Electronic Cigarettes

Transcription

Ogden City
City Council Work Session Notice
January 14, 2014
City Council Work Room
Municipal Building – Third Floor
2549 Washington Boulevard, Ogden, Utah 84401
Notice is hereby given that the Ogden City Council will meet in a Work Session on
Tuesday, January 14, 2014 in the Council Work Room on the third floor of the Municipal
Building located at 2549 Washington Boulevard in Ogden City, Weber County, Utah.
The Work Session will be held immediately following the meetings listed below, which begin
at 6:00 p.m.:
Redevelopment Agency Meeting
Special City Council Meeting
The purpose of the Work Session is to receive an E-cigarette presentation, budget training,
and to discuss Council Business.
Pursuant to Section 52-4-207 “Electronic Meetings” of the Open and Public Meetings Law,
Chair Hyer will participate in the meeting via teleconference, and such electronic means will
provide the public body the ability to communicate via the teleconference.
~~~~~~~
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing auxiliary communicative aids and services for this
meeting should contact the Management Services Department at 629-8701 (TDD # 629-8949) or by email:
ADACompliance@ci.ogden.ut.us at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
The undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and/or agenda was posted in
three public places within the Ogden City Limits on this 10th day of January, 2014. These public places being: 1) City
Recorder’s Office on the 2nd floor of the Municipal Building; 2) 2nd floor foyer of the Municipal Building; and 3) the Weber
County Library. A copy was posted to the Utah State Public Notice Website and the Ogden City Website, as well as
provided to the Standard-Examiner.
TRACY HANSEN, MMC
OGDEN CITY RECORDER
Visit the City Council Meetings page at: councilmeetings.ogdencity.com
Ogden City Council Agenda Information Line – 801-629-8159
PRESENTATION BY WEBER-MORGAN HEALTH DEPARTMENT
REGARDING E-CIGARETTE USAGE TRENDS AND A POTENTIAL
POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING E-CIGARETTE REGULATION
PURPOSE OF
WORK SESSION:
Receive presentation on e-cigarette usage and review
draft policy statement
On December 2, 2013, Kristi Jones, B.S., CHES, with the Weber-Morgan
Health Department gave a presentation to County officials at the Weber
Area Council of Governments (WACOG) meeting regarding e-cigarette
usage among youths and adults in the state and in the Weber-Morgan area.
Ogden City Council Staff was present for that presentation and requested
of Ms. Jones that she give the presentation to the Ogden City Council as
well.
The presentation describes the potential health risks associated with ecigarette usage, highlights the high usage trends Weber-Morgan County
residents, particularly youth, are experiencing, and also describes
regulatory gaps in the state code as well as the regulatory limitations of the
FDA and others. The presentation is accompanied by a draft policy
statement the Weber-Morgan Tobacco-Free Coalition (WMTFC) is
developing to outline the policy changes the WMTFC would like to have
implemented in state code regarding e-cigarettes.
During the work session on January 14, 2014, Ms. Jones and Karina
Frutos with Project Success will be present to review the presentation and
to discuss with Council members the draft policy statement. Discussion
among Council members will include whether, and to what extent, the
Council would like to participate with the WMTFC in drafting and
adopting a policy statement regarding the regulation of e-cigarettes.
______________________________________________________________________________
Memos Prepared By:
Council Staff
Bill Cook, 629-8734
Glenn Symes, 629-8164
Ogden City Council Work Session: January 14, 2014
1
Kristi Jones, B.S., CHES
Karina Frutos, Project Success

Typically consists of 3 parts:
 Battery
– powers the e-cigarette
 Atomizer
- heating element
 Cartridge
– contains nicotine and flavor
(including propylene glycol)
Source: www.compare-electroniccigarettes.com
2003
2006
2010
20062007
2008
2009
National Data 2013
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Source: Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2013. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2011. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
2011
2013
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Source: Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2013. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2011. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
2011
2013

Solutions come in a small bottle
without a child safety cap, and
are often fruit flavored.

Nicotine solutions come in varied strengths and
concentration methods.

Solutions are very concentrated and can contain 500 to
over 1,000 mg of nicotine in one 30 ml (1oz) bottle.

Creates a risk of overdosing or poisoning, as the lethal
dose of nicotine poisoning for:

Adults: 30-60 mg

Children: just 10 mg

Rapidly absorbed through the skin.

Nicotine is highly addictive, can be toxic in high doses, and
has immediate bio-chemical effects on the brain and
body.

Potential negative impact on adolescent brain development

Risk for nicotine addiction and initiation of conventional
cigarettes or other tobacco products.

Youth are sensitive and can feel dependent earlier than
adults

Three out of four teen smokers end up smoking into
adulthood, even if they intend to quit after a few years
• Youth appeal
• New & cool trend
• Split the cost of the device between friends
• E-juice is cheap and can be purchased with lunch $$
•
•
•
•
New & cool trend
Use at school
Use rates have skyrocketed!
Attractive flavors & low price
• Youth groups worked to collect e-cigarette surveys from AugOct.
•
•
•
•
S Ogden Days
Weber Co Fair
Raptors
Demolition Derby
• Convenience sample
• 989 adult surveys
• 386 youth surveys
• Part of a statewide survey
• Waiting on State results
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Ever Tried
Current use e-cigs-every
day
Current use e-cigs-some
days
Current use e-cigs-rarely
Current use e-cigscombined
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Have not used
both
Use both-tried
e-cigs first
Use both-Tried
cigarettes first
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Easy=1
2
3
4
5=difficult
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
A person older than 19
years old or older gave
them to me
Bought at vapor or ecig specialty shop
Bought them at a
convenience store/gas
station
Bought them on the
internet
Gave someone else
money to buy them for
me
Has authority to regulate
• Product
• Whether to regulate as new
products or “modified risk
products”(for which health
claims can be made). The
latter process much harder
for manufacturers to obtain
approval, so likely that ecigarettes will mostly be
marketed as new tobacco
products
• How the product is
marketed
• NO authority over where
e-cigarettes are used and
how they are taxed and
whether they are even sold
• Utah Indoor Clean Air Act §26-38-2(1),(4)(c)
• Youth Access §76-10-104 and §76-10-105
• Schools §53-A-11-902(5)(a)through(d) and §7610-101
• Definition of tobacco products
• Definition is inconsistent in state code
• Price
• Products are not taxed as tobacco products & can be very inexpensive
• Youth access
• Online sales, free samples, paraphernalia
• Retail
• Local health departments do not have the authority to conduct compliance
checks on e-cigarettes. Only law enforcement currently has the authority.
• No requirement for state tobacco retail license
• Schools
• Definition of paraphernalia
• Create an organization policy statement on e-cigs!
• Weber-Morgan Tobacco Free Coalition Draft Statement (emailed)
• Other examples: Utah Medical Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free
Kids, National Association for County and City Health Officials (NACCHO)
• Support at events (Town Hall meetings and Tobacco Prevention
Taskforce Education Day)
• Town Hall Meeting Thrs Jan 23 7-8 pm (location in Ogden TBD)
• Share concerns with legislators
Policy Statement on Youth and Electronic Cigarettes or “E-cigarettes”
The Weber-Morgan Tobacco-Free Coalition (WMTFC) is very concerned about the increase in the use of electronic
cigarettes, or “e-cigarettes” among youth, the increase of sales to youth and overall youth access related to e-cigarettes.
Despite the fact that e-cigarettes are age-restricted by law in Utah, youth use rates have skyrocketed. In Utah, the
percentage of e-cigarette use among middle and high school students tripled from 2011 to 2013. i In the Weber-Morgan
Health District, youth use rates increased by over 500 percent. ii The WMTFC strongly urges the state of Utah to apply
laws governing cigarettes and other tobacco products to e-cigarettes, in order to narrow regulatory gaps related to
youth access of e-cigarettes. The WMTFC supports state legislation that includes any of the following measures:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Extend enforcement authority to the State and local health departments for the sales of electronic cigarettes, electronic
cigarette cartridges, electronic cigarette liquid, and electronic cigarette paraphernalia to underage persons; extends the
application of civil penalties to those sales; and extends licensing and enforcement authority and civil penalties to the
manufacturing of electronic cigarette liquid.
Establish licensing requirement and fees for retail sales of electronic cigarettes, electronic cigarette cartridges, electronic
cigarette liquid and electronic cigarette paraphernalia.
Establish a procedure for the application for, issuance and revocation of retail licenses for the sale of electronic cigarettes,
electronic cigarette cartridges, electronic cigarette liquid and electronic cigarette paraphernalia.
Establish licensing requirement and fees for the manufacture and wholesale sales of electronic cigarette liquid.
Establish a procedure for the application for, issuance and revocation of licenses for the manufacture and wholesale sale of
electronic cigarette liquid.
Extend coverage of code to prohibit providing electronic cigarette cartridges and electronic cigarette liquids to underage
persons.
Rename tobacco paraphernalia to smoking paraphernalia, extends definition of paraphernalia to electronic cigarette
accessories, cartridges and electronic cigarette liquid and extends the prohibition of providing these products to minors.
Include electronic cigarette cartridges and electronic cigarette liquids in the investigations and enforcement authority of
peace officers.
Background
Despite the dramatic rise in the use of e-cigarettes, there is very little known about their actual health risk of their
impact on efforts to reduce youth tobacco use or even help smokers quit. No federal agency currently regulates how ecigarettes are made or how and to whom they are marketed and sold.
