United Nations Security Council
Transcription
United Nations Security Council
UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL This Background guide includes basic information regarding the topics to be discussed in the committee. CHAIRED BY: KAHAAN MEHTA AARJAV PHUKAN The Security Council- Address to the Delegates Dear Delegates, We take extreme pride and pleasure to welcome you to Maria’s Model United Nations 2015 and would also like to congratulate you on your participation in the Security Council, the most powerful committee in The United Nations. The resolutions passed in The Security Council are binding. This means that what the fifteen of you deliberate upon will be the law applicable to every single human being. I hope that is a sentiment strong enough to make you realise the importance of the committee you have joined. The topics that have been chosen for this session are: (i) Transnational Terrorism with Specific focus in The Middle East (ii) The Question of a Nuclear Free World. We hope that the following background guide gives you a fair idea on both the topics. They have been prepared in a manner such that will give you a hint as to the tone of the debate expected, the subject areas which must be addressed and the kind of robust response demanded. Delegates are requested to please keep in mind, that the following is not a detailed research work. It addresses the aforementioned topics in the briefest of manners possible. It is expected on the part of the delegates to carry out further research about their country policies, political stance and so on. The veto power, which only the permanent countries are allowed, is likely to add a twist on certain matters that require voting but it must be borne in mind that if and when possible, the primary aim of the Security Council has always been, to achieve consensus, thus landing on a plausible and sensible solution acceptable by all. As for the committee proceedings, since both these topics are likely to put any interested delegate sit on the edge of the chair, the flow of debate will be, we hope, lively and in the true spirit of peace and security for the world. Ensuring you a very good MUN experience and a highly stimulating session, Kahaan Mehta Chair, Security Council Aarjav Phukan Co Chair, Security Council. MMUN• Security Council Position Paper Guidelines Due 25th April 2015 Each committee topic should be addressed in a succinct policy statement representing the relevant views of your assigned country. You should identify and address international and regional conventions, treaties, declarations, resolutions, and programs of action that are relevant to the policy of your country. You should also include recommendations for action to be taken by your committee. A delegate’s role as a Member State should affect the way a position paper is written. To understand these differences, please refer to the Background Guide. It may also be helpful to view the Sample Position Paper. A position paper should be submitted for each assigned committee. The two page position paper should cover all the topics in the background guide, not a separate paper for each topic. Do not submit papers for committees not assigned to your country. Only those delegations that follow the guidelines and meet the submission deadline will be eligible for awards. All papers must be typed and formatted according to the standards below: Length must not exceed two pages Margins must be set at 1 inch or 2.54 cm. for the whole paper Font must be Times New Roman sized between 10 pt. and 12 pt. Country and committee name must be clearly labelled on the first page. Agenda topics must be clearly labelled in separate sections National symbols (headers, flags, etc.) are deemed inappropriate for MMUN position papers Please note that position papers must be comprised of entirely original writing. The NMUN Conference will not tolerate plagiarism, including copying from Committee Background Guides. Violation of this policy may result in dismissal from the conference. Although United Nations documentation is considered within the public domain, the conference does not allow the verbatim re-creation of these documents. Write a position paper to Organize and outline your viewpoint on an issue Formally inform others of your position as a foundation to build resolution to difficult problems Present a unique, though biased, solution or a unique approach to solving a problem Frame the discussion in order to define the "playing field." This can put you in an advantageous position with those who may not be so well prepared as regards the issues behind their positions Establish your credibility Here you are demonstrating that you have a command of the issues and the research behind them, and can present them clearly Let your passion be demonstrated in the force of your argument rather than in the use of emotional terms Guide you in being consistent in maintaining your position in negotiation Sample Position Paper Committee: Security Council Topic Area A: Former Yugoslavia Country: Ghana Delegate: Mr. Kofi Annan (Example) Ghana strongly believes that U.N. policy regarding the situation in the Balkans has been flawed from the start. First, Ghana would like to remind the Security Council of Article 51 in the United Nations Charter. Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individuals or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. This article of our Charter clearly establishes the right of any sovereign nation to defend itself from an external attack. However, the U.N.