COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCES (COMNAVAIRFOR

Transcription

COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCES
(COMNAVAIRFOR)
AIRCRAFT CARRIER
TRAINING READINESS MANUAL
(CVN TRAMAN) COMNAVAIRFORINST
3500.20D
CH 3
UPDATE ONE
COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20D CH 3
30 Jun 14
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMANDER NAVAL AIR FORCES BOX
357051
SAN DIEGO,CA LIFORNIA 921357051
COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20D
N7
JUN 2 9 2012
From:
Commander, Naval Air Forces
Subj:
AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL
Ref:
(a) OPNAVINST 3000.15, Fleet Response Plan
(b) COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 3501.3 Series, US Fleet Forces
Command Fleet Training Continuum
(c) NRTP 1-03.5 (Defense Readiness Reporting System-Navy
Reporting Manual
1. Purpose. This is a joint Commander, Naval Air Force,
Pacific (COMNAVAIRPAC)/Commander, Naval Air Force, Atlantic
(COMNAVAIRLANT) instruction. To promulgate revised Aircraft
Carrier Training and Readiness Manual (CV TRAMAN) to be used by
all aircraft carriers, staffs and units of Naval Air Force,
Pacific and Atlantic Fleets in support of references (a) through
(c)
2.
Cancellation.
COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20C
3. Overview. This instruction underwent extensive revision due
to rapidly evolving readiness reporting processes and a number
of newly-introduced inspections, certifications and directives.
Fleet inputs provided a fleet-authored context to deliver a more
user-friendly document addressing training and readiness across
all Personnel, Equipment, Supply, Training and Ordnance (PESTO)
pillars.
4. Background. The CV TRAMAN complements the United States
Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) Fleet Training Continuum
instruction (FTC) and Commander, U.S. SEVENETH Fleet (C7F)
Training Plan by providing CVN-specific readiness standards and
training requirements. It serves as a guide for conducting
ship-wide, departmental and team training during the Fleet
Response Training Plan (FRTP) while setting standards for
measuring readiness against the CVN Navy Mission Essential Task
List (NMETL). The CV TRAMAN ultimately provides Combatant
Commanders with trained CVN crews capable of sustained combat
operations as part of the larger Carrier Strike Group (CSG).
30 Jun 14
JUN 2 9 2012
5.
Discussion.
Incorporated updates and revisions:
a. Aligns and standardizes Training Pillar readiness
reporting with NMETL, Carrier Sierra Hotel Aviation Readiness
Program (CV SHARP) and Defense Readiness Reporting System - Navy
(DRRS-N) methodology.
b. Introduces the Unit Level Training Assessment Sustainment (ULTRA-S) event for both Continental United States
(CONUS) and Forward Deployed Naval Forces (FDNF) CVNs.
c. Creates a 36-month FDNF training cycle (vice current 24)
utilizing periodicity-driven training to accomplish CONUSequivalent training while supporting C7F requirements.
d. Implements the Training and Assessment Cards (TAC)
program as a replacement to the Fleet Exercise Program (FXP)
They encourage training to objective conditions and standards.
e. Updates Battle E and Departmental E competition rules
and requirements.
f. Consolidates all training and pertinent inspection,
certification and assessment requirements in two appendices
(CONUS and FDNF) that provide, by FRTP phase, a single source
matrix for all training-related requirements.
g. Due to the mid-year release of this document, CV TRAMAN
REV C applies for Battle E and Departmental E award competition.
In all other areas, REV D applicability applies immediately.
For commands adversely impacted by REV D in the near term,
CNAP/L N7 will address mitigations on a case-by-case basis.
6. Change Recommendations. Recommendations for changes to this
instruction are encouraged. Recommendations shall be submitted
to Commander Naval Air Force Pacific or Atlantic via the chain
of command as specified within this instruction.
Chief of Staff
Distribution:
SharePoint
2
30 Jun 14
RTTUZYUW RUCOSSA0603 1811934-UUUU--RHMCSUU.
ZNR UUUUU
R 291934Z JUN 12 ZYB
FM COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA
TO ALCARFOR
COMAFLOATRAGRU ATLANTIC NORFOLK VA
COMAFLOATRAGRUPAC SAN DIEGO CA
INFO COMUSFLTFORCOM NORFOLK VA
COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
COMFOURTHFLT
COMFIFTHFLT
COMSIXTHFLT
COMSEVENTHFLT
COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA
COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK VA
BT
UNCLAS //N03500//
SECINFO/U/USA/USA//
MSGID/GENADMIN,USMTF,2009/COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA/0603/JUN//
SUBJ/AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL (CV TRAMAN)
/REVISION D RELEASE//
REF/A/MSGID:GENADMIN/COMNAVAIRFOR/261534ZAUG2011//
REF/B/DESC:DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/YMD:20100209//
NARR/REF A IS COMNAVAIRFOR JOINT CNAP-CNAL ANNOUNCING ANNUAL
REVIEW OF AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL.
REF B IS COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20C AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING AND
READINESS MANUAL.// POC/BOB WARREN/CIV/UNIT:COMNAVAIRPAC N70A//TEL:619-545-1543 /TEL:DSN 735-1543/EMAIL:BOB.WARREN@NAVY.MIL//
GENTEXT/REMARKS/1.THIS IS A COORDINATED COMNAVAIRLANT
COMNAVAIRPAC MESSAGE.
2. OVERVIEW. THE NEW COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20D, CVN TRAINING
MANUAL (CV TRAMAN), HAS BEEN SIGNED FOLLOWING AN EXTENSIVE YEARLONG REVISION DUE TO RAPIDLY EVOLVING READINESS REPORTING
PROCESSES AND A NUMBER OF NEWLY-INTRODUCED INSPECTIONS,
CERTIFICATIONS AND DIRECTIVES. FLEET INPUTS PROVIDED A FLEETAUTHORED CONTEXT TO DELIVER A MORE USER FRIENDLY DOCUMENT
ADDRESSING TRAINING AND READINESS ACROSS ALL PESTO PILLARS.
3. BACKGROUND. THE CV TRAMAN COMPLEMENTS THE USFF FLEET
TRAINING CONTINUUM (FTC) AND C7F TRAINING PLAN BY PROVIDING CVNSPECIFIC READINESS STANDARDS AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS. IT
SERVES AS A GUIDE FOR CONDUCTING SHIPWIDE, DEPARTMENTAL AND TEAM
TRAINING DURING THE FLEET RESPONSE TRAINING PLAN (FRTP) WHILE
SETTING STANDARDS FOR MEASURING READINESS AGAINST THE CVN NAVY
MISSION ESSENTIAL TASK LIST (NMETL). THE CV TRAMAN ULTIMATELY
PROVIDES COMBATANT COMMANDERS WITH TRAINED CVN CREWS CAPABLE OF
SUSTAINED COMBAT OPERATIONS AS PART OF THE LARGER CSG.
4. DUE TO RELEASE MID CY12, REF B (REVISION C) WILL APPLY FOR
THE CY12 BATTLE E AND DEPARTMENTAL AWARDS PROGRAM WHILE REVISION
D WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY FOR ALL OTHER AREAS. FOR
THOSE CVNS POSSIBLY DISADVANTAGED BY REV D IMPLEMENTATION IN THE
NEAR TERM, CNAP/L N7 WILL COORDINATE MITIGATION MEASURES ON A
CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
5.
OVERVIEW OF REVISION D:
3
30 Jun 14
A. ALIGNS AND STANDARDIZES TRAINING PILLAR READINESS
REPORTING WITH NMETL, CV SHARP AND DRRS-N METHODOLOGIES.
B. INTRODUCES THE UNIT LEVEL TRAINING ASSESSMENTSUSTAINMENT
(ULTRA-S) EVENT FOR BOTH CONUS AND FDNF CVNS.
C. CREATES A 36-MONTH FDNF TRAINING CYCLE (VICE CURRENT 24)
UTILIZING PERIODICITY DRIVEN TRAINING WHILE SUPPORTING C7F
REQUIREMENTS.
D. IMPLEMENTS THE TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT CARD (TAC)
PROGRAM AS A REPLACEMENT TO THE FLEET EXERCISE PUBLICATIONS
(FXP).
E. UPDATES BATTLE E AND DEPARTMENTAL E COMPETITION RULES
AND REQUIREMENTS.
F. CONSOLIDATES ALL TRAINING AND PERTINENT INSPECTION,
CERTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS IN TWO APPENDICES
(CONUS AND FDNF) THAT PROVIDE A SINGLE SOURCE MATRIX FOR ALL
TRAINING-RELATED REQUIREMENTS BY FRTP PHASE.
6. THE INITIAL RELEASE DOCUMENT, ALONG WITH ASSOCIATED SUPPORT
MATERIALS, CAN BE ACCESSED VIA THE CNAP/L N7 NIPR SHAREPOINT
UNDER CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS:
HTTPS: SLASH SLASH
WWW.PORTAL.NAVY.MIL/COMNAVAIRFOR/N7/FLT_TRAMAN//
BT
#0603
NNNN
4
30 Jun 14
ZNR UUUUU
R 311934Z OCT 12 ZYB
TO ALCARFOR
COMFOURTHFLT
COMFIFTHFLT
COMSIXTHFLT
COMSEVENTHFLT
BT
UNCLAS //N03500//
PASS TO INFO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N7// COMNAVAIRLANT
NORFOLK VA//N7// SECINFO/U/USA/USA//
MSGID/GENADMIN,USMTF,2009/COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA/1002/OCT//
SUBJ/AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING READINESS MANUAL (CVN TRAMAN)
/REVISION D CHANGE ONE//
REF/A/DESC:DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/YMD:20120629//
AMPN/REF A IS COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20D AIRCRAFT CARRIER
TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL.// POC/BOB
WARREN/CIV/UNIT:COMNAVAIRPAC N70A/-/TEL:619-545-1543 /TEL:DSN
735-1543/EMAIL:BOB.WARREN@NAVY.MIL//
GENTEXT/REMARKS/1. THIS IS A COORDINATED COMNAVAIRLANT/
COMNAVAIRPAC MESSAGE.
2. OVERVIEW. AFTER FOUR MONTHS OF FLEET REVIEW AND ANALYSIS,
CHANGE 1 TO REF A CORRECTS ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS AND PROVIDES
ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION TO POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED
IN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. CHANGES ARE IDENTIFIED THROUGHOUT THE
REVISED DOCUMENT BY CHANGE BARS AT THE OUTSIDE MARGINS.
3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 31 OCT 12.
4. SUMMARY OF CHANGES:
A. GENERAL. CORRECTED ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS THROUGHOUT
B. CHAPTER 3, SECTION 2, SUB-SECTION 3200, PARAGRAPH 3.
CHANGED FIRST SENTENCE TO READ: "DOCK TRIALS, FAST CRUISE AND
CREW CERTIFICATION PROVIDE THE MEANS TO VERIFY THE CREW IS
PREPARED TO TAKE THE SHIP TO SEA."
C. CHAPTER 3, FIGURE 3-4.
(1) MODIFIED REQUIREMENTS FOR OOD RULES OF THE ROAD
EXAM.
(2) ADDED CRYPTOLOGICAL LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE EXAM
D. CHAPTER 3, FIGURE 3-5.
(1) CHANGED MINIMUM PASSING SCORE FOR RULES OF THE ROAD
(ROR) EXAM.
(2) UPDATED NOTE 3 TO REFLECT CHANGE IN REQUIREMENTS.
E. CHAPTER 3, SUB-SECTION 3304, PARAGRAPHS 7.A. THROUGH
7.H.
REPLACED COMNAVAIRFOR WITH COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT.
F. CHAPTER 3, SUB-SECTION 3306, PARAGRAPH 3. DELETED.
G. CHAPTER 3, SECTION 7, SUB-SECTION 3700, PARAGRAPH 1.
5
30 Jun 14
CHANGED FIRST SENTENCE TO READ: "THE CSDL IS A SPREADSHEET USED
TO TRACK DISCREPANCIES THROUGHOUT THE FRTP."
H. CHAPTER 4, SUB-SECTION 4807, PARAGRAPH 3. CHANGED LAST
SENTENCE TO READ: "THESE SPECIFICS WILL BE COVERED BY THE ATG
SHIPBOARD TRAINING TEAM (SBTT) COURSE OF INSTRUCTION, WHICH
SHOULD BE CONDUCTED ONE TO TWO MONTHS PRIOR TO CART II."
I. CHAPTER 6, SECTION 10, SUB-SECTION 61002, PARAGRAPH 3.
CLARIFIED ULM-4 DISQUALIFICATION BUSINESS RULES.
J. CHAPTER 7, SECTION 1, SUB-SECTION 7101, PARAGRAPH
1.A.(3) TO READ: "DEPARTMENTAL AWARDS (EMPHASIZING IMPROVEMENTS
FROM PREVIOUS YEAR)."
K. CHAPTER 7, SECTION 2, SUB-SECTION 7203, PARA 3.AA.
CHANGED TO READ: "NAVIGATION AND PILOTING, INCLUDING COMPLETING
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR THESE EVOLUTIONS."
L. APPENDIX I AND II. UPDATED SUB-EVENTS PREVIOUSLY MARKED
AS "XXXX" TO 2000-SERIES NUMBERING.
5. ALTHOUGH NOT PART OF REF A, TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT CARDS
(TACS) ASSOCIATED WITH TRAINING EVENTS SPECIFIED IN APPENDICES I
AND II HAVE ALSO BEEN REVISED. VERSION 2.0 OF ALL TACS ARE
EFFECTIVE CONCURRENTLY WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGE 1.
6. A PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) OF THE FULLY REVISED
INSTRUCTION AND UPDATED VERSIONS OF ALL TACS (ANNOTATED AS
SHAREPOINT VERSION 2.0) CAN BE ACCESSED VIA THE CNAP/L N7 NIPR
SHAREPOINT SITE FOR CARRIER TRAINING READINESS AT:
HTTPS: SLASH SLASH
WWW.PORTAL.NAVY.MIL/COMNAVAIRFOR/N7/FLT_TRAMAN//
BT
#1002
NNNN
6
30 Jun 14
ZNR UUUUU
R 261934Z JUN 13
TO ALCARFOR
COMTHIRDFLT
COMFOURTHFLT
COMFIFTHFLT
COMSIXTHFLT
COMSEVENTHFLT
BT
UNCLAS
PASS TO INFO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N7// COMNAVAIRLANT
NORFOLK VA//N7// MSGID/GENADMIN/COMNAVAIRPAC// SUBJ/AIRCRAFT
CARRIER TRAINING READINESS MANUAL (CVN TRAMAN) REVISION D CHANGE
TWO// REF/A/DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/YMD:20120629//
REF/B/MSGID:GENADMIN/281934ZMAR2013
NARR/ REF A IS COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20D AIRCRAFT CARRIER
TRAINING READINESS MANUAL. REF B IS CV SHARP AND CVN TRAMAN
ALIGNMENT MESSAGE. REF A IS COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20D AIRCRAFT
CARRIER TRAINING READINESS MANUAL.// POC/BOB
WARREN/CIV/COMNAVAIRPAC N70/LOC: SAN DIEGO/TEL: 619-545- 1543//
RMKS/1. THIS IS A COORDINATED COMNAVAIRPAC/COMNAVAIRLANT
MESSAGE.
2. FOLLOWING EXTENSIVE TYCOM REVIEW AND VALUABLE FLEET
FEEDBACK, CHANGE TWO TO REF A UPDATES THE CONUS AND FDNF CVN
TRAINING AND READINESS MATRICES, UNIT LEVEL TRAINING POLICIES,
AND FAST CRUISE REQUIREMENTS.
3. GUIDANCE CONCERNING CY13 BATTLE E CALCULATIONS PROMULGATED
IN REF B REMAIN IN EFFECT.
4. EFFECTIVE DATE: UPON RECEIPT.
5. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THE REVISED INSTRUCTION IN PORTABLE
DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) WITH ALL CHANGES INCORPORATED AND A
SUMMARY OF CHANGES INCLUDED CAN BE ACCESSED VIA THE CNAP/L N7
NIPR SHAREPOINT SITE. ADDITIONALLY, ALL TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT
CARDS (TACS) HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO ALIGN WITH THE REVISED
TRAINING AND READINESS MATRICES.
6. THESE FILES ARE LOCATED AT:
HTTPS: SLASH SLASH
WWW.PORTAL.NAVY.MIL/COMNAVAIRFOR/N7/FLT_TRAMAN.
BT
#0001
NNNN
7
30 Jun 14
8
30 Jun 14
R 191934Z MAR 13 ZYB
FM COMNAVAIRFOR SAN DIEGO CA
TO ALCARFOR
INFO COMCARSTRKGRU ONE
COMCARSTRKGRU TWO
COMCARSTRKGRU THREE
COMCARSTRKGRU FIVE
COMCARSTRKGRU SEVEN
COMCARSTRKGRU EIGHT
COMCARSTRKGRU NINE
COMCARSTRKGRU TEN
COMCARSTRKGRU ELEVEN
COMCARSTRKGRU TWELVE
COMSTRKFORTRAPAC
COMSTRKFORTRALANT
AFLOATRAGRUMIDPAC PEARL HARBOR HI
AFLOATRAGRUPACNORWEST EVERETT WA
AFLOATRAGRUWESTPAC YOKOSUKA JA
BT
UNCLAS //N01650//
PASS TO
INFO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N7//
COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK VA//N7//
SECINFO/U/USA/USA//
MSGID/GENADMIN,USMTF,2009/COMNAVAIRFOR SAN DIEGO CA/0302/ MAR//
SUBJ/GUIDANCE FOR CY13 AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEPARTMENTAL BATTLE
/EFFICIENCY (BATTLE E) CALCULATIONS//
REF/A/DESC:DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/YMD:20120606//
AMPN/REF A IS COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.20 D AIRCRAFT CARRIER
TRAINING READINESS MANUAL CHANGE 1.//
POC/CVN TRNG OPS/SAN DIEGO CA/UNIT:COMNAVAIRPAC N70A /NAME:BOB
WARREN/TEL:619-545-1543/TEL:DSN 735-1543
/EMAIL:BOB.WARREN@NAVY.MIL//
GENTEXT/REMARKS/1.THIS IS A COORDINATED COMNAVAIRPAC/
COMNAVAIRLANT MESSAGE.
2. THIS MESSAGE PROVIDES GUIDANCE FOR CY13 AIRCRAFT CARRIER
DEPARTMENTAL BATTLE E CALCULATIONS. EFFECTIVE DATE: UPON
RECEIPT.
3. SUMMARY OF CHANGES:
A. THIS CY13 COMPETITION GUIDANCE PROVIDES AN INCREMENTAL
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN DUE TO CURRENT DATA COLLECTION LIMITATIONS
IN CV-SHARP. THE LONG TERM GOAL IS CAPTURING EXPERIENCE AND
PERFORMANCE IN DAY-TO-DAY TRAINING TO MEASURE RESPECTIVE
DEPARTMENTAL READINESS VICE COMPLETING STAND-ALONE COMPETITIVE
EXERCISES FOR CREDIT.
B. FOR DEPARTMENTAL AWARD CALCULATIONS THAT INCLUDE
TRAINING READINESS METRICS, SCORES WILL BE CALCULATED USING
PERFORMANCE SCORE AVERAGES FOR DESIGNATED TRAINING SUB-EVENTS.
THIS METHOD SUPERSEDES REF A GUIDANCE.
C. DESIGNATED DEPARTMENTAL SUB-EVENTS SHALL BE GRADED IAW
GUIDANCE PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 6, PAGE 6-5, SUB-SECTION 6103, PARA
3A-3D OF REF A.
9
30 Jun 14
D. INITIALLY, CY13 DEPARTMENTAL PERFORMANCE SCORES FOR
DESIGNATED COMPETITIVE SUB-EVENTS WILL BE POPULATED WITH
EQUIVALENT CY12 COMPETITIVE SCORES. CY12 ELIGIBLE CARRY-OVER
SCORES WILL BE FORWARDED BY CNAP/L N70 SEPCOR. CY12 EQUIVALENT
FXP SCORES CARRIED OVER MAY BE REASSESSED UNDER THE
CORRESPONDING TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT CARD (TAC) FORMAT. CY12
EVENTS EXPIRING IN CY13 MUST ALSO BE REASSESSED UNDER THE TAC
FORMAT OR A SCORE OF ZERO WILL BE ASSIGNED. VALID, CURRENT
PERFORMANCE SCORES ON
31 DECEMBER 2013 WILL BE THE BASIS FOR CALCULATIONS.
E. DESIGNATED DEPARTMENTAL SUB-EVENTS SHALL BE GRADED BY
AN EXTERNAL EVALUATOR (CSG STAFF, DESRON AND AIR WING ARE NOT
CONSIDERED EXTERNAL ENTITIES). IN THE EVENT THIS IS NOT
SUPPORTABLE, CVNS MAY REQUEST A TYCOM WAIVER VIA THE CSG STAFF
FOR AN ALTERNATE EVALUATOR.
F. FINAL DESIGNATED DEPARTMENTAL SUB-EVENT GRADES WILL BE
COMBINED WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTAL METRICS, E.G., INSPECTION,
CERTIFICATION, ASSESSMENTS, AND ASSIST VISIT (ICAV) SCORES AND
CALCULATED IAW RESPECTIVE BUSINESS RULES SPECIFIED IN REF A.
G. FOR EVENTS THAT CANNOT BE SCORED IN CY13 DUE TO
EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR OPERATIONAL NECESSITY, A WAIVER MAY
BE SUBMITTED IN FOURTH QUARTER, CY13 VIA THE STRIKE GROUP
COMMANDER.
H. COMPLETION OF DESIGNATED DEPARTMENTAL SUB-EVENT SCORES
SHALL BE DOCUMENTED VIA NAVAL MESSAGE AND SUBMITTED MONTHLY TO
CNAP/CNAL N70.
5. CY13 DESIGNATED SUB-EVENTS, MONTHLY SUB-EVENT REPORT AND
WAIVER MESSAGE TEMPLATES CAN BE ACCESSED VIA THE CNAP/L N7 NIPR
SHAREPOINT SITE FOR CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS AT:
WWW.PORTAL.NAVY.MIL/COMNAVAIRFOR/N7/FLTTRAMAN//
BT
#0302
NNNN
10
30 Jun 14
R 021934Z JUL 14
TO ALCARFOR
COMAFLOATRAGRULANT NORFOLK VA
COMAFLOATRAGRUWESTPAC YOKUSKA JA
COMTHIRDFLT
COMFOURTHFLT
COMFITHFLT
COMSIXTHFLT
COMSEVENTHFLT
BT
UNCLAS
PASS TO INFO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N7//
MSGID/GENADMIN/COMNAVAIRPAC//
REVISION D CHANGE THREE//
REF/A/DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/YMD:20130626//
REF/B/MSG/COMPACFLT/YMD:20140605//
REF/C/MSG/COMUSFLTFORCOM/YMD:20140411//
NARR/REF A IS AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL
REVISION D CHANGE TWO.
REF B IS JOINT COMPACFLT COMFLTFORCOM GUIDANCE FOR CONDUTING
CODE FOR UNPLANNED
ENCOUNTERS AT SEA (CUES) TRAINING AND REF C IS CHANGE ONE TO THE
FLEET TRAINING
CONTINUUM APPROVING REVISED DEPLOYMENT CERTIFICATION CONSTRUCT//
POC/BOB WARREN/CIV/COMNAVAIRPAC N701/LOC: SAN DIEGO/TEL: 619545-1543//
MESSAGE.
2. CHANGE THREE
A. CODIFIES CHANGES TO REF A PREVIOUSLY DISSEMINATED VIA
SEPCOR.
B. ADDS UNIT LEVEL TRAINING PROTECTIVE MEASURES ASSESSMENT
PROTOCAL GUIDANCE.
C. ADDS UNIT LEVEL TRAINING COLUMN TO CVN TRAINING AND
READINESS MATRIX.
D. ADDS CUES TRAINING REQUIREMENTS PER REF B.
E. CODIFIES FLEET CHANGE RECOMMENDATIONS TO CVN TRAINING
AND READINESS MATRIX.
F. ELIMINATES DEPLOYMENT CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE PER REF C.
3. EFFECTIVE DATE: UPON RECEIPT.
4. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THE REVISED INSTRUCTION IN PORTABLE
DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) WITH
ALL CHANGES INCORPORATED AND A SUMMARY OF CHANGES INCLUDED CAN
BE ACCESSED VIA THE
CNAP/L N7 NIPR SHAREPOINT SITE AT:HTTPS: SLASH SLASH
11
30 Jun 14
BT
NNNN
12
30 Jun 14
R 181934Z SEP 14
TO ALCARFOR
COMAFLOATRAGRULANT NORFOLK VA
COMAFLOATRAGRUWESTPAC YOKUSKA JA
COMTHIRDFLT
COMFOURTHFLT
COMFITHFLT
COMSIXTHFLT
COMSEVENTHFLT
BT
UNCLAS
PASS TO INFO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N7//
MSGID/GENADMIN/COMNAVAIRPAC//
REVISION D INTERIM CHANGE 3 UPDATE ONE//
REF/A/DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/YMD:20140630//
REF/B/MSG/COMNAVAIRPAC/YMD:20140614//
NARR/REF A IS AIRCRAFT CARRIER TRAINING AND READINESS MANUAL
REVISION D CHANGE THREE.
REF B IS COMNAVAIRPAC MESSAGE ANNOUNCING RELEASE OF REF A.//
POC/BOB WARREN/CIV/COMNAVAIRPAC N701/LOC: SAN DIEGO/TEL:
619-545-1543//
MESSAGE.
2. THE FOLLOWING CHANGES WERE OMITTED FROM REF A.
A. CHAPTER SIX, SECTION ONE, SUB-SECTION 6103, ADDS PARA 3D
PROVIDING BUSINESS RULES FOR RESCHEDULING BATTLE E SUB-EVENTS
FOR A
HIGHER SCORE.
B. CHAPTER SIX, SECTION FOUR, SUB-SECTION 6401, NOTE 3,
UPDATES
CYBER SECURITY WORKFORCE READINESS CALCULATIONS FOR GREEN CS
AWARD.
C. CHAPTER SIX, SECTION SEVEN, CHANGES RED E AWARD TITLE TO:
ENGINEERING AND REACTOR.
D. CHAPTER SIX, SECTION EIGHT, SUB-SECTION 6801 UPDATES
CALCULATIONS FOR BLUE M AWARD.
E. CVN TRAINING AND READINESS MATRIX, APPENDIX ONE AND TWO,
ADDS: AAW 2011 CIWS PHALANX LIVE FIRE TRAINING SUB-EVENT.
3. ALL CHANGES TO REF A REFLECTED IN THIS UPDATE APPLY FOR THE
CY 14
CVN BATTLE E COMPETITIVE CYCLE.
4. ALL CHANGES TO REF A REFLECTED IN THIS UPDATE CAN BE
ACCESSED VIA
THE CNAP/L N7 NIPR SHAREPOINT SITE AT:HTTPS: SLASH SLASH
BT
13
30 Jun 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROMULGATION LETTER
PROMULGATION MESSAGE FOR REVISION D
PROMULGATION MESSAGE FOR REVISION D CHANGE 1
PROMULGATION MESSAGE FOR CY 13 BATTLE E CALCULATIONS
PROMULGATION MESSAGE FOR REVISION D CHANGE 3 UPDATE ONE
TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................14
LIST OF FIGURES................................................30
SUMMARY OF CHANGES.............................................34
RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGE......................................38
RECORD OF CHANGES..............................................40
CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW
1100 INTRODUCTION...................................1-1
1101 RESPONSIBILITIES...............................1-1
1102 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES....................1-3
CHAPTER 2 TRAINING READINESS REPORTING
SECTION 1 CV-SHARP
2100 GENERAL OVERVIEW...............................2-1
2101 GUIDANCE.......................................2-1
2102 REFERENCE......................................2-1
2103 ACTION.........................................2-1
SECTION 2 DRRS-N
2200 GUIDANCE.......................................2-3
2201 REFERENCE......................................2-3
14
30 Jun 14
2202 ACTION.........................................2-3
2203 CVN MISSION ESSENTIAL TASK LIST (METL).........2-3
SECTION 3 RELATIONSHIP OF DRRS-N, CVN METL AND CVSHARP..........................................2-7
CHAPTER 3 TRAINING CYCLE
SECTION 1 FLEET RESPONSE TRAINING PLAN (FRTP)
3100 OVERVIEW.......................................3-1
3101 FRTP PHASES (CONUS-BASED)......................3-1
3102 FDNF TRAINING..................................3-1
3103 MAINTENANCE PHASE..............................3-5
3104 BASIC PHASE UNIT LEVEL TRAINING (ULT)..........3-5
3105 INTEGRATED PHASE TRAINING......................3-6
3106 SUSTAINMENT TRAINING AND DEPLOYMENT............3-7
SECTION 2 MAINTENANCE PHASE TRAINING
3200 TRAINING DURING MAINTENANCE PERIODS............3-9
3201 COMMAND ASSESSMENT OF READINESS AND
TRAINING I (CART I)............................3-9
3202 PREPARATION FOR THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD........3-10
SECTION 3 PREPARATION FOR BASIC UNIT LEVEL
TRAINING
3300 CREW PREP OVERVIEW............................3-13
3301 LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE (LOK) EXAMS................3-13
3302 POST-MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS (ALL FRTP
PHASES).......................................3-17
3303 SHIP BOARD TRAINING TEAM (SBTT)...............3-20
3304 CREW CERTIFICATION............................3-20
3305 FAST CRUISE...................................3-24
15
30 Jun 14
3306 SEA TRIALS....................................3-27
3307 SHAKEDOWN TRAINING............................3-27
SECTION 4 BASIC PHASE TRAINING
3400 GENERAL.......................................3-29
3401 TRAINING SUPPORT FOR FRTP EVENTS..............3-29
3402 FLIGHT DECK/CATCC CERTIFICATION PHASE
I, II AND III.................................3-30
TRAINING II (CART II).........................3-31
3404 TAILORED SHIP'S TRAINING AVAILABILITY
(TSTA)........................................3-32
3405 FINAL EVALUATION PROBLEM (FEP)................3-33
3406 BASIC PHASE COMPLETION GRADE..................3-37
SECTION 5 INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINMENT TRAINING
3500 INTEGRATED TRAINING EVENTS....................3-39
3501 SUSTAINMENT TRAINING EVENTS...................3-41
3502 UNIT LEVEL TRAINING ASSESSMENT – SUSTAINMENT
(ULTRA-S).....................................3-42
SECTION 6 OTHER TYPES OF TRAINING
3600 LIMITED TEAM TRAINING (LTT)...................3-44
3601 ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (AT/FP)
TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION....................3-45
3602 FLEET REPLACEMENT SQUADRON (FRS)
CARRIER QUALIFICATION (CQ)/ TRAINING
COMMAND (TRACOM) CQ...........................3-45
3603 SYNTHETIC TRAINING (FST AND NON-FST)..........3-45
3604 NAVIGATION TRAINING...........................3-47
3605 REACTOR DEPARTMENT TRAINING...................3-48
16
30 Jun 14
3606 MONTHLY IN PORT TRAINING EXERCISES
(MITE)................................................3-49
3607 CARRIER AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER
(CATCC) TEAM TRAINING.................................3-51
3608 PROTECTIVE MEASURES ASSESSMENT PROTOCAL
(PMAP)................................................3-51
SECTION 7 REPORTING
3700 CONSOLIDATED SHIP'S DISCREPANCY LOG
(CSDL)...............................................3-53
3701 CATEGORIES OF DISCREPANCIES DEFINED.............3-53
3702 END-OF-MISSION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS...........3-54
3703 ASSESSMENT OF THE FRTP..........................3-56
CHAPTER 4 SHIPBOARD TRAINING
SECTION 1 TRAINING PROGRAM OVERVIEW
4100 GENERAL..........................................4-1
4101 TRAINING GOALS...................................4-1
4102 ELEMENTS OF A TRAINING PROGRAM...................4-2
4103 SHIPBOARD TRAINING PROGRAM.......................4-2
4104 LONG RANGE TRAINING PLAN.........................4-3
4105 SHORT RANGE TRAINING PLAN........................4-6
4106 TRAINING RECORDS.................................4-7
4107 PLAN, SCHEDULE, AND RECORD TRAINING..............4-7
SECTION 2 INDIVIDUAL READINESS: FLTMPS SCHOOLS COMPLETION
REPORTING
4200 GUIDANCE.........................................4-9
4201 REPORTING SOURCE FOR SCHOOLS COMPLETION..........4-9
4202 REQUIRED SCHOOLS COMPLETION PERCENTAGE..........4-10
17
30 Jun 14
4203 USING LONG RANGE TRAINING PLAN AND WATCH TEAM
REPLACEMENT PLAN TO MANAGE INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
COMPLETION......................................4-10
SECTION 3 ALL HANDS TRAINING
4300 GENERAL.........................................4-11
4301 INDOCTRINATION DIVISION TRAINING................4-11
4302 DAMAGE CONTROL (DC) TRAINING....................4-12
4303 BASIC FIRST AID.................................4-16
4304 3M TRAINING.....................................4-17
4305 GENERAL MILITARY TRAINING.......................4-18
4306 SAFETY TRAINING.................................4-18
4307 ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING..........................4-20
4308 METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY TRAINING...........4-20
4309 ANTITERRORISM (AT) AWARENESS TRAINING...........4-21
4310 RADIOLOGICAL TRAINING...........................4-22
4311 OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT (ORM)...............4-22
4312 UNDERSEA WARFARE................................4-22
4313 ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) REQUIREMENTS............4-22
SECTION 4 DIVISIONAL TRAINING
SECTION 5 ONGOING/WATCHSTATION TRAINING
4500 ONGOING TRAINING................................4-25
4501 WATCH STATION TRAINING..........................4-26
SECTION 6 IN-RATE TRAINING
4600 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARDS (PQS).........4-29
4601 ADVANCEMENT TRAINING............................4-32
SECTION 7 NON-RESIDENT TRAINING COURSES
SECTION 8 SHIP’S TRAINING TEAMS
18
30 Jun 14
4800 GENERAL TRAINING TEAM PROCEDURES...............4-37
4801 INTEGRATED TRAINING TEAM (ITT).................4-38
4802 DAMAGE CONTROL TRAINING TEAM (DCTT)............4-43
4803 ENGINEERING TRAINING TEAM (ETT)................4-43
4804 COMBAT SYSTEMS TRAINING TEAM (CSTT)............4-44
4805 AIR DEPARTMENT TRAINING TEAM (ADTT)............4-44
4806 SEAMANSHIP/NAVIGATION TRAINING TEAM
(SNTT)..............................................4-44
4807 MEDICAL TRAINING TEAM (MTT)....................4-45
4808 FORCE PROTECTION TRAINING TEAM (FPTT)..........4-46
4809 PROPULSION PLANT DRILL TEAM (PPDT).............4-46
4810 WEAPONS TRAINING TEAM (WTT)....................4-47
CHAPTER 5 INSPECTIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED
FOR CERTIFICATION AS INDEPENDENT UNIT READY FOR
TASKING (IURFT)
SECTION 1 POLICY REGARDING ICAVS AND TRAINING
5100 ICAV DEFINITIONS AND GUIDANCE...................5-1
5101 LIST OF IURFT REQUIREMENTS......................5-2
SECTION 2 IURFT INSPECTIONS
5200 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (ALREMP) INSPECTION..............5-7
5201 CATAPULT ACCUMULATOR INSPECTION.................5-7
5202 DIESEL INSPECTION...............................5-7
5203 PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL POWER SURVEY
INSPECTION (PEPSI)...................................5-8
5204 ELECTRONIC KEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
(EKMS) INSPECTION....................................5-8
19
30 Jun 14
5205 SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION
(SCI) SECURITY MANAGEMENT INSPECTION.................5-9
5206 SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP) SECURITY
MANAGEMENT INSPECTION................................5-9
SECTION 3 IURFT CERTIFICATIONS
5300 CATAPULT CERTIFICATION..........................5-10
5301 ARRESTING GEAR CERTIFICATION....................5-10
5302 INTEGRATED LAUNCH AND RECOVERY TELEVISION
SURVEILLANCE (ILARTS) SYSTEM
CERTIFICATION.....................................5-10
5303 VISUAL LANDING AIDS (VLA) CERTIFICATION.........5-10
5304 IMPROVED FRESNEL LENS OPTICAL LANDING
SYSTEM (IFLOLS) CERTIFICATION........................5-10
5305 MANUALLY OPERATED VISUAL LANDING AIDS
(MOVLAS) CERTIFICATION...............................5-10
5306 LANDING SIGNALS OFFICER/HEADS UP
DISPLAY (LSO/HUD) CERTIFICATION......................5-10
5307 JET BLAST DEFLECTOR (JBD) CERTIFICATION.........5-10
5308 FLIGHT AND HANGAR DECK AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAM
(AFFF) SYSTEMS
CERTIFICATION.....................................5-10
5309 WIND MEASURING AND INDICATING SYSTEM
(WMIS) CERTIFICATION.................................5-11
5310 FLIGHT DECK/CARRIER AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
CENTER (CATCC) CERTIFICATION.........................5-11
5311 PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS
(PALS) CERTIFICATION.................................5-11
5312 TACTICAL AIR NAVIGATION (TACAN) SYSTEM
CERTIFICATION.....................................5-11
5313 SEARCH AND RESCUE (SAR) CERTIFICATION...........5-12
5314 EVOLVED/NATO SEA SPARROW MISSILE SYSTEM
(ESSMS/NSSMS) CERTIFICATION.......................5-12
20
30 Jun 14
5315 TDL OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION AND
CERTIFICATION........................................5-12
5316 METEOROLOGY & OCEANOGRAPHY (METOC)
CERTIFICATION........................................5-13
5317 NAVIGATION SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
(NAVCERT)............................................5-13
5318 AVIATION FUELS SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION............5-14
5319 ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION HAZARD
(RADHAZ) CERTIFICATION...............................5-14
5320 POINTING AND FIRING CUT-OUTS (P&FCO)
CERTIFICATION........................................5-14
5321 MAGAZINE SPRINKER SYSTEM (MSSC)
CERTIFICATION........................................5-14
5322 OIL POLLUTION ABATEMENT/OILY WATER
SEPARATOR CERTIFICATION..............................5-14
SECTION 4 IURFT ASSESSMENTS
5400 COMBAT SYSTEMS, COMMAND, CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS, AND COMPUTER READINESS
ASSESSMENT (C5RA)....................................5-16
5401 COMBAT SYSTEMS SHIP QUALIFICATION
TRIALS (CSSQT).......................................5-16
5402 RELIGIOUS MINISTRY TEAM (RMT)
ASSESSMENT...........................................5-16
5403 ISIC’S NAVIGATION ASSESSMENT....................5-16
5404 WEAPONS AND CARGO ELEVATOR ASSESSMENT...........5-17
5405 AIRCRAFT ELEVATOR (ACE) ASSESSMENT..............5-17
5406 VERTICAL PACKAGE CONVEYOR/DUMB WAITER
(VPC/DW) ASSESSMENT..................................5-17
5407 ANTI-TERRORISM (AT) ASSESSMENT..................5-17
5408 MINE READINESS ASSESSMENT.......................5-18
21
30 Jun 14
5409 CVN WEAPONS OPERATIONAL READINESS
ASSESSMENT (WORA)...................................5-18
5410 CVN WEAPONS MID-DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONAL
READINESS SELF-ASSESSMENT (MORSA)...................5-19
5411 TORPEDO READINESS ASSESSMENT/TECHNICAL
ASSIST VISIT (TRA/TAV)..............................5-20
SECTION 5 VISITS
5500 WEAPONS SAFETY ASSISTANCE TEAM (WSAT)
VISITS............................................5-22
5501 CONVENTIONAL ORDNANCE SAFETY REVIEW
(COSR) VISIT.........................................5-22
5502 CVN AIRCRAFT HANDLING TEAM (AHT)................5-23
5503 FORCE SAFETY/INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSIST..........5-24
5504 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOLLOW-ON SURVEYS............5-24
5505 SHIPBOARD SAFETY SURVEY.........................5-24
5506 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CONTROL AND
MANAGEMENT ASSIST....................................5-25
5507 3M ASSIST VISITS................................5-25
5508 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT ASSIST (SMA) VISIT............5-25
5509 CYBER SECURITY INSPECTION AND
CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (CSICP)........................5-26
5510 ENGINEERING ASSIST VISITS.......................5-27
5511 CVN ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE ASSIST TEAM
(CEMAT) VISITS.......................................5-27
5512 MAGAZINE SPRINKLER SYSTEM VERIFICATION..........5-29
5513 MOBILE ORDNANCE TRAINING TEAM (MOTT)
VISIT.............................................5-30
5514 AVIATION ORDNANCE READINESS REVIEW
(AORR) VISIT.........................................5-30
SECTION 6 AVAILABLE TRAINING
22
30 Jun 14
5600 GENERAL GUIDANCE...............................5-32
5601 3M TRAINING TEAM (3MTT) TRAINING...............5-32
5602 CV-TSC ASSIST TRAINING.........................5-32
5603 UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT.........................5-33
5604 ATLANTIC FLEET WEAPONS PACKAGING AND
UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT TRAINING.....................5-33
5605 ATLANTIC/PACIFIC FLEET MISSILE
SENTENCING INSPECTION TRAINING......................5-33
5606 NAVIGATION SEAMANSHIP AND SHIPHANDLING
TRAINER (NSST)......................................5-33
5607 ANTI-TERRORISM (AT) TRAINING...................5-35
CHAPTER 6 BATTLE EFFICIENCY “E” COMPETITION
SECTION 1 BATTLE “E” GUIDANCE
6100 GENERAL.........................................6-1
6101 POLICY..........................................6-1
6102 BATTLE “E” DISQUALIFIERS........................6-3
6103 AWARD COMPUTATION...............................6-3
6104 WEARING AND DISPLAY OF AWARDS...................6-6
6105 IMA SUPPORT....................................6-11
SECTION 2 AIR DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N43/N73)
6200 GENERAL........................................6-15
6201 AWARD COMPUTATION (YELLOW E) CVN...............6-15
6202 DISQUALIFICATION...............................6-15
6203 QUALIFICATION..................................6-16
SECTION 3 AIRCRAFT INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N42)
6300 GENERAL........................................6-19
23
30 Jun 14
6302 QUALIFICATION..................................6-20
SECTION 4 COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N6)
6400 GENERAL........................................6-21
6401 AWARD COMPUTATION (GREEN CS)...................6-21
6403 QUALIFICATION..................................6-23
SECTION 5 DAMAGE CONTROL (TYCOM N72)
6500 GENERAL........................................6-25
6501 AWARD COMPUTATION (RED DC).....................6-25
6503 QUALIFICATION..................................6-25
SECTION 6 DECK DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
6600 GENERAL........................................6-27
6601 AWARD COMPUTATION (WHITE CROSSED
ANCHORS WITH BLACK D)...............................6-27
6603 QUALIFICATION..................................6-27
SECTION 7 ENGINEERING AND REACTOR DEPARTMENTS
(TYCOM N9)
6700 GENERAL........................................6-29
6701 AWARDS COMPUTATION (RED E).....................6-29
6703 QUALIFICATION..................................6-31
SECTION 8 HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N01H)
6800 GENERAL........................................6-33
24
30 Jun 14
6801 AWARD COMPUTATION (BLUE M).....................6-33
6803 QUALIFICATION..................................6-35
SECTION 9 NAVIGATION DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
6900 GENERAL........................................6-37
6901 AWARD COMPUTATION (WHITE SHIP'S WHEEL).........6-37
6903 QUALIFICATION..................................6-37
SECTION 10 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
61000 GENERAL.......................................6-39
61001 AWARD COMPUTATION (GREEN E)...................6-39
61002 DISQUALIFICATION..............................6-39
61003 QUALIFICATION.................................6-40
SECTION 11 SAFETY DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N45)
61100 GENERAL.......................................6-41
61101 AWARD COMPUTATION (GREEN SAFETY CROSS)........6-41
61103 QUALIFICATION.................................6-44
SECTION 12 SECURITY DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N3D)
61200 GENERAL.......................................6-45
61201 AWARD COMPUTATION (BLACK “S”).................6-45
61203 QUALIFICATION.................................6-45
SECTION 13 SUPPLY DEPARTMENT
61300 GENERAL.......................................6-46
25
30 Jun 14
61301 AWARD COMPUTATION (BLUE “E”).................6-46
61302 DISQUALIFICATION.............................6-48
61303 QUALIFICATION................................6-48
SECTION 14 WEAPONS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N4)
61400 GENERAL......................................6-50
61401 AWARD COMPUTATION (BLACK W)..................6-50
61403 QUALIFICATION................................6-52
SECTION 15 CARRIER MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY AWARD
(PURPLE ”E) (TYCOM N43)
61500 GENERAL......................................6-54
61501 ANNUAL PURPLE ”E” AWARD COMPUTATION..........6-54
61503 QUALIFICATION................................6-64
61504 3M QUARTERLY MESSAGE REPORT FORMAT
(SKED 3.2).........................................6-65
SECTION 16 SHIP’S 3M INSPECTION (TYCOM N43)
61600 GENERAL......................................6-68
61601 AWARD COMPUTATION............................6-68
SECTION 17 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY
CONSERVATION (EPEC) AWARD (TYCOM N45)
61700 GENERAL......................................6-70
61701 ANNUAL “EPEC” AWARD COMPUTATION..............6-70
61703 QUALIFICATION................................6-72
SECTION 18 TIE BREAKER (TYCOM N00)
26
30 Jun 14
CHAPTER 7 AWARDS
SECTION 1 ARLEIGH BURKE FLEET TROPHY
7100 GENERAL........................................7-3
7101 NOMINATIONS....................................7-3
7102 CUSTODY OF THE AWARD...........................7-4
SECTION 2 JUNIOR OFFICER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN
SHIPHANDLING
7200 GENERAL........................................7-5
7201 ELIGIBILITY....................................7-5
7202 EVALUATION BOARD...............................7-5
7203 EVALUATIONS....................................7-5
7204 AWARDS.........................................7-7
7205 ACTION.........................................7-7
7206 REPORTS........................................7-8
SECTION 3 ASSOCIATION OF OLD CROWS (AOC)
7300 GENERAL........................................7-9
7301 NOMINATION PROCEDURES..........................7-9
7302 SELECTION......................................7-9
SECTION 4 THE BATTENBERG CUP AWARD
7400 GENERAL.......................................7-11
7401 NOMINATION....................................7-11
7402 SELECTION.....................................7-11
SECTION 5 MARJORIE STERRETT BATTLESHIP FUND AWARD
7500 GENERAL.......................................7-13
7501 SELECTION.....................................7-13
7502 EXPENDITURE...................................7-13
27
30 Jun 14
SECTION 6 PROPULSION PLANT WATCH OFFICER (PPWO)
OF THE YEAR AWARD
7600 GENERAL.......................................7-15
7601 NOMINATION....................................7-15
7602 SELECTION.....................................7-15
SECTION 7 ENLISTED ENGINEER OF THE QUARTER
7700 GENERAL.......................................7-17
7701 NOMINATION....................................7-17
7702 CRITERIA......................................7-17
7703 SELECTION.....................................7-17
SECTION 8 ENLISTED ENGINEER OF THE YEAR
7800 GENERAL.......................................7-19
7801 NOMINATION....................................7-19
7802 CRITERIA......................................7-19
7803 SELECTION.....................................7-19
SECTION 9 COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC EXCELLENCE
IN INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION WARFARE AWARD
7900 GENERAL.......................................7-21
7901 CRITERIA......................................7-21
7902 AWARD SUBMISSION AND FORMAT...................7-21
7903 SELECTION.....................................7-22
CHAPTER 8 FORWARD DEPLOYED NAVAL FORCE (FDNF) CARRIER
TRAINING CYCLE
SECTION 1 GENERAL
8100 PURPOSE........................................8-1
8101 DISCUSSION.....................................8-1
28
30 Jun 14
SECTION 2 PREPARATION FOR TRAINING
8200 GENERAL........................................8-3
8201 TRAINING SUPPORT FOR FRTP EVENTS...............8-3
TRAINING (CART).....................................8-4
8203 CREW PREPARATION...............................8-4
8204 CORE TRAINING (CT) I AND II....................8-5
8205 UNIT LEVEL TRAINING ASSESSMENT SUSTAINMENT (ULTRA-S)...............................8-6
8206 RESPONSIBILITIES...............................8-7
8207 FLEET SYNTHETIC TRAINING (FST).................8-8
8208 REACTOR DEPARTMENT TRAINING....................8-8
SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT OF FDNF FRTP - FDNF END-OFMISSION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX I CONUS TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX II FNDF TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
BACK COVER
29
30 Jun 14
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2-1 CVN METL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.......................2-5
FIGURE 2-2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CVN METL, CV-SHARP,
AND DRRS-N T-PILLAR.................................2-7
FIGURE 3-1 NOTIONAL STRIKE GROUP FLEET RESPONSE
TRAINING PLAN.......................................3-3
FIGURE 3-2 SCHEMATIC OF TRAINING EVENTS DURING THE
FRTP CYCLE..........................................3-4
FIGURE 3-3 LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE EXAMS – BY FTRP PHASE..........3-15
FIGURE 3-4 LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE EXAMS – EXAMINEES AND
MINIMUM PASSING CRITERIA...........................3-16
FIGURE 3-5 DOCK TRIALS, FAST CRUISE, AND SEA TRIALS REQUIREMENTS
BY DURATION OF MAINTENANCE
AVAILABILITY.......................................3-18
FIGURE 3-6 ATG TRAINING SUPPORT PERSONNEL....................3-30
FIGURE 3-7 REGIONAL ITCS.....................................3-50
FIGURE 4-1 SAMPLE LONG RANGE TRAINING PLAN....................4-5
FIGURE 4-2 SAMPLE SHORT RANGE TRAINING PLAN.................. 4-7
FIGURE 4-3 REALTIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAINING, PQS, AND WTRP......4-32
FIGURE 6-1 BATTLE EFFICIENCY AWARD............................6-7
FIGURE 6-2 DEPARTMENTAL "E" EXCELLENCE AWARD DEPARTMENTS WITHOUT UNIQUE DESIGN...................6-7
FIGURE 6-3 DEPARTMENTAL "CS" AWARD COMBAT SYSTEMS.............6-7
FIGURE 6-4 DEPARTMENTAL "M" AWARD MEDICAL.....................6-7
FIGURE 6-5 DEPARTMENTAL "DC" AWARD DAMAGE CONTROL.............6-8
FIGURE 6-6 DEPARTMENTAL "W" AWARD WEAPONS.....................6-8
FIGURE 6-7 DEPARTMENTAL "S" AWARD.............................6-8
FIGURE 6-8 DEPARTMENTAL "CROSSED ANCHOR WITH D" AWARD
DECK................................................6-8
30
30 Jun 14
FIGURE 6-9 DEPARTMENTAL "SHIP'S WHEEL" EXCELLENCE
AWARD NAVIGATION....................................6-9
FIGURE 6-10 IMA COMPUTATION TABLE............................6-12
FIGURE 6-11 IMA EVENTS TABLE.................................6-13
FIGURE 6-12 AIMD MEASURES....................................6-19
FIGURE 6-13 AIMD EVENTS......................................6-19
FIGURE 7-1 ENGINEER OF THE QUARTER NOMINATION SCHEDULE.......7-17
FIGURE 8-1 FDNF CARRIER TRAINING READINESS SUSTAINMENT
(36-MONTH CYCLE)....................................8-3
FIGURE I-1 EXAMPLE FOR CONUS EXPERIENCE AND PERFORMANCE
REQUIREMENTS........................................I-9
FIGURE I-2 AIR DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS).................I-10
FIGURE I-3 ATTT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS)...........................I-13
FIGURE I-4 COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT (TACT)
SUB-EVENTS (CONUS)................................I-15
FIGURE I-5 COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT (TECH)
SUB-EVENTS (CONUS)...............................I-22
FIGURE I-6 DAMAGE CONTROL SUB-EVENTS (CONUS).................I-26
FIGURE I-7 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS).........I-32
FIGURE I-8 INTEGRATED TRAINING TEAM SUB-EVENTS (CONUS).......I-34
FIGURE I-9 MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS).............I-35
FIGURE I-10 DECK DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS)...............I-37
FIGURE I-11 NAVIGATION DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS).........I-38
FIGURE I-12 WEAPONS DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (CONUS)............I-40
31
30 Jun 14
FIGURE II-1 EXAMPLE FOR FDNF EXPERIENCE AND PERFORMANCE
REQUIREMENTS.......................................II-2
FIGURE II-2 AIR DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF).................II-4
FIGURE II-3 ATTT DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)................II-6
FIGURE II-4 COMBAT SYSTEMS (TACT) SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)..........II-7
FIGURE II-5 COMBAT SYSTEMS (TECH) SUB-EVENTS (FDNF).........II-12
FIGURE II-6 DAMAGE CONTROL SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)................II-15
FIGURE II-7 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)........II-19
FIGURE II-8 INTEGRATED TRAINING TEAM SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)......II-20
FIGURE II-9 MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)............II-21
FIGURE II-10 DECK DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)..............II-22
FIGURE II-11 NAVIGATION DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)........II-23
FIGURE II-12 WEAPONS DEPARTMENT SUB-EVENTS (FDNF)...........II-24
32
30 Jun 14
33
30 Jun 14
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
1. This summary of changes is provided to assist in reviewing
and implementing Change 2 to Revision D of COMNAVAIRFORINST
3500.20. The areas of focus for this change are:
a. Appendix I and II: Updates Training and Readiness (T&R)
Matrices.
b. Chapter 3: Provides clarification to Unit Level
Training policies, to include new requirements to conduct Fast
Cruise, Dock Trials, and Sea Trials following maintenance
availabilities and non-operational periods of greater than 60
days throughout the FRTP.
c.
Chapter 6:
Updates guidance for Purple E calculations.
2. Change Bars on subsequent pages indicate changes or updates
from the previous version of this manual. Change 2 to Revision
D incorporates the following significant changes:
3.
Chapter 2
a. Sub-section 2103, provides clarification for CVN Mission
Essential Task List (METL) construction using conditions and
standards.
b. Figure 2-1, illustrates the CVN METL development
process.
4.
Chapter 3
a. Sub-section 3103, adds requirement during the
Maintenance Phase for ships to ensure the In Port Emergency Team
(IET) is properly constituted and trained to respond to
emergencies and interface and practice combating casualties with
shore authorities and emergency services.
b. Sub-section 3104, identifies the CVN T&R matrix
(Appendix I ) as the minimum training (Experience) and
assessment (Performance)requirements during the Basic Phase.
c.
Sub-section 3201
(1) Adds a requirement for each carrier to capture
lessons from the Sustainment Phase by conducting a review of the
NMETL as described in Chapter 2.
(2) Adds a requirement for a carrier in RCOH to conduct
a second CART I event to update the WTRP and training
requirements
34
30 Jun 14
d. Sub-section 3202, specifies additional skills and
knowledge required to support shipyard activities and
maintenance, fire fighting, and damage control during
maintenance availabilities.
e. Sub-sections 3300, 3302, 3304, 3305, 3306, 3400, and
3500, provides guidance on requirements to conduct Fast Cruise,
Dock Trials, and Sea Trials following maintenance availabilities
and non-operational periods of greater than 60 days throughout
the FRTP.
f. Figure 3-5, summarizes requirements for Fast Cruise,
Dock Trials, and Sea Trials throughout the FRTP.
g.
