Civil Servants in the Romanian Public Administration

Volume XVI • No. 3 • Summer
Civil Servants in the Romanian Public
Administration from the Legal and Managerial
Point of View
Armenia Androniceanu,
Bogdan Nastase,
Public Administration and Public Management Department,
Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.
Legal Aspects
The legislation concerning civil servants has been constantly ammended
after the Revolution, in order to better
accommodate changes in the administrative structure – and to better respond to the challenges Romania had
to face as a state on its way to EU Accession – as well as a young Member
[continued on page 2] >
PA in CEE
Civil Servants in the Romanian PA / 1
Review of Activities
Calendar of Events / 5
NISPAcee news 3/2009
The main characteristics of the Romanian civil servants make for an
interesting case-study. The authors
present both the legal, as well as the
managerial aspects of the Romanian
civil service, in order to identify its
main strengths and weaknesses. The
methodology is based on empirical
research, public reports and legislative scanning. The results indicate
that for a young EU Member State
such as Romania, the HR capacity of
the public system needs to be increased – and that public administration reform represents a continuous
process, emphasising the need to
adapt the bureaucratic system to the
challenges of European integration.
Recent Publications / 8
NISPAcee Events
17th NISPAcee Annual Conference / 10
Civil Society Organisations in Kyrgyzstan / 17
NISPAcee Announcements
18th NISPAcee Annual Conference / 18
NISPAcee Journal / 19
Translations into CEE National Languages / 19
21
NISPAcee Membership / 20
Public Administration in CEE
>[continued from page 1]
State. Some of the most important
milestones are presented below.
The Statute of Civil Servants
was published in 1999 and represented a major step forward
for the civil service: it aimed to
ensure, in compliance with the
legal provisions, a stable, professional, transparent, efficient and
unbiased civil service, for the
benefit of citizens a well as that
of the authorities and public institutions in the central and local
public administration.
The local authorities awaited,
with much interest, the Local
Public Administration Law of
2001, which regulated the general regime of local autonomy,
as well as the organisation and
functioning of the local public
administration authorities.
In order to attract welltrained young people into the
public administration, a new
specific public function with
a special statute was created
in 2004, by Emergency Ordinance: that of public manager,
who benefited from a fast track
promotion system and from a
motivating level of salary. This
measure was considered to better answer the reform needs of
the public administration, having as a main target the creation
and development of a body of
professional and neutral public
servants, comparable with those
existing in the EU member state
countries.
At the same time, the importance of maintaining an updated
view on the body of civil servants was reflected in the Government adopting the decision regarding the professional record
of civil servants.
2
In 2004, a new law on administrative contentious was also
adopted, to better protect citizen
interest against abuse.
In 2004, the Parliament of
Romania adopted the law on
the Code of Conduct for Civil
Servants, regulating the general
norms of moral and professional
conduct compulsory for civil
servants. The Code was aimed at
securing an increase in the quality of the public service, a good
management with a view to best
serving public interests and to
contribute to the elimination of
bureaucracy and corruption in
the public administration sector.
Public confidence has represented a constant priority for the
Romanian Government: admitting the importance of forward
planning, the Government
regulated the management side
of the civil service (to be dealt
with in more detail in the next
sub-chapter), with administrative decisions such as the annual
Decision on the approval of the
Public Sector Ocupational Plan
or the Decision regarding the
organisation and development
of the civil servant’s career.
The legislative proposals envisaged by the Government deal
mainly with salary adjustments:
since 2009 is marked by the effects of the current crisis and is, at
the same time, an electoral year,
it seems that it is high time to
implement such measures as, for
instance, the long-awaited unitary and transparent pay-system.
Managerial Aspects
The management of civil servants is ensured in Romania by
the National Agency of Civil
Servants1. It was set up by the
Law on the Statute of civil servants as a specialised body of the
central public administration,
dealing with the management of
the civil service and civil servants. It is subordinated to the
Ministry of Administration and
Interior. The main objectives
of the Agency refer to drafting the legislative framework
1 http://www.anfp.gov.ro
concerning the civil service and
civil servants, monitoring and
controlling the enforcement of
regulations in the field, managing the programmes related to
the civil service, international cooperation and the civil servants’
national database management.
Civil servants are required
to undergo periodical training
programmes (usually every
year). The main partner in this
regard is the National Institute
of Administration (INA). INA
also provides training for future
public managers – or high-level
civil servants. As part of the
European administrative system, the Romanian civil servants
also visit international training
institutes such as the European
Institute of Public Administration in Maastricht. The European
Institute in Romania is also a
training provider, with core programmes focused on European
studies.
The civil servants have the
possibility to participate in trade
unions (eg. Sed Lex), in order
to better express their views on
draft legislative proposals in
particular – and to have their
interests better represented, in
general.
The Romanian Central Public
Administration
Civil servants work at all levels
of public administration, ensuring continuity and stability to
the overall functioning of the
administrative system. According to experience and education,
they are to be found working on
executive functions (referents,
counsellors), management functions (Directors, Heads of Unit)
– or as leading high civil servants (e.g. Secretaries-General). At
Government level, civil servants
work to ensure the application of
Romania’s national and foreign
policies. In order to exercise its
duties, the Government has at
its disposal an apparatus com-
Public Administration in CEE
posed of the General Secretariat
and departments with specific
attributions. Subordinated to the
Government administration are:
Ministries, as specialised
central public administration institutions. Various structures are
subordinated to the
ministries, e.g. agenFigure 1
cies and authorities.
Specialised public
administration institutions with connected activities:
Deconcentrated
public services, at
county (= ro. “judeţ”)
level
In 2007, in line with the
decentralisation process, 85 %
of civil service positions were
registered at local and territorial level (40 % at local level and
almost half of that total at territorial level).
total civil service. Only 31 % of
civil servants are men. Irrespective of the central or local level,
civil servants are mostly women
(more than 55 % in each case) and
permanent (80 %).
Civil servants are, by definition, apolitical.
However, political interference
represents one of
the main weak
points both at
local level and
the central level.
Whistleblowing
is still incipient
– as well as its
reglementation.
NISPAcee news 3/2009
Autonomous
The limits
bodies (=ro. “regii
Source: National Agency of Civil Servants 2007 Management Report.
imposed by law
autonome”), national
on the sources of
companies, public
revenue for civil
Share of civil service positions in
institutions which offer public
servants only allow them extrathe central and local civil adminservices, but are not part of the
work in academia – not in the
istration in Romania, 2007
central public administration;
private sector, defined as incomThe connection between the
Other specialised institutions
patible with the public function.
central and the local levels is enof the central public administraNonetheless, the external credits
sured by the prefecture institution.
tion, such as the agencies.
undertaken by the Government
The holder of this position was
from International Financing Ininitially politically named, ensurThe Romanian Local Public
stitutions (IFIs), such as the IMF,
ing the role of Government repAdministration
are increasing the downward
resentation in the territory. The
pressure on salaries. The personThe public authorities at local
prefect was apolitical over the
nel expenses are seen as one of
level have the following struclast years, belonging to the group
the most important shares of
ture:
of high-level civil servants. Since
public expenses. Another weak
2009, the prefect is again named
Elected local councils and
point for the civil service is the
politically. The prefect runs the
mayors chosen at community/
spectre of corruption. Since the
deconcetrated services. There
city level. They function as ausalaries remain low, the incentive
tonomous administrative author- are no subordination reports
to defect is high.
between prefects and mayors,
ities and they have attributions
Looking at the internal struccity councils, district councils and
directed at solving the problems
ture
of positions in the public
their
respective
presidents.
in the communes or cities.
administration, we shall see cleavDistrict councils – at “judeţ”
Strong Vs. Weak
ages that separate civil servants
level. These councils coordinate
Points of the Civil
from, for instance, contractual
the activities of the communal
positions – some with special
Service
and city councils, with a view to
statuses and privileges. Doubled
The level of education represents an
running public services at disby the internal division between
indicator of a system’s capacity to
trict level.
the “regular” civil servants and
cope with challenges. In central
The civil servants working in
“special” civil servants, such as
public administration, 8 out of 10
the local public administration
civil servants have a higher educa- the public managers, for inoffer expertise, as well as adminstance, these demarcation lines
tion, compared with 7 out of 10 at
istrative support (the secretary is
contribute to a problematic work
the territorial level – and with a
one of the key stakeholders in all
atmosphere, both at the local
mere 3 out of 10 at the local level.
local communities).
and central level, since the work
The gender balance is in favour of
to be done is sometimes similar,
women, with 69 % in 2007 of the
3
Public Administration in CEE
irrespective of the position occupied by a person – be it civil
servant or contractual agents.
