Michael O`Halloran, MD, FAAP - American Academy of Pediatrics
Transcription
Michael O`Halloran, MD, FAAP - American Academy of Pediatrics
SENIOR BULLETIN AAP Section for Senior Members Editor: Associate Editor: Advocacy for Children Editors: Travel & Leisure Editor: Financial Planning Editor: Health Maintenance Editor: Computers Editor: General Senior Issues Editors: Outdoors Editor: Joan Hodgman, MD, FAAP Arthur Maron, MD, MPA, FAAP Lucy Crain, MD, MPH, FAAP Burris Duncan, MD, FAAP Donald Schiff, MD, FAAP Herbert Winograd, MD, FAAP James Reynolds, MD FAAP Avrum Katcher, MD, FAAP Jerold Aronson, MD, FAAP Avrum Katcher, MD, FAAP Eugene Wynsen, MD, FAAP John Bolton, MD, FAAP Vo l u m e 1 7 N o . 1 – W i n t e r 2 0 0 8 Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The recommendations in this publication do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Message from the Chairperson Avrum L. Katcher, MD, FAAP Chairperson, Section for Senior Members Welcome to all members of the Section for Senior Members. The state of the world, and our health care system, reminds me of a commentary that appeared in Lancet, 51 years ago. It went something like this: “Once upon a time there was a very poor country, where nobody had enough to eat and the average expectation of life was 24 years. In another place, a very rich country, everyone had plenty to eat and the average expectation of life was 64 years. In this country, people saved extra milk and butter and cream and eggs and sent them to the very poor country, where they were distributed, especially to the children, who would otherwise have had none. In this way the expectation of life in the very poor country was raised from 24 to 27 years. Meanwhile the expectation of life in the very rich country rose too, from 64 up to 67 years. Everyone who did not die of cancer of the lung from smoking cigarettes died of cardiovascular disease. Then someone discovered that this was due to eating and drinking too much milk and butter and cream and eggs. So they stopped eating and drinking milk and butter and cream and eggs in the rich country, and sent all to the very poor country. As a result the expectation of life in the very poor country was raised high enough for them to start dying of cardiovascular disease so that they, too, could stop eating and drinking milk and butter and cream and eggs.” What’s Inside? Message from the Chairperson . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 Executive Committee/Subcommittee Chairs . . . 2 Announcing the 2008 Seniors NCE. . . . . . . . . . 3 2007 SENIOR EDUCATION PROGRAM . . . . . . 3 Michael O’Halloran, MD, FAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Dr. Silverman Awarded Seidal Career Award. . . 5 Cross-Cultural Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 The End of the Year and the Battle Goes On . 5-6 2008 Computer Safety Update . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 Senior Membership Categories . . . . . . . . . . . 8-9 Dr. Anders Receives Child Advocacy Award 10-11 One Fine Golden Ager’s Favorite Things. . . . . 12 ADVOCACY IN ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-15 Exploring Remedies for Long-Term Care . . 15-16 Retirement “In Toto” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-18 Retirement “In Toto” Part 2 . . . . . . . . . . . 18-19 A woman called a local hospital . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Parenting a Different Paradigm . . . . . . . . . . . 20 TRIPLE BOOK REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21-22 Promoting the Value of Pediatrics. . . . . . . . . . 22 Reminds me of what I was told years ago, be careful what you ask for, because it may come with consequences you had not expected. LUCIANISSIMO AND THE HIGH C . . . . . . 23-24 Well, thus far we have had only positive consequences Title: Age of Reason . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Editors Note: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Continued on Page 2 Copyright© 2008 American Academy of Pediatrics Section for Senior Members Executive Committee Avrum L. Katcher, MD, FAAP Chair Flemington, NJ David Annunziato, MD, FAAP Immediate Past Chair East Meadow, NY Michael O’Halloran, MD, FAAP Eau Claire, WI George Cohen, MD, FAAP Rockville, MD Lucy Crain, MD, MPH, FAAP San Francisco, CA John Bolton, MD, FAAP Mill Valley, CA Arthur Maron, MD, MPA, FAAP Boca Raton, FL Subcommittee Chairs Program Lucy Crain, MD, FAAP Financial Planning James Reynolds, MD, FAAP Membership George Cohen, MD, FAAP History Center/Archives David Annunziato, MD, FAAP Newsletter Editor Joan Hodgman, MD, FAAP 323/226-3400 hodgman@usc.edu Associate Editor Arthur Maron, MD, FAAP 561/394-6114 artmaron@aol.com Staff Jackie Burke, Sections Manager 800/433-9016, ext. 4759 jburke@aap.org Tracey Coletta, Sections Coordinator 800/433-9016, ext. 4926 tcoletta@aap.org Mark A. Krajecki, Pre-Press Production Specialist 847/434-7866 mkrajecki@aap.org 2 Message from the Chairperson Continued from Page 1 from all the hard work our members have contributed. Joan Hodgman and Arthur Maron continue their wonderful work on the Bulletin, whose latest issue you are reading. Jerry Aronson has even further expanded our Web page, where as you probably know there is an enormous amount of information for Seniors related to many aspects of aging and life, as well as opportunities to work with the AAP. We have been very pleased with the responses of the AAP chapters on the encouragement to form chapter senior committees. Dr. Annunziato and Jackie Burke have completed a total revision of the splendid Chapter Guide, to aid Chapters who desire to create or expand such committees. Your chapter officers and executive directors have copies of the Chapter Guide. If not, please contact Jackie Burke at the AAP office in Elk Grove Village, IL, at jburke@aap.org. If you have any questions or desire further advice, contact one or more of the Chapters who have very positive programs. These include: ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA I, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, IOWA, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND, MISSOURI, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK II, SOUTH CAROLINA, TEXAS, VIRGINIA, and WISCONSIN. Other Chapters are considering establishment of Senior Committees or programs as well. An even larger group are calling on Senior members to work in the area of advocacy, often in dealing with legislators and administrators. Wisconsin has formed a joint venture with the state AARP Chapter, to work with grandparents who find themselves parenting again, teaching healthy diets, and offering screening tests. The two groups have also supported the SCHIP venture. Our Executive Committee, led by Lucy Crain, Michael O’Halloran and Jerry Aronson, are working closely with Jackie Burke and Ken Slaw and his staff at the national AAP headquarters on a strategic planning initiative. What goals should we pursue? What may we realistically be able to accomplish? What will most benefit children, and simultaneously meet the needs and wishes of our membership? The Executive Committee will devote a large proportion of time to this topic at the Spring Meeting with the data that is being gathered. We had a similar venture a number of years ago and we hope to progress even further now. It was noted by the executive committee that AAP membership categories and options for seniors do not appear to be widely advertised. The feeling is that many seniors are not aware of emeritus and retired membership categories. If you are unsure on this point, suggest you communicate with Jackie Burke or the membership division at AAP. The Executive Committee also believes that a major goal for the Section for Senior Members is to aid our members to “develop” and “grow” well. The comparability with the role of the pediatrician in child development is not entirely facetious. The life cycle changes through which we all must progress are similar in principle to those of any other age. We have the advantage of our training as pediatricians in this area, and of our life experience. Look on our web page for more information on this topic. Edward R. Murrow, the broadcaster who brought such vivid images to us via his nightly radio comments from Britain, would sign off with “Good night and good luck.” I’d close with “Good health and good luck!” Avrum L. Katcher, MD, FAAP Chairperson, Section for Senior Members American Academy of Pediatrics Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Announcing the 2008 Section for Seniors Education Program at the NCE in Boston October 11-14, 2008: Monday, October 13 • 1:30-5:30 pm CRUCIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR GRANDPARENTING • Tax Exempt Investment Options to Assure College Educations for Your Grandchildren: Lorna Meyer, Senior Vice President, President of Private Banking & Investment Group, Merrill Lynch. • Foster Parenting & Grandparenting 101: Another Way to Stay Young?: Dr. Errol and Mrs. Judy Alden, Office of Executive Director, American Academy of Pediatrics. • Impact of Adult Diet, Health, and Lifestyle on Future Generations: Lisa Hark, Ph.D., R.D., Director, Nutrition Education Program, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. EDUCATION PROGRAM OF AAP SECTION FOR SENIORS 2007 NCE SAN FRANCISCO by Lucy S. Crain, MD, MPH, FAAP, Chair, Section Education Committee More than 60 section members and guests attending the 2007 Section for Seniors CME program, PROMOTING LONGEVITY IN THE ERA OF STEM CELL RESEARCH, submitted very positive evaluations, indicating their regret that more section members weren’t in attendance at this remarkably informative session. Since our Section budget does not permit recording the program for others unable to attend, the following is a summary of this year’s presentations. • GENES, AGING, & DISEASE: Dale Bredesen, M.D. is Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and President and CEO of the Buck Institute for Age Research in Novato, California. Dr. Bredesen’s research has revealed alternatives to apoptosis for programmed cell death. He described studies showing cancer development ensuing as malignant cells fail to commit suicide and explained paraptosis, consisting of complementary pathways providing fail-safe mechanisms to ensure that cell death occurs when and where required. In addition to his erudite explanations of complex scientific research, he amused the audience with his description of his laboratory’s creation of transgenic mice, which model Alzheimer’s disease (or “Mausheimer’s”). This research has demonstrated a single point mutation sufficient to rescue the major phenotypic abnormalities of synaptic loss, atrophy of dentate gyri, and electrophisiologic abnormalities. • DIAGNOSIS & TREATMENT OF MEMORY DISORDERS: Bruce Miller, M.D. is Professor of Neurology at UCSF, where he is Director of the Center on Memory & Aging. Dr. Miller spoke as a clinician and neuro-cognitive researcher, defining various types of dementias, their diagnosis and treatment options. He spoke of emerging research on apoproteins, which may have clinical applicability for pediatric populations to assist in longterm memory retention. He also reviewed various factors which increase risk for memory loss, including head injury, cerebrovascular accidents, neoplasms, and advised diet, exercise, and active creative activities, as well as judicious attention to good health. He reviewed additional research on promising medications for augmenting memory, advising that preventive efforts are at this time more promising than current pharmaceutical options. • STEM CELL RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY 101: Martin Pera, Ph.D., is a Research Professor and Director of the Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine at Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. He presented a superb overview of stem cell research, describing isolation and characterization of pluri-potential stem cells. He hypothesized how stem cell cultures representing different cell types can be controlled to express different cell types in vitro, and defined possible future clinical applications, predicated by propagation of stem cells on a large scale under defined conditions for large scare research projects and clinical trials. Noting the numerous practical and ethical questions remaining, he gave a promising outlook. Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 3 Michael O’Halloran, MD, FAAP AAP Section for Senior Members • Executive Committee Member Five years ago, I retired after 30+ years of practice in front-line general pediatrics for Midelfort Clinic-Mayo Health System in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. My retirement found me increasingly involved with the American Academy of Pediatrics. I had not been particularly active in the academy during my years in practice other than maintaining my membership. I did, however, strongly believe in the efforts of the academy directed toward the education of pediatricians, the support of profession in general, and the Academy’s overriding interest in the welfare of children. Retirement changed my focus. Beginning with a bit of a shove from a mentor, Dr. Carl Eisenberg, a recent past president of the Wisconsin Chapter of the AAP, I agreed to chair the new senior committee on the Wisconsin chapter. As a committee chair I was a member of the chapter executive committee, which is advisory to the board. Since then I’ve become webmaster for the chapter web site, a situation that I, and many of my friends, can barely believe. Again with encouragement from Dr. Eisenberg, I’ve become interested in our chapter history and have made a couple of trips to the AAP archives in Elk GroveVillage, Illinois. I have also become one of the trained oral interviewers for the AAP. In 2006, I began service to the academy as a newly elected member of the Executive Committee of the AAP Section for Senior Members. I was born, the oldest of six children, to Pat and Ray O’Halloran and raised in a west Minneapolis suburb. Sometime in junior high, I decided I’d like to become a physician and kept at it in spite of some mixed messages from a beloved family doctor. The education track went from Benilde High School in St. Louis Park, Minnesota to undergrad at John Carroll University in Cleveland, Ohio, to Medical school at Creighton University in Omaha Nebraska, to a rotating internship in Portland Oregon. During medical school, I met and married Marty. My marriage to her was, and continues to be, a matter of profound wonder to me. Then my career was detoured by the doctor draft in 1968. While in the Army, I was initially an artillery Battalion Surgeon near theVietnam DMZ and then an emergency room (receiving) physician with the 95th Evacuation Hospital in Da Nang, Vietnam. 4 Finally, then, with my two year obligation with the Army finished, I began my pediatric residency with Good Samaritan Hospital and the four hospital residency program in Phoenix, AZ. My wife and I decided that we were Upper-Midwesterners at heart and we headed back north with our three children, Teresa, Patrick and Peggy. I wanted to be part of a multispecialty group practice and found a perfect fit with the Midelfort Clinic in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, less than 2 hours from the Twin Cities in Minnesota. I loved my career in general pediatrics at Midelfort clinic. Other activities during those years included membership on Midelfort Clinic board of directors; membership on the first board of directors of the clinic’s prepaid health plan; teaching responsibilities with the University of Wisconsin Medical School, the University of Minnesota Medical School, and the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner program at the College of St Catherine in Saint Paul, Minnesota; consultant for a western Wisconsin head start program; chair of clinic and hospital pediatric departments; secretary of our county medical society; and 17 years as medical director of a neurodevelopment evaluation clinic serving nine counties of northern Wisconsin. In my hometown of Eau Claire, Wisconsin, I’m still involved with Luther Hospital, now integrated with Midelfort Clinic. I’m a member of the Library Committee, I’m a Physician Adviser for the hospital coding section of the Medical Records Department and I’ve organized our retired physicians into a quasiofficial section of our clinic. In the community, I’m on the board of directors of the local Institute for Learning in Retirement, responsible for arranging classes to offer the 500 retired persons on the mailing list and recently I’m a volunteer for the local hospice program. I consider it a privilege to help with the goals of the AAP Section for Senior Members as a member of the Board of Directors. I believe these goals to include: pre-retirement help for soon-to-retire pediatricians, involvement with the AAP history project, fostering volunteerism, mentoring pediatricians just starting practice, assisting the AAP with advocacy, and helping pediatricians stay connected to the AAP as a way to continue their career-long interest in promoting the welfare of children. Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Dr. Silverman Awarded Seidal Career Award The Senior Bulletin is pleased to announce that Dr. Benjamin Silverman MD, FAAP has been awarded the James Seidel Career Award for Distinguished Service by the Section on Emergency Medicine. The award is named in honor of Jim Seidel who was an early mover and shaker in the field when there was no organized Emergency Medicine for Children. We wish to congratulate Dr. Silverman on this prestigious award. Further details can be found by visiting the Section’s web site. Cross-Cultural Solutions Operates volunteer programs around the world in partnership with sustainable community initiatives in the areas of health, education, and social services. Programs available in 12 countries with start dates offered year-round and lengths of stay from 1-12 weeks. We are an international not-for-profit organization with no political or religious affiliations. See our website for more information. I checked the Cross-Cultural Solutions web site and it appears like a very good group. I didn’t see anything in the site saying a physician would have a role as a physician so I emailed them. I found out they do in fact have a some opportunities for hands on medical care and some others in health education. Even without those things, I suspect it will be of interest to some of our members for non-medical jobs. Michael O’Halloran, MD, FAAP The End of the Year and the Battle Goes On by Donald Schiff, MD, FAAP As the tiresome campaigns for the nominations of the major political parties for President continues, the nation limps along with a growing frustration among child advocates who had hoped that 2007 would be a year of progress. The attempt by the majority party in Congress to improve the SCHIP program and reduce the number of uninsured children went down to defeat by a combination of repeated Presidential vetoes and filibusters in the Senate. The S-CHIP will probably survive in a depleted state by means of funding through continuing resolutions. AAP leaders hope that a new administration and new Congress in 2009 will appreciate the critical importance of having all of our nation’s children have quality health insurance and the need to restructure the program to provide insurance for an additional four million currently unin- sured children. S-CHIP is only one of the federal programs affecting children currently in danger of losing funds and thereby providing fewer services to children. The Supplemental Nutrition program for Women and Children ( WIC), which since 1974 has been providing valuable nutritional services to mothers and children, is being revised. Some of the recommended changes appear to be advantageous, with improved availability of fruits, vegetables and whole grains, but just as SCHIP was caught in the contentious budget negotiations, WIC is also facing, according to an analysis by the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities, a reduction in the number of children served by this program by 500,000, if the administration’s budget proposals are adopted. WIC, which has enjoyed bipartisan support previ- Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 ously and served 8.2 million poor people in 2007, has been acclaimed as improving health and nutrition programs and reducing the number of low birth weight infants. Its future rests in the hands of the Administration and the Senate. A review of health care reforms frequently is referenced back to the 1930’s and the feeble efforts of FDR and Harry Truman. Most readers are surprised to find that Richard Nixon in 1971, in order to forestall a single payer national health insurance program, proposed a mandate which would require all employers to cover their workers with a Medicaid type program which all Americans could join by paying a sliding scale premium based upon income. More recently, many states unwilling to wait for a comprehensive Continued on Page 6 5 The End of the Year and the Battle Goes On Continued from Page 5 national program, have attempted to produce a statewide plan, which would not only serve their state, but also serve as a potential model for a future national plan. Massachusetts has tried twice in 1988 and 2006, Minnesota, Tennessee, Vermont and Washington have created statewide plans which have been unable to significantly reduce their number of uninsured, and the national total has increased to over 47 million. In 2008, we can anticipate health care reform to become one of the major issues of discourse between the candidates and the voters. The Democratic proposals for changing the tax structure to pay for health care for the currently uninsured is certain to be met with a massive effort to counter any such restructure. The National Federation of Independent Business, a powerful opponent of any health insurance mandate for small business, has again restated their strong opposition to any employer mandate in any future health care legislation. The possibility of a new alignment of administration and Congress in 2009 provides hope that the lack of progress in securing health insurance for all of our children can end, and that we can finally achieve that goal, which will certainly make us a stronger as well as healthier nation. Powerful efforts by pediatricians in coalition with the other child advocates will be needed to succeed. This is our shared responsibility. Please contact me with your thoughts and ideas at donroschiff@comcast.net 2008 Computer Safety Update by Jerald Aronson, MD, FAAP Preventive care applies to your computer, as well as yourself. As you immunize yourself against preventable infections, immunize and protect your computer from virus and “trojan horse” infections. Failure to do so may cause you significant time and money to repair your PC, and subject you to a significant loss of data that you may not be able to replace. A computer virus is a program designed to infect executable files or the system areas of hard and floppy disks, and then make copies and spread itself. Executable files are the software applications that run your program applications, e.g. word-processing, web surfing, etc. Viruses usually operate without the knowledge or desire of the computer user. Viruses have the potential to infect any type of executable code, not just the files that are commonly called ‘program files’. For example, some viruses infect executable code in the boot sector of your computer hard drive. Another type of virus, known as a ‘macro’ virus, can infect word processing (e.g. WORD) and spreadsheet (EXCEL) documents that use macros (templates). It’s also possible for HTML (common web files) documents containing JavaScript often downloaded from the Internet to contain and spread viruses or other malicious code. Sharing an infected file with another PC can infect the other computer. Thus, in addition to primary protection of your computer with anti-virus software (more on this later), it is a good idea to run an antivirus scan of a disk that you receive from someone else before running any programs or accessing any files on that disk. 6 Remember, simply downloading a file to your computer won’t activate a virus or Trojan horse. You have to execute the hidden code in the file to trigger it. This could mean running a program file, or opening a Word/Excel document in a program (such as Word or Excel) that can execute any macros in the document. We’ll discuss virus and Trojan horse prevention strategies later. Usually, your data files are safe from virus and Trojan horse infection. Data files are the specific files that store the information generated by your use of application programs, e.g. word processing, picture editing, etc. Data files include graphics and sound files such as .gif, .jpg, .mp3, .wav, etc., as well as plain text in .txt files. For example, just viewing picture files won’t infect your computer with a virus. The virus code has to be in a form, such as an .exe program file or a Word .doc file that the computer will actually try to execute. A Trojan Horse is different. It is a destructive program that masquerades as a benign application. Unlike viruses, Trojan horses do not replicate themselves but they can be just as destructive. One of the most insidious types of Trojan horse is a program that claims to rid your computer of viruses but instead introduces viruses onto your computer. Trojan horses place your computer at risk and can do significant damage. For example, Trojan Horse programs can: Continued on Page 7 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 2008 Computer Safety Update Continued from Page 6 • Provide the attacker with complete control of the victim’s system. Attackers usually hide these Trojan horses in games and other small programs that unsuspecting users then execute on their PCs. • Provide the attacker with sensitive data such as passwords, credit card information, log files, e-mail address or Instant Messenger (IM) contact lists and/or install a key logger that will send all recorded keystrokes back to the attacker stealing private, confidential information like financial information and passwords. • Destroy and delete files, • Use your computer as a proxy server or by allowing an attacker to connect to your computer. This gives the attacker the opportunity to do everything from your computer, including the possibility of conducting credit card fraud and other illegal activities, or even to use your system to launch malicious attacks against other networks. • Stop or kill security programs such as an antivirus program or firewall without the user knowing. • Attack a network to bring the network to its knees by flooding it with useless traffic. This is called a “denial of service” attack. What should you do if you think that your PC is “infected”? Remember, just because your computer is acting strangely or one of your programs doesn’t work right, this does NOT mean that your computer has a virus. If you haven’t used a good, up-to-date anti-virus program on your computer, do that first. Many problems blamed on viruses are actually caused by software configuration errors or other problems that have nothing to do with a virus. 