Ending Sex Trafficking in Oakland
Transcription
Ending Sex Trafficking in Oakland
Ending Sex Trafficking in Oakland Picture source: Brett Myers/Youth Radio. Ryan Hunter, MPP May 2011 Produced for the East Bay Asian Youth Center Oakland, California The author conducted this study as part of the program of professional education at the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley. This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the course requirements for the Master of Public Policy degree. The judgments and conclusions are solely those of the author, and are not necessarily endorsed by the Goldman School of Public Policy, by the University of California, or by any other agency. 1|Page Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people who granted me interviews or otherwise gave input into the production of this report, including staff from the Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council, the Alameda County District Attorney’s office HEAT Watch program, CALICO, Banteay Srei, Covenant House, the Sexually Exploited Minors Network, Oakland City Councilwoman Libby Schaaf, the San Diego County Office of Education, Oakland Unified School District Staff, and the Child Exploitation Unit and Problem Solving Officers in the Oakland Police Department. Thanks are also due to my classmates and faculty advisor at the Goldman School of Public Policy, who provided input on innumerable drafts of this work. This report would not exist without the efforts of the community organizers and concerned local residents in the Neighborhood Organizing Committee at the East Bay Asian Youth Center, who came together to demand better for their neighborhood and their city. Finally, we all owe thanks to the police officers, lawyers, case workers, advocates, probation officers, researchers, and concerned community members whose combined efforts over the past decade have saved many women and girls from sexual exploitation and whose perseverance will see Oakland through the challenges ahead. 2|Page Table of Contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................... 2 Glossary of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 7 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 7 Priority 1: Focus and coordinate the city’s efforts to fight demand for commercial sex, including john school and increased reverse sting operations ............................................................................ 7 Priority 2: Increase resources to prevent youth entry into prostitution .............................................. 8 Priority 3: Improve community policing practices ................................................................................ 8 Additional next steps ............................................................................................................................ 9 Oakland’s daughters are for sale ................................................................................................................ 10 Sexual exploitation destroys our communities ...................................................................................... 10 Sexual exploitation destroys women and girls ....................................................................................... 11 The numbers: Commercial sexual exploitation in Oakland .................................................................... 12 The vision: Oakland without sexual exploitation .................................................................................... 15 Understanding the market for commercial sex .......................................................................................... 16 Solutions for Oakland.................................................................................................................................. 18 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 18 Priority 1: Focus and coordinate the city’s efforts to fight demand for commercial sex, including john school and increased reverse sting operations .......................................................................... 19 Priority 2: Increase resources to prevent youth entry into prostitution ............................................ 19 Priority 3: Improve community policing practices .............................................................................. 20 Additional next steps .......................................................................................................................... 20 Demand – The Johns ................................................................................................................................... 22 What Oakland is doing: Demand ............................................................................................................ 23 Beat Feet ............................................................................................................................................. 23 SOAP Orders ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Dear John letters ................................................................................................................................. 23 Reverse sting operations..................................................................................................................... 23 Operation Shame (defunct) ................................................................................................................ 24 Recommendations: Demand .................................................................................................................. 24 1. Launch a task force on demand and a publicity campaign ............................................................. 24 2. Begin offering john school as a condition of probation .................................................................. 26 3. Increase reverse sting operations ................................................................................................... 27 4. Implement new shaming strategies that do not violate civil rights................................................ 29 3|Page 5. Provide more information to Spanish-speaking johns.................................................................... 31 6. Express Oakland’s support for the ACCESS Act ............................................................................... 32 Supply – The Girls........................................................................................................................................ 33 What Oakland is doing: Supply ............................................................................................................... 34 AB499: The Sexually Exploited Minors Pilot Program ........................................................................ 34 The Sexually Exploited Minors Network ............................................................................................. 34 Family Justice Center .......................................................................................................................... 38 HEAT Watch victim stabilization efforts ............................................................................................. 38 BAWAR advocacy ................................................................................................................................ 39 Measure Y funding .............................................................................................................................. 39 Safe house (defunct) ........................................................................................................................... 39 Recommendations: Supply ..................................................................................................................... 40 1. Engage schools in prevention and early intervention and include OUSD in local coalitions.......... 40 2. Target prevention support for the Latino community .................................................................... 41 3. Move more fully toward treating commercially sexually exploited girls as victims ....................... 42 Distribution – The Pimps ............................................................................................................................. 44 What Oakland is doing: Distribution ....................................................................................................... 44 District Attorney prosecution efforts .................................................................................................. 44 OPD efforts.......................................................................................................................................... 44 Prosecution through City Attorney’s office ........................................................................................ 45 AB 17: The Human Trafficking Accountability Act .............................................................................. 45 Recommendations: Distribution ............................................................................................................. 45 1. Express the City’s support for AB 90 ............................................................................................... 45 Environment – The Track ............................................................................................................................ 46 What Oakland is doing: Environment ..................................................................................................... 47 Enforcing nuisance ordinances against motels. .................................................................................. 47 OPD Community Policing efforts ........................................................................................................ 48 HEAT Watch Neighborhood Program and Bay Area HEAT Coalition .................................................. 48 Recommendations: Environment ........................................................................................................... 49 1. Ensure that community policing efforts actively engage all community members in two-way dialogue............................................................................................................................................... 49 2. Reinstitute the Beat Health Unit in the Oakland Police Department ............................................. 51 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 53 Appendix A: Example Dear John letter and community reporting form .................................................... 54 Appendix B: Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels ............................................................................... 56 4|Page Appendix C: Predicting the movement of street prostitution hotspots ..................................................... 64 Police enforcement displaces street prostitution................................................................................... 64 Methodology........................................................................................................................................... 64 Obtaining and preparing data ............................................................................................................. 64 Experimental and control groups ....................................................................................................... 65 Associating demographic data with points ......................................................................................... 67 Means-comparison tests..................................................................................................................... 68 Opportunities and constraints ............................................................................................................ 68 Limitations of the Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 71 Conclusions and Discussion .................................................................................................................... 71 Maps…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………72 Endnotes ..................................................................................................................................................... 76 5|Page Glossary of Acronyms ACDAO – Alameda County District Attorney’s Office BAHC – Bay Area HEAT (Human Exploitation and Trafficking) Coalition, the regional collaboration coordinated by the Alameda County District Attorney’s office BAWAR – Bay Area Women Against Rape CSEC – commercially sexually exploited child(ren) or the commercial sexual exploitation of children EBAYC – East Bay Asian Youth Center FJC – Family Justice Center FOPP – First Offender Prostitution Program, San Francisco’s john school HEAT Watch – Human Exploitation and Trafficking Watch, a local collaboration coordinated by the Alameda County District Attorney’s office ICPC – Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council MISSSEY – Motivating, Inspiring, Supporting, and Serving Sexually Exploited Youth NCPC – Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council, the City of Oakland’s designated points of community input for community policing NET – Neighborhood Enforcement Team, an OPD unit associated with community policing OPD - Oakland Police Department OUSD – Oakland Unified School District PSO – Problem-solving officer(s), OPD’s community policing officers SACEY/SPA – Sexually Abused and Commercially Exploited Youth Program / Safe Place Alternative SEM – sexually exploited minor SOAP—Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution order, sometimes given to johns as a condition of probation VOC – Victims of Crime funding 6|Page Executive Summary For the past decade, local government entities, non-profit service providers, and community members have been working to end the commercial sex trade in Oakland. A commitment to the vigorous arrest and prosecution of pimps and traffickers, the development of a continuum of care for sexually exploited women and girls, the engagement of community advocates, and state level policymaking have all made Oakland and Alameda County leaders for other Bay Area communities in fighting trafficking. Sadly while significant progress has been made towards a systemic approach to fighting human trafficking, the sex trade still thrives in our city. At any time of the day or night, women’s bodies are for sale on Oakland streets and on the internet. Born from the concerns of community members at the East Bay Asian Youth Center, this report seeks to address a twofold problem: the negative effects that visible street prostitution has on Oakland communities and the system of commercial sexual exploitation that traps women and girls. To reach the recommendations in this document, I conducted a thorough examination of the traffickingrelated practices and policies of local agencies, including interviews with stakeholders in government, nonprofits, and the community, as well as a review of documented anti-trafficking efforts over the last decade. I also conducted a comprehensive review of the research literature and the practices of other municipalities. I identified several next steps for Oakland, including strategic gaps in the provision of services and innovative programs happening in other communities that could be effectively replicated in Oakland. Those next steps are outlined below. In addition, this report represents the first large-scale mapping since 2003 of past and present efforts to combat sex trafficking in Oakland and Alameda County. Recommendations While my report outlines more than a dozen beneficial next steps for Oakland, three steps stand out as priorities moving forward: Priority 1: Focus and coordinate the city’s efforts to fight demand for commercial sex, notably through the creation of a john school program and an increase in reverse sting operations. Priority 2: Increase resources to prevent youth entry into commercial sexual exploitation, especially by training OUSD staff and involving OUSD in regional collaborations. Priority 3: Improve community policing practices to build greater trust and collaboration in immigrant communities where street prostitution is prevalent. Priority 1: Focus and coordinate the city’s efforts to fight demand for commercial sex, including john school and increased reverse sting operations The Oakland Police Department (OPD) and the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office (ACDAO) see the arrest and prosecution of pimps and traffickers as a primary goal; the Sexually Exploited Minors (SEM) Network agencies focus primarily on the rescue and care of commercially sexually exploited women and youth; but no Oakland agency has a primary goal of targeting the men who buy 7|Page commercial sex. A clear focus on johns would be consistent with Alameda County’s view that minors involved in prostitution are victims rather than criminals. The national anti-trafficking movement is increasingly recognizing that, as long as demand for commercial sex exists, prostitution will exist. While some Oakland policies have targeted johns, many policies have had difficulty in implementation (Beat Feet), been short lived (Operation Shame), or generally viewed as less important than the prosecution of pimps. A coordinated push on demand would fill a gap in Oakland’s anti-trafficking strategy. I identify several steps toward implementing a new anti-demand strategy, but two are key: john school and an increase in reverse sting operations. Mandatory classes for johns, commonly called john school, force men to grapple with the impact of their crime on women and girls, and were shown by a US Department of Justice-commissioned evaluation to significantly reduce recidivism among buyers of commercial sex. John school and physical arrest are the only two strategies that have been shown to deter men from buying sex. Further, john school operates at no cost to taxpayers as long as police maintain a commitment to conducting regular reverse sting operations. The fees paid by arrested johns subsidize reverse sting operations and provide funding to victims of commercial sexual exploitation. Priority 2: Increase resources to prevent youth entry into prostitution Many agencies in Oakland provide services to women who want to come out of prostitution: OPD connects prostituted women and girls with services when they are arrested, and agencies in the SEM Network provide a continuum of care to sexually exploited women. However, nearly all resources provided to sexual exploitation victims begin only after an initial contact with the justice system. By the time a girl becomes connected to an agency like MISSSEY, BAWAR, or the WestCoast Children’s Clinic, she has typically already been bought and sold on the street, been subjected to many kinds of sexual abuse by johns and pimps, and has developed a criminal record. The biggest gap in the continuum of care is in prevention and early intervention. While prevention work is admittedly difficult, an excellent next step would be the involvement of Oakland’s public schools. Each woman bought and sold in Oakland – at least those who are local – was once an OUSD student. Pimps and older prostitutes recruit at district middle and high schools. If teachers and staff at these schools know the early warning signs of prostitution involvement, some girls could be prevented from becoming trapped in sexual exploitation and diverted to appropriate supportive resources. In the mold of San Diego County’s efforts, OUSD should train district staff to recognize commercial sexual exploitation and to know where to send girls for help. Priority should be on school health center staff, psychologists, and counselors; followed by administrators; and finally middle and high school classroom teachers. Additionally, OUSD should have representation on local anti-trafficking collaborations, including HEAT Watch and the SEM Network. The current omission of local schools from these partnerships results in missed opportunities for intervention. Priority 3: Improve community policing practices A collaborative, trusting relationship between neighborhood residents and OPD is vital to successful efforts to addressing community concerns, including street prostitution. For example, OPD problemsolving officers (PSOs) are moving to implement a “Dear John letter” strategy, sending warning letters to the owners of vehicles seen soliciting prostitutes; however, such a program cannot succeed without participation and two-way feedback from the community. 8|Page While OPD has high commitment toward community policing, and PSOs genuinely desire to help the community, some on-the-ground realities make it difficult to build meaningful neighborhood collaboration. The Oakland communities most affected by street prostitution have large immigrant populations, where language barriers and distrust of law enforcement create high barriers to trust for OPD PSOs. Several steps will help communication and trust between PSOs and immigrant communities, notably: ensuring that community meetings have opportunity for real two-way collaboration between community members and officers, rather than being a forum for police to report on their activities, providing for language needs of immigrant communities, including giving translation at community meetings and assigning beat officers who have the cultural and linguistic fluency to operate in ethnic communities, actively engaging the community not only at Neighborhood Crime Prevention Councils, but also at meetings of established community groups, and ensuring that beat officers and PSOs stay assigned to the same area for an extended period of time, to build relationship with community members. Additional next steps Besides the priority issues discussed above, my research identified the following additional next steps for Oakland in combating commercial sexual exploitation: Expand the treatment of sexually exploited minors as victims. In the long term, move toward the decriminalization of prostituted minors, in the mold of the original AB 499 legislation. Implement new shaming strategies that do not violate civil rights. Such strategies could include billboards, posters, web sites, or newspaper listings, but should only use pictures of second-time convicted offenders. Provide information to Spanish-speaking johns. A portion of Oakland’s johns are migrant workers with limited English skills and a lack of knowledge about American laws about prostitution. Raleigh, NC significantly reduced the arrest rate of Latinos by providing outreach to Spanish-speaking communities. Target prevention support for the Latino community using the Banteay Srei model. The network of community service providers includes resources specifically for African-American and Southeast Asian girls, but no agency provides support specifically for Latino ethnic communities. Reinstate OPD’s Beat Health Unit. This unit focused on improving problem properties throughout Oakland. Beat Health won a national award and was found effective in a randomized experiment in the early ‘00s, but it has not operated since 2005. Express Oakland’s support for the ACCESS Act, AB 90, and the renewal of the AB 499 pilot program. These pieces of state legislation would advance anti-trafficking work here in Oakland, by increasing the fines against johns who solicit minors, making it easier to convict traffickers, and extending the sunset of the existing AB 499 pilot program. 