A/2C Hunter S. Thompson 23 Aug 57 1. A/2C Hunters. Thompson
Transcription
A/2C Hunter S. Thompson 23 Aug 57 1. A/2C Hunters. Thompson
llU'l A@Q 8.VI� 11 Vi It§ AU IP!@VBIN@ @ IHHJND CCMMb\i\UJ UNITED STATES AIR FORCE !;Un Ah fil®rui ias@, frhvhh1 ADDl!IElilll llll!!i>&.Y Avvoo, Base Staff Personnel Officer Personnel Report: A/2C Hunter S. Thompson 23 Aug 57 1. A/2C Hunters. Thompson, AF 15546879, has worked in the Internal Information Section, OIS, for nearly one year. During this time he has done some outstandi�g sports writing, but ignored APGC-OIS policy, 2. Airman Thompson possesses outstanding talent in writing. He has imagination, good use of English, and can express his thoughts in a manner that makes interesting reading. 3, However, in spite of frequent counseling with explanation of for the conservative policy on an AF Base newspaper, Airman Thompson consistently written controversial material and leans so strongly to editorializing that it was necessary to require that all his writing thoroughly edited before release. the reasons has critical be 4, The first article that called attention to the writing noted above was a story very critical of Base Special Services. Others that were gtopped before they were printed were pieces that severely criticized Arthur Godfrey and Ted Williams that Airman Thompson extracted from national media releases and added his flair for the inuendo and exaggeration. 5. This Airman has indicated poor judgement from other standpoints by releasing Air Force information to the Playground News himself, with no con sideration for other papers in the area, or the fact that only official releases, carefully censored by competent OIS staff members, are allowed. 6. In summary, this Airman, although talented, will not be guided by policy or personal advice and guidance. Sometimes his rebel and superior attitude seems to rub off on other airmen staff members. He has little consideration for military bearing or dress and seems to dislike the service and want out as soon as possible. 7. Consequently, it is requested that Airman Thompson be assigned to other duties immediately, and it is recommended that he be earnestly considered under the early release program. B, It is also requested that Airman Thompson be officially advised that he. is to do no writing of any kind for internal or external publication unless such writing is edited by the OIS staff, and that he is not to accept outside employment with any of the local media. W.S. EVANS, Colonel, USAF Chief, Office of Information Services Document 1: "Personnel Report, Hunter S. Thompson" 1. What is the purpose of this document? 2. How is this document organized? 3. Please comment on the style of the document. What do you notice about the language? Do the language and the organization help the document fulfill its purpose? How? NEWS RELE E AUi Pl!IH)VUNG @f!@UND COMMAND EGLON AUi F@IICI IASi!, Fl!.@IU@.A @PfllDd @Ill 9Nl'@l!ijj£'f8@N IHVOCH � 26VU - 2&22 EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA-(Mov8)-S/Sgt. Manmountain Dense, a novice Air Policeman, w�s severely injured here today, when a wine bottle e�loded inside the 'AP gatehouse at the west entrance to the base. Dense was incoherent for several hours after the disaster, but managed to make a statement which led investigators to believe the bottle was hurled from a speeding car which approached the gatehouse on the wrong side of the road, coming from the general direction of the SEPERATION CENTER. Further investigation revealed that, only minutes before the incident at the gatehouse,.a reportedly "fanatical" airman had received his separation papers and was rumored to have set out i� the direction of the ga�ehouse at a high spead in a muffler-less car with no brakes. An immediate search was begUn for Huntef s. Thompson, one-time sports editor of the base newspaper and wisll-kru»m "fflOralG problem". Thompson was known to have a sometimes over-powering affinity for wina and was described by a recent arrival in the base sanatorium as "just the type of bastard who would do a thing like that". An apparently uncontrolable iconociast, Thompson w&e discharged tod&y after one of the most hectic and unusual Air Force careers in recent histol?f. According to Captain Munnington Thurd, who was relieved of his duties as base classification officer yesterday and admitted to the neuropsychological section of the base hos pital, Thompson was "totally unclassifianble" and "ons of the momt saY&ga and unnatural airmen I've ever come up against." "I'll never understand how he got this discharge", Thur& went on to smy. "I almost had a stroke yesterday when I heard he was being given m'I honcrmbls discharge. It's terrifying-simply terrifying." And.then Thurd siank into a deleriwn. -30- Document 2: "News Release, Air Proving Ground Command, Elgin AFB, Florida" Note: This document was ghost-written by Hunter S. Thompson, who is the subject of the Personnel Report (Document 1). 1. What is the purpose of this document? 2. How is this document organized? 3. Please comment on the style of the document. What do you notice about the language? Do the language and the organization help the document fulfill its purpose? How? 4. Does the fact that the document was written by Hunter S. Thompson-subject of Documents 1 & 2-have any influence on your reading of this document? Stated another way, how does Thompson effectively comment on his own discharge? Discuss this at some length. Quest lov eon How Hip-Hop Fai l ed Black America-- Vulture 5/26/2016 \'ULTURE ,eA�G:. .lm,�� vulture.com April 22, 2014 11 :45 a.m. When the People Cheer: How Hip-Hop Failed Black America By Questlove Photo: Maya Robinson and Photo by Getty This is the first in a weekly series of six essays looking at hip-hop's recent past, thinking about its distant past, and wondering about the possibility of a future. Read the second one here (hUp://www.vullure.com/2014/04/q11estlove-011-money:jay-z-how-hip-hop:fai/ed-black amel'ica-part-2.html), the third one here (http://www.v11lture.com/2014/o5/questlove-hip hopfailed-black-america-pari'-8-black-loses-cool.html), and the fourth one here (http://www.vulture.com/2014/05/questlove-lww-hip-hop-has-become-the-new-disco.html) There are three famous quotes that haunt me and guide me though my days. The first is from John Bradford, the 16th-century English reformer. In prison for inciting a mob, Bradford saw a parade of prisoners on their way to being executed and said, "There but for the grace of God go I." (Actually, he said "There but for the grace of God goes John Bradford," but the switch to the pronoun makes it work for the rest of us.) The second comes from Albert Einstein, who disparagingly referred to quantum entanglement as "spooky action at a distance." And for the third, I go to Ice Cube, the chief lyricist of N.W.A., who delivered this manifesto in "Gangsta Gangsta" back in 1988: "Life ain't nothing but bitches and money." Those three ideas may seem distant from one another, but if you set them up and draw lines http://www.vulture.co m/2014/04/quesflove-on-how-h p i -hop-fail ed-black-america.htm I 14 / 5/26/2016 Questlove on How Hip-Hop Failed Black America -- Vulture between them, that's triangulation. Bradford's idea, of course, is about providence, about luck and gratitude: You only have your life because you don't have someone else's. At the simplest level, I think about that often. I could be where others are, and by extension, they could be where I am. You don't want to be insensible to that. You don't want to be an ingrate. (By the by, Bradford's quote has come to be used to celebrate good fortune - when people say it, they're comforting themselves with the fact that things could be worse - but in fact, his own good fortune lasted only a few years before he was burned at the stake.) Einstein was talking about physics, of course, but to me, he's talking about something closer to home - the way that other people affect you, the way that your life is entangled in theirs whether or not there's a clear line of connection. Just because something is happening to a street kid in Seattle or a small-time outlaw in Pittsburgh doesn't mean that it's not also happening, in some sense, to you. Human civilization is founded on a social contract, but all too often that gets reduced to a kind of charity: Help those who are less fortunate, think of those who are different. But there's a subtler form of contract, which is the connection between us all. And then there's Ice Cube, who seems to be talking about life's basic appetites - what's under the lid of the id - but is in fact proposing a world where that social contract is destroyed, where everyone aspires to improve themselves and only themselves, thoughts of others be damned. What kind of world does that create? Those three ideas, Bradford's and Einstein's and Cube's, define the three sides of a triangle, and I'm standing in it with pieces of each man: Bradford's rueful contemplation, Einstein's hair, Ice Cube's desires. Can the three roads meet without being trivial? This essay, and the ones that follow it, will attempt to find out. I'm going to do things a little differently, with some madness in my method. I may not refer back to these three thinkers and these three thoughts, but they're always there, hovering, as I think through what a generation of hip-hop has wrought. And I'm not going to handle the argument in a straight line. But don't wonder too much when it wanders. 111 get back on track. * I want to start with a statement: Hip-hop has taken over black music. At some level, this is a complex argument, with many outer rings, but it has a simple, indisputable core. Look at the music charts, or think of as many pop artists as you can, and see how many of the black ones aren't part of hip-hop. There aren't many hip-hop performers at the top of the charts lately: You have perennial winners like Jay Z, Kanye West, and Drake, along with newcomers like Kendrick Lamar, and that's about it. Among women, it's a little bit more complicated, but only a little bit. The two biggest stars, Beyonce and Rihanna, are considered pop (or is that pop-soul), but what does that mean anymore? In their case, it means that they're offering a variation on hip-hop that's reinforced by their associations with the genre's biggest stars: Beyonce with Jay Z, of course, and Rihanna with everyone from Drake to A$AP Rocky to Eminem. It wasn't always that way. Back in the late 'Sos, when I graduated high school, you could count the number of black musical artists that weren't in hip-hop on two hands - maybe. You had http://www.vulture.com/2014/04/questlove-on-how-hip-hop-failed-black-america.html 2/4 5/26/2016 Questlove on How Hip-Hop Failed Black America -- Vulture folksingers like Tracy Chapman, rock bands like Living Colour, pop acts like Lionel Richie, many kinds of soul singers - and that doesn't even contend with megastars like Michael Jackson and Prince, who thwarted any easy categorization. Hip-hop was plenty present - in 1989 alone, you had De La Soul and the Geto Boys and EPMD and Boogie Down Productions and Ice-T and Queen Latifah - but it was just a piece of the pie. In the time since, hip-hop has made like the Exxon Valdez (another 1989 release): It spilled and spread. So what if hip-hop, which was once a form of upstart black-folk music, came to dominate the modern world? Isn't that a good thing? It seems strange for an artist working in the genre to be complaining, and maybe I'm not exactly complaining. Maybe I'm taking a measure of my good fortune. Maybe. Or maybe it's a little more complicated than that. Maybe domination isn't quite a victory. Maybe everpresence isn't quite a virtue. Twenty years ago, when my father first heard about my hip-hop career, he was skeptical. He didn't know where it was all headed. In his mind, a drummer had a real job, like working as music director for Anita Baker. But if I'm going to marvel at the way that hip-hop overcame his skepticism and became synonymous with our broader black American culture, I'm going to have to be clear with myself that marvel is probably the wrong word. Black culture, which has a long tradition of struggling against (and at the same time, working in close collaboration with) the dominant white culture, has rounded the corner of the 21st century with what looks in one sense like an unequivocal victory. Young America now embraces hip-hop as the signal pop-music genre of its time. So why does that victory feel strange: not exactly hollow, but a little haunted? I have wondered about this for years, and worried about it for just as many years. It's kept me up at night or kept me distracted during the day. And after looking far and wide, I keep coming back to the same answer, which is this: The reason is simple. The reason is plain. Once hip-hop culture is ubiquitous, it is also invisible. Once it's everywhere, it is nowhere. What once offered resistance to mainstream culture (it was part of the larger tapestry, spooky-action style, but it pulled at the fabric) is now an integral part of the sullen dominant. Not to mention the obvious backlash conspiracy paranoia: Once all of black music is associated with hip-hop, then Those Who Wish to Squelch need only squelch one genre to effectively silence an entire cultural movement. And that's what it's become: an entire cultural movement, packed into one hyphenated adjective. These days, nearly anything fashioned or put forth by black people gets referred to as "hip-hop," even when the description is a poor or pointless fit. "Hip-hop fashion" makes a little sense, but even that is confusing: Does it refer to fashions popularized by hip-hop musicians, like my Lego heart pin, or to fashions that participate in the same vague cool that defines hip-hop music? Others make a whole lot of nonsense: "Hip-hop food"? "Hip-hop politics"? "Hip-hop intellectual"? And there's even "hip-hop architecture." What the hell is that? A house you build with a Hammer? This doesn't happen with other genres. There's no folk-music food or New Wave fashion, once you get past food for thought and skinny ties. There's no junkanoo architecture. The closest thing to a musical style that does double-duty as an overarching aesthetic is punk, and that doesn't have the same strict racial coding. On the one hand, you can point to this as proof of hip-hop's success. The concept travels. But where has it traveled? The danger is that it has drifted into oblivion. The htto://www.vulture.com/2014/04/quesUove-on-how-hip-hop-fail ed-black-america.htm I 3/4 Questlove on How Hip-Hop Failed Black America -- Vulture 5/26/2016 music originally evolved to paint portraits of real people and handle real problems at close range - social contract, anyone? - but these days, hip-hop mainly rearranges symbolic freight on the black starliner. Containers on the container ship are taken from here to there - and never mind the fact that they may be empty containers. Keep on pushin' and all that, but what are you pushing against? As it has become the field rather than the object, hip-hop has lost some of its pertinent sting. And then there's the question of where hip-hop has arrived commercially, or how fast it's departing. The music industry in general is sliding, and hip-hop is sliding maybe faster than that. The largest earners earn large, but not at the rate they once did. And everyone beneath that upper level is fading fast. The other day, we ran into an old man who is also an old fan. He loves the Roots and what we do. Someone mentioned the changing nature of the pop-culture game, and it made him nostalgic for the soul music of his youth. "It11 be back," he said. "Things go in cycles." But do they? If you really track the ways that music has changed over the past 200 years, the only thing that goes in cycles is old men talking about how things go in cycles. History is more interested in getting its nut off. There are patterns, of course, boom and bust and ways in which certain resources are exhausted. There are foundational truths that are stitched into the human DNA But the art forms used to express those truths change without recurring. They go away and don't come back. When hip-hop doesn't occupy an interesting place on the pop-culture terrain, when it is much of the terrain and loses interest even in itself, then what? Back to John Bradford for a moment: I'm lucky to be here. That goes without saying, but I1l say it. Still, as the Roots round into our third decade, we shoulder a strange burden, which is that people expect us to be both meaningful and popular. We expect that. But those things don't necessarily work together, especially in the hip-hop world of today. The winners, the top dogs, make art mostly about their own victories and the victory of their genre, but that triumphalist pose leaves little room for anything else. Meaninglessness takes hold because meaninglessness is addictive. People who want to challenge this theory point to Kendrick Lamar, and the way that his music, at least so far, has some sense of the social contract, some sense of character. But is he just the exception that proves the rule? Time will tell. Time is always telling. Time never stops telling. © 2016, New York Media LLC. View all trademarks http://www.vulture.com/2014/04/questlove-on-how-hip-hop-failed-black-america.html 4/4 Document 3: Questlove, "When the People Cheer: How Hip-Hop Failed Black America" 1. What is the purpose of the article? 2. What is Questlove's thesis in the article? Find the sentence that you think best summarizes the essay's argument and write it below, then explain why you think that this is the thesis of the article. 3. In the space below, state the three quotations from John Bradford, Albert Einstein, and Ice Cube that Questlove references throughout the article. 4. Discuss the use of these quotations to functionally organize the essay. How does Questlove employ them throughout the article? 5. Comment on the article's basic argument. Do you agree or disagree with Questlove's assessment of hip-hop? Make an argument using at least three pieces of evidence from the article. Hateful Things Sei Shonagon 0 O R RY T O L E A V E , but one's visitor keeps chattering away. If it is someone of no importance, one can get rid of him by saying, "You must tell me all about it next time"; but, should it be the sort of visitor whose presence commands one's best behaviour, the · situation is hateful indeed. One finds that a hair has· got caught in the stone on which one is rub bing one's inkstick, or again that gravel is lodged in the inkstick, making a nasty, grating sound. Someone has suddenly fallen ill and one summons the exorcist. Since he is not at home, one has to send messengers to look for him. After' one has had a long fretful wait, the exorcist finally arrives, and with a sigh of relief one asks him to start his incantations. But perhaps he has been exorcizing too many evil spirits recently; for hardly has he installed himself and be gun praying when his voice becomes drowsy. Oh, how hateful! A· man who has nothing in particular to recommend him discusses all sorts of subjects at random as though he knew everything. An elderly person warms the palms of his hands over a brazier and stretches out the wrinkles. No young man would dream of behaving in · such a fashion; old people can really be quite shameless: I have se'en some . dreary old creatures actually resting their feet on the brazier and rubbing· them against the edge while they speak. These are the kind of people who in visiting someone's house first use their fans to wipe away the dust from the mat and, when they finally sit on it, ·cannot stay still but. are forever spreading out the front of their hunting· costume or even tucking it up under their knees. One might suppose that such behaviour was restricted to people of humble station; but I have observed it in quite well-bred people, including a Senior Secretary of the Fifth Rank in the ':Ministry of Ceremonial and a former Governor of Suruga. I hate the sight of men in their cups who shout, poke their fingers in their mouths, stroke their beards, . and pass on the wine to their neigh bours with great cries of "Have some more! Drink up!" They tremble, · shake their heads, twist their faces, and gesticulate like children who are singing, "We're off to see the Governor." I have seen really well-bred people behave like this and I find it most distasteful. To envy others and to complain about one's own lot; to speak badly about people; to be inquisitive about the most trivial matters and to resent NE IS IN A H and abuse people for not telling one, or, if one does manage to worm out some facts, to inform everyone in the most detailed fashion as if one had known all from the beginning-oh, how hateful! One is just about to be told some interesting piece of news when a baby ·. starts crying. A flight of crows . circle about with loud caws.. An admirer has come on a clandestine visit; but a dog catches sight of · him and starts barking. One feels like killing the beast. . One has been foolish enough to invite a man to spend the night in an i.