1. Go online and download Updates to the anti-virus program that is on your PC. In general, the antivirus software companies update their software very quickly to publicly known dissemination of virus threats. 2. Physically disconnect (remove the cable or telephone line) your computer from the Internet. Depending upon what type of virus or Trojan Horse your computer has, intruders may have access to your personal information or be using your PC to communicate with others. Disconnecting the PC from the Internet will prevent this from happening. 3. Run your updated anti-virus software! 4. If you do NOT have anti-virus software installed, go out and buy a program, immediately. Install it from the CD and Scan your computer prior to installing the software. 5. Back up your important files. Place all of your picSenior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 tures, documents, email address books, financial files on an external device (portable hard drive) or CD. NOTE – you should run new anti-virus software on these files before using them again. They should not be trusted since they are potentially infected. 6. If the previous steps failed to clean up your computer, consider getting professional, technical help at a computer store, e.g. Best Buy, Circuit City. They may have software and techniques available that will work and prevent the next step from being necessary. 7. Reformat your hard drive and reinstall your operating system. Note – this will result in the loss of all of your programs and files! It is important that you have the original Install discs for the software that you will need to re-install. a. Re-install your anti-virus software and other programs b. Scan the discs containing your back-ups. If clean, then restore to the hard drive of your PC. More importantly, protect your computer and prevent infections in the first place! • Install anti-virus software from a well-known, reputable company, • Select the Auto-Update feature as you install the software and allow the anti-virus software to UPDATE regularly. • USE anti-virus software regularly. Set the anti-virus Scheduling function to routinely scan your PC. I allow my software to automatically scan my PC each night. Once per week is a common default in antivirus software. • Use the anti-virus software Default settings unless you have a good reason to not do so. The default setting will usually maximally protect your system. For example, it will set your PC to Scan on bootup, autoscan all executable program files, scan incoming and out-going email, etc. Unfortunately, depending upon the speed of your PC, the use of default settings may slow things down a bit. • Use an Internet firewall.Windows XP SP2 andVISTA have one built in. However, you must assure that it is turned on. From the Start Menu, Select Control Panel, and View the Security Center Firewall setting. Assure that it is on. To view a demo of the way to set up your Windows XP firewall, click on the following: Window’s XP http://security.getnetwise. org/tools/firewallxp-instruct. This video tutorial shows you how to enable the firewall option built into the Microsoft XP operating system. Continued on Page 8 7 2008 Computer Safety Update Continued from Page 7 • Some purchased programs provide many different types of protection, including Firewall protection. You still need to assure that the default setting of ON is actually in place. • Set your Windows Operating System to AutoUpdate. Microsoft regularly identifies hacker “holes” and security vulnerabilities in its software protection. Auto-Update will assure that you maintain your Operating System and/or other Microsoft products in the most up-to-date configuration to protect your computer. • Do Not open documents or attachments from an email unless you can positively verify what it is, whom it came from, and why it was sent to you. • Do NOT follow unsolicited links in emails or unknown web pages. Intruders may be “phishing” for your data or access to your computer. • Use “Strong” passwords to protect your personal information. Tips for a “Strong” password are: • Using passwords that have at least eight characters and include numerals and symbols. • Avoiding common words: some hackers use programs that can try every word in the dictionary. • Not using your personal information, your login name, or adjacent keys on the keyboard as passwords. • Change your passwords and/or PINs regularly (at minimum, every 90 days) and keep them in a secure place out of plain view. Don’t share your passwords on the Internet, over email, or on the phone. Remember, reputable merchants, banks, and Internet Service Providers will not ask you for your Social Security number or other identifying information to prevent identify fraud preferring to rely on “Strong” passwords to protect your account. • Using a different password for each online account you access (or at least a variety of passwords with difficulty based on the value of the information contained in each. • Avoid online CHAT rooms! They may provide you with some nasty surprises. • Backup, Backup, Backup your system regularly. If your PC becomes infected, a recent backup may be the only way to re-create your archived data files. For additional information, please read the Computer Security article in the Senior Bulletin Fall 2005 edition at www.aap.org/seniors under Senior Bulletin. For additional questions and comments, please email me at jmaronson@aap.net. Membership Categories for Retired and Senior AAP Members by Michael O’Halloran, MD, FAAP Many pediatricians are unaware that, in addition to the membership category of “Fellow”, “Specialty Fellow”, etc., there are two other categories of membership designed especially for retired pediatricians and senior pediatricians. The idea is to make it easy for us to stay connected to the AAP as a way for us to continue our lifelong interest in the welfare of children. And, not incidentally, our academy needs us. The two categories created to accomplish this are “Retired Fellow” and “Emeritus Fellow”. Both categories involve a decrease in dues and they both have some conditions, which need to be met to qualify. The Retired Fellow category requires that a fellow, specialty fellow, dual fellow, or corresponding fellow must be at least fifty five years old, must have been an AAP member for 5 years or more, and must no longer derive income from professional activities. Retired Fellows may not hold national AAP office. The dues for this category, as of this writing (December 2007) are $176, a considerable savings. One can add a subscription to Pediatrics for an additional $68. The Emeritus Fellow category requires that a fellow, specialty fellow, dual fellow, or corresponding fellow must be at least 65 years of age and have been an AAP member for 30 years or more. Emeritus Fellows may not hold national AAP office. One need not be retired for this category. The dues for this category are $63. One can also add a subscription to Pediatrics for an additional $68. If you believe you are eligible to take advantage of either of these membership categories, please call AAP Member Services at 800/ 433-9016 x. 5897. The following are lists of the privileges and benefits associated with belonging to either of these categories. Continued on Page 9 8 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Membership Categories for Retired and Senior AAP Members Continued from Page 8 Retired Fellow Privileges: • Vote in National Elections • Use of “FAAP” Designation • Serve on Committees • Section Membership • Chapter Membership • Listing in AAP Online Membership Directory Benefits: • Pediatrics subscription at the discounted member price - optional • AAP News subscription • Red Book™ 2006: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases • Access to Members Center, PediaLink.org™, and PedJobs • A copy of select AAP manuals and samples of patient literature† • Discount member pricing on publications, subscriptions, CME courses including the National Conference & Exhibition • Pediatric Insurance Consultants (PIC), Inc Group Insurance Plans • GEICO Auto Insurance • Bank of America WorldPoints credit card • Annual Report • Hertz Car Rental Discounts • ResX.com, internet based travel booking engine Emeritus Fellow Privileges: • Vote in National Elections • Use of “FAAP” Designation • Serve on Committees • Section Membership • Chapter Membership • Listing in AAP Online Membership Directory Benefits: • Pediatrics subscription at the discounted member price - optional • AAP News subscription • Red Book™ 2006: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases • Access to Members Center, PediaLink.org™, and PedJobs • A copy of select AAP manuals and samples of patient literature† • Discount member pricing on publications, subscriptions, CME courses including the National Conference & Exhibition • Pediatric Insurance Consultants (PIC), Inc Group Insurance Plans • GEICO Auto Insurance • Bank of America WorldPoints credit card • Annual Report • Hertz Car Rental Discounts • ResX.com, internet based travel booking engine Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 9 Dr. Anders Receives Child Advocacy Award The following is the acceptance speech given from Dr. Bronwen J. Anders, MD, FAAP, Child Advocacy Award recipient: I am deeply honored and touched by this advocacy award from the Seniors Section. I believe my California Chapter 3 nominated me (perhaps because I am the only old foguey of the group), but to have been chosen by you is indeed flattering. We do what we like doing in our little corners of the world and are very pleased when our work is recognized and deemed important. Advocacy means many things to many people and different frameworks have been devised to attempt to understand better the concept. Dr. Judy Palfrey in her new book, Child Health in America; Making a Difference through Advocacy, describes; 4 types of advocacy clinical, group, legislative, and professional. I am going to choose a framework which moves from championing individual patients to gradually include all the children of the world. Looking back over my career, this has been the path I myself have followed. I believe all pediatricians know how to advocate for individual patients, children and adolescents, in their offices. They help to interpret results from hazy lab or x-ray reports. They demand sooner appointments from specialists who state the first available opening is 6 months hence. They work out ways to achieve confidentiality with teens and encourage them to discuss their issues with their parents. They might even know how to direct patients to cost effective ways to get medicines, and to access health insurance if they have none. The next step is learning how to advocate for support for families. This facility comes with time and familiarity with resources available outside the office. This might involve knowing about support groups for families with a new baby with Down’s syndrome or parents of a newly diagnosed child with cancer or even ADHD. It might mean trying to refer single parents up to resources for childcare, or helping homeless families to look for opportunities. The ability to provide “family-centered care” has taken on a life of its own, with models that work and resources. The Medical Home model described