Taking age into account, we
have, on the one hand, the
increased salary and expertise,
whilst on the other hand, pressure to retire. The most successful teams of civil servants involve a mixture of youth, dynamism, energy and enthusiasm,
with an input of experience,
calm and know-how.
Current
Opportunities for the
Civil Service
In Romania, public administration has the fundamental role of
mediating between public and
private interest. On its way to
EU accession, Romania has faced
not only the need to adapt its
economic system (processes), but
also its administrative system
(structures). After accesstion, the
opportunities created by the current financial crisis include the
possibility of taking advantage
of lower prices to re-engineer the
public information management
systems. Another recent opportunity has come from the necessity to keep civil servants motivated: due to the budget deficit,
the Romanian Government had
to take drastic measures to cut
off costs at the beginning of 2009
(including blocking the approximately 15 % vacant positions). One of these measures
was the decrease in the number
of weightings. The 75 % weighting of the civil servants working
with European funds was targeted. A potential solution could be
found in financing this incentive
from the Technical Assistance
funds destined to public administration, therefore relieving the
pressure on the state budget.
4
Between 2007 and 2013, 208
million euros have been allocated
to Romania for the Operational
Programme Development of Administrative Capacity, through
the European Social Fund. Taking into account that the national
co-financing needed is only 2 %
per project – and that up to 98 %
of the eligible expenses may be
covered from structural funds,
public institutions may develop
integrated projects, in order to
better answer common needs
that neighbouring administrative units are facing.
Conclusions
Becoming an EU Member State
has meant that Romania has
translated the European principles into its legislation. As a
consequence, the priority is now
to develop apolitical managerial
mechanisms oriented towards
development. At local level, this
translates into establishing the
mechanisms which stimulate
regional development. The civil
servants play an important role
in this process: they represent
the stability and continuity element in the public system, going
beyond political debate.
The public perception of
civil servants is still affected by
inherited cliches, many of them
negative. As a suggestion, a
strong, effective communication
campaign aimed at presenting
the exact role of the civil servants
in society could result in a more
realistic image of the civil service,
benefitting both public administration and the final beneficiaries:
the citizens themselves.
Changes are still needed in
the Romanian public organisations in order to increase their
human resources capacity for
supporting the reform processes.
Nevertheless, the Romanian
public administration has taken
the initial steps in the direction
of a functioning, citizen-oriented
administration, in line with the
general principles of the European administrative system. With
the introduction of a Civil Servants’ Status, a Code of Conduct
for the Civil Servants, as well as
other executive decisions targeted and an improved efficiency of
the outputs, Romania has gained
in the overall quality of the administrative process.
Bibliography
Books:
1. Androniceanu, Armenia. 2004.
Management Public Internaţional,
Ed. Economică.
2. Hofstede, Geert. 2005. Cultures
and Organizations, Software of
the Mind (2nd, revised edition).
McGraw-Hill.
3. Peters, B. Guy. 1999. Institutional
theory in political science, London:
Wellington House.
4. Pollitt, Christopher, 2005. Performance or compliance ?, Oxford
University Press.
Articles:
1. Năstase, Bogdan. 2008. The waterdrop principle or about the
management of EU Law implementation, in Quality – Access to
Success, year 9, no. 93, p. 92–95.
2. Page, Edward. 1997. Bureaucracy and the EU, in People who
run Europe, Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
3. Pierson, Paul. 1996. The new
institutionalism and EC Governance: the promise and limits of
institutional analysis, in Governance, Vol.9, No.4.
Legislation:
• Law No 188 of December 8, 1999
– updated – The Statute of Civil
Servants.
• Other relevant legislation on
civil servants.
Official reports:
• 2004–2007 reports of the National Agency of Civil Servants.
• 2007 IRSOP survey on civil service.
Internet:
http://www.gov.ro
http://www.anfp.gov.ro
http://www.ase.ro/cicmp
http://www.eipa.nl
Review of Activities
Calendar of Events
July 4–11, 2009, Summer School
“Cultural Dimensions of Politics in Europe 2009”
Place: Prague, Czech Republic
Organiser:
Center for Public Policy
Language: English
Contact:
phone: +420 739 569 045,
fax: +420 281 930 584,
e-mail: cdpe@cpvp.cz,
web: http://www.cdpe.cpvp.cz
July 05–12, 2009, The 6 DRC
(Danube Rectors’ Conference)
Summer School on Regional
Co-operation:
th
July 5–10, 2009, Summer School
“Model Based Public Planning,
Policy Design, and Management: a System Dynamics approach”
Place: Ustica (Palermo, Italy)
Contact:
Carmine Bianchi,
e-mail: bianchi@unipa.it,
phone: +39.091.587400,
web: www.ced4.it
July 6–18, 2009, 5th International
Jean Monnet Summer School
July 11–21, 2009, The European
Summer School 2009 (ESS 2009)
“TransAtlantic Relations from
the Perspective of Central Europe”
Place: Prague, Czech Republic
Organiser:
The EUROPEUM Institute for
European Policy
associated with the Jean Monnet
Centre of Excellence in European
Studies at the Faculty of Social
Sciences of Charles University
Language: English
Contact:
e-mail: ess2009@europeum.org,
web: http://www.europeum.org/
ess2009/ess.php
July 20–25, 2009, Central and
Eastern Europe Twenty Years
After
Place: Vama Veche, Romania
Organiser:
The Luxembourg Institute for
July 29 – August 15, 2009, 4th
ECPR Summer School in Methods and Techniques
Place:
Ljubljana, Republic of Slovenia
Organiser:
European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), the University of Ljubljana
Language: English
Contact:
ECPR Central Services,
University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park,
Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ,
UK,
e-mail: ecpr@essex.ac.uk,
web: http://www.essex.
ac.uk/ecpr/events/
summerschools/ljubljana/
index.aspx
August 24–27, 2009,
Summer School – Data
Modeling and Analysis
for e-Governance
Language: Bulgarian;
English
Place: Sofia, Bulgaria
Contact:
Prof. Roumiana Tsankova,
Sofia, Technical University, Faculty
of Management,
e-mail: rts@tu-sofia.bg,
Assist. Prof. Nadia Gilina
e-mail: ngilina@yahoo.com
August 24–30, 2009, JM-CETRO
Summer School 2009. The
Domestic Europeanization of
Labour Market and Employment Policies: Effects, Mechanisms and Actors in the process
of institutional change
Place: Oldenburg, Germany
NISPAcee news 3/2009
“Regime Change and Transitions across the Danubian
Region: 1989–2009”
Place: Budapest, Hungary
Organiser:
The Institute for the Danube Region and Central
Europe (IDM), Vienna,
IDResearch Ltd (IDR),
Pécs, the Eötvös Loránd
University (ELTE) in Budapest and the Faculty of
Humanities of the University of Pécs
Language: English
Contact:
Mr. Zoltán Vörös,
IDResearch Ltd.,
phone: +36-30-867-1955,
fax: +36-72-522-624,
e-mail: voros@idresearch.hu,
web:
http://www.drcsummerschool.eu
“International Environment and
European Integrations”
Language: English
Place: Rijeka (Croatia)
Contact:
Prof. Vinko Kandžija,
Faculty of Economics,
University of Rijeka, Croatia,
phone: +385-51-355100,
fax:. +385-51-675750,
e-mail: kandzija@efri.hr
European and International
Studies (LIEIS), the Black Sea
University Foundation, the European Cultural Centre
Language: English
Contact:
Mrs. Maria Burs-Popescu,
European Cultural Centre,
Bucharest, Romania,
phone: +4021-6508145,
+4021-6503280,
fax: +4021-6503280,
e-mail: cti@clicknet.ro
5
Review of Activities
Organiser:
The Jean Monnet Centre for Europeanisation and Transnational
Regulations Oldenburg (CETRO)
Language: English
Contact:
Sascha Zirra,
e-mail:
sascha.zirra@uni-oldenburg.de,
web: http://www.cetro.unioldenburg.de/en/38590.html
August 30- September 13, 2009,
Minority Politics and Minority Conflicts in Eastern Europe
from the 19th to the 21st Centuries
Place: Hannover, Germany
Organiser:
Leibniz Universität Hannover
Summer Academy
Language: English
Contact:
Prof. Dr. Malte Rolf,
Dr. Sören Philipps,
Leibniz University of Hannover,
Germany,
phone: +49 (0)511-762-4201,
+49 (0)511-762-19164,
fax: +49 (0)511-762-3128,
+49 (0)511 762-19185,
e-mail:
malte.rolf@hist.uni-hannover.de,
s.philipps@ipw.uni-hannover.de,
web: http://www.hist.uni-hannover.
