You can see a copy here
Transcription
You can see a copy here
20 Landscape Architect Quarterly 12/ 20/ 22/ Round Table The Big Chill Features Design in a Cold Climate Chilling Out with Nature Publication # 40026106 Winter 2012-2013 Issue 20 Contents 03/ Up Front Information on the Ground Chill: 06/ 12/ Northern Inspiration Cornelia Hahn Oberlander in conversation with Nancy Chater, OALA Round Table The Big Chill Helle Søholt and Gil Peñalosa in conversation MODERATED BY ADRIENNE HALL 18/ 20/ 22/ 26/ A Fun Run on Chilly Hills The Ultimate Tobogganing Design Design in a Cold Climate Werner Schwar, OALA, on designing in the North Chilling Out with Nature William Sullivan in conversation with Todd Smith Plant Corner Plants for Winter Interest TEXT BY TODD SMITH 28/ Technical Corner Environmentally Friendly Alternatives to Road Salts TEXT BY KATE NELISCHER, WITH RESEARCH BY FUNG LEE, OALA 32/ 42/ Notes A miscellany of news and events Artifact Grow Op: Exploring Landscape + Place TEXT BY LORRAINE JOHNSON Winter 2012-2013 Issue 20 President’s Message Editorial Board Message President’s Message Editorial Board Message As I write this, we are heading into the holidays and many of us are looking forward to taking a little time to “chill.” With the holidays comes winter weather; the deep freeze allows us to change our type of recreation as well as enjoy beautiful, sparkling, winterswept landscapes. As an Ottawa resident, I look forward to the opening of the “largest skating rink in the province,” the Rideau Canal. This UNESCO site hosts hundreds of skaters daily throughout the season. The winter landscape has a unique hold on northeners’ minds. We love it or hate it in the instance, but beyond our conscious experience of it, perhaps our subconscious is also busy interpreting the many cultural archetypes and symbologies that resonate in this chilly season. In a province affected by weather extremes, landscape architects who work in the field of design must consider seasonal aspects of the spaces they create, and address winter dormant views as well as those at the height of bloom in late spring and summer and the transitional views of fall. As an Association, we are currently undertaking work that will consider all aspects of practice our members undertake throughout careers and across many expressions of the profession. It is absolutely fascinating to ponder how the creativity of our members has affected the many types of professional landscape architectural practice. On the first Saturday of December, I was privileged to attend a seminar on the legislative process regarding practice legislation. As I looked around the room at the many familiar faces, I was struck by the value that we, as landscape architects, bring to a community and how very important it is that we position ourselves on par with our allied professionals so that we may, without debate, be the ones who provide professional services regarding landscape architectural matters…from the very beginning of the process. During the seminar, it was reassuring to hear that of the steps to ready ourselves to advance a practice legislation case, most have already been taken. To name a few: a representative Council, an Executive, adequate staff, specific educational and entrance requirements, governing bylaws, a means of reporting and disciplining those in contravention of bylaws and policies, and members capable of supporting a budget that addresses professional practice. So, we are very close to being in a position to advance our case for defining a scope of practice of landscape architecture and to have that scope protected with a provincial statute. That would be chill! JOANNE MORAN, OALA PRESIDENT@OALA.CA Adam Gopnik’s book Winter and his “five windows on the season”—romantic, radical, recreational, recuperative, and remembering—remind us of how our experience of winter has been tempered or conditioned by our cultural histories and mores, and that the landscape of winter, and our designs upon it, is a reflection of these stories. Of course, winter just carries on with no regard for us—we choose to ignore it or celebrate its existence. As the climate changes and winter freezes and thaws increase (or decrease) in frequency, does the winter cultural landscape become a “new” space within which to consider public space, circulation, and flora? What are the changes you are experiencing in your Ontario winter? Perhaps people wish to be outside more in the winter— definitely an opportunity for landscape architects. Ground has joined the Twitter revolution with a delightful bang. If you have never used Twitter, you will be amazed at some very interesting and helpful industry information within the network. Please follow us: @Groundmag and send us a tweet! The Editorial Board would like to give wholehearted and grateful thanks to Nancy Chater, OALA, and Rob Walkowiak for their