and then institutionalized by Dr. Cal Sia, includes incorporating parents as partners in the therapeutic programs planned especially for Children with Special Health Care needs. The powerful political role of Family Voices is a reflection of this growing awareness as families have joined together with their pediatricians to advocate for their children The science of community pediatrics along with the AAP policy paper for all of us in this new role has only 10 Shown are: Advocacy for Children Editor, Lucy Crain, MD, MPH, FAAP alongside Advocacy Award recipient, Bronwen J. Anders, MD, FAAP. evolved in the past decade. Collaborating with other community members to define barriers to access and equity deficiencies for ALL children is a relatively new phenomenon. Understanding that teachers, school nurses, after-hours programs, Park and Recs officials, and even businesses can be our partners in the effort leading to healthier children, has greatly enhanced our work advocating for children at the community level. John McNights book, Building Communities from the Inside Out, defined the new paradigm of asset based community mapping, or ABCD. This emphasizes the hidden strengths of a community as opposed to the old and depressing method of needs assessments. He furthermore had the insight to look for informal associations and their members as partners in improving children’s health, in contrast to the more traditional institutions such as schools and health departments. An important development in community pediatrics for me was the introduction of the CATCH program. This 12 year old program has helped pediatricians to find a fellowship of like-minded colleagues, looking to step outside of their offices and collaborate with community members and organizations, and to gain funding to build programs that enhance the health of children. With just 10,000 dollars of seed money more than 900 pediatricians have been helped to develop programs for children. Dr. John Duffee of Springfield, Ohio has recently taken a 7,000 dollar CATCH grant Continued on Page 11 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Dr. Anders receives Child Advocacy Award Continued from Page 10 and leveraged it into a 3 million dollar operation, increasing access to care for low-income children and their families in his neighborhood. Out of a small coalition of activists including the mayor, a local minister and Dr. Duffee a center of excellence was built in the southern poor area of the city. I personally am very grateful to Dr. Ed Rushton, who was the first director of the CATCH program, and who mentored me into early CATCH work. I wrote the first funded CATCH grant to establish a Pediatric Tuberculosis Task Force to ensure that all children with TB infection and disease in San Diego County had access to quality diagnosis and medication throughout their treatment. This was written on a napkin in one of the early CATCH meetings as Dr. Rushton was describing the new program, designed to be easy for busy pediatricians. This resulted in a collaboration between the Health Department, Children’s Hospital, San Diego City Schools and UCSD, which is still going strong.We also collaborated with pediatricians in Tijuana to share insights into keeping continuity for those children living on both sides of the border. Dr. Tom Tonniges took over from Ed Rushton and went on to greatly enhance support for the CATCH program. It is fitting that Ed’s son, Francis Rushton is the current director of the Council on Community Pediatrics. Legislative advocacy is a step which doesn’t come naturally to many shy pediatricians. I have been greatly supported in efforts to learn legislative advocacy from the quality staffs of the Academy’s Chicago and Washington offices. Both of these offices, in addition to our California district staff have done a formidable job of helping us to know about important legislation affecting children and giving us effective methods to carry our messages to legislators. I have been to Washington and to Sacramento several times to learn about legislative advocacy. We have learned how to teach advocacy to residents in training, in person with legislators or perhaps more practically at home from their computers. Anne E. Dyson was a pediatrician who understood the importance of the CATCH program for pediatricians and had a vision of innovative ways of teaching child advocacy to residents. Out of this was born the Dyson Initiative. We at UCSD were one of the fortunate first 10 sites to be funded in this effort. My ability to continue teaching residents in underserved multicultural sites on both sides of the US-Mexico border was greatly facilitated because of this initiative. Once again we had partners across the other Dyson sites defining the community pediatrics curriculum for residents, including advocacy at all levels. Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 And now, as I finally try to free myself up from clinical responsibilities there is the allure of International Child Health. This is the next logical step from community pediatrics, looking towards the health of ALL children and seeing our community as the world. We have had a work collaborative called the Equity group consisting of pediatricians from Great Britain and the US, in which we have sought ways to teach and implement the Convention of the Rights of the Child in our pediatric practices. This relevant document, setting standards of rights for all the world’s children has been largely ignored in our country and we are the only country who has not ratified it. The British pediatricians see such problems as globalization, pollution, international trafficking of children as being challenges which we have to begin to deal with, having direct effects on children’s health. The Tsunami and its devastating loss of lives, homes, and communities galvanized many pediatricians for humanitarian work. I was struck with the difficulties many had finding the right niche to be successful. Like many other chapters we have begun a committee to help colleagues and residents to prepare themselves for this kind of work and to know the organizations and funding sources for such work. Pediatricians and residents need to learn skill sets for humanitarian work and to know about opportunities for work abroad. Many residency programs are developing global health curricula. The Section on International Child Health (SOICH) provides a wonderful fellowship of pediatricians around the world, interested in sharing research, and success stories, and implementing the Convention of the Rights of the Child. The newest program is ICATCH, which has just funded its first 4 programs in Pakistan, Uganda, the Philippines and El Salvador. And perhaps as we retire from regular clinical work (always with regrets, since taking care of individual children is what we are all about), we can begin to advocate for ourselves, and if we are lucky to appreciate our marital partners of many years, our children and grandchildren. Some of the programs which we have been involved in will be carried on by inspired residents or younger colleagues. Others will have failed to have devoted successors. We, on the other hand can now: • Enjoy a Tuesday midday nap without guilt. • Spend an hour getting fleeting smiles out of a newborn grandchild. • Watch sandhill cranes do their mating dance. 11 One Fine Golden Ager’s Favorite Things To commemorate her 69th birthday on October 1, 2007 actress/vocalist, Julie Andrews made a special appearance at Manhattan’s Radio City Music Hall for the benefit of the AARP. One of the musical numbers she performed was ‘My Favorite Things’ from the legendary movie ‘Sound Of Music.’ Here are the lyrics she used: Maalox and nose drops and needles for knitting, Walkers and handrails and new dental fittings, Bundles of magazines tied up in string, These are a few of my favorite things. Cadillac’s and cataracts, hearing aids and glasses, Polident and Fixodent and false teeth in glasses, Pacemakers, golf carts and porches with swings, These are a few of my favorite things. When the pipes leak, when the bones creak, when the knees go bad, I simply remember my favorite things, and then I don’t feel so bad. Hot tea and crumpets and corn pads for bunions, No spicy hot food or food cooked with onions, Bathrobes and heating pads and hot meals they bring, These are a few of my favorite things. Back pains, confused brains, and no need for “sinnin”, Thin bones and fractures and hair that is thinnin’, And we won’t mention our short, shrunken frames, When we remember our favorite things. When the joints ache, when the hips break, when the eyes grow dim, Then I remember the great life I’ve had, and then I don’t feel so bad. Ms. Andrews received a standing ovation from the crowd that lasted over four minutes and repeated encores. Ms. Andrews’ clever wit and humor strikes a strong chord with all of us. “Nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equal, or by the law of the land.... To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right of justice.” From: Letter Patent of King John, in Latin, at Runnymede, 15 June 1215. From: Cotten Manuscript in British Library, London. One wonders, if the Brits could do this almost 900 years ago, why we cannot do this in the United States of America today. Avrum L. Katcher, MD, FAAP 12 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Lucy Crain’s Note: Ann Parker, MD, FAAP is a developmental and behavioral pediatrician in private practice in Berkeley, CA. In addition to a busy practice working with patients with learning disabilities, developmental disabilities, and behavioral issues, she has become an expert on infant deafness and severe hearing loss in childhood. She demonstrates advocacy in action and is a real champion for children with hearing impairment, caring for as well as teaching about this little appreciated area of disability for which so many recent advances make all the difference in lives of young children diagnosed early. ADVOCACY IN ACTION by Ann Parker, MD, FAAP, Berkeley, CA Regarding my becoming involved in advocacy for children with deafness, my interest came from caring for patients. As an ambulatory pediatrician, I was haunted by the fear of having a deaf child go unnoticed in my practice. It is estimated that pediatricians encounter approximately a dozen children with severe hearing impairments over the course of their practice lifetime. During the period in which I practiced general pediatrics (1976-1994), deafness in children was on the average not detected until three years of age. Thus, children were not being identified or receiving interventions until long after early formative stages of language development. A long-time interest in neuroscience and child development and in the stories of others drew me to pediatrics. Eventually, the concerns of the families of children with developmental disabilities drew me to neurodevelopmental and behavioral pediatrics. Working with children with developmental differences, I was impressed by the number of youngsters presenting with identified and unidentified hearing loss. My awareness of the need to monitor for deafness throughout childhood developed when, following a mild case of chickenpox, one of my pediatric patients developed a permanent and disabling profound unilateral hearing loss. A growing interest in deafness and the awe and respect I had for the deaf youngsters I was encountering led to my visiting The Center for the Education of the Infant Deaf (CEID), a place I passed daily on my way to work. I stopped in to see what was happening at CEID in the early 1990s and have been visiting regularly and advocating for toddlers and preschool children ever since. CEID is an early intervention program for hearingimpaired children. Early intervention services provided to youngsters and their families include: identifying deafness, parent support and education including sign language classes, a home visitation program for deaf and multiply handicapped infants and preschool children and an active total communication toddler and preschool program for deaf children associated with an onsite mainstream daycare program. Acting as medical consultant for CEID allowed me to get to know these remarkable children directly and to learn of the courage and concerns of their families. In the 1990s family after family presented with a heart-wrenching story about how their child’s deafness was detected or rather “went undetected”. In most cases, parents suspected deafness long before professionals and fought to be heard and have their concerns validated. Some were told their children had “selective deafness”, a phrase invented to suggest that their children consistently chose not to hear loud noises such as the banging of a hammer or the slam- Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 ming of an elevator door. Some were