While new companies whose primary products are e-cigarettes originally dominated the e-cigarette market, all three
U.S. tobacco companies-Altria/Philip Morris, Reynolds American and Lorillard-have now all entered the e-cigarette
market. Lorillard in 2012 purchased blue eCigs, and is selling them nationally. Altria and Reynolds recently started
selling their e-cigarette products: Reynolds in Colorado in July 2013 and Altria in Indiana in August 2013. Reynolds
American recently announced plans to launch their e-cigarette product, Vuse in Utah in mid-January 2014.
E-cigarettes have also been advertised using themes and images that bear an eerie similarity to the advertising that
decades ago made cigarettes so attractive to youth and made them appear to be an essential part of American culture—
the very type of advertising that is no longer permitted for cigarettes. Several manufacturers, including Lorillard and
NJOY, have recently introduced television-advertising campaigns for their e-cigarettes, and Reynolds has said it plans an
extensive marketing campaign including TV ads.
1
These developments underscore the urgent need for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the state of Utah to
take action to protect public health. The lack of regulation poses serious risks to public health:
Concerns:
•
Nicotine use as a gateway to conventional cigarettes for children
1.
2.
3.
•
Candy-like flavors and product design appeal to children – based on data nationally and from Utah children
1.
2.
3.
•
vi
“Young adults perceive the new tobacco products positively and are willing to experiment with them”
Appealing features, i.e. “high-tech,” colorful, fruit & candy flavors, designed to look like every-day items
vii
In 2011, 1 in 20 Utah Students (grades 8, 10, and 12) had tried e-cigarettes
E-cigarette use has doubled among youth nationally, tripled among youth in Utah
1.
2.
•
In 2012, an estimated 160,000 students in the U.S. who reported ever using e-cigarettes had never used conventional
iii
cigarettes.
In youths, concerns regarding e-cigarette use include the potential negative impact of nicotine on adolescent brain
development, as well as the risk for nicotine addiction and initiation of the use of conventional cigarettes or other
iv
tobacco products.
Youth are sensitive to nicotine and can feel dependent earlier than adults. Because of nicotine addiction, about three
v
out of four teen smokers end up smoking into adulthood, even if they intend to quit after a few years
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recently showed that e-cigarette use has doubled since 2011, prompting CDC’s
viii
conclusion that e-cigarette use is “condemning many kids to struggling with a lifelong addiction to nicotine.
ix
E-cigarette use among youth in Utah has tripled from 2011 to 2013.
E-cigarettes contain significant and unregulated amounts of nicotine which poses the risk of nicotine addiction
– based on recent FDA and published studies
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
•
FDA studies show wide variations in the amount of nicotine, making them poor candidates for a tobacco
x
cessation treatment products - Large deviations from the content claimed on the label
No current regulation of how e-cigarettes are made or what is in them
xi
Poor cartridge labeling that lacks any indication of cartridge content, expiration date, or health warnings
Sold with ambiguous amounts of nicotine on the label. It is unclear if a value (eg, 24 mg), is mg/cartridge or
xii
mg/ml
xiii
Cartridges leak - and pose a poisoning risk to children
i. The Utah Poison Control Center data shows a shocking increasing trend in calls related to exiv
cigarettes, especially among youth under the age of 5 years old.
Lack of licensing requirement for e-cigarette retailers in Utah
f.
Utah does not currently require a tobacco retail license for e-cigarette retailers.
i. Currently, state law only requires tobacco specialty retail licenses for stand-alone e-cigarette
specialty shops opened after July 1, 2012 (Utah State Code 10-8-41-6). There is no way of knowing
how many e-cigarette retailers are in Utah due to the lack of uniform licensing to sell the products.
ii. There are no penalties to stores that sell to minors. Citations can only be issued to the store clerk
who sells by law enforcement (Utah State Code 77-39-101)
Effective regulation can guard against these risks and prevent e-cigarettes from increasing the number of people
addicted to nicotine or re-glamorizing the act of smoking. This is not the first time the tobacco industry has introduced
products they claim will reduce the death and disease caused by existing tobacco products. The tobacco industry has a
long history of deceiving the public and targeting kids, with devastating consequences for the nation’s health. Federal
and state authorities must ensure that history does not repeat itself with a new generation of tobacco products,
including e-cigarettes.
2
i
Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2013. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health. Tobacco Prevention
and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2011. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
ii
iii
iv
v
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Electronic Cigarette Use Among Middle and High School Students-United States, 2011-2012. MMWR 2013;62:729
Dwyer JB, McQuown SC, Leslie FM. The dynamic effects of nicotine on the developing brain. Pharmacol Ther 2009;122:125-39.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office
on Smoking and Health, 2012.
vi
“Young adults perceive the new tobacco products (includes ALL new products such as dissolvables, snus and e-cigs) positively and are willing to experiment with
them,” Choi et al 2012 Choi K, Fabian L, Mottey N, Corbett A, Forster J. Young adults' favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic
cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2088-93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300525. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
vii
viii
ix
Utah Prevention Needs Assessment Survey, 2011
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Electronic Cigarette Use Among Middle and High School Students-United States, 2011-2012. MMWR 2013;62:729
x
Cobb, N. K., Byron, M. J., Abrams, D. B., & Shields, P. G. (2010). Novel nicotine delivery systems and public health: The rise of the “e-cigarette”. American Journal of
Public Health, 100, 2340–2342. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.199281
xi
Trtchounian, A. & Talbot, P. (December 7, 2010) Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Is there a need for regulation? Tobacco Control. 2011;20:4752 doi:10.1136/tc.2010.037259
xii
xiii
xiv
Utah Poison Control Center. Calls related to tobacco and nicotine. University of Utah, College of Pharmacy. L.S. Skaggs Pharmacy Institute. Received 11/4/2013.
3
FY14 WM E-cigarette
Surveys Adult & Youth
Guymon, Anna
10/16/2013
2013 WM E-cigarette Surveys Adult & Youth
Table of Contents
Weber-Morgan Adult E-cig survey .......................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 1 Weber-Morgan Adult E-cig Survey 2013 (n=989) ................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2 Adult tobacco use status WM (n=989) ................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 3 2013 WM Adult Use of E-cigarettes (n=989) ........................................................................................................ 4
Figure 4 2013 WM Adult E-cig Survey-Policy Support (n=989)........................................................................................... 4
Events Where Surveys Were Completed: ....................................................................................................................... 5
Weber-Morgan Youth E-cig Survey ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 5 2013 Youth Experimentation and Use of Tobacco Products (n=386) ................................................................... 6
Figure 6 2013 WM Youth Experimentation and Use of E-cigarettes (n=386)..................................................................... 7
Figure 7 Initiation E-cigs and Cigarettes (n=those who have tried e-cigs) WMHD Convenience Sample Data 2013 n=386
............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Figure 8 How easy is it for you to get e-cigs? (scale of 1-easy to 5-difficult) WMHD Convenience Sample Data 2013
n=386 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
Figure 9 How do you usually get your e-cigs? WMHD Convenience Sample Data 2013 n=386 ......................................... 8
Events Where Surveys Were Completed: ....................................................................................................................... 9
2
Weber-Morgan Adult E-cig survey
Convenience sample. Collected at various community events from 7/1/2013-10/6/2013
(sample size: 989 age 18+)
Figure 1 Weber-Morgan Adult E-cig Survey 2013 (n=989)
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
18-24
25-39
40.00%
40-55
30.00%
56+
Female
20.00%
Male
10.00%
0.00%
Age group
Gender
Figure 2 Adult tobacco use status WM (n=989)
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
Current tobacco user
Former tobacco user
30.00%
Never tobacco user
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Tobacco Use Status
3
Figure 3 2013 WM Adult Use of E-cigarettes (n=989)
25.00%
Ever Tried
20.00%
Current Use-Every Day
15.00%
Current use-Some days
Current use-rarely
10.00%
Current use-combined (dual
use)
5.00%
Never tobacco users who have
tried e-cigs
0.00%
Adult Use of Electronic Cigarettes
Figure 4 2013 WM Adult E-cig Survey-Policy Support (n=989)
50%
45%
40%
Adjusting tax for e-cigs to match
Utah cigarette excise tax
35%
30%
Include e-cigs in tobacco
retailer compliance checks
25%
Require a license for selling ecigs
20%
15%
Ban outdoor and store front
advertisements
10%
5%
0%
Support Policy
4
Events Where Surveys Were Completed:
Frequency
536 24th street
COR Meeting
Fellowship Manor-MUH
1
24
5
Halloween Havoc
59
New Zion Baptist Church
17
ongoing
44
Parker Hannifin health fair
Project Success-Juneteenth
Raptors
Riverdale Elementary School Town
Hall Mtg
Roy Night Out
2
19
102
17
36
S Ogden Days
55
Salvation Army
130
St. Benedict's Manor
UTA Event
Weber County Fair
Weber State University Block Party
Women's Retreat House
Worksite health fair - Barnes
Aerospace
Total
4
17
329
91
35
2
989
5
Weber-Morgan Youth E-cig Survey
Convenience sample. Collected at various community events from 7/1/2013-10/6/2013
(sample size: 386 age 10-17years, age mean: 14.78years)
Gender
Male
Female
Figure 5 2013 Youth Experimentation and Use of Tobacco Products (n=386)
25%
Ever tried cigarettes
20%
Ever tried snuff, chew or dip
15%
Ever tried cigars, little cigars,
pipes
Used cigarettes in past 30 days
10%
Used chew, dip or snuff in past
30 days
5%
Used cigars, little cigars or pipes
in past 30 days
0%
Experimentation and Use of Tobacco Products
6
Figure 6 2013 WM Youth Experimentation and Use of E-cigarettes (n=386)
30%
25%
20%
Ever Tried
Current use e-cigs-every day
15%
Current use e-cigs-some days
Current use e-cigs-rarely
Current use e-cigs-combined
10%
5%
0%
Figure 7 Initiation E-cigs and Cigarettes (n=those who have tried e-cigs) WMHD
Convenience Sample Data 2013 n=386
70%
Have not used
both
60%
50%
40%
Use both-tried
e-cigs first
30%
20%
10%
Use both-Tried
cigarettes first
0%
7
Figure 8 How easy is it for you to get e-cigs? (scale of 1-easy to 5-difficult) WMHD
Convenience Sample Data 2013 n=386
70%
60%
50%
Easy=1
40%
2
30%
4
3
5=difficult
20%
10%
0%
Figure 9 How do you usually get your e-cigs? WMHD Convenience Sample Data 2013
n=386
30%
A person older than 19 years
old or older gave them to
me
25%
20%
Bought at vapor or e-cig
specialty shop
15%
Bought them at a
convenience store/gas
station
10%
Bought them on the internet
5%
0%
8
Events Where Surveys Were Completed:
END Class
9
Halloween Havoc
14
Highland Jr
19
Northern Utah Coalition presentation-Weber Valley Youth Detention
13
Project Success Event
14
Raptors
30
Roy Night Out
13
S Ogden Days
58
UTA Event
4
Weber County Fair
144
Weber State University Block Party
22
Weber Valley Detention
46
TOTAL
386
9
Youth Survey (Ages 12-18)
