Planning Proposal in respect of >

Planning Proposal
Anderson Road
Lot 8 DP 816552, 5 Anderson Road, Berkeley Vale
File No. RZ/4/2009
Anderson Road
Lot 8 DP 816552, 5 Anderson Road, Berkeley Vale
File No. RZ/4/2009
Introduction & Locality Context
1
Part 1
Objectives or Intended Outcomes
2
Part 2
Explanation of Provisions
3
Part 3
Justification
4
Section A – Need for the Planning Proposal
Section B – Relationship to strategic planning framework
Section C – Environmental, Social and Economic Impact
Section D – State and Commonwealth Interests
4
4
13
16
Part 4
Mapping
17
Part 5
Community Consultation
18
Part 6
Project Timeline
19
Introduction & Locality Context
The subject site is located on the boundary of the suburbs Berkeley Vale and Glenning Valley.
The site is mostly cleared with remnant vegetation retained to street frontages. The site is surrounded by
residential development to the north and east and rural residential lots to the south and west. There are
sections of vegetated land to the west and east of the site linked by the existing vegetation to the south
of the site.
Figure 1
Contextual Locality Plan
Part 1
Objectives or Intended Outcomes
The objective of this proposal is to enable development of the vacant site at 5 Anderson Road
Berkeley Vale for residential subdivision whilst respecting the amenity of the area, managing impact
on services and maintaining significant vegetation.
Part 2
Explanation of Provisions
The outcome will be facilitated by an amendment to Wyong Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2013. The
following table identifies the proposed amendments:
Existing Provision
Proposed Amendment
Land Zoning Map
-
(Extract of 8550_COM_LZN_010_ 020_20140204 )
Annexure 04B
-
Lot Size Map
-
(Extract of 8550_COM_LSZ_ 010_020_20140204)
Annexure 04C
Table 1 – Explanation of Map and Instrument Amendments
Change the zoning of the subject lot from
E4 – Environmental Living to R2 – Low
Density Residential
Annexure 04D
Change the minimum lot size from 2 Ha to
450m2.
Annexure 04E
Part 3
Justification
Section A – Need for the Planning Proposal
1.
Is the Planning Proposal a result of any Strategic Study or report?
The land is identified as being within an Urban Development Program area shown in the Central Coast
Regional Strategy (CCRS) Map 2 listed as Figure 2 below.
The land is listed in the Wyong Shire Council Settlement Strategy – Rezoning Request Strategy for short
term investigation.
Following a request from the landowner and provision of supporting studies, Council resolved to
submit the Proposal for a Gateway determination (Annexure 01A).
2.
Is the planning proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is
there a better way?
The simplest method of permitting residential subdivision of the land is considered to be an
amendment to the zone and lot size maps.
Section B – Relationship to strategic planning framework
3.
Is the planning proposal consistent with the objectives and actions contained within the
applicable regional or sub-regional strategy (including the Sydney Metropolitan Strategy and
exhibited draft strategies)?
Central Coast Regional Strategy 2008
The land adjoins an existing urban area in the suburb of Berkeley Vale and Metropolitan Development
Program (MDP) area identified in the CCRS and is considered to be a logical extension of this urban
development.
Figure 2
Extract from CCRS
4.
Is the planning proposal consistent with the local Council’s Community Strategic Plan, or other
local strategic plan?
Wyong Community Strategic Plan (CSP) 2030
The Wyong Shire Community Strategic Plan (CSP) identifies what the Shire Strategic Vision is, how the
vision was created through the community, the importance of the community, Council, State and
Federal Government working together to achieve the Shire’s vision, and how the Shire Strategic Vision
integrates with Council’s Asset Management Strategy and long-term Financial Strategy.
The CSP identifies 8 priority objectives, each supported by a range of actions:
•
Communities will be vibrant, caring and connected with a sense of belonging and pride in their
neighbourhood.
The proposed development is immediately adjoining existing residential development. Opportunities
exist for new residents to participate in existing programs in the district, including community,
business, sports, recreation, education and creative groups. The Planning Proposal is consistent with
the Wyong Shire Settlement Strategy.
•
There will be ease of travel within the Shire and to other regional centres and cities. Travel will be
available at all hours and will be safe, clean and affordable.
