Fall 2008-r10.pmd - Beaumont Technologies, Inc. Beaumont
Transcription
Fall 2008-r10.pmd - Beaumont Technologies, Inc. Beaumont
No .7 7, Fa ll 2 00 8 Molding Views Brought to you by the Injection Molding Division of the Society of Plastics Engineers Chair’s Message Embracing the Perfect Storm and Repositioning Ourselves There is no doubt that plastics engineers are facing and embracing a perfect storm— the loss of home equity and retirement savings, the likelihood of a deepening global recession, worries about job security, energy and environmental issues, and a spiraling downturn of the economy that even the governments, central banks, and finance ministers worldwide can not stop. It is anticipated that unemployment rates will continue to rise and the daunting challenges facing the industry and our members will be very significant. So what should we do to weather through this period of turbulence? There are many answers depending on whom you ask, with no shortage of advice from the media, family, friends, colleagues, and even presidential and local election candidates. Sometimes, however, the true answers Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng Professor, UW-Madison may lie within your heart. Personally, I would like to suggest a few things for our members. First, we can embrace the continuing trend of globalization and try to capitalize on it by upgrading our job skills. Whether we like it or not, the trend of globalization is likely to continue. We need to appreciate the benefits of globalization that enable the reduction of product costs and time to market. Of course, we should not lose sight of the potential impacts on our businesses and job prospectives. Try to become a professional capable of performing tasks with partners from around the globe and be able to solve problems or design products and conduct operations from the “system” level. If possible, gain an understanding of and respect for cultural variations across various parts of the world. This would be a great time to learn a new language! You may want to look for opportunities to retrain yourself through distance learning programs if you can’t afford to go back to school, or through government-sponsored vocational programs, if you can’t afford regular tuition. Continued on page 3 IN THIS ISSUE: Chair’s Message 1 IMD Leadership 2 Committee Reports 2 Feature Article: Engineering Jobs 4 Ask The Experts (IM, Hot Runners, and CAE) 5 Reader Comments 7, 10 Featured Technology: MeltFlipper 11 Conference: Molding 2009 13 Call For Papers 14 IMD Best Paper 15 Experimental Study on the Energy Efficiency of Different Screw Designs for IM Feature Article: Partners in Education 19 IMD Best Student Paper 20 Investigation of Comparative Stress Distributions in Thermoforming Versus IM Featured Product: Learn-on-Demand 22 Feature Article: Injection Moulding Process Benefits Both Process and Moulded Part Sponsorship Opportunities Conference: SAMTMP 2008 Student Activities Report Molding Corner: AGA-PGT, Inc. On The Road: Milwaukee MiniTec Feature Article: SPE’s New Website SPE & Industry Event Calendar SPE Webinars BOD Meeting Minutes New IMD Members and Companies Membership Application Sponsors in this Issue Publisher’s Message 23 26 27 27 28 30 31 33 34 35 37 38 39 39 Disclaimer: The editorial content published in this newsletter is the sole responsibility of the authors. The Injection Molding Division publishes this content for the use and benefit of its members, but is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of editorial content contributed by various sources. Fall 2008 Page 1 SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Leadership DIVISION OFFICERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS IMD Chair Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison turng@engr.wisc.edu Awards Chair Jim Peret JimPeret@cox.net Membership Chair Nick Fountas, JLI-Boston fountas@jli-boston.com Board Member Mal Murthy, Doss Plastics dosscor@gmail.com Communications Chair, Website Chair Lee Filbert, IQMS lfilbert@iqms.com Nominations Chair Don Allen Phillips Chemical Co. allende@cpchem.com New Board Member Erik Foltz The Madison Group erik@madisongroup.com Councilor, Reception Chair Jack Dispenza, Design Results jackdispenza@gmail.com TPC ’09 Brad Johnson, Penn State Erie bgj1@psu.edu New Board Member Adam Kramschuster Univ. of Wisconsin–Stout kramschustera@uwstout.edu Chair-Elect, Alt. Treasurer Dave Karpinski Nortech dkarpinski@nortech.org Past Chair, Executive Committee Liason Hoa Pham Lyondell Basell hoa.pham@lyondellbasell.com Secretary, Student Activities Chair Walt Smith Xaloy, Inc. w.smith@us.xaloy.com Technical Director Peter Grelle Dow Automotive pgrelle@dow.com Treasurer Jim Wenskus allerlei@alum.mit.edu Education Chair Pat Gorton, Energizer pgorton@energizer.com Engineer of Year Award Chair Kishor Mehta Plascon Associates, Inc. ksmehta@nauticom.net Historian, Fellows & Honored Service Awards Chair Larry Schmidt LR Schmidt Associates schmidtlra@aol.com Past Secretary Larry Cosma Performance Polymers LarryCosma@yahoo.com Board Member Jan Stevens, Tupperware janstevens@tupperware.com Board Member Michael Uhrain, Demag michael.uhrain@dpg.com Board Member Raymond McKee, Rexam raymond.mkee@rexam.com New Board Member Susan Montgomery Priamus Sys. Tech., LLC s.montgomery@priamus.com CONTRIBUTORS Newsletter Publisher, Sponsorship Chris Lacey Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison lacey@engr.wisc.edu Committee Reports ANTEC 2009 Update by Brad Johnson The year 2009 will be the first year ever that SPE’s ANTEC and SPI’s NPE will be held at the same time and place, combining the world’s largest technical conference for the plastics industry with the largest trade show in the United States. ANTEC runs Monday, June 22nd, through Wednesday, June 24th, while NPE will last the entire week. Just about everybody who is anybody in the plastics industry will attend this conference. This will be a great opportunity for you and your organization to showcase what you are doing in the arena of injection molding. In addition, I would like to invite you to present a paper at ANTEC. There are two formats that can be presented: technical and commercial. Please visit http://www.4spe.org/antec-2009-call-papers to find more information, including a template which is very helpful when planning and writing your entry. See page 14 for more details. I would also like to know if you have any ideas about special sessions or topics that you would like to see presented. Please contact Brad Johnson (bgj1@psu.edu), the IMD ANTEC 2009 Technical Program Chair, with your ideas. With your help, we can make this event better than ever! Technical Program Committee Report by Peter Grelle The SPE IMD co-sponsored the “Injection Molding: Innovation and Emerging Technologies Conference” on June 10, 2008 in Erie, Pennsylvania. One hundred people registered for the conference. Bill Carteaux, the president of SPI, and Rob Neilley, IMM editor, gave interesting keynote addresses on two of the days. The conference included a plant tour of Rehrig––Pacific’s Erie operation one evening. The presentations from industry and the faculty tutorials were all well-received. In 2009, the conference will take a one year hiatus due to the NPE in Chicago, Illinois. The 2009 ANTEC paper review committee will meet on December 13, 2008, in Orlando, Florida. The committee will consist of Brad Johnson, Dave Karpinski, Jan Stevens, and Pete Grelle. Fall 2008 Page 2 SPE Injection Molding Division Chair’s Message Message - Cont Chair’s Continued from page 1 Second, we should all strive to live within our means and make sure that we have enough savings for a rainy day. Part of today’s problems stems from our unsustainable culture of consumerism and negative saving rates. From our own financial decisions to corporate management, we need to build a safety net for unexpected needs or emergencies. It may be a perfect time to re-access our investment strategies and take into account the timing of our retirement. We mustn’t let panic or fear blind our judgment in favor of overlooking the fundamentals. As our life expectancy increases, we may be able to work longer if we choose. Third, we should prioritize our prospective on life and understand that sometimes happiness may be right in front of us. Studies have found that while money might seem to “buy” happiness initially, it won’t last long. True happiness and a meaningful life come from the support and understanding of our family and friends, especially in tough times. We work hard to earn wealth and status, but we can not trade them in for health, which we as humans have a tendency to take for granted. Thus, taking care of our health and focusing on the rich and meaningful parts of our lives may pay more dividends in the long term than any amount of money. The State of the Division In this issue, you will find many articles, reports, and announcements that highlight the various activities and programs of the Injection Molding Division. Following our great tradition, which won us the SPE Gold Level Pinnacle Award at ANTEC 2008, the division is actively involved in developing various technical programs (e.g., Milwaukee MiniTec, page 30), and sponsoring SPE scholarships (visit the SPE Foundation Web site at www.4spe.org/spefoundation), and relevant conferences (e.g., SAMTMP 2008, page 27, and Molding 2009, page 13). The IMD is proud to be a sponsor of the SAMTMP 2008 to be held in Beijing, China, November 15-17, 2008. As part of our goal to expand membership worldwide, we hope to meet many new members from our presence in Asia. These activities aid in meeting the charter of the SPE IMD as well as strengthening its position within SPE. Five new Board members have been appointed since ANTEC 2008 to help in these efforts and more new volunteers continue to join us. We value feedback and participation from our current and prospective members and encourage you all to join us in these various activities and in recognizing members with distinguished service and contributions to the molding community. Please do not hesitate to contact us (see the contact information on page 2) if you have any questions, suggestions, comments, or candidates for nomination. Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng Chair, 2008-2009 Fall 2008 Page 3 IMD Chair Professor Turng receives the SPE Pinnacle-Gold Award from then SPE President, Dr. Vicki Flaris, at the ANTEC 2008 Banquet. Want to be a Reporter for the IMD Newsletter? When you attend a molding event such as a conference, exhibit, or trade show, you can share your experience with thousands of IMD members. The IMD Newsletter features the column “Things On The Road” to provide members with an opportunity to contribute to the IMD community. We also welcome informative feature articles by our readers. Send your review or summary to Chris Lacey (lacey@engr.wisc.edu) and see it published in the next newsletter! SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article Increase Productivity with Priamus Control Systems Engineering Jobs Are Prestigious by Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng According to the results of a Harris Interactive survey of 1,010 adults (surveyed July 8-13, 2008), and published on the front page of USA TODAY (Snapshot on Monday, August 25, 2008), the profession of Engineer ranked first in terms of prestige, and furthermore, had the biggest percentage-point increase from 2007 to 2008, surpassing other coveted professions such as actor, architect, journalist, union leader, and banker (see chart below). This further confirms the esteemed status of engineers, who actually apply scientific and engineering principles, combining those skills with creativity, workmanship, innovation, and hard work to produce tangible goods and create wealth that are sustainable and real. IMD members, you deserve this recognition! Keep up the good work! Automatic balancing of hot runner molds Automatic transfer to holding pressure 2007-2008 Jobs Rising in Prestige Real-time material viscosity measurement Banker Union Leader Journalist Architect Actor Engineer 0 2 4 6 8 10 Advanced cavity pressure & cavity temperature sensors 2008 Job Prestige Rating Banker Union Leader - Reduce dimensional deviation Journalist Architect - Achieve individual and overall part weight savings Actor Engineer 0 Fall 2008 10 20 30 Page 4 40 SPE Injection Molding Division Ask The Experts Injection Molding Questions Bob Dealey, owner and president of Dealey’s Mold Engineering, Inc. answers your questions about injection molding. Bob has