-imposed arms embargo over the regions of the former Yugoslavia clearly takes this right away from the nation of Bosnia-Herzegovina. While the U.N. has blindly imposed this embargo over all of exYugoslavia, the amply supplied Serbs have used the armaments left behind by the Yugoslavian Federal Government to beat the poorly armed Bosnians into submission. As such, Ghana believes that the U.N. is doing a tremendous injustice to the nation of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Thus, unless this body acts immediately to halt Serbian aggression in Bosnia, we are obliged to lift our blanket arms embargo to allow the Bosnians to defend themselves. It should be noted here that we can, and should, lift the arms embargo against Bosnia while keeping it against Serbia, as the Serbs are not currently fighting for the safety or integrity of their nation (as the international community recognizes it), but are rather the aggressors in this situation. However, Ghana would like to stress that it strives for a peaceful solution to the conflicts in Bosnia and Croatia, and to the tensions in Macedonia and Kosovo, and thus would not simply endorse an escalation of warfare within the region. As the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina is of the utmost importance, as the greatest number of human lives are being lost there, Ghana believes that the Security Council should deal with this nation first. Although Ghana does not like the fact that the Bosnian-Croat federation would hold only 51% of the land of Bosnia-Herzegovina, we believe that if the Bosnian-Muslim and Croat leaders can agree to this type of reduction in land, then it should be acceptable to the world community. Because two of the combatants have agreed to this type of land agreement, Ghana believes that it is up to the Security Council to force the Bosnian Serbs and Yugoslav Serbs to accept this new partition of Bosnia, or face a collective onslaught and erosion of their currently held positions. As such, Ghana approves of the fact that the Yugoslav Serbs have ostracized the Bosnian Serbs for not agreeing to the aforementioned plan; however, to make sure that no aid is reaching the Bosnian Serbs, Ghana believes that the U.N. should force the Federal Serbs to allow U.N. monitors between the internationally recognized borders of Serbia and Bosnia. If Serbia does not allow this, Ghana believes that the Security Council should tighten the embargo against Serbia, not even allowing humanitarian aid into the country. Although this may seem unnecessarily harsh, we believe that more direct pressure on the Serbian people and leaders will force them to quickly change their stance, thus saving more lives in the long-term. In addition, Ghana believes that the proposed Bosnian-Croat federation should receive military backing from the U.N. and NATO in order to safeguard its existence. Although we know that the U.N. cannot control NATO, we believe that our positive working relationship in the past will allow for continued cooperation in this realm. Thus, we believe that only a significant and overt military support for the Bosnians will result in an end to this conflict. Ghana believes that a continued U.N. presence in Croatia and Macedonia will be the best way to defuse tensions in those nations. Although UNPROFOR has experienced difficulties in Croatia, Ghana would like to point out that many of the recent breaks in the cease-fire there have been due to offensives by the Croats, who were the people that UNPROFOR was originally trying to protect. Thus, unless both the Croats and Serbs in Croatia are willing to stop fighting, UNPROFOR should not take on a further role. However, as the pre-emptive peacekeepers in Macedonia seem to be working, Ghana fully supports them and requests the Security Council to evaluate the situation and perhaps send more troops there to safeguard the peace. About The Security Council Committee Overview: The United Nations Charter has explained, in detail, The Security Council in its Fifth Chapter from Article 23 onwards. Pursuant to the above stated article, The Security Council shall comprise of fifteen members, five of which shall be permanent in terms of their presence in all the proceedings of the committee until it is dissolved. These member nations which enjoy the right of permanent presence in The Security Council are- The People’s Republic of China, The French Republic, The Russian Federation, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and The United States of America . The five permanent seats, known as the P5, are held by the leaders of the victorious Allied nations of the Second World War that formed the UN – particularly the SC – as a forum to prevent future global war and that “men in all lands may live out their lives in freedom from fear and want” The members who do not enjoy this right of perennial seats are elected for a term of two years. Considering the fact that each member nation is allowed one representative, this is a single delegate committee. The other non-permanent members for this session of The Security Council are: (in order of the alphabet) Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Federal Republic of Germany Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Islamic Republic of Iran Islamic Republic of Pakistan Republic of Iraq Republic of South Sudan Republic of Turkey Syrian Arab Republic The Kingdom of The Netherlands Mandate of the Committee: Sixty-Nine months and some four months back, The Security Council sat for the first time with the aim to promote the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world's human and economic resources, the Security Council shall be responsible for formulating, with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee referred to in Article 47, plans to be submitted to