Strategic Science and Technology for Canada`s Future - Mari-Tech

Strategic
Science and Technology
for
Canada’s Future Navies
Jack Cornett,
Calvin Hyatt, Jim Kennedy and
Dave Hazen
DRDC Atlantic
Mari-Tech 2011
Victoria, B.C.
May 2011
Overview
• What new ships is the Navy planning to build?
• What are the strategic roles for Science and Technology?
• How does Defence Research and Development Canada enable
these Maritime developments?
• What do the major capital projects include?
1
Evolution of Canada’s Navy
Life Extension (SELEX)
SSK
AOR
New
Boats?
Joint Support Ship
Bids deemed noncompliant
August 2008
Capability Sustainment
AOR
Project Redefined
Canadian Surface
Combatant (Flight 1)
DDG
FFH
Mid Life Update
(HCM/FELEX)
MCDV
2
2005
2010
Canadian Surface
Combatant (Flight 2)
Arctic/Offshore
Patrol Ship
2015
2020
2025
How does DRDC science enable these projects?
Space, RADAR,
Electronic Warfare,
Communications
Military
Engineering,
Mobility Systems,
Weapons Testing,
ChemBio Defence
Human Factors,
Command
Effectiveness,
Simulation,
Health, Diving
3
Electro-Optics,
Weapons,
Command and
Control (C2)
Antisubmarine,
Mine & Torpedo
Defence, C2,
Signatures,
Materials,
Air & Naval
Platforms
4
Four Interrelated Strategic Roles of Science
5
Why
• Complex challenges
• Rapidly evolving threats
• Globalization of S&T
How
• Provide rigorous evidence-based
S&T advice within DND/CF
decision loops
• Exercise constructive challenge
on decision options
• Provide credible insights into
defence and security S&T trends,
threats and opportunities
Why
• Globalization of S&T
• Highly multi-dimensional issues
• Solution diversity
How
• Generate, access and apply
validated evidence-based
knowledge for defence & security
priorities
• Maximize positive impact /
mitigate negative impact of S&T
advances for defence & security
• Build multidisciplinary
perspectives on complex
problems
Why
• Complex CFDS investment plan
• High risk / high complexity
operations
• Rapidly evolving technological
options and threats
How
• Foresight – provide decision
makers with possible futures
• Bring S&T to bear in identifying
investment plan options and new
opportunities
• Synchronize S&T results for
stakeholder success
Why
• Innovation is everywhere
• Multiple players with partial
solutions
• Government expectation for
socio-economic benefits
• Speed matters
How
• Help provide 2-way window
between industry & DND/CF to
connect needs and capabilities
• Facilitate industry-industry
linkages during R&D phase
• Help connect innovation system
players
Trusted Advisor - Undersea Warfare
Specifications advice for :
• Antisubmarine Warfare
• Mine & Torpedo Defence
• Underwater Force
Protection
•…
6
Risk Mitigator - Test & Simulate Performance
• Naval Platforms
• Materials
• Helicopter – Ship
interactions
• ……..
7
Knowledge Integrator – Specs need changes
Knowledge of ship systems
operations
– Failure/Forensic Investigations
– Materials Identification
– Quality Assurance/NDE
– Environmental/Health and Safety
Protection
– Fuels and Lubricants
– Condition Based Monitoring
8
Open Innovator
-Partner to accelerate technology development
Pleiades
Demonstrated
Open Architecture
CFAV Quest
9
The Halifax Modernization
10
COMBAT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION
(CSI) DURING REFIT
DLP
ESM
2D Radar
Upgraded
Sensors
IFF
Omni
Fire
Control
Radar
Nav
Radar
3D Air and
Surveillance
Radar
Upgraded
Trainers
Fire
Control
Radar
CCS
Ops Room &
Compartments
11
Human Factors analyses enhanced Command and
Control
12
NEW OPS ROOM
MULTIMULTI-FUNCTION WORKSTATION (MFW)
KVM Controls
Task Lighting
PKI Card Reader Slot
CDST
Keypad
PID
Keyboard
SID
Fire Switch/ Task Lighting
Power Outlet
13
•
More Comfortable Seat
•
Larger Work Area
•
Multi Screen
Ops Room Overview- Team work analysis
CIO
ESM
ARRO
TS
SAC
ASPO
ORS
EWS
HMS
AWWD
ORO
UWWD
SPS
FCO A
FCO C
IMD
FCO B
SCS
CANTASS2
NAVCOM
CTG
TAS SUP
CANTASS1
CO
WO
TECH
GCCS-M
14
Evolution of Canada’s Navy
Mid Life Update
(HCM/FELEX)
Canadian Surface
Combatant (Flight 2)
15
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Arctic/Offshore Patrol ShipProject
16
CD1
STRATEGIC DRIVERS for AOPS
Canada’s Northern Strategy
• Promoting social and economic
development
• Protecting our environmental
heritage
• Improving and devolving Northern
governance
Canada First Defence Strategy
• Need for capacity to exercise control
over and defend Canada's sovereignty
in the Arctic
• Demonstrating a visible Canadian
presence in this region
• Assist other government agencies such
as the Coast Guard respond to any
security challenges that may arise
AOPS is part of the Government of Canada’s “All
of Government Approach” to development of the
Canadian Arctic
17
Slide 18
CD1
CFDS - Last Bullet:
- I think you want to use the term "support" vice help
- is it just security or is it other stuff as well - we help many OGDs on E/W coasts and not all security - some safety, some
environmental, etc.