over 30 years of experience in plastics injection-molding design, tooling, and processing. Reach Bob by email at MoldDoctor@DealeyME.com. Question: Thanks from so many of us on your insight into molding issues. I have two questions. I have a 4-cavity hot runner mold (LLDPE) making a medical squeeze tube. It is 1/2" diameter at the hot tip and 4" long. Should I be using 60 degree chilled water or warm water for the mold? My problem is that I am bending the moving side cores which are 52 R resulting in a thin side wall and some backfill at the parting line. Venting is adequate but not excellent. Also, should I be injecting fast or slow? I am injecting onto a flat core. ~Robert Lowe, BL Plastics Inc. Answer: First the venting. If it is "adequate," it is likely not good enough. All of the trapped air, gases, and volatiles need to have an easy egress from the cavity. This is the simplest and least expensive fix that will provide the maximum benefit to filling the cavity. As for the mold surface temperature: A warmer surface will, in theory, allow plastic to flow further and with less pressure. It would be better if you measure the mold surface temperature rather than the chiller water temperature. A simple molding test could be the best method to determine the best mold surface temperature. Starting with your present 60-degree water and using your existing molding parameters, adjust the cushion (or lack of cushion) to yield a part about 90% full. Increase the mold temperate in 10 degree increments, trying 80, 90, or even 100 degrees, and then observe the results. You will find a point that the part fills easier and/or completely. Evaluate the cycle time ramifications and choose the most beneficial mold surface temperature versus cycle time and part quality. As for injection speed, common wisdom today is that a faster speed will allow the cavity to fill with less Fall 2008 Page 5 pressure. Again a simple test is the best way to prove the best filling speed for an existing mold. Start with a slow speed and gradually increase it (being careful not to over pack the mold) while observing core deflection. These results will allow you to determine the best injection speed for your mold. While doing these experiments observe fill patterns on your particular part (not having a sample makes it a little difficult to understand the core deflection). Visualize how a second gate on the opposite side would allow material to enter and help stabilize the core. A large number of parts with slender core ratios (length-todiameter ratios of over 5 to 1) will exhibit core deflection when gated on only one side, with plastic material impinging on the slender core. The solution to core deflection is typically a gate on the top center where material can flow and surround the core adding stability or a double gate arrangement. Recent studies have indicated that some cores deflect in the packing stage and really are not a result of filling where, in many instances, low pressures are observed. Each case is unique and some core movement or deflection is dependent on how the core is anchored (insertion, fit, and concept), the mold material itself, and the direction of plastic impinging on the core. You did not mention the mold material used for your core. Extensive testing has shown that material with higher rates of thermal conductivity can allow the mold surface temperature to be evaluated for ease of injection and yet will cool the part more evenly to maintain or even reduce your molding cycle. Copper alloys are excellent for this application. Typically NiSiCr copper alloys are used in medical applications and many have a thin, dense chrome plating applied. Additionally, tungsten carbide has a very high thermal conductivity, exceeding that of typical tool steels. SPE Injection Molding Division Ask The Experts Question: Secondly, I have a stationary sticking problem with 3/4" long parts, again in LLDPE. The stationary side is ribbed. Should this side be highly polished or sand blasted? In blow molding, the sand blasted surface releases better. ~Robert Lowe, BL Plastics Inc. Answer: If the part has aesthetic finish requirements on the surfaces that are creating the resistance to release, that finish must be applied to the mold. Without knowing any more about your application, I would suggest that you consider an SPI B-1 or B-2 finish. A skilled mold polisher must install this finish in the direction of part release (draw). Where I’ve seen highly polished surfaces release well, it is more often a combination of draft on the cavity and ejection method than the high polish that is responsible for lower release and/or ejection forces. Sand blasted surfaces do break the vacuum better, if that is the reason that the part is sticking to the core. Other than the vacuum release aspect, the sand blast surface will, in theory, create higher initial injection or release forces and compound the ejection problem. Please let us know how you make out and/or if you need more information. Undoubtedly many of the division members and readers have encountered similar situations and could provide their thoughts. The great thing I’ve found about professionals in the injection molding industry is a willingness to help a fellow molder. If you need more assistance, please send a digital picture of the part, core, gate arrangement, and mold, along with test results from the above recommendations, and either I or other readers will try to offer more suggestions. Hot Runner Questions Terry Schwenk, owner and president of Process & Design Technologies, LLC, answers your hot runner questions. Terry has over 34 years of experience in the plastics industry, and more then 22 years in hot runner technology specifically. Email your questions to Terry at tschwenk@processdesigntech.com Question: What causes hot runner systems to leak and how can the leakage be prevented? Answer: This is one of the great mysteries of operating hot runner systems. If you have been one of the few who have never experienced a hot runner leak, count yourself lucky. If you use hot runner systems long enough, you will eventually experience a leak. The unfortunate problem is that most times you don’t realize a material breach has occurred until the system stops Fall 2008 Page 6 working or you see material coming out of the electrical box. This, in my opinion, is the worst thing that can happen to a hot runner system because the time it takes to find the leak and the effort to analyze what happened can be very costly. If you have a tool running and you know a leak has occurred, before you shut down the tool try to do a color change and run a few shots through the system. This can be very helpful in determining where the leak is coming from. Leakages can be categorized into three major areas: mechanical, electrical, or thermal. Knowing this can help analyze the problem. In addition, it is important to understand that a leak can NOT occur unless the following three items are present: (1) heat, (2) pressure, and (3) a leak path. If you take away heat the material solidifies and stops flowing. Take away pressure and the material viscosity will prevent it from flowing. Take away a leak path and the material has no place to go. Most material leakages occur due to a design flaw or improper installation. But analyzing and trying to find the source of the leak can be monstrous. Design flaws SPE Injection Molding Division The Experts Experts Ask The can range from a missed dimension to an incorrect tolerance on the print. Improper installation can range from poor machining, poor surface finish, a programming error, not holding tolerance, improper assembly, wiring, or a loose screw or seal. In the case of the nozzle seals, the seals contact the cavity steel creating an interference fit, thus closing off a leak path. When seals get damaged by over heating, or are dinged during installation, their effectiveness is compromised. The success of the seal is dependant on having full contact with the cavity block not only from a mechanical seal standpoint but also from a thermal standpoint. When the seal contacts the cavity block it gives up some of its heat making it cooler. But if the seal is loose in the bore it not only creates a leak path, it remains hot and the material doesn’t solidify. If there is no design flaw or improper installation, processing conditions may be the problem. Controlling the temperature of the hot runner system and the mold plates surrounding the system is critical. When the system or mold is heated thermal expansion takes place and controlling that expansion is essential to maintaining the integrity of the system and mold base. Carbon steels expand at a rate of 0.0000063 inches per degree Fahrenheit per inch. Thus, a piece of steel measuring 10 inches in length heated to 100 F over ambient temperature will expand 0.0063 inches. A hot runner manifold 10 inches in length heated to 470 F will expand 0.0252 inches. If the system or mold base is over heated, or the water wasn’t turned on, this can affect the mating of the surfaces. Components that are not seated properly due to excessive thermal expansion will create a leak path. Once a leak path has been established, even if you turn the water back on, the damage will have already been done and the system will leak. Additional processing issues can be as simple as not following proper startup or shut down procedures. These procedures can change depending on the type of tool being processed, such as a single face tool versus a stack mold, or a multi-component versus an insert mold. Paying attention to the hot runner supplier’s recommendations will avoid most issues. Paying close attention to the installation and integration of the hot runner system will prevent leakage from occurring. In addition, having well trained processing personnel will avoid leakages when a mistake is made. Fall 2008 Page 7 Reader Comments From Previous Issues Regarding injection molding plastisol fishing lures (Spring 2008), Caspar Van Spaendonck of Philips Consumer Lifestyle, the Netherlands, had this to say. You might check on the dough moulding compound (DMC) for moulding. This is glass fiber reinforced polyester resin for injection moulding. A long time ago, Philips made speaker housings out of this material, but these days, the back doors of small cars are moulded of this material. See: http://www.composite. com.au/compounds.html#2 Polyurethane clear coat moulding is a process of curing the resin in the tool. A source is: http:// www.kraussmaffei.com/index.php?itid=317& content_news_detail=4219&back_cont_id=229 By the way, you were right on the barrel: Do not use the normal screw and barrel used for thermoplastic material. A special barrel must be used! SPE Injection Molding Division Ask The Experts CAE Questions John Ralston, operations and engineering manager of Beaumont Technologies, Inc., answers your questions about flow simulation. John has over 18 years of CAE experience using various flow simulation packages. Reach John at jralston@beaumontinc.com with a subject line of “SPE and CAE.” Question: I did a mold filling simulation on a new part and mold design to ensure that we had enough pressure available to fill the part. However, the analysis under-predicted the pressures by 20% and now I am on the verge of being pressure limited. I have to go back and rework the mold or find a molding machine with more available pressure. Is this a common problem with CAE? Why is the analysis prediction so different from the actual results? Answer: We see many instances where the flow analysis simulation program’s pressure results do not match closely with the actual injection molding process. There are several reasons on why this could happen. First you need to determine if it is a problem caused by software limitations or an error related to the comparison of the actual injection molding process. In order to determine the cause of why the pressure prediction is not the same as the actual molding, we recommend the following trouble shooting steps. STEP 1. First you need to determine if the analysis truly reflects what is being molded. Here are some common items to review when setting up an analysis to replicate an injection molding process. Comparison of Analysis vs. Machine Setup. Simulations allow the user to specify an injection time or polymer flow rate, while injection molding machines normally have an injection profile. Profiles may ramp up from a slow rate to full velocity and then slope down again prior to the end of the filling phase. Even if the molding machine is programmed to have a constant