Mel Turner, Mayor Sue Frost, Vice Mayor Jeannie Bruins, Council

Transcription

Mel Turner, Mayor
Sue Frost, Vice Mayor
Jeannie Bruins, Council Member
Steve Miller, Council Member
Jeff Slowey, Council Member
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of Thursday, December 11, 2014
City Hall Council Chambers
7117 Greenback Lane, Citrus Heights, CA
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m.
PLEASE NOTE: The Council may take up any agenda item at any time, regardless of the order listed.
Action may be taken on any item on the agenda. The City Council has established a procedure for
addressing the Council. Speaker Identification Sheets are provided on the table inside the Council
Chambers. If you wish to address the Council during the meeting, please complete a Speaker
Identification Sheet and give it to the City Clerk. So that everyone who wishes may have an opportunity
to speak, there is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Council. Audio/Visual
presentation material must be provided to the City Clerk’s Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda
will be made available for public inspection at City Hall located at 6237 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus
Heights during normal business hours. Email subscriptions of the agenda are available online by signing
up with the City’s Notify Me service.
City Council meetings are televised live on Metro Cable 14, the government affairs channel on the
Comcast and SureWest Cable Systems and replayed on the following Monday at 9:00 a.m. Meetings are
also webcast live at www.citrusheights.net.
The Agenda for this meeting of the City Council for the City of Citrus Heights was posted in the
following listed sites before the close of business at 5:00 p.m. on the Friday preceding the meeting.
1. City of Citrus Heights, 6237 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, CA
2. Rusch Park Community Center, 7801 Auburn Boulevard, Citrus Heights, CA
3. Sacramento County Library, Sylvan Oaks Branch, 6700 Auburn Blvd., Citrus Heights, CA
If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to
participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office 916-725-2448, 6237 Fountain Square
Drive, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. TDD (hearing impaired only) 916-725-6185.
December 5, 2014
______________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the City Council meeting is in session.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Agenda Packet Page 1
Citrus Heights City Council
Thursday, December 11, 2014
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 PM
CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER
1.
Flag Salute
2.
Roll Call: Council Members: Bruins, Miller, Slowey, Frost, Turner
3.
Video Statement
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
SPECIAL ITEMS
4.
SUBJECT: Certification of Election Results
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 2014-____ Adopting a Resolution of the City
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal
Election Held on November 4, 2014, Declaring the Result and Other Such Matters as Provided
by Law.
5.
Swearing in of New Council Members
6.
Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor
PRESENTATIONS
7.
Presentation by Republic Services - Recycle Poster Contest Winners
8.
Citrus Heights Police Department – Citizen Recognition
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND REGIONAL BOARD UPDATES
PUBLIC COMMENT
Under Government Code Section 54954.3, members of the audience may address the Council on any
item of interest to the public and within the Council’s purview, or on any Agenda Item before or during
the Council’s consideration of the Item. If you wish to address the Council during the meeting, please
fill out a Speaker Identification Sheet and give it to the City Clerk. When you are called upon to speak,
step forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Normally, speakers are limited to five
minutes each with 30 minutes being allowed for all comments. Any public comments beyond the initial
30 minutes may be heard at the conclusion of the agenda. The Mayor has the discretion to lengthen or
shorten the allotted times.
Page 2 of 4
CONSENT CALENDAR
It is recommended that all consent items be acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or
action is requested by a Council Member.
9.
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special/Regular Meetings of November
13, 2014
10.
SUBJECT: Annual AB 1600 Development Fee Report
RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that Council Accept and File the Attached Annual
AB 1600 Development Fee Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2014.
11.
SUBJECT: Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy – Award of Professional Services Contract
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an
Agreement for Professional Services with Davey Resource Group, to Provide Professional
Services for the Development of the Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy.
12.
SUBJECT: Auburn Blvd Complete Streets Enhancement Project Phase 2 Project RPSTPLE5475(038) Award of Design Services Contract
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a
Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Brinkerhoff for the Design of the Auburn
Boulevard Complete Streets Enhancement Project Phase 2.
13.
SUBJECT: Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project - Project Acceptance – City PN 20-11-007
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Accepting the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail
Project as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to Record a Notice of Completion and
Release the Contract Retention.
14.
SUBJECT: Retroactive Adoption of the Payrate Schedule for the City of Citrus Heights for
Fiscal Year 2012-2013
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Retroactive Adoption of the Payrate Schedule
for Fiscal Year 2012-2013.
15.
SUBJECT: Proposed Contract Amendment No. 2 – Street Sweeping Services
Wells Sweeping, LLC
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving Amendment No. 2 to the Street
Sweeping Services Contract with Wells Sweeping, LLC and Authorizing the General Services
Director to Execute the Amendment.
Page 3 of 4
PUBLIC HEARINGS
REGULAR CALENDAR
16.
SUBJECT: Emergency On-Call Transportation Repairs – Authorization of Contracted
STAFF REPORT: David Wheaton / Stuart Hodgkins
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute
Contracts with Arrow Construction and Biondi Paving and Engineering for Emergency
Transportation Services.
17.
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Compensation Program for Non-Represented Employees
STAFF REPORT: Stefani Daniell / Ronda Rivera
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Implementing the Fiscal Year 2014-2015
Compensation Program for Non-Represented Employees.
18.
SUBJECT: Approval of Budget Augmentation to the FY 2014-2015 History and Arts
Commission Budget for an Amount Not to Exceed $2,500
STAFF REPORT: Rhonda Sherman / Katherine Cooley
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving a Not to Exceed $2,500 FY 20142015 Budget Augmentation for the Purpose of Enhancing the City’s Oral History Project.
19.
SUBJECT: Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Establishment of New and the Relocation or
Expansion of Existing Massage Establishments
STAFF REPORT: Rhonda Sherman
RECOMMENDATION: Introduce for a First Reading and Read by Title Only and Waive the
First Full Reading of Ordinance No. 2014-___ An Interim Ordinance of the City of Citrus
Heights Adopted as an Urgency Measure Pursuant to California Government Code Section
65858 Making Findings and Establishing a Temporary Moratorium on the Establishment of New
and the Relocation or Expansion of Existing Massage Establishments.
20.
SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Use of the General Fund Reserve Balance
STAFF REPORT: Stefani Daniell
Council of the City of Citrus Heights, Establishing Guidelines for Use of General Fund Reserve
Balance.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
ITEMS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
Page 4 of 4
ITEM 4
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
Henry Tingle, City Manager
FROM:
Amy Van, City Clerk
SUBJECT:
Certification of November 4, 2014 General Municipal Election Results
Summary and Recommendation
The certification document for the November 4, 2014, General Municipal Election has been
provided by Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections.
It is recommened that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution certifying the results of the
November 4, 2014 General Municipal Election with regard to Members of the City Council.
Fiscal Impact
There is no cost associated with the certification process.
Background and Analysis
The City Council, as the governing body of the City, declares the results of the election for each
City Council office voted on at a municipal election. As a result of the election, the following
Council Members have been re-elected and elected to the City Council for full, four-year terms:
Jeannie Bruins
Mel Turner
Steve “Sparky” Miller
Conclusion
Staff recommends the adoption of the resolutions certifying the results of the November 4, 2014
General Municipal Election.
Attachments: (1) Resolution No. 2014-___ including Exhibit A Certificate of Facts
RESOLUTION NO. 2014- ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,
CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD
ON NOVEMBER 4, 2014, DECLARING THE RESULT AND OTHER SUCH MATTERS AS
PROVIDED BY LAW
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Citrus
Heights, California, on Tuesday, November 4, 2014, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law;
that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all
respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed; and the
returns made and declared in the time, form and manner required by the provisions of the Elections
Code of the State of California for the holding of election in general law cities; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections Department canvassed
the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, and the results are received,
attached and made a part hereof as “Exhibit A.”
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City of Citrus Heights
does hereby determine:
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as
follows: Jeannie Bruins, Mel Turner, Steve “Sparky” Miller, Tim Schaefer, Bridget Duffy.
2. That the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the
respective offices for which the persons were candidates are listed in Exhibit “A” attached.
3. The City Council does declare and determine that:
Jeannie Bruins, Mel Turner and Steve “Sparky” Miller were elected as Members of the
City Council for the full term of four years.
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book
of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 11th day
of December 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Melvin D. Turner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Special/Regular Meetings of Thursday, November 13, 2014
City Hall Council Chambers
7117 Greenback Lane, Citrus Heights, CA
ITEM 9
CALL SPECIAL MEETING TO ORDER
The special council meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Turner
1.
Roll Call: Council Members present: Bruins, Miller, Slowey, Frost and Turner
Council Members absent: None
Staff present:
Daniell, Rivera, Tingle, Van, Ziegler and department
directors.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CLOSED SESSION
2.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957:
Title: City Manager
3.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54957.6
Agency Designated Representatives: Henry Tingle, City Manager
Employee Organization: Citrus Heights Police Officers Association
Employee Organization: Unrepresented Employees (ALL)
4.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Sipple v. Alameda et al.
City Attorney Ziegler announced that there was no reportable action from closed session.
STUDY SESSION
5.
CalPERS Update / Final Audit
Human Resources and City Information Director Rivera and Finance Director Daniell led the study
session on the CalPERS Update / Final Audit. She explained that the Public Employee Pension
Reform Act made several changes to public employee pensions and provided an overview of the
impacts to Citrus Heights. She also provided an overview of the recent audit conducted by
CalPERS.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Turner adjourned the special meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes
Special/Regular Meetings of November 13, 2014
CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER
The regular council meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor Turner.
1.
The flag salute was led by Council Member Jeff Slowey.
2.
Roll Call: Council Members present: Bruins, Miller, Frost and Turner
Council Members absent: None
Staff present:
Anderson, Boyd, Hodgkins, Piva, Sherman, Tingle,
Van, Ziegler and department directors.
3.
The video statement was read by City Clerk Van.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Slowey, the City
Council approved the agenda.
AYES:
Bruins, Miller, Slowey, Frost and Turner
NOES:
None
ABSENT: None
PRESENTATIONS
4.
Presentation of the California Highway Patrol/ Office of Transportation Safety (CHP/OTS)
California Law Enforcement Challenge (CLEC) Special Recognition Award
California Highway Patrol Assistant Commissioner Warren Stanley explained that the California
Law Enforcement Challenge was started in 2003 and is a competition among local law enforcement
agencies looking at their traffic safety programs and how they promote traffic safety within their
community. He presented the 2013 Law Enforcement Challenge Impaired Driving Speed
Awareness to Police Chief Boyd.
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND REGIONAL BOARD UPDATES
Council Member Slowey attended the Veteran’s Day Ceremony at Sylvan Cemetery. He provided a
report from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Board meeting. He encouraged the
public to read the article in the latest Comstock’s Magazine about Citrus Heights.
Council Member Bruins provided a report from the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
and Sacramento Area Sewer District Board meeting. She attended a Mutual Housing of California
breakfast. She attended the Arcade Park ribbon cutting ceremony.
Vice Mayor Frost congratulated Mark Wells as the new Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District
Chief. She also congratulated the candidates that were elected at the November 4, 2014 General
Election.
Page 2
Council Member Miller provided a report from the Regional Transit Board meeting.
Mayor Turner commented on the Veteran’s Day Ceremony held at Sylvan Cemetery. He
announced the Citrus Heights Tree Lighting Ceremony to be held on December 4th at City Hall. He
announced the new Art in City Hall features the work of local artist Bita Baharestani.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jordan Chernesky with Republic Services announce that November through January 2015 Republic
Services will collect two 30-gallon trash bags full of leaves for free. He explained that they also
provide Christmas tree recycling.
Sheng Lo with Asian Resources, Inc. reported that many of their staff members are certified
enrollment counselors for Covered California that can provide assistance.
Bridget Duffy congratulated the Council Members that were re-elected.
Michael Lagomarsino stated he and other Planning Commissioners attended a training session held
by the American Planning Association Sacramento County Section.
Millie Loutensock congratulated the Council Members that were re-elected.
CONSENT CALENDAR
5.
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special/Regular Meetings of October
17, 2014 and October 23, 2014.
6.
SUBJECT: Sunrise Boulevard Complete Streets Improvements Phase 3 STPCML
5475(033)
Approval of Caltrans Supplemental Agreement No. 019-N2
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 2014-111 Adopting a Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute the Program Supplemental Agreement for the Sunrise Boulevard Complete Streets
Improvement-Phase 3 Project.
7.
Pulled for discussion.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Slowey, seconded by Council Member Bruins, the City
Council approved Consent Calendar Items 5 and 6.
AYES:
NOES:
None
ABSENT: None
Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION
7.
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Citrus Heights Municipal Code Chapter 78 Article III
Prohibition Against Intrusive and Unsafe Panhandling
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance No. 2014-006, and Waive Reading of the Entire
Ordinance and Read by Title Only An Ordinance of the City of Citrus Heights to Amend
Chapter 78, Street, Sidewalks, and Public Places, of the Citrus Heights Municipal Code by
Amending Article III “Prohibition Against Intrusive and Unsafe Panhandling”.
Council Members Miller and Bruins pulled Item 7 for questions.
City Clerk Van explained that the First Reading of the ordinance was conducted at the October 23
Council Meeting and this is the Second Reading of the ordinance.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Bruins, the City
Council adopted Ordinance No. 2014-006, and Waive Reading of the Entire Ordinance and Read by
Title Only An Ordinance of the City of Citrus Heights to Amend Chapter 78, Street, Sidewalks, and
Public Places, of the Citrus Heights Municipal Code by Amending Article III “Prohibition Against
Intrusive and Unsafe Panhandling”.
AYES:
NOES:
None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.
SUBJECT: Allocation of Federal 2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Funds and Approval of the Draft 2015 – 2019 Consolidated Plan - Continued from October
9, 2014 City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT: Katherine Cooley / Nicole Piva
City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, Adopting The 2015 Action Plan And 2015-2019
Consolidated Plan, And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute Contracts To Implement
The Adopted 2015 Action Plan.
Housing and Grants Technician Piva stated staff is recommending that the City Council hear public
testimony and approve the Community Development Block Grant 2015 Action Plan and the 20152019 Consolidated Plan. She presented an overview of the Quality of Life Committees
recommendations for the allocation of 2015 CDBG funds:
Agency
Capital Improvement Projects
Highland Ave Accessibility Improvements
City-wide Accessibility Improvements
Housing Repair Program
Mobilehome Repair Grants – Up to $10,000
Public Services
Asian Resources, Inc.
Campus Life Connection
Page 4
Amount Recommended
$278,000
$90,000
$1,000,000 (CalHome Grant)
$8,000
$10,000
A Community for Peace
Meals on Wheels
Sacramento Self-Help Housing
Homelessness Prevention
Sacramento Self-Help Housing Landlord
Tenant Counseling/Mediation
Terra Nova Counseling
$13,000
$15,000
$8,000
$14,000
$16,000
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m.
Public Comment
Adriana Joyner with Terra Nova Counseling thanked the City Council for their support.
Mayor Turner closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Vice Mayor Frost, the City
Council approved Resolution No. 2014-112 Adopting a Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Citrus Heights, Adopting The 2015 Action Plan And 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, And
Authorizing The City Manager To Execute Contracts To Implement The Adopted 2015 Action
Plan.
AYES:
NOES:
None
ABSENT: None
REGULAR CALENDAR
9.
SUBJECT: Agreement with Steadfast Sunrise I – V, LLC and Kings Business, LLC for
Supplemental Police Services
STAFF REPORT: Christopher Boyd / Ryan Kinnan
City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, Designating 6041 Sunrise Boulevard and
6508/6510 Antelope Road as a Critical Facilities and Authorizing the City Manager to
Contract with Steadfast Sunrise I – V, LLC and Kings Business, LLC for Supplemental
Police Services.
Police Commander Anderson reported that as a police department the primary mission is to protect
the safety of the Citrus Heights residents, the visitors and employees in the event of an emergency,