the Members of the United Nations for the establishment of a system for the regulation of armaments. The Charter of the United Nations (1945) established the main functions for the SC: maintain international peace and security; develop friendly relations among states; cooperate to solve international problems and promote human rights; and be a centre for harmonizing action among Member States. The SC is given a multitude of options to fulfil these duties, including economic sanctions, arms embargoes, financial sanctions, travel bans, and collective military actions. Among its administrative roles, the SC recommends the admission of new members to the UN General Assembly (GA); advises the UN General Assembly on the appointment of the Secretary-General; and elects judges to the International Court of Justice in conjunction with the GA. In addition to its distinctive mandate and powers, the SC is the only UN body that may pass legally binding resolutions, under Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations which states that “Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council." While the other bodies of the UN pass nonbinding resolutions that provide recommendations and sources of global consensus, the SC’s power to impose the binding resolutions allow it to act as a force of collective security. For any procedural change or resolution to pass in the SC, it must garner at least nine votes. For any substantive action, no permanent member may vote against the action. This “veto power” is a unique privilege given to the permanent members in the Charter of the United Nations, which enables them to singularly deny any resolution from adoption by casting a negative vote. The use of the veto is rarely evoked, as consensus is the primary goal of the SC. Of the 1,859 draft resolutions voted upon between 1945 and 2012, the veto power was used only 261 times; only draft resolutions have been vetoed since 1996. It must be considered, however, that the use of the veto is only ultimately unnecessary because its mere existence and the threat of its use are sufficient. Of note, a permanent member may abstain on a substantive vote without denying the substantive issue to be approved, thereby allowing the member to maintain its national position of disagreement or indifference without hindering the work of the SC as a whole. Functions and Powers: Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations prohibits the UN from intervening in matters of "domestic jurisdiction of any state." Chapter VII allows the SC to intervene, unless it judges any situation to be a 'threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; the SC uses this exception to Article 2(7) in order to justify inventions that could threaten international peace and security by expanding beyond national borders.' Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations also grants special powers to the SC to enforce its mandate of maintaining international peace and security, such as economic sanctions, arms embargoes, financial sanctions, travel bans, and collective military actions, including the power to deploy and direct peacekeeping forces. Before these powers are used, the SC will often pursue alternative courses under Article 38 of the Charter of the United Nations of pacific settlement. These alternative methods include: calling for ceasefires, requesting discussions to resolve the issues leading to conflict, and creating investigations into disputlasting peace, the SC established the Peace Building Commission (PBC) by adopting SC resolution 1645 (2005); the PBC advises and assists international actors to help Member States emerging from conflict or situations that may disrupt international peace. All in all, the basic functions and powers of the United Nations Security Council are as stated below (1): to maintain international peace and security in accordance with the principles and purposes of the United Nations; to investigate any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction; to recommend methods of adjusting such disputes or the terms of settlement; to formulate plans for the establishment of a system to regulate armaments; to determine the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression and to recommend what action should be taken; to call on Members to apply economic sanctions and other measures not involving the use of force to prevent or stop aggression; to take military action against an aggressor; to recommend the admission of new Members; to exercise the trusteeship functions of the United Nations in "strategic areas"; To recommend to the General Assembly the appointment of the Secretary-General and, together with the Assembly, to elect the Judges of the International Court of Justice. Recent Sessions: In relation to the set agenda of troubles in the Middle East, the UNSC has met twelve times from 6th of January to the 27th of March. This is a clear indication of the gravity of the situation. Almost a day before the publication of this document, the UNSC has met to discuss threat the instability in the Middle East poses to the security of the world, although no votes were taken on the said matter. Conclusion: The modern Security Council has, despite its slight breach of Article 2(7) but in the spirit of saving humankind from harbingers of political and economical instability, judicial insecurity, and massacres in the name of “freedom”, has decided to intervene in internal matters of the State should the sovereign power’s attempts to curb it fail, and the “disease” threatens to flare globally. Delegates should draw upon this strategy when preparing for the SC at NMUN, bearing in mind that the values