velocity, the ram will not move at a constant speed as the ram can not instantly change velocities. The same is Fall 2008 Page 8 true at the end of the filling phase. Profiles on the machine will most likely require less pressure than the constant velocity that is typically used for most CAE flow simulation analyses. Machine Switchover. If the machine switch-over to pressure control is close to the point where the cavity is completely filled, then it is possible that the cavity will experience hydrostatic conditions. This will be evident through a rapid rise in cavity and machine pressures. In multi-cavity molds, these pressure spikes can also occur due to filling imbalances. For example, the machine may be set to switch-over when 95% of the shot has been injected. But if an imbalance exists, some cavities may be full while others are only 60% full. The full cavities will see a significant pressure spike again due to the hydrostatic pressure conditions. Be sure to compare the switch-over point used in the analysis to what is set on the machine. Accounting for Screw Conveyance and Machine Nozzle Losses. Many CAE analysts do not model the machine nozzle geometry, nor do they consider the pressure required to move the ram. If the nozzle geometry is not accounted for, then the pressure loss through the machine nozzle and screw conveyance losses need to be added to the analysis results for a more accurate pressure prediction. As a rule of thumb, add 10% to 25% of the pressure achieved in the analysis to account for these losses. This rule of thumb range is certainly affected by the design of the nozzle (shut-off nozzle, extended nozzle, diameters and length of the nozzle including the orifice size, etc.), so be aware of your nozzle’s design and its impact on pressure loss. Correct Mold and Melt Temps. In addition to the injection rate, the mold and melt temperatures used in the analysis must also be conveyed to the processor so that those temperatures are used in the process. High mold and melt temperatures will lower the viscosity and decrease the actual pressure. The melt temperature used in the analysis is NOT the barrel or nozzle settings. The best way to measure the melt temperature is with an air shot and a hand held pyrometer (we recommend following RJG’s 30/30 melt test). The mold temperature specified in the analysis is the temperature at the plastic– metal interface, NOT the temperature of the coolant or SPE Injection Molding Division Ask The Experts the setting on your thermolator. The coolant temperature will typically be lower than the temperature at the plastic– metal interface. It should also be noted that if you did not run a cooling analysis, the CAE software assumes perfect uniform cooling—which in most cases does not replicate the true molding process. STEP 2. Once you have verified that you are closely replicating the molding process, the next step is to verify the analysis inputs. Major areas of concern with setting up an analysis include the following. Analysis Selection. There are multiple solution platforms that can be used for a filling analysis. Depending upon the software vendor, these could include 2D, Midplane (2 ½ D), Dual Domain, Hybrid 3D, and Full 3D methods. The decision to use a particular solution method is complex and based on the scope of the problem, part complexity, and the degree of accuracy required. Choosing a wrong solution platform may cause inaccurate results. You should ask questions of your CAE analyst or supplier to verify that your problem can be solved effectively and efficiently with the chosen solution platform. Inaccurate Modeling. Ensure that the entire feed system is modeled, including the sprue, runner system, and gates. This applies for hot and cold runner systems, or hybrid systems (hot-to-cold). There is a pressure loss associated with any channel that the melt flows through, with the feed system contributing significant portions of the total pressure loss. Material Characterization. This is an area where a lot of variation could be introduced. CAE analysis calculations for flow, temperature, and pressure are highly dependant upon proper material characterization. In most cases, the material database supplied with the CAE software is limited, which presents a problem when performing an analysis for your specific job. To compound the problem, even if you find the exact material, supplier, and grade in the database, the data may not be valid for several reasons. For example, improper rheological characterization or the use of generic family data (Generic PVT) may inaccurately represent your specific material’s rheology. Single point thermal conductivity or specific heat values verses tabulated data may also cause problems. The best way to ensure proper results is to have the material Fall 2008 Page 9 tested based on your analysis requirements. The drawback with material testing for each project would be added expense and time required. Another option would be to run verification analyses concurrently with the actual analysis. This can be accomplished by analyzing an existing mold or through the use of proprietary methods such as Veri-flo™ services (contact Beaumont Technologies, Inc. for more information). SUMMARY. As you can see, there are many variables that can contribute to inaccurate results with CAE flow analysis programs. We discussed the major sources for error, but there are certainly others to consider. The key to obtaining the best results is to understand the injection molding process, how it relates to flow analysis simulation, and the limitations and assumptions made in the code. If you are outsourcing flow simulation, do your homework and find a CAE consulting source that understands these issues and can react appropriately, providing you with the best results available with today’s technology. The key to making simulation successful is having someone with the ability to interpret the results, not just the ability to make pretty pictures. SPE Injection Molding Division Ask The Experts Reader Comments From Previous Issues Regarding a copolymer with an orange peel surface finish (Summer 2008), Caspar Van Spaendonck of Philips Consumer Lifestyle, the Netherlands, had this to say. Having some experience with Asian tooling, it might be that the polishing of the tool was done too hastily. When polishing steel with too high speed and pressure (over polishing), an orange peel effect can appear. See this link for ASSAB / Uddeholm polishing guidelines (orange peel problems are mentioned on page 8): http:// www.buau.com.au/english/files/ POLISHING-ENGLISH_950901.pdf Regarding bubbles in a clear polycarbonate part (Spring 2008), Caspar Van Spaendonck of Philips Consumer Lifestyle, the Netherlands, had this to say. I appreciated your article on PC moulding; it was practical, helpful, and to the point. Allow me to share some experience on the air inclusions. If the bubble consistently appears in the same location, ask yourself the following questions. 1) Are three flow fronts colliding? Especially in a flat area with no pins or other venting possibilities, the air will be trapped. In the worst case, it will burn. This is a tool/gating problem. If you are lucky with a shut-off hot runner, you can try sequential opening of the runner nozzles to move the colliding flow fronts. 2) Is there a weldline after a hole? In cases where not vented or poorly vented air is dragged along, venting the pin will help. 3) Is the bubble at the end of the flow where the part cannot be easily packed? Here we have a real problem with PC. Acombination of difficulty flowing and over packing near the gate can cause excessive stress. If the gate does not freeze too early, a special packing pressure profile might be the solution. Fall 2008 Page 10 SPE Injection Molding Division Featured Technology An Example of MeltFlipper Technology: Performance Evaluation of an 8 Cavity PVC Medical Parts The image below shows the two distinct flow groups of an 8 cavity geometrically balanced mold. Flow groups are made up of a group of cavities that receive the same melt properties with or without the patented Beaumonth Techology MeltFlipper melt rotation technology used by Integrity Plastics for this evaluation. The inside four cavities make up flow group 1 (red) and the outside four cavities make up flow group 2 (blue). Any variation between these flow groups is caused by shear. These shear variations can be addressed using MeltFlipper technology. Variations within these flow groups are classified as steel imbalances. Steel imbalances can be caused by differences in runner size, wall thickness variations, cold slug issues, venting, gate diameters, etc. MeltFlipper technology cannot resolve steel variations. 1 5 2 6 3 4 7 8 5 Step Software Results Short shot samples were analyzed using the Beaumont 5 Step Software to determine the root cause of imbalance in the medical PVC part mold. Shown below is the steel variation for the two flow groups. Flow group 1 shows a 2.1% steel variation (due mainly to cavity 6). Flow group 2 shows a 4.6% steel variation (due mainly to cavity 5). Fall 2008 Page 11 SPE Injection Molding Division Featured Technology Steel imbalances are caused by differences in the physical steel dimensions. Small differences in runner and gate diameters can have a large effect on the filling balance. Shown below is the pressure drop equation highlighting the impact that the channel radius (r) has since it is raised to the 4th power. Cavity 5 and 6 are both the lightest cavities in their respective flow groups. Consequently, these parts are fed by the same secondary runner which should be checked for consistency to the other runners. The difference between the flow groups evaluates the amount of shear imbalance. The shear imbalance determined from the short shot samples was 8.1%. Shear imbalances are caused by shearing the material through the machine nozzle and the runner system. MeltFlipper technology provided uniform filling by managing and distributing the high sheared laminates to all the cavities. By using the MeltFlipper technology, Integrity Plastics was able to improve the filling balance and enable the cavities to receive identical melt properties. The MeltFlipper technology has the potential to increase the process window with improved dimensional consistency. Other benefits include a potential for decreased scrap, lower injection pressures, and faster mold commissioning. Fall 2008 Page 12 SPE Injection Molding Division Fall 2008 Page 13 SPE Injection Molding Division Call For Papers Fall 2008 Page 14 SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Paper Experimental Study on the Energy Efficiency of Different Screw Designs for Injection Molding Jeff A. Myers: BARR Inc., Onsted, MI Mark Ruberg 1, Ritch Waterfield 1, Mark Elsass1, Steve Kelsay1: Milacron Inc, Batavia, OH Abstract New advances in screw designs and mixing sections have allowed processors to advantage of new resins, higher production rates, and improved product quality. With new material formulations, and increased energy cost it is paramount that the machine utilize the total energy input in the most efficient manner. This paper will present data on the melting performance of a new injection screw design with a unique flight geometry that maximizes the conductive melting mechanism (low shear) in the screw channel. A comparison is made between the total energy required for melting, pumping and mixing characteristics between a standard General purpose screw, barrier screw and a new Variable Barrier Energy Transfer screw (VBET) (12). Background Injection molding is the most widely used plastic forming process in the industry today. The cost of each part produced depends on a number of factors including resin, cycle time, total energy input and scrap rate just to name a few. In general, the lowest cost per part will occur at the highest production rate and the lowest energy usage. The majority of the energy required to fully melt the resin is dictated by the screw design selected. Viscous energy dissipation via shearing in single screw extrusion has been the subject of intensive study over the last forty years. It is well documented in the literature that the polymer pellets start to melt after 2 to 4 diameters from the hopper and are compacted into what is known as a “solid bed”, as shown by Figure 1. The initial melting mechanism of a tightly compacted solid bed is mainly by rubbing on the hot barrel surface as it rotates with the screw and by conductive heating from the barrel heaters (1). As the melt film between the solid bed and the barrel