or disasters or acts of terrorism. One of the ways we do this is by periodically evaluating locations
within our community to determine if these locations by their nature may be identified by criminals
as the potential for a violent attack. Critical facilities can be defined as those facilities that are
determined to be essential for conducting emergency operations, which would include maintaining
the health, safety, and overall wellbeing of the public following a disaster emergency and or act of
terrorism. Sunrise Mall and Stone’s Gambling Hall and Tavern fall within the definition of critical
facilities. Both entities have also requested supplemental police services from the Citrus Heights
Police Department and staff is recommending approval.
Page 5
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Slowey, seconded by Council Member Bruins, the
City Council approved Resolution No. 2014-113 Adopting a Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Citrus Heights, Designating 6041 Sunrise Boulevard and 6508/6510 Antelope Road as a
Critical Facilities and Authorizing the City Manager to Contract with Steadfast Sunrise I – V, LLC
and Kings Business, LLC for Supplemental Police Services.
AYES:
Bruins, Slowey, Frost and Turner
NOES:
Miller
ABSENT: None
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
10.
SUBJECT: Report Back from Finance Committee on History and Arts Commission
Request for Additional Funds
RECOMMENDATION: Receive Input from the City Council and Bring Back Formal
Action on December 11, 2014.
STAFF REPORT: Community / Economic Development Department
Community and Economic Development Director Sherman stated this item is a report back from the
Finance Committee on a request of the History and Arts Commission for additional funds. The
request for funds is for two projects: additional art purchases for the City’s permanent art collection
and additional oral interviews for the City’s oral history project. There was agreement in the
Finance Committee that the request was worthy of consideration there was not agreement on the
amount and staff is seeking Council direction and will then come back with a formal action at the
December 11th Council meeting.
Council discussion followed staff’s presentation.
By consensus the City Council was in agreement with funding the oral history project
augmentation, but at this time, not the City art collection augmentation. They directed staff to bring
back an item for formal action.
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None
ITEMS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS/FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Principal Civil Engineer Hodgkins provided an update on the Sunrise Bus Stop Improvements
Phase II.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Turner adjourned the regular meeting at 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
Page 6
ITEM 10
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Stefani Daniell, Finance Director
SUBJECT:
Annual AB 1600 Development Fee Report
Staff recommends that Council accept and file the attached Annual AB 1600 Development Fee
Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.
Fiscal Impact
No impact to the General Fund.
In accordance with the provisions of the State of California Government Code Section 66001 and
66006, the City is required to publish an annual report for each fund established to account for
public facilities fees (also known as development impact fees). The report must include the
beginning and ending balances by public facility type for the fiscal year and the amount of fees,
interest, other income and expenditures for each fund.
To be in full compliance with State law, the City must:
•
•
Spend or commit development impact fees within five years of collecting them; or
Adopt a resolution that makes a finding that there remains a reasonable relationship
between the current need for the fees and the purpose for which they were originally
proposed.
Subject: Annual AB1600 Development Fee Report
Date: December 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Currently, the City collects four different categories of impact fees as described in this report.
The Transit Impact Fee and the Park Facilities Impact Fee have not held any development fees
beyond the five-year period described in AB 1600. As of June 30, 2014, $56,519 in the
Roadway Impact Fee has been held beyond the five-year period as described in AB 1600. In
fiscal year 2014-2015, $184,668 was budgeted for the Stock Ranch Reimbursement Agreement
that was approved by Council in March 2003. As of June 30, 2014, $90,543 in the Low Income
Housing Impact Fee has been held beyond the five-year period as described in AB1600. In fiscal
year 2014-2015, $114,933 was budgeted for the Sayonara Redevelopment Project.
The City generally collects impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits for new
residential and commercial construction. The impact fees are deposited into separate
development impact fee funds.
The pace of development activity impacts the level of development fees. This source of funding
is subject to considerable variation due to economic cycles.
The City annually adopts an Operating Budget and Five Year Capital Improvement Program,
which are on file with the City Clerk.
This report includes one page for each development impact fee to make certain findings with
respect to the unexpended fund balance of each development impact fee pursuant to California
Government Code Section 66001. The beginning and ending balances for each fund and the
amount of fees, interest and expenditures for each fund are shown on each page. The schedule
also describes projects funded by these development impact fees. Capital projects are included
in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and the Capital Budget is adopted as part of the
City’s Annual Operating Budget.
Conclusion
Staff recommends that Council accept and file the attached Annual AB 1600 Development Fee
Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.
Attachments:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Low Income Housing Impact Fee Annual AB 1600 Fee Report for FY 13-14;
Roadway Impact Fee Annual AB 1600 Fee Report for FY 13-14;
Park Facilities Impact Fee Annual AB 1600 Fee Report for FY 13-14;
Transit Impact Fee Annual AB 1600 Fee Report for FY 13-14.
City of Citrus Heights
AB 1600 Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2014
Roadway Impact Fee
Fund 251
The purpose of this fund is to fund the design and construction of streets infrastructure improvements
required to mitigate the impact of new development.
Account Description
Revenue
Developer Fees
Interest Income
Total Revenue
Beginning Fund
Balance - 7/1/13
Ending Fund
Balance 6/30/14
9,848
5,372
15,220
Expenditures
Total Available
FY 13-14
233,124
442,348
(217,905)
224,444
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Revenue Collected FY 09-10
Total Revenue for Last Five Years
37,886
30,765
63,409
20,645
15,220
167,925
Result: $56,519 must be committed. In fiscal year 2014-2015, $184,668 was budgeted for the Stock Ranch
Reimbursement Agreement that was approved by Council in March 2003.
Project
Master Transit Plan
Transfer to Transit Impact Fee
Fountain Square Drive
Auburn Blvd/Van Maren Intersection
Antelope/Saybrook Intersection
Greenback Lane Widening - Right of Way Acquisitions
Antelope Road Improvement Project - Design Phase
2007 Road Reconstruction Project
Fair Oaks Overlay Project
Auburn Blvd. Design and Right of Way Acquisition
Auburn Blvd. Complete Streets and Joint Trench
Utility Undergroundiing Project
Total
Project to
Date Funding
% Complete
64,403
100%
170,821
100%
1,852,646
100%
534,332
100%
407,799
100%
853,950
100%
41,640
100%
265,156
100%
360,750
100%
302,001
100%
233,124
5,086,623
100%
% Funded with Fee
100%
100%
76%
34%
100%
100%
6%
19%
46%
7%
3%
AB 1600 Fee Report
Low Income Housing Impact Fee
Fund 252
The purpose of this fund is to provide a trust fund for low income housing projects.
Account Description
Revenue
Developer Fees
Interest Income
Total Revenue
Beginning Fund
Balance - 7/1/13
0
1,602
1,602
Expenditures
Total Available
Ending Fund
Balance 6/30/14
FY 13-14
0
112,876
1,602
114,478
5,351
807
12,873
3,302
1,602
23,935
Result: $90,543 must be committed. In fiscal year 2014-15, $114,933 was budgeted for the Sayonara
Redevelopment Project.
Projects
Housing Programs Assistance
Purchase Domestic Violence Intervention Center Shelter
Modernization of SHRA Units
Total
Project to
Date Funding % Complete
9,811
Ongoing
347,809
100%
354,015
100%
711,635
% Funded with Fee
100%
100%
55%
AB 1600 Fee Report
Park Facilities Impact Fee
Fund 254
The purpose of this fund is to maintain existing park and recreation facility standards and mitigate the
impacts caused by new and anticipated development activity to existing park and recreation facilities.
Account Description
Revenue
Developer Fees
Interest Income
Total Revenue
Beginning Fund
Balance - 7/1/13
Ending Fund
Balance 6/30/14
9,707
193
9,900
Expenditures
Total Available
FY 13-14
24,917
33,194
(15,017)
18,177
26,017
22,701
9,348
4,283
9,900
72,248
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001.
Projects
Building Permit for Sunrise Park - Restroom Demolition
Van Maren Park
Contribution for Rusch Park Basketball Court
Park on Sayonara Drive
Total
Project to
Date Funding
595
334,557
25,000
307,492
667,645
% Complete % Funded with Fee
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
AB 1600 Fee Report
Transit Impact Fee
Fund 255
The purpose of this fund is to maintain existing transit standards and mitigate the impacts caused by new and
anticipated development activity.
Account Description
Revenue
Developer Fees
Interest Income
Total Revenue
Beginning Fund
Balance - 7/1/13
FY 13-14
Ending Fund
Balance 6/30/14
1,400
2,289
3,689
Expenditures
67,639
Total Available
169,536
(63,950)
105,586
20,146
10,525
15,839
82,205
3,689
132,404
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001.
Projects
Sunrise Mall ADA Driveway Design
Greenback/Firestone Concrete Construction
Miscellaneous Concrete Construction
Bus Stop Rehabilitation Project 2006
Bus Stop Improvements
Purchase Konica Color Copier
Auburn Blvd. Design and Right of Way Acquisition
Sunrise Blvd. Bus Stop Improvement Project
Total
Project to
Date Funding
5,562
4,379
12,405
120,981
698,470
1,714
125,524
67,639
1,036,675
% Complete
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
21%
% Funded with Fee
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
18%
3%
60%
ITEM 11
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Rhonda Sherman, Community and Economic Development Director
Colleen McDuffee, Planning Manger
Chris Myers, Facilities and Grounds Manager
Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:
Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy – Award of Professional Services
Contract
In 2013, the City was selected to receive grant funding from the Strategic Growth Council Urban
Greening Planning Grant for the development of the Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy
(CHUGS). A portion of this funding was used to conduct the Urban Forest Tree Inventory in 2014.
In July 2014, staff issued a request for proposals (RFP) seeking professional services for assistance
with CHUGS.
A total of two proposals were received on August 15, 2014. After an initial review of the proposals,
staff elected to hold on-site interviews for both firms. After interviews, Davey Resource Group was
the firm selected as the most qualified for this project.
Staff recommends City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to
execute an Agreement for Professional Services with Davey Resource Group.
Fiscal Impact
The City received a $207,000 grant from the Strategic Growth Council for Urban Greening
Planning. The project includes $207,000 in Urban Greening Planning funds and a $32,500 in City
match (In-kind Staff time) and Tree Mitigation Funds. In January 2013 the City entered into a
contract with the State that outlines the scope of work for the project and allocates the funding to the
City. Grant funding can be used for a variety of expenses associated with the project, including
outreach costs, technical document preparation. Approximately $90,000 of the grant has previously
been utilized for the Urban Forest Inventory and associated urban greening tasks.
Subject: CHUGS - Award of Contract
Date:
December 11, 2014
Page 2 of 3
The contract with Davey Resource Group is for an amount not to exceed $96,000. The remaining
grant funds can be utilized for staff time, outreach materials, or other related costs.
The proposed project is to develop the Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy. Project goals
include:
- Development of an Urban Forest Management Plan
- Facilitate community input and consensus for a successful, implementable CHUGS
- Evaluation of City Codes related to drought tolerant and native landscaping
- Evaluation of City Codes related to the States Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
A total of two proposals were received on August 15, 2014. The table below lists the firms
considered and the cost of each proposal.
Firm
Davey Resource Group
Mann Made Resources
Cost
$66,680
$59,680
The City elected to interview both teams that submitted proposals. The interviews allowed the
review team to gauge the depth of project understanding, discuss work-plans, hear about project
challenges and innovative strategies and/or approaches, as well as gain a clear picture of how well
the project team could work with staff throughout the project.
After interviews, Davey Resource Group was the firm selected as the most qualified for this project.
This project is a professional services contract and is not subject to the same award requirements as a
public works construction contract. Staff considered prices of the services after interviewing the
teams and chose Davey Resource Group as the most desired consultant. Davey Resource Group was
selected based on the team’s expertise in urban forestry and urban greening and overall experience
of the team.
Based on conversations with Davey Resources Group, staff opted to include additional scope of
work to include an Urban Canopy Assessment to supplement the Urban Forest inventory as well as a
more refined public outreach component resulting in a total project cost of $96,000. All of these
costs are reimbursable under the terms of the grant.
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an
Agreement for Professional Services for the Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy with Davey
Resource Group
Exhibits
A.
Resolution No. 14-___ authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement for
Professional Services with Davey Resource Group
Subject: CHUGS - Award of Contract
Date:
December 11, 2014
Page 3 of 3
Attachments
1.
Project Work Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-____
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP, TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITRUS HEIGHTS
URBAN GREENING STRATEGY
WHEREAS, in September 2013, the City was awarded a Urban Greening Planning Grant for
the preparation of a Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy; and
WHEREAS, In July 2014, the City issued a Request for Proposals for Professional Services
for the Citrus Heights Urban Greening Strategy; and
WHEREAS, on August 15, 2014, three proposals were received; and
WHEREAS, Davey Resource Group was selected from a group of consultant teams through
a competitive selection process; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work includes, but is not limited to community outreach, plan
preparation, and project coordination; and
WHEREAS, the contract amount is not to exceed $96,000; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement for Professional Services will be paid for with Grant funding
from the Urban Greening Planning grant and matched with staff time; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the
City of Citrus Heights that the City Manager is authorized to execute an Agreement for Professional
Services with Davey Resource Group for the preparation of the Citrus Heights Urban Greening
Strategy.
The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the
book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California,
this 11th day of December, 2014, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
D R G
Fee Proposal
Davey Resource Group prices consulting projects by determining the number of hours that are
dedicated to a task within a project, and multiplying that by our hourly rates, which are
included in this proposal. To create a project that fits your budget, there are certain line items
that can be adjusted. For example, by limiting document review, DRG can hold additional
stakeholder meetings. Please know our pricing is negotiable and we can provide more detail as
necessary. We look forward to the opportunity to discuss our pricing and methodology with
you.
Hourly Rates and Personnel:
Davey Resource Group
Dana Karcher
Market Manager
$125.00
Emily Spillett
Operations Manager
$95.00
Tina McKeand
Project Coordinator (Manager)
$95.00
Ruth Williams
Urban and Community Forestry
Specialist
$85.00
Julia Bartens
Urban and Community Forestry
Specialist
$85.00
Foothill Associates
Ed Armstrong
Landscape Architect
$150.00
Meredith Branstad
Landscape Architect
$120.00
C. Guider
Project Administration
$85.00
Ann Marie Perozzi
Graphic Designer
$80.00
D R G
Task
Fee
Kickoff Meeting
$2,120
Task 1: Urban Forest Master Plan
$32,840
Task 2: Evaluation of the City’s codes related to landscaping/development
of guidelines, policies and palette
$22,436
Task 3: Evaluation of Existing Water Efficient Landscape Policies and
Development of a Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
$12,459
Task 4: Attend Project Meetings and Community Outreach
$9,580
Task 5: Urban Tree Canopy Assessment
$16,216
TOTAL
$95,651
Note: Davey Resource Group includes mileage and printing in our hourly rates.
D R G
3
3. Proje
ect Wo
ork Pla
an
A
A. Detailed
d description of the proposed
p
work
w
plan
C
Citrus Heightss will be well served by DR
RG and Foothiill Associates’’ experience iin providing p
plans to citiess across tthe country. O
Our well‐developed metho
odology is tho
orough, yet f lexible. The ffollowing desscription of ou
ur aapproach to this project is based on wo
orking with co
ommunities a nd entities th
hat we have sserved both lo
ocally and aacross North A
America. W
We will begin this project w
with a kickofff meeting that will be held in Citrus Heights. We will set the agen
nda with yyour input and approval be
efore this meeting takes place. At this time, we estaablish lines off communicattions, eexpectations ffor interactio
on (telephone
e, e‐mail, othe
er), and introdduce you to o
our team and their roles. D
DRG/Foothill Associates te
eam memberss attending th
his meeting innclude our Project Manageer, Project Deeveloper, aand Project Co
oordinator, and Foothill Associates’ Pro
oject Manageer. For this meeeting, it is ou
ur hope that your ccritical project team memb
bers would be
e in attendance. This incluudes not onlyy your projectt manager, bu
ut any key p
personnel thaat might be in
nteracting witth DRG througghout this proocess. At thiss meeting, wee will obtain n
names aand contact in
nformation frrom you for th
he projected stakeholder iinterview can
ndidates. Also
o, we will also
o verify tthe resourcess that we need
d to obtain frrom the City o
of Citrus Heigghts. We discuss and agreee on mileston
ne dates ffor timely com
mpletion of th
he project and
d assure that our bi‐weeklly reporting m
meets your standards. Wee will rreview our im
mplementation
n plan as well. TTask 1: Deve
elopment of
o an Urban Forest Man
nagement P
Plan – Dave
ey Resource
e Group
D
DRG has varie
ed methodolo
ogies for the ccompletion off an urban fo rest managem
ment plan. W
We base our p
projects o
on a adaptive managemen
nt methodologgy; examiningg what the citty has, what tthey want, want they need
d, and h
how to achievve the goals. B
Based on the objective Cittrus Heights w
wants to achieeve for this plan, and tech
hniques w
we have utilizzed for other communitiess, we have devveloped the ffollowing metthodology: TTo incorporatte and evalua
ate the existin
ng tree inven
ntory, DRG plaans on utilizin
ng i‐Tree, a to
ool developed
d to d
determine the
e structure, fu