told that their children must be hearing because they were babbling at 6-9 months of age – something we know all children do whether or not they are hearingimpaired. And some were told that there was little to be done before the age at which most children begin to talk, thus just be patient. The parents I met were determined to hear something else from their pediatricians, such as, “Let’s check hearing and if appropriate let’s intervene”. Many parents of syndromic children with genetic conditions associated with deafness or parents of ICN graduates who had taken antibiotics or undergone ECMO also felt ignored when they voiced their concerns. The parents I met were my inspiration. I began talking with colleagues, with residents and with community leaders who expressed an interest in issues related to children. Each time I mentioned that age three was the average age at which a deaf child was identified I began to realize that I was part of the problem. I was accepting the statistic but not advocating for change. Change through developing, monitoring and funding early screening and diagnostic programs, change through early intervention programs, change through change through education and through legislation. My career in pediatrics has correContinued on Page 14 13 ADVOCACY IN ACTION Continued from Page 13 sponded to a period during which the fields of neuroscience, genetics and development have blossomed. This has heightened our awareness of children with neurosensory and neurodevelopmental deficits and our ability to effectively intervene in their lives. It is currently estimated that 50 percent of children with deafness have a genetic condition and of those children 30% demonstrate a syndromic condition – a tip off when looking for deafness. However, 70% do not present with currently identified syndromic features and thus a high level of suspicion and a commitment to universal newborn hearing screening is needed to pick up their deafness. 50% of deafness in children appears related to environmental factors which again points to the need for a high level of suspicion early and as well as ongoing screening for progressive deafness. There have been significant advances in identifying, tracking, and supporting deaf youngsters since the early 1990s, when Hawaii and Rhode Island were the only states with legislation regarding early hearing detection and intervention programs. In 1993, fewer than 5% of all infants were screened for hearing loss prior to hospital discharge. Currently approximately 68% of all infants born in the United States are screened. Certainly progress but still far below true universal screening. Though there was initially significant resistance to embracing the idea of newborn hearing screening programs, currently 42 states and the District of Columbia have legislated though not necessarily mandated or funded, newborn screening and intervention programs. 14 Most state programs were established after the federal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Act was signed into law in 1999 which granted three years of funding to states for development of screening and intervention programs. The AAP 1999 policy statement Early Identification of Hearing Impairment in Infants and Young Children furthered the cause and the position statement by the National Joint Committee on Hearing in the year 2000 expanded the concept of hearing screening to include “ early hearing detection and intervention” (EHDI) through integrated and family centered interventions. Recommendations included 1) screening all newborns not merely those identified as high risk infants which would only identify 50% of infants born with significant hearing loss 2) a specific schedule for screening, assessment, and intervention including family support in a timely fashion before 6 months of age 3) periodic monitoring of infants passing newborn screening but demonstrating risks for unilateral or bilateral hearing impairment. This commitment to early detection of deafness and early intervention has resulted in a drop in the age at which children with significant hearing loss are identified, a drop from 30 to about 12 months of age. The significance of early intervention, education and support is no longer in question and great technological advances are being made. Infants as young as a month of age are being identified, fitted with effective hearing aids and receiving early intervention services. Advances in the technology and procedures for cochlear implantation and an increasing understanding of the risks and benefits of cochlear implants and the training and support required to benefit from implantation has increased the number of children regarded as candidates for implantation and decreased the age recommended for implantation. Progress has certainly been made; however, many of our children are still not being identified or served. Of the 30 plus infants born daily with significant hearing loss, many are not being screened and many who are screened are at risk of not being tracked, monitored or provided with beneficial interventions. In many states the term “universal”? is a misnomer. When I ask pediatric residents what percent of newborns in California are screened for hearing I see looks of confusion and hear grunts of disbelief when I reveal that our universal newborn screening program merely requires screening of the 70% of children born in acute care hospitals receiving CCS (California Children’s Services or Title V ) funding in California. Though a majority of states have legislation recommending or mandating early hearing screening programs, funding for these programs is mandated in only thirteen states and the District of Columbia. Insurance companies generally have an option as to whether or not newborn hearing screening is a covered benefit and parents can decline screening for financial, religious or cultural reasons even when hospitals are mandated to screen. Tracking and monitoring systems are still inadequate in many states. Many families do not have access to hearing aids due to lack of funding from state agencies or private insurance companies. Though the effectiveness of early intervention programs has become clear, many Continued on Page 15 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 ADVOCACY IN ACTION Continued from Page 14 professionals and families are not adequately aware of local early intervention programs for deaf children or how they might access appropriate services through a child’s Individualized Family Service Plan (IFEP) as outlined in part C of IDEA. Further advocacy and education is needed to address these issues. With an increasing recognition of the prevalence of progressive and late onset hearing loss and the significance of unilateral hearing loss it has become clear that advocacy for ongoing hearing screening and intervention programs throughout childhood must become a priority. It is necessary to guard the gains that have been made and to advocate for interventions that truly benefit our children and our society. Through advocacy, I believe we are honoring and acting upon the trust placed in us by our patients. References: 1. Pediatric Resource Guide to Infant and Childhood Hearing Loss 2nd Edition CEID, 1035 Grayson St. Berkeley, CA 94710. www.ceid.org. 2. Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of health and Human Services National Conference of State Legislatures report: updated May 2007. 3. National Assessment for Hearing Assessment and Management Utah State University. www.infanthearing.org/research/summary/accuracy.html. 4. American Academy of Pediatrics: www.aap.org. Exploring Remedies for Long-Term Care by Joel M. Blau, CFP™ and Ronald J. Paprocki, JD, CFP™ MEDIQUS Asset Advisors, Inc. “Results. One client at a time.”(sm) Long-term care (LTC) issues are becoming an even greater part of physicians’ risk management plans. As more and more baby boomers approach retirement age, concerns about their own potential disability and illness as well as that of their elderly parents have taken center stage. The need for long-term care is generally defined by an individual’s inability to perform the most basic activities of daily living (ADL) such as bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, continence and generally moving around. There are many ways to pay long-term care costs, the simplest being payment “out of pocket”. Unfortunately, with long-term care costs dramatically on the rise, the economic burden of paying for long-term care expenses on an out of pocket basis may be devastating. To further complicate matters, governmental resources such as Medicare and Medicaid may not be sufficient for most physicians. A limited amount of nursing home care or home health care is available for those over age 65 under Medicare Part A Hospital Insurance. Medicaid is a welfare program designed to provide health care for the truly impoverished. Many have tried to qualify for Medicaid by gifting or otherwise disposing of assets, a strategy known as the “Medicaid spend down”. However, legislation such as the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 and the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 have imposed restrictions that severely limit its use. Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 The remaining options for coverage of long-term care costs include utilizing a reverse mortgage on a home, using an “accelerated death benefit” within a life insurance policy (if available), limited coverage through private health insurance, or shifting the risk to a private insurance company via the purchase of a long-term care insurance policy. Long-term care insurance is designed to pay for long-term care services at home or in an institution, either skilled or unskilled, with benefits varying greatly among the different major carriers. The decision to purchase LTC insurance generally must be made while you are still healthy. When shopping for a policy, be sure that you are familiar with the common elements within most policies as well as the differences of these provisions when comparing policies and companies: 1. Amount of benefit: Most policies pay a fixed dollar amount for each day you are eligible for the benefit, such as $200 per day. 2. Inflation protection: Since health care costs are increasing, a policy without a provision for inflation may be inadequate over the long term. 3. Guaranteed renewability: Similar to disability insurance, almost all long-term care policies available in the insurance marketplace are guaranteed renewable, meaning that the policy can not be canContinued on Page 16 15 Exploring Remedies for Long-Term Care Continued from Page 15 celed as long as you pay the premiums on time, and as long as you were truthful when completing the application. Keep in mind, however, that just because a policy is guaranteed renewable does not mean the premium cannot be increased. Most insurers reserve the right to raise premiums for an entire class or group of policyholders. 4. Place of care: It is important to know if the policy requires that a nursing home be licensed or certified by the state to provide skilled or intermediate nursing home care. Additionally, many long-term care policies can provide coverage in the insured’s home. If home health care is not covered in the policy, it may be available as a rider, for an additional premium cost. The insurance company will reimburse the cost of long-term care received at home based on certain limitations. 5. Level of care: “Skilled care” refers to daily nursing and rehabilitation care under the supervision of skilled medical personnel. “Intermediate care” is the same as skilled care, except that it requires only intermittent or occasional nursing and rehabilitative care. “Custodial care” deals with assisting with one’s daily activities, including eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, etc. Typically persons assisting the insured do not need to be medically skilled, but the care is usually based upon the physician’s certification that such care is needed. These are just some of the many factors to consider when implementing a long-term care insurance program. As is the case with other types of insurance, policy features must be compared and weighed. Typically, the more benefits included in the policy, the higher the premium. Mr. Blau welcomes readers’ questions. He can be reached at 800-883-8555 or at blau@mediqus.com. Securities offered through Joel M. Blau, CFP, a registered representative of Waterstone Financial Group, Member NASD/SIPC. Waterstone Financial Group and MEDIQUS Asset Advisors, Inc. are independently owned and operated. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of Waterstone Financial Group. The material has been prepared or distributed solely for information purposes and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security. Investors in mutual funds should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the prospectus, which can be obtained from your investment professional and should be read carefully before investing. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity. Diversification does not assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. Retirement “In Toto” The End of a Professional Life by Don Blossom, MD, FAAP This is a very personal story. After reading several articles in the AAP Seniors Bulletin chronicling the personal adjustments of retirement, yet clinging to “the profession” in various ways, I wanted to share a different view. I started my professional career as a medical student in San Antonio and a resident at the University of Minnesota. I mark my entry into the profession at medical school because from that day forward I considered myself “a professional” and this attitude helped me negotiate the rigors of my education. After residency, my wife (of 40 yrs) 16 and I headed off to private practice and to raise a family. My professors at U of M were appalled that I should squander my talents and superior education on private practice. Nevertheless, we journeyed to the mountains of northern New Mexico and joined 3 other pediatricians in a small community of 20,000. We were also serving a larger region of the state. And, I wouldn’t change this experience for anything. (Note: At this point I must inform you of one of my writing “quirks”, that is, when I use “parenthesis” I am usually talking to myself or else I’m hearing those little voices again.) The “practice” was varied, challenging, and exciting. It consisted of a diverse population that included: four hundred proud Hispanic families (who made their children a priority) resident scientists from the breadth of the US (whose priorities occasionally were in question), and from Europe, and other countries; Hippies from the north (who had few priorities) cowboys and Native Americans from every direction (with cultural challenges) and a barrio Hispanic population in poverty (and often into violence or the drug culture). The patholContinued on Page 17 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Retirement “In Toto” The End of a Professional Life Continued from Page 16 ogy was varied, daunting, and unusual, as were the psychiatric issues and the social issues. The communities of Hispanics were rich in family and tradition in contrast to the fragmented and displaced families of the scientists. My professors in Minneapolis could never have known the challenges of my early days of “private practice”. I was the first pediatrician in the area that was trained in modern Neonatal Medicine, and although I was a generalist, nearly all of the difficult neonatal cases came my way, by default. The University of New Mexico, then 100 miles away, was just getting started in the tertiary care business and there were lots of holes to fill in the system. We were often on our own out in the boondocks. It was also the days before the specialization of Emergency Room Physicians, and we were further challenged by 24hour coverage of our ER’s pediatric population. To facilitate covering ER, NNU, and Pediatric Ward our office was located in the hospital where we rented space from the hospital administration. In addition, we covered several outlying clinics in Northern New Mexico, which had no pediatric care at the time. I served as Public Health Officer and the School Physician. Our group established relationships with the medical schools of the University of Texas and University of New Mexico to proctor, mentor, and teach fourth year Medical Students. My wife, to her credit, postponed her “higher education” to primarily raise our three children in my absence (with my intermittent appearances and duties as a father). I am pleased to report that all of the children are now successful and happy adults, and they appear to have suffered no significant pathology, so my absence may have been to their benefit. The hours were long and the problems challenging. We saw trauma as well as illnesses, slapped plaster on fractures and sutured wounds, attended deliveries and C-sections and then supported any gravely ill neonates. We taught medical students and our nursing staff; we started sex-education for our schools and gave community lectures on pediatric health. Of course there were epidemics of infectious illnesses from Measles to Chickenpox, Haemophilus and Pneumococcal Meningitis, Reyes Syndrome and Kawasaki’s Disease, and an occasional case of Bubonic Plague. We saw burns and overdoses, abuse and neglect, in addition to beans up the nose and bugs in the ears. And there were the complexities of chemotherapy for the unfortunate children with malignancies, the tightrope management of juvenile diabetics, and the rehabilitation of our developmentally handicapped. All of this existed while promoting and administering to preventative health and the growth and development of our well baby, child, and adolescent community. It was all challenging, rewarding, sometimes heartbreaking, but nearly always exhilarating. The pace and excitement suited my Type A perfectionist personality and, as best I can tell, I was good at it. It was good for the ego. It was good for the community. It was great fun. Sixty hour plus weeks were a joy. My workaholic addiction was in full stride and I was getting my “fix” on a regular basis. So . . . what happened to the focus of this article “Retirement in Toto”? Did I lapse into an old man’s musings? One more cup of coffee please and I shall continue. Without shame I will explain. But, I needed to “set the table” and Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 establish the mood of accomplishment and satisfaction that we all feel within a lifetime of an important profession. The exhilaration and exhaustion of labors and sleepless nights, the heartache of the little ones who perished, the warmth and joy of a child’s innocence and honesty (and their broad grins and eyes shining with admiration). (Note: Occasionally their eyes showed the stark fear of what was coming next.) Because, when we retire, these are some of the things that we give up and it’s not an easy task. We give up more - the community notoriety and respect that fade in our absence. We are no longer “The Doctor”, but rather a private citizen lost in anonymity, and many of the things that massage our egos (and we all know how big they are!) are missing and gone forever in retirement. So we cling to our past, uncertain of our future, and unwilling to let go of this important personal history. And most of us never do let go. I’ll tell you what helped me let go. It may be helpful. (Then again, it may not.) First of all, there were all of the changes in medicine that are inevitable with time. There were unsuccessful fights with the hospital administrators to save our small community Pediatric Ward (it was merged with the adult ward). The encroachment of managed healthcare into the independent decision making of my professional world, resulting in important patient care decisions being made by administrators and those less qualified and experienced than myself. And finally, there was the inevitable march of sub specialization into my world, relegating me to a “well baby” doctor. There were no longer the challenges of acute care medicine; the drama of “saving lives”, the challenges of a difficult diagnosis, the Continued on Page 18 17 Retirement “In Toto” The End of a Professional Life Continued from Page 17 uncertain horror of an emergency room visit. All sick newborns were rapidly whisked away to the tertiary care facilities (to their benefit I might add). And there I was, left to continually mutter to myself and listening to myself tell mothers and families the same preventative instructions over and over and over and over again in my new role as a pediatric educator, but hardly as a practitioner. The bloom was off the rose. My job as a “private practitioner” of this glorious profession of Pediatrics was changed and gone forever. It was now a business, not a calling. I was now a social worker and source of information, not a physician, not a healer. My idealism had been replaced by the reality of managed care and all that goes with it. And all of this made it easier to give up “In Toto” my beloved profession. Bury it with a tombstone of fond memories. Move on to the unset- tling uncertainty of a different life. Hey, I’ve still got all my marbles. Well, most of them anyway. The shiny “steelies” have a little tarnish and they don’t roll toward their goal at the same pace but they still hit the target!! I’ve got a lot left in the tank. So why not tackle some new areas of life. And, if I haven’t lost you at this point I tell you all about it in the next episode of “As the Ex-Pediatrician Turns”. Retirement “In Toto” Part 2 As the Ex-Pediatrician Turns by Don Blossom, MD, FAAP In earlier paragraphs I set forth the foundation for my retirement. Most of it was real. Some of it was (most likely) my perception of my professional circumstances. Nevertheless, I became an unsatisfied practitioner. So where did I take it? How did I go from being a “big fish in a small pond” to “a fish out of water”? It wasn’t easy and there was a transition. At first I grumbled a lot. I’m sure my wife and my partners had to endure a lot of nasty stuff. However, I didn’t holler at my patients or their mothers no matter how non-compliant they were. I did most of my “holler’n”in my early years (it takes some of us more time to mature than others). I resigned from my practice, bid farewell to my partners and became a medical vagabond. It’s called Locum Tenens practice. I held licenses in several states and “hired out” my services to those who needed pediatric help. It barely met expenses but my skills in investing were beginning to pay dividends. It reintroduced new challenges into my career. I worked in several towns in Georgia (I tried to get to The Masters - no luck), Montana & 18 Alaska (great fly fishing), all over the state of New Mexico (helping out old friends), and Massachusetts (God only knows why, maybe for “da chowda”). I spent three years working half time in an indigent town in the Rio Grande Valley that badly needed pediatric help. And, I slipped “down-under” to work in a mostly Maori population on the North Island of New Zealand for a full year. (Their National Health Care System is like a badly run HMO in the USA . . . but lots of nice people.) I had no country, very little identity, and I got tired of dirty underwear and eating out. (My wife did come with me to NZ.) While in NZ our home in New Mexico was totally destroyed in a firestorm (Now this is Mother Nature’s subtle way of getting your attention and telling you to move forward). All were rewarding experiences (except the fire) and I have no regrets. I needed this mini medical sabbatical to transition into a new life and come to accept myself as I really was, a broken down ol’ sawbones. Everybody else did. As a retired physician I was in very little demand. Many of my efforts to volunteer my wis- dom and experience were rejected. But I still had a lot of gas left in the tank. Sounds sad, huh? But, like T.O. says “getcha box o’ Kleenex ready” ‘cause there is more. And, life and time does have a price to pay but we can’t just sit back and let our frontal lobes atrophy can we? I had a few other experiments to try. Now golf was always one of my favorite things, so I lowered my handicap. But man does not live by golf alone so I perfected my flyfishing and journeyed to all parts of the mountain west in search of rising trout. The Big Horn in Montana, the Arkansas and the Frying Pan in Colorado, several sojourns to Alaska, and a trip to El Saltamontes in Chilean Patagonia. I volunteered for several community projects and state organizations. I dabbled in writing a few articles here and there (occasionally getting one published and this was good for the ol’ ego). Of course my wife, now with a masters in Family Studies was ready to run off to the Peace Corps to aid the sick, the poor, and the destitute masses of the world. She couldn’t quite understand that my 30 years of practicing medicine in Continued on Page 19 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 Retirement “In Toto” Part 2 As the Ex- Pediatrician Turns Continued from Page 18 Northern New Mexico qualifies as a third world country (at least in some areas). But she didn’t run off. (I guess my frontal lobes were still intact.) Together we spend about three months a year traveling to exotic countries of the world. African Safaris (running from belligerent elephants in the Kalahari), the Galapagos Islands (snorkeling in the Humboldt current at the Devils Crown), Machu Picchu (climbing Huaynu Picchu) and the Amazon Rain Forest (sweating & slapping flies), and soon we will travel to Egypt and Jordan (hopefully, we can avoid Osama and