Figures 3-4 and 3-5, updated LOK Exam requirements.
h.
Sub-section 3404,
(1) Provides scheduling guidance to allow the ship
sufficient time to address CART II discrepancies and tailor the
training schedule for TSTA In Port.
(2) Directs FST-U scenarios to meet objectives listed in
Appendix B of the Fleet Synthetic Training Program,
COMUSFLTFORCOM/COMPACFLTINST 3500.3 (series).
i. Sub-section 3607, adds Carrier Air Traffic Control
(CATCC) Team Training information.
j. Sub-section 3702, specifies timeline for CSG to send
CART II End of Mission Report to TYCOM.
5.
Chapter 5: administrative changes only.
6.
Chapter 6:
a.
Sub-section 61501,
(1) Updates 3M Quarterly Report requirements for ships
with SKED 3.1 and SKED 3.2.
(2) Updates measures for delinquent MCAP deficiencies.
b. Sub-section 61504, updates sample 3M Quarterly Message
Report Format.
c. Sub-section 61601, requires a waiver to be submitted to
use carry over scores for Battle “E” and Departmental Award
calculations when a 3M Assessment has not been conducted in 24
months.
7.
Appendix I
35
30 Jun 14
a. Amplified guidance for use of Appendix tables and
Training and Assessment Cards (TACs) and specified requirements
for execution and logging of training.
b. Updated Sub-Event Performance (P) and Experience (E)
values.
8.
c.
Grouped Sub-Events by Department.
d.
Specified Experience levels for all training phases.
Appendix II
a. Updated Sub-Event Performance (P) and Experience (E)
values.
b.
Grouped Sub-Events by Department.
c.
Specified Experience levels for all training phases.
d. Added Selected-Restricted Availability (SRA)
requirements for Performance and Experience.
36
30 Jun 14
37
30 Jun 14
RECOMMENDATION FOR CHANGE
POINT OF CONTACT
Originating Command:
Rank:
Name:
Telephone:
Email:
RECOMMENDED CHANGE
Chapter/Appendix:
Sub-Section:
Page:
Current Wording:
Section:
Paragraph:
Recommended Wording:
Rationale:
Submit via CSG to COMNAVAIRPAC/COMNAVAIRLANT, Code N7.
38
30 Jun 14
39
30 Jun 14
RECORD OF CHANGES
Change
Number
Date of
Change
Date Change
Entered
Original
29 Jun 12
29 Jun 12
CNAF ltr
1
31 Oct 12
31 Oct 12
CNAF 311934Z OCT 12
2
26 Jun 13
26 Jun 13
CNAF 261934Z JUN 13
3
30 Jun 14
30 Jun 14
CNAF 021934Z JUL 14
UPDATE ONE
18 Sep 14
18 Sep 14
CNAF 181934Z SEP 14
40
Change Entered By
29 Jun 12
30 Jun 14
41
30 Jun 14
Chapter 1
1100
OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION
The Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF) Aircraft Carrier
Training Readiness Manual (CVN TRAMAN), supplements and
amplifies the training doctrine contained in OPNAVINST 3120.32
(series), Standard Operations Regulations Manual (SORM), and
other instructions from higher authority. It is the primary
source of policy, direction and requirements for all aspects of
Unit Level Training (ULT) in support of the Fleet Training
Continuum (FTC). The current Fleet Response Training Plan
(FRTP) was created to meet the requirements of the FTC. The
CVN TRAMAN provides policies for the administration and conduct
of an aircraft carrier training program which will achieve the
prescribed standards of readiness to perform the ship's combat
missions as identified in OPNAVINST C3501.65, Required
Operational Capability/ Projected Operational Environment
(ROC/POE) for Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carriers. Training
responsibilities are assigned to every echelon of command, but
primary responsibility for accomplishment of training resides
with the individual unit Commanding Officer. Numbered Fleet
Commander (NFC) Operation Orders (OPORDs) provide general
direction for use by subordinate commanders in the execution of
their duties.
1101
1.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Type Commanders (TYCOM) shall:
a. Establish training readiness standards for aircraft
carriers and monitor training readiness of each ship throughout
the readiness cycle.
b. Ensure all aircraft carrier ULT and assessment events
are planned and executed as prescribed by this instruction in
accordance with the FRTP cycle. TYCOMs will coordinate with
Carrier Strike Group Commanders (CSGs) and NFCs to ensure these
events and other operational requirements (e.g. Fleet
Replacement Squadron Carrier Qualifications (FRSCQ)) are
properly scheduled and reflected in NFC operational schedules.
c. Provide training assistance as requested by ship’s CSG,
and assist the CSG in conducting certifications and inspections
to ensure unit level proficiency throughout the FRTP.
d. Conduct Battle Efficiency (Battle ‘E’) competition
among aircraft Carriers as specified in Chapter Six.
e. Conduct a Basic Phase ULT Conference with the ship, CSG
and Afloat Training Group (ATG) to brief ULT evolutions from
Crew Certification though Final Evaluation Period (FEP).
1-1
30 Jun 14
f. Exercise oversight responsibility for training
readiness of aircraft carriers in the absence of an assigned
CSG.
g. Provide notification via Record of Changes posted on
Sharepoint upon updates/changes of Training Assessment Cards
(TACs) or Appendices I or II.
2.
Carrier Strike Group Commanders shall:
a. Exercise oversight responsibility for training
readiness of aircraft carriers.
b. Familiarize the CSG staff with the requirements and
readiness measures defined in this manual.
c. Schedule training events and services as specified in
Appendices I and II (as applicable). Work closely with the
TYCOM, ATG Commander, and Commander, CSG 4/15 to maintain a
balanced and efficient training plan.
d. Ensure individual training requirements contained
within the Fleet Training Management Planning System (FLTMPS)
are accurate with ship’s configuration and related
requirements.
e. Ensure respective TYCOM N7 is provided a monthly
Consolidated Ship’s Discrepancy Log (CSDL) as outlined in
Chapter 3.
f. Ensure CVN crews are provided opportunities to conduct
meaningful training and maintain maximum readiness levels
consistent with each stage of the FRTP.
3.
Commander, Afloat Training Group (ATG) shall:
a. Provide Subject Matter Experts to conduct ULT in
accordance with COMNAVAIRFOR policy and guidance.
b. Coordinate scheduling of the Shipboard Training Team
(SBTT) course, and provide the ship’s crew with fundamental
skills and techniques to self-train.
c. Provide assistance to TYCOM/CSG in the conduct of
inspections, certifications, assessments and assist visits
(ICAVS) (e.g. NSSM/ESSMS certification, navigation check ride,
crew certification, etc.), where applicable.
d. Participate in the Basic Phase ULT conference with the
ship, CSG and TYCOM to brief upcoming ULT evolutions from Crew
Certification through FEP.
e. Maintain liaison with TYCOM/CSG throughout the FRTP to
maintain continuity of the training plan.
1-2
30 Jun 14
f. Provide standardized End-of-Mission Reports to the CVN,
CSG and TYCOM, as specified in the reporting formats maintained
on the CNAF SharePoint site following each phase of training.
Reports will document training shortfalls and recommend
corrective actions.
4.
Aircraft Carrier Commanding Officers shall:
a. Comply with the requirements specified in this
instruction, particularly the training requirements specified
in Appendix I (CONUS)/Appendix II (FDNF) and in FLTMPS.
b. Place primary emphasis for CVN training plans and
schedules on attainment and maintenance of maximum mission area
readiness.
5.
Ship’s Training Teams:
a. Have a clear understanding of training and resource
requirements as outlined in Appendices I and II, and Training
Assessment Cards (TACs).
b. Ensure the material condition of the ship supports a
safe training environment.
c. Develop tailored training scenarios and schedule of
events (SOEs) to support ULT evolutions.
d.
Conduct pre-drill briefs, as required.
e. Provide ATG Training Liaison Officer (TLO) a copy of
all required training information, for example: Battle Orders,
Watch Team Replacement Plans (WTRPs), Watch bills, training
simulation information, training team designations, and other
reports (as required).
f.
1102
Prepare end-of-mission (EOM) reports.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES
Recommendations for changes are strongly encouraged. Submit
recommendations to Commander, Naval Air Force Pacific or
Atlantic N7 via the chain of command.
1-3
30 Jun 14
1-4
30 Jun 14
Chapter 2
Section 1
2100
TRAINING READINESS REPORTING
CV-SHARP
GENERAL OVERVIEW
1. The Carrier Sierra Hotel Aviation Readiness Program (CVSHARP) is the CVN training readiness management tool that
supports the development and sustainment of the CVN’s training
readiness. The system is based on team training event
completions (with individual training visibility) logged in CVSHARP and then rolled up to a unit level training readiness
depiction. This functionality provides the CO with detailed
information on the depth and sustainability of the crew’s
training readiness in terms of teams and the individual Sailor.
2. CV-SHARP also serves as the sole authoritative source to
populate the Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS-N)
Training “T-Pillar” Readiness data.
3. Details of team types/number of required teams are dictated
by TYCOM-designated subject matter experts (SMEs).
2101
GUIDANCE
1. The primary benefit of CV-SHARP is the ability to track CVN
training based on individual and team training readiness;
indicating the depth of the unit’s training health. The program
is intended as the primary onboard tool for CVN training and
readiness management.
2. Detailed program information and training tools will be
promulgated in a future carrier readiness reporting directive.
2102
REFERENCE
1. Supplemental guidance for CV-SHARP reporting and usage by
Commander, Naval Air Forces, Pacific (COMNAVAIRPAC)/Commander,
Naval Air Forces, Atlantic (COMNAVAIRLANT) Units, COMNAVAIRFOR
INSTRUCTION 3500.38 (series).
2103
ACTION
COs shall:
1. Implement CV-SHARP as the primary tool for CVN training
readiness management.
2.
Ensure accurate and timely logging of events completed.
1-1
30 Jun 14
3. Ensure departmental CV-SHARP representatives within their
command are designated and fully conversant with CV-SHARP
functionality.
4.
Provide feedback to TYCOM on program functionality and use.
2
30 Jun 14
1-3
30 Jun 14
Section 2
2200
DRRS-N
GUIDANCE
DRRS-N is the US Navy’s mission essential task / capabilitybased readiness reporting system and is the primary unit level
readiness reporting tool. Training events captured within CVSHARP are sent to DRRS-N for translation into Mission Essential
Task (MET)-based training readiness in the Training Pillar for a
near real-time depiction of the carrier’s readiness to conduct
its warfighting mission.
2201
REFERENCE
1. The Defense Readiness Reporting System-Navy (DRRS-N)
Reporting Manual, NTRP 1-03.5 (series), establishes DRRS-N
readiness reporting procedures.
2.
Detailed program information is available in the Software
User Manual (SUM).
2202
ACTION
DRRS-N instruction tasks COs to:
1.
Ensure accurate and timely update of DRRS-N assessments.
2. Implement DRRS-N reporting and ensure appropriate personnel
within their command are fully trained and comply with DRRS-N
reporting requirements.
3. Provide feedback to TYCOM and Fleet Commander on unit
NMETLs.
2203
CVN MISSION ESSENTIAL TASK LIST (METL)
1. The CVN METL is the TYCOM’s common baseline for tasks, with
associated conditions and standards that are used in planning,
executing, assessing and evaluating Fleet training and
capabilities. It consists of a series of Mission Essential
Tasks (METs) deemed critical, by the TYCOM, for mission
accomplishment. Each MET is constructed by mission analysis of
the OPLANs, CONPLANs or Mission Orders to establish the
essential tasks and any supporting tasks along with the
conditions and standards under which the tasks are required to
be performed in order to achieve the mission. Detailed guidance
for the construction of METs is set out in OPNAVINST 3500.38
series (Universal Naval Task List) Chapter 2. The common
baseline of METs is used for assessing operational performance
and determining associated resources and entitlements.
2. COMNAVAIRFOR (N7) will conduct an annual review of the CVN
METL. To support this process each carrier will conduct a
review of the current CVN METL during the FRTP against the
current OPLANs, CONPLANs and Mission Orders. The CART I report,
4
30 Jun 14
made prior to return
the completed review
Negative reports are
found on the CNAF N7
to homeport from deployment, shall verify
along with any recommended changes.
required. CART I message template can be
SharePoint portal.
3. An overview of the CVN METL Development Process is shown in
Figure 2-1.
1-5
30 Jun 14
Figure 2-1 CVN METL Development Process
6
30 Jun 14
1-7
30 Jun 14
Section 3
RELATIONSHIP OF DRRS-N, CVN METL AND CV-SHARP
1. CNAF N7 manages DRRS-N T-Pillar, CVN METL and CV-SHARP.
Although closely linked, each serves a unique role in carrier
training and readiness and has its own data set and rules.
The
relationship between CVN METL, CV-SHARP, and DRRS-N T-Pillar is
shown in Figure 2-2.
Further information can be found at the
CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
2. DRRS-N measures and reports the readiness of Navy forces to
accomplish assigned missions through the construct of a METL. The
CVN METL defines capabilities the CVN will need to achieve mission
success covering all the PESTO resources (Personnel, Equipment,
Supply, Training, and Ordnance).
3. T-Pillar data, in fulfillment of CVN METL requirements,
populates DRRS-N and reflects the ship’s overall training
readiness.
4. CV-SHARP is the CVN interface that captures and provides event
completion information upline to DRRS-N via T-Pillar population.
This data is captured in capabilities-based calculation in terms
of Performance (P) and Experience (E) factors accomplished through
sub-events.
5. CV-SHARP also includes other training requirements of interest
to the Commanding Officer, above and beyond DRRS-N reporting, to
assist in proper resourcing levels entitlement determinations, and
overall readiness of the crew.
Figure 2-2 Relationship between CVN METL, CV-SHARP, and DRRS-N T-Pillar
2-1
30 Jun 14
Chapter 3
Section 1
3100
TRAINING CYCLE
FLEET RESPONSE TRAINING PLAN (FRTP)
OVERVIEW
In accordance with the Fleet Training Continuum (FTC), the FRTP
was designed to provide Navy Component Commanders (NCCs),
Numbered Fleet Commanders (NFCs), and Type Commanders (TYCOMs)
with guidance to successfully execute Fleet training. Notional
FTC requirements are illustrated in Figure 3-1. The FRTP is a
flexible and scalable approach to training, which is managed by
TYCOMs during the Maintenance and Basic Unit Level Training
Phases for CONUS-based units. For Forward Deployed Naval Force
(FDNF), C7F, in conjunction with the TYCOM, manages the training
cycle. The FRTP aligns Navy capabilities and missions, in
support of Combatant Commander and Navy requirements. FRTP
requirements are defined through Fleet training instructions.
Required CVN training events are set forth in the Training and
Readiness Matrix (Appendix I and II) of this instruction. The
NMET conditions and standards required to be achieved for each
training event are specified in CVN Training and Assessment
Cards (TACs).
TACs do not supersede any instruction by a
higher authority but provide a TYCOM compendium of best
practices set against NMETL conditions and a standard for the
conduct and reporting of CVN training. TACs are available on
the TYCOM SharePoint site.
3101
FRTP PHASES (CONUS-BASED)
A notional CONUS-based FRTP for CSG and CVN consists of four
phases: Maintenance, Basic Unit Level Training, Integrated
Training and Sustainment, which can continue through one or more
deployments. This results in defined progressive levels of
employable capability for Naval Forces. Figure 3-2 (Training
Events During the FRTP Cycle) illustrates a phase-based training
accomplishment notional standard. To gain maximum benefit from
limited training time and resources, a ship must enter each
training cycle with a clear understanding of specific training
required and a detailed plan to accomplish the required
training.
3102
FDNF TRAINING
The FRTP ensures naval capabilities are aligned with mission
essential tasks and potential operational tasking. By nature of
location, the FDNF CVN has different training opportunities
available compared to CONUS units. Forward deployed OPTEMPO
affords opportunities to maintain tactical proficiency through
dedicated training events in conjunction with regional and
exercise commitments. Therefore, the FDNF carrier remains
within the Sustainment Phase and complies with the requirements
of this phase as specified in Appendix II in support of the
1
30 Jun 14
overarching Commander, SEVENTH FLEET Training Plan.
training is discussed in detail in Chapter 8.
2
FDNF
30 Jun 14
Figure 3-1 Notional Strike Group Fleet Response Training Plan
3
30 Jun 14
Figure 3-2 Schematic of Training Events During the FRTP Cycle
4
30 Jun 14
3103
MAINTENANCE PHASE
1. During the Maintenance Phase, units will focus on ensuring
they are manned with personnel with the appropriate
qualifications and minimum required schools. Additionally,
units shall ensure team trainers are completed, and any
shortfalls in personnel, equipment, supply, training and
ordnance are identified for resolution and/or mitigation.
2. During the Maintenance Phase, the ship must ensure the In
Port Emergency Team (IET) is properly constituted and trained to
respond to emergencies and the interfaces with shore authorities
and emergency services are fully understood and practiced.
3. In accordance with CNAFINST 3500.3 (series), during the
early part of the Maintenance Phase, training is focused on the
individual. Crew members should be provided the tools and
training necessary to succeed in a complex maintenance
environment (period identified in the T&R matrix as ‘In Port’).
During the latter part of the maintenance availability, focus
shifts to operational and team training (identified in the T&R
matrix as ‘Crew Prep’). Maintenance Phase training requirements
are further defined in sub-section 3200 of this chapter.
3104
BASIC PHASE
The Maintenance Phase is followed by a period of ULT. This
ensures the CVN will achieve the level of readiness required for
certification as ready to conduct follow-on training and
additional certifications as required. The concept is to
complete major prerequisites for a deployment (manning,
maintenance and training) so additional tailored training can be
completed quickly should the carrier be tasked to respond to a
crisis or contingency operation. In accordance with the FRTP,
the length of the carrier’s Basic Phase is determined by the
length of the preceding maintenance availability. The CONUS CVN
T&R matrix (Appendix I to this instruction) provides details of
minimum training (Experience) and assessment (Performance)
requirements.
The Basic Phase focuses on completion of TYCOM ULT requirements.
Requirements include team training (onboard and ashore), unit
level exercises (in port and at sea), unit inspections,
certifications, assessments and qualifications. Successful
completion of Basic Phase ensures units are proficient in all
required NMETL capabilities, meet TYCOM certification criteria,
and are ready for more complex integrated training events.
1. Command Assessment of Readiness and Training (CART). This
is a two-part event intended to help the ship meet ULT
objectives described above. CART I and II requirements are
further defined in sub-section 3201 and 3403 of this chapter.
5
30 Jun 14
2. Unit Level Training (ULT). A nominal 30-90 day period
between the end of CART and the beginning of TSTA when the
ship’s training team will build the experience of watchstanders
and certain Basic Phase performance assessments are conducted.
3. Tailored Ship's Training Availability (TSTA). Is divided
into a series of training availability periods (TSTA In Port,
TSTA I/II/III). Each TSTA has specific training events designed
to incrementally enhance the ship's operating proficiency and
gradually integrate the air wing. TSTA requirements are further
defined in sub-section 3405 of this chapter.
4. Final Evaluation Period (FEP). Final element of the Basic
Phase. During FEP, the ship shall demonstrate readiness to
proceed to the Integrated Phase. FEP requirements are further
defined in sub-section 3406 of this chapter.
3105
INTEGRATED PHASE
The Integrated Phase of training is intended to combine
individual unit warfare skill sets into a single cohesive strike
group capable of operating within a challenging, multi-warfare
joint multinational and interagency environment. Training is
tailored to the strengths and weaknesses of individual ships and
air wings. The Integrated Phase is further defined in subsection 3500 of this chapter.
Major Combat Operations. MCO is the certification a CSG
receives upon successful completion of all required
certification events and signals the end of Integrated Phase.
This certification is attained when a group and its associated
staff and units is trained, assessed and certified to its full
capability for major combat operations. MCO requirements are
further defined in COMPACFLT/COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 3501 (series).
3106
SUSTAINMENT PHASE
The Sustainment Phase follows the Integrated Phase, and
continues until commencement of the Maintenance Phase.
Sustainment consists of a variety of training evolutions
designed to maintain a CSG's readiness during and following
deployment.
Sustainment training, in port and at sea, allows forces to
demonstrate proficiency in operating as part of a joint or
coalition combined force and ensures proficiency is maintained
in all NMETs in order to maintain MCO status. The extent of the
sustainment training will vary depending on the unit’s required
length of time in an MCO Ready status, as well as the
anticipated tasking. During sustainment, units/groups maintain
an MCO Ready status until the commencement of the Maintenance
Phase, unless otherwise directed by CTF 80/C3F. Unit/group
integrity during this period is vital to ensure integrated
proficiency is maintained.
6
30 Jun 14
One or more post-deployment Sustainment Training Exercises
(SUSTEX) and Unit Level Training Assessment - Sustainment
(ULTRA-S) may be scheduled to maintain readiness throughout
Sustainment Phase.
1. (ULTRA-S). The purpose of ULTRA-S is to ensure the CVN is
ready for a potential second deployment within the same FRTP
cycle. It provides the CSG staff with a mid-cycle opportunity
to observe assess and evaluate shipboard watch standing,
warfighting and survival proficiencies while sustaining
requisite readiness levels. ULTRA-S requirements are defined in
sub-section 3502 of this chapter.
2. CTF 80/C3F, supported Commander, CSG 4/15 and TYCOMS, shall
schedule and support training events to maintain required
readiness levels.
3. Strike Group Commanders are responsible to report readiness
levels achieved in sustainment training events to the NFCs, with
INFO copies to the TYCOM and CSG 4/15.
7
30 Jun 14
8
30 Jun 14
Section 2
3200
MAINTENANCE PHASE TRAINING
TRAINING DURING MAINTENANCE PERIODS
1. Shipboard operations during new construction, Complex
Overhauls(COH), Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH), Selected
Restricted Availabilities (SRA)/Planned Incremental Availability
(PIA), Docking Planned Incremental Availabilities (DPIA),
Docking Selected Restrictive Availabilities (DSRA), Extended
Docking Selected Availabilities (EDSRA), Incremental Selected
Restricted Availabilities (ISRA) or Post-Shakedown
Availabilities (PSA), differ markedly from those of ships
operating in a readiness cycle. Specialized skills and
procedures, which have limited use and application during normal
operations, are critical to safety and productivity during an
extensive maintenance period. Conversely, some skills and
routines essential to normal underway operations are relatively
unused until the final stages of a shipyard period.
Consequently, a specially adapted training plan must be
developed each time a ship enters one of these maintenance
periods.
2. A ship’s maintenance period training plan must be prepared
and implemented well in advance of the scheduled start date of
the maintenance availability period. It consists of two phases:
a. Development of skills to ensure safe, efficient and
productive maintenance period.
b. Development of knowledge and skills necessary to safely
take the ship back to sea.
3. Dock Trials, Fast Cruise and Crew Certification provide the
means to verify the crew is prepared to take the ship to sea.
The Naval Supervising Activity (NSA) certification of work
during Sea Trials marks the completion of the maintenance
period.
3201
COMMAND ASSESSMENT OF READINESS AND TRAINING I (CART I)
1. Operating aircraft carriers typically complete a standard
FRTP. CART is a two-part event intended to assist the ship.
CART ensures maximum benefit is derived from limited training
assets during the FRTP.
2. CART I is an internal ship event normally conducted during
the return home from deployment. The ship looks ahead to the
next deployment and determines who will fill critical billets.
The ship then constructs a comprehensive Watch Team Replacement
Plan (WTRP) depicting how personnel will be trained to fill each
billet. Requests for school quotas should be transmitted to
quota control authorities with sufficient lead time to afford
maximum attendance prior to completion of the scheduled
9
30 Jun 14
maintenance availability. It is also required that each Carrier
captures lessons from the Sustainment Phase by conducting a
review of the NMETL as described in Chapter 2 of this
instruction. Carriers in RCOH will conduct a second CART I
event to update the WTRP and training requirements as outlined
above. The second CART I event will be scheduled 12 months
prior to the scheduled end of RCOH and Fast Cruise to validate
findings from the original CART I. This second CART I will
ensure that new or modified equipment/systems installed or
upgraded during the overhaul have been properly captured in the
areas of schools, NECs and Maintenance Phase training plans.
WTRP shortfalls identified during CART I shall be documented on
the Consolidated Ship’s Discrepancy Log (CSDL). The ship will
provide mid-month CSDL updates to CNAL/CNAP N7 via the CSG
throughout the Maintenance Period.
3202
PREPARATION FOR THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD
1. CNAFINST 3500.3 (series) assists ship’s force personnel to
successfully prepare for and execute maintenance availabilities,
and provides standardized references for CVNs to plan and
transition in and out of PIA/DPIA periods.
2. The first phase of training for a maintenance period focuses
on maintenance period specific subjects. Training on the
subjects below shall be complete when the maintenance
availability starts. Training on maintenance topics should
continue early in the maintenance availability, and then taper
off as Sea Trials approach. Training on maintenance topics
should still be sufficient to ensure newly reporting personnel
can function safely and effectively in the shipyard.
a. Basic Shipyard safety procedures such as: dry dock and
crane operations, confined space entry, pollution abatement and
general housekeeping.
b. Shipyard organization and protocols for interface
between shipyard and ship's force personnel.
c. Shipyard and maintenance provider work procedures and
related documentation, including planning, work authorization
documents and discrepancy reports.
d. Ship’s Force Maintenance and Material Management
procedures for placing equipment in an inactive status.
e. Procedures for planning, executing and documenting
ship's force work packages.
f. Skills and knowledge required to support shipyard
activities, such as fire watch, habitability projects, quality
assurance, electrical tag-out, Foreign Material Exclusion
procedures (FME) and maintenance period safety precautions and
procedures.
10
30 Jun 14
g. Skills and experience in firefighting and damage control
to ensure emergencies are dealt with effectively (this may
include a future TYCOM certification of the IET).
3. Operational training shall continue during the maintenance
period, building in intensity as completion approaches. The
goal is to ensure a qualified crew ready to man underway watch
stations and support shipboard systems testing. Emphasis on
operational training should not distract the crew from ensuring
the highest quality ship’s force and depot-level work. The bulk
of formal school requirements should be completed during the
maintenance availability and before completion of Crew
Certification. Coverage of operational topics is necessary
during early parts of the maintenance period focusing on Crew
Certification, advancement, and professional development.
Applicable Personnel Qualification Standards (PQS) shall be used
whenever possible to qualify personnel for at-sea watch
stations. When a shortfall for at-sea/underway watch personnel
qualification is noted, Job Qualification Requirements (JQR) may
be developed by the CVN to fulfill immediate qualification
requirements. In accordance with OPNAVINST 3500.34 (series),
the TYCOM shall determine JQR fleet-wide applicability. If
Fleet-wide applicability is determined, the JQR shall be
forwarded to the appropriate Learning Center Model Manager for
incorporation into the PQS program.
4. A shipboard training program which includes both cross-deck
and synthetic training will help ensure the crew is ready to
achieve certifications and operate the ship safely during the
first underway period.
5. A thorough evaluation of the WTRP during CART I will provide
a solid foundation for planning and conducting operational
training.
11
30 Jun 14
12
30 Jun 14
Section 3
3300
PREPARATION FOR BASIC PHASE TRAINING
CREW PREP OVERVIEW
1. As a carrier nears the end of the CONUS Maintenance Phase,
focus will shift to preparation for Basic Phase ULT; this period
of time is described as ‘Crew Prep’. Following maintenance, the
Crew Prep phase focuses on completion of TYCOM requirements
indicated in the Crew Prep column of the Maintenance Phase in
Appendix I:
a.
Individual and Team Training (onboard and ashore)
b.
Unit Level Exercises (in port and at sea)
2. Successful completion of the Basic Phase ensures units are
proficient in all required NMETL capabilities, meet TYCOM
certification criteria, and are ready for more complex
integrated training events.
3. To gain maximum benefit from limited training time and
resources, a ship must enter each training cycle with a clear
understanding of what specific training is required and a
detailed plan for accomplishing the required training.
3301
LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE (LOK) EXAMS
1. LOK exams are an assessment tool to be used during ULT.
They are utilized to assist trainers and training teams in
determining whether watch standers possess the minimum
competencies required to commence training. Due to some LOKs
requiring the entire crew’s participation, Training Officers
must implement testing plans with ample time for completion.
2. Watch standers shall take required LOK exams during
specified intervals, based on preparation for a specific
training event in the CVN FRTP. Results will be included as a
criterion in the ship’s “Ready to Train” message. Initial
testing shall be used as a baseline to determine the focus of
future training events. Remedial testing shall be used to
ensure the ship meets minimum criteria prior to completing Basic
Phase training.
a. Crew Certification Phase III. Prior to commencement of
Crew Certification Phase III, the ship shall complete the LOK
exams listed below. In order to promulgate the “Ready to Train”
message and proceed to Crew Certification Phase III, the listed
exams must have been administered, and, if necessary,
remediated, until at least 80 percent of all required examinees
have attained a minimum passing score (in accordance with
Figures 3-4 and 3-5 below).
(1) Damage Control General (entire crew)
13
30 Jun 14
(2) Medical General (entire crew)
(3) Navigation Rules of the Road (5)
(4) Deck Seamanship General (5)
(5) Lookout (12)
(6) SAR Exam (Rescue Swimmer) (2)
(7) Quarter Master General (12)
b. CART II. All other LOK exams shall be completed prior
to CART II. Note there is no requirement at this stage of
training for a specific percentage of the required examinees to
pass the respective exams. The purpose is to complete all exams
and report the results (via the “Ready-to-Train” message) to
provide ATG areas which may require additional training.
Additionally, the results of the LOK exams highlight the
effectiveness of the ship’s PQS program, and provide an overview
of the ship’s readiness to train in all areas with at least
minimally qualified personnel.
c. FEP. Prior to the end of FEP, all LOK exams shall have
been administered, and, if necessary, remediated, until at least
80 percent of all required examinees have attained a minimum
passing score (in accordance with Figures 3-4 and 3-5 below).
NOTE 1: LOK exams will not be re-administered during FEP to
those crew members who have previously attained a passing
score.
NOTE 2: Personnel assigned to the FDNF CVN are only
required to pass the Damage Control and Medical examinations
once every 36 months. Personnel shall be tested during the
first year in which they have been onboard for more than six
months.
3. LOK procedures. LOK and Perception Database procedures are
available on ATG’s website at:
https://atg.surfor.navy.mil/toolbox/private/index.htm
4. Feedback. Feedback and updates to LOK exams will be
completed by the Subject Matter Expert (SME) and Centers for
Excellence (CNE). The CVN Training Officer should periodically
check for updates to the practice program. Feedback from the
Fleet is essential to ensure accuracy and relevancy of the
exams. This is accomplished by accessing the LOK website and
submitting feedback via the feedback form.
14
30 Jun 14
Unclassified Exams
Minimum required to take exam (by event)
Crew Certification
0
0
Entire Crew
Entire Crew
5
0
12
CART II
FEP
6
Note 2
9
Note 2
Note 1
0
Note 1
0
Note 1
0
5
Note 2
Note 1
0
GATOR, ANAV, at least 80% each of qualified OODs,JOODs,and TOPWOs Note 1
0
0
4
Note 2
0
15
Note 2
0
15
Note 2
2
Note 1
0
12
Note 1
0
Minimum required to take exam (by event)
Classified Exams
Crew Certification
CART II FEP
AIC
0
6
Note 2
CIC General (Amphib CIC-LINK) (CDC SURF, TOP, TIC)
0
10
Note 2
EW OP/IW (C2W-14-SF)
0
13
Note 2
INTEL (CIVIC/IS)
0
8
Note 2
Sea Sparrow (NSSMS)
0
9
Note 2
TAO
0
4
Note 2
TIC/Track Supervisor
0
5
Note 2
Nixie Team Member
0
4
Note 2
Acoustic Analysis
0
9
Note 2 & 3
ASTAC
0
3
Note 2
SSES (CTR)
0
6
Note 2
Note 1: Prior to commencing Crew Cert. Phase III, required LOK Exams shall be administered (and
remediated), until at least 80 percent of all required examinees attain the minimum passing score.
Note 2: Prior to the end of FEP, all LOK Exams shall be administered, and, if necessary, remediated, until
at least 80 percent of all required examinees have attained a minimum passing score.
Note 3: Ships without AN-SQQ34VC2 installed shall only be administered 3 Acoustic Analysis exams.
Note 4: Prior to the end of FEP, all LOK Exams shall be administered, and, if necessary, remediated, until
all PQS Qualified Watchstanders have attained a minimum passing score.
Figure 3-3 Level of Knowledge Exams – By FTRP Event
CIWS (if installed)
CSOSS
Damage Control General
Medical General
Deck Seamanship General
GCCS-M Operator
Lookout
OOD Rules of the Road
Comm Watch Officer/Supervisor
Network Administrator
TST/Tech Control
SAR Exam (Rescue Swimmer)
QM General
15
30 Jun 14
Min #
Examinees
Min
Score
Note
COMM WATCH
OFFICER/SUP
4
70%
1
COMM
NETWORK ADMIN
15
70%
1
COMM
COMM
TST/TECH CONTROL
15
70%
1
DC
DC
DC
43119-4G (303)
50
ALL
80%
1, 5
MED
MED
MED
43119-K (302)
30
ALL
80%
1, 5
ENG
BY TYPE
SEE LOK WEBSITE
25
SEE
WEBSITE
70%
1
No
NAV
RULES OF
ROAD
OOD RULES OF ROAD
(ROR)
43101-4F (302)
25
5
90%
2, 3
No
NAV
NAV
GENERAL QM
43492-2I (319)
25
3
70%
1
No
SEAMAN
SHIP
SEAMAN
SHIP
SEAMAN
SHIP
SEAMAN
SHIP
SEAMAN
SHIP
SEAMAN
SHIP
LOOKOUT
43354-C (301/305)
& 43492-2G (302)
25
12
80%
1
GENERAL DECK
SEAMANSHIP
43127-C
25
5
80%
1
40
3
80%
1
STRIKE
STRIKE
CIWS
25
6
80%
1
STRIKE
STRIKE
GCCS-M
43373-D
(302/303/304)
43357-D (312),
43555-1C (301) &
43555-3 (301)
25
5
70%
1
No
CS
CS
CSOSS
43511-C (301)
25
9
80%
1,4
Yes
AW*
AIC
AIC
25
6
70%
1
AW*
LINK
TIC
43311-4A (316) &
43398-13A (316)
43398-13A (312)
& 43573
25
5
70%
1
AW*
AIC
CIC GENERAL
25
20
70%
1
AW*
TAO
TAO (SHIP CLASS)
43304-D (301)
100
4
70%
1
Yes
EW*
EW
EW OP
43357-D (313)
50
13
80%
2
Yes
CRY
CRY
SSES OP
43551-1A
25
6
70%
1
Classified
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Warfare
Area
Test Area
Watch station/Exam
COMM
COMM
COMM
PQS
SAR
#
Questions
Note 1: Minimum Passing Requirement for Ship = 80% of required examinees attain a passing score.
Note 2: Minimum Passing Requirement for Ship = 100% of required examinees attain a passing score.
Note 3: Navigator, Assistant Navigator, at least 80% of qualified OODs, JOODs, and TOPWOs.
Note 4: A minimum of one Sailor from each division in CS Department is required to take the CSOSS exam.
Note 5: All personnel onboard for greater than six months. FDNF personnel are only required to pass exams once every
36 months.
Figure 3-4 Level of Knowledge Exams – Examinees and Minimum Passing Criteria
16
30 Jun 14
3302
POST-MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS (ALL FRTP PHASES)
1. This section provides policies for the conduct of CVN Dock
Trials, Crew Certification, Fast Cruise and Sea Trials.
2. There are four publications that address these final steps
of maintenance availability.
(a) OPNAV INSTRUCTION 9080.3G, Procedures for Tests and
Trials of Navy Nuclear Powered Ships Under Construction,
Modernization, Conversion, Refueling and Overhaul
(b) OPNAVINST C9210.2, Engineering Department Manual for
Naval Nuclear Propulsion Plants
(c) COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 Rev. B, Joint Fleet
Maintenance Manual
(d) COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPACINST 3500.20(series),
Aircraft Carrier Training Readiness Manual
3. Each describes the sequence differently.
The following
paragraphs, coordinated with NAVSEA and Naval Reactors, seek to
eliminate ambiguity by assembling and summarizing the various
technical requirements and clearly outlining Command
expectations for aircraft carriers.
4. For the purposes of this instruction, a “day” is defined as
a calendar day, not as an arbitrary 24-hour period. Thus, it
incorporates the normal working shifts of shipyard and support
activities. This is also called a “work day” in other
references.
5. Figure 3-6 below contains a summary of requirements and
guidance regarding the sequencing of dock trials, fast cruise,
and sea trials. Source documents should be referenced to ensure
all applicable requirements, such as evolutions to be performed
and content of messages, are satisfied. Source documents are
denoted as applicable
17
30 Jun 14
Availability/
Upkeep/
Non-operation
Dock
Trials
Fast
Cruise
5
9 months or
longer in
duration
Yes
Ref
(a)
days,
with a
repair
day in
the
middle
(2-1-2)
Ref (a)
4 to 9 months
in duration;
FDNF SRAs
Yes
Ref
(a)
2
days
Ref (a);
augmented
by ref
(c)
Messages required
Pause
(Note3)
1. NSA (Work comp)
2. Ship req permission
3. TYCOM authorizes
4. Ship completion of
Fast Cruise (Note 2)
1 day
Ref (a)
Ref (a)
1. NSA (Work comp)
2. Ship req permission
3. TYCOM authorizes
4. Ship completion of
Fast Cruise (Note 2)
1 day
Ref (a)
Sea Trials
As required to
complete the
Project-generated,
TYCOM approved
agenda Refs (a) and
(c)
As required to
complete the
Project-generated
TYCOM approved
agenda Refs (a) and
(c)
Messages
required
1. Ship req
2. TYCOM auth
3. Daily SITREP
Refs (a) and (c)
1. Ship req
2. TYCOM auth
3. Daily SITREP
Refs (a) and (c)
1 day
>60 days but
less than 4
months in
duration
Per
AWP
Ref
(c)
Ref (a);
augmented
by ref
(c)
12
hours
No
No
No
(Note 1)
Note 1: The length of the fast cruise for a CIA or extended upkeep period is at the Commanding Officer’s discretion and
should be coordinated with the Type Commander. The extent of the training for the Fast Cruise should be based on crew
readiness and tied to the duration of the CIA/upkeep period plus any adjoining in-port periods.
Note 2: Completion of Fast Cruise message may be combined with ship’s request to commence Sea Trials.
Note 3: The pause between the end of Fast Cruise and the start of Sea Trials should be sufficient to allow the crew to
rest and reset from simulation mode and complete the pre-underway checklist, but not so long the rhythm established
during Fast Cruise is lost. Generally a one day pause following the completion of Fast Cruise should be scheduled to
meet this requirement. Should material issues prevent proceeding to Sea Trials within a day after completion of Fast
Cruise, Commanding Officers will engage the TYCOM (N43/N9/N7) to realign schedule expectations. Delays in excess of 72
hours may result in the Type Commander (TYCOM) directing an additional Fast Cruise.
Figure 3-5 Dock Trials, Fast Cruise, and Sea Trials Requirements by Duration of Maintenance Availability
18
30 Jun 14
6. In planning the sequence, it helps to work backwards. For
example, begin with the CNO end date, go back the number of days
necessary to complete your Sea Trials agenda, factor in your
pause, plot out your Fast Cruise, etc.
Example: The CNO end date for a six-month PIA is 22 Oct. The
proposed sea trials agenda (based upon the work package)
requires three days. Recent engine repairs dictate two-day dock
trials.
Nominal Availability Completion Schedule:
Dock Trials commence 15 Oct
Dock Trials complete 16 Oct
Fast Cruise commences 17 Oct
Fast Cruise completes 18 Oct
One day pause 19 Oct
Underway for Sea Trials 20 Oct
Avail completes 22 Oct
7. It is important all stakeholders understand each other’s
perception of, and intentions for deviations from a nominal
availability completion schedule early in the planning process.
The Fast Cruise and Sea Trials sequence should be treated like
operational commitments and the timing may not always be
convenient (e.g., occur during holidays). Do not wait until
late in the availability to plot this sequence. A clearly
understood sequence upfront aligns the Project Team and
technical community for success.
8. Safety. Post-maintenance trials following extended shipyard
availabilities must be undertaken with the knowledge the crew
lacks recent experience operating as a unit and the ship's
structure and fittings are unproven. All tests and procedures
must be conducted carefully and methodically. Trials and tests
that are inherently hazardous should not be conducted unless
qualified non-ship's company observers are present.
9.
Prerequisites of the first underway period are:
a. Satisfactory ship's material condition as shown by the
successful completion of alongside tests.
b. Ship's Force Dock Trials and a satisfactory state of
training as demonstrated by the successful completion of Crew
Certification Inspection and Fast Cruise.
19
30 Jun 14
c. Per OPNAVINST 9080.3 series, deficiencies in either
material condition or state of training that affect safe
operations must be corrected prior to getting underway for Sea
Trials. Subsequent to delivery or completion of propulsion
plant post-maintenance Sea Trials, the CO may authorize critical
operation of the propulsion system in support of tasks assigned
the ship. However, as long as the ship remains in the shipyard,
the CO shall notify the Shipyard Commander or the Supervisor of
Shipbuilding, as appropriate, in advance of any operation of the
ship's propulsion system. This notification should include the
nature and duration of such operations.
10. As discussed above in paragraph 5 and in Figure 3-6,
requirements for Fast Cruise, Dock Trials, and Sea Trials depend
upon the length of the availability, the extent of the work
accomplished, and the state of crew training. Specific Crew
Certification requirements are provided in sub-section 3304 of
this chapter.
3303
SHIP BOARD TRAINING TEAM (SBTT)
The Shipboard Training Team (SBTT) Course of Instruction (COI)
is scheduled and conducted with ATG and TYCOM prior to Crew
Certification. Ideally, SBTT should be scheduled approximately
a month prior to Crew Certification Phase II.
3304
CREW CERTIFICATION
1. Crew Certification is a mandatory assessment of the crew’s
ability to take the ship to sea and deal with emergencies. The
Crew Certification process is orchestrated by the CSG, supported
by the TYCOM and ATG, in order to ensure the crew is qualified
in the basic underway functional areas required to proceed to
sea safely (Navigation, Seamanship, Safety and Damage Control)
following a maintenance period or new construction. It is also
intended to administratively pulse the remaining warfare areas
in preparation for follow-on training (not part of the Crew
Certification assessment). During Crew Certification, ATG will
provide the required instruction to ensure the ship’s Integrated
Training Team (ITT) is capable of assessing risk, and
implementing controls to reduce risk associated with training.
Interventions by the Ship’s Training Teams during Crew Cert
evolutions are acceptable and appropriate.
2. CSG and ATG representatives are tasked with confirming the
ship has:
a.
Appropriate administrative programs in place
b.
Required instructions and bills in force
c.
Up-to-date and effective PMS program
d.
Meaningful training and PQS programs in place
20
30 Jun 14
3. Phase I will normally be conducted approximately four months
prior to Fast Cruise. This one-day assist visit shall primarily
review the ship's training plans and schedule, and will include
a review of status of implementation, or update of support areas
such as PQS, technical documentation and logistic support. PMS
implementation shall be checked on a separate schedule by the
COMNAVAIRFOR 3M Team. Detailed areas to be checked include
General Ship Training, Damage Control, Engineering (nonpropulsion), Medical, Communications, Navigation, Air, Deck,
Operations, Supply, Weapons, and Safety Departments. Reactor
Department will comply with Naval Reactor, JFMM, and associated
CNAF N9 directives.
4. Phase II shall normally be conducted approximately two to
three months prior to Fast Cruise. This one-day inspection
should be accomplished at a suitable place (preferably
shipboard). It consists of:
a. A review of past training conducted and future training
planned.
b. Examination of PQS qualified watch standers with
emphasis on knowledge of emergency/casualty bills and general
ship operational procedures.
c. Identification of personnel who will complete required
LOK exams prior to Crew Certification Phase III in accordance
with Figures 3-4 and 3-5 above.
d. An audit of the ship's SORM, administrative, operational
and emergency bills and Watch Quarter and Station Bills.
e. TYCOM Aircraft Handling Teams will coordinate with the
ship and the CSG staff to evaluate Air Department’s Flight Deck
Certification Checklist and associated procedures.
5. Phase III shall be conducted onboard the carrier just prior
to Fast Cruise, but no earlier than three weeks prior. There
will normally be a 48-hour period between the end of Crew Cert
Phase III and the beginning of Fast Cruise. The CSG shall
submit a waiver request to the TYCOM if, due to operational
constraints, they are required to deviate from the overall
scheduling or sequencing of these events. Phase III shall
specifically evaluate the crew's state of training during
simulated underway operations, emphasizing emergency drills.
This two-day inspection will be orchestrated by the CSG staff
(utilizing ATG as the executive agent for training, and other
ships in the group and/or other commands in the area as required
or requested). If the ship intends to operate helicopters
during Sea Trials, Phase III Certification shall include an
evaluation of the A/C Crash and Fire Phase I and an inventory of
the required materials by the TYCOM Aircraft Handling Team.
21
30 Jun 14
6. When conducting Crew Cert Phase III emergency drills, ATG
will only be assessing the watch standers per the prescribed
TACs.
7.
Roles and Responsibilities
a. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT assigns the CSG staff to act as the
Force Commander's representative to orchestrate and validate
Crew Certification requirements.
b. COMNAVAIRLANT will act as certifying agent for ships
going through new construction or extended maintenance in East
Coast shipyards that do not have a permanent CSG assigned.
c. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT N43 will designate a representative
from the staff to observe all Sea Trials following new
construction and shipyard availabilities. The representative
will evaluate the material condition of the ship and assist
ship's force in matters pertaining to the availability or
preparation for future maintenance or Post-Shakedown
Availabilities.
d. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT N43
schedule and sequence of Fast
operational standpoint at the
set up the Schedule of Events
and N9 will review and approve the
Cruise and Sea Trials from an
same time the ship is required to
(SOE).
e. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT N43 will arrange for personnel
embarkation during post-maintenance trials for personnel
assigned by COMNAVSEASYSCOM.
f. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT N6 will assist Carrier CSOs and
Information Warfare Officers with training and installs for ADP
and Cyber Security.
g. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT N9 will schedule a Post-Overhaul
Reactor Safeguards Examination (PORSE) prior to initial critical
operations in an overhaul without refueling or availability
greater than six months.
h. COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT Aviation Handling Team (N73) is
responsible for CVN Flight Deck Certification (COMNAVAIRFORINST
3500.71 (series)).
i. The CSG staff is responsible for orchestrating Crew
Certification requirements including the transmission of
required end-of-mission reports.
j. ATG acts as the executive agent for the CSG in assessing
and training during Crew Certification.
k. The CO will provide a Ready-to-Train letter (available
at CNAF N7 SharePoint site) to the CSG and ATG TLO verifying the
completions of required Afloat Self Assessment (ASA) check
22
30 Jun 14
sheets and LOK exams (available via ATG Toolbox)required for
Crew Certification. A signed copy of the CO’s Battle Orders and
CART I CSDL will also be provided for review.
8.
Crew Certification requirements:
a.
Maintenance Availabilities four months duration or less.
(1) Crew Certification and/or Sea Trials are not
required.
b. Maintenance Availabilities greater than four months but
less than two years in duration (PIA/DPIA).
apply.
(1) Crew Certification Phase II and III requirements
(2) The CSG staff shall submit a formal request to
COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT, copying the repair activity. Upon receipt of
such request, the repair activity is requested to advise
COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT what effects Crew Certification will impose
upon the availability schedule.
(3) Crew Certification shall be conducted using guidance
outlined in Afloat Self Assessment (ASA) check sheets (available
via ATG Toolbox) and checklists CL1, CL2, and CL3 which are
available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
c. Construction, overhauls, and maintenance availabilities
greater than two years.
(1) A three-part Crew Certification: Phase I, Phase II
and Phase III, is required. Crew Certification shall be
conducted using guidance outlined in ASA check sheets and
checklist CL1, CL2, and CL3 which are available at the CNAF N7
SharePoint site.
d. The time devoted to Crew Certification, Fast Cruise and
Sea Trials should normally not be truncated. Schedules
proposing shorter periods of time should provide substantiating
information on which the decision to schedule a reduced period
was based. Waivers will be entertained by the TYCOM, by
exception, with substantiated operational necessity criterion.
e. The procedures for conducting Crew Certification
inspections are minimum requirements and should not be construed
as restrictive. A final Crew Certification SOE shall be
approved by the TYCOM prior to commencement of the event. Any
changes or late add-on events require TYCOM concurrence.
Additional preparation materials (sample tests and ASA
checklists) can be found on the CNAF website and the ATG Test
Bank: https://www.atg.surfor.navy.mil/index.htm
23
30 Jun 14
9. Discrepancies. Discrepancies identified during each phase
of Crew Certification will be documented on the ship’s CSDL.
For Crew Certification only, the definitions below apply.
Restrictive/Major/Minor definitions for all other FRTP events
are provided in Section 7 of this chapter, titled “REPORTING”.
a. Restrictive – Those discrepancies that would preclude
safe operation of the ship and must be corrected prior to Fast
Cruise. Restricted discrepancies can only be cleared by the
CSG.
b. Major – Those discrepancies that could hinder proper
operation of the ship and must be corrected prior to getting
underway. Major discrepancies can only be cleared by the CSG.
c. Minor - Those discrepancies that do not affect proper
operation of the ship. CVN can continue with training
continuum. Minor discrepancies shall be corrected as soon as
practical. Minor discrepancies can be cleared by CSG or CVN CO.
10.
Reports.
Minimum Crew Certification reports are:
a. Upon completion of Phase I and II, the ATG TLO shall
make a report to the CVN CO and CSG Commander. A Crew
Certification Phase I/II Completion Message shall be prepared by
the CSG and forwarded to CNAF Code N7. A sample Crew Cert
Completion message is available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
b. Upon completion of Crew Certification Phase III, the ATG
TLO shall prepare a written report for the CVN CO, CSG Commander
and TYCOM CNAF Code N7. A Crew Certification Phase III
Completion message shall be prepared by the CSG and forwarded to
CNAF Code N7. Discrepancies will be listed by category
(Restrictive, Major, Minor) as described above. The carrier
will be tasked to provide a plan to correct discrepancies.
Discrepancies identified during each phase of Crew Cert will be
documented on the ship’s CSDL.
3305
FAST CRUISE
1. The overall objectives of Fast Cruise are to train the crew
and determine their ability to take the ship to sea safely,
following a period of maintenance or non-operations. Prior to
commencing Fast Cruise, all equipment required to support normal
at-sea operations should be online in its normal configuration
to the greatest extent possible. In addition to the normal
underway routine, equipment should be operated to check for
proper operation and to determine the state of training of the
crew. Fast Cruise shall, as far as is practicable, simulate atsea operational conditions. It will be conducted by ship's
force unhampered by construction or repair work or by the
movement of shipyard personnel through the ship. No trials,
tests or other work should be performed on the ship during this
24
30 Jun 14
period. The Fast Cruise must be completed one to three days
prior to Sea Trials.
2. Specific guidance for conducting Fast Cruises, including
requesting and reporting procedures, is included in the Joint
Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM), CFFCINST 4790.3 volume 2
sections 3.6.8. and 3.6.8.3 (applies to ships in a CNO scheduled
availability). Additional requirements for CVNs are included in
OPNAVINST 9080.3 (series) and the Engineering Department Manual
for Nuclear Powered Ships (EDM).
3.
Duration.
a. A five-day Fast Cruise is required for ships completing
construction, conversion, or RCOH per OPNAVINST 4700.8 (series).
A five day Fast Cruise period is also required for CVNs
completing availabilities lasting greater than nine months.
This should consist of two days of operation, a one day shutdown
to allow the shipyard and/or contractors to correct
deficiencies, and two more days of operation. The Fast Cruise
should end at least one day prior to initial Sea Trials.
b. Ships completing an availability lasting four months or
greater but less than nine months shall schedule a Fast Cruise
commensurate with the length of the maintenance availability
(i.e. Planned Incremental Availability (PIA), Planned
Incremental Availability with Dry-docking (DPIA) or Selected
Restricted Availability (SRA). Completion of Fast Cruise will
be at the CVN CO's discretion, but shall adhere to the
following:
(1) For CNO Availabilities (PIA, DPIA, SRA), refer to
Figure 3-6 of this chapter.
(2) It will last for at least two days, which include
two working days and an overnight.
(3) It may be divided into sections, but should be
completed within a five-day period.
(4) It should not end more than three days or less than
one day prior to Sea Trials.
c. Ships completing a maintenance upkeep or non-operational
period exceeding 60 days but less than 4 months shall schedule a
Fast Cruise commensurate with the length of the maintenance
upkeep or non-operational period. The Fast Cruise should last
at least one work day and end not less than 12 hours prior to
the scheduled underway time. In accordance with the Engineering
Department Manual (EDM), prior to the commencement of Fast
Cruise, all required propulsion plant equipment will be lit off
to reflect an at sea posture.
25
30 Jun 14
4. The general evolutions and drills listed below should be
conducted for Fast Cruises of any duration. The ship shall be
on ship’s electrical power. Additional drills and operations
are at the discretion of the CO. Documentation available at the
CNAF N7 SharePoint site provides recommended ship-wide and
department-specific evolutions to be completed prior to and
during Fast Cruise. Every effort should be made to conduct as
many of these items as time allows. The ship should be operated
as if underway, simulating the various evolutions required for
safe operation of the ship. Each underway section should be
exercised in the evolutions that are normally performed on a
watch section basis. During each evolution, operationally test
all communication systems to ensure each is in proper working
order and, where duplicate systems exist, a priority system is
designated.
a.
Minimum Fast Cruise requirements:
(1) Station the Special Sea and Anchor Detail
(2) Station the normal underway watch (section watches)
(3) Simulate getting underway and returning to port
(4) Walk through all major Sea Trial evolutions
(5) Exercise the Reduced Visibility Bill
(6) Simulate boat transfer at sea
(7) Spot-check storage and availability of spare parts
and tools
(8) Verify adequacy of stores and provisions
(9) Simulate transit, performing all evolutions and
operating equipment, as required
(10) Conduct the following emergency drills for each
section:
(a) Loss of steering
(b) Loss of electrical power to navigational radar
and communications equipment
(11) Conduct man overboard (boat recovery)
(12) Exercise the crew at General Quarters
(13) Exercise the crew at abandon ship
(14) Conduct communications drills with bridge, radio
and other controlling stations
26
30 Jun 14
(15) Simulate an anchoring evolution, exercising the
deck and auxiliaries equipment to the maximum extent practicable
b. The EDM delineates the minimum propulsion plant Fast
Cruise requirements following an availability greater than nine
months. The EDM also specifies that, for all other
availabilities, the CO should determine which items will be
accomplished. For all Fast Cruise periods, ships will submit
their proposed propulsion plant drill and evolution package to
the local TYCOM’s representative for review and concurrence.