· unsuitable place-and then he starts snoring. ·· A gentleman has visited one secretly. Though he is wearing a tall, lac� quered hat, he nevertheless wants no one to see him. He is so flurried, in fact, that upon leaving he bangs into·something with his hat. Most hateful! is annoying too when he lifts up the Iyo blind that hangs at the entrance .of the room, then lets it fall with a great rattle. If it is a head-blind, things • are still worse, for being more solid it makes a terrible noise when it is . dropped. There is no excuse for such carelessness. Even a head-blind does not make any noise if one lifts it up gently on entering and leaving the room; the same applies to sliding-doors. If one's· movements are rough, . even a paper door will bend and resonate when opened; but, if one lifts ..... :the door a little while pushing it, there need be no soun& .. tf( . .'- One has gone to bed and is about to doze off when a mosquito appears, i(tannouncing himself in a reedy voice. One can actually feel the wind made W>by his wings and, slight though it is, one finds it hateful in the extreme. \•\ A carriage passes with a nasty, creaking noise. Annoying to think that }jfhe · passengers may not even. be aware of this! If I am travelling in some ;{pne's carriage and I hear it creaking, I dislike not only the noise. but also fthe. owner of the carriage. t\J%ne is in the middle of a story when someone butts in and tries to show fSihat he is the only clever person in the room. Such a petson is hateful, and s\§Q,' indeed, is anyone, child or adult, who tries to push himself forward. �:/,,-,: One is telling a story about old times when someone breaks in with a l·i�ttle detail that he happens to know, implying that· · ·one's own version is �5- 1yipaccurate-disgusting behaviour! · ·· W;,/} .Very hateful is a mouse that scurries all over the place. ·\ ,01E?J Some children have called at one's house. One makes-·a great fuss of "\.ihem and gives them toys to play with. The children become accustomed tffothis treatment and start to come regularly, forcing their way into one's ff�rier rooms and scattering one's furni�hings and possessions. Hateful! F:}>A · certain gentleman whom one does _not want to see visits one at home }§r in the Palace, and one pretends to be asleep. But a maid comes to tell )'f�ne and shakes one awake, with a look on her face that .says, "What a t6�1eepyhead! " Very hateful. ·· · A· newcomer pushes ahead of the other members in a group; with a knowing look, this person. starts laying down the law and forcing advice upon everyone-most hateful. A man with whom one is having an affair keeps. singing the praises of some woman he used to know. Even if it is a thing of the past, this can be very annoying. How much more so if he is still seeing the woman! (Yet sometimes I find that it is not as unpleasant as all that.) A person who recites a spell himself after sneezing. In fact I detest anyone who sneezes, except the master of the house. Fleas, too, are very hateful. When they dance about under someone's clothes, they really seem to be lifting them up. The sound of dogs when they bark for a long time in chorus is ominous and hateful. I cannot stand people who leave without closing the panel behind them. How I detest the husbands of nurse-maids! It is not so bad ifthe child in the maid's charge is. a girl, because then the man will keep his distance. But, if it is a boy, he will behave as though he were the father. Never letting the boy out of his sight, he insists on managing everything. He ·regards the other attendants in the house as less than human, and, if anyone tries· to scold the child, he slanders him to the master. Despite this disgraceful behaviour, no one dare accuse the husband; so he strides about the house with a proud, self-important look, giving all the orders. I hate people whose letters show that they lack respect for worldly civilities, whether by discourtesy in the phrasing or by extreme politeness to someone who does not deserve it. This sort of thing is, of course, most odious if the letter is for one.self, but it is bad enough even if it is addressed to someone else. As a matter of fact, most people are too casual, not only in their letters but in their direct conversation. Sometimes I am quite disgusted at noting how little decorum people observe when talking to each other. It is partic ularly unpleasant to hear some foolish man or · woman omit the proper marks of respect when addressing a person of quality; and, when servants . fail to use honorific forms of speech in referring to their- masters, it is very bad indeed. No kss odious, however, arethose masters who, in addressing their servants, use such phrases as "When you were good enough to do such-and-such" or "As you so kindly remarked.". No doubt there are some masters who, in describing their own actions to a servant, say, "I presumed to do so-and-soF' Sometimes a person who is utterly devoid of charm will try to create a good impression by using very elegant language; yet he only succeeds in being ridiculous. No doubt he believes this refined language to be just what the occasion demands, but, when it goes so far that ,everyone bursts out laughing, surely something must be wrong. It is most improper to address high-ranking courtiers, Imperial Advis- h S. C ers, and the like simply by using their names without any titles or marks ot respect; but such mistakes are fortunately rare. If one ·refers to the maid who is in attendance on some lady-in-waiting as "Madam" or "that lady," she wiU be surprised, delighted, and lavish in her praise. When speaking to young noblemen and courtiers of high rank, one should always (unless Their Majesties are present) refer to them by their official posts. Incidentally, I have been very shocked to hear important people use the word "I" while conversing in Their Majesties' presence. · Such a breach of etiquette is really distressing, and I fail to see why people · cannot avoid it. · A man who has nothing in particular to recommend him but who speaks in an affected tone and poses as being elegant. An inkstone with such a hard, smooth sqrface that the stick glides over · it without leaving any deposit of ink. · Ladies-in-waiting who want to know everything that is going on. · Sometimes one greatly dislikes a person for no particular reason-and then that person goes and does something hateful. A gentleman who travels alone in his carriage to see a procession or some other spectacle. What sort of a man is he? Even though he may not · be a person of the greatest quality, surely he should have taken along a few of the many young men who are anxious to see the sights. But no, there he sits by himself (one can see his silhouette through the blinds), with a proud look on his face, keeping all his impressions to himself. : A lover who is leaving at dawn announces that he has to find his fan and his paper. "I know I put them somewhere last night," he says. Since it is pitch dark, he gropes about the room, bumping into the furniture and muttering, "Strange! Where on earth can they be?" Finally he discovers the objects. He thrusts the paper into the breast of his robe with a great rustling sound; then he snaps open his fan and busily fans away with it. Only now is he ready to take his leave. What charmless behaviour! "Hate ful" is an understatement. Equally disagreeable is the man who, when leaving in the middle of the night, takes care to fasten the cord of his headdress. This is quite unneces sary; he could perfectly well put it gently on his head without tying the cord. And why must he spend time adjusting his cloak or hunting cos tume? Does he really think someone may see him �t this time of night and criticize him for not being impeccably dressec:l? . A good lover will behave as elegantly at dawn as at any other time. He drags himself out of bed with a look of dismay on his face. The lady urges him on: "Come, my friend, it's getting light. You don't want anyone to . find you here." He giyes a deep sigh, as if to say that the night has not ···-been nearly long enough and that it is agony to leave. Once up, he does not instantly pull on his. trousers. Instead he comes close to the lady and whispers whatever was left unsaid during the night. Even when he is dressed, he still lingers, vaguely pretending to be fastening his sash. Presently he raises the lattice, and the two lovers stand together by the side door while he tells her how he dreads the corning day, which will keep them apart; then he slips away. The lady watches him go, and this moment of parting will remain among her most charming memories. Indeed, one's attachment to a man depends largely on the elegance of his leave-taking. When he jumps out of bed, scurries about the room, tightly fastens his trouser-sash, rolls up the sleeves of his Court cloak, over-robe, or hunting costume, stuffs his belongings into the breast of his roh.e and then briskly secures the outer sash-one really begins to hate him. -Translated by Ivan Morris Document 4: Sei Shonagon, "Hateful Things" 1. What is the purpose of the essay? 2. Discuss the organization of the essay. How are the paragraphs built? What do you notice about them? 3. How do the tone, structure, and content of the essay's concluding paragraphs differ from the rest of it? Describe. 4. Comment on the conclusion of the essay. How do these differences in tone, structure, and content relate to the essay's overall meaning? State your opinion and discuss at some length. The Lonesome Death Of Hattie Carroll WRITTEN BY: BOB DYLAN William Zantzinger killed poor Hattie Carroll With a cane that he twirled around his diamond ring finger At a Baltimore hotel society gath'rin' And the cops were called in and his weapon took from him As they rode him in custody down to the station And booked William Zantzinger for first-degree murder But you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears Take the rag away from your face Now ain't the time for your tears William Zantzinger, who at twenty-four years Owns a tobacco farm of six hundred acres With rich wealthy parents who provide and protect him And high office relations in the politics of Maryland Reacted to his deed with a shrug of his shoulders And swear words and sneering, and his tongue it was snarling In a matter of minutes on bail was out walking But you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears Take the rag away from your face Now ain't the time for your tears Hattie Carroll was a maid of the kitchen She was fifty-one years old and gave birth to ten children Who carried the dishes and took out the garbage And never sat once at the head of the table And didn't even talk to the people at the table Who just cleaned up all the food from the table And emptied the ashtrays on a whole other level Got killed by a blow, lay slain by a cane That sailed through the air and came down through the room Doomed and determined to destroy all the gentle And she never done nothing to William Zantzinger But you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears Take the rag away from your face Now ain't the time for your tears In the courtroom of honor, the judge pounded his gavel To show that all's equal and that the courts are on the level And that the strings in the books ain't pulled and persuaded And that even the nobles get properly handled Once that the cops have chased after and caught 'em And that the ladder of law has no top and no bottom Stared at the person who killed for no reason Who just happened to be feelin' that way without wamin' And he spoke through his cloak, most deep and distinguished And handed out strongly, for penalty and repentance William Zantzinger with a six-month sentence Oh, but you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears Bury the rag deep in your face For now's the time for your tears Document 5: Bob Dylan, "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" 1. Make a list of five facts that you know for sure about the song (e.g., Bob Dylan wrote it, it rhymes, it tells a story): 2. What is the purpose of the song? How do you know? 3. In some detail, describe Dylan's characterization of Hattie Carroll & William Zantzinger. 4. What is the poem's attitude toward justice? How do you know? Write a brief answer using evidence from the poem. Save paper and follow @newyorker on Twitter DEPT. OF ANNOTATION JANUARY 26, 2009 ISSUE A LONESOME DEATH BY DAVID SIMON I n February of 1963, twenty-four-year-old William Zantzinger, armed with a toy carnival cane and wrecked on whiskey, made a spectacle of himself at the Spinsters' Ball at the Emerson Hotel in Baltimore. He was a drunken country mouse in the big city, at a time when the notion of racial equality had barely shown itself in the neighborhood of his father's tobacco farm. When the hotel's black waitstaff was slow to serve Zantzinger another drink, he yelled racial epithets at Hattie Carroll, a barmaid and a fifty-one-year-old mother of eleven, and he rapped her on the shoulder with his cane. She became upset, then collapsed and died of a stroke. Bob Dylan read about the case in the newspaper. He wrote the magnificent "Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" with the paper splayed on the table of a Seventh Avenue luncheonette. Zantzinger was then and forever after a master villain. Twenty-five years later, I tried to interview him for a newspaper story. He was working in a real-estate office (there was an equal-housing sticker on the door), and I found Zantzinger a disappointing lump of a man, with small dark eyes and black hair thinning from behind. T he eyes followed me angrily as I offered up my two-sides-to-every-story patter, trying to get him to talk. "There was a girl come down here from Baltimore five years ago," he said."I didn't talk to her. And one before that. I got nothing to say." I tried trashing Dylan: "That son of a bitch libelled you. You could've sued his ass for what he did." Zantzinger smiled."We were gonna sue him big time. Scared that boy good!" he said."The song was a lie. Just a damned lie." He enjoyed talking about how his lawyer had fired shots across Dylan's bow. Columbia Records was on the receiving end as well, Zantzinger said, adding that he dropped the idea of a lawsuit because, after being convicted of manslaughter and assault, he'd seen enough of courtrooms and controversy. By then, too, there was little left of Zantzinger's reputation. But even a dispassionate reading of the facts of the case leads one to conclude that Dylan took great liberties. Hattie Carroll was not"slain by a cane" that was"doomed and determined to destroy all the gentle," as Dylan wrote. No physical injury was done to her, nor was there any evidence to suggest lethal intent. The medical examiner's report-citing Carroll's enlarged heart and severe hypertension-attributed her death as much to Zantzinger's verbal abuse as to the tap of his cane. Nor did Zantzinger have "high office relations in the politics of Maryland" to influence the case, as Dylan implied. Zantzinger ran through all of this. He knew the song and its equivocations. He knew precisely the historical role to which it had consigned him. "He did some good stuff, I guess," he said of Dylan."The blowing-with-the-wind song, that one? But I'm probably not gonna be the best judge. I mean, for me, he's not much of . a smger." I told Zantzinger about a note I had found in the old homicide file: "Attached is 'correspondence from . . . a folksinger in New York who seeks information about the aforementioned case, which was investigated by your agency." But Dylan's letter wasn't attached-snatched, perhaps, as a souvenir, from the police files. But the cover sheet, dated months after the release of"Hattie Carroll,"was telling. Dylan was apparently writing too late to improve his song's accuracy; his letter was the reaction of a worried young man. Zantzinger enjoyed that immensely. I told him that the Carroll children would not talk. He acknowledged that he had paid them money in an out-of-court settlement. "I know that I caused that woman's death," he said."I'm responsible. Me talking does nothing for that woman or her family. Just put this in your article: I admire and respect the Carroll family for their decision not to talk publicly. Like them, I think the best thing to do is let it rest."W hen I got up to go, he extended his hand, and I took it. He stayed in his chair, and I saw myself out. Picasso said that art is the lie that shows us the truth, and that's how Dylan and his ballad should probably be judged. But to hold that standard to W illiam Zantzinger, the man, who died earlier this month, at the age of sixty-nine, seems too crude a measure. In 1963, he was sentenced to six months in jail for Hattie Carroll's death, on the same day as the March on Washington. Zantzinger lived long enough to see Martin Luther King,Jr., honored with a national holiday and to know that this week Barack Obama would be inaugurated as President. We can imagine him galled at this outcome, a small-minded racist rightly defined by his ugliest moment. Perhaps that's him, or perhaps he was more than that. At any rate, he knew his part and he played it to the end. + DAVID SIMON Document 6. David Simon, "A Lonesome Death" 1. What is the purpose of this article? How do you know? 2. How does the William Zantzinger of Dylan's song compare to the William Zantzinger of Simon's article? Explain with evidence. 3. The article contends that Dylan took liberties with the truth when describing the case of Hattie Carroll and William Zantzinger. What were some of the ways he "bent the truth"? 