unction, and value of the u
urban forest. The i‐Tree suite of softwaree tools provide the m
models necesssary for cities tto analyze the
eir trees and asssess the valuee of the servicces they provid
de. Knowing tthat the u
urban forest d
doesn’t exist in a vacuum, DRG will poin
nt efforts tow
ward critical isssues that aree of concern tto m
municipalitiess such as stormwater runo
off and air quality. This w ill be accomp
plished througgh an analysiss of Citrus H
Heights’ urban forest inven
ntory using i‐TTree Streets ((www.itreetoools.org). Thee i‐Tree suite of tools was d
developed in partnership w
with the USDA
A Forest Service, the Natioonal Arbor Daay Foundation
n, the Societyy of M
Municipal Arb
borists, the International SSociety of Arb
boriculture, Caasey Trees an
nd Davey Treee Expert Company. TThe i‐Tree Streets model w
will help evalu
uate the ecosyystem servicees provided by the urban fforest and help eestablish meaaningful and m
measurable goals for the fu
uture of the uurban forest.
TThe following quantificatio
on is available
e through i‐Trree Streets: ●
●
●
Storm
mwater runofff reduction. Air qu
uality improve
ement. Carbo
on dioxide red
duction. Davey Resource Gro
oup l August 2014 11 Agenda Packet Page 27
D R G
Energgy conservatio
on. Prope
erty value increase. In
n addition, i‐Tree Streets caalculates the following asp
pects of your ttree resourcee: ●
●
Structture (e.g., spe
ecies composition, age disttribution, cannopy cover).
Functtion (environm
mental and ae
esthetic bene
efits). ● Value
e (annual mon
netary value o
of benefits an
nd costs). ● Mana
agement need
ds (e.g., recom
mmended maaintenance, sttocking levelss, tree confliccts).
TThe data, charts, and document created
d by using the
e i‐Tree Streeets model, willl be full colorr graphic repo
ort that w
will inform the remainder of the UFMP and support the developm
ment of goalss and objectivves. It will be utilized tto “tell a storyy” about Citru
us Height’s urrban forest in
n a factual andd scientific method to inteernal and exteernal sstakeholders. ●
●
O
Once the i‐Tre
ee Streets rep
port is comple
eted, DRG will begin to deevelop recommendations for urban forrest ggoals, objectives, and policies. This willl be a process that is com pleted througgh research aand education
n. D
Determining w
what the City has is the first step; this w
will be capturred through d
departmental interviews, aand rresearch of exxisting codes and policies. The stakeho
older interview
ws are the criitical as they set the tone ffor the p
project. We w
work with the
e city’s projecct manager to
o determine t he list of city personnel th
hat have a “sttake” in tthe urban fore
est. This inclu
udes members of various city departmeents and eleccted officials iif so desired. Having p
previously con
nducted many of these typ
pes of projectts, DRG has ddeveloped meethodology fo
or this critically important tassk. Our proce
ess includes developing a sstandard set oof questions tthat will be assked during these interviews. These question
ns do not pre
eclude additio
onal discussioon that might be pertinent, but they do allow for cconsistency in
n research. In
n addition, if aa critical stake
eholder’s schhedule makess it difficult to
o conduct the interview, an e‐mail surveyy can take the
e place of a faace‐to‐face innterview. Oncce this step iss complete, D
DRG will aanalyze the daata to determ
mine strengths and gaps. D
DRG will comppare against b
best managem
ment practicees (BMPs), and in
ncorporate co
ommunity culture to develop our recom
mmendationss to include in
n the plan. W
While we are researching e
existing codes and policiess, we will alsoo examine current mainteenance and pllanting sstandards thaat exist within
n the city. We
e will do this by researchinng specificatio
ons currentlyy in use, as weell as aauditing recen
nt planting an
nd maintenan
nce sites within the city lim
mits. We will document th
hem, and com
mpare w
with current B
BMPs includin
ng ANSI A300
0 and Z133, CaalFire, and th e Internation
nal Society of Arboriculturee. We will d
determine wh
hat standardss need to be u
updated, and incorporate recommendaations into thee plan. B
Because our e
experience is nationwide, w
we have a gre
eat deal of exxperience in tthe developm
ment and reviision(s) of TTree Preserva
ations Ordina
ances. To com
mplete this ob
bjective, will incorporate q
questions abo
out the current o
ordinance into
o our researcch. This includ
des asking staaff and stakehholders if thee current ordinance is bein
ng ffollowed and enforced, pro
ovides the pro
oper mitigation, fits with tthe culture off the commun
nity, or is too
o st
b
burdensome o
or not strong enough. In aaddition, this will be a partt of the 1 co
ommunity workshop preseentation tto determine if stakeholde
ers understand and are sattisfied with thhe ordinance. Recommend
dations will bee p
provided as a secondary do
ocument and incorporated
d into the plaan if desired. D
Developing priority forest improvemen
nt needs will be developedd after the reesearch, intervviews, and w
workshop(s) ttake place. Th
hroughout the process, we
e will listen foor the needs of the city, prrovide solutio
ons, Davey Resource Gro
D R G
rrecommend B
BMP’s, and co
omparison citty methods an
nd structure. Additional im
mprovement recommendaations w
will come from
m the iTree Sttreets analysiis of the urbaan forest itselff. M
Much like the
e working with
h Tree Ordinaances, determ
mining the usee of Tree Mittigation Fund
ding will comee from o
our experiencce, and workin
ng with your stakeholders. We will exaamine if the p
past usage has been effecttive, u
ultimately increasing the canopy within
n Citrus Heights. We will m
make compariisons to like ccommunities and d
determine if tthere are diffe
erent method
dologies that might createe a better outtcome for usee of the fundin
ng. In aaddition, the i‐Tree Streetss analysis can help determine the best ttrees for mitiigation (trees that are perfforming b
best in Citrus Heights) and can help guid
de the mitigation. O
Our intent is tto deliver a m
management p
plan that is dyynamic, usea ble, and incorporates treee managemen
nt policy ffor Citrus Heigghts. It will in
ncorporate information on
n public trees , but will also
o maintain a ffocus on sustaaining aand growing ccanopy throughout the cityy limits. The goals and obbjectives will b
be It will be fformatted forr a variety o
of uses including: 
Assistting personne
el in budgeting, staffing, an
nd other operrational aspects. In addition, it will givee staff a tool fo
or coordination on projectts including capital projectts. 
Suppo
orting plannin
ng policies bo
oth internally and external ly and speak to both stakeeholder group
ps. 
Urban
n forest perso
onnel will havve a tool that will support ttheir efforts tto maintain aa healthy and sustaiinable municiipal forest. 
Publicc stakeholderrs will have a document that allows theem a definitivee way to ackn
nowledge thee city strate
egies for Citru
us Heights urb
ban forest and
d find ways too participate in the health
h and sustainaability of the city’s trees. 
It will integrate atttainable goalss into five yeaar incrementss, with a 25+ yyear shelf lifee. TThe document will be narrative text autthored by botth the projectt coordinatorr and the urbaan and comm
munity fforestry specialist(s). As eaach of the above compone
ents relates too one anotheer within the u
urban forest, they will b
be addressed through our initial researcch, current be
est managem
ment practicess, and comparison to otheer ccommunities that are simillar to Citrus H
Heights. We w
will produce aa 100% draft ccopy for yourr initial review
w and eediting, addre
ess the changes you are se
eeking, and th
hen deliver a ffinal draft to you. The form
mat can be d
determined by Citrus Heights from our sample planss and determiined by the fiinal budget. TTo futher info
orm the plan and provide aadditional guidelines for t ree managem
ment, DRG pro
oposes the d
development of an urban fforest canopyy study. TTask Two: Ev
valuation of the City’s codes rela
ated to land
dscaping/developmen
nt of guideliines,
p
policies and
d palette (FFoothill Asso
ociates with
h support fro
om DRG)
TThe City of Cittrus Heights’ current landsscape guidelin
nes are contaained in Sectio
on 106.34 of the Municipaal Code. FFoothill Assocciates’ landscaape architects will review landscape‐reelated City cod
des and policcies and work with City sstaff to identify opportunitties to incorporate additional native an d drought‐to
olerant landsccape policies. Davey Resource Gro
D R G
FFoothill Assocciates will devvelop plantingg guidelines for the City off Citrus Heights. The guideelines will ideentify n
native and dro
ought toleran
nt plants suitaable for use in
n Citrus Heighhts. The guidelines will incclude an intro
oduction d
discussing local climate zon
nes, micro‐cliimates, invasive species, w
water efficiency, other reso
ources for plaant information, aand a guide to
o using the pllant list. The plant list willl be divided in
nto sections b
by plant form
m (groundcover, shrub, or tre
ee) for ease o
of use. Each sspecies includded in the plaant list will have an entry w
with the ffollowing info
ormation: 
Plant Descriptiion including scientific and
d common naame, deciduous/ evergreen
n, approximaate liffespan, heigh
ht, width, bloo
om color and season, and origin. 
Cultural Requirements inclu
uding water u
use, sun/ shadde tolerance, and any speccial maintenaance or husbandry nee
eds. 
d Use such ass mass plantin
ng, specimen,, border, screeening, and butterfly or Recommended
hummingbird ggardens. 
Representative
e photograph
hs will be inclu
uded for as m
many species as possible, d
depending on
n photograph avvailability. TThe draft plan
nting guidelines and recom
mmended chaanges to the CCity Code will be submitted electronically in P
PDF, Microsofft Word, and Adobe InDesign format fo
or review by CCity staff. Wee will meet wiith City staff tto review ttheir commen
nts and conce
erns on the drraft guidelines. Following this meeting,, the plantingg guidelines and p
proposed ordinance changges will be pre
epared for pu
ublic review a nd commentt. At the closee of the publiic review p
period, Foothill Associates will meet witth City staff to
o review pubblic commentss on the prop
posed plantingg gguidelines and
d identify chaanges to the gguidelines and
d ordinance rrevisions. On
nce these changes are integrated into the documents, the fin
nal guideliness will be provided electronnically to the City in PDF, M
Microsoft Word, and A
Adobe InDesiggn format. TTask 3: Evaluation of Ex
xisting Wate
er Efficient Landscape
L
e Policies an
nd Develop
pment of a W
Water
E
Efficient Lan
ndscape Orrdinance (FFoothill Asso
ociates)
TThe Californiaa Model Wate
er Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWEELO) that wass established in 2006 undeer A.B. 1
1881, which required all lo
ocal agencies to develop an
n ordinance oor adopt the m
model ordinaance by Januaary 31, 2
2010. Currently, the City o
of Citrus Heights has adoptted the state MWELO. FFoothill Assocciates’ landscaape architects will begin by reviewing eexisting City ccodes and pollicies, includin
ng the zzoning code, b
building and d
design review
w permit applications and checklists, an
nd the Generaal Plan, to dettermine ttheir complian
nce with the MWELO. We
e will also worrk with the thhree water pu
urveyors, Citrrus Heights W
Water D
District, Cal American Water, and Sacramento Suburrban Water D
District, to dettermine their requirementts for irrigation instaallation and inspection. U
Using this information we w
will develop aa revised wateer efficient laandscape o
ordinance to rreplace Sectio
on 106.34.060 of the City’s Municipal CCode that com
mplies with sttate regulatio
ons and m
meets the nee
eds of our loccal water districts. TThe administrrative draft re
evised ordinance will be prrovided electrronically in PDF and Micro
osoft Word fo
ormat for rreview by Cityy staff. We w
will meet with City staff to rreview their ccomments an
nd concerns o
on the adminiistrative d
draft revised o
ordinance. The ordinance
e will then be updated to r eflect City staaff commentss and a draft revised Davey Resource Gro
D R G
o
ordinance will be prepared
d for public re
eview and com
mment. Folloowing the pub
blic review peeriod, Foothilll A
Associates will meet with C
City staff to re
eview public ccomments onn the proposeed ordinance and identify changes tto be impleme
ented in the ffinal revised o
ordinance. Th
he final ordinnance will be provided elecctronically in PDF and M
Microsoft Wo
ord format. O
Once the final revised ordinance is apprroved by City staff, Foothilll Associates w
will provide rrecommendattions on cchanges need
ded to other forms, applicaations, and ch
hecklists to prroperly refereence and imp
plement the reevised o
ordinance. TTask 4: Attend Project Meetings
M
and
a
Commu
unity Outrea
ach (DRG a
and Foothilll Associatess)
O
Our project te
eam will atten
nd and facilitaate the follow
wing project m
meetings and outreach in aaddition to th
he review m
meetings asso
ociated with sspecific tasks above: K
Kick‐off meeting – DRG willl organize, aggendize, and ccomplete thee minutes for the kick‐off m
meeting. As d
discussed p
previously, the meeting will allow our p
project team tto review thee project goalss, scope, budget, and scheedule w
with City stafff. Stakeholde
ers and key co
ontacts outsid
de the City wiill be identifieed at this meeeting for inclu
usion in tthe project prrocess. 1st Community Workshop –
– At the first ccommunity w
workshop, ou r project team
m will present information
n on the eexisting ordinances and the existing con
ndition of the
e urban forestt. DRG will prrepare inform
mation on thee UFMP to p
present to the
e public includ
ding the results of the i‐Trree Streets Annalysis. Footh
hill Associatess will review tthe eexisting City p
planting guide
elines and water efficient o
ordinances annd standards and potentiaal changes to the o
ordinances. M
Meeting atten
ndees will the
en be asked fo
or their inputt to determine the commu
unity vision fo
or the u
urban forest in Citrus Heights. It is assu
umed that the
e City will be responsible ffor securing a location for and p
publicizing the
e communityy meeting. Th
he project teaam will assist with develop
pment of a meeeting announcement fflyer. 2nd Communitty Workshop – The projectt team will prresent the draaft plans and ordinances fo
or community review aat the second community w
workshop. A DRG urban aand communi ty forestry sp
pecialist will d
discuss the drraft C
CHUGS plan aas it relates to
o the trees in the planting palette and t he UFMP. Fo
oothill Associaates will present the p
proposed plan
nting guidelin
nes and waterr efficient landscape ordinnance revision
ns, as well as the planting gguidelines. It is assumed that the City w
will be respon
nsible for secuuring a locatio
on for and pu
ublicizing the ccommunity m
meeting. The project team will assist with developmeent of a meetting announccement flyer.
P
Planning Com
mmission – The project team
m will presen
nt the project documents aand recommeendations, inccluding tthe UFMP, Plaanting Guidelines, and pro
oposed ordinaance updates,, to the Plann
ning Commisssion and answ
wer q
questions as n
necessary. C
City Council ‐ The project team will pressent the proje
ect documentts and recom
mmendations, including thee UFMP, P
Planting Guidelines, and prroposed ordin
nance update
es, to the Cityy Council and answer quesstions as neceessary. C
Community o
outreach will also take place throughou
ut tasks 1 – 33. Our projectt team will deevelop inform
mational eeducational m
materials addrressing the urrban forest, w
water efficien t landscapingg, and native or drought to
olerant laandscaping. These materiials may inclu
ude website e
enhancementts, brochures,, flyers, posteers, or worksh
heets. Davey Resource Gro
D R G
TThe exact nature of the maaterials will be determined
d in consultattion with City Staff based o
on public inteerest and ffeedback from
m the commu
unity worksho
ops. EEducational m
materials abou
ut the urban fforest will address an und erstanding off the benefitss that trees prrovide b
beyond aesthetics and whyy increasing tthe urban fore
est canopy is important. PProper tree care and plantting, tree sselections, young tree maintanance can
n be included for property owner beneffits. In addition, changes tto code, m
mitigation, orr other relevant informatio
on gleaned fro
om the UFMPP can be communicated th
hrough a seriees of information cards that can
n be distribute
ed throughou
ut a certain tim
me frame as aa campaign. TTo increase aw
wareness of tthe importancce of water efficient landsscaping, a bro
ochure may in
nclude a discu
ussion of p
plant selection and irrigatio
on technique
es. Additionally, we can prrepare a workksheet to help
p property ow
wners p
plan and desiggn their irrigaation system. TThe Plant Guidelines developed as part of the projecct will alreadyy be formatteed for booklett printing. Ad
dditional m
materials might include haandouts on ce
ertain types of plants, suchh as seasonal color or turf alternatives. We ccould also wo
ork with the City’s webmasster to transfo
orm the Plantt Guidelines into a searchaable databasee on the C
City’s website
e. TThis scope inccludes up to 8
80 hours to de
evelop outreaach materialss for Foothill A
Associates an
nd 60 hours fo
or DRG. A
All educationaal outreach m
materials will b
be provided in electronic fformat PDF and Microsoftt Word, Adobe InDesign, or A
Adobe Illustrator as approp
priate. We asssume the Citty will be resp
ponsible for aall printing. TTask 5: Urba
an Tree Can
nopy Assesssment – Da
avey Resourrce Group
TThe Urban Tre
ee Canopy (U
UTC) Assessm
ment will inclu
ude land coveer classificatio
on and mapping, as well ass tree ccanopy assesssment analysis by geograp
phic and/or land use bounddaries. GIS deliverables w
will be included. In aaddition, the plan will inclu
ude the follow
wing: 
Development o
of prioritized planting areaas that includdes stormwater analysis. TThis analysis w
will id
dentify and prrioritize tree p
planting sitess to reduce sooil degradatio
on and loss wiith considerattion to permiability, e
existing land ccover, and slo
ope. ort Card as a valuable, inte
eractive publiic outreach and communiccation tool th
hat  A Canopy Repo
illlustrates tree
e canopy, pub
blic tree resou
urces and oth er metrics, opportunities, and challengges by neighborhood. Davey Resource Gro
ITEM 12
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
David Wheaton, General Services Director
Kevin Becker, Principal Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Auburn Blvd Complete Streets Enhancement Project Phase 2
Project RPSTPLE-5475(038)
Award of Design Services Contract
On October 23, 2014, City Council approved the Program Supplemental Agreement with
Caltrans for funding of the Auburn Blvd. Phase 2 Preliminary Engineering and Environmental
$1,062,000 (+ city match $138,793 = $1,200,793). The total grant is for $4 million ($3,541,200
Federal/State + $458,800 City Match). The remaining funding will not be programmed until the
City has completed and adopted the environmental study and findings.
Staff recommends City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to
execute a contract for services with Parsons Brinckerhoff for the environmental, preliminary
design and right of way for Auburn Boulevard Complete Street Enhancement Project, Phase 2 –
Rusch Park to the northern city limits (NCL). If approved, the City Manager will execute the
contract after receiving Caltrans certificate of compliance letter for the contract.
Fiscal Impact
The total cost of preliminary engineering, environmental and right way for the Project is
estimated at $4 million. The grant fund of $3,541,200 has a city match requirement of $458,800
(11.47%). The balance will be funded as approved in the 2013/14 CIP (Storm Utility & Gas
Tax). The contract with Parsons Brinkerhoff is for a not too exceed cost of $1,543,168.
The Boulevard Plan, adopted in 2005, set the framework for developing the Auburn Boulevard
Corridor from Sylvan Corners to the northern City limits. The Auburn Boulevard Project is
reflected in the Capital Improvement Program and Strategic Goals set by City Council during
their annual retreat. The Project was also the City’s former Redevelopment Agency’s number
one priority since the inception of the Agency in 1997.