de/sommerakademie/minderheitenin-osteuropa
September 10–13, 2009, Twenty
Years after the Fall of the Berlin
Wall: The Politics of Memory
and Democratization in Europe
Place: Riga, Latvia
Organiser: The Advanced Social
and Political Research Institute at
the University of Latvia
Language: English
Contact:
Dr. Timofey Agarin,
Riigiteaduste Instituut, Tartu,
Estonia,
phone: +372 5637 5543m,
e-mail: conferenceASPRI@lu.lv
6
September 17–19, 2009, 20 Years
of Transition in Central and
Eastern Europe: Money, Banking and Financial Markets
Place: London, UK
Organiser:
London Metropolitan Business
School
Language: English
Contact:
Liz Caswell,
London Metropolitan Business
School, London Metropolitan
University,
phone: +44 020 7133 3868,
fax: +44 020 7133 3899,
e-mail: CICMConference2009@
londonmet.ac.uk,
web: http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/
lmbs/research/cicm/cicm-conference/
cicmconference_home.cfm
September 24–26, 2009, Conference “16th Days of Slovene
Administration – Crisis as Challenge and Opportunity for the
Reforms of Public Administration”
Language: Slovene/English
Place: Portoroz, Slovenia
Contact:
Marija Sušnik,
e-mail: marija.susnik@fu.uni-lj.si,
web: http://www.fu.uni-lj.si
September 25–26, 2009, The 4th
Symposium on European Issues: What Will Be ? Analysis
and Visions for Europe
Place: Klagenfurt, Austria
Organiser:
The Department of Sociology at
the University of Klagenfurt
Language: English
Contact:
Josef Langer,
Karen Meehan,
Alpen-Adria-Universität
Klagenfurt,
phone: +43 (0)463-2700-3402,
fax: +43 (0)463-2700-993402,
e-mail:
josef.langer@uni-klu.ac.at,
karen.meehan@uni-klu.ac.at,
web: http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/
sozio/bilder/SYMPOCall2009x.pdf
October 7–10, 2009, Second
Euro-Mediterranean Dialogue
on Public Management
Languages: English, French
Date and Place:
7–10 October 2009, PortorozPiran, Slovenia
Contact:
Fabienne Maron,
phone: + 32 2 536 08 84,
fax: + 32 2 537 97 02,
e-mail: f.maron@iias-iisa.org,
web: www.med-2009.com
October 12–16, 2009, Incorporating Diversity into the Teaching of Public Administration
– Course Innovation Session
for teachers in higher education
and trainers in relevant fields,
particularly from the former
Soviet Union, Mongolia, SouthEastern Europe
Language: English
Place:
Central European University
(CEU), Budapest, Hungary
Deadline: September1, 2009
Contact:
Curriculum Resource Center,
Central European University,
Budapest, Hungary,
phone: +36-1-327 3189
+36-1-327 3000,
fax: +36-1-327 3190,
e-mail: crc@ceu.hu
web: www.ceu.hu/crc, http://lgi.osi.
hu/documents.php?id=2597
October 17–18, 2009, 1989–2009:
The East European Revolutions
in Perspective
Place: London (University of
London Union), UK
Organiser:
Debatte. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe
Language: English
Contact:
Gareth Dale,
e-mail: gareth.dale@brunel.ac.uk,
web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/
journals/pdf/conferences/cdeb_08.
pdf
November 3–4, 2009, Europe
Twenty Years after the Fall of
the Berlin Wall: Overcoming
“East and West”
Place: Wellington, New Zealand
Organiser:
National Centre for Research on
Review of Activities
Europe, University of Canterbury, Christchurch; Victoria University of Wellington; Australasian Association for Communist
and Post-Communist Studies;
New Zealand European Union
Centres Network, and New
Zealand Institute of International
Affairs, Wellington
Language: English
Contact:
John Leslie, Political Science,
Victoria University,
e-mail: john.leslie@vuw.ac.nz,
web: http://www.eucnetwork.org.
nz/activities/conference/index
November 19–20, 2009, International Conference “Public
Administration: New Developments and Global View”
Organiser:
Public Administration Academy
of the Republic of Armenia
Contact:
e-mail: aspa@nt.am
November 23–24, 2009, 20 Years
of Transformation in the Region
of Central and Eastern Europe
Place: Lodz, Poland
November 16–17, 2009, 20th anniversary of the Velvet Revolution
– International Conference
Place:
Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Organiser:
Nation’s Memory Institute
Language:
Slovak, Czech, and English
Contact:
Peter Balun,
Ustav pamati naroda, Bratislava,
Slovak Republic,
phone: +421 2 593 00 338,
e-mail:
konferencia.november1989@upn.
gov.sk,
web: http://www.upn.gov.sk/
aktuality/20th-anniversaryof-the-velvet-revolution-internationalconference
Events of the Faculty
of Economics and
Administration, Masaryk
University, Brno, Czech
Republic
Language: English
Courses in autumn semester
2009:
Transformation of the Public
Sector
Contact:
Dr. Robert Jahoda,
e-mail: jahoda@econ.muni.cz
Economic Aspects of the Transition Process
Contact:
Assoc. Prof. Libor Žídek,
e-mail: zidek@econ.muni.cz
Impacts of the Transformation
on the Regional Development
of the Czech Republic
Contact:
Dr. Vladimír Žítek,
e-mail: zitek@econ.muni.cz
Events of the Faculty
of Economics and
Administration,
University of Pardubice,
Pardubice, Czech
Republic
Language: Czech, English
Special e-learning courses in
Moodle system in autumn semester:
Human Resources Management
in Public Sector
Project management for Local
Administration
Contact:
Dr. Jan Stejskal
e-mail: jan.stejskal@upce.cz
Events of the Hague
Academy for Local
Governance, The
Netherlands
July 6–9, 2009, Special Course:
Decentralisation and Local Governance
Language: English
NISPAcee news 3/2009
November 5–7, 2009, Post-Communism and the New European
Identity
Place: Oradea, Romania
Organiser:
The Research Centre on Identity and Migration Issues of the
Faculty of Political Science and
Communication, University of
Oradea
Language: English
Contact:
e-mail: contact@e-migration.ro,
web: http://e-migration.ro/AboutRCIMI-Conference.php
Organiser:
Department of Political Systems,
Political Studies Institute, Faculty
of International and Political
Studies of the University of Lodz
Language:
Polish, English and Russian
Contact:
Dr Michał Słowikowski,
Dr Maciej Potz,
e-mail:
slowik@mnc.pl;
maciekpotz@hotmail.com,
web: http://www.wsmip.uni.lodz.pl/
KSP/ksp.html
7
Review of Activities
Contact:
Emmely Benschop,
phone: +31-70-373 8695,
fax: +31-70-373 8660,
e-mail: info@thehagueacademy.com,
web: www.thehagueacademy.com
September 8–11, 2009, Special
Course: City Diplomacy
Language: English
Contact:
Emmely Benschop,
phone: +31-70-373 8695,
fax: +31-70-373 8660,
e-mail: info@thehagueacademy.com,
web: www.thehagueacademy.com
September 20–25, 2009, Special
Course: How to Use the Power
of Your Citizens ?