9|Page Oakland’s daughters are for sale “While many efforts have been put forth to address this issue, the problem has continued to worsen. Consequently, Oakland has developed an unfortunate reputation… of being one of the more notable areas in the western United States for prostitution… due to the ever growing pool of young girls (victims) who are lured, coerced, and forced into the illegal sex industry.” – from a 2007 Oakland Police Department report1 For Oakland communities, the thriving sex trafficking industry creates a two-fold problem: For one, visible street prostitution is a blight on communities, making neighbors feel unsafe and depressing local development. Even more upsetting is the effect of the industry on women and girls who are frequently psychologically coerced or forced – through violence or economic necessity – to subject themselves to a lifestyle of virtual slavery and continuous abuse. Sexual exploitation destroys our communities Dan lives in East Oakland in a residential area two blocks away from International Boulevard. Each day, Dan crosses International to drop off his son, a second grader at Think College Now Elementary. Prostituted women frequently walk up and down the sidewalk in front of the school and have even come into the school to use the restroom. One morning while dropping his son off, Dan waited at the crosswalk next to a woman dressed only in transparent lace. Dan knows that many women on the street are exploited, but he nevertheless does not want his son exposed to prostitution at school. Some parents of pre-teen girls in Dan’s community have had pimps or prostitutes try to recruit their daughters, and they fear for their children’s safety. In the fall of 2010, the East Bay Asian Youth Center (EBAYC) conducted a listening campaign among parents in the San Antonio and Eastlake neighborhoods in East Oakland. When EBAYC asked parents what they dislike about their neighborhood, the second most frequently cited concern was prostitution. Many people said the neighborhood was not a safe place to raise children, and the most cited reasons included the recruitment of children into criminal activity and that “it is normal here for kids to see things they shouldn’t.” 2 These two neighborhoods are bisected by International Boulevard, the biggest hot spot for street prostitution in Oakland. Oakland neighbors in high-prostitution areas often feel unsafe. Business owners who try to make positive change have been threatened by pimps. OPD sites it as common practice for pimps to recruit girls from middle and high schools.3 Parents rightly fear for their children’s safety. Prostitution takes a financial toll on Oakland as well. Areas of high prostitution activity have difficulty attracting and retaining successful businesses, making economic development difficult. Enforcement is also expensive. While specific data for Oakland is not available, the average major city in America spends about $12 million each year combating prostitution.4 A recent literature review found a variety of negative impacts of street prostitution on communities: Prostitution is associated with higher crime rates and leads to public safety problems like condoms and syringes being discarded on the street. Surveys of business owners and community organizations frequently indicate that prostitution negatively affects business activity and lowers community quality of life. Research on other adult-oriented businesses (such as strip clubs) indicate that the presence of commercial sex negatively impacts public safety: crime rates increase when those businesses open and decrease when they close.5 10 | P a g e Sexual exploitation destroys women and girls Twelve-year-old Carmen lives in North Oakland. One day after school, she tells her friends that she’s going to meet some guys. The next evening, one of Carmen’s friends receives a call from her: Carmen is being held by several men in their 20’s in a San Francisco motel and is being forced to have sex. After being repeatedly raped in Richmond, San Francisco, and Hayward, Carmen is turned out unexpectedly by her pimp in the middle of the night. Police find her passed out in an all-night market. Afraid that she will get in trouble, Carmen tells police she lives at her pimp’s address, but the police manage to get her home. However Carmen, like many sexually exploited minors, had a history of sexual abuse in the home as well and repeatedly runs away. In one two-month disappearance from home, Carmen is frequently spotted selling herself on East Oakland street corners.6 Prostitution is often portrayed as victimless crime, where men buy sex from women who freely sell their services in an equal exchange. In most cases, nothing could be further from the truth. Advocates call prostitution modern-day slavery. Many girls are brought into prostitution as a teen by a “Romeo pimp,” who poses as a boyfriend, establishes emotional control over an impressionable girl, and then psychologically coerces them into selling themselves. “Gorilla pimps” may simply grab girls off the street and force them into the back of a car. These pimps control their girls through threats, intimidation, and physical violence. Nearly all prostituted women in Oakland are under the control of a pimp, and most will be raped on a regular basis. A 2005 OPD report on minors involved in prostitution had this to say: “It is common practice for pimps to recruit teenage girls from local middle and high schools, and then encourage these prospects out onto the street through a combination of smooth talk, money, clothes, drugs, and for many, a feeling of being wanted or needed. Many of these young women are frequently the victims of child abuse and/or sexual abuse and are often living at or below the poverty level.”7 Indeed, many women who enter prostitution have a history of sexual abuse at home. In one study, 70% of adult women in prostitution said their childhood sexual abuse led to entry into prostitution. Among survivors of prostitution at one aftercare program in Portland, Oregon, 85% reported a history of incest.8 Prostituted girls lead brutal lives. In a sample of 200 prostituted women in San Francisco, more than three quarters had entered prostitution as a minor. The median age of entry was below 16, and some girls had entered by the age of 9.9 Other studies have put the average age of entry at 12 or 13. Other characteristics of commercially sexually exploited women and girls are equally galling: More than two thirds of prostituted men and women suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder, a rate higher than that of Vietnam War veterans.10 Active prostitutes have a risk of murder 18 times higher than a comparable non-prostituted person.11 Half of those interviewed in one study had been assaulted by johns; 23% reported that the assault resulted in a broken bone.12 A Minnesota study revealed that 46% of prostituted women had attempted suicide.13 Rape is frequent among prostituted women. Several studies reported women raped as often as once per week (by pimps and johns). In San Francisco, more than two-thirds of prostituted women and girls reported being raped.14 In short, “the game” of prostitution dooms women to lives of exploitation, misery, and abuse. 11 | P a g e The numbers: Commercial sexual exploitation in Oakland Oakland and Alameda County lack a comprehensive database of information on sex trafficking, despite the 2003 recommendation of the Minors in Prostitution Task Force to develop one and the designation in 2005 of a portion of a three-year $450,000 Department of Justice grant to create a database of information on sexually exploited minors.15 Efforts to create that system are ongoing and complicated by the inter-jurisdictional nature of the problem. In the meantime, hard statistics about the extent of prostitution in Oakland and Alameda County are sparse.i In 2002, an OPD survey identified 218 minors being prostituted by 155 pimps16; the number of identified sexually exploited minors (SEMs) had doubled by 2004. At the time, OPD also stated that 70% of massage parlors in Oakland contained Asian women held hostage in forced prostitution. 17 In 2006, OPD’s Child Exploitation Unit conducted 47 operations that resulted in 660 arrests (of girls, johns, and pimps), including 47 arrests related to felonies.18 In late 2010, the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office (ACDAO) began conducting Safety Net meetings to collaboratively review SEM cases. As of January 13, 2011, ACDAO has reviewed 57 cases of commercial sexual exploitation of children. The girls involved had a median age of 17 years old, but were as young as 12 in some cases. Most had significant previous involvement in the dependency and delinquency systems. STD infection and pregnancy were common among SEMs in Safety Net cases.19 A significant chunk of Oakland’s sex market is home-grown. Seventy percent of the exploited minors in ACDAO’s Safety Net reviews were Alameda County residents.20 ii Of more than 200 prostituted girls screened by the WestCoast Children’s Clinic’s Screening, Stabilization, and Transition program in Oakland, only five were born outside the US. Of the girls screened in the WestCoast study: 53% once lived in a group home 43% reported a history of physical or sexual assault 25% were clinically depressed 52% had serious drug abuse problems. Screeners also noted that, because these estimates required voluntary self-disclosure from girls, the data likely underestimate rates of psychological distress. 21 These data are not drawn from a representative sample and likely over-represent women involved in prostitution on the street (as opposed to “indoor” prostitution solicited online or in massage parlors). The racial breakdown below also reflects these WestCoast data. i Even so, Oakland and Alameda County may be doing better than most. A survey of 31 Bay Area law enforcement agencies conducted by the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office found that 87% of agencies do not collect any data specific to the commercial sexual exploitation of children. (Source: Bay Area HEAT Coalition meeting, 28 April 2011.) ii The other 30% of cases came largely from Contra Costa and Sacramento counties. They also included girls from other Bay Area counties and from as far away as Los Angeles. 12 | P a g e iii Although Oakland has made great strides in setting up systems to combat commercial sexual exploitation and to provide services to women coming out of prostitution, sex can still be bought and sold throughout Oakland, on the street, in massage parlors, and online. Girls are still recruited into sex work from Oakland schools. Existing efforts to combat sex trafficking have failed to make a huge dent in the number of women sold each day in Oakland. The map on the following page shows prostitution-related incidents reported to OPD between Dec. 25, 2010 and April 18, 2011. Redness shows the relative density of prostitution activity in an area. The map shows that International Boulevard (E 14th St.) is the most active prostitution area in the city, with two distinct clusters of incidents (one between 7th Ave. and Fruitvale and another just east of High Street) . West Oakland also receives prostitution reports; San Pablo Ave. is known as a secondary geographic center for street prostitution. iii WestCoast Children’s Clinic, data from screenings of MISSSEY participants. Data represents the racial categorization collected by WestCoast. The girls screened by WestCoast are not a random sample of the SEM population in Oakland. In particular, the screened girls came largely from street prostitution, and as such likely over represent the black population in prostitution. Sexually exploited Asian and Latina youth in Oakland tend to work indoors. 13 | P a g e Prostitution reports to OPD, with relative density Points reflect prostitution incidents reported to OPD between December 25, 2010 and April 18, 2011. Darker red areas reflect a greater density of prostitution activity in an area. OPD crime data is given to the nearest intersection to protect the identities of victims. Because these data reflect OPD crime reports, they may overrepresent areas that OPD has targeted for enforcement. Data sources: Prostitution data from Oakland Crime Watch, elevation data from USGS Seamless Server, and Oakland street and highway data from UC Berkeley Department of Landscape Architecture. Mapping by Ryan Hunter. 14 | P a g e The vision: Oakland without sexual exploitation In the future, our vision is that Oakland communities are places where parents feel safe raising their children. In these neighborhoods, young girls can walk home from school or sit at the bus stop without fear, and schools are not magnets for violence, but shelters from it. No girl in Oakland has her childhood stolen from her. Women and girls who become ensnared in the sex trade will have a way out. Comprehensive services will address victims’ psychological trauma, their medical needs, and the financial and social factors that resulted in sexual exploitation. The cycle of victimization, arrest, and further institutionalization will end. Prostitution will never seem like the only choice: young women will have options for good education and employment, regardless of family background or income level. Pimps and traffickers as well as johns will have to watch their backs. Vigorous enforcement will make pimping a dangerous and unprofitable business, and prosecutors will ensure that those who perpetrate sexual abuse and slavery are brought to justice. Johns find Oakland an inhospitable place to buy sex. International Boulevard will be a center of commerce and a source of community pride. Business owners on International work together with community members to make the neighborhood clean and attractive. Partnerships between the police department, prosecutors, service providers, business owners, and community members ensure effective and innovative solutions to new problems as they arise. Finally, we hope that Oakland is held up as a national model for successful combating commercial sexual exploitation . The goal of this report is to outline clear next steps that civic leaders can take to move Oakland toward this vision. Implementing the recommendations in the following pages will advance the fight against commercial sexual exploitation in our city. A note: Although I frame this report as recommendations for Oakland, the information herein spans many layers of local government, including Alameda County and Oakland Unified School District, not just Oakland City Government. 15 | P a g e Understanding the market for commercial sex Commercial sex exists in a market economy, subject to forces of supply and demand. We can conceive of four broad components of the market that could be targeted for intervention22: The demand side of the market consists of the men who pay for commercial sex acts, or “johns.” These johns may solicit girls directly on the street, in massage parlors and other businesses, or over the internet, as well as indirectly through the consumption of pornography produced from trafficking victims. The supply side of the market consists of the women and girls whose bodies are sold for sex. Again, commercially sexually exploited women and girls may be solicited for sex either on the street or “indoors”. The distribution network consists of pimps and human traffickers. While some women may sell their services directly, most prostitution is mediated by a trafficker. These traffickers procure women and girls, often using physical or psychological coercion, and then provide them for sale. Pimps treat their girls as assets, guarding them against other pimps, keeping them away from law enforcement, and organizing their sale online. The surrounding environment provides a context for the market for sex. Some interventions do not target demand, supply, or distribution directly, but instead aim to make the environment a less convenient place to conduct commercial sex transactions. The chart below demonstrates that the sex trafficking market is driven by demand, with johns soliciting the services of prostituted women either directly or through a pimp as an intermediary. Source: Abt Associates Inc. 16 | P a g e Historically, US anti-prostitution efforts have focused on supply – that is, enforcement of solicitation laws against street prostitutes. Street walking women are the most visible part of the market and the easiest target for law enforcement. However, simply targeting women misses the deeper roots of the problem: without services to break the cycle of abuse and exploitation in their lives, women picked up for solicitation are often back out on the street with their pimp within a few hours, and the underlying structure of the market has not been disrupted. At worst, women arrested on the street are punished with fines; in order to pay the fines, women turn again to prostitution. A comprehensive approach to ending sex trafficking requires recognizing the complexity of the problem: Commercial sex workers are rarely in that role by choice; getting these women and girls off the streets for good requires specialized victim services. Street prostitution is only a portion of the whole market for sex; an increasing proportion of sexual transactions take are arranged online. Sex traffickers exercise brutal and violent control over their business, and prosecutors face extreme difficulty getting convictions more stringent than misdemeanor pimping and pandering. There is no silver bullet for prostitution. To disrupt the market for sex trafficking, multiple levels of civic organization must work in tandem, including law enforcement, prosecutors, nonprofit and government social service providers, and members of the community. Strategies targeting demand, supply, distribution, and the environment must be implemented simultaneously. Because this report grew out of the concerns of East Oakland residents about the effects of visible street prostitution along International Boulevard on their quality of life, some of the solutions described here are geared specifically toward the elimination of street, or outdoor, prostitution. Wherever possible, I have identified solutions that will undermine the entire sex trafficking industry in Oakland, both indoor and outdoor. 17 | P a g e Solutions for Oakland Oakland is not a newcomer to anti-trafficking work. Agencies in Oakland have been actively and creatively engaged in combating commercial sexual exploitation for the past decade. To understand how Oakland can continue to improve, it is necessary to have a thorough understanding of what Oakland is doing and has attempted in the past. This report gives an outline of Oakland’s previous efforts to combat prostitution by intervening with girls, johns, pimps, and the environment. I believe this description of local anti-prostitution efforts to be the most comprehensive description of city-wide efforts since the 2003 Alameda County Minors in Prostitution Report; however, the information is still far from exhaustive. Additionally, this report outlines how local agencies can advance the work that has already been done. In choosing policy recommendations, I looked for polices that were: Evidence-based. Unfortunately, very little empirical evidence exists about anti-prostitution strategies, either to confirm the effectiveness or demonstrate the ineffectiveness of programs. As one researcher states, “This is a recurring theme in research into prostitution – the consequences of policy change are all too often hidden or practically unmeasurable.”23 A few strategies, however, do have research-based evidence of effectiveness. Systemic. Certain strategies may have a short-term impact or an impact in a particular neighborhood but ultimately make little headway in undermining the whole system of commercial sex in Oakland. I looked for true systemic strategies that were likely to strike at the roots of the market for sex. Politically and financially feasible. Historic budget shortfalls are leading to a crisis in Oakland. The city recently laid off many police officers. While gains could undoubtedly be made by hiring more investigators to go after pimps or by providing greater funds to community programs, most of the solutions I outline below can be implemented without large infusions of cash beyond the funding sources already available. Compassionate towards victims of sexual exploitation. Alameda County aims to treat minors involved in prostitution as victims rather than criminals. Policies that focus on punitive measures or “crackdowns” on prostituted women generally prove ineffective. I looked for policies that recognize pimps and johns as the driving forces of the market for sex and provide avenues for prostituted women to escape exploitation. A caveat: Implementing strategies that make it more difficult for pimps or johns to buy and sell sex on the street (for example, the “Dear John” letters described below) will tend to reduce the size of the overall market for sex, but will also drive some portion of the outdoor market indoors. Whether operating indoors or outdoors leads to a better quality of life for the women involved is a matter of some debate among experts in the field. However, communities certainly benefit when prostitution happens in a less visible way. Therefore, I have included solutions that may drive some sex trafficking indoors but are likely to decrease the overall size of the market and the visibility of prostitution in Oakland communities. Recommendations I have identified 12 next step recommendations for Oakland to move forward in the fight against commercial sexual exploitation. The following pages outline policies that will curb johns’ demand for commercial sex, reduce the supply of commercially sexually exploited women, penalize the pimps who distribute prostituted women, and make the environment in Oakland less conducive to prostitution. 18 | P a g e Three of the recommendations should be particular priorities for Oakland: Priority 1: Focus and coordinate the city’s efforts to fight demand for commercial sex, including john school and increased reverse sting operations The Oakland Police Department (OPD) and the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office (ACDAO) see the arrest and prosecution of pimps and traffickers as a primary goal; the Sexually Exploited Minors (SEM) Network agencies focus primarily on the rescue and care of commercially sexually exploited women and youth; but no Oakland agency has a primary goal of targeting the men who buy commercial sex. A clear focus on johns would be consistent with Alameda County’s view that minors involved in prostitution are victims rather than criminals. The national anti-trafficking movement is increasingly recognizing that, as long as demand for commercial sex exists, prostitution will exist. While some Oakland policies have targeted johns, many policies have had difficulty in implementation (Beat Feet), been short lived (Operation Shame), or generally viewed as less important than the prosecution of pimps. A coordinated push on demand would fill a gap in Oakland’s anti-trafficking strategy. I identify several steps toward implementing a new anti-demand strategy, but two are key: john school and an increase in reverse sting operations. Mandatory classes for johns, commonly called john school, force men to grapple with the impact of their crime on women and girls, and were shown by a US Department of Justice-commissioned evaluation to significantly reduce recidivism among buyers of commercial sex. John school and physical arrest are the only two strategies that have been shown to deter men from buying sex. Further, john school operates at no cost to taxpayers as long as police maintain a commitment to conducting regular reverse sting operations. The fees paid by arrested johns subsidize reverse sting operations and provide funding to victims of commercial sexual exploitation. Priority 2: Increase resources to prevent youth entry into prostitution Many agencies in Oakland provide services to women who want to come out of prostitution: OPD connects prostituted women and girls with services when they are arrested, and agencies in the SEM Network provide a continuum of care to sexually exploited women. However, nearly all resources provided to sexual exploitation victims begin only after an initial contact with the justice system. By the time a girl becomes connected to an agency like MISSSEY, BAWAR, or the WestCoast Children’s Clinic, she has typically already been bought and sold on the street, been subjected to many kinds of sexual abuse by johns and pimps, and has developed a criminal record. The biggest gap in the continuum of care is in prevention and early intervention. While prevention work is admittedly difficult, an excellent next step would be the involvement of Oakland’s public schools. Each woman bought and sold in Oakland – at least those who are local – was once an OUSD student. Pimps and older prostitutes recruit at district middle and high schools. If teachers and staff at these schools know the early warning signs of prostitution involvement, some girls could be prevented from becoming trapped in sexual exploitation and diverted to appropriate supportive resources. In the mold of San Diego County’s efforts, OUSD should train district staff to recognize commercial sexual exploitation and to know where to send girls for help. Priority should be on school health center staff, psychologists, and counselors; followed by administrators; and finally middle and high school classroom teachers. Additionally, OUSD should have representation on local anti-trafficking collaborations, including HEAT Watch and the SEM Network. The current omission of local schools from these partnerships results in missed opportunities for intervention. 