his boys). Our list of countries and adventures is longer than our life expectancies. Our children are scattered across the US so we spend lots of time traveling in our country also to see the grandchildren. How do I pay for it all on a meager “retired” pediatrician’s past earnings? It’s my new avocation -dabbling in the investment world. While I was in private practice, I ran our corporate profit sharing plan and learned a lot about investing with some degree of success. I now have plenty of time to research my investment ideas and I have done well. I stay at arm’s length from all stockbrokers. I prefer making my own mistakes rather than gnashing my teeth over their bad advice (and I prefer $7.99 a trade rather than a $300 commission). I have always loved crunching numbers, learning new technology, and dissecting businesses and these skills have served me well. I actually enjoy reading books by Ben Graham, “The Intelligent Investor” or Warren Buffet, or Jack Welsh, or pouring through an end-of-the-year report. This new endeavor has many challenges, much to learn, and I find very little stress associated with my efforts (though that is not true for many investors). Working out and staying in good physical and mental condition is important to me. I have a quality gym where I spend 90 minutes a day working up a sweat and minimizing the effects of age on depreciating strength with weight training. It’s good for the body and soul. I like to top it all off by rewarding myself with a hot steam bath. I do some of my best thinking in that cloud forest. And at this stage of my life I have plenty of time to enjoy the many perfect New Mexico days with their turquoise skies and star filled nights. I have time for a late breakfast on the Santa Fe plaza before meandering through the galleries with my wife. And, time to read all of those great works that I never had time for during my professional career (finally, a real education!). I do absolutely no pediatrics at all. I’ve conquered the major withdrawal symptoms of self-pity, feeling underappreciated, my quest to save the world, and boredom. And, I have time to write to you, and if it’s right, to connect on a subject with which we physicians do very poorly - cutting the cord. But, retirement isn’t for everyone. Am I happy? Mostly. Could it be better? It can always be better. So bring on the next adventure. But the final question still remains: Is my retirement plan better than sex? (Next comes a long pause while the writer tries to remember sex.) “No, emphatically no.” A woman called a local hospital . . . “Hello! Could you connect me to the person who gives information about patients? I’d like to find out if a patient is getting better, doing as expected, or getting worse.” The voice on the other end said, “What is the patient’s name and room number?” “Sarah Finkel, Room 302.” “I’ll connect you with the nursing station . . . “ “3-A Nursing Station. How can I help you?” “I’d like to know the condition of Sarah Finkel in Room 302.” “Just a moment. Let me look at her records . . . Mrs. Finkel is doing very well. In fact, she’s had two full meals, her blood pressure is fine, she is to be taken off the heart monitor in a couple of hours and, if she continues this improvement, Dr. Cohen is going to send her home Tuesday at noon.” The woman said, “What a relief! Oh, that’s fantastic . . . That’s wonderful news!” The nurse said, “From your enthusiasm, I take it you are a close family member or a very close friend!” “Neither, I AM Sarah Finkel in 302! Nobody here tells me a thing! Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 19 Parenting a Different Paradigm by Susan DiPietro My journey towards examining my beliefs and assumptions about parenting began when my second very independent child began school. This child did not adhere to an unquestioning obedience to a rule of authority. His reluctance to blindly follow a teacher’s instructions forced me to look at my personal beliefs and what I saw as social beliefs surrounding the roles we expect children to fulfill. I began to look at characteristics that would most likely begin any parent’s wish list for their child when they reach adulthood items such as being independent, able to think and make reasonable decisions for themselves, enjoy what they do for a living and in general be content with their lives. I then contrasted this with what not only the school’s foster, but also what I often saw myself and others doing as parents. Generally teachers wish for students who stay quietly in their seats working on a given assignment. The teacher will answer that creativity and questions are encouraged, but I can almost 100% assure you that there are strict boundaries around the “allowed” questions. Just wait for the reaction when your child asks why an assignment is important and then refuses to complete the assignment when the answer is inadequate. I began to wonder if we as a society expect children at the age of 18 to suddenly become independent thinkers capable of making good decisions on their own, while paying lip service to, but not really promoting these characteristics. I for one did not see independent thinking fostered in school – unless it conformed to the teacher’s concept of independent thinking. As a quick check how often were you graded down on a paper because your analysis did not coincide closely enough with the instructors’ analysis? This led me to question my own motivations for disciplining my children. Was I disciplining for my own needs or truly for those of my child? Now this can get a little tricky, but let’s take an example – a child throwing a tantrum in a store. Do I take the child out of the store for one of the following reasons: Children aren’t suppose to throw tantrums – a socially correct view The child must learn to control himself – or next time it will be worse – personal fears People will stare at me and begin to offer ‘helpful hints’ – embarrassment, or do I take the child out so that the child can regroup and go back calmly into the store? Now the out come looks the same – the child is removed from the store, but the purpose behind each scenario is quite different and the implication for how we as adults approach children is profound. In the first scenario the parents are acting on their own fears, which may be well intentioned. Fears that the child will not learn appropriate behaviors, will not fit in socially or more personal fears that others may be judging parental abilities. In the second scenario the parent is not acting from fear or personal concerns, 20 but from an interest in helping the child gain mastery over themselves. It is my contention that true selfcontrol comes from learning this internal mastery rather than from controls imposed externally. Improving parent skills lies in asking ourselves some hard questions, and then making changes in underlying fundamental assumptions and belief systems. The biggest question is are we acting out of our own fears? In which case we are likely to be imposing external controls on the child rather than helping them develop their own internal controls. Do we view parenting as controlling the child or influencing the child?When have we ever had true control? Even infants can refuse to eat and sleep. I prefer influence as children and teenagers require guidance, but this implies the development of internal self regulation rather than externally enforced controls. Do we have enough of our own internal self-regulation to help a child who is out of control regain their own internal balance? The best guide is one who knows the terrain. The ability to maintain our own state of calmness and not confound the situation with our own needs as parents is the first step in helping to build an environment favorable for a child to develop internal self-regulation. This state of calmness not only translates directly to the child, but also allows adults to react to situations with more flexibility and creativeness. Creativeness and flexibility are highly desirable as each child and each situation are different and may require a different approach. Prior to reading another parenting book – if one approach always worked there would only be one parenting book - as parents and caregivers perhaps we need to look within ourselves and do the ground work to develop a parenting paradigm which will foster growth and development leading to those characteristics which most of us would say we would like to see in young (and older) adults. Further reading and exploration: Unconditional Parenting: Moving from Rewards and Punishments to Love and Reason by Alfie Kohn. Dr. B. Bryan Post Post Institute For Family Centered Therapy _ HYPERLINK “http://www.postinstitute.com” __www.postinstitute.com_ Susan DiPietro my daughter works as a Family Partner for EMG, which cares for severely emotionally, disturbed youth. She is in the Foster Family agency. Her e-mail is: sdipietro@emg.org. Joan Hodgman, MD, FAAP Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 TRIPLE BOOK REVIEW THREE DIFFERENT BOOKS AT LEAST ONE WILL INTEREST EVERY READER by Avrum L. Katcher MD, FAAP PONTOON by Garrison Keillor Viking, 2007 This is another one of the stories of Lake Wobegon, which Keillor has been memorializing for 30 plus years, in television shows, books, short stories and a movie as well. Keillor’s gift is the ability to describe, write about and explain about people for whom he has great affection, and who are so real that the reader says, “I know you!” And you do. His output is immense, but the work he does attains heights comparable perhaps only to Thornton Wilder in the play “Our Town.” One difference is that Our Town made me weep, just from a television production. Keiller’s work often leaves me laughing, chuckling and certainly nodding in comprehension. Of a woman who left home, to leave a dissolute life and make a fortune, now returned to Lake Wobegon he describes “She was original and creative and vibrant and independent and praised by one and all and then one day she suddenly got very sick of herself and had to get away and she came back here [to Lake Wobegon]. It’s peaceful here. You don’t have to be wonderful here. You can just be who you are.” Or another woman, who describes herself in a letter to her daughter, “I’m an old lady and I need to tell my stories to people who already know them and can tell me the parts I’ve left out. So, I’ll head home soon. Can’t live with people, can’t live without them. That’s how it goes. Just one thing after another. Love, your mother.” One could go on, but it is not necessary. This is a story about people, many people, written by a man who is able to describe them in a fashion that you nod your head, “Yes, of course.” A pleasure to read about them. One cautionary note. Since he writes about real people, there is a good deal of smut, but mostly happy smut however some may take offense. Just so you know. I loved it. *** WHAT ON EARTH HAVE I DONE? by Robert Fulghum St. Martin’s Press, NY 2007 Fulghum has done best sellers; perhaps the best known is All I really need to know I learned in Kindergarten. He is no Thornton Wilder or Garrison Keillor. Rather something of a cutie-pie who produces two to four page mini-chapters about people and life, as he tells of his adventures around the world, seeking answers to the questions that mothers ask, generation after generation: “WHAT ON EARTH HAVE YOU DONE?” And, “WHAT IN THE NAME OF GOD ARE YOU DOING?” And, “AND WHAT WILL YOU THINK OF NEXT?” And, from fathers, ‘WHAT THE HELL…?” Fulghum’s answers are cute, but sufficiently enjoyable to make mention of. He also likes the people he knows, even when he does not agree with what they are doing. He quotes Epictetus, “If you can fish, fish. If you can sing, sing. If you can fight, fight. Determine what you can do. And do that.” And also, “Why worry about being a nobody when what matters is being a somebody in those areas of your life over which you have control, and in which you can make a difference?” And he provides his own answers, “Not a self-defense or an apology. Just a statement of position. The world and the universe go their inevitable way. Meanwhile…I know what I can do. Meanwhile…I do it.” *** Continued on Page 22 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 21 TRIPLE BOOK REVIEW . . . Continued from Page 21 And finally, in a more serious vein by far, PLAIN SECRETS. AN OUTSIDER AMONG THE AMISH by Joe Mackall Beacon Press, Boston, 2007 Joe Mackall has lived in the midst of the Swartzentruber Amish community of Ashland County, Ohio, for over sixteen years. They may be the most traditional and insular of all the Amish sects. They live without gas, electricity, or indoor plumbing, without lights on their buggies or cushioned chairs in their homes. Mackall has become friendly with many, although he is not an anthropologist, psychologist or scientist, he does have a background