Slide - MARIZA GEORGALOU
Transcription
Slide - MARIZA GEORGALOU
Placemaking & place identity in social media: Snapshots from Facebook Dr Mariza Georgalou Lancaster University m.georgalou@gmail.com www.marizageorgalou.com 3rd International Hybrid City Conference, University Research Institute of Applied Communication, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens • September 17-19, 2015 Aim “Events and actions happen somewhere and who we are is entwined with where we are, where we have been, or where we are going” (Barnes 2000) Web technologies fundamental shift in how we perceive + experience place. Social media writing + posting multimedia content is a self-reflexive process not situated in a particular location. It can exist anywhere en route construction of a hybrid place identity as mobile, shifting. How do Facebook users refer to places? Where are these references tied up to places? What do they imply or infer about place identities in these references? 2 Agenda Place, identity and language Background of study Placemaking on Facebook – Verbal check-ins – Representational locating of self – Culinary experiences + placemaking – Socio-political aspects of places Concluding remarks 3 Place identity Place = location + everything that occupies that location, i.e. tasks, practices, routines, everyday life integrated + meaningful phenomenon (Relph 1973; Myers 2006) Place identity = assortment of memories, conceptions, interpretations, ideas, attitudes, values, beliefs, social meanings, preferences, feelings about specific physical settings (Proshansky et al. 1983) Ways we understand ourselves by attributing meanings to places. 4 Place identity & language How does place acquire its meanings? 1) representation (written, talked about, photographed) 2) situated interactions (Scollon & Scollon 2003; Thurlow & Jaworski 2011) Language can form + transform everyday experiences of ‘self-in-place’. (Johnstone 2011; Tuan 1991) Places constructed in ways that carry significant implications for who we are, who we can claim to be or where we belong. (Dixon & Durrheim 2000; Taylor 2003) Means to represent, describe + symbolic resource 5 Background Discursive construction of identity within Facebook – Greek users (Georgalou 2014) – construction + co-construction – multimodality – textual practices Theoretical + methodological frameworks ∙ constructionist approach to identity ∙ discourse analysis ∙ computer-mediated discourse analysis ∙ multimodal discourse analysis ∙ discourse-centred online ethnography: observation + engagement (Androutsopoulos 2008) 6 Participants & data Helen ∙ born 1979 ∙ BA, MA, PhD – Language, Literature, Linguistics ∙ Lecturer in Linguistics / EAP tutor FB profile information Status updates Comments Video & article links Photos Interview excerpts Field notes Informants’ comments on analysis May 2010 – April 2013 ∙ Athens, Greece & UK (2 months / year) ∙ Hungarian partner lives in Budapest Carla ∙ born 1975 ∙ BA in Translation and Interpreting ∙ translator of Latin American literature ∙ Athens, Greece 7 Placemaking Placemakingon onFacebook Facebook Verbal check-ins ∙ Organise perspective + orient readers (van Dijk 2009) ∙ Place + emotions + activity ∙ Entextualisation: extract + relocate instance of culture (Blommaert 2005; Leppänen et al. 2014) First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin 8 Placemaking on Facebook Representational locating of self ∙ Performance of identity + belonging ∙ Validate experience of being at certain places experiencing certain moments Havana, Cuba profile pic (Mendelson & Papacharissi 2010) ∙ Posing as placement action which indicates + locates self (Jaworski & Thurlow 2009) ∙ Tourism vs place that matters Hungarian countryside profile pic 9 Placemaking on Facebook Representational locating of self II ∙ Multilingualism (English, French, Greek, Spanish) ∙ Song lyrics, poetry verses, film titles + lines ∙ Ideas, feelings, memories attached to locations ∙ Linguistic + cultural capital ∙ Playful engagement 10 (Proceedings, p. 365) Placemaking on Facebook Culinary experiences & placemaking ∙ Food makes place symbolic construct deployed in discursive construction of imaginative geographies (Cook & Crang 1996) ∙ Food as metonymy for nation ∙ In motion series of place ids – inclusive ‘we’ ∙ Places constructed interactionally Gemista (stuffed vegetables) 2 Greeks, 2 Iranians, 1 Austrian (former / current UK residents) comment (Proceedings, p. 366) 11 Placemaking on Facebook Culinary experiences & placemaking II ∙ Culinary tourism ∙ Food = transportable symbol of place, moveable sign of Otherness (Molz 2007) ∙ Eat ‘differences mobilities make’ (Molz 2007) ∙ Openness + desire to consume difference + competence in the other culture Polish Zapiekanka Placemaking on Facebook Socio-political aspects of places ∙ Physical environments = social environments ∙ Economic, political, social upheavals, crises consequences for place identity (Proshansky et al. 1983) ∙ Check-in vs discursive practice embedded in broader socio-political + historical context. Placemaking on Facebook Socio-political aspects of places II ∙ Transgressive semiotics TO RENT FOR SALE ∙ Place as symbol of resistance ∙ Citizen journalism ∙ Implied representational locating of self (Jaworski & Thurlow 2009) ∙ ‘I’m there, at the heart of the events, protesting + documenting’. 