19 | P a g e Priority 3: Improve community policing practices A collaborative, trusting relationship between neighborhood residents and OPD is vital to successful efforts to addressing community concerns, including street prostitution. For example, OPD problemsolving officers (PSOs) are moving to implement a “Dear John letter” strategy, sending warning letters to the owners of vehicles seen soliciting prostitutes; however, such a program cannot succeed without participation and twoway feedback from the community. Oakland police arrest a girl for suspected prostitution. Source: Oakland North blog While OPD has high commitment toward community policing, and PSOs genuinely desire to help the community, some on-the-ground realities make it difficult to build meaningful neighborhood collaboration. The Oakland communities most affected by street prostitution have large immigrant populations, where language barriers and distrust of law enforcement create high barriers to trust for OPD PSOs. Several steps will help communication and trust between PSOs and immigrant communities, notably: ensuring that community meetings have opportunity for real two-way collaboration between community members and officers, rather than being a forum for police to report on their activities, providing for language needs of immigrant communities, including giving translation at community meetings and assigning beat officers who have the cultural and linguistic fluency to operate in ethnic communities, actively engaging the community not only at Neighborhood Crime Prevention Councils, but also at meetings of established community groups, and ensuring that beat officers and PSOs stay assigned to the same area for an extended period of time, to build relationship with community members. Additional next steps Besides the priority issues discussed above, my research identified the following additional next steps for Oakland in combating commercial sexual exploitation: Expand the treatment of sexually exploited minors as victims. In the long term, move toward the decriminalization of prostituted minors, in the mold of the original AB 499 legislation. 20 | P a g e Implement new shaming strategies that do not violate civil rights. Such strategies could include billboards, posters, web sites, or newspaper listings, but should only use pictures of second-time convicted offenders. Provide information to Spanish-speaking johns. A portion of Oakland’s johns are migrant workers with limited English skills and a lack of knowledge about American laws about prostitution. Raleigh, NC significantly reduced the arrest rate of Latinos by providing outreach to Spanish-speaking communities. Target prevention support for the Latino community using the Banteay Srei model. The network of community service providers includes resources specifically for African-American and Southeast Asian girls, but no agency provides support specifically for Latino ethnic communities. Reinstate OPD’s Beat Health Unit. This unit focused on improving problem properties throughout Oakland. Beat Health won a national award and was found effective in a randomized experiment in the early ‘00s, but it has not operated since 2005. Express Oakland’s support for the ACCESS Act, AB 90, and the renewal of the AB 499 pilot program. These pieces of state legislation would advance anti-trafficking work here in Oakland, by increasing the fines against johns who solicit minors, making it easier to convict traffickers, and extending the sunset of the existing AB 499 pilot program. 21 | P a g e Demand – The Johns “Prostitution is there because men are looking for it.” – a john24 Demand drives the market for commercial sex. As long as men are willing to pay for sex, the market will find a way to provide it. Historically however, enforcement around prostitution has focused on supply – the girls. However, most women do not sell sex by choice, but rather because of deep poverty, drug addiction, or the physical or psychological control of a trafficker. Increasingly, national anti-trafficking advocates are looking to demand-side solutions. Recent research suggests that between 15% and 20% of American men have bought sex at least once in their lives. 25 While no policy change can entirely eliminate the demand for commercial sex, interventions that Oakland police trail a car that has just picked up a suspected prostitute. increase the Source: Oakland North blog likelihood that johns Source: Oakland North blog will be caught, increase the consequences for purchasing sex, increase johns’ fear of public exposure, and force johns to come to terms with the reality of their behavior all have the potential to decrease overall demand. Oakland has implemented a number of interventions that target johns. These interventions, however, have not been coordinated in a strategic way; some were initiated by OPD, others by the City Council, and most did not involve significant engagement with the community. Several of them have been shortlived or faced significant barriers to consistent implementation. Further, while OPD and ACDAO focus primarily on the arrest and prosecution of traffickers and SEM Network agencies focus on providing services to sexual exploitation victims, no agency has a primary goal of targeting demand for sex. Moving forward, a task force on demand should take the lead on developing strategies that will deter johns from buying sex in Oakland. Strategic coordination of the demand-targeting strategies that currently exist, coupled with the implementation of new strategies like john school, will be key to having real impact on the demand for commercial sex in Oakland. 22 | P a g e What Oakland is doing: Demand Beat Feet In 1997, the Oakland City Council passed an ordinance that allows the city to declare vehicles used to solicit a prostitute a public nuisance; those vehicles may then be impounded until the owner pays a fine. That original statute was overturned by a decision of the California Supreme Court26, but recent state legislation paved the way for the reimplementation of the Beat Feet Program. Sgt. Jim Saleda, head of the Vice Unit at OPD, identified Beat Feet as an important tool in deterring johns.27 On March 1, 2011, the City Council passed a new ordinance, introduced by Councilmember Pat Kernighan, that again allows police to impound johns’ vehicles.28 This new measure, however, applies only to repeat offenders. SOAP Orders Oakland uses a common form of trespass/exclusion ordinance called a Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution (SOAP) order to keep known offenders out of known prostitution areas. Typically imposed as a condition of probation, SOAP orders prohibit convicted johns from entering designated zones without a lawful purpose. International Boulevard and the two blocks surrounding it to the north and south are included in Oakland’s SOAP zone. Oakland employs SOAP orders against prostitutes and pimps as well as johns. 29 Dear John letters According to a February 23, 2011 meeting with OPD problem-solving officers, the department will begin sending warning letters to the owners of cars seen soliciting prostitutes along International Boulevard;30 other cities have also employed such “Dear John letter” programs.31 32 While OPD’s program is still in development, Dear John programs typically involve police running the license plate numbers of cars spotted picking up prostitutes or cruising in a prostitution area and sending a form letter to the car’s owner. The letter contains information such as the consequences of an arrest for solicitation, the health risks of patronizing prostitutes, or the exploitation and abuse common to prostituted women. Appendix A contains a sample Dear John reporting form and a sample Dear John letter from police departments in other jurisdictions. While no Dear John campaign has been rigorously studied in the US, a British study found that an antiprostitution campaign that prominently featured Dear John letters led to a decrease in street prostitution in the community.33 Dear John programs cannot succeed without strong partnerships with the community. Police depend on tips phoned in from neighborhood residents to get license numbers of suspected johns. The Dear John program depends on good community policing practices to be effective going forward. Dear John programs have been subject to criticism on civil rights grounds, because the letters imply involvement in prostitution based solely on an anonymous report; however, other types of phone tip lines share the same problem. Reverse sting operations Police sting operations with female officers posing as prostitutes are the most common anti-demand measure employed by US law enforcement. Support officers wait nearby and arrest any johns that proposition the undercover officer or any pimps that might ask the undercover officer to work for them. 23 | P a g e OPD’s Vice Unit conducts regular reverse sting operations, but the recent cuts in the police force may result in fewer operations. Reverse stings require the participation of many officers beyond the five officers in the Vice Unit and therefore can be quite costly. OPD has relatively few female officers, and the most frequent used decoys may be recognized by some johns. A large number of supporting units are necessary to both ensure the safety of the undercover female officers and to process the large number of johns typically picked up in such operations (typically 20 or more).34 Arresting johns is one of only two anti-prostitution strategies that have demonstrated proof of effectiveness.iv For most crimes, arrest actually increases the likelihood of future recidivism; however a 2006 study found that arresting someone for soliciting a prostitute reduced the likelihood of their future arrest by about 70%.35 Operation Shame (defunct) In 2005, an initiative championed by Councilmember Ignacio de La Fuente posted blurred photos of suspected johns on billboards on International Boulevard. Clear Channel donated billboard space. The program generated immediate controversy: because the billboards posted photos of men who had been arrested for solicitation but not necessarily convicted, advocates like the American Civil Liberties Union protested, and the city withdrew the billboards a few months later amid fears of lawsuits.36 Recommendations: Demand 1. Launch a task force on demand and a publicity campaign What this strategy is: Create a new body within the Mayor’s office or the District Attorney’s office with a high-profile role in reducing the demand for commercial sex. This anti-demand task force would coordinate Oakland’s current anti-demand work and new initiatives like those discussed below. Following the new push on demand, the city should launch a media blitz, including press conferences, news stories, bench ads, billboards, and other channels, that warns potential johns to stay out of Oakland and away from trafficked women. This strategy addresses demand for commercial sex strongly and strategically, rather than the piecemeal efforts that have happened to this point. Membership of this task force would need to include OPD, the Mayor’s office and/or City Council, the District Attorney’s office, and community service providers, in addition to other stakeholders. Because these stakeholders already convene in HEAT Watch meetings, that group might be a good place to locate such a task force. Who would be involved: The Mayor or the District Attorney HEAT Watch Other organizational stakeholders. Why it’s a good idea: In 2003, the Minors in Prostitution Task Force recommended that Oakland launch a new push on demand37, but since then, no coordinated effort has taken place. Oakland’s current and past efforts to fight demand have been haphazard, each initiated by different departments within OPD or different iv The other is john school. See below. 24 | P a g e members of the City Council. The efforts of these separate actors would be more effective if coordinated and publicized together. Most local agencies involved with combating commercial sexual exploitation have focused on either caring for SEMs as victims (for example, the SEM Network) or on the prosecution of pimps and traffickers (for example, OPD). The stated goals of the HEAT Watch program relate directly to these two areas: “victim safety and trafficker accountability.”38 No local agency has defined demand reduction or john accountability as a major focus of their work. As the HEAT Watch program builds its working capacity, it should take on demand directly. If HEAT does not have the capacity to do so, another working group should fill in the gap. Publicity would be an important part of an anti-demand campaign. Billboards, bench ads, and posters along International Boulevard could remind johns that buying sex often means exploiting trafficked and abused girls. Importantly, using press conferences, news stories, editorials, and other publicity channels can not only let johns know that they will be watched, arrested, fined, or placed on probation, but also can let community members know better how they can respond. Anti-demand poster from Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin’s Dear John campaign. The poster was created pro bono by a local marketing firm. Source: City of Atlanta, Mayor’s Office 25 | P a g e Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin launched a coordinated campaign against demand for commercial sex in the mid-00’s.39 Funded largely by private donations and pro bono work from a local PR firm, Atlanta’s “Dear John” campaign was among the first anti-prostitution campaign in the country to focus on demand for underage girls. Mayor Franklin was the public face of a much wider campaign against sex trafficking that included state and local legislation, law enforcement efforts, and increased survivor services in the non-profit sector.40 Atlanta won a World Leadership Award from the World Leadership Forum in London and was also recognized for its media efforts by the Southeast National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences and the Public Relations Society of America. “Dear John was fueled by a powerful, female, urban mayor who was willing to expend political capital on this issue.”41 With a similar female urban mayor with a history of work against sex trafficking, Oakland is poised to effectively launch a similar effort. Projected outcome: A reduction in the overall demand for commercial sex, due to a heightened sense of public scrutiny and a greater awareness of the consequences of arrest and prosecution. 2. Begin offering john school as a condition of probation What this strategy is: Dozens of cities and counties around the country conduct classes for men arrested for solicitation, commonly called john schools. Much like traffic school for driving violations, john school is an educationbased intervention for johns. Some municipalities structure their john school as an alternative to prosecution, while others require john school in conjunction with prosecution for solicitation. San Francisco’s john school, the First Offender Prostitution Program (FOPP), was among the first such programs in the country when it was founded in 1995 and has been replicated nationwide. The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office, San Francisco Police, and Standing Against Global Exploitation (SAGE) partner to run the john school. When SFPD catches johns in reverse sting operations, first-time offenders may avoid criminal prosecution by paying a $1,000 fine and attending john school. The oneday classes include information about the legal and health risks of patronizing prostitutes and the brutal reality of exploitation for trafficked women. Johns that do not reoffend have the charges against them dropped in one year; if a john does reoffend in that time, he may be prosecuted on both counts.42 Who would be involved: Alameda County District Attorney Oakland Police Department Community service provider(s) Why it’s a good idea: Besides arresting johns, attendance at john school is the only demand deterrence strategy with a significant base of evidence. A US Department of Justice-commissioned evaluation found that in the year San Francisco implemented FOPP (1995), recidivism among johns in the city dropped sharply, and that drop was sustained for the next ten years. San Diego had similar results when implementing a john school program in 2000. The evaluation of the FOPP was conducted over two years and included data from over 150 interviews, 200 john school participant surveys,500 participant evaluations, and the criminal history of over 100,000 men arrested for soliciting prostitutes in California since 1970. Using a time series model that included the ten years before and the ten years after FOPP implementation, evaluators demonstrated that San Francisco’s drop in recidivism in 1995 was not related to any statewide trends. In fact, researchers did not expect to find a statistically significant impact on recidivism from a one-day intervention, but they were unable to achieve a different result even after conducting several alternative analyses. 43 Other studies have found that john schools lead to attitude change among participants.44 John schools operate at no cost to taxpayers and can actually subsidize other anti-trafficking activities. The fees paid by johns more than cover the cost of the class, and overages can be used to pay for police reverse sting operations and services to women coming out of prostitution. San Francisco’s cost to run 26 | P a g e the program is about $3,099 per class, which is fully covered with only four participants. The administrative cost of the class is about $20,000 per year. From 1995-2007, FOPP subsidized over $1 million in SFPD reverse sting operations and nearly $1 million in recovery services for formerly trafficked women.45 For a john school to remain financially self-sustaining in Oakland, OPD would need to commit to regularly conducting reverse sting operations. While some johns have no concern for the consequences of their actions, many have rationalized their behavior: they tell themselves that buying sex is a mutually beneficial arrangement, that they do needy women a favor by providing them with income, or that most women enjoy commercial sex. Surveys of men who buy sex find that the vast majority (96%) believed that prostitution was usually a consenting act between two adults.46 John school dispels these myths and rationalizations by forcing johns to look at the realities of life for sexually trafficked women and sexually exploited minors. Because johns say that “the distance you get from exchanging cash for sex means that afterwards you don’t contemplate the impact on the prostitute,”47 it should come as no surprise that testimonies from prostitution survivors typically have the greatest impact on john school participants. A phone study conducted by the Schapiro Group as a part of Atlanta’s effort to fight demand found that confronting men with the truth about having sex with minors had a significant chilling effect on johns’ behavior: The authors concluded that effective deterrence had nothing to do with raising awareness of the increased penalties advocates have achieved through the State Legislature, but rather by removing the thin veil of ignorance men seek to maintain when requesting "very young girls." For about half of men who seek to pay for sex with very young girls, about half abandoned the transaction through a series of three incrementally escalating warnings about the underage status of the girl. Most men would prefer to order sex with a young girl by avoiding any and all direct discussion of her age.48 Johns gloss over inconvenient truths about prostitution; john school brings those truths to light. For some johns, taking a cold, hard look at their actions and the system of sexual exploitation they help create will be enough to change their behavior. Nationally, john school programs have had remarkable longevity: over 80% of the programs implemented since 1981 were still active in 2007. John school is an evidence-based strategy with widespread adoption around the country. Given Oakland and Alameda County’s previous engagement on issues of sexual trafficking and exploitation, the absence of a john school program is a glaring omission. Projected outcomes: A decrease in recidivism among arrested johns. A consistent revenue stream to subsidize reverse sting operations and services for girls exiting commercial sexual exploitation. 