1. What is your age? ____ years
2. What is your gender?  female
 male
 other
3. Have you ever tried…?
 Cigarettes
 Chewing tobacco, snuff, or dip
 Cigars, little cigars, or pipes
4. Have you used any of the following in the past 30 days?
 Cigarettes
 Cigars, little cigars, or pipes
5. Have you ever tried Electronic Cigarettes or E-cigarettes (also known as Personal Vaporizers or PVs)?
 Yes
 No (Skip To Question 11)
6. If you have tried both E-cigarettes and regular cigarettes, which one did you try first?
 I have not tried both E-cigarettes and regular cigarettes
 I tried E-cigarettes first
 I tried regular cigarettes first
7. Have you used E-cigarettes in the past 30 days?
 Every day
 Some days
 Rarely
 Not at all (Skip To Question 11)
8. What is your most important reason for using E-cigarettes? (Please describe)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
9. In the past 30 days, how did you usually get your E-cigarettes?
 I bought them at a Vapor or E-cigarette specialty shop
 I bought them at a regular store (convenience store, supermarket, discount store, gas station)
 I bought them on the Internet
 I gave someone else money to buy them for me
 A person 19 years old or older gave them to me
 Other (please describe) _________________________________________________________________
10. On a scale of 1-5, how easy is it for you to get E-cigarettes? (very easy)  1  2  3  4  5 (very difficult)
11. According to Utah law, where is use of E-cigarettes allowed? (Check one answer)
 in any location, indoors and outdoors
 only in locations where cigarette smoking is allowed
 not sure
12. During the past 30 days, how often have you seen other students use E-cigarettes on school property?
 Never
 1-3 times in the past 30 days
 1-3 times per week
 Daily or almost daily
 More than once a day
13. Does your school have a policy that bans the possession or use of E-cigarettes?  Yes  No  Not sure
14. Do you think that you might try E-cigarettes in the future?  Yes  No
15. In your opinion, do E-cigarettes contain any of the following?  Toxins  Addictive substances  Neither
16. What is your zip code? ___________
17. What is your race or ethnicity? (Check all that apply)
 American Indian or Alaska Native
 Black or African American
 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
18. Do you consider yourself?
 Heterosexual or straight
 Gay or lesbian
 Bisexual
 Asian
 Hispanic or Latino
 White
 Other
 Not sure
THANK YOU!
Adult Survey
1. What is your age?
 12-17
 18-24
 25-39
2. What is your gender?
 female
 male
 other
3. Are you a ….. Current tobacco user
 Former tobacco user
 Never tobacco user
 40-55
 56+
 Do you currently use…  Cigarettes
(check all that apply)
 Cigars or pipes
4. Have you ever tried Electronic Cigarettes or E-cigarettes (also known as Personal Vaporizers or
PVs)?  Yes
 No (Skip To Question 7)
5. Do you now use E-cigarettes?
 Every day
 Some days
 Rarely
 Not at all (Skip To Question 7)
6. What is your most important reason for using E-cigarettes? (Please describe)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
7. According to Utah law, where is use of E-cigarettes allowed? (Check one answer)
 in any location, indoors and outdoors
 only in locations where cigarette smoking is allowed
 not sure
8. Please indicate what kind of E-cigarette policies you would support? (Check all that apply)
 adjusting the tax for E-cigarettes to match the Utah cigarette excise tax
 including E-cigarettes in tobacco retailer compliance checks to enforce underage sales restrictions
 requiring a license for selling E-cigarettes
 banning outdoor and store front advertisements for E-cigarettes
9. Do you think that you might try E-cigarettes in the future?  Yes  No
10. How do you rank the health risk for Electronic Cigarettes?
 Safe
 Some risk
 Great risk
 Not sure
11. What is your zip code? ___________
THANK YOU!
Optional demographic questions:
What is your race or ethnicity? (Check all that apply)
 American Indian or Alaska Native
 Asian
 Black or African American
 Hispanic or Latino
 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
 White
Do you consider yourself?
 Heterosexual or straight
 Gay or lesbian
 Bisexual
 Other
 Not sure
TPCP Data Update: Electronic Cigarettes
Experimentation and Use of Electronic Cigarettes Among Utah Students (Grades 8, 10, 12) by Local Health District,
2011 and 2013
Bear River
Central
Davis
Salt Lake County
Southeast
Southwest
Summit
Tooele
TriCounty
Utah County
Wasatch
Weber-Morgan
Total
e cig experimentation, grades 8, 10, 12
2011
2013
3.3%
10.1%
4.1%
9.3%
4.6%
13.7%
7.1%
13.5%
5.4%
10.2%
2.7%
7.8%
5.4%
14.0%
7.8%
13.2%
4.3%
13.8%
2.4%
4.4%
6.4%
8.8%
7.9%
30.0%
5.2%
12.1%
30 day use of e-cigs, grades, 8,10,12
2011
2013
1.1%
5.2%
1.4%
1.8%
1.6%
8.9%
2.5%
5.3%
1.6%
3.1%
0.9%
3.0%
2.7%
4.2%
2.5%
5.9%
1.7%
4.2%
0.8%
1.8%
2.3%
4.5%
3.6%
19.9%
1.9%
5.9%
Source: 2011 and 2013 Utah PNA
Use of Tobacco Product by Type of Product, Utah Students (Grades 8, 10, 12), 2011 and 2013
30 day use, grades 8,10,12
2011
Cigarettes
5.2%
Smokeless Tobacco
1.6%
Cigars
2.5%
Electronic Cigarettes
1.9%
Hookah
4.5%
Snus
1.2%
Source: 2011 and 2013 Utah PNA
2013
3.8%
1.1%
2.0%
5.9%
4.6%
0.7%
Experimentation and Use of Electronic Cigarettes Among Utah Adults (18+), 2012
e cig experimentation
current use of e-cigs
Adults 18+
8.0%
1.9%
Current Cigarette Among Utah Adults (18+), 2012: 10.2%
Source: 2012 BRFSS
Utah Poison Control Center Calls Related to Tobacco and Nicotine
Product 2011 Exposures All Exposures <=5 2012 Exposures All Exposures <=5 1/1/13‐11/4/13 Exposures All Exposures <=5 Chewing tobacco 8 9 14 16 14 15 Cigarettes Cigars Snuff Unknown Tobacco 67 1 2 8 70 1 2 14 53 0 5 15 57 0 6 21 64 0 2 12 69 0 2 22 E‐cig device E‐cig liquid cartridge 3 0 6 1 9 1 15 1 40 1 61 1 Tobacco Prevention and Control in Utah
Thirteenth Annual Report, August 2013
Utah Department of Health, Tobacco Prevention and Control Program
Table of Contents
Tobacco Prevention and Control Update
Anti-tobacco Ads and Cessation Services
Youth Prevention and Cessation
Ending Tobacco-related Disparities
The Effects of Tobacco on our Communities
Utah Cigarette Consumption and Expenditures
Effects of Tobacco on Our Communities
Smoking Rates by Local Health District and Small Area 4
5
6
7
7
8
Capacity and Infrastructure
Building Tobacco-free Communities 9
Use of Funds FY201310
Local Health Department Updates
Bear River Health Department11
Central Utah Public Health Department
12
Davis County Health Department13
Salt Lake County Health Department
14
Southeastern Utah District Health Department
15
Southwest Utah Public Health Department
16
Summit County Health Department17
Tooele County Health Department18
TriCounty Health Department19
Utah County Health Department20
Wasatch County Health Department21
Weber-Morgan Health Department22
References23
The Tobacco Prevention and Control Program Informs Utahns About New Tobacco and Nicotine Products
• Electronic cigarettes are currently not regulated for safety
or for effectiveness as a quit device.