increases, heat is generated from viscous shear heating, which dominates the melting of the polymer. In conventional screws, viscous shear heating is the principle source of energy to melt the polymer (2). More modern screw designs utilize a barrier flight as shown in Figure 2. As the melt film is wiped off the barrel surface by the main flight, the melt is deposited Fall 2008 Page 15 into a separate melt channel. A barrier flight divides the solid and melt channel such that the clearance over the barrier flight will only allow melt to enter into this channel. The main function of a barrier flight is to separate the melted polymer from the solid bed and keep the solid bed from becoming unstable and prematurely breaking up. By continuously removing the melt film over the barrier flight, the solid bed surface remains intact. This allows for a greater solid bed surface area on the barrel wall to keep the viscous energy dissipation via shearing as high as possible. In addition, since the melt film thickness over the barrier flight is small, the shear energy is also high. It is believed that this type of phase separation will increase the melting rates as compared to non-barrier type screws. However, since approximately 90% of the polymer is melted by the high shear in the barrier section, the melt temperatures are correspondingly higher, which is undesirable in many applications. Recognizing the inherent problems and limitations of barrier type screws, the solid/melt mixing type screw was developed (1). This principle differs from the barrier designs in that the metering section is divided into two equal subchannels by a secondary flight. The solid bed is intentionally broken up at the end of the melting section to allow some solids to enter the mixing section. The clearance of the secondary flight is much greater than the clearance of the barrier flight on a barrier screw, allowing unmelted pellets to pass through. The depth of one subchannel decreases while the depth of the other increases, forcing the melt to flow over the secondary flight at relatively low shear rates, as shown by Figure 4. Solid bed fragments mixed in the melt are broken into individual pellets by passing over the secondary flight. The pellets are continually mixed with the melt promoting heat transfer by conduction from the melt to the pellets. Since the viscous energy dissipation via shearing in solid/ melt mixing screws is low and the primary melting mechanism is by conduction, the melt temperature is reduced (3). The goal of this work is to evaluate the total energy requirements for the molding machine with three different screw designs and make a comparison on the performance and energy each screw required at different molding conditions. SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Paper Material The resin used for this study was a standard injection grade High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Fortiflex T50500 grade. The melt flow rate (MFR) of the resin was 6.5 g/10 min (190 0C, 2.16 Kg). All tests were performed using 100% virgin natural pellets. Equipment The experiments were performed on a Milacron MM550 (4) injection machine with the specifications listed in Table 1. The barrel was fitted with standard Ceramic heater bands. The total kW per zone is listed in Table 2. The General purpose (GP) and Barrier screw that were evaluated are typical designs supplied by the machine manufacture. The GP screw had a 100mm constant lead-length and a primary flight clearance of 0.10mm. It had a 12diameter feed section that was 12.70mm deep, a 5diameter constant taper transition section, and a 5diameter constant depth meter section that was 4.70mm deep. The Barrier screw had a 9.4-diameter feed section that was 14.50mm deep with a 100mm lead-length, 8.0 diameter barrier section with a 125mm lead-length, and a 2.6 diameter constant depth meter section that was 5.33mm deep. The feed and metering section were single flighted and the barrier section was designed with a melt and solid channel as shown in Figure 2. The clearance over the barrier flight had a constant depth of 0.51mm. The barrier screw had a 2.0 diameter spiral mixing section at the discharge end. The VBET solid/melt mixing design had a lead-length of 120.7mm and a primary flight clearance of 0.10mm. It had a 6.0 diameter feed section that was 19.0mm deep. The constant taper transition section was 6.4 diameters long with a starting depth of 19.0mm and ending at 7.6mm depth. The solid/melt mixing section was 6.9 diameters long with a starting depth of 7.6mm and exit depth of 6.9mm. Within the mixing section the channel depth varied between 3.8mm and 12.7mm. As shown in Figure 4, the depth and length of the undercut flight varied through the length of the mixing section. The starting depth of the first peak was 3.8mm and the ending depth was 2.5mm. The period of these oscillations was out of phase for the two channels. The constant depth meter section was 1.3 diameters long at 6.9mm deep. The discharge end of the screw had a 1.0 diameter slotted mixing section. This screw design will be referred to as the Mixing screw in the rest of the paper. Fall 2008 Page 16 The barrel heater zones and screw motor were connected to a data acquisition systems which allowed the total power to be recorded for each test. A meter was installed on the main power supply which recorded the total machine power required for the duration of each test. To investigate the total energy input for each screw, the molding parameters were held constant throughout the test and are listed in Table 3. Data was recorded for fifty consecutive shots once the machine was at steady state. Results and Discussion The screw Recovery Rate (g/sec) is shown in Figure 5. The Mixing screw had an 18% higher rate compared to the GP design and a 15% higher rate compared to the Barrier design at 150 rpm. The melt temperature was measured using a hand held pyrometer after the last consecutive shot in each test. The maximum discharge temperature at 75 and 150 rpm is shown in Figure 6. The discharge temperatures for the Mixing Screw were 14 to 12 oC lower than the Barrier design at 75 and 150 rpm respectively. The melt quality for the Barrier and Mixing screw showed no sings of unmelt. The melt quality of the GP design showed evidence of unmelts at 75 and 150 rpm. At 150 rpm, unmelted pellets were more evident in the purging and the molded part. This data is consistent with the low discharge temperature with the GP design. The specific energy inputted by the screw is shown in Figure 8. The Mixing screw used 6 to 12 % less energy compared to the GP and Barrier design. The varying depths in the solid/melt section of the Mixing screw allowed energy from the screw to be used more effectively. Shear energy inputted to the resin in the shallow channel regions was readily transferred to the cooler solids in the deep channel. The total energy required, Et , to produce a single part is calculated from the following relationship: E t = P t /RM ; kW/kg (1) RM = 3.66*W t /CT ; kg/hr (2) Where Pt is the total machine power in kW. RM is the machine specific rate in kg/hr, which is a function of the cycle time. Wt is the part weight in grams, and CT is the total cycle time in seconds. The results at 75 and 150 rpm are listed in Figure 9. The Mixing screw required 1.6 to 2.6% less energy per molded part compared to the Barrier and GP design. The actual value would be higher if scrap rates and are included in the calculation. SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Paper Conclusions Machine efficiency is an important aspect in the molding process. The data clearly shows that screw design plays an important role in the total energy required to produce a molded part. The results of our tests suggest that a design that maximizes conductive melting as the primary melting mechanism requires less energy per part than a GP or Barrier design. Data from a subsequent test indicated that the Mixing screw is able to produce a more uniform melt temperature distribution and improved mixing which can also improve the overall machine efficiency. Figure 2. Barrier screw channel flow. References 1. C.I Chung, Extrusion of Polymer, Hanser, (2000). 2. J.A. Myers, R.A.Barr, SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers, 48,154 (2002) 3. T.A. Hogan, M.A. Spalding, E.K. Kim, R.A. Barr, J.A. Myers, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 180, 490 (2003) 4. Milacron Inc. Plastic Technologies Batavia, OH 5. “ET” Registered Trademark of Robert BARR Inc. 6. C.I. Chung and R.A. Barr, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 29, 168 (1983). 7. C.I. Chung and R.A. Barr, U.S. Patent 4,405,239. 8. T.A. Plumley, M.A. Spalding, J. Dooley, and K.S. Hyun, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 40, 324 (1994). 9. S.A. Somers, M.A. Spalding, J. Dooley, and K.S. Hyun, SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, 41, 222, (1995). 10. B.A. Salamon, M.A. Spalding, J.R. Powers, M. Serrano, W.C. Sumner, S.A. Somers, and R.B. Peters, R.B., Plast. Eng., 57, 4, 52 (2001). 11. R.A. Barr, U.S. Patent 6,599,004 (2001). Key Words: Solid Melt/Mix, Conductive Melting, VBET. Figure 3. Solid/melt mixing channel flow. Figure 4. Schematic of VBET section. Table 1. Machine specifications. Injection Capacity, Max G.P. Styrene , kg Screw Diameter, mm L/D Maximum Screw Stroke, mm Electric Screw Motor, kW Maximum Screw, rpm Number of Heater Zones Total Heating Capacity, kW 2.98 100 22:1 400 75 200 5 53.8 Table 2. Heater zone specifications. Figure 1. Conventional screw channel flow. Fall 2008 Page 17 Zone Zone -1-Feed end Zone-2 Zone-3 Zone-4 Total kW per zone 11.5 11.5 11.5 19.0 53.50 SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Paper Table 3. Molding conditions. Screw Speed, rpm Back Pressure, Bar Feed Throat, o C Zone-1, o C Zone-2, o C Zone-3, o C Zone-4, o C Nozzle, o C Screw Stroke, mm Cycle Time, sec 75, 150 6.2 60 229 229 229 229 229 183 22.0, 18.0 Figure 7. Screw motor power required. Figure 5. Screw recovery rate. Figure 8. Specific energy inputted by the screw. Figure 6. Discharge temperature. Figure 9. Total machine energy required per molded part. Fall 2008 Page 18 SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article Partners in Education By Mike Thomas, Milwaukee SPE Milwaukee SPE is delighted to announce that this year’s Ticona grants will be awarded to two deserving students on March 17, 2009, during Milwaukee SPE’s Annual Education Career Night. Ticona and Milwaukee SPE will begin their 12th year presenting these joint financial grants. With a shared goal of the education of our customers, employees, members, communities, and public and private schools and universities, Ticona and SPE Milwaukee have worked seamlessly over the years to recruit and reward deserving recipients of this prestigious award. Ticona is always looking for polymer, engineering, and manufacturing talent from Midwestern Universities, and the partnership between Ticona and Milwaukee SPE seeks to further the placement of qualified individuals with Ticona, thus keeping talent in the Midwest. Mike Thomas, a former employee of 32 years with Ticona and current member of Milwaukee SPE, has directed this joint financial grant from SPE Milwaukee’s side for the last 12 years. Originally started with Ticona’s Pat Hughes in 1995, Mike continued the program with Jack Grates and, more recently, with Clay Linstid. Clay visited Milwaukee in February 2007 to personally present the grant to Scott Winkelmann of UW-Milwaukee. Clay also worked with Gail Bristol of SPE National on joint educational programs. It is with great regret that I inform you that Clay passed away unexpectedly on June 29, 2008. He is sorely missed by everyone who knew him. Vivek Jain of Ticona has taken over for Clay in coordinating Ticona’s educational programming in 2008 and 2009. Ticona’s generosity and commitment to the students and professionals in the plastics industry over the years has not gone unnoticed. Ticona, which is part of Celanese Corporation, is a global company of material scientists, design engineers, technical support experts, account managers, and customer service representatives dedicated to helping companies achieve their goals in the use of engineering resins. They are a world leader in materials such as acetal polymers, liquid crystal polymers, long fiber reinforced thermoplastics, and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. They hold strong positions across their broad portfolio of other thermoplastics as well. Ticona has about 1,800 employees in