3. Increase reverse sting operations What this strategy is: OPD would commit to more regularly conducting reverse sting operations to arrest men attempting to buy sex. 27 | P a g e Who would be involved: Oakland Police Department, Child Exploitation (Vice) Unit Why it’s a good idea: Oakland has been following a growing consensus that women in prostitution should be regarded as victims and law enforcement strategies targeting prostitution should concentrate on the customers and traffickers. Sweden’s 1999 law criminalizing the demand for prostitution but not criminalizing the sale of sex has been a notable success, gaining support from women’s rights organizations and dramatically decreasing the incidence of street prostitution.49 50 Increasing enforcement against johns, particularly as a part of a broader campaign to fight demand for commercial sex, would be consistent with this understanding of women as victims. Previous increases in OPD reverse sting operations had the side benefit of catching pimps as well.51 If a regular beat officer were to arrest and book a john for soliciting sex from a prostitute, they would be taken off the street for several hours. OPD beat officers more often issue written citations to such men.52 Reverse sting operations are necessary to efficiently arrest large numbers of men who buy commercial sex. The research literature has demonstrated that arresting johns reduces the likelihood of future solicitation. Researchers compared two groups of men who patronized a prostitute in Colorado Springs: one group was identified through police arrests, while the other group was identified through public health activities. The two groups were demographically similar. Researchers compared the rates of rearrest of the first group to rates of arrest of the second group and found that an initial arrest reduced the likelihood of being arrested again by 70% (compared to no police interaction). This finding was in stark contrast to previous research showing no specific deterrent effect of arrest for other kinds of offenses, indicating that the kinds of men who solicit sex may be more motivated by factors such as shame or reputation than typical criminals are. 53 In Raleigh, NC in 2003, police began to increase their physical arrest of men soliciting prostitutes as a part of Operation Dragnet; previously, johns had usually been issued a citation and then released. Physical arrest allowed the johns to be fingerprinted and have their picture placed on local public access TV. Raleigh PD also found that many officers were unaware that they could charge men with “soliciting for prostitution” and “loitering for the purpose of prostitution” outside of a sting operation. While the effect of arresting johns in Raleigh is impossible to measure independently of other Operation Dragnet efforts, the entire campaign resulted in decreased RPD calls for service related to prostitution, decreased community complaints, and a low rate of rearrest of johns.54 Enforcement activity needs to happen consistently and follow prostitution wherever it goes. When arrests are made only in temporary sweeps or in only a few areas of hotbed prostitution activity, “*t+his results in short-term enforcement and temporal or geographic displacement, and in prostitutes seeking alternative means to fund drug misuse, usually street crime.”55 A consistent supply of arrested johns, typically from reverse sting operations, is necessary to the financial solvency of john school programs. Projected outcome: An increase in arrests of johns and a corresponding decrease in recidivism rates. 28 | P a g e 4. Implement new shaming strategies that do not violate civil rights What this strategy is: Oakland’s previous attempt to use shaming billboards to deter potential johns is far from unique. Many cities around the US and the world have used similar public shaming techniques to scare johns away from soliciting prostitutes. Some cities (including Chicago and Arlington, Texas) post johns’ pictures on the internet. Other cities (including Detroit, Charlotte, and Fort Worth) show johns’ pictures on public access television. In England, the names of men arrested for solicitation are posted in the newspaper.56 Most of the civil rights concerns raised over Oakland’s previous Operation Shame campaign could be allayed by using only the pictures of johns who have been convicted of solicitation. Who would be involved: Oakland Police Department Alameda County District Attorney’s Office/HEAT Watch Why it’s a good idea: While no comprehensive studies of shaming’s effectiveness have been completed, survey data indicates that men view exposure as a worse consequence even than arrest. 57 A survey of Scottish men asked what would deter them from buying sex. Large majorities said they would be deterred by the risk of public exposure, including being added to a sex offender registry (89%), having their picture on a billboard (86%), having their picture in the paper (84%), or having a letter sent to their family (77%). 58 The cost of many shaming strategies is low. Establishing a john website would take few police resources. Clear Channel donated free billboard space for Operation Shame; local newspapers or TV stations may be willing to make similar in-kind donations. Opponents of shaming tactics rightly argue that shaming programs fail to rehabilitate johns, stigmatizing them while making no attempt to help them change their behavior.59 Indeed, the objective of a shaming campaign is not rehabilitation, but rather a disincentive to begin soliciting women for sex in the first place. For a shaming program to be effective, potential johns must know about the risk of public shame; therefore, johns should not be publicly shamed upon their initial offense. Instead, they should be informed that rearrest for solicitation will result in their picture being publicized. Alternately, first offenders might also avoid public shaming by enrolling in john school. The table on the following page summarizes the use of various shaming strategies in cities across the United States, Canada, and the UK and illustrates the widespread use of public shaming. Projected outcome: A reduction in the overall demand for commercial sex, due to a fear of public exposure. A reduction in recidivism rates among first-time offenders. 29 | P a g e Cities with “naming and shaming” programs in the US, UK, and Canada60v City Anchorage, AK El Cajon, CA North County, CA Riverside, CA Denver, CO Orlando, FL Atlanta, GA Chicago, IL Frederick, MD Detroit, MI Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN Asheville, NC Charlotte, NC Raleigh, NC Omaha, NE Rochester, NY Akron, OH Dayton, OH Oklahoma City, OK Reading, PA Philadelphia, PA Nashville, TN Arlington, TX Dallas, TX Fort Worth, TX Waco, TX Richmond, VA Calgary, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Nanaimo, British Columbia Winnipeg, Manitoba Ottawa, Ontario Vanier, Ontario Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Middlesbrough, England Hampshire, England Preston, Lancashire, England Strathclyde, Scotland v Website X X X X X X X X Television X X X X X Newspaper Dear John Letter X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X This is not a comprehensive list. vi Other strategies include publicly releasing client records recovered in a brothel raid (Frederick, MD) and billboards (Omaha, NE, Rochester, NY) 30 | P a g e vi Other 5. Provide more information to Spanish-speaking johns What this strategy is: A targeted outreach campaign to Spanish-speaking communities would provide more information about the laws and risks associated with patronizing prostitutes. Who would be involved: Community service provider(s) Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council Why it’s a good idea: While men who buy sex in Oakland come from every race and socioeconomic background and while little local data exists about the john population, several interviewees said a portion of Oakland’s johns are Latino immigrant workers. These men may be alone in the Bay Area, separated from their families for months or years at a time.61 One research analysis found that even native-born johns did not have accurate knowledge about prostitution laws.62 If johns in general lack knowledge about the law, nonEnglish speaking immigrants likely have even less knowledge of US solicitation laws. Giving Spanishlanguage information about the illegality and exploitative nature of prostitution, the legal and financial consequences of getting caught soliciting a prostitute, and the risk of disease would deter some immigrant johns. Police in Raleigh, NC identified two distinct populations of johns in the prostitution market: risk-averse men from suburban communities and Hispanic men, primarily new immigrants, who appeared unaware of the risk associated with prostitution. Follow-up police interviews with Latino men arrested for solicitation revealed that many of them did not know it was illegal to pay for sex. A subsequent Latino educational campaign included posters, pamphlets, articles in local newspapers and magazines, and 8-minute public service announcements on a Spanish language radio station. Latino health educators and outreach workers distributed the materials. Arrest of Latino johns decreased following the outreach campaign.63 Projected outcome: A decrease in the number of Spanish-speaking men soliciting sex. 31 | P a g e A poster from Raleigh’s Latino outreach campaign. Source: Raleigh Police Department. 6. Express Oakland’s support for the ACCESS Act What this strategy is: AB 12, the Abolition of Child Commerce, Exploitation, and Sexual Slavery (ACCESS) Act, would increase to $25,000 (from $5,000) the fine against an adult convicted of paying for the sexual services of a minor and would direct those fines to community agencies that help sexually exploited minors obtain education, counseling, and shelter.64 Oakland Assemblyman Sandré Swanson is sponsoring this legislation. While the city has limited power to affect state lawmaking, various city and county agencies could make statements of support for the legislation. Who would be involved: Oakland City Council Mayor District Attorney’s office Why it’s a good idea: Under current state law, men who buy sex from children receive a lighter penalty than other child molesters, even though state law assumes that children are unable to consent to sex. According to Assemblyman Swanson’s office: “The ACCESS Act will ensure that persons funding the illicit activities of human traffickers and paying for the sexual services of child sex slaves are treated as severely under the law as an adult engaging in a non-commercial sex act with a minor.”65 Projected outcome: An overall decrease in demand for sex with children, due to fear of increased penalties. Increased revenue for providers of services to SEMs. 32 | P a g e Supply – The Girls “We’ve all been molested. Over and over, and raped. We were all molested and sexually abused as children, don’t you know that? We ran to get away… We were thrown out, thrown away. We’ve been on the streets since we were 12, 13, 14.” – a survivor of prostitution66 Effective supply-side solutions to the problem of sex trafficking recognize that most women enter prostitution either through force, coercion, or manipulation, or because they have run out of other options. Most have been victims of abuse and trauma. Instead of ramping up enforcement against women, local law enforcement, policymakers, and service providers should seek to prevent girls from entering prostitution in the first place and provide clear pathways out of prostitution for women and girls already in the life, including resources for mental health and their financial and social stabilization. The barriers to leaving prostitution are many. San Francisco researchers identified many barriers to exit in their review of the literature: self-destructive behaviors and substance abuse, mental health problems, effects of childhood trauma, psychological injury from violence, chronic psychological stress, lack of self-esteem, feelings of shame and guilt, physical health problems, lack of knowledge about available services, limited systems of support, strained relationships with family, physical or emotional control from pimps and drug dealers, social isolation, limited job skills or options, lack of basic needs (i.e., economic self-sufficiency), lack of education, criminal records, inadequate social services, and societal discrimination and stigma.67 Given the incredible barriers to exit for commercially sexually exploited women and girls, it should come as no surprise that many women go through cycles of seeking services and then returning to prostitution before making a clean break from the lifestyle. Both local Oakland practitioners and the research literature report this pattern. Law enforcement and service providers should learn to recognize this dynamic and expect it, being encouraged each time a girl returns for services rather than shocked at each return to the street. According to research on exiting prostitution, “informal and formal supports are considered critical to street-level prostitution exit success because of the sheer number and quality of changes necessary for women to successfully leave the sex industry.” 68 Over the past decade, many agencies in Oakland have begun to provide such supports to prostituted women, and many girls have left the streets as a result. Efforts to expand and enhance that care are ongoing. However, at present, most of the services offered for commercially sexually exploited women and girls in Alameda County kick in only after a girl’s initial contact with the justice system. A step forward for Oakland would be to increase prevention services for girls at risk of sexual exploitation, particularly by bringing local schools into the collaboration around this issue. Historically, US anti-prostitution efforts have largely focused on the most visible aspect of the commercial sex market – the prostituted women – and have largely consisted of highly visible police action – typically large sting operations where many prostituted women are arrested. Failing to recognize that the women involved in prostitution often have little control over their situation, this overly simplistic “crackdown” strategy can have disastrous effects. When trafficked women are arrested, they can wind up with a criminal record that causes them to cling to pimps for protection or with hefty fines that they can only pay off by continuing to sell themselves. In 1999, Sweden set an international benchmark for treating prostituted women as victims by criminalizing the purchase of sex but not criminalizing its sale. In other words, Swedish law recognizes johns as sexual abusers while not punishing exploited women. As a result of the legislation, the number 33 | P a g e of prostituted women in Sweden dropped from approximately 2,500 to approximately 1,500 within three years.69 Norway and Iceland have since passed similar legislation.70 Oakland and Alameda County have taken steps to similarly treat women as victims, but have gotten only halfway there. Local authorities help build connections to advocacy and social services for girls who are identified as commercially sexually exploited children (CSEC). Fewer resources are available for women 18 and over. However, an effort to identify CSEC as victims of child abuse and preclude them from being charged as criminals was stymied. What Oakland is doing: Supply The systems that come into play when a SEM is taken into custody are extremely complex, and the programs and policies described below are only a few pieces of the system of juvenile justice and victim services that are available to sexually exploited women and girls. A complete mapping of police, probation, and prosecution procedures is beyond the scope of this report. AB499: The Sexually Exploited Minors Pilot Program In 2008, the state legislature passed AB 499, the Sexually Exploited Minors Pilot Program for Alameda County. AB 499 authorizes the District Attorney to create a pilot project on sexually exploited minors. The pilot project includes the development of new protocols for minors who are victims of commercial sexual exploitation, training for county employees about commercial sexual exploitation, and a diversion program to funnel SEMs away from prosecution. 71 The initial version of the AB 499 legislation was far more ambitious, moving towards full decriminalization of minors involved in prostitution. A draft version of AB 499 defined commercial sexual exploitation of children to be a form of child abuse, specified that child abuse laws also apply to minors in prostitution, and made clear that CSEC were not criminals and could not be charged with solicitation. Under the draft version of AB 499, police could arrest CSEC and place them in protective custody (a “safety hold”) to get them off the street and into treatment programs. 72 That draft legislation would have created a new way to detain citizens without charging them with a crime, much like 5150 involuntary psychiatric holds. Because of concerns about violating citizens’ habeas corpus rights, the American Civil Liberties Union and others objected to the legislation. The result was a substantially altered law that authorizes the development of protocols and a diversion program particular to CSEC, but does not decriminalize minors in prostitution. Sandré Swanson’s office calls the final version of AB 499 a “gateway to treating minors as victims of exploitation” and “the first step toward a shift in policy.” 73 Even in its amended form, AB 499 has never been funded, and the diversion program it authorizes is still in the planning stages. The current pilot program applies only to Alameda County and will sunset on January 1, 2012 if not renewed by the legislature. AB 799, pending in the current legislative session, would extend the sunset of the pilot program to January 1, 2017. It makes no other change to the previous legislation.74 The Sexually Exploited Minors Network Since 2005, the Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council has convened the Sexually Exploited Minors (SEM) Network, a collaboration of community organizations that provide services to minor victims of sexual exploitation. 75 Through the efforts of the SEM Network and related service providers, Oakland provides a continuum of care for girls trying to come out of prostitution. 34 | P a g e The SEM Network includes the following agencies that provide services to sexually exploited youth or technical assistance: Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council Asian Health Services/Banteay Srei BAYC CALICO Covenant House DreamCatcher Youth Shelter East Bay Asian Youth Center MISSSEY One Love A Safe Place Safe Youth Youth Justice Institute Youth Radio UC Cooperative Extension/4-H JPG Consultants A number of local government bodies, including ACDAO and Oakland Human Services, are represented in the SEM Network. In recent years, however, community service providers have made up most of the network’s activities. SEM Network agencies provide a range of services, including advocacy, street outreach, prevention and intervention training, and collaborative review of CSEC cases. 76 A few of the services provided by SEM Network member agencies are detailed in the sidebar. In addition, the SEM Network facilitates a program called the Sexually Abused and Commercially Exploited Youth and Safe Place Alternative (SACEY/SPA) that provides advocacy, clinical case management services, and a drop-in center for SEMs. A partnership between several service providers and the SEM Network, SACEY/SPA is housed at the Family Justice Center. SACEY/SPA staff work directly with intake, placement, probation officers, and juvenile hall staff, including being present during juvenile court proceedings. They also provide support to juveniles who testify in adult court against their exploiters. 35 | P a g e A SAMPLING OF SEM NETWORK AGENCIES AND THEIR SERVICES: MISSSEY (Motivating, Inspiring, Supporting, and Serving Sexually Exploited Youth) provides direct services to CSEC, including case management, client advocacy, and recovery resources. MISSSEY also provides space for the SPA drop-in center (described below) as well as training and assistance to other groups on sexual exploitation issues. Banteay Srei, a collaboration between Asian Health Services and the East Bay Asian Youth Center, is a prevention program to assist Southeast Asian women who are engaged in or at risk of commercial sexual exploitation. The program was formed after Asian Health Services found many young Southeast Asian women coming to their clinic with prostitution-related health issues and realized that commercial sex in the Southeast Asian community was largely hidden from view. Banteay Srei provides a supportive, developmental environment for these young women. Covenant House, located in Jack London Square, provides shelter for homeless youth, including transitional age youth over 18. In addition to providing housing, Covenant House staff regularly conduct mobile outreach, providing information, food, and transportation to exploited girls on the street. The Dream Catcher Youth Shelter provides free emergency housing for homeless teens. The center has recently completed a new building that will house a 20-60-day residential stabilization program for CSEC, including six beds set aside for CSEC. In many ways, SACEY/SPA provides a service foundation for many of the city and county’s efforts to serve CSEC. The SEM Network frames many of the network’s services – including MISSSEY programming, Covenant House Street Outreach, and BAWAR advocacy – as components of the larger SACEY/SPA model.77 The next page shows a flow chart of SACEY/SPA services. According to the Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council (ICPC), SACEY/SPA has produced significant results by stabilizing CSECs and engaging them in services. Of girls in SACEY/SPA services: 75% gain access to stable housing 90% re-enroll in school 80% increase school attendance 60% complete probation 50% are not re-arrested 90% connect with therapeutic mental health services 60% are not re-victimized.78 Currently, the SEM Network is involved in two projects to serve sexually exploited youth: The SEM Network is developing a CSEC-specific shelter as an extension of their SPA services, called DreamSPA. DreamSPA would provide on-site services for CSEC. The SEM Network is also working with the county foster care system to provide better support for CSEC in the foster system. As Alameda County is moving toward the Family-to-Family approach to foster case, placing more children in their own families or in foster care wherever possible rather than in group homes, the SEM Network is developing increased supports for foster families that care for CSEC.79 36 | P a g e Flow chart of SACEY/SPA services for SEMs. Source: Alameda County ICPC. 37 | P a g e Family Justice Center Founded in 2005 as a one-stop shop for victims of domestic violence, the Family Justice Center (FJC), located in downtown Oakland, also offers many resources for victims of commercial sexual exploitation. The services provided by the FJC include crisis intervention, legal assistance, medical care, employment assistance, and law enforcement support. Many agencies serving sexually exploited women and girls, including several SEM Network agencies, have a presence at the FJC. These include: Alameda County Probation Department Alameda County District Attorney’s office Bay Area Women Against Rape (BAWAR) Highland Hospital SACEY/SPA MISSSEY Oakland Police Department WestCoast Children’s Clinic Entry into the FJC is restricted to guarantee the safety of victims seeking services. When a victim comes to seek services at the FJC, a staff member conducts an intake interview and directs them to appropriate services. FJC staff maintain client confidentiality.80 HEAT Watch victim stabilization efforts In October 2010, the Alameda County District Attorney’s office (ACDAO) received funding for the HEAT (Human Exploitation and Trafficking) Watch program. HEAT Watch convenes agencies working to fight trafficking around the region, including law enforcement, probation officers, community service providers, mental health providers, and community members. HEAT Watch currently pursues two kinds of strategies: efforts to more effectively prosecute pimps and traffickers and efforts to help victims of sexual exploitation. According to ACDAO’s program blueprint, “H.E.A.T. Watch provides law enforcement and community partners with effective and proven strategies to improve local, regional, and national capacity to identify, intervene in, investigate, and prosecute CSEC cases while supporting and protecting youth who are victims and/or are at-risk for [commercial sexual exploitation.”81 HEAT Watch has several new efforts geared specifically toward minor victims of commercial sexual exploitation: Safety Net meetings. When OPD brings a girl into Juvenile Hall on solicitation charges, they alert ACDAO. Each pending SEM case is then discussed at a weekly Safety Net meeting with staff from law enforcement agencies, service providers (including CALICO, MISSSEY, and the WestCoast Children’s Clinic), Social Services, Probation, and ACDAO to create individualized victim assistance plans.82 Safety Net meetings aim to provide support to SEMs regardless of whether or not they agree to testify against their pimp. Any Alameda County law enforcement agency, including Hayward and Fremont, can make use of Safety Net services. Girls Court. HEAT Watch is also setting up a specialized courtroom at Juvenile Hall. On Thursdays, two judges with expertise in SEM cases will deal primarily with girls picked up for solicitation. Eventually, the DA’s office hopes to use Girls Court to funnel SEMs away from prosecution and into the CSEC Diversion Program.83 ACDAO anticipates Girls Court to begin in May or June of 2011.84 CSEC Diversion Program. ACDAO is setting up a 12-week pilot diversion program as an alternative to detention for minors arrested for prostitution in Alameda County. Authorized by AB 499, the CSEC Diversion Program will connect participants to counseling, advocacy, and 38 | P a g e supportive services. Upon successful completion of the program, juveniles will have the charges against them dropped and the arrest cleared from their record. The pilot program will include 20 Oakland youth, with the goal of replication in other communities in the future.85 Eventually ACDAO hopes to provide comprehensive aftercare to girls who complete the diversion program. 