time and dedication to Ground. Rob has moved on to other pursuits, while Nancy remains a member of the Editorial Board. She was Co-Chair for nearly four years (attending virtually every one of our monthly meetings in those four years!) and her leadership and organization were inspirations. Thank you! We welcome with enthusiasm our new interim Chair, Denise Pinto, whose initial efforts on the Editorial Board include launching Ground into the Twittersphere and facilitating an improved, searchable platform for Ground on the OALA website. (You can now, for example, send pdfs of specific Ground articles to friends and colleagues.) Wherever you are this winter, we hope you enjoy perusing this issue dedicated to all things chill. TODD SMITH EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBER Masthead .20 Editor Lorraine Johnson 2013 OALA Governing Council OALA Editorial Board Nancy Chater Eric Gordon Adrienne Hall Jocelyn Hirtes Fung Lee Leslie Morton Kate Nelischer Denise Pinto (interim chair) Maili Sedore Todd Smith Netami Stuart Victoria Taylor President Joanne Moran Art Direction/Design www.typotherapy.com Advertising Inquiries advertising@oala.ca 416.231.4181 Cover OALA member Eric Gordon’s design of an ideal tobogganing run. See page 18. Ground: Landscape Architect Quarterly is published four times a year by the Ontario Association of Landscape Architects. Ontario Association of Landscape Architects 3 Church Street, Suite 407 Toronto, Ontario M5E 1M2 416.231.4181 www.oala.ca oala@oala.ca Copyright © 2013 by the Ontario Association of Landscape Architects All rights reserved ISSN: 0847-3080 Canada Post Sales Product Agreement No. 40026106 Vice President Morteza Behrooz Treasurer Sarah Culp Secretary Doris Chee Past President Glenn O’Connor Councillors Alana Evers Jonathan Loschmann Associate Councillor—Senior Jonathan Woodside Associate Councillor—Junior Inna Olchovski Lay Councillor Linda Thorne Appointed Educator University of Toronto Elise Shelley The paper is manufactured by Cascades in Canada with 100% postconsumer waste using biogas energy (methane from a landfill site) and is EcoLogo, FSC® and Processed Chlorine Free (PCF) certified. OALA About About the OALA Ground: Landscape Architect Quarterly is published by the Ontario Association of Landscape Architects and provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas and information related to the profession of landscape architecture. Letters to the editor, article proposals, and feedback are encouraged. For submission guidelines, contact Ground at magazine@oala.ca. Ground reserves the right to edit all submissions. The views expressed in the magazine are those of the writers and not necessarily the views of the OALA and its Governing Council. The Ontario Association of Landscape Architects works to promote and advance the profession of landscape architecture and maintain standards of professional practice consistent with the public interest. The OALA promotes public understanding of the profession and the advancement of the practice of landscape architecture. In support of the improvement and/or conservation of the natural, cultural, social and built environments, the OALA undertakes activities including promotion to governments, professionals and developers of the standards and benefits of landscape architecture. Upcoming Issues of Ground Ground 21 (Spring) Politics Deadline for advertising space reservations: January 21, 2013 Ground Advisory Panel Ground 22 (Summer) Play Deadline for editorial proposals: March 11, 2013 Deadline for advertising space reservations: April 22, 2013 Appointed Educator University of Guelph Sean Kelly University of Toronto Student Representative Sara Ahadi University of Guelph Student Representative Sarah Taslimi OALA Staff Ground is printed on 100 percent post-consumer, processed chlorinefree paper that is FSC certified. OALA Registrar Linda MacLeod Administrator Aina Budrevics Coordinator Joanna Wilczynska 's environmental savings with Cascades paper Compared to products in the industry made with 100% virgin fiber, Ground: Landscape Architect Quarterly's savings are: 15 trees 55,306 L of water 158 days of water consumption 838 kg of waste 17 waste containers 2,178 kg CO2 14,566 km driven 25 GJ 113,860 60W light bulbs for one hour 6 kg NOX emissions of one truck during 20 days .20 Andrew B. Anderson, BLA, MSc. World Heritage Management Landscape & Heritage Expert, Oman Botanic Garden Victoria Lister Carley, OALA, Victoria Lister Carley Landscape Architect, Toronto John Danahy, OALA, Associate Professor, University of Toronto George Dark, OALA, FCSLA, ASLA, Principal, Urban Strategies Inc., Toronto Katherine Dugmore, MCIP, RPP, Waterfront Project Manager, City of Thunder Bay Real Eguchi, OALA, Eguchi Associates Landscape Architects, Toronto Donna Hinde, OALA, Partner, The Planning Partnership, Toronto Ryan