polymer production, compounding plants, and laboratory and design centers throughout the world. Their products serve designers and engineers in a number of key markets, including automotive, appliance components, information technology, consumer and recreational products, industrial, medical and health, and many others. They are dedicated to the principles of responsible care, including care for the health and safety of their customers, employees, and neighbors, as well as the environment overall. Their global reach, extensive product portfolio, and engineering and science capabilities enable them to work with their customers at any stage of the process—be it an early concept or in the full production stage—anywhere in the world. Ticona’s goal is simple: To meet the customer’s design and engineering challenges and exceed the customer’s expectations of technical expertise and support. For more information, visit Ticona’s website (www.ticona.com) and Milwaukee SPE (www.milwaukeespe.org). These two fantastic organizations are committed to maintaining their leadership position in the plastics industry. A long term relationship is vital to our success. Fall 2008 Page 19 SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Student Paper Investigation of Comparative Stress Distributions in Thermoforming Versus Injection Molding Thomas W. Shoaf, Department of Industrial Studies University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, WI 53818 Abstract Experimental Procedure The comparison of stress distributions has been investigated in thermoformed and injection molded parts of a similar design. Injection molding is traditionally preferred for automotive applications because of its ability to create parts with minimal internal stress. However, in recent years because of potential cost reductions, thermoformed parts are often being substituted. Matrox Inspector has been used to evaluate internal stress created by both processes. Results show a difference in the comparative stress distributions of similar parts that is dependent on location. In this study, two injection molded parts with different designs were prepared; the first part being a clear Plexiglas faceplate and the second being a common, clear plastic cup. Using the injection molded parts as a template, two male molds were produced in order to be able to form a nearly identical thermoformed part. Clear sheets of PET (polyethylene terephthalate) were heated in a thermoformer at 550 degrees Fahrenheit for 19 seconds then vacuum formed around the molds for 14 seconds. The subsequent thermoformed parts were then hand cut from their sheets. Several of each injection molded and thermoformed parts were then separately subjected to a polarized light and viewed through a polarizing film. This caused bright bands of colors, created by the bending of light, to form as shown in Fig 1. These bands of color indicate areas of stress in the part. A Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5 was then used to take photographs of the areas which were to be analyzed. Each of the injection molded and comparative thermoformed parts had an area designated for analysis. For the face plates the area for analysis was the flat face area away from the injection site, otherwise known as the gate. The analysis area on the plastic cups was on the bottom of the cup at the injection site. To quantify the stresses in the areas of analysis, the photographs were loaded into Matrox Inspector; a computer program designed for photographic analysis which, hereafter, will be referred to as photographic analysis software (PAS). A blob analysis, with threshold at 140, was then performed to indicate areas of stress in the plastic, as shown in fig. 4. The results from the blob analysis where then recorded and averaged. Introduction A product’s strengths and weaknesses are often dependent on how it is processed. Because of its ability to produce a nearly stress free part, the preferred technique for processing plastics for use in automobiles has been injection molding. Whenever the design parameters of a product allow, thermoforming is being considered as a viable processing alternative. This can potentially reduce the cost and processing times of production. Because of these savings many manufacturers have switched from injection molded to thermoformed parts. The differences between the thermoforming technique and injection molding technique can create different stress distributions in identical parts that are inherent to each individual process. Research has shown that these stresses are the result of changes in the equilibrium position of atoms and the distortion of valence angles in the molecular chains as well as from changes in the distances between segments in the molecules [1]. High levels of stress in a plastic have the potential to adversely affect a final product. This can manifest itself in the form of reduced optical characteristics, post processing warpage, and premature, or unexpected, failure of a part [3]. These stresses can also leave a plastic open to chemical attack, reducing the lifespan of a part. It is because of this that the focus of this study is the comparative stress distributions created by the injection molding technique versus those of the thermoforming technique. Fall 2008 Page 20 Results and Discussion A PAS blob analysis was used to quantitate the areas of stress in the test areas. A blob analysis works by segmenting objects in an image from a background, as well as from each other, using a variety of threshold operations. The PAS then counts and labels the segmented objects. For each test area the threshold was set to count only the highest concentrations of colored SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Student Paper bands produced by the polarizing film; effectively indicating and counting the areas of stress. Analysis of the injection molded and thermoformed faceplates revealed 16 and 184 average areas of stress respectively, as shown in Fig 2. The stress in the injection molded part can be explained by the molding conditions. If the part cools too quickly from the melt, frozen-in stresses may be quite high due to differential shrinkage [2]. Even so, most of the plastic is able to relax during cooling, relieving the majority of the internal stress. This, however, is not the case for the high levels of stress in the thermoformed parts, which are a result of the heating and stretching inherent to the thermoforming process. When running a blob analysis on the injection molded and thermoformed cups the PAS respectively indicated 87 and 78 average areas of stress as shown in Fig 3. The high level of stress in the injection molded cup is due to the fact the area of analysis on the cup was near the plastic injection location. Flow-induced stresses arise from the presence of the shear and normal stresses during the filling and packing of the polymer in the mold cavity [4]. During the cooling phase, some of these stresses are frozen in the final product due to incomplete relaxation. This gives the area of injection in the injection molded part a similar stress distribution to the thermoformed part. Comparison of the different stress distributions due to processing in relation to the analysis areas show less stress in the injection molded parts away from the injection area. However, in the thermoformed parts stress distribution was high in both analysis areas. then injection molding is the best choice of processing. However, for this technique to produce the best part an investment needs to be made in the research and development of the mold to prevent stress form forming during processing. When the design of a mold allows for its use and the internal stress in the part is not a concern then thermoforming is an often cheaper, viable option. References 1. G. Menges, A. Dierkes, L. Schmidt, and E. Winkel, SPEANTEC Tech Paper, 300 (1980). 2. H. B. DALY, K. T. NGUYEN, B. SANSCHAGRIN, K. C. COLE, Journal of Injection Molding Technology (USA), 2, 59 (1998). 3. H. B. DALY, K. T. NGUYEN, B. SANSCHAGRIN, K. C. COLE, Journal of Injection Molding Technology (USA), 2, 78 (1998). 4. J. M. Hoffman, A. Sjong, SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers, 1409 (2006). Conclusion When comparing the stress distributions of injection molded versus thermoformed parts, a number of patterns start to emerge. First the injection molded parts in general have a lower level of internal stress in comparison to the thermoformed parts. Second, stress in the injection molded parts is concentrated around the gate and dissipates as a function of distance, while the thermoformed parts tend to have similar levels of stress throughout. The internal stress level in an injection molded part can be influenced by the injection process itself or by rapid cooling after the initial injection. These can lead to the creation of an injection molded part that has a stress level comparable to that of a thermoformed part. For this reason it is important to consider the application of the part to be produced before making a choice of technique to process it. If a part needs a relatively low level of internal stress Fall 2008 Page 21 Figure 1. Image of the bright bands of colors. Figure 2. PAS indicated average number of stress areas in injection molded faceplates at 16 and 184 for the thermoformed faceplates. SPE Injection Molding Division IMD Best Student Paper Figure 3. PAS indicated average number of stress areas in injection molded cup at 87 and 78 for thermoformed cup. Featured Product Learning-on-Demand SPE and SpecialChem are offering a special 20% discount on a subscription to the Learning-on-Demand library of videos, good through November 30th. Learning-on-Demand, a new service SPE has developed in collaboration with SpecialChem, offers online access to talks by experts on specific technical topics, including most of our e-Live webinars. At a sale price of $550 (€ 399) for one year, you’ll receive unlimited access to more than 150 recorded presentations, with new videos added weekly. Go to www.omnexus.com/lod and benefit from the special rebate for SPE members. Use the code SPEXT4 when registering. Remember, this offer ends November 30th. The Learning-on-Demand Team Learning-on-demand@specialchem.com Fall 2008 Page 22 SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article Injection Moulding Process Benefits Both Process and Moulded Part by André Lück, Demag Plastics Group Injection compression moulding (ICM) and its advantages for machine selection, process design, and part properties have long been known. Many injection moulding processes are currently gaining important benefits when combined with injection compression moulding. Whether compression is applied sequentially or in parallel with injection, with ICM control for injection moulding machines, the possibilities are endless. Injection compression moulding, sometimes also called injection stamping moulding, provides many qualitative advantages for injection moulding apart from reduced material shearing and less orientation. It also permits reductions in injection pressure, clamping force, and cycle time. In addition, there tends to be an improved holding pressure effect, which minimises sink marks and warpage. The number of ICM applications is increasing—for IMD-decorated parts, mechanically stable plastic elements in automobiles, or exceptionally thin-walled packaging articles, for optical and foamed parts, as well as for thin parts with a finely textured surface, or for decorative backing injection. The advantages of ICM—ranked in decreasing order of importance—can be categorised as follows. 1. In the ICM process, shrinkage is compensated not only via the fluid centre but by compression of the melt as the mould closes. There are two advantages: the action of the holding pressure is on a flat surface and uniform, and overpacking of the cavity is possible earlier during injection. By reducing holding time, this cuts cycle times, removes sink marks at points of material accumulation or at the end of the flow path, and diminishes clamping force requirements. 2. Reduced molecular orientation during injection into an extended cavity has a positive effect on warpage and provides better longtime dimensional accuracy. 3. Improved venting to the mould enables critical parts to be easier filled which avoids surface flaws and tends to result in fast injection. Fall 2008 Phases of injection compression moulding. Injection compression moulds call for special engineering design. Flat-face effect of the hold pressure during injection compression moulding is advantageous. Page 23 SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article 4. Backing injection reduces stresses in mats or foils to be decorated and ultimately, enhances the freedom on using designs and decors. 