ZUS

Transcription

ZUS
Management by objectives in the social security administration
Social Insurance Institution (ZUS)
Vilnius, 3-4 October 2013
Plan of the Presentation
1. ZUS’s scope of operation
2. Reasons for MBO implementation in ZUS
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
4. Results of MBO implementation in ZUS
2
1. ZUS’s scope of operation
 Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) is one of the largest public institutions in Poland
as far as:
• the scope of performed assignments,
• the size of committed public funds

 



 
are concerned.

  

 



SŁUPSK

GDAŃSK
1 Headquarters
43 branches
214 inspectorates
68 local offices

 


OLSZTYN
KOSZALIN

 


 






SZCZECIN









 BYDGOSZCZ
BIAŁYSTOK

TORUŃ





 PIŁA  


 

 











  PŁOCK

  



  

GORZÓW WLKP.
 POZNAŃ

I

WARSZAWA II
II
 




 

 POZNAŃ

SIEDLCE
WARSZAWA I 

 

   
 




 

 

 ŁÓDŹ I  WARSZAWA
 III








ZIELONA 
 OSTRÓWWLKP.







GÓRA






   

RADOM
  
  LUBLIN 


ŁÓDŹ II


w Zduńskiej
WROCŁAW
      
LEGNICA 
TOMASZÓW
 
  Woli



  MAZ.
 
 
     
 





KIELCE






LEGENDA


BIŁGORAJ
 CZĘSTOCHOWA



  
 

 



WAŁBRZYCH



  

OPOLE





Obszar terytorialnego działania oddziału




ZABRZE
 SOSNOWIEC
 



  CHORZÓW




RZESZÓW

KRAKÓW





 
  

   
Oddział
  TARNÓW

  CHRZANÓW 

RYBNIK
 
Inspektorat


  

  
BIELSKO
Biuro
Terenowe



JASŁO
-BIAŁA
 NOWY SĄCZ

 ZUS’s structure

 