86 HEAT Watch has an ambitious agenda for creating pathways out of prostitution for SEMs; however efforts are less than a year old and still in the early stages of implementation. BAWAR advocacy Bay Area Women Against Rape (BAWAR) provides advocacy services to SEMs who are picked up for solicitation. As a first crisis responder for minors involved in prostitution, BAWAR sometimes accompanies OPD Child Exploitation offices on prostitution sting operations, providing advocacy services to minors picked up for solicitation at the point of arrest. In other instances, BAWAR advocates interact with the youth when she is brought into the station. While the Family Justice Center provides services to girls who come looking for help, BAWAR advocates work to give crisis support to girls who may not be actively seeking help, but have been pulled off the street by the justice system. After a SEM is booked by OPD and sent to juvenile hall, a BAWAR advocate will visit them the next morning, providing food and clothes and additional crisis counseling. In addition, BAWAR advocates work with probation officers to make plans for each girl and advocate for safe release for SEMs. In 2009, BAWAR provided advocacy for 163 clients.87 Measure Y funding Oakland’s violence prevention parcel tax fund, Measure Y, sets aside a pool of funds specifically for sexually exploited minors. Measure Y provides significant funding to the Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council (ICPC) which coordinates the SEM Network, as well as MISSSEY, Covenant House, and BAWAR. SACEY/SPA is also Measure Y-funded. Measure Y funding also provided a $225,000 challenge grant to build a safe house for girls escaping prostitution (described in detail below), but the grant was never disbursed. 88 Safe house (defunct) One of the early goals of the SEM Network was the creation of a safe house, a supportive facility that could house SEMs who were seeking to exit prostitution, providing them supportive services at an undisclosed rural location far away from their pimps. The SEM Network believed the safe house would provide a much-needed secure housing option for SEMs, whose only alternatives might otherwise be juvenile detention or going back to their pimp. The ICPC web site lists the lack of shelter facilities for SEMs, an unwillingness of group homes to accept SEMs, and “threats, intimidation, and relapse” in the recovery process as key reasons to build a safe house. 89 The city of Oakland issued a challenge grant to Alameda County ($225,000 from Measure Y money) to build the safe house. The county agreed to the match, but the rest of the funding fell through when the recession hit. Building the safe house is no longer a priority for the SEM Network. The city and county have both developed partnerships with private safe houses, and Oakland’s SEM population has seemed to demonstrate a higher-than-normal rate of relapse from those safe houses. 90 While the ICPC is still committed to providing stable housing for SEMs escaping exploitation, their efforts now focus on increasing shelter space through the DreamSPA and developing the capacity of foster care to meet the needs of SEMs (as discussed above). 39 | P a g e Recommendations: Supply 1. Engage schools in prevention and early intervention and include OUSD in local coalitions What this strategy is: Oakland public schools should require training for appropriate staff that equips them to be aware of the problem of commercial sexual exploitation of children, recognize early warning signs or risk factors for prostitution involvement, and direct prostitution-involved or at-risk students to supportive resources. Additionally, Oakland Unified School District would join and regularly send representatives to local coalitions fighting sex trafficking, including the SEM Network and the HEAT Coalition. Who would be involved: Oakland Unified School District Why it’s a good idea: Practically every CSEC who was raised in Oakland – and many if not most exploited women on Oakland’s streets are localvii – was once a student in an OUSD school. Each of those girls had contact with school staff who, had they known the telltale warning signs of prostitution involvement – truancy, changes in dress, unusual sources of income, talk of older boyfriends – might have been able to intervene early in the girl’s abuse. OUSD is aware of the commercial sexual exploitation of students. In the 2002-2003 school year, the School Attendance Review Board reviewed 814 cases of truant students – of these, 53 girls and 5 boys self-reported as involved in prostitution.91 Pimps recruit from Oakland’s middle and high schools, forcing older prostitutes to bring in new girls. (In 2002, self-identified prostitution-involved OUSD students said that Castlemont High School and Lowell, Roosevelt, and Calvin Simmons Middle Schools were frequent recruiting grounds.92) Nearly every exploited girl enters prostitution as a teen or pre-teen.93 OUSD’s work on the issue has included the closure of the Fremont High School campus and coordination with Campus Security Officers.94 However, OUSD has not been represented in any broader city or county partnerships on CSEC (i.e., the SEM Network or HEAT Watch). The district’s efforts on CSEC are not coordinated with the broader local efforts on the issue. Because OUSD schools touch nearly every exploited child and serve as recruiting grounds for pimps, the district must not be omitted from the coalitions working to fight trafficking. OUSD needs a seat at the table. OUSD has developed specific resources for school sites on gang prevention and intervention, including warning signs of gang involvement and proper responses to gang related incidents.95 OUSD should develop a similar resource for school sites to help them plan for commercial sexual exploitation prevention. SEM Network participants have identified this kind of training and plan as a next step for efforts to fight sex trafficking in Oakland.96 Differing levels of training could be provided to classroom teachers, counselors and psychologists, and campus security officers. In developing OUSD training around commercial sexual exploitation, priority should be given to staff at school health centers and school psychologists and counselors. Many vii Though comprehensive local data is sparse, the Westcoast Children’s Clinic at least indicates that Oakland’s CSEC are domestic, with less than 3% foreign-born. 40 | P a g e sexually exploited youth seek medical care for problems related to sex work, most also develop mental health problems that may result in a referral to a school psychologist, and school counselors may also encounter girls who are truant or exhibiting other warning signs of sexual exploitation. These groups of people especially need to be able to identify sexually exploited youth, provide them treatment, and refer them to other services as appropriate. School administrators should be a next priority, as they can disseminate information to their staff and have more availability to attend training than classroom teachers. Finally, rolling out a training to all middle and high school classroom teachers is an excellent goal for the next several years. Other cities are recognizing the important role of schools in combating sex trafficking. The San Diego County Office of Education regularly conducts trainings on CSEC for teachers, administrators, and counselors in their constituent school districts. These trainings include representatives from law enforcement, Child Protective Services, and school districts, as well as documentary clips about the gravity of the problem. Content includes red flags for prostitution involvement and training on mandatory reporting. The cost of putting on a training is low – typically less than $25 per participant.97 98 The Seattle School District is also looking to include material on prostituted youth in its violence prevention curriculum. 99 Grossmont Union High School District in San Diego County is working to roll out this training to every district staff. 100 GUHSD would be an excellent model for Oakland. MISSSEY believes such trainings to be a necessary step towards having public institutions that respond to CSEC as victims, and MISSSEY’s existing CSEC trainings could be easily adapted for the school context.101 Projected outcomes: A decrease in the number of OUSD students who are drawn into prostitution. An increase in the number of at-risk or already sexually exploited youth referred to services. 2. Target prevention support for the Latino community What this strategy is: While ethnic-specific resources exist for SEMs in the African-American and Southeast Asian communities in Oakland, no programs exist to outreach in particular to the Latino community. An outreach program modeled after Banteay Srei would provide a supportive environment to Latina youth who are at risk of sexual exploitation. Who would be involved: SEM Network agencies, especially Banteay Srei Why it’s a good idea: According to 2010 Census data, while the city of Oakland saw a 2% decrease in population from 2000 2010, the Latino population of Oakland rose by more than 13% to just under 100,000 people. Latinos now make up over a quarter of Oakland’s total population.102 However, while agencies dealing with girls on the street serve largely African-American SEMs and Banteay Srei offers support to Southeast Asian SEMs and girls at risk of sexual exploitation, no similar program exists for at-risk or exploited Latina youth. ICPC notes that the children of immigrants are vulnerable to sexual exploitation for several reasons, including 41 | P a g e Parents (particularly refugees) who sometimes suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder and may be less equipped to help children, A cultural gap between first-generation parents and American-born children, A lack of information about victims’ services, and A fear of authoritarian figures and law enforcement.103 A culturally appropriate program for Latina youth could be tailored to address these vulnerabilities. While little hard data is available, anecdotal evidence suggests that outdoor prostitution in Oakland is mainly composed of African-American girls, while Latina and Southeast Asian sex workers in Oakland work indoors. Girls in street prostitution (predominantly black) are more often picked up in police stings and therefore have more frequent contact both with the justice system and with community service providers. Banteay Srei helps meet the needs of Southeast Asian girls who may otherwise slip under the radar of services. A similar program should be directed toward sexually exploited Latinas, who may be similarly uninvolved with services due to their relative hiddenness. Projected outcome: A decrease in the number of Latina girls who are drawn into commercial sexual exploitation. 3. Move more fully toward treating commercially sexually exploited girls as victims What this strategy is: In the short term, Oakland and Alameda County should express their support for AB799, the renewal of the sexually exploited minors pilot program in Alameda County, and appropriate agencies should follow documentation procedures to ensure that SEMs qualify for Victims of Crime (VOC) funds. In the long term, local authorities should move toward the full decriminalization of sexually exploited women – especially minors – in favor of increased enforcement on pimps and johns. Doing so likely requires state legislation similar to the draft version of AB499, which sought to create an involuntary “safety hold” to get SEMs off the street and connected to services without charging them with a crime. Who would be involved: California State Legislature Oakland City Council Alameda County Board of Supervisors Probation office Alameda County District Attorney’s office Why it’s a good idea: Oakland and Alameda County aspire to treat prostituted girls – at least those under 16 – as victims. Truly, all the local entities involved in fighting sex trafficking, from OPD to the DA’s office to SEM Network agencies, recognize that the girls are not the source of sex trafficking problems, and each organization seeks to get prostituted women and girls connected to services and focus enforcement efforts on pimps and traffickers. However, the legal reality is that OPD cannot arrest and detain a prostituted girl without charging her with a crime. Girls arrested for solicitation must appear before a judge at juvenile hall within 48 hours. They develop a criminal record. SEMs’ criminal involvement often precludes them from receiving VOC funds, even if they were kidnapped or raped. In some cases, prostituted women are required to pay 42 | P a g e restitution. According to the ACDAO, such restitution fees average between $175 and $200 – or about four tricks’ worth of cash. 104 AB 499 provides for a diversion program as an alternative to prosecution for SEMs, but the state legislature has never provided any funds for that purpose. Three years later, ACDAO has begun development of a 12-week diversion program. However, the legislation that prompted the creation of the program will sunset at the end of 2011 unless reauthorized by the state legislature. In the short-term, local agencies can take steps to address some of the problems created by the criminalization of SEMs. Staff in the ACDAO’s HEAT Watch program are already working with OPD to clearly document SEMs’ status as victims in police reporting, in order to ease the process of obtaining VOC funds. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors and the City Council can express their support for the renewal of the SEM Pilot Program in AB 799, which will extend the sunset of the pilot to 2017. 105 In the long-term, however, local actors should move further to the full treatment of sexually exploited women as victims. The Swedish model, treating both prostituted adults and minors as victims while cracking down on pimps and johns, has been extremely effective overseas. Oakland and Alameda County have an opportunity to be a national leader in the anti-trafficking movement by demonstrating that decriminalizing the sale of sex (at least by minors) while cracking down on its purchase can effectively reduce prostitution. Oakland can demonstrate that compassion toward prostitution victims and a commitment to enforcement are entirely compatible. According to a study commissioned by the US Department of Justice, “opponents of the Swedish model in the United States argue that the ability to arrest those alleged to be engaged in prostitution is one of the only means by which women and girls can be extracted from the control of pimps and traffickers, thus protected and perhaps linked to support services.”106 Oakland law enforcement has made a similar argument. In the absence of another method for connecting girls to services, a “safety hold” policy like that in the draft version of AB 499 would be a necessary step toward the decriminalization of SEMs. A movement to decriminalize prostituted women is a difficult political sell: It requires careful interpretation, lest it be confused with condoning prostitution. In California, it requires bipartisan support in a beleaguered state legislature. Further, it requires the expenditure of political capital, as the ACLU and other groups are likely to continue their opposition to the safety hold. However, such a move is a worthy long-term goal. The more that Alameda County can lay the supporting groundwork of victim services – such as the AB 499 diversion program – the better the county’s case toward supporting decriminalization of SEMs. A successful program would make Alameda County an international model in the fight against the sex trade. A note: Because a move toward full decriminalization would receive great public scrutiny, this strategy more than any other should be accompanied from the beginning by a rigorous evaluation that could demonstrate its effectiveness (or lack thereof). The county would need such evidence to fend off legal challenges, and the presence of an evaluation would help with the replication of the model in other municipalities. Projected outcome: An increase in the proportion of girls successfully referred to services (and therefore who successfully escape prostitution) and a proper recognition of SEMs as victims. 43 | P a g e Distribution – The Pimps “How do I know these kids are worth money? Cause I been living off them for years, that’s how. All kinds of people will buy them. You wouldn’t believe it. What do I care if they want to throw away a couple of hundreds of dollars to screw some stupid 13-year-old? I could care less, so long as they give me their money.” - Phil, a 46-year-old pimp107 Pimping is big business in Oakland. The girls that a pimp controls can earn $50 or more per trick and turn as many as ten tricks in a day – a daily profit of as much as $500 per prostituted girl. “A mid-1980’s study of one pimp who managed 26 prostitutes revealed that he earned $200,000 during one seven-month period – or approximately $343,000 per year – none of which was reported to the Internal Revenue Service.”108 In 2009 dollars, this pimp makes about $675,000 per year. With such potential for profit, it is little wonder that many pimps use physical force or psychological coercion to get more women into their “stable.” Historically, weak legal enforcement and small penalties have encouraged entrepreneurs in the underground economy to take up pimping as a relatively safe way to earn money. In 2005, OPD reported that “drug dealers are turning to pimping minors, because they are aware that it is harder to get convicted for pimping than for narcotics in Alameda County.”109 Under California law, pimping is punishable by 3 to 6 years in state prison (or 3 to 8 years if the prostitute is a minor under the age of 16). Securing convictions against pimps typically requires prostituted women and girls to agree to testify against them. Pimps generally coach the women they control to say they are working alone, in order to avoid prosecution, and women picked up for solicitation fear reprisal from their pimp if they give information to the police. What Oakland is doing: Distribution District Attorney prosecution efforts The ACDAO, as a part of the HEAT Watch program, has begun charging traffickers with crimes that carry higher penalties than simply pimping and pandering. The program’s blueprint states that “Vigorously prosecuting perpetrators, who financially benefit from the trafficking enterprise, and ensuring they receive the maximum sentence supported by the facts and law, is a key component of H.E.A.T. Watch.”110 From 2006 through 2010, ACDAO won convictions against 119 of 187 defendants charged with trafficking-related offenses. In some instances, the DA’s office won life sentences against traffickers by winning convictions on charges of kidnapping, rape, burglary, extortion, or robbery in addition to pimping and pandering, which carries a maximum sentence of only a few years.111 OPD efforts The Oakland Police Department has been fighting sex trafficking for many years, and enforcement against pimps is a hallmark of that work. In 2000, OPD created the Child Exploitation Unit, which merged with the Vice Unit in 2004. Since then, OPD has conducted coordinated vice crime and child prostitution operations. After OPD was awarded a $450,000 Department of Justice grant in 2005 to combat human trafficking, a revised strategy was put in place that increased the capacity of the Child Exploitation Unit and made a number of changes: two 44 | P a g e additional investigators were brought on, a prostitution tip line was established,viii regular beat officers received training in sexual exploitation, and presentations on the topic were presented at community meetings and Neighborhood Crime Prevention Councils.112 The City Council’s appropriation of DOJ grant funds for the 2010-11 FY indicates that the $100,000 of funding for that year will be spent primarily on overtime pay for officers conducting trainings on sex trafficking and exploitation and conducting sting operations.113 Prosecution through City Attorney’s office The Oakland City Council passed an ordinance on March 1, introduced by Councilwoman Pat Kernighan, that updates the city’s laws on prostitution-related offenses in several ways, notably by declaring prostitution-related offenses local crimes. This move allows misdemeanor prostitution offenses (related to pimps, johns, or prostitutes) to be prosecuted through the City Attorney’s office rather than requiring the involvement of the DA or State/Federal officials.114 AB 17: The Human Trafficking Accountability Act Assemblyman Sandré Swanson introduced the Human Trafficking Accountability Act (AB 17), which passed the California legislature in October 2009. The legislation increased the fines related to pimping, pandering, and procurement of a minor; specifically, it authorizes courts to impose additional fines of $5000 for the pimping and procurement of a minor under 16, increases the maximum authorized fine for procurement of a minor to $20,000, and orders an additional $20,000 fine for offenders who are convicted of abducting a minor for the purposes of prostitution. Half of the fines collected will be deposited in a Victim-Witness Assistance Fund to support minors exiting prostitution. Recommendations: Distribution 1. Express the City’s support for AB 90 What this strategy is: The City Council would introduce a resolution in support of AB 90, legislation introduced by Sandré Swanson that would ease the prosecution of pimps and traffickers. Who would be involved: Oakland City Council Why it’s a good idea: AB 90 makes clear that where a trafficking victim is 18 years of age or younger, a showing of force, fraud, or coercion is not required in proving the elements of the crime. Because minors cannot consent to a sexual act, to require a showing of force as it relates to a minor trafficking victim is unreasonable. Instead, the legislation changes the standard of proof to a showing that the defendant caused, induced, encouraged, or persuaded the victim. This bill makes state law consistent with federal law.115 Projected outcome: viii An increase in the prosecution and successful conviction of pimps and johns. OPD’s prostitution tip line is 510-238-2373. 