Language: English
Contact:
Suzanne Jansen,
phone: +31-70-373 8695,
fax: +31-70-373 8660,
e-mail: info@thehagueacademy.com,
web: www.thehagueacademy.com
November 19–20, 2009, Special
Course: Masterclass Municipal
International Cooperation for
Dutch Municipalities
Language: Dutch
Contact:
Marlies de Jong,
phone: +31-70-373 8695,
fax: +31-70-373 8660,
e-mail: info@thehagueacademy.com,
web: www.thehagueacademy.com
Seminars of the European
Institute of Public
Administration (EIPA),
Maastricht, Netherlands
September 14–15, 2009, Transformational Government: Reducing Administrative Burden
Place: Maastricht
September 17–18, 2009, Working
with Impact Assessment in the
EU
Place: Maastricht
8
September 21–22, 2009, The
New Relationship with our
Neighbours: A Practical Guide
to the European Neighbourhood
Policy
Place: Maastricht
Recent
Publications
September 23–25, 2009, Developing the Project Pipeline for
EU Structural Funds
Place: Maastricht
Public Integrity: Theories and
Practical Instruments
September 28–30, 2009, Tutorial:
Project Cycle Management:
A Technical Guide
Place: Maastricht
September 28–29, 2009, Practical
Tools for National Implementation: Implementation of EU
Policies at National Level
Place: Luxembourg
September 29 – October 1, 2009,
Introductory and Practitioners Seminar: European Public
Procurement Rules, Policy and
Practice
Place: Maastricht
October 5–7, 2009, Public Private
Partnerships (PPP) – Practitioners’ Workshop: Making PublicPrivate Partnerships Work – A
Practical Guide
Place: Maastricht
October 15–16, 2009, State Aid
Policy and Practice in the European Community – An Integrative and Interactive Approach
Place: Maastricht
October 15–16, 2009, Supporting the Programme Monitoring
Committees in EU Structural
Funds
Place: Maastricht
October 22–23, 2009, Understanding Decision-Making in
the European Union: Principles,
Procedures and Practice
Place: Maastricht
Contact:
Ms Joyce Groneschild,
e-mail: j.groneschild@eipa-nl.com,
web: www.eipa.eu
Editors:
Patrycja J. Suwaj, Hans J. Rieger
Publisher: NISPAcee
Resume:
Different theories, mechanisms
and instruments supporting
public integrity have been put
forward in this book. The book
collects different approaches to
public integrity for better understanding of the concept, ideas,
mechanisms and instruments
supporting public integrity.
The book contains collective
work and findings within the
NISPAcee Working Group on
Integrity.
Contact: NISPAcee
Civil Service Training Systems
in the Western Balkans Region
Publisher: ReSPA, 2008
Language: English
Resume:
This publication provides a comparative overview of the Civil
Service Training Systems in the
Western Balkans, including Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo (under
UNSCR 1244/99).
Review of Activities
Restrictions of Cross-Border
Services between Austria
and Slovenia – An Economic
Assessment of the Existing
Market Regulations.
Sustainability of Civil Service
Reforms in Central and
Eastern Europe Five Years
After EU Accession.
Authors:
Thomas Döring, Birgit Aigner
Publisher:
Carinthia University of Applied
Sciences, School of Public Management.
Price: 14,50 EUR
Language: German
Resume:
The survey asks for the economic
usefulness of the restrictions of
cross-border service activities
between Austria and Slovenia.
To be able to provide an answer to this question, the topic
is analyzed in four steps: First,
the expected welfare effects of
cross-border service restrictions
will be outlined by discussing the
impact of such regulations on the
efficient allocation of resources
as well as the pace of economic
change. Therefore, theoretical
and empirical insights concerning
the economic effects of international trade with services will be
considered. Secondly, the survey
analyzes the empirical situation
of cross-border trade of goods
and services between Austria and
Slovenia in order to argue that
Austria realizes a “double dividend” with respect to the existing
regulatory system. In part three,
the question is asked to what
extend a complete liberalization
of cross-border services would
affect Austrian regions economically, if one takes into account
the geographical limited market
radius of the currently regulated
service industries. Finally, the
status quo analysis of the existing
restrictions of cross-border services between Austria and Slovenia
provides a background to derive
policy recommendations concerning the onward handling of
these restrictions.
Contact: Marika Gruber,
phone: +43-5/90500-1239,
Publisher: Sigma 2009
Language: English
Resume:
This paper examines the fate of
civil service reforms that Central
and Eastern European (CEE)
countries undertook to prepare
themselves for the EU accession
that took place in May 2004 (5th
EU enlargement).
Distribution:
free of charge on Sigmaweb
(www.sigmaweb.org/papers).
Attractiveness of Civil Service
in the Western Balkans.
Publisher: ReSPA 2009
Language: English
Resume:
This publication provides a
comparative overview of the
Attractiveness of Civil Service
in the Western Balkans– salaries and other motivation tools,
including in Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Croatia, the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia.
Distribution:
free of charge on ReSPAweb
(www.respaweb.eu).
fax: +43-5/90500-1210,
e-mail: m.gruber@fh-kaernten.at,
web: www.fh-kaernten.at.
English-Russian Glossary
of Terms and Concepts
in Polisy Analysis, Public
Administration and Public
Economics.
Editor: Oleksandr Kiliievych
Language: Russian
Resume:
The glossary is the first publication of its kind in the Russian language. It is also a unique resource
for those who know only English,
since it brings together in one
volume the concepts and terms
used in policy analysis, public administration and public economics. The glossary will facilitate an
understanding of these fields by
actors in government, civil society, universities and international
organizations. Public policy is a
new field in the countries of the
former Soviet Union and Russian terminology has yet to be
established and standardized.
Although there have been many
seminars on public policy as a
result of donor activity, their effectiveness has been constrained
because translators have difficulty in rendering English language
terms into Russian. By clarifying
the meaning of terms, this work
facilitates a discussion of substance. The glossary defines some
2,500 terms and concepts and
cites examples of their usage in
authoritative texts. This contextualizing of the terms and concepts
gives the reader a better grasp of
their meaning. Over 130 sources
are used. In addition, there is an
English-Russian, Russian-English
dictionary of over 3,000 terms.
The extensive preface discusses
some of the difficult terminological issues.
Orders:
Merim Razbaeva,
e-mail:
merim.razbaeva@ucentralasia.or
NISPAcee news 3/2009
Distribution: free of charge on
ReSPAweb:
http://www.respaweb.eu/index.
php?option=com_remository&It
emid=111&func=select&id=61.
9
NISPAcee Events
The NISPAcee 17th Annual Conference
State and Administration in a Changing World
May 14–16, 2009, Budva, Montenegro
Montenegro, representative
of the Municipality of Budva,
Adrian Ionescu, LGI/OIS, Budapest, Hungary, Allan Rosenbaum, IASIA President, Florida
Internatioanl University, Miami,
USA, and Jacek Czaputowicz,
Director of the National School
of PA, Warsaw, Poland. The
keynote presentation was made
by B. Guy Peters, University of
Pittsburgh, USA and Attila Agh,
Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
The 17th NISPAcee Annual
Conference, organised in cooperation with the Government
of the Republic of Montenegro,
the Human Resources Management Authority, was attended
by more then 260 participants
from 40 countries from all over
the world. This included 20 CEE
countries covered by NISPAcee’s
institutional membership.