4. After reading the song and the article, do you think that it's appropriate for an artist to fictionalize the truth in ways such as these? Why or why not? Feel free to quote directly from the article. Save paper and follow @newyorker on Twitter A REPORTER AT LARGE DECEMBER 8, 2014 ISSUE THE RIDE OF THEIR LIVES Children preparefor the world's most dangerous organized sport. BY BURKHARD BILGER Calf riders wait in the arena alley on the last day ofthe Youth Bull Riders World Finals, in Abilene, Texas. Rodeo bull riders learn as children by riding sheep, calves, and steers. Many ride theirfirst bull before their teens. PHOTOGRAPHS BY JONNO RAHMAN R odeo bulls, like the boys who dream of riding them, are unpredictable creatures. They can start out shy and skittish, then suddenly turn ornery. They'll lie down in the chute one day and try to gore you the next. The most dangerous bull ever ridden, by some accounts, began as a scrawny yellow calf in 1988. Half Charolais and half Brahman, he was still long and bony at age three, but liable to turn fat and ungainly if his breeding held true. His owner, Phil Sumner, named him J31-he wasn't sure the bull would live long enough to earn a real name. Sumner took him to a few scrubgrass rodeos in northern Oklahoma, but didn't see much fight in him. "I was thinking, Dude, you're going to have to step up your game plan or you're going to be going to McDonald's," Sumner told me. Then one Sunday afternoon at a small arena outside of Okeene, Oklahoma, something in the bull snapped. The kid who was riding him got his hand caught in his rope. He was flopping around on J31's back, trying to dismount, when the bull suddenly went crazy beneath him. He leaped up and spun around, bucked forward and kicked back, his legs so high behind him that he almost flipped end over end. By the time the boy pulled free, the bull had nearly gone over the fence. "It just freaked him out," Sumner said. Animals, as a rule, don't like to have other animals on their backs. They find it strange and distressing-an attack or a violation, an act of dominance. This hasn't kept us from trying to ride them, of course. Horse, mule, donkey, camel, llama, yak, and elephant-the bigger the animal, the more likely we are to climb on top of it. People have sat on ostriches, orcas, alligators, and water buffalo, straddled giant tortoises, and set toddlers on St: Bernards. Their mounts may try to shake them off at first, but the contest is an unequal one, and they tend to knuckle under eventually. Some even learn to like it. Not rodeo bulls. Their brains aren't wired for submission. They not only refuse to be ridden; they find ever more inventive ways to cast people off. Watching old videos ofJ31, you can see him learn as he goes. At first, he just charges around the ring and jumps up and down. But the older he gets the crueller and less predictable he becomes. He spins one way, then the other, charges forward, and jerks to the side. His front and back ends start to uncouple, jackhammering the ground independently. His spine twists and rolls, leaving the rider with no balancing point, no center of gravity. By the age of five, he weighs nearly two thousand pounds and is built like a clenched fist: all hoof and horn and fast-twitch muscle. Sumner eventually sold him to another rancher, Sammy Andrews, figuring that he was too much bull for the local rodeo circuit. It was Andrews who gave him a name to match his reputation: Bodacious. "He was like a monster once he matured,"TuffHedeman, a four-time world champion, told me. "Even the good guys were super scared of him. You'd see world champions ride him for a jump or two and then get off." In 1993, at a rodeo in Long Beach, California, Hedeman drew Bodacious for what some consider the greatest ride in history-a near perfect exhibition of balance and anticipation. Two years later, the bull got his revenge. At the world championships in Las Vegas that August, Hedeman was leading the standings by what proved to be an insurmountable three hundred points when he drew Bodacious again. This time, a split second after leaving the chute, the bull bucked forward with all his might. Hedeman did what riders are supposed to do: he leaned high over the bull's shoulders and flung his arm back as a counterbalance. But just as he came forward, Bodacious threw his head back-smashing it square into Hedeman's face. Hedeman stayed on somehow, his hand twisted in the rope, only to get head-butted again, thrown into the air, and bounced off the bull's back like a rag doll. The ride broke every bone in Hedeman's face below the eyes. It took thirteen and a half hours of reconstructive surgery and five titanium plates to repair the damage, and Hedeman's sense of smell and taste never returned. "I told my buddy afterward, I must have broke my jaw, because when I bite down my teeth don't come together," he recalled. "People were looking at me and then turning their eyes away or putting their hands over their faces. I thought, I must look like Frankenstein or something." Seven weeks later, when a rider named Scott Breding drew Bodacious at the National Finals Rodeo, he elected to wear a hockey mask for protection. It didn't help. In less than four seconds, the bull had knocked Breding offwith the same move, fracturing his left eye socket. The next day, Sammy Andrews retired Bodacious from competition. "I didn't want to be the guy who let him kill someone," he told me. T he boys at the Camp of Champions couldn't wait to get on a bull like that. How else would they be world champions one day? Bull riding is a collaborative sport a pairs competition in which one partner tries to kill the other, like an ice dance with an axe murderer. If a rider manages to hang on for eight seconds, he'll earn up to fifty points for his own form and fifty for the bull's. The meaner the animal the better the score. "Ooh, I really want to ride 44!"Wacey Schalla told his friends Trigger Hargrove and Jet Erickson one morning. He jumped up and down on the catwalk along the arena, and pointed at a bony brown calf in the chute below. "I hear that sucker's rank!" Wacey,Trigger, and Jet were eight years old. The tops of their heads barely cleared my waist, yet they already had the rangy look of seasoned riders. They wore saddleman jeans and paisley Western shirts, tooled leather boots and straw cowboy hats, oversized to fend off the broiling June sun.Wacey was the smallest of the three and the most intensely focussed. His eyes would turn to slits above his freckled cheeks as he visualized his next ride. Trigger was taller and leaner, with a natural swagger-he was an excellent roper as well as rider. Jet was the shyest and the most delicately built.W hile Trigger kept up a running monologue-"That 36 nearly yanked my arm off! But then the next one didn't hardly buck at all"-Jet slumped against the rails, adrift in his own thoughts. "He's kind of a floater," his father, Everett, told me. "But when he scoots up on that calf and it takes off, his body takes over and he just rides." He laughed. "It kind of reminds you of the legends of the past, watching them kids." In the past two decades, selective breeding has made rodeo bulls more dangerous and valuable than ever before. The best ones cost ha!fa million dollars and their semen canfetch thousands. Almost every weekend, the three boys would ride against one another at some small-town rodeo in Oklahoma. The previous Saturday, it had been Elk City, with Wacey coming in first, Trigger second, and Jet third. But the order could easily have been shuffied. "It's just back and forth with those three,"Trigger's grandfather, Eddie, told me. "They're the fiercest competitors and the best of friends." All three were the sons of professional rodeo riders. They'd gone from bouncing around on sheep at the age of three or four-"mutton busting," it was called-to riding calves at six and now the occasional steer. In two or three years, they'd get on their first bulls. Their winnings came mostly in the form of engraved belt buckles and prize saddles-"I've got a bunch more in my closet somewhere,"Wacey told me, when he showed me a few buckles at his house-as well as small cash purses. But they'd grow more substantial soon enough. Caden Bunch, one of the eleven-year-olds at the camp, had made more than a hundred thousand dollars. The Camp of Champions was a final tuneup for the biggest rodeo of their lives: the Youth Bull Riders World Finals. The event would draw the top fifty riders from six age groups to Abilene, Texas, in July. It would feature rougher stock than most of them were used to riding, so they wanted all the help they could get. The camp, founded by a bull rider turned cowboy preacher named Andy Taylor, was a combination rodeo school and revival meeting. The first half of the week had been devoted to girls' events-barrel racing, goat tying, and breakaway roping-and the second half to boys' events: calf roping, bull riding, and bronco busting. The camp was held on the grounds of the Trinity Fellowship, a budding megachurch in Sayre, Oklahoma, on the short-grass prairie just east of the Texas Panhandle. There were livestock pens and dusty red arenas to one side and a striped tent to the other, where the campers met for church services every morning and evening. "You know what's cool, boys?"Ted Nuce, one of the trainers and a former world-champion bull rider, told them. "Riding bulls is a Jesus trap. You guys are going to pray because you want to. You need some protection out there." Earlier that day, the boys had been to the first of the morning services. These had a comforting sameness to them. The house band, led by a local bulldozer operator and his sons, would play some Southern-flavored Christian rock. Andy Taylor would drawl a few lines of Scripture, then some retired bull riders would come up to testify. These were small, wiry, tightly wound men-"the bantam roosters of the rodeo world," one calf roper called them-accustomed to keeping their pain to themselves. They'd talk, haltingly, about the injuries that had laid them low at the height of their careers, and how little they knew about earning a living in the real world. How they'd succumbed to drink and drugs, disloyalty and meanness before the Lord pulled them through. "Some of my family members just abandoned me," a young, bespectacled bull rider named Matt Austin confessed. "I was broken. But I'm here to tell you that God will never leave you." I couldn't tell how deeply this registered with the eight-year-olds. Riding calves is less life-threatening than riding bulls, and Wacey and his friends seemed to think they were immortal anyhow. They were by turns the best-behaved boys I'd ever met-they addressed adults as sir and Ma' am, took off their hats in church, and lowered their eyes and mumbled "Excuse me" when they bumped into you-and the rowdiest, the least domesticated. "They make me proud," their counsellor, Keith Hutton, told me on my first night at camp. He was about to say more when a chorus of screams and shouts erupted from the bunkhouse below, in the church basement. "He's bleeding!" a high voice was squealing. "There's blood everywhere!" Hutton sighed and blew out his cheeks. He waited a moment for the noise to subside, then lurched up from the couch and trudged downstairs. Reports on the incident would remain muddled and contradictory. As far as Hutton could tell, Wacey was jumped by another boy after beating him in a game of H-0-R-S E. Trigger waded in to defend him, and in the ensuing fracas the assailant fell and smacked his head, opening up a gash. "It was kind of a freaky deal," Hutton told me the next morning. "It looked like his head had fallen off, there was so much blood." By then, in any case, the boys were all friends again, monkeying around in the breakfast line while Trigger practiced his roping tricks. A little blood, they knew, came with the territory. Trigger's uncle had torn off a thumb roping steers, and Jet's father had snapped the Cl vertebra in his neck when a bull named Stoney tossed him on his head. He spent the next six months immobilized in a halo, not sure if he could ever get on a bull again. "We know it's dangerous," he told me. "But there's more glory in it than injuries, I'll promise you that. And the pain always goes away. Sometimes you just have to wait longer than others." W hen breakfast was over, Hutton corralled the boys into a little trailer hitched to a golf cart and hauled them over to the arena. (He was legally blind, so he couldn t drive a van.) "The Calf-Rider Express is pullin' out!" he shouted, then turned and fixed them with a baleful glare. "Hey! I don't need to hear a bunch of yellin'! We had enough of that foolishness last night. And don't go jumpin' off the trailer! That freaks me out." Bald and gap-toothed, with bright, bewildered eyes, Hutton grew up an Army brat in England. He got deported for selling black-market cigarettes, and spent the next few decades smoking weed and paying rent, as he put it, until he found Jesus. "This hot blonde was on me to come to church," he said. "I thought she might give me a little, but I ended up crying out thirty years of being pissed. I've been clean ever since."When he wasn't volunteering at the church, Hutton worked as a roofer, a substitute teacher, and a drug counsellor. It sometimes seemed like he'd treated someone in almost every family in his town. Western Oklahoma is a tough place to live in the best of times. The soil is poor and full of gypsum and clay. The winds can rise to catastrophe out of a clear blue sky. In the right light, there's a kind of grandeur to its vast, featureless sweep, where every truck stop and water tower can take on totemic power. But any sense of self-importance has long since been wrung from the local population. People age quickly here. The young men with hips cocked and thumbs hooked through belt loops turn into swaybacked old ranchers soon enough, beer guts tucked into embroidered shirts. The girls in ponytails and rhinestones weather into creased, careworn women. They know that the eyes of the world are focussed elsewhere-on Texas, perhaps-and do their best to get on with it. Early that morning, a towering thunderhead had rumbled in from the east, stripping branches from the cottonwoods and flooding the streets of Oklahoma City. But the sky blew clear within minutes, leaving only muddy ruts behind. "They're saying that this is going to be the next Mojave Desert if we don't have a weather change," Hutton said. "It's been going on for ten or twelve years now."The fracking industry had brought new jobs to the area-Elk City was growing fast-but without water the boom might not last long. And what with the low minimum wage and the high teen-pregnancy rate, methamphetamines and prescription-drug addiction, life was lived ever closer to the bone. Around here, the notion of childhood as a safe, protected place-a benign bubble -seemed like poor training for life. Religion and rodeo made more sense. Rodeo campfeatures calfroping and bronco bustingfar boys;far girls, there's barrel racing, goat tying, and breakaway roping. When the eight-year-olds had arrived at the arena and put on their helmets and protective vests, one of the trainers gathered them around him in a circle. "We don't do this for the money," he told them. "We do this because the very first time we got on a bull the first time we got bucked off and hit the ground and got up-right there we knew that this is what we were meant to be doing." He cast his eyes around the circle, peering hard at each one of them. "God has a, plan for you being here," he said. "What you learn in bull riding you're going to be able to apply to everyday life. When life gives you a storm, you can sit back and let it toss you wherever it wants to toss you, or you can have the confidence to know that God created you to be a winner, and to have honor and glory." The boys didn't need convincing. A bucking calf seemed like the ultimate amusement park ride to them-a bumper car and extreme coaster rolled into one. When they weren't in line for another ride, they were practicing their moves on the Mighty Bucky: a padded barrel perched on a steel pivot and springs. I never saw a serious injury among the eight year-olds, but plenty of boys were bawling by the time they picked themselves up off the ground. Yet they couldn't wait for the next round. The teen-agers, if anything, were even more eager. Nearly every ride left one of them hobbling to the gate, clutching an arm or leg. I saw one boy's cheek split open by a bull's horn and another boy dragged across the ground like tin cans behind a bumper, then stomped on for good measure. Both were back on another bull the same day. I thought about a playground near my house in Brooklyn, in Park Slope. A couple of years ago, it was beautifully renovated by the city, with a rock-lined stream meandering through it and an old-fashioned pump that children could crank to set the water flowing. The stream was the delight of the neighborhood for a while, thronged with kids splashing through the shallows and floating sticks down the current. Yet some parents were appalled. The rocks were a menace, they declared. The edges were too sharp, the surfaces too slippery. A child could fall and crack her skull. "I actually kept tapping them to check if they were really rocks," one commenter wrote on the Park Slope Parents Web site. "It seemed odd to me to have big rocks in a playground."Within two weeks, a stonemason had been brought in to grind the edges down. The protests continued. One mother called a personal-injury lawyer about forcing the city to remove the rocks. Another suggested that something be done to "soften'' them. "I am actually dreading the summer because of those rocks," still another complained. The parents at the camp flipped this attitude on its head. They valued courage over caution, grit over sensitivity. They revelled in the raw physicality of boys. The mothers sat in the bleachers taking videos and hollering advice-"Wyatt, just ride the way Daddy taught you!"The fathers straddled the chute, leaning over their sons to cinch the rope and shove the calf into position: ''Are you ready?""Yes, sir!""You've got to take the fight . · "When the gate blew open, t hey 1eaped up on · l""V to h1m.""'T. .res, sir. .1ou' ve got to want 1t. the rail and watched their sons with clenched fists and narrowed eyes. They weren't stage parents, for the most part. They just took following your bliss to its logical extreme. "I'd let my kid do whatever he has a passion for," one mother told me, "even if he wanted to be a piano player." ti ow dangerous is bull riding? The best numbers come from a sports epidemiologist named Dale Butterwick. In 2006, when he was at the University of Calgary, utterwick set up a registry of rodeo injuries and spent three years filling it with data from rodeo medics and riders' self-reports. Between 1989 and 2009, he found, twenty one contestants had died in the United States and Canada. Sixteen were bull riders, including one twelve-year-old boy. Another twenty-eight sustained "life-changing" injuries. Butterwick's study didn't track the riders' less grievous accidents-the breaks, tears, gashes, dislocations, concussions, and contusions that can occur on almost any ride. But, according to a twenty-five-year study that used data from the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association, injuries tend to cluster in four areas: the head and face (sixteen per cent), the neck and back (fifteen per cent), the knees (twelve per cent), and the shoulders (twelve per cent). "It's not ifyou're gonna get hurt; it's when," some of the parents at the camp acknowledged. Others downplayed the risk, saying they'd rather have one bull try to kill them than eleven football players. Yet bull riders are ten times more likely than football players to be seriously injured. Theirs is the most dangerous organized sport in the world. Butterwick's data ended