ELBLĄG

 ZUS employs over 45 thousand persons
3
1. ZUS’s scope of operation
 ZUS provides services for:
14.5 million insured. It inter alia:
• keeps accounts recording individual insurance history for each person
• collects contributions transfers a part of the old-age pension contributions to
Open Pension Funds (OPFs)
• collects, accounts for and transfers to the National Health Fund (NHF)
contributions to health insurance
• certifies incapacity for work mainly for pension purposes
7.5 million beneficiaries, for whom ZUS establishes pension entitlements,
assesses pension amount, makes calculations and pays pensions
1.7 million contribution payers. It inter alia conducts monthly contribution
settlement, transferring contributions to funds separated from the Social Insurance
Fund, i.e. the old-age pension fund, the disability pension fund, the accident and
sickness fund.
4
2. Reasons for MBO implementation in ZUS
ZUS’s ambition
to ensure
o high standards of
customer service
o timely and reliable
execution of
additional tasks
assigned to ZUS
to increase
customer
satisfaction
to improve
ZUS’s image
and reputation
5
2. Reasons for MBO implementation in ZUS
ZUS’s
ambition
ZUS’s
scope of
operation
MANAGEMENT
BY
OBJECTIVES
CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
ZUS’s
readiness
to perform
additional
tasks
6
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
MBO implemented on two levels
OPERATIONAL
STRATEGIC
•ZUS’s strategy for the
years 2010-2012
•ZUS’s strategy for the
years 2013-2015
•Comprehensive
measurement system
of ZUS’s branches
performance
•Internal
benchmarking (cost,
resources)
7
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
MBO APPROACH ON STRATEGIC LEVEL (1/3)
 ZUS transformation Strategy for years 2010-2012
• In 2010-2012 ZUS realized its Transformation Strategy which ultimate goal
was to increase customer satisfaction by:
- digitization of delivered services,
- introduction of process management,
- reorganization towards achievement of a front/back office model,
- supervision of resources allocation and funds’ management.
• These four overall objectives were cascaded to specific goals within eight
area policies (functional strategies).
• Both overall and specific objectives were aimed to improve the efficiency,
quality and financial performance of services provided by ZUS, so as to
achieve customer contentment and improve ZUS’s image.
8
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
MBO APPROACH ON STRATEGIC LEVEL (2/3)
 ZUS development Strategy for years 2013-2015
• The improvement both of customer satisfaction and ZUS image confirmed
that the customer satisfaction-building mechanism accepted in the Strategy
for 2010-2012 proved to be effective.
• Thus changes initiated in 2010-2012 will be continued in the next strategic
planning period, i.e. in 2013-2015.
9
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
MBO APPROACH ON STRATEGIC LEVEL (3/3)
 Balanced Scorecard
• In the process of formulating ZUS Strategy (both for 2010-2012 and 2013-2015)
the Balanced Scorecard structure was adopted.
• BSC has been used for many years in business, but it is also increasingly being
applied in the public sector (e.g. in local governments, health care).
• In the commercial sector, the
hierarchy of perspectives
emphasizes the importance of
finance as a guarantor of
business success. For ZUS the
BSC model has been adapted
by exposing the role of the
customer, while finance
becomes a tool for effectiveness
control.
10
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
MBO APPROACH ON OPERATIONAL LEVEL (1/2)
 Comprehensive measurement system of ZUS’s branches performance
•
To ensure the smooth implementation of the Strategy at the operational level, a
complex quarterly task performance measurement system has been introduced.
•
The system:
•
-
recognizes the wide spectrum of ZUS activities,
-
provides a multidimensional assessment of various kinds of activities.
Seven areas of assessment have been identified:
-
customer service,
-
keeping insured persons’ accounts,
-
running contribution payers’ accounts,
-
contribution payers’ control,
-
payment of long-term benefits,
-
payment of short-term benefits,
-
medical certification.
11
3. Two levels of MBO in ZUS
MBO APPROACH ON OPERATIONAL LEVEL (2/2)
• Each area is measured in three dimensions:
- task effectiveness (timeliness of claims/applications’ handling and
percentage of handled cases),
- quality (error scale and claims/applications’ lead time),
- efficiency (labor productivity indicators and unit costs’ indicators).
• In order to balance the role of individual assessment areas and to prioritize
specific actions a weighing system has been introduced.
• The evaluation system clearly resulted in focusing ZUS branches’ operations
on areas significant for customer service, thus contributing to the
establishment and adoption of customer service standards common for the
entire Institution. As a result it played a key role in the process of task
standardization in branch offices, and thus in the improvement of the
performance level and increase of ZUS’s customer satisfaction.
12
4. Results of MBO implementation in ZUS
EFFECTS OF MBO APPROACH IN ZUS
BUILDING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
IMPROVEMENTS IN ZUS’S FUNCTIONING:
•
•
introduction of process management,
•
changes in ZUS’ organizational structure,
particularly in terms of the structural
unification of organizational units and
integration of some of the tasks in common
service centers,
•
reorganization of resources for their more
effective use and adjustment to process
management,
•
standardization of costs that ensures task
performance in accordance with the
principles of economy, with respect for public
funds and transparency of costs.
the Electronic Services Platform (means of
customer contact and support),
•
uniform customer service rules at ZUS’s
customer service halls,
•
enhanced catalogue of matters possible to be
settled "on the spot" at customer service
halls,
•
improved timeliness of processing
applications and issuing decisions,
•
shorter time of handling cases,
•
pro-customer approach.
13
4. Results of MBO implementation in ZUS
RESULTS OF MBO IMPLEMENTATION IN ZUS
• Customer satisfaction level has increased
from 3.76 to 3.92 (on a five-point scale)
between the fourth quarter of 2010 and the
fourth quarter of 2012.
• The level of social acceptance for ZUS’s
operation has increased from 20% to 32%
over 2009-2012.
14
Dziękuje za uwagę
IMIĘ I NAZWISKO AUTORA/AUTORÓW PREZENTACJI
Ms. Katarzyna DEJER
Director of the Controlling Department (ZUS)
15