 12, 79(1994). (5) Dodhia S., Morley A. and Panton R., ‘‘Responding to symptoms: educational needs of community pharmacists.” Pharm. J., 237, 561. 563(1986). (6) Rudolph N. and Jones I.F., “Community pharmacists and the extended role,” ibid., 242, R1-R3(1989). (7) Goodburn E., Mattosinho S., Mongi P. and Waterston A., “Management of childhood diarrhoea by pharmacists and parents: is Britain lagging behind the Third World?” Br. Med. J., 302, 440-3 (1991). (8) Consumers” Association. “Pharmacists. How Reliable Are They?” Which? Way to Health. 191-194 (December 1991). (9) Bernardi, V.W., “A comparison of selected variables associated with participation in pharmacy continuing education programs,” PhD 306 dissertation, The University of Connecticut (1974). pp. 94-104. (10) Morley, A. and Jepson, M.H., “Pilot survey of attitudes to continuing education.” Pharm. J., 235, 594-595(1985). (11) Hardigan, W.D., “An analysis of a state board of pharmacy’s audits of continuing education credits.” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 54, 132-137(1990). (12) Wells, B.G., Rawls, W.N., Ryan, M.R. and Rosenbluth, S.A., “A certificate continuing education program in psychiatric pharmacy practiced ibid., 47, 244-249(1983). (13) Riley, D.A., Shannon, M.C. and Nickel, R.O., “Home study CE. as possible components of pharmacy degrees.” ibid., 49, 154-156(1985). (14) Pharmaceutical Care: the future for community pharmacy, “Report of the Joint Working Party on the future role of the community pharmaceutical services,’” Pharmaceuticai Press, London (1992). (15) Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, “Manpower. Survey of pharmacists 1988-1990.” Pharm. J., 246. 621-625(1991). (16) Mottram, D.R., “Trends in continuing education.” ibid., 235, 477-478 (1985). (17) Tann, J., Hodges, M. and Stewart, B.J., “Evaluation of distance learning packages for residential homes and patient medication records,” ibid., 248, 127-129(1992). (18) Furber, T.H. and Gill, S.K., “Participation in, and attitudes to. continuing education in Trent.” ibid., 238, 404-407(1987). (19) Hunt, A.J., Luplon, C. and Portlock, J., “The utilization of continuing education opportunities by community pharmacists in Wcssex.” ibid., 247, R9(1991). (20) Matchett, J.A., “Continuing education via the packaged program.” Amer. J. Pharm. Educ., 42, 383-385(1978). (21) Greene, R. and Shand, G., “Continuing education—a Canadian approach.” Pharm. J., 223, 435-436(1979). (22) Westwood, N., “Reaching general practice pharmacists in Britain.” ibid., 227, 517-518(1981). (23) Bailey, D.J., Briggs, A. and Greenleaf, J.C., “The Open University and continuing education of pharmacists.” ibid., 233, 459-462(1984). (24) Dunn, W.R. and Hamilton, D.D., “Determining the continuing education priorities for pharmacists.” ibid., 237, 225-228(1986). (25) Shannon, M.C. and Kenny, W.R., “A descriptive analysis of pharmacy continuing education offerings in 1985.” Mobius, 6, 19-32(1986). (26) Harrison, I., “Comment. Distance learning.” Brit. J. Pharm. Pract., 9, 361(1987). (27) Yung, D.K., “Commentary. Continuing pharmacy education in Canada.” J. Clin. Pharm. Ther., 15, 399-403(1990). (28) Anon., “Current affairs. A quarter of pharmacies could close— National Audit Office report.” Pharm. J., 248, 733-735(1992). American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 58, Fail 1994