5. Material shear in injection compression is less so that fibre degradation in the case of long fibre thermoplastics (LFTs) is reduced and mechanical part properties are improved. The possible advantages are counterbalanced, however, by the extra costs for the machine and mould as well as restrictions in respect of part geometry: • The IM machine requires an additional ICM controller, the extra cost, by the way, is often exaggerated. • The mould must be physically adapted to ICM in order to prevent the melt from penetrating into the parting line. There are a number of technical solutions to address this problem. • Undercuts or penetrations across the compression direction are problematic. • Parts that are designed with considerable depth in the injection direction are very difficult to mould by the ICM process. Basically, the ICM processes are always alike and easy to understand since what they add to the injection moulding is only an additional stroke of the clamping unit: 1. Close mould down to the compression gap, Fall 2008 Table 1: Advantages and disadvantages of different mould concepts for injection compression moulding. In processing LFTs, Injection compression moulding makes for favourable fibre orientation. Applied for optical parts, ICM reduces double refraction. Page 24 SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article 2. Inject and fill cavity 80 to 95% (equivalent to 100% or more of the ultimate volume), 3. Sequential or simultaneous compression by clamping the mould, and 4. Apply hold pressure, cool, open mould, and eject part. Compression is effected either by the closing movement of the mould only or by the movement of an individual mould element that is activated by means of a hydraulic core pull function (“core compression”). Besides the basic functions, it is possible in ICM to use a number of additional options, for instance, pre-compression and intermediate opening. Pre-compression serves for the forming of materials to be decorated. Intermediate opening may be necessary where the mould is initially closed somewhat more than necessary for ICM in order to prevent jetting and ensure laminar flow during injection. Intermediate opening may also be helpful in foaming if it is desired to permit initial distension to the melt. ICM controllers come at two levels of sophistication: (1) sequential ICM control with the process phases taking place in succession, and (2) simultaneous ICM control with the process occurring in parallel with injection as well as precompression and intermediate opening. The options are summarised on Demag screen pages 9 (“compression control”) and 8 (“pre-compression/ intermediate opening”) for the control of injection compression. Here, ICM control is fully integrated in the “flexible machine operation.” It is an add-on feature that can be deactivated to serve as a standard IM machine. What is often underestimated is the savings potential on cycle time. Injection into an extended cavity and parallel compression will, as a rule, shorten cycle time by anything from a few tenths of a second to more than a second. The rest of the cycle is identical in the case of sequential and parallel compression with Fall 2008 In the in-mould decoration process, ICM counteracts creasing. In decorative backing injection, ICM reduces stresses in the material to be decorated. Table 2: Advantages of ICM for various applications. Page 25 SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article Sponsorship Opportunities the press-moulding by means of ICM offering potential to reduce holding pressure time. Here again, time savings are possible of a few tenths of a second or up to several seconds—depending on the type of part and material. Recently, there have been distinct improvements in mould designs. The trend is for the classical vertical flash face to be replaced by female mould/male plug concepts or by designs with guided intermediate plates. In some cases, male plug and core compression variants have established themselves. An overview of the pros and cons of the three mould variants is provided in Table 1. Injection compression by means of the clamping unit of IM machines offers the advantage of a substantially higher force reservoir compared to designs with a male plug fitting into a female mould. In contrast to hydraulic two-platen machines, toggle clamping units apply the force uniformly and centrally to the mould with a distinctly sufficient compression force—contrary to a widely held prejudice. Especially when filling asymmetrically arranged cavities or cavities with long flow distances, the toggle is advantageous. Thanks to the special kinematics of the toggle, mould movements can be duplicated and guided with a very high degree of accuracy near the locking range and, consequently, for extremely small compression gaps. Typical examples In many currently important applications—such as IMD components, mechanically stressed LFT parts, thin-walled packaging articles, optical parts, parts made by decorative backing injection, finely textured surfaces and foamed moulded parts—an ICM function will provide technical or economical benefits (Table 2). It is a good plan to decide already at the design stage of the mould whether an ICM function will be helpful for technical, economical or qualitative reasons. It is also important to configure the machine with the necessary ICM functions and to ensure the ICM controller is logically organised and easy to operate. About the Author: André Lück, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) for Plastic Engineering, is a Process Development Engineer in the Research and Process Technology Center of the injection moulding machine manufacturer Demag Plastics Group in Schwaig, Germany. Contact: andre.lueck@dpg.com Fall 2008 Page 26 Become A Sponsor Today The newsletter for the Injection Molding Division of SPE is issued three times a year to more than 5000 members worldwide. This readership is composed of individuals just like YOU who are involved in all aspects of injection molding, from product design and engineering through processing and product quality. These editions are made possible through the generous support of the sponsors shown in this newsletter. An index to our sponsors, with website addresses, can be found on the last page of every issue. SPONSOR’S FEE SCHEDULE Three issues/year 1 page 1/2 page 1/3 page 1/4 page 1/10 page $3,300/yr. $1,900/yr. $1,260/yr. $960/yr. $350/yr. AD SIZE (W X H in inches) 1/10 page: 1/4 page std: 1/4 page horiz.: 1/3 page square: 1/3 page vertical: 1/2 page horiz.: 1/2 page isl.: Full page: business card 3-3/8 by 4-7/8 4-3/4 by 3-1/4 4-3/4 by 4-3/4 2-1/4 by 10 7 by 4-7/8 4-3/4 by 7 7 by 10 No bleeds permitted on any ad. ISSUE DEADLINES Spring Issue: February 20 Summer Issue: June 20 Fall Issue: October 20 For information on sponsorship of future issues please contact our publisher: Chris Lacey 608-263-5963 lacey@engr.wisc.edu SPE Injection Molding Division Member Profile Student Activities Report Student Activities Report By Walter S. Smith The Injection Molding Division (IMD) offers a $3000 scholarship that is made annually to a graduate or undergraduate student. Applicants must have experience in the injection molding industry, such as courses taken, research conducted, or jobs held. The scholarship will be awarded through the SPE foundation. The IMD continues to sponsor the Injection Molding Reception at ANTEC. Many students attend this event. This is a great opportunity for students to network and meet professionals in their chosen career field. Furthermore, the IMD contributes $1000 to the Student Author Travel Fund which aids students in their travel to the various ANTEC cities. The SPE Foundation 2008 Scholarship brochure/application is available for interested students who will be attending college during the 2008–2009 school year. General foundation scholarships range up to $4000/year. Specific scholarships requiring specific knowledge or background can range up to $7000/year. SPE offers membership to over 120 student chapters. Learn, network, and educate yourself with the help of SPE. Get involved in an existing SPE chapter or start your own! For more information on what it takes to start a student chapter, or to find out what SPE can do for your plastics program, contact Tricia McKnight at tmcknight@4spe.org. I strongly recommend that all students get involved. I promise that it will be worth your time and effort. Fall 2008 Page 27 SPE Injection Molding Division Molding Corner AGA-PGT, Inc. – A World Class Molder and Mold Maker of Plastic Gears by Mal V. Murthy, Ecogenus Group LLC A Bit Of History In 1944, Helmar Anderson, Edward Bertsche, and Clarence Anderson formed the ABA Tool & Die Company in Manchester, CT, as a metal component machine shop dedicated to the supply of precision parts to the aircraft industry, primarily Pratt & Whitney of nearby East Hartford, CT. The company performed well and in the early 1950’s, it evolved into a manufacturer of injection molds for the new and burgeoning plastics industry. Circa 1956, Donald Anderson, Helmar’s son, assumed the presidency of the company and brought in his brother Bill, as accountant and buyer, and his brother Earl, as shop floor manager and maintenance director. As the plastics industry grew and changed, ABA Tool & Die moved along with it. In 1961, ABA Tool & Die began to manufacture injection molds specifically for the production of plastic gears. Remarkably, many of those gears are still hard at work today. Thus began the ascent of what was once a tool and die machine shop into one of the world’s pioneers and world class manufacturers of plastic gears and plastic gear injection molds. In what was the first publication devoted exclusively to the design of plastic gears (there were many publications regarding metal gears), William McKinley and Samuel Pierson collaborated to publish “The ABA Plastics Gearing Design Manual” in 1967. There are many stories of injection mold makers being asked by their customers to “qualify” their molds by running them on in-house injection molding machines, and ABA was no exception. As you might imagine, production injection molding was not far behind, and in 1969, ABA Tool & Die started the Plastics Gearing Technology (PGT) division. It was 23 years later that the ABA mold making division officially merged with the PGT molding division to form ABA-PGT, Inc., an Fall 2008 Page 28 employee stock ownership (ESOP) company dedicated to the manufacture of plastic gears and plastic gear injection molds. The New Millennium The newly merged entities enjoyed the fruits of a plastics industry growing by leaps and bounds, as plastics cut into many of the previously sacred domains of cut metal gears. Boasting lower costs, reduced weight, and less noise, plastics were becoming a gear designers panacea for correcting problems posed by metal. But ABA-PGT wasn’t about to stand still and simply grow as the industry grew. It was, and remains, a technology-driven enterprise. The company pioneered another first: the “lights out” manufacturing of plastic gears in 1996 at a satellite plant in Vernon, CT. The success of the company presented space challenges, as their facility at 1395 Tolland Turnpike— a rather typical old New England mill—became cramped. With help from the state of Connecticut, ABAPGT built a state-of-the-art molding and mold making facility in a new industrial park in Manchester, CT: a 68,000 square foot building that now holds 40 injection molding machines and a 30-man tool room. SPE Injection Molding Division Molding Corner “Lights Out” facility in Vernon, Connecticut Not An Injection Molder of Gears, But A Gear Molder What’s the difference between an injection molder that occasionally molds gears and a gear molder that exclusively molds gears? This: Plastic gear quality is determined by measurements of concentricity, roundness, involute profile, tooth spacing errors, axial hourglass or taper, helix angle (for helical gears), and size, arc tooth thickness, and outside and root diameters. A plastic gear molder has invested in special measurement equipment/software and has trained personnel to provide assurance that each lot of parts is consistent. shrinkage and spark gap, thus producing a moldingquality finish and avoiding the distortion of postprocessing. Add 60 years of expertise across a full staff of tool designers and toolmakers, and you have a winning combination. Contact: ABA-PGT, Inc. 10 Gear Drive, Manchester, CT 06042 Website: www.abapgt.com Email: Info@abapgt.com Phone: (860) 649-4591 FAX: (860) 643-7619 It’s The Tool That Makes The Part ABA-PGT designs the gear molds that it makes and then manufactures that mold to the highest standards of quality. Alloy steel components hardened to Rockwell “C” 50-62 result in durability that enables the company to offer a one million cycle service commitment—the best in the industry. In-house manufactured master-gear quality electrodes properly compensate for mold Fall 2008 Page 29 SPE Injection Molding Division On The Road SPE Milwaukee MiniTec: October 21, 2008 Over 60 people attended the SPE MiniTec in Milwaukee, entitled “Emerging Technologies and Materials: Nanotechnology and Biopolymers,” on Tuesday, October 21st, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The event was coorganized and co-hosted by Vic Baez, president of SPE Milwaukee, and Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng, chair of the SPE Injection Molding Division. Sponsors included Nanocor, Dealey’s Mold Engineering, and Sabic Innovative Plastics. Speakers came from both academia and industry, including such prominent names as Tom Hotaling of Nanocor, Maureen Reitman of Exponent Failure Analysis Associates, John Baldus of the Wisconsin Office of Energy Independence, Sam Dahman of RTP Company, Ned Bryant of RTP Company, Krishna Pillai of UWMilwaukee, Tim Osswald of UW-Madison, Bill Hickey of Phillips Plastics Corp., Craig Clemons of the US Forest Products Laboratory, Adam Kramschuster of UW-Stout, Sarah Gong of UW-Milwaukee, and LihSheng (Tom) Turng of UW-Madison. The presentations were followed by a networking reception partially sponsored by Leanne Burton of Great Lakes Calcium. Milwaukee co-organizers, Prof. Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng of the SPE IMD, and Mr. Vic Baez of the SPE Milwaukee section, welcome the attendees. MiniTec speakers (from left): Prof. Adam Kramschuster, Dr. Maureen Reitman, Prof. Sarah Gong, and Prof. Lih-Sheng (Tom) Turng. MiniTec attendees browsed the table-top exhibit. Over 60 people attended the MiniTec. Fall 2008 Page 30 SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article SPE’s New Website By Susan Oderwald Initial Release I am pleased to announce that we have launched a new SPE website. This marks an important upgrade to our online presence around the globe. As of now, the new site includes a series of “under the hood” changes that will allow it to function more efficiently and better support SPE’s many transactions that now take place online. It also includes a completely new look, feel, and architecture. This update was sorely needed to allow members to better search and navigate, and to allow SPE to better promote the full range of Society activities and events—including events produced independently by SPE groups. As you explore this new site, keep in mind that the architecture and layout were engineered by a professional web-development firm with the average SPE member or prospect in mind. The site design was based on composite profiles of SPE members and nonmembers, from both our 2007 member-survey results and outside research on how technical people, and engineers specifically, utilize the web as part of their daily jobs. The site was NOT designed for people who are already familiar with the Society. This strategy protected us from making incorrect assumptions about how others might use the site. Important Upgrades Most of the site contains the same information and functionality of the prior site, but some important upgrades have been added: • Fall 2008 A MUCH better calendar function that is pervasive throughout the site, and a new group forum function to replace the antiquated AskPIP service. This includes a discussion forum for each Division and Special Interest Group. Page 31 • Much of the site is accessible to members through a single login mechanism. An important exception is the Online Technical Library. At present, this service is provided by a vendor with whom a unified login is costprohibitive. We are moving to a new provider within the next six to eight months. The Online Technical Library will be accessible under the single login feature after the transition. We are looking forward to that. • The new website was designed, from the ground up, with “search engine optimization” in mind (for details, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Search_engine_optimization). This is an important advancement. We anticipate that the site will gain more visibility and usage over time by folks who had previously not been able to find us online. Full search engine optimization will take a month or so to complete (all the basics are done, but a full auditing and testing phase can take place only in a live environment). The new site will provide a great deal more statistical information about its usage, which will help us monitor and change the site over time as demand dictates. Group Pages One especially good thing about the site is that it puts our technical groups—Sections, Divisions, Special Interest Groups, and Student Chapters—front and center (group pages are housed under the menu “Technical Groups”). An important advancement to the Division and Special Interest Groups pages is that online discussion boards are posted to and accessible from group pages, in addition to the pages where one can reach the entire discussion board. If you visit the discussion forum and post a question under “Automotive,” a notification will also appear on the SPE Injection Molding Division Feature Article Automotive Division’s webpage. This redundancy is important because different users of the site will come to information in different ways. This site-wide functionality is programmed into our calendar feature as well. Events that are posted to the calendar feature of an individual group’s webpage will be instantaneously populated on the Society-wide calendar, located throughout the site. We are, of course, very excited about this new functionality. However, these new features will be useful only if individual groups make full use of them. I was a little disappointed to learn that of our 80-plus active Sections, fewer than 25 utilized the old SPE site to promote their activities. I hope that this will change. Given the nature of search engine optimization, it is very likely that outsiders to SPE seeking activities and information on plastics will find them first through our global site, and only later discover local sites. It is therefore important that all groups, Sections, Divisions, Special Interest Groups, and Student Chapters update the SPE site as much as possible (in addition to independently-maintained sites). Technical Challenges As with all new launches of a site, there will undoubtedly be a few glitches to work through as various support technologies are fully tested and tried in a live environment. The site was optimized for Internet Explorer 7.0 or higher and Mozilla Firefox 2.0 or higher. If you use another browser, you may see occasional odd spacing. The Leadership Services area and content for SPE group pages are being moved to the new site. These areas can still be accessed through a legacy version of the previous website, at http://legacy.4spe.org/communities. Membership Chairs and Treasurers should be on the lookout for a separate email with guidance on how to access materials necessary for their operational area. Thank you for your patience as we work to bring these online. Moving Forward Your constructive feedback is always welcome, but I don’t want to overwhelm my staff at this particular moment. If you could please jot down ideas and comments and forward them to us over the next few months, we will work through them all. If you see glaring errors (broken links, typos, incorrect information on an event, etc.) please forward those immediately to seoderwald@4spe.org, and I will distribute them to the appropriate folks. To assist us in this type of troubleshooting, please copy and paste the link (string at the top of your browser that specifies the exact page), so we can locate the problem. Moving all of our information over to this new system, wireframe, and design was a huge undertaking by our technical staff here at headquarters. I want to thank and applaud everyone for their efforts, with the full understanding that this is just the beginning. A number of new functions and activities are scheduled to be added to the site over the next six to twelve months. As you all know, a website is never finished. As we move into the next phase of website enhancements, we will turn our attention to developing an extranet to facilitate the operational aspects of administering Society activities, including more online tools for SPE groups (document storage, newsletter forms and templates, friendlier access to data downloads, etc.). We look forward to bringing you these additional features in the near future. Fall 2008 Page 32 SPE Injection Molding Division SPE & Plastics Industry Event Calendar November 2008 Blow Molding - Concept to Customer November 17–18, 2008; Toronto, Ontario Canada Plastic Parts Failure Analysis and Product Liability November 5–6, 2008; Charlotte, North Carolina USA Die Design Principles for Extrusion of Polymers November 5–6, 2008; Charlotte, North Carolina USA Fundamentals of Plastic Materials & Processes November 19, 2008; Toronto, Ontario Canada Scientific Processing for Injection Molding November 19, 2008; Toronto, Ontario Canada Mold Design & Mold Building Fundamentals November 5–6, 2008; Detroit, Michigan USA December 2008 Injection Molding: Advanced Concepts & Analyses November 5–7, 2008; Charlotte, North Carolina USA Euromold Exhibition December 3–6, 2008; Frankfurt, Germany Snap-Fits, Press-Fits & Welding of Plastics November 7, 2008; Detroit, Michigan USA Modern Toolmaking Conference December 4, 2008; Frankfurt, Germany Highlights of Thermoplastic Formulation & Compounding November 10, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA February 2009 Expo Plasticos 2009 February 3–5, 2009; Cintermex, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico Blown Film Technology & Troubleshooting November 10, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA Crystallization & Mechanical Behavior of Polymers November 10–11, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA Twin-Screw Extrusion Technology November 10–11, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA SPE 2008 New Technology Symposium November 11–12, 2008; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA SPE International Polyolefins Conference 2009 February 22–25, 2009; Houston, Texas USA GPEC® 2009 February 25–27, 2009; Orlando, Florida USA March 2009 SPE Polymer Nanocomposites Conference March 2–4, 2009; Bethlehem, Pennsylvania USA Practical Applications for Melt Rheology in Polymer Processing November 11–12, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA SPE Thermoset Conference March 4–5, 2009; New Orleans, Louisiana USA Purchasing & Quoting of Plastics Parts November 12–13, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA The Failure Analysis & Prevention SIG’s Virtual Conf. March 5–6, 2009; On-line via SPE E-Learning Thermoplastic Elastomers November 13, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA SPE 30th Industrial Thermoforming Symposium & Workshop March 8–13, 2009; Dallas, Texas USA Profile Extrusion Design and Advanced Processing November 13–14, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA Fundamentals of Patent Law for Plastics Professionals November 14, 2008; College Park, Georgia USA 6th European Additives & Colors Conference March 11–12, 2009; Antwerp, Belgium Plast ‘09 March 24–28, 2009; Milan, Italy Principles of Polymer Blending & Alloying November 17, 2008; Toronto, Ontario Canada June 2009 Fundamentals of Extrusion November 17–18, 2008; Toronto, Ontario Canada ANTEC™ 2009 June 22–24, 2009; Chicago, Illinois USA http://www.4spe.org/conferences-and-events Fall 2008 Page 33 SPE Injection Molding Division SPE & Plastics Industry Event Calendar Webinars An SPE e-Live® Webinar is a simple and easy way to view a live presentation from the comfort of your home. You can also participate in an SPE webinar along with your colleagues in an office or conference room as well. All you need is a direct or dial-up Internet connection and a separate phone line to access the teleconference portion of the presentation. There will be a touchtone polling and question and answer