NISPAcee would like to
thank the local organisers, the
Human Resource Management
Authority of the Government
of Montenegro, represented by
its Director, Svetlana Vukovic,
Jadranka Djurkovic and other
colleagues, for the excellent
organisation of the conference,
financial support and the preparation of various social events,
which created a very convivial
and pleasant background for
conference participants.
10
NISPAcee would also like to
thank the Local Government and
Public Service Reform Initiative
affiliated with the Open Society
Institute, Budapest, Hungary
which financially supported the
meetings of several working
groups and contributed to the
success of the conference.
We also would like to extend our appreciation to the
programme coordinators of
each of the conference sessions
and working groups for their
contribution to the high scientific and academic value of the
entire event.
The conference began with
welcoming and opening speeches presented by Gyorgy Jenei,
NISPAcee President, Corvinus
University
of Budapest,
Budapest,
Hungary,
Jusuf Kalamperovic,
Minister of
Internal Affairs and PA,
Montenegro,
Svetlana Vukovic, Director of the Human Resource
Management
Authority
of the Government of
The morning plenary session
was concluded with a presentation of the NISPAcee Alena
Brunovska Award for Teaching
Excellence in Public Administration to Prof. Mirko Vintar,
University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia who delivered a paper “Public Administration and
IT: Is it time to get married ?”.
The following part of the
conference programme consisted
of working sessions on the main
conference theme, general sessions, meetings of seven working groups and Panel Sessions
and Forums, which enriched the
NISPAcee Events
ference programme. The overall
objectives are the presentation
of different projects and relevant
activities, as well as enabling and
facilitating an exchange of views,
experiences and good practices
among participants, institutions
and countries.
General Session
Chairs:
Mzia Mikeladze, Caucasus University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Gyorgy Jenei, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest,
Hungary.
programme of the conference
with new information, a presentation of new initiatives and new
opportunities for collaboration
with external organisations as
well as with NISPAcee.
The NISPAcee Business
Meeting was also, as usual,
on the conference programme.
The annual reports (activities,
finances) and future plans were
presented to representatives of
NISPAcee’s members and other
participating guests.
The closing plenary session
was opened by Stanka SetnikarCankar and reports from all
sessions and working groups
(for a short summary see below)
were presented. The NISPAcee
MERIT AWARD was presented
to Tiina Randma-Liiv, Estonia,
The Award for NISPAcee’s
Best Graduate Student Paper
was presented to the winner
Mr. Catalin Daniel Dumitrica,
Romania, PhD student at the
National School of Political Studies and Public Administration,
Romania for his paper “Building
a Metropolitan Area Model for
the Romanian Administrative
Space”.
Report of Panels and
Forums
Several panel sessions and
forums were included in the con-
NISPAcee news 3/2009
The election of new NISPAcee
Steering Committee members
was an important part of the
programme. To replace Sergei
Pushkarev, Russia who had completed his term on the Steering
Committee, the General Assembly elected new NISPAcee Steering Committe member, Jacek
Czaputowicz, Director of the
National School of PA, Warsaw,
Poland and also re-elected Mzia
Mikeladze, Caucasus University, Tbilisi, Georgia for the next
period.
Juraj Nemec, Slovakia, Laszlo
Vass, Hungary and Mirko Vintar, Slovenia, for their substantive contributions to NISPAcee’s
devlopment.
Eight presentations were submitted in the framework of the
General Session. Due to the
specifics of this Session, a wide
scope of issues were covered.
Out of eight, four were devoted
to the Romanian context. Discussions were held on some of
the drawbacks of the Romanian
legislation regarding public
management education. Another
paper was devoted to the school
aged population of Romania and
what needs to be done in order
to increase their enrolment in
schools. The notion of corporate social responsibility was
discussed for Romanian public
institutions and it was concluded
that this notion is vague whilst
pursuing narrow and very specific goals by these institutions.
One paper analysed to what degree social policies of the Romanian government are presented
in the written press. An interesting presentation was made on a
corporate study of the Austrian
and Hungarian tax systems. Despite the similarities between the
tax laws of these two countries,
decision-makers in Hungary and
Austria took different paths to
address current challenges. A
critical analysis of these paths
was undertaken. Two papers
regarding the Bulgarian public administration reforms and
relationship between Bulgarian
11
NISPAcee Events
municipalities were presented.
Another paper addressed the
general issue of migration within
the EU.
Panel on Health
Care, Reforms and
Implementation
country reforms for next year’s
meeting in Warsaw. This protocol will also be sent to experts
in other countries not present at
the meeting, in order to create a
broader base for co-operation in
research.
programmes, in particular, can
influence the changing of the
human resources behaviour for a
more ethical one and how the results could be measured in time.
The panel served as an exchange
of the best practice experiences
The panel also improved
linkages between NISPAcee and
the International Political Science
Association’s Research Committee 25 on Comparative Health
Policy.
with practitioners and engaged
scholars for setting up an integrated action plan containing the
most successful actions and institutions from different countries
in the fight against corruption.
Panel on Integrity in Local
Authority Areas
Panel on Policy Analysis
Development Issues
Chairs:
Armenia Androniceanu, Bucharest Academy of Economic
Stuides, Bucharest, Romania.
Thomas Wurm, DBB Akademie,
Bonn, Germany.
Moderator:
David Elder, Queen’s University,
Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Chair:
Valeriy Tertychka, National
Academy of Public Administration, Office of the President of
Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Chairs:
Juraj Nemec, University of Matej
Bel, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia.
James Bjorkman, Institute of
Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands.
Health care, its reforms and implementation are crucial topics
for every country in Central and
Eastern Europe. Therefore, during its 2009 conference, NISPAcee organised a panel on Health
Care, Health Reforms and Implementation. Its primary goal was
to compare the processes and
outcomes of health reforms in
the CEE region, including explanations for their successes and
failures.
As agreed by consensus,
health care reforms in Central Europe deliver planned
outcomes and results only on
a limited scale. There are no
effective tools and measures to
improve the Central European
region where governance and
public policy still need to reach
international standards. A Czech
paper, for example, noted that
only one Czech government had
provided the requisite implementation capacities. Finding the
‘right balance’ between market
incentives and government regulation within different country
conditions is another challenge
for CEE countries. Obvious cost
containment measures, such as
co-payments, have been ‘vetoed’
by voters in Hungary, the Czech
Republic and Slovakia.
12
After the panel, the coordinators provided all participants
with a draft research protocol to
help them to develop studies of
Panel discussions focused on
the ethical dimension of the
public policy process, decentralisation’s impact on the corruption phenomenon in public
administration, the ethics from
the socio/cultural perspective
and other subjects raised by the
participants. During the discussions the participants attempted
to identify how education, in
general, or the special training
The Panel heard presentations
from Ukraine, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Canada. The presentations and the following
discussions maintained the dual
perspectives of policy analysis
as a Government/State function
and policy analysis as an academic discipline.
NISPAcee Events
During the discussions, there
had been an underlying theme
of following up on the 2009
discussion, developing a focus
for further discussions and setting out a workplan. The panel
did not come to a firm proposal
for such a workplan for 2010,
but did set some possible directions, all within an over-riding
goal of institutionalisation of
the panel as a Working Group,
the principal purpose of which
would be to allow for discussing and sharing experiences on
the use of policy analysis within
governments and the teaching
and training of policy analysis
in academic and governmental institutions, and to give an
opportunity for participants
to highlight achievements of
policy analysis as an academic
discipline and its value within
states/governments.
The areas for possible future
work are:
2.Policy analysis – where it is
carried out.
• Inside government – Policy
Analysis Groups, Ministries and Agencies, Centre
of Government
• Outside government –
think tanks, academic
institutions. This would
allow for presentations on
country case studies.
3.Policy analysis – definition of
concepts.
Chairs:
Juraj Nemec, Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia.
B. Guy Peters, University of
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
United States.
There were three panels addressing the issues of the main theme
of the Conference – State and
Administration in a Changing
World. The papers in these panels covered a variety of themes
concerning the changing role of
the State and public administration in governing. There was a
strong emphasis on the need for
reform, and the difficulties of
reforming, in the papers. One
pervasive theme was “good
governance” and the need to
eliminate corruption in order to
create effective States. Another
important theme was the diffusion of ideas about governing,
and using those ideas to motivate reform.