- your call
C. Donovan, 26/10/2010
Ship Requirements (1)
– Polar Class 5 (one metre first year ice with old ice inclusions)
– Open Water Speed of 17 knots
– Good Seakeeping for Offshore Patrol Missions
– Range of at least 6,800 nautical miles at 14 knots SS3
– Command Management System
– Gun Armament for Sovereignty Enforcement
18
Ship Requirements (2)
– Aviation Facilities for Commercial and Military Helicopters
– Small Landing Craft and Rugged Boats for Boarding and Rescue
Operations
– Cargo Handling; up to 6 containers
– Full Propulsion Redundancy
– Accommodations for 85 personnel; 45 crew and up to 40 mission
personnel
– Designed to Class Society and largely to Commercial Ship Standards
19
AOPS Design
General:
Length - 97 metres
Beam – 19 metres
Draught - 5.7 metres
Displacement - 5800 tonnes
Range/Speed - 6800 nm@ 14 kts/17 kts
Endurance - 120 days
Command and Communication
•Communication links required to operate with
Canadian Forces and Other Government
Departments such as Coast Guard, RCMP and
Canadian Border Services
•Mission HQ support space for response to
SAR, and other like emergency response
Weapons/sensors
• 25 mm gun
• Radar
• Space for additional
sensors
Crew – 45 - with accommodation
for additional 40
20
Stores/Ammo loading
The Joint Supply Ship procurement: What Happened?
In Aug 2008, PWGSC announced that both
bidders were non-compliant with the JSS
mandatory requirement to construct three (3) JSS
for $1.575B
This effectively terminated the procurement for JSS(1).
However, the project remained active under existing
Project Definition (PD) funding to redevelop the
procurement plan using the National Ship Building
Strategy.
21
Statement of Requirement
Modern
AORs
AORs
•The JSS will provide Canada with a modem, task tailored, globally
deployable, naval support capability
•The JSS Project will recapitalize Canada's naval support vessels, modernizing
and apportioning joint force capabilities in line with the strategic vision
outlined in the Canada First Defence Strategy..
22
Strategic Effects
• Task Group Operations
– provide logistics support to sustain
the operations of a Task Group of
Canadian or allied ships during a
conflict, or near-conflict
• Limited Sealift
– transport equipment, supplies and
personnel in support of
contingency, humanitarian or joint
operations
• Limited Support to Forces
Ashore
– operate in support of CF or multinational operations being
conducted ashore
23
JSS Capabilities
Helo Ops /
Hangar
ReplenishmentAt-Sea
Self-Defence
The JSS will replace the core
capabilities of the current
Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment
ships, including:
• Provision of fuel, ammunition, spare parts,
food and water, and other supplies;
• Modern medical and dental facilities;
• Operation and maintenance of an aviation
element; and
Cargo Fuel
Tanks
• Basic self-defence capabilities (CIWS,
ESM, ECM).
Medical / Dental
Afloat JTFHQ
(Space & Weight)
24
Evolution of Canada’s Navy
JSS Redefined
Procurement Redefined
•Design further evolved
•Government assuming more risk
•Integrated into National Ship Building Strategy
25
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
The CSC Project
Stated in the Canada First Defence Strategy, 12 May 08,
Starting in 2015, replace the Forces’ Core equipment fleets,
including:
… ships to replace existing destroyers and frigates;
common hull design frigate and destroyer variants ensure
that the military can continue to monitor and defend Canadian
waters and make significant contributions to international naval
operations.”