of cooperation and compromise are still paramount within the often highly charged atmosphere of SC sessions. The SC can act as an incredibly powerful force for world change, and delegates should reflect on its strengths as well as its weaknesses as they consider the Council’s agenda. Agenda 1: Transnational Terrorism with Specific Focus in the Middle East “NO-ONE IN THIS WORLD CAN FEEL COMFORTABLE, OR SAFE, WHILE SO MANY ARE SUFFERING AND DEPRIVED." Former Secretary General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan March 22, 2002 Monterey, Mexico 1.1 Introduction: Terrorism is commonly defined as violent acts (or the threat of violent acts) intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for a religious, political, or ideological goal, and which deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (e.g., neutral military personnel or civilians). This is the most basic and well known definition which was used included in the dictionaries to define the word ‘terrorism’. However, recent events of aforesaid threat of use of violence by individuals or sub national groups to obtain a political or social objective through intimidation of a large audience beyond that of the immediate victims have given rise to a new term- “Transnational Terrorism”. Through its perpetrators, victims, or audience, transnational terrorism has implications for two or more countries. If an incident starts in one country but terminates in another (e.g., 9/11 and 3/11), then the incident is a transnational terrorist event, as is the case for the hijacking of a plane in country A that is diverted to country B. The kidnapping of foreign workers in Iraq during 2004 to pressure governments to pull their citizens from the U.S.-backed reconstruction efforts represents one of the most penetrating examples of transnational terrorist attacks. 1.2 Affected Areas: The Middle East- The Middle East has been an area associated with transnational terrorism. It has been the target of many Islamic and State terrorist organisations for over two decades now. Despite of repeated attempts to resolve the ongoing dispute in the area, all has been in vain. Thus, this time, the UNSC will specifically focus on these areas of unrest and try to establish peace and equilibrium and peace in the area. Those which pose the most immediate threats are stated below: Al-Qaeda Al-Qaeda (al-kah-ee-də translation: “The Base”) Al-Qaeda, an international terrorist network, is considered the top terrorist threat to the United States. The group is wanted for its September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, as well as a host of lesser attacks. To escape the post-9/11 U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, alQaeda's central leadership fled eastward into Pakistan, securing a safe haven in loosely governed areas there. In July 2007, U.S. intelligence agencies found that the organization was regrouping and regaining strength in these tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan, though targeted killings of senior alQaeda leaders have since diminished the group's command and control capabilities. In February 2009, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair told lawmakers that the group's core "is less capable and effective than it was a year ago." The killing of al-Qaeda's top leader Osama bin Laden by U.S. forces in Pakistan in May 2011 served a significant blow to the organization, but analysts say al-Qaeda remains deadly with its networks spread all over the world. Plus, a number of affiliated groups have gained prominence in recent years, complicating the task of containing the organization. The al-Nusra Front, or Jabhat al-Nusra, ("The Support Front for the People of Al-Sham"), The al-Nusra Front is a branch of al-Qaeda operating in Syria and Lebanon with its current leader as Abu Mohammad al-Julani. The group announced its creation on 23 January 2012, during the Syrian Civil War. The group has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United Nations, the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Turkey. Al-Nusra aims to overthrow the Assad regime and replace it with a Sunni Islamic state. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) also translated as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), self-proclaimed as the Islamic State (IS), is a Sunni, extremist, jihadist rebel group controlling territory in Iraq and Syria. The group originated as Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in 1999, which became Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn—commonly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI)—in 2004. In April 2013, the group changed its name to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. It grew significantly under the leadership of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and by November 2014, ISIL controlled a third of Iraq and Syria. After entering the Syrian Civil War, it established a large presence in the Syrian governorates of ArRaqqah, Idlib, Deir ez-Zor and Aleppo. The group's original aim was to establish an Islamic state in Sunni-majority regions of Iraq. Following its involvement in the Syrian Civil War, this expanded to include controlling Sunni-majority areas of Syria. It then proclaimed a worldwide caliphate on 29 June 2014, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi—known by his supporters as Amir al-Mu'minin, Caliph Ibrahim—was named its caliph, and the group was renamed the Islamic State ISIS is widely known for uploading videos of beheadings onto the internet. November 14, 2014 - The U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria concludes that ISIS has committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, and leaders of the militant group should be held accountable by organizations such as the International Criminal Court Hezbolla Hezbollah (meaning Party of God) is a political and military party in Lebanon founded in 1982 to fight the IsraelI occupation in southern Lebanon. It is regarded by many in the Arab and Muslim world as a legitimate militant Shia political party in Lebanon. In addition to its military wing, Hezbollah maintains a civilian arm, which runs hospitals, various news services, and eductional facilities. South Lebanon was occupied by Israel between 1982 and 2000. Hezbollah fought a guerilla war against Israel and the South Lebanon Army. The fighting culminated during Operation Grapes of Wrath in April 1996 when Israel launched an assault and air-campaign against Hezbollah. The campaign failed and resulted in the Israelis killing more than 100 civilians in one incident alone.In May 2000, Israel withdrew its army from south Lebanon. This was widely considered a victory for Hezbollah and boosted its popularity in Lebanon. The move did not end the conflict because Hezbollah is still contesting Israel's control of the Shebaa farms region. Hamas: Hamas is a Jihadi (fighting for a holy purpose) movement in the broad sense of the word Jihad. It is part of the Islamic awakening movement and upholds that this awakening is the road which will lead to the liberation of Palestine from the river to the sea. Hamas is a Palestinian Islamic organization, with an associated military wing, the Izz ad-Din alQassam Brigades, in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere in the Middle East including Qatar. Hamas' charter calls for the destruction of Israel. Though Hamas does not recognize Israel's legitimacy, in 2011 it committed to a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank. It's not clear whether Hamas could reconcile itself to the existence of Israel. Based on the principles of Islamism gaining momentum throughout the Arab world in the 1980s, Hamas was founded in 1987 (during the First Intifada) as an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Co-founder Sheik Ahmed Yassin stated in 1987 and the Hamas Charter affirmed in 1988, that Hamas was founded to liberate Palestine, including modern-day Israel, from Israeli occupation and to establish an Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In the January 2006 Palestinian parliamentary elections, Hamas won a decisive majority in the Palestinian Parliament, defeating the PLO-affiliated Fatah party. In March 2007, a national unity government headed by Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas was briefly formed, but this failed to restart international financial assistance. Tensions over control of Palestinian security forces soon erupted in the 2007 Battle of Gaza, after which Hamas took control of Gaza, while its officials were ousted from government positions in the West Bank. In 2011, Hamas and Fatah announced a reconciliation agreement that provides for creation of a joint caretaker Palestinian government. Boko Haram: Boko Haram is actually the nickname in the Hausa language for the group officially known in Arabic as "Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati Wal-Jihad"--the People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad. Coined by northern Muslims and subsequently picked up by the press, the name Boko Haram translates loosely as "Western education is forbidden" and is derived from one of the chief tenets of the teachings of Muhammad Yusuf, the group's early leader, who claimed that western style education ("boko" in Hausa) and the holding of government jobs are religiously forbidden, or haram, under Islam. More than five thousand people have been killed in Boko Haram-related violence, and three hundred thousand have been displaced. Some experts view the group as an armed revolt against government corruption, abusive security forces, and widening regional economic disparity. They argue that Abuja should do more to address the strife between the disaffected Muslim north and the Christian south. After its founding in 2002, Boko Haram's increasing radicalization led to a violent uprising in July 2009 in which its leader was executed. Since mid-2014, the militants have been in control of swathes of territory in and around their home state of Borno, but have not captured the capital of the state, Maiduguri, where the group was originally based. It has been speculated that Boko Haram might be supported financially and/or with manpower by other Extremist groups from the Middle-East. 1.3. Role of the UN and The Security Council: In June 1993, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ‘Terrorism and Human Rights subCommission on Human Rights Resolution 2002/24 stated that “terrorism is indeed aimed at the destruction of human rights, fundamental freedoms and democracy and that it could never be justified, including to promote and protect human rights.” However, the committee added that all counterterrorism measures must be used “in strict conformity with international law, including international human rights law and humanitarian law standards.” The key treaty that relates to the subject of human rights and terrorism is Security Council Resolution 1624, which “deals with incitement, stresses that States must ensure that any measures they take to implement the resolution comply with all of their obligations under international law in particular international human rights law, refugee law, and humanitarian law.” The CTC is tasked to monitor state adherence to this notable resolution, report to the Security Council when states infringe upon the treaty, and recommend how to avoid sacrificing civil liberties for security. 