with an alarming spike: in the last two years of the study, the rate of catastrophic injury was more than double that of the twenty-year average. This came as no surprise to Cody Custer, the senior trainer at the camp. "The quality of the stock just keeps getting better," he told me. "When we were riding, you might go to ten rodeos and maybe get one bull that bucked really hard. Now, out of a herd of thirty, twenty-two will be buckers. It's an epidemic, really." Custer's son Brett was a sixteen-year-old bull rider at the camp. He was a little stud, Custer said. "But all it takes is one time to break an egg in there-or kill a kid or paralyze him."The Camp of Champions played it safe by rodeo standards. The boys had to wear helmets and vests, the trainers stressed caution, the livestock were somewhat less than homicidal. But at the Youth World Finals all bets would be off: the previous year, among the oldest contestants, three out of four had been bucked off. When Custer was born, in 1965,rodeo still seemed an extension of ordinary cowboying. He joined his first roundup at the age of four,on his family's ranch south of the Grand Canyon,and spent much of his youth riding bareback.He learned to loosen his hips and shift his weight,to roll with every pitch and yaw.He learned to ride with his feet, clamping them tight to an animal's sides and reacting to the slightest twitch.He learned to use every inch and ounce of his lariat-thin frame,sitting tall to increase his leverage and send pressure down his legs.By the age of fourteen, he'd ridden some twenty-five hundred steer.These were castrated animals,not nearly as strong and wild as an uncut bull,which was just what he needed."Most of them just went straight up and down," he told me."But my confidence got sky high and so did my skills." In his twenty years on the circuit,Custer had his share of injuries: a collapsed lung, several broken ribs,and a broken jaw that had to be wired shut for five weeks. He had major surgeries on both shoulders and one of his knees and suffered a string of severe concussions,the worst of which knocked him out for more than half an hour.Yet he counts himself lucky.Custer won a world championship in 1992,was elected to the Professional Bull Riders Ring of Honor in 2003,and was still walking when he retired, that same year."I got away pretty good,all things considered," he told me."You probably won't be hearing about twenty-year bull-riding careers anymore." g odacious changed the way rodeo animals are bred. Before him,most bulls were a dubious commodity-worth more for beef than for bucking cowboys. A rancher m g t get a hundred dollars every time his bull was ridden,twice that much at big events. The riders made the real money-they were the ones that people came to see.Bodacious changed that equation.People who'd never heard of Tuff Hedeman knew the name of the bull who'd "rearranged his face," as Hedeman's wife later put it.After Bodacious was retired,he toured the country like a war hero,appearing in GQ and Penthouse, making personal appearances at restaurants,casinos,and car dealerships."It was unreal," Sammy Andrews told me."I thought we'd sell two or three T-shirts. But we had tour buses coming around to see him."There were Bodacious coffee mugs,belt buckles,jewelry lines,and condoms."If a Brahman bull ever were a superstar,then Bodacious just might be," the band Primus sang."He's a cream-colored,beefy-brawn,full-fledged,four-footed bovine celebrity." Wacey Schaf/a (left) and]et Erickson practice on an oil barrel bull. Withfewer andfewer ordinary animals to practice on, the learning curve gets steeper every year. It wasn't long before breeders found that they didn't really need riders to make money.As Bodacious's brand of notoriety spread to other bulls-Wolfman,Dillinger,Asteroid,Bushwacker ranchers began to earn more from selling sperm,swag,and licensing agreements than they did from rodeos. At events called futurities, the bulls could now compete directly against one another, carrying dummy cowboys on their backs while judges rated their bucking ability. The top bull could earn a quarter of a million dollars at a single event, and as the purses grew so did the sport's attention to genetics. Ranchers once content to breed any bull that leaped around now turned to outcrossing and in-vitro fertilization to select specific behaviors: the dropkick, the side spin, the twisting belly roll. The result was a succession of ever more powerful, more athletic, more murderous bulls. The only question was who could ride them. When Custer won his world championship, in 1992, he rode more than three-quarters of the bulls he drew. Last year's world champion rode just hal£ The change has been especially hard on young riders. Their learning curve gets steeper every year, and there are fewer and fewer ordinary animals for them to practice on. "These kids that are eleven, twelve, thirteen years old-they're getting on bulls that we never saw until we were pros," Custer told me. "It's like a phenomenal little football player being put in with a bunch of college kids who want to knock his head off." Custer is a hard man to rile up. The dashing young cowboy from the old videos now wears tinted glasses and button-down shirts and ends every conversation with "God bless." But when he talks about rodeo politics you can see the old bull rider in him. Four years ago, when his son was still in junior high, Custer sent a letter to the National High School Rodeo Association asking for steers to be used rather than bulls for the smaller contestants. A number of retired rodeo stars co-signed the proposal, but the request was ignored. "The guys who are raising the bulls, most of them have dollar signs in their eyes," Custer told me. "Their interest is not in that little boy. Their interest is in the bull." A couple of weeks before the Youth World Finals, I went to visitDillon Page, the co owner ofD&H Cattle Company, in south-central Oklahoma. Page's family has raising livestock in the bottomland along the Washita River for three generations. W hen he bought his first set of bucking bulls, thirty years ago, there were a few dozen rodeo stock contractors in the country. Now there are close to a thousand. For the past few years, Page has managed the ranch with his son HoytDillon, at one point winning the Professional Bull Riders Stock Contractor of the Year award for six years running. H.D., as his son is known, runs the breeding operation and shuttles the bulls to rodeos, whileDillon directs the day-to-day workings of the ranch. On the morning I visited, he'd been up since seven, haying the fields. "We've got some bulls acting like queers back there," he told me as we walked toward his truck to begin the morning feeding. "Seems to happen every time you get a weather change. A couple of bulls start ridin' each other, then they go to fightin', and it just turns into a blasted mess. That's how you end up with a lot of your cripples." Page, who is sixty-three, has the crouched, sinewy build and the flinty manner of an old deputy sheriff in a Western. He holds the small of his back as he walks and rubs his neck, which is deeply creased and baked red by the sun. As he muttered instructions to the cowboys on his property, a gold tooth flashed from time to time in his upper jaw. Some five hundred bulls were scattered across the ranch's fifteen hundred acres. Tawny, black, mottled, white-rodeo bulls are almost always mutts-they grazed under spreading pecans, in thirteen pastures separated by tall steel fences. The best of them could go for half a million dollars in their prime, but the ranch made even more by selling half-interests in calves. An investor might pay twenty-five thousand for a yearling, cover all its expenses and entry fees, then split the winnings with Page and his son. If all went well, the bull would get sent to thirty-five or forty rodeos a year, earning five to ten thousand in fees and up to a hundred thousand in futurities and other winnings. After eight or nine years, he'd be retired, then used to sire calves for another decade or more. A single straw of champion semen could go for upward of five thousand dollars. When we reached the first pasture, Page jumped out of the truck to open the gate and drove over to a row of galvanized troughs. He put the truck in neutral to set it rolling slowly beside them and flipped a toggle beneath the steering wheel. This triggered an auger in back to release the feed-a mixture of cracked corn, cottonseed, soybean hulls, and dried distiller's grain. As it poured down the length of the troughs, Page jumped out of the cab again and ran back to pull some hay from the truck bed. He scattered it around the troughs, ran back to the cab, climbed in, and drove to the next gate, then started the process all over. At one point, a big white bull came shouldering toward him, testicles hanging nearly to the ground. Page shouted and waved his arms. When that didn't work, he bent down and picked up a dirt clod and pelted him with it. The bull stood his ground and gave a deep grunt, then shook his horns and clattered off. "You just hope they don't decide to run over you," Page said when he got back in. Before he bred bulls, Page tried his hand at riding them for a few years. He was never good enough to make a career of it, he told me, but he got off easy where injuries were concerned-just a few broken bones and a ruptured spleen. Although there was that one ride, when he was seventeen or eighteen-the one that left him with three ribs broken off into his lower belly. "I was pissin' and shittin' blood for four days," he said. "I don't know if it was my bladder or my kidneys, but something wasn't right in there."The pain got so bad that he had a friend haul him to the emergency room in Ardmore. But the doctors kept him waiting for four or five hours, so he went back home. Two weeks later, the bleeding finally stopped. "I guess it wasn't life-threatening," he said. I asked him how he would have fared on bulls like the ones he breeds now, and he laughed. "Oh, not very well, I guess. I rode some pretty good ones in my day-one of'em, J's Pet, hadn't been rode in five years. I thought I'd done a pretty good deal. But he couldn't even hold a light to some of these things that we buck today." B ucking bulls are like human athletes: every generation has a few that are unaccountably great. The Peyton Mannings and LeBron Jameses can't really be reproduced or used to gauge the average level of play. It's when you look down the bench that you start to see a pattern. "Take Stone Sober over there," Page said. He pointed to a red bull pacing inside a trailer next to the pasture, soon to be taken to a rodeo. He was built like a middleweight wrestler, with bunched shoulders and thick veins ridging his muscles. "We'd rather have him a little bigger," he said. "He's probably thirteen hundred, fourteen hundred pounds-his mama was little bitty. But he can jump as high as this fence with somebody on it. He can turn back and spin and go the other way, and he has a lot of kick and a great big belly roll. Shucks, there ain't no telling what he's gonna do. I don't think he knows hissel£" In the past three years, Stone Sober had bucked off twenty two out of twenty-three riders, most of them in under four seconds. ]adeyn Lara (left) and Shayne Spain after completing the third round ofmutton busting. Spainfinished third over all,· Larafinished eighth. They have becomefriends through competing together. An animal like that is a freak of nature, Page said. It's a petri dish full of exotic mutations-of tics and phobias, spastic nerves and explosive rages, carefully culled and combined. The sperm from a champion sire is usually collected off-site, mixed with eggs from a proven dam, and transplanted into a rancher's cows. It doesn't always work. Genetic recombination is a crapshoot, and the outcome depends as much on psychology as on physiology. "Confidence plays a big part in it," H. D. Page told me later, on the phone. "If a bull gets rode every time he pokes his head out the gate, he'll either quit buckin' or change his buckin' pattern to win. Some of them just figure it's not worth the effort, and some of them learn to enjoy their jobs. They get addicted to the adrenaline." The result can be as unhealthy for the bull as for the rider. When a two-thousand-pound animal leaps six feet in the air and hammers down on his back legs, things can go wrong: joints pop, tendons snap, backs get thrown out of kilter. One of the pastures on the Pages' ranch was full of hobbled old gladiators, kept around for semen or sentiment. "This one here broke his leg at the finals," Page said, pulling up next to a white-headed bull with a black eye patch. "Hard Twisted. Won a hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars as a two-year-old, but you can't set a broke leg. See how crooked it is?" He let the truck idle a little farther, then pointed to a big brown bull stepping gingerly beside the fence. "His leg? He broke it so bad that it drawed up. It don't even touch the ground." He shook his head. "I shoulda done killed him. They make the best hamburger meat there is-well muscled and lean. Ain't nobody that'll have better hamburger meat. But sometimes you get to thinkin' too much and you keep 'em around when you shouldn't." I asked Page if he ever wonders if things have gone too far. His son tried to ride Bodacious three times, yet here they are trying to make bulls even meaner. Is there a limit to how dangerous a bull can or should be? "I hope not," he said. "Because I intend on making one that's a whole lot ranker than we've had before." He smirked. "You know the bad thing? We can't breed cowboys. If you could figure out how to get a set of women and three or four sires that had all that heart and the other ingredients that it takes, then you could match the sires and the dams up like we do the bulls. Then maybe we'd have a great bull rider." In the meantime, there's only one alternative: start them young. I he Taylor County Expo Center, in Abilene, must have looked like the Taj Mahal to Wacey and his friends. They'd been to a lot of rodeos by then-dusty little arenas at t e edge of town, with a rickety concession stand on one side and some bleachers on the other-but never one like this. The parking lot was as big as an airport, with what looked like a giant spaceship in the middle. It had a hallway inside that went clear around it, filled with folks selling cowboy hats and rifle cases, saddle soap, tooth guards, rope rosin, and T-shirts that said things like "Mama Tried" and "The Hurrier I Go, the Behinder I Get."W hen you walked down the tunnel and out into the arena, the seats went up and up on every side. The roof looked like it was five stories high. The floor was covered in a maze of pens and chutes full of livestock, with cowboys hanging off all the rails. There was even air-conditioning-at a rodeo! Imagine that. The World Finals are really six separate competitions, each for a different age group and animal. The four-to-six-year-olds ride sheep, the seven- and eight-year-olds are on calves, the nine-to-eleven-year-olds on steers, and the rest on increasingly fearsome bulls. Each contestant rides once a day for three days, earning up to a hundred points per ride from the four judges stationed around the arena. On the fourth day, the top fifteen scorers out of the fifty in each group compete for their division championship. There are cash prizes for the highest scores every day and a big pot at the end for each champion more than sixty thousand dollars altogether. ''A lot of this event is about the luck of the draw," Curtis Spain, one of the event's organizers, told me. The best buckers earn the best scores for their riders, but they're also the most likely to toss a rider off. "We call that thinning the herd." Back home in Forney, Texas, Spain had his own rodeo arena as well as a mechanical bull. His son Mason was one of the top eleven-year-olds in the finals, and his daughter Shayne, age seven, was an excellent mutton buster-one of only two girls in the finals. Girls could qualify for the older age groups as well, but most dropped out before that-often at their parents' urging. "The world's most dangerous sport is not something you really want to let your little girl do," her father told me. "This is Shayne's farewell tour." The first round was rough on Spain's kids, as it was on the boys from Oklahoma. All of them rode well but drew sluggish animals, earning mediocre scores. Trigger was the exception. He drew one of the feistiest calves in the pen-a big black Holstein-but got bucked off right before the buzzer. "He came out and took two big blows and then started lopin' ,"Trigger told me the next morning. "The second blow put me over on the side, and it's really hard to stay on when he's lopin' and bouncin' like that."I told him that I was sure he'd do better this time, but he didn't look convinced. "Hopefully,"he said, picking at his chaps. "The Star-Spangled Banner"was blaring over the loudspeakers by then-a taped version by LeAnn Rimes, sounding like a country girl who'd just walked out on her worthless lover. Over by the chutes, the mutton busters were getting ready to start the second round. Shayne Spain leaned against a rail and glanced up at Jadeyn Lara, the only other girl in the finals. Shayne was a year older and half a head taller, with a gap in her front teeth. Her stringy blond hair fell loose across her shirt-her brother's, which she'd worn for good luck.Jadeyn had on a pink vest that said "Ridin' Dirty"and pink chaps stitched with dollar signs-her nickname wasJ. Money. She'd positioned herself at the highest point in the arena, on a platform above the center chute, and was kneeling there with her head lifted high, like the figurehead on a ship's prow. She and Shayne had both dominated their local rodeo circuits-Shayne in north-central Texas andJadeyn in the southeast-and both wanted badly to be the first girl to win the finals. "The boys hate it," Curtis Spain told me. "They hate losing to a girl. But little girls develop faster than little boys, and Shayne is fearless, man. She likes rubbing their noses in it." Sheep aren't all that into bucking. Truth be told, they don't like to run that much, either. It takes a sharp spur and a clanging cowbell to get most of them moving, and even then they're a pretty smooth, well-cushioned ride. Still, the mutton busters found ways to fall off. Some lost their grip on the wool and keeled over sideways. Others held on tight and pulled their mounts down on top of them. One or two hit the arena wall and got peeled off, or flipped head over heels when their sheep came to a dead stop. Shayne andJadeyn both managed to hang on, but Shayne got the better draw. Her sheep had been sheared recently, so it was harder to hold but also faster and jumpier. She scored a sixty-four, for fifth place over all.Jadeyn started off well, or at least upright, then slowly began to tip over. By the time the buzzer sounded, she was hanging off her sheep at three o'clock, yet she never fell: fifty-four points-enough for eighteenth place. Ajunior bull rider loaded in the bucking chute in the final moments before a ride. Contestants at the Youth Bull Riders World Finals range in agefromfour to nineteen. By the time the calf riders' turn came, the crowd was getting giddy. "Sweet Child O' Mine"was playing on the P.A., with a ragged chorus of bleats and bellows behind it. As the contestants lined up, the m.c. introduced each one with a verbal drumroll: age, home