James, OALA, Landscape Architect, Peterborough Alissa North, OALA, Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, Principal of North Design Office, Toronto Peter North, OALA, Assistant Professor, University of Toronto, Principal of North Design Office, Toronto Cecelia Paine, OALA, FCSLA, FASLA, Professor and Associate Dean of Graduate Studies, University of Guelph Nathan Perkins, MLA, PhD, ASLA, Associate Professor, University of Guelph Jim Vafiades, OALA, Senior Landscape Architect, Stantec, London Chilling Out with Nature 01/ Windsor skyline. IMAGE/ En:Adoch, Creative Commons .20 22 Chilling Out with Nature William Sullivan in conversation with Todd Smith 23 .20 We all enjoy a walk in the park or a view across a meadow. This good feeling is a qualitative evaluation of how greenspace impacts our sense of well-being. William Sullivan, Professor of Landscape Architecture at University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, is conducting research into how these impacts can also be quantified. This is important data for landscape architects as it informs policy and strengthens the argument for public greenspace. Landscape designer and Ground Editorial Board member Todd Smith recently spoke with Sullivan about his latest research and thoughts on the subject. Chilling Out with Nature .20 24 02 Todd Smith (TS): Why is the work of landscape architects important to this research? William Sullivan (WS): We have had, for centuries, artists and poets and great writers who have all engaged in the creative process in which they talk about the healing benefits of being exposed to nature. And, within the past few decades, we have developed a compelling body of empirical evidence to support those ideas. It is now very clear that the work of landscape architects can be productive towards the health of ecosystems, and in turn very important for the health of families and communities. TS: How do we know a healthy ecosystem when we see it? WS: We can take measurements of nonhuman systems by assessing healthy landscape indicators such as biodiversity levels, water balance, soil content, and biotic potential. With respect to people, of course, qualitative surveys are helpful, but these indicators are harder to measure. One recent study, though, indicates a strong correlation. The American Journal of Epidemiology published a study that showed the health impacts of greening vacant lots in Philadelphia. The impacts are impressive. There was a marked reduction in gun violence and reported assaults; the residents reported less stress and more exercise; and there was a significant decrease in vandalism. If we think of this increased presence of natural systems as a remedy, then nature can have a huge financial and social impact on the health of communities. What is amazing is that we have landscape architecture as the profession that is dedicated and highly qualified to deliver this remedy in the landscape towards better community and ecosystem health. TS: Is this evidence only recent and fairly new to the collective consciousness, or have we just forgotten how important natural systems are to healthy communities? WS: That is a good question, because millions of North Americans are disconnected from natural places, even urban greenspaces, either by design or culture. I don’t think it is an either/or issue; I think what we need now are comprehensive interventions that are based on science and based on experience and education, and that are directed at young people and old people, and at scales both near home and regional. We need a more multifaceted approach to this issue. TS: Please explain your theory on landscape benefit-delivery mechanisms. WS: The evidence suggests that landscapes deliver health benefits through at least three mechanisms, each of which has significant implications for public health policy. The first mechanism is simply to have exposure or a view to a greenspace. Having this vantage seems to reliably reduce the physiological experience of stress. When I say physiological stress, I am talking about cortisol and adrenaline levels, and heart rate and blood pressure; muscle tension seems to be reduced when we have exposure to a greenspace. This can have profound and positive long-term health implications. The second mechanism is that this exposure also reliably increases people’s capacity to pay attention, which is a phenomenal thing! When you think about our lives in the modern world, almost everything we care about—our relationships, problem solving, planning, and creativity—all relies on our capacity to pay attention. Greenspaces seem to give the brain a break and allow for this capacity to renew itself. The third way in which greenspaces impact health is that they bring neighbours together. In communities that have more greenspace, folks rely on each other, they know each other better, and from decades of social