26
Modeling and Simulation
To Ensure FEASIBLE Designs
SHOP5
Paramarine
Cost Model
» Conceptual Design Level
» Early Stage Design
Model
» Inputs
» Preliminary Design Level
» Inputs
» Inputs
»
Combat System (Wc, KGc)
»
Displacement
»
Hull Characteristics
»
»
» Outputs
27
»
Speed
»
Range
»
Endurance
»
Resistance & Powering
»
Basic Seakeeping
»
Basic Stability
Detailed locations of
equipments
Geometric definition of
the ship
» Outputs
»
»
»
»
»
General arrangement
Seakeeping,
Stability,
Structural Analysis
Detailed Model
»
»
»
Weights of SWBS
Groups
Dimensions
Internal and external risk
factors
» Outputs
»
»
»
»
Acquisition cost
Cost distributions
Uncertainty in total cost
Risk assessment
27
CSC – Examining the possibilities…
Today
Tomorrow
AAD & TG C2 Variant
• Conduct long range, 3D radar search,
conduct medium range air defence,
control fighter aircraft and coordinate
naval fires. Possesses the enhanced
communications required for a Task
group Commander at sea
Iroquois Class Destroyers (3)
Area Air Defence and Command & Control
Commissioned 1972-73 (37-38 years old)
Mid-life Modernisation 1991-1995
Game Changers
Multi-weapon launchers (Mk41 VLS)
• CEC (Cooperative Engagement Capability)
• Multi Function Radars
• Open architecture CMS
•Miniaturisation = more space
Halifax Class Frigates (12)
General Purpose Frigates
Commissioned 1992-96
Mid-life Modernisation - 2010-15
28
General Purpose Variant
• Enhanced anti-submarine warfare and antisurface warfare capabilities, and conduct
naval fires
Common Eqpt
(example only)
• All CSC ships require self defence
capabilities in anti-air, anti-surface and antisubmarine disciplines. Maximize platform
system commonality.
28
Current status - Design Space Analysis
• Provide cost/capability trade-off objective evidence
• Identify and evaluate technically feasible and economically viable ship concepts
–
Analyse ship configurations and dynamically conduct cost-capability trades
–
Link to operational requirement
• Refine Requirements Document with better known impact on cost-capability
–
Create an evolving framework to store critical information about the ship design
• Reduce overall project execution risk
29
On the Horizon
-What will change the game?
-How does the procurement remain flexible?
What you don’t
know
Electric
Weapons?
Autonomous
Vehicles?
30
Technology Development Strategy
Research / Development – Technology Investment Fund
Evaluation and Refinement –Applied Research Project
Technology Evaluation – Technology Demonstration Projects
Operations –
31
What are some key strategic drivers?
• Personnel Safety
• Staffing
• Risk Aversion
• Efficiency
• Cost – Capital and Lifecycle
• Accelerating and Open Innovation
• Future spiral development rather than midlife refits
32
What are some of the strategic
scientific opportunities?
• Autonomy
• New Materials
• Electro-optics
• Social networking
33
Summary
• Four major ship building projects planned for next >10 years.
• Science and Technology play a key role
– Adviser
– Risk mitigator
– Knowledge integrator
– Open Innovator
• Flexible and spiral designs will be key
• Lots of opportunity for joint DRDC – industry partnerships
34
Evolution of Canada’s Navy
Life Extension (SELEX)
SSK
AOR
New
Boats?
Joint Support Ship
Bids deemed noncompliant
August 2008
Capability Sustainment
AOR
Project Redefined
Canadian Surface
Combatant (Flight 1)
DDG
FFH
Mid Life Update
(HCM/FELEX)
MCDV
35
2005
2010
Canadian Surface
Combatant (Flight 2)
Arctic/Offshore
Patrol Ship
2015
2020
2025
36
Acknowledgements
• This brief was generated using material provided by:
• Dave Hazen
• Jim Kennedy
• Calvin Hyatt
• David Hopkin
• AOPS PMO
• CSC PMO
• JSS PMO
• HMC FELEX PMO
37
Material & Labour Cost
- Notional Auxiliaries (13% of
Cost)
Combat Systems (53% of Cost)
Propulsion & Electrical (13% of
Cost)
Hull (13% of Cost)
38
38
Outfit & Furnishing (8% of
Cost)