town, championships, and sponsors. Tiger Mart, B&B Towing, Pop's Honey Fried Chicken. A lot of the boys already had stage names: Dusty Rhodes, Colt Christie, Fate Snyder, Tater Tot Wilcox. Their parents knew that rodeo is one part extreme sport, one part show business. Some of the riders looked as gaudy as rodeo clowns in their embroidered shirts and lizard-skin boots, crested Roman helmets, and vests that read "Cowkids for Christ."But it was up to the calves to make them look good. Wacey drew a big white Holstein with mean-looking eye patches. The calf looked promising at first, but proved to be a halfhearted bucker. It was all Wacey could do to score sixty points, leaving him in thirteenth place-just enough to make the championship round, if he rode well the next day.Jet drew one of the rankest calves in Abilene: a twisting, half-spinning specimen who'd bucked off his rider the day before. For a second or two,Jet looked loose and in control. Then he leaned a touch too far forward, the calf changed directions and kicked up its back legs, and just like that the boy was tumbling through the air. A few minutes later, Trigger met the same fate. He came out looking stiff and off center, got thrown to one side, and bounced offjust before the buzzer. Both boys got up crying but dried their tears by the time they reached the gate. They would not qualify for the final round. "He hit the ground trying,"Jet's father told me afterward. "That calf would dang sure have been hard for any kid to ride."Trigger's dad was less philosophical. "He's in a slump,"he said. "First time I've seen it in his life. It's just really frustrating-he's got so much natural talent. W hen he's locked in, he can't be beat, but he's been riding like an average kid. Those first two calves, he could ride those with his eyes closed." T he next morning, before the national anthem, one of the event directors made his way to the microphone. A tall, barrel-chested Texan named Danny Malone, he worked as a lineman northwest of Fort Worth and had a sixteen-year-old boy in the Open Bull competition. It had been brought to his attention, he announced, that some parents had been acting inappropriately-using foul language and "whuppin' on'' boys who'd been bucked off. "Well, I'm here to tell you that that will not be tolerated,"he said. "It's the reason we have U.S. Marshals and Texas Rangers here. If you are caught, you will be asked to leave this property and you will not be allowed back." He paused, then added, almost beseechingly, "Guys, come on! They're young and they're trying their best. If they're not-hey, we don't know what's going on in their heads. Maybe they're just having an off day. Now, I know I'm not their parent. I can't tell you what to do with your kids in private. But if I see you whuppin' on them I will not tolerate it. And, yes, I know who you are." Most parents at the World Finals weren't used to seeing their kids bucked off, much less three out of four times. At one point, I watched one of the fourteen-year-olds leave the arena after getting thrown off his second bull. He sat down, took off his helmet, and smashed it into his forehead. Then he did it again, methodically, five times in a row. "That's gotta hurt," someone next to me said. It was the first time I'd heard that at a rodeo. W hen I asked Malone for a rundown of the week's injuries, he mentioned "the usual bumps and bruises"-rodeo-speak for everything from deep lacerations to hobbling hematomas. Then he went on to list a dislocated hip, a fractured eye socket, and a stock contractor whose incisors had been knocked in by a swinging gate. "We had to put his teeth in saline and send him to the trauma center," Malone said.. Malone's son Austen was one of the best riders in Abilene, as well as one of the most injury-prone. A lanky, sweet-faced kid with long curly blond hair, he'd had several concussions, broken arms, and a dislocated neck. He'd shattered his right leg so badly that the tibia and the fibula were snapped off completely, the foot turned around backward. The previous year, Austen had spent a week in the hospital after a bull jumped on his chest. Yet he'd come back to win the World Finals. "I worry about it. I do," his father told me. "We discuss it all the time. If something serious happens in the arena and God calls his number-if a fatality happens to my son bull riding-it'll be a struggle. I'm not going to lie to you. But I' ll know that my son will be at peace. That he died happy and enjoying what he was doing." A few minutes later, the mutton busters came out to kick off the third round. Shayne was just seven points out of the lead, but her father didn't have much faith in the sheep she'd drawn: its last rider had scored only fifty-four points. Shayne's only hope was to spur it out of its torpor, working its sides with both heels, though she'd have a harder time keeping her balance. "I told her to let fly the leg," Curtis said. "Just let fly. Get all the points you can."The tactic worked. The sheep pelted across the arena with sudden vigor, the girl kept her seat, and the ride earned sixty-two points. "You know what they say," the m.c. shouted. "Sometimes the best cowboy for the job is a cowgirl!" Shayne was now in third place for the championship round. Even better, she'd outscored her rival, Jadeyn, who hadn't been as lucky in her draw and was stuck back in eighth. "We're making our way up!" Curtis told me. "We're like a shark, circling, circling, looking for a chance." Wacey was in a tougher spot, twenty-one points out of first. He needed both a great ride and some help from the leaders to win. W hen I found him on the catwalk, waiting for his third ride, his brow was furrowed and his eyes fierce with concentration. "Just thinking about the business of what I've got to do," he said. At his parents' ranch, in Eakly, Oklahoma, he'd spent hours watching bull-riding videos to perfect his form. He'd been working on keeping his free hand high to help control his upper body, and his other hand pulled tight against the rope. When the calf kicked up, he needed to lean forward off its haunches, and when it broke to the side, he had to keep his butt down, centered and correct. "Riding bulls is such a mind game," his father, Luke, told me. "You can buck yourself offjust as easily as anything. But he's a little young for that. The truth is he's on top of his game." Earlier that morning, the third-round draw had been posted on the wall of the tunnel to the arena. Luke peered at it for a second, then nodded with a tight grin. For once, Wacey had a bucker. Calf No. 99992 had tossed his rider on the first day and hadn't been ridden the second, so he'd be fresh. "That's good," Luke said. "He can score some points on that one after those sorry calves he's had." His wife, Nikki, wasn't so sure. She'd seen what happened to Jet and Trigger. "I was kind of hoping for something a little more average," she said, her face pale and drawn behind her shades. Wacey, though, had no doubts: he wanted that cal£ Afarmer champion who is angry about the breeding of fiercer andfiercer bulls says, "You probably won't be hearing about twenty-year bull-riding careers anymore." Riders know that injury is a matter ofwhen, not if. W hen his turn finally came, he punched his helmet and climbed into the chute. He clamped his legs around the calf 's bony, squirming back, rubbed some rosin into his rope, and wrapped it tight around his fist. "Ride him like a champ, Wace!" Jet yelled, from the catwalk above him. Trigger was there, too, grinning down at him. Then the gate flew open and the calf charged out, leaping and flexing across the arena like a steel spring shot from an old tractor. He twisted one way and the other, jackknifed in the air and rolled his belly, but could not get the rider off. Wacey matched him rhythm for rhythm, free arm waving and heels flying, spurring him on even harder. W hen the buzzer sounded and he'd tumbled to his feet, he gave one of the bullfighters a high five and ran off. A little later, the m.c. announced the judges' tally: 74.5 -the highest score for a calf rider all week. Wacey would go on to win the round and finish the rodeo in style, riding his last calf cleanly for a sixty-two. It wasn't quite enough to win the championship: his calf was game but underpowered, and he finished third. But his record from the previous round would stand. Shayne ended on an even better note, winning the last round. She finished third in her group as well. She and Wacey each earned a little more than a thousand dollars for their efforts-enough to cover their families' costs and perhaps a dinner at Applebee's on the way home. By the time the judges had cut their checks and passed them out in the hall, the Expo Center was nearly empty, its booths packed up and the parking lot deserted. The other parents had headed home hours ago. Their boys had a long road ahead of them, and it would soon be past their bedtime. W atching the medics put away their ice packs and syringes, painkillers and rolls of bandages, I thought about the last time Tuff Hedeman drew Bodacious. It was December of 1995, just seven weeks after the bull had nearly killed him. Hedeman had lost twenty-five pounds and his body was still healing, but he'd managed to qualify for the National Finals Rodeo anyway. Like Cody Custer and Lane Frost-the hero of the movie " 8 Seconds," who was killed by a bull named Takin' Care of Business in 1989Hedeman belonged to a generation of riders who prided themselves on never backing down. "They just had something the guys don't have today,"Dillon Page told me. "They were raised up in the country and they got on bulls to win."Yet when Hedeman drew Bodacious again, in the sixth round of the finals, he knew what he had to do. "I thought at first that I might have done something wrong the last time,"he told me. "But when I watched a video of the ride, the fact is that I was in perfect position for a bull of that calibre with that bucking pattern.There was nothing I could do. If I'd tried to lean back to avoid his head, I would have been stretched out vertically, and when his back legs hit the ground the force of the downdraft would have jerked me off. That's why most people really feared him. He was a great bull, but he got to the point where you could ride him correctly and still nearly get killed."And so, when Hedeman's turn came to ride that night at the National Finals Rodeo, he climbed into the chute and onto Bodacious's back. But when the gate swung open, Hedeman let the bull charge through without him. Then he tipped his hat to him and left the arena.Three rounds later, Scott Breding put on his hockey mask and gave Bodacious his final ride. Hedeman wouldn't trade his bull-riding experiences for anything.The closest he's come to that feeling has been flying in an F-16 fighter jet. "It's just this explosion of adrenaline," he told me. "It's indescribable." Still, when one of his sons started to get interested in the sport a few years ago, Hedeman took him into his trophy room and showed him some pictures of the guys he used to ride with. "I told him, 'Just look at them. Those are the best guys that rode every year.'Then I pointed at a few and said, 'I watched this guy die, this guy die, and this guy die.This guy's in a wheelchair and this guy's in a wheelchair.' For me, ninety per cent of it was good. I never had a life threatening injury. But the last thing I would ever want my son to do is ride bulls. It's . msane. " His son never did take up bull riding, but for other boys Hedeman's story was just the sort of cautionary tale that hooked them on the sport for life. At the Camp of Champions,I'd watched a succession of stiff-backed and patched-together men walk up to the microphone and, as the Oklahoma sun flamed and guttered on the horizon, do their best to warn the boys about what lay ahead-what a brutal, debilitating world this could be. Yet the result was only to earn more converts. "Blessed be the Lord, oh, my soul,"as the cowboy preachers sang. "For I am fearfully and wonderfully made." On the last afternoon, a cattle trough was hauled under the tent and twenty or thirty boys lined up to be baptized in it. Andy Taylor had asked the campers if any of them were ready to be born again, and Trigger,Jet, and Wacey all raised their hands. W hen the time came, though, only Trigger and Wacey went down easily.Jet, stripped to his swim trunks, climbed in willingly enough but then seemed to change his mind. He pushed his feet up against the end of the trough and gripped the rim tight with his hands. For just a moment, he hung there like a spider perched above a water glass. Then one of the church elders cradled his head and slowly, quiveringly,Jet let himself go under. + Burkhard Bilger published his first piece in The New Yorker in 2000 and became a staff writer the following year. Document 7: Burkhard Bilger, "The Ride of Their Lives" 1. What is the purpose of the essay? 2. What is Bilger's thesis in the article? Find the sentence that you think best summarizes the essay's argument, then explain your reasoning. 3. How is the essay organized? Briefly outline the parts of the essay. 4. How does the author use techniques of fiction and storytelling to advance the article? 5. How does science create ethical concerns around bull riding? Explain and evaluate. 6. After reading the essay, what is your opinion of Youth Bull Riding? Should parents allow their children to participate in it? Why or why not? Explain using plenty of evidence from the text. ' ·. ',,'.·\;·:/ yeat;s t last festival, some 25,000 pounds of fresh-caught lobster was consumed af;ter preparation in the World's Largest Lobster Cooker; aboard the Lobster Float. Consider the Lobster For 56 years, the Maine Lobster Festival has been drawing crowds with the promise of sun, fun, and fine food. One visitor would argue that the celebration involves a whole lot more sv DAVID FOSTER WALLACE T HE ENORMOUS, PUNGENT; AND EXTREMELY well Lee Ann Womack and Orleans, annual Maine Sea Goddess ·411111 marketed Maine Lobster :Festival is held every beauty pageant, Saturday's big parade, Sumlay's William G. late J\lly in the state's midcoast region, meaning Atwood Memorial Crate Race, annual Amateur Cooking . the western side . of Penobscot Bay, the nerve Competition, carnival rides and midway attractions and food stem of Maine's lobster industry. What's called booths, and the MLF's Main Eating Tent, where something the midcoast runs from Owl's Head and Thomaston in the over 25,000 pounds of fresh-caught Maine lobster is con south to Belfast in the north. (Actually, it might extend all sumed after preparation in the World's Largest Lobster the way up to Bucksport, but we were never able to get farther Cooker near the grounds' north entrance. Also available are north than Belfast 011 Route l, whose summertntffic is, as you lobster rolls, lobster turnovers, lobster sautc, Down East lnbcan imagine, unimaginable.) The region's two main commu ster salad, lobster bisque, lobster ravioli, and deep-fried nities are Camden, with its very old money and yachty harbor lobster dumplings. Lobster Them1idor .is obtainable at a sit and five-star restaurants and phenomenal B&Bs, and Rock down restaurant called The Black Pearl on Harbor Park's land, a serious old fishing town that hosts the Festival every northwest wharf. A large all-pine booth sponsored by the summer in historic Harbor Par�,. right along the water.1 Maine Lobster Promotion Council has free pamphlets \Vith Tourism and lobster are the· midcoast region's two main recipes, eating tips, and Lobster Fun Facts. The winner of industries, and they're both warm-weather enterprises, and Friday's Amateur Cooking Competition prepares Saffron the Maine Lobster Festival represents less an intersection of Lobster Ramekins, the recipe for which is available for puh· the industries than a deliberate collision,joyful and lucrative lie downloading atwww.mainelobsterfestival.com. There are and loud. The assigned subject of this article is the 56th An lobster T-shirts and lobster bobblehead dolls and inflatable nual MLF, July 30 to August 3, 2003. whose official theme lobster pool toys and clamp-on lobster hats with big scarlet was "Lighthouses, Laughter, and Lobster." Total paid atten claws that wobble on springs. Your a.�signed correspondent dance was over 80,000, due partly to a national CNN spot in saw it all, accompanied by one girlfriend and both his own t J tne during which a Senior Editor of a certain other epicure parents-··-·one ofwhich parents was actually born and raised in an magazine hailed the MLF as one of the best food..the1ned Maine, albeit in the extreme northern inland part, which is pofostivuh; in !he world. 2003 Festival highlights: concerts by tato country and a world away from the tour.istic midcoast.2 1 There's il comprehensive native apothegm: "Camden by the sea, Rockland by the smell." 2 N.B. All personalty c:onnected parties have made it clear from the start that they do not want to be talked about in this article. so GOURMET AUGUST 2004 F'IELDNOTES F everyone knows what a lob . ster is. As usual, though, there's much mme to know than most of us care about..··-it 's all a matter of what your in terests are. Taxonomically speaking, a lobster is a marine crus tacean of the family Homaridae, characterized by five pairs of jointed legs, the first pair tem1inating in large pincerish claws used for subduing prey. Like many other species of benthic carnivore, lobsters are both hunters and scavengers. They have stalked eyes. gills on their legs, and antennae. There are dozens of different kinds worldwide, ohvhich the relevant species here is the Maine lobster, flomarus america1111s. The name "lobster'' comes from the Old English loppestre, which is thougllt to be a corrupt form of the Latin word for locust combined with the Old English loppe, which meant spider. Moreover, a crustacean is an aquatic arthropod ofthe class Crustacea, which comprises crabs, shrimp, barnacles, lob sters, and freshwater crayfish. All this is right there in the encyclopedia. And an arthropod is an invertebrate member of the phylum Arthropoda. which phylum covers insects, :spiders, crustaceans, and centipedes/millipedes, all ofwhose main commonality, besides the absence of a centralized hrahHpine assembly, is a chitinous exoskeleton composed of segments, to which appendages are articulated in pairs. The point is that lobsters are basically giant sea·fosects.3 Like most arthropods, they date from the Jurassic period, biologically so much older than mammalia that they might as well be from another planet. And they are......particularly in their natural brown-green state, brandishing their claws like weapons and with thick antennae awhip·-not nice to look at. OR PRACTICAL PURPOSES, away as California, in demand only because it was cheap and high in protein, basically chewable fuel. Now, of course, lobster is posh, a delicacy, only a step or two down from caviar. The meat is richer and more substan tial than most fish, its taste subtle compared to the marine gaminess of mussels and clams. In the U.S. pop-food imagination, lobster is now the seafood analog to steak, with which it's so often twinned as Surf'n' Turfon the really ex... pensive part of the chain steak house menu. In fact, one obvious project <>f the MLF. and of its om nipresently sponsorial Maine Lobster Promotion Council, is to counter the idea that lobster is unusually luxe or rich or un healthy or expensive, suitable only for effete palates or the occasi<mal blow-the-diet treat. It is emphasized over and over in presentations and pamphlets at the festival that Maine lobster meat has fewer calories, less cholesterol, and less sat urated fat than chicken.s And in the Main Eating Tent, you can get a "quarter" (industry shorthand for a 1 !4-pound lob .. ster), a 4-ounce cup of melted butter, a bag of chips, and a soft roll w/ butter ..pat foraround $12.00, which is only slight ly more expensive than supper at McDonald's. B E APPRISED, though, that the Main Eating Tent's sup pers come in Styrofoam trays, and the soft drinks are iceless and t1at, and the coffee is conveuience ..store coffee in yet more Styrofoam, and the utensils are plastic (there are none of the special long skinny forks for pushing out the tail meat. though a few savvy dinel'S bring their own). Nor do they give you near enough napkins, considering how lJp until sornetin1e in the 1800s, lobster ,vas literally lo,v-class food, eaten only by the poor a:nd institutionalized. And it's true that they are garbagemen of the sea, eaters of dead stuff.4 although they'll also eat some live shellfish, cer.. tain kinds of injured fish. and sometimes each other. But they are themselves good eating. Or so we think now. Up until sometime in the 1800s, though, lobster was literally low-class food, eaten only by the poor and institutionalized. Even in t11c harsh penal environment of early America, some colonies had laws against feeding lobsters to inmates more than once a week because it was thought to be cruel and un usual, like making people eat rats. One reason for their low status was how plentiful lobsters were in old New England. "Unbelievable abundance" is how one source describes the situation, including accounts of Plymouth pilgrims wading out and capturing all they wanted by hand, and of early Boston's seashore being littered with lobsters after hard storms-these latter were treated as a smelly nuisance and ground up for fertilizer. There is also the fact that premodern lobster was often cooked dead and then preserved, usually packed in salt or crude hermetic containers. Maine's earliest lobster industry was based around a dozen such seaside can·· neries in the 1840s, from which lobster was shipped as far messy lobster is to eat, especially when you're squeezed onto benches alongside children of various ages and vastly f di ferent levels of finc·motor development-..