45 | P a g e Environment – The Track "I don't have prostitutes walking down the street all hours of the day. I don't have drug-related activities on the street in front of my store. It is now heaven on earth.” – business owner in Oakland’s Dimond district, one week after the 2003 closure of the Hillcrest Motel116 A fourth category of solutions do not seek to intervene directly in the commercial sex market, but rather seek to create a context in which it is difficult for a sex market to thrive. In general, these strategies seek to alter the physical environment. For example, Oakland has worked to shut down problem properties like motels, and other communities have pursued strategies like the creation of one-way streets and road barriers to deter johns from pulling to curbs.117 I have also included in this section a discussion of the general police presence in the area, which may not target prostitution per se, but has an overall effect on the real and perceived public safety of a neighborhood. Environmental strategies are, by their very nature, place-based: in this case, place-based strategies generally involve implementing changes along International Boulevard (commonly called “The Track”), the current center of street prostitution in Oakland. Place-based strategies run a substantial risk of simply displacing the problem elsewhere. Pimps are persistent, and they can easily move their operations to a new area. British researchers found that following stepped up enforcement against prostitution in one neighborhood of Cardiff, Wales, prostitution activity increased in nearby unpatrolled areas. 118 Indeed, International Boulevard has not always been the center of Oakland’s sex market; in the past, San Pablo Avenue was a major trafficking center, and street prostitution activity continues there as well. Further, environmental strategies will likely only affect street prostitution, not the significant indoor market for commercial sex. Some reformers fear that environmental changes put exploited women in worse situations. Researchers at the University of Huddersfield warn that “the risk of displacement threatens to negate any gains of enforcement activity by making prostitution an even more hidden and secretive enterprise.” 119 ACDAO notes that nearly all of the cases seen by their HEAT unit involve some use of the internet, including Craigslist, MySpace, and Redbook.120 At the same, place-based initiatives do have a place in a broad anti-trafficking strategy. A nuisance property is a nuisance property, any way you split it, and every Oakland neighborhood should have the capacity to take action against properties that are magnets for crime. Some studies show hot-spot policing to be effective in reducing crime overall crime (though spillover effects outside of the enforcement area have only been examined in the short term). 121 Successful place-based solutions can also lay the groundwork for city-wide change. Additionally, police enforcement in particular can move with the problem from one hot spot to another. OPD has acknowledged the need to focus on commercial sex wherever it occurs, saying , “juvenile prostitution is not restricted only to the City’s major thoroughfares. Since these victims are often dispatched to homes, motels, and other locations, the Department’s efforts are focused on behavior rather than locations.”122 46 | P a g e What Oakland is doing: Environment Enforcing nuisance ordinances against motels. Oakland has been working to curb prostitution at motels for at least the past decade. In 2000, OPD’s Beat Health Unit took action against a motel near Oakland International Airport that had become a magnet for crime, including prostitution. When the on-site manager failed to change the motel’s management practices after repeated OPD requests, OPD and the City Attorney’s office initiated a nuisance abatement lawsuit and brought it to the attention of the motel chain’s domestic CEO in Texas and international CEO in France. The lawsuit was settled with a $250,000 performance bond (which would have been forfeited to Oakland if the motel failed to comply with stated improvement measures) and a payment of $35,000 in recouped investigation costs to the city. The motel rapidly changed its business practices thereafter, and in 2003, OPD won a national award for problem-oriented A police car outside the National Lodge, one of three motels named in the policing for their 123 124 City Attorney’s lawsuits. efforts. The Beat Source: InsideBayArea.Com (Ray Chavez/staff) Health Unit was shut down in 2005. In an effort championed by then-Councilwoman Jean Quan in 2003, the city pressed for and won the closure of the Hillcrest Motel in the Dimond district.125 126 After the motel’s closure, the city purchased the property, brought in a private developer to create senior affordable housing, and spurred an economic revitalization of the neighboring commercial district. 127 City Attorney John Russo’s office filed lawsuits in December 2010 under the state Red Light Abatement Act128 against three budget motels: the Economy Lodge (at 12th St and 1st Ave.), the National Lodge (at 17th St. and International Blvd.), and the Sage Motel (at MacArthur Blvd. and High St.). 129 130 If the city succeeds in declaring the motels public nuisances, each motel owner may be subject to a $25,000 maximum fine, and the property may be shut down for up to one year. 131 EBAYC has proposed that the city purchase the National Motel and redevelop the property to meet a community need, such as affordable housing or a grocery store, and the East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation (EBALDC) has determined that the site would be suitable for such a purpose. 47 | P a g e OPD Community Policing efforts In 1996, the Oakland City Council passed a resolution to implement community policing in the city. Oakland’s community policing program employs problem-solving officers (PSOs) who focus not on incident response but rather on proactively tackling ongoing problems in Oakland neighborhoods. PSOs also seek community input and partnership, primarily through Neighborhood Crime Prevention Councils (NCPCs) established in each police beat.132 OPD’s community policing program is funded through the Measure Y violence prevention parcel tax. The community policing program was shut down due to the interruption of Measure Y funds in June 2010 and was re-launched in January 2011. According to OPD’s quarterly report on community policing, PSOs opened seven formal projects associated with prostitution in the first quarter of 2011, representing 7% of all projects. The report found a strengthened institutional commitment to community policing but also noted that severe constraints on OPD resources prevent full implementation of an effective program.133 As of the writing of this report, PSOs are implementing a two-month push to combat street prostitution in East Oakland. Two officers from the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET), a group of officers paid for with redevelopment funds, were reassigned from deep East Oakland to International Boulevard in the Eastlake/San Antonio area to combat street prostitution. PSO Lt. Yelder indicates that the officers are spending two weeks in increased enforcement activities, including arresting women and girls on the street to develop a comprehensive list of prostituted women in Oakland, followed by one week of intensive outreach getting girls into services, followed by another week of outreach to community groups. That four-week cycle would then be repeated once more. The eight-week push spanned March and April, 2011.134 HEAT Watch Neighborhood Program and Bay Area HEAT Coalition As part of the ACDAO’s anti-trafficking efforts, HEAT Watch outreaches to communities through the HEAT Watch Neighborhood Program. Representatives from ACDAO attend NCPC meetings, host community awareness events about the commercial sexual exploitation of children, and maintain relationships with direct services providers and community members. In addition, ACDAO has set up a HEAT Watch tip line, ix so that community members can easily report suspected human trafficking activity.135 ACDAO also coordinates the Bay Area HEAT Coalition (BAHC), a regional convening of agencies from around the San Francisco Bay Area that have contact with CSEC. BAHC seeks to develop a regional response to sex trafficking, including data sharing, common protocols across cities and counties, and sharing of expertise. ACDAO describes BAHC as mulit-system and multi-jurisdictional. BAHC provides a single point of contact for Bay Area anti-trafficking work and is developing a resource guide to identify points of contact across all nine Bay Area counties. In 2012, BAHC will coordinate a national conference on human trafficking. ix The HEAT Watch Tip Line is 510-208-4959. 48 | P a g e Recommendations: Environment 1. Ensure that community policing efforts actively engage all community members in twoway dialogue What this strategy is: OPD problem-solving officers would improve community policing practices on the ground by stationing officers in the community for several years at a time, facilitating two-way dialogue between officers and the community at NCPC meetings, attending existing community meetings, and meeting the linguistic needs of immigrant communities by providing translation at meetings, and recruiting and placing neighborhood officers who have appropriate cultural and linguistic fluency. Who would be involved: Oakland Police Department Community and neighborhood organizations like EBAYC Neighborhood Crime Prevention Councils Why it’s a good idea: Partnerships between the police and local communities are vital to consistent efforts to curb street prostitution in neighborhoods. For example, the Dear John letter program under development by PSOs requires consistent community participation and feedback to police to be successful. While OPD has worked for many years to implement community policing, problems remain. OPD’s stated goals include encouraging active citizen involvement in community policing efforts, An Oakland Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council. ensuring active PSO Source: Oakland North blog involvement in the affairs of the community, developing the capacity of residents to speak and act effectively on their own behalf, and strengthening and building groups and organizations so residents can advocate for their own interests.136 49 | P a g e However reductions in department resources have limited OPD’s ability to address community concerns, and some community members feel a lack of representation or voice in their NCPC. Community members from the Eastlake and San Antonio neighborhoods report that NCPC meetings sometimes feel like a one-way discussion, where police explain their activities to residents and ask for help but do not actively solicit community feedback or use community concerns to shape department priorities in an ongoing way. A study integrating community policing learning from 12 law enforcement agencies closely examined the importance of community partnerships in policing: “Police agencies that are serious about community policing should be moving beyond this sense of partnership; that is, beyond the tendency to view citizens as simply an extra set of eyes and ears in the neighborhood … Community policing reformers characterize partnerships as having two-way communication and a degree of powersharing between the partners. Communication in several of the partnerships that we observed was constrained in some way, undermining their potential value. In other instances, however, police agencies were providing citizens with new opportunities to truly collaborate in matters from which they previously had been excluded. Those departments had greatly increased their ability to solve complex problems.”137 Moving forward, OPD PSOs need to be certain they actively involve community members in a way that involves true listening and partnership. The areas of the Oakland flatlands that have significant problems with street prostitution are primarily Southeast Asian and Latino immigrant communities. A project from the New York Police Department (NYPD) found that, because immigrant communities have high barriers to trust with the police, community policing among such communities requires regular channels of communication between immigrant community leaders and police, as well as outreach to a variety of community representatives.138 Language barriers prevent low-income immigrant populations from being involved in community policing. Most NCPCs do not provide translation for Spanish, Vietnamese, or Chinese-speaking populations. In some instances, the solution will be as simple as recruiting volunteers from ethnic communities to translate. In addition, beat officers who do not speak the language or understand the culture of neighborhood residents will have great difficulty building trust. OPD should make concerted efforts to assign PSOs to neighborhoods based on cultural and linguistic fluency. Building trust for law enforcement, especially in Oakland immigrant communities, takes time. A national roundtable discussion between immigrant leaders and law enforcement also concluded that “the community policing philosophy of long-term assignment of officers to specific neighborhoods or areas and the geographic deployment of officers to facilitate contact with residents should remain core practices for local law enforcement.” 139 In fact, the Oakland City Council resolution that implemented community policing provides for PSOs to remain in place for six years, with optional extensions of up to two years.140 In practice, however, most OPD assignments are much shorter, usually on the order of one year. OPD should make every effort to leave beat officers in place for as long as possible to build trust with the community. The same roundtable discussion concluded that meetings conducted on the community’s turf were useful to building trust.141 NCPC meetings are conducted in the community, but they are OPD’s meetings, and OPD typically sets the meeting agenda. While NCPCs are a valuable tool for creating community organization in neighborhoods that lack it, where community organizations already exist in 50 | P a g e neighborhoods, OPD should also proactively seek to solicit their partnership and feedback as a part of a comprehensive community policing strategy. Participating in existing community meetings would be a helpful step toward a real two-way dialogue between police and the community. Projected outcome: Greater trust and cooperation between police and community, resulting in more effective community policing. 2. Reinstitute the Beat Health Unit in the Oakland Police Department What this strategy is: OPD would create a new unit tasked with improving the conditions at problem properties, including budget motels and massage parlors. This unit would be modeled on the evidence-based, award-winning Beat Health Unit that was disbanded in 2005. Who would be involved: Oakland Police Department City Attorney’s Office Community members and business owners Why it’s a good idea: OPD has an excellent track record of dealing with problem motels, as noted in the history above, including a productive partnership with the City Attorney’s office to bring legal action against property owners who do not implement good business practices. However, since the dissolution of the Beat Health Unit, the task of addressing problem properties has fallen to the PSOs, whose responsibilities are broad and whose time is limited. A unit dedicated specifically to nuisance locations would be able to clean up or close down a greater proportion of problem properties. The Beat Health Unit, originally established in 1988, dealt with several thousand problem locations in Oakland before its dissolution in 2005.x Beat Health cases first involved establishing a relationship with the property owner or manager to provide strategies to address crime and disorder on the property. If those efforts failed, Beat Health officers involved inspectors from city agencies to enforce local safety codes, and in about 2% of cases Beat Health cooperated with in-house legal staff or the City Attorney to bring formal legal complaints against properties. Beat Health’s efforts won a national award for problem-oriented policing in 2000, and a 1999 randomized experimental study found that the Beat Health approach was effective in reducing drug dealing and improving the physical conditions of street blocks, relative to a control group consisting of standard police patrols.142 PSOs currently carry out most of these functions when necessary, but their wider range of responsibilities means they cannot work on property issues with the same breath or depth that Beat Health once did. A dedicated problem property unit could address far more prostitution hotspots, like problem motels and massage parlors. In Nassau County, New York, a concerted police effort targeting the property owners resulted in the elimination of all known illegal massage parlors. 143 Because of current city budget problems and recent police layoffs, the creation of a new Beat Health unit should be regarded as a long-term goal. In the meantime, PSOs should make sure that they employ x OPD declined an opportunity to comment on the reasons for the dissolution of the Beat Health unit. 51 | P a g e consistent and proactive enforcement against the owners of illegal massage parlors and nuisance motels by: proactively giving crime prevention information to the owners of budget motels, working with legitimate business owners to develop business practices that discourage crime on the premises, 144 and working with the City Attorney’s office to file nuisance abatement lawsuits against noncompliant properties under California’s Red Light Abatement Law. When possible, abated properties should be redeveloped by the city. Appendix B lists 37 law enforcement responses to problems at budget motels, drawn from Community Oriented Policing Services. Projected outcomes: An increase in responsible anti-crime measures taken by Oakland property owners. A reduction in the number of properties, like motels and massage parlors, that allow sex trafficking to thrive through ignorance, neglect, or criminal intent. 52 | P a g e Conclusion Sex trafficking is a brutal and stubbornly pervasive problem in Oakland. Hundreds of Oakland women and girls, many of them minors, are forced to sell their bodies every day on the street, in massage parlors, or on the internet. Meanwhile, communities are saddened and angered by the sale of sex on their streets, as local businesses fail to thrive and parents fear for the safety of their daughters. In the past decade, local agencies at work on this issue have made great strides: Community service providers and many government agencies collaborate in the SEM Network and the HEAT Watch programs. SEM Network providers have grown their funding and provide a true continuum of care to girls exiting prostitution. The District Attorney’s office creatively prosecute traffickers to win lengthy sentences, and the Oakland Police have secured federal funding to expand their sting operations, put many more traffickers behind bars, and begun connecting girls to advocacy and community resources. The case workers, police officers, attorneys, policymakers, and the survivors of commercial sexual exploitation who have been involved in this fight for many years deserve thanks for their hard work and perseverance. Still, much work remains to be done. A new focus on demand reduction is needed to complement the aggressive prosecution of traffickers and the aftercare efforts toward prostituted girls; that demand effort should include complimentary, evidence-based methods with relatively low cost, like john school and an increase in reverse sting operations. Additional resources should be directed to early intervention and prevention for sexually exploited minors, especially in Oakland’s middle and high schools. To ensure high-functioning community partnerships, Oakland’s community policing effort must be certain that it effectively builds trust with immigrant populations in the communities where prostitution is most prevalent. By implementing these and other strategies, Oakland can reduce overall demand for commercial sex, divert at-risk girls from the horrors of sexual slavery, and improve the overall level of trust and partnership between police and neighborhoods. If Oakland leaders sustain a commitment to ending commercial sexual exploitation through proven smart practices and innovative new programs, then we will more and more achieve a future where traffickers are brought to justice, women and girls can live free from fear, and none of our daughters are for sale. 53 | P a g e Appendix A: Example Dear John letter and community reporting form Sample community reporting form used by the Raleigh Police Department for their Dear John program.145 54 | P a g e Sample letter sent to owners of cars involved in prostitution arrests in Pensacola, Florida.146 Many “Dear John” letters follow a similar format. 