Every effort should be made to include as many of the casualty
drills and evolutions delineated by the EDM commensurate with
the length of time scheduled for the Fast Cruise. For Fast
Cruises of two-day duration or less, it may not be feasible to
conduct major propulsion plant drills on every watch section, so
consideration should be given to planning drill sets that allow
for a thorough evaluation of each watch section. All casualty
assistance teams should be exercised during the Fast Cruise.
c. While no trials, tests or other work should be performed
on the ship during the Fast Cruise period, history has shown
that situations may arise which require repair of critical
equipment by shipyard personnel during this time. To ensure
minimal impact on Fast Cruise, each case shall be discussed with
the Project Supervisor (if in an availability), TYCOM
representative(s) and Naval Reactors Regional Representative
(for propulsion-related equipment). Repair by entities other
than ship’s force during a Fast Cruise should be a rare
exception, reserved for situations where delay in doing so would
cause adverse operational impact.
d. Additional guidance for conducting an effective Fast
Cruise is provided in the Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM)
and at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
3306
SEA TRIALS
1. Sea Trials shall be conducted upon completion of all
availabilities. Primary emphasis during this (nominal) five-day
underway period is testing equipment and certifying systems and
capabilities in accordance with the direction provided in the
JFMM.
2. Training in basic underway functional areas should also be
conducted, especially in the areas of navigation, CDC surface
operations, deck seamanship, flight deck emergency operations
and damage control. Training should not disrupt the primary
purpose of Sea Trials described above.
3307
SHAKEDOWN TRAINING
1. Shakedown training is conducted for ships completing new
construction, or overhauls of greater than nine months duration.
27
30 Jun 14
Shakedown training is only conducted if significant at sea
operations or transits are scheduled between completion of
construction/overhaul and commencement of the Post Shakedown
Availability (PSA). This includes post-maintenance carriers
scheduled for home port transit prior to completing Basic Phase
ULT.
2. The purpose of shakedown training is to ensure the crew is
capable of safely performing routine at sea operations,
including flight operations. Primary emphasis shall be on
engineering casualty control, seamanship, navigation, damage
control, flight deck emergency operations, communications and
safety-related exercises.
3. The TYCOM will coordinate with the CSG staff and ATG to
determine shakedown training requirements and schedule
appropriate training periods. They will normally be one to two
weeks in length. Shakedown training will be individually
tailored based on the ship's requirements and expected tasking
during their operations or transit period.
At a minimum, shakedown training should include shakedown
exercises identified in the FDC column of Appendix I, unless
specifically waived by the CSG Commander. Shakedown training is
not required for ships commencing a ULT Phase after overhaul,
since they will receive normal ULT as described in this chapter.
28
30 Jun 14
Section 4
3400
BASIC PHASE TRAINING
GENERAL
Basic Phase training begins the day after the Maintenance Phase
ends (Sea Trials) and concludes when the carrier is considered
an Independent Unit Ready For Tasking / certified ready to
commence Integrated Training. The intent of Basic Phase
training is to provide the TYCOM, CSG and unit with a continuous
and uninterrupted block of time to complete Basic Phase ULT
requirements such as watch station/team training, schoolhouse
training, and unit level sub-events outlined in Appendix I.
For extended maintenance or non-operational periods during the
Basic Phase, review Table 3-5 and Sub-Sections 3302, 3304 and
3306 for Fast Cruise Dock Trials, and Sea Trials requirements.
3401
TRAINING SUPPORT FOR FRTP EVENTS
ATG provides SMEs to support carrier ULT events. The CSG staff
shall request support from ATG via naval message at the
beginning of the FRTP, prior to Ship Board Training Team (SBTT)
course. A sample Training Support Request message is provided
at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site. The Figure 3-7 below lists the
training support personnel the carrier should request, by
mission area. CNAL CVN AT/FP training will be supported by CNAL
representatives.
29
30 Jun 14
Mission Area
Crew Cert
NSSMS
Cert
I-III
SBTT
CART II
Notional Event
Length
3-6 Days
2-5 Days
3-4
Days
4-5 Days 4-5 Days
Air
TSTA
Inport
TSTA/FEP
SAR
CERT
AT/FP
PH I/II/IV
(CNAP
Only)Note
12
25 Days
5 Days
2/3/3 Days
31
52
52
52
DC
113
23
113
113
113
Seamanship/Nav/SAR
24
24
24
24
24
Combat
116
28
129
129
129
27
35
AT/FP
8/8/810
Medical
111
Total
25
2
211
211
211
211
11
32
32
32
3
8/8/8
Notes (Notional Ratings required):
1. 1 x ABE, 1 x ABF, 1 x ABH
2. 1 x ABE, 2 x ABF, 2 x ABH
3. DC
4. 1 x BM, 1 x QM
5. BM/QM
6. 1 x FC, GM, ET, IT, IS, CTR, CTT 3 x OS
7. 2 x FC
8. 1 x OS, FC
9. 1 x FC, GM, ET, IS, CTR, CTT, STG, 2 x IT, 3 x OS
10. GM/MA
11. HM
12. Due to geographical proximity of East Coast CVNs, CNAL ATFP Certs will be
conducted by CNAL N3D.
Figure 3-6 ATG Training Support Personnel
3402
FLIGHT DECK/CATCC CERTIFICATION PHASE I, II and III
Flight Deck/CATCC Certification is the means by which CNAF N73
and N74 evaluate the CVN’s ability to conduct routine day/night
aircraft launch and recovery operations in a safe manner.
Flight Deck and CATCC Certifications are conducted in accordance
with CNAP/CNALINST3500.71 (series). The Aircraft Handling Team
report will be utilized by the Air Department as a CART II
checklist.
30
30 Jun 14
3403
COMMAND ASSESSMENT OF READINESS AND TRAINING II (CART II)
1. The purpose of CART II is to assess the training needs of
the ship and develop a training plan for the subsequent Basic
Phase training period. In order to reach trained strength, it
is imperative to develop both skills (through teaching) and
experience (through repetition). Therefore the outcome of CART
will be a clear understanding of specific training requirements
with a detailed plan for accomplishing and achieving requisite
experience. At the conclusion of CART II, representatives from
the TYCOM, ATG, Strike Group Commander, and Air Wing Commander
will develop a detailed, tailored schedule for completing the
Unit Level phase of the training.
CART II should be preferably
scheduled the first five-day in port period following Flight
Deck Certification.
2. The CVN CO will provide a Ready-to-Train letter to the ATG
TLO verifying completion/status of required Afloat Self
Assessment (ASA) check sheets, LOK exams, and Watch Team
Replacement Plans (WRTP) required to conduct CART II.
Additionally, this letter will specify all weapons systems,
including minor caliber guns, are configured to support CART II.
CIWS firing keys will be removed or key custody procedures in
place and ESSM/NSSM/RAM, if loaded, will have the safe/operate
plugs removed. The CVN CO shall also provide a signed copy of
the CO’S Battle Orders and the ship’s most recent CSDL. The
CO’s Ready-to-Train letter and Battle Orders will be submitted
not later than seven days prior to commencement of the training
event. An example is available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
3. CART II consists of three elements, conducted over a five
day period:
a. Days One-Two. ATG personnel, using ASA checklists
contained in the Training and Assessment Cards (TACs), conduct a
thorough review of the ship’s material and administrative
readiness to conduct training. This shall include an assessment
of the ship's ongoing training and PQS programs and WTRP.
Individual team drill continues in preparation for the Unit
Level phase of training.
b. Days Three-Four. Training and evaluations of the ship's
training teams (ADTT, DCTT, CSTT, etc.) are conducted by ATG
personnel. Training battle problems will include Condition I
and III scenarios designed to measure proficiency of the ship's
training teams. It is recognized operable equipment and
material conditions will be affected by the conduct of these
scenarios. The primary concern is to evaluate the ability of
the ship's training teams to plan, conduct and evaluate to the
maximum extent possible.
c. Day Five. A scheduling session is conducted at the
completion of CART II. Representatives from the ship, ATG, CSG
31
30 Jun 14
staff, TYCOM and Air Wing Commander review and approve a plan
for Basic Phase ULT, based on the ship’s training manual
(previously developed by the ship). All major events should be
included in the plan, especially those requiring outside
services. Sample schedules for conducting CART II are provided
at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
3404
TAILORED SHIP'S TRAINING AVAILABILITY (TSTA)
1. TSTA is a multi-phase event conducted under TYCOM and CSG
supervision by ATG. The specific focus of each TSTA is
described in detail below. The purpose of TSTA is not merely to
give the crew a solid foundation of unit level operating
proficiency, but also to develop or enhance the ship's ability
to self-train following completion of the unit phase.
2. In addition to working with and through the ship's training
teams to conduct exercises, ATG will include an assessment of
the ship's ongoing training and PQS programs as part of each
TSTA.
a. By the start of TSTA, the ship should have PQS-qualified
Condition I and III watch teams.
b. The air wing will embark to conduct carrier
qualifications, receive training in shipboard damage control and
survival, and to help the ship complete training exercises that
require air services.
c. Although training is focused at the unit level, the ship
and air wing integration effort begins during this period and
each at sea period should be utilized to build proficiency in
flight deck operations, basic Case I, II and III procedures and
search and rescue operations, including rescue planning
coordination and mishap reporting procedures. The ultimate goal
is a smooth transition to the Integrated Phase.
3. TSTA In Port. This five-day in port period is primarily
utilized to resolve CART II discrepancies and to prepare for
TSTA (underway). Also, classroom training can be requested from
the CVN TLO or any ATG Warfare Team Leader. To allow the ship
sufficient time to resolve CART II discrepancies, TSTA In Port
should be scheduled no earlier than 30 days after the completion
of CART II, operational schedule permitting.
4. Fleet Synthetic Trainer – Unit Level (FST-U). Mandatory
unit level event that utilizes the Navy Continuous Training
Environment(NCTE) for event distribution. FST-U is a scenariobased, objective-driven, three to five day event normally
conducted during TSTA In Port, scheduled by CSG staff and
directly supported by ATG, CSCS and other agencies as required.
FST-U scenarios shall meet the objectives listed in APP B of the
Fleet Synthetic Training Program COMUSFLTFORCOM/COMPACFLTINST
3500.3(series). Primary objective is to improve tactical
32
30 Jun 14
proficiency by developing basic communications/link skills and
completing unit level TYCOM combat systems training requirements
tailored to individual CO/CSG objectives. Additional
information concerning FST-U can be found in section 3603.
5. TSTA/FEP. The TSTA period will be conducted as a 25-day
underway block, with the air wing embarked throughout. The
following breakdown provides emphasis points during this
underway period:
a. TSTA I. Emphasis during this nominal eight day underway
period is on navigation, seamanship, engineering, damage
control, and other training. Basic flight deck operations
consist of drills and limited air wing carrier qualifications.
Combat Systems training is focused on shipboard training areas
where support from the air wing is not required.
b. TSTA II. Emphasis during this nominal eight day
underway period is on flight deck operations, increased emphasis
on Combat Systems, Engineering and Damage Control Condition I
and III tactical and casualty control scenario execution, while
maximizing use of air wing support. The Evolved/NATO Sea
Sparrow Missile System (ESSM/NSSM) Certification should be
completed by TSTA Phase II. By the end of this phase, each of
the ship's training teams should be capable of planning,
conducting, evaluating and critiquing exercises within its
functional area.
c.
TSTA III.
Nominal seven day period with three purposes:
(1) Train the crew on complex unit phase exercises
(2) Prepare for a Final Evaluation Problem (FEP)
(3) Continued air wing integration with increased
complexity of integration drills.
d. Simulation and scenario-based training. During the
Basic Phase, the ship will demonstrate proficiency by conducting
complex scenarios utilizing embedded trainers (BFTT and BEWT).
BFTT shall be utilized to complete Condition III and Condition I
Combat Systems driven scenarios. The Ship’s CSTT shall refer to
the ATG Complexity Matrix to determine required complexity for
Condition III and Condition I scenarios. BFTT will be the
primary device utilized for all Combat Systems in port training
events. BFTT requirements are further defined in sub-section
3606 of this chapter.
3405
FINAL EVALUATION PROBLEM (FEP)
1. Overview. FEP is a nominal two-day graded event at the
conclusion of the TSTA portion of the underway period. FEP is
the culmination of Basic Phase ULT and evaluates the ship’s
33
30 Jun 14
“within the lifelines” ability to conduct combat missions,
support functions and survive complex casualty control
situations. It provides ATG the opportunity to evaluate ship
readiness and its ability to sustain readiness through selftraining. ATG will observe and assess aggregate shipboard watch
standing, warfighting and ship survival proficiencies, and the
ship’s resident capacity to sustain and build upon those
proficiencies. Ships completing FEP will have demonstrated the
minimum required skills to proceed to the Integrated Phase. The
CSG will recommend to the TYCOM the carrier be considered ready
to commence Integrated Phase training.
2.
FEP Key Elements.
a.
Conducted in two Phases:
(1) Phase I consists of the ship operating in a hostile
environment. The ship is expected to conduct limited or no
flight ops, and will be evaluated on its ability to successfully
overcome all threats. Based on how the scenario evolves, the
ship may be required to go to General Quarters; however, careful
attention must be given to planning and performing those events
required to be executed in a non-GQ environment. The aim of FEP
Phase I is to test the watch standers' ability to react
effectively to threats in order to successfully overcome damage
and hostile action. For successful completion of FEP Phase I,
the scenario presented by the ship's ITT must test all the watch
teams in all the Primary Mission Areas. The watch teams must
demonstrate the ability to conduct timely and appropriate
responses in order to prevail against all likely aggressors and
achieve the mission.
(2) Phase II consists of the ship operating in a hostile
environment. An escalating series of events will require the
ship to go to General Quarters. The scenario will incorporate
an overwhelming series of threats. The aim of FEP Phase II is
to test the command and control of the ship to prioritize
actions in the face of overwhelming adversity. For successful
completion of FEP Phase II, the scenario presented by the ship's
ITT must test the ship's command and control, in all the Primary
Mission Areas when faced with progressively demanding incidents
that are ultimately overwhelming. The ship's command and
control teams must demonstrate the ability to relieve vital
stations, assess damage reports and respond by directing the
efforts of the watch standers to conduct vital actions in order
to ensure that the overall mission is not compromised and where
possible recover warfighting capability.
b. Ship’s ITT will develop and conduct FEP with CSG
guidance and ATG-assist.
c. Safety is paramount. Imposed artificialities and
simulations are necessary and must be understood by ship’s
personnel.
34
30 Jun 14
d. The tailored scenario will include warfighting skills
and tactical decision making abilities required to during fleet
operations, but will focus on single-ship operations tailored to
ship-specific systems. FEP will culminate in a Total Ship
Survivability Exercise (TSSE) that will evaluate the ship’s
ability to survive/recover from significant battle damage.
e. Casualty control exercises will be incorporated to
ensure watch teams can reconfigure equipment in a simulated
hostile and/or restricted maneuvering environment and operate
the ship with material degradation.
f. Watch teams presented must be on a command-approved
watch bill. Transitions between Conditions of Readiness are at
the CVN CO’s discretion.
g. The ship's training teams will demonstrate their ability
to plan and execute integrated ship-wide training and for
follow-on training.
h. The ship’s material condition must support safe conduct
and watch standers need to be aware of all equipment
limitations.
i. ATG will evaluate all events and assign grades in
accordance with the relevant TACs to those events in Appendix I
of this instruction. This score will form part of the overall
Basic Phase grade.
3.
Responsibilities for conduct of FEP.
a.
TYCOM:
(1) Monitor FEP completion.
(2) Coordinate TYCOM/CSG/ATG/CVN Basic Phase planning
conference prior to commencement of ULT.
b.
CSG:
(1) The CSG staff will be the Senior Observer. The
Senior Observer will resolve questions concerning the conduct of
the evaluation.
(2) Assist ship in procuring required services and
coordinate aircraft/vehicles/boats embarkation.
CVN.
(3) Review schedule of events (SOE) presented by the
(4) Submit training support requirements message
following scheduling conference.
35
30 Jun 14
c.
ATG:
(1) Develop and deliver background information required
for the ship/CSG to construct TSTA/FEP scenarios. This package
will include geo-political, Electronic Order of Battle (EOB),
Naval Order of Battle (NOB), required services, etc. To provide
realism and complement the scenario, ATG will assist ship’s CSTT
to coordinate intelligence data including source, time sensitive
data, and exercise messages.
(2) Provide personnel for the TSTA/FEP Team and
coordinate scenario/SOE tailoring with the ship’s ITT. The
senior ATG representative will report directly to the Senior
Observer.
(3) Monitor ITT conduct of TSTA/FEP. Ship manning
constraints and/or scenario complexity may necessitate active
ATG participation in FEP. CSG and ATG coordinate degree of
participation.
(4) ATG CVN TLO or designated representative will
provide the CSG, TYCOM and CVN CO an objective assessment by
mission area of crew performance upon completion of each phase.
Sample end-of-mission reports are provided at the CNAF N7
SharePoint site.
d.
CVN CO:
(1) Ensure ITT develops
scenario/SOE. The ITT will use
information provided by ATG, as
scenarios meet required CSG/ATG
requirements.
and executes a TSTA/FEP
the TSTA/FEP background
a guideline, ensuring all
objectives and safety
(2) Provide a Ready-to-Train Letter to the ATG TLO at
the in-brief and in the event of any weapons posture change.
This letter will specify all weapons systems, including minor
caliber guns, are configured to support TSTA/FEP. CIWS firing
keys will be removed or key custody procedures in place and if
ESSM/NSSM/RAM loaded, the safe/operate plugs are removed.
(3) At a minimum, provide a copy of the following (as
applicable) to the Senior ATG Representative at the in-brief:
CO’s Battle Orders, current copy of the ship’s Eight O’clock
Reports, Condition I/II/III Watch Bills, training team
designations and a list of the ship’s standard simulations.
(4) Obtain OPAREA clearance and request required
services to support TSTA/FEP.
(5) Conduct Pre-TSTA/FEP briefings as required.
4. Standardization. ATG is the TYCOM/CSG executive agent for
FEP procedural and standardization issues. ATG will advise CSG
36
30 Jun 14
staff of procedural and standardization issues to ensure TYCOM
requirements are met.
3406
BASIC PHASE COMPLETION
The ship’s Basic Phase completion will reference all graded subevents listed in the Basic Phase column in Appendix I along with
all required ICAVs. These sub-events are completed during:
Flight Deck/CATCC Certification, CART II, TSTA In Port, TSTA
I/II/III, and FEP. A ship is deemed to have completed Basic
Phase when sufficient training has been conducted to achieve the
minimum Experience levels mandated in Appendix I to this
instruction and a Performance grade has been submitted for all
sub-events requiring a ‘P’ score during Basic Phase. Experience
levels will fluctuate daily according to the
learn/maintain/degrade periodicities, underway training
opportunities and personnel turnover. However, on average, a
ship should maintain a steady upward progression until attaining
Sustainment Phase Experience requirements.
37
30 Jun 14
38
30 Jun 14
Section 5
3500
INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINMENT TRAINING
INTEGRATED TRAINING EVENTS
1. The goal of the Integrated Phase is to bring together the
individual units to afford strike group level integrated
training and operations in a challenging operational
environment. It provides an opportunity for units and staffs to
complete CSG Commander staff planning and Warfare Commanders’
courses, conduct multi-unit in port and at sea training and
build on individual skill proficiencies attained during Basic
Phase. During this phase, CSG decision makers and watch
standers build the foundation for performing their anticipated
deployed mission.
2. Force Protection Exercise (FPEX). Consists of a four-day in
port SOE-driven exercise to certify the strike group in AT/FP
prior to deployment. The exercise is scenario driven;
increasing in complexity with detailed geo-political injects
that result in the increase of force protection conditions from
Alpha through Delta. It is designed to stress the CSG ability
to detect, deter and deny terrorist activities.
3. FST-Warfare Commander (FST-WC). A mandatory Integrated
Phase event that utilizes the NTCE. FST-WC is a two to three
day test and a two to three day exercise event, conducted in
consecutive weeks, which focuses on execution of ASW, SUW,
Strike and AD/TBMD tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP)
while validating OPTASK SUPPS and Pre-Planned Responses (PPRs).
FST-WCs are single/dual/multi-warfare focused, scripted
scenarios. This event may be a designated a JNTC/Coalition
event. This is a self-assessed event with designated training
teams from staffs and ships critiquing watch execution and
evaluating OPTASKS and PPRs. Training audience includes warfare
commanders and all CSG assigned units. FST WC provides the
opportunity to establish communications/link connectivity as
well as develop a Common Operating Picture (COP), all while
tactically executing a common mission in a less complex scenario
than a FST-GC.
4. FST-Group Commander (FST-GC). A mandatory Integrated Phase
event that utilizes the NCTE. FST-GC is a five-day test and a
three to five day exercise, conducted in consecutive weeks,
onboard fleet units using a tailored battle problem distributed
from the TTG/FDNF battle lab. Primary focus of training is the
CSG staff, Warfare NMET/JTT-based training objectives,
concentrating on the execution of plans, tactics and procedures
through scenario execution. TTGs mentor CSG staff improving
readiness for Integrated Phase underway operations. Training
audience includes CSG Warfare Commanders, CAG, staffs, and all
CSG assigned units. FST-GC builds on the group commander
training scenario which leads into the COMPTUEX scenario;
providing the opportunity to establish the battle rhythm, C4I
39
30 Jun 14
connectivity, develop the COP and practice TADIL coordination,
while tactically executing a common mission/scenario. This
event may be designated a JNTC/Coalition event.
5. Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUEX). An 18-day SOEdriven exercise and a three-day Final Battle Problem (FBP). It
is conducted and directed by the Carrier Strike Group 4/15 (CSG
4/15) Commander, and is focused on developing the carrier/air
wing team into a cohesive unit and, if additional assets are
available, integrating these units into the deploying CSG. In
addition, the carrier/air wing team and available CSG units will
develop basic warfighting proficiencies, and coordinate CSG
operations that will be required during the sustainment phase of
training. The deploying CSG Commander closely monitors the
progress of the carrier and air wing team. Integration of the
deploying CSG Commander’s staff with the CSG 4/15 Commander’s
staff occurs at the outset of COMPTUEX.
a. FBP. The culmination of COMPTUEX is a three-day
exercise monitored and assessed by CSG 4/15. It is designed to
stress the CSG staff, carrier/air wing and CSG units across all
warfare areas. When proficiency is demonstrated, the CSG 4/15
Commander will submit a recommendation to the NFC on the CSG’s
readiness for the next phase of training.
6. Combat Operations Efficiency (COE)/Blue Water Certification.
During COMPTUEX, CSG 4/15 will conduct an assessment of the
ability of the ship and its Air Wing to operate at range from
shore-based diversion facilities. Satisfactory completion is a
requirement for COMPTUEX.
7. Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFEX). The final phase of
Integrated Training is participation in a JTFEX at sea. During
this exercise the entire CSG will be assessed in its overall
performance for major combat operations.
8. FST-Joint (FST-J). This applies to any FST event that rises
to the criteria specified for a JFCOM J7/JNTC event and is
designated as a joint event by JNTC/JWFC. FST-J is normally
three to five days and may satisfy WC/GC/S/F criteria based on
achieved NMETS/JMETS objectives. FST-J may be used for
operational level (JFMCC, JTF-HQ) training when appropriate or
required. This exercise is eligible for Coalition
participation.
9. Deployment Certification. The culmination of training
attained when a group, and its associated staff and units, are
trained, assessed and certified to its required capability for
major combat operations. Requirements are further defined in
COMPACFLT/COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 3501 (series) and USFF/CPF
111800ZFEB2014 Naval message.
10. Preparations for Overseas Movement (POM). Once a group has
achieved deployable status, the group will normally return to
40
30 Jun 14
port for a period of POM and Deploying Group System Integration
Testing (DGSIT) prior to deployment.
11. For extended maintenance or non-operational periods during
the Integrated Phase, review Table 3-5 and Sub-Sections 3302,
3304 and 3306 for Fast Cruise Dock Trials, and Sea Trials
requirements.
3501
SUSTAINMENT TRAINING EVENTS
1. Sustainment Phase training is designed to exercise units and
staffs in multi-mission planning and execution, to include
effective interoperability in a wartime environment. Once a
unit or a group attains the required readiness levels to be
available for forward deployed operations, key proficiencies
required to carry out anticipated tasks must be maintained
through tailored Pre-deployment sustainment training approved by
the NFCs. Post-deployment sustainment Training, also approved
by the NFCs, may be required to maintain MCO-Ready status.
Sustainment training, in port and at sea, will ensure forces
maintain proficiency in all mission essential tasks in order to
minimize operational risk. The extent of the sustainment
training will vary depending on the unit’s length of time in a
surge readiness status, as well as the anticipated tasking.
a. FST-Sustainment (FST-S). A sustainment phase event to
be completed within 90 days of deployment certification. FST-S
consists of a five-day test and a three to five day exercise.
It is conducted in consecutive weeks aboard Fleet units and
selected shore sites using a tailored battle problem distributed
from the TTG/FDNF Battle Lab. The primary training audience is
CSG staffs and assigned units. NMET-based training objectives
concentrate on execution of plans, tactics and procedures
through scenario execution and the ability of the training
audience to execute planned missions in a maritime or joint
environment. FST-S provides the opportunity to establish battle
rhythm, communications connectivity, develop the COP, and
practice link coordination while tactically executing a common
mission/scenario. This event may be designated a JNTC/Coalition
event and is scalable between a WC-level or higher event
depending on proficiency requirements.
b. FST-Force (FST-F). An integrated/sustainment phase
Force-level training event. FST-F is a two week test and three
to five day training event. It is conducted during consecutive
weeks onboard Fleet units and applicable shore sites using a
tailored battle problem distributed from the TTG/FDNF Battle
Lab. The primary training audience is the JFMCC, JFACC, TASWC,
CSG staffs and assigned units. FST-F provides the opportunity
to train multiple strike groups in Force level operations,
establish battle rhythm, communications connectivity,
development of the COP and practice link coordination while
tactically executing a common mission/scenario. Participation
41
30 Jun 14
in a FST-F can satisfy the WC/GC requirement.
designated a JNTC/Coalition event.
This event may be
c. Sustainment Exercise (SUSTEX). During the Sustainment
Phase, a SUSTEX may be required in order to sustain core skills,
maintain Combat Operations Efficiency (COE) certification,
demonstrate the ability to operate as part of a joint,
multinational, and interagency force, and ensure proficiency is
maintained in all NMETs. Strike Group Commanders are responsible
for conducting sustainment training events in order to maintain
group/unit certifications and readiness levels attained during
the final employment certification.
3502
UNIT LEVEL TRAINING ASSESSMENT - SUSTAINMENT (ULTRA-S)
1. As required during each 32-month CONUS FRTP cycle (normally
after each major deployment), the CVN will schedule an
assessment of its ULT proficiency. During ULTRA-S, the ship
will renew the performance assessments of those training events
that are required to be maintained in accordance with Appendix I
Sustainment column. Its purpose is to ensure the CVN is ready
for a potential second deployment within the same FRTP cycle.
Depending on the ship’s schedule, ULTRA-S may be conducted
concurrently or separately from any required SUSTEX.
2. ULTRA-S also provides the CSG staff a mid-cycle opportunity
to observe, assess and evaluate shipboard watch standing, war
fighting and survival proficiencies while sustaining requisite
readiness levels. Damage Control readiness is an area that
easily atrophies following an extended deployment.
3. The CSG, assisted by ATG, will conduct an ULTRA-S to
determine the ship’s ability to self-train and maintain
proficiency in all applicable primary mission areas. ULTRA-S
will be a three to five day event consisting of a review of the
ship’s material and administrative readiness to conduct training
and their ability to self-train, conduct combat missions,
support, and survive combat casualty control situations during
the remainder of the Sustainment Phase.
4. The content of the evolutions during ULTRA-S are at the
discretion of the CSG staff but must be sufficient to maintain
Sustainment Phase training experience and performance
requirements in Appendix I. If Sustainment Phase periodicity is
broken for any reason, then mandated Basic and Integrated Phase
training evolutions for that event are expected to be completed
before the CVN re-deploys.
5. For extended maintenance or non-operational periods during
the Sustainment Phase, review Table 3-5 and Sub-Sections 3302,
3304 and 3306 for Fast Cruise Dock Trials, and Sea Trials
requirements.
42
30 Jun 14
43
30 Jun 14
Section 6
3600
OTHER TYPES OF TRAINING
LIMITED TEAM TRAINING (LTT)
1. Throughout Basic Phase, team trainers and in port training
devices play a key role in developing the ship's operating
proficiency. Maximizing use of shipboard training devices saves
operating funds and gives the crew a head start in preparing for
strike group operations. In port periods throughout Basic Phase
should be used to qualify team members. These periods should
also be used to refine and develop drill guides and scenarios.
2. LTTs are intended to assist the carrier in correcting
training shortfalls by addressing specific deficiencies in
warfare area proficiencies as well as the carrier’s ability to
maintain personnel, management, and material readiness.
Successful assessments are a function of carrier’s capabilities
and preparedness, which can be enhanced by LTTs. LTTs are not
to be used solely to prepare for or enhance near-term assessment
results.
3. LTT support will be limited to Fleet Concentration Areas
(FCA) for training supporting near-term operational tasking.
LTT requests for locations outside FCA will be supported
provided ATG resources (personnel and TADTAR) are available.
ATG manpower resources are limited and cannot guarantee filling
every request.
4. Ships may request and schedule LTTs within six months of
desired training dates. If long range scheduling conflicts
arise, LTTs may be cancelled for higher priority events. ATG
will work with the carrier and CSG to reschedule.
5. Training objectives must be clearly stated. The servicing
ATG will use the ship-provided training objectives to establish
the ATG Training Team with the appropriate skill set. ATG will
develop the training SOE with the ship to ensure effective use
of resources. To ensure requested training can be fully
supported, the following guidance is provided:
a. LTT requests must be sent to servicing ATG via Naval
message. INFO copies shall be provided to homeport ATG, CSG and
TYCOM N7.
b. LTT requests must specify desired warfare training area.
Request should include training objectives, specific dates
requested, PRI and SEC desired dates/times, identify U/W and in
port days, locations, and method of pick-up and drop-off of SME.
This will ensure ATG allocates proper manning based on current
schedule and future training requirements. A sample message can
be found at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
44
30 Jun 14
3601 ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (AT/FP) TRAINING AND
CERTIFICATION.
During the AT/FP Certification process, the ship and the CSG
review AT/FP readiness and tailor the ship’s FRTP to ensure
continuous proficiency in the AT/FP warfare area. Details of
the phased AT/FP training and certification process are
available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site
3602 FLEET REPLACEMENT SQUADRON (FRS) CARRIER QUALIFICATION
(CQ)/ TRAINING COMMAND (TRACOM) CQ.
The carrier may be tasked to support FRS and/or TRACOM CQ
periods following Flight Deck Certification. FRS CQ/TRACOM CQ
is normally seven days underway, and may be scheduled at any
time in the FRTP following completion of Flight Deck
Certification. Ship’s engineering training (or other needed
training) is normally emphasized in non-flying hours during this
underway period.
3603
1.
SYNTHETIC TRAINING (FST AND NON-FST)
Battle Force Tactical Training System (BFTT)
a. BFTT is designed to provide training capabilities for
unit and embarked staff personnel to achieve and maintain combat
readiness.
b. BFTT is a highly flexible system essential to the ship’s
ULT, FST and Strike Group training. It supports joint/allied
exercise interoperability and provides the ITT, CVN CO, ATG and
CSG with the ability to conduct coordinated, realistic, high
stress Combat System training for developing war fighting
proficiency and maintaining combat readiness. It is capable of
placing watch teams within a tactical, realistic or close to
realistic environment capable of expanding tactical decision
making and coordination of ships weapons, organic assets, and
non-organic assets.
c. BFTT use in conducting training scenarios is mandatory.
Required utilization is ten hours per month. Current authorized
scenarios used for reporting will be provided by ATG. CSO,
CDCO, and Training Officers will coordinate scheduling.
d. Safety. Ships conducting Combat Systems training with
BFTT are not authorized to control aircraft, due to possible
navigational errors caused by the BFTT Navigation Simulator
(NAVSIM). This also applies to uploading navigational data to
any aircraft getting ready to launch. Flight operations are
restricted to daytime Visual Flight Rules (VFR) during BFTT
training.
45
30 Jun 14
e. BFTT Required Schools. Appropriate technicians must be
trained and attend requisite schools:
2.
(1) BOPC Course
S-221-4005
(2) Waterfront BFTT Maintenance Course
A-150-0050
(3) BEWT
S-102-0045
FLEET SYNTHETIC TRAINING (FST)
a. This section provides a general overview of FST events.
Details of Unit, Warfare Commander, Strike Group Commander and
Joint FST events are provided in sub-sections 3404, 3500 and
3501 of this chapter.
b. In port tactical training is conducted by means of
multi-warfare synthetic exercises implemented through the FST
program. FST provides graduated warfare proficiency,
operational mission rehearsal, and joint interoperability
training on the ship’s own equipment, through a series of
evaluated training events. FST integrates multi-unit/multiwarfare in port training into the Fleet Response Training Plan
(FRTP) using shore based simulation, ship embedded simulation,
stimulation systems, and distribution networks. FST develops
and maintains war-fighting proficiency through in port tactical
exercises to further enhance underway training during the FRTP.
c. The FST training program begins during the FRTP’s Basic
Phase Unit Level Training at a basic exercise level. FST
becomes progressively more complex and challenging as a Strike
Group progresses through the FRTP. During Basic Phase Unit
Level Training, Fleet Synthetic Training-Unit (FST-U) exercises
are available in applicable warfare areas for units to develop
and maintain proficiency. They provide an opportunity to master
skills prior to participating in Strike Group events in the
Integrated Training Phase. The Carrier Strike Group Commander
uses FST events to train the CSG in multi-unit, multi-warfare
events. The FST series culminates in Sustainment Phase Training
for Strike Groups in multi-mission planning and execution.
d. The execution of FRTP events using the Navy Continuous
Training Environment (NCTE) distributed scenario architecture is
part of an effort to improve training effectiveness and
efficiency through the use of modeling and simulations (M&S)
systems. The goal is for M&S to support a Fleet Synthetic
Training (FST) Plan with repeatable, sustainable and scalable
architecture that can accommodate unit through Strike Group
level training, including Joint and Coalition forces. To
effectively participate in FST exercises, it is imperative ships
be ready to enter into the NCTE virtual environment. This can
only be achieved through frequent use of installed or embedded
simulation systems in realistic scenarios that flex not only the
systems themselves, but also the ability of the watch teams to
46
30 Jun 14
continually improve their war fighting effectiveness throughout
a wide range of tactical environments. COs should strive to
incorporate new M&S systems into training plans as soon as they
are installed and operational. These systems provide
significant opportunity for innovative training solutions.
Ships are encouraged to experiment and provide feedback on
lessons learned and best practices to CNAF N7.
e. The CSG Commander shall monitor unit participation and
performance in all FST events.
(1) Ensure units have satisfactorily completed FST-U
prior to participation in integrated exercises.
(2) Ensure FST events for subordinate units are
scheduled and listed in WEBSKED.
3604
NAVIGATION TRAINING
1. Simulators are available for instruction in and exercise of
BRIDGE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (BRM) and SPECIAL EVOLUTIONS. CVNs
are required to complete two BRM per FRTP.
2. Yokosuka, Sasebo, Everett, Pearl Harbor, San Diego, and
Mayport serve their Fleet Concentration Areas (FCAs).
Additional information may be found on the scheduling Website:
http://www.nsstraining.net/mainpage.html.
3. Additional details about navigation simulator training can
be found at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
4. Code For Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES) Training shall
be conducted to ensure all U.S. Navy Forces are able to
communicate effectively and continue to operate safely with
Western Pacific Naval Symposium (WPNS) member navies at sea IAW
established international laws, norms and standards, including
CUES. At a minimum, CVNs will conduct CUES training once per
OFRP during the Basic Unit Level Phase of training to ensure
watch teams attain a solid understanding of CUES. Additional
CUES training should be scheduled as required to maintain CUES
proficiency throughout the entire OFRP. Watch Standers
completion of CUES training shall be documented utilizing the RAdmin program. Additionally, completion of CUES training shall
be documented in the Commanding Officer’s pre TSTA/FEP Ready–toTrain Letter presented to the ATG TLO during the TSTA/FEP inbrief. CUES documents and required training can be accessed for
download at the COMPACFLT Maritime OPS Center website and at the
CTF 80 CAS page, respectively;
http://www.pr.cas.navy.smil.mil/navy/cpf/home.nsf/main.html
http://www.uar.cas.navy.smil.mil/fleet/usff/site.nsf/main.html
47
30 Jun 14
3605
REACTOR DEPARTMENT TRAINING
1. The Nuclear Power Training Manual (NPTM), and Engineering
Department Manual (EDM), serve as the primary guiding documents
for training program design and implementation within the
Reactor Department. Consequently, the Reactor Department
training program should conform to the requirements of these
over-arching documents and the EDM and NPTM have precedence when
any conflicts exist with this instruction.
2. The periodicity of Operational Reactor Safeguard Examination
(ORSE)/Post Overhaul Reactor Safeguard Examination (PORSE) is
governed by OPNAV and Fleet Commander instructions. Approval of
the CNO and the Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion is required
to extend the interval between examinations beyond 15 months.
For CVNs, CNAF has determined that, in order to maximize
scheduling flexibility during the FRTP, ORSE shall normally be
scheduled during the homeward bound transit from deployment with
the subsequent ORSE typically falling between COMPTUEX and
JTFEX. The Nuclear Propulsion Examining Board places heavy
emphasis on day-to-day performance of the Reactor Department
from one ORSE to the next. By design, this day-to-day
philosophy makes it nearly impossible for a ship to ramp up
performance just in time for the inspection. In order to
maintain propulsion readiness at desired levels throughout the
cycle, the training of nearly 400 nuclear propulsion plant
operators requires the conduct of frequent (almost daily)
propulsion plant drills and evolutions.
3. These drills and evolutions should be worked into the daily
“Battle Rhythm” of the ship. Typical CVNs conduct between six
and ten propulsion and electrical limiting drill sets per week
at sea. Experience has shown that electrically limiting drills
can significantly improve watch team performance during actual
casualties and contrary to popular opinion should not result in
damage to electronic systems. Ships that routinely shutdown
electronics before drills may introduce more problems in
equipment upon recovery because of faulty switch lineups,
condensation, and thermal effects. During drills affecting the
electric plant, ships are encouraged to conduct integrated
drills that involve both the PPDT and the CSTT in evaluating the
restoration effort.
4. Ships that have taken this integrated approach to training
have shown dramatic improvement in restoration of critical
combat systems during drills or following actual casualties.
With this integrated approach, ships that can demonstrate
proficiency in rapid restoration have enhanced their war
fighting readiness, reduced the operational impact of casualties
and are subjected to fewer restrictions.
5. CVNs have typically operated with as few as three and as
many as six steaming watch sections, depending on the state of
the ship’s qualification and training program. Aside from the
48
30 Jun 14
obvious quality of service implications, increasing the number
of watch sections has proven to directly translate to increased
level of knowledge within the department.
3606
MONTHLY IN PORT TRAINING EXERCISES (MITE)
1. General. In port training can be arranged for either
individual or multiple participants. CSG staff and Carriers are
encouraged to identify, schedule and participate in as many in
port training opportunities as required to maintain tactical and
operational proficiency at the highest levels. Regularly
scheduled group in port training events will be organized by a
designated In port Training Coordinator (ITC)as shown in Figure
3-8 below:
49
30 Jun 14
Fleet Concentration Area
In port Training Coordinator
San Diego
ATG PAC
Pearl Harbor
ATG MIDPAC
Yokosuka
ATG WESTPAC
Everett / Bremerton
ATG PACNORWEST
Norfolk
ATG LANT
Figure 3-7 Regional ITCs
2. ITC Duties. The ITC is responsible for scheduling and
coordinating in port training exercises called for in Appendix
I.
a. The ITC and commands assisting in the execution shall
make the final determination of the amount and type of training.
The ITC will ensure in port exercises are scheduled so as not to
directly conflict with Integrated or Sustainment Phase training
events.
b. The ITC will ensure an Officer Conducting Exercise (OCE)
designation is established for each in port exercise. While the
ITC can be an exercise OCE, there is training benefit in
planning, conducting and debriefing exercise events.
c. The OCE will ensure appropriate documentation required
to support each series of exercises (e.g. OPGEN, Pre-Ex, CONOPS)
is promulgated as necessary. The OCE will submit a postexercise report to the ITC and event participants that
identifies the level of training accomplished and suggested
areas for improvement.
d. The ITC will assemble data reflecting ship participation
and forward a quarterly summary report to CNAP/CNAL.
3. CSG Duties. CSGs are encouraged to ensure all carriers make
the maximum use of in port training opportunities but can excuse
ships from participation in the event of special circumstances.
Justification for exclusion from in port training must take into
consideration opportunities to recover lost readiness and is
therefore only expected when POM, major inspection/certification
and/or installs compromise physical ability to participate.
4. CVN CO. Perform duties as exercise OCE, when tasked.
Ensure participation in the various in port training
opportunities is a high priority. Active participation by
training team members, division supervisors and inexperienced
trainees in pre-exercise planning, event execution and post50
30 Jun 14
exercise debriefs is essential in maximizing training benefit
and value to all participants. Crewmembers should be encouraged
to cross deck to a neighboring ship in order to participate in
scheduled training if maintenance, install or other industrial
work makes participation onboard impractical. The ability to
implement a robust in port training program using embedded
simulator capability and in port training resources is a
hallmark of an effective FRTP plan geared toward maintaining
watch team and training team proficiency.
3607
CARRIER AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (CATCC) TEAM TRAINING
CATCC Team Training is conducted during the maintenance phase of
the FRTP. The team training course (C-222-2017) is conducted at
Naval Air Technical Training Center (NATTC), Pensacola, FL.
Each CATCC team shall attend team training in accordance with
CATCC Supplemental Information located at the CNAF N7 SharePoint
site.
3608
PROTECTIVE MEASURES ASSESSMENT PROTOCAL (PMAP)
PMAP is an information technology for the 21st Century (IT-21)
certified CD-ROM based situational awareness tool and database
collection method designed to evaluate Navy Unit Level Training
exercises throughout the FRTP that may have an environmental
effect. Additionally, it provides standard, approved operating
protective measures, policies and planning tools to the CVNs
Commanding Officers to aid in conducting Unit Level Training
with minimal environmental impact.
CVNs shall comply with guidance provided in OPNAVINST 5090.1 and
CNSF/CNAFINST 5090.1(series) during all operations.
51
30 Jun 14
52
Section 7
3700
30 Jun 14
REPORTING
CONSOLIDATED SHIP'S DISCREPANCY LOG (CSDL)
1. The CSDL is a spreadsheet used to track discrepancies
identified throughout the FRTP. The spreadsheet is used to track
Restrictive/Major/Minor discrepancies which, if unresolved, may
lead to degradation in operational or training readiness. The
CSDL is training centric and does not take the place of the
Current Ship’s Maintenance Program (CSMP). Although
discrepancies may exist on both documents, the CSDL serves a
training impact purpose. The CSDL is created during the ship’s
first Basic Phase ULT event (CART I); it is a living document.
Discrepancies noted that are not immediately resolvable shall be
annotated in the CSDL.
2. An updated copy of the CSDL will be provided by the ship to
the TYCOM, via the CSG at the completion of each Basic Phase FRTP
event. The goal is to minimize the discrepancies to ensure
maximum training readiness. Additionally, the ship shall provide
mid-month update reports to the TYCOM via the CSG until the ship
is certified MCO-Ready (or until final resolution of all
discrepancies listed on the CSDL).
3. A sample CSDL may be obtained from COMNAVAIRFOR N7
SharePoint.
3701
CATEGORIES OF DISCREPANCIES DEFINED
The following definitions apply for all FRTP events except Crew
Certification. Specific Crew Certification Restrictive/Major/
Minor definitions can be found in sub section 3100.
1. Restrictive - Those discrepancies that preclude safe
operation of the CVN. CVN shall not proceed with training
continuum until Restrictive discrepancies are corrected.
Restrictive discrepancies shall be cleared by CSG.
2. Major - Those discrepancies that are not Restrictive or
Minor, but which impact training or operations. Major
Discrepancies must be corrected prior to certification of the
watch team, department, event, or system. The CVN may continue
with training continuum; however, discrepancies must be corrected
as soon as possible. Major discrepancies shall be cleared by
CSG. Multiple Major discrepancies may prevent a CVN from
advancing to the next phase of the training continuum.
3. Minor - Those discrepancies that do not affect proper
operation of the ship. CVN can continue with training continuum.
Minor discrepancies shall be corrected as soon as practical.
Minor discrepancies can be cleared by CSG or ship’s force.
53
30 Jun 14
3500.20D
CH 2
3702
END-OF-MISSION
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
26 Jun 13
1. This section provides reporting requirements for specific
portions of the FRTP. Additional information and sample message
formats are available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
2. CART I. Prior to returning to home port from a normal or
surge deployment the carrier shall send a message to the CSG
Commander reporting CART I completion. INFO copies shall be sent
to the TYCOM, NFC, Air Wing Commander and ATG.
a. CART I completion message will provide a preliminary
schedule of major training events to be accomplished during the
FRTP. Sample CART I message format is available at the CNAF N7
SharePoint site.
b. The CSG shall send a CART I endorsement message to the
TYCOM and NFC.
c.
CART I completion message will provide assessments of:
(1) Ship's Integrated Training Team (ITT) organization
and effectiveness.
(2) Afloat Self-Assessment Check sheets
(3) Ship's Watch Team Replacement Plan, utilizing the
following reports:
(a) NEC-producing schools from FLTMPS
(b) Non-NEC schools required by FLTMPS
(c) Enlisted Distribution and Verification Report
(d) Officer Distribution Control Report
(e) Long Range Training Plan (LRTP), including:
1.
TADTAR requirements
2.
Required schools
3.
Required team training
3. CART II. ATG will report the results of CART II to the CSG
using end-of-mission report samples provided at the CNAF N7
SharePoint site. CSG will send CART II End of Mission Report to
TYCOM within seven days of completing the event.
a. The message shall include a list of major discrepancies
and training concerns resulting from the CART II assessment,
including:
(1) Assessment of the ship's ongoing training programs
54
30 Jun 14
(2) Assessment of the Ship's ITT’s ability to brief,
execute and debrief complex drill sets
(3) Assessment of ITT/watch standers’ level of
proficiency and readiness to train in each mission area
(4) Recommendation regarding emphasis for upcoming ULT
(as appropriate)
(5) Identify resources required to complete Basic Phase
training events (i.e. commercial air services, range services,
NCEA).
b. The CART II message shall provide a schedule for
completing remaining Basic Phase training and ICAVs required
during Basic Phase ULT.
c. All discrepancies noted during CART II shall be added to
the CSDL.
4. TYCOM Basic Phase Completion Risk Report. The TYCOM shall
provide a Phase Completion Risk Report if a unit is at risk of
not completing the FRTP Basic Phase on schedule. The report is
required as soon as it is recognized a unit is at risk. This
report will be submitted to appropriate NFCs, info USFF and CPF
using the message template available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint
site.
5. TSTA/FEP. ATG shall report completion of TSTA/FEP to the
CSG, with info copies to the CVN and TYCOM. The report shall
include a brief overview of training conducted, an assessment of
the ship's ongoing training and PQS programs, an assessment of
the crew's readiness for continued training by mission area, and
recommendations regarding follow-on training emphasis (as
appropriate). The CSG will report the completion of ULT within
two working days to the TYCOM. INFO copies will be provided to
CSG 4/15 and NFCs. The CSGs report shall include a plan of
action to correct any deficiencies or accomplish missed training
noted by ATG. The CSG shall assist the carrier and air wing in
preparing the end of Basic Phase training brief for presentation
to CNAP/CNAL N00.
6. TYCOM Basic Phase Completion Report. CNAP/L shall provide a
report to the assigned NFC when the carrier completes Basic
Phase. This requirement is specified in the Fleet Training
Continuum (FTC) instruction. Specifically, CNAP/L will certify
the carrier is ready for follow-on training. The report is
required when the Basic Phase completion certification is granted
to a unit, or not later than 30 days prior to COMPTUEX for Strike
Groups (or major advanced training events for an independent
deployer). This report will be submitted to NFCs (AO dependent),
with info copies to USFF and CPF. A sample Completion Report is
provided at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
55
30 Jun 14
3500.20D
CH 2 CSG 4/15 recommends the aircraft carrier/air wing
7.
COMPTUEX.
team
certifications
to their NFC component.
26 Jun
13
3703
ASSESSMENT OF THE FRTP
1. Ship’s certification authorities (TYCOM for Basic Phase ULT,
NFC for Integrated and Sustainment Training) must evaluate Navy
Forces using NMET and capability standards throughout the FRTP.
The NMET conditions and standards for CVNs are specified for each
training event in the associated Training and Assessment Cards.
2. The FTC instruction (COMUSFLTFORCOM/COMPACFLTINST 3501.3
(series)) requires certification authorities complete a Fleet
Performance Assessment. Fleet Performance Assessments are
intended to certify required training is complete. The
assessment should provide performance data to assist in
development of sustainment training. It should focus on areas
where TYCOMs may improve training objectives.
56
30 Jun 14
Chapter 4
Section 1
4100
SHIPBOARD TRAINING
TRAINING PROGRAM OVERVIEW
GENERAL
1. The execution of a training program requires careful
organization and scheduling in addition to proper administration
of program content and scope.
2. In order to effectively monitor the training program's
progress, comprehensive evaluation, systematic recording and
reporting procedures must be established ship-wide.
a. The U.S. Navy SORM provides functional guidelines for
division, department and ship training programs.
b. OPNAVINST 3500.34 (series), NAVEDTRA 43100-1 (series),
and COMNAVAIRFOR 3500.52 (series) detail administrative
requirements for the PQS program. PQS is an important
sub-system of the command’s overall training program, designed
to be tailored to each individual's particular watch standing
requirements.
c. Guidelines provided in the above manuals should be
adapted and tailored to each ship. The goal is to ensure an
adequate, responsive and realistic training organization exists
for the ship, team, and individual.
4101
TRAINING GOALS
1. Training goals must reflect proficient teams are the primary
shipboard unit for accomplishment of mission tasks and the
individual is the basic element of a proficient team. Each
Sailor must be developed individually and concurrently molded
into a full team member.
2. In order to achieve this goal, the ship’s training program
should achieve the following objectives:
a. Develop basic skills and knowledge of sea-going naval
personnel.
b. Develop specific skills required to maintain and operate
installed equipment.
c. Develop each individual's latent talents along selective
advancement paths.
d.
Develop leadership in All Hands to the fullest extent.
1
30 Jun 14
e. Develop the team skills required of the ships cruising,
battle, damage control and primary and secondary mission area
functional teams.
f. Realize the maximum potential of the total ship,
personnel and equipment systems in order to successfully execute
primary and secondary missions.
g. Develop tactical training for all officers and enlisted
personnel.
h. Develop personnel indoctrination of newly assigned
individuals per OPNAVINST 3120.32 (series).
i. Encourage the training and use of Navy E-Learning assets
and use of the Navy Knowledge Online (NKO) website:
https://www.nko.navy.mil. Every member of the crew should
establish an NKO account and have access to it.
4102
ELEMENTS OF A TRAINING PROGRAM
To maintain an effective training program, the following
elements must be included in the ship's training methodology:
1. Training should be conducted at multiple levels, including
training for: individuals, supervisory watches, supervisors, and
training teams.
2. Training topics should include: required administrative
programs, operations, maintenance, and professional/general
military training.
3. Training topics should relate to the ship's operational
schedule.
4.
The training schedule should be realistic and achievable.
5. Monitoring of actual training should be conducted
effectively and provide feedback for continual improvement.
6. Instruction should be dynamic and conducted by knowledgeable
persons.
7. Senior officers (e.g., CO, XO, Heads of Department (HOD),
Principal Assistants) must show an active interest/involvement
in the training program (i.e. giving/monitoring training).
4103
SHIPBOARD TRAINING PROGRAM
1. Supervisors may develop their own personnel management
tools. However, it is recommended the number of forms and
documents be kept to an absolute minimum. The records required
by this instruction will suffice in all but the most unusual
circumstances. Only training records and plans used for the
2
30 Jun 14
current training cycle need to be retained. Specific
requirements for the use of R-ADMIN for documenting PQS
qualifications and generating watch bills are found in Section
6.
2. CNAF ships will develop a training instruction which shall
consist of the following:
a.
Long range training plan – at least one for the command
b. Short range training plan - at least one per command and
one per department.
c. Record of drills, completed training, supervised
evolutions and exercises observed for competitive purposes.
Records must be kept on the nature of operational training
afforded each watch team.
d.
Any additional training guidance as directed by the CO.
e. Training Organization is discussed in Chapter 8 of
OPNAVINST 3120.32 (series).
4104
LONG RANGE TRAINING PLAN
1. The long range training plan is the basic instrument for
informing personnel of training goals and operating schedules.
This plan provides the framework to develop shorter range
training plans and is a valuable tool to aid in promulgating
creation of command objectives.
2.
The long range training plan shall include:
a.
The ship’s employment schedule.
b. A list of all required examinations, inspections,
certifications and assist visits (ICAVs). The list shall
include both frequency for completion and primary department
responsible.
c. A list of all TYCOM required exercises, including the
periodicity and the date of last satisfactory completion. A
summary of TYCOM exercise requirements is provided in Appendices
I and II.
d. A list of off-ship school and NEC requirements. The
Fleet Training Management Planning System (FLTMPS) is the sole
source for identification of individual shipboard training
requirements. The list shall include individuals who hold these
qualifications and their EAOS/PRD. The list will be maintained
at the department level.
e. A list of all lectures and seminars appropriate to each
training group (i.e. ship-wide, department, division or team).
3
30 Jun 14
This list should include, as a minimum, the Fundamentals and
Systems topics from applicable PQS. The ship’s Training Officer
shall maintain ship-wide topics. Department-specific training
lists will be maintained at the department level.
3. An example of the required Long Range Training Plan (LRTP)
is provided below in Figure 4-1.
a. The LRTP is a comprehensive list of training events
(exercises, evolutions, courses of instruction, drills, GMT,
lectures, seminars, inspections and assist visits) which must be
completed throughout the ship's operational cycle.
b. This plan need not duplicate lists contained in other
directives, but instead may simply refer to the applicable
sections of governing directives.
c. Each department must have a similar plan which lists
events pertinent only to that department. The ship may combine
command list and departmental lists in one instruction.
d. The ship’s Training Officer should ensure each
department is following the ship’s overall training plan.
4
30 Jun 14
Figure 4-1 Sample Long Range Training Plan
5
30 Jun 14
4105
SHORT RANGE TRAINING PLAN
1. This plan is the mechanism for planning, scheduling and
executing shipboard training. Effective scheduling requires
careful attention to detail by the chain of command in order to
minimize conflicts and to maximize use of every training window
of opportunity. Due to the complexity and extensive ship-wide
involvement of many training events and the limited amount of
underway training opportunities, there must be a positive spirit
of cooperation and resourcefulness when scheduling training.
2.
The short range training plan shall include the following:
a.
Quarterly employment schedule.
b. Quarterly training plan. The purpose of the quarterly
training plan is to indicate the ship's plans that may affect
the scheduling or conduct of training. Once the plan is
developed, HODs shall add any additional department plans, and
provide a copy to each training group within the department.