-not to mention the people who've somehow smuggled in their own beer in enonnous aisle-,blocking coolers, or who all of a sudden pro duce their own plastic tablecloths and try to spread them over large portions of tables to try to reserve them (the tables) for their little groups. And so on. Any one example is no more than a petty inconvenience, of course, but the MLF turns out to be full of irksome little downers like this-·. ·sce for instance the Main Stage's headliner shows, where it turns out that you have to pay $20 extra for a folding chair if you want to sit down; or the North Tent's mad scramble for the NyQuil-cup size samples of finalists' entries handed out after the Cook ing Competition; or the muclHoute<I Maine Sea Goddess pageant finals, which turn out to be excruciatingly long and to consist mainly of endless thanks and tributes to local sponsors. What the Maine Lobster Festival really is is a mid . level county fair with a culinary hook, and in this respect it's not unlike Tidewater crab festivals, Midwest corn festivals, Texas chili festivals, etc., and shares with these venues the 3 Midcoasters' native term for a lobster is, in fact, "bug.'' as in "Come around on Sunday and we'll cook up some bugs." 4 Factoid: Lobster traps are usually baited with dead herring. 5 Of course, the common practice of dipping the lobster meat in melted butter torpedoes all these happy fat.specs, which none of the Council's promotional stuff ever mentions, any more than potato-industry PR talks about sour cream and bacon bits. AUGUST 2004 55 FIELD NOTES core paradox of all teeming commercial demotic events: It's not for everyone. 6 Nothing against the aforementioned cu,.. phoric Senior Editor, but I 'd be surprised ifshe'd spent much time here in Harbor Park. watching people slap canal-zone mosquitoes as they cat deep--fried Twinkies and watch Pro fessor Paddywhack, on six--foot stilts in a raincoat w ith plas tic lobsters protruding from all directions on springs, terrify their children. L 08ST£R IS ESSENTIALLY a summer food. This is because we now prefer our lobsters fresh, which means they have to be recently caught, which for both tactical and economic reasons takes place at depths of less than 25 fath oms. Lobsters tend to be hungriest and most active (i.e., most trappable) at summer water temperatures of45- -50"F. In the autumn, some Maine lobsters migrate out into deeper water, either for warmth or to avoid the heavy waves that pound New England's coast all winter. Some burrow into the bot tom. They might hibernate; nobody's sure. Summer is also lobsters' molting season· ····spccifically early-· to mid-July. Chitinous arthropods grow by molting, rather the way peo ple have to buy bigger clothes as they age and gain weight. Since lobsters can Ii ve to be over l 00, they can also get to be quite large, as in 20 pounds or more though truly senior lobsters arc rnre now, because New England's waters are so heavily trapped.7 Anyway, hence the culinary distinction between hard·· and soft-shdl lobsters. the latter sometimes a .k.a. shedders. A soft-shell lobster is one that has recently molted. In m idcoast restaurants, the summer menu often of. t.' l · ..· ·t·.•l1.(.•·.\\t. ·, ·.1.··(:�<,. j. .;lI.-.><"S <J.,l(..>1·1�-. . 1-, <=-:../v···e.�,1·1. -l,-)(·�)t]-1,=-;1� .. ... . '-.�.. ·•l,· c.) 1-11;.:.: \./.r1t··' . ..1<->-11 . � . . . . ·1· 1·�· ,··L\.s -� t1·.1-..>J.....><l.. b,.,' 0<:l.. .. ·tr).. .·1-.->n\.. (.•:1,.J. 1·,·,rt'., ,vv..J!l·. ..1e·. .. r.1 ,1c· ):-1 1 ·>11t 1· 1·· 1· 1-1 t..l..1c) l<c·�·t· t· :lc). � . 'l, r c·-J,"t'"11 ·,(>. <)l-)· . . «V·/.1<,. . ..)1. ·1.s.. .\j ( �· , 8 . 11 l.1·:rt C ... ,L1-·1,: . . .\...,, ..·1 <·..,·l..·>f.;-t·"1·· , ,. l., . .1· s ,. �- ./'\. catch a 1ablemate right in the eye. !fit's winter or you're buy ing lobster someplace far from New England, on the other hand. you can almost bet that the lobster is a hard-shell, which for obvious reasons travel better. As an a la carte entree, lobster can be baked, broiled. steamed, grilled, sauteed, stir-fried, or microwaved. The most common method. though, is boiling. If you're someone who enjoys having lobster at home. this is probably the way you do it, since boiling is so easy. You need a large kettle w/ cover. which you fill about half foll with water ( the standard advice is that you want 2.5 quarts of water per lobster). Sea water is optimal, or you can add two tbsp salt per <1uart from the tap. It also helps to know how much your lobsters weigh. You get the water boiling, put in the lobsters one at a time, cover the kettle, and brin g it back up to a boil. Then you bank the heat and let the kettle simmer······ten minutes for ihe first pound of lobster, then three minutes for each pound alter that. (This is assuming you·ve got hard-shell lobsters. which, again, ifyou don't l ive between Boston mid Halifax. is prob ably what you've got. For shedders, you 're supposed to sub·· tract three m inutes from the total.) The reason the kettle's lobsters turn scarlet is that boiling somehow suppresses every pigment in their chitin but one. Ifyou want an easy test of whether the lobsters arc done, you try pulling on one nf their antennae-·-if it comes out of the head with minimal e ffort, you're ready to eat A detail so obvious that most recipes don't even bother to mention it is that each lobster is supposed to be alive when you put it in the kettle. This is part of lobster's modem ap· ./l.. . . . fors both kinds, with shcdders being slightly cheaper even though they're easier to dismantle and the meat is allegedly sweeter. The reason for the discount is that a 1110Iting lol)ster uses a layer of seawater for insulation while its new shell is hardening, so there's slightly less actual meat when you crack open a shedder, plus a redolent gout of water that gets all over everything and can sometimes jet out lemonlike and . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . .. ,, . . . ,, ..- • peal : It's the freshest food there is. There's no decomposi· tion between harvestin g and eating. And not only do lobsters require no cleaning or dressing or plucking { though the me· chanics of actually eating them a rc a different matter), but they're relatively easy for vendors to keep alive. They come up alive in the traps, are placed in containers ofseawater, and can, so long as the water's aerated and the animals' claws arc 6 !n truth. ihere's a great deal to be said about the differences between woikin?;·class Rockland and the heavily populist flavor of its festival veisus comfortable and elitist Camden with its expensive view and shop, given entirely over to $200 sweaters and great mws of Victorian homes converted to uoscale B&Bs. And about these differences as two sides of the great coin that is U .S. tourism . Vr;ry little of which will besaid here., except lo amplify the above--mentioned paradox and to reveal your assigned correspondent's own preferences, I conte.ss that I have never understood why so many people's idea of a fun vacation is to don flip flops and sunglasses and crawl through maddening trn!HG lo loud ho! crowded tourist ventres in order to sample a "local flavor" that is by definition ruined by the presence of tourists. This may {as my festival companions keep pointing out) all be a matter of pe1sonality and hardwired taste: The fact that l just do 1wt like tourist venues means that l'II never understand their appeal and so arn probably no! the one lo talk about it (the supposed ap!)€al). But, sine,, this note win almost surely not st1rvive magaz.ine"edi!ing anyway. here goes: As I see it, it probably really i;good fort he soul to b11a tourist. even if it's only once in a while. Not.good for tile soul ina reJresllingor enlivening way. though, but rather in a grim. steely-eyed, Jet's-!oo}i"llonestly-at-the-!acts-·<1nd-find-some-·way-to·deril-with·1hem way. My personal experience has nol been that travel ing around !he country is brnadeningor relaxing. or that radic-01 changes in place and context have a salutiry effect, but rather that intranational tourism is rad ically constricting, and humbling in the hardest w,1y-hos!ile to my fantasy of being a real individual, of living somehow outside and above it an. (Coming up is the part that my companions find especially unh,,ppy and repelkinl, a sure way to spoi! the fun of vacation travel:) lo be a mass tourist, for me, is to become a pure late-date American: alien, ignorant. p;eecty for something you cannot ever have, disappointed in a way you can never admit I! is to spoil. by way of sheer ontology, the very unspoiletlne,syou are !here to eiperience, !t is to impose yourself on places that. in all noneconornic ways would be better, realer. without you. lt is. in lines and gridlock and transaction after tramaction, t,1 confrnn! a dimension of yourself that is as inesc,1pable as it is painful: As a tourist, you become economically significant but existentially loath:,orne, ,m insect on a dead thing. 7 Datum: In a goodye,ir, ihe U. 5. industry produces around 80 million pounds of lobster. and M,iine accounts for more than half that total. 56 tl O IJ fH l !:: T AUGUST 2004 FIELONOTES pegged or banded to keep them from tearing one another up under the stresses ofcaptivity,8 survive right up until they're boiled. Most of us have been in supermarkets or restaurants that feature tanks o f live lobster, from which you can pick out your supper while it watches you point. And part <Jfthe over all spectacle ofthe M.a ine Lobster Festival is that you can see actual lobstermen 's vessels docking at the wharves along the northeast grounds and unloading freshly caught product, which is transferred by hand or cart l 00 yards to the great clear tanks stacked up around the Festival's cooker--which is, as mentioned, billed as the World's Largest Lobster Cooker and can process over I 00 lobsters at a time for the Main Eating Tent. S O THEN HERE ts A QUESTION that's all but unavoidable at the World's Largest Lobster Cooker, and may arise in kitchens across the U.S.: ls it all right to boil a sen tient creature alive just for our gustatory pleasure? A related set of concerns: Is the previous question irksomely PC or sentimental? What docs "all right" eve11 mean in this con text? ls it all just a matter of individual choice? As you may or may not know, a certain well-known group called People for the Ethical Treatment of A nimals thinks that the morality oflobster-boiiing is not just a matter ofindividual conscience. In fact, one of the very first things we hear about the M LF ... we l L to set the scene: We' re coming in by cab from the almost indescribably odd and rustic Knox County Airport9 very late on the night before the Festival opens, sharing the cab with a wealthy political consultant who lives on Vinalhaven lsland in the bay half the year (he's headed forthe island fcny in Rockland). The consultant and cabdriver are responding to informal journalistic probes about how people who live in the midcoast region actually view the MLF, as in is the Festival just a big-dollar tourist thing or is it something local residents look forward to attending, take genuine civic pride. in, etc. The cabdtiver·· ·who's in his seventies, one ofapparcntly a whole platoon of retirees the cab company puts on to help with the summer rush, and wears a U.S...ffag lapel pin, and drives in what can only be called a very deliberate way · · ·assures us that locals do endorse and enjoy the MLF, although he himself hasn ·1 gone in years. and now come to think ofit no one he and his wife know has, either. However, the demilocal consul tant's been to recent Festivals a couple times (one gets the im pression it was at h is w ife's behest), of which his most vivid impression was that ''you have to line up for an ungodly Jong time to get your lobsters, and meanwhile there are all these CX····t1ower children coming up and down along the line hand ing out pamphlets that say the lobsters die in terrible pain and you shouldn't cat them." And it turns ont that the post-hippies of the consultant's recollection were activists from PETA. There were no PETA people in obvious view at the 2003 MLF,10 but they've been conspicuous at many of the recent Festivals. Since at least the mid-1 990s, articles in everything from The Camden Herald to The New York Times have describe<l PETA urging boycotts of the MLF, often deploying celebrity spokespeople like Mary Tyler Moore for open letters and ads saying stuff like "Lobsters are extraordinarily sensitive" and ''To me, eating a lobster is out orthe question." More concrete is the oral testi mony of Dick, our florid and extremely gregarious rentaI-car guy, to the effect that PET A's been around so much in recent years that a kind ofbrittlely tolerant homeostasis now obtains between the activists and the Festival's locals, e.g.: "We had some incidents a couple years ago. One lady took most ofher clothes off and painted herself like a lobster, almost got her self arrested. But for the most part they're let alone. [Rapid series of small ambiguous laughs, which with Dick happens a lot.J They do their thing and we do our thing.'· This whole interchange takes place on Route I . 30 July. during a four-mile. 50.. minute ride from the airportll to the dealership to sign car·-rental papers. Several irreproducible segues down the road from the PET A anecdotes, Dick·· · · whose son-in-law happens to be u professional lobsterman and one of the Main Eating Tenr s regular suppliers- articulates what he and h is family feel is the crucial mitigat·· ing factor in the whole mornlity·of.boiling-lobsters- alive issue: "There's a part of the brain in people and animals that lets us feel pain, and lobsters' brains don't have this part." Besides the fact that it's incorrect in about 1 1 differen t ways, the main reason Dick's statement .is interesti ng is that its thesis is more or Jess echoed by the Festival's own pro nouncement on lobsters and pain, which is part ofa Test Your 8 N,8. Similar reasoning underlies the practice of whal.'s termed "debeaking" broHer chickens and brood hens in modern factoty farms. Maximum commercial €Hiciency rnquire; that enmmous poultry populations be confined in unnaturally dose quarters, under which conditions many birds go craz:.J and per.k one an· other to death. As a purely observational side-note, be apprised that debeaking is usually an au!ornated proceslS and that the chickens receive no anesthetic. It's not clear to me whether most GO!IHMH reader$ know flbou! debeaking. or about related practices like dehorning cattle in connnercial feedlots, croppiflg swine'$ tails in factory hog farms to keep psychotirn!ly bored neighbors from chewing them oH. and so forth. It so happens that your assigned correspondent knew al most nothing ,,bout standard meat-industry operations before starting work on this article. 9 The terminal used to be somebody's hnuse, for example, ancl the lost-luggagi;..reporting room was clearly once a pantry. 10 It turned out that one Mr. William R. Riv,,s-n1vas, a high-ranking PETA official out of the group's Virginia headquarters, was indeed there this year, albeit solo, working the Festival's main and side entrances on Saturday, August 2, handing out pamphlets and adhesive stickers emblazoned with "Being 8oi!ed Hutts," which is the !agline in nwst cl PETA's published material about lobster. I learned thal he'd been there only later, when speaking with Mr. Riva�·Rivas on the phone. I'm nn! sure how we mis,,ed seeing him in situ ,it tho Festival. and J can't see much to do except apologize for the oversight-although it'salso I rue that Saturday was thn day of the big MLF parade through Rockland, which basic iournalistic responsibility seernerJ to require going to (and which, with all due re spect. mean! that Saturday was maybe not the best day for PETA to work the Harllor Park grounds, e.specia!!y if it was going to l:le just orm person for one day, since a lol of diehard Mlf partisans W'He o!1-sl!e watching the parade (which, again wi!h no offense intended, was in truth kind of cheesy and boring, consis!·· ing mostly of slow homemade floats and various rnidcoast people waving at oneano!her, and with an extremely annoying man dressed as. Blackbeard ranging up and down the length of the crowd saying "Arrr·· over and over and brandisl1ing a plastic sword at people, etc.; plus it. rained)). 11 The short versiun regarding why wr; were back at the airport after already arriving the previous night involves lost luggage and a miscommunication about wlleie and what the local National Car Rental franchise waS-······Oick came, out p(irsonolly to the airport and got us, out of no evident motive but kindness. (He also h'l!ked nonstop the entire way, witl1 a veiy distinctive speaking style that can be describe.d only as manically !aconic; the truth is that I now know more about this man than I do about sorrui members of my own tamily.) 