• The lack of regulation is of great concern due to poor
labeling; varying nicotine content; insufficient child safety
caps; and use of fruit and candy flavors that are attractive
to children.
• The nicotine contained in most electronic cigarette
products perpetuates nicotine addiction.
E-cigarettes are banned in the
same places as cigarettes.
Offices, restaurants, bars, schools, movie theaters, airplanes—according to the Utah Indoor Clean Air Act, if cigarettes aren’t
allowed, neither are e-cigarettes. Museums, music venues, delis, coffee shops, thrift stores, TRAX—we could go on like this all
• Due to lack of data regarding safety or use as a
tobacco cessation aid, electronic cigarettes cannot be
recommended as a safe alternative to cigarette smoking.
2
day. So the next time you want to use an e-cigarette here, there, or anywhere cigarettes aren’t allowed, remember, they aren’t
just unsafe and untested, they’re banned.
1.800.QUIT.NOW
Letter from the Executive Director
The mission of the Utah Department of Health is to protect the public’s health through
preventing avoidable illness, injury, disability and premature death; assuring access to
affordable, quality health care; and promoting healthy lifestyles.
Tobacco use is a leading cause of preventable death, disease, and disability in Utah
and the reduction of tobacco use remains an important public health priority. In addition
to contributing to Utah’s primary causes of death such as cancer, heart disease, and
respiratory diseases, tobacco use causes or worsens most chronic diseases. Utah’s
economy loses $663 million each year due to smoking-related medical costs and lost
productivity.
Recent increases in smoke-free policies and subsequent declines in cigarette smoking
have led to the development of a growing number of alternative tobacco or nicotine
products. These products, which include electronic cigarettes, hookahs, and dissolvable
tobacco, are marketed as safe and “cool”. Increasing use of these products, especially
among youth, is alarming since long-term health risks are unknown and nicotine addiction
caused by these products may serve as a gateway to cigarette smoking. To continue to
reduce the burden of tobacco use in Utah, a sustained commitment to effective tobacco
prevention and cessation interventions is needed.
The Tobacco Prevention and Control Program (TPCP) works with many partners to offer
proven tobacco prevention and cessation programs. Our free and confidential phone
and web-based quit programs help thousands of Utah tobacco users to quit each year.
Tobacco-free policies in schools and communities prevent youth from starting to use
tobacco, and protect Utahns from secondhand smoke. Community-based programs
ensure that those at higher risk for tobacco use have access to programs and services
that meet their unique needs.
•
Since 2001, TPCP-funded quit services, the Utah Tobacco Quit Line (1.800.QUIT.NOW)
and UtahQuitNet.com, have served more than 100,000 tobacco users.
•
As a result of the Recovery Plus Partnership between the TPCP and the Division of
Substance Abuse and Mental Health (DSAMH), all of Utah’s publicly-funded substance
abuse and mental health clinics (serving 17,000 clients) adopted tobacco-free campus
policies and integrated tobacco cessation into treatment protocols.
•
The TPCP partnered with businesses, health plans, and healthcare providers to form the
Utah Tobacco Prevention Task Force, which promotes comprehensive tobacco-free policies
and works to increase access to cessation services in business and healthcare settings.
It is my pleasure to present this report detailing our accomplishments for FY13. We express
our appreciation to the Utah State Legislature, Tobacco Control Advisory Committee, our
Independent Evaluation Team at the Research Triangle Institute, and our state and local
partners for their guidance and commitment.
Above: Gavin Hoffman,
MaryBeth and Bob Stover, and
Scarlet Hartwell were among
seven Utahns who shared their
efforts to quit smoking as part
of the inspirational TPCP
Your support provides us with the opportunity to promote healthy lifestyles for all Utahns.
What a privilege it is to work on behalf of the community and for the community to make a
better future for us all.
Sincerely,
“Be A Quitter” TV and
Internet campaign. Their
stories can be found at http://
beaquitterutah.com/.
W. David Patton, Ph.D.
Executive Director
3
Tobacco Prevention and Control Update
OUR MISSION
The Utah Department of Health (UDOH) Tobacco Prevention and Control Program (TPCP) and our partners use
proven and comprehensive strategies to reduce tobacco use and related disease and death.
Anti-tobacco Ads and Cessation Services
Helping Tobacco Users Quit for Good
10.2%
Utah’s adult smoking rate remains the
lowest in the na-
75%
of Utah adult
smokers plan to quit
within a year.1
The TPCP’s anti-tobacco advertising campaign
continued to encourage tobacco users to quit.
The campaign used a mix of ads that graphically
showed the health effects of tobacco use and
messages that inspired tobacco users to keep trying
to quit. All ads informed about quit services and
resources. TPCP used TV, radio, Internet, and print
media to distribute campaign messages.
88% of adult smokers are aware of the Utah
Tobacco Quit Line (1.800.QUIT.NOW) and 92%
know about UtahQuitNet.com.2
Above: Quit Line counselor
Michelle is taking calls at the Utah
Tobacco Quit Line (UTQL).The
UTQL is free and confidential.
Callers receive quit kits, personal
quit plans, and counseling
sessions tailored to their needs.
In FY13, the Utah Tobacco Quit Line and UtahQuitNet had more than 9,200 new registrations. Since 2001, more than 100,000 Utahns have used these services.
In FY13, 51% of Utah’s Quit Line users were uninsured and 19% were enrolled in Medicaid.
42% of Quit Line callers and 31% of QuitNet users reported 30 consecutive days of tobacco use cessation during their
7-month followup surveys.3
Partnering with Businesses and Providers to Promote Quitting
The Utah Tobacco Prevention Task Force consists of healthcare providers, business and healthcare leaders,
and public health experts who work together to promote quitting and reduce tobaco use. On May 1, 2013,
the Task Force partnered with Utah’s major health plans to conduct a Tobacco-free Workforce Summit. More
than 100 participants from 23 industries learned about tobacco cessation benefits and policies.
Monitoring Tobacco Use Trends
4
Who Currently Smoke Cigarettes by Year,
2009-2012.1
11.5
11.2
11.3
10.2
2010
2011
2012
20
2009
Please note: Due to survey methodology changes, smoking rates reported before
2009 are not comparable to the rates listed in Figure 2.1
Figure 1. Percent of Utah Adults (18+)
Percentage
Survey data indicate that one in 10 Utah adults (more than 200,000 Utahns)
currently smoke cigarettes. Strong tobacco-free policies, ongoing educational
interventions, and quit services are needed to further reduce the number of
people addicted to nicotine and the social and economic burden associated
with this addiction.
10
0
Youth Prevention and Cessation
Nearly 90% of adult smokers start by age 18. We’re working to prevent youth from starting to smoke and helping those who
use tobacco to quit before it becomes a lifelong habit.
Utah’s anti-tobacco youth coalition Outrage educated fellow
teens about the addictive properties of new tobacco products
like e-cigarettes, dissolvable tobacco, and hookah, all of which
are marketed as safe and cool.
Twenty-two school districts serving 220,000 students in
470 schools have worked with us since 2002 to pass and
enforce comprehensive tobacco-free campus policies and offer
tobacco prevention education.
In FY13, 460 Utah youth tobacco users took part in the Utahdeveloped teen cessation class Ending Nicotine Dependence
(END).
illegal sales of tobacco to underage youth have
declined 62% to a statewide rate of 6.1%. The TPCP partSince 2001,
nered with Utah’s 12 local health departments to educate tobacco
retailers about Utah tobacco laws and to recognize stores that
have a record of not selling tobacco to underage youth.
Above: Members of Utah’s new statewide youth antitobacco group, OUTRAGE, at their planning meeting in
April 2013.
18.1%
The national youth
cigarette smoking rate.4
5.9%
Utah’s youth cigarette
smoking rate.4
50%
Decline in youth cigarette
smoking in Utah since 1999.4
The percent of Utah high school students who have tried cigarette smoking has declined 41% since 1999.4
In the last 15 years, Utah has seen
significant declines in cigarette experimentation and use among youth. With
stronger smoke-free policies and growing
social norms that discourage cigarette
smoking, a variety of new tobacco
Figure 2. Percent of Utah Students in Grades 8, 10, and 12 Who Tried Tobacco Products by
Type of Product and Gender, Utah, 2011.5
8.0%
11.5%
Cigars, cigarillos,
little cigars
2.5%
7.4%
Chew
11.5%
11.8%
Hookah
2.1%
6.3%
Flavored
chew
4.9%
5.5%
E-cigarettes
3.4%
5.1%
Snus
and nicotine products have flooded
U.S. markets. Due to unsubstantiated
claims about the safety of these products
and frequent use of candy-like flavors,
these products pose the risk of serving as
a gateway to cigarette smoking
for youth and young adults and of
prolonging nicotine addiction in
current tobacco users.
5
Ending Tobacco-related Disparities
Utah minority populations, members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community, Utahns with low income
or lower levels of formal education, and those suffering from substance abuse or mental health issues are disparately affected by
tobacco use and TPCP strives to end these disparities.