Training, planning and scheduling for periods shorter than the
quarter will be on a department level.
c. Monthly training plan, by department. Using the
quarterly training plan as a guide, each division and training
team shall submit a proposed monthly training plan to the
cognizant HOD not later than the last week preceding the
upcoming month. This plan shall indicate what training is to be
conducted on specific days, where the training is to be
conducted, and who the instructor/monitor will be. The HOD will
keep copies of the department's monthly training plans and use
the compiled package as the primary tool for coordinating the
scheduling of ship wide events.
d. Weekly training schedule, by department. Each week the
HOD shall provide each division and training team under the
cognizance of the department a copy of the single department
training schedule. The single schedule shall include all
training applicable to the department, including drills,
demonstrations, pre-briefs and debriefs.
3. An example of a Short Range Training Plan (SRTP) is shown
below in Figure 4-2. An SRTP shall be prepared from the LRTP,
for the command and for each department. This schedule should
cover a period of about three months. The SRTP lists exercises,
drills and lectures.
6
30 Jun 14
Training
JAN
FEB
MAR
Exercise
Evolutions
GMT
Inspection
Figure 4-2 Sample Short Range Training Plan
4106
TRAINING RECORDS
1. Training records should be kept to an absolute minimum and
need only be maintained to show what training has been
accomplished and what remains.
2. Each training group supervisor shall maintain records for
personnel assigned to their respective group (i.e. repair locker
leaders track their assigned locker personnel; Division Officers
will track their division qualifications; ETT, DCTT, SNTT, MTT,
FPTT and CSTT team leaders will track their team’s
qualifications).
3. PQS documentation will be maintained per NAVEDTRA 43100-1
series (Unit Coordinator’s Guide).
4. Air Department training jacket requirements are outlined in
CNAFINST 3500.71 (series).
5.
GMT shall be tracked utilizing the R-ADMIN program.
6. Training (MUSTER) Syllabuses for EGRESS/SCBA/EEBD are
required to be maintained for six months.
7. Verification of all required schools per this instruction
and the COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.80 (series) will be validated in
FLTMPS.
4107
PLAN, SCHEDULE, AND RECORD TRAINING
1. All training plans, schedules and records may be either
typed, hand-written, or maintained on ADP/WP systems. Record of
completion and grade sheets for competitive exercises should be
retained until at least the end of the competitive cycle.
2. Appendix I/II provide guidance in tabular form for the
events and periodicities required to meet TYCOM minimum CVN
training standards.
The CNAF Training and Assessment Cards (TAC) comprise a
compendium of standards and practices for CVN training.
7
The
30 Jun 14
TACs are the replacement product for the legacy Fleet Exercise
Program (FXP). The TAC sets out details of what, when and how
each drill is to be scheduled, conducted and scored. The TAC
will be used for all assessments of CVN performance. They can
be accessed via the CNAF N7 SharePoint site. Unless noted
otherwise, the passing score for a TAC event is 80% or better.
Points for TAC event line items are “all or nothing”; no partial
points are awarded for a TAC event line item.
8
30 Jun 14
Section 2
REPORTING
4200
INDIVIDUAL READINESS: FLTMPS SCHOOLS COMPLETION
GUIDANCE
1. Personnel assigned to carriers are required to attend formal
training for warfare and mission areas. At a minimum, 80
percent of required personnel must complete designated training
in each warfare/mission area as reflected in the Fleet Training
Management Planning System/Enterprise Training Management System
(FLTMPS/ETMS) summary report. This requirement for schools
“accomplishment percentage” is applicable to all carriers.
2. This directive leverages coordination between
Ship/CSG/Training Support Commands (TSC) to maximize course
utilization by focusing on three key areas:
a. Meet 80 percent school course completion requirement for
personnel onboard.
b. Ensure use of Command’s 12-month long-range school
training plan and Watch Team Replacement Plan (WTRP).
c.
shows.
Preclude Missed Training Opportunities (MTOs)/course no-
3. The formal schools requirement (80 percent or greater
completion for total required courses in each warfare/mission
areas) requires chain of command involvement.
a. Training Officers and division training personnel should
conduct continuous review of the Fleet Training Management
Planning System/Enterprise Training Management System
(FLTMPS/ETMS) summary report.
b. When classes are required, request quotas (using the
Enterprise Navy Training Reservation System (eNTRS) program
where available).
c. Track course attendance to ensure no-shows are kept to a
minimum.
d. Directly contact the local TSC/TSD when problems arise
or issues are anticipated.
4201
REPORTING SOURCE FOR SCHOOLS COMPLETION
FLTMPS/ETMS is the single source for TYCOM school requirements.
FLTMPS/ETMS can be used interchangeably; the data contained in
all 44 training modules is identical. As the single source for
TYCOM school requirements, FLTMPS/ETMS shall be used to
determine warfare/mission area school accomplishment
percentages.
9
30 Jun 14
4202
REQUIRED SCHOOLS COMPLETION PERCENTAGE
1. The warfare/mission area percentage requirement (80% or
greater) is continuous throughout the FRTP cycle and during
maintenance periods. Required numbers of graduates in FLTMPS
may be adjusted for ships in extended maintenance periods, so
that ships should always maintain at least 80% of the graduates
required in FLTMPS. Calculation of these percentages is
straightforward: the number of graduates onboard (not to exceed
100 percent for any single school requirement) is divided by the
FLTMPS number of required graduates. This number should be
between 80 and 100 percent.
2. Ships are required to maintain a minimum 80 percent
completion rate for required schools in each of the following
warfare/mission areas: ATFP, Aviation, AW, C2W, CCC, Command,
FSO, INT, LOG, Maintenance, Medical, MOB-D, MOB-E, MOB-N, MOB-S,
NC, STW, Supply, SUW, USW and Weapons.
3. ATG will validate CNAF required school completion
percentages in FLTMPS/ETMS during Cart II and FEP (Core Training
(CT) and ULTRA-S for FDNF). Comments on school completion
percentages will be made in CART II and FEP reports (Core
Training (CT) and ULTRA-S reports for FDNF).
4203
USING LONG RANGE TRAINING PLAN AND WATCH TEAM REPLACEMENT
PLAN TO MANAGE INDIVIDUAL TRAINING COMPLETION
1. Ships should manage Projected Rotation Dates (PRDs) to
distribute personnel turnover across the FRTP cycle. This will
prevent large spikes in school replacement plans. Utilize the
command 12 month training plan located on FLTMPS to assist in
maintaining training completion percentages.
2. Commands should identify "training shortfall" deficiencies
early. School quotas should be requested and scheduled early to
correct deficiencies before completion percentage falls below
80%. If available quotas are not sufficient, units may request
assistance from CSG/TSC/TYCOM to secure additional school
quotas.
10
30 Jun 14
Section 3
4300
ALL HANDS TRAINING
GENERAL
1. In addition to providing training for watch, quarter and
station assignment, battle station assignment, and special
shipboard evolution assignment, it is essential that a wellrounded shipboard training program specifically include measures
for training the individual officer, Sailor or Marine in:
a.
All duties of their rank or rate.
b.
Preparation for promotion/advancement.
c.
Development of leadership.
d. All duties, responsibilities, and expectations of a
member of the Naval Service.
e.
Safety and survival in the shipboard environment.
f. Periodic training, as required by higher authority, on
Navy Rights and Responsibilities, fraternization, and sexual
harassment.
2. Responsibility for basic training of the individual officer,
Sailor or Marine is specifically assigned to the CO by Article
0728, U.S. Navy Regulations, 1990.
4301
INDOCTRINATION DIVISION TRAINING
1. The initial days and even hours a new officer, Sailor, or
Marine spends on board ship will have a significant effect on
molding their attitude toward the command and, therefore, their
ability to perform as an effective member of the ship's company
for the remainder of their tour on board. It is imperative each
ship has an effective Indoctrination (“I") Division program to
introduce new crewmembers to the command.
a. While it should be tailored to the specific needs of
officers or enlisted members, the program should incorporate the
common elements of providing members a place to sleep and stow
their gear, the location of and times they will be able to get
meals, accurate processing of the members’ service and pay
records, enrollment in the command physical readiness program,
an introduction to unique shipboard regulations, medical
readiness, and reiteration of Navy policies concerning drug and
alcohol abuse, discrimination, sexual assault awareness and
prevention, and harassment.
b. Shortly after new members report, they should be
provided the opportunity to meet key members of the command.
This should include, at a minimum, the CO, XO, Supply Officer,
Medical Officer, Dental Officer, Safety Officer, Damage Control
11
30 Jun 14
Assistant, Hazardous Material Coordinator, Administration
Officer, Personnel Officer, Security Manager, Physical Readiness
Coordinator, Command Master Chief, Chief Master at Arms, Equal
Opportunity Officer and Command Career Counselor.
2. Ideally, "I" Division should be completed in the time
between when new members report to the ship and when they report
to their division. As a minimum, it should include the
following:
a. An orientation tour focusing on available services for
crewmembers, location and availability of damage control
equipment, and security requirements.
b. Donning and lighting off of the EEBD, SCBA and life
vests should be demonstrated by each individual.
c. Navy Pride and Professionalism training, to ensure the
ship maintains 100 percent compliance with OPNAVINST 1740.3C.
d. Distribution of general damage control and 3M PQS books
to all new crewmembers.
e. Level I Antiterrorism (AT) Awareness Training. All
crewmembers, military and civilian, shall receive Level I
Antiterrorism Awareness Training in accordance with SECNAVINST
3300.3 (series).
f. Security Education and Training. All crewmembers,
military and civilian, shall receive initial security
instruction in accordance with OPNAVINST 5530.14 series. The
security education program will include all pertinent aspects of
physical security, law enforcement and loss prevention programs
including those specifically related to antiterrorism.
g.
Briefing on Information Assurance by the ISSM.
h. Propulsion plant indoctrination, required by NAVSEA
S9213-33-MMA-000/ (/V) (Radiological Controls for Ships) and
NAVSEA S9213-41-MAN-000/(C) (Engineering Department Manual for
Naval Nuclear Propulsion Plants).
i. Operational Risk Management (ORM). All crewmembers
shall receive an overview brief that describes ORM and its
tenets. The brief shall provide on-duty and off-duty examples
for all types of ORM including: Time Critical, Deliberate and
Analytical.
4302
DAMAGE CONTROL (DC) TRAINING
1. The ship's DC training program will include widespread
indoctrination of all hands, including embarked staffs and Air
Wing personnel. Indoctrination will cover procedures and
practices necessary to maintain the protective material
12
30 Jun 14
conditions of readiness, and actions required to be taken in the
event of fire, battle damage or other emergency. Each
individual aboard ship should be fully capable of taking the
initial actions to properly report fires and flooding, and
should be able to set fire and flooding boundaries. Emergency
egress training must be completed within 96 hours of reporting
aboard and shall include training on how to don training EEBD.
a. All afloat personnel will complete DC PQS (NAVEDTRA
43119-series, Watch Stations 301-306) within six months of
reporting aboard.
b. Personnel reporting from another ship who have already
completed basic DC shall qualify on ship-specific DC systems of
the DC PQS (NAVEDTRA 43119-series, section 200) within three
months of reporting aboard.
c. All personnel shall complete emergency egress training
within 96 hours of reporting aboard ship and every six months
thereafter. This training will consist of blindfolded escape
from working, berthing, and watch standing spaces. Training
will include actual activation and donning of training Emergency
Escape Breathing Device (EEBD) and Self Contained Breathing
Apparatus (SCBA). Document completion using PQS chart or other
appropriate means.
d. Personnel may not be assigned to a Repair Party or
Inport Emergency Team (IET) until they have completed DC PQS
(Watch Stations 301-306). All personnel assigned to Repair
Party Teams or IETs shall complete the DC PQS (NAVEDTRA 43119series) applicable to their assignment within three months of
team assignment. All personnel shall be fully qualified in all
prerequisite Watch Stations prior to assignment to a new
position on Repair Party Teams and IETs.
e. Damage Control Training Team (DCTT) personnel shall be
fully qualified for the billet they are assigned to train and
complete the DCTT members PQS from DC PQS (NAVEDTRA 43119series, Watch Station 320).
f. Gas Free Engineering Petty Officers and Fire Marshals
shall complete applicable sections of DC Watches PQS (NAVEDTRA
43119-H series) prior to assignment.
g. Post-Fire Test Assistants will be qualified as Gas Free
Engineers, Gas Free Engineer Assistants or Gas Free Engineering
Petty Officers.
h. Departmental or Division Damage Control Petty Officers
(DCPOs) shall complete DC Watches PQS (NAVEDTRA 43119-4 series),
Watch Station 303, 3-M PQS (NAVEDTRA 43241 Series) Watch Station
303 Work Center Supervisor and be certified by the Damage
Control Assistant (DCA) or Ship’s Fire Marshal prior to
assignment.
13
30 Jun 14
i. DC Maintenance personnel shall complete DC PQS (NAVEDTRA
43119-series, Watch Stations 301-306), DC Watches PQS (NAVEDTRA
43119-4 series) DCPO, 3M Watch Station 301, and be certified by
the Damage Control Assistant (DCA) prior to assignment.
j. One Petty Officer in each in port fire party and each
repair locker shall qualify within six months of assignment on
Watch Station 304, Oil/Hazardous Material (Substance) Spill
Response Scene Leader, in the Hazardous Material/Environmental
Protection Programs Afloat PQS, NAVEDTRA 43528-A.
2.
Formal Training Requirements for Afloat Personnel:
a. All personnel shall complete live fire fighting training
every six years. The initial six-year qualification is
satisfied if fire fighting training was received during initial
accession training sources after June 2005. Recurring training
requirements can be obtained through attendance at one of the
equivalent live fire fighting training courses listed in FLTMPS.
Personnel assigned to Crash and Salvage shall attend (as a team)
the Aircraft Fire Fighting Shipboard Team Training (AFSTT) (C780-2012A) once during an 18 month cycle or whenever the team
experiences a greater than 40 percent turnover. Personnel
taking this course shall be certified as meeting the requirement
for attending Shipboard Aircraft Fire Fighting (J-495-0413).
b. Personnel assigned to shipboard duty not receiving
accession-level Chemical, Biological and Radiological Defense
(CBR-D) training may fulfill training requirements by completion
of on board training by the DCA, CBR-D Training Specialist (NEC
4805) or Senior Enlisted Damage Control Training Specialist (NEC
4811) and completing the appropriate DC PQS (NAVEDTRA 43119series).
c. Repair party leaders and officers shall attend Damage
Control Repair Party Leaders Course (K-495-0040). DCA-Senior
Enlisted Course (A-4G-111) is an acceptable substitute.
d. Repair parties and IETs shall attend Shipboard Fire
Fighting Team Training (J-495-0018) and Shipboard Damage Control
Training (K-495-0045). They shall attend both courses once per
deployment cycle, not to exceed length of FRTP between courses.
Officer accession level fire fighting training or the General
Shipboard Fire Fighting (J-495-0416) is the minimum requirement
for replacement personnel who have not participated in formal
team training.
e. The following personnel shall attend Shipboard Aircraft
Fire Fighting (J-495-0413):
(1) Ship’s force flight deck personnel receiving flight
deck hazardous duty pay assigned to aircraft carriers.
Unqualified personnel shall attend within six months of
assignment and then every four years thereafter. If an
14
30 Jun 14
individual’s four-year qualification expires during a
deployment, the individual shall attend the course prior to
deployment.
(2) Embarked flight deck personnel, pilots, aircrew and
all other embarked personnel receiving flight deck hazardous
duty pay. Personnel shall attend within six months of initial
squadron/unit assignment and every four years thereafter. If an
embarked individual’s four-year qualification expires during a
deployment, the individual shall attend the course prior to
deployment.
(3) In accordance with Watch Station 301 (CVN Flight
Deck Observer) PQS, requirements for Aircraft Firefighting (J495-413) can be deferred until post-deployment availability for
personnel reporting onboard while the ship is deployed.
f. Prospective DCAs and ship’s Fire Marshals shall attend
Surface Warfare Damage Control Assistant (A-4G-111) course prior
to assignment.
g. Gas Free Engineers, Gas Free Engineer Assistants and Gas
Free Engineering Petty Officers (one per in port duty section)
shall attend Gas Free Engineer and Gas Free Engineering Petty
Officer for Surface (Afloat) Operations (K-495-0051) or
equivalent prior to assuming duties). DCA-Senior Enlisted
Course (A-4G-111) is acceptable substitute for Gas Free
Engineers and Gas Free Engineer Assistants.
h. AFFF WCS plus seven others from each ship shall attend
Foam Generating Systems Operation and Maintenance (K-495-2179).
i. All personnel shall complete Self-Contained Breathing
Apparatus (SCBA) refresher training within three months of
reporting on board and every six months thereafter through NKO
course NSWC-SAP4.5O-1.0.
j.
Training requirements for embarked personnel:
(1) Fleet Marines and other military members embarked in
U.S. Navy ships for a limited duration (such as a deployment)
are not required to attend Navy fire fighting courses of
instruction, with the exception of embarked flight deck
personnel, pilots, aircrew and all other embarked personnel
receiving flight deck hazardous duty pay. Personnel shall
attend within six months of initial squadron/unit assignment and
every four years thereafter. If an embarked individual’s fouryear qualification will expire during a deployment, the
individual shall attend the course prior to deployment.
(2) CVN COs will provide basic DC instruction for Fleet
Marines, other military members and contractor personnel
embarked in U.S. Navy ships for a limited duration. This
instruction will include, as a minimum: emergency egress from
15
30 Jun 14
berthing and work spaces, use of an EEBD, use of carbon dioxide,
PKP and AFFF extinguishers, fire stations, compartment numbering
system, general quarters station, abandon ship station, man
overboard station, shipboard communication systems, emergency or
casualty reporting and use of the APC system for those personnel
assigned to mess deck duties.
(3) Embarked personnel must be indoctrinated in the use
and limitations of personnel protective equipment and devices
currently available on board. Personnel must be required to
demonstrate, upon reporting and semi-annually thereafter, their
ability to use an SCBA and EEBD and to egress their living,
working, watch stations and battle stations under conditions of
minimum visibility. Completion of this semi-annual training
will be documented on the Division PQS chart.
(4) Completion of Damage Control PQS (NAVEDTRA 43119series) Watch Stations 301-306, within six months of reporting
to the ship is mandatory for All Hands, including embarked
staffs and air wing personnel.
(5) All ship riders shall be instructed in the use of an
EEBD when embarking.
(6) All embarked personnel for deployment are required
to have received chemical, biological and radiological defense
(CBR-D) training. Those who did not receive CBR-D training
during accession/pipeline training, or did not attend the
introduction to CBR-D course (J-495-0483) before it was
canceled, shall complete a one day CBR-D course conducted aboard
the ship by an instructor with the 4805 or 4811 NEC.
(7) Positive documentation of CBR-D training in service
records is required.
(8) Embarked staffs require propulsion plant
indoctrination by NAVSEA S9213-33-MMA-000/ (V) (Radiological
Controls for Ships).
4303
BASIC FIRST AID
1. COMNAVAIRFOR considers a comprehensive program in first aid,
self-aid, buddy-aid and the medical aspects of CBR warfare
essential to maintaining a high level of combat readiness. Such
training is recognized as a potentially critical factor for
casualty reduction and in minimizing adverse effects on combat
effectiveness in modern warfare. Training of this nature will
enhance the successful management of mass casualties in any
disaster, whether in peace or war.
2. The eight basic War Wounds or “GITMO Wounds” are; Amputated
Hand, Burns, Electrical Shock, Compound Fracture of the Lower
Extremity, Fracture of the Jaw with Facial Injury, Open
Abdominal Wound with Extruded Viscera, Smoke Inhalation and
16
30 Jun 14
Sucking Chest Wound/Pneumothorax. The ship’s crew should
receive war wound training, cardio pulmonary resuscitation
(CPR), and stretcher bearer training at every available
opportunity such as during GQ drills and the ship’s
indoctrination course.
4304
3M TRAINING
1. The Navy's Material Maintenance Management (3M) system is
the foundation on which shipboard equipment reliability rests.
The equipment installed in Navy ships has been carefully
designed and evaluated to provide long years of service in a
harsh at sea environment with the minimum of maintenance. It is
critical maintenance be accomplished properly per applicable
maintenance requirements. In order to maintain proper supply
and technical support, the installation and removal of equipment
must be reported to appropriate authorities. Malfunctions of
equipment must be reported to higher authority to ensure:
a. Reduced capabilities are made known to operational
planners
b. Required technical and material assistance can be
organized and performed
c.
A history of equipment failures is compiled
2. Completion by All Hands of the appropriate level of the
personnel qualifications standards training program will
significantly aid in accomplishing these objectives and is
mandatory within six months of reporting on board for duty.
3. All ships are required to establish a quality assurance
program, per instructions issued by the TYCOM and higher
authority, to ensure maintenance actions are properly
accomplished.
a. In addition to the Spot Check program by Chiefs,
Division Officers, HODs, 3M Coordinators, CMCs, XOs, Command
Master Chiefs, and COs, ships should include training for
maintenance personnel on each particular MRC card, prior to the
new person being authorized to accomplish a maintenance
requirement for the first time.
b. The first time a maintenance person accomplishes a
maintenance action, they should be observed by an experienced
qualified Sailor who has proven competent at performing that
maintenance item. This course of action will greatly reduce
errors and minimize development of bad habits early in a
Sailor's career. It will therefore enhance their technical
skills as well as overall equipment reliability. Positive work
habits and effective quality control checks must be incorporated
into every aspect of the training program.
17
30 Jun 14
4. The 3M Training Team (3MTT) is formed to enhance and
maintain a peak level of PMS performance by providing focused
training and evaluation for ship board spot-checkers. 3MTT
members must be 3M (304) Division Officer PQS qualified and
designated in writing.
4305
GENERAL MILITARY TRAINING
1. The General Military Training (GMT) program is applicable to
all Navy personnel, both officers and enlisted personnel. Its
origins are in the consolidation of training requirements from
numerous independent programs. Over the years, the scope of the
GMT program has grown to cover a wide variety of military and
other topics. It is a promulgated standardized curriculum under
a central manager and resource sponsor; GMT guidance is provided
in OPNAVINST 1500.22 (series).
2. GMT is designed to train, motivate and inform Navy personnel
about topics affecting their military life and to deal with
issues that impact their military career, preparing them for
future leadership roles.
3. The GMT program is divided into three phases, each of which
targets a specific population.
a. GMT-I is designed for presentation to officer and
enlisted personnel during initial accession training.
b. GMT-II is presented to enlisted personnel while assigned
to an “A” school or the Apprentice Training Program.
c. GMT-III is designed for presentation during regularly
scheduled training sessions in individual units. Its purpose is
to continue the development of those topics introduced in
earlier phases and to address contemporary topics that reflect
new or changed Department of Defense or Navy goals and
objectives. GMT-III requirements are limited to 12 hours a year
and requirements will be reviewed by Naval Education and
Training Command (NETC) annually to ensure relevancy.
d. To assist individual units in meeting GMT-III training
goals, NETC has prepared training materials. Training materials
can be obtained contacting Naval Education and Training Command
(NETC) or utilize the following website:
https://wwwa.nko.navy.mil/.
4306
SAFETY TRAINING
1. Successful implementation and execution of the safety
program requires continuous, effective All Hands training and
participation. The Safety Officer and Division Safety Petty
Officers (DSPOs) shall execute the on board training program for
safety per OPNAVINST 5100.19, "NAVOSH Program Manual for Forces
Afloat."
18
30 Jun 14
2. Prior to assuming their duties, Safety Officers and
Assistant Safety Officers (NOBC 0862, SSC 1861) shall attend the
Afloat Safety Officer Course (A-4J-0020).
a. Safety Officers should also receive refresher training
provided via courses offered by NAVOSHENVTRACEN, or conferences
or workshops related to the elements required by the command
safety program.
b. Assistant Safety Officers should receive annual
continuing education by attendance at the NAVENVIRHLTHCEN
Occupational Health and Preventive Medicine Workshop or the
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Conference.
3. The Safety Department individual in charge of the
Respiratory Protection Program will attend the Respiratory
Protection Program Manager's Course (A-493-0072) taught at
NAVOSHENVTRACEN.
4. The Supply Officer designated as Command Hazardous Material
Coordinator will attend NAVOSHENVTRACEN Hazardous Material
Coordinator Course (A-8B-0008) prior to being assigned.
5. All DSPOs (primary and alternate) shall attend the Safety
Programs Afloat Course (A-493-2099) and complete Divisional
Safety Petty Officer Watch Station 301 of Afloat Safety Programs
PQS (NAVEDTRA 43460-4 series) within six months of being
assigned their duties and have one year left before their PRD.
DSPOs are further encouraged to complete the requirements for
NEC 9571 during their assignment.
6. It is strongly recommended the LCPO and an Aviation
Electrician (AE) assigned to the Safety Department has the NEC
9580.
7. All Hands NAVOSH training will be conducted upon reporting
aboard (e.g., "I" Division) and at least annually thereafter.
This training will concentrate on the practical aspects of the
NAVOSH Program as implemented aboard ship and include:
a. Introduction to the NAVOSH Program and identification of
key personnel, the chain of command, and mishap reporting.
b. Hazard identification and known hazards (e.g., heat,
noise, asbestos, confined space entry, gas free requirements,
sight conservation, hazardous materials and electrical shock).
c.
Safety precautions and standards.
d.
Electrical safety/tag-out procedures.
e.
Mishap prevention and reporting.
f.
Radiation.
19
30 Jun 14
g.
Back injury prevention.
h.
Traffic safety.
i. The ship's program for separation and disposal of
plastics, trash and hazardous material, including medical
waste/prohibitions regarding disposal of oil, the ship's
centralized HAZMAT locker, oily waste and sewage in port and at
sea.
8. At least two five-minute safety briefs shall be accomplished
at quarters or muster each month. Division Officers shall be
responsible for ensuring assigned personnel receives mandatory
training on safety programs.
9. Whenever necessary to raise the level of awareness of
personnel safety, (e.g., increased numbers of personnel
injuries, mishaps and near mishaps) the command will initiate a
Safety Stand Down. Commands should consider safety stand downs
following a safety evaluation (e.g., Naval Safety Center
Survey). As a minimum, commands will conduct one safety stand
down per year.
10. Training records for Safety will be maintained by each
division or training group supervisor per U.S. Navy SORM
(OPNAVINST 3120.32). Divisional safety training shall be
attended by the Division Officer and/or LPO and recorded in the
training record.
11. For more detail on training requirements and information on
training films and videotapes, see OPNAVINST 5100.19 Series and
the NAVOSH Training Guide for Forces Afloat (NAVEDTRA 10074A).
4307
ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING
Per OPNAVINST 5090.1 Series, Safety Officers and Assistant
Safety Officers (NOBC 0862, SSC 1861) shall attend the
NAVOSHENVTRACEN Afloat Environmental Protection Coordinator
Course (A-4J-0021) prior to assuming their duties.
4308
METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY TRAINING
1. All CVNs have permanently assigned METOC personnel. Various
major staffs, including Numbered Fleets and CSGs, have METOC
Officers assigned. Although many similarities exist between
these divisions and their support responsibilities, the
differences in equipment, assigned spaces, shipboard
organizations, manning, personnel training, and experience are
significant. Variations in the METOC services resulting from
these differences can be mitigated via standardized training
practices.
2. Except for FDNF ships, permanent manning of METOC personnel
on board CVN ships has been reduced to four personnel on Norfolk
20
30 Jun 14
and San Diego-based ships and to five personnel on Pacific
Northwest-based ships. A Strike Group Oceanography Team (SGOT)
is assigned to augment the CVN METOC Division in phases, with
the total augmented support dependent on the operational
schedule of the ship.
3. Modern weapons and sensors are increasingly sensitive to
atmospheric and oceanographic conditions, resulting in the need
to accurately measure and quantify the effects of the
operational environment. Additionally, weather and sea
conditions must be considered in each evolution and for each
operational or tactical decision. METOC personnel are primarily
responsible for collecting, interpreting and analyzing METOC
data, forecasting conditions for future operations and
forecasting the environmental impacts on the performance of
weapons, sensors and platforms. The METOC Division’s role is
multi-faceted, encompassing all aspects of the operating
environment. Formal, on-the-job, and computer-based training
are key elements.
4. CNAF is responsible for shipboard training, manning and
equipment readiness. Senior METOC Officers assigned to Fleet
Forces Command, PACFLT, Numbered Fleet staffs and the Strike
Group Oceanography Team Norfolk and San Diego support CNAF in
this effort. They will:
a. Ensure METOC personnel training complies with
requirements as outlined in the Fleet Training Management
Planning System (FLTMPS) database.
b. Monitor equipment and computer software upgrades for
individual METOC Divisions and ensure compliance with governing
TYCOM and Fleet directives.
5. An expanded discussion of METOC training is available at the
4309
ANTITERRORISM (AT) AWARENESS TRAINING
1. The key to an effective AT program is to develop an
awareness that is both sustained and reinforced from initial
entry to termination of service. All personnel must be aware of
basic personal protective measures against terrorism and
specific threats for the area they operate in or transit.
Therefore, initial Level I AT Awareness Training shall be
conducted for all crewmembers, military or civilian, annually
thereafter. Training is available on NKO.
2. Subsequently, all crewmembers, military and civilian,
deploying OCONUS shall receive an AOR-specific AT protection
brief within three months of deployment/travel.
3. Any expanded discussion of AT training can be directed to
the CNAP/L Force Protection Lead.
21
30 Jun 14
4310
RADIOLOGICAL TRAINING
Radiological training for all personnel permanently assigned to
nuclear powered ships and embarked staffs is governed by NAVSEA
S9213-33-MMA-000/ (V) Radiological Controls for Ships. This
includes all hands yearly and indoctrination training, training
for embarked staffs, and emergency response personnel that may
respond to casualties in the propulsion plants (e.g. At Sea Fire
Party).
4311
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT (ORM)
1. ORM is a critical element in the planning and execution
phases of all training and real evolutions and activities aboard
ship and ashore/off-duty.
2. Per OPNAVINST 3500.39 series, the ship’s XO is assigned as
the ORM Manager, and is accountable to ensure ORM permeates all
shipboard activities and operations. In addition, at least one
officer, preferably a HOD (i.e. Operations or Safety), and two
senior enlisted, preferably the Command Master Chief and one
other senior departmental MCPO in the command, shall be assigned
as the XO’s ORM Assistants. The ORM Program Manager and
assigned Assistant ORM Program Managers shall attend the ORM
Applications and Integrations (ORM A&I) Course (CNET11997).
3. Annually, all ship’s crew members shall complete the Navy
Knowledge On-line (NKO) GMT ORM Course and any additional NKO
ORM courses as appropriate for the level of management or
supervision held by the individual.
4312
UNDERSEA WARFARE
All CV-TSC gram analyst personnel will participate in a minimum
of 10 events every rolling quarter of Weekly SIPRTOP Training to
increase proficiency in LOFARGRAM analysis. The average score
must be equal to or greater than 80% for the 90-day period. Any
ship unable to participate in the minimum 10 events shall
request a waiver via naval message to the CNAF CV-TSC
Coordinator.
4313
ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) REQUIREMENTS
Each watch team (minimum of two) will be required to complete
two Battle Force Electronic Warfare Training (BEWT) scenarios
per month. Three scenarios have been developed and will be
forwarded to each CVN via SIPRNET email. The scenarios are to
be downloaded and transferred to the BEWT system. The scenarios
are based on real-world AORs and increase in complexity (basic,
intermediate, and advanced). Each ship will report completion
of these scenarios via CV-SHARP. A check sheet has been
developed that categorizes the sub-events and watch standers
actions throughout the scenarios.
22
30 Jun 14
Section 4
DIVISIONAL TRAINING
1. Divisional training is the foundation on which the entire
ship's training program rests. Properly executed, it leads
directly to material and operational readiness, safety and
advancement. Improperly done, it wastes valuable man hours and
hurts crew morale. It is imperative COs empower Division
Officers and Leading Chief Petty Officers with an understanding
of their importance to program success.
2. Sub-sets of the divisional training program encompass the
work center and team training programs.
a. Work centers are administrative organizations
established to accomplish maintenance while teams are
operational organizations designed to accomplish functional
operational tasks.
b. Unless directed by other existing instruction (i.e.
NATOPS), all training teams shall maintain training records as
directed by existing shipboard instruction in an existing
database (i.e. R-ADMIN).
3. Effective divisional training should be preplanned,
conducted on a regular schedule in a location suitable for
training, attended by the entire division (work center or team
as applicable), monitored by someone other than the instructor
who is knowledgeable in the subject matter (Officer or Chief
Petty Officer/supervisor for work teams), and evaluated so a
critique may be provided to the instructor following the
presentation.
4. The format for divisional training should be tailored to the
subject matter.
a.
Formal lecture
b.
Demonstration followed by practical application
c. Competition where teams demonstrate proficiency at
previously acquired skills
5. While divisional training is normally thought of as a group
exercise, it can also be tailored to the individual.
a. Required readings in rate training manuals and
completion of the corresponding lessons may be required
b. Implementation of a divisional orientation workbook can
rapidly integrate a new Sailor into the organization
c. A requirement to demonstrate proficiency at certain
tasks, such as emergency egress, physically donning an EEBD or
SCBA, or skills learned in "A" school, apprenticeship training,
23
30 Jun 14
or at a previous command ensures Sailors are ready for further
training or identifies the need for remedial training.
6. Care should be taken in selecting personnel who will be
conducting divisional training to ensure both junior and senior
crewmembers have the opportunity to be instructors. Also, care
should be taken to ensure junior crewmembers are truly qualified
to conduct the training assigned.
a. Assignments should be made sufficiently in advance of
the training session to allow the instructor time to research,
prepare and rehearse the presentation.
b. The entire presentation should be critiqued by the
Leading Petty Officer, Divisional Chief Petty Officer or
Division Officer prior to presentation. This step provides an
opportunity to improve the presentation while affording
identification and correction of any factual errors.
c. During a presentation, a crewmember knowledgeable in the
subject matter should be assigned to monitor and provide the
instructor with a formal critique on its completion. In this,
the presentation becomes more than a lesson for the division; it
provides leadership training for the instructor, improving both
his knowledge of the subject matter and his ability to pass that
knowledge along.
7. Training guidance and requirements for Reactor Departments
on CVNs is contained in CNAFINST C1512.3 (Series) Nuclear Power
Training Manual.
24
30 Jun 14
Section 5
4500
ONGOING/WATCHSTATION TRAINING
ONGOING TRAINING
1. All shipboard training must be directed toward ensuring the
crew is capable of safely taking the ship to sea and meeting
operational requirements. The training program is not limited
to Officers of the Deck and bridge watch standers; it must also
include navigational watches, visual signaling watches,
lookouts, Combat Direction Center surface, air and
anti-submarine warfare module watch standers, TAOs, air traffic
and air intercept controllers, flight deck watches, engineering
plant steaming and auxiliaries watches and damage control
personnel.
2. It is recognized during overhaul periods the maintenance of
sufficient qualified watch standers is a tremendous management
problem that requires extensive advance planning.
a. Proper execution of CART I by all departments will
significantly aid in ensuring proper formal training is
scheduled and appropriate people are trained. A Watch Team
Replacement Plan (WTRP) will be formulated for execution during
the upcoming FRTP. This is evaluated by ATG during CART II.
b. Formal schools, mobile training systems, team trainers,
operational cross-deck opportunities and regularly scheduled
drills, within the ship's lifelines and with other units in
port, can all be used to maintain the level of crew training
during overhaul.
3. Air Department Refresher Training. Air department personnel
assigned to flight deck and below decks duties shall receive
instructor-based technical systems training in their respective
fields.
a. Recurring training requirements shall be obtained
through attendance at one of the following training courses:
(1) C-821-2012 Shipboard Aviation Fuels Refresher
(2) C-604-2016 ALRE Catapult Refresher
(3) C-604-2024 ALRE Catapult Basic
(4) C-604-2025 ALRE Arresting Gear
(5) C-670-2017 ALRE QA Admin
(6) C-604-2017 ABH Refresher
b. All non-designated ABF, ABE and ABH personnel shall
attend within 12 months of assignment.
25
30 Jun 14
c. All previously qualified “A” school and refresher course
graduates personnel shall attend every 32 months thereafter.
4. During multi-year overhauls, the requirement still exists to
maintain a continuum of operational readiness. Well-trained
Sailors can be invaluable in preparing their replacements for
future operations. When critical equipment is unavailable,
cross decking of personnel to other units is not only
encouraged, but expected.
4501
WATCH STATION TRAINING
1. Underway, it is essential watch standers function as a team.
Throughout the ship, watch teams must be regularly drilled on
standard operating and emergency procedures to ensure preplanned responses are properly executed. The inability of one
station to perform their required assignment may have
devastating consequences. Drills must be realistic and
therefore must be planned and executed with the minimum of
simulations and deviations. Drills should be observed by
qualified personnel and critiqued both on individual efforts and
contribution to the team effort.
2. The tactical situation underway can often lead to long,
potentially unproductive watches. There are often minimal or no
communications, course or speed changes, contacts or changes in
equipment configurations. During these times, a concerted
effort must be made to stimulate watches to ensure all watch
standers remain alert and ready to respond. Officers
responsible for operation of watch stations should ensure time
spent on watch is used to sharpen the skills of watch standers.
a. During periods of restricted EMCON, establishment of an
in house circuit between CDC and the bridge allows conduct of
drills.
b. Visual signaling drills should be conducted as the
tactical situation allows. Signal bridge personnel can also
join in communications drills and PUBEXs between CDC and the
navigational bridge.
c. Flash cards can be used to drill lookouts on contact
recognition.
d. Engineers can practice evolutions and emergency
procedures (shifting air ejectors, changing distilling plant
lineups, etc.) under supervision of experienced personnel as
authorized by the Engineering Officer.
e. All watch stations can practice locating and donning
EEBDs, SCBAs and practicing emergency egress.
f. The preceding list provides only a sampling of the
drills that can be executed on watch. The ship is limited only
26
30 Jun 14
by the creativity of its leaders and watch standers. Firm
leadership at the HOD level is required to ensure meaningful,
properly supervised training is incorporated into each watch.
3. Carriers should regularly participate in tactical
maneuvering drills with their escorts.
4. Carrier security forces shall maximize the use of small arms
simulators (where available) to increase or improve weapons
proficiency and achievement of qualifications through the use of
course of fire software. Use of systems that exercise a watch
stander’s decision-making skill in the employment of deadly
force should be used to the maximum extent possible.
5. Ship handling drills should be executed during all available
opportunities. Maneuvering, man overboard drills or using a
smoke float to practice an approach into a mooring buoy are
examples of excellent training which can be accomplished when
the tactical situation permits.
6. At anchorage or in port, the ship's boats should be
regularly used to practice small boat handling and to qualify
boat officers.
27
30 Jun 14
28
30 Jun 14
Section 6
4600
IN-RATE TRAINING
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION STANDARDS (PQS)
1. The CNO has adopted the Personnel Qualification Standard
(PQS) system of training as a means to ensure all personnel are
trained and qualified to meet promulgated Navy standards. PQS
is applicable to both officers and enlisted personnel.
a. The general background and policy concerning the
development and implementation of PQS is contained in OPNAVINST
3500.34 (series) and COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.52 (series).
b. Guidelines for implementation and administration of PQS
are outlined in the Unit Coordinator’s Guide (NAVEDTRA 43100-1
series).
c. The “PQS Catalog” (NAVEDTRA 43100-5) provides the latest
list of available PQS standard materials. Ships can obtain PQS
materials by:
(1) Writing to NETPDTC. Address: NETPDTC N34, 6490
Saufley Field Road, Pensacola FL, 32509-5237.
(2) Calling NETPDTC: DSN 922-1035 or Commercial (850)
452-1035 or the NETPDTC Bulletin Boards at DSN 922-1394/1820 or
Commercial (850) 452-1394/1820.
(3) E-mailing NETPDTC at: N34.pqs@smtp.NETC.navy.mil
(4) Using Navy Knowledge Online website to order PQS on
CD ROM or download PQS materials: www.nko.navy.mil.
2. An individual's PQS is a written compilation of the minimum
requirements to certify qualification of the individual to
perform the duties of a given job or watch station. It serves
as a vehicle for continuous training of a carrier's crew. PQS
is used in conjunction with formal school training, general
military training, rate training study, other NAVEDTRA manuals
and on the job experience.
a. Officers will derive significant benefit by progressing
systematically through PQS training pertinent to their shipboard
duties.
b. Enlisted personnel will be significantly assisted in
completing advancement in rating criteria through the knowledge
and skills derived from the completion of various PQS elements.
3. It is imperative no member of the Naval Service, officer or
enlisted, be placed in a position for which he or she is not
qualified.
29
30 Jun 14
4. The PQS System provides a means by which training progress
can be monitored and qualifications can be documented. It is
recommended:
a. Watch Team Replacement Plans, formulated during CART I,
be used as a tool to assign watch stander PQS.
b. Watch bills in use should be reviewed against PQS charts
to ensure all watch standers are qualified or under the
instruction of a qualified individual.
c. Watch bills must indicate the level of qualification for
each watch stander: qualified (Q), interim qualified (I) or
under instruction (UI).
d. Regular audits should be undertaken to ensure
qualifications are correctly entered in service records and PQS
tracking systems (either charts or ADP programs) in a timely
manner.
5. The final determination of the depth of knowledge and level
of proficiency required of individuals to answer and/or perform
each specific PQS line item, and to ultimately achieve final PQS
qualification, will be made by the individual command. The PQS
for most watch stations contains a final line item for either a
written or oral examination of the individual's knowledge of the
watch station. This is the most critical signature for the
Sailor to achieve, because it requires the candidate to put
together all that has been learned into a useful whole.
a. If oral examinations are used, only the most experienced
and knowledgeable watch standers in the area of qualification
should be qualified to administer the examination and sign off
this line item. A successful oral board signifies the Sailor
has proven his knowledge and understanding of the
responsibilities of that particular watch station and is ready
for final qualification.
b. For certain critical tasks or watch stations, a written
exam may allow a more complete assessment of the candidate's
readiness for final qualification than would an oral
examination.
6. The Unit Coordinator’s Guide addresses the procedures to
follow when tailoring a PQS watch station qualification of an
experienced/previously qualified Sailor when reporting aboard.
7. At times it will not be possible to man all required watch
stations with fully qualified personnel. If this occurs, COs
are authorized to grant interim qualifications to individuals
who are making satisfactory progress accomplishing PQS line
items. Interim qualifications should be for a specific limited
period of time, not to exceed 90 days from the time the ship
30
30 Jun 14
returns to sea, during which the individual is expected to
achieve final qualification.
8. All watch stations normally stood on board ship are covered
by a formal PQS developed by NETC. In some circumstances,
usually the installation of new equipment, a formal PQS may not
yet have been developed. Should this be the case, it is the
ship's responsibility to develop JQRs to cover the duties of
that watch station, using the standard PQS line item format as a
guide. In addition, if the formal developed PQS for a given
watch station does not cover all aspects and duties of the watch
as stood on board, it is the duty of the ship to
add/delete/modify PQS line items for those watch requirements as
required and approved by the respective CO, XO or HOD.
9. PQS in specific areas is periodically reviewed by the PQS
Development Group. Support for these reviews and necessary
rewrites to PQS are coordinated through the TYCOM. COs should
submit inputs for changes to PQS via the CSG to the appropriate
PQS Model Manager.
10.
Relationship between Training and PQS Programs.
a. Training and PQS, while two distinct programs, are
fundamentally linked since PQS is the basis of a command
training program and both programs enable effective Watch Team
Replacement Plan (WTRP) management. The relationships among
these programs is shown below in Figure 4-3.
b. The entry point of the shipboard training and
qualification process is the WTRP. It should identify watch
stations that will need to be filled due to either rotation or
upward progression, and identify the Sailor intended to fill
that watch station. These fills can come either from
Prospective Gains (PG) or from existing crewmembers. In the
case of a PG slated to fill a WTRP gap, an analysis of required
schools and/or NECs for the watch station should take place and
the ship, working early in the process with NPC should initiate
those required adjustments to the training track of the PG.
Navy Personnel Command (NPC), for their part, must provide the
receiving unit with viable alternatives to ensure units are
gaining members with required training and/or NECs. Once the PG
reports, or in the case of an existing crewmember, the WTRP
coordinator should create a PQS assignment for that Sailor, with
a qualification goal date early enough to meet the need
identified in the WTRP. That PQS assignment should then trigger
the scheduling of the supporting training lectures. Training
Teams must also ensure those individuals working on a PQS
assignment are offered opportunities to perform the 300 series
tasks during Training Team evolutions. These steps will ensure
all Sailors receive the necessary training in support of their
qualification goals.
31
30 Jun 14
Prospective Gain (PG)
PG
reports
aboard
WTRP finds gaps that
must be filled
WTRP
Adjust track of PG get
required school(s)
Crew
Fill
the
gap
Division Training Program
100/200 series lectures
Qualified
watchstander
PQS assignments &
PQS POA&M
PQS assignments trigger
the scheduling of lectures
and events to support
qualification on time to
meet WTRP needs
Training Team evolutions
300 series tasks
Figure 4-3 Realtionship between Training, PQS,and WTRP
c. Relational Administration (R-ADM) is the TYCOMrecognized database to record PQS completion data. R-ADM shall
be used to record PQS completions and create shipboard watch
bills.
4601
ADVANCEMENT TRAINING
1. The CO is specifically assigned responsibility for basic
training of individuals assigned to his command by U.S. Navy
Regulations. In fulfilling this assignment, he/she must
personally concern themselves with the preparation of enlisted
personnel for advancement and preparation of assigned officers
for promotion. The following provisions are applicable to both
officer and enlisted training programs. At a minimum, ships
should:
a.
Comply with the PQS program.
b.
Use NKO website and resources.
c. Send the maximum number of assigned personnel (permitted
by quotas and operational commitments) to schools that will
enhance performance in their current or anticipated billets.
Creative use should be made of no-cost orders and shipboard
billeting to minimize TAD costs while maximizing training
opportunities.
2. For enlisted personnel, ships should also establish a formal
training program supporting completion of the Enlisted Surface
32
30 Jun 14
Warfare Specialist (ESWS) and the Enlisted Aviation Warfare
Specialist (EAWS) qualification programs.
3. For officers, an education program should incorporate the
following provisions as a minimum:
a. All Division Officers, regardless of designator, are to
complete the Division Officer portion of the Surface Warfare
Officer PQS Program, including division administration, damage
control, and 3M.
b. For all assigned 116X officers, establish a mandatory
Surface Warfare Officer qualification program per OPNAVINST
1412.2. Consider designating a Surface Warfare Officers’
Advisor from among the senior Surface Warfare Officers on board
to assist in qualifying 116X officers as Surface Warfare
Officers. The SWO Advisor can provide advice and counseling on
future career development. Separate advisors should be
designated for nuclear and non-nuclear officers in recognition
of the differences in career patterns.
c. For senior ship’s company and Air Wing officers, provide
opportunity to attain proficiency/qualification as Conning
Officers and Command Duty Officers (Underway) including other
shipboard evolutions. This opportunity should be afforded to
the maximum extent permitted by regularly assigned duties and
flight duties.
33
30 Jun 14
34
30 Jun 14
Section 7
NON-RESIDENT TRAINING COURSES
1. Navy correspondence courses, more correctly called Nonresident Training Courses (NRTC), are an excellent method for
officers and enlisted personnel to expand their professional
knowledge, improve their opportunities for promotion or
advancement and increase their worth to the Navy. They are
self-study courses. They may include assigned exercises,
lessons or examinations designed to assist students in acquiring
knowledge or skills described in an associated text. The NRTC
may be either locally administered or administered by the Naval
Education and Training Program Management Support Activity
(NETPMSA). Written material may consist of:
a. A training manual (TRAMAN) written specifically for the
NRTC, or
b. An existing Navy manual, directive or commercially
procured text that is the basis for the NRTC.
2. Historically, several types of Navy non-resident training
products were developed at various commands. They were
distributed for different purposes and for different training
communities. This created many different terms used to describe
these training products and caused confusion to the ordering
activities. NETC has consolidated and simplified this program.
The catalog of “Non-resident Training Courses", NAVEDTRA 12061,
is distributed to all ships and stations to be used for ordering
training manuals and associated non-resident training courses.
This publication is updated semi-annually with changes to ensure
ordering activities have the latest information on availability
of Navy nonresident training products. Command Educational
Services Officers, Training Officers, career counselors and
training petty officers that order training materials should
have a copy of this manual and be provided with changes. They
must also be familiar with the ordering procedures.
3. Additional information may be found at the following site:
https://www.courses.netc.navy.mil/default.aspx.
35
30 Jun 14
36
Section 8
4800
SHIP’S TRAINING TEAMS
30 Jun 14
GENERAL TRAINING TEAM PROCEDURES
1. The following general training team procedures shall apply
to all ship’s training teams to optimize shipboard team
training. These procedures shall be used while conducting
drills, exercises and observed evolutions.
a. Pre-exercise training team meetings shall be held to
discuss drill scenario, team assignments, time lines, flow of
communications, objectives of training, evaluation/training
mode, grading and debriefing procedures and operational risks.
b. Proposed training packages shall be presented to the
ITT Leader, CO or designated representative for approval.
Packages shall include an exercise risk assessment matrix.
c. Each training team member shall take notes to allow
reconstruction of the exercise/drill with other team members
when the drill is complete. Grading forms shall be retained as
part of the ship’s training records for the duration of the
FRTP.
d. Training team members observing a safety violation that
poses a hazard to personnel or equipment shall immediately take
steps to stop the drill/exercise and correct the unsafe
condition.
e. A critique for participating watch/team personnel shall
be conducted as soon as feasible following completion of each
drill/exercise. The critique shall cover the training team's
training observations, grade assigned and lessons learned.
Integration goes beyond simple timeline merging. Integration
occurs when one training team must meet its training and
objectives in order for another training team to accomplish
theirs. Integration must include an initiating event – “CAUSE”
- which results in an impact and required actions – “EFFECT” to another training team's area of responsibility and
assessment. CAUSE and EFFECT are the benchmark for planning
and executing realistic, challenging and effective training
scenarios.
2. All training team members will be designated in writing,
either by designation letter or by being listed on the
ship's/department’s collateral duty notice. Training team
members should, at a minimum, be experienced in the area being
assessed or trained.
3. The ATG Shipboard Training Team (SBTT) course is designed
to teach shipboard training team members procedures to
construct and execute training scenarios. The SBTT should be
37
30 Jun 14
completed six to eight weeks prior to CART II. Ships are
highly encouraged to send all training team members to SBTT.
4.
Expected training proficiency levels during TSTA.
a.
Watch stander proficiency:
(1) TSTA I. Watch standers shall be assigned to all
required watch stations. Proficiency may be weak.
(2) TSTA II. Watch standers shall be able to correctly
perform routine duties commensurate with their rate/rating and
watch station with minimal prompting.
(3) TSTA III. Watch standers shall be able to
consistently react correctly during sustained, stressful
operations that involve transition to an increased level of
readiness.
b.
Training Team Proficiency:
(1) TSTA I. Training teams shall be in place and
qualified for the positions they are observing. Ability to
conduct scenario based training, i.e., plan, brief, execute and
debrief, may be weak.
(2) TSTA II. Training teams shall be able to
effectively conduct (plan, brief, execute, and debrief) single
mission area scenario-based training.
(3) TSTA III. Training teams shall be able to
effectively conduct scenario based training, integrated with
two or more other training teams. Able to effectively plan,
execute and accurately assess and debrief their participation
in a complex, stressful multi-mission scenario.
4801
INTEGRATED TRAINING TEAM (ITT)
1. All aircraft carriers shall establish a standing ITT. This
team is under the direction of the XO. The ITT team is
responsible for ensuring the maximum integration of shipboard
training evolutions from CART II through the deployment. The
ITT will be trained by ATG during SBTT and Crew Certification.
It will be assessed during TSTA and evaluated during FEP (CT
and ULTRA-S, respectively for FDNF).
2. The ITT will be comprised of the XO (team leader), ITT
Coordinator, Assistant Supply Officer, Safety Officer and a
primary and alternate team leader from all other ship’s
training teams.
3. The team leaders of all shipboard training teams are
required to coordinate and schedule all individual training
team evolutions through the ITT. All team leaders should
38
30 Jun 14
utilize CV SHARP to prioritize training events with respect to
FRTP phase requirements.
4.
Organization and responsibilities:
a. The XO, as designated ITT Leader, is responsible to the
CO for individual training team’s effectiveness and ability to
train in required levels of readiness.
b. The ITT Coordinator may be the Training Officer or
other officer assigned responsible to the XO for the execution
of the integrated training scenario. The ITT Coordinator will
ensure integrated drill scenarios are developed based on
individual training team inputs, coordinate all pre-exercise
and post-exercise briefings maintain all integrated drill
critiques and lessons learned and ensure ITT qualification
records are maintained. Additional duties of the ITT
Coordinator include:
(1) Managing integrated drill plan.
(2) Assess training team decision-making.
(3) Assess ITT’s overall ability to train while
evaluating team’s ability to coordinate scenario and manage
training timeline.
(4) Present drill package timeline to XO and CO for
approval.
(5) Conduct ITT briefs and debriefs.
(6) Coordinate scenario conduct.
(7) Provide an assessment of overall tactical/technical
performance.
(8) Route critiques to CO for review.
c. The Safety Officer is an advisor to ITT in the
development and conduct of scheduled events. Safety Officer’s
perspective and input are vital to ensure all evolutions are
executed safely. Operational Risk Management (ORM) is an
integral part of planning, executing and debriefing scenarios.
Applying ORM to ITT events not only serves to identify hazards,
assess risks and implement controls to reduce the risk
associated with specific scenario, but also reinforces training
and implementation of ORM and a proper safety culture.
d. Strike Operations Officer will ensure proper scheduling
of training evolutions and deconflict requirements based on the
ship and air wing’s schedule.
39
30 Jun 14
e. Assistant Supply Officer will assist in coordinating
training evolutions and ensure there are no conflicts with
Supply Department events or requirements.
f. Ordnance Handling Officer will ensure proper
coordination with the Weapons Department.
g. HODs shall ensure personnel assigned to the ITT are
qualified in area of responsibility.
5. ITT ship-wide evolution packages should be developed and
include: scenario, objectives, and timeline. Packages shall be
forwarded to the CO for signature via the XO.
6. Following completion of the evolution and training team
debriefs, the ITT should reassemble to compare results, resolve
conflicts, compile lessons learned and prepare a summary
debrief. ITT debriefs should be forwarded to the CO via
appropriate HODs and the XO. The ITT debrief should include at
a minimum:
7.
a.
Objectives met, and reasons why any were not met
b.
Material deficiencies and corrective action taken
c.
Lessons learned
d.
Coordination/integration issues
Action:
a. ITT will meet prior to each ship-wide training
evolution (e.g. General Quarters) to ensure maximum capability
and integration among exercises and drills. This meeting is in
addition to regularly scheduled Planning Board for Training
(PB4T) meetings.
b. ITT will coordinate training and drill scenarios with
PB4T and evaluate specific long and short range training goals
during each phase of training. Goals should support
development of specific training scenarios in line with FRTP
phase-specific requirements as outlined in this manual and
captured in CV-SHARP. Feedback and evaluation comments on
conduct of each training scenario will be forwarded to the CO
via appropriate HODs, Training Officer and XO.
c. ITT will use realistic training scenarios in developing
drills and exercises, with simulated intelligence reporting.