research, we know that people who have stronger social networks have more favourable health outcomes. When you consider these results, public policy should demand “nature” at every doorstep! This would deliver measurable impacts. Chilling Out with Nature 25 .20 Psychological Health Attention Restoration Contact With Urban Nature Physical Health Individual Benefits Stress Reduction Physical Activity Underlying Mechanisms Social Interactions Reduction in Incivilities Community Benefits Human Benefits TS: I want to go back to your comments about violence and guns and vandalism, and their inverse correlation to greenspace. How does CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) relate to your work? WS: There is a lot of overlap but it’s not the same thing. I think the CPTED programs could be clearer about their effects. What I know from my research is that greenspaces pull people outside; neighbours come out of their condos and their row houses. When that happens—when neighbours occupy the same space at some time—a whole bunch of wonderful things are more likely to happen. People become much more comfortable with who their neighbour is, this recognition breeds familiarity, and they are more likely to intervene on behalf of one another, or on behalf of the neighbourhood. So CPTED is all about sending signals to would-be perpetrators that “you will be observed and seen here...there are sightlines in place to notice you.” What greenspaces do essentially is they put people on the street. They also create a social network and a stronger set of social ties within which neighbours are likely to intervene on behalf of each other. TS: Your report Urban Nature: human psychological and community health, published last year in the Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology, is a comprehensive account of so much research dedicated to the relationship between landscape and health. Thinking back to Olmstead and his claims that parks provide sanitary benefits to users, what do you make of his interpretation of health and landscape, and how has this idea translated to the 21st century? WS: I think that people such as Dick Jackson, a professor at the UCLA School of Public Health, and Howie Frumkin, author of the recent Making Healthy Places: Designing and Building for Health, WellBeing, and Sustainability, along with Andy Dannenberg and Dick Jackson, for example, are really picking up the charge left by Olmstead. Olmstead was very charismatic and put forth arguments that made people listen. Today, we need to go beyond that: we need hard evidence that supports the health of public spaces. I don’t think that the passionate arguments of the past are going to be enough to secure the investments needed to create public spaces. But the evidence is there, and the people I’ve mentioned, and also Rachel Kaplan, have been very good at putting the arguments and evidence together. I think that is a distinction between Olmstead’s day and the present day. Today, we need a small army of scholars, writers, and designers, all of whom are doing their best to keep this issue alive and capture the attention of the media. TS: If we assume that the average rural view has more greenspace, what are some urban precedents of a good greenspace ratio? WS: There are several cities that stand out. Chicago is increasing its forest canopy; Washington, D.C., is also working hard to increase canopy cover from past decades. We need places like Central Park and Millennium Park, but we also need, perhaps more so, animation of the city fabric with greenspace, almost like a bloodstream. We need green infrastructure that delivers greenspace and functions as a water utility at the same time. TS: Any final thoughts about urban ecology and health? WS: As we get more serious about understanding and taking care of water in the urban landscape, we will learn a new set of opportunities to engage in green infrastructure. We still have this habit of referring to the stuff that comes out of the sky and falls to the ground as “storm water.” And since we don’t like storm water, we want to get rid of it. If we call it “rainwater,” well, that’s a resource! We then think about ways to use it as a resource, then we need landscape architects to design infrastructure that allows water to stay close to where it falls, or to be stored, or harvested for later use. This source-control design will encourage a new green infrastructure that provides more greenspace views and better health. More information about William Sullivan’s work is available at www.willsull.net/William_Sullivan/ Welcome.html. BIO/ TODD SMITH, MLA, ISA, IS A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL INTERN AND CERTIFIED ARBORIST AT IBI GROUP IN TORONTO. 02/ Hamilton skyline. IMAGE/ Nhl4Hamilton, Creative Commons 03/ Landscape benefit delivery mechanisms. IMAGE/ Dr. William C. Sullivan, ASLA