in English and Journalism and is on faculty at the local University, and has published rather extensively in his field. He could be a scientist, and he certainly is a writer. He writes in a familiar vein, which you will recognize if you have read the form of essays in The New Yorker and know who Joseph Mitchell was. Or Eudora Welty. Beautiful descriptions in straightforward English of people, places, events and circumstances. He expounds a way of life, a system of living, for a sect whose members are satisfied with what they are and who they are, and see no reason to change. When a man has died, perhaps as the result of medical error—perhaps not—the family leader who is also a minister said, “Everybody who knew him needed him to be exactly the way he was.” And Mackall realizes that after letting these words soak in, that he felt better. And he knew that the speaker said what he did not to make him feel better, or to evangelize, which is not the way of this group, but because “he believes what he said from the brim of his straw hat right down to the bottom of his rubber boots.” Mackall concludes, “I have learned a great deal from the…family and the lives they lead…some Amish families love with the same love I believe exists in my family and in the family that reared me. I’ve learned lessons about the bounties and burdens of a close community. I’ve learned how seriously God’s will is trusted…I’ve learned that I can drag my sorry heart and weak will to the farm in the middle of a day, and be consoled, completely and utterly, by beliefs I do not or cannot hold…I’ve learned that there are alternatives and values other than those projected by the mass media and our consumer culture…I need not consume more than I need; and that I should produce my fair share.” And finally, “Despite how conflicted I am about aspects of the Swartzentruber Amish way of life, I can still recognize beauty and truth when I see it. And the beauty and truth of it is this: That to these plain people, in these times and in all others, the values that reign supreme are community, acceptance, and faith, which can, with prayer and a little luck, lead to peace.” And I agree, from my own heart. And I hope you will take a look at each of these three relatively short books, because each, in it’s own way, tells stories about people. All kinds of people. Not just Muslims, Catholics, Protestants, African-Americans, Hispanics, the Puritans, Republicans, Democrats, doctors, the sick, the well. All of us. The people who need us to be the way we are. Promoting the Value of Pediatrics The AAP Department of Communications, with help from the AAP Private Payer Advocacy Advisory Committee, has created a new public awareness campaign, “Promoting the Value of Pediatrics,” designed to increase appreciation of one of the greatest values in health care today: pediatric care. Resources are provided for AAP members to help them implement the campaign at the local level. For materials and more information, go to the Promoting Pediatrics Web Site within the AAP Member Center. 22 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 LUCIANISSIMO AND THE HIGH C BY James L. Reynolds, MD, FAAP Luciano Pavarotti (1935-2007) died this September at age 71. He made his U.S. debut in Miami in 1965 opposite Joan Sutherland. He was known by various epithets over the years: “Lucky,” “Lurch,” “Deep Throat” and, most endearingly, “Lucianissimo. Most popularly, Pavarotti was known worldwide as the “King of the High C’s”. This distinction was won with his brilliant rendition of nine perfect serial high C’s in the aria, “Pour mon âme” from Donizetti’s “Fille du Régiment”. He rendered this feat at the Met’s 1972-1973 season where it earned him a record 17 curtain calls and an invitation to appear on Johnny Carson’s “The Tonight Show”. He first performed this, however, at Covent Garden in 1966. Mr. Pavarotti once described his emotion on singing a high C as “excited and happy, but with a strong undercurrent of fear. The moment I actually hit the note, I almost lose consciousness. A physical, animal sensation seizes me. Then I regain control.” Pavarotti did not hold the record for the very highest tenor notes. The1980 Guinness Book of World Records named Stefan Zucker, ‘’the world’s highest tenor’’, for having hit an A above high C and holding it for 3.8 seconds. That occurred at Town Hall, New York, on Sept. 12, 1972. Notably also, Mr. Zucker sang the role of Salvini in the world premiere of the fourth and final version (1829) of Bellini’s “delson e Salvini” When His voice shot up to a series of notes well above the usual tenor top of high C the audience responded with shouts, groans and hisses, and critics gave him poor reviews. The critic Donal Henahan wrote in The New York Times that Zucker’s high notes were like ‘’the scratching of a fin- gernail on a blackboard’’, and another critic called Zucker ‘’a male Joan Sutherland’’. He had his supporters: a woman in the audience hit a man next to her when he wouldn’t stop booing during the performance. A tenor as popular as Enrico Caruso did not have a high C. Plácido Domingo, who started out as a baritone and developed as a tenor, has had trouble with high C’s. Musicians have sometimes referred to him as “Mingo”, omitting the Do in his surname. When asked about omission of the “Do”, the answer is: He has none—the syllable “do” in the solfeggio scale of course represents the note C. Through the 18th C. high C’s were sung by castrati, not by usual tenors. Boys with good voices were operated upon before puberty so they could produce the note as adults. The first prominent unaltered male operatic singer who hit high C’s was a Frenchman, Gilbert-Louis Duprez who sang the notes with a chest voice rather than falsetto in Rossini’s opera, “Guillaume Tell,” in 1831. Pavarotti was also noted for his William Tell. The problem for male vocalists is the strong tendency of their voice to become falsetto when reaching for high notes: Normally, the male voice is pitched lower than that of the female. For a man, singing in the high range is much easier done falsetto; a powerful male voice singing high C is distinctly unusual. There is a mystique about the high C. It’s considered the acme of operatic technique. More than with any other vocalization a singer has to have the training and experience to know exactly what he is doing in order to produce a clear and sustained high C. Apparently the sources of sound, Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008 the chest voice, which is powerful, and the head voice, containing the resonant head cavities, must be perfectly balanced, along with the base of the tongue, the jaw, and the larynx all being in perfect alignment, free of tension, in order for a talented man to produce a ringing high C. Too much tension in the throat and a raised larynx, i.e., the jaw not dropped enough— mouth not wide open enough— are inimical to high C production. The perfect high C moment in opera is exciting, suspenseful, emotional, and aesthetically joyous; audiences cheer. But cheers turn to jeers if the note falters. Adolphe Nourrit, the reigning tenor in Paris until Duprez, mentioned above, attracted attention with his testicular high C’s. Nourrit struggled unsuccessfully to emulate his younger rival. This inability may have contributed to his suicide: a case of death on the high C’s, as one incorrigible punster said. Pavarotti’s voice was exceptional not only for its vocal range—in his earlier years he could actually reach A above high C—but for his vocal honey-toned quality, color, control, and tessitura, i.e., vocal timbre and volume: Operatic tenors have an approximate range from the C one octave below middle C to the A one octave above middle C. Speculatively, the ability to reach a high C may be a genetic laryngeal trait: Pavarotti’s father, a baker in Modena, was also an amateur tenor. Vocally, operatic tenors are classified into five types based not only on range and tessitura, but also on passaggio, transition vocal lift points. The average passaggio begins with a vocal lift around middle C or C# and ends with a lift at F or F# above middle C. The five Continued on Page 24 23 LUCIANISSIMO AND THE HIGH C Continued from Page 23 operatic tenor types are (from highest to lowest) Leggiero, a very light lyric tenor—e.g., Juan Diego Flórez and Rockwell Blake— Lyric—such as Pavarotti, Roberto Alagna, and José Carreras— Spinto, a lyric tenor with more “push”—Enrico Caruso was one— Dramatic, ringing, powerful, rich, heroic—Franco Corelli and Plácido Domingo are examples— and Heldentenor, the German equivalent of Dramatic, but with more baritonal quality—Lauritz Melchior was a Heldentenor. (Sopranist and Countertenor [alto or mezzo] are even higher pitched voices than Tenor.) The word “tenor” comes from the Latin, tenere meaning to hold. Pavarotti was the most widely known tenor of his time both in classical and popular-music cir- cles. His theme song, Nessun Dorma (None Shall Sleep), from Turandot, became extraordinarily popular 65 years after Giancomo Puccini wrote it. Pavarotti used it to introduce television coverage of the 1990 (soccer) World Cup; then, on the eve of the cup final in Rome, he shared it with two other tenors, Plácido Domingo and José Carreras, in a “Three Tenors” concert on the eve of the cup final. The CD became the world’s top-selling classical recording. As his voice waned in the ‘90s, Pavarotti became increasinglyand widely popular, but understandably, less successful in classical opera. He was eventually booed at La Scala for missing his high notes, but fortunately, his elaborately venerating funeral in Modena could not have meen more lauditory. A recent declaration by former New York City mayor, Rudy Giuliani, could eaasily and appositely have been said by Pavarotti: “I’m trying to say this in the most humble way possible: I’m very good at doing the impossible.” Such braggadocio must be an Italian thing, and Italians seem to mix effectively their politics and opera. During the 19th C. Italian u n i f i c a t i o n m ov e m e n t , t h e Resorgimento, Italian opera goers would shoutVERDI!,VERDI! which the incognoscenti thought was an evocation of the heroic operatic composer of the movement, but was primarily intended as an acronym: Vittorio Emanuele, Re Di Italia, i.e., Victor Emanuel, King of Italy. He did become unified Italy’s first king. Maybe bravura performance in politics and opera do mix. Editors Note: EugeneWynsen, MD, FAAP, has been a contributor to the Bulletin of seminal articles. The first to go through my hands as editor was his article about withholding antibiotics for otitis media. I was not sure about this article, but most of us use too many antibiotics, so I accepted it for publication. The next issue of the AAP News had an article on the front page by a distinguished Earn Nose and Throat expert recommending withholding antibiotics for about 1/2 half of cases of otitis media. The next was an article about probiotics for the Spring Bulletin. I knew about them so I had no problem with approving that one for publication. Interestingly, the APP News came out in September with a front-page article on Probiotics. The last article that Dr. Wynsen has contributed is the one about Itsi Bitsi. I don’t have the journal in front of me, please fill in the proper title. I have not seen any follow-up in the wider press but am expecting it daily. Perhaps I don’t read the proper literature for follow-up on this subject. I have had no contribution from Dr. Wynsen for Fall or Winter. I am writing this note in the hopes that it will convince him to share his avant guard articles with us again. Joan Hodgman, MD, FAAP, editor Title: Age of Reason Author: Arthur Krystal Published in NewYorker, 22 October 2007, pp 93-104. This is a short excerpt from a long profile of Jacques Barzun, an incredible polymath, now just about at age 100. He has some difficulties said to be due to “aging and spinal stenosis, which causes pain and numbness in the legs. He relies on a cane or a walker to get around, and, as one might expect, he is alert to the irony of aging: when time is short, old age takes up a lot of time. There are doctors’ visits, tests to be suffered, results to wait for, ailments and medications to be studied—all distractions from the work. ‘Old age is like learning a new profession,’ he noted drily. ‘And not one of your own choosing.’” What is most remarkable about this brilliant scholar is that despite all of this, he seems, according to the author, a professional essayist, to continue to know everything. At one point in a long series of conversations, Krystal was astonished at a reference that Barzun knew quite well, and exclaimed, “Why would you know that?” [Barzun] replied, mildly, It’s my business to know such things.” Avrum L. Katcher, MD, FAAP 24 Senior Bulletin - AAP Section for Senior Members - Winter 2008