The site is close to existing major population areas with good access to services. A bus services
operate along nearby Wyong Road which also provides quick access to the M1 Motorway and
Tuggerah Railway Station.
The development of the land will increase traffic movements on Anderson Road, Hillside Drive,
Beckingham Road and the intersection with Wyong Road. There will be some reduction in ease of car
travel at peak times however assessment of the proposal indicates that these impacts will be relatively
minor. Traffic issues are further discussed in the assessment of the proposal against the Ministerial
Section 117 Directions below.
•
Communities will have access to a diverse range of affordable and coordinated facilities, programs and
services
The proposed development will result in developer contributions to cultural and community facilities,
open space, sports and recreation facilities. Council is currently seeking to increase utilisation of many
of its existing facilities
•
The community will be well educated, innovative and creative; people will attain full knowledge potential
at all stage of life.
Not relevant to this Proposal.
•
Areas of natural value in public and private ownership will be enhanced and retained to a high level in
the context of ongoing development.
It is proposed that significant vegetation on site be maintained through restrictions on the
development of certain parts of the land. The community will be given an opportunity to comment on
any potential impacts of this proposal though the exhibition process.
•
There will be a sense of community ownership of the natural and built environment through direct
public involvement with programs and services.
The community will be given an opportunity to comment on any potential impacts of this proposal
though the exhibition process.
•
There will be a strong sustainable business sector and increased local employment built on the Central
Coast’s business strengths.
Not relevant to this Proposal.
•
Information communication technology will be consistent with the world’s best practice and adaptive to
technological advances across all sectors.
It is recommended that future development of the land facilitate the provision of high speed
broadband services.
The Wyong Shire Settlement Strategy 2013
The Settlement Strategy is Wyong Shire’s principal reference for the management of population
growth, local employment increase and infrastructure access for the next 20 years. The Settlement
Strategy replaces the Wyong Residential Development Strategy 2002 (RDS).
The RDS identified the subject site within Council’s Urban Development Program Strategy (UDP). The
UDP was reviewed in the development of the Settlement Strategy. Subsequently as this Planning
Proposal request had already been lodged, in preference to noting this site as a Wyong RDS retained
site, the completion of this rezoning request as a high priority in the Settlement Strategy (Annexure 05
I).
5.
Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable state environmental planning policies?
The proposal has been considered against the relevant State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPP)
as detailed below.
State Environmental Planning Policy
Comment
SEPP No. 44 – Koala Habitat
Aims to encourage the proper conservation and
management of areas of natural vegetation that
provide habitat for koalas to ensure a
permanent free-living population over their
present range and reverse the current trend of
koala population decline:
(a) by requiring the preparation of plans of
management before development consent
can be granted in relation to areas of core
The ecological assessment by Peak Land
Management (Annexure 05B) submitted with
the Planning Proposal request, notes that lees
than 15% of trees on site are koala feed trees
and therefore in accordance with the
requirements of the SEPP land does not contain
potential koala habitat.
State Environmental Planning Policy
Comment
koala habitat, and
(b) by encouraging the identification of areas of
core koala habitat, and
(c) by encouraging the inclusion of areas of
core koala habitat in environment
protection zones
SEPP 55 – Remediation of Land
Aims to promote the remediation of
contaminated land for the purpose of reducing
the risk of harm to human health or any other
aspect of the environment
(a) by specifying when consent is required, and
when it is not required, for a remediation
work, and
(b) by specifying certain considerations that are
relevant in rezoning land and in determining
development applications in general and
development applications for consent to
carry out a remediation work in particular,
and
(c) by requiring that a remediation work meet
certain
standards
and
notification
requirements.
As required by the Gateway Determination for
the
rezoning
proposal,
a
Preliminary
Contamination
Assessment
has
been
undertaken for inclusion in the public exhibition
material with the planning proposal (refer to
Annexure 05 G).
The report indicates that apart from some
potential of their being some pesticide
contamination from previous agricultural use
the site is considered suitable for residential
development.
It is therefore considered that further sampling
would be required prior to lodgement of a
development application but the relatively
minor prospect of contamination and the
likelihood that any contamination could be
remediated should not preclude the rezoning
process. It is noted that residential development
is currently permissible on the subject site and
surrounding land.