Utah’s
LGBT community reports high rates of cigarette smoking. 27% of Utah adults
who identify as gay or lesbian and 31% of those who identify as bisexual report current
smoking (2011/12).1 Tobacco industry marketing targeting these groups has been identified
as a major cause of these disparities.
Among racial and ethnic groups, smoking rates are highest in the African American and
Native American communities.
Percent of Current Smokers
Figure 3. Percent of Utah Adults Who Reported Current Cigarette Smoking by
Race or Ethnicity, Utah, 2010-2012 (Combined Data; Age-adjusted)1
Above: TPCP works closely with
RespiraUtah, the Hispanic/Latino
Network, to ensure that Spanish language advertisements are
culturally and linguistically appropriate. The poster shown above was
developed as part of the statewide
“Quitting for Real” campaign.
50
40
30
20
19.7
20.2
11.7
8.5
11.0
10.8
10
0
The TPCP funds five community-based networks to address tobacco use with strategies that consider the social, spiritual, and health implications unique to each community. In FY13, the networks that represent Utah’s African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino, Pacific Islander, and LGBT communities completed
comprehensive community needs assessments.
In FY13, 2,345 Medicaid clients gained access to tobacco cessation services and
counseling through a collaborative effort between Medicaid and TPCP. 20% of Utahns who
are covered by Medicaid report that they currently smoke cigarettes (2012).1
Nearly 1,600 pregnant women on Medicaid and 895 low-income or uninsured tobacco users received free counseling
and tobacco cessation prescriptions during FY13.
Since May 2013, Utah’s publicly-funded substance abuse and mental health treatment facilities serving17,000 clients
have policies in place that prohibit tobacco use on clinic grounds and ensure that tobacco cessation services are available
as part of treatment. These policies were passed as part of the Recovery Plus initiative and are expected to reduce the
high tobacco use rates among substance abuse and mental health clients.
6% of Utah’s pregnant women report that they smoked while pregnant (2011). Smoking among pregnant women has decreased by 24% since 1999. 12% of pregnant teens and 13% of pregnant women with a high school education or less
6
6
report smoking during pregnancy (2011).6
6
The Effects of Secondhand Smoke
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen, similar to asbestos,
and repeated exposure can have many of the same harmful effects as direct exposure to tobacco. In a 2012 study, TPCP
found that:
19,800 Utah children age 17 and younger were exposed to secondhand smoke at home in the past week.
1
39.5% of Utah adults reported breathing secondhand smoke in the past week at indoor or outdoor locations.
1
Eliminating Secondhand Smoke Exposure
TPCP helps to protect Utahns from the harmful effects of tobacco
smoke by educating business owners, housing managers, and community members about tobacco-free policies. In FY2013:
155 publicly-funded substance abuse and mental health treatment
facilities and 4 hospitals or clinics adopted policies to protect Utahns
from secondhand smoke.
In addition, 11 worksites and 4 municipalities or outdoor recreation
venues adopted tobacco-free policies.
1,528 new smoke-free housing units were listed in the TPCP’s
Smoke-free Apartment and Condominium Statewide Directory.
Above: Cassandra Fairclough, Gloria Sawyer, Siosia
Hafoka, and Leslie Haberkern educate multi-unit housing managers about smoke-free housing policies at the
2013 Utah Apartment Association Trade Show.
21,000 smoke-free housing units are now available in 17 counties.
Utah Cigarette Consumption and Expenditures
2010 State Cig Tax
Increase:
$0.70 to $1.70
40
30
20
10
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
0
2000
costs and lost productivity.8
2002 State Cig Tax
Increase:
$0.52 to $0.70
50
1998
omy an estimated $663 million
annually in smoking-related medical
60
1996
Tobacco use costs the Utah econ-
70
1994
sumption has declined by 57%.7
1997 State Cig Tax
Increase:
$0.27 to $0.52
80
1992
Since 1990, Utah’s cigarette con-
Number of Cigarette Packs Sold per Capita by Year, Utah, 1990-20127
1990
those same years.
Figure 4.
Number of Cigarette Packs Sold per Capita
Decreases in Utah’s per capita
cigarette consumption in 1997,
2002, and 2010 coincide with
increases in cigarette taxes
7
Smoking Rates by Local Health District and Small Area
0.0
LHD or Small Area
Bear River LHD
Other Cache/Rich County
Logan
Other Box Elder County
Brigham City
Central Utah LHD
Juab/Millard/Sanpete Counties
Sevier/Piute/Wayne Counties
Davis County LHD
*Farmington/Centerville
Bountiful
Syracuse/Kaysville
Layton
Woods Cross/No SL
Clearfield/Hill AFB
Salt Lake County LHD
*South Jordan
Sandy, SE
Foothill/U of U
*Sandy, NE
Riverton/Draper
West Jordan, W/Copperton
Millcreek
Cottonwood
Rose Park
West Jordan, SE
Avenues
Holladay
West Jordan, NE
South Salt Lake
Sandy Center
Murray
Midvale
Downtown Salt Lake
Taylorsville
West Valley I
West Valley II
Magna
Kearns
Glendale
Southeastern Utah LHD
Grand/San Juan Counties
Carbon/Emery Counties
Southwest Utah LHD
Other Washington Co.
Cedar City
St. George
Other Southwest Dist.
Summit County LHD
Tooele County LHD
TriCounty LHD
Utah County LHD
**Provo/BYU
West Orem
*American Fork/Alpine
*Provo South
Lehi/Cedar Valley
North Orem
Springville/Spanish Fork
Pleasant Grove/Lindon
Utah Co. South
*East Orem
Wasatch County LHD
Weber-Morgan LHD
Riverdale
South Ogden
Morgan/E Weber Co.
Roy/Hooper
Ben Lomond
Downtown Ogden
8
10.0
20.0
Utah State
Rate 10.8%
US Rate
19.8%
30.0
40.0
Percent Current Smokers
Figure 5.
Current Cigarette Smoking by Local Health
District, Small Area, Utah, and U.S. Adults, 2011-2012, LLCP
Raking, (Aggregate data, age-adjusted)1
Small Area
Local Health District
How to Read this Graph:
Local health districts are represented by
blue bars. Small areas within local health
districts are represented by orange bars.
Small area definitions can be found in the
Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System Small Area Report, 2001-2005,
Appendix C.
The horizontal lines represent 95%
confidence intervals, which indicate that
the given interval will contain the true
measurement value 95% of the time.
We use small area data to identify and reach
individuals who are at higher risk for tobacco
use.
26.2%,
At
Glendale has the highest smoking
rate among small areas statewide.
2.5%,
At
West Orem has the lowest smoking
rate among small areas statewide.
* These estimates have relative
standard errors of >30% and do not
meet UDOH standards for reliability.
**The estimate for Provo/BYU has
been suppressed because the relative
standard error was greater than 50% or
it could not be determined.
Capacity and Infrastructure
Building Tobacco-free Communities
More than 85% of Utah TPCP funding is passed on to other agencies and local communities. To ensure that these
funds are used effectively, TPCP provides infrastructure, assistance, and evaluation services to our partners.
Statewide Services
By providing statewide services, we save money and make sure that services are
the same from place to place. As part of our statewide coordination and support
efforts, we work with local health departments and other partners to:
• Create a statewide strategic plan and submit progress reports for state and
federal funding sources
• Educate tobacco retailers and provide training to help them understand
underage tobacco sales laws and meet national standards for the Division of
Substance Abuse and Mental Health’s federal block grant funding
• Provide tobacco cessation services for youth, adults, and pregnant women
throughout Utah
• Offer tobacco cessation counseling and quit medications to low-income
Utahns
• Collaborate with healthcare providers and insurance companies to make
tobacco cessation services more widely available
• Develop new marketing materials for local and high-risk groups
• Work closely with the community to reach out to those who are disparately
affected by tobacco use
Coordination and Planning
As a part of our ongoing commitment to offer technical assistance and to bring
communities together to share ideas, we:
• Share information about secondhand smoke prevention and amendments and
the Utah Indoor Clean Air Act
• Conduct site visits and help partners through regular telephone and e-mail
communication
• Provide policy guides, educational materials, and other resources
Data and Evaluation
TPCP uses and distributes data to make sure we reach those who need our help
the most. In addition, we evaluate all of the programs we fund. To support our
funded partners in their efforts to collect and analyze their own data, we:
• Share survey data that help identify groups and locations with the highest
tobacco use rates
• Help plan evaluations, create surveys or focus group guides, and assist with
data analysis and report writing
Top left: TPCP works closely with Harambee, an African-American health and wellness advocacy group. Middle left: Statewide marketing campaigns (Quitting for Real) are distributed
to local areas through TV, radio, and print ads. Bottom left: TPCP provides local partners
with the support and resources to pass policies and place permanent signage.
9
Use of Funds FY2013
State TPCP Funding
Utah Tobacco Settlement Account: $4,387,079
Utah Cigarette Tax Restricted Account: $3,150,500
Figure 7.
Funding for the Tobacco Prevention and Control Program’s
tobacco prevention and cessation efforts comes from state
and federal funding and cigarette taxes.
Drawdown of Federal Funds
Federal and private revenues depend on matches with state funds.
• Our work with retailers to prevent underage tobacco sales
•
•
protects $6.4 million in Synar block grant funding for Utah’s
Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health. The Synar
amendment regulates youth access to tobacco products.
TPCP secured $1,306,083 in funding from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
Our marketing campaign was eligible to draw down
$1,045,891 in federal Medicaid match dollars.