55 | P a g e Appendix B: Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels The following tables from the Community Oriented Policing Services guide on Disorder at Budget Motels detail law enforcement responses to problems at budget motels.147 General Principles for an Effective Strategy # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 1 Enlisting community support to address the problem Establishes joint ownership of the problem and a solid foundation for change …there is sufficient public interest in and political support for addressing the problem A local business association, such as the Chamber of Commerce, may be best positioned to take the lead in enlisting and maintaining community support 2 Obtaining cooperation from motel owners and managers Limits the need to regulate changes in business practices …the needs and opinions of motel managers and owners are sought early in the problem-solving process Not all motels are interested in changing the way they do business; these establishments will require a different approach 3 Establishing and enforcing minimum motel functionality and security standards Restricts the operation of motels to those that can provide accommodations that meet basic standards …pertinent city and county agencies, such as code enforcement, the attorney’s office, and the health department can provide assistance May require years to implement, as well as significant political support and ongoing resources for implementation 4 Establishing crimeand- disorder performance standards and goals Shifts the responsibility for safety to those most able to improve conditions—motel operators …a number of motels already maintain annual CFS/room ratios of less than 1.0 May require years to implement, as well as significant political support 56 | P a g e Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued Specific Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels Deterring/Screening Problem Guests and Visitors # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 5 Requiring all adult guests and visitors to present governmentissued photo ID at the front desk immediately upon arrival Creates a record of motel users for police purposes; can help screen out those who do not wish to be identified by motel personnel …front desk clerks consistently adhere to information collection requirements and refuse to allow access to people without proper IDs A guest/visitor log is most useful to police if the information is legibly recorded on a standardized form, or, if possible, entered into a standardized computer database 6 Requiring that guests and visitors be at least 21 years old, unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian Denies minors access to a place to drink alcohol; helps prevent minors from being sexually assaulted in a motel room … front desk clerks consistently refuse to allow unaccompanied minors on the premises and a large number of problem guests are under 21 Can be difficult to implement without perimeter control 7 Maintaining and enforcing “no rent” and “no trespass” lists Prevents one-time problem motel users from becoming repeat motel users …both visitors and guests are required to present photo ID to enter the property Requires good recordkeeping on the part of motels and perimeter control 8 Limiting visitors and contact between strangers Inhibits parties; reduces the opportunity for illicit transactions between strangers …motels can control both pedestrian and vehicle access to the property Controlling the perimeter may be costly 9 Prominently posting notices and signs that clearly outline appropriate guest and visitor behavior, as well as the sanctions that will be levied against violators Sets rules for motel users’ behavior; removes excuses regarding the consequences of violations …guests and visitors read the notices, and management enforces the rules Motels with lower CFS/room ratios may not want or need explicit rules prohibiting prostitution and drug use 10 Guaranteeing payment from high-risk guests Gives motel staff leverage over guests who won’t leave or pay; helps screen guests who can’t afford a room …guests’ credit cards are legitimate Not all motel customers will have credit cards; in these cases, motels can require multi-night deposits well in advance of departure dates 57 | P a g e Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued 11 Refusing to rent to known or suspected prostitutes, gang members, or drug dealers, or to anyone clearly intoxicated or under the influence of illicit substances Denies motel access to extremely highrisk guests and visitors …clerks can identify high-risk guests, management supports denying them access, and the motel can either replace them with low-risk guests or absorb the resulting short-term loss of revenue Clerks cannot discriminate against people who would like to rent rooms based on their race, religion, gender, or other protected characteristics 12 Implementing clear check-in policies, and training clerks in their use Standardizing and formalizing check-in procedures aids clerks in consistently screening out problem guests …clerk turnover is relatively low, or key information is provided to new clerks, in written form Managers may need to periodically check on adherence to check-in procedures and standards 13 Reinforcing formal and informal social controls over problem guests People who have influence over problem guests limit their ability to frequent the premises, or they require improvements in behavior …problem motels are patronized by significant numbers of people who can be influenced (parolees/probationers, military personnel, college students, or seasonal laborers) Parolees/probationers may have difficulty finding other housing that meets their needs 58 | P a g e Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued Managing Problem Guests and Visitors # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 14 Assigning potential problem guests to rooms near the front office or with high natural surveillance Increases the guests’ risk of getting caught engaging in problem behaviors …such rooms are not booked when suspicious guests arrive This response should be used in only a few borderline cases at any one time; if a clerk or manager does not feel comfortable renting to a person, they should not proceed with check-in 15 Employing welltrained, uniformed, on-site security guards, with clear expectations regarding duties Provides significant oversight of the property …guards go beyond patrolling and proactively use all the tools at their disposal to keep order on the property Involves a substantial cost to the motel 16 Prohibiting “back-in” parking Reduces motels’ appeal to criminals; gives guards an opportunity to engage violators …motels are located in or near states that do not require a front license plate Signs prohibiting this practice must be posted; guests may not understand the restriction 17 Inspecting the rooms of guests who refuse maid service or behave suspiciously after check-in Limits the amount of time guests have total control over the use of rooms …motels employ security guards or other staff who are trained in recognizing drug paraphernalia Situations involving suspected clandestine drug labs or sales are dangerous, and police involvement is recommended 59 | P a g e Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued Changing the Physical Environment # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 18 Limiting access to the property Problem guests and visitors can be screened out at the front desk …direct room access or use of the property by people not associated with the motel is a source of the problem Involves a cost to the motel; police and other emergency personnel must have access to the property 19 Installing and monitoring CCTV Increases the risk offenders will get caught engaging in illicit or undesirable behavior …the motel has only a few identifiable problem areas Involves a cost to the motel 20 Installing adequate lighting, and improving the visibility at blind corners with mirrors Increases the risk offenders will be detected …problems occur at night and in the motel’s public areas Involves a cost to the motel 21 Landscaping and maintaining the property in a way that minimizes crime opportunities and maximizes the perception of ownership Sends the message that the location is unsuitable for criminal activity …it is done in conjunction with access control, and strict guest and visitor screening Involves a cost to the motel 22 Establishing redesign and property improvement incentives Provides motel owners with resources or benefits for upgrading properties or improving their security features …motels are interested in serving a legitimate clientele, but lack the resources to attract legitimate customers May involve a cost to the jurisdiction and/or the motel 60 | P a g e Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued Fostering Responsibility Among Motel Owners and Managers for Maintaining Safe Lodging # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 23 Informing owners and managers about problems on site Removes excuses on the part of owners and managers …the problem motels are concerned about their reputation or the threat of abatement Requires ongoing staff support to forward crime-and-disorder statistics to motels and conduct follow-up meetings 24 Requiring that a manager be on the property at all times Ensures that the property will have 24hour oversight …a manager can live in the motel Involves a cost to the motel 25 Encouraging owners to sign “good neighbor agreements” Creates a formal record of specific management practices agreed to by a problem motel …the agreed-upon practices can be easily monitored The consequences of violating the agreement should be spelled out 26 Offering employee training programs Provides employees with information that can help them run safe motels; ensures employees are aware of pertinent regulations …training sessions are required and offer information that will help prevent fraud, establishment of drug labs, theft, vandalism, robbery, and other crimes that adversely affect motel finances and employees Requires ongoing staff support to develop, coordinate, and conduct the training 61 | P a g e Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued Establishing and Enforcing Regulations and Penalties # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 27 Limiting occupancy to no more than 28 days in a 90-day period, and evicting problem tenants Prevents occupants from becoming legal tenants at motels not designed for long-term stays; removes problem guests …guests staying longer than seven days undergo morethorough screening procedures, such as credit and reference checks Guests who need long-term housing but can afford or obtain only motel lodging may cycle in and out of multiple motels over a period of months 28 Conducting regulatory inspections and audits Ensures that buildings meet codes designed to protect guests and visitors …city/county agencies coordinate efforts Requires ongoing staff support to coordinate and conduct inspections/audits 29 Implementing licensing requirements for lodging establishments, including minimum security, sanitation, and management standards Ensures that motels meet minimum standards of operation specifically developed for overnight lodging establishments …a significant number of a jurisdiction’s motels operate in a substandard way Requires significant political support to be instituted, as well as ongoing resources to manage the licensing program 30 Enacting special regulations for adult motels Targets those motels most likely to generate a high number of service calls by limiting their operations in various ways …problems at the motels stem from prostitution, and compliance with regulations can be easily monitored Exemptions may need to be made for legitimate hourly rentals such as those for corporate hospitality suites 31 Requiring a performance bond or other changes at the property in exchange for continued business operation Gives police financial leverage over problem motels …problem motels have sufficient resources and incentive to take out a bond Requires legal support and clear evidence of significant problems at a property 32 Seeking cost recovery for excessive city time spent at problem motels Jurisdictions calculate the value of officer or other staff time required to address problems at a motel …one or two motels are extreme outliers with respect to callsfor-service ratios May require legal action 33 Closing the property Problem motels can no longer operate …motel owners have actively allowed crime to occur on the property Can be expensive and timeconsuming; must have the support of city or county legal staff; all legal property owners must be accurately identified, which can be a challenge 34 Using asset forfeiture or seizure Jurisdictions assume ownership of property used for illicit purposes …the property can be relatively easily sold or converted to other Faces legal challenges 62 | P a g e uses Responses to Disorder at Budget Motels, continued Responses With Limited Effectiveness # Response How It Works Works Best If... Considerations 35 Continually arresting offenders at problem properties Intended to remove problem guests from motels and deter them from returning …arrests are used to build a case against owners regarding poor guest screening Except for casebuilding, this is not shown to be an effective use of officer time 36 Conducting field interviews of people at problem motels, and traffic stops of vehicles leaving them; scheduling extra police patrols of problem motels Intended to deter problem guests from frequenting motels …the measures are used to better understand what attracts problem guests to the motels Except for datagathering, this is not shown to be an effective use of officer time 37 Implementing Crime-Free Hotel/Motel programs Intended to promote voluntary compliance with good management practices 63 | P a g e Focuses on process rather than outcomes Appendix C: Predicting the movement of street prostitution hotspots Police enforcement displaces street prostitution Over time, the geographical center of street prostitution activity in Oakland shifts. Years ago, San Pablo Avenue was considered the hub for Oakland’s street walkers. More recently, International Boulevard has taken that dubious title, earning the nickname “The Track.” When police enforcement increases in one geographical area, pimps and traffickers do not simply fold their lucrative business; they move it elsewhere. This dislocation of crime is an unfortunate side effect of traditional “hot spot” policing. But what if we could guess where pimps would move? If law enforcement, community groups, and other local government agencies could predict the future movement of street prostitution activity, they could take preventative measures in those neighborhoods. In other words, what are the distinctive characteristics of Oakland neighborhoods where sex is sold on the street now, and what areas might provide a hospitable environment for the sale of sex on the street in the future? The central question this analysis seeks to address is , given where street prostitution occurs now, what areas of Oakland are most at risk of becoming future prostitution centers? I performed an analysis using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) software to determine the characteristics of neighborhoods where street prostitution happens now and then to find other neighborhoods with similar characteristics. The analysis involved two stages: First, I identified demographic characteristics that are correlated with current prostitution hotspots. I did this by combining census block group data with the geographical location of reported prostitution incidents as well as with a control group of random points. Taking the average of the prostitution and control points, I performed means-comparison statistical tests to determine the ways in which prostitution hotspots are distinct from the average Oakland neighborhood. Second, I used the distinctive characteristics of current hotspots to identify similar areas in other parts of Oakland. I designated levels of distinctive demographic characteristics that represented “opportunities” and “constraints” for street prostitution, weighted them according to importance, and produced individual layers for each characteristic. By combining 13 weighted layers of geographical data, I obtained a street prostitution risk value for fine-grained geographical areas in Oakland. While my analysis cannot claim that any correlated factors cause street prostitution, the maps below provide useful information about neighborhoods with correlated factors. Methodology Obtaining and preparing data Data on existing prostitution hotspots came from Oakland CrimeWatch. The data I downloaded consisted of all reported crimes for a period of several months before the receipt of the data. I identified all crimes related to prostitution, pimping, and pandering and filtered out crimes unrelated to street prostitution, resulting in a table of 219 prostitution-related reports occurring between December 25, 2010 and April 18, 2011. Using the addresses associated with these events, I geocoded and matched all 219 prostitution incidents to geographical points. Because OPD generalizes the address of police reports to the nearest cross street, each point fell at the intersection of two street segments. 64 | P a g e Most other Oakland data was obtained from the UC Berkeley Department of Landscape Architecture’s Oakland dataset. Included in these data were census block groups with a range of demographic characteristics. Elevation data (NED 1-arc second) was obtained from the US Geological Survey’s Seamless Server. For simplicity’s sake, when I refer to “demographic characteristics” in the following discussion, I am also including variables like income and elevation that are not strictly demographic. Experimental and control groups I created a control group of 219 random points within the boundary of the city of Oakland. In the analysis that follows, the 219 prostitution report points form an experimental group, while the 219 random points form a control group. By associating each control and experimental point with the values of demographic characteristics (racial composition, income levels, occupancy rates, and others) in that geographical location and then averaging those points together, I produced two sets of mean statistics: Experimental means that describe the neighborhood characteristics at the average prostitution report location in the city. Control means that describe the neighborhood characteristics at the average geographic location in Oakland. The next page shows maps of the experimental and control points. My analysis included means comparisons for the following variables: Percent white population Percent black/African-American population Percent Asian population Percent Hispanic population Population in 2000 Median age Owner occupancy rate Vacancy rate Percent of population between the ages of 10-14 Percent of population between the ages of 15-17 Percent of population between the ages of 18-21 Median income Poverty rate Elevation All measures were taken from 2000 Census data, except for elevation. 65 | P a g e 66 | P a g e Associating demographic data with points Several steps were required to associate demographic characteristics from census block and elevation data with my experimental and control points. Because prostitution incidents are recorded at intersections, nearly all prostitution points fell on a boundary between census block groups. In order to obtain a spot estimate for each variable at every point location, I had to convert my census block data into a continuous surface. I first decomposed the census blocks into points, then used kriging interpolation to make 13 continuous floating point raster images for each of the variables above. (NED elevation data came in raster format directly.) Then I used GIS tools to associate each point with values for all 14 variables in that geographic location. The result was a pair of tables (one experimental and one control) containing estimates of all 14 variables for all 219 prostitution incident points and all 219 random points. The map below is an example of one of the interpolated raster layers. 67 | P a g e Means-comparison tests After associating values for all 14 variables to each point, I exported the experimental and control attribute tables to Excel and ran t-tests (two-tailed for unequal variances) on each pair of variable means. The results of those test are given in the table below. Demographic comparison, control and prostitution points Statistic Poverty rate Control Mean Control Prostitution Prostitution σ Mean σ t-value 16% 11% 28% 6% **-13.46 $57,298 $43,779 $24,039 $9,031 **10.91 Vacancy rate 2% 2% 5% 3% **-8.97 Owner Occupancy rate 47% 31% 18% 8% **12.97 Median age 29.2 13.5 24.3 5.6 **4.85 % of population 10-14 5% 3% 7% 2% **-8.39 % of population 15-17 3% 2% 4% 1% **-9.31 % of population 18-21 3% 2% 6% 2% **-16.81 % white 32% 27% 18% 8% **7.25 % black 23% 22% 19% 20% *2.04 % Asian 10% 10% 22% 13% **-10.44 % Hispanic 13% 15% 32% 16% **-13.08 92 114 12 5 **10.21 91.7 64.5 91.8 54.4 -0.02 Median income Elevation (meters) Population in 2000 (per block) Bold variables showed statistically significant differences. n=219 for both groups. * - significant at α = .05 ** - significant at α = .01 Nearly every variable in the analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups. Only per-block population was insignificant. The percentage of black population showed a statistically significant difference at the α = .05 level but not at the α = .01 level. Opportunities and constraints In order to indentify Oakland neighborhoods at risk of incurring street prostitution, I used the statistically significant variables identified in the first half of the analysis to define opportunity and constraint boundaries. In this context, opportunities are factors that were positively correlated with street prostitution activity in the analysis, while constraints are factors that were negatively correlated with prostitution activity. For example, because the means comparisons found a strong positive correlation between high vacancy rates and street prostitution, areas with especially high vacancy rates 68 | P a g e (one standard deviation above the experimental mean) were classified as opportunity areas, while areas with vacancy rates below the control mean were classified as constraint layers. I included as opportunities and constraints the 12 variables that were significant at the .01 level. Because street prostitution requires easy traffic access, I also created a 13th opportunity layer based on a 500-foot buffer from major Oakland thoroughfares. All but two of the prostitution reports occurred within 500 feet of a thoroughfare. The following streets were classified as thoroughfares: 7th St, 14th St., 73rd Ave., 98th Ave., Adeline, Bancroft, Broadway, Foothill, Fruitvale, Grand, Harrison, Hegenberger, High, Macarthur, Mandela, Park, San Pablo, Seminary, and Telegraph. The tables on the next page give the opportunity and constraint boundaries along with the rationale for the choice and the relative weight given to them in the analysis. To create suitability layers for use in the final analysis, I reclassified the floating point interpolation rasters as integer rasters, breaking them each into three ranges based on the opportunity and constraint breaking points. I then decomposed those integer rasters into polygons, with opportunity regions, constraint regions, and neutral regions. The map below shows one of the 12 polygon suitability layers. 