Subject: Auburn Blvd. Complete Streets Enhancement Project Phase 2 – Award of Design Services Contract
Date:
December 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
The Auburn Boulevard Project is one of the City’s largest public works projects, totaling
approximately $20 million for Phase I - Segments II and III. It has required a significant amount
of environmental work, time to develop, right-of way acquisition and time to construct. Phase I
of the Project was completed in this year. A complete Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
the Boulevard Plan has been approved.
The City received a grant that will allow Auburn Blvd. Phase 2 work to proceed through the
purchase of right of way. The scope of consultant work includes preliminary engineering
(design plans to 35% & joint trench plans to 80%), environmental, right of way engineering,
grant writing assistance and public outreach. The consultant will complete just enough of the
design in this phase to identify Right of Way requirements. The amount of the next grant and
final right of way will dictate the final design and if the plans need to be segmented. Staff is
hopeful to have funding for the entire 0.82 miles.
After advertising the project, the City received three (3) proposals – Quincy, Parsons
Brinckerhoff and Psomas. After presentations and interviews of the three firms, staff selected
Parsons Brinckerhoff to negotiate a final cost proposal. Parsons Brinckerhoff’s subconsultant
team includes Dokken Engineering (environmental), Cunningham Engineering (landscaping),
Unico Engineering (Drainage and Surveying), Interwest Consulting Group (Right of way), Y &
C Transportation Consultants (Electrical) and Bennett Engineering (Caltrans processing). Based
on successful negotiations, staff is recommending a design services contract with Parsons
Brinckerhoff.
If approved, the City Manager will execute the contract after receiving Caltrans certificate of
compliance letter for the contract. Consultant contracts over $1 million with federal funds
require Caltrans to audit the process and contract contents. This review is expected to be
completed in January.
Conclusion
enter into a Contract for Design Services with Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc. to design the Auburn
Blvd. Complete Streets Enhancement Project Phase 2.
Attachment:
Resolution
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS
BRINKERHOFF FOR THE DESIGN OF THE
AUBURN BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREETS
ENHANCEMENT PROJECT PHASE 2
WHEREAS, in October 2014 the City Council approved a Grant Supplemental
Agreement with the State for the Auburn Boulevard Complete Streets Enhancement Project
Phase 2, Rusch Park and the northern city limits, for Preliminary Engineering, Environmental
and Right of way for the roadway improvements; and
WHEREAS, after soliciting for design proposals, the City received three proposals and
after interviewing all three, selected Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to enter into a Professional Services Contract with
Parsons Brinckerhoff in an amount not to exceed $1,543,168; and
WHEREAS, funding for this project is budgeted
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of
the City of Citrus Heights, the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a Contract for
services with Parsons Brinckerhoff to design the Auburn Boulevard Complete Streets
Enhancement Project Phase 2.
The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it
into the book of original resolutions.
this 11th day of December, 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 13
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Kevin Becker, Principal Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project
Project Acceptance – City PN 20-11-007
On January 23, 2014, City Council awarded the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project (Project) to B &
M Builders, Inc. in the amount of $937,673.50. At the April 10, 2014 City Council meeting, Council
approved increasing the contract amount to $1,114,214 to add waterline work. The contractor has
completed all construction work and the Project has been field accepted by staff
Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached resolution, accepting the Project as complete
and directing the City Engineer to record a Notice of Completion for the Project and release the
remaining retention amount after the 35 day lien period.
Fiscal Impact
The Contractor was awarded a contract for $937,673.50 but very shortly afterward was increased to
$1,114,214. During the progress of the work the contractor received 4 additional change orders for
$47,512 to address adding drainage, tensar fabric, landscaping and adding asphalt speed tables. Due to
unsuitable subgrade, the project significantly overran the bid quantities for base rock and excavation.
The total contracted expenditures for the contractor’s work was $1,220,132.95 (a 10% increase after
city council approved increasing the contract to add the Citrus Heights Waterline project). Citrus
Heights Water District has already reimbursed the city $299,321 for the waterline work on this project.
Below is a summary of the funding for this project:
$ 538,200
HSIP grant - HSIPL-5475(030)
Citrus Heights Water District
$ 299,321
Measure A (Pedestrian Safety and Traffic Control) $ 252,795
Storm Water Utility
$ 163,600
TOTAL
$ 1,227,418
The above funding total includes materials testing.
Subject: Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project – Project Acceptance
Date:
December 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
On January 23, 2014, City Council awarded the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project (Project) to B&M
Builders, Inc.. At the April 10, 2014 meeting, City Council approved an additional $176,540 in
waterline work for the Citrus Heights Water District (CHWD), increasing the contracted amount to
$1,114,214. The district reimbursed the City for the additional waterline work.
In April, the contractor began excavation on the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail project. Almost
immediately, the contractor encountered a wet clay-like soil that lacked sufficient strength properties to
make compaction under the trail, even when dried out. The geotechnical consultant recommended
over-excavation of the soil, placing a tensar fabric under the rock base and placing an additional 12” of
aggregate base in the areas of unsuitable soil. The contractor used 155% of the aggregate base quantity
and 186% of the excavation which added about $100,000 to the project’s total cost.
In addition to the above work, staff directed approximately $35,000 in additional drainage work. This
work included 5 additional inlets and 4 sections of pipe from 45 lf to 65 lf and in various locations.
The design of 3 table top crossings necessitated some of the additional drainage work. Three inlets and
a pipe were discovered during the grading that necessitated the remaining additional drainage work.
The City opened bids for the Project on December 19, 2013. Fourteen (14) bids were received and
after a thorough analysis, staff determined B & M Builders bid of $937,673.50 was the lowest
responsive and responsible bid. On January 23, 2014, the City Council awarded a contract to B & M
Builders for the Project. Work on the project was completed and field accepted on October 15, 2014.
Staff and the Contractor have agreed on the final pay quantities and now seek final acceptance by the
City Council.
Conclusion
Staff recommends City Council approve the attached resolution accepting the Project as complete and
directing the City Engineer to record a Notice of Completion for the Project and release the remaining
retention amount after the 35 day lien period.
B & M Builders has provided the required 100% Warranty Bond to guarantee their work for one year.
Attachments: Resolution
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OLD AUBURN MULTI-USE TRAIL PROJECT AS
COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO RECORD A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION AND RELEASE THE CONTRACT RETENTION
WHEREAS, On January 23, 2014, City Council authorized the award of a contract to B & M
Builders, Inc. for the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project; and
WHEREAS, to B & M Builders has completed the work for the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail
Project in accordance with the special provisions and standard construction specifications, and has
approved the Final Engineer’s Estimate of Quantities and retention amount to be released for the
project.
City of Citrus Heights that the Old Auburn Multi-Use Trail Project is hereby accepted as complete.
The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into
the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this
11th day of December, 2014, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
____________________________________
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 14
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Sharon Neilson, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT:
Retroactive Adoption of the Payrate Schedule for the City of Citrus
Heights for Fiscal Year 2012-2013
Staff recommends City Council approve the attached Resolution retroactively adopting the
Payrate Schedule for the City of Citrus Heights for Fiscal Year 2012-2013.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact.
Background & Analysis
The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California Code of
Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 require that individual payrates shall be listed on a schedule
which has been duly approved and adopted by the employer’s governing body in accordance
with requirements of applicable public meeting laws. The pay schedule must identify the
position title for every employee position, show the payrate for each identified position as a
single amount or as multiple amounts within a range, and indicate the time base.
Specific pay schedules for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 did not meet the requirements listed above and
were not previously approved by the Citrus Heights City Council. CalPERS audit staff has made
a determination that correcting this discrepancy requires that the City Council retroactively adopt
the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Payrate Schedule, which is included as Exhibit A to the Resolution.
Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution retroactively adopting
the Payrate Schedule for the City of Citrus Heights for the Fiscal Year 2012-2013.
Attachments:
1. Resolution 2014-___ Retroactive Adoption of the Payrate Schedule for the City of Citrus
Heights for Fiscal Year 2012-2013
a. Exhibit A: Payrate Schedule FY 2012-2013
CALIFORNIA, RETROACTIVE ADOPTION OF THE PAYRATE SCHEDULE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013
WHEREAS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and California
Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 require governing bodies of local agencies contracting with
CalPERS to approve and adopt a payrate schedule in accordance with public meeting laws; and
WHEREAS, the payrate schedule must identify each position by title, list the individual
payrate amount or ranges for that position, show the time base upon which the amounts are based, and
track all revisions; and
WHEREAS specific pay schedules for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 did not meet the requirements
listed above and were not previously approved by the Citrus Heights City Council; and
WHEREAS CalPERS audit staff has made a determination that correcting this discrepancy
requires that the City Council retroactively adopt the Payrate Schedule for FY 2012-2013,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Citrus
Heights:
Section 1.
Findings
The City Council hereby finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct and have
served as the basis, in part, for the findings and actions of the City Council as set forth below.
Section 2.
The City Council hereby adopts retroactively the Payrate Schedule for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 attached
as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
11th day of December 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Mel Turner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
SALARY TABLE
FY 2012-2013
07/01/2012 through 08/19/2012
POSITION TITLES
Accountant
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Technician
Animal Services Officer I**
Animal Services Officer II**
Assistant City Clerk
Assistant Engineer
Assistant Planner
Assistant to the City Manager
Associate Civil Engineer
Associate Engineer
Associate Planner
Building Inspector I
Building Inspector II
Chief Building Official
Chief of Police
City Clerk
City Engineer
City Engineer - Extra Help
City Manager
Community & Economic Development Director
Community Enhancement Manager
Community Services Officer I
Community Services Officer II
Construction / Maintenance Inspector I
Construction / Maintenance Inspector II
Crime Scene / Property Evidence Specialist I
Crime Scene / Property Evidence Specialist II
Database and Applications Analyst
Development Services Technician I
Development Services Technician II
Development Specialist I
Development Specialist II
Dispatch Assistant - Extra Help
Engineering Aide
Engineering Technician I
Engineering Technician II
Event and Community Outreach Coordinator
Executive Support Supervisor
Facility Aide - Extra Help
Facility and Grounds Manager
Facility and Grounds Supervisor
Facility Attendant - Extra Help
Finance Director
Financial Assistant II
Financial Associate
General Services Director
GIS Interns - Extra Help
Grants & Housing Program Technician I
Grants & Housing Program Technician II
Housing Planner
Human Resources Analyst I
Human Resources Analyst II
Annual
Minimum
67,510.35
Annual
Maximum
Hourly
Minimum
30.2176
22.3195
24.5514
22.2460
24.4706
36.2611
26.7835
29.4617
26.6952
29.3647
29.8429
26.8545
35.8115
32.2254
81,012.26
87,459.42
75,108.59
104,951.18
90,130.35
61,443.20
73,731.84
25.1791
27.6970
62,852.61
69,137.95
95,042.69
79,508.62
130,735.90
156,882.96
22.2264
24.4491
28.4040
31.2444
26.8384
29.5222
44.4872
25.6512
28.2163
18.8410
22.9892
25.2881
27.8169
32.4078
10.8160
130,735.90
61,443.20
62,852.61
69,137.95
17.4301
22.3195
20.9161
26.7835
10.4000
21.3760
23.5136
12.4800
25.6512
28.2163
156,882.96
73,731.84
75,423.09
82,965.38
73,731.84
05/01/2013 - 6/30/2013
01/28/2013 - 04/30/2013
Hourly
Maximum
30.2176
22.3195
24.5514
22.2460
24.4706
36.2611
26.7835
29.4617
26.6952
29.3647
29.8429
26.8545
35.8115
32.2254
Annual
Minimum
67,510.35
32.8272
25.1791
27.6970
104,951.18
90,130.35
61,443.20
73,731.84
62,852.61
75,423.09
69,137.95
82,965.38
See Police Dispatch Assistant - Extra Help
19.1577
21.0734
23.1808
27.0065
62,852.61
75,423.09
8.3200
95,042.69
114,051.39
79,508.62
95,410.22
10.8160
130,735.90
156,882.96
17.4301
22.3195
130,735.90
156,882.96
10.4000
21.3760
23.5136
61,443.20
73,731.84
62,852.61
75,423.09
69,137.95
82,965.38
30.2176
22.3195
24.5514
22.2460
24.4706
36.2611
26.7835
29.4617
26.6952
29.3647
29.8429
26.8545
35.8115
32.2254
18.5220
20.3742
23.6700
26.0370
22.3654
24.6019
37.0727
21.3760
23.5136
62,852.61
69,137.95
114,051.39
95,410.22
130,735.90
156,882.96
62,852.61
75,423.09
95,042.69
79,508.62
114,051.39
95,410.22
130,735.90
61,443.20
62,852.61
69,137.95
73,731.84
75,423.09
82,965.38
35.8115
32.2254
32.8272
39.3926
25.1791
27.6970
30.2149
33.2364
46.8476
65.5865
18.5220
20.3742
23.6700
26.0370
22.3654
24.6019
37.0727
21.3760
23.5136
22.2264
24.4491
28.4040
31.2444
26.8384
29.5222
44.4872
25.6512
28.2163
19.1577
21.0734
23.1808
27.0065
22.9892
25.2881
27.8169
32.4078
130,735.90
156,882.96
10.8160
17.4301
22.3195
20.9161
26.7835
10.4000
21.3760
23.5136
12.4800
25.6512
28.2163
156,882.96
12.4800
25.6512
28.2163
29.8429
26.8545
8.3200
10.8160
20.9161
26.7835
36.2611
26.7835
29.4617
26.6952
29.3647
75,423.09
82,965.38
8.3200
95,042.69
79,508.62
30.2176
22.3195
24.5514
22.2460
24.4706
156,882.96
114,051.39
22.9892
25.2881
27.8169
32.4078
75,423.09
Hourly
Maximum
114,051.39
180,653.20
100,180.70
136,419.97
22.2264
24.4491
28.4040
31.2444
26.8384
29.5222
44.4872
25.6512
28.2163
62,852.61
69,137.95
19.1577
21.0734
23.1808
27.0065
62,852.61
73,731.84
65.5865
75,423.09
82,965.38
22.9892
25.2881
27.8169
32.4078
61,443.20
30.2149
33.2364
156,882.96
114,051.39
22.2264
24.4491
28.4040
31.2444
26.8384
29.5222
44.4872
25.6512
28.2163
104,951.18
90,130.35
227,760.00
130,735.90
95,042.69
Hourly
Minimum
81,012.26
87,459.42
75,108.59
95,042.69
150,544.78
83,483.92
97,442.83
46.8476
Annual
Maximum
39.3926
114,051.39
180,653.20
100,180.70
136,419.97
65.5865
Annual
Minimum
67,510.35
25.1791
27.6970
227,760.00
130,735.90
95,042.69
18.5220
20.3742
23.6700
26.0370
22.3654
24.6019
37.0727
21.3760
23.5136
Hourly
Maximum
32.8272
30.2149
33.2364
156,882.96
114,051.39
Hourly
Minimum
81,012.26
87,459.42
75,108.59
95,042.69
150,544.78
83,483.92
97,442.83
46.8476
Annual
Maximum
39.3926
114,051.39
180,653.20
100,180.70
136,419.97
65.5865
75,423.09
82,965.38
75,423.09
8.3200
114,051.39
95,410.22
61,443.20
227,760.00
130,735.90
95,042.69
15.7008
19.1577
21.0734
23.1808
27.0065
62,852.61
104,951.18
90,130.35
30.2149
33.2364
156,882.96
114,051.39
Hourly
Minimum
81,012.26
87,459.42
75,108.59
95,042.69
150,544.78
83,483.92
97,442.83
18.5220
20.3742
23.6700
26.0370
22.3654
24.6019
37.0727
21.3760
23.5136
Annual
Maximum
39.3926
114,051.39
180,653.20
100,180.70
136,419.97
46.8476
227,760.00
130,735.90
95,042.69
Annual
Minimum
67,510.35
32.8272
95,042.69
150,544.78
83,483.92
97,442.83
08/20/2012 through 01/27/13
Hourly
Maximum
130,735.90
61,443.20
62,852.61
69,137.95
17.4301
22.3195
20.9161
26.7835
10.4000
21.3760
23.5136
12.4800
25.6512
28.2163
156,882.96
73,731.84
75,423.09
82,965.38
Page 1 of 3
07/01/2012 through 08/19/2012
POSITION TITLES
Human Resources and City Information Director
Human Resources Associate
Human Resources Manager
Human Resources/City Information Technician
Information Technology Analyst I
Information Technology Analyst II
Information Technology Manager
Information Technology Technician II
Interns - Extra Help
Junior Engineering Aide - Extra Help
Junior Planner
Maintenance Worker I
Maintenance Worker II
Management Aide - Extra Help
Management Analyst I
Management Analyst II
Management Interns - Extra Help
Neighborhood Enhancement Officer I
Neighborhood Enhancement Officer II
Neighborhood Enhancement Technician
Office Assistant
Operations Manager
Planning Manager
Planning Technician
Police Commander
Police Communications Supervisor
Police Crime Analyst
Police Dispatch Assistant - Extra Help
Police Dispatcher I*
Police Dispatcher II*
Police Fleet Manager - Extra Help
Police Lieutenant
Police Officer
Police Officer - Trainee
Police Officer Reserve Level I - Extra Help
Police Officer Reserve Level 1 Trainee - Extra Help
Police Officer Reserve Level 2 - Extra Help
Police Records Assistant I*
Police Records Assistant II*
Police Records Data Entry Assistant - Extra Help
Police Records Supervisor
Police Sergeant
Police Volunteer Coordinator - Extra Help
Principal Accountant - Auditor
Principal Civil Engineer
Principal IT Analyst
Program Analyst - Extra Help (added 10/2012)
Program Assistant
Property Clerk - Extra Help
Public Information Officer
Receptionist (added 08/2012 )
Records Data Entry Assistant - Extra Help
Senior Accountant-Auditor
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Civil Engineer
Senior Community Services Officer
Senior Crime Scene / Property Evidence Specialist
Senior IT Technician
Annual
Minimum
130,735.90
Annual
Maximum
Hourly
Minimum
156,882.96
22.3195
99,875.78
99,875.78
62,852.61
69,137.95
08/20/2012 through 01/27/13
Hourly
Maximum
27.0065
29.3065
32.2372
32.4078
35.1678
38.6846
20.9886
8.3200
13.6841
25.5758
17.4984
19.2483
15.2686
25.1863
21.9521
Hourly
Minimum
22.3195
01/28/2013 - 04/30/2013
Hourly
Maximum
27.0065
29.3065
32.2372
32.4078
35.1678
38.6846
20.9886
8.3200
13.6841
25.5758
17.4984
19.2483
15.2686
25.1863
109,766.18
63,620.34
131,719.33
76,344.32
26.3425
156,882.96
21.9521
27.0621
32.4745
24.4235
26.8658
45.6936
29.3081
32.2389
54.8324
24.4235
26.8658
45.6936
29.3081
32.2389
54.8324
28.7442
20.3742
28.7442
14.5600
10.8160
18.3340
20.1674
34.4930
24.4491
34.4930
28.7442
20.3742
28.7442
14.5600
10.8160
18.3340
20.1674
34.4930
24.4491
34.4930
52,807.46
34.3661
20.3742
41.2393