In-kind Revenue: Campaign Added Value
Federal
Funding
15%
Utah Cigarette
Excise Tax
36%
Utah Tobacco
Settlement
49%
Media vendors donate approximately $1.5 for every $1 spent
by TPCP on media. This includes donated ad time, news
specials, and other media events, and adds up to $4,268,940.
Utah Cigarette Excise Tax
Figure 6.
Estimated Annual Cost of Smoking in Utah; Cigarette and Tobacco
Tax Revenue; Tobacco Industry Marketing Expenditures in Utah; Utah
Tobacco Settlement Payment; and CDC Recommended and Actual Annual
Investment in Tobacco Prevention and Control. (Latest Available Data)
10
293.6
300
In 2011, the tobacco industry spent an
estimated $37 million to market tobacco
products in Utah and recruit new tobacco
users.9
200
36.4
23.6
CDC Recommended TPCP Investment in
Utah
8.8
FY13 TPCP Budget
37.0
2012 Estimated Utah MSA Payment
2012 Utah Cigarette Tax Revenue
Annual Lost Productivity Due to Smoking
in Utah (2000-2004)
100
Estimated Annual Utah Tobacco Industry
Marketing Expenditure
130.6
0
Federal Funding
Tobacco-related Expenditures
369.0
Annual Direct Medical Expenses Due to
Smoking in Utah (2004)
Dollars (in millions)
400
Utah Tobacco Settlement
In 2012, Utah’s gross cigarette tax revenue
was $130.6 million.10
Utah’s 2013 tobacco settlement payment was
$36.4 million.10
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention recommends that Utah spend
$23.6 million annually to reduce tobacco use.11
At $8.8 million, the TPCP was funded at 37%
of this recommended level.
Bear River Health Department (BRHD)
“
Changing Policy for the Future
Our We’ve Seen Enough campaign raised awareness of
tobacco advertising in stores. We will continue campaigns
like this to expose tobacco marketing and reduce youth
tobacco use.
Ciera White, Governing Youth Council Leadership
”
Bear River Health Department (BRHD) continued
its effective interventions to decrease exposure to
secondhand smoke. In the past year, BRHD staff have
educated dozens of worksites, clinics, and homeowner
associations about the benefits of tobacco-free policies.
As a result, three new policies were passed and
numerous policies were updated and strengthened.
To inform tobacco users about quit services, BRHD
used newspaper articles, signage at gas stations, and
healthcare provider trainings. In addition, Bear River’s
tobacco users were offered local quit classes for youth
(Ending Nicotine Dependence) and adults (Freedom
From Smoking).
Above right: Youth from the Bear River Governing Youth Council collected more
than 4,000 signatures from citizens who agreed that there was too much tobacco
advertising in stores. With the signature pages connected into paper chains, the youth
marched down Main Street in Logan to protest youth-targeted tobacco advertising.
Tobacco Statistics
BRHD
State
7.2%
10.2%
Youth Cigarette Smoking in Grades 8, 10, 12 (2011)
3.9%
5.2%
Pregnant Women Smoking (2011)
5.7%
6.2%
2.7%
2.8%
Adult Experimentation with Electronic Cigarettes (2012)
4.2%*
8.0%
Homes with No Smoking Rule (2012)1
94.8%
92.6%
Number of Quit Line Registrations (FY2013)
184
7,514
Number of QuitNet Registrations (FY2013)
103
2,523
Number of Participants in the Ending Nicotine
Dependence Teen Cessation Program (FY2013)
101
457
Anti-tobacco Ad Recall in the Past Month (2011)1
79.1%
84.9%
Adult Cigarette Smoking (2012)1
5
6
Adult Use of Chewing Tobacco, Snuff, or Snus (2012)
1
1
The youth smoking
rate in Bear River
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-20%
3.7%
of Bear River stores sold
tobacco to underage
youth during compliance
checks.12
Illegal sales of tobacco
to underage youth have
dropped
since 2001.12
-67%
* This estimate has a relative standard error of >30% and does not meet UDOH standards for reliability.
11
Central Utah Public Health Department (CUPHD)
“
Engaging Local Youth
After I learned about the terrible effects of tobacco, I
joined Central’s Outrage group. I want to help others to
not use tobacco or do other drugs.
”
Briana Martinez, Outrage member
Engaging local youth in tobacco prevention and
cessation efforts is a priority for Central Utah Public
Health Department (CUPHD). In FY13, CUPHD awarded
scholarships to 19 youth from their six counties for their
efforts to promote healthy lifestyles and reduce tobacco
use among their peers.
The teens educated their peers about the irreversible
damage caused by tobacco in the “Some Things Can’t be
Fixed” campaign. This campaign included display boards
and educational activities. The teens’ second campaign
titled “The Consequences of Smoking During Pregnancy”
focused on the effects of smoking on babies and pregnant
women.
Above: Youth from the Central Utah Public Health District attend a “Say Goodbye to
Tobacco” youth advocacy training held in Richfield in April, 2013.
The youth smoking rate
in Central Utah Public
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-32%
4.5%
Tobacco Statistics
CUPHD
State
13.1%
10.2%
5.3%
5.2%
10.0%
6.2%
5.5%
2.8%
Adult Experimentation with Electronic Cigarettes (2012)1
14.0%
8.0%
94.3%
92.6%
133
7,514
50
2,523
10
457
84.8%
84.9%
Youth Cigarette Smoking in Grades 8, 10, 12 (2011)5
Pregnant Women Smoking (2011)6
of Central Utah stores sold
tobacco to underage youth
during compliance checks.12
Adult Use of Chewing Tobacco, Snuff, or Snus (2012)1
dropped
since 2001.12
-67%
12
Davis County Health Department (DCHD)
“
Leading the Way
We hope everyone will come on board with our new policy and enjoy a
healthier life. We will support those who quit or want to quit in any way we
can. We don’t want to attend another tobacco-related funeral for anyone
who lives here.
”
Randy Banks, Manager, Skyline View Apartments, Layton
Davis County Health Department (DCHD) staff worked closely with
Skyline View Apartments in Layton to develop a tobacco-free policy for
their property this past year. Part of the inspiration behind the policy was
the lung-cancer related death of a long-term tenant who lived just two
doors from the management office. Over the years, Skyline View had
experienced other smoking-related deaths and cigarette-related fires.
The new policy creates a healthier and safer living environment for all
residents, a key focus of DCHD objectives for tobacco-free multi-unit
housing. The policy prohibits use of tobacco products, including e-cigarettes,
on Skyline View property (housing units and grounds). Skyline View and
DCHD staff have also helped residents who want to quit locate smoking
cessation programs and other resources.
In addition to promoting tobacco-free policies, DCHD has been instrumental in researching the growing availability of electronic
cigarettes and their potential impact on Davis County youth.
Tobacco Statistics
DCHD
State
7.5%
10.2%
4.4%
5.2%
4.6%
6.2%
1.3%
2.8%
5.1%
8.0%
95.8%
92.6%
379
7,514
262
2,523
Number of Participants in the Ending Nicotine Dependence
Teen Cessation Program (FY2013)
109
457
87.2%
84.9%
Since 2009, the youth
smoking rate in Davis
County Health
District has
remained at
4.4%
5
3.2%
of Davis County stores
sold tobacco to underage
checks.12
dropped
since 2001.12
-81%
13
Salt Lake County Health Department (SLCoHD)
Motivating Tobacco Users to Quit
“
Smoking is a big deal in our population and everyone wants to quit. There
are a lot of issues that can push smoking cessation to the back burner.
Since the cessation class has started, we not only have a place to send
our patients for help, but they have built a camaraderie where they support
each other even outside of the class.
Robert Simpson, MD, 4th St. Clinic
”
Educating about quit services and providing
quit programs to vulnerable populations is a
priority for Salt Lake County Health Department
(SLCoHD). In FY13, SLCoHD partnered with
the 4th Street Clinic, which provides healthcare
and support services to homeless Utahns, to
add tobacco cessation treatment to their programs. In its first year,
the cessation class served 99 homeless patients.
On March 23, 2013, SLCoHD sponsored a “Kick Ash 5K Fun Run” in
celebration of Kick Butts Day to raise awareness about the dangers
of tobacco. Prior to the start of the Fun Run, County Mayor Ben
McAdams delivered a motivating speech to runners and spectators
before the more than 200 participants began the 3.1-mile course at
Wheeler Farm.
in the Salt Lake County
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-22%
Tobacco Statistics
SLCoHD
State
12.0%
10.2%
6.6%
5.2%
6.9%
6.2%
3.4%
2.8%
10.5%
8.0%
Homes with No Smoking Rule (2012)
90.6%
92.6%
2,089
7,514
1,081
2,523
37
457
85.1%
84.9%
5
8.8%
6
of Salt Lake County
stores sold tobacco to
underage youth during
compliance checks.12
dropped
since 2001.12
-46%
14
Each runner received a medal and the winners received awards. Free quit kits and
tobacco cessation resources were available to all who participated.
1
Number of Participants in the Ending Nicotine Dependence
Teen Cessation Program (FY2013)
Southeastern Utah District Health Department (SEUDHD)
“
Promoting Quit Services
After attending the first class I felt empowered and closer to
quitting. I had a plan and felt I could do it, just had to try it. My
teacher’s support was instrumental since I received answers
and information not from the text book. I feel so much happier
since I quit.