1.4. Points of Discussion: On 2 May 2006, former Secretary-General Kofi Annan addressed the launch of the United Nation ‘Uniting Against Terrorism’26 project. In the speech he detailed the five basic pillars of what he termed as a “principled, comprehensive strategy” to fight terrorism globally: Dissuade disaffected groups from choosing terrorism as a tactic to achieve their goals; Deny terrorists the means to carry out their attacks; Deter States from supporting terrorists; Develop State capacity to prevent terrorism; Defend human rights in the struggle against terrorism. 1.5. Some Points which need to be pondered upon include: (i) The quickest response to the growing threats posed to right to life and freedom of all kinds in order to reduce the civilian causality and deaths keeping in mind the humanitarian methods to be employed in methods of counter-terrorism against the above stated Transnational Terrorist Organisations in compliance to resolution 1624. (ii) The arguments of support extended by some member states to UNSC recognised transnational terrorist organisations. (iii) Impact of transnational terrorist activities on economy, trade and commerce, etc. 1.6. A few questions to work on: How has your country responded to Security Council Resolutions regarding Terrorism (UNSCR/1624) and all other such resolutions? How does your country intend to tackle the problems of Middle East? What methods does it propose to The Security Council to fight such problems? Which steps have already been implemented by United Nations or other countries to stop the expansion of the terrorist groups in the Middle-East? How much successful were those attempts and what was the part of their failure, if any? What are the other effects of such activities on the economic, political, social and judicial sections of the society? Agenda 2: The Question of a nuclear free world. “An unconventional threat requires an unconventional response... we face a new dimension in the fight against terrorism” - IAEA Director General Mohamed El Baradei 1.1. Introduction Quite simply, nuclear weapons can be defined as “weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that are powered by nuclear reaction.” They are capable of inflicting massive destruction to property and/or population, using chemical, biological or radioactive material. The following are the current member states with nuclear arsenal: However, North Korea, India, Pakistan, and Israel are all either: alleged, undeclared or known nuclear states. Although the NPT deals with state-state nuclear threats, in terms of the CTC, the threat is when nuclear weapons get into the hands of non-state actors. 1.2. History of the Issue: On 28 April 2004, the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1540(2004) under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter which affirms that the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and their means of delivery constitutes a threat to international peace and security. The resolution obliges States, INTER ALIA, to refrain from supporting by any means non-State actors from developing, acquiring, manufacturing, possessing, transporting, transferring or using nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their delivery systems. Resolution 1540 (2004) imposes binding obligations on all States to daopt legislation to prevent the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, and their means of delivery, and establish appropriate domestic controls over related materials to prevent their illicit trafficking. It also encourages enhanced international cooperation on such efforts. The resolution affirms support for the multilateral treaties whose aim is to eliminate or prevent the proliferation of WMDs and the importance for all States to implement them fully; it reiterates that none of the obligations in resolution 1540 (2004) shall conflict with or alter the rights and obligations of States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the Chemical Weapons Convention, or the Biological Weapons Convention or alter the responsibilities of the IAEA and OPCW. On 27 April 2006, the Security Council extended the mandate of the 1540 Committee for a further two years with the adoption of Resolution 1673 , which reiterated the objectives of Resolution 1540 (2004) and expressed the interest of the Security Council in intensifying its efforts to promote full implementation of the resolution. On 25 April 2008, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1810, which extended the mandate of the 1540 Committee for a period of three years, with the continued assistance of experts, until 25 April 2011. Through Resolution 1810 (2008), the Security Council urged the 1540 Committee to continue strengthening its role in facilitating technical assistance, including by engaging actively in matching offers and requests for assistance, therefore strengthening its clearinghouse function. The Security Council also requested the 1540 Committee to consider a comprehensive review of the status of implementation of Resolution 1540 (2004). As part of this comprehensive review, the 1540 Committee decided to hold an open meeting with broad participation from UN Member States and relevant international organizations. The open meeting took place at UN headquarters from 30 September to 2 October 2009 and a final document is published on the 1540 Committee website. On 20 April 2011, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1977, which reaffirms that the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and their means of delivery constitutes a threat to international