24.4491
34.3661
20.3742
41.2393
24.4491
90,796.16
95,012.32
90,796.16
115,326.85
96,105.57
69,137.95
83,162.35
86,374.91
12.9792
22.0008
24.2008
63,368.86
52,807.46
108,955.39
114,014.78
108,955.39
90,796.16
95,012.32
90,796.16
17.7670
17.5728
95,042.69
95,042.69
114,051.39
114,051.39
109,766.18
63,620.34
131,719.33
76,344.32
69,137.95
11.7862
14.1434
31.8515
38.2218
99,794.86
83,162.35
103,649.73
86,374.91
28.1165
32.4745
28.9642
52,807.46
90,796.16
95,012.32
90,796.16
29.3065
17.7670
17.5728
35.1678
21.3203
21.0900
12.9215
11.7862
15.5057
14.1434
31.8515
38.2218
82,965.38
69,137.95
99,794.86
28.1165
32.4745
28.9642
25.1863
Annual
Minimum
156,882.96
99,875.78
119,850.85
95,042.69
95,042.69
114,051.39
114,051.39
109,766.18
63,620.34
131,719.33
76,344.32
26.3425
32.4745
18.8410
29.3081
32.2389
24.8324
28.7442
20.3742
28.7442
14.5600
10.8160
18.3340
20.1674
11.7862
34.4930
24.4491
34.4930
34.3661
20.3742
41.2393
24.4491
96,105.57
52,807.46
108,955.39
114,014.78
108,955.39
90,796.16
95,012.32
90,796.16
29.3065
17.7670
17.5728
35.1678
21.3203
21.0900
12.9215
15.5057
82,965.38
69,137.95
22.3195
26.7833
27.0065
29.3065
32.2372
32.4078
35.1678
38.6846
20.9886
8.3200
13.6841
25.5758
17.4984
19.2483
15.2686
25.1863
10.4000
22.2460
24.4706
20.2236
16.1518
12.4800
26.6952
29.3647
24.2683
19.3821
21.9521
26.3425
27.0621
15.7008
24.4235
26.8658
45.6936
32.4745
18.8410
29.3081
32.2389
24.8324
28.7442
20.3742
28.7442
14.5600
10.8160
18.3340
20.1674
11.7862
34.4930
24.4491
34.4930
34.3661
20.3742
41.2393
24.4491
29.3065
17.7670
17.5728
35.1678
21.3203
21.0900
12.9215
15.5057
16.4209
30.6910
20.9981
23.0979
18.3223
115,326.85
12.9792
22.0008
24.2008
14.1434
63,368.86
Hourly
Maximum
75,423.09
82,965.38
12.4800
26.6952
29.3647
24.2683
19.3821
27.0621
15.7008
24.4235
26.8658
45.6936
Hourly
Minimum
119,850.85
16.4209
30.6910
20.9981
23.0979
18.3223
62,852.61
69,137.95
12.9792
22.0008
24.2008
14.1434
63,368.86
108,955.39
114,014.78
108,955.39
82,965.38
See Police Records Data Entry Assistant -Extra Help
100,180.70
83,483.92
100,180.70
86,374.91
103,649.73
38.2218
103,649.73
23.4304
27.0621
24.1369
Annual
Maximum
130,735.90
99,875.78
31.8515
86,374.91
23.4304
27.0621
24.1369
20.9886
8.3200
13.6841
25.5758
17.4984
19.2483
15.2686
See Police Records Data Entry Assistant -Extra Help
83,483.92
103,649.73
32.4078
35.1678
38.6846
115,326.85
12.9792
22.0008
24.2008
108,955.39
114,014.78
108,955.39
27.0065
29.3065
32.2372
21.9521
96,105.57
63,368.86
21.3203
21.0900
82,965.38
23.4304
27.0621
24.1369
115,326.85
26.7833
10.4000
22.2460
24.4706
20.2236
16.1518
(see Dispatch Assistant)
96,105.57
22.3195
75,423.09
82,965.38
26.3425
32.4745
Hourly
Maximum
119,850.85
12.4800
26.6952
29.3647
24.2683
19.3821
27.0621
05/01/2013 - 6/30/2013
Hourly
Minimum
119,850.85
16.4209
30.6910
20.9981
23.0979
18.3223
62,852.61
69,137.95
10.4000
22.2460
24.4706
20.2236
16.1518
114,051.39
114,051.39
130,735.90
99,875.78
75,423.09
82,965.38
95,042.69
95,042.69
Annual
Maximum
99,875.78
119,850.85
12.4800
26.6952
29.3647
24.2683
19.3821
Annual
Minimum
26.7833
119,850.85
16.4209
30.6910
20.9981
23.0979
18.3223
62,852.61
69,137.95
10.4000
22.2460
24.4706
20.2236
16.1518
131,719.33
76,344.32
156,882.96
99,875.78
75,423.09
82,965.38
109,766.18
63,620.34
130,735.90
99,875.78
119,850.85
114,051.39
114,051.39
Annual
Maximum
26.7833
119,850.85
95,042.69
95,042.69
Annual
Minimum
28.1165
32.4745
28.9642
31.8515
38.2218
23.4304
27.0621
24.1369
28.1165
32.4745
28.9642
Page 2 of 3
07/01/2012 through 08/19/2012
POSITION TITLES
Senior Maintenance Worker
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Office Assistant
Senior Planner
Senior Planning Technician
Senior Police Dispatcher*
Senior Police Records Assistant (added May 2013)
Senior Police Records Assistant - Extra Help
Streets and Utilities Maintenance Supervisor
Support Services Manager
Traffic and Signal Operations Supervisor
Annual
Minimum
Annual
Maximum
Hourly
Minimum
22.1355
79,508.62
95,410.22
79,202.24
95,042.69
17.7670
24.1473
29.5524
79,508.62
99,875.78
79,508.62
95,410.22
119,850.85
95,410.22
08/20/2012 through 01/27/13
Hourly
Maximum
Annual
Minimum
Annual
Maximum
26.5626
Hourly
Minimum
22.1355
79,508.62
95,410.22
79,202.24
95,042.69
21.3203
17.7670
28.9768
35.4628
24.1473
29.5524
79,508.62
99,875.78
79,508.62
95,410.22
119,850.85
95,410.22
01/28/2013 - 04/30/2013
Hourly
Maximum
Annual
Minimum
Annual
Maximum
26.5626
79,508.62
95,410.22
70,659.68
84,791.62
21.3203
Hourly
Maximum
22.1355
26.5626
17.7670
28.9768
35.4628
24.1473
29.5524
79,508.62
99,875.78
79,508.62
95,410.22
119,850.85
95,410.22
05/01/2013 - 6/30/2013
Hourly
Minimum
Annual
Minimum
Annual
Maximum
79,508.62
95,410.22
70,659.68
84,791.62
21.3203
28.9768
35.4628
79,508.62
99,875.78
79,508.62
Hourly
Minimum
Hourly
Maximum
22.1355
26.5626
17.7670
21.3203
24.1473
29.5524
26.0370
26.0370
28.9768
35.4628
31.2444
31.2444
95,410.22
119,850.85
95,410.22
*hourly rate based on 1872 annual hours
** Formerly Animal Control Officer I/II
CITY COUNCIL
$600 per month (as outlined in Government Code § 36516)
Revision Summary Log:
Resolution 2013-097 passed 09-04-2013; eff. 07-01-2013
Resolution 2013-129 passed 12-13-2013; eff. pay date of 01-17-2014
Resolution 2014-___ passed 12-11-2014 Retroactive Schedule for FY 2012-2013
Page 3 of 3
ITEM 15
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Chris Fallbeck, Principal Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Proposed Contract Amendment No. 2 – Street Sweeping Services
Wells Sweeping, LLC
In December 2004, City Council awarded a 5-year contract to Wells Sweeping, LLC to provide
for citywide street sweeping services. The contract provisions allowed for two one-year
extensions. In April 2009, staff presented Council with Amendment No. 1, reducing the overall
contract cost as well as extending the contract term through December 2014. Subsequently, staff
surveyed the market and determined it is fiscally in the City’s best interest to enter into a long
term contract with Wells Sweeping, LLC.
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution, approving Amendment No. 2
with Wells Sweeping, LLC to extend the existing street sweeping contract through 2024.
Fiscal Impact
The negotiated contract cost of $22.96 per street sweeping curb mile would be locked into place
for the next 10-years commencing January 2015. This price includes disposal and hauling fees.
There are no provisions for curb mile increases based on CPI, or any other considerations in this
agreement. The one caveat is this is a non-prevailing wage agreement and in the event a future
State entity subjects street sweeping to prevailing wage rates, the contract would be opened to
renegotiations and/or either party would have the option to terminate the contract with notice.
The negotiated contract amendment will save the City more than $656,000 throughout the next
ten years, based on current contract pricing of $25.81-$33.10 per curb mile over the same time
period.
The street sweeping budget is determined each year through the City’s annual budget process
and includes, for example, specialty street sweeping, call-outs for post traffic accident and other
types of emergency sweep requests. Funding sources for these services are Measure A
Maintenance, Solid Waste and Stormwater Funds.
Subject: Street Sweeping Services – Proposed Contract Amendment with Wells Sweeping, LLC
Date:
December 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Over the past year, City staff has met with Wells Sweeping to consider a longer term contract for
street sweeping services in Citrus Heights. The longer term proposal is consistent with similar
maintenance contracts General Services negotiated and City Council approved in recent years,
saving perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars. Two examples are the Solid Waste and Street
Light/Signal Maintenance contracts. Discussions with Wells Sweeping centered around “locking
in” a long term contract; providing more certainty for Wells Sweeping as a company we have
conducted business with for more than ten years; and protecting the City from bidding in a
market of uncertainty where environmental regulations are viewed for change in the near future.
Cost negotiated with this proposal also allows savings of the City’s Measure A Maintenance for
reinvestment into road repair.
The negotiated curb mile cost of $22.96, fixed over ten (10) years, is favorable compared to data
staff has collected over several months for other communities of similar size. For an example,
several cities in the Bay Area who use the same street sweeping contractor are paying
approximately $25/square mile, excluding the cost of hauling and dumping fees. Nearly all of
these contracts allow for annual price adjustments based on local CPI. The City of West Covina
pays a curb mile rate, annual CPI increase, and Tipping (dumping) Fee, which is typical. They
also pay a fuel fee when fuel prices exceed $2.40 per gallon. The County of Sacramento recently
bid and approved a street sweeping contract at a rate of approximately $35.86 per curb mile.
Conclusion
Wells Sweeping, LLC has provided quality, cost effective street sweeping services to the City of
Citrus Heights for over a decade. Wells has met or exceeded Air Resources Board (ARB)
regulations, minimizing diesel fuel emissions and has updated their equipment in recent years to
maintain them in highest working order. The proposed contract is consistent with City Council’s
goal to maintain long-term financial stability and provides savings to reinvest into neighborhood
street maintenance.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Amendment No. 2 to
the Wells Sweeping, LLC contract for street sweeping through 2024 and authorize the General
Services Director to execute the amendment.
Attachment:
Resolution
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH WELLS SWEEPING, LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE
GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on December 4, 2004, the City Council authorized the award of a street
sweeping service contract to Wells Sweeping, LLC after a competitive bidding process; and
WHEREAS, Wells Sweeping, LLC has provided consistent and responsive street sweeping
services during the current contract term and under previous contracts; and
WHEREAS, Wells Sweeping, LLC has submitted a proposal to the City to maintain reduced
unit prices based on non-prevailing wage rates at a fixed curb-mile rate of $22.96 through the ten
year period; and
WHEREAS, Wells Sweeping, LLC has further proposed to extend the term of the 2005 2014 Street Sweeping Service Agreement to 2024; and
WHEREAS, the proposal will reduce costs and continue to provide for economical,
responsive and stable service delivery for Citrus Heights; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the current service agreement and incorporate the
terms of the proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of
Citrus Heights that Amendment No. 2 of the 2005-2014 Street Sweeping Service Contract is
approved and the General Services Director is authorized to execute the Amendment.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 16
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Stuart Hodgkins, Principal Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Emergency On-Call Transportation Repairs – Authorization of
Contracts
In March 2012, the City awarded a 6½ -year contract to Central Valley Engineering and Asphalt,
Inc. (CVE) to perform on-call street maintenance services, including but not limited to pothole
repairs, sidewalk repairs and other emergency roadwork related to compaction, pavement and
concrete failures. The contract was awarded to CVE as the most responsive, responsible bidder,
meeting the City’s expectations for experience as outlined in the Request for Proposals (RFP).
Since then, concerns have arisen regarding the company’s responsiveness, timely execution of
contracted work, and overall quality of services provided. Due to these ongoing concerns, the
General Services Director has directed staff to re-advertise on-call street maintenance services.
Staff anticipates the process of re-advertising and securing a new On-call Street Maintenance
Contract will take between two (2) and three (3) months.
In the interim, it is necessary for the City to continue to provide for immediate/emergency
response to street maintenance related issues that may present a public safety concern, including,
but not limited to severe pavement failures, uplifted sidewalk and sink holes. To provide
uninterrupted services, it is in the City’s best interest to execute an agreement for such services
in order to reduce or eliminate hazardous conditions within the City’s right of way. To allow for
greater flexibility and in consideration of variable bid item prices, staff recommends executing
two separate contracts with two separate, well qualified contractors.
Staff recommends City Council approve the attached resolution, confirming the need to provide
emergency transportation related maintenance services and authorizing the City Manager to
execute contracts for emergency on-call transportation repairs with Arrow Construction and with
Biondi Paving & Engineering, for amounts not-to-exceed $100,000 per contract.
Subject: Emergency Repair Work – Authorization of Contracts
Date:
December 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Fiscal Impact
The General Services Department budgets annually for maintenance work as well as emergency
repairs. There are sufficient Gas Tax funds and Measure A Maintenance funds to support these
two proposed emergency on-call contracts, as identified in the 5-Year Capital Improvement
Program as well as in the 14-15 fiscal year budget.
The General Services Department has been maintaining the City’s transportation-related
infrastructure since 2006, utilizing various maintenance contracts specific to the facilities to be
maintained (street lights, traffic signals, streets and sidewalks, signage and striping). The City’s
first On-call Street Maintenance contract was executed with CVE in 2006. After approving two
(2) one-year contract extensions, in 2012 the City opted to seek current proposals for these
critical services. An updated RFP was issued and eight (8) proposals were received. Ultimately,
CVE’s proposal was found to be responsive to the RFP and the most cost effective for the City
and therefore, they were awarded a new multi-year contract.
In the past several months, concern has been raised regarding CVE’s performance, specifically
timeliness of scheduling and performing contracted work, maintaining clean and safe worksites
throughout the duration of the projects and the overall quality and appearance of their finished
paving. Due to these ongoing concerns, the General Services Director has directed staff to readvertise for On-Call and Emergency Street Maintenance Services, a process that may take up to
three months before a contractor is selected and a contract executed. Therefore, in the interim to
allow for emergency repair services, the General Services Department has made contact with
several other well qualified contractors to inquire about availability to provide such need
emergency services. These contractors, Arrow Construction and Biondi Paving and Engineering,
submitted proposals to the City for consideration in 2012.
Conclusion
execute contracts for emergency on-call transportation repairs with Arrow Construction and
Biondi Paving & Engineering, for amounts not-to-exceed $100,000 per contract.
Attachment:
Resolution
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE CONTRACTS WITH ARROW CONSTRUCTION AND BIONDI PAVING AND
ENGINEERING FOR EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
WHEREAS, in March 2012, the City executed a 6 ½ year contract with Central Valley
Engineering and Asphalt, Inc. for On-Call Street Maintenance Services; and
WHEREAS, due to concerns with the contractors performance, the General Services
Department has opted to re-advertise for these services; and
WHEREAS, it is in the City’s best interest to have on-call contracts in place in the interim to
allow for emergency repairs; and
WHEREAS, the City has solicited responses from two responsive, responsible and well
qualified contractors to perform such services.
City of Citrus Heights, the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a not-to-exceed $100,000
contract with Arrow Construction for emergency transportation services; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of
Citrus Heights, the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a not-to-exceed $100,000 contract
with Biondi Paving and Engineering for emergency transportation services.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 17
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Ronda Rivera, Human Resources/City Information Director
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Compensation Program for Non-Represented
Employees
The City of Citrus Heights is committed to fiscal responsibility. Employee compensation
follows this commitment as the City does not have automatic salary increases. All recommended
salary increases must go before the City Council for approval and are based on fiscal
responsibility.
Staff recommends Council approve the attached Resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2014-2015
Compensation Program for Non-Represented Employees.
Fiscal Impact
For Fiscal Year 2014-2015, the estimated total cost for all funds for the above recommendation
is estimated to be $324,000. The impact to the General Fund is estimated at $288,000.
Background & Analysis
The City has consistently determined employee benefits and compensation levels based on fiscal
responsibility. During the economic downturn that began in 2009, City employees made
concessions in benefits and salary that effectively saved Citrus Heights in excess of $5,000,000
over pre-concession amounts. The willingness of City employees to work with the City Council
to maintain fiscal responsibility was greatly appreciated. While other agencies were faced with
layoffs, furloughs, and reducing services, Citrus Heights was able to maintain a balanced budget,
guaranteed no layoffs or furloughs, and maintained services. Again, this was accomplished
through the cooperation of City staff and leadership of elected officials.
Compensation Program Proposal
Based on current budget projections, staff recommends the following:
A. Non-represented employees, excluding City Manager and Executive Team
1. Merit increase of 2% for all employees hired in 2013 or prior.
2. Salary increase based on longevity applicable to current employees hired between
1998 and 2009 based on years of service. The following table illustrates the total
proposed salary increase:
Subject: Implementation of the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Compensation Program
December 11, 2014
Page 2
Year Hired
2014
2010-2013
2007-2009
2001-2006
1998-2000
Years of Service
0
1-4
5-7
8-13
14-16
Merit
Based%
0.00%
2.00%
2.00%
2.00%
2.00%
Longevity
Based%
0.00%
0.00%
1.00%
3.00%
5.00%
Total %
0.00%
2.00%
3.00%
5.00%
7.00%
B. Executive Team
1. Merit increase of 2%, longevity based salary increase of 3%, and 2% merit increase
which represents the amount deferred and not received by the Executive Team from
the Pay-for- Performance program in Fiscal Year 2008-2009.
2. The City will make a deferred compensation contribution of 5% of salary on behalf of
each eligible executive management employee. The employee will be required to
match the City’s contribution up to the annual federal limit.
3. Additional forty (40) hours of Management Leave, for a total of 120 hours per fiscal
year, effective Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
4. A one-time four-week sabbatical that must be used no later than December 31, 2016.
This leave cannot be cashed out but may be taken intermittently.
C. City Manager
1. Merit increase of 2%, longevity based salary increase of 3%, and 2% merit increase
which represents the amount deferred and not received by the City Manager from the
Pay-for- Performance program in Fiscal Year 2008-2009.
2. Additional forty (40) hours of Management Leave, for a total of 120 hours per fiscal
year, effective Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
3. A one-time four-week sabbatical that must be used no later than December 31, 2016.
This leave cannot be cashed out but may be taken intermittently.