Julie Crocco, SEUDHD quit class participant
”
Southeastern Utah District Health Department (SEUDHD) successfully
promotes tobacco cessation services throughout Carbon County, Emery
County, San Juan County, and Grand County.
In FY13, SEUDHD partnered with local healthcare providers to ensure that
patients who use tobacco are referred to quit services. SEUDHD worked
especially hard to offer pregnant women quit assistance.
In addition, the SEUDHD staff informed community members about the Utah
Tobacco Quit Line and Utah QuitNet through local billboards, links on radio
station websites, and an exciting 5K/10K race that included tobacco prevention
education.
At right: Local resident Brittni Marvadakis quit tobacco last year and was featured
on a billboard to inspire other young parents to quit and serve as positive role
models for their children.
Tobacco Statistics
SEUDHD
State
18.9%
10.2%
8.2%
5.2%
15.8%
6.2%
5.5%
2.8%
12.6%
8.0%
90.8%
92.6%
162
7,514
81
2,523
83.7%
84.9%
Since 2009, the
youth smoking rate in
Southeastern Utah Health
District has
remained at
8.2%
5
6.9%
of Southeastern Utah
dropped
since 2001.12
-44%
15
Southwest Utah Public Health Department (SWUPHD)
Helping Citizens Get Healthy
“
On being smoke-free for nine weeks:
”
I’m happy. I’m staying busy and can’t even imagine going back
to smoking. Every day that I wake up is a good day!
Utah Tobacco Quit Line user from Kanab, September 2012
Southwest Utah Public Health Department (SWUPHD) successfully
promotes quitting among youth and adult tobacco users. In FY13,
Utah Tobacco Quit Line registrations from Beaver and Kane Counties
increased by more than 30%. Youth Quit Line registration remained high
in all five SWUPHD counties.
A recent Tobacco Quit Line user from St. George describes his
experience as follows: “I enjoy breathing in deeper, it feels different. We
don’t have to worry about the effect [of cigarette smoke] on the kids in
the car. It’s freedom.”
At right: Professional BMX rider and Dew Tour winner Mike Aitken
signs autographs for youth at The TRUTH’s 6th annual Rule the
Rocks Competition in St. George. The event offers tobacco prevention
education and quit resources and attracted more than 250 participants.
in Southwest Utah Public
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-36%
0.5%
of Southwest Utah
dropped
since 2001.12
-98%
Tobacco Statistics
SWUPHD
State
9.1%
10.2%
4.2%
5.2%
6.5%
6.2%
2.8%
2.8%
Adult Experimentation with Electronic Cigarettes (2012) 1
3.8%*
8.0%
93.9%
92.6%
352
7,514
206
2,523
32
457
84.6%
84.9%
16
Summit County Health Department (SCHD)
Protecting Residents from Secondhand Smoke
“
Over 75% of tenants, including smokers, would choose to live in a
smoke-free complex. At the SCHD we feel we can give our residents
that choice by helping multiple unit housing complexes create
smoke-free policies.
”
Olivia Gunnerson, SCHD Health Educator
Secondhand smoke (SHS) is the third leading cause of preventable disease in the
U.S. and a leading cause of acute and chronic disease. Secondhand smoke from
nearby neighbors can have a negative impact on the residents who live in apartments
and condominiums. Secondhand smoke from one unit can seep through air ducts and
cracks, or travel through a shared ventilation system and enter into another person’s
living space.
HOW’S THE
AIR DOWN
THERE?
To keep their multiple-unit housing residents safe from secondhand smoke, Summit
County Health Department (SCHD) helped apartment complexes and condominiums
create smoke-free policies. Newspaper ads were created, postcards were sent to all
apartment and condominium complexes, and the county health department website
was updated with information regarding secondhand smoke and tobacco-free
policies.
CONSIDER THIS:
Up to 50% of the air in apartment buildings may be recirculated
throughout the entire building. If your neighbors smoke, it could be
dangerous for you and your children. Exposure to secondhand smoke
can cause ear infections and more frequent and severe asthma
attacks in children. It can even cause Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
Additionally, SCHD offers free support and
resources for managers and owners of multiunit housing complexes who want to adopt
smoke-free policies.
dlord about
Ask your lan
policies that
no-smoking
air in
the
ar
could cle
your home.
For more information, contact the Summit County Health Department, at 435-333-1500.
Tobacco Statistics
SCPHD
State
9.1%
10.2%
5.1%
5.2%
4.1%
6.2%
2.7%
2.8%
1.0%*
8.0%
94.5%
92.6%
40
7,514
31
2,523
89.7%
84.9%
6
The youth smoking
rate in Summit County
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-51%
6.9%
of Summit County
dropped
since 2001.12
-71%
17
Tooele County Health Department (TCHD)
“
Continuing Progress
It is important to know the dangers of smoking. My great grandma started smoking
when she was young and became sick with emphysema. She was on oxygen for
20 years and stayed in her home a lot. We wished she could have gone places
with us more. Smoking took her life. I don’t want tobacco to hurt those I love or
anyone.
”
Katrina Clausing, Kick Butts Day Participant, Tooele
Tooele County Health Department (TCHD) works hard to
promote tobacco-free lifestyles and smoke-free outdoor
venues.
On Kick Butts Day 2013, local youth lined Tooele’s Main
Street to educate about the harmful effects of tobacco with
posters and signs the youth had created. The signs also
promoted Utah’s statewide quit services, the Utah Tobacco
Quit Line (1.800.QUIT.NOW) and UtahQuitNet.com.
TCHD provided assistance to local businesses, Wireless
Beehive and Tooele County Chamber of Commerce, to
strenghten their tobacco policies, provide access to quit
services, and protect employees from secondhand smoke.
The youth smoking
rate in Tooele County
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-35%
5.2%
of Tooele County stores
checks.12
dropped
since 2001.12
-78%
Tobacco Statistics
TCHD
State
15.8%
10.2%
7.3%
5.2%
8.7%
6.2%
2.8%
2.8%
6.9%*
8.0%
89.9%
92.6%
130
7,514
76
2,523
30
457
88.2%
84.9%
18
TriCounty Health Department (TRCHD)
Creating Smoke-free Communities
“
I am excited and proud that Naples City is partnering with TRCHD to
make all city property, including our park, tobacco-free. We understand the
consequences of tobacco use and hope that this policy will help reduce
tobacco use and improve the health and welfare of our citizens.
Dean A. Baker, Mayor, Naples City
”
TriCounty Health Department continued to reduce tobacco
use through support for tobacco-free communities. TRCHD
provided education and assistance to create opportunities
for smoke-free housing, worksites, and municipalities.
Naples City Municipal Parks had an existing tobacco policy
that had not been updated in more than 15 years. TRCHD
worked with Naples City Manager, Craig Blunt, to develop
a more comprehensive policy that addresses emerging
tobacco products and defines where tobacco is restricted.
New signs are being posted to help with enforcement of
the tobacco-free policy.
At right: Christal Dent, Health Educator at TRCHD, presents an award from the Coalition for Tobaccofree Utah to the Naples City Council to honor their efforts to establish tobacco-free policies.
Tobacco Statistics
TRCHD
State
20.9%
10.2%
6.1%
5.2%
16.3%
6.2%
6.7%
2.8%
8.6%
8.0%
87.4%
92.6%
101
7,514
69
2,523
25
457
83.4%
84.9%
Adult Cigarette Smoking (2012)
1
5
Adult Experimentation with Electronic Cigarettes (2012)
1
Since 2009, the
youth smoking rate
in TriCounty Health
District has
remained at
6.1%
5
15.3%
of TriCounty stores sold
tobacco to underage
checks.12
dropped
since 2001.12
-17%
19
Utah County Health Department (UCHD)
“
Youth Making a Difference
I quit and believe it or not, I did it through the [Utah
Tobacco] Quit Line! I didn’t want to quit, but I knew I had
to quit, if not for me then for my babies. My boys are
happier and I’m gonna be around for their weddings and
my grandbabies.
Suelyn Massey, Springville
”
Through its comprehensive tobacco program, Utah County
Health Department (UCHD) promotes tobacco-free parks and
recreation areas and provides quit options for youth, adults,
and pregnant women.
To honor and celebrate all those in Utah County who had quit
using tobacco or wanted to quit, a Cold Turkey 5K run was
held in conjunction with the Great American Smokeout. A Utah
County resident was presented a frozen turkey for having set
her quit date prior to the Cold Turkey 5K. The winners of the
race received prizes.
At left: Ciggy Butt is getting dunked at the Smoke-free Skate
Park Event and Competition held at Greenwood Skate Park in
American Fork.
The youth smoking
rate in Utah County
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-16%
4.5%
of Utah County stores
checks.12
dropped
since 2001.12
-58%
20
Tobacco Statistics
UCHD
State
4.8%
10.2%
2.6%
5.2%
2.6%
6.2%
1.9%
2.8%
4.2%
8.0%
94.9%
92.6%
774
7,514
280
2,523
92
457
82.9%
84.9%
Wasatch County Health Department (WCHD)
“
Educating and Protecting Citizens
We are glad to have support from the Wasatch County Council to
establish a smoke-free campus policy. Reducing exposure to the
harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke is essential for the health of our
community.