Scenario should lead to a series of casualties throughout the
ship. As the ship combats casualties, a cohesive, united
effort should be the final result. The ultimate goal of ITT is
to prepare the crew for combat. It is imperative quality
training and honest evaluations are the standards.
40
30 Jun 14
d. ATG will provide guidance for developing ship-wide
evolution packages and individual drill packages during SBTT.
The packages will be briefed prior to drills and critiqued upon
conclusion, or as soon as practical. Each ship-wide evolution
package shall contain the following:
(1) Training Objective. Identify goals of the drill
package. This will vary in complexity from exercising a
warfare area with no casualties to a multi-threat scenario with
multiple casualties across all departments.
(2) Scenario. Define the scenario and equipment
required to conduct the drill package, and assess and mitigate
any unacceptable risks associated with each step in the
scenario. The scenario can be generated using onboard training
devices to exercise tactical systems in various warfare areas.
Equipment casualties at key points of the scenario will test
the ability of watch standers to report the problem accurately
and continue “fighting through” the scenario using available
equipment or casualty reconfiguration of affected
equipment/systems. Define responsibilities and location of ITT
members during conduct of the integrated drill package. The
number of departmental/functional training team members
required to execute any given drill package will depend on
purpose, requirements and complexity.
(3) Major Events (Timeline). Major events will be
imposed on a time sequence basis by exercise, exercise title
and casualty evaluator. The timing should be scheduled to
coincide with key events and allow a reasonable time for the
initiator/evaluator to fully conduct assigned tasks.
(4) Remarks. Amplify evolution events and equipment
losses and their impact during execution of the package. The
tactical impact of the overall package, safety warnings and/or
cautions should also be included. ORM will be incorporated.
e. Pre-evolution Briefs. After an integrated evolution
package has been approved, ITT coordinator shall conduct a preexercise brief. The following steps are prescribed as a
minimum:
(1) Ensure timely notification of team members
specified as initiators/evaluators for the exercise.
(2) Review previous exercise critiques for lessons
learned.
(3) Ensure a safety walk-through and ORM review are
conducted by ITT members prior to starting drill.
f. Evolution Evaluation. The integrated drill package
shall be conducted in a professional manner under the
management of the team leader. ITT observers will note
41
30 Jun 14
observations on a critique form. Members will pay particular
attention to detailed observation of the following key points:
(1) Symptom Recognition. Did the operator correctly
identify all symptoms associated with the problem? Were
correct reports generated? Were all necessary personnel
apprised of the casualty?
(2) Fault Isolation. Did technicians quickly and
correctly isolate the fault? Were casualty control folders
properly used? Was the proper consideration given to the
impact of isolation action that could act on other systems?
Were the symptoms considered in selection of isolation actions?
(3) Tactical Impact Assessment. Did casualty control
organizations properly assess tactical impact of the casualty?
Were systems diagrams, space folders and other technical
documentation properly used? Were the TAO and OOD properly
informed of tactical impact of the imposed casualty and
provided timely updates?
(4) Reconfiguration. Were technicians aware of
casualty modes of operation? Were personnel efficient in
performing reconfiguration actions? Was the system quickly and
effectively reconfigured to restore maximum combat readiness?
(5) Restoration. Were proper technical manuals and
test equipment used to effect restoration of the casualty?
Were troubleshooting techniques employed? Were techniques
employed able to correctly identify specific causes of
casualty? Were parts properly identified and requested from
supply support? Were required interfaces initiated?
(6) Securing. Were systems restored to normal
operation modes? Were timely reports generated? Was all
supporting equipment properly secured and stowed?
g. Evolution Debriefs. Valuable lessons learned will be
lost if exercises are not properly debriefed. ITT will conduct
briefs in two stages:
(1) Watch Station Debrief. ITT members observing the
exercise will conduct a detailed debrief to the trainees under
their observation. Aspects of individual performance will be
thoroughly discussed with particular attention made to seek and
answer questions that participants may have.
(2) Overall Debrief. Individual team leaders will
debrief the conduct of the integrated drill packages. Members
will emphasize objectives met and not met, problem areas and
ORM safety or training shortfalls that require corrective
action. Training team personnel will report any ITT deficiency
to the ITT leader. During debrief, exercise critique forms
will be presented to the team leader for review.
42
30 Jun 14
h. Emergencies. In the event of an actual casualty during
integrated evolutions, the ITT coordinator will pass the
following word over the 1MC to halt training: “An actual
casualty has occurred, freeze the problem, freeze the clock”.
DCA will coordinate fire fighting and damage control from
Damage Control Central (DCC), and Senior Medical Officer (SMO)
will handle medical emergencies. The ITT Coordinator shall be
kept informed of the situation and is responsible for informing
the chain of command. Resumption of drills will occur with ITT
Leader’s authorization only.
4802
DAMAGE CONTROL TRAINING TEAM (DCTT)
1. All aircraft carriers will establish a standing Damage
Control Training Team (DCTT). The XO shall be designated as
the DCTT Leader. Under the XO’s direction, the team will be
responsible for the training of all repair lockers, including
electronic, flight deck and hangar deck repair, the at sea
emergency team and in port emergency parties.
2. The DCTT Coordinator shall be the Fire Marshall, “R”
Division Officer, or DCCM, not the ship’s Damage Control
Assistant (DCA). Team members whose responsibilities cover a
specific area (i.e., first aid), need only be PQS qualified in
the watch station they are evaluating. Officers (other than
the XO), will be either SWO-qualified or have completed Repair
Locker Leader PQS. The team will be comprised of members from
all departments, including Medical (the MTT lead or medical
LCPO will be a member of DCTT), CSOOW, hangar bay and flight
deck representatives and a senior member of the Master-at-Arms
Force. The ship's DCA and Fire Marshall shall be responsible
for training the DCTT and for providing them with technical
assistance.
3. The DCTT will be used by the CO to train and conduct battle
problems, observe and grade repair party and in port emergency
party actions, verify setting of appropriate material
conditions of readiness and to conduct continuous on board
training and inspections.
4803
ENGINEERING TRAINING TEAM (ETT)
1. All aircraft carriers will establish a standing Engineering
Training Team (ETT). This team will be responsible under the
Engineer Officer (CHENG) for the operational and casualty
control training of engineering watch standers who perform
duties outside of the propulsion plant. The ETT leader will
normally be the Auxiliaries Officer (AUXO).
2. The ETT will be comprised of personnel knowledgeable and
PQS qualified in the operation of the engineering systems
outside of the propulsion plant which are the responsibility of
Engineering Department to maintain and operate.
43
30 Jun 14
3. When conducting training and evaluation of operations and
casualty control, members of ETT will use the Engineering
Operating Sequencing System (EOSS), or in cases where EOSS is
not available, will use locally prepared and approved
procedures for operating equipment or systems and in responding
to casualties.
4804
COMBAT SYSTEMS TRAINING TEAM (CSTT)
1. All aircraft carriers will establish a standing Combat
Systems Training Team (CSTT) per COMNAVAIRFOR 3500.69 (series).
This team is under the direction of the Combat Direction Center
(CDC) Officer. The CSTT is responsible for training personnel
involved in every aspect of the ship's Combat system, including
CDC, Communications Systems, Weapons Systems,
Intelligence/Cryptologic/Meteorological support, Maintenance
Support and Casualty Control.
2. The Operations Officer and Combat Systems Officer (CSO)
share responsibility for establishing an effective CSTT in
accordance with COMNAVAIRFOR 3500.69 series. The Team Leader
may delegate team leader duties to the Assistant CDC Officer or
any other CSTT Officer who is a qualified TAO, or senior member
of the CSTT charged with conduct of a specific training
evolution. The Combat Systems Maintenance Officer (CSMO) or
the Systems Test Officer (STO) is the primary CSTT Technical
representative for Combat Systems Department. CSTT will
conduct training on ship’s combat systems including: CDC,
Communications Systems, Weapons Systems,
intelligence/Cryptologic/Meteorological support, Maintenance
Support and Casualty Control. Additionally, the CDC Officer
will be responsible for the development of the tactical
scenario used to initiate ship-wide integrated drills.
4805
AIR DEPARTMENT TRAINING TEAM (ADTT)
Due to unique operational requirements and evolving procedures,
carriers will establish a standing ADTT in accordance with
COMNAVAIRFORINST 3500.86 (series).
4806
SEAMANSHIP/NAVIGATION TRAINING TEAM (SNTT)
1. All aircraft carriers will establish a standing
Seamanship/Navigation Training Team (SNTT). This team will be
under the direction of the Navigator. The SNTT is responsible
for training all ship's company personnel responsible for safe
navigation and seaman evolutions of the ship. The combination
of the seamanship and navigation training teams is primarily
for the conduct of combined training events: i.e., UNREP,
anchorage, and man-overboard exercises. The Navigation
Department personnel assigned to this team will conduct all
MOB-N exercises and the Deck Department personnel will conduct
all MOB-S related exercises.
44
30 Jun 14
2. The SNTT will be comprised of navigation personnel
knowledgeable in piloting, radar navigation, navigation rules
(COMDTINST M16672.2 series) and visual communications
procedures. The senior member will be the Navigator, who will
ensure all navigation evolutions and visual communication
procedures are properly observed and critiqued. The SNTT will
also be comprised of Deck Department personnel knowledgeable in
all areas of deck seamanship, including underway replenishment
and small boat operation, which have completed the PQS for the
watch station they are evaluating. The team will be comprised
of the First Lieutenant and Ship’s Boatswain, assisted by the
Auxiliaries Officer and qualified deck/auxiliaries personnel.
3. The SNTT will observe, grade and critique all navigation
(MOB-N), deck (MOB-S) and visual communications exercises,
reporting results to the CO.
4. Underway and in port, the SNTT should be utilized by the CO
to train for, observe, and evaluate all deck seamanship
evolutions. Whenever possible, members of the SNTT should make
use of standard TAC grade sheets and the CNSF/CNAFINST 3530.4
series when carrying out their duties.
4807
MEDICAL TRAINING TEAM (MTT)
1. All aircraft carriers will establish a standing Medical
Training Team (MTT). This team will be responsible to the
Senior Medical Officer (SMO) for the proper training of medical
personnel and ship’s company in all aspects of first aid,
stretcher bearing, medical response team performance, war wound
and mass casualty treatment.
2. The MTT will be comprised of personnel with the requisite
knowledge, background and training to facilitate medical
training. The team leader will be the Ship’s Nurse, leading a
team made up of at a minimum, one medical officer, one Leading
Chief Corpsman and one Independent Duty Hospital Corpsman. The
MTT lead or medical LCPO will also be a member of DCTT. MTT
members will be PQS/JQR qualified and designated in writing by
the CO or his designated approving authority.
3. The MTT will observe, grade and critique all medical (FSO)
exercises and report the results to the CO. Members of the MTT
will use standard TAC grade sheets when carrying out their
duties. Prior to any medical drill/evolution, the MTT leader
will conduct a brief, utilizing a drill package that outlines
the objective of the drill, timeline, personnel assignments,
lessons learned (from previous drills) and safety concerns
(utilizing ORM). Following each drill, MTT will debrief
Sailors on station, and conduct a drill debrief with all MTT
and other drill team members involved. The drill package and
debrief will be routed via chain of command for CO’s approval.
These specifics will be covered by the ATG Ship Board Training
45
30 Jun 14
Team (SBTT) course of instruction, which should be conducted
one to two months prior to CART II.
4. Per CNAFINST 6000.1 (series), one Hospital Corpsman and
four stretcher bearers will be assigned to each of the 10
repair lockers (RL). As an extension of MTT, each RL HM will
be responsible for the buddy-aid/first-aid training of the
stretcher bearer team and RL personnel.
5. Administrative records should be maintained for all COapproved drills for one training cycle. Training requirements
are outlined in Appendices I and II of this document.
4808
ANTITERRORISM TRAINING TEAM (ATTT)
1. All aircraft carriers will establish a standing
Antiterrorism Training Team (ATTT). This team will be under
the direction of the Antiterrorism Officer (ATO). The ATTT is
responsible for training personnel involved in every aspect of
the ship's antiterrorism and force protection programs.
2. The ATTT will be comprised of the most knowledgeable and
experienced personnel on the ship and will conduct
antiterrorism and force protection training as directed by the
ATO. The team shall consist of, but is not limited to: ATO,
Security Officer, Antiterrorism Training Supervisors (ATTS),
Small Arms Marksmanship Instructor (SAMI) and select members of
the ship’s Navy Security Force (NSF). Additionally, the ATTT
should be comprised of a wide cross-section of departmental
representation ensuring each department’s AT responsibilities
are adequately addressed. The ATTT shall be PQS and/or JQR
qualified in the appropriate watch station(s) they are
training/evaluating, and designated in writing by the CO.
3. The ATTT will conduct training as well as observe and
assess all AT/FP exercises and evolutions, including NCO
exercises from the appropriate TACs as required by this manual.
The ATTT Leader will be an active participant in the ship's ITT
and will have an input to the ship's PB4T to ensure AT/FP
training and exercises are included in ship's training plan as
well as during all training phases of the FRTP. In addition to
their training role, the ATTT is an excellent asset to assist
the ship's ATO in AT/FP operational planning, and should also
be available to assist embarked aviation squadrons and other
units.
4809
1.
the
for
the
PROPULSION PLANT DRILL TEAM (PPDT)
All CVN’s will establish a PPDT. This team will be under
direction of the Reactor Officer. The PPDT is responsible
operational and casualty control training and drills within
propulsion plant.
46
30 Jun 14
2. Specific guidance on composition and requirements of the
PPDT are contained in the NPTM.
4810
WEAPONS TRAINING TEAM (WTT)
1. All Aircraft Carriers will establish a standing WTT in
applicable Air/Surface warfare mission areas. Specific
guidance on composition and requirements of the WTT are
contained in this instruction, NAVSEA OP 4, CV NATOPS, NAVAIR
11-140 series manuals and other explosives safety and support
system technical manuals.
2. The WTT will be under the direction of the Weapons Officer.
The WTT is responsible for training of flight deck, hangar
deck, magazine, weapons elevator, armory and armed watch
standers in every aspect of the assigned mission. Working in
conjunction with the Force Protection Training Team (FPTT), the
WTT will provide training and qualification of armed watch
standers.
3. The WTT will be comprised of the most knowledgeable and
experienced personnel in each area of responsibility as defined
below. The WTT will be led by the Ordnance Handling Officer.
The Air Gunner, Ship’s Gunner, Weapons Assembly Officer,
Elevator Officer and Departmental LCPO shall assist the
Ordnance Handling Officer (OHO) and hand-select appropriate WTT
members from each Gunnery (G) Division.
4. The WTT will observe, grade, and critique all departmental
training evolutions and exercises and report the results to the
WTT team leader who will advise the ITT team leader of training
progress.
47
30 Jun 14
Chapter 5 PRE-REQUISITE INSPECTIONS,
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS FOR INTEGRATED
PHASE TRAINING
Section 1
5100
POLICY REGARDING ICAVS AND TRAINING
ICAV DEFINITIONS AND GUIDANCE
1. Inspections, Certifications, Assessments and Assist Visits
(ICAVs) are provided by TYCOMs to support continuous evaluation
of a ship's readiness to perform her combat mission. ICAVs are
used to ensure all aspects of unit management and operations
which influence combat readiness are considered under normal
day-to-day conditions.
2. This chapter deals specifically with those ICAVs that must
be completed and current IAW their assigned periodicity prior to
commencing the Integrated Phase of training. A complete listing
of ALL ICAVs is found in COMNAVAIRFORINST 5040.1 (series) with
amplifying information for guiding references. ICAVs are
defined as follows:
a. Inspection: A periodic on-site evaluation, audit or
examination of operational proficiency, material conditions, or
other valid program requirements by external organizations.
Results are reported to higher authority (TYCOM or above).
b. Certification: A periodic evaluation or examination of
equipment and/or systems for the specific purpose of providing
the license, permit, or the authorization necessary for
operation of equipment or systems. This includes qualifications
that are evaluations or examinations of the
personnel/organizations to properly employ/operate equipment
and/or systems.
c. Assessment: A periodic evaluation of the key systems,
processes, and results of an organization following an
established framework and methodology. Distribution of
assessment results is limited to the Unit Commander, CSG
Commander and TYCOM.
d.
Assist Visits: A periodic or as needed on-site visit to
aid a unit in evaluating operational proficiency, material
conditions, or other valid program requirements by an external
organization. Results are reported to the TYCOM.
(1) Assist Visits are conducted at the CO’s discretion.
Results remain within the lifelines of the assessed command.
Assist teams, which function as outlined in succeeding sections,
exist to serve the command; they have varying visit schedules
based on necessity as viewed by the ship and CSG.
1
30 Jun 14
(2) Assist Visit team members are normally oriented
toward a particular technical or operational area and enunciate
Navy, Fleet and Force policies.
(3) The evaluation and/or assistance specifically
include meeting with the senior Petty Officers, Chief Petty
Officers and Junior Officers of the department visited in an
attempt to further awareness, involvement and initiative on the
part of the command's middle management personnel. These
meetings shall include an exchange of unit personnel ideas with
team members on subjects that include personnel manning, state
of training and ideas for additional training.
(4) During visits, team leaders will ensure the CO or
his representative is briefed. Normally, these briefings may be
conducted upon arrival, periodically during the visit, and upon
departure. At a minimum, the visiting team will provide the CO
a summary of accomplishments and visit results.
(5) Deficiencies noted during unit evaluations, which
are not amenable to local solution, will normally be addressed
by the CO through his operational or administrative chain of
command.
5101
LIST OF IURFT REQUIREMENTS
1. IAW USFF/CPFINST 3000.15 (series), the TYCOM shall ensure
carriers complete all Basic Phase Inspections, Certifications
and Assessments that are prerequisites for achieving IURFT
operations. The CSG will provide an updated status as part of
the CSG’s Basic Phase Completion Report. This report will
include mitigation steps and an estimated time of completion for
any incomplete ICAV. CONUS based CVNs shall maintain all ICAVs
within periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series). The
FDNF CVN shall maintain all ICAVs within periodicities required
by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series).
2.
Inspections
1200 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PROGRAM (ALREMP) INSPECTION
1201 CATAPULT ACCUMULATOR INSPECTION
1202 DIESEL INSPECTION
1203 PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL POWER SURVEY INSPECTION
(PEPSI)
1204 ELECTRONIC KEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (EKMS) INSPECTION
2
30 Jun 14
1205 SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (SCI) SECURITY
MANAGEMENT INSPECTION
1206 SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP) SECURITY MANAGEMENT
INSPECTION
3.
Certifications
1300 CATAPULT CERTIFICATION
1301 ARRESTING GEAR CERTIFICATION
1302 INTEGRATED LAUNCH AND RECOVERY TELEVISION SURVEILLANCE
(ILARTS) SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
1303 VISUAL LANDING AIDS (VLA) CERTIFICATION
1304 IMPROVED FRESNEL LENS OPTICAL LANDING SYSTEM (IFLOLS)
CERTIFICATION
1305 MANUALLY OPERATED VISUAL LANDING AIDS (MOVLAS)
CERTIFICATION
1306 LANDING SIGNALS OFFICER/HEADS UP DISPLAY (LSO/HUD)
CERTIFICATION
1307 JET BLAST DEFLECTOR (JBD) CERTIFICATION
1308 FLIGHT AND HANGAR DECK AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAM
(AFFF) SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
1309 WIND MEASURING AND INDICATING SYSTEM (WMIS)
CERTIFICATION
1310 FLIGHT DECK/CARRIER AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (CATCC)
CERTIFICATION
1311 PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS (PALS)
CERTIFICATION
1312 TACTICAL AIR NAVIGATION (TACAN) SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
1313 SEARCH AND RESCUE (SAR) CERTIFICATION
1314 EVOLVED/NATO SEA SPARROW MISSILE SYSTEM (ESSMS/NSSMS)
CERTIFICATION
1315 TDL OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION
1316 METEOROLOGY & OCEANOGRAPHY (METOC) CERTIFICATION
3
30 Jun 14
1317 NAVIGATION SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION (NAVCERT)
1318 AVIATION FUELS SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
1319 ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION HAZARD (RADHAZ)
CERTIFICATION
1320 POINTING AND FIRING CUT-OUTS (P&FCO) CERTIFICATION
1321 MAGAZINE SPRINKER SYSTEM (MSSC) CERTIFICATION
1322 OIL POLLUTION ABATEMENT/OILY WATER SEPARATOR
CERTIFICATION
4.
Assessments
1400 COMBAT SYSTEMS, COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND
COMPUTER READINESS ASSESSMENT (C5RA)
1401 COMBAT SYSTEMS SHIP QUALIFICATION TRIALS (CSSQT)
1402 RELIGIOUS MINISTRY TEAM (RMT) ASSESSMENT
1403 ISIC’S NAVIGATION ASSESSMENT
1404 WEAPONS AND CARGO ELEVATOR ASSESSMENT
1405 AIRCRAFT ELEVATOR (ACE) ASSESSMENT
1406 VERTICAL PACKAGE CONVEYOR/DUMB WAITER (VPC/DW)
ASSESSMENT
1407 ANTI-TERRORISM (AT) ASSESSMENT
1408 MINE READINESS ASSESSMENT
1409 CVN WEAPONS OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSESSMENT (WORA)
1410 CVN WEAPONS MID-DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONAL READINESS SELFASSESSMENT (MORSA)
1411 TORPEDO READINESS ASSESSMENT/TECHNICAL ASSIST VISIT
(TRA/TAV)
5.
Assist Visits
1500 WEAPONS SAFETY ASSISTANCE TEAM (WSAT) VISITS
1501 CONVENTIONAL ORDNANCE SAFETY REVIEW (COSR) VISIT
4
30 Jun 14
1502 CVN AIRCRAFT HANDLING TEAM (AHT)
1503 FORCE SAFETY/INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSIST
1504 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOLLOW-ON SURVEYS
1505 SHIPBOARD SAFETY SURVEY
1506 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT ASSIST
1507 3M ASSIST VISITS
1508 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT ASSIST (SMA) VISIT
1509 CYBER SECURITY INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
(CSICP)
1510 ENGINEERING ASSIST VISITS
1511 CVN ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE ASSIST TEAM (CEMAT) VISITS
1512 MAGAZINE SPRINKLER SYSTEM VERIFICATION
1513
MOBILE ORDNANCE TRAINING TEAM (MOTT) VISIT
1514
AVIATION ORDNANCE READINESS REVIEW (AORR) VISIT
5
30 Jun 14
6
30 Jun 14
Section 2
INSPECTIONS
Carrier inspection with short overview (Note: the FDNF CVN shall
maintain all ICAVs within the periodicity required by CNAFINST
5040.1 (series) and Appendix II of this instruction):
5200 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
(ALREMP) INSPECTION
The objective of the ALREMP Inspection is to eliminate aircraft
and crew losses and prevent damage to equipment due to
maintenance errors. OPNAVINST 4790.15 series sets forth
policies, programs and an organizational structure governing the
ALREMP. Standardized auditing practices shall be employed by
maintenance management teams Navy-wide. Commander Naval Air
Forces shall provide ALRE Maintenance Management Teams (AMMTs)
to conduct audits of all units to ensure the
operations/maintenance of ALREMP is within guidance.
5201
CATAPULT ACCUMULATOR INSPECTION
Catapult accumulator inspections are conducted in accordance
with the CPF/CLF 4790.3 (series) Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual.
Routine inspections will be conducted at least once every 18
months by the TYCOM SGPI. The 18-month period begins with the
first warm-up of the catapult accumulator to normal operating
temperatures and pressure following the previous routine
inspection. Routine inspections may be conducted as early as 12
months or as late as 24 months to provide scheduling
flexibility. Inspections that exceed the 18-month interval must
have TYCOM concurrence.
5202
DIESEL INSPECTION
1. All diesel engines, including main propulsion, ship’s
service and emergency diesel generators onboard ships, shall be
inspected in accordance with OPNAVINST 9220.3(series) and NAVSEA
S9233-CJ-HBK-010/020.
2. Diesel engines shall be inspected in accordance with
periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series) (d)
a.
Routine/Pre Availability Inspections.
b.
Post-Casualty/Re-Overhaul.
c.
Post-Overhaul/Repair.
d.
New Construction (Acceptance Inspection).
e. Renovation of engines previously placed in Inactive
Equipment Maintenance (IEM).
7
30 Jun 14
5203
PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL POWER SURVEY INSPECTION (PEPSI)
Assesses the current condition of the ship’s electrical system,
minor repairs within the scope of operator qualifications,
definitions of repairs beyond the scope of operator’s
qualifications, training of operator personnel, certifications
of systems for operational use and maintenance of records.
PEPSI visits also include an evaluation of electrical power
variations in motor generator sets, static frequency converters,
aircraft electrical starting stations and other vital weapons
systems.
5204
ELECTRONIC KEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (EKMS) INSPECTION
1. The Electronic Key Management System (EKMS) inspection shall
be conducted in detail to evaluate the safeguarding of
CMS/COMSEC and other EKMS material.
2. The EKMS inspection team will be comprised of members of the
staff of the CSG. A formal, independent review and examination
of records and activities conducted to assess the adequacy of
system controls and ensure compliance with established policies
and operational procedures. The report will be prepared and
forwarded to the ship’s CO with an information copy to TYCOM N6.
Adverse findings are limited to facts for which there is
documentary or other tangible evidence.
3. CMS training and assist visits will be conducted, at a
minimum of 90 days prior to a scheduled EKMS inspection. It is
highly recommended and in the command’s best interest to take
advantage of the training and assistance services available
prior to deployment or upon a change of command or EKMS Manager,
as applicable.
4. EKMS inspections will be conducted in accordance with
periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series). This
inspection will be unannounced and conducted in accordance with
the procedures contained in EKMS 3 (series) and will include ALL
Local Elements(s).
5. Commanding Officers will ensure that unannounced spot checks
are conducted at least quarterly, of the COMSEC Vault and spaces
with COMSEC material is used and stored. The CO may delegate no
more than two of the four quarterly inspections to the XO. More
details can be found in EKMS 1 (series) Article 450.
6. The CSG/IUC is required to submit a quarterly report via
message to NCMS//N7// detailing the results of formal EKMS
inspections. The format for this report and further information
are contained in EKMS 3 (series).
7. Specific information on preparing for and conducting EKMS
inspections is contained in the EKMS 1 (series) and EKMS 3
(series).
8
30 Jun 14
5205 SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (SCI) SECURITY
MANAGEMENT INSPECTION
As directed by DOD 5105.21-M-1, the CVN Special Security Officer
(SSO) will conduct self-inspections of their Sensitive
Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIF) at least annually.
The purpose of the self-inspection is to ensure compliance with
the policies and procedures contained in the DOD 5101.21-M-1 and
other applicable SCI security regulations and directives. In
addition, the SSO will contact the Regional SSO to conduct an
annual inspection. Finally, Defense Intelligence Agency Counter
Intelligence and Security Activity (DIA/DAC) will conduct
inspections every three to five years or sooner based on threat,
sensitivity or programs, physical modifications and past
security performance.
5206 SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP) SECURITY MANAGEMENT
INSPECTION
The CVN Special Access Program Control Officer (SAPCO) shall
establish a Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) in accordance
with JAFAN 6/0, SECNAVINST S5460.3 (series) and OPNAV/N*(-001700 and provide support to the assigned CSG and CVW. The CVN
SAPCO will conduct annual self-inspections of their SAPFs and
inform the CNAL/CNAP SAPCO of the results. The purpose of the
inspection is to ensure continual compliance with policies and
procedures contained in SAP security regulations and directives.
Additionally, the SAPCO will coordinate with assigned CSG and
CVW to ensure timely program access for appropriate personnel,
provide support for CVW and CVN certification for SAP operations
by the Strike Fighter Weapons Schools and coordinate with USFCC
or CPF for Training Assist Visits (TAV) and compliance
inspections prior to deployment.
9
30 Jun 14
Section 3
CERTIFICATIONS
The Certifications listed in this section must be current for
the carrier to achieve IURFT Certification. (Note: the FDNF CVN
shall maintain all ICAVs in accordance with periodicities
required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series) and Appendix II of this
instruction) Certain equipment modifications may require recertification outside of planned availabilities and will be
coordinated directly between the appropriate TYCOM code and CVN
personnel.
5300
CATAPULT CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the ship’s catapults.
5301
ARRESTING GEAR CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the ship’s arresting gear.
5302 INTEGRATED LAUNCH AND RECOVERY TELEVISION SURVEILLANCE
(ILARTS) SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the ILARTS System.
5303
VISUAL LANDING AIDS (VLA) CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition and accuracy of VLA equipment.
5304 IMPROVED FRESNEL LENS OPTICAL LANDING SYSTEM (IFLOLS)
CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the IFLOLS.
5305 MANUALLY OPERATED VISUAL LANDING AIDS (MOVLAS)
CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the MOVLAS.
5306 LANDING SIGNALS OFFICER/HEADS UP DISPLAY (LSO/HUD)
CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the Landing Signals Officer
Heads Up Display.
5307
JET BLAST DEFLECTOR (JBD) CERTIFICATION
Validates the material condition of the JBDs.
5308 FLIGHT AND HANGAR DECK AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAM (AFFF)
SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
CNAFINST 9555.1 (series) sets forth responsibilities and
procedures for maintenance and testing of fixed flight deck,
hangar deck, weapons elevators, and JP-5 pump rooms AFFF systems
10
30 Jun 14
for CVNs. CNAF 9555.1 (series) provides minimum requirements
for flight deck, hangar deck, weapons elevators and JP-5 pump
room sprinkler systems testing, but does not limit the
Commanding Officer from more frequent testing if deemed
necessary. Requirements for the AFFF Systems Certification are
set forth in the 9555.1 (series). This certification is not
intended to take the place of scheduled maintenance.
5309
WIND MEASURING AND INDICATING SYSTEM (WMIS) CERTIFICATION
The WMIS system certification verifies the WMIS System provides
continuous visual indication of wind direction (in degrees) and
wind speed (in knots) relative to the ship’s bow. The WMIS
Certification also verifies the system’s ability to provide
electrical signals representative of wind direction and speed
for computation of flight deck cross wind and headwind
conditions, computation of wind vectors for weapons launch
systems, and recording by meteorological equipment.
5310 FLIGHT DECK/CARRIER AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (CATCC)
CERTIFICATION
Flight Deck/CATCC Certification establishes minimum criteria to
be met prior to conducting Flight Deck operations following the
completion of Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH), Planned
Incremental Availability (PIA), Docking Planned Incremental
Availability (DPIA), Selected Restricted Availability (SRA),
Post Shakedown Availability (PSA), new construction or other
extended non-flying periods.
Flight Deck/CATCC Certification
shall be conducted in accordance with CNAP/CNALINST 3500.71
(series) and periodicities required by Ref (d). CATCC
certification ensures CATCC crews have satisfactorily completed
training requirements and meet prescribed readiness standards.
Certification validates CATCC’s ability to safely support
sustained flight operations at sea.
5311 PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS (PALS)
CERTIFICATION
The purpose of PALS Certification is to validate and certify the
AN/SPN-41 Independent Landing Monitor (ILM) (Bull’s-eye and the
AN/SPN 46(V) Precision Approach and Landing System utilized by
CATCC. System validation is completed using NAEC-AWS-51-870
checklist requirements. Inspection results are submitted to
NAVAIR, Lakehurst (4.8.7) and cognizant commands utilizing the
NAVAIR NAEC-AWS-51-870 report as guidance.
5312
TACTICAL AIR NAVIGATION (TACAN) SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
There are two types of TACAN Certifications. The first
certification is a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) flight
inspection for the first CVN in each class, or any CVN
completing major top side (silhouette) change. The second
certification is the Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation
11
30 Jun 14
Facility (SESEF). This certification is normally completed
after a major change or upgrade to the TACAN system, or in
accordance with periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1
(series). TACAN certifications are completed IAW NAVAIR AE
TACAN-GYD-000 Revision 01, Instructions and Procedures Guide For
Certification of Shipboard Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN)
Systems.
5313
SEARCH AND RESCUE (SAR) CERTIFICATION
The SAR Certification is a CNO and COMNAVAIRFOR requirement
administered by ATG during Basic Phase ULT. The SAR Evaluator
will conduct an evaluation of ship's rescue boat crew,
forecastle deck crew and surface ship's swimmers. The
evaluation shall be administered in accordance with
periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series) and in
accordance with OPNAVINST 3130.6 (series) (NAVAL SEARCH AND
RESCUE (SAR) STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM.) If SAR Certification
expires during ship's overhaul, the ship shall request the ATG
SAR Evaluation Team to conduct a full SAR Certification prior to
Sea Trials. Evaluations expire on the last day of the 24th
month. SAR Evaluation failure will result in removal of SAR
Certification.
5314 EVOLVED/NATO SEA SPARROW MISSILE SYSTEM (ESSMS/NSSMS)
CERTIFICATION
The CVN Evolved/NATO Sea Sparrow Missile System (ESSMS/NSSMS)
Certification is conducted by COMNAVAIRFOR, assisted by ATG, in
(series). The ESSMS/NSSMS Certification is conducted in three
phases during Basic Phase Unit Level Training. Phase I
(Administration) and Phase II (Training, Manning, and Material)
are normally conducted during CART II. Phase III (Safety, Watch
Team Performance during Tactical Scenarios, and AAW 1025 FEP
Sub-Event) will normally be completed by TSTA Phase II.
ESSMS/NSSMS Certification is required prior to loading any
launcher with live missiles or conducting a missile firing
exercise. ESSMS/NSSMS Certification will be conducted IAW
5315
TDL OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION
COMNAVNETWARCOM promulgates the requirement for all Tactical
Data Link (TDL) equipped ships to complete TDL Operational
Verification (TOV) (LONGLOOK)/(QUICKLOOK) (TOV L/L, Q/L). The
TOV L/L (for ships) and Q/L (for aircraft) are conducted in
support of CNO TDL Interoperability Objectives. The major
emphasis of the TOV L/L and Q/L is a validation of a unit’s TDL
Program’s compliance with NAVY/JOINT TDL message standards and
is required for each TDL system installed in the unit.
12
30 Jun 14
5316
METEOROLOGY & OCEANOGRAPHY (METOC) CERTIFICATION
1. A Strike Group Oceanography Team (SGOT) is assigned to
augment the CVN METOC Division in phases, with the total
augmented support dependent on the operational schedule of the
ship. An overall METOC Certification will be awarded to the
combined METOC Division comprised of Ship’s Company personnel
and SGOT personnel. Every effort will be made to assign the
same SGOT personnel to the CVN throughout the FRTP (less
maintenance phase) to ensure training consistency.
2. Naval METOC Professional Development Detachments (NMOPDDs)
in San Diego and Norfolk will train shipboard personnel in METOC
product preparation, operations, forecasting techniques,
tactical decision aids (TDAs) and other professional knowledge.
NMOPDDs will provide and conduct Basic Phase Unit Level Training
METOC Warfare Training Scenarios. The NMOPDD-provided BASIC OA
Tactical Team Trainer should be scheduled before CART II to
improve readiness.
3. During CART II, the SGOT Norfolk or San Diego Fleet
Assessment/Readiness Officer, or other appropriate designated
representative, will conduct administrative checks using the
Afloat Self Assessment (ASA) checklist, review ready to train
goals and observe the ability to provide meteorological and
oceanographic support to the CO, TAO, and key watch standing
personnel.
4. The METOC Certification is achieved when all METOC Basic
Phase Unit Level Training certification requirements are met.
The SGOT Norfolk or San Diego Fleet Assessment / Readiness
Officer will work with the appropriate Afloat Training Group
(ATG) to assess and certify the OA Division as having
successfully completed FEP and Basic Phase ULT. Supplemental
information on this subject is available at the CNAF N7
SharePoint site.
5317
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION (NAVCERT)
The Integrated Navigation Suite equipment onboard CVNs is tested
and certified during NAVCERT. NAVCERT is a prerequisite for the
Aircraft Carrier Landing Systems (ACLS) Certification test
programs and CNAF authorization for ECDIS-N Certification.
NAVCERT provides a uniform method of assuring CVN’s Integrated
Navigation Suite can effectively and safely support the CVN’s
navigation requirements. After initial systems installation, a
NAVCERT “Systems Groom” will be conducted in accordance with
periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series).
Certification and system groom criteria can be found in
NAVSEAINST 9420.4 (series). ECDIS-N Certification requirements
can be found in CNSL/CNAFINST 3530.4 (series).
13
30 Jun 14
5318
AVIATION FUELS SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
The Aviation Fuels System Certification is conducted in
(series). NAVAIR will act as the certification authority for
aviation fuels facilities and equipment and NAVSEA
representatives shall provide technical authority on the NAVSEA
cognizant AV/Fuels System components. Prior to AV/Fuels System
Cert, a NAVSEA representative shall conduct a Console
Certification and Inspection on the JP-5 computer based control
console. A circuit-to-circuit operational test on the
functionality of all fuel/JP-5 devices (TLI, EVO, VPI and IO
boxes) associated with the computer-based console will be
conducted. Console certification shall be based on testing and
operational verification in accordance with the NAVAIR Report
(NAEC-AWS-51-870).
5319
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION HAZARD (RADHAZ) CERTIFICATION
The RADHAZ Certification validates the safe and correct
installation of RADHAZ cut-out zones whenever a SHIP-ALT has
been accomplished which affects the RADHAZ zones, or if it has
been more than three years since the last certification. The
RADHAZ Certification shall be conducted IAW NAVSEA @9040-AA-GTP010/SSCR.
5320
POINTING AND FIRING CUT-OUTS (P&FCO) CERTIFICATION
The P&FCO validates the safe, correct and interference free
installation of weapons systems pointing and firing cut out
zones. Whenever a SHIPALT has been accomplished which affects
the P&FCO, or if it has been more than three years since the
last certification, the P&FCO Certification shall be conducted
IAW NAVSEA S9040-AA-GTP-010/SSCR.
5321
MAGAZINE SPRINKER SYSTEM (MSSC) CERTIFICATION
The MSSC assesses the operability and maintainability of the
ship’s magazine sprinkler system following completion of an
availability, or following major system repairs. A Magazine
Sprinkler System Review Technical Assist Visit (MSSV) is a
functional check that determines the level of readiness of a
magazine sprinkler system. MSSV TAV should be scheduled as
close to the completion of the availability as possible. MSSV
TAV are conducted IAW NAVSEA S9522-HBK-010. Formal request for
the MSSV should be submitted to COMNAVSURFLANT//N602B// for
Atlantic Fleet carriers and COMNAVSURFPAC//N8222// for Pacific
Fleet carriers. Information copies shall be submitted to the
appropriate TYCOM and Regional Maintenance Center (RMC).
5322
OIL POLLUTION ABATEMENT/OILY WATER SEPARATOR CERTIFICATION
The OPA/OWS certification process is applicable to all U.S. Navy
surface ships on which shipboard OPA equipment and systems are
14
30 Jun 14
currently installed or are being installed during new
construction, conversion, or under the Fleet Modernization
Program (FMP). These shipboard Waste Oil/Oily Waste (WO/OW)
control systems include: oily waste separators (OWS), oil
content monitors (OCM), oily waste holding tanks (OWHT), oily
waste transfer system, waste oil tanks (WOT), oily waste ultrafiltration systems (OWUS) and associated components. The
OPA/OWS certification shall be conducted IAW NAVSEAINST
9593.2(series).
15
30 Jun 14
Section 4
ASSESSMENTS
The Assessments listed in this section must be current for
carrier IURFT certification (Note: FDNF CVN shall maintain all
ICAVs in accordance with periodicities required by CNAFINST
5040.1 (series) and Appendix II of this instruction.)
5400 COMBAT SYSTEMS, COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND
COMPUTER READINESS ASSESSMENT (C5RA)
The aircraft carrier C5RA will normally be scheduled as a single
event encompassing a 14-day period. The evaluation is normally
timed to occur 90 to 140 days prior to deployment. The C5RA
coordinator will conduct liaison with the appropriate group
commander and the ship in scheduling the visit. The objective
of the CSRA is to assist the ship in attaining a high state of
combat systems readiness and C4I prior to commencing deployment.
5401
COMBAT SYSTEMS SHIP QUALIFICATION TRIALS (CSSQT)
CSSQT verifies and validates a ship’s combat/weapon systems have
been installed correctly and can be operated and maintained in a
safe and effective manner. This is accomplished by assisting
ship’s force in achieving a sustainable level of combat/weapon
systems operational readiness and maintainable level of material
readiness. CSSQT should be scheduled IAW NAVSEA 9093 (series)
instructions. CSSQT verifies and validates combat/weapon
systems performance for new construction ships and for ships
undergoing significant conversion/modernization availabilities.
Data collection and analysis of combat/weapon systems and ship
performance during CSSQT supports warfare area qualifications
and certifications. In addition, the CSSQT period can be
leveraged to conduct integrated Developmental and Operational
Testing (DT/OT), tactics validation and Fleet proficiency
training.
5402
RELIGIOUS MINISTRY TEAM (RMT) ASSESSMENT
The RMT Assessment checklist serves as a basis for ensuring
COMNAVAIRFOR units are competent to meet the Religious Ministry
needs of embarked crewmembers upon completion of the Basic
Phase. The RMT Assessment shall be conducted IAW CNAFINST
1730.2 (series).
5403
ISIC’S NAVIGATION ASSESSMENT
The ship’s CSG is responsible for conducting a Navigation
assessment IAW CNSF/CNAFINST 3530.4 (series). The assessment
shall be accomplished in accordance with periodicities required
by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series). If a CVN has not conducted an
assessment due to PIA, DPIA or RCOH, it will be considered out
of periodicity and conducted during Crew Certification. If the
last Navigation Assessment exceeds the 32-month periodicity, the
CSG will submit a Restrictive Navigation Message to TYCOM N7
16
30 Jun 14
stating ”current underway operations are for CSG/ATG supervised
training only” or “are in response to a emergency sortie order
or national emergency.” Once the Navigation Assessment criteria
are met, the CSG will provide an “Authorized for Unrestricted
Navigation Operations” Message to CNAF (N7) IAW the 3530.4
(series).
5404
WEAPONS AND CARGO ELEVATOR ASSESSMENT
The shipboard weapons and cargo handling elevators are supported
through the elevator assessment and repair program, which is
executed by the Elevator Support Unit (ESU). The ESU program
provides direct fleet support for maintenance and modernization
of shipboard elevators. The program is executed by ESU on a per
ship’s cycle, as directed by the individual ship’s deployment
and maintenance schedule. Although ESU scheduled milestones are
based on the maintenance cycle, the primary focus of the program
is to achieve peak system readiness in preparation for
deployment. Weapons and Cargo Elevator Assessments are
conducted IAW Volume IV Chapter 8 of the CLF/CPF 4790.3 (series)
instruction.
5405
AIRCRAFT ELEVATOR (ACE) ASSESSMENT
Although aircraft elevators are designed for use in a marine
environment, scheduled periodic maintenance, testing and
assessments are required for sustained reliable performance.
Aircraft elevator assessments should be conducted IAW guidance
set forth in NSTM Chapter 588 and CLF/CPF 4790.3 (series).
5406
VERTICAL PACKAGE CONVEYOR/DUMB WAITER (VPC/DW) ASSESSMENT
Validates material condition of Vertical Conveyors/Dumbwaiters.
Assessment shall be conducted IAW CLF/CPF 4790.3 (series).
5407
1.
ANTI-TERRORISM (AT) ASSESSMENT
AT Training is divided into four phases:
a.
Phase I (Assessment and Readiness Phase)
b.
Phase II (Training Phase)
c.
Phase III (Practical Training Phase)
d.
Phase IV (Evaluation/Assessment Phase).
2. The successful conclusion of Phase IV will result in final
certification of the unit by the CSG.
3.
Units will coordinate with their CSG and ATG to schedule
and execute AT/FP phase training to ensure the training timeline
is accomplished. AT/FP phased training will not exceed 30
months between AT/FP certification and the commencement of an
17
30 Jun 14
AT/FP training cycle. Waivers to accomplish training outside
the standard timeline must be approved by the TYCOM.
4. Completion of Phase IV shall be documented by CSG
notification message to the appropriate TYCOM, certifying the
completion of required AT Basic Phase Unit Level Training and
stating the ship is ready to proceed to the Intermediate Phase
of FRTP.
5. Supplemental information on this subject is available at the
5408
MINE READINESS ASSESSMENT
The Mine Readiness Assessment (MRA) is conducted every 32 months
(normally during COMPTUEX for CONUS-based CVNs). The MRA is
conducted by the WSAT. The purpose of the MRA is to assess the
ability of the ship to perform mine warfare missions and tasks.
The MRA will consist of the Quick Strike Modification Kit
preparation, MK-57 programming, MK 595 pre-setter self test,
assembly of 10 Quick Strike Mines and a review of training
documentation. OPTEMPO extensions will be granted on a case by
case basic and as practical.
5409
CVN WEAPONS OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSESSMENT (WORA)
1. The time available to train the carrier/air wing team in the
operational readiness of the Weapons Department is significantly
limited by the Air Wing Non-Combat Expenditure Allocation
(NCEA), limited land targets and underway time during workups.
Achieving and sustaining fully trained teams can be further
limited by short turnarounds, extended maintenance
availabilities, limited underway time and large personnel
turnover. Accordingly, to ensure carrier Weapons Departments
have achieved war fighting readiness in support of the ship’s
armament and the embarked Air Wing, a WORA will be conducted
underway during the Integrated Phase (preferably COMTUEX) or the
Pre-Deployment Sustainment Phase to demonstrate the Carrier/Air
Wing team has attained the weapons employment readiness levels
required for FDNF operations. WSAT reports WORA results to
either Commander Carrier Strike Force Training Pacific/Atlantic
CSG 4/15 or the embarked CSG.
2. The COMNAVAIRFOR Weapons Safety Assist Team (WSAT) will
assist the CSG 4/15 Chief Observer. The functions of the WSAT
Team ISO this assessment include:
a. Act as the principal technical advisors to COMNAVAIRFOR
relative to improvement of CVN ship surface and aviation weapon
safe handling and stowage, and the related support equipment.
b. Act as the principal technical advisor to COMNAVAIRFOR
for Joint Special Warfare operations on CVN ships.
18
30 Jun 14
c. Evaluate effectiveness of Weapons, Operations, and Air
Department coordination and execution of the daily air and
combat operations ordnance load plan.
d. Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of timely and safe
sustained support of CVN ship’s armament and Carrier Air Wing in
a combat environment.
e. Evaluate the readiness of the weapons elevator system
and installed manual and pneumatic hoist, including Emergency
Ordnance Handling (EOH) equipment.
f. Evaluate the adequacy, material condition and proper
configuration of AWSE (MHE/OHE/WSE) per the COSAL/IMRL; and,
OPNAVINST 8000.16 (series) and related technical manuals.
g. Evaluate the readiness of the mission and shipfill
ammunition allowances and the magazine arrangements to optimize
ship survivability.
h. Evaluate safe flight and hangar deck ordnance operations
per NAVSEA OP 4, NAVAIR 00-80T-105, NAVAIR 00-80T-120 and other
applicable written guidance with particular attention being
directed to weapons movement, aircraft loading and downloading
and arming/de-arming processes.
i. Assess the readiness of the CVN Weapons Department and
other departments directly supporting combat ordnance operations
(or mirror-image training).
j. Assess a conventional weapons loading exercise (LOADEX).
The WSAT lead will provide a load plan to the ship’s Strike
Operations Officer and Ordnance Handling Officer at a minimum 24
hours prior to execution. The WSAT will evaluate weapons
handling through the breakout/stowage, buildup/breakdown,
strike-up/strike-down and air wing loading/downloading
processes.
5410 CVN WEAPONS MID-DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONAL READINESS SELFASSESSMENT (MORSA)
The Non-Combat Expenditure Allocation (NCEA) provides training
ordnance only for unit level training. Most Air Wing live
ordnance expenditures are conducted from the host air station or
at advanced bases ashore. Little opportunity is available over
the course of the FRTP for periodic CONOPS mirror image training
in the combat scenarios expected at the deployed areas of
operation. The WORA provides the means to assess the
operational readiness of the Ship/Air Wing weapons team for
deployed combat operations during COMPTUEX. The CVN Weapons
Mid-Deployment Operational Readiness Self-Assessment provides
the means to ensure the Ship/Air Wing team is maintaining the
same level of weapons operating proficiency as observed during
the Integrated Phase; a means for a mid-cycle/mid-deployment
19
30 Jun 14
reassessment of the effectiveness of the FRTP; and, a means to
evaluate the effectiveness of sustainment training.
5411 TORPEDO READINESS ASSESSMENT/TECHNICAL ASSIST VISIT
(TRA/TAV)
1. The Torpedo Readiness Assessment (TRA) and Technical Assist
Visits (TAV) is conducted by COMNAVAIRFOR Staff (N40A) in
(series). OPTEMPO extensions will be granted on a case-by-case
basis. The purpose is to provide the CO the means to formally
assess the ability of the CVN ship assigned a Lightweight
Torpedo support responsibility, to properly and safely store,
handle, and prepare MK 46 and MK 54 war
shot/exercise/recoverable exercise torpedoes.
2. The TRA/TAV can be requested to include all or a portion of
the activity’s capability, following the guidance in
3. The requesting activity should ensure sufficient recoverable
exercise torpedoes (REXTORPs), all air-launched accessories,
common/peculiar tools, and test equipment required to support
operations are on hand and in serviceable condition.
4. Request the TRA/TAV from COMNAVAIRFOR, via Official
correspondence, NLT 30 days prior to the desired date for the
requested visit. The TRA/TAV should not be scheduled less than
60 days prior to the planned TRA.
5. The Weapons Officer and the CO will be provided an oral
debrief at the conclusion of the TRA/TAV with a written report
provided in follow on correspondence.
20
30 Jun 14
21
30 Jun 14
Section 5
VISITS
The visits listed in this section are not required for the
carrier to be certified as IURFT, but these visits often occur
during the Basic Phase. The FDNF CVN shall maintain all ICAVs
in accordance with periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1
(series) and Appendix II of this instruction.
5500
WEAPONS SAFETY ASSISTANCE TEAM (WSAT) VISITS
1. The CNAF WSAT provides aircraft carrier and Air Wing weapons
personnel with on-site training and assistance by visiting ships
and observing all aspects of conventional weapons handling,
including stowage, assembly/disassembly, loading/unloading,
arming/de-arming, and weapon movement, in accordance with
CNAFINST 5440.2 (series) and 8020.3 (series).
2. The primary purpose of the WSAT is to review and provide
technical assistance, advice, and training to fleet weapons
personnel. The WSAT will conduct a Conventional Ordnance Safety
Review (COSR) TAV for the CVN post PIA. Recommend scheduling
COSR TAV at least 60 to 90 days prior to COSR. The ship will
conduct an initial COSR Assessment Shipboard Explosive Safety
Self Assessment (SESSA) prior to or during the CART portion of
Unit Level Training (ULT). WSAT will also serve as the TYCOM
representative during AORR. WSAT will deploy aboard CVNs during
COMPTUEX, to conduct a Mine Readiness Assessment (MRA) and the
Weapons Operational Readiness Assessment (WORA). During these
visits, the WSAT reports to the Chief Observer and discrepancies
noted during the inspection of weapons stowage, magazines,
magazine sprinkler systems, security of conventional weapons,
and any problems experienced during the assembly, handling
movement, loading, and arm/de-arm evolutions.
3. The WSAT is also available to Naval Air Force squadrons,
Naval Air Stations, Naval Air Facilities and supporting units,
and Marine aviation commands when scheduled to deploy to
COMNAVAIRFOR ships or bases, in matters relating to conventional
weapons safety.
4. The WST conducts Technical Assist Visits onboard aircraft
carriers and shore stations that support COMNAVAIRFOR
activities. Additional assist visits are conducted as schedules
permit, to Type Wings, Air Wings, squadrons, training schools
and other weapons activities.
5501
CONVENTIONAL ORDNANCE SAFETY REVIEW (COSR) VISIT
1. The COSR shall be conducted in accordance with periodicities
required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series). This review maybe
completed as either a one or two part inspection as directed by
the TYCOM. The ship will conduct an initial COSR Assessment
Shipboard Explosive Safety Self Assessment (SESSA) prior to or
during the Unit Level Training Plan (ULT) portion of CART.
22
30 Jun 14
OPTEMPO extensions will be granted on a case-by-case basis and
as practical.
2. When conducted as a two-part inspection the COSR will be
scheduled, at the CO’s discretion, following the ship’s
industrial maintenance availabilities as per FRTP (R+7), and
prior to initial ammunition on load as per FRTP (R+9) to ensure
all spaces and support equipment are fully operational, and the
ship is ready to receive ammunition and conduct underway
explosive operations. When conducting a one-part review or when
completing the second part of a two-part review, the COSR will
be scheduled as will be scheduled after ammunition load out as
per FRTP (R+11) to assess the proper and safe stowage of
ammunition. The COSR will be conducted once during the ship’s
FRTP.
3. The COSR provides a thorough review of the ship’s explosive
safety program to ensure safe handling and stowage of ammunition
and explosives, prevent related damage to the ship and injury to
personnel, instill a heightened awareness of explosive safety
within ship’s force, and provide informal explosive safety
training, where required.
4. The Naval Ordnance Safety and Security Activity Explosive
Safety Support Office, Atlantic/Pacific
(NAVORDSAFSECACTESSOLANT/PAC) provides COSR services. COSR
service requests should be submitted to COMNAVAIRLANT/PAC
(N40A), with information copy to the ISIC and NAVORDSAFSECACT
ESSOLANT/PAC, as applicable.
5. The NAVORDSAFSECACT DET COSR team leader will provide an
oral debrief to the Commanding Officer and Weapons Officer. A
formal report of COSR findings will be provided once the
ESSOLANT/ESSOPAC leadership review.
5502
CVN AIRCRAFT HANDLING TEAM (AHT)
1. The CNAP/CNAL AHT is available upon request to assist
carrier Air Departments in order to achieve levels of
standardization, safety, and efficiency required to support
Flight and Hangar deck operations.
2. Carrier Aircraft Handling Teams perform the following
functions:
a. Act as technical advisors to TYCOMs relative to
improvement of aircraft handling procedures and equipment aboard
CVNs.
b. Evaluate effectiveness of Air Department administration,
and material condition of assigned equipment per OPNAVINST
4790.4 (series).
23
30 Jun 14
c. Augment assigned CSG training to assess readiness during
the COMPTUEX Final Battle Problem and provide input to CSG 4/15
for “No-Divert” flight operations after reviewing Air
Department’s proficiency in all areas relating to Flight Deck
operations.
d. Conduct CVN Flight Deck Certification in accordance with
CNAP/CNALINST 3500.71 (series).
5503
FORCE SAFETY/INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSIST
1. All CVN Safety Departments will be assessed in accordance
with periodicities required by CNAFINST 5040.1 (series) and
CNAFINST 5100.3 (series). This assessment is normally completed
during Phase I and II Crew Certifications. However, Ship’s
Safety Departments desiring additional NAVOSH, Industrial
Hygiene and/or Hazardous Material technical assistance should
request the assistance from the CNAF Force Industrial Hygiene
Officer. Assistance can be requested for any of the following:
a.
Identifying safety hazards.
b.
Establishing various elements of the NAVOSH program.
c.