60 AUGUST 2004 F'IELDNOTES Lobster IQ quiz that appears in the 2003 MLF program cour tesy of the M.aine Lobster Promotion Council; "The nervous system ofa lobster is very si,nple, and is in fact most similar to the nervous system of the grasshopper. It is decentralized with no brain. There is no cerebral cortex, which in humans is the area ofthe brain that gives the experience of pain." Though it sounds more sophisticated, a lot ofthe neurolo gy in this latter claim is still either false or fuzzy. The human cerebral cortex is the brain-part that deals with h igher facul ties like reason, metaphysical self-awareness, language, etc. Pain reception .is known to be part of a much older and more primitive system o f nociceptors and prostaglandins that arc managed by the brain stem and thalamus.12 On the other hand, it is true that the cerebral cortex is involved in what's variously called suffering, distress, or the emotional experi ence of pai ll···· i.e., experiencing painful stimuli as unplem,·· ant, very unpleasant, unbearable, and so on. B £FORE WE GO ANY FURTHER, let's acknowledge that the questions of whether and how different kinds of ani mals foci pain, and of whether and why it might bejus. ti liable to inllictpt1in on them i n order to eat them, turn out to be extremely complex and difficult. A nd comparative neu roanatomy is only part of the problem. Since pain is a totally subjective mental experience, we do not have direct access to anyone or anything's pain but our own; and even just the principles by which we can infer that others experience pain and have a legitimate interest in not feeling pain involve hard-core philosophy---·metaphysics, epistemology, value theory, ethics. The fact that even the most highly evolved nonhuman mammals can't use language to communicate with us about their subjective mental experience is only the first layer of additional complication in trying to extend our reasoning about pain and morality to animals. And every thing gets progressively more abstract and convolved as we move farther and farther out from the h ighcHype mammals into cattle and swine and dogs and eats and rodents, and then birds and fish, and finally invertebrates like lobsters. The more important point here, though. is that the whole animal-eruelty ..and..eating issue is not_just complex, it's also uncomfortable. It is. at any rate, uncomfortable for me, and forjust about everyone J know who enjoys a variety of foods and yet does not want to see herself as cruel or unfeeling. As far as I can tell, my own main way of dealing with this con- tlict has been to avoid thinking about the whole unpleasant thing. I should add that it appears to me unlikely that many readers of GOURMET wish to think hard about it, either, or to be queried about the morality of their eating habits in the pages of a culinary monthly. Since, however, the assigned subject of this article is what it was like to attend the 2003 MLF, and thus to spend several days in the midst of a great mass of Americans all eating lobster, and thus to be more or less impelled to think hard about lobster and the experience ofbuying and eating lobster, it turns ont that there is no hon est way to avoid certain moral questions. There are several reasons for this. For one thing, it's not just that lobsters get boiled alive, it's that you do it yourself-· or at least it's done specifically for you, on--site.13 As mentioned, the World's Largest Lobster Cooker, which is highlighted as an attraction in the Festival's program, is right out there on the M LF 's nmih grounds for everyone to see. Try to imagine a Nebraska Beef Festiva!l4 at which part of the festivities is watching trucks pull up and the live cattle get driven down the ramp and slaughtered right there on the World's Largest Killing Floor or something-there's no way. The intimacy of the whole thing is maximized at home, which of course is where most lobster gets prepared and eaten (although note already the semiconscious euphemism "pre pared," which in the case oflobsters really means killing them right there in our kitchens). The basic scenario is that we come in from the store and make our little preparations like getting the kettle filled and boiling, and then we Ii ft the lobsters out of the bag or whatever retail container they came home in ... whereupon some uncomfortable things stati to happen. How ever stuporous the lobster is from the trip home, for instance, it tends to come alarmingly to lifo when placed in boiling water. lfyou're tilting it from a container into the steaming kettle, the lobster will sometimes try to cling to the container's sides or even to hook its claws overthe kettle's rim like a person trying to keep from going over the edge ofa roof. And worse is when the lobs1er's fully immersed. Even if you cover the kettle and ntm mvay, you can usually hear the cover rattling and clanking as the lobster tries to push it ofI Or the creature's claws scrap· ing the sides of the kettle as it thrashes around. The lobster, in other words, behaves very much as you or I would behave if we were plunged into boiling water (with the obvious excep· tion ofscreaming).15 A blunter way to say this is that the lob ster acts.as if it's in terrible pain, causing some cooks to leave 12 To elaborate by way of example: The common experience of accidentally touching a ho! stove and yanking your hand back before you're even aware that any thing's going on is explained by the filct that many of the processes by which we detect and avoid painful stimuli do not involve the cortex. In thecas,1 of the hand and stove. the brain is bypaSSBd altogether; ell the important neuroc.hemica! action takes place in the spine. l3 Morality.wise, let's concede that this cuts both ways. lobster-eating is at least not abetted by the system of corporate factor/ Farms that produces most beet. pork, and chicken. Bec.ause, if nothing else, of the way they're marketed and packaged for sale, we cat these latter meats without having to consider that they were once conscious, sentient creatums to whom horrible things were done. (N.B. PETA distributes a certain video---the title of which is being omitted as part of the elaborate editorial wmprom1se by which this note appears at all-in which you can see just about everything meat-related you don't want to see or think about. (N.B.2 No! that PETA's any sort ot font of unspun truth. Uke many partisans in complex moral disputes, the PETA pt'OPle are fanatics, and a lot of their 1het.01ic seems simplistic ,ind :,elf-righteous. Personally, though, I have to say that I found this unnamed video both credible and deeply upsetting.)) t4 1s it significant that "Jobst.er," "fish," and "chicken" are our culture's words for both the animal and the meat, whereas most mammals seem to require eu pl1emi�rns like "beef" and "pork" \hat help us separate the meat we eat from the living creature the meal once was? Is this evidence that some \<.ind of deep un· ease abnot eating higher ,1nima!s 1s endemic enough to show up in English usage, but that the unease diminishes aswe move out of the mammalian order? (And is ··1amb"i"larnb" the counterexample that sinks the whole theo,y, or are there special, biblico-historical reasons for that equivalmce?) 1 5 There's a relevant populist myth aboutthe high-·pitched whistling sound that sometimes issues from a pot of boiling lobster. The sound is really vented steam from the !ayer of seawater between !he lobster's flesh and its carapace (this is why shedders whistle more than hard-shells), but the pop version has it that the sound is the lobster's rabbitlike death scream. Lobsters communicate via pheromones in their urine antl don't have anything close to the vocal equipment for screaming. but \h(i myth's very persistent--which might, once again, point to a low-level cultural unease about the boiling thing. 62 A U G U S T 2 004 the kitchen altogether and to take one of those little light weight plastic oven timers with them into another room and wait unti I the whole process is over. There happen to be two main criteria that most ethicists agree on for determining whether a living creantre has the capacity to suffer and so has genuine interests that i.t may or may not be our moral duty to consider.JG One is how much of the neurological hardware required for pain-experience the animal comes equipped with··· · ·nociceptors, prostaglandins, neuronal opioid receptors, etc. The other criterion is whether the animal demonstrates behavior associated with pain. And it takes a lot ofintellectual gymnastics and behaviorist hairsplit ting not to see struggling, thrashing, and lid-clattering as just such pain-behavior. According to marine zoologists, it usual ly takes lobsters between 35 and 45 seconds to die in boiling water. (No source I could find talked about how long it takes them to die in superheated steam; one rather hopes it's faster.) There are, of course, other fairly common ways to ki!I your lobster on-site and so achieve maximum freshness. Some cooks' practice is to drive a sharp heavy knife point first into a spot just above the midpoint between the lobster's eyestalks (more or less where the Third Eye is inhuman fore heads}. This is alleged either to kill the lobster instantly or to render it insensate-and is said at least to eliminate the cow ardice involved in throwing a creature into boiling water and then fleeing the room. As far as l can tell from talking to pro ponents of the knife-in-the-head method, the idea is that it's more violent but ultimately more merciful, plus that u will ingness to exert personal agency and accept responsibility even w<>rsefcrueler ways people prepare lobster. Time .. thrifty cooks sometimes microwave them alive (usually after poking several extra vent holes in the carapace, which is a prec.iution most shellfish-microwavers learn about the hard way). Live dismemberment, on the otl1er hand, is big in Europe; Some chefs cut the lobster in halfbefore cooking; others like to tear off the claws and tail and toss 011ly these parts in the pot. And there's more unhappy news respecting sufforing criterion number one. Lobsters don't have much in the way of eyesight or hearing, but they d<> have an exquisite tactile sense, one facilitated by hundreds of thousands of tiny hairs that protrude through their carapace. "Thus,'' in the words of T.M. Prudden's industry classic About Lobstff, "it is that al .. though encased in what seems a solid, impenetrable armor, the lobster can receive stimuli and impressions from without as readily as ifit possessed a soft and delicate skin." And lob sters do have nociceptors,17 as well as invertebrate versions ofthe prostaglandins and major neurntransmitters via which our own brains register pain. Lobsters do not, on the other hand, appear to have the equipment for making or absorbing natural <>pioids like en·· dorphins and enkephalins, which are what m<>re advanced nervous systems use to try to handle intense pain. From this fact, though, one could conclude either that lobsters are maybe even morti vulnerable to pain, since they lack mam malian nervous systems' built-in analgesia, or, instead. that the absence of natural opioids implies an absence of the real ly intense pain..sensations that natural opioids are designed to mitigate. I for one can detect a marked upswing in mood as Sorne cooks take one of those little lightweight plastic oven tin1ers with then1 into another roorn and ,vait till the ,vhole process is over. for stabbing the lobster's head honors the lobster somehow and entitles one to eat it. (There's often a vague sort ofNative American spirituality-of-the-hunt flavor to pro ..knife argu ments.) But the problem with the knife method is basic biol·· ogy: Lobsters' 1tervous systems operate off not one hut several ganglia, a.k.a. nerve bundles, which are sort <>fwired in series and distributed all along the lobster's underside, from stem to stern. And disabling only the frontal ganglion does not normally result in quick death or unconsciousness. Another alternative is to put the lobster in cold salt water and then very slowly bring it up to a full boil. Cooks who advo.. cate this method are going mostly on the analogy to a frog, which can supposedly be kept fro111 jump.ing ()tit.of a boiling pot by heating the water incrementally. In order to save a lot of research-summarizing, l.'ll simply assure you that the analogy between frogs and lobsters turns out not to hold. Ultimately, the only certain virtues of the home-lobotomy and slow-heating methods are comparative, because there are I contemplate this latter possibility: It could be thnt their luck ofendorphin/enkephalin hardware means that lobsters' raw subjective experience of pain is so radically different from mammals' that it may not even deserve the tenn pain. Per haps lobsters are more like those frontal-lobotomy patients one reads about who report experiencing pain in a totally dif ferent way than you and !. These patients evidently do feel physical pain, neurologically speaking, hut don't dislike it, .... though neither do they like it; it's more that they feel it but d<>n 't feel anything about it.. ·the point being that the pain is not distressing to them or something they want to get away from. Maybe lobsters, who are also without frontal lobes, are detached from the ncurnfogicaJ . registration-of-injmy-or hazard we call pain in just the same way. There is, after all, a difference between (l) pain as a purely neurological event, and (2) actual suffering, which seems crucially to involve an emotional comp<>nent, an awareness of pain as unpleasant, as something to fear/dislike/want to avoid. 16 "Interests" basically means strong and legitimate preferences, which obviously require some degree of consciousness, responsiveness to stimuli. etc. See, for instance, the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer, whose 1974 Animal Liberation is more or less the bible ot the modern a11imai-rights movement: "It would be nonsense to say that it was not in the interests of a stone to he kicked along the road by a schoolboy. A stone does not have interests because it cannot svffer. Nothing that we can do to it could possibly make any difference to its welfare. A mouse, on the other hand, does have an interest in not being kicked along the road, because itwill suffer ii it is." 17 This is the neurological term for special pain receptors that are {according to Jane A. Smith and Kenneth M. Boyd's Lives in the Balance) "sensitive to po tentially damaging extremes of temperature, to mechanical forces, and to chemical svbslances which are released when body tissues are damaged." AUGUST 2004 GOURMET 63 FIELDNOTES Still, after all the abstract intellection, there remain the facts of the frantically clanking lid, the pathetic clinging to the edge of the pot. Standing at the stove, it is hard to deny in any mean ingful way that this is a living creature experiencing pain and wishing to avoid/escape the painful experience. To my lay mind, the lobster's behavior in the kettle appears to be the ex pression of a preference; and it may well be that an ability to form preferences is the decisive criterion for real suffering. ts The logic of this (preference� suffering) relation may be easi est to see in the negative case. If you cut certain kinds of wo1ms in half, the halves will often keep crawling around and going about their venniform business as if nothing had happened. When we assert, based on their post-op behavior, that these worms appear not to be suffering, what we're really saying is that there's no sign that the worms know anything bad has hap pened or wouldprefer not to have gotten cut in half. Lobsters, however, are known to exhibit preferences. Ex periments have shown that they can detect changes of only a degree or two in water temperature; one reason for their com plex migratory cycles (which can often cover 100-plus miles a year) is to pursue the temperatures they like best.ts And, as mentioned, they're bottom-dwellers and do not like bright light: If a tank of food lobsters is out in the sunlight or a store's fluorescence, the lobsters will always congregate in whatever part is darkest. Fairly solitary in the ocean, they also clearly dislike the crowding that's part of their captivity in tanks, since (as also mentioned) one reason why lobsters' claws are banded on capture is to keep them from attacking one another under the stress of close-quarter storage. I N ANY EVENT, at the Festival, standing by the bubbling tanks outside the World's Largest Lobster Cooker, watch ing the fresh-caught lobsters pile over one another, wave their hobbled claws impotently, huddle in the rear corners, or scrabble frantically back from the glass as you approach, it is difficult not to sense that they're unhappy, or frightened, even if it's some rudimentary version of these feelings ... and, again, why does rudimentariness even enter into it? Why is a primitive, inarticulate form of suffering less urgent or uncom fortable for the person who's helping to inflict it by paying for the food it results in? I'm not ttying to give you a PETA-like screed here-at least I don't think so. I'm trying, rather, to work out and articulate some of the troubling questions that arise amid all the laughter and saltation and community pride of the Maine Lobster Festival. The truth is that if you, the Fes- tival attendee, pennit yourself to think that lobsters can suffer and would rather not, the MLF can begin to take on aspects of something like a Roman circus or medieval torture-fest. Does that comparison seem a bit much? If so, exactly why? Or what about this one: Is it not possible that future generations will regard our own present agribusiness and eating practices in much the same way we now view Nero's entertainments or Aztec sacrifices? My own immediate reaction is that such a comparison is hysterical, extreme-and yet the reason it seems extreme to me appears to be that I believe animals are less morally important than human beings;2° and when it comes to defending such a belief, even to myself, I have to acknowledge that (a) I have an obvious selfish interest in this belief, since I like to eat certain kinds of animals and want to be able to keep doing it, and (b) I have not succeeded in work ing out any sort of personal ethical system in which the belief is truly defensible instead of just selfishly convenient. Given this article's venue and my own lack of culinary so phistication, I'm curious about whether the reader can identi fy with any of these reactions and acknowledgments and discomforts. I am also concerned not to come off as shrill or preachy when what I really am is confused. Given the (possi ble) moral status and (very possible) physical suffering of the animals involved, what ethical convictions do gourmets evolve that allow them not just to eat but to savor and enjoy flesh-based viands (since of course refined enjoyment, rather than just ingestion, is the whole point of gastronomy)? And for those gourmets who'll have no truck with convictions or rationales and who regard stufflike the previous paragraph as just so much pointless navel-gazing, what makes it feel okay, inside, to dismiss the whole issue out of hand? That is, is their refusal to think about any of this the product of actual thought, or is it just that they don't want to think about it? Do they ever think about their reluctance to think about it? After all, isn't being extra aware and attentive and thoughtful about one's food and its overall context part of what distinguishes a real gourmet? Or is all the gourmet's extra attention and sensibility just supposed to be aesthetic, gustatory? These last couple queries, though, while sincere, obvious ly involve much larger and more abstract questions about the connections (if any) between aesthetics and morality, and these questions lead straightaway into such deep and treach erous waters that it's probably best to stop the public discus sion right here. There are limits to what even interested persons can ask of each other.