period at the conclusion of the event. Presentations are recorded by the Society of Plastics Engineers for future distribution.Webinars are usually one hour in length (typically 11am to12pm EST). The cost is $99 ($150 for non-members). Understanding Bioplastics and Property Modification With Additives November 5, 2008 Failure Analysis of Plastic and Rubber Materials - Part 1 January 8, 2009 Statistical Process Control November 6, 2008 Failure Analysis of Plastic and Rubber Materials - Part 2 January 15, 2009 Developing International Standards With ASTM Committee D20 November 13, 2008 Failure Analysis of Plastic and Rubber Materials - Part 3 January 22, 2009 Film & Textile Insert Injection Moldings: Applications and Challenges November 19, 2008 Failure Analysis of Plastic and Rubber Materials - Part 4 January 29, 2009 Engineering Design with Polymers and Composites - Part 1 December 3, 2008 Closed-Loop Process-Control Systems for Injection Molding Based Upon Melt-Front Detection February 4, 2009 Engineering Design with Polymers and Composites - Part 2 December 4, 2008 Container Molding: Never-Ending Challenges February 11, 2009 Simulation-Driven Product Design in Plastic Packaging February 19, 2009 Utilizing FTIR, DSC, TGA and Ash to Identify Polymer Types December 10, 2008 Tutorial on Carbon and Environmental Footprint of Bioplastics Using Biocarbon Content and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) December 11, 2008 Basic Rubber Technology December 17, 2008 Plastics Recycling: Processes, Opportunities, and Issues December 18, 2008 The Failure Analysis & Prevention SIG’s Virtual Conference March 5–6, 2009 Fast-Scan DSC March 11, 2009 Closed Loop Control in Laser Welding of Plastic Components March 25, 2009 DMA - An Introduction and Overview April 15, 2009 http://www.4spe.org/conferences-and-events/webinars Fall 2008 Page 34 SPE Injection Molding Division Board of Director Meeting Minutes Board of Director’s Meeting - October 20, 2008 - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Chairman: Chair-Elect: Councilor: Technical Dir: Treasurer: Secretary: Tom Turng Dave Karpinski Jack Dispenza Peter Grelle Jim Wenskus / Dave Karpinski Walt Smith Chairman, Tom Turng: · Meeting called to order at 1:00 pm Central time. · Roll call taken. Milwaukee MiniTec, Jack Hill: Discussed Milwaukee MiniTec details. SPE Presentation, Tricia McKnight: · Talked about recent SPE activities, financial situation and present assets of SPE, new website, ANTEC 2009, EUROTEC Papers, and other SPE plans for 2009. Secretary, Walter Smith: · Review minutes of May 4, 2008 meeting. Motion to accept May 4th minutes made by Jack Dispenza and seconded by Dave Karpinski. Motion passed by Board. · Board roster was circulated for updates and approvals. Financial Report, Jim Wenskus/Dave Karpinski: July 1, 2008 – September 30, 2008 · The IMD SPE rebate was $4,468.96. · Newsletter sponsorships payments were $1310.00. · Interest and dividends were $129.02 for a total of $42,216.61 of available funds. · Expenses were $531.51 for an ending balance of $41,685.10. Financial Audit, Larry Cosma/Walt Smith: Skipped. (This information is in the IMD bylaws). Councilor Report, Jack Dispenza: The SPE Councilor Committee meeting took place on Saturday, October 18, 2008. · Color and Appearance and CAD are the two divisions returning their rebate to SPE. · Talk about giving our SPE rebate back to SPE in the winter meeting in Orlando? · Action item: Jack to submit complete Councilor’s report to the IMD Board. Fall 2008 Page 35 Chair Elect Report, Pinnacle Award, Dave Karpinski: · There will be no newsletter awards given anymore. · The 2008–2009 Section/Goals & Plans must be submitted by November 15th. · Council and Sections/Divisions Committee Meetings: Jack Dispenza to verify attendance to 2007–2008 Council and Sections/Divisions Committee meetings. · Membership: Nick Fountas to verify if the IMD is in compliance. Prospective members information to be sent to SPE. · Technical Programming: Collect information on recent Topcon activities with non-SPE organizations. · Communication: IMD to improve SPE headquarters database accuracy. IMD Board Members to verify evidence of compliance. · Membership: Develop and implement at least one new service that offers member value. IMB Board members to verify evidence of compliance. Technical Director, Peter Grelle: Technical Programs Update · ANTEC 2009 paper review, December 13th, Brad Johnson, Pete Grelle, Dave Karpinski, and Jan Stevens at the Florida Mall Hotel in Orlando, Florida. 104 Abstracts submitted. Papers due November 14, 2008. The Matrix meeting is scheduled for December 15, 2008. · Penn State Erie Conference, Brad Johnson: June 10–12, 2008, 100 attendees. · Milwaukee IM MiniTec, Tom Turng: 60 attendees. · Coming TopCon and MiniTech scheduling discussed. · Molding 2009 & SAMTMP 2008 sponsorship discussed. · Drawing for attending Molding 2009: two IMD board members or guests will win this drawing. John Ratzliff (Our IMD SPE liaison): Seeking IMD members to speak at trade shows in China on various technical topics. Fellows & HSM Committee, Larry Schmidt: Larry requested candidate names for HSM and SPE Injection Molding Division BOD Minutes - Cont Fellow from existing board members. Nomination forms for the following two IMD Board members have been completed and forwarded to SPE headquarters: · Robert A. Beard – Honored Service Member · Shia-Chung Chen – Fellow BOD Terms & IMD History, Larry Schmidt: · Action Item: Existing Board members to send Larry an e-mail stating your dates of service on the IMD Board. Larry also needs best paper award history. · Action Item: Walt Smith to send Larry another disc containing IMD Board history and IMD information. European Update, Jan Stevens: No update given at this time. Membership Report, Nick Fountas: · Below are the SPE/IMD membership numbers as of May 2008: – 4,932 IMD members, both primary and secondary; down 6.2% from year prior. – 18,501 SPE primary members; down 5.9% from year prior. · A new IMD brochure has been developed to recruit new members to the IMD and will be distributed at ANTEC, Topcons, MiniTecs, and third party conferences. · Action Item: Nick to submit updated Membership report to the IMD Board. Communications Committee Report, Lee Filbert/Chris Lacey: · Chris went over sponsors to the IMD newsletter, both new and lapsed sponsors. · Need more sponsors for the newsletter. · Action item: Walt Smith needs to get Fall IMD Board meeting minutes to Chris Lacey by Monday 10/27/08 for inclusion in the Fall/ Winter newsletter. · It was suggested that the IMD Board offer a 10% discount upon IMD sponsorship renewal for the newsletter. Website Committee, Lee Filbert: · Lee put forth pricing proposals for the website construction. Three website development bids were shown, including Fall 2008 · Nelix ($5250), Scott Watson ($3800), and Acera Technologies ($999). Raymond Mckee, Nick Fountas, and Pat Gorton will serve on website committee with Lee. Discussion about Education Committee and Chair Candidate, Tom Turng: · Pat Gorton will serve as committee chair for the Education Committee. · Susan Montgomery will serve on this committee. Nominations Committee, Don Allen: · Don Allen will be working with Tom Turng and Larry Schmidt on the dates of service for board members. Student Activities, Walt Smith: · Action Item: Tom Turng to contact Leslie Kiel concerning rooms for IMD board meeting and Student Reception room at ANTEC 2009. · IMD will sponsor the Injection Molding Reception at ANTEC 2009 for $7500. · IMD will contribute $1000 to the Student Author Travel Fund. · IMD will sponsor an annual $3000 scholarship to a graduate or undergraduate student. New Business, Tom Turng: · New IMD Board members: Tom Turng appointed three new members to the IMD Board for the remainder of the term effective October 20, 2008, up to ANTEC 2009. · The new IMD Board members are Susan E. Montgomery, Erik Foltz, and Adam Kramschuster. · Action Item: Tom to talk to Mal Murthy about being an emeritus member to the IMD Board. Old Business, All IMD Members: · Next IMD Board meeting will be on either January 23, 2009, or February 6, 2009, in Orlando, Florida. · Tom went over action items from May 4, 2008 board meeting. · Mike Uhrain can not be TPC in 2011 because of prior commitments in Germany. The board needs to find another volunteer for the 2011 TPC. · Eric Foltz volunteered to help Nick Fountas on the Membership Committee. · Motion by Pete Grelle at 5:01 PM Central time to adjourn meeting. Motion passed by board members. Page 36 SPE Injection Molding Division New Members The IMD welcomes 73 new members from around the world. Nicolae Abrudean David Job Mark Vliem Steven Lubowinski Tony Acuna Renita J. Anderson Mark G. Kurtzweg Al W. Leidinger Ralph Whitney Clifton C. Willis Robert M. Maier Alex Mayes David Arencon Andrei Belooussov Greg Letendre Ed Mackessy William Chi Wai Wong John L. Anderson Mason Myers Andreas Nuess Morton D Bohn IV Dave Brimble David W. Magnuson Adrian Mines David A Baglia Caprice Black Richard Oles Steve Parker Wayne T. Comeau Rosendo Cordova Ken Nelson Al Norton Yann Cally Cary D Colton Florian Petzold Julio Rivera Mike Ervin Bill Patton John Correia Steve Cowen Tom Scheck Andreas Schreiber Board of JimDirectors Fleming Jr. Meeting MinAnil Pitta John Gaidos Ruben Gonzalez-Nunez, Jack Pollitt Andre Preissler Sr. Ed Grabowski Dustin Hahn Larry Sletten Mark W. Snyder Ph.D. Keith Hague Margaret Reeber Won-gil Gil Ryim Len Harvey Sebastian Hessner Kevin Stoneman Corey Tracey Jeff Hammond Raleigh J. Harness Dave W. Smith Mark Smith Alan Hickok Fritz Klaiber Richard Vaughan Mike Vaughn Mickael Havel Mark Hawkins Peter Thorpe Robert W. Tymcio Jeffrey P. LeFan Alexander Willer The IMD also welcomes 56 companies and organizations that have recently expanded their membership in the Injection Molding Division. A.C Dispensing Equipment Inc. ACT Fastening Solutions Greene, Tweed & Co. Heubach GmbH Qingdao Blue Ocean New High Tech Co. Ltd. Arkema Inc. Armstrong Mold Corp. HydroHoist Marine Group IKV RWTH Aachen Reckitt Benckiser Rowa Group USA BD Biosciences Beaumont Technologies Imerys Performance Minerals N.A. Imtech Design Moldflow SafetySyringes Inc. SIGMA Plastic Services Inc. Brett Martin Ltd. Centre Catala Del Plastic Simulation Infiltrator Systems Inc. Sinostar Ltd. Square D Co. CINCH Compressor Products International Institute of Plastics Processing CIKV Tacony Manufacturing Tec Products Inc. Covidien Dickten Masch Plastics LLC Lewis Pipe Co. Inc LyondellBasell Industries Tri-Craft Inc. U. Auckland Douglas Corp. EcoWater Systems LLC M Vliem & Associates LLC Mabe Universidad De Guadalajara Vanguard Search Group Elster Amco Water EM Lyon Moldion Natech Plastics Inc Vision Plastics Inc. Wilsonart International Engplasticos Eurotherm Inc. Piper’s Croft Plasti-Co Equipment Co. Wittmann Inc. Worldwide Dispensers FiSA North America, Inc. GAF Material Inc. Progressive Components PSG Plastic Service Group Inc. Xaloy Inc. Fall 2008 Page 37 SPE Injection Molding Division Membership Application Fall 2008 Page 38 SPE Injection Molding Division Sponsors Publisher BEAUMONT (www.BeaumontInc.com) 12 D-M-E (www.DME.net) 10 DEALEY’S MOLD ENGINEERING (www.DealeyME.com) 5 INCOE (www.Incoe.com) 7 PRIAMUS (www.Priamus.com) 4 PROCESS & DESIGN 6 TECHNOLOGIES (www.ProcessDesignTech.com) XALOY (www.Xaloy.com 9 Dear Readers, I hope you’ve enjoyed the fall edition of the SPE IMD newsletter. This issue has a “Featured Technology” column. Would you like to showcase one of your technologies or let others know about a technology that has made a difference in Chris Lacey your life? If so, please send me Newsletter Publisher an email for consideration in our 1513 University Ave. Madison, WI 53523 next issue. The success of the Ask the T: 608-263-5963 F: 608-265-2316 Expert columns continues to lacey@engr.wisc.edu grow with the addition of John Ralston of Beaumont Technologies, here to answer your CAE questions. Do you have an idea for making this newletter even better? Then what are you waiting for? Please email me with your suggestions. Last but not least, we invite you to take advantage of our sponsorship opportunities. It’s a great way to reach over 5000 individuals in the injection molding industry! Don’t have an ad? With your images and text, I can help design one for you (see the Dealey’s Mold Engineering and Priamus ads as examples). Sponsorship details can be found on page 26. http://www.4spe.org/conferences/antec-2009 http://www.npe.org/ http://www.plasticsindustry.org/ Fall 2008 Page 39 SPE Injection Molding Division