14 WE STAY AT SYNTAGMA Placemaking on Facebook Socio-political aspects of places III ∙ During crisis places become ‘unattractive’ + cause stress displacement ∙ Discourses about places become deterritorialised acquiring irritated style (Blommaert 2005; van Dijk 2009) ∙ Renounce identification with place: 1) deictic with pejorative nuance 2) condemnatory coinage 15 Concluding remarks Place id: components + overlapping layers geographical, social, political, cultural, emotional. With Facebook, users can bring together these components + layers from virtually anywhere. 1. Place identity is different for different users. 2. Users identify with different scales or types of places. 3. Place identity differs with respect to role in given places. 4. Place identity is associated with different representations of personal meanings + sociopolitical meanings. 5. Place identity is associated with different types of discursive means. 16 Concluding remarks II Place identity on Facebook 1) fluid 2) interactive, collaborative Communicate about + through place akomi kai otan den vriskomai stin Ellada kano posts gia themata pou aforoun stin katastasi edo (even if I’m not in Greece I write posts on issues related to the situation here) Helen (online interview) Communicate ‘something about themselves that goes beyond the descriptive characteristics of a place’ (Humphreys & Liao 2011) – assert or eschew belonging – communicate openness + respect to other cultures – affiliate with (or disaffiliate from) certain place through different languages – make political statements – disidentify with stressful aspects of a place – raise awareness about local + national issues 17 Thank you! 18 References Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). “Potentials and limitations of discourse-centered online ethnography”. Language@Internet 5, 8. Barnes, R. K. (2000) “Losing ground: Locational formulations in argumentation over New Travellers”. Doctoral dissertation. University of Plymouth, UK. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cook, I. and Crang, P. (1996). “The world on a plate: Culinary culture and geographical knowledges”. Journal of Material Culture 1(2): 131-153. Dixon, J. and Durrheim, K. (2000). “Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other”. British Journal of Social Psychology 39: 27-44. Georgalou, M. (2014). “Constructions of identity on Facebook: A discourse-centred online ethnographic study of Greek users”. Doctoral dissertation. Lancaster University, UK. Humphreys, L. and Liao, T. (2011). “Mobile geotagging: Reexamining our interactions with urban space”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16(3): 407-423. Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (2009). “Gesture and movement in tourist spaces”. In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, C. Jewitt, Ed. London / New York: Routledge. 253-262. Johnstone, B. (2011). “Language and place”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics, R. Mesthrie, Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. 203-217. Leppänen, S., Kytölä, S., Jousmäki, H., Peuronen, S. and Westinen, E. (2014). “Entextualization and resemiotization as resources for identification in social media”. In The Language of Social Media: Communication and Community on the Internet, P. Seargeant and C. Tagg, Eds. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 112-136. 19 References II Mendelson, A. L. and Papacharissi, Z. (2010). “Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries”. In The Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, Z. Papacharissi, Ed. London: Routledge. 251-273. Molz, J. G. (2007). “Eating difference: The cosmopolitan mobilities of culinary tourism”. Space and Culture 10(1): 77-93. Myers, G. (2006). “Where are you from?: Identifying place in talk”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(3): 320-343. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. and Kaminoff, R. (1983).“Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self”. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3(1): 57-83. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion. Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. Taylor, S. (2003). “A place for the future? Residence and continuity in women’s narratives of their lives”. Narrative Inquiry 13(1): 193-215. Thurlow, C. and Jaworski A. (2011). “Banal globalization? Embodied actions and mediated practices in tourists’ online photo-sharing”. In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, C. Thurlow and K. Mroczek, Eds. London and New York: Oxford University Press. 220-250. Tuan, Y. F. (1991).“Language and the making of place: A narrative-descriptive approach”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81(4): 684-696. van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 20 Image sources Slide 2: Slide 3: Slide 4: Slide 5: Slide 6: Slide 16: Where are you?, Netflix TV program House of Cards (http://i.stack.imgur.com/TgRju.jpg) You are here (http://pixel.brit.co/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/5-youarehere.jpg) You make this place so much better, © Morley (https://instagram.com/p/iUf_yLvRFm/) comic book woman (http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2540662/images/o-WOMAN-COMIC-BOOK-facebook.jpg) typewriter © Kat Von D (https://instagram.com/thekatvond/) vintage camera © MonsterGallery (https://img0.etsystatic.com/000/0/5148979/il_570xN.52869580.jpg) Facebook & Greece, © extend graphics (http://visual.ly/facebook-use-greece) Map and place pins, © wersm (http://wersm.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/pinonmap-657x360.png) 21