SEPP (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008
The Planning Proposal does not include any
specific provisions relating to Exempt and
Complying Development, nor does it contradict
or repeat any provisions in the SEPP (Exempt
and Complying Development Codes) 2008.
Table 2 – SEPP Assessment
Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (s.117 Directions)?
6.
The proposal has been considered against the relevant Ministerial Section 117 Directions as
summarised below with a full assessment of the relevant Directions following:
No.
Direction
Applicable
Consistent
Employment & Resources
1.1
Business & Industrial Zones
N
N/A
1.2
Rural Zones
N
N/A
1.3
Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive
Industries
Y
1.4
Oyster Aquaculture
N
N/A
1.5
Rural Lands
N
N/A
Y
Environment & Heritage
2.1
Environmental Protection Zones
Y
Y
2.2
Coastal Protection
N
N/A
2.3
Heritage Conservation
Y
Y
2.4
Recreation Vehicle Areas
N
N/A
Housing, Infrastructure & Urban Development
3.1
Residential Zones
Y
Y
3.2
Caravan Parks and Manufactured Home Estates
N
N/A
3.3
Home Occupations
Y
Y
3.4
Integrating Land Use & Transport
Y
Y
3.5
Development Near Licensed Aerodromes
N
N/A
3.6
Shooting Ranges
N
N/A
Hazard & Risk
4.1
Acid Sulfate Soils
N
N/A
4.2
Mine Subsidence and Unstable Land
N
N/A
4.3
Flood Prone Land
N
N/A
4.4
Planning for Bushfire Protection
Y
Y
No.
Direction
Applicable
Consistent
Regional Planning
5.1
Implementation of Regional Strategies
Y
Y
5.2
Sydney Drinking Water Catchments
N
N/A
5.3
Farmland of State and Regional Significance on
the NSW Far North Coast
N
N/A
5.4
Commercial and Retail Development along the
Pacific Highway, North Coast
N
N/A
5.8
Sydney’s Second Airport: Badgery’s Creek:
N
N/A
Local Plan Making
6.1
Approval and Referral Requirements
Y
Y
6.2
Reserving Land for Public Purposes
N
N/A
6.3
Site Specific Provisions
Y
Y
N
N/A
Metropolitan Planning
7.1
Implementation of the Metropolitan Strategy
Table 3 – S117 Ministerial Direction Considerations
Ministerial Direction
Consistency
1.3
Mining, Petroleum Production and
Extractive Industries
Department of Trade and Investment (Mineral
Resources) were consulted prior to public
exhibition and have provided unconditional
support for the proposal having no significant
interest over subject site (Annexure 03 C).
The objective of this direction is to ensure that
the future extraction of State or regionally
significant reserves of coal, other minerals,
petroleum and extractive materials are not
compromised by inappropriate development.
2.1 Environmental Protection Zones
The objective of this direction is to protect and
conserve environmentally sensitive areas.
The subject land is zoned E4 – Environmental
Living under the provisions of the Wyong Local
Environmental Plan, 2013. The objectives of the
zone are:
•To provide for low-impact residential
development in areas with special ecological,
scientific or aesthetic values.
• To ensure that residential development does
not have an adverse effect on those values.
• To allow additional land uses that will not have
an adverse impact on those values.
The subject land is a transition parcel between
the residential development to the north and
east of the subject land and the existing ruralresidential development to the south. The land is
extensively cleared and ecological assessment
and archaeological review reveal limited
potential for adverse impacts should the land be
developed.
By providing residential development on this
cleared transition parcel of land, the wider
planning principles for the area will be
maintained. The development will provide for a
suitable use of the land (rather than a low-scale
sprawling use as currently permitted) and will
provide for a small addition to local housing
supply to cater for existing demand.
Giving the land over to residential development
will not have any significant adverse impacts in
terms of environmental outcomes.
The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH)
were consulted prior to public exhibition (
Annexure 03 A) and have indicated that
provided:
•
Connectivity to vegetation from east to west
is maintained
•
Restrictive covenant to protect vegetation is
applied.
•
Provision of a vegetation management plan
for entire site.