”
Jonelle Fitzgerald, Health Promotion Director, WCHD
The Wasatch County Council passed a smoke-free policy for the
Wasatch Community Services Complex building and grounds in
March of 2013.
The Community Services Complex houses Wasatch County
Health Department, Planning, Information Systems, USU
Extension, and Wasatch Mental Health. The health department
posted signs to inform staff and visitors of the policy and prevent
exposure to more than 4,000 dangerous chemicals found in
secondhand smoke.
At right: During Kick Butts Day, 2013, youth from the Wasatch
High School Governing Youth Council (GYC) educated students
about the toxic chemicals found in cigarettes.
Tobacco Statistics
WCHD
State
10.0%*
10.2%
4.3%
5.2%
5.4%
6.2%
5.1%
2.8%
4.1%*
8.0%
92.5%
92.6%
32
7,514
23
2,523
83.1%
84.9%
The youth smoking
rate in Wasatch County
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-53%
5.6%
of Wasatch County
dropped
since 2001.12
-60%
21
Weber-Morgan Health Department (WMHD)
“
Smoke-free for our Kids
Being part of the Weber Morgan Tobacco-free Coalition helps me
better accomplish our organization’s goals because of the collaborative
nature of the Coalition. I can always rely on the resources and services
offered by our coalition partners.
”
Hanen Abraham, Project Success, Ogden
The Weber-Morgan Health Department (WMHD) continues to promote health and wellness through its Weber-Morgan Tobaccofree Coalition. In addition, WMHD partnered with Davis County Health Department to develop “Smokeless not Harmless,”
a Newspaper in Education publication printed by the Standard Examiner. The 16-page insert reached 63,000 newspaper
subscribers. The insert was also distributed to classrooms throughout Weber, Morgan, and Davis counties and provided an
opportunity for teachers to discuss the health risks of all forms of tobacco and nicotine, especially emerging products.
At left: Children from Riverdale’s
KAT (Kids Against Tobacco)
coalition are featured on WeberMorgan’s UTA bus ads. WMHD
partnered with UTA to use bus
ads to remind the community that
public parks in the Weber-Morgan
Health District are smoke-free. In
recognition of the UTA partnership,
WMHD hosted a public celebration
at Ogden Intermodal Hub.
The youth smoking
rate in Weber-Morgan
Health District has
decreased
since 2009.5
-14%
8.9%
of Weber-Morgan stores
checks.12
dropped
since 2001.12
-46%
22
Tobacco Statistics
WMHD
State
13.9%
10.2%
7.1%
5.2%
9.7%
6.2%
1.9%
2.8%
13.9%
8.0%
91.0%
92.6%
522
7,514
231
2,523
17
457
90.3%
84.9%
References and Resources
References
1 Utah Department of Health. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). 2010-2012. Salt Lake City:
Utah Department of Health, Center for Health Data. Note: Recent changes to the BRFSS survey methodology
provide more accurate estimates of the burden of smoking nationwide and in Utah (landline and cell phone (LLCP)
inclusion; raking used for data weighting). The 2012 rate of smoking is not comparable to the rates published
before 2009 (no cell phone inclusion; post-stratification used for data weighting). For details, see http://health.utah.
gov/opha/publications/hsu/1206_BRFSSCell.pdf.
2 Crankshaw E, Eggers M, Lieberman A, Brown B, Hennessy C. (2012). Annual Report for the Evaluation of the
Utah Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. 2011-2012. Research Triangle Park: RTI International.
3 Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Utah Tobacco Quit Line and Utah QuitNet annual reports 2012 and
2013. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
4 YRBSS: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Youth Online: Comprehensive Results. Retrieved August 13,
2013 from http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/App/Default.aspx?SID=HS.
5 Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Prevention Needs Assessment Tobacco Questions, 2011. Salt Lake
City: Utah Department of Health.
6 Utah Birth Certificate Database. Retrieved July 8, 2013 from Utah Department of Health, Center for Health Data,
Indicator-Based Information System for Public Health at http://ibis.health.utah.gov. These smoking rates are based
on pregnancies that resulted in live births.
7 Orzechowski and Walker, 2012. The Tax Burden on Tobacco-Historical Compilation. Volume 47. Arlington,
Virginia: Orzechowski and Walker Consulting.
8 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2010). State Tobacco Activities Tracking
and Evaluation (STATE) System. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved August
14, 2013 from http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/ReportTopic/ReportTopics.aspx#Nav500.
9 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (2013). State-specific Estimates of Tobacco Company Marketing Expenditures
1998 to 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2013 from http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0271.pdf
10 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2010). State Tobacco Activities Tracking
and Evaluation (STATE) System. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved August
1, 2013 from http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/HighlightReport/HighlightReport.aspx?FromHomePage=Y&S
tateName=Utah&StateId=UT.
11 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2007). Best Practices for Comprehensive
Tobacco Control Programs - 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved
August 14, 2013 from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/stateandcommunity/best_practices/index.htm.
12 Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. (2013). Tobacco Compliance Check Summary Data, SFY2001-2013,
Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health.
Resources
Visit us online at http://www.tobaccofreeutah.org/
23
Tobacco Prevention and Control
Advisory Committee
Craig Anderson, C.S.W., P.S.
Cornerstone Counseling
Center
Lori Harding
Utah Parent Teacher
Association
Lloyd Berentzen, M.B.A.
Bear River Health Department
Brent Kelsey
Utah Division of Substance
Abuse and Mental Health
Heather Borski, M.P.H.
Utah Department of Health*
W. Glenn Lanham
American Lung Association
Dulce Diez-Riol, M.P.H.
Utah Department of Health,
Office of Health Disparities
Beverly May, M.P.A.
National Campaign for
Tobacco-Free Kids
Gary Edwards, M.S.
Salt Lake County Health
Department
Robert Rolfs, M.D., M.P.H.
Mary Lou Emerson, M.S.
Utah Substance Abuse
Advisory Council
Teresa Theurer
Community Member
Teresa Garrett, DNP
Marc B. Watterson
American Heart Association
*Non-voting member
Utah Department of Health
Tobacco Prevention and Control Program
1 (877) 220-3466
www.tobaccofreeutah.org
www.health.utah.gov
To view this report online, visit
www.tobaccofreeutah.org/pdfs/
BUDGET TRAINING
PURPOSE OF
WORK SESSION:
Executive
Summary
Background
To Receive Training from the Finance Manager/Comptroller
Relating to the City’s Budget
Laurie Johnson, the City’s Finance Manager and Comptroller, will provide
training relating to the City budget.
Title 10, the State’s Municipal Code, authorizes the City Council, as the
legislative body, to control and manage the City’s Budget. Under the
Council/Mayor form of government, the Mayor proposes a budget each
year which is reviewed, modified, and adopted by the Council. Any
changes to the budget must be authorized by the City Council.
In order to effectively carry out this budgetary role, it is important that
Council members understand the philosophy that directs the
Administration’s budget. It is also important to understand how the
various components of the budget are developed and work together to
ensure the overall goals of the City are accomplished.
Proposal
Laurie Johnson, the City’s Finance Manager and Comptroller, will provide
training relating to the City budget. A copy of her presentation is attached.
Council Staff Contact: Janene Eller-Smith, (801)629-8165
Ogden City Council Work Session: January 14, 2014
1
Ogden City
Council Budget
Training
January 14, 2014
Guiding Philosophy
It’s
All About
PEOPLE!
It’s All About People Perspective
 Not
“MY” money
 Everything
affects someONE – a person or
group of people
Where does the Council
budget belong?
 General
Fund
 Enterprise
 Internal
Fund
Service Fund
Ogden City Budget
City Budget
General Fund
Internal
Service Funds
Enterprise
Funds
Ogden City Budget – General
Fund
General Fund
Mayor
City Council
Management
Services
City Attorney
Fire
Police
CED
Public
Services
General Fund Revenues
 Sales
Tax – 27%
 Property Tax – 19%
 Other Taxes – 16%
 Licenses/Permits/Road Funds – 13%
 Allocation from Enterprise Funds – 12%
 Other – 13%
General Fund Revenues –
How do these change?
 Sales
Tax – 27%
 Property Tax – 19%
 Other Taxes – 16%
 Licenses/Permits/Road Funds – 13%
 Allocation from Enterprise Funds – 12%
 Other – 13%
Ogden City Budget –
Enterprise Funds
Enterprise
Funds
Water Utility
Sewer Utility
Refuse Utility
Airport
Golf Courses
Recreation
Property
Management
Medical
Services
Enterprise Fund Revenues
 User
Fees
 External Users
Ogden City Budget – Internal
Service Funds
Internal
Service Funds
Fleet &
Facilities
Risk
Management
Information
Technology
Internal Service Fund
Revenues
 User
Fees
 Internal Users
Information
Technology
Fleet &
Facilities
Risk
Budget Authority
 Who
can authorize a transfer between
funds?
 Who
can authorize a transfer within a
budget?
Questions?

Electronic Cigarettes

Transcription

Similar documents

GI-211 - Secretly Distribution

Virtual Data Fusion and True Mobility Virtual Data Fusion and True

ALLIANCE ONE ZAMBIA

Traveller Declaration Card to Be Used by Canadian Residents to

Tobacco Cessation

The word wide web of tobacco internet marketing

Alternative Tobacco Products-Geltko [Read-On

Fazlani Exports Pvt. Ltd.

CCU Commits to Live Well! - Coastal Carolina University