69 | P a g e Opportunities Statistic Opportunity bound Rationale Weight Near thoroughfare Within 500 feet Captures 99% of existing prostitution points 5 Poverty rate Over 34% 1 SD above experimental mean 3 Median income Under $15,000 1 SD below experimental mean 3 Vacancy rate Over 8% 1 SD above experimental mean 3 Owner occupancy rate Under 10% 1 SD below experimental mean 3 Median age Under 19 1 SD below experimental mean 2 % of population 10-14 Over 9% 1 SD above experimental mean 1 % of population 15-17 Over 5% 1 SD above experimental mean 1 % of population 18-21 Over 8% 1 SD above experimental mean 1 % white Below 10% 1 SD below experimental mean 1 % Asian Above 22% 1 SD above experimental mean 1 % Hispanic Above 47% 1 SD above experimental mean 1 Elevation (meters) Under 20 feet Arbitrary, about 1.5 SD above experimental mean 2 Constraints Statistic Constraint bound Rationale Weight Poverty rate Under 15% Control mean -3 Median income Over $57,000 Control mean -3 Vacancy rate Under 2.5% Control mean -3 Owner occupancy rate Over 47% Control mean -3 Median age Over 29 Control mean -2 % of population 10-14 Under 4.5% Control mean -1 % of population 15-17 Under 2.7% Control mean -1 % of population 18-21 Under 3.1% Control mean -1 % white Above 32% Control mean -1 % Asian Below 10% Control mean -1 % Hispanic Below 12% Control mean -1 Elevation (meters) Over 90 feet Control mean -2 70 | P a g e Using the GIS “Union” tool, I combined all 13 opportunity/constraint layers to create a master suitability layer. Adding together the weight values for each individual polygon yielded the final suitability map, shown at the end of this analysis. Limitations of the Analysis It is important to note that I cannot claim that any of the statistically significant variables in the analysis cause street prostitution activity, only that they are strongly correlated with it. Indeed, I do not believe, for example, that a high proportion of racial minorities in a neighborhood causes street prostitution. Rather, other factors (like general crime levels or poverty) probably create a friendly environment for street prostitution, and the areas that struggle with crime and poverty also tend to be non-white. The areas identified on the map as “street prostitution risk zones” merely resemble current street prostitution hotspots. A more rigorous time series analysis would be necessary to make causal claims. Due to the constraints of time, resources, and data availability, I could not include many relevant variables. Many of the variables included in the analysis may not be important predictors of a neighborhood’s suitability for street prostitution. Ideally, I would have been able to include many more variables in the analysis, particularly factors thought to have a strong effect on street prostitution, such as the quality of street lighting, land use patterns, OPD activity or assignments, the presence of budget motels, and the level of community engagement in local business associations or NCPCs. OPD CrimeWatch data may not accurately reflect street prostitution activity. First, OPD data reflect officially reported crimes, not arrests, convictions, or phoned-in tips. CrimeWatch’s webpage says that data reflect only the most recent 90 days of incidents, but the data I obtained spanned more than 90 days. Importantly, OPD police report data may not accurately represent where street prostitution is occurring but rather where OPD is concentrating enforcement resources. (For instance, based on anecdotal evidence, I believe prostitution activity along San Pablo is underrepresented in the maps.) Conclusions and Discussion The maps below show that the major cluster of street prostitution activity is along International Boulevard between Lake Merritt and Fruitvale Ave., with a secondary cluster just east of High Street and additional activity scattered throughout West Oakland. On average, areas with street prostitution have lower income, a lower rate of owner occupancy, and a higher vacancy rate, proportionally fewer whites and more minorities, and a greater proportion of young people than the typical area in Oakland. About 99% of reported prostitution incidents occurred within 500 feet of a thoroughfare. Several areas in West Oakland show particularly strong risk, notably along San Pablo, Adeline, and Mandela Parkway. The data may under-represent existing street prostitution in those areas. Nevertheless, these West Oakland thoroughfares seem to be likely candidates for future street prostitution activity. In the event of major police crackdowns on International, the outdoor market for sex could easily move to West Oakland. Deep East Oakland also shows considerable correlation with current prostitution hotspots, especially along Seminary, Bancroft, and International near 98th Ave. However, currently no prostitution activity occurs east of 50th Ave., despite much of deep East Oakland showing hot spot risk. Future analyses could examine the question of why. One explanation might be violent crime: deep East Oakland has a higher rate of violent crime, and johns may feel less safe on the street there. In that case, a reduction in violent crime might actually lead to an increase in street prostitution. On the other hand, deep East Oakland communities might have particular resources that help them discourage street prostitution. In that case, similar areas in the Oakland flatlands could learn from deep East Oakland’s success 71 | P a g e 72 | P a g e 73 | P a g e 74 | P a g e 75 | P a g e Endnotes 1 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department. 10 July 2007. “A Report on Past Efforts and Current Strategies to Eliminate the Escalation of Prostitution and Sexual Exploitation of Minors in the City of Oakland.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. [Online]. Available: http://oakland.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=1018175&GUID=86DB5498-2622-4BE6-9B4F-5E05FD16ECD1. Accessed 22 February 2011. 2 “EBAYC Survey Codebook.” 2010. East Bay Asian Youth Center, 2010 Listening Campaign. 3 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department. 12 April 2005. “A Follow Up Report from the Chief of Police on Efforts to Address the Issue of Minors Involved in Prostitution in Oakland.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. 4 Walker, Nancy, Ed. 9 April 2002. Prostituted Teens: More Than a Runaway Problem. Michigan Family Impact Seminars. 5 Cited in Shively, Michael, et. al. 16 August 2010. Developing a National Action Plan for Eliminating Sex Trafficking. Abt Associates. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. 6 Adapted from Loza-Muriera, Barbara and Laura Hobson-Faure. 2003. Alameda County Minors in Prostitution/Sexually Exploited Minors Task Force Report. Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council. 7 City of Oakland, 12 April 2005. 8 Farley, Melissa. 2006. “Prostitution, Trafficking, and Cultural Amnesia: What We Must Not Know To Keep the Business of Sexual Exploitation Running Smoothly.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism. 9 Cited in Waltman, Max. 2010. “Prohibiting Purchase of Sex in Sweden: Impact, Obstacles, Potential, and Supporting Escape.” Working paper. Stockholm University. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid. 12 Cited in Walker. 13 Ibid. 14 Ibid. 15 City of Oakland, 12 April 2005. . 16 Loza-Muriera and Hobson-Faure. 17 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department. 26 October 2010. “A Report and Proposed Resolution Authorizing the City Administrator, on Behalf of the City of Oakland, to Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds in an Amount Not to Exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) From the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, FY 2010 Law Enforcement Response to Human Trafficking Grant Program for Continued Implementation and Operation of the East Bay Task Force on Human Trafficking in the Police Department.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. 18 City of Oakland, 10 July 2007. 19 Alameda County District Attorney’s Office, Bay Area HEAT Coalition Meeting. 28 April 2011. 20 Ibid. 21 Westcoast Children’s Clinic. Data from screenings of MISSSEY participants. 76 | P a g e 22 Adapted from Shively, et. al. 2010. 23 Wilcox, Aidan, Christmann, Kris, Rogerson, Michelle and Birch, Philip. 2009. “Tackling the Demand for Prostitution: A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Published Research Literature.” Project Report. Home Office. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/7178/. Accessed 11 January 2011. 24 Macleod, Jan, Melissa Farley, Lynn Anderson, and Jacqueline Golding. 2008. “Challenging Men’s Demand for Prostitution in Scotland.” Women’s Support Project. *Online+. Available: http://myweb.dal.ca/mgoodyea/Documents/Client%20studies/Challenging%20men%27s%20demand%20for%20p rostitution%20in%20Scotland%20Farley%202008.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2011. 25 Shively, et. al. 2010. 26 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department. 27 November 2007. “A Report and Proposed Ordinance Repealing Ordinances No. 11987, 12015, 12093, and 12684 C.M.S. Which Declare Vehicles Used to Solicit An Act Of Prostitution, For Pandering, For Pimping, Or To Illegally Acquire A Controlled Substance, To Be Public Nuisances, And Authorize The Seizure And Forfeiture Of Said Vehicles; And a Proposed Resolution Authorizing The City Administrator, Or Her Designee, On Behalf Of The City of Oakland, To Support Assembly Bill #1724 (Jones), Which Seeks To Change State Law To Authorize Local Governments To Enact And Enforce Local Legislation To Forfeit Nuisance Vehicles Used In The Illegal Purchase Of A Controlled Substance, Pimping, Pandering, Or Solicitation Of Prostitution.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. *Online+. Available: http://oakland.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=1018945&GUID=00FC5E4E-7D4A-438D-B070-EA907D17FA7D. Accessed 22 February 2011. 27 Saleda, Sgt. James. Oakland Police Department, Exploitation Unit. Interview. 18 February 2011. 28 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department and City Attorney’s Office. 8 February 2011. “Report and Ordinance Adding Chapter 9.56 to the Oakland Municipal Code, Declaring Vehicles a Public Nuisance and Authorizing Impoundment of such Vehicles When They are Used to Solicit an Act of Prostitution, for Pandering, Pimping, or Illegal Dumping.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. File # 10-0349-1. [Online]. Available: http://oakland.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=829275&GUID=B8120991-421F-4D90-9CC4A95714B6FC48&Options=ID|Text|&Search=prostitution. Accessed 22 February 2011. 29 Saleda interview, 18 February 2011. 30 Yelder, Lt. Ronald and Sgt. Phil Freeman. 23 February 2011. Research meeting at East Bay Asian Youth Center. 31 Hermann, Peter. “Fighting prostitution one john at a time.” Baltimore Sun 20 December 2009. [Online]. Available: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2009-12-20/news/bal-md.hermann20dec20_1_prostitution-lehmancars. Accessed 22 February 2011. 32 Raleigh Police Department. 30 June 2006. “Operation Dragnet: Reducing the Visibility of Street Prostitution in Raleigh, NC.” Submission for the Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. [Online]. Available: http://www.popcenter.org/library/awards/goldstein/2006/06-42.pdf. Accessed 23 February 2011. 33 Wilcox et. al. 34 Saleda interview, 18 February 2011. 35 Brewer, Devon et. al. December 2006. “A Large Specific Deterrent Effect of Arrest for Patronizing a Prostitute.” PLoS One, Issue 1. [Online]. Available: http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/A_Large_Specific_Deterrent_Effect_of_Arrest_for_Patronizing_a_Prostitute.p df. Accessed 22 February 2011. 36 Allen-Taylor, Douglas. 18 January 2006. “Dear Johns: For Shame.” AlterNet. *Online+. Available: http://www.alternet.org/story/30942/. Accessed 22 March 2011. 37 Loza-Muriera and Hobson-Faure. 77 | P a g e 38 “H.E.A.T. Watch Program Blueprint.” 2011. Alameda County District Attorney’s Office. 39 “Dear John Campaign.” 2006. City of Atlanta. Web site. [Online]. Available: http://www.atlantaga.gov/mayor/dearjohn_111006.aspx. Accessed 22 March 2011. 40 Boxill, Nancy and Deborah Richardson. Summer 2007. “Ending Sex Trafficking of Children in Atlanta.” Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, Vol. 22, No. 2. 41 Shively, et. al. 2010. 42 Shively, Michael, et. al. 7 March 2008. Final Report on the Evaluation of the First Offender Prostitution Program. Abt Associates. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. 43 Ibid. 44 Kennedy, M. Alexis, Carolin Klein, Boris Garzalka, and John Yuille. 2004. “Attitude Change Following a Diversion Program for Men Who Solicit Sex.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Vol. 40. 45 Shively et. al. 2008. 46 Macleod et. al. 47 Cited in Macleod et. al.. 48 “Men Who Buy Sex with Adolescent Girls: A Scientific Research Study.” 2009. The Schapiro Group. Cited in Shively, et. al. 2010. 49 Ekberg, Gunilla. October 2004. “The Swedish Law That Prohibits the Purchase of Sexual Services.” Violence Against Women, Vol. 10, No. 10. 50 Waltman. 51 Schaaf, Libby. Oakland District 4 City Councilmember. Phone Interview. 21 March 2011. 52 Saleda interview, 18 February 2011. 53 Brewer et. al. 54 Raleigh Police Department. 55 Wilcox et. al. 56 Willoughby, Michelle. July 2008. “Demand Deterrence Strategies: International Initiatives to Eliminate Demand for the Sex Trade.” Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation. 57 Sited in Wilcox. 58 Macleod et. al. 59 Cited in Wilcox. 60 Willoughby. 61 Saleda interview, 18 February 2011. 62 Cited in Wilcox. 63 Raleigh Police Department. 64 California Assembly. AB 12. 6 December 2010. Draft. Abolition of Child Commerce, Exploitation, and Sexual Slavery Act of 2011. Assembly Member Sandré Swanson, intr. [Online]. Available: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgibin/postquery?bill_number=ab_12&sess=CUR&house=B&author=swanson. Accessed 22 February 2011. 65 Swanson, Sandré. 2011. “AB 12 – (The ACCESS Act) Fact Sheet.” 78 | P a g e 66 Farley 2006. 67 Baker, Lynda M., Rochelle L. Dalla, and Celia Williamson. 2010. “Exiting Prostitution: An Integrated Model.” Sage. [Online]. Available: http://vaw.sagepub.com/content/16/5/579.full.pdf+html. Accessed 22 February 2011. 68 Baker et. al. 69 Ekberg. 70 Farley, Melissa. 2009. “Theory versus reality: Commentary on four articles about trafficking for prostitution.” Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 32, No. 2. 71 California Assembly. 2008. AB 499. An act to add and repeal Chapter 4.3 (commencing with Section 18259) of Part 6 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to sexually exploited minors. Assembly Member Sandré Swanson, intr. [Online]. Available: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_04510500/ab_499_bill_20080927_chaptered.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2011. 72 California Assembly. 20 February 2007. AB 499. DRAFT. An act to amend Sections 647, 653.22, 653.23, 679.01, 679.04, 11165.1, and 11166.3 of the Penal Code, and to amend Sections 300 and 313 of, and to add Sections 307.6 and 626.1 to, the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to sexually exploited minors. Assembly Member Sandré Swanson, intr. 73 Swanson, Sandré. 2010. “2010 Legislative Update.” *Online+. Available: http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a16/pdf/Swanson-Leg-Update-10.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2011. 74 California Assembly. AB 799. 17 February 2011. Draft. An Act to Amend Section 18259.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to sexually exploited minors. Assembly Member Sandré Swanson, intr. [Online]. Available: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0751-0800/ab_799_bill_20110217_introduced.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2011. 75 “SEMRise/SEM Network.” 2010. Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council. Web site. *Online+. Available: http://www.acgov.org/icpc/sem/semrise.htm. Accessed 29 March 2011. 76 Loza-Muriera, Barbara. “Sexually Exploited Minors/Commercially Sexually Exploited Children.” Presentation to California State PTA. 29 January 2011. 77 SACEY/SPA Program Components, Service Activities, and Providers. 78 Loza-Muriera presentation, 29 January 2011. 79 Loza-Muriera, Barbara. Alameda County Interagency Children’s Policy Council. Interview. 17 February 2011. 80 “Alameda County Family Justice Center.” Web site. *Online+. Available: http://www.acfjc.org/. Accessed 11 April 2011. 81 “HEAT Blueprint” 82 Sciupac, Maia. Alameda County District Attorney’s Office, HEAT Watch Coordinator. Phone interview. 6 April 2011. 83 Ibid. 84 ACDAO BAHC meeting, 28 April 2011. 85 Ibid. 86 Sciupac interview, 6 April 2011. 87 “Bay Area Women Against Rape.” Web site. *Online+. Available: http://www.bawar.org/index. Accessed 11 April 2011. 79 | P a g e 88 “Outreach to Sexually Exploited Minors.” 2007. Measure Y web site. *Online+. Available: http://measurey.org/index.php?page=sexually-exploited-minors-2. Accessed 29 March 2011. 89 “Interagency Children’s Policy Council of Alameda County: Safe House Planning.” Web site. *Online+. Available: http://www.acgov.org/icpc/shsummary.htm. Accessed 11 April 2011. 90 Loza-Muriera interview, 17 February 2011. 91 Loza-Muriera and Hobson-Faure. 92 Ibid. 93 Farley 2006. 94 Smith, Tony. Superintendent, Oakland Unified School District. 15 March 2011. Research meeting. 95 “Gang Prevention and Intervention Handbook for Schools.” 2010. Oakland Interagency Gang Prevention Collaborative. [Online]. Available: http://publicportal.ousd.k12.ca.us/199410109161217937/blank/browse.asp?A=383&BMDRN=2000&BCOB=0&C=5 7572. Accessed 4 March 2011. 96 Loza-Muriera interview, 17 February 2011. 97 Baeza, Gabriela. 10 March 2011. Phone interview. San Diego County Office of Education. 98 Schmidt, Steve. “Teenage prostitution targeted in East County.” 13 November 2010. San Diego Union Tribune. [Online]. Available: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/13/schools-law-enforcement-trying-domore-against-tee/. Accessed 10 March 2011. 99 “Seattle Women’s Commission 2011 Workplan.” 2011. Web site. *Online+. Available: http://www.seattle.gov/womenscommission/workplan.htm. Accessed 10 March 2011. 100 Madrigal-Weiss, Mara. 11 March 2011. Phone interview. San Diego County of Education. 101 “MISSSEY Statewide and National Advocacy Plan.” 1 March 2008. MISSSEY. *Online+. Available: http://www.misssey.org/documents/misssey_strategic_plan.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2011. 102 US Census Bureau, American Fact Finder. 2010 and 2000 Census Redistricting Data. Public Law 94-171 Summary File. [Online]. Available: http://factfinder2.census.gov/. Accessed 11 April 2011. 103 Loza-Muriera presentation, 29 January 2011. 104 Sciupac, Maia. Alameda County District Attorney’s Office, HEAT Watch Coordinator. Email. 8 April 2011. 105 AB 799. 106 Shively, et. al. 2010. 107 Quoted in Walker. 108 Cited in Walker. 109 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department. 8 February 2005. “An Information Report on the ‘Alameda County Minors in Prostitution Task Force Report’ and the Police Department’s Efforts to Address the Issue of Minors Involved in Prostitution in Oakland.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. 110 “HEAT Blueprint” 111 ACDAO BAHC meeting, 28 April 2011. 112 City of Oakland, 10 July 2007. 113 City of Oakland, 26 October 2010. 80 | P a g e 114 City of Oakland, Oakland Police Department and City Attorney’s Office. 8 February 2011. “Report and Ordinance Amending Section 9.08.260 of the Oakland Municipal Code to (1) Prohibit the Sexual Exploitation of Women and Children, (2) Prohibit Business Owners from Allowing Prostitution on their Property, (3) Declare ProstitutionRelated Offenses Local Crimes, and (4) Clarify Terms Related to Prostitution Offenses.” Report to the Public Safety Committee, Oakland City Council. 115 California Assembly. AB 90. 6 January 2011. Draft. An Act to Amend Section 236.1 of the penal code, relating to human trafficking . Assembly Member Sandré Swanson, intr. [Online]. Available: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgibin/postquery?bill_number=ab_90&sess=CUR&house=B&author=swanson. Accessed 22 February 2011. 116 Casey, Laura. “Neighbors hail closure of Hillcrest; residents, businesses say less prostitution, drug deals since motel was shuttered a week ago.” Oakland Tribune 15 September 2003. LexisNexus. Web. 16 February 2011. 117 Willoughby. 118 Wilcox et. al. 119 Ibid. 120 ACDAO BAHC meeting, 28 April 2011. 121 Braga, Anthony. 2008. Crime Prevention Research Review No. 2: Police Enforcement Strategies to Prevent Crime in Hot Spot Areas. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. [Online]. Available: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/e040825133-web.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2011. 122 City of Oakland, 10 July 2007. 123 Oakland Police Department, Beat Health Unit. 2003. “The Oakland Airport Motel Program: Eliminating Criminal and Nuisance Behavior at a Problem Motel.” Submission for the Herman Goldstein Award for Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing. [Online]. Available: http://www.popcenter.org/library/awards/goldstein/2003/0326%28W%29.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2011. 124 Harris, Harry. “Oakland police win award for motel clean-up; Department’s health unit stamped out drugs, prostitution at East Oakland site.” Oakland Tribune 31 July 2003. LexisNexus. Web. 16 February 2011. 125 Casey, Laura. “Residents go after Hillcrest Motel again; Dimond District neighbors on MacArthur Boulevard call it a site for violence; owners from Hillsborough deny allegations.” Oakland Tribune 12 May 2003. LexisNexus. Web. 16 February 2011. 126 “Neighbors hail closure of Hillcrest” 127 Casey, Laura. “Blighted Oakland motel becomes gem for seniors.” Oakland Tribune 15 November 2005. [Online]. Available: http://www.domusd.com/ASSETS/Domus_LincolnCourt_111505.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2011. 128 Red Light Abatement Act. Cal. Penal Code § 11225-11235. 129 Oakland City Attorney’s Office. 22 December 2010. “Oakland sues to shut down hotels catering to prostitution.” Press release. [Online]. Available: http://www.oaklandcityattorney.org/PDFS/Press%20Releases/Oak%20sues%20to%20shut%20down%20hotels%20 catering%20to%20prostitution%2012%2022%2010.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2011. 130 Anderson, Mike. 22 December 2010. “Oakland Sues 3 Hotels for Allegedly Welcoming Prostitutes.” NBC Bay Area. [Online]. Available: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local-beat/Oakland-Sues-Hotels-in-Sex-Trade112354564.html. Accessed 23 February 2011. 131 California and City of Oakland v. Patel, Patel, Patel, National Lodge, and DOES 1 through 30, Case No. 10552481 (Alameda Co. Superior Court, 21 December 2010). [Online]. Available: http://www.oaklandcityattorney.org/PDFS/National%20Lodge%20Complaint.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2011. 81 | P a g e 132 City of Oakland, Resolution No. 79235. 17 May 2005. “Resolution amending resolution no. 72727 C.M.S., which implemented the City of Oakland’s community policing policy, to provide a structured approach to community involvement.” Oakland City Council. 133 “Measure Y Community Policing Quarterly Report.” 15 April 2011. Resource Development Associates. *Online+. Available: http://www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca/groups/police/documents/webcontent/oak028479.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2011. 134 Yelder meeting, 23 February 2011. 135 ACDAO BAHC meeting, 28 April 2011. 136 “Community Policing.” Oakland Police Department. Web site. *Online+. Available: http://www2.oaklandnet.com/Government/o/OPD/s/CommunityPolicing/index.htm. Accessed 18 April 2011. 137 Maguire, Edward and William Wells, eds. “Implementing Community Policing: Lessons from 12 Agencies.” July 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/e080925236-ImpCP-Lessons.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2011. 138 Khashu, Anita, Robin Busch, and Zainab Latif. August 2005. “Building Strong Police-Immigrant Community Relations: Lessons from a New York City Project.” Vera Institute of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Series. [Online]. Available: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/ric/Publications/Building_PoliceImmigrant_Relations.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2011. 139 “Enhancing Community Policing with Immigrant Populations: Recommendations from a Roundtable Meeting of Immigrant Advocates and Law Enforcement Leaders.” 28 August 2008. US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. [Online]. Available: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/e041016266-enhancing-cp-immigrant-populations_b.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2011. 140 City of Oakland, Resolution No. 79235. 17 May 2005. “Resolution amending resolution no. 72727 C.M.S., which implemented the City of Oakland’s community policing policy, to provide a structured approach to community involvement.” Oakland City Council. 141 “Enhancing Community Policing with Immigrant Populations.” 142 Mazerolle, Lorraine Green, Jan Roehl, and Colleen Kadleck. 1998. “Controlling Social Disorder Using Civil Remedies: Results from a Randomized Field Experiment in Oakland, California.” Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 9. 143 Farley, Melissa. 30 September 2008. Memo to San Francisco City Leaders on Prostitution. 144 Campbell DeLong Resources Inc. and Portland Police Bureau. 1999. Crime Prevention in Overnight Lodging: A Guide to Preventing Drug Activity, Prostitution, and Other Illegal Behavior in Hotels and Motels. [Online]. Available: http://www.portlandonline.com/police/index.cfm?a=31556&c=29869. Accessed 22 February 2011. 145 Raleigh Police Department. 146 Shively, et. al. 2010. 147 Schmerler, Karin. January 2005. Disorder at Budget Motels. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police ProblemSpecific Guides Series, No. 30. US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. [Online]. Available: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/e10042574.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2011. 82 | P a g e