3.1 Residential Zones
Aims to encourage a variety and choice of
housing types to provide for existing and future
housing needs, to make efficient use of existing
infrastructure and services and ensure that new
housing has appropriate access to infrastructure
and services, and to minimise the impact of
residential development on the environmental
and resource lands.
Applies when a planning proposal affects land
It is proposed that these conditions be realised
through appropriate Development Control Plan
(DCP) provisions (Annexure 05 H).
The proposed development offers a residential
development within a transition zone between
the immediately adjoining residential lands to
the north and east of the subject land and the
rural-residential developments to the south. The
proposal can make use of existing infrastructure
including road, sewer connection point, water,
electricity and telecommunications.
within an existing or proposed residential zone,
and any other zone in which significant residential
development is permitted or proposed to be
permitted.
3.3 – Home Occupations
Aims to encourage the carrying out of low impact
small business in dwelling houses.
Applies when the relevant planning authority
prepares a planning proposal.
The proposed rezoning aims to permit for
residential development which may result in
home occupations being carried out within
resulting dwellings. There is nothing within the
proposed rezoning that would detract from
encouraging low impact businesses within future
dwellings.
3.4 Integrating Land Use & Transport
Aims to ensure that urban structures, building
forms, land use locations, development designs,
subdivision and street layouts to achieve:
improving access to housing, jobs and services by
walking, cycling and public transport; increasing
choice of available transport and reducing
transport reliance on cars; reducing travel
demand; supporting efficient and viable public
transport services; and provide for efficient
movement of freight.
The proposed development will result in some
additional traffic movement on the existing road
infrastructure, which is dealt with more
specifically within the Traffic Impact Assessment
(Annexure 05 A). The site specific DCP requires
that there be no direct access to the existing
road network (Annexure 05 H).
Applies when a planning proposal creates alters
or moves a zone or provision relating to urban
land, including land zoned for residential,
business, industrial, village or tourist purposes.
4.4 Planning for Bushfire Protection
This direction provides requirements to be
fulfilled for draft LEPs that affect land mapped as
bushfire prone land.
The objectives of the
direction are to protect life, property and the
environment
from
bushfire
hazard
by
discouraging the establishment of incompatible
land uses in bushfire prone areas and to
encourage sound management of bushfire prone
areas.
The subject land has access to the public
transport options available along the Wyong
Road corridor as well as access to the nearby
pedestrian and cycle opportunities.
The applicant has prepared a Bushfire Impact
Assessment which indicates that the site may be
developed for residential development providing
measures to address bushfire threat are
employed in the subdivision and subsequent
building design (Annexure 05 F).
5.1 Implementation of Regional Strategies
The objective of this direction is to ensure draft
LEPs are consistent with regional strategies such
as the Central Coast Regional Strategy.
There will be some reduction in ease of car travel
at peak times however assessment indicates that
these impacts will be relatively minor.
The NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS) were consulted
prior to public exhibition and have indicated
support for the proposal (Annexure 03 B).
Subdivision design will need to consider required
vegetation retention and the requirements of
Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006.
The planning proposal is considered to be
consistent with the Central Coast Regional
Strategy.
The land adjoins an existing Metropolitan
Development Program) MDP area shown on
Map 2 of the CCRS. The Planning Proposal is
consistent with the objectives and actions
contained within the CCRS, specifically Action 4.4
which requires:
Council to investigate the potential for land
located within and around centres for
future residential opportunities.
6.1 Approval and Referral Requirements
Aims to ensure that LEP provisions encourage the
efficient and appropriate assessment of
development.
6.3 Site Specific Provisions
Aims to discourage unnecessarily restrictive site
specific planning controls.
Applies when the relevant planning authority
prepares a planning proposal to allow particular
development to be carried out.
Table 4 – S117 Ministerial Direction Compliance
The planning proposal does not include
provisions which require additional concurrence
from other agencies.
The LEP will contain land use and lot size
restrictions only.
Any site specific provisions will be provided in a
Development Control Plan (Annexure 05 H).
Section C – Environmental, Social and Economic Impact
7.
Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological
communities, or their habitats, will be adversely affected as a result of the proposal?
The site is predominately cleared with narrow forest remnants along the Anderson Road (western side)
and Gordon Vaughan Road (southern side) frontages, widening in the south-eastern corner of the site.