Training Safety Officers and Safety Petty Officers.
d. Preparing for the various PRE-INSURV, INSURV or other
oversight inspections.
2. Reports for formal assessments will be generated for the CO.
An informational copy will be provided to CNAF Safety (N45).
Unless requested by the ship, no formal reports will be
generated for assist visits; information shared or provided will
remain within the lifelines of the ship.
5504
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOLLOW-ON SURVEYS
An update of the Baseline Industrial Hygiene Survey is necessary
when system, equipment, or load out changes significantly affect
the onboard hazard and/or risk. Deterioration of existing
controls, modifications and additions to shipboard processes and
equipment will occur over time. The ship’s Assistant Safety
Officer (who is also an Industrial Hygiene Officer, NOBC 1861)
is responsible for updating the baseline industrial hygiene
survey at least bi-annually. The CNAF Industrial Hygiene
Officer can be contacted to coordinate additional assistance
from the nearest supporting BUMED activity.
5505
SHIPBOARD SAFETY SURVEY
The Shipboard Safety Survey is conducted by the Naval Safety
Center. The survey is two days long, and includes training and
a survey of a representative sample of the entire ship. The
goal is to identify safety hazards, train Safety Officers and
24
30 Jun 14
Safety Petty Officers, and provide the CO an evaluation of the
command’s safety status. Shipboard safety surveys are optional
and at the discretion of the CO. The survey report is made only
to the ship. No grade or relative standing is assigned and
follow-up reports are not required. This survey is available by
request to NAVSAFECEN.
5506
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT ASSIST
Ships desiring assistance for implementation, day-to-day
operations, or equipment problems with their Hazardous Material
Minimization Centers (HAZMINCENs) may request an assist from
Consolidated Hazardous Materials Re-Use Inventory
Management/Hazardous Materials Inventory Control System
(CHRIMP/HICS) Assist Teams. These teams may be contacted
through Naval Inventory Control Point (NAVICP). Training and
assist visits may also be requested through the TYCOM Supply
Management Assist team.
5507
3M ASSIST VISITS
1. The 3M Team (or any member of it) is available to visit any
ship, on request, to provide guidance in any 3M area of
interest. 3M guidance is prescribed in COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.1
(series). Information or assistance is available by
telephone/e-mail.
2. “Optional Assist” (3MA) visits should be requested via naval
message or letter to respective coast TYCOM, indicating specific
areas desired for assistance.
3. “Required 3MA Assist” visits will be scheduled through CNAF
N43, who will coordinate with CNAF N3 for ship de-confliction.
4. “3M Training Team Team” visits (3MTT) will be scheduled
through CNAF N43, who will coordinate with CNAF N3 for ship deconfliction. These visits shall be conducted every eight to 10
months (ship’s schedule permitting) to ensure proper training
and focus for 3MTT team members as an integral part of the
ship’s self-assessment program.
5508
SUPPLY MANAGEMENT ASSIST (SMA) VISIT
1. The Afloat Supply Management Assist Team will visit a ship
for the purpose of evaluating Supply Department operations when
requested by the Commanding Officer. Such visits shall be
coordinated via the TYCOM. Typically, the SMA will be scheduled
by the TYCOM 60-90 days prior to the Supply Management
Inspection (SMI). Tailored Assist Visits will be provided upon
request of the CO or the Supply Officer.
2. The SMA will provide the CO with an objective evaluation of
the ship's Supply Department operation and offer recommendations
for improvement, if necessary. An informal debrief of the
25
30 Jun 14
findings will be provided to the Supply Officer and/or the CO
prior to the team’s departure from the ship.
5509 CYBER SECURITY INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
(CSICP)
1. The CSICP is the DoN's process of formally inspecting
shipboard IA posture based on DoD, DoN, DISA, and National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards.
2. The shipboard Cyber Security Inspection (CSI) follows the
same format and guidelines as the Command Cyber Readiness
Inspection (CCRI) that DISA performs for shore commands. The
CSI should be integrated into the ship's Fleet Response Training
Plan (FRTP) and is required as part of renewing the ship's
network ATOs.
3. Notification of the CSI schedule for a ship normally occurs
120 days prior to the actual inspection. If the ship has a
robust and vital IA program, preparation for the CSI should
cause minimal impact.
4. Notification of the CSI schedule occurs when the schedule
message is released, notionally five to six months prior to the
inspection.
5. FLTCYBERCOM OCA will contact the ship 90 days prior to the
inspection to begin coordination. Blue Teams and CYBERFOR
assistance teams will help to ensure readiness and can fairly
accurately predict CSI performance. Outside assistance aside,
the very best preparation for the CSI is daily vigilance and
attention to detail in all areas of cyber-readiness. An
overview of the three phases of CSICP appears below:
a. Stage I: Administrative Review. This is a nominal oneday review, scheduled and conducted by your ISIC. This review
will consist of an internal program review of administration,
leadership engagement, and training. Upon successful completion
of Stage I, a command will be determined ready to progress to a
Stage II unit level assessment to be conducted within the
following 12-month period.
b. Stage II: Unit Level Training and Assessment. This is
a nominal three to five day, graded assessment (advise and
assist format) scheduled and executed by CYBERFOR and Echelon II
Commanders. This assessment will include a review of Stage I,
plus an additional in-depth assessment of network security,
physical security and all five IA Facets: Administration,
Training, Personnel, Operations, and Monitoring and Assessment.
For afloat commands, any similar assessments conducted as part
of FRTP will be incorporated into Stage II to eliminate
redundancy. Upon successful completion of Stage II, a command
is determined ready to progress to the Stage III, a
26
30 Jun 14
comprehensive inspection to be scheduled and conducted within
the following 12-month period.
(1) Pre-CSI Training and Assist Visits. CYBERFOR's PreCSI Training and Assist Team, CYBERFOR N41, provides IA program
training and assistance as a subset of a ship's CSICP Stage II.
(2) These visits are valuable for identifying shipboard
IA program deficiencies for ship's force action prior to a Stage
III inspection.
(3) Stage III: Cyber Security Inspection. This is a
nominal five-day comprehensive graded inspection involving all
cyber security areas; specifically, leadership engagement,
physical security, administration, training, network
configuration, and network operations. This inspection will be
scheduled and conducted by FLTCYBERCOM inspection teams and is
structured to replace the DISA CCRI. As CSICP matures, several
Stage III inspection teams will be assigned to select Echelon II
Commanders to conduct inspections on behalf of FLTCYBERCOM using
the same established process. Stage III inspections will result
in a grade and will measure cyber security compliance and
identify operational risks to command and control,
communications, computer and combat systems, and the GIG. Upon
successful completion of Stage III, a command will be certified
for operational status. For accreditation purposes, this
certification will meet the DoD activity IV (IA sustainment)
annual review requirement."
6. A command’s IA program is only as good as the people who
manage it. Ensuring that both operators and managers have the
proper training is therefore critical to the ship’s INFOSEC
posture. NAVY CYBER FORCES’ INFORMATION ASSURANCE HANDBOOK will
assist ships for daily Cyber Security and provide CSI
preparation guides.
5510
ENGINEERING ASSIST VISITS
Teams from the ATG or the COMNAVAIRFOR Nuclear Power Mobile
Training Teams (NPMTT) will visit each ship periodically during
the FRTP to keep the TYCOM apprised of the engineering readiness
of aircraft carriers, and to offer expert assistance and
guidance to COs to prepare for the Engineering Qualification and
Operational Reactor Safeguard Examination (ORSE) process.
Training visits to nuclear powered propulsion plants are
coordinated by the TYCOM NPMTT. These teams provide the CO with
an objective evaluation of the ship's engineering readiness and
offer expert recommendations for improvement, if necessary.
5511
CVN ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE ASSIST TEAM (CEMAT) VISITS
1. The CEMAT provides dedicated waterfront support, enhanced
availability planning, improved deployment readiness, judicious
27
30 Jun 14
use of maintenance dollars, and enhanced communications between
ship's force, TYCOM, and the Navy technical community.
2. Key players in executing the CEMAT "find, fix, train and
document" philosophy are: ship's force, TYCOM, NSWCCD
Philadelphia, Regional Maintenance Center (RMC), NSWCCD Port
Hueneme Division, and industrial contractors.
3. CEMAT visits are nominally two to three weeks in length and
accomplished prior to the pre overseas movement period. During
this period, CEMAT technical and logistics representatives work
with ship's force using guidelines and procedures tailored to
the individual ship and accomplish the following:
a. Conduct pre-operational checks of each equipment and
system.
b.
Align and adjust equipment and systems as required.
c. Conduct system operational testing and identification of
operational discrepancies.
d. Prioritize discrepancies and correct to the maximum
extent possible in conjunction with the visit.
e. Identify equipment for repair or overhaul during future
maintenance availabilities.
f. Instruct ship's force in proper procedures to maintain
and repair auxiliary machinery and systems.
g.
Provide logistic support validation.
h.
Document equipment discrepancies on OPNAV 4790/2K.
i.
Accomplish emergent repairs.
j. Provide technical assistance in support of UD, LOA,
INSURV, TSTAs, CSRA, SRA, PIA, and DPIA etc.
28
30 Jun 14
4. CEMAT systems and equipment follow closely the HULL MECHANIC
AND ELECTRICAL (HM&E) conference identified problem areas and
include:
AESS, HESS
Air Conditioning Plants
Anchor Windlass
B&T Cranes
Boilers and Automatic Controls
Catapult Support Equipment
CHT
Damage Control Closures
Air Compressors
Ammunition Handling Equipment
B&A Crane
Boat Davits
Capstans
Centrifugal Pumps
Conveyors
Damage Control Communication
Systems
Electronic Cooling Systems
HP Air Systems Exterior
Main Engines
Recycling Systems
O2N2 Systems
Rotating Auxiliary Machinery
UNREP RAS Equipment
Winches
Degaussing
Electronic Dry Air/Dehydrators
Communications Systems
Firefighting Systems
LP Air Systems
Refrigeration Plants/Units
Steering Gear
Valves
Special Frequency Generating Equip
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Charging Systems
5. Assistance from the CEMAT should be scheduled directly with
COMNAVAIRFOR (N43).
5512
MAGAZINE SPRINKLER SYSTEM VERIFICATION
1. The MSSV assesses the configuration and operability of the
ship’s magazine sprinkler system following completion of a
maintenance availability or following major system repairs. A
Magazine Sprinkler System Verification (MSSV) is a functional
check that determines the level of readiness of a magazine
sprinkler system. MSSV should be scheduled as close to the
completion of the availability as possible. MSSV are conducted
IAW NAVSEA S9522-HBK-010.
2. Formal request for the MSSV should be submitted to the
cognizant Regional Maintenance Center (RMC) utilizing the
applicable PLA indicated below with an information copy sent to
the applicable TYCOM:
(SERMC) SOUTHEAST RMC MAYPORT FL//240/900/952/953D//
(SWRMC) SOUTHWEST RMC SAN DIEGO CA//200/230/233A//
(JARMC) NAVSHIPREPFAC AND JAPAN RMC YOKOSUKA JA//192//
(HARMC) NAVSHIPYD AND IMF PEARL HARBOR HI//200/280//
29
30 Jun 14
(NWRMC) NAVSHIPYD AND IMF PUGET SOUND WA//210//
(MARMC) SHIPSUPPACT NORFOLK VA//200/215.4//
5513
MOBILE ORDNANCE TRAINING TEAM (MOTT) VISIT
1. The MOTT provides on the job training (OJT) and technical
assistance to Fleet activities assigned an air-launched weapon
mission and task. The MOTT is available, upon request, to
conduct training and assist visits onboard afloat units during
all phases of the CVN FRTP and to shore activities.
2. The Mobile Ordnance Training Team (MOTT) is organized with
aviation ordnance specialists experienced in both organizational
and intermediate level airborne weapons maintenance tasks.
3. The MOTT can provide both formal and practical job training
in all facets of weapons stowage, breakout, assembly, strikeup/down, and staging, as well as the maintenance and
configuration of related support equipment. The MOTT can also
review effectiveness of the activity’s Explosives Handling
Personnel Qualification/Certification Program, if requested.
4. MOTT services can be utilized as often as necessary until
desired proficiency levels are attained. The forward deployed
CVN is normally provided semi-annual MOTT visits. The training
is exportable and may be utilized while underway, in port, or at
any shore site desiring assistance
5. The MOTT provides an oral debrief to the activity Weapons
Officer. The MOTT also provides formal correspondence
identifying the personnel who were successfully trained and the
specific training provided. The MOTT maintains direct liaison
with, and assists the Fleet Support Activity (FSA), as well as
the aviation ordnance formal schoolhouses. The COMNAVAIRFOR
MOTT will update/maintain the master file and the distribution
list for the COMNAVAIRFOR Standardized Weapons Training Plan
(SWTP).
6. LANTFLT MOTT is also tasked by COMUSFLTFORCOM with providing
ammunition sentencing training to Atlantic Fleet Ships.
7. LANTFLT MOTT services may be requested by naval message to
COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK VA //N40C//. PACFLT MOTT service requests
should be directed to COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N40C//.
5514
AVIATION ORDNANCE READINESS REVIEW (AORR) VISIT
1. The AORR will be conducted IAW OPNAVINST 8000.16 (series)
and COMNAVAIRFORINST 8000.16 (series) as directed by the TYCOM
Force Weapons Officer. Purpose is to fully review ship’s
overall readiness to identify potential short falls that could
30
30 Jun 14
possibly impede or hinder their ability to successfully complete
assigned missions.
2. All assigned personnel whose duties involve weapons handling
and weapons support must have a thorough knowledge and
understanding of handling, assembly, fusing, arming and testing
of weapons systems. CVNs are tasked to reliably and safely
employ various ordnance assets; it is required they maintain a
myriad of support equipment, special tools and
testing/programming equipment to effectively support their
mission. All CVNs will be subject to an AORR in order to
evaluate their capabilities.
3. The AORR shall be scheduled by the CVN over a four-day
period during a ship’s in port period (post-TSTA R+8) but prior
to the command’s COMPTUEX (R+10). For FDNF, the AORR will be
conducted annually. Requests for the AORR support shall be
submitted to COMNAVAIRFOR (N40A) by naval message, with
information line to:
NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV CHINA LAKE CA//674000D//670000D//.
31
30 Jun 14
Section 6 AVAILABLE TRAINING
5600
GENERAL GUIDANCE
1. This section provides an easy reference for information on
available carrier training. The training listed in this
section is not provided as a requirement for IURFT operations.
2. TYCOM support and Assist Visit training are available
throughout the FRTP. Contact with the TYCOM early in the FRTP
is both encouraged and recommended, so potential deficiencies
in training or issues with equipment and manning can be
identified for correction. This will enable the CVN to be
better prepared for subsequent training, evaluation and
certification periods.
5601
3M TRAINING TEAM (3MTT) TRAINING
1. A 3M Training Team (3MTT) is mandated for every carrier to
enhance and maintain a peak level of PMS performance via
focused training and evaluation for ship board spot-checkers
and maintenance personnel.
2. A 3MTT shall be a minimum 30-member team led by the XO with
the 3M Officer and 3M Coordinators serving as primary
assistants. The team shall be comprised of Officers, Chief
Petty Officers and departmental 3M Assistants. The team shall
have at a minimum, one departmental representative, but shall
be proportionally represented by the four major departments:
(Reactor, Engineering, Combat Systems, and Air). 3MTT members
must be 3M (304) Division Officer PQS qualified, should be an
E-7 and above, with 12 months or more remaining onboard, and
shall be designated in writing by the 3M Officer.
3. 3MTT teams shall be evaluated during 3M Assessments. 3MTT
will be evaluated and training provided by TYCOM every eight to
10 months as part of a robust training and self-evaluation
program. The goal of 3MTT training events is to promote and
maintain the highest level of PMS performance and knowledge
through self-critical evaluations and deck-plate involvement.
The ship’s involvement shall be noted during these training
events, and feedback on performance provided.
5602
CV-TSC ASSIST TRAINING
1. CV-TSC Mobile Training Team (CV-TSC MTT). The MTT exists
to provide the CSG Commander, DESRON Commodore, CVW Commander,
and CVN CO the most operationally capable CV-TSC possible,
using hands-on training. The Team will train and assess all
AN/SQQ-34CV2 Operational events any time during FRTP starting
in the Basic Phase.
2. Each CVN installed with AN/SQQ-34CV2 shall request (via
Naval Message to CV-TSC ASHORE JACKSONVILLE FL) an MTT visit to
coincide with all CVTSC performance events in APP I starting
32
30 Jun 14
with CART II. CV-TSC MTT will provide one to two weeks of in
port/at sea onboard training.
3. At the conclusion of each visit, the CV-TSC MTT will
provide the ATG TLO, CVN’s Operations Officer, CDC Officer and
CNAF CV-TSC Coordinator an objective view of the CVN’s CV-TSC
readiness and offer recommendations for improvements.
5603
UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT
1. Pacific Fleet Underway Replenishment Training: Exportable,
"hands-on" technical training on underway replenishment
systems, including: equipment maintenance, winch repair
procedures and the rigging of less common replenishment
configurations are available from NAVSURFWARCEN DET Port
Hueneme, Port Hueneme, CA. Training may be scheduled directly
with NAVSURFWARCEN DET Port Hueneme with information copies of
the request provided to COMNAVAIRFOR N7 and N43.
2. Atlantic Fleet Underway Replenishment Training:
Expeditionary Warfare Training Group, Atlantic (EWTGLANT)
offers a two to five day course of instruction to train UNREP
teams from Atlantic Fleet units. The course (A-060-0026) is
designed to prepare rig teams for shipboard receiving and
delivery of Standard Tensioned Replenishment Alongside Methods
(STREAM) rigs. It is offered to Naval (primary BMs) and
Military Sealift Command enlisted personnel. To schedule
training, contact EWTGLANT at (757) 462-5139 (COMM) or 253-5139
(DSN).
5604 ATLANTIC FLEET WEAPONS PACKAGING AND UNDERWAY
REPLENISHMENT TRAINING
The Packaging Handling, Shipping and Transportation (PHS&T)
Center at the Naval Surface Warfare Center Detachment Earle
offers pre-deployment underway training, to train Weapons and
Deck Department personnel on correct unit packaging of
ammunition per military standards and selecting and configuring
connected/vertical replenishment slings, and strong backs,
preferably during ammunition on-load. Schedule training through
COMNAVAIRFOR N40C.
5605 ATLANTIC/PACIFIC FLEET MISSILE SENTENCING INSPECTION
TRAINING
Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD) Missile
Presentencing Inspection Team provides training for personnel
for performing post deployment Missile Sentencing Inspection
(MSI) and training for fleet personnel performing Missile Presentencing Inspection (MPI).
5606
NAVIGATION SEAMANSHIP AND SHIPHANDLING TRAINER (NSST)
1. Simulators are available for the instruction of Bridge
Resource Management (BRM) and Special Evolutions. Simulators
33
30 Jun 14
in Norfolk, Yokosuka, Everett, and San Diego serve their Fleet
Concentration Areas (FCAs). Supplemental information on this
subject is available at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
Additional information may be found on the scheduling website:
http://WWW.NSSTRAINING.ORG./
2.
Courses Available.
a. BRM - CVNs are required to complete two BRM per FRTP.
CVNs are required to send three Watch Teams, each team
consisting of an OOD and CONN, plus a Senior Observer (CO, XO,
or Senior Watch Officer). Ships may send a maximum of ten
students. The Navigator may act as a Senior Observer. Ships
will provide copies of CO’s standing orders for the OOD. This
course satisfies requirement to complete 24 hours of BRM and 16
hours of Advanced Ship Handling (ASH) every 24 months.
b. Special Evolutions Training - The most flexible course
offered, Special Evolutions affords the CVN to train in any
evolution the CO believes will benefit his watch standers.
CVNs will use the Special Evolutions topics and scenarios menu
available on the scheduling website. CVNs can request anywhere
from four hours (one morning or afternoon) to 16 hours (two
mornings and two afternoons) of training. CVNs are limited to
32 hours annually.
c. Four other courses are being developed: ARPA, Radar
Observer, ECDIS-N, Basic Ship Handling Training (BST). The
goal is to attain U.S. Coast Guard Standards of Training,
Certification, and Watch Keeping for Seafarers (STCW)
Certification for these four courses as well as the BRM course.
Courses will be introduced on a pilot basis as they are
completed.
3. Non-Course Simulator Use - In addition to the V2 FMB (All
Sites), all Second and Third Fleet NSST facilities include a
smaller footprint NSST variant, the V1. The V1 is a single
person trainer, and the training audience is generally intended
for a Conning Officer or OOD. Installed onboard, it may be
operated by a single operator/trainee without instructor
support. It consists of a helm console, three flat panel
displays and contains a selection of pre-built port/hull
specific scenarios. The V1 also includes an electronic
coaching function that mentors students in ship handling
basics. CVNs are encouraged to schedule time in the VI through
the NSST Website. The V2 will be available for CVN use during
specified times when other courses not being taught during the
workday.
4. CVN Responsibilities. In addition to course-specific
requirements, ships are responsible for all training functions
during ship-only simulator use including pre-briefing,
coaching, role playing/radio communications and debriefing as
needed for each scenario run. Ships will send senior personnel
capable of instructing those being trained.
34
30 Jun 14
5. Scheduling. Ships are responsible for submitting requests
for all desired courses, special evolutions training and shiponly simulator use, and can do so by logging onto the NSST
Training Website. HTTP://WWW.NSSTRAINING.ORG.
6. Supplemental information on this subject is available at
the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
5607
ANTI-TERRORISM (AT) TRAINING
1. Supplemental information on this subject is available at
the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
The nature of the asymmetric
threat does not afford forces the luxury of a lengthy training
program spread over the entire Basic Phase ULT within the FRTP.
Rather, with the significant in port time normally associated
with the training phase of FRTP, ships must execute around-theclock AT operations immediately upon return to homeport and/or
the completion of the maintenance availability period. Thus,
it is imperative a robust and complete AT training plan, which
ensures the basic proficiency to execute homeport AT skills and
complete follow-on complex/integrated training events, be
completed and assessed as early as possible in the FRTP. COs
shall ensure all sentry training is complete by the end of the
ship’s maintenance period. The remainder of AT training and
assessment shall be completed prior to the beginning of TSTA.
2.
Unit Level AT Training is designed to ensure:
a. AT watch standers achieve the level of proficiency in
the skills necessary to properly stand assigned AT posts.
b. The Antiterrorism Training Team (ATTT) is capable of
safely and effectively planning, conducting, and critically
evaluating the ship AT training program.
c. The ship's command structure is able to coordinate an
effective response to AT contingencies.
d. The ship is properly prepared to conduct Intermediate
and Advanced AT training.
3. Basic Phase AT ULT will follow the building block
methodology of “assess, train, and certify”. The team that
employs this training methodology is the ATTT.
is
responsible, under the direction of the Antiterrorism Officer
(ATO), for training personnel involved in all aspects of the AT
program. This resident expertise allows the ship to conduct
the majority of required security and antiterrorism training
organically. To support the development of such resident
expertise, TYCOM N34, CSG ATOs and Naval Criminal Investigative
Service (NCIS) Security, Training, Assistance and Assessment
Teams (STAAT) will conduct Assessment and Assist Visits as
detailed below.
4.
Recurrent Anti-Terrorism (AT) Training
35
30 Jun 14
a. Supplemental information on this subject is available
at the CNAF N7 SharePoint site.
Recurrent training commences
upon successful completion of Basic Phase ULT AT Assessment.
This training is ongoing throughout the remainder of the FRTP
and deployment, and is designed to maintain the state of AT
readiness essential to the protection of personnel and assets.
b. As a minimum, Security/AT NCO drills identified in
Appendix I (Appendix II for FDNF) of this manual shall be
conducted in accordance with established periodicities.
Additionally, training and drill sets shall be conducted in
preparation for all follow-on AT evolutions.
c. Drills should be conducted to exercise AT operational
readiness, and to evaluate the command AT plan and all
applicable PPRs and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP).
d. Throughout this period the TYCOM N34 staff and CSG ATOs
are available to provide additional Assist Visits as requested
by the ship. TYCOM and CSG ATOs may, as conditions dictate,
conduct no-notice AT drills during recurrent training to gauge
the readiness of the command to meet and properly respond to AT
threats.
36
30 Jun 14
Chapter 6
Section 1
6100
BATTLE EFFICIENCY “E” COMPETITION
BATTLE “E” GUIDANCE
GENERAL
1. The Commander Naval Air Force Carrier Battle Efficiency
Competition (Battle “E”) is designed to measure and recognize
the level of battle efficiency through superior performance and
readiness by each carrier and its respective departments. The
competition is based on a calendar year.
2. Eligibility for the overall Battle “E” and departmental
awards demands demonstrated operational excellence in addition
to superior achievement during inspections, certifications
assessments and qualifications conducted throughout the
competitive cycle.
3. The Battle “E” is awarded to the carrier (CNAP and CNAL)
that have demonstrated the highest level of proficiency
throughout the competitive cycle.
4. A ship must have remained current in all Inspections,
Certifications and Assessments. Certification expirations can
remove a department and ship from award consideration, unless
waived by respective TYCOM. Waivers must clearly demonstrate
all means have been exhausted to meet the requirement. All
waiver requests require CSG endorsement.
5. A ship must have consistently demonstrated a high level of
safety awareness and Operational Risk Management (ORM) in all
phases of shipboard operations. A satisfactory ORM training
program, as assessed by ATG during ULT events, is required.
Class A mishaps due to negligence will normally disqualify a
command for the Battle “E”.
6. Any action by a ship requiring a formal investigation will
not be a disqualifier until the investigation board results are
approved/validated.
6101
POLICY
1. Competitive Cycle: The CNO Battle "E" for aircraft carriers
is 01 January to 31 December.
2. Awards: The Battle "E" is presented by the respective TYCOM
to the carrier which, based upon competitive standings at the
end of the competitive cycle, has achieved the highest degree of
battle readiness through sustained superior performance and
operational effectiveness. Additionally, departmental awards
are presented to each carrier having achieved outstanding
readiness levels at the departmental level.
1
30 Jun 14
3.
Battle “E” eligibility
a. To be eligible for the Battle “E" and departmental
awards, a ship must be in an operational status for a minimum of
180 days of the competitive cycle and specifically nominated for
each award by the ship’s CO.
b. COs should forward a package encompassing a CO’s
overview narrative and nominations for individual departmental
awards. The narrative should highlight significant
accomplishments and major FRTP/FDNF cycle milestones achieved
during the competitive cycle to include calculated metrics for
each nominated department. The CSG shall endorse the CO’s
letter and provide comments as desired. The Battle “E” package
(CO’s letter and CSG endorsement) should be compiled and
forwarded in accordance with the annual CVN award nomination
procedures message. If a ship has not met the 180 day
operational requirement due to a maintenance availability or
RCOH, the ship will not be eligible for the overall Battle “E”
Award. In these cases, the ships will retain the TYCOM
departmental awards (excluding the Carrier Maintenance
Efficiency Purple “E” Award and Environmental Protection and
Energy Conservation EPEC Award) from the previous cycle.
However, a ship-wide or departmental failure of any inspection,
certification or assessment that occurs during maintenance or
RCOH or any incident causing major damage to equipment or
injury/death to personnel will likely preclude the ship from
retaining previous year’s departmental awards. A ship shall be
considered operational from the last day of Sea Trials until the
first day of the next scheduled maintenance availability.
c. If the ship subsequently wins departmental awards in the
cycle immediately following, consecutive award stripes earned
before the non-competing cycle will be retained.
4.
Military Personnel Eligibility
a. Navy personnel permanently attached to and serving with
cited ships and units during the competitive cycle for which the
award was given, or any part thereof, are entitled to the award.
b. All selected Reserve personnel permanently attached to
and serving with the mobilization augmentation Navy Reserve
unit(s) during the competitive cycle for which the award was
given, or any part thereof, are entitled to the award provided
the individuals concerned performed active duty for training
aboard the unit during the competitive cycle.
c. Reservists performing active duty for training aboard
units awarded the Battle “E” who are not members of the
dedicated Reserve unit(s), and Reservists who were members of
the dedicated Reserve unit(s), but who did not perform active
duty for training aboard, are not eligible for the award.
2
30 Jun 14
d. Transients and temporary duty personnel are not eligible
for the award (i.e. Cross-deck training personnel, Midshipmen).
e. Embarked personnel, staffs, squadrons or detachments are
also not eligible.
f.
6102
Civilian personnel are not eligible for the award.
BATTLE “E” DISQUALIFIERS
1. An overall ship "failure" or grade of "unsatisfactory" on
3MI or ORSE, even if followed by a satisfactory re-inspection,
disqualifies the ship and individual departments responsible for
the mission area failure for the competitive cycle in which the
"failure/ unsatisfactory" occurs. A department failing its
portion of the 3M Inspection is disqualified from earning a
departmental award; however, a departmental 3M failure does not
specifically disqualify the ship from competing for the Battle
“E”. A 3M departmental failure results in a 10 point deduction
to the department’s overall Battle “E” score, multiple
departmental failures would most likely put the command out of
the running for the overall award.
2. Any safety mishap resulting in major injury/death to
personnel or major damage to equipment while conducting any
evolution will likely result in both ship-wide and departmental
disqualification from Battle “E” eligibility or point deductions
from final Battle “E” grade computations. Accidents or safety
incidents of a less serious nature will be evaluated on a caseby-case basis by the CSG and may result in disqualification for
one or more awards.
6103
AWARD COMPUTATION
At the end of the calendar year, ships will prepare and submit
Battle “E” packages containing calculated metrics for each
nominated department. Award computations are contained in
Sections 2 through 15 of this chapter. The TYCOM will validate
ships’ calculations and assign final Battle “E” points for each
nominated department’s competitive grouping. Differences
between ship’s and TYCOM calculated metrics will be reconciled
as required.
1. TYCOM codes responsible for providing scores and
calculations required for final Battle “E” calculations will
deliver input to CNAP/CNAL N7 NLT 15 JAN.
SECTION 2 AIR DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N43/N73)
SECTION 3 AIRCRAFT INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
(TYCOM N42)
SECTION 4 COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N6)
3
30 Jun 14
SECTION 5 DAMAGE CONTROL (TYCOM N72)
SECTION 6 DECK DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
SECTION 7
REACTOR DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N9)
SECTION 8 HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N01H)
SECTION 9 NAVIGATION DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
SECTION 10 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
SECTION 11 SAFETY DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N45)
SECTION 12 SECURITY DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N3D)
SECTION 13 SUPPLY DEPARTMENT
(TYCOM N41)
SECTION 14 WEAPONS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N4)
SECTION 15 CARRIER MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY AWARD (PURPLE ”E)
(TYCOM N43)
SECTION 16 SHIP’S 3M INSPECTION (TYCOM N43)
SECTION 17 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY CONSERVATION
(EPEC) AWARD (TYCOM N45)
SECTION 18 TIE BREAKER (TYCOM N00)
2. Departmental Awards. Any department which meets the
departmental standard of 90 points is awarded the respective
departmental award.
The following factors will be considered in computing readiness
levels for each department/ship.
a. When an inspection, certification, assessment or
evaluation is graded or evaluated as unsatisfactory, zero credit
is earned, regardless of the outcome of re-inspection/reassessment.
3. Where inspections, certifications, assessments
evaluations (ICAV) are conducted more than once in
cycle and a satisfactory mark is received in each,
recorded will be the last graded event. Battle “E”
Sub-Event Grading
or
a competitive
the score
Required
a. Battle “E” Required Sub-Event grading shall be graded by
ATG, or an external agency approved by the TYCOM. Observers
shall be carefully chosen based on seniority, technical
4
30 Jun 14
background and experience and shall not be assigned to the ship
or its associated air wing.
b. Battle “E” required Sub-Events not completed during the
competitive cycle will be scored “zero” unless waived by the
TYCOM. A request for waiver shall not be submitted prior to the
fourth quarter of the competitive cycle and will require
justification that all means were exhausted in accomplishing the
requirement. CSG endorsement will indicate efforts expended to
assist the ship in obtaining opportunity, observers and/or
services to meet the requirement. If the TYCOM grants the
waiver, the event will be computed as an average of the grade
submitted by other competitors (“Fleet average”). If the event
is not waived, it will be considered incomplete and will be
scored “zero” and counted accordingly in the computation for
relative standing. Except in unusual circumstances, waiver
request received by the TYCOM later than 15 days after
completion of the competitive cycle will be disapproved.
c. Battle “E” required Sub-Event scoring for all Battle ‘E’
events shall be conducted in accordance with the applicable
Training Assessment Card (TACs) to the MCO standard. Battle “E”
required Sub-Events will be calculated using the most recent ‘P’
score reported by an authorized external assessment agency, e.g.
ATG or CSG (if authorized by the TYCOM). Completion of Battle
“E” required Sub-events shall be reported to the TYCOM via naval
message.
d. Battle “E” required Sub-Events that result in
Performance grades of 80% or above cannot be rescheduled in
order to improve the score. Battle “E” required Sub-Events with
a performance grade below 80% may be rescheduled (with TYCOM
approval and ATG/approved external evaluator availability) and
conducted to obtain a higher grade if desired. A re-attempt may
only be graded one additional time (event if the second attempt
is below 80%) in order to improve the grade. The final grade
for the Battle “E” calculation will be the average of the two
scores. Under normal circumstances, a re-attempt will not be
conducted the same day the drill was failed and will be reattempted after a complete de-brief of the failed drill, any
training deficiencies corrected and new brief of the drill being
re-attempted is conducted. Waivers for the minimum time between
exercise re-attempts can be given by the TYCOM based on the
circumstances of the failure, confidence in the team’s readiness
to pass the re-attempt and expiring availability of training
resources.
4. Carryover of ULT events and ICAV scores. Due to the
structure and timing of the FRTP, ships will not always conduct
ULT events or receive inspections and certifications (not
counting re-inspections) normally factored into calculations
each calendar year. In these instances, scores from the
previous cycle completion will be carried over provided they
5
30 Jun 14
remain within the periodicity specified in Appendix I/II and
applicable governing instructions.
a. In departmental awards calculations, a failed 3M
Inspection from the previous year (whether corrected by a reinspection or not) will not be carried over as a disqualifier in
the current CY Battle “E” cycle.
b. When a ship fails to meet minimum overall satisfactory
criteria during a 3M Inspection, it is no longer eligible for
the Battle “E” during that competitive cycle year. Points
utilized for the following competitive cycle will be calculated
based upon the average score of the original inspection and
subsequent re-inspection.
5. Both CNAL and CNAP will award one Battle Efficiency winner
per competitive cycle. CNAL/CNAP ships with the highest scores
will win their respective Battle “E”. The objectively graded
award is based on relative standings of the competing ships
based on the following point breakdown:
Air Department
10
Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Dept 10
Combat Systems Department
10
Damage Control
10
Deck Department
10
Reactor Department
10
Medical Department
10
Navigation Department
10
Operations Department
10
Security Department
10
Supply Department
10
Weapons Department
10
Safety Department
10
Departmental award total
130
Environmental Protection/Energy Cons.
5
Maintenance Efficiency (Purple “E”)
20
3M Inspection
10
Note: Overall 3M Inspection grade/10
TYCOM Commander discretionary points
5
Grand Total
170
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
pts
Note 1: In the unlikely case of a tie, respective TYCOM
Commander will determine the overall Battle E winner.
Note 2: Points for individual departmental awards will be
assigned based on relative ranking as compared to same
department for all respective TYCOM competing carriers. The
carrier whose department has achieved the most departmental
points will be awarded the full 10 points, second will be 9 pts,
etc. A point will be deducted from a departmental score if the
departmental score is less than 80%. Two points will be
deducted if less that 60%. Departments disqualified due to
6
30 Jun 14
failure of an assessment/inspection will receive ”zero”
departmental points.
6104
WEARING AND DISPLAY OF AWARDS
1. Awards shall be displayed in accordance with Figures 6-3
through 6-11. All awards will be displayed on the port and
starboard bridge bulwark aft of the Battle “E”.
2.5”
2.5”
5”
5”
3”
3”
20”
8”
15”
12”
2”
16”
6”
1.4”
1.5”
1.2”
Figure 6-1 Battle Efficiency Award
Figure 6-2 Departmental "E" Excellence
Award - Departments without unique
design
7
30 Jun 14
2.5”
2.5”
5”
5”
15”
15”
3”
3”
3”
18”
1.5”
25”
1.2”
1.2”
Figure 6-3 Departmental "CS" Award
Combat Systems
Figure 6-4 Departmental "M" Award
Medical
2.5”
2.5”
5”
5”
3”
15”
3”
15”
3”
25”
18”
1.5”
1.2”
1.2”
Figure 6-5 Departmental "DC" Award
Damage Control
Figure 6-6 Departmental "W" Award
Weapons
8
30 Jun 14
2.5”
2.5”
5”
5”
3”
15”
15”
15”
12”
Figure 6-7 Departmental "S" Award
Figure 6-8 Departmental "Crossed
Anchor with D" Award Deck
Safety
2.5”
5”
15”
15”
Figure 6-9 Departmental "Ship's Wheel" Excellence Award Navigation
9
30 Jun 14
The order of display of awards:
Naval Air Force Battle Efficiency Pennant
(White formula 6 and Black formula 48)
White E
Air Department
(Yellow formula 42)
Yellow E
Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department
(Black formula 48)
Black E
Combat Systems Department
(Green formula 39)
Green CS
Cost-Wise Readiness Excellence
(Purple striping)
Purple E
Damage Control
(Red formula 40)
Red DC
Health Services Department
(Blue formula 43)
Blue M
Operations Department
(Green formula 39)
Green E
Reactor/Engineering Department
(Red formula 40)
Red E
Security Department
(Black formula 48)
Black S
Supply Department
(Blue formula 43)
Blue E
Weapons Department
(Black formula 48)
Black W
Safety Department
(Green formula 39)
Green +
Deck Department
(White formula 6 and Black formula 48)
White Crossed
Anchors with
Black D
Navigation Department
(White formula 6)
White Ship's
Wheel
10
30 Jun 14
2. Consecutive Awards. Service stripes the same color as the
related award color is added for additional awards earned in
consecutive years. Instead of the letter and four service
stripes for winning the award five consecutive times, in the
case of the Battle "E", a gold "E" shall be displayed with a
silver star above the "E". In the case of departmental awards,
an "E" or approved equivalent and a star of the same color will
be shown for the fifth consecutive award, replacing the service
stripes. Another star shall be added for each five successive
annual awards.
3. Hull/Crew Exchanges/Ship Exchanges. In cases where entire
crews move from one ship to another; e.g., “Sea Swap,” the
general rule is awards follow the crew and will be displayed in
the ship the crew is embarked. This will require additional
attention to record crew award status. In the case of exchanges
that involve decommissioning of one of the ships, award
eligibility will be tied to the hull. Actions of the
decommissioned ship will not transfer to the exchange hull since
the entire crew does not transfer.
4. Transients, temporary duty personnel and those assigned to
the cited ships and squadrons for active duty for training are
not eligible for this award.
6105
IMA SUPPORT.
1. The ability of an aircraft carrier to maintain material
readiness of the embarked Air Wing through the performance of
intermediate level maintenance and supply support is essential
to successful Strike Group operations. The following method of
computation is designed to provide a valid and equitable
procedure for determining point distribution toward both the
AIMD Black “E” and Supply Department Blue “E.” The intent of a
separate category for IMA Support from these two departments is
to recognize their contribution to Battle Efficiency via the
Battle “E” regardless of performance as individual departments.
Combining IMA Support into a single category ensures the IMA
Support Team works closely to achieve optimal support for the
Air Wing.
2. Computation for IMA Support. Each CVN will receive points
based on percentage of standard achieved. The standard is based
on Fleet Response Plan (FRP) timing and is progressively
challenging up to and including deployment. Due to geography,
standards exist for LANT/PAC and FDNF CVN.
11
30 Jun 14
GROUPING
MEASURE
DIRECT
SUPPORT
Total NMCS/PMCS
(Note 1)
NMCS/PMCS Issue
Effectiveness
(Note 1)
INDIRECT
SUPPORT
SOURCE
POINTS
N423
25
N423
25
VPOOL Effectiveness (Note 2)
N423
20
Non-SE REPAIR RATE
(Note 1)
N423
10
Non-SE AWM Backlog
(Note 1,3)
N423
10
Non-SE AWP Backlog
(Note 1,4)
N423
10
TOTAL
100
Figure 6-10 IMA Computation Table
Note 1: As reported daily via the AMCR. Repair rate is defined as (RFI/RFI+BCM) for all
repair MAFS less work centers 731, 9XX, and calibration lab are used to compute repair
rate. All BCM codes are applicable. NMCS PMCS is defined as (NMCS Off ships + NMCS
ExReps + PMCS Off ships + PMCS ExReps).
Note 2: As reported weekly via the ASMR. It is extremely important ASMR data are
correctly loaded into the AMSRR database to ensure data availability to correctly measure
readiness.
Note 3: Represents only in-work (IW) and awaiting maintenance (AWM) count for non-support
equipment for work centers 0XX, 4XX, 5XX, 6XX, 7XX and 8XX, less work center 731. The
number is lifted off the daily production report, part 3 for supported organizations that
represent squadrons and detachments, only.
Note 4: Represents only awaiting parts (AWP) count for non-support equipment for work
centers 0XX, 4XX, 5XX, 6XX, 7XX and 8XX, less work center 731. The number is lifted off
the daily production report, part 3 for supported organizations that represent squadrons
and detachments, only.
12
30 Jun 14
Figure 6-11 lists the standards to be calculated as overall averages for each event
period (TSTA, COMPTUEX, JTFEX, and Deployment). Events are weighted as follows:
TSTA/FEP
15%
FDNF C5F Ops
50%
C2X
20%
C7F Ops
50%
JTFEX
15%
Deployed
50%
NMCS
PMCS
Issue
Effective
-ness
RPOOL
Effective
-ness
Repair
Rate
TSTA/FEP
50
82%
84%
55%
60
90
COMPTUEX
34
83%
85%
55%
125
175
JTFEX
20
85%
90%
55%
35
65
Deployed
59
85%
90%
55%
200
135
C5F Ops
59
85%
90%
55%
300
338
C7F Ops
39
85%
90%
55%
210
188
AWP Backlog
IW/AWM Backlog
FDNF
LANT/PAC
Event
Figure 6-11 IMA Events Table
13
30 Jun 14
3. Disqualification. The occurrence of any of the following
will result in disqualification for the Aircraft Intermediate
Maintenance Department Black “E”:
a. One (1) Class “A”, “B” mishap or two (2) Class “C”
mishaps due to Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department’s
failure to comply with NAMP policy or prescribed NATOPS
procedures.
b. The occurrence of a major CMS violation by Aircraft
Intermediate Maintenance Department personnel which should have
been prevented or five reports of a “Practice Dangerous to
Security” by Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department.
c. An AMI grade of “Off-Track” for Quality Assurance or
Production Control programs.
d.
Departmental failure of the 3M Inspection.
e. Departmental failure of the periodic NAVSEA Det
Radiation Affairs Support Office (RASO) radiation Affairs
Support Program (RASP) inspection.
4. Qualification. If less than thirty (30) AMCRs are submitted
during the competitive cycle ninety (90) points will be awarded
for this category.
14
30 Jun 14
Section 2
6200
AIR DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N43/N73)
GENERAL.
The ability of an aircraft carrier to safely and efficiently
launch and recover aircraft is critical to successful Strike
Group operations. Instructions for the conduct, evaluation and
reporting of required Air Department Performance Sub-Events are
contained in the General Section, this chapter, Appendix I of
this manual.
6201
AWARD COMPUTATION (YELLOW E) CVN
Max Pts
Calculation
Notes
Battle “E” required
Sub-Events
80
Flight Deck Certification
10
2
ALRE Maintenance Program
10
3
TOTAL
80 x AVG/100
1
100
Note 1. Designated departmental Battle “E” required Sub-events
will be calculated using the most recent ‘P’ score reported by
an authorized external assessment agency, e.g. ATG or CSG (if
authorized by the TYCOM). All events will be weighted equally.
A score of zero will be assigned to Performance Sub-Events not
completed.
Note 2. Maximum of 2 pts. Per each division (V-1,2,3,4,5) in
each of the following areas:
a. Successful completion of CNAFINST 3500.71 (series)
checklist(s) resulting with no outstanding reportable items.
(Awards 1 point)
b. Successful completion of required exercises and
evolutions (participation, planning, building, briefing,
execution and debriefing), with no degradation of operational
capabilities resulting from equipment damage, safety violation
or injury to personnel. (Awards 1 point)
Note 3.
6202
Points awarded per ALREMP grade sheet.
DISQUALIFICATION.
The occurrence of any of the following will result in
disqualification for the Air Department Yellow “E”:
15
30 Jun 14
a. One (1) Class A mishap or two (2) Class B mishaps caused
by Air Department’s failure to comply with prescribed NATOPS
standard operating procedures.
b.
A grade of Not Ready for Advanced Training.
c.
6203
QUALIFICATION.
Any Air Department receiving a total score of 90 points or
greater will be awarded the Yellow "E”.
16
30 Jun 14
ALREMP GRADE SHEET.
Aircraft Launch and Recovery Equipment Maintenance Program
(ALREMP)
Grading Points Breakdown
Command: ______________________
1.
Date Audit Conducted:__________
MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES
a.
VIDS-MAF Flow
b.
R-status/VIDS Board validation
c.
Maintenance Action processing
d.
ALRE Training Program
Points earned:
2.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
________
(3 points)
a.
Maintenance Instructions
b.
Audit Program
c.
Technical Publications
d.
ALRE Discrepancy Reporting Program
e.
MAFs
f.
QA Manning
g.
QA Training and Qualification Program
h.
Other QA Monitored Programs
Points earned:
3.
(1 point)
TOOL CONTROL PROGRAM
________
(3 points)
a.
Tool Control Program
b.
Calibration Program
c.
Maintenance Support Capability
d.
Record Keeping / Tool Accountability
Points earned:
17
________
30 Jun 14
4.
EQUIPMENT READINESS / MATERIAL CONDITION
a.
Material condition of spaces and equipment
b.
Spaces FOD Free
c.
On-site maintenance procedures
d.
General housekeeping
Point earned:
Maximum score:
(3 points)
________
10 Points
Total Points earned: ________
18
30 Jun 14
Section 3
N42)
6300
AIRCRAFT INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT (TYCOM
GENERAL.
1. The ability of an aircraft carrier to maintain material
readiness of the embarked air wing through the performance of
intermediate level maintenance is essential to successful Strike
Group operations. AWARD COMPUTATION (BLACK E)
MEASURE
SOURCE
POINTS
Maintenance Backlog (2)
TRMS
20
SE Capability Rating (3)
TRMS
20
IMA Support (4)
TRMS
25
AMI (5)
INSP RESULT
N422
35
Total
100
Figure 6-1 AIMD Measures
Note 1: Each CVN will receive points based on percentage of
standard achieved except as noted. The standard is based on
Fleet Response Plan (FRP) timing and is progressively
challenging up to and including deployment. FRP Phases are
defined in CNAFINST 4790.3 (series) as periods including
specific events, listed below (events are weighted per paragraph
7105A).
Standards
Events
Non-FDNF
Backlog
C-Rating
Basic Phase
(TSTA/FEP)
150
1.40
Integrated Phase
(C2X/Fallon)
300
1.25
Sustainment Phase
(JTFEX/
100
1.25
Post-Deployment)
Deployment
335
1.20
C5F Ops
638
1.30
C7F Ops
400
1.20
FDNF
Figure 6-12 AIMD Events
Note 2: As reported weekly via ASMR, paragraph 3B1.
19
30 Jun 14
Note 3: Average of entire competitive cycle. TRMS capability
rating is computed based on BROAD ARROW reporting and
operational impact of the BROAD ARROW.
Note 4: Percentage of points received under IMA Support category
will be applied to total of 20 points available; e.g. 90 points
of 100 available in IMA Support category equals 90 percent of 20
points or 18 points toward departmental award.
Note 5: AMI points are based on results of the AMI. Each
program except Quality Assurance, Maintenance Safety and
Production Control receiving an "Off-Track" grade will decrease
the score by 1 point. Quality Assurance, Maintenance Safety and
Production Control programs receiving a ”Needs More Attention”
grade will decrease the score by 2 points.
6301
DISQUALIFICATION.
1. The occurrence of any of the following will result in
disqualification for the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance
Department Black “E”:
a. One (1) Class “A”, “B” mishap or two (2) Class “C”
mishaps due to Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department’s
failure to comply with NAMP policy or prescribed NATOPS
procedures.
b. The occurrence of a major CMS violation by Aircraft
Intermediate Maintenance Department personnel which should have
been prevented or five reports of a “Practice Dangerous to
Security” by Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department.
c. An AMI grade of “Off-Track” for Quality Assurance,
Maintenance Safety or Production Control programs.
d.
e. Departmental failure of the periodic NAVSEA Det
Radiation Affairs Support Office (RASO) radiation Affairs
Support Program (RASP) inspection.
6302
QUALIFICATION.
Any Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department which receives
a grade of 90 points or greater will be awarded the Black “E”.
20
30 Jun 14
Section 4
6400
COMBAT SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N6)
GENERAL
The ability of a ship to operate and fight effectively is
paramount. Readiness of shipboard combat systems is a top
priority in order to effectively utilize sophisticated Command,
Control, Communications and Computer, Combat and Intelligence
(C5I) systems. The following method of computation is designed
to provide a valid and equitable procedure for determining the
most deserving Combat Systems Department(s) to receive the
competitive award for efficiency. Instructions for the conduct,
evaluation and reporting of required Combat Systems Department
exercises are contained in the general section, this section and
Appendix I of this manual.
6401
AWARD COMPUTATION (GREEN CS)
Max Pts
Calculation
Notes
Sub-Events
70
Network System Security
20
2
CSWF Readiness
5
3
Test Equipment
5
4
TOTAL
70 x AVG/100
1
100
Note 1. Designated departmental Battle “E” required Sub-Events
completed.
Note 2. The following criteria will apply for calculating
Network System Security based on Blue Team network assessment:
- Ten points T1
- Eight points T2
- Four points T3
- Zero points T4
Ten points are given if ISIC determines compliance in the
following areas (two points each)
21
30 Jun 14
- Compliance with CND directives (e.g., CTOs, INFOCON
requirements, maintenance of required logs).
- Enforcement of traditional security.
- Ensuring a robust vulnerability remediation program (e.g., use
of VRAM).
- Enforcement of configuration management.
- Leadership involvement (e.g., spot-checks, use of checklists).
Note 3. Cyber Security Work Force (CSWF) Readiness data derives
from TWMS. Therefore, monthly unit CSWF data entry and
management is important and should correctly reflect units
actual CSWF assigned duties along with required PQS, training,
IA certification and Privileged Access Information. TYCOM N63
will download the IA Certification Statistic Percentage Report
at the end of each month which will contribute to the overall
yearly average for a total of five points. Yearly CSWF
Readiness calculation percentage criteria as follows:
- Five points 80% or higher
- Three points 60-79%
- Zero points below 60%
Note 4.
1. The following criteria will apply for calculating the Test
Equipment Readiness percentage by N43:
a.
Five points 90% or higher
b.
Three points 85-89%
c.
Zero points below 85%
2. Readiness for the year is calculated as an average of
MEASURE Format 310E (Electronics) inventory summary reports for
each quarter.
3. Five points are given if actual test equipment deficiencies
do not exceed 10 percent of the ship’s allowance in the Ships’
Portable Electrical/Electronic Test Equipment Requirements List
(SPETERL). Two points are awarded when deficiencies are less
than 15 percent and one point for less than 20 percent.
22
30 Jun 14
a. Actual deficiencies are determined from the SPETERL
updated by the ship’s MEASURE format 310 E inventory. Test
equipment deficiencies from GPETE Initial Outfitting (GINO)
scheduled for future purchase will not be counted.
b. Calculate deficiency percentages by dividing the number
of actual deficient test equipment by the SPETERL total test
equipment allowance figure.
6402
DISQUALIFICATION
disqualification:
1. Command failure of EKMS inspection as defined in EKMS 3B,
Chapter 2, Article 205.d.1 “One (1) COMSEC Incident (Incidents
identified by the inspector during the course of inspection)”.
2. Three reportable “Practice(s) Dangerous to Security (PDS) as
defined in EKMS 3B, Chapter 2, Article 205.d.2 “Three (3) PDS
(Includes Reportable and Non-reportable PDS’s identified by the
Inspector during the course of inspection”.
3.
Departmental failure of the 3M assessment.
4. Confirmed Incident: Two or more OPREP-3’s due to event
categorized as a 1, 2, 4 and/or 7 per CJCSM 6510.01A and
reported ICW OPNAV F3100.6J in which an outside entity,
CYBERFOR/NIOC/NOC/NCDOC/DISA, discover and/or advise originating
command of information assurance incident.
5. Command is the ORIGINATOR of three or more Electronic
Spillages; reported ICW NTD 11-08 (ALCOM 156/08).
Any computer network defense incident or policy violation
evaluated by the ISIC to be serious in nature or resulting in
DISA action to remove the command from the Global Information
Grid (GIG) shall result in disqualification.
6403
QUALIFICATION.
Any Combat Systems Department which receives a grade of 90
points or greater may be awarded the Combat Systems Department
“GREEN CS”.
23
30 Jun 14
24
30 Jun 14
Section 5
6500
DAMAGE CONTROL (TYCOM N72)
GENERAL.
The ability of a ship to control damage, either real or
simulated, and to effect emergency repairs forms an excellent
basis upon which to judge battle readiness for damage control.
Instructions for the conduct, evaluation and reporting of
required damage control training are contained in the general
section, this section and Appendix I of this manual.
6501
AWARD COMPUTATION (RED DC)
Max Pts
Calculation
100
100 x AVG/100
Notes
Sub-Events
TOTAL
1
100
Note 1: Designated departmental Battle “E” required Sub-Events
completed.
6502
DISQUALIFICATION.
Departmental failure of the 3M Inspection will result in
disqualification for the Red “DC”.
6503
QUALIFICATION.
Any ship which receives 90 points or greater will be awarded the
Red "DC."
25
30 Jun 14
26
30 Jun 14
Section 6
6600
DECK DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
GENERAL.
The seamanship displayed by individual ships provides an outward
manifestation of the ship's smartness, vigilance and overall
readiness. Instructions for the conduct, evaluation and
reporting of required events are contained in the general
section, in this section, and in Appendix I of this manual.
6601
AWARD COMPUTATION (WHITE CROSSED ANCHORS WITH BLACK D)
Max Pts
Calculation
100
100 x AVG/100
Notes
Sub-Events
TOTAL
1
100
completed.
6602
DISQUALIFICATION.
Departmental failure of the 3M Inspection will result in
disqualification for the White Crossed Anchors with Black “D.”
6603
QUALIFICATION.
Any Deck Department which receives 90 points or greater will be
awarded the White Crossed Anchors with Black “D”.
27
30 Jun 14
28
30 Jun 14
Section 7
6700
ENGINEERING AND REACTOR DEPARTMENTS (TYCOM N9)
GENERAL
The ability of a ship to steam safely, efficiently and reliably,
combined with its ability to control either real or simulated
damage and to effect emergency repairs forms the basis upon
which to judge the battle readiness of aircraft carrier
engineering and reactor department(s). To quantitatively
determine each carrier's level of readiness, instructions for
the conduct, evaluation and reporting of required Engineering
and Reactor Department inspections and trials are contained in
the general section, in this section and in Appendix I of this
manual.