Should Council approve the proposed Compensation Program, the following changes will be
required in order to implement specific provisions:
1. Update to Broad Band Salary Ranges
The proposed update to the City’s Compensation Program will cause some classifications
to no longer fit within their identified broad band salary ranges. The proposed changes
below will allow staff to implement the Compensation Program for FY 2014-2015.
The chart below shows the current and proposed broad band salary ranges:
Current
Proposed
Executive Management (Exempt)
$110,000 - $215,000
No Change
Management (Exempt)
$ 70,000 - $150,000
$ 70,000 - $160,000
Supervisory/Administrative (Exempt)
$ 51,000 - $125,000
$ 51,000 - $140,000
Professional/Technical (Non-exempt)
$ 30,000 - $110,000
No Change
Support Staff (Non-exempt)
$ 27,500 - $ 65,000
No Change
Subject: Implementation of the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Compensation Program
December 11, 2014
Page 3
2. Adopt Revised Payrate Schedule
Council approved Resolution 2014-049 on June 12, 2014, adopting the current Payrate
Schedule for the City of Citrus Heights. Attachment 2, Resolution 2014-__ includes the
recommended revisions to the salary ranges, incorporating the proposed changes to the
compensation program, as well as updates based on individual classification reviews
since prior approval.
3. Amend Personnel Rules & Regulations Section 4.7 Management Leave
The Personnel Rules and Regulations Section 4.7 Management Leave will need to be
amended to show Management Leave for the City Manager and Executive Staff members
has increased to 120 hours per fiscal year.
4. Amend City benefit program for Deferred Compensation
Update the benefit program for Executive Staff members to reflect changes in the
deferred compensation program. The City’s contribution will be 5% of salary with the
employee being required to match the City contribution up to the federal limit.
5. Amend the City’s Pay-for-Performance Administrative Policy
The City’s current policy allows for approximately 20% spread between the high and low
of the salary range. The proposed Compensation Program would amend this to allow for
a spread of no greater than 30% between the high and low of the ranges.
Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolutions implementing the Fiscal
Year 2014-2015 Compensation Program effective December 28, 2014, commencing with the pay
date of January 16, 2015.
Attachments:
(1.) Resolution 2014-___ Implementation of the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Compensation
Program
(2.) Resolution 2014-____ Adopting Payrate Schedule for Fiscal Year 2014-2015
a. Payrate Schedule for the City of Citrus Heights for Fiscal Year 2014-2015
CALIFORNIA, IMPLEMENTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 COMPENSATION
PROGRAM FOR NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights has engaged in sound fiscal planning practices and
intends to continue such practices; and
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights has employees rendering valuable services to the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve a compensation program for non-represented
employees; and
WHEREAS the proposed compensation program changes will become effective December 28,
2014.
Heights:
Section 1.
Findings
Section 2.
The City Council hereby approves the proposed changes to the Compensation Program for nonrepresented employees and directs the City Manager to make the corresponding changes to the
Personnel Rules and Regulations Section 4.7 Management Leave, the City’s Pay for Performance
Administrative Policy, and the City’s deferred compensation program as follows:
Non-represented employees, excluding City Manager and Executive Team
1. Merit increase of 2% for all employees hired in 2013 or prior.
2. Longevity increase applicable to current employees hired between 1998 and 2009 based on
years of service. The following table illustrates the total proposed salary increase:
Year Hired
2014
2010-2013
2007-2009
2001-2006
1998-2000
Years of Service
0
1-4
5-7
8-13
14-16
Merit %
0.00%
2.00%
2.00%
2.00%
2.00%
Longevity %
0.00%
0.00%
1.00%
3.00%
5.00%
Total %
0.00%
2.00%
3.00%
5.00%
7.00%
Resolution 2014-__
Implementation of Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Compensation Program
Executive Team
1. Merit increase of 2%, longevity increase of 3%, and additional merit increase of 2% which
represents the amount deferred and not received by the Executive Team from the Pay-forPerformance program in Fiscal Year 2008/2009.
2. Additional forty (40) hours of Management Leave, for a total of 120 hours per fiscal year,
effective Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
3. Addition of a one-time four-week sabbatical that must be used no later than December 31,
2016. This leave cannot be cashed out but may be taken intermittently.
City Manager
1. Merit increase of 2%, longevity increase of 3%, and additional merit increase of 2% which
represents the amount deferred and not received by the City Manager from the Pay-forPerformance program in Fiscal Year 2008/2009.
2. Additional forty (40) hours of Management Leave per fiscal year, for a total of 120 hours per
fiscal year.
3. Addition of a one-time four-week sabbatical that must be used no later than December 31,
2016. This leave cannot be cashed out but may be taken intermittently.
Section 3.
The City Council hereby adopts the revised Broad Band Salary Ranges, effective December 28, 2014
as follows:
Executive Management (Exempt)
$110,000 - $238,650
Management (Exempt)
$ 70,000 - $168,000
Supervisory/Administrative (Exempt)
$ 51,000 - $133,750
Professional/Technical (Non-exempt)
$ 30,000 - $117,700
Support Staff (Non-exempt)
$ 27,500 - $ 69,500
11th day of December 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Mel Turner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE REVISED PAYRATE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights engages in sound economic planning practices; and
WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires governing bodies
of local agencies contracting with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to approve and
adopt a payrate schedule in accordance with public meeting laws; and
WHEREAS, the payrate schedule must identify each position by title, the individual payrate
amount or ranges for that position, the time base upon which the amounts are based, and track all
revisions.
Heights:
Section 1.
Findings
Section 2.
The City Council hereby adopts the revised Payrate Schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
Section 3.
This Resolution shall take effect on December 28, 2014.
this 11th day of December 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
Mel Turner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
SALARY TABLE
Effective: 12/28/2014
POSITION TITLES
MINIMUM
ANNUAL
MAXIMUM
ANNUAL
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
HOURLY HOURLY
ACCOUNTANT
32.0578
41.1623
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
23.6788
30.4036
ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN
26.0465
33.4439
ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER I
23.6008
30.3035
25.9608
33.3337
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
31.6603
40.6520
ASSISTANT PLANNER
28.4899
36.5812
34.8264
44.7170
BUILDING INSPECTOR I
26.7125
34.2989
BUILDING INSPECTOR II
29.3837
37.7287
57.9839
74.4513
COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER I
19.6500
25.2306
COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER II
21.6150
27.7538
COMMUNITY SVCS OFFICER - XTRA
19.6500
25.2306
CONSTRUCTION / MAINT INSP I
25.1115
32.2432
CONSTRUCTION / MAINT INSP II
27.6226
35.4675
CRIME SCENE / PROP EVD SPEC I
23.7275
30.4660
CRIME SCENE / PROP EVD SPEC II
26.1002
33.5125
DATA ENTRY ASST - XTRA HELP
12.5040
16.0550
DATABASE & APPLICATION ANALYST
39.3304
50.5003
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECH I
22.6778
29.1182
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECH II
24.9456
32.0301
ENGINEERING AIDE
20.3244
26.0966
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I
22.3568
28.7061
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II
24.5925
31.5767
ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER II
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
71,621.73
91,962.12
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
92,785.70
119,136.70
ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER
79,682.71
102,312.64
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
65,185.10
83,697.66
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
100,830.79
129,466.92
CHIEF OF POLICE
159,712.95
205,070.83
88,568.09
113,721.42
120,606.61
154,858.90
CITY CLERK
CITY ENGINEER
CITY ENGINEER - XTRA
CITY MANAGER
258,544.72
COMMUNITY & ECON DEV DIRECTOR
138,697.72
178,087.73
COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT MANAGER
100,830.79
129,466.92
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST I
66,680.34
85,617.49
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST II
73,348.45
94,179.23
Amended 12-28-2014
Page 1 of 4
POSITION TITLES
MINIMUM
ANNUAL
MAXIMUM
ANNUAL
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
HOURLY HOURLY
EVENT & COMMUNITY CTR TECH
21.4552
27.5485
EVENT AND COMM OUTREACH COORD
28.6512
36.7881
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
28.6512
36.7881
9.0000
9.6300
11.4747
12.2779
FINANCIAL ASSISTANT II
18.4916
23.7432
FINANCIAL ASSOCIATE
23.6788
30.4036
GIS INTERN
11.0334
14.1668
GRANTS & HOUSING PROG TECH I
22.6778
29.1182
GRANTS & HOUSING PROG TECH II
24.9456
32.0301
28.6512
36.7881
23.6788
30.4036
INFORMATION TECH ANALYST I
31.0913
39.9212
INFORMATION TECH ANALYST II
34.2004
43.9133
27.0542
34.7376
9.0000
9.6300
JUNIOR ENGINEERING AIDE
14.5174
18.6404
JUNIOR PLANNER
27.1333
34.8393
MAINTENANCE WORKER I
18.5641
23.8362
MAINTENANCE WORKER II
20.4206
26.2198
MANAGEMENT AIDE
16.1985
20.7989
MANAGEMENT INTERN
11.0334
14.1668
MANAGEMENT INTERN - EXTRA HELP
11.0334
14.1668
NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCMNT OFCR I
25.9608
33.3337
NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCMNT OFCR I
23.6008
30.3035
NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCMNT OFCR II
25.9608
33.3337
NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCMNT TECH
21.4552
27.5485
OFFICE ASSISTANT
17.1355
22.0019
OFFICE ASSISTANT - XTRA
17.1355
22.0019
EXECUTIVE SUPPORT SUPERVISOR
66,680.34
85,617.49
FACILITY AIDE
FACILITY AND GRNDS MANAGER
FACILITY AND GRNDS SUPERVISOR
100,830.79
129,466.92
84,350.70
108,306.16
FACILITY ATTENDANT
FINANCE DIRECTOR
138,697.72
178,087.73
FINANCE MANAGER
100,830.79
129,466.92
GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
HOUSING PLANNER
138,697.72
65,185.10
178,087.73
83,697.66
HR & CITY INFO TECHNICIAN
HUMAN RESOURCES & CTY INFO DIR
138,697.72
178,087.73
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I
66,680.34
85,617.49
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II
73,348.45
94,179.23
HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATE
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
INFORMATION TECH MANAGER
105,958.21
105,958.21
136,050.25
136,050.25
INFORMATION TECH TECHNICIAN
INTERN - EXTRA HELP
MANAGEMENT ANALYST I
66,680.34
85,617.49
MANAGEMENT ANALYST II
73,348.45
94,179.23
OPERATIONS & MAINT MANAGER
87,946.91
Amended 12-28-2014
112,923.83
Page 2 of 4
POSITION TITLES
MINIMUM
ANNUAL
OPERATIONS MANAGER
100,830.79
MAXIMUM
ANNUAL
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
HOURLY HOURLY
129,466.92
PAYROLL TECHNICIAN
26.0465
33.4439
23.2890
29.9031
POLICE CRIME ANALYST
28.7102
36.8639
POLICE DISPATCH ASSISTANT
16.6570
21.3876
POLICE DISPATCHER I
25.9109
33.2694
POLICE DISPATCHER II
28.5020
36.5965
POLICE FLEET MANAGER-XTRA
48.4763
62.2437
POLICE OFFICER
30.4947
36.5936
POLICE OFFICER - R1 TRAINEE-XTRA
15.4467
16.5280
POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE I-XTRA
30.4947
39.1552
POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE II-XTRA
11.4747
14.7336
POLICE OFFICER - TRAINEE
21.6150
27.7538
POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT I
19.4505
24.9744
POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT II
21.3956
27.4718
POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT II-XTRA
21.3956
27.4718
POLICE SERGEANT
36.4590
46.8134
POLICE VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR-XTRA
21.6150
27.7538
PROGRAM ANALYST-XTRA
31.0913
39.9212
PROGRAM ASSISTANT
18.8490
24.2020
PROPERTY CLERK-XTRA
18.6430
23.9406
13.7085
17.6015
33.7913
43.3881
SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES OFCR
24.8573
31.9168
SENIOR IT TECHNICIAN
31.1123
39.9480
SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER
23.4836
30.1529
18.8490
24.2020
SENIOR PLANNING TECHNICIAN
25.6179
32.8934
SENIOR POLICE DISPATCHER
31.3522
40.2561
SENIOR TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN
27.6226
35.4675
SR CRIME SCENE / PROP EVID SPC
28.7102
36.8639
PLANNING MANAGER
100,830.79
129,466.92
116,450.95
149,522.91
67,494.82
86,663.25
PLANNING TECHNICIAN
POLICE COMMANDER
POLICE COMMUNICATNS SUPERVISOR
POLICE LIEUTENANT
101,958.40
POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT - AUDITOR
PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER
PRINCIPAL IT ANALYST
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
56,023.43
130,914.78
71,933.99
96,325.65
123,682.12
100,798.57
129,425.36
96,325.65
123,682.12
73,348.45
94,179.23
88,568.09
113,721.42
RECEPTIONIST
SENIOR ACCOUNTANT-AUDITOR
SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR
SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
91,635.14
84,350.70
117,659.34
108,306.16
SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT
SENIOR PLANNER
74,962.75
Amended 12-28-2014
96,252.31
Page 3 of 4
POSITION TITLES
MINIMUM
ANNUAL
MAXIMUM
ANNUAL
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
HOURLY HOURLY
SR POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT
23.5351
30.2190
SR POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT-XTRA
23.5351
30.2190
STREETS & UTILITIES MAINT SUP
SUPPORT SERVICES MANAGER
TRAFFIC & SIGNAL OPERATION SUP
84,350.70
108,306.16
105,958.21
136,050.25
84,350.70
108,306.16
CITY COUNCIL $600 Per month (as outlined in Government Code § 36516)
Revision Summary
Resolution 2013-129 passed 12-13-2013; eff. pay date of 01-17-2014 Resolution
2014-049 passed 02-13-2014; eff. 02-13-2014
Resolution 2014-___ passed 12-11-2014 Retroactive Schedule for FY 2012-2013
Resolution 2014-___ passed 12-11-2014 eff. 12-28-2014
Amended 12-28-2014
Page 4 of 4
ITEM 18
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Rhonda Sherman, Community and Economic Development Director
SUBJECT:
Approval of Budget Augmentation to the FY 2014-2015 History and
Arts Commission Budget for an Amount Not to Exceed $2,500
The History and Arts Commission requested an augmentation to their FY 2014-2015 Budget for
two projects – additional art purchases for the City’s permanent art collection and additional
interviews for the City’s oral history project.
It is recommended that the City Council approve “Resolution No. 2014 ____, A Resolution of
the City of Citrus Heights, California, approving a not to exceed $2,500 FY 2014-2015 Budget
augmentation for the purpose of enhancing the City’s oral history project.” A copy of the
Resolution is included as Attachment 1.
Fiscal Impact
The impact to the General Fund is $2,500.
On October 23, 2014, Bob Gerald, History and Arts Commission Chair, on behalf of the
Commission submitted a request to the City Council for additional FY 2014-2015 funds for two
specific History and Arts related projects. The request was presented to the City Council under
Public Comments. The City Council asked that staff bring this request to the Finance Committee
and then back to the full City Council for a vote.
The request for funds is for two projects: additional art purchases for the City’s permanent art
collection and additional oral interviews for the City’s oral history project. A copy of the request
is included as Attachment 2. Attachment 3 is a copy of the City’s art collection inventory and
Attachment 4 is one estimate for the oral history project interviews. This estimate is for
budgeting purposes only. The actual project will need three quotes, as this is a professional
services project.
Subject: History and Arts 2014-2015 Budget Augmentation
Page 2 of 2
The Finance Committee discussed this request and determined, while there was interest in
recommending an augmentation to the existing budget, there was no agreement on the amount.
Staff brought this question to the City Council at their November 13th City Council meeting
under Department Reports. The Council gave direction to staff to that they were in agreement
with funding the oral history project augmentation, but at this time, not the City art collection
augmentation. It was further suggested that staff hold a study session on the City’s permanent
art collection after the New Year.
Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council approve “A Resolution of the City of Citrus Heights
approving a not to exceed $2,500 FY 2014-2015 Budget augmentation for enhancing the City’s
oral history project.”
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. _______
2. Request for Budget Augmentation
3. City’s Permanent Art Collection Inventory
4. Sample Quote for Interviewing Services
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NOT TO
EXCEED $2,500 FY 2014-2015 BUDGET AUGMENTATION FOR
THE PURPOSE OF ENHANCING THE CITY’S ORAL HISTORY PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City’ History and Arts Commission has requested an augmentation to their
FY 2014-2015 budget;
WHEREAS, This budget augmentation will be used to fund additional art purchases for the
City’s permanent art collection and additional interviews for the City’s oral history project;
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to fund the additional interviews for the oral history project at
this time in an amount not to exceed $2,500.00;
does hereby approve the requested FY 2014-2015 Budget augmentation for the History and Arts
Commission budget in an amount not to exceed $2,500.00.
11th day of December, 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
BUDGET CHANGE PROPOSAL
The History and Arts Commission is requesting a change to its 2014/15 budget to support two, time
sensitive projects; acquiring additional art pieces for the City permanent art collection, and recording
additional senior citizen memories of Citrus Heights as part of the continuing Oral History Project. The
Commission is requesting an addition to its 2014/15 budget of $6,710.
Art Purchase
The History and Arts Commission has been making do with a budget of $7,500 since its original budget
was halved several years ago. One project alone, Art in City Hall, takes up one third of that budget. The
commission has been trying to develop the City permanent collection to reflect the cultural diversity and
artistic endeavors of the residents of Citrus Heights and California and incorporate a comprehensive
overview of all art mediums: for example, painting, fiber and textile art, pottery, glass, watercolor,
sculpture, glass, and bead work. Working toward these goals, the Commission has the immediate
opportunity to acquire several pieces recently offered to us:
1) A framed piece called Rocky Point. According to the internet, the original price was $1,900. Carol
Brown, the artist, would sell it to the City for $1,000. The City only has one fiber art piece in their
collection.
2. A photo of Native American Petroglyphs in the Eastern Sierra with the Milky Way. The photographer
is offering it to us for $250 plus shipping and handling.
3. Caliente Cowboy" by Photographer Jim Burch. The cost, including framing is $200.
The cost for these purchases is $1,450.
In addition to these specific items, additional funding is requested so that the Commission may continue
to work toward its goal of creating for the City of Citrus Heights a comprehensive art collection.
Specifically:
1. $700 to obtain art that represents the military and the personal and/or historical contributions of
servicemen and women.
2. $500 to obtain art (photos with framing, drawing or painting) that depicts dancers.
3. $500 to obtain art (photos with framing, drawing or painting) that depicts musicians.
4. $800 to obtain art that gives recognition to the contribution of Native Americans - either photos,