An Ecological Report was submitted in support of the proposal (Annexure 05 B) and was subject to
Council review.
The Ecological Report (Peak Land Management December 2010) submitted with the rezoning request,
identifies forest types of Coastal Narrabeen Moist Forest and Coastal Foothills Spotted Gum/Grey
Ironbark. Council review indicates the vegetation does not satisfy the Spotted Gum/Grey Ironbark
Forest Ecologically Endangered Community (EEC) descriptors. There are 2 patches of the threatened
flora species Melaleuca biconvexa within the forest remnants.
The 2 patches of Melaleuca biconvexa are intended to be retained within the existing road reserves or
within future residential lots protected by title restrictions. There is likely to be an impact on these
stands of Melaleuca biconvexa as a result of construction of the road access, sewage pump station and
rising main and stormwater management facilities. However, the 2 patches are considered to be small
and isolated and proposed management of impacts through detailed design are considered
reasonable to manage impacts. The impacts are not considered sufficient to prevent the proposal
from proceeding.
Vegetation along the southern boundary is considered to provide a local wildlife connection between
larger fragments to the east and west of the site.
It is proposed to retain trees along the southern and western boundary. This requires an Arborist
Report to assess the health of the trees to identify those suitable for retention or replacement during
the development application process.
A site specific draft DCP (Annexure 05 H) has been developed and requires the submission of an
updated Ecological Assessment Report, is to be considered in the development of the Vegetation
Management Plan, Bushfire Assessment Report, subsequent service plan and lot layout plan.
Site access and servicing location are to be reviewed based on the retention of key vegetation, safe
access and required bushfire protection measures. In addition the draft DCP requires the existing trees
be protected by a restriction on the title of the land.
Figure 3– Vegetation
8.
Source: Peak Land Management 2010
Are there any other likely environmental effects as a result of the planning proposal and how
are they proposed to be managed?
The management of other potential environmental effects including bushfire, contamination and
natural resource management have been dealt with in the assessment within Section B above.
In addition to the considerations mentioned elsewhere in this report, it is noted that a Water Cycle
Management Plan submitted in support of this proposal (Annexure 05 D) indicates that stormwater
quality and quantity issues can be adequately addressed if future residential subdivision is to occur.
9.
Has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic impacts?
Social
Archaeology
An Archaeology Due Diligence Assessment of the land concluded that there was unlikely to be any
Aboriginal objects or artefacts on the land and further impact assessment was not required (Annexure
05 C).
Services
The rezoning of the land and subsequent residential development will create some additional demand
for community, cultural and recreational services.
The rezoning proposal will form an extension to the Berkeley Vale residential community. It falls
within the Southern Lakes Section 94 Contribution Plan catchment. This Plan imposes a contribution
rate for Open Space and Recreational Facilities Works, Community Facilities Works (and administration
of the Plan). The development will generate an increase in the demand for these services and facilities
and will be required to contribute under the Plan and meet its share of the cost of their provision.
The Shire Wide Contributions Plan (library stock, performing arts centre, public art commissions,
regional open space and shire cycleway network and administration costs) will apply to future
development of the land. The development will generate an increase in the demand for these services
and facilities and will be required to contribute under the Plan and meet its share of the cost of these
services.
Economic
The Planning Proposal has been assessed in terms of Council’s Long Term Financial Strategy, Asset
Management Strategy and operational budget. Financial impacts and appropriate management
measures have been identified to ensure the development funds any specific infrastructure, facilities
or services not funded through contributions plans. Assets to be acquired by Council as a result of the
development are considered likely to be financially sustainable. Processing of the Planning Proposal is
to be budget neutral.
No broad economic effects of the Proposal have been identified.
Section D – State and Commonwealth Interests
10.
Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal?
The Proposal is expected to create a marginal increase in demand for public schools, electricity supply,
emergency services, health services, public administration, rail and main road transport and
telecommunications services. A servicing plan based on an indicative subdivision layout has been
provided and indicates that the site can be adequately serviced (Annexure 05 E). Sewer servicing will
require the construction, dedication to Council and provision for funding for the ongoing upkeep of a
sewer pump station. This process is set out in a Voluntary Planning Agreement being considered
concurrently with this Planning Proposal.