6701
1.
AWARDS COMPUTATION (RED E)
The Red “E” Award computation is as follows:
(0.5)x(ORSE Grade) + (0.25)x(NPMTT Grade)
+ (0.2)x(3MI Final Grade) + TYCOM Evaluation
ORSE Grade Computation (See Note 1)
Max Pts
Calculation
ORSE (DTD)
25
25 x “Z”
ORSE (CRE)
25
25 x “Z”
ORSE (LOK)
20
20 x “Z”
ORSE (CRC)
15
15 x “Z”
ORSE (ADMIN)
5
5 x “Z”
ORSE (MAT)
5
5 x “Z”
ORSE (CPS)
5
5 x “Z”
ORSE grade:
100
Note 1: When more than one ORSE is given during a competitive
period, grades will be averaged. Where an ORSE has not been
conducted in a cycle, the ship’s last ORSE grade will be used in
the calculation.
29
30 Jun 14
2.
NPMTT Grade Computation (See Note 1)
Max Pts
Calculation
NPMTT (DTD)
25
25 x “Z”
NPMTT (CRE)
25
25 x “Z”
NPMTT (LOK)
20
20 x “Z”
NPMTT (CRC)
15
15 x “Z”
NPMTT (ADMIN)
5
5 x “Z”
NPMTT (MAT)
5
5 x “Z”
NPMTT (CPS)
5
5 x “Z”
NPMTT grade:
100
Note 1: NPMTT-0, NPMTT-1, and NPMTT Admin visits will not be
used in calculation of grades. NPMTT-2 and NPMTT-3 visits
during the competitive period will be averaged using 40%
weighting of NPMTT-2 and 60% weighting of NPMTT-3 to obtain the
final grades.
Grades from additional visits following NPMTT-2
may be included in the average as desired by the ship (i.e.
grades from an NPMTT-2.5 visit). In those cases, NPMTT-2 and
NPMTT -2.5 will be averaged together and weighted as stated
above for NPMTT-2, the same will apply to NPMTT-3 and NPMTT-3.5
visits. Where a graded NPMTT visit has not been conducted in a
cycle, the ship’s last NPMTT grade prior to the cycle will be
used in the calculation.
3.
3MI Grade
The 3M Inspection “Final Grade” grades for Reactor Department
and Engineering Department will be averaged equally.
4.
TYCOM Evaluation
TYCOM Evaluation points will be awarded based on all aspects of
a ship’s performance relative to Reactor and Engineering
Departments. Among the areas that may be evaluated are INSURV
MI performance and success of PIA/DPIA. A maximum of 5
percentage points (.05) will be awarded.
Note 1: The NPEB adjective grades during ORSE/PORSE and NPMTT
grades will be converted to a “Z” factor per the following:
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Significantly Below Average
1.00
0.98
0.90
0.80
0.50
30
30 Jun 14
Unsatisfactory
6702
0.00
DISQUALIFICATION.
disqualification for the Reactor/Engineering Department RED “E”:
1.
Departmental failure of the 3M Inspection
2.
Failure of ORSE.
6703
QUALIFICATION.
Any Reactor/Engineering Department whose total score is 90
points or greater will be awarded the Red “E”.
31
30 Jun 14
32
30 Jun 14
Section 8
6800
HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N01H)
GENERAL.
The following method of computation is designed to provide a
valid and equitable procedure for determining the most deserving
Health Services Departments to receive the competitive award for
efficiency. Although Medical and Dental are separate CVN
departments they share the same WQSB. Therefore, for training
purposes these departments shall be referred to as “Health
Services”. Instructions for the conduct, evaluation and
reporting of required Health Service Department inspections and
exercises are contained in the general section, this section,
and in Appendix I of this manual.
6801
AWARD COMPUTATION (BLUE M)
Max Pts
Calculation
Notes
35
35 X AVG grade/100
1
Readiness Inspection (IMRI)
10
10 X grade/100
2
Monthly IMR
10
10 X Ave grade/100
3
(MRI)
35
35 x grade/100
4
Monthly QA Reports
10
See Note Below
5
Sub-Events
Individual Medical
Medical Readiness Inspection
TOTAL
100
Note 1. Designated departmental Battle ”E” required Sub-Events
completed.
Note 2. IMRI Inspection by TYCOM required annually, may be
completed in conjunction with Medical Readiness Inspection.
Note 3. IMR based on data reflected in IMR-lite on NMO or MRRS.
Average grade is determined by the average of the ships company
overall IMR score reported on the first day of each month.
33
30 Jun 14
Note 4. Grade assigned by TYCOM. If an MRI is not performed
during the calendar year, the most recent MRI grade may be used,
subject to TYCOM approval.
Note 5. Monthly QA reports submitted on time with command
endorsement. Grade will be calculated as 5 x # months report
submitted on time/12.
6802
DISQUALIFICATION.
1. The occurrence of any Class A personnel mishap (death or
permanent disability) attributable to negligence on the part of
the Health Services Department will result in disqualification
from competition for the Blue “M”.
2.
6803
QUALIFICATION.
Any Health Services Department which receives 90 points or
greater may be awarded the Blue "M".
34
30 Jun 14
35
30 Jun 14
Section 9
6900
NAVIGATION DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
GENERAL.
The navigational skill displayed by individual ships provides an
outward manifestation of the ship's smartness, professionalism
and overall readiness. The following method of computation is
designed to provide a valid and equitable procedure to select
the most deserving Navigation Department(s) for recognition.
6901
AWARD COMPUTATION (WHITE SHIP'S WHEEL)
Max Pts
Calculation
100
100 x AVG/100
Notes
Sub-Events
TOTAL
1
100
completed.
6902
DISQUALIFICATION.
disqualification from competition for the White Ship's Wheel:
1. A major CMS violation by Navigation Department personnel or
bridge watch standers that should have been prevented or five
reports of a "Practice Dangerous to Security" by Navigation
personnel or bridge watch standers.
2. Grounding or collision attributable to bridge watch standers
or Navigation team.
3.
6903
QUALIFICATION.
Any Navigation Department that receives 90 points or more will
be awarded the White Ship's Wheel.
36
30 Jun 14
37
30 Jun 14
Section 10
61000
OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N70)
GENERAL.
The critical role performed by the Operations Department in all
facets of the ship's performance requires that evaluation be
ongoing throughout the competitive cycle in order to properly
reflect the department's actual performance in response to real
world tasking. Instructions for the conduct, evaluation and
reporting of required Operations Department assessments and
exercises are contained in the General Section, in this chapter,
and Appendix I of this manual.
61001
AWARD COMPUTATION (GREEN E)
Max Pts
Calculation
100
100 x AVG/100
Notes
Sub-Events
TOTAL
1
100
completed.
61002
DISQUALIFICATION.
disqualification from competition for the Green "E":
1. A major CMS violation by Operations Department personnel
that should have been prevented or five reports of a "Practice
Dangerous to Security" by operations personnel.
2.
Departmental failure of the 3M Inspection
3. Failure to maintain 3M Program periodicity for the SLQ-32 EA
portion of Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facility’s
(SESEF) ULM-4 range.4. Unsatisfactory completion of the EW
Assessment Exam (C2W-14-SF) facilitated by ATG during the
competitive cycle, or the previous calendar year. The ship/CSG
is responsible for scheduling the EW Assessment Exam for all CTT
personnel. A ship can take the exam a maximum of three times
during the cycle to achieve the minimum score of 80%. All CTT
personnel assigned to stand EW Watches at condition 3 or higher
must take the exam.
5. Unsatisfactory completion of the Cryptologic LOK Exam
facilitated by the ATG during the competitive cycle, or the
38
30 Jun 14
previous calendar year. A ship can take the exam a maximum of
three times during the cycle to achieve the minimum shipboard
average of 80%.
6. Failure to maintain 3M program periodicity for the SLQ-32
Radio Frequency Isolation Self-Test (RFIST) throughout the
competitive period.
61003
QUALIFICATION.
Any Operations Department receiving an overall score of 90
points or greater will be awarded the Green "E."
39
30 Jun 14
Section 11
61100
SAFETY DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N45)
GENERAL.
1. The ability for a ship to achieve operational excellence is
rooted in its ability to operate effectively, efficiently and
safely regardless of which phase of the FRTP the ship may be in.
Thus, each departmental award has aspects of safety imbedded
within its review. Therefore, it is also important to recognize
those carriers that have an excellent safety program.
2. The ability of a ship’s crew to identify, evaluate and
control or eliminate hazards and mishaps, both on and off-duty,
is a true indicator of the effectiveness of the Ship’s Safety
Program, and thus, the basis for judging this category of the
Battle Efficiency competition. Safety training, mishap tracking
and reporting, mishap prevention efforts, and level of
compliance of Aviation and Afloat Safety, Operational Risk
Management, Industrial Hygiene, Environmental and Occupational
Health Programs are all within the realm of scoring for this
category.
61101
AWARD COMPUTATION (GREEN SAFETY “S”)
Max pts
Calculation
Notes
ORM Assessments
20
20 x assessment grade%/100
1
Safety Training %
20
2 x each program%/100
2
Mishap Prevention
10
# Cmd Stand-Downs x 5
3
10
# Completed Surveys x 5
4
Special Safety Events
10
# Cmd events x 5
5
TYCOM Safety Evaluation
30
30 x grade/100
6
TOTAL:
100
1. Note 1: A total of twenty (20) points can be earned for this
criterion:
a. Four (4) points per major competitive exercise or
evolution evaluated (ex. CONREP, VERTREP, COMPTUEX, MISSILEX,
etc.), up to sixteen (16) points maximum, within the ship’s FRTP
that are successfully completed w/out incident, based upon the
grade received for an ORM Assessment of that evolution. ORM
Evolutions Assessments will be accomplished by a trained ORM
Assessment Team (i.e. SFTG, ATG) using standardized criteria and
evaluation sheets approved by COMNAVSAFECEN.
40
30 Jun 14
b. Up to four (4) additional points may be earned for an
Administrative ORM Assessment performed by TYCOM during the
NAVOSH Program Evaluation.
c. Special Note: Any incident (i.e. groundings, collision,
fires, etc.) that is categorized as an Operational Class A
mishap shall automatically result in a score of zero (0) points
for this category. Any incident that results in an Operational
Class B mishap or a Class A Motor Vehicle (PMV/GMV) or Off-Duty/
Recreational mishap to one or more of the ship’s crew will
result in the deduction of five (5) points per each occurrence
from their total score in this category. The CO may request
waiver of operational Class A automatic disqualification for
Green Safety “S” if the mishap investigation finds the ship was
in full compliance with applicable operational procedures and
appropriate Training and Safety ORM directives.
2. Note 2: “NAVOSH Training” includes all locally or higher
mandated training programs involving Safety, HM/HW and OSH as
applicable to each ship, i.e. Hearing Conservation (annual
requirement) per OPNAVINST 5100.19 series.
a. When evaluated by TYCOM, the Safety Department should be
able to articulate completion percentages for all required
Safety/OSH training. Grades for each program evaluated will be
directly dependent upon documented training completion
percentages of crew for that specific program. 20 points
maximum, regardless of the number of programs evaluated.
b. Any single required NAVOSH Training program not
evaluated as “effective” by an outside activity i.e.
COMNAVSAFECEN, INSURV or TYCOM will automatically result in a
maximum score of 15 points for the entire NAVOSH Training
evaluation, regardless of the number of programs evaluated.
3. Note 3: Five (5) points, up to a maximum of ten (10) points,
shall be awarded for each documented Command-wide Safety Stand
Down. Safety Stand Downs are hereby defined as a minimum of
four hours on the ship’s schedule of events set aside by Letter
of Instruction or other similar documentation that are intended
solely to support NAVOSH-specific events, training, and or
presentations. Command operational stand downs such as Fast
Cruise or Pre-Deployment Briefings are not an accountable event
for this criterion. If the ship completes more than two (2)
Safety Stand Downs in one award cycle, the additional Stand
Downs may be applied to satisfy the “Special Activities”
criterion (see Note 5).
4. Note 4: A total of ten (10) points can be earned for this
criterion by completion of the required Industrial Hygiene and
NAVSAFECEN Shipboard Safety Survey within specified time frames
per OPNAVINST 5100.19 (series) and CNAFINST 5100.3 (series).
41
30 Jun 14
a. Five (5) points will be awarded for a complete shipboard
Industrial Hygiene Survey within the last 2 years. Surveys
determined incomplete shall not be given full credit and points
awarded will be based on the percent of IH survey completed.
The latest BUMED guidance on Industrial Hygiene Surveys will
serve as the basis for survey completion status. The amount of
points awarded will be re-evaluated annually to account for
improvement in survey completion percentage.
b. Five (5) points
Safety Center Shipboard
documented for the ship
award points will carry
are within periodicity.
will be awarded when a formal Naval
Safety Survey has been completed and
during the past three years. These
over as appropriate as long as surveys
5. Note 5: Five points, up to 10 points maximum, shall be award
for each Special Safety Event (ex. “DUI Prevention Fair”)
sponsored or held by the Ship’s Safety Department. However, the
ship must document the completion of the event by sending a
Naval Message to TYCOM (N45) with a description the type of
activity completed, outcomes and impact of the Special
Activities completed to fully achieve all five points. Command
Safety Stand Downs may be used to earn points in place of the
“Special Events” criterion. However, only a maximum of four (4)
points per event will be awarded for each “Command Safety Stand
Down” that the ship uses in lieu of each special event to
fulfill this criterion.
6. Note 6: The latest Board of Inspections and Surveillance
(INSURV) Program inspection criteria will be used as basis for
TYCOM evaluation of Safety Programs. This inspection checklist
has been slightly modified to provide weighted scores for each
category/program evaluated.
61102
DISQUALIFICATION.
1. The occurrence of one or more Operational Class A mishaps as
defined in OPNAVINST 5102 series; or, occurrence of three or
more Operational Class B or Class A Motor Vehicle (PMV/GMV) or
Off-Duty/Recreational mishaps (i.e. three separate occasions) is
automatic grounds for disqualification from competition for the
Green Safety “S”. The CO may request waiver of operational
Class A automatic disqualification for Green Safety “S” if the
mishap investigation finds the ship was in full compliance with
applicable operational procedures and appropriate Training and
Safety ORM directives. Note: Operational Mishaps do not include
aviation flight mishaps, but do include aviation air-ground and
flight-related mishaps that involve ship’s crew or any shipboard
systems or equipment that support the Air Wing.
2. The failure (overall grade, or grade for Safety, below
passing) of any CSG, TYCOM, OPNAV or other major command-wide
inspection (i.e. INSURV, ORSE, 3M) within past cycle will result
42
30 Jun 14
in automatic disqualification from competition for the Green
Safety “S”.
3. Any violation of MARPOL, EPA or other state or local
regulations that results in civil suit or punishment of ship’s
crew for Environmental or Hazardous Materials/Waste Compliance.
61103
QUALIFICATION
Any Safety Department which receives 90 points or greater will
be awarded the Green Safety “S”.
43
30 Jun 14
Section 12
61200
SECURITY DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N3D)
GENERAL.
The ability of a ship to detect, deter and defend against
terrorist attacks is the basis upon which to judge battle
readiness for Antiterrorism (AT). AT efficiency, evaluation and
reporting of required AT training and exercises are contained in
the general section, this section, and Appendix I of this
manual.
61201
AWARD COMPUTATION (BLACK “S”)
Max Pts
Calculation
100
100 x AVG/100
Notes
Sub-Events
Total
1
100
completed.
A score of zero will be assigned to competitive exercises not
completed.
61202
DISQUALIFICATION.
61203
QUALIFICATION.
Any Security Department receiving an overall score of 90 points
or greater will be awarded the Black “S
44
30 Jun 14
Section 13
61300
SUPPLY DEPARTMENT
GENERAL.
The Supply Department is evaluated on its effectiveness and
efficiency in performing its primary mission of providing supply
support to the ship and embarked Air Wing, and quality of life
services for all on board personnel. To provide for a valid and
equitable selection of the most effective Supply Department(s),
several factors are taken into consideration, including
performance on inspections, awards received and daily
performance of key functions.
61301
AWARD COMPUTATION (BLUE “E”)
Max Pts
Supply Management Inspection
Notes
40
1
IMA Support
10
2
EOM Readiness Goals
25
3
Training
10
4
5
5
10
6
(SMI)
Service Awards
EOM Service Goals
TOTAL
1.
100
Note 1: Computation of 40 points for SMI follows:
a. Step 1: A numerical grade within the following range of
values is assigned to each functional area evaluated during the
SMI:
95
88
75
62
0
-
100
94
87
74
Outstanding
Excellent
Good
Marginal
Failure
b. Step 2. A weighted average of numerical grades is
calculated using the following weights:
45
30 Jun 14
Readiness
Stock Control (S1)
6
Financials (S1F)
5
Customer Service (S1A)
5
Postal (SIAP)
3
Aviation Support (S6)
19
Material (S8)
12
HAZMAT (S8A)
7
Quality Assurance (S10)
3
Readiness Total
60
Services
Food Service (S2/S2M)
19
Sales (S3)
10
Disbursing (S4)
3
Hotel Svcs/CPO Mess (S5/S11)
5
MWR (S7)
3
Services Total
Total
40
100
c. Step 3. Multiply the weighted average by .40 (40%) to
establish the total points of 40 available for the departmental
award.
2. Note 2: (IMA Support) Percentage of points received under
IMA Support category will be applied to total of 10 points
available for the departmental award.
3. Note 3: (EOM Readiness Goals) Average percentage of the 12
major goals achieved or waived per month throughout the calendar
year multiplied by 25 points available for the departmental
award.
4. Note 4: (Training) The Supply Department Training program
will be assessed during the SMI and provided a numerical grade
out of 10 based on the criteria in CNAFINST 4440.2.(series).
This numerical grade will be applied to the total points of 10
available for the departmental award.
46
30 Jun 14
5. Note 5: (Service Awards) For each of the possible Supply
Awards (Captain Edward Francis Ney TYCOM Nominee, Carl
Scheuefele Award, Dorie Miller Award, Ships Store Best of Class,
Disbursing Excellence Award, Postal Excellence Award) a ship
receives or is runner-up, points are awarded as follows: 2
points for first place; 1 point for second place; zero points
for third place and below. The ship with the highest raw score
will receive 5 points, second highest 3 points, and third
highest 2 points of the total available for the departmental
award.
6. Note 6: (EOM Service Goals). Average performance of the
seven major goals achieved or waived per month throughout the
calendar year multiplied by 10 points available for the
departmental award.
61302
DISQUALIFICATION.
disqualification for the Supply Department Blue “E”:
1.
2. Failure of the disbursing portion of the Federal Examination
Group (FEG) surprise on-site audit.
3. Accountability issue as determined by the Force Supply
Officer.
61303
QUALIFICATION.
Any Supply Department receiving an overall score of 90 points or
greater will be awarded the Blue "E" award.
47
30 Jun 14
48
30 Jun 14
Section 14
61400
WEAPONS DEPARTMENT (TYCOM N4)
GENERAL.
The ability of a ship to safely handle, store and assemble
weapons is essential to combat readiness of the ship and its
embarked Air Wing. Instructions for conduct, evaluation and
reporting of required Weapons Department exercises are contained
in the general section, in this section, and in Appendix I of
this manual.
61401
AWARD COMPUTATION (BLACK W)
Max Pts
Notes
30.0
1
20.0
2
5.0
3
5.0
4
25.0
5
5.0
6
10.0
7
Inspections/Reviews
Weapons elements of the (COSR)
Magazine Sprinkler System
Review (MSSV)
Torpedo Readiness Assessment
(TRA)
Mine Readiness Assessment
(MRA)
Weapons Operational Readiness
Assessment
Mid-Deployment Operational
Readiness Self-assessment
(MORSA)
Aviation Maintenance Inspection
(AMI)(Armament Weapons Support
Equipment(AWSE) Portion)
TOTAL
1.
100.0
Note 1:
a.
A maximum of 30 points will be awarded.
MAJOR DISCREPANCIES
3 points will be deducted for any major discrepancy.
49
30 Jun 14
b.
MINOR DISCREPANCIES
0-15 discrepancies
= 0 points deducted
16-30 discrepancies
discrepancy
= .5 point deducted per
31 or more discrepancies
= 1 point deducted per discrepancy
c. All findings discovered during COSR will become a part
of the COSR report; however, any discrepancies that are
corrected immediately will not count towards the overall points
assigned. “Design Deficiencies” will not be assigned a point
deduction. Multiple discrepancies of the same nature in
multiple locations will only count as one discrepancy.
2.
Note 2:
a.
MAJOR DISCREPANCIES
1 point will be deducted for any major discrepancy.
b.
MINOR DISCREPANCIES
0-10 discrepancies
= 0 points deducted
11-20 discrepancies
discrepancy
21 or more discrepancies
discrepancy
c. All findings discovered during MSSV will become part of
the MSSV report, however, discrepancies that are corrected
immediately will not count towards the overall points assigned.
“Design Deficiencies” will not be assigned a point deduction.
Multiple discrepancies of the same nature in multiple locations
will only count as one discrepancy.
3. Note 3: A maximum of 5 points will be awarded for the
successful completion of the Torpedo Readiness Assessment
4. Note 4: A maximum of 5 points will be awarded for the
successful completion of the Mine Readiness Assessment.
5.
Note 5:
a. A grade of Fully Combat Ready = 25 points. Any safety
violation observed will have 5 points deducted from the final
score.
b.
Air Plan/Load Plan Response (maximum of 3 points)
c.
Ordnance Control Center Management (Maximum of 5 points)
50
30 Jun 14
d.
Weapons Stow Plan (maximum of 4 points)
e.
Weapons Strike up/flow (maximum of 3 points)
f.
Air Wing Flight Deck Support (maximum of 5 points)
g. AWSE and Weapons Elevator Material Readiness (maximum of
5 points)
6. Note 6: TYCOM assigns a grade of 0-5 points. In assigning
points, the following factors will be utilized: Evaluated
events, maintenance, training and operational practices within
the competitive cycle and contributions to safety, mission and
accountability.
7. Note 7: On-track grade earns a maximum of 10 points, Needs
Attention grade earns a maximum of 5 points and an off-track
grade earns 0 points.
61402
DISQUALIFICATION.
Failure of the departmental 3M Inspection will result in an
automatic disqualification for the Black “W”.
61403
QUALIFICATION.
Any Weapons Department receiving an overall score of 90 points
or greater will be awarded the Black “W”.
51
30 Jun 14
52
30 Jun 14
Section 15 CARRIER MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY AWARD (PURPLE ”E)
(TYCOM N43)
61500
GENERAL
1. The Carrier Maintenance Efficiency Award (Purple ”E”)
recognizes the importance of continuous effective maintenance in
support of long term combat readiness. It recognizes the
efficient use of material and personnel resources as a
foundation for sustained training and deployed operations.
Failure to maintain established Purple ”E” criteria during a
competitive cycle will impact a ship’s overall score for the
Battle Efficiency Award.
2. The Purple ”E” measures shipboard maintenance processes for
both availability and non-availability years. The conditional
metrics during availabilities apply to CNO Planned Incremental
Availabilities (PIA), Docking Planned Incremental Availabilities
(DPIA), Selected Restricted Availabilities, and Extended Docking
Selected Restricted Availabilities (EDSRA). They do not apply
during Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) and Carrier
Incremental Availabilities (CIA). A command’s award calculation
comes from maintenance related assessment as well as the
documented material condition of the ship, Ship’s Force
availability production.
3. The Commander, U.S. Naval Air Forces Atlantic and Pacific
Maintenance Logistics Departments (N432) will be responsible for
collecting the below data no later than 15 January following a
competitive calendar year. Questions regarding applicability or
qualification for the Purple ”E” should be directed to CNAP/CNAL
N432.
61501
Event
ANNUAL PURPLE ”E” AWARD COMPUTATION
Maximum Points
Current Ship’s
25
Maintenance Project (CSMP)
3M Quarterly Report
20
Maintenance Support Center
10
(MSC) Assessment
Carrier Team One’s Ship’s
5
Force Productivity Index
Carrier Team One’s Work
5
Authorization Forms (WAF)
Material Condition Assessment
5
Program (MCAP)
Ship’s Zone Inspection Program
5
Ship’s Engineering Trouble Call
10
And Self Repair Program
CASREP Quality (Demo Mode CY12)
15
Total 100
53
Notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30 Jun 14
1. Total points available for ships in CNO Availabilities are
100. Total points for ships not in CNO Availabilities are 80.
Any ship that meets a minimum standard of 85 percent total
overall score will earn the Purple “E”.
2. The Carrier Team One Ship’s Force Productivity and Work
Authorization Form metrics will be evaluated for the Purple “E””
award only during CNO Availabilities per section 61600. These
metrics will apply to the calendar year associated with over 50
percent of the Availability production days. Projects may
review their data on the Carrier Team One Metrics website
(www.carrierteam1.navsea.navy.mil).
3.
Note 1:
Current Ship’s Maintenance Project (CSMP)
a. A thorough and accurate CSMP is necessary to understand
and improve the material condition of a ship. This objective is
achieved by utilizing CSMP Validity Factor (CVF) Work Candidate
Evaluation sheets used to grade the ship’s CSMP. This form may
be found in COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.1 (series) 3M Manual. The
ship’s CSMP will be reviewed twice yearly using the most current
ship’s CSMP Shore File. If a 3M Inspection occurs during the
yearly cycle, the CSMP grade from the Inspection will apply
towards one of the two reviews. The average from the two
reviews will be used to determine each ship’s CSMP Purple ”E”
score. A ship that fails the 3M Inspection during the active
competitive year will not qualify for the Purple “E” (see
Section 6503). The CVF form assigns a value to each of the
following Work Candidate categories. The final grade is
obtained by reviewing 10 percent of each CSMP (ship produced
Work Candidates only) and averaging the total Work Candidate
scores. All Work Candidates assigned to CASREPs will be
reviewed. All Work Candidates will have appropriately assigned
codes IAW OPNAVINST 4790.4 Series
b.
Recommended Solutions (10 Points) must include:
(1) WHICH specific equipment
(2) WHAT is wrong with symptoms or conditions referenced
to PMS, a standard drawing or specification
(3) WHY it is important
(4) Equipment Operational Status now
issues
c.
(5) Description of any personnel or equipment safety
Recommended Solution must include:
(1) WHAT needs to be done and HOW MUCH (linear feet,
square feet, quantity)
54
30 Jun 14
(2) WHERE should the work be done (S/F, IMA, SY)
(3) WHEN should the work be done
d.
CSMP Summary
(1) The Work Candidate Summary is a condensed
description of the problem. It will not contain the recommended
solution or compartment location.
e.
Configuration Item (20 Points)
(1) Must match the equipment described in the Problem
Description and be lowest level identifiable configuration item.
(2) Must be written with correct Configuration item,
i.e. equipment must use its own configuration as defined by its
functional description, APL, location, PRID, etc.
f.
Status Code
(1) Must match the operational status in the Problem
Description.
g.
Safety Code
(1) When used, the Safety Code must accurately reflect
the situation described in the problem description. If the
Problem description describes a safety condition and a Safety
code is not used, points will be deducted.
h.
Contacts
(1) Work Candidate will correctly display valid and
current 1st and 2nd contacts.
The first contact will contain the
name of the senior person engaged in the maintenance action.
The second contact will contain the name of the supervisor of
the first contact/maintenance person.
i.
Deadline Date
(1) All Work Candidates which require assistance from a
Type 2 or 3 Maintenance Activity will have a valid deadline
date. Deadline dates assigned on a Type 1 or 4 Work Candidate,
will be a valid date.
j.
Priority Code
(1) A value other than ‘4’ must be justified in the
Problem Description or by an associated CASREP of the
appropriate Category.
k. Ship’s Force Work List (SFWL) deficiencies will be
documented per Chapters 6, 8, and 9 of the CNAF 3M Instruction
55
30 Jun 14
(CNAFINST 4790.1 Series). Program logs not per CNAFINST 4790.1
will apply towards the total number of Work Candidates
evaluated.
l. All ship’s force originated work candidates created
after implementation of Standardized Work Centers which use a
non–JFMM standard work center will receive 0 points.
m. The minimum CSMP grade required for Purple ”E”
eligibility is 80%.
4.
Note 2:
3M Quarterly Report.
(1) For ships that have SKED 3.1:
(2) Contains data that provides information on PMS
accomplishment, performance and monitoring. A maximum of 5 point
will be awarded per quarter. Computations will be:
(3) Recorded Accomplishment Rate (RAR). Greater than 80%
equals 1 point.
(4) Accomplishment Confidence Factor (ACF). If Ship
Force ACF differs from 3M Training Team (3MTT)) ACF from 0 –
15% equals 2 points, 16 – 19% equals 1 point, 20% or greater no
points. 3MTT ACF is determined by spot checks conducted by a
ship’s 3MTT member observing a maintenance person only. Spot
checks conducted by a member of the ship’s 3MTT grading a Spot
Checker shall not be used in calculating ship’s 3MTT ACF.
(5) PMS Performance Rate (PPR). 90 – 100% equals 2
points; 80 – 89.9% equals 1 point; less than 80% equals 0
points.
b.
For Ships that have SKED 3.2:
(1) Contains data that provides information on PMS
accomplishment, performance and monitoring. A maximum of 5 point
will be awarded per quarter. Computations will be:
(2) Periodic Accomplishment Rating (PAR). Greater than
80% equals 1 point.
(3) Situational Accomplishment Rating (SAR). Greater
than 80% equals 1 point.
(4) Administrative Accomplishment Rating (AAR). Greater
than 80% equals 1 point.
(5) Spot Check Accomplishment Rating (SCAR). If Ship
Force SCAR differs from 3M Training Team (3MTT) SCAR from 0 –
15% equals 2 points, 16 – 19% equals 1 point, 20% or greater no
points. 3MTT ACF is determined by spot checks conducted by a
ship’s 3MTT member observing a maintenance person only. Spot
56
30 Jun 14
checks conducted by a member of the ship’s 3MTT grading a Spot
Checker shall not be used in calculating ship’s 3MTT ACF.
(6) See paragraph 61505 3M QTRLY REPORT FORMAT (para
61504 for SKED 3.1)
(7) The message should be sent no later than 10 calendar
days after the end of each quarter.
(8) TYCOM will spot check 3M Quarterly report during
every 3M Visit and as a result, shall adjust ship’s 3M Quarterly
Report Points as applicable per the following guidelines:
(a) CNAL/CNAP 3M Inspection will adjust ships RAR
(PAR), ACF (SCAR) and PPR IAW the 3M inspection grade, which may
change 3M Quarterly report Points awarded to the ship for that
quarter.
(b) CNAL/CNAP 3M Assists will adjust the ships ACF
(SCAR) IAW the 3M Teams ACF which may change the 3M Quarterly
Report Points awarded to the ship for that quarter.
5.
Note 3:
Maintenance Support Center (MSC).
a. The Purple ”E” score will be determined by three key
areas of the COMNAVAIRFOR MSC Assessment conducted annually IAW
COMNAVAIRFORINST 4700.23 (series). Each area is weighted for a
total combined score of 100 percent: Technical Documentation
Library Management. This score will be based on the
COMNAVAIRFOR MSC Assessment Guide (MSC Procedures Manual and
Handbook, TL130-A1-HBK-010, TAB ‘Assessment’) Part II, Sections
C1, C2, and C3. The total points for this section will equate to
45% of the total MSC Purple ”E” score.
b. Equipment Configuration Management. This score will be
based on the COMNAVAIRFOR MSC Assessment Guide (MSC Procedures
Manual and Handbook, TL130-A1-HBK-010, TAB ‘Assessment’) Part
II, Section B2. The total points for this section will equate to
45% of the total MSC Purple ”E” score.
c. Problem Worksheet Management. This score will be based
on the COMNAVAIRFOR MSC Assessment Guide (MSC Procedures Manual
and Handbook, TL130-A1-HBK-010, TAB ‘Assessment’) Part II,
Section B1. The total points for this section will equate to 10%
of the total MSC Purple ”E” score.
6.
Note 4:
Carrier Team One’s Ship’s Force Productivity Index
a. Carrier Team One’s Ship’s Force Resources Productivity
Index (1.B.1.2.1.C) monitors ship’s man hours and work
accomplishment during PIA, DPIA and SRA Availabilities. The two
contributing metrics are designed to promote early
identification of the SF work and to ensure that an
availability’s production remains on schedule. Complete Team 1
57
30 Jun 14
metrics definitions and graphics can be viewed through a metrics
account obtained from the Carrier Team One Portal
(www.carrierteam1.navsea.navy.mil). The two SFR contributors
for SF Productivity are:
b. Ship’s Force Man Hours executed (1.B.1.2.C.1) measures
overall ship’s force production work from A+1 to C+0. It
compares actual man days expanded with an expected monthly
progress level.
c. Ship’s Force Man Hours accomplished (1.B.1.2.1.C.2)
captures the component unit (CU) phase production work completed
(from AIM and ARTEMUS) and compares it to an expected ship’s
force production level from A+1 to C+0. It is used to help
reduce the detrimental effects of excessive work being delayed
until the end of the production period.
d. Due to their impact on availability production support
and crew training, both ship’s force work metrics have yellow
and red zones above 100 %. The point scale for these metrics
are:
(1) Green
(85-115 percent)
5 points
(2) Yellow
(65.0-84.9, 115.1-135.0 percent
2 points
(3) Red
(<64.9 and > 135.1 percent)
0 points
e. The annual SF resources contributions to an availability
year will be the sum of the averages of these two metrics. If
availability is conducted during two calendar years, the “In
Availability” Purple “E” contributions will apply to the year
that contains over 50 percent of the productions work days.
7.
Note 5:
Carrier Team 1’s Work Control (WC) Process Index
a. Carrier Team 1’s work control (WC) process index
measures two key factors of the work authorization form (WAF),
quality and timeliness. Both support equipment and personnel
safety during PIA, DPIA and SRA Availabilities. Complete Team 1
b. Work Control Process Quality (1.B.1.5.1.a) measures the
quality of a project’s WAFs once the project is underway. It
computes an error ratio based on three weighted categories of
errors (minor, major and critical) contrasted with the total
number of WAFs authorized for each work production month. The
goal of this metric is to maintain the conditions for the
effective administration of a safe work control process.
c. Work Control On-Time Delivery (1.B.1.5.1.B) tracks the
percentage of routine WAFs which provide timely support of
58
30 Jun 14
availability’s production work. It uses the centralized work
control team’s (CWCT’s) WAF issue log to identify whether or not
monthly WAFs supported all work production schedules (not
include WAFs expedited through the approval process for emergent
work).
d. The monthly work control contributions will be
calculated by multiplying each metric’s percentage by five
(e.g., work control on time delivery (1.B.1.5.1.B) measured at
90 percent contributions 4.5 points for the month (0.9 X 5
maximum). For annual work control contributions to an
availability year will be the sum of the averages of these two
metrics. If availability is conducted over two calendar years,
the “In Availability” Purple “E” contributions will apply to the
year that contains over 50 percent of the production days.
8.
Note 6:
Material Condition Assessment Program (MCAP)
a. MCAP program tracks propulsion plant deficiencies
throughout a CVN’s life cycle, and it systematically identifies
non-operational material deficiencies that routinely impede
successful exit testing. Carrier Team 1’s metrics will only
apply to propulsion plant space deficiencies. Complete Team 1
b. MCAP’S Computer-Based Training (CBT) accomplishments
(1.B.1.4.A.1): measures a reactor department’s successful
completion of the MCAP training for Basic Nuclear Engineering
Qualifications (BNEQ) and Basic Reactor Department
Qualifications (BRQD). This metric calculates the monthly
percentages of required personnel who successfully complete the
exam. The MCAP CBT metric point scoring:
(1) Green
(90.0-100 percent completion)
5 points
(2) Yellow
(80.0-89.9 percent completion)
2 points
(3) Red
(<79.9 percent completion)
0 points
(4) All Reactor Department personnel have been directed
to complete the MCAP CBT.
c. Delinquent MCAP deficiencies (1.B.1.4.B.4) measure the
number of deficiencies that are older than 30 days that have not
been entered into a CVN’s Current Ships Maintenance Plan (CSMP).
This metric directly affects an availability work package’s
support of the delivery of an integrated work schedule at A-2.
Delinquent MCAP deficiency point scoring:
(1) Green
(<26 average deficiencies)
5 points
(2) Yellow
(26-50 average deficiencies)
2 points
59
30 Jun 14
(3) Red
(>50 average deficiencies)
0 points
d. 1B141a Outside Inspection Churn - this metric looks at
the increase (%) in MCAP deficiencies based on additional MCAP
deficiencies from MTT, ORSE, or CNAL / CNAP N9 Checks.
(1)
Less than or equal to 10% = 5 points
(2) 11% to 20% = 2 points
(3)
Greater than or equal to 21% = 0 points
e.
1B141d Deficiency Correction Focus - this metric looks
at the average age of closed MCAP deficiencies during a month.
This metric is designed to ensure timely completion of MCAP
deficiencies.
(1) Less than or equal to 50 days (average age of
deficiencies closed that month) = 5 points
(2) 51 to 60 days (average age of deficiencies closed
that month) = 2 points
Greater than or equal to 61 days (average age of deficiencies
closed that month) = 0 points.
f. MCAP’s Purple “E” contributions will be the sum of the
four metric’s average divided by 4.
g. Delinquent MCAP deficiencies are not counted from A-2 to
C+1.
9.
Note 7:
Ship’s Zone Inspection Program
a. Zone Inspections assessments will be used to determine
the performance levels of the ship’s Zone Inspection Program to
improve the material condition and to identify, document, and
repair deficiencies. This objective is achieved by utilization
of the COMNAVAIRFOR 4790.1 (series) Zone Inspection Program
Check Sheets that grades the ship’s programs in 25 areas. The
Ship’s Zone Inspection Program will be reviewed twice yearly by
the 3M Officer and electronically reported to the respective
CNAF N43 MDS Analyst by 10 January and 10 July. Both the Zone
Inspection Program Check Sheet and the TYCOM TSIMS ZIDL program
export report must be sent. If a CNAF 3M Assist or Inspection
occurs during the yearly calendar cycle, the Zone Inspection
Program grade from the CNAF 3M Team will apply towards one of
the two reviews. The average from the two reviews will
determine each ship’s Zone Inspection Program Purple “E” score.
The point scales are listed below.
(1) 92-100
5 points
60
30 Jun 14
(2) 84-91
4 points
(3) 76-83
3 points
(4) 68-75
2 points
(5) 60-67
1 point
(6) 59 and below
0 points
b. CNAF 3M Team will spot check the Ship’s Zone Inspection
Report during the 3M Visit. If a delta of 3 points is observed
from what the ship reported, the CNAF 3M Team will adjust the
Ship’s Zone Inspection Report points awarded for that reporting
period accordingly.
10. Note 8:
Program
Ship’s Engineering Trouble Call and Self Repair
a. The Ship’s Self Repair Efficiency (SRE) assessments will
be used to determine the performance level of the ship’s
continuous maintenance screening program and proper reporting of
man hours. This objective is achieved by utilization of the
COMNAVAIRFOR 4790.1 (series) SRE Check Sheet that grades the
ship in three areas: Trouble Call Program (TCP), Ship’s Self
Repair Periods (SSRP) and Practicals (PRAT) in order to derive
the total SRE. The ship’s SRE will be reviewed twice yearly by
the 3M Officer/Repair Officer and electronically reported to the
respective CNAF N43 MDS Analyst by 10 January and 10 July. Both
the SRE Check Sheet and the TYCOM TSIMS/MODES Engineering
Trouble Call Program export report must be sent. If a CNAF 3M
Assist or Inspection occurs during the calendar cycle, the SRE
grades from the CNAF 3M Team will apply towards one of the two
reviews. The average from the two reviews will determine each
ship’s SRE Purple “E” score. Each is weighted for a total
combined score of 100 percent.
b. CNAF 3M Team will spot check the Ship’s Engineering
Trouble Call and Self Repair Availability Programs Report during
any 3M Visit. If a delta of 20 percent is observed from what
the ship reported, the CNAF 3M Team will adjust the points
awarded for the Ship’s Engineering Trouble Call and Self Repair
Availability for that reporting period accordingly.
(1) Purple ”E” point awards (10 points total). Refer to
SRE Check Sheet:
(a) Trouble Call Process (TCP) 20%:
.5 points for each of the four graded categories.
(b) Ship Self Repair Periods (SSRP) 40%:
61
30 Jun 14
.6 points for each of the first four graded
categories
.4 points for each of the remaining four graded
categories
c.
Practicals
(1) .4 points for each of the 10 graded categories
11. Note 9: Casualty Report (CASREP) Quality. CASREP quality
metrics will be assessed by measuring the timeliness of the
CASREP Update messages and the accuracy of reporting between the
CASREP and the work candidate referenced in the CASREP message.
Data will be extracted from MFOM CASREP, RMAIS and OARS. CASREP
Quality will be in Demo Mode for CY 2012.
a. CASREP Update or Correction messages transmitted after
Estimated Time of Repair (ETR) of previous Initial or Update
message.
(1) Percent Late of total Update/Correction messages
(a) 0 – 1%
7.5 points
(b) >1 - 2%
4.0 points
(c) >2 - 5%
2.0 points
(d) >5%
0.0 points
b. Work Candidate status information referenced by CASREP
Job Control Number (JCN) in CASREP message PARTSID data set not
matching the casualty described in the CASREP message.
(1) Percent of non-matching JCNs
(a) 0
c.
– 1%
7.5 points
(b) >1 - 2%
4.0 points
(c) >2 - 5%
2.0 points
(d) >5%
0.0 points
Configuration Accuracy:
(1) For each initial CASREP message having an incorrect
APL deduct .1 point from CASREP Quality score. Examples:”
(a) APL is an XRIC when a valid APL is available
(b) APL is not that of the CASREP’d system
62
30 Jun 14
61502
DISQUALIFICATION.
Ship-wide failure of the 3M Inspection will preclude a ship from
consideration for the Purple “E”.
61503
QUALIFICATION.
1. Since the Purple ”E” is an award for recognizing efficiency
and efficient use of resources, all CNAF ships are eligible for
the Purple ”E” 365 days of the year in operational and/or
maintenance status.
2. A carrier in Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) as well
as long term PIAs can fall outside the minimum 180 days of
operational status, and will generally not qualify for the
Battle “E” or other departmental awards. The Purple ”E”
specifically addresses assessing PIA/SRA project management and
participation. Summary conditions applicable to Purple ”E”
eligibility are:
3. A ship in RCOH, due to its long term lay-up status,
generally will not be eligible due to RCOH unique management and
scheduling requirements.
4. A ship in RCOH may be eligible in the last year of the RCOH
where more focus and participation by the ship is expected to
exit RCOH into PSA/SRA. Eligibility will be jointly decided by
CNAF N43.
5. If the ship subsequently wins departmental awards in the
cycle immediately following, consecutive award stripes will be
earned.
6. The ship’s 3M Inspection will play a key role in earning the
Purple ”E” due to the adjustment of the 3M quarterly report.
7. Due to timing and frequency of various assessments and
inspections not every ship will be able to receive all scores
within the competitive calendar year. In those instances,
scores from the previous cycle completion will be carried over
to facilitate calculations for 12 months.
61504
3M Quarterly Message Report Format (SKED 3.2)
This message should be sent no later than 10 calendar days after
the end of each quarter. E-mail submissions will not be
accepted:
63
30 Jun 14
UNCLASSIFIED//
FM USS CVN
TO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA//N43//
INFO SHIP’S ISIC/CSG COMMANDER
SUBJ: CVN XX 3M QUARTERLY REPORT
REF/A/DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/28JUN2012//
REF/B/DOC/COMNAVAIRFOR/14MAY2012//
NARR/REF A IS COMNAVAIRFOR 3500.20 SERIES, CVN TRAMAN. REF B IS
COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.1 SERIES, TYCOM 3M MANUAL.//
POC/THREE_M_OH/LT/USS EVERY CVN/-/TEL:(619)545-1540/TEL:DSN 7351540 /EMAIL:THREEMOH.3MO@CVN.NAVY.MIL//
RMKS/1. (CVNS WITH SKED 3.2 LIVE ONLY) REF B DIRECTS CARRIER TO PROVIDE 3M
PAR, SAR, AAR, SHIPS SCAR, AND SHIPS 3MTT SCAR DATA, COLLECTED FROM THE
PREVIOUSLY CLOSED OUT QUARTERLY PMS REPORT.
2. DEPT
PAR
PAR
PAR
SAR
SAR
SAR
SCAR
AAR
ASSIGN ACCOMP
ASSIGN ACCOMP
ADMIN
100
90
90
200
100
50
92.1
98.1
AIMD
295
265
89.83
146
146
100
90.3
100
COMBAT SYST 1000
989
98.90
540
522
96.67
89.1
100
DECK
985
979
99.39
126
122
96.83 99.13
100
ENGINEERING 2022
2000
98.91
765
745
97.39 89.35
100
GRAPHICS
112
112
100
0
0
100 90.12
100
LEGAL
98
97
98.98
0
0
100
100
100
MED/DEN
145
138
95.17
42
40
95.23 98.67
100
NAV
167
159
95.21
27
22
81.48 95.45
100
OPS
323
320
99.07
33
31
93.94 98.78
100
REACTOR
1500
1498
99.87
245
238
97.14 89.56
100
RMD
35
35
100
0
0
100
100
100
SAFETY
126
119
94.44
12
12
100 96.14
100
SUPPLY
545
530
97.25
212
200
94.34 93.10
100
TRAINING
98
87
88.78
5
5
100 89.35
100
WEAPONS
678
654
96.46
1200
1189
99.08 85.46
100
TOTAL:
3. SHIPS PAR: 98.09% (8072 ACCOMPLISHED/8229 ASSIGNED)
SUMMARY OF LOST/RESCHEDULED MR
TOOLS, PARTS, MATERIALS
TEST EQUIP/CRL OUT OF CAL
OPERATIONAL COMMITMENT (EXPLAIN)
MAINT DISCREP/TFBR
CASREP
4. SHIPS SAR: 94.91% (3372 ACCOMPLISHED/3553 ASSIGNED)
SUMMARY OF LOST/RESCHEDULED MR
TOOLS, PARTS, MATERIALS
TEST EQUIP/CRL OUT OF CAL
OPERATIONAL COMMITMENT (EXPLAIN)
MAINT DISCREP/TFBR
CASREP
5. SHIPS SCAR: 93.54
A. # PERFORMED
B. # SAT
C. # UNSAT
6. SHIPS FORCE SUMMARY OF UNSAT SPOT CHECKS
A. ADMIN:
64
30 Jun 14
B. HAZMAT:
C. SAFETY:
D. PPE:
E. MAINT PERSON K/P:
F. TAGOUT:
7. 3MTT SCAR
A. #PERFORMED
B. #SAT
C. #UNSAT
8. 3MTT SUMMARY OF UNSAT SPOT CHECKS
A. ADMIN:
B. HAZMAT:
C. SAFETY:
D. PPE:
E. MAINT PERSON K/P:
F. TAGOUT:
9. SHIPS AAR: 99.88
10. 3M TRAINING SUBJECTS, FOCUSED 3MTT, AND 3MA TRAINING COMPLETED DURING
QUARTER.
11. 3M ORGANIZATION SUMMARY OF TREND ANALYSIS FOR QUARTER
12. PMS IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR NEXT QUARTER
13. OPEN TEXT / ISSUES/ SUMMARY
###
65
30 Jun 14
66
30 Jun 14
Section 16
61600
SHIP’S 3M INSPECTION (TYCOM N43)
GENERAL.
1. As prescribed in COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.1, the 3M Team (or
any member of it) is available to visit any ship, on request, to
provide guidance in any 3M area of interest. Information or
assistance by telephone/e-mail is also available and highly
encouraged. “Optional Assist” visits should be requested to
respective coast TYCOM by naval message or letter indicating
specific areas desired. “Required Assist” visits will be
scheduled through CNAF N43.
2. The 3M Inspection is conducted once per 24 months IAW the
standards set forth in the COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 (series)
Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM) Volume VI, Chapter 19 and
the COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.1 (series). The purpose of the
inspection is to assess the ship's ability to document and
perform maintenance utilizing the Maintenance Data System (MDS)
and the Planned Maintenance System (PMS) IAW NAVSEAINST 4790.8
(series). The 3M Inspection will be coordinated/scheduled by
CNAF N43.
61601
AWARD COMPUTATION
Max Pts
3M Inspection
TOTAL
10
Calculation
3M Inspection score / 10
10
Note 1. 3M scores will carry over for 24 months. When a 3M
Assessment has not been conducted in 24 months, a waiver must be
submitted via the CSG to CNAL N43, info CNAL/CNAP N7 to utilize
the carry over score for Battle “E” calculations.
Note 2. When a ship fails to meet minimum satisfactory criteria
during a 3M Inspection, the ship is no longer eligible for the
Battle “E” during that competitive cycle year. Points utilized
for the following competitive cycle will be calculated based
upon the average score of the original Inspection and subsequent
re-inspection. This also applies to w departmental award
calculations.
67
30 Jun 14
68
30 Jun 14
Section 17 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY CONSERVATION
(EPEC) AWARD (TYCOM N45)
61700
GENERAL
1. The EPEC Award advances Navy energy conservation and
environmental protection objectives by recognizing those ships
that consistently meet established goals for reducing energy and
protecting the maritime environment.
2. Energy security is a strategic Navy priority and
environmental stewardship enables our sailors to carry out their
missions while minimizing impacts on the environment.
3. The EPEC Award will recognize the achievements of those
carriers exhibiting consistent commitment to these vital aspects
of fleet training and operation.
61701
ANNUAL “EPEC” AWARD COMPUTATION
Event
Maximum Points
Notes
Semi-Annual I/P Energy Con TRNG
10
1
HVAC System Spot Check program
10
2
Energy Conservation Lessons Learned
3
10
Maintain (1) Navy Afloat Environmental
Coordinator Course appointed as the AEPC
By the Commanding Officer
10
4
Environmental Protection Lessons Learned
Message
10
5
Complete Quarterly Environmental
Compliance Board Meeting
10
6
Complete Marine Species Awareness TRNG
Prior to major training exercise
10
7
Demonstrate Access and proficiency
Utilizing PMAP
10
8
Conduct Annual Environmental Protection
Training.
Ensure ballast water exchanges are
Recorded in Engineering Log
10
9
10
10
Total
69
100
30 Jun 14
NOTE 1:
RADM data for >= 80% of onboard personnel.
NOTE 2:
MSG to TYCOM> 10% of MIP# 6641/005 MRC Q-2 Fan
Coil Unit Air Filter spot checked annually.
NOTE 3:
MSG received/MSG not received.
NOTE 4:
CO graduation ltr and FLTMPS grad report for
APEC Course.
NOTE 5:
MSG received/MSG not received.
NOTE 6:
MTG Minutes with RQD attendees present (documented
/not documented).
NOTE 7:
Verify Training in RADM
NOTE 8:
Present latest version of PMAP, Pollution Wheel
And shipboard personnel demonstrate proficiency.
NOTE 9:
Review RADM >+ 80% of personnel trained.
NOTE 10: Check ships schedule for Ops outside of local area
And where Ballast Water was taken on in
Potentially polluted waters or within 3 NM of
Land; if so, check Engineering logs for proper
Documentation of actions IAW applicable
Instructions.
61702
DISQUALIFICATION.
1. Any reportable Pollutant spill determined to be caused by
the ship
2. Any Discharge of Weapons System in violation of PMAP
directed restrictions or any failure to use PMAP prior to
engaging in qualifying training events.
3. Any anchoring evolution, Sonar use, or NIXIE employment that
violates PMAP directed or other training restrictions.
61703
QUALIFICATION
Detailed award qualification criteria will be promulgated
SEPCOR.
70
30 Jun 14
Section 18
TIE BREAKER (TYCOM N00)
In the unlikely event of a tie for the Battle “E” between
competing units, the respective TYCOM Commander will make the
final determination of the competition winner.
71
30 Jun 14
72
30 Jun 14
Chapter 7
AWARDS
In addition to the Battle “E”, Carriers and Carrier-assigned
personnel are eligible for several other awards. This chapter
consists of nine sections which describe criteria for these
awards:
SECTION 1 ARLEIGH BURKE FLEET TROPHY.......................... 3
SECTION 2 JUNIOR OFFICER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN
SHIPHANDLING........................................ 5
SECTION 3 ASSOCIATION OF OLD CROWS (AOC)...................... 9
SECTION 4 THE BATTENBERG CUP AWARD ............................ 11
SECTION 5 MARJORIE STERRETT BATTLESHIP FUND AWARD ............. 13
SECTION 6 PROPULSION PLANT WATCH OFFICER (PPWO) OF THE YEAR
AWARD............................................... 15
SECTION 7 ENLISTED ENGINEER OF THE QUARTER.................... 17
SECTION 8 ENLISTED ENGINEER OF THE YEAR....................... 19
SECTION 9 COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC EXCELLENCE IN
INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION WARFARE AWARD.......... 21
1
30 Jun 14
2
30 Jun 14
Section 1
Ref:
ARLEIGH BURKE FLEET TROPHY
(a) OPNAVINST 3590.11 (series)
(b) USFFC 3590.11 (series)
(c) COMPACFLTINST 3590.1 (series)
7100
GENERAL.
In accordance with ref (a), the Arleigh Burke Fleet Trophy is
presented by the regional Fleet Commander to the ship or air
squadron of each Fleet that demonstrates the greatest
improvement in battle efficiency during the current calendar
year. Although based on the Battle Efficiency competition,
winning the Battle “E” is not a prerequisite. Selection
criteria for Atlantic and Pacific Fleet units are set forth in
references (b) and (c) respectively.
7101
NOMINATIONS.
1. Nominations are submitted from each CSG Commander. Each
nomination shall be submitted by letter to TYCOM NLT 30 January,
and shall include a proposed citation, full resume and
justifying rationale. The comparative data/input should be
presented in bullet format and should not exceed two pages in
length. Emphasis should be on quantifiable and verifiable
improvements and state the following:
a.
COMPARISON STATISTICS.
(1) Previous and current position in competition.
(2) Readiness improvements as identified in performance
readiness ratings and exercise completion.
(3) Departmental awards (emphasizing improvement from
previous year).
b.
OPERATIONAL SUMMARY.
(1) Factors in the operating schedule.
(2) Commitments.
(3) Noteworthy accomplishments during major exercises/
deployment.
(4) Examples of extraordinary improvement in
performance.
(5) Miscellaneous firsts/accomplishments.
3
30 Jun 14
2. Note: Inputs should compare previous to current year and
emphasize an improvement in battle efficiency.
7102
CUSTODY OF THE AWARD.
The plaque will be presented by the Fleet Commander on behalf of
the Chief of Naval Operations, and is permanently retained by
the winning ship or squadron.
4
30 Jun 14
Section 2
7200
JUNIOR OFFICER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN SHIPHANDLING
GENERAL.
The Junior Officer Award for Excellence in Shiphandling is
presented annually by the TYCOM to recognize shiphandling skill.
A competitive program is conducted annually to develop a spirit
of enthusiasm among junior officers through competition with
their contemporaries, and to enhance their professional
development as naval officers. The selection process is
conducted throughout the calendar year. The objective is to
improve shiphandling proficiency, generate high morale, and
increase retention of junior officers within the Naval Service.
7201
ELIGIBILITY.