drawing, painting or some other artistic medium.
5. $500 to obtain a painting that represents a California scene - similar to the painting that Ms. Carroll
donated which would display the natural beauty of California.
The amount requested for additional art purchases is $3,000.
The total additional budget amount requested for the permanent art collection is $4,450.
Oral History Project
Two years ago the History and Arts Commission, realizing that much of the history of Citrus Heights was
in the memories of the City’s most senior citizens, embarked on a project to begin recording those
memories on video. The Commission has recorded 5 interviews, which are available through the City web
site Interviews with residents and former residents who attended a Lauppe family reunion at the Rusch
home in 2013 and interviews of former students of San Juan High School at the school’s 100th
anniversary have also been recorded.
While the Commission has a substantial waiting list of individuals to record, there is a need for urgency to
record some in that many of the people high on the Commission’s priority list are in their 90s.
The Commission estimates that one additional day of videotaping would be needed to record six to eight
more interviews. The cost of one day of videotaping plus the required editing to make the interviews
ready for public viewing is estimated to be $2,260. As mentioned above, the Commission’s current
annual budget of $7,500 is inadequate to support this project
The additional budget amount requested for the Oral History Project is $2,260.
The total budget change requested for these two projects is $6,710.
STAFF USE ONLY
History and Arts Commission
Permanent Collection Inventory
Art in City Hall Permanent Art Collection
Began in 2002
Purchased and or Donated Prior to FY 13/14
(Shaded in Grey)
Last Updated: 11/10/14
23
Purchased and or Donated in FY 13/14
21
Total Pieces in Art Collection
44
Total Funds Spent (HAC Commission Funds)
$9,100
Inventory No: PAC-2011-901
Purchase Price: $75.00
Location: Trellis Hall
Description:
• 17 ½ x 13
• Glass Framed
• Light
Nevada City
Carol Ross
Description:
• 16 x 22
• Glass Framed
• Light
Gossip Session
Ruth Baird
Inventory No: PACPurchase Price: Print Donated
Description:
• 15 ½ x 16 ½
• Glass Framed
• Light
Sylvan School House
1
Inventory No:
PAC-2011-903 - A
PAC-2011-903 - B
PAC-2011-903 - C
Location: CHPD Lobby
Description:
• Very Heavy
• Very Fragile
Elevator Series
Skip Lee
Location: Outside Rhonda Sherman’s Office
Description:
• 31 x 39
• Glass Framed
• Heavy
Rest Stop
Mary Covella
Location: Inside Rhonda Sherman’s Office
Description:
• 14 x 28 ½
• Glass Framed
• Heavy
Blue Flower Path
Jeanne Collier
Location: Community Center Lobby
Description:
• 22 x 28
• Glass Framed
• Light
Aspen Stroll
Phyllis Eymann
2
Location: Community Center, Senior Center
Description:
• 22 x 28
• Glass Framed
• Light
Aspen Grove
Phyllis Eymann
Location: Inside Monica Alejandrez’ s Office
Description:
• 22 x 28
• Glass Framed
• Light
Pansies
Phyllis Eymann
Location: General Services Building
Description:
• 27 x 35
• Glass Framed
• Heavy
Old Sacramento
Barbara Peck
Location: General Services Building, Lobby
Description:
• 13 x 17
• Glass Framed
• Light
Wood Lake, CA
Mary Danforth
3
Location: General Services Building, Lobby
Description:
• 28 x 19
• Glass Framed
• Light
Portrait Study
Ellen Bakan
Location: Finance Building, Lobby
Description:
• 18 x 14 ½
• Glass Framed
• Light
Unknown Title
Ellen Bakan
Purchase Price: Donated by Chris Myers
Description:
• 28 x 40
• Not Glass Framed
• Medium
Majestic Oak
Kathryn Kroeger
Description:
• 20 x 24
• Light
Horton’s Farm
Ken Maddex
4
Purchase Price: Donated by Emily Berente
Description:
• 17 ¾ x 21 ¾
• Glass Framed
• Light
Golden Valley Charter School
2005
Emily Berente
Description:
• 21 ½ x 27 ¾
• Heavy
Fort Bragg Sunset
Ken Maddex
Description:
• 21 x 17
• Glass Framed
• Light
Red Rose
Diane D. McGuinn
Description:
• 23 x 28
• Glass Framed
• Heavy
Mermaid Girl
Joann Wilson
5
Description:
• 15 x 17
• Glass Framed
• Light
Summer House
Beverly Carson
Purchase Price: Donated by CH Marching Band
Description:
• 21 x 31
• Glass Framed
• Heavy
Citrus Heights Marching Band
2012
Description:
• 14 x 14
• Light
Nailed It
Sean Goin
Purchase Price: Donated by Artist
Description:
• 15 ¾ x 12 ¾
• Light
Ann
Sharlene Plescia
6
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 16 x 20
• Light
Gental Spirit
Lisa Culjis
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 12 x 12
• Light
Rare Sighting
Lisa Culjis
Location: Citrus Heights, Lobby
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 16 x 20
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Dancer, Nat Festival-Myanmar
Davida Feder
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Solitude
Larry Klink
7
Description:
• Date: 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Spotted Owl
Larry Klink
Purchase Price: $75.00 (mat and frame)
• Print Donated by Artist
Location: Community Center, Lobby
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Floral Ice Pattern
Larry Klink
Location: City Hall, Staircase
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 12 x 15
• Glass Framed
• Light
Cup O Java
Sandy Lindbald
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 26 x 32
• Glass Framed
• Heavy
Backwood Journey
Carol Brown
8
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Light
Dusty Poppy Daze
Sage Sweetwood
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Light
Light at the End of the Burma Tunnel
Sage Sweetwood
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Light
My Father is Missing
Sage Sweetwood
Description:
• Date: 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Light
Rajasthan Women
Sage Sweetwood
9
Location: City Hall, Near Elevator
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 34 x 44
• Medium
Kaleidoo Drangonfly
Ed Chaney
Location: City Hall, Lobby
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 60 x 90
• Heavy
Sandy Point
Carol Aust
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Cambridge Heights Elementary 2014
Avery Becker
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Cambridge Heights Elementary 2014
Kathleen Huynh
10
Inventory No: PAC-2014--943
Purchase Price: Donated
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Crescent Owl Moon
Jeff Langell
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Maidu Dancer
Jeff Langell
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Packer Crossing the Stream at Lower Pioneer Lake
Ron Rothbalt
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 17 x 21
• Glass Framed
• Medium
Little Cowboy
Herve Blandin
11
Description:
• Date: FY 13/14
• 20 x 16
• Medium
Big Sur Vista
Jackie Carroll
Location: Outside Rhonda Sherman’s Office
Description:
• 12 x 18
• Celebrate Citrus Heights Bronze Sculpture
Maquette
• Heavy
Little Boy
Philip Sciortino
Purchase Price: $2,000
Location: Community Center
Description:
• x
• Hand-crafted Model
• Heavy
Picure Coming Soon
14-Mile Road House
Donated by Artist
Missing
Pam Dempsey
Arco Mono Poly Lily
12
Service Contract For Video
www.webinitmedia.com - www.iammomentproductions.com
8 Oral Interviews:
Edit and Render:
$60/ hr
$60/ hr
24
13
$1440.00
$820.00
Total:
$2260.00
Client ______________________________ Date_____________________________
Videographer _________________________ Date_____________________________
Media Process
I. Event Date: DATE: To be Scheduled
II. Services Rendered
•
•
•
2 Camera Cut, HD Quality
3 hours per interview - including set up tare down and travel
8 interviews
III. Deliver edited files: D ATE: ______________________
CANCELLATION POLICY. All deposit fees are non-refundable. A minimum of 30 days notice will be required for cancelation of this
contract, Any cancellation made with less than 30 days notice prior to the agreed upon service date will result in full payment by the end of
the agreed upon event date. If the cancellation is initiated with in 30 days all monies paid, less the deposit shall be fully refunded, R
shall be paid out of months end.
WORK PRODUCT OWNERSHIP. Any copyrightable work ideas, discoveries, products or other information (collectively, the “work Product”)
developed in whole or in part by Webinit Media and Iammoment Productions in connection with services will be the exclusive property of
Webinit Media and Iammoment Productions. Webinit Media and Iammoment Productions reserves the right to use highlighted featured film
as examples to work for future clients.
GOVERNING LAW. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the state of California.
FORCE MAJEUR. If performance of this Contract or any obligation under this Contract is prevented, restricted, or interfered with by causes
beyond either party’s reasonable control (“Force Majeure”), and if the party unable to carry out its obligations gives the other party prompt
written notice of such event, then the obligations of the party invoking this provision shall be suspended to the extent necessary by su
event. The term Force Majeure shall include, without limitation, acts of God, fire, explosion, vandalism, storm or other similar occurrence,
orders or acts of military or civil authority, or by national emergencies, insurrections, riots, or wars, or strikes, lock-outs, work stoppages,
ch
other labor disputes, or supplier failures. The excused party shall use reasonable efforts under the circumstances to avoid or remove such
causes of non-performance and shall proceed to perform with reasonable dispatch whenever such causes are removed or ceased. An act or
omission shall be deemed within the reasonable control of a party if committed, omitted, or caused by such party, or its employees, officers,
agents, or affiliates.
WAIVER OF CONTRACTUAL RIGHT. The failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver
of limitation of that party’s right to subsequently enforce and compel strict compliance with every provision of this Contract.
DEFAULT. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a material default under this Contract:
1. The failure to make a required payment when due.
2. The insolvency or bankruptcy of either party.
3. The subjection of any of either party’s property to any levy, seizure, general assignment for the benefit of creditors, application for
sale for or by any creditor or government agency.
4.The failure to make available or deliver the services in the time and manner provided for in this contract
ITEM 19
Memorandum
December 4, 2014
TO:
Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Rhonda Sherman, Community & Economic Development Director
SUBJECT:
Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Establishment of New and the Relocation or
Expansion of Existing Massage Establishments
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Urgency Ordinance No. ___-2014, establishing
a forty-five (45) day moratorium on the establishment of new and the expansion or relocation of
existing massage establishments within the City. This moratorium is needed in order to conduct
a study on how to best address the potential imminent threats to public safety, health, and welfare
resulting from massage establishments.
Fiscal Impact
None.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City may establish a moratorium prohibiting
any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated zoning proposal that the legislative body or
the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time.
The City may adopt a moratorium on an urgency basis provided that the City finds that there
exists a threat to the public health, safety and welfare.
A number of massage establishments as presently regulated pose a risk to the public health,
safety and welfare. Staff has repeatedly received complaints from concerned residents regarding
such businesses. These businesses could result in harmful effects on the community, including
but not limited to significant risk of injury to massage clients by improperly trained and/or
uneducated massage therapists, blight, prostitution activity at massage establishments in the City,
and secondary effects illegal activities may have on City residents. Massage establishments
serving as fronts for illegal activity may also have negative impacts on commercial areas by
creating an uninviting and potentially dangerous environment.
Subject: Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Establishment of New and the Relocation or Expansion of
Existing Massage Establishments
Page 2 of 3
In addition to receiving complaints from concerned residents, staff has conducted inspections of
several of the nearly fifty operating massages establishments within the City. Staff has
determined that several of the establishments have outstanding code violations, and some
establishments may be a front for illegal activity. During inspections City Code Enforcement
staff found, for example, the following code violations at establishments within the City:
massage therapists inappropriately dressed, unlicensed massage therapists and locks on massage
room doors. On multiple occasions, the Citrus Heights Police Department conducted undercover
“sting” operations to determine whether illegal activity occurred at particular establishments; the
Police Department encountered prostitution in at least two establishments.
In order to ensure that the City’s zoning provisions are adequate and that massage establishments
will be located and regulated in a manner that protects the public and satisfies the policies, goals
and objectives of the General Plan, staff recommends that the Council direct the Community
Development Department to review the current provisions in the Municipal Code and consider
whether they are adequate to meet the needs of the City or should be amended to ensure
sufficient protection for the community. This study is necessary at this time because the
California Legislature recently passed AB 1147, effective January 1, 2015. AB 1147 provides
additional authority for cities and counties to regulate land use and zoning for massage
establishments. Previously, in 2008, the Legislature placed limitations on cities’ and counties’
authority to regulate land use and zoning for massage establishments. A study is needed in order
to determine whether the City’s current laws regarding massage establishments need to be
amended in order to protect against the potential harmful impacts on the community.
Additionally, to ensure future businesses of these types are regulated and located properly so as
to protect the public, health, safety and welfare, staff recommends that the Council place a
moratorium on the approval or issuance of massage special business licenses for the
establishment of new and the relocation or expansion of existing massage establishments. This
moratorium would not apply to massage operators and therapists operating in conformance with
federal, state and city laws and regulations under the following circumstances: (1) renewal of
general or special business licenses for an existing massage establishment that will maintain the
business without expansion and in its current location; (2) renewal of a massage therapist permit,
as long as the therapist remains employed at the same massage establishment where he or she
was previously permitted; (3) renewal of a special business license or a massage therapist license
for off-premises massage therapists and home occupation massage therapists; (4) issuance of an
initial massage therapist permit for employment at a business which has dismissed or otherwise
experienced a net reduction in massage therapists below current employment levels, provided
that the former employee surrendered to the City his or her massage therapist permit issued to the
employee for that massage establishment’s location; (5) issuance of an initial general business
license or special business license for a person to operate, engage in, carry on, or allow the
operation of an existing massage establishment, provided that the applicant seeks to maintain the
business without expansion and in its current location; (6) issuance of an initial general business
license or other City license, permit or entitlement to establish, operate, relocate or expand
massage establishments that are staffed entirely by massage therapists certified by the California
Massage Therapy Council (CMTC), but only until Assembly Bill 1147 takes effect on January 1,
2015; and (7) issuance of an initial massage therapist permit to a person who has a valid
Subject: Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Establishment of New and the Relocation or Expansion of
Existing Massage Establishments
Page 3 of 3
certificate to practice massage from the CMTC that will expire within the next 30 days, and who
is in good standing with the CMTC, or a person whose valid CMTC certificate expired less than
15 days prior to his or her permit application, and who was in good standing with the CMTC at
the time of expiration, as long as the therapist remains employed at the same massage
establishment where he or she was employed at the time of CMTC certificate expiration.
Conclusion
Staff recommends that Council approve an urgency ordinance adopting a temporary moratorium
on the establishment or new and the relocation or expansion of existing massage establishments
within the City pending review and possible amendment to the City regulations applicable to
these types of businesses.
This ordinance will become effective immediately upon passage if adopted by at least a fourfifths vote of the Citrus Heights City Council and shall be in effect for forty-five days from the
date of adoption unless extended by the City Council.
Attachments
1. Ordinance No. ___-2014
2367539.1
ORDINANCE NO. 2014-___
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS ADOPTED AS
AN URGENCY MEASURE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65858 MAKING FINDINGS AND ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY
MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW AND THE RELOCATION OR
EXPANSION OF EXISTING MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights has an overriding interest in planning and
regulating the use of property within the City. Implicit in any plan or regulation is the City’s
interest in maintaining the quality of urban life and the character of the City's neighborhoods.
Without stable, well-planned neighborhoods, sections of the City can quickly deteriorate, with
dramatic consequences on social, environmental, and economic health and welfare; and
WHEREAS, in 2008 the California Legislature adopted Senate Bill 731, repealing and
replacing Chapter 10.4 (commencing with section 4600) of Division 2 of the Business and
Professions Code, relating to massage therapy (“Massage Therapy Act of 2008” or “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Massage Therapy Act of 2008 placed certain limitations on the ability of
cities to regulate massage establishments concerning business licenses, zoning, and health, safety
and welfare regulations; and
WHEREAS, prior to the enactment of the Massage Therapy Act of 2008, the City had
amended its Municipal Code and Zoning Code to: (1) protect the health, safety and welfare of
the residents of the City; (2) ensure the potential harmful effects on City residents resulting from
massage establishments were limited; (3) ensure a degree of compatibility between the location
of massage establishments and surrounding commercial properties; and (4) ensure the City’s
ordinances were consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City, under the Massage Therapy Act of 2008, has had no ability to
implement zoning regulations that address the location of massage establishments certified by
the California Massage Therapy Council (“CMTC”); and
WHEREAS, the City, under the Massage Therapy Act of 2008, had to amend its
Municipal Code and Zoning Code regulations in response to those provisions of the Act that
limited cities’ and counties’ authority to regulate certain massage establishments, in particular
cities’ and counties’ ability to regulate the location of CMTC-certified massage establishments;
and
WHEREAS, the City, under the Massage Therapy Act of 2008, issued business licenses
to CMTC-certified massage establishments without making a determination of whether such uses
were consistent with the goals and purposes of the City’s Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature recently passed Assembly Bill 1147, effective