@ 18 "Preference" is maybe roughly synonymous with "interest," but it is a better term for our purposes because it's less abstractly philosophical-"preference" seems more personal, and it's the whole idea of a living creature's personal experience that's at issue. 19 Of course, the most common sort of counterargument here would begin by objecting that "like best" is really just a metaphor, and a misleadingly anthropomorphic one at that. The counterarguer would posit that the lobster seeks to maintain a certain optimal ambient temperature out of nothing but unconscious instinct (with a similar explanation for the low-light affinities about to be mentioned in the main text). The thrust of such a counterargument will be that the lobster's thrashings and clankings in the kettle express not unpreferred pain but involuntary reflexes, like your leg shooting out when the doctor hits your knee. Be advised that there are professional scientists, including many researchers who use animals in experiments, who hold to the view that nonhuman creatures have no real feelings at all, only "behaviors." Be further advised that this view has a long history that goes all the way back to Descartes, although its modern support comes mostly from behaviorist psychology. ' To these what-look-like-pain-are-really-only-reflexes counterarguments, however, there happen to be all sorts of scientific and pro-animal-rights counter counterarguments. And then further attempted rebuttals and redirects, and so on. Suffice to say that both the scientific and the philosophical arguments on ei ther side of the animal-suffering issue are involved, abstruse, technical, often informed by self-interest or ideology, and in the end so totally inconclusive that as a practical matter, in the kitchen or restaurant, it all still seems to come down to individual conscience, going with (no pun) your gut. 20 Meaning a tot less important, apparently, since the moral comparison here is not the value of one human's life vs. the value of one animal's life, but rather the value of one animal's life vs. the value of one human's taste for a particular kind of protein. Even the most diehard carniphile will acknowledge that it's possible to live and eat well without consuming animals. 64 GOURMET AUGUST 2004 .1 , :I Document 8: David Foster Wallace, "Consider the Lobster" 1. What is the purpose of the essay? How do you know? 2. How is the essay organized? If you could break it into parts, how would you label them? 3. Comment on Wallace's use of footnotes. What are the footnotes for, and how do they advance the purpose of essay? 4. Wallace uses a lot of big words--no doubt you've looked up a few of them by now. Does his vocabulary improve the essay or detract from it? Explain your reasoning. 5. What is your opinion on Wallace's argument? Articulate yourself here, using plenty of evidence from the text. Toni Cade Bambara Gorilla, My Love (UNITED STATF.S) That was the year H1mca B11hha changed his name. Not a change np, hnt u change back, since Jefferson Winston Vale was the name in the first place. Which was news to me ca11se he'd heen my H11nca Buhba my whole lifetime, since I couldn't manage Uncle to save my life. So for as I was eoncemecl it was a change completely to somethin sounclin very µ;eographical weatherlike to me, like somethin you'd find in a almanac.·. Or somethin vo11'd run across when you sittin in the n;1vigator seat with a wet thumh on tl;e map crinkly in your lap. watchin the roads and signs so when Granddaddy Vale say "Which way, Scout," you got sense enough to say take the next exit or take a left or what ever it is. Not that Scout's my name. Just the name Gnmddaddy call whoever sittin in the navigator seat. Whieh is nsuall}' me c.·ause I don't feature sittin in the back with the pecans. Now, yon figure pecaus all tight to be sittin ,vith. If you thinks so, that's your business. But they dusty sometime and make you cough. And they got a way of slidin around and dippin down sudden, like maybe a rat in the buckets. So if you scary like me. you sleep with the lights on and blame it on Baby Jason and, so as not to waste good elechic, you study the maps. And that's how come I'm in tlw navigator seat most times and get to he called Scout. So Hunca Bubba in the_ back with the 1wc,ms and Bahy Jason, and he in f love. An<l we got to hear all this stuf ahont this woman he in love with and all. Which really ain't enough to keep the mind alive, though Baby Jm;on got no better sense than to give his undividecl attention and keep grahbin at the photograph which is just a picture� of some skinny woman in a countrified dress with her hand shot np to her face lik<� she sha111t• fore cameras. But there's a movie hm1se in the hackgrouml which I ,Lx ahout. Cause I am a movie freak from way hack, even though it do get 11w in tro11hlt· so111eti111e. Like when me and Biµ; Brood and Bahy Jason was 011 om own last Easter and couldn't go to the Dorset c1111se we'd seen all tlw Thret� Stooges tht•y was. And the RKO Hamilton was dosed read}fog up for the Easter Pageant that night. And the \Vc�st End, the Regun and the S1mst•t was too far. less we had grownups with 11s which we didn't. So \\'t' walk up Amsterdam Avemtt> to the Washington and Gmilla, !l'l!J Love playin. tht>y say, whidt snit me just fine, Gori/Ill, M.v Lo11e I 'i9 . tlionv;l1 Ill<' ·· 111: lm1• . part kinda draµ; Big Brood s11111<·. As for Bal iy Jason. 1d 1nc>l. lik,· ( ;r,t 11ddadd, s,I\. 111."d li,llow 1111• into llw fi 1 •1y f11mat·1• if' Ism· <.·01111• 1 1n. Som· go i 11 o111d g,•i tli;.1 ·1· hags ol' I l a,111t1n• potato t·l1ips wl iieli 110! 1 ;111�- an• llrl· livsl p11lalo d1ips 1>111 llw IH'st hag\ li,r lilo\\i' ll 11p and l111sti11 n·al l1111d so tlw 111alro11 l·o1111· lr11lti11 drnrn tlw aislt• "itl, 11\'r d1111 r l" s,•11: lla.sl i i11 ll1at llasl1ligl1l d1·ad i11 �0111 ,.,,. ,o .,011 1·,111 e;i\1• l1t·r s1111u· lip. a111I if slll ' amw 1 ·r hack a11d ,011 .,ln·ad, !i11isl1 s1•1•i11 ll11• -.110\\ a11:"a.,. wli_, tl11 •11 yon j11sl l11rn llll' plat·!' 0111. \\'l r il'l1 I In\!' 11 1 ,h 1111 Ii,· \\'itl1 Bali� Ja,rn 1 kickin al Ill<' s1•al in l'ro11l. 1 •_u;gi11g 1111· 1111 a11tl Bii.!; Brood 11111111l11i11 l io11l \\lrat fi1 •n·1•so1111• H1i11gs \\ 1· e;oi11 do. \\'hit·I, 1111·a11, 1111'. I .il,1· wl11·11 llw l,ig l1t1:·' t·11111t• 11p 011 11s talld11 h1111l l.1 •11 11n1• a 11il'k1•l. It , 111t· tlmt l1id1· ll1t• 111011t•\. Or wlw11 ll11• liad lic>�, in tltt• park tak1 • Big Bro 1 11 1's Spa11d1·1·11 \\a_, frt1111 l1i 111. II\ 1111• tl1at j11111p 1>11 tlll'y lial'k and fi,v;l1l awliil,•. \11d ll\ 11w tl,at 1111m 011t ll1t• sl111\\ if llw 111atro11 gt'! loo salt,. S 1 1 Ill!' 11111, i,· 1·01111· 011 a11d rigl i t ,l\\,l\ it', tlii\ cl11in·II\ ;1111sil' a11d ;.1,·arl, 111 11 al>rnrl 111 1 gorill.t B1111t l1•,11s. ;\' 11d I .1 111 n•a1h to kill. 1u1l t·a11s1• I got a11,tl r i11v; g.ti11sl Jt-,11,. J11,t tlmt .\\ l1t·11 ,rn, liwd lo \\,1ld1 a gorilla pid11;·1 · �111; do11:l ,,.1 1 111.1 l!;l'I 111,•,,,-d an1111 1tl willr S11111la, Sl'l111ol st11rL So I a111 11 rad. B1 •sid1 ·s. \\ <' \1·1· lliis ragg,•1 h 11ld lini\\ 11 lil1111'.i11!!,1>{/\i11!!,s ('\('I"\ \ 1 •ar a11d l'IIOHgl1 :s,·11011gl,. ( :111\\ 1111ps lig,in• 111 1 ·, 1;,111 lr<'al ,1111 j,;sl ,ill� Ito\\. ,\·j,il'l i l i11rn, 1111· 1 1p. Tl11•i1 • I ,1111. 111, li·,·l 11p and Ill\ I I.I\ 11111n· pnl.1lo l'l1ips n•alh salt,, a11d 1·risp, a11d lwo ja\\ lin·.ik,•rs 111 111_, lal' a111l 1lw 11111111·, s. ili· i11 111, ,111 11• frrn11 tlu· hig l io�s. and lwn· 1·111111·s tl1is .l1·,11s :-.l11ff. Som• all go \\ ild. Y1·lliu. l1ooiu ..slrn11pi11 a11d t'al'· 1Yi11 1111. lk·all., 111 \\,1k1· 111 1· 111a11 i11 !Ill' l1oc1tl1 11p tl11•n• \\ 1111 11111sta \H'III 111 ,;lvq1 a111I p11l 1111 llw \\ r11ng 1v1·k B11t 110. t·am1• l11• lroll1 ·r dmrn lo slr11t 11p a11d 1h,·11 111· l11ni 1111' s1111111l 11p MJ \\ 1• n·all, e;11lta l111lh·r likt• t·raz� tu 1 •\ 1 • 11 llt' ar 01,r.. ,,•h1•, gnrnL \111 1 tl11· 111aln111 r,1p1·s 11ff 1111· d,ildr,•11 stT!io11 a11d llasl11 •s l ll 'r li�l1 1 all 11wr tlu• plav,• .11111 \\(' \('II SOllll' llllll"I' a11d '>Cllllt' kids slip 1111d,·r 1111 ' rnp1· :11111 11111 11p n11d do\\ 11 1111' aisl1· 111.,1 lo ,1111\\ it tak1• 1111ir1· tlra11 so1111• d11sh nl,- ,,·h,•1 r•1p1· l11 ti,• 11., tlo\\ 11. \11d 1'111 flingi11 tl1t• kid i11 front 111'11H•\ p11pt·nn1. \11d Ball\ la,1111 kid,i11 wals .. \11d it's n•,1lly s11111l'll1111. Tlll'11 l11·n· vo 1111 · 1111• l i ig :111d had 111aln11 1. 1111· 11111' tl1t•, II'! 0111 i11 1·as1• 111' 1•1111·rg1•111·,.. \11d sl11 • loti11 11,al llaslilii.d,t lik1· ,111· gn1111a 11,,. it 011 s11111t"l1111h. Tlds lll'n· ll11· t"olon•d 11 1atro11 Bra111h ;11111 lwr l'ri1 ·111b l'.tll Tl111111lnli1111s. Sl i t' d11 1101 pla�. Sli1• do 1101 s1111lt·. So \\1· ,11111 ll)l ,111d \lalcl r 1111' sh 11pli• ass pil'l11 n•. \\'l111·l r h 11111 ,11 sir11pl1· .is ii i, ,t11pid. ( a11,,• I n·ali1.1 • tl,at J11st ,1l io11I a11, l1rnh i11 111\ l'.1111ih h l11'lln tlra11 tl i i\ god 1111•, al\\ a,, lalk111 al in1 1t. \h dad1 h \\rn;ldllt 'il,111,l li1r 11olu>lh ln•alill .Ill\ ol' 11., tl r at \\;l\. \h lllilllla ,p1·t·iall:. ·\11d I l'.111111,1 \1'1' ii"'"'· Bi_� B11111d 11p 1111·1'1 ' 011 till' l'l'oss lalki11 lin11t Foq.?;h 1 • tl11•111 I >ad1h 1·.111"· 1111·, d111r't k111 1\\' \I l1 al 1111•, d1 1i11. .\11d 111, \la11 1a ,m ( ; I '! or1 do\\ 1 1 l'n1111 llll'n' \ 1111 l;iv, fool \\ l1ald1a 1l,i11l, tl,h L,. plmti11 1t-'.J .-\111 1 IH\ Dad1 h :1 ·1li 11 lo ( ;,:111ddad 1 h In g<'I 111111 a l,1tld,·r (',111:0.(' Bi� Brood al 'li11 tl11 · rooL Ids 111otl11 •r ,id1• ol tlll' L1111ih ,lio\\ i11 r q>. \11d 111, 111.1111.1 and l1t•r ,isl1•r Dais:, j11111pi11 011 ll1l'III 1\0111.tm l>l'.tli11 1111'11 1 \\lll1 ll1t·, prn·kl'll11u1k'i, ,\1111 1111111 ':t B11lilm 1t•lli11 1111•111 lolk, Oil tlw, k111 ·1•\ ti,,·, l idlt•r gl'I 11111 tl11· \\ a� a11d go gl'I so1111· ll l'lp or 1111•, �on, 111 �I'! lr.11llpl1·d 011 .\11 1 1 < :ra11dd.ul1 h \',tit· s,I\ i11 I .1·m 1 · tlll' 1,0\ .iln111' ii lltal 'i \\ lmt lw \\.1111, lo do ,dtl1 Iris lili• \\ t' airi'I e;ol 11oll r i11 to sm alio11t 0 60 TONICADEBAMBARA it. Then Aunt Daisy givin him a taste of that pocketbook, fussin hont what a damn fool old man Granddaddy is. Then everybody jmnpin in his chest like the time Uncle Clayton went in the army and come hack with only one leg and Gnmcklackly say somethin .stupid about that's life. Aud by this time Big Brood off the ('fOSS and in the park pinyin hamlhall or sk11lly or somethin. And the family in the kitchen thro\\in di.shes at eac:h other, scn•mnin hont if you hadn't done· this I wouldn't had to do that. And me in the parlor trying to de'> 1ny arith metic vellin Shut it off. \.\ll;ich is what I was yt•llin all hy myself which make me a sittin target for Th11nderb11ns. But when I yell We want our mom�y hack, that gets c\'cryhody in choms. And the movie windin np with this hea\'enly cloud music and the smart-ass np there in his hole in the wall tums up the sound again to drown us out. Then there conws Bugs Bunny which we already .seen so we know we been had. No )!;orilla my nnthin. And Big Brood .say Awwww sht-eet, w<-' goiu to see the manager aml get onr money hack. And I know from this we hn.si nes.s. So I bmsh the potato chips out of my hair which is wlwrt"' Baby Jason like to put em, ancl I march myself up the aisle to deal with the managn who is a crook in the first place for lyin ont there sayin Gmilla. My Looe pinyin. And I never did like the man cause he oily and pasty at the same time like the had )!;UY in the serial, the one that got a hideout behind a pnsh-lmtton hookc:ase and play "Moonlight Sonata.. with glows on. I knock on the door and I am fo rions. And I am alone, too. Cause Big Brood suddenly got to go so had even though my mama told ns bout )!;oin in them nasty hathroo111s. Ami I hear him sigh like he dis)!;nsted when he get to the door a11cl set• only a little kid them. An<l now I'm really f111io11s cause I get so tired grow1111ps messin over kids just cause thev little ancl can't takti em to court. What is it, he say to me like I lost my mitte;,s or wet on myself or am .somebody's retarded chil�I. vVlwn i11 reality I am the smartest kid P.S. I 8fi ever had iu its whole lifetime and von ean ,LX anybody. Even them teachers that don't like me cause I won't 'sing them Southern son)!;s or hack off when they tell me my questions are ont of' order. And cause my Mama coml' np there in a minute when them teachers shut playin the dozt�ns hehind colored folks. She stalk in with her hat pulled clown had and that P ersian lamh coat drapt•d hack over one hip on ac.·c.·01111t of' she got her fist phmtcd there so she can talk that talk which gets 11s all hnmotizecl, and tPadier he comi11 1111do11e cause she know this conic.I bl' her joh and lwr hehind canst• Mama got pnll with tlw Board and had hy lwr own s�lf anyhow. So I kick the door open wider and just walk right hy him and sit down and tell the 111a11 ahont himself and that I want my money hack aml that gm•s for Bahy Jason and Big Brood too. And he still trying to shullle me ont tlw door e\'ell though I'm sittin which shows him for the fool ht> is. Just like them t(-'ach <·rs do fore they realizt' Mama like a stone on that .spot and ain't hackin np. So he ai11't gettin np off the money. So I was forc:<�d to k•avt•, takin the matches from nnc.ler his ashtrnv. and St't a fire under the c:amly stand, which dost•d the raggedy ole Washingt<m down li.>I' a week. My Dad;ly hac.l the suspet't it was 111e canse Big Brood got a hig 111011th. But I <"'xplaiued right quick what the whole thin)!; was about aml I figured it was t'\'en-steven. Cause if yo11 say Go- Gorilla. My love I 61 rilla, My Love, you suppose to mean it. Just like wlwn yon say yon goin to give me a party on my bitthday. you gotta mean it. And if yon say me and Baby Ja son can go South pecan ha11lin with Grandclaclcly Vale, yon better not he comin up with no stuff about the weather look uncertain or did yon mop the bathroom or any other t1icldfied h11siness. I mean even g,mgsters in the mmies say My word is my bond. So don't nohody get away with nothin for as I'm conc(�111ed. So Daddy put his helt ha('k on. Cause that's the way I was raised. Like my Mmna say in one of them sitnatious when I won't hack clown, Okay Bnclhircl, yon right. Your point is well-taken. Not that Badbird my nam<\ just what she say when she tired arguin and know I'm right. And Aunt Jo, who is the hardest head in the family and worse even than Aunt Daisy, she sav, Yon absolutely tight Miss Muffin, ,�•hich also ain't my real name !mt.the mm�e she gave me one time when l got some medicine shot in my behind and w011kln't get np off her pillows for nothin. And even Granddaddy Vale-who got no memory to speak of, so sometime you can just plain lie to him, if you want to be like that-he sav, Well if that's what I said, then that's it. But this name business was clifler:nt they said. It wasn't like H11nca Bnhha had gone hack on his word or anything. Just that he was thinkin bout gettin married und was usin his real name now. Which ain't the wav I saw it ,lt all. So there I am in the navigator seat: And l tum to him an<l jnst plain ole itx him. l 111ea11 I come tight on out with it. No sense goin all around that ham the old folks talk ahout. And like my manta say, Hazel-which is my real name and what she remembers to call 111e when she bein se1io11s-when yo11 got some thin mt your 111i11d, speak up and let the chips fall where they may. And ii' any hody don't like it, tell em to come see your mama. Ami Daddy look up from the papc>r and say. You hear your mama good. Hazel. And tell em to come see me first. Like that. That's how I was raised. So I turn clear round in the navigator seat and say, "Look here, H 11nca Bnbha or Jefferson Windsong Val<· or whatt•vcr yom name is, you gonna nnmy this girl?" "Sun• am," he say, all g1fos. And I say. "Memher that time you was hahy-sittiu me when wt• lived at four-o-nine and there was this hig snow and Mama and Daddy got held np i11 the cmtllh)' so you had to stay fr>r two days?" And he say, "Sure do." "Well. Yo;, remember how yon told me I was the, cutest thing that ever walked the earth?" "Oh, you \\'f:'l'(• real ente when yon wert• little," lw say. which is suppose to he fi11111y. I am not la11ghin. "\Vl�II. Yon re111ember what vo11 said?" And Grancldacldy Vale s<p1h;·tin over the wheel anti ,t-.;in Which way. Scout. Bnt Scout is busy and don't care if wt• all get lost fi>r days. "\Vatcha mean. Peaches?" "My name is Hazel. Ami what I niea11 is you said �-011 ,wre goin); to IIHlfl�' me when I grew up. You were going to wait. Tliat:� what I mt'illl, my th�m· Un de Jefferson." Ami he clou't say nuthin. Just look at uw real strange like h<-' 62 TONI CADE BAMBARA m·n-r saw 11w hdim� in Iii<.•. Likt·' l1t• lost in some wdrcl town hi tilt' 111iddlt• of night ancl lookin for directions ancl there·s 110 011e to ask. Likt• it was rm• that messt•d up the maps and tunwd tlw road posts ro1111cl. "\\'<'II, yo11 said it, didn't you?" And Bahr Jason lookin ha<.'k am! l'mth lih· wt• pinyin pi11v;-p1111g. Only I ain't pla�·i11. 1'111 l111rtin and I ca11 ll('ar that I m11 scn•m11i11. And Cramhhuldy \'ak• rn111nhli11 how\\'(' IIP\cr g011n,1 gd to wh1•n• \\'t' goin if I don't turn aro1111d a11d takl:' 111y llil\'iWttor joli S< •t'iollS. "W1•ll, li,r t·ryi11 out lo11d, I laz1•l. �rnt Just a littl1• girl. :\11d I was .inst tl•asi11." .. · Aml I was j 11st t!'asin.' " I sav baek j 11st how lw said it so h, • eai I I u •ar what a lt·tTihll' thi11µ;· it is. Tht•11 I do;,·t Sil)' ·1111thin. And Ill' don't sa�· 1111tlii11. And Baby Jason do11't say 1111thi11 nohow. ThP11 Granddmld�, Val<• spt·ak 11p... Look lll'rt', Prt•tfo11s, it \\'as 1l1111L·a B11hha what told you tllt'111 things. This ltt•r<\ J1·t' fr·rso11 \\'inston \ 'al1·... And I I1111ca Buhim sa\', Tit at was srnm·. . "Tlrat :s right. hodv l'ISt'. rm a II('\\' SOllll'l,ody." ..:'(011 a lyi11 dawg." I say. wlu•11 I 111Pa11t to sav trt•,u:h(•rons dog. hut just couldn't J.!;<-'t hole! ol' tht• word. It slippt'd away fro111 till'. And I'm 1·1:ing and ernmpli11 down i11 tll<' s1•at and just do11't ean·. Ami C:nuuldadd�, say to hush and stt•ps mt tlw �as. Arni 1'111 losi11 111� h1•m'ins and don't 1•,·1•11 know wh(•n• to look on tlll' 111ap ea11s1· I t'tlll't s1•1• for c1:·i11. Ami Bah�· Jason 1·1:·i11 too. Ca11Sl' hl' is 111�' blood hrotl11·'l' and 1111dl'rsta11ds that wt• 11111st stkk togt•I IH'r or lw for. ('\t•r lost. what with �row1111ps pla�ill d1an)!;<·-11p and turnin you rouml 1•,·1·1y which Wll\'. so had. t\11(1 do11't ('\('II Sil\. the,·. SOIT\'. . Document 9: Toni Cade Bambara, "Gorilla, My Love" 1. What is Hazel's purpose in telling the story? How do you know? 2. How is the story organized? Describe the Hazel's train of thought and selection of events as plainly as you can. 3. Why do you think it's organized this way? How does this way of organizing the narrative serve the story's purpose? 4. Toni Cade Bambara elects to have Hazel narrate the story in the "vernacular"-the language common to her time, place, and culture. How does this decision relate to the overall intention of the story? 5. Do you think that Toni Cade Bambara has the same intention in writing the story as Hazel has in telling it? Why or why not? Stated another way: what is Bambara's purpose in writing the story? Make a claim and prove it using plenty of evidence from the text.