Note: the indicative subdivision layout mentioned within Annexure 05 has not been endorsed by Council. The final subdivision
layout will require consideration of the site specific development control plan and other relevant plans and policies at Development
Application stage.
11.
What are the views of State and Commonwealth public authorities consulted in accordance with
the gateway determination?
In accordance with the Gateway Determination dated 11 January 2013 the following Public Authorities
have been consulted prior to exhibition of this Planning Proposal.
Agency
NSW Rural Fire
Service
NSW Trade and
Investment –
Minerals and
Petroleum
Office of
Environment &
Heritage (Planning)*
Comment
Support Proposal
Council Comment
Relevant Section
117 Direction
comments updated
Support Proposal
Support – subject
to suitable
protection of
existing threatened
species
Table 5 – Proposed Agency Consultation List
Relevant Section
117 Direction
comments updated.
To be further
consulted during
exhibition with
additional
information
Part 4
Annexure
04 -A
Mapping
Map Title
Locality Plan
Existing Provision
04 B.
Land Zoning Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LZN_ 010_020_20140204)
04 C.
Lot Size Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LSZ_ 010_020_20140204)
Proposed Provisions
04 D.
Land Zoning Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LZN_ 010_020_20150316)
04 E.
Lot Size Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LSZ_ 010_020_20150316)
Table 6 – Existing and Proposed Provisions
Part 5
Community Consultation
The proposal will be made available for 28 days for community/agency consultation and undertaken
in accordance with any determinations made by the Gateway.
It is expected that the proposal will be made available at the following locations:
-
Wyong Shire Administration Building, 6 Hely Street, Wyong
-
Tuggerah Library and Information Centre, Gavenlock Road, Westfield;
-
Bateau Bay Library, Bay Village Road Bateau Bay and
-
Council’s website (On Exhibition page and Consultation Hub page) www.wyong.nsw.gov.au.
Additionally, notification of the exhibition of the proposal has been provided to adjoining landholders
prior to its commencement.
A public hearing is considered unlikely to be necessary.
Part 6
Project Timeline
Action
Start Date
End Date
Anticipated commencement date (date of Gateway
Determination)
19/11/2013
4/07/2015
Anticipated timeframe for the completion of required
information
19/11/2013
11/03/2015
Timeframe for government agency consultation (post
exhibition as required by Gateway determination)
25/03/2015
15/04/2015
Commencement
exhibition
25/03/2015
24/04/2015
Timeframe for consideration of submissions
24/04/2015
27/05/2015
Timeframe for consideration of a proposal post exhibition
– (Council Report)
16/04/2015
27/05/2015
Date of submission to the Department to finalise LEP
28/05/2015
3/06/2015
Anticipated date RPA will make the plan (if delegated)
15/06/2015
19/06/2015
Anticipated date RPA will forward to the Department for
notification
19/06/2015
3/07/2015
and
Table 7 – Key Project Timeframes
completion
dates
for
public
Supporting Documentation
No.
Document
01
Assessment and Endorsement
A.
Council Report and Minutes – WSC – 25/9/13
B.
Gateway Determination – DP&E – 19/11/13
C.
Gateway Compliance Checklist – WSC – 5/3/14
02
Land Use Provisions
A.
Land Use Tables – Wyong LEP 2013
03
Agency Responses
A.
Office of Environment and Heritage – 17/12/2013
B.
NSW Rural Fire Service – 14/1/14
C.
NSW Trade and Investment – Minerals and Petroleum – 19/12/13
04
Mapping
A.
Locality Plan
Existing Provisions
B.
Land Zoning Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LZN_ 010_020_20140204)
C.
Lot Size Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LSZ_ 010_020_20140204)
Proposed Provisions
D.
Land Zoning Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LZN_ 010_020_20150316)
E.
Lot Size Map
(Extract of 8550_COM_LSZ_ 010_020_20150316)
05
Supporting Studies
A.
Traffic Impact Assessment
B.
Ecological Report
C.
Archaeology Due Diligence Report
D.
Water Cycle Management Plan
No.
Document
E.
Servicing Plan
F.
Bushfire Assessment
G.
Site Contamination Report
H.
Draft Development Control Plan
I.
Extract – WSC Settlement Strategy 2013
Table 8 – Supporting Documentation to the Planning Proposal