Reports of Working
Groups
Working Group on Local
Government
Coordinators:
Gabor Soos, Tocqueville
Research Center, Budapest,
Hungary.
Markku Temmes, University of
Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
This WG focused on the problems and challenges of cityregions, metropolitan areas
and capital cities. This focus
turned out to be important and
interesting in the CEE environment. City-regions have increasing importance as engines in
the development of a global
economy. In some presentations,
there were interesting examples
of the models with which CEE
countries are supporting their
metropolitans to catalyse national economic development.
City-regions also represent the
marvellous historical heritage
of European urban culture. The
CEE area and Central Asia are
full of interesting city-regions
with a long history of urbanisation. Several presentations tackled the challenges and threats
of urbanisation and the national
models to steer development in
former communist countries.
The WG concentrated on
three sub-themes to cover cityregion development issues –
development, governance and
decentralisation problems. The
WG plans to continue its work
in the next conference by focusing on the local impacts and
challenges of the global crisis.
The WG is planning a publication around city-region themes
in the CEE environment. The
working title could be The Urban
CEE. The idea is to describe and
analyse urban development in
the transition environment. The
presentations at the Budva conference will provide a solid basis
for this kind of publication. The
content of the publication will be
finalised during the summer of
2009. Depending on the results
of the presentations at the next
conference, the WG has plans
to produce a second publication
concerning the impacts of the
economic crisis on local government in the CEE countries.
Working Group on
E-Government
Coordinators:
Ignace Snellen, University of
Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ljupčo Todorovski, University of
Ljubljana, Slovenia.
The main theme of this year’s
working group meeting was the
establishment of a NISPAcee
learning platform on e-government. The platform represents a
common framework for facili-
NISPAcee news 3/2009
1.Study of policy analysis
through various forms of
policy documents (which can
be adapted for use in teaching):
• Policy Memorandum
• Green Paper
• White Paper
• Regulatory Impact Assessment/Regulatory Impact
Analysis Statement
• Briefing Notes (Information
Notes, Decision Notes)
Report of Working
session on the Main
Conference Theme
13
Review of Activities
tating a more formal exchange
of best practices in the use of
information and communication technologies in the public
of country-level development
of e-government, and yet another session to applications of
knowledge management tech-
posts. Afterwards there was the
heavily discussed topic of the
next presentations regarding a
project description on HR and
training aspects. The discrepancy between training needs and
training offers were discussed,
as well as the question of the privatisation of training for public
servants and the sustainability of
reforms and the speed of change
in the reform processes.
The working group will continue next year with the priority
being HR policy and instruments, based on the expectations
and topical needs of the group.
Working Group on PA
Reform in CEE CA
Coordinators:
Veronica Junjan
Michiel S. de Vries
14
sector, where the transfer of
knowledge can be monitored,
documented, and evaluated.
The platform can also facilitate
a comparative analysis of good
practices that would go beyond
single country borders. With
the call for papers for this year’s
meeting, a process was initiated to establish the learning
platform by soliciting an initial
set of candidate showcases to be
considered for inclusion in the
learning platform. The authors
of the 12 papers who attended
the meeting come from seven
countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Turkey). The
papers were proposed in five
thematic sessions. We dedicated
one thematic session (three slots
of the conference programme)
to e-learning platform showcases and presentations of specific
e-government projects (also
to be considered for inclusion
in the platform). One session
was dedicated to the models
and methods for evaluating
e-government projects, another
session to a general analysis
nologies in e-government. The
WG will continue its efforts to
build the NISPAcee e-government learning platform in years
to come by soliciting papers on
a further comparative analysis
of showcases or the analysis
of their transferability to other
governmental sectors, regions
or countries.
Working Group on Civil
Service
Coordinators:
Patrycja Joanna Suwaj, Polish
Association for Public Administration Education, Bialystok,
Poland.
Hans Rieger, DBB Akademie,
Bonn, Germany.
The working group discussed
several dimensions of the “Civil
Service”. The presentations
began with the topic of regulation and law. Country reports
and comparative studies were
discussed. This was followed by
a discussion of the problem of
political patronage in the process of appointing high ranking
The discussions concentrated
on the factors of success and
failure of Public Administrative
Reform and the divergence and
convergence of developments in
CEE and CA. The papers gave
very good descriptions of what
is happening and has happened
in different regions. We went
from the Baltics to the Balkans
and from Central Europe to
Eastern Europe and to Central
Asia. Although the explanations
for success and failure are broad,
there are some similarities. These
are the importance of the context
and common inheritance of CEE
and CA countries and especially,
as one participant mentioned,
the role of officials as and executive for the elite; the previous
denial of the importance of competence; the previous absence of
a merit system and the previous
lack of a public service. Many
things have improved, but not
quickly enough.
In the working group we
discussed the causes: These were
partly found in the existing conflicts: conflicts between external
pressure to reform and path
NISPAcee Announcements
dependencies; conflicts of interest
within public organizations, and
a lack of skills, knowledge and
attitudes within the public sector.
At the same time, it was acknowledged that, in part, problems are
unavoidable, that the transition
seen in public administration
reform in CEE and CA is characterised by trying to move from
one extreme (State) to the other
(Market) and, of course, one
ends up somewhere in between
(Administrative market) and
that somewhere in between is a
typical hybrid. This is difficult
and complex to manage under
adverse circumstances, suffering from the various views of the
influential actors on the organisation and strong conflicts within
the organisation, at the same time
a lack of skills, outside arrogance
and varying internal support
results in enforced changes that
no-one really supports. The preliminary problem, as identified,
seems to be that where one needs
a simple structured organisation
in PA, complex organisations are
created.
Working Group on Public
Sector Finance and
Accounting
Coordinators:
Lucie Sedmihradska, University
of Economics of Prague, Czech
Republic.
The Working Group focused this
year on municipal asset management. Next to 11 country studies,
which were elaborated based on
the WG research protocol, four
papers on other related topics were presented. Each of the
country studies contained a case
study of a selected municipality
and/or a type of municipal asset.
Use of the case approach proved
to be beneficial as it brought
an empirical component to the
papers and, in several cases, it
highlighted additional issues or
problems. The main conclusion
came from the Canadian case:
We should take municipal asset
management into the broader
picture of local government
finance: it is not only a potential
source to generate revenue, but
rather a tool to implement local
government strategies regarding
local development, housing or
improvement of infrastructure.
The WG agreed on the topic for
next year’s conference: Local
government finance in times of
crisis: How to respond ?
Working Group on
Capacity Building of a
Civil Servants’ Training
System According to EU
Requirements
Chair persons:
Marek Haliniak, National School
of Public Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
Rodica Stefanescu, Ecological
University of Bucharest, Romania.
Inesa Vorontchuk, University of
Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
The main messages of the papers
presented and discussed in WG
VI were that:
• globalisation and EU integration bring a tremendous
change in the working context
for public administration (PA),
and create new demands and
challenges for the capacity
building of civil servants;
• meeting all these needs and
challenges, a new human and
social capital, particularly a
new type of leadership, has
to be built through significant
investments in training activities;
• the education system for PA
has to undertake new responsibilities, including leading
the change with new curricula
and ethical standards, new
methods of training delivery
and new approaches, and
a shift to continuous learning for both individuals and
organisations.
In terms of defining priorities,
the following were
recommended:
• the sustainable development
concept, including environmental issues;
• the modern ICT era must be
included in the learning process and social interactions
in PA;
• academia should take an active role in developing new
knowledge, skills, and attitudes to facilitate change, and
be a leader in order to achieve
the goals ahead;
• training must provide a
common understanding of
the phenomena around (e.g.
globalisation) and a common
language for decision-makers
and their community members, through the introduction of new concepts such as
micro-economics, competitiveness and social responsibilities;
• networking should be the
main channel and instrument
of leading change towards
sustainable results, through
collaboration in strategic partnerships between academia,
government, NGOs and busi-
NISPAcee news 3/2009
This problem will be explored
more systematically in the future. The coordinators proposed
a plan to publish a book on public administration reform with
comparative studies on reforms
which have succeeded and failed
in the different regions. It was
the shared conclusion that something is missing in mainstream
theory on administrative reform,
which accounts for the fact that
public administration reforms
in CEE countries and Central
Asia, often does not result in the
effects expected.