January 1, 2015, amending Section 460, and repealing and replacing Chapter 10.5 (commencing
with Section 4600) of Division 2, of the Business and Professions Code, and amending Section
51034 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1147 would return most land use authority over all massage
establishments to cities and counties; and
WHEREAS, the City anticipates requests for the establishment, relocation and expansion
of massage establishments within the City, but current provisions of the City’s Municipal Code
and Zoning Code fail to thoroughly address the impacts related to the establishment, relocation
or expansion of massage establishments in relation to the health, safety and welfare of the
community, including but not limited to, the impacts they may have on surrounding residents,
businesses and other uses; and
WHEREAS, the City values local business and recognizes that most massage
establishments throughout the City are operated lawfully and professionally and staffed by
massage therapists who uphold professional and community standards; and
WHEREAS, despite the lawfulness of most massage establishments, many others serve
as fronts for illegal activity that could potentially have negative secondary effects on commercial
areas by creating an uninviting and potentially dangerous environment, which may adversely
affect the City’s economic vitality and ability to attract and retain businesses and shoppers to the
City; and
WHEREAS, Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution provides that a city may
make and enforce all local police, sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict
with general laws within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858, subdivision (a) provides that the
legislative body of a city may, to protect the public safety, health and welfare, adopt as an
urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a
contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal the City Council is considering or
studying or intends to study within a reasonable time; that adoption of such urgency measures
requires a four-fifths vote of the legislative body; that such measures shall be of no effect 45
days from the date of adoption, and may be extended a maximum of two times for a total
duration of two years; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to address community concerns regarding the
establishment and operation of massage establishments within the City and intends to (1) study
the potential impacts massage establishments may have on the public health, safety and welfare,
(2) determine what local regulations, including but not limited to zoning regulations, may be
appropriate to limit the negative impacts of massage establishments, and (3) determine
appropriate controls for the protection of public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, passage of Assembly Bill 1147 has significantly changed the relevant
circumstances by returning much land use authority over massage establishments to local
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council takes note that surrounding jurisdictions, including the
County of Sacramento, have updated their massage ordinances to adopt stricter requirements on
massage establishments which, in conjunction with the passage of Assembly Bill 1147, the City
anticipates will increase requests for the establishment, relocation and expansion of massage
establishments within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CITRUS HEIGHTS:
SECTION 1. Recitals.
The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. Purpose.
The purpose of this Ordinance is to temporarily prohibit the establishment of new and the
relocation or expansion of existing massage establishments within the City of Citrus Heights
until such reasonable time as a detailed study of the possible adverse impacts such
establishments might have on commercial uses and the general health, safety and welfare may be
made.
SECTION 3. Scope and Applicability of Moratorium.
a.
From and after the effective date of this Ordinance, no license, permit or other
entitlement for use, including but not limited to the issuance of a general business license,
massage establishment license, massage therapist permit, building permit, conditional use permit,
or other land use approval, shall be approved or issued by the City for the establishment,
relocation or expansion of a massage establishment. Additionally, the establishment, relocation
or expansion of massage establishments is hereby expressly prohibited in all areas and zoning
districts of the City.
b.
For purposes of this Ordinance:
1. “Massage” means any method of pressure on, or friction against, or stroking, kneading,
rubbing, tapping, pounding, vibrating, or stimulating of the external parts of the human
body below the neck with the hands or other parts of the body, with or without the aid of
any mechanical or electrical apparatus or appliances, or with or without supplementary
aids such as rubbing alcohol, liniments, antiseptics, oils, powder, creams, lotions,
ointments or other similar preparations commonly used in the practice of massage.
2. “Massage establishment” means a fixed place of business where any person engages in or
carries on massage, as defined in this Ordinance, in exchange for any form of
consideration.
3. “Expansion” includes, but is not limited to, a net increase an establishment’s floor space,
or the employment of any additional massage therapists beyond the number licensed at
the massage establishment as of the date this Ordinance is adopted.
c.
This Ordinance shall not prohibit the approval or issuance of the following:
1. The renewal of a general business license or a massage establishment license for an
existing massage establishment, provided that the renewal seeks to maintain the business
without expansion and in its current location, and the massage establishment is operating
in a manner, and housed within a building, which complies with all City, State, Federal or
otherwise applicable, codes, rules, regulations or laws.
2. The renewal of a massage therapist permit, as long as the therapist remains employed at
the same massage establishment where he or she was previously licensed, as long as there
are no existing violations of City, State, Federal or otherwise applicable, codes, rules,
regulations or laws by the employer or the employee.
3. The renewal of a special business license or a massage therapist license for off-premises
massage therapists and home occupation massage therapists.
4. The issuance of an initial massage therapist permit for employment at a business which
has dismissed or otherwise experienced a net reduction in massage therapists below
current employment levels, provided that the former employee surrendered to the City his
or her massage therapist permit issued to the employee for that massage establishment’s
location, and the massage establishment is operating in a manner, and housed within a
building, that complies with all City, State, Federal or otherwise applicable, codes, rules,
regulations or laws.
5. The issuance of an initial general business license or massage establishment license for a
person to operate, engage in, carry on, or allow the operation of an existing massage
establishment, provided that the applicant seeks to maintain the business without
expansion and in its current location, and the massage establishment is operating in a
manner, and housed within a building, which complies with all City, State, Federal or
otherwise applicable, codes, rules, regulations or laws.
6. The issuance of an initial general business license or other City license, permit or
entitlement to establish, operate, relocate or expand a “certified massage establishment”
or a “certified sole proprietorship,” as those terms are defined in Citrus Heights
Municipal Code Section 22-605, but only until Assembly Bill 1147 takes effect on
January 1, 2015. After January 1, 2015, the City shall not approve or issue any such
license, permit or entitlement while this Ordinance is in effect.
7. The issuance of an initial massage therapist permit to a person who has a valid certificate
to practice massage from the MTO that will expire within the next 30 days, and who is in
good standing with the MTO, or a person whose valid MTO certificate expired less than
15 days prior to his or her permit application, and who was in good standing with the
MTO at the time of expiration, as long as the therapist remains employed at the same
massage establishment where he or she was employed at the time of MTO certificate
expiration. “MTO” and “MTO certificate” have the same meanings as provided in Citrus
Heights Municipal Code Section 22-605.
d. This Ordinance shall not apply to the following persons while engaged in the
performance of their duties:
1. Physicians, surgeons, nurses, chiropractors, osteopaths, acupuncturists, naturopathic
doctors, and physical therapists or acupuncturists who are duly licensed to practice within
the scope of their licenses, and massage therapists working under the direct supervision
of such duly licensed physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, osteopaths, acupuncturists,
naturopathic doctors and physical therapists.
2. Persons operating or employed at hospitals, nursing homes, sanitariums, or any other
health facility duly licensed by the state.
3. Trainers of any amateur, semiprofessional or professional athlete or athletic team.
4. Barbers or cosmetologists lawfully carrying out their particular occupation or business,
and holding a valid, unrevoked license or certificate of registration issued by the State of
California and where massage comprises not more than ten percent of the square footage
of the establishment.
5. Persons operating or employed at athletic clubs or fitness facilities, where such facility is
designed and equipped for indoor sports, exercise, or physical education, and where
massage comprises not more than 25 percent of the square footage of the establishment.
6. A recognized school of massage which: (i) teaches the theory, ethics, practice, profession
and work of massage; (ii) requires a residence course of study to be given before the
student is furnished with a diploma or certificate of learning or completion; and (iii) has
been approved pursuant to Education Code section 94915, or, if said school is not located
in California, has complied with the standards commensurate with those specified in
Education Code section 94915.
7. Reflexologists performing reflexology.
For clarity, this subsection (d) shall not exempt any person in the above categories from
obtaining a massage therapist permit if required under Section 22-606 of the Citrus Heights
Municipal Code.
SECTION 4. Except as otherwise permitted under this Ordinance, the establishment, relocation
or expansion of a massage establishment within the limits of the City of Citrus Heights is
declared to be a public nuisance. Violations of this Ordinance may be enforced by any
applicable laws or ordinances, including but not limited to injunctions or administrative or
criminal penalties under the Citrus Heights Municipal Code.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance is an interim ordinance adopted as an urgency measure pursuant
to Government Code Section 65858 and is for the immediate preservation of the public peace,
health and welfare. This Ordinance is deemed necessary based on the findings of the City
Council as set forth in the recitals incorporated by Section 1 of this Ordinance, and the additional
information set forth below:
1. The City Council finds that, in general, massage establishments could potentially result in
serious harm to the public safety, health and welfare, including but not limited to the significant
risk of blight, prostitution activity at massage establishments in the City, and negative secondary
effects such as other illegal activity. Massage establishments serving as fronts for illegal activity
may also have negative impacts on commercial areas by creating an uninviting and potentially
dangerous environment.
2. The City Council finds that massage establishments, whether as a result of the manner or
hours of operation, security, or lack thereof, siting, or maintenance, have the potential of
becoming a source of criminal or other activity, resulting in the creation of a public nuisance.
3. The City Council finds that the City currently has little control over the location of
massage establishments certified by CMTC and, under the Massage Therapy Act of 2008, cannot
adopt land use or zoning requirements that treat such massage establishments different from
other professional or personal services business.
4. The City Council finds that circumstances have changed significantly since the City
amended its Municipal Code and Zoning Code in response to the Massage Therapy Act of 2008.
Earlier this year the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 1147, which returns significant
land use control over massage establishments to local jurisdictions, effective January 1, 2015.
This is a substantial change from current circumstances.
5. The City has concluded that the best method of protecting public safety, health, and
welfare is to study, revise and consider the adoption of regulations concerning location and
operation of new and existing massage establishments.
6. The City Council finds that it is necessary to ensure that these types of businesses are
properly located within the City, both to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and to
ensure that these businesses are located in a manner that is consistent with City standards, goals
and policies.
7. It is necessary to immediately study, hold public hearings on, and consider the adoption
of, potential amendments to the City’s Municipal Code and Zoning Code concerning massage
establishments pursuant to the return of local land use control authorized by Assembly Bill 1147.
8. A comprehensive set of regulations cannot be enacted without due deliberation and study,
and it will take an indeterminate length of time to work out the details of such comprehensive
regulations. Issuing licenses, permits or other entitlements prior to the completion of the City’s
study of such establishments poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety,
and welfare by enabling parties to evade the operation of potential restrictions, thus defeating in
whole or in part the ultimate objective of those restrictions.
9. On the basis of the foregoing findings and all evidence in the record including but not
limited to the staff report and testimony from staff, the City Council finds that the establishment
of new and the relocation or expansion of existing massage establishments or businesses offering
related services prior to the completion of the City’s review poses a threat to the public health,
safety and welfare and, in accordance with Government Code section 65858, adopts this
Ordinance establishing a moratorium on massage establishments in the City.
SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby declares that it would have
passed and adopted this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact
that any one or more of said provisions be declared unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise
invalid.
SECTION 7. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not
result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and
15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines
(Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations) because it has no potential for
resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; it prevents changes in the
environment pending the completion of the contemplated Zoning Code review.
SECTION 8. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage if adopted by at
least a four-fifths vote of the Citrus Heights City Council and shall be in effect for forty-five
days from the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council as provided for by
Government Code Section 65858.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance as required by
applicable law.
INTRODUCED and ordered published this 11th day of December, 2014.
ADOPTED this ________ day of ____________________, 2014, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_________________________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
2350956.3
ITEM 20
Memorandum
December 11, 2014
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Guidelines for use of the General Fund Reserve Balance
In the past, the City has reported the General Fund Reserve Balance as Committed Funds in the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). In order to continue reporting the General
Fund Reserve Balance as Committed Funds, Government Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 54 (GASB 54) states that the City Council must take formal action to commit
these amounts. As of June 30, 2014, the General Fund Reserve Balance was $27,279,124. Staff
recommends that the City Council adopt the following guidelines for use of the General Fund
Reserve Balance:
•
•
•
•
City Hall Renovation and/or Replacement - $22,000,000.
Neighborhood Street Resurfacing - $350,000 in FY 2014-2015.
Arterial Major Patch Repairs - $200,000 in FY 2014-2015.
Revenue Stabilization – If there is a revenue shortfall of 10% of budgeted revenues, the
remaining General Fund Reserve Balance may be used to cover the shortfall.
Fiscal Impact
The City has always maintained fiscal responsibility. Adopting guidelines for use of the General
Fund Reserve Balance is another mechanism in maintaining long-term financial stability and
meets one of the City’s Six-Month Strategic Objectives set by Council on October 17, 2014.
During the FY 2013-2014 audit, it was determined that the City had not formally committed the
General Fund Reserve Balance according to GASB 54 requirements. In order to continue
reporting the General Fund Reserve Balance as Committed Funds, GASB 54 specifies that the
City Council must take formal action to commit these amounts. Additionally, GASB 54 requires
the criteria for use of any revenue stabilization reserves to be specified in the formal action
approving the reserve for it to be considered committed. Finally, recommending to the City
Subject: Guidelines for use of the General Fund Reserve Balance
Page 2 of 2
Council for action guidelines for the use of the General Fund Reserve Balance will satisfy the sixmonth strategic objective that was set by Council at the October 17, 2014 Strategic Planning
Retreat.
According to GASB 54, once funds are committed, they cannot be used for any other purpose
unless the government formally removes or changes the specified use by resolution.
Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the guidelines for use of
the General Fund Reserve Balance.
Attachments: (1) Resolution Establishing Guidelines for use of General Fund Reserve Balance
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR USE OF
GENERAL FUND RESERVE BALANCE
WHEREAS, the City has always maintained fiscal responsibility; and
WHEREAS, adopting guidelines for use of the General Fund Reserve Balance is another
mechanism in maintaining long-term financial stability; and
WHEREAS, adopting guidelines for use of the General Fund Reserve Balance satisfies one of
the City’s Six-Month Strategic Objectives set by Council on October 17, 2014;
City Council commits the following:
A)
B)
C)
D)
City Hall Renovation and/or Replacement - $22,000,000.
Neighborhood Street Resurfacing - $350,000 in FY 2014-2015.
Arterial Major Patch Repairs - $200,000 in FY 2014-2015.
Revenue Stabilization – If there is a revenue shortfall of 10% of budgeted revenues,
the remaining General Fund Reserve Balance may be used to cover the shortfall
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California this
11th day of December, 2014 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
Council Members:
NOES:
Council Members:
ABSTAIN:
Council Members:
ABSENT:
Council Members:
____________________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk

Mel Turner, Mayor Sue Frost, Vice Mayor Jeannie Bruins, Council

Transcription

Similar documents

sunray plaza

2012 Estate PP BLANC

REACH Out Newsletter August 2013

history of our school. - Colorado Heights University

City of Harker Heights Blood Drive

Sales Sheet for Tocobaga

job shop poster-05

Carey`s article - LuxuryMarinHomes.com

Let yourself go - The Hermosa Inn

Citrus Economic Summit