peace and security, and extends the mandate of the 1540 Committee for a period of ten years to 2021. The Security Council thus recognizes that full implementation of resolution 1540 (2004) by all States is a long-term task that will require continuous efforts at national, regional and international levels. Resolution 1977 (2011) also provides for two Comprehensive Reviews, one after five years and one before the end of the mandate. Additionally, the 1540 Committee is mandated by resolution 1977 (2011) to continue to strengthen its role to facilitate the provision of technical assistance and to enhance cooperation with relevant international organizations. The Committee is also mandated to continue to refine its outreach efforts, and to continue to institute transparency measures. On 29 June 2012, the Security Council adopted Resolution 2055 (2012), which enlarged the Group of Experts supporting the work of the 1540 Committee to up to nine (9) experts. 1.3. Landmark Treaties: A. The Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material was adopted on 26 October 1979 in Vienna, Austria. The initial signing ceremony took place in Vienna and at New York on 3 March 1980, and the convention entered into force on 8 February 1987. The convention is deposited with the International Atomic Energy Agency. In July 2005 a diplomatic conference was convened to amend the Convention and strengthen its provisions, as a result of which it was renamed the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities. The Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material provides for certain levels of physical protection during international transport of nuclear material. It also establishes a general framework for cooperation among states in the protection, recovery, and return of stolen nuclear material. Further, the Convention lists certain serious offenses involving nuclear material which state parties are to make punishable and for which offenders shall be subject to a system of extradition or submission for prosecution. B. The NPT is a landmark international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. The Treaty represents the only binding commitment in a multilateral treaty to the goal of disarmament by the nuclear-weapon States. Opened for signature in 1968, the Treaty entered into force in 1970. On 11 May 1995, the Treaty was extended indefinitely. A total of 190 parties have joined the Treaty, including the five nuclear-weapon States. More countries have ratified the NPT than any other arms limitation and disarmament agreement, a testament to the Treaty's significance. The provisions of the Treaty, particularly article VIII, paragraph 3, envisage a review of the operation of the Treaty every five years, a provision which was reaffirmed by the States parties at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference. To further the goal of non-proliferation and as a confidence-building measure between States parties, the Treaty establishes a safeguards system under the responsibility of the IAEA. Safeguards are used to verify compliance with the Treaty through inspections conducted by the IAEA. The Treaty promotes cooperation in the field of peaceful nuclear technology and equal access to this technology for all States parties, while safeguards prevent the diversion of fissile material for weapons use. The above are only two of the several landmark and regional treaties all of which the delegates are expected to be well versed with. 1.4. Resolution 1540 In resolution 1540 (2004), the Security Council decided that all States shall refrain from providing any form of support to non-State actors that attempt to develop, acquire, manufacture, possess, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery, in particular for terrorist purposes. The resolution requires all States to adopt and enforce appropriate laws to this effect as well as other effective measures to prevent the proliferation of these weapons and their means of delivery to non-State actors, in particular for terrorist purposes. The UN Office for Disarmament Affairs provides support for activities of the Committee established pursuant to resolution 1540 (2004), which is tasked to report to the Security Council on the implementation of the resolution. Currently, UNODA activities are focusing on the following key areas: Facilitation of national implementation activities including through regionally coordinated approaches Cooperation between international, regional and sub-regional organizations Effective partnerships of key stakeholders including civil society, private sector and academia. 1.5. The Delegates must consider the following while researching the topic: Sanctions imposed on Countries with Nuclear arsenal and their reasons for the same The members, non-members and the other related changes in the number of member states Environmental Impact of Nuclear Weapons Necessity of Nuclear weapons Possession of weapons by politically unstable countries The risk of possession of Nuclear weapons by terrorist organizations 6. The Delegates may also base their research on the following questions: Does your country possess nuclear weapons? Is it a member of any treaty of non-proliferation? What is the stance on the possession of nuclear weapons by the country? What measures does the Member State have in mind to ensure non proliferation? What solution does the Member State have to the ongoing conflict of interest on nuclear deals between countries? The Delegates must bear in mind that the question is that of a nuclear free world and whatever their positions, for or against, they must be able to provide plausible solutions in support of their argument.