Mihály Lados, Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian
Academy of Sciences.
15
NISPAcee Events
ness – to build a shared vision,
designing the training curricula, and obtaining support
for community actions.
The proposals emanating from
the group discussions were to:
• keep on interacting and
further develop networking
amongst the interested parties
on particular topics (e.g. education), by forming a special
e-mail group/forum, to followup on the initiated dialogue,
to follow on with new ideas,
and to build upon, with new
initiatives.
• consider changing the WG
VI title, in order to better
describe its real focus on the
papers developed on education. Therefore, it has been
proposed to formulate the
new WG VI title as: “Training
System & Institutions’ needs
for effective Capacity Building
of Civil Servants to respond to
the Challenges, in close collaboration with their major
Stakeholders”.
Working Group for
Practitioners
Moderator and rapporteur:
Biljana Nikolovska Zagar, Civil
Servants Agency, Macedonia.
Damir Ahmetovic, UNDP BiH,
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
In the framework of the NISPAcee Conference, The Human
Resources Management Authority (HRMA), Montenegro organised the working session on the
topic: “The Recruitment Process
in Public Administration in the
countries of Western Balkans”.
16
The aim of the working session was to gather the countries
of the Western Balkans together
with EU member states and
other countries and independent
experts who will exchange their
experiences in the area of human resources management and
the recruitment process. Within
the working session and based
on the presentations and discussions of member countries,
international experts and relevant international organisations,
the best model of selection and
recruitment of human resources
was discussed in accordance
with the best practice and standards of the EU. Through members’ discussions, presentations
and conclusions, analyses were
implemented and the necessary
training was identified and organised at the regional level.
NISPAcee Fair of New
Project Proposals
Chair: Ludmila Gajdosova,
NISPAcee Executive Director.
The Fair of New Project Proposals is a new NISPAcee initiative.
The purpose of the Fair was to
encourage members and other
interested partners to engage in
creative thinking and identify
possible new projects, activities, partners and donors etc., to
come up with ideas for discussion and to reach decisions by
the participants on the proposals
that could be further developed
and coordinated by NISPAcee.
Several initiatives selected for
the Fair programme were presented and discussed among the
participants.
A UNDP policy specialist introduced a new regional project
“The Regional Centre for Public
Administration Reform”, which
aims at facilitating professional
networking and co-operation
between the countries in the
region of Central and Eastern
Europe and the Commonwealth
of Independent States.
The project proposal “Establishing the Eurasian Institute
for Leadership Development
in Public Administration at the
Siberian Academy for Public
Administration” aims to develop best leadership training
technologies, train the trainers
and disseminate new courses
and training among educational
institutions in Siberia, other regions of Russia and the countries
of NIS, especially Central Asian
countries.
The representative of the
Academy of Management under
the President of Kyrgyz Republic
presented the fellowship project
proposal “Civil Service Capacity
Building for Change Management”, which has been designed
to support practical policy and
public management reforms, by
building capacities of talented
and committed government
officials who are well placed to
influence policy, practical implementation of reforms and serve
as change agents.
The introduced project “Converting Crisis into Development
Opportunities” should support
schools of public administration
(SPA) in their effort to nurture
creative and innovative approaches to solve the actual
problem of crisis by producing
new intellectual capital.
AdInfoSys Management
Institute from Armenia proposed
the project “Citizens’ Perception of the Public Services and
Assessment of their Satisfaction
with Public Services Delivered”,
which is aimed at making public
services’ delivery more responsive to the needs of individuals
and local communities.
At the end of the Conference
a new joint UNDESA / NISPAcee
initiative on the development of
on-line training courses, which
will be available via the NISPAcee and UNPAN websites was
introduced.
Within the Fair, additional
proposals from conference participants were presented and discussed and there was agreement
to continue project development
and implementation.
NISPAcee Events
Sustainability and Effectiveness of Civil
Society Organisations in Kyrgyzstan
NISPAcee is running a project
called the “Sustainability and
Effectiveness of Civil Society Organisations in Kyrgyzstan” supported by SlovakAid, a Slovak
Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ programme. The aim of the project
is to create better conditions for
civil society organisations for
their active participation in the
policymaking processes.
Ms. Konokbaeva Aida. Special
guests in the study visit included
members of the Embassy of the
Kyrgyz Republic in Austria –
Mr. Azamatov Alakunov and
Mr. Muratbek Baihodjoev. The
Slovak side was represented
mainly by Slovak project experts
– Ms. Gajdošová Ľudmila, Ms.
Hricková Jana, Mr. Hodás Milan
and Ms. Jasová Adriana.
Within the project, the workshop “Sustainability and Effectiveness of Civil Society Organisations in Kyrgyzstan” was implemented by NISPAcee
and its Kyrgyz project
partner, the Institution
Social Research Centre,
American University of
Central Asia, in Bratislava, Slovakia in March,
2009. The workshop was
organised in conjunction with a study visit
to the relevant Slovak
governmental institutions and civil society
organisations (CSOs).
The workshop programme
focused on the following topics: relevant Kyrgyz legislation;
the Slovak law-making proce-
dure; E-governance in Slovakia;
business enterprise of CSOs in
Slovakia; Slovak practices in
the area of defending common
interests of the CSOs, and CSOs,
democracy and law enforcement
– the vicious circle and practice
of Slovak CSOs.
In the frame of the study visit,
the Kyrgyz delegation had the
opportunity to visit the National
Council of the Slovak Republic,
to meet and participate in discussions with the heads and representatives of different sections,
departments and committees.
They also visited the standing advisory body of the Government
of the Slovak Republic – The
Governmental Council for Nongovernmental and Non-profit
Several proposals on the
policy recommendations for the
improvement of the Kyrgyz legislation were formulated as a result
of the workshop and the study
visit based on Slovak experiences
and the agreement of all participants, for example: the allocation
of 1 % of income tax; the creation
of a governmental advisory body
for non-governmental organisations; analysis of the Kyrgyz
law on access to information
and the internet system of legal
information in order to propose
their improvement; generation
of an interactive “Portal of the
legal acts” where all Bills could
be publicised and publicly discussed; obligatory hearing on the
public’s suggestions to the bill in
inter-ministerial legislative procedure; a free copy of the Collection
of Laws to each municipality;
obligatory involvement of CSOs
and citizens in the parliamentary legislative procedures; the
right to petition for stopping the
legislative process; increase in the
capacity of parliamentary staff;
each book published in Kyrgyzstan should be given to the
Parliamentary library; creation
of an official communicating tool
between the 3rd sector and the
state and the creation of periodical dialogue between CSOs and
government. The selected recommendations will be analysed,
developed in detail and publicised at the end of the project in
November, 2009.
NISPAcee news 3/2009
The Kyrgyz delegation included 10 representatives from Parliament, the
Government and the 3rd sector.
Members of the Kyrgyz Parliament were represented by Mr.
Sabirov Alisher, Ms. Moldosheva
Dinara, Mr. Zhamaldinov Ziiadin and Mr. Baitikov Asanbek.
Also taking part in the delegation was Mr. Aidraliev Akylbek,
Head of the Department on
Electronic Governance from the
Office of the Prime Minister. The
Kyrgyz 3rd sector was represented by Mr. Mambetov Aidar
from the Association of Civil
Society Support Centres. The
Kyrgyz partner institution was
represented by a team of experts
and managers – Mr. Baktygulov Sheradil, Ms. Alymbaeva
Aida, Ms. Esengul Chinara and
organisations, the Ministry of the
Interior of the Slovak Republic
– Section for Public Administration. A meeting and discussions
with representatives of the 1st
Slovak Non-profit Service Centre
were also on the programme,
as well a visit to the NISPAcee
Secretariat and its library.
