Review by Michael Shaw in ArtScene
Transcription
Review by Michael Shaw in ArtScene
January, 2013 15 Dylan Vitone, “Wolfpack” from the series “Yellowstone,” 2011, archival inkjet print, 17 x 70”. large, geometric forms. This coincided with her teaching tenure at Los Angeles Valley Arts College, where she remained until 1994. The repetitive honeycomb shape appears in various sizes to simulate the sense that one’s perception was bending around the canvas. The evolution of style comes full circle, as the decade began with disparate objects that fractured into space and ended with connected forms that shift in shade and perspective. A. Moret DYLAN VITONE (dnj Gallery, Santa Monica) Dylan Vitone’s photographs are panoramic for more than simply stylistic reasons; they frequently echo the often ÀVKERZOSURQHVXEMHFWVWKDWKHGRFXments. Whether it’s bodybuilders in Miami or tourists in Yellowstone, many of these people have cameras, and therefore are snapping pictures of their own. The models or landscapes or wildlife, in other words, are his subjects’ subjects. Even when no cameras are present, in his more portrait-leaning shots, Vitone establishes a mood in which the main players tend to have a knowing look about them — very much ready for their close-ups. Included here are his 2012 series “Rutland” and his 2011 series “Yellowstone,” the latter a response to his “Miami Project” from 2009. The Pittsburgh-based Vitone did Miami no favors by capturing several of the most ingrained stereotypes the rest of the world harbors towards that beachside metropolis. Some of the photos’ titles speak for themselves: “Porn Star On A Table;” “Bikini Models in a Hall;” “Male Model Shoot;” and “Drug Bust,” to name a few. The more benignly titled “Group Photo” features a bikini-clad young woman as viewed from behind, standing beside her friend and taking a snapshot of a group of men, who may be famous, in mid-pose. Just beyond this mise en scène, a few stray beachgoers observe the shoot, a few other groups cluster together oblivious, while still others simply gawk aimlessly at the beach scene at large. It’s the beach as social spectacle, one Miami cliché rendered large. Though no one in “Group Photo” appears to have been caught facing the viewer (Vitone, and then us), the subject-object dynamic exists instead within the scene. While Vitone subsequently chose Yellowstone as a wilderness-like counterpoint to Miami, there’s actually a through line in that dynamic, giving the two series arguably more in common than not. The bikini models and the bodybuilders of Miami become the buffalo and the elk of Yellowstone, where a far greater berth is provided these reluctant stars, but with no less intensity in the voyeurism. This is where we should WDNHDFORVHUORRNDW9LWRQH·VVSHFLÀF panoramic technique. The well-trodden tool of stitching together a sequence of several images into one can be found in everything from real estate interiors to tourist-luring beach spreads. Vitone pushes the format quite far, assembling six to eight photos per image on average, so that you can be looking down one stretch of road to both the east and the west in the same image, an affect which heightens the central area into an arena, a literal collision of visual activity. This approach is especially effective in putting the celebrities of Yellowstone – the buffalo, the elk, or the lone bear – even more pronouncedly in the crosshairs of the tourists’ lenses (the Miami portraits, by contrast, generally scatter the focus to a slew of subjects, both central and secondary). Even in what would otherwise be Vitone’s panoramic take on classic landscape photography, people and/or 16 vehicles make slight spatial intrusions into the frame, not only sullying the view but also perhaps reminding us that one’s quest to “get away” is ultimately futile. (Meanwhile, the clearly visible seam breaks from unmatched portions of stitching that occasionally appear in Vitone’s panoramas don’t at all detract from our illusions; on the FRQWUDU\WKHEUHDNVDUHUHÁHFWLYHRI the imperfections in the larger scope of each imperfect reality. Among Vitone’s latest work is the series “Rutland,” a look inside the anarchist playground known as Skatopia, in Rutland, Ohio. With the gritty landscapes featuring skate ramps, pipes and pools, ramshackle houses and mobile homes, and the skaters, gutter punks and anarchists that inhabit them, Vitone here inhabits more the role of documentary photographer. The access granted by his subjects is somewhat surprisingly open, considering that the rituals involving overturned, burning cars and other bouts of endorsed mayhem that might not be the image that such a community would want to put out in the world. But upon revisiting one of Vitone’s ongoing themes – people who exhibit a great amount of comfort with being seen, or who even are actively seeking attention – the logic quickly falls into place. Apart from the innately aesthetic skate venues, providing Vitone with urban landscapes set in the midst of the semi-wild, there are several images in which the subjects engage with the photographer, rather than just dot, or blot, the landscape for scale and/or context. “Roach Motel” portrays a group of guys and gals with gutter-punk/anarchist accoutrements KDQJLQJDERXWDFDELQWXUQHGJUDIÀWL HPEOD]RQHGIRUW7KHFHQWUDOÀJXUHD young man with cut-off jeans, a denim vest sans shirt and a fedora, directs a rather steely-eyed glare at us, while the others direct eye contact amongst each other. The engagement eschews the straightforwardness of the bodybuilder striking a pose in Miami. In addition to documenting a subculture, Vitone also comes face-to-face with individuals. The protagonist of “Roach Motel,” though a willing participant, also is capable, if inadvertently, of con- ArtScene veying a sense of self that’s more complex than simply existing as yet another poster boy for that subculture. As much as the group scenes at Skatopia revel in a celebration of hardcore alterna-culture – and don’t get me wrong: it’s a fun ride – when the portrayals hone in on an individual level, we become pointedly aware, through our protagonist, of the ever-so-subtle line between documentation and exploitation. But perhaps that’s just an inevitable blurring that comes from how convincingly deep inside this otherwise-private ecosystem that Vitone was able to go, a key victory in itself. Michael Shaw NED EVANS and CHARLES CHRISTOPHER HILL (Gallery 478, San Pedro) Ned Evans and Charles Christopher Hill have a lot in common. Born two years apart (1948 and 1950), they both live and work in Venice; both earned MFAs from UC Irvine; and both studied art with Ed Moses, Billy Al Bengston and Vija Celmins. Today both artists exhibit internationally; and both of them are known for creating colorful and vigorous geometric abstractions WKDWDUHVWURQJO\LQÁXHQFHGE\OLJKW But there the similarities end. How wise of the gallery to install their respective works side by side. One step inside the gallery and viewers can compare and contrast the stark differences among the 38 paintings. While Ned Evans, “1012VH,” 2012, acrylic on paper, 11 x 14”.