17
NISPAcee Announcements
Invitation & Call for papers
The 18th NISPAcee Annual Conference
13–15, May 2010, Warsaw, Poland
Public Administration in Times of Crisis
Organised in Co-operation with The National School of Public Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
The annual conferences of NISPAcee focus upon a significant
theme, which facilitates a better understanding of important
issues regarding the administrative development and policymaking capacity in Central
and Eastern Europe and Central
Asia. The Conference includes
experts, scholars and practitioners who work in the field of
public administration in Central
and Eastern Europe (including
all countries covered by the NISPAcee membership, the Russian
Federation, Caucasus and Central Asia), as well as from many
other regions and countries of
the world.
The Conference programme
will include the opening and
closing plenary sessions, general sessions, working sessions
on the main conference theme,
specialised panels and forums
and meetings of NISPAcee
Working Groups, which will
run in parallel.
Papers are invited on the
Main Conference Theme, for
the General Session, or on the
themes of the various Working
Groups, which will be announced for the conference.
Main Conference
Theme
18
The current crisis, since the
Autumn of 2008’s financial meltdown, affects the NISPAcee regions particularly strongly, both
indirectly – as members of the
global community – and directly,
because especially in Central and
Eastern Europe, it had and still
has, a massive impact, already
toppling several governments
and changing outlooks and policies on a fundamental scale. But
the fact that the crisis is severe is
as obvious as that at some time
in the future, it will diminish
and that the regions will (have
to) recover and become competitive once more.
The role of public administration in all of this is particularly
important because the crisis has
signaled and forced, both here
and elsewhere, a “return of the
state” on a scale beyond anything since the great transformation of late 1989 / 91. The state is
back, and in many respects more
strongly than before, because it
is now in the business of administering not only the crisis,
but also finance and even the
economy, both via guarantees,
subsidies, and policies and very
directly by taking over entire
sectors of the economy.
In such a world, the role of
public administration is necessarily large, because the “state in
action” is public administration,
and the success of crisis management – and the wise spending
of all the sums allotted to it – as
well as of a recovery – depends
first and foremost on a highquality civil service, both in
structure and personnel, that is
capable of shouldering this gigantic task. The need for such a
capacity of public administration
and the increased importance of
the public sector are therefore
hardly contested any longer.
It is quite obvious that the
development of appropriate
Information Technology and efficient information mechanisms
in the public administration are
core components of capacity
building.
Public administration represents the nucleus of the information mechanism of the state. It
perceives, receives and processes
information to determine the
quality of public policymaking. Information mechanisms
within public administration
do not function properly, their
deficiencies influencing the efficiency and transparency of the
decision-making process in the
administrative system.
Only properly functioning information mechanisms can support the creation of a consensus
based on policies and efficient
implementation of government
decisions and can increase the
“absorption” capacities of the
public administration.
What is, however, much less
clear is how this capacity can
be achieved. Does this mean
a return to more traditional,
classical civil service models
with wide competences ? Has
the public discrediting of the
market system, due to the crisis,
also led to that of public management models copied from
there ? Can we still afford such
models if they have proven to
be ineffectual; can we afford to
abolish what has been a success ? Is the cutting-down of the
size of the civil service to save
public expenses a knee-jerk
reaction that will do more harm
than good, and cost more than it
NISPAcee Announcements
will save, or is it the only viable
option in many countries right
now ? Is the much-discussed
“Neo-Weberian State” the appropriate new paradigm for
crisis and / or post-crisis times ?
Is there anything to be learned
from earlier and other crises and
public administration responses
to them ? This is what scholars
and practitioners will have to
discuss in Warsaw in 2010.
General Session
Working Groups
The call for papers for Working
Groups, which will be included
in next year’s conference, will be
announced by the end of July,
2009.
Deadline for applications to
present papers: September 30,
2009.
All additional information about
next year’s conference will be
published on the NISPAcee website: www.NISPA.org
Call for Papers
The NISPAcee Journal is predominantly devoted to public
administration and public policy
issues in Central and Eastern Europe. The main goal is to publish
top quality papers based on own
empirical research carried out
in Central and Eastern Europe,
theoretical papers developing
general public administration
and public policy theory, or
their specific dimensions in
the region.
The Journal serves all interested parties – academicians,
politicians and public officials
– to help develop public administration and public policy
theory and practice in the
region. A high quality standard
review process is the principal
quality assurance tool of the
Journal and the intention is to
become one of the top periodicals in the area.
The Journal is published
twice per year. The first issue
includes selected peer-reviewed
articles. The second issue is
based on papers from TED
(EGPA/NISPAcee Trans-European Dialogue). The TED is
an annual scholarly high-level
focused conference on a timely
topic in Public Administration.
We invite colleagues to submit
their research papers in English
for consideration. Manuscripts
should be sent in electronic form
at whatever time.
Editorial correspondence, including manuscripts for submission, should be addressed to
Mr. Juraj Sklenar,
managing editor,
e-mail: sklenar@nispa.org.
Information:
http://www.nispa.org/_portal/
journal.php
Translation of Selected Publications
into CEE National Languages
The publication project is supported by the LGPSRI/OSI (Local
Government and Public Service
Reform Initiative affiliated with
the Open Society Institute),
Budapest, Hungary. The goal of
this project is to translate relevant
publications from the field from
English to CEE national languages based on requests and needs of
institutions from CEE countries.
Eligibility is limited to members
of NISPAcee and other institutions with professional interest in
public administration in Central
and Eastern Europe; Applicants
will have to prove the utility of
the translated publications in
their respective countries, the distribution policy, quality of translation, and an ability to cover the
distribution costs; Priority will be
given to institutions, which will
distribute the publication at their
own expense; Applicants should
determine clear overall calculation of costs of translation (checking/ editing) and publishing
(priority will be given to reasonable price quotes for translation
and publishing).
Please send letters of inquiry
and applications to NISPAcee
Secretariat.
NISPAcee news 3/2009
In order to include a wide array
of potential contributors and
to make the NISPAcee Annual
Conference even more attractive to Public Administration
and Policy scholars, experts,
and practitioners and to further
enhance its position as one of
the most important meetings
in the field internationally, the
18th NISPAcee Annual Conference will again include General
Sessions, in which papers that
cover topics, which go beyond
the conference or working group
themes, can be presented. The
only criteria for acceptance are
(a) scholarly quality, (b) interest of the topic and (c) “from or
about the region”, i.e. papers
should come from Central and
Eastern Europe, Central Asia,
and the Caucasus, or be about
that region.
The NISPAcee Journal of Public
Administration and Policy
The deadline: September 15, 2009
19
NISPAcee MEMBERSHIP
Presently, the NISPAcee enlists 125 Institutional
members (from 23 countries), 27 Associate members
(from 14 countries), and 13 Individual members
(from 7 countries).
New Institutional members of the NISPAcee
Department of Regional Science and Management,
Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice,
Kosice, Slovakia
Lazarski School of Commerce and Law, Warsaw,
Poland
Association of Finance Officers of Local Governments & Public Enterprises,
Veles, Macedonia
North Caucasian Academy of Public Administration Rostov-na-Donu,
Russia
NISPAcee NEWS is published with the support of the Local
Government and Public Service Reform Initiative (Affiliated with the Open
­So­ciety Institute), Nador ut. 11, 1525 Budapest 114, Hungary.
NISPAcee News is pub­lished quarterly. We invite individuals as well as
organisations to ­con­trib­ute to the first issue of volume XVI. NISPAcee
reserves the right to edit sub­missions for clarity, style, grammar and
space.
The deadline for the next issue is September 15, 2009.
NISPAcee Secretariat
Polianky 5
841 01 Bratislava 42
Slovak Republic
tel/fax: +421-2-6428 5357
tel/fax: +421-2-6428 5557
e-mail: nispa@nispa.org
http://www.nispa.org
20