Due to the size and complexity of aircraft carriers, this
competition will be conducted on an individual ship basis from 1
January through 31 December. Eligibility to participate in this
competition falls to all officers up to and including the rank
of Lieutenant Commander permanently assigned to ship's force
(candidates are eligible only for one award at a single duty
station). The selected winner for each respective carrier will
be nominated via the CSG for recognition by the TYCOM.
7202
EVALUATION BOARD.
Candidates shall be evaluated by a board comprising of:
1.
Commanding Officer.
2.
Navigator.
3. A line officer or qualified officer of the deck, senior to
any person being evaluated and not a candidate in the
shiphandling competition.
4. A designated representative of the embarked Group Commander,
if available.
7203
EVALUATIONS.
1. Evaluations shall be individually prepared by members of the
board utilizing a standardized evaluation sheet. The evaluation
must cover the following at a minimum:
a.
The candidate's judgment.
b.
The use of standard commands.
c. Ship control skill (including use of engines, rudder
direction / timing and accuracy in positioning the ship).
5
30 Jun 14
d. Proper and timely dissemination of information to the
Commanding Officer, Navigator, Flag Watch Officer, Air Officer,
Engineering Officer, ship's company.
e. The officer’s demeanor, confidence, decisiveness,
alertness and command presence.
f. The officer’s ability to effectively mentor and train
under instruction bridge watch standers, and to directly enable
a positive bridge learning environment. Efforts directly result
in the qualification of Officers of the Deck (u/w), Junior
Officers of the Watch (JOOW), and Command Duty Officers (u/w).
2. Observations of shiphandling skills should be conducted
during normal operating conditions. To encourage the
improvement of shiphandling skill and to afford all officers
competing the chance to participate in special evolutions, the
ship may schedule special training evolutions, such as practice
anchorages. An evaluation sheet should be prepared after a
period of observation that spans as many shiphandling evolutions
as practicable. The evaluation period should last throughout
the entire year, ideally enabling each candidate to receive
several evaluations from each board member. This will provide
the board members with a broader understanding of each
candidate's knowledge and skill by presenting a more accurate
measure of individual progress and proficiency.
3. During periods of observation/evaluation, each candidate
should be required to demonstrate knowledge and skill in as many
of the following evolutions as possible:
a. Navigation and piloting, including completing
performance assessments for these evolutions.
b. Approaches to an anchorage or pier.
anchoring is not required.)
c.
(Actual mooring or
Preparations for getting underway.
d. Positioning of the ship for making the approach/making
the approach to a delivery ship.
e.
Conning alongside.
f.
Tactical maneuvering.
g.
Flight operations.
h. Emergency procedures. (Man overboard, aircraft
crash/ditching, loss of steering, enemy torpedo, etc.)
4. A separate file of completed evaluations and any other
applicable data shall be maintained on each candidate for use in
determining the winner of the shiphandling competition. If the
6
30 Jun 14
individual is transferred during the competitive year, this
information should be forwarded to the next command as
appropriate.
5. Selection of candidates shall be by the evaluation board
described above. Evaluation sheets shall be the primary means
of comparing candidates and determining the selection. Any
additional available data may also be used with the exception of
time on board, relative seniority and previous sea experience.
No ranking or relative standing of the other candidates will be
published or disclosed.
7204
AWARDS.
There will be one TYCOM winner from CNAP and CNAL. TYCOM
winners will be awarded a Navy and Marine Corps Achievement
Medal.
7205
1.
ACTION.
Commanding Officers shall:
a. Develop selection criteria in consonance with the
guidelines contained herein.
b. Ensure the fitness reports of shiphandling competition
winners reflect this most significant accomplishment.
c. Consistent with operational requirements, ensure eligible
officers are afforded maximum opportunity for participation and
for actual shiphandling practice.
2. Strike Group Commanders are encouraged to personally
supervise and participate in this program to help maintain
interest and to emphasize the importance of professional
shiphandling.
3. TYCOMs will select a winner from each Coast based on inputs
received. Criteria for competitors will be based on:
a.
Nomination write up.
b.
Package completeness.
c.
CSG and CO’s endorsements.
d.
Operational sea time and mission completion.
e.
Port visits.
f.
Shiphandling Sub-Events.
7
30 Jun 14
7206
REPORTS.
1. The ship shall submit a letter to the CSG with the name of
nominee for the shiphandling competition award following the
competitive year. The letter will contain a Personal Award
Recommendation as an enclosure (OPNAV 1650/3 (Rev 3-76) form).
Complete blocks 1-6, 8, 11-19, 22, and 25.
2. A proposed citation is required. Nominations will be
endorsed by Unit Command, CSG (if available) and forwarded to
the TYCOM no later than 31 January of the year following the
competition in order to ensure eligibility.
8
30 Jun 14
Section 3
7300
ASSOCIATION OF OLD CROWS (AOC)
GENERAL.
The Association of Old Crows (AOC) is a non-profit international
association engaged in the science and practice of Electronic
Warfare (EW), Information Operations (IO) and related
disciplines. Each year, the AOC presents a variety of awards to
dedicated individuals and service units in recognition of their
outstanding contributions and achievements in Electronic
Warfare, Information Operations, and related fields during the
previous calendar year. Further information can be found on the
AOC website: http://www.crows.org.
7301
NOMINATION PROCEDURES.
1. An annual CNO message will solicit inputs and provide
selection criteria for TYCOM recommendations. Award submissions
are normally submitted to the AOC by 15 April.
2. Unit Award nominations will be submitted to the cognizant
CSG for each ship/squadron for selection/endorsements. CSG
shall forward endorsed complete package to TYCOM by the date
promulgated in the record message announcement. Packages
received after deadline will be disqualified from TYCOM
nomination.
3. Individual Award nominations will be delivered to OPNAV via
USFF/CPF by the TYCOM. Submission deadlines for USFF/CPF will be
stated in annual CNO message.
7302
SELECTION.
The annual CNO message will solicit inputs and provide selection
criteria for TYCOM recommendations. Award winners will be
determined during the AOC’s June Board of Directors Meeting.
9
30 Jun 14
10
30 Jun 14
Section 4
THE BATTENBERG CUP AWARD
Ref:
(a) CUSFF 3590.11 (series)
7400
GENERAL.
This annual award is presented as recognition of excellence to
an Atlantic Fleet ship or submarine that having won the Battle
”E”, has demonstrated the greatest accumulation of crew
achievements. These include performance in competition for
Atlantic Fleet Sportsmanship Award, TYCOM Sailor of the Year
Award, Golden Anchor Award (for retention), Captain Edward F.
Ney Award (for food service), and command excellence awards.
Other information, such as operating schedules, commitments and
unusual factors contributing to the nomination may also be
considered. One CNAL ship will be nominated per TYCOM.
Nomination criteria and selection procedures are set forth in
ref (a).
7401
NOMINATION.
CNAL will nominate the year’s Atlantic Fleet Carrier Battle ”E”
winner to COMUSFLTFORCOM by 31 March for consideration as the
Battenberg Cup Award nominee.
7402
SELECTION.
An ad hoc board will be convened by USFF Awards Administrator to
review the nominations and make a recommendation to the
Commander. The award will be presented by Commander, US Fleet
Forces to the most deserving nominee with an appropriate
ceremony.
11
30 Jun 14
12
30 Jun 14
Section 5
MARJORIE STERRETT BATTLESHIP FUND AWARD
Ref:
(a) OPNAVINST 3590.11 (series)
7500
GENERAL.
The Marjorie Sterrett Battleship Fund is a monetary contribution
awarded annually to one ship from each of the Atlantic and
Pacific Fleets for the benefit of the enlisted crewmembers. The
fund is administered by a board of trustees and the amount
awarded is based upon the fund’s earnings. Award eligibility is
designated by the CNO via USFF/CPF in October of each year for
class grouping of ships.
7501
SELECTION.
In those years that designation of the award falls to CNAF, the
award will be presented by CNAF to the carriers winning the
Battle Efficiency Competition; no input from the ship is
required. CNO will announce the winners by message and notify
the trustees with a recommendation to transfer the funds to the
COs of the winning ships.
7502
EXPENDITURE.
Detailed procedures for the distribution and expenditure of the
monetary award are set forth in ref (a).
13
30 Jun 14
14
30 Jun 14
Section 6
AWARD
7600
PROPULSION PLANT WATCH OFFICER (PPWO) OF THE YEAR
GENERAL.
1. The Propulsion Plant Watch Officer of the Year Award is
presented annually by the TYCOM in recognition of force
readiness contributions from commissioned engineering officers.
The competition period runs throughout the calendar year. All
qualified Propulsion Plant Watch Officers (regardless of rank)
serving in their first CVN tour as a commissioned officer are
eligible. Each carrier is encouraged to nominate an officer for
this award.
2. Ship’s candidates shall be evaluated by a board comprised of
the following:
a.
Commanding Officer.
b.
Engineering / Reactor Officer.
c.
A qualified PPWO not participating in the competition.
d. A representative from the embarked CSG staff (if
available).
7601
NOMINATION.
1. Nominations for this award shall be forwarded to the
respective TYCOM N9 Awards Coordinator.
2. Nominations shall include (as a minimum) comments regarding
the candidate’s performance in the following categories:
a.
Maintenance ability.
b.
Leadership ability.
c.
Training ability.
d.
Operational abilities (i.e. watch standing).
e.
Performance of assigned duties.
f.
Military appearance.
g.
Time period candidate was observed.
7602
SELECTION.
TYCOM N9 will convene a board within 15 days of the nomination
deadline. During the board process all nomination packages will
be considered and a winner determined. Those selected for the
award will be presented with the Navy-Marine Corps Achievement
15
30 Jun 14
Medal by the TYCOM.
encouraged.
Electronic submissions in PDF format are
16
30 Jun 14
Section 7
7700
ENLISTED ENGINEER OF THE QUARTER
GENERAL.
The Enlisted Engineer of the Quarter is awarded by each TYCOM to
recognize Force readiness contributions from enlisted Sailors in
an engineering rate and to promote and encourage standards of
excellence amongst non-commissioned engineers.
7701
NOMINATION.
Nominees of specific ranks are recognized once per quarter of
the calendar year to ensure all enlisted ranks are recognized.
Ships may nominate candidates for any significant contribution
made in the year preceding the submission. Nominations shall be
forwarded to the respective TYCOM N9 Award Coordinator by letter
or email no later than the 15th day of the month following the
quarter specified in Figure 7-1.
Jan – Mar
E-3 and below nominees of Engineering Rates,
including non-designated fireman.
Apr – Jun
Engineering Rated E-7 and above.
Jul – Sep
Engineering Rated E-6.
Oct – Dec
Engineering Rated E-4 or E-5.
Figure 7-1 Engineer of the Quarter Nomination Schedule
7702
CRITERIA.
1. COs shall develop selection criteria to identify their
respective candidates.
2. Submissions should include as a minimum comments regarding
the candidate’s performance in the following categories:
a.
b.
Leadership ability.
c.
Training ability.
d.
e.
Subordinate retention (E-6 and above nominees only).
f.
Military appearance.
7703
SELECTION.
Individuals selected for the award and all nominees will be
announced by TYCOM message. Each quarter’s winner will receive
17
30 Jun 14
a certificate from the TYCOM recognizing their achievement. The
certificate will be presented by the nominating ship during an
appropriate ceremony.
18
30 Jun 14
Section 8
7800
ENLISTED ENGINEER OF THE YEAR
GENERAL.
The Enlisted Engineer of the Year is awarded by each TYCOM to
recognize Force readiness contributions from an enlisted Sailor
in an engineering rate (up to and including the rank of E-6),
who achieved and sustained a superior level of performance
throughout the calendar year. Selection or nomination for
Engineer of the Quarter is not a prerequisite for this award.
7801
NOMINATION.
Each carrier may nominate one candidate who displayed exemplary
engineering professionalism consistently throughout the calendar
year. Nominations will be solicited by message and shall be
forwarded to the respective TYCOM N9 Awards Coordinator by
letter or email.
7802
CRITERIA.
1. COs shall develop selection criteria to identify their
respective candidates.
2. Submissions should include as a minimum comments regarding
the candidate’s performance in the following categories during
the calendar year:
a.
b.
Leadership ability.
c.
Training ability.
d.
e.
Subordinate retention (E-6 nominees only).
f.
Military appearance
7803
SELECTION.
TYCOM N9 will convene a board within 15 days of the nomination
deadline. Nominations received by the deadline will be
considered and a winning candidate determined. The Award winner
will be presented with the Navy-Marine Corps Achievement Medal
by the TYCOM.
19
30 Jun 14
20
30 Jun 14
Section 9 COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC EXCELLENCE IN INTELLIGENCE
AND INFORMATION WARFARE AWARD
7900
GENERAL
The COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC Excellence in Intelligence and
Information Warfare Award (EIIWA) is an annual recognition of the
accomplishments of one COMNAVAIRPAC and one COMNAVAIRLANT CVN-CVW
Intelligence and Information Warfare teams. The submissions from
both COMNAVAIRPAC and COMNAVAIRLANT units best demonstrating
superior readiness and performance in leading and supporting
operations will be recognized as the COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC
EIIWA winners, respectively. Participation by the entire CVN-CVW
team will be considered, to include Fleet Intelligence Detachment
(FID) and Cryptologic Technician Direct Support (DIRSUP)
contributions.
7901
CRITERIA
1. The EIIWA is awarded in recognition of CVN-CVW teams superior
intelligence performance in leading and supporting afloat naval
operations and improving the operations/intelligence and
information warfare interface.
2. The following criteria will be evaluated when determining
award selection:
a. Maintenance and Training Phase Intelligence and
Information Warfare Readiness: nominees shall include, but not
limited to MITEs participation, Level of Knowledge exams, FLTMPS
compliance, CV-SHARP measurements, TQCP evaluation, TSTA-FEP and
COMPTUEX/JTFEX evaluations/grades, Warfare Qualifications, etc.
Submission of metrics, anecdotal information, and endorsements
are encouraged.
b. Deployment and Surge Phase Intelligence and Information
Warfare Accomplishments: nominees shall include significant
Intelligence and Information Warfare accomplishments for Strike
Group, Fleet and National requirements, to include a
chronological listing of all command FRTP and
deployed/operational events that benefited from or supported
intelligence and information warfare.
Submission of metrics,
anecdotal information, and endorsements are encouraged.
c. Other: direct and indirect “non-intelligence and
information warfare” contributions to CVN and CVW readiness, to
include, but not limited to 3M inspections, individual and group
recognitions, awards, honors, etc.
d. CSG endorsement commenting on contributions and impacts
made the by CVN-CVW team during the award period.
21
30 Jun 14
7902 AWARD SUBMISSION AND FORMAT
Competitive period for the award is 01 January to 31 December.
Ships desiring consideration for this award will forward
submissions to their CSG via letter or record message. CSGs will
forward endorsement to CNAF. Submissions can be classified to
best convey accomplishments and contributions and should be
submitted to the COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC N2 via the
appropriate domain conveyance.
7903
SELECTION
COMNAVAIRLANT/COMNAVAIRPAC N2 is administrative authority for the
EIIWA and will announce winners via record message. An award
plaque for each COMNAVAIRPAC and COMNAVAIRLANT winner will be
provided for display.
22
30 Jun 14
Chapter 8
Section 1
8100
FORWARD DEPLOYED NAVAL FORCE (FDNF)
CARRIER TRAINING CYCLE
GENERAL
PURPOSE
1. This chapter provides FDNF-specific responsibilities and
procedures for the FDNF CSG and carrier. It provides guidance
for training, assessment, evaluation and reporting of FDNF unitlevel requirements and events.
2. Due to the unique nature and requirements of the FDNF, it
has a cycle which resides in a continuous Sustainment Phase.
This chapter refines the FDNF cycle in order to meet USFF FRTP
and Commander, SEVENTH FLEET (C7F) training and certification
requirements while providing an efficient equivalency to CONUSbased carriers. Previously based on a 24-month cycle, the FDNF
cycle is updated to 36 months to more closely align with the 32month CONUS cycle. It is important to note that ULT
requirements will vary from year to year during the 36-month
FRTP based on the periodicity of events as established in
Appendix II.
8101
DISCUSSION
1. As an addendum to USSF FRTP training requirements, C7F
instruction 3501A directs SEVENTH FLEET units to establish a
training continuum, tailored to its unique operating
environment. It is annotated as the SEVENTH FLEET Training
Program (7FTP). The 7FTP consists of two components:
Certification and Sustainment Training. Both will leverage
Fleet operations and exercises including Fleet Training
Exercises (FTX), Command Post Exercises (CPX) and multi-warfare
synthetic exercises implemented through the FST program as
described in CFFCINST 3500.2 (series). The 7FTP encompasses
training through assessed underway and in port events in the
following areas: warfare proficiency, operational requirements,
SEVENTH FLEET unique missions, OPLANs, mission rehearsal and
FDNF/Joint/Coalition interoperability
2. ULT Requirements. The FDNF cycle is based on a 36-month
timeline. Every effort will be made by C7F, CSG (CTF 70) and
TYCOM to afford the FDNF carrier a training plan (schedule) with
sufficient opportunity to conduct meaningful training and
maintain maximum readiness levels consistent with TYCOM and C7F
requirements, missions and OPLANs. Because the FDNF carrier
operates continually in the Sustainment Phase, it cannot follow
the CONUS-based carrier FRTP cycle (i.e. FEP event following
each annual maintenance availability period). As a result, a
tailored training plan is required to ensure currency and
proficiency in all areas with associated performance targets.
1
30 Jun 14
On a periodic basis (event-based as well as rolling calendar),
the FDNF carrier will be tasked to conduct training,
certifications and assessments in areas that may degrade during
the maintenance cycle, or be overcome by previous operational
requirements.
3. FDNF Periodicities. FDNF periodicities are prescribed in
Appendix II. Every event has a prescribed periodicity for
experience and performance. They will vary slightly from CONUSbased carriers to account for the 36-month FDNF cycle but remain
in compliance with USFF FRTP and C7F requirements.
2
30 Jun 14
Section 2
8200
PREPARATION FOR TRAINING
GENERAL
A description of training progression for the FDNF carrier is
provided in Figure 8-1 and paragraphs below.
Figure 8-1 FDNF Carrier Training Readiness Sustainment (36-month cycle)
8201
TRAINING SUPPORT FOR FRTP EVENTS
a. As a part of the FDNF tailored cycle, training,
certification and assessment events will be implemented to meet
overall requirements. The FDNF will accomplish the same
training objectives of CONUS-based carriers. ATG continues to
provide SMEs to support these events. The FDNF carrier shall
request ATGWP support via naval message early in the annual
maintenance availability, prior to Crew Certification. A sample
Training Support Request message can be accessed via the CNAF N7
SharePoint portal. The utilization of an external agency other
than ATG for event grading must be approved by the TYCOM through
submission of an External Evaluator Waiver request. External
evaluators shall be carefully chosen based on seniority,
technical background and experience.
3
30 Jun 14
Figure 3-7 of Chapter 3 lists ATG training support for each FRTP
event by mission area.
8202
COMMAND ASSESSMENT OF READINESS AND TRAINING (CART).
1. CART is an internal event conducted during the return home
from each FDNF deployment. It facilitates maximum benefit from
limited training assets and opportunities. The FDNF carrier
must have a clear understanding of the specific training and
assessments it will require and a detailed plan for
accomplishment.
2. During CART, the ship looks ahead to the next deployment and
determines who will fill critical billets. The ship then
constructs a comprehensive Watch Team Replacement Plan depicting
how personnel will be trained to fill each billet. Requests for
school quotas should be transmitted to quota control authorities
with sufficient lead time to afford maximum attendance prior to
completion of the scheduled maintenance availability. Watch
Team Replacement Plan (WTRP) shortfalls identified during CART
shall be documented on the Consolidated Ship’s Discrepancy Log
(CSDL). The ship will provide mid-month CSDL updates to
CNAL/CNAP N7 via the CSG throughout the Maintenance Period.
8203
CREW PREPARATION
1. During the annual maintenance availability period, the
carrier will commence a period of crew preparation to ready
itself for a return to sea. The duration of the crew
preparation period is at the discretion of the CO but must be
sufficient to allow for completion in the following:
a.
ANTI-TERRORISM AND FORCE PROTECTION (ATFP).
b.
SHIP BOARD TRAINING TEAM (SBTT)
c.
CREW CERTIFICATION
d.
FAST CRUISE
e.
SEA TRIALS
f.
FLIGHT DECK/CATCC CERTIFICATION
2. Because of the dynamic environment of FDNF, ATFP events must
be scheduled during the annual SRA to ensure adequate in port
time to train and exercise prior to the annual deployment. The
certification cycle is 24 months allowing for no more than 30
months between certifications. The FDNF Carrier must schedule
well in advance with the CSG, ATG and TYCOM to complete ATFP
requirements. On the odd year a Phase I, II and IV
certification must be completed. In the even-year, sustainment
is required by conducting a Phase I and Phase II LTT. These
LTTs must be completed with ATG observing and reporting findings
4
30 Jun 14
to the CO. This will ensure continuous readiness in conjunction
with the required annual events observed by the CSG.
3. SBTT is a Course of Instruction (COI) scheduled and
conducted with ATG prior to Crew Certification, FDC/CATCC
Certification and Core Training I/II and ULTRA-S events
(explained later in detail). The ship will receive the scenario
package during this time with corresponding instructions.
4. Crew Certification is the process by which the CSG
Commander, supported by the TYCOM and ATG, ensures the ship is
ready to proceed safely to sea with a qualified crew. Due the
short duration of the FDNF SRA, only Crew Certification Phases
II and III are required annually utilizing guidance outlined in
Chapter 3 and checklist CL2 and CL3 which are available at the
CNAF N7 SharePoint site. During Crew Certification, the CSG and
ATG are tasked to confirm:
a.
Appropriate administrative programs in place
b.
Required instructions and bills in force
c.
Up-to-date, effective PMS program
d.
Effective training and PQS programs in place
e. Dock Trials plan (as outlined in OPNAVINST 9080.3
(series))
5. Fast Cruise shall be conducted per the Joint Fleet
Maintenance Manual (COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3 (series)), OPNAVINST
9080.3 (series) and the Engineering Department Manual for
Nuclear Powered Ships (EDM). Additional guidance is outlined in
Chapter 3 of this manual and the COMNAVAIRFOR N7 SharePoint
site.
6. Sea Trials shall be conducted as outlined in Chapter 3, subsection 3305 of this instruction.
7. Flight Deck/CATCC Certification assesses the FDNF carrier’s
ability to safely conduct routine day/night aircraft launch and
recovery operations in a safe manner. These assessments are
conducted in accordance with CNAFINST3500.71 (series).
8204
CORE TRAINING (CT) I AND II
1. CT I and II shall be conducted upon completion of the annual
maintenance availability period.
2. The purpose of CT I/II is to train and assess the carrier’s
training teams and watch standers in requisite warfare areas
with emphasis on core competencies (DC, Navigation, Training
Teams, etc).
5
30 Jun 14
3. CT I and II are intended to assist in updating training
shortfalls in preparation for ULTRA-S and follow-on operations.
The schedule of events and warfare training requested during the
CT periods is at the discretion of the carrier CO and CSG but
must be coordinated and approved by the TYCOM. Both periods of
Core Training are nominal 5-day periods when ATG/MTT will be
available to support both/either period if requested. The
overall objective is to include all training necessary to ensure
Sustainment Phase experience and performance requirements are
maintained.
4. If the FDNF carrier, CSG, ATG and TYCOM agree training
currency and proficiency exist for a particular warfare area or
event, the carrier may request assessment in that area/event
during CT periods vice the sequential ULTRA-S event. This
precludes unnecessary training in routinely performed events and
affords a more tailored, efficient ULTRA-S event. However, the
‘P’ requirement indicated in the CORE column of APP II,
specifies the events that must be graded for ‘P’ by the end of
CORE Training. CORE ‘P’ grades will be assessed under MCO
conditions. Careful attention must be paid to ensure
periodicities can be maintained in respective areas during the
remainder of the 36-month cycle.
8205
UNIT LEVEL TRAINING ASSESSMENT - SUSTAINMENT (ULTRA-S)
1. ULTRA-S shall be conducted annually upon completion of CT I
and II and serves as the CONUS-based equivalent of latter stage
TSTA and FEP. Since the FDNF CVN continually executes in the
Sustainment Phase, the capstone FEP event for CONUS-based
carriers in transitioning to Integrated Phase training is not
relevant. ULTRA-S will serve as the primary assessment event to
ensure standardization in TYCOM and C7F requirements.
2. ULTRA-S is a nominal four to five day graded event that
captures the culmination of the FDNF carrier’s ULT and its
overall proficiency. During this period, the ship will renew
various performance assessments including annual core
competencies. Although operational commitments prevail, the
FDNF carrier shall strive to accomplish ULTRA-S early on in
their deployment cycle.
3. ULTRA-S SOE will be tailored according to event periodicity
in the Sustainment column of Appendix II of this instruction.
It must include, but is not limited to, those events with
assessments set to expire. SOE is developed by the ship/CSG,
but requires TYCOM coordination and approval.
4. Standardization. ATG is the TYCOM/CSG executive agent for
procedural and standardization issues during ULTRA-S. ATG will
advise the CSG of procedural and standardization issues to
ensure TYCOM requirements are met.
6
30 Jun 14
8206
RESPONSIBILITIES.
Responsibilities for conducting FDNF Training (CT I, CT II,
ULTRA-S):
1. TYCOM. Assume role as Senior Observer. Monitor CT I, II
and ULTRA-S training and assessments, and resolve questions and
concerns, as required.
2.
CSG.
a. Assist ship in scheduling required resources and
services and coordinating the embarkation/debarkation of
aircraft/vehicles/boats to support events.
b.
Review the CT, ULTRA-S SOEs presented by the carrier.
c. Submit a training support requirements message upon
completion of the training scheduling conference.
d.
3.
Act as external evaluator when authorized by TYCOM.
ATG.
a. Develop and deliver background information required for
the ship/CSG to construct training scenarios. This package will
include geo-political, Electronic Order of Battle (EOB), Naval
Order of Battle (NOB), required services, etc. To provide
realism and complement the scenario, ATG will assist ship’s CSTT
to coordinate intelligence data including source, time sensitive
data and exercise messages.
b. Provide SME personnel for the training periods and
coordinate scenario/SOE tailoring with the ship’s ITT. The ATG
CVN TLO will report directly to the Senior Observer.
c. The TLO or designated representative will provide the
TYCOM, CSG and CO an objective assessment by mission area of
crew performance upon completion of each phase.
4.
Commanding Officer:
a. Task ITT to develop and execute CT I, II and ULTRA-S
scenario/SOE. The ITT will use the TT I, II, and ULTRA-S
background information provided by ATG as a guideline, ensuring
all scenarios meet required CSG/ATG objectives and safety
requirements.
b. Provide a Ready-to-Train letter to the ATG TLO at the
in-brief: At a minimum, the Ready-to-Train letter shall
include: CO’s Battle Orders, current copy of the ship’s eight
o’clock reports, Condition I/II/III Watch Bills, WTRPs, training
team designations and a list of the ship’s standard simulations.
7
30 Jun 14
c. Obtain/request OPAREA clearances and required services
to support CT I, II and ULTRA-S.
d.
Conduct pre-CT I, II and ULTRA-S briefings as required.
e.
Submit external evaluator waiver request as required.
8207
FLEET SYNTHETIC TRAINING (FST)
1. FST is the key component of the C7F Training Plan and
provides staffs and units the ability to develop working
relationships and tactical expertise in naval, joint and
coalition environments.
2. The FDNF carrier shall conduct FST in accordance with
requirements set forth in COMSEVENTHFLTINST S3501 (series).
8208
REACTOR DEPARTMENT TRAINING
1. CVN Nuclear Engineering Training Requirements. Nuclear
engineering training requirements are governed by NAVSEA S921341-MAN-000(C) Engineering Department Manual for Naval Nuclear
Propulsion Plants and COMNAVAIRFORINST C1512.3 (series) Nuclear
Power Training Manual.
2. For general information concerning ORSE and Reactor
Department Drills, refer to Chapter 3 of this instruction.
8
30 Jun 14
Section 3 ASSESSMENT OF FDNF FRTP - FDNF END-OF-MISSION
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. CSG/CTF-70 will provide a summary of training conducted per
this instruction, and will report on the carrier’s training
readiness status and significant issues discovered during the
following FDNF FRTP events. Definitions for
Restrictive/Major/Minor discrepancies are listed in Section
3701.
2.
CART.
a. The carrier shall send a message to the TYCOM reporting
completion of CART I. The CSG will endorse the ship’s message.
The message will provide assessments of the:
(1) Ship’s Integrated Training Teams (ITT)
organization.
(2) Afloat Self Assessment Check Sheets.
(3) Ship’s Watch Team Replacement Plan, to include:
(a) NEC producing/Non-NEC FLTMPS required schools
(b) Enlisted Distribution and Verification Report
(c) Officer Distribution Control Report
(4) Long Range Training and Requirement Plan (LORTARP),
to include:
(a) Identification of TADTAR requirements
training.
(b) Identification of required schools and team
(c) Ship’s Required Master Schools List.
b. This message will also provide a preliminary schedule
of major training events to be accomplished during the 36-month
cycle.
c. A sample CART message is provided on the COMNAVAIRFOR
N7 SharePoint site.
3.
Crew Certification Phase II/III
a. The CSG shall send a message to the TYCOM reporting
completion of Crew’s Certification process Phase II/III.
b. This message will provide an assessment of the ship’s
training and administrative readiness and comment on the
8-9
30 Jun 14
performance during simulated underway operations and emergency
drills.
c. The message shall also indicate the number of
Restrictive/Major discrepancies identified during the Crew’s
Certification process.
d. A sample Crew’s Certification completion message is
provided on the COMNAVAIRFOR N7 SharePoint site.
4.
Flight Deck Certification/CATCC Certification
The CNAF Aircraft Handing Team, in conjunction with CNAF CATCC
Team, will prepare and release the Flight Deck/Carrier Air
Traffic Control Center Certification message, upon completion
of the FDC/CATCC Cert process.
5.
CT I and II.
a. The ATG TLO will report the results of CT I and II
events when completed to the CSG. The CSG will inform TYCOM
via message. This message shall include:
(1) A list all Restrictive/Major discrepancies /
training concerns resulting from the CT I and II training and
assessment.
(2) An assessment of the ship's ongoing training
programs.
(3) An assessment of the ship’s Integrated Training
Team (ITT) organization’s ability to brief, execute and debrief
complex drill sets.
(4) An assessment of ITT/watch standers level of
proficiency and readiness to train in each mission area.
(5) A recommendation regarding emphasis for additional
follow-on training as required.
b. The CSG CT message shall also provide a mitigation plan
and schedule for completing any outstanding events,
inspections, certifications, assessments and optional assist
visits (ICAVS).
c. All discrepancies noted during CT I and II shall be
documented on the Current Ship’s Discrepancy Log (CSDL).
6.
ULTRA-S.
a. The ATG TLO shall report completion of the ULTRA-S
evaluation event to the CSG, info the ship and TYCOM. The ATG
report shall include:
8-10
30 Jun 14
(1) A brief overview of training conducted.
(2) An assessment of the ship's ongoing training and
PQS programs.
(3) An assessment of the crew's overall readiness by
mission area.
(4) Recommendations regarding follow-on training as
appropriate.
b. The ATG report shall also include ULTRA-S sub-event
grades using the Training and Assessment Cards (available at
the COMNAVAIRFOR N7 SharePoint site).
c. The CSG will report completion of ULTRA-S within two
working days to the TYCOM and C7F.
d. The CSG message shall make recommendations concerning
the ship’s ability to continue in the Sustainment Phase and
comment regarding requirements for recommended follow-on
training.
e. The message shall list All Restrictive/Major
discrepancies noted during this event and provide a mitigation
plan and schedule for completing any outstanding ULTRA-S
required training events or ICAVS.
f. All discrepancies will be documented on the CSDL. The
ship, via the CSG, will continue to provide mid-month updates
to the TYCOM until final resolution of all noted
Restrictive/Major discrepancies. Sample templates for End-ofMission reports are provided on the COMNAVAIRFOR N7 SharePoint
site.
8-11
30 Jun 14
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) BLANK)
8-12
30 Jun 14
Appendix I CONUS TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
1. This Appendix breaks out the individual training sub-events
that represent the minimum amount of training and assessment
required during the major phases within the Fleet Response
Training Plan (FRTP). The syllabus and grading criteria for all
training events are set out in the TACs which must be used for
both training and assessment of each event. Nothing in this
Appendix prevents a Commanding Officer from conducting
additional training above the minimum requirement, if resources
are available and deemed necessary. Training requirements
consist of Experience (training) and Performance (assessment).
Generating a training Schedule of Events (SOE) must take into
account both requirements. It is important to recognize that
while individual sub-events can be trained separately, they are
all part of the integrated performance of the ship. Therefore,
the individual sub-events need to be conducted as part of
integrated drill packages in order to achieve the conditions
necessary to demonstrate satisfactory performance. Details of
the minimum integration necessary for a performance grade are
indicated in the Integration column of these tables and in the
corresponding TACs. A ship will not be considered ready to move
on to the next FRTP phase until both E and P requirements in
these tables have been completed; TYCOM/CSG Mitigation Plan is
required otherwise. E levels will fluctuate daily according to
the learn/maintain/degrade periodicities, underway training
opportunities and personnel turnover. However, on average a
ship should maintain a steady upward progression until attaining
Sustainment Phase E requirements.
Note 1: TYCOM requirements for individual
schools are not listed in this Appendix. They
can be found in the Fleet Training Management
Planning System (FLTMPS).
Note 2: Nuclear engineering training requirements are not
provided in this document. Nuclear engineering training
requirements are governed by NAVSEA S9213-41-MAN-000(C)
Engineering Department Manual for Naval Nuclear Propulsion
Plants and COMNAVAIRFORINST C1512.3 (series) Nuclear Power
Training Manual.
2.
Explanation of columns on training matrix pages.
a. Sub-Event. The Sub-Event number for a particular
evolution as classified in CV-SHARP.
b. Title. A brief description of the event. Each SubEvent is supported by an associated TAC, published on the CNAF
SharePoint site. The TAC describes, in detail, what needs to be
accomplished, by whom and how the event is assessed. Assessment
I-1
30 Jun 14
criteria includes the conditions and standards that are required
to be achieved.
c. Phase. The training requirements for each Sub-Event are
broken down by FRTP phase (see details of the content of each
phase in Ch 3). In each phase, ‘E’ and ‘P’ columns with
requirements are annotated. Each Phase stands alone so a ship
only needs to conform to the training requirements applicable to
the phase it is currently executing. ‘E’ levels and ‘P’ scores
carry forward from one phase to the next. Events in a previous
phase do not need to be rescheduled.
The periods of time and
responsibility for training in each column used in this Appendix
are as follows:
(1) Maintenance Phase – In Port. This is the period of
time from the commencement of Maintenance until the start of
Crew Prep. During this time the ship’s training team will
oversee the conduct of all training. All assessments will be
conducted by TYCOM teams unless specified otherwise in the TAC.
(2) Maintenance Phase – Crew Prep. This is normally the
last 4-6 months of the maintenance phase and includes: SBTT,
Crew Cert I,II,III (as applicable), Fast Cruise, FD Cert Phase
I/II (as applicable) and Sea Trials. During this time ATG will
train the ship’s training teams in the execution of training and
conduct assessments to ensure the ship is safe to proceed to
sea. In some cases the P requirement is annotated # and this
indicates that an alternative assessment agency normally
conducts this assessment.
(3) Basic Phase. This is the period of time when Basic
Phase ULT will be conducted. ‘E’ and ‘P’ levels for each
element of Basic Phase are indicated separately.
1. FDC.
A nominal 5 day period underway when
FDC phase III is conducted and events are assessed by TYCOM
(unless otherwise indicated in the TAC).
2. CART.
A nominal 5 day period in port when
training and assessments are conducted by ATG unless indicated #
(see details in the TAC).
3. ULT. A nominal 30-90 day period between the
end of CART and the beginning of TSTA when the ship’s training
team will build the experience of watchstanders and certain
basic phase performance assessments are conducted.
4. TSTA. A nominal 5 day period in port
followed by 25 days underway when training and assessments are
conducted by ATG unless indicated # (see details in the TAC).
5. FEP.
A nominal 2 day period underway when
training and assessments are conducted by ATG unless indicated #
(see details in the TAC). Events requiring a ‘P’ grade during
I-2
30 Jun 14
this period must be completed in order to ensure sufficient
integration is achieved to attain a valid ‘P’ grade.
NOTE: The latest P grade achieved during Basic
Phase (irrespective of when it was conducted) will
comprise the Basic Phase score that will remain
valid for readiness reporting until its periodicity
expires or it is re-graded.
(4) Integrated. This is the period of time when strike
group integrated training takes place under the direction of
Commander Strike Group Training (Pacific/Atlantic).
1. C2X. This column indicated the first part
of Integrated training and does not necessarily require a C2X to
be completed. In any event the E and P levels required in this
column must be completed before the ship can commence the final
phase of Integrated training.
2. JTFX. This column indicates the final part
of Integrated training and does not necessarily require a JTFX
to be completed. The requirements of this column must be
completed before the ship is deemed to have completed Integrated
Phase.
(5) Sustainment. This is the period of time from the
end of Integrated Phase training to the start of Maintenance
when the ship sustains the training readiness levels achieved.
This period of time includes an annual ULTRA-S when ATG will be
available to re-grade ‘P’ events that are due to expire before
the next scheduled ULTRA-S. This column indicates:
1.
The E level to be maintained
2. The E periodicities for ‘Learn’, ‘Maintain’
and ‘Degrade’.
3.
The P periodicity (days until it expires).
NOTE: The (long term) replacement FDNF carrier will
require a tailored training plan to meet Basic and
Intermediate Phase requirements prior to assuming FDNF
Sustainment Phase status.
(6) Integration. The sub-events in the column must be
conducted as part of an integrated drill package with the subevent being graded for performance. Details of the integration
required is specified in the Conditions section of the TAC.
Sub-events required for integration do not need to be graded but
they must be conducted to meet the Performance conditions.
3. Requirements for E and P.
To determine the E and P
requirements a ship references the tables below in the column
that correlates to the FRTP phase in which the ship is
I-3
30 Jun 14
operating. Each FRTP Phase column specifies an E level and P
requirement as applicable. P requirements will be annotated
with (Y/N).
a. Experience ‘E’ Requirement. In each FRTP Phase column
the E number indicates the level required to be achieved and
maintained by all required watchteams. To achieve an E level
for a sub-event, it is required to be conducted for training
(sub-events represent training events only and are not a
reflection of ‘watches logged’ (see paragraph 5.b). When team
training has been conducted and E is logged in CV-SHARP that
watchteam gains E credit and the ‘degradation clock within CV
SHARP begins. If this is the watchteam’s initial experience
entry into CV SHARP, the watch team has now achieved an E level
of 1. If the sub-event is then repeated, by the same watch
team, within the ‘Learning’ periodicity, the watch team’s E
level rises to a level of 2. If the watch team repeats the subevent within the ‘maintain’ periodicity the experience level
remains the same but the ‘degradation clock’ is reset. If the
sub-event is not rescheduled it will automatically degrade by
one level after the ‘Maintain’ periodicity has expired, and
continue to degrade in accordance with the ‘Degrade’ periodicity
until the event is re-scheduled and the ‘degradation clock’
within CV SHARP is reset. For scheduling purposes the unit
should identify the ‘E’ requirement and the current ship’s ‘E’
achieved and plan to schedule sufficient training to bring all
watch teams up the required E level by the end of that phase.
‘E’ levels will degrade over time and as individuals leave
watchteams. Therefore Watch Team Replacement Plans must make
allowances for sufficient training for both qualified and Under
Instruction watchstanders to prevent Experience degradation
resulting from personnel turnover.
Note: ‘E’ is gained each time an event is conducted for
performance. So when scheduling training, all assessed
events can be included in the plan to achieve sufficient
experience. Experience is cumulative so the E level
achieved in one column carries over to the next column.
b. Performance ‘P’ Requirement.
In each FRTP Phase column
a (Y/N)’ indicates if the sub-event requires an assessment of
Performance.
Performance scores are reported as a percentage
for the unit (see paragraph 4). Each ‘P’ score overwrites the
previous ‘P’ score and remains valid until the Performance
periodicity expires. If a ‘P’ event is not repeated within the
Performance periodicity the ‘P’ score will degrade to zero.
NOTE: A pictorial overview of Appendix I is provided in
Figure I-1.
4. Reporting Training Readiness. The figures submitted for ‘E’
and ‘P’ are factored to provide a Training Readiness Figure that
is passed to DRRS-N (P x E) which represents the ship in the
best possible light.
I-4
30 Jun 14
a. Experience achieved by watch teams is aggregated for
readiness reporting by notional teams to indicate the highest
possible E levels the ship could achieve in the MCO required
watch teams (which may be less than the number of ship’s formed
watch teams). The Sub-Event E is calculated by averaging the
lowest notional Team E from each participating Team Type. SubEvent E is aggregated first by Mission Essential Task (MET) and
then by Mission Area; this E is the figure passed to DRRS-N.
b. The Performance score achieved by the unit for each supevent is rolled up so that the achieved Performance score
passed to DRRS-N represents a Performance band as follows:
P achieved ≥ 90%
- Performance of 100% passed to DRRS-N
P achieved 80%-89% - Performance of 90% passed to DRRS-N
P achieved < 80%
- Actual Performance passed to DRRS-N
c. The combined ExP for each PRMAR is then displayed in
DRRS-N as the Training Figure of Merit (Tfom). The threshold
level color for the Tfom score in DRRS-N is:
> 80%
- Green
> 60% - < 80%
- Yellow
< 60%
- Red
d. NOTE: As DRRS-N depicts readiness with respect to MCOready status, it is expected unit readiness will depict Red
and Yellow starting in the Maintenance Phase and progress to
Green as the Integrated Phase concludes
e. CO’s comments will support all DRRN-S reports and can be
informed by all three scores of P, E and Training Readiness to
substantiate the actual readiness of a unit
5.
Training and Assessment Cards.
a. Each Sub-Event in Appendix I/II is supported by a
Training and Assessment Card (TAC) which is published on the
CNAF N7 Sharepoint Site.
b.
Training (for Experience Level).
(1) When an event is scheduled for experience the
training team shall check the current experience level of the
watch teams and provide an appropriate training environment. The
training team, in consultation with the ship’s CO can use any
level of simulation they deem fit for a training event. The
complexity of the training environment is set at the discretion
of the training team at a level that is commensurate with the
training needs of that team (Crawl-Walk-Run). However, careful
I-5
30 Jun 14
consideration should be given to ensuring all teams are prepared
to meet the conditions (which include integration) set out in
the TAC (which represent the MCO standard).
(2) To gain E credit a complete watchteam must be
present for the event and must be trained to complete all MOPs
specified in the TAC. Use of the TAC to record interventions
required during training is encouraged as this provides valuable
feedback on the competency of the watchstanders. Recorded
interventions should be used to inform follow on training.
(3) Once training is completed, the event is logged for
‘Experience’ in CV-SHARP and all individuals in that team gain
‘E’ credit.
c.
Assessment (for Performance Grade).
(1) When a sub-event is required to be assessed for
Performance ‘P’, the external agency assessing the event is
required to use the TAC for grading. To achieve a valid ‘P’
score the ship must demonstrate its ability to meet the
standards (MOPs) under the conditions set in the TAC. If the
assessment scenario does not meet the conditions set in the TAC,
no ‘P’ grade will be recorded. Most sub-events are required to
be integrated. The ship’s training teams should take care to
ensure the watchstanders are ready to conduct the sub-event as
part of an integrated drill package (as indicated in the
‘Integration’ column of these tables and the Conditions section
of the TACs).
(2) The Performance score is a Unit Performance Score
and therefore not all teams are necessarily required to be
assessed for Performance of that sub-event. Details of how many
teams must be assessed is specified in the associated TAC card.
If more than one team are required to be assessed, the
performance score will be an average of all required teams that
were assessed.
(3) During a Performance event the assessing agency
shall use the TAC to score each MOP as ‘achieved’ or ‘not
achieved’. If ‘achieved’ the full weighted score is awarded (no
partial scores) if the MOP is ‘not achieved’ the score awarded
for that MOP is zero. During a performance event interventions
are permitted at any time by both the ship’s training team and
any qualified assessor and an overall score will still be
awarded but the score for the MOP that required intervention
will be zero. Therefore, training and assessment teams should
only intervene during an assessed event in order to progress an
event that has stalled or if a hazard is developing that could
lead to a personnel or equipment casualty. Once the performance
event is completed, scores awarded for each MOP shall be added,
the sum divided by the maximum achievable points and the result
multiplied by 100.
I-6
30 Jun 14
NOTE: A TYCOM guide for development of a TAC is
published on the CNAP Sharepoint site under
‘supplemental information’.
I-7
30 Jun 14
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
I-8
30 Jun 14
Title
Basic Phase
Periodicity
Exact details of
how the event is
conducted and
graded are found
in the applicable
TAC.
Numbers explain the number of times
the event must be scheduled conducted
and reported for E (cumulative figures)
during each phase. Y/N indicates if a
performance grade will be given in each
phase.
Learn – In this example, E will increase if the event is repeated within 15
days of the last event.
Maintain – The E level will be maintained if it is repeated within 30 days.
Degrade – If it is not repeated within 30 days, E will degrade by 1 every
10 days.
FRTP Requirements for Experience Reporting (Exp) and Performance Assessment (Perf)
MAINT
Sub
Event
TITLE
PHASE
BASIC PHASE
Crew
Prep
In Port
FDC
E
P
E
P
0
N
1
Y
CART
INTEGRATED
ULT
P
E
P
E
N
6
Y
8
TSTA
FEP
C2X
SUSTAINMENT & Periodicity
JTFX
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Leve
l
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
P
(CONUS)
Exp Period
Perf
Lear
n
Main
t
Deg
MITE
Expirati
on
(days)
15
30
10
N
450
Integrati
on
MTT
FSO
1051
Battle Dressing
Stations Operations
3
N
MOB-D
1203
Maint Phase
Integrated phase
Sustainment
Integration
In this example there is no need to
maintain Experience (0) and no
performance grade (N) in port. During
crew prep, the event must be scheduled,
conducted and reported once to gain an
experience level of 1 and graded for
performance (Y) prior to basic phase.
E and P scores are
dictated in the same way
as in the basic phase. P
scoring may be
conducted by different
agencies than those in
the basic phase.
In this example, throughout
sustainment, events must be
scheduled with a frequency
that maintains an E level of
10. Performance grades,
once achieved will remain
valid for 450 days.
All sub events can be
drilled for experience
independently but in
this case, for a P
grade, it must be
conducted with MOBD 1203.
Figure I 1 Example for CONUS Experience and Performance Matrix.
I-9
30 Jun 14
Figure I-1 Air Department Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
INTEGRATED
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
FRTP Requirements for Experience Reporting (Exp) and Performance Assessment (Perf) (CONUS)
Integration
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ AD Drill
450
MOB-A 1031
FSO 1051
FSO 106169
MOB-D 2085
ADTT
FSO 1092
Training Team
Assessment - ADTT
MOB-A 1007
Flight Deck CONFLAG
Mass Casualty Exercise
0
MOB-A 1011
Set FW Alert
MOB-A 1016
Launch and Recover
Aircraft
MOB-A 1031
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
90
180
90
N
E
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
5
Y
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
810
E
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
4
N
5
N
5
N
7
Y
8
N
10
14
20
14
N
810
0
N
0
N
2
Y
#
2
N
4
N
24
Y
25
N
25
N
25
N
25
15
21
15
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
20
60
20
N
810
0
N
3
N
5
Y
#
6
N
8
N
9
N
10
Y
11
N
11
N
11
15
30
14
N
1170
E
0
N
2
N
3
Y
#
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
N
1170
E
0
N
2
N
3
Y
#
4
N
5
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
E
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
E
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1016
MOB-A 1012
MOB-A 1020
MOB-A 1069
MOB-A 2026
STW 2007
STW 2010
MOB-A 1011
E
MOB-A 1011
MOB-A 2025
Recover Aircraft - Tanking
Aircraft Crash & Fire –
Flight Deck (Phase I)
MOB-A 1033
Helicopter Crash & Fire Flight Deck
MOB-A 1034
Aircraft Fire - Hangar Bay
MOB-A 1035
Aviation Fuel Station Fire
- Flight Deck
MOB-A 1036
0
Combat Flt Ops
MOB-A 1012
MOB-A 1020
N
- Hangar Bay
I-10
MOB-A 1011
MOB-A 2030
MOB-A 2031
30 Jun 14
MOB-A 1041
CDP Change - Topside
(Day)
0
N
2
N
3
Y
#
4
Y
5
N
5
Y
5
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1042
(Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1046
Status Light Failure - Day
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 1047
Status Light Failure Night
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 1051
Emergency Lower JBD
(Day)
0
N
2
N
3
Y
#
4
N
5
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 1052
Emergency Lower JBD
(Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 1056
Catapult Hangfire (Day)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 1057
Catapult Hangfire (Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1061
Rig MOVLAS - Station 1
(Day)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1062
(Day)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1063
(Day)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1066
Fuels System Casualty Pump Room
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 1068
MOB-A 2028
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1066
MOB-A 1068
MOB-A 2028
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
1170
E
MOB-A 1066
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 2028
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
5
Y
*
5
N
5
30
90
30
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
14
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
90
45
N
1170
E
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
14
N
1170
E
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
3
N
4
N
5
30
90
60
N
810
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
3
N
3
N
3
60
90
60
N
810
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 1068
Fuels System Casualty Flight Deck
Fuels System Casualty Hangar Bay
MOB-A 1069
Aircraft Refuelling.
MOB-A 1071
Rig Barricade (Day)
MOB-A 1072
Rig Barricade - LP Air
Loss (Day)
MOB-A 1073
Rig Barricade (Night)
MOB-A 2019
Helicopter NVD
Operations
MOB-A 2023
VERTREP
I-11
MOB-A 2032
E
MOB-A 2033
E
E
MOB-A 1011
30 Jun 14
MOB-A 2027
Recover Man Overboard Helo
FSO 2033
MOB-N 2005
MOB-S 2000
CCC 1091
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
3
N
4
N
5
60
90
60
N
1170
Fuels System Casualty Filter Room
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 2029
Advanced Arrestor Gear Recovery Control Station
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
3
N
4
Y
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
14
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1016
MOB-A 2030
Flight Deck (Phase II)
0
N
3
N
4
Y
#
5
N
6
N
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1031
MOB-A 2031
MOB-A 2031
Flight Deck (Phase III)
0
N
3
N
4
Y
#
5
N
6
N
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1031
MOB-A 2030
MOB-A 2032
CDP Change - Below
Decks (Day)
0
N
2
N
3
Y
#
4
Y
5
N
5
Y
5
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1041
MOB-A 2033
CDP Change - Below
Decks (Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
14
N
1170
MOB-A 1042
MOB-A 2034
Loss (Night)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
45
N
1170
MOB-A 2035
(Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 2036
(Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 2037
(Night)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-A 2028
I-12
E
MOB-A 1066
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 1068
30 Jun 14
Figure I-2 ATTT Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
INTEGRATED
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
Y
#
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
Integration
ATTT
FSO 1095
Training Team Assessment
- ATTT
NCO 1501
Surveillance
NCO 1502
Protest
NCO 1503
Entry Control Point
Penetration - Basic
NCO 1504
Pedestrian Carried
Improvised Explosive
Device (PCIED)
Vehicle Borne Improvised
Explosive Device (VBIED)
NCO 1505
FSO 1091
+ AT Drill
NCO 1506
Alarmed Response (In
Port)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1507
Suspicious Package (In
Port)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1508
Bomb Threat (Written /
Verbal)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1509
Active Shooter (In Port)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1510
Small Boat Probe
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1511
Small Boat Attack
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1512
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1513
Floating Object Improvised Explosive
Device (IED)
Swimmer Attack
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1515
Light Aircraft Attack
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
E
NCO 1517
Armed / Barricaded
Hostage (In Port)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
NCO 1531
Admin and Management
(ATFP)
1
Y
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
*
1
N
1
1
180
30
N
810
I-13
ASU 1031
FSO 1081
30 Jun 14
NCO 2002
Entry Control Point
Penetration - Advanced
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
NCO 2004
Alarmed Response
(Underway)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
NCO 2005
Suspicious Package
(Underway)
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
NCO 2006
Active Shooter (Underway)
NCO 2007
Armed / Barricaded
Hostage (Underway)
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
Y
*
3
N
3
90
120
90
N
810
# Performance Events not graded by ATG (for details see TAC)
* Performance Events not graded by CSG-4/15 (for details see TAC)
I-14
30 Jun 14
Figure I-3 Combat Systems (Tactical) Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
(CONUS)
INTEGRATED
CART
ULTRA
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
6
N
8
N
9
Y
14
N
19
N
20
Exp Period
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
15
30
15
N
1170
Battle E
Integration
CSTT (TACTICAL)
AAW 1001
Analyze & Plan for an AAW
Mission / Task
EW 1021
ASU 1006
INT 1011
IO 1206
AAW 1006
Direct & Manage CDC
during ADEX
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
5
Y
5
N
6
15
30
30
N
1170
AAW 1016
Initialize and
Configure/Reconfigure
Systems
0
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
27
N
30
N
30
Y
33
N
36
N
40
7
15
15
N
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
AAW 1021
Detect and Tracking
Exercise - Air Contacts
AAW 1025
Engage - ESSM/ NSSM
AAW 1026
Engage - RAM
AAW 1027
Engage - CIWS
AAW 1028
Engage - Supersonic Target
AAW 1029
Engage - Low Slow Flier
AAW 1041
Air Intercept Control - Task 1
AAW 1042
AAW 1043
E
0
N
2
N
6
N
8
N
19
N
23
N
24
Y
30
N
35
N
40
7
15
7
N
450
E
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
E
AAW 1021
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
AAW 1021
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
AAW 1021
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
AAW 1021
ASU 1031
0
N
3
N
5
N
7
N
8
N
10
Y
11
N
15
N
20
N
25
25
45
7
N
810
AAW 1042
AAW 1043
AAW 1048
0
N
3
N
5
N
7
N
8
N
10
Y
11
N
15
N
20
N
25
25
45
7
N
810
AAW 1041
AAW 1043
AAW 1048
0
N
3
N
5
N
7
N
8
N
10
Y
11
N
15
N
20
N
25
25
45
7
N
810
AAW 1041
AAW 1042
AAW 1048
I-15
E
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
2012
AAW 1021
30 Jun 14
AAW 1048
0
N
3
N
5
N
7
N
8
N
10
N
11
N
15
Y
20
N
25
25
45
7
N
810
Link 11 - Establish &
Maintain
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
30
N
36
N
40
7
15
7
N
810
AAW 1072
Link 11 - Intrusion &
Jamming
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
N
810
AAW 1076
Maintain
0
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
30
N
36
N
40
7
15
7
N
810
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
5
Y
5
N
6
15
30
60
N
810
AAW 1071
AAW 1081
Link Multi Tadil - Establish
& Maintain
AAW 1041
AAW 1042
AAW 1043
E
AAW 2011
Engage - CIWS (PHALANX)
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
90
30
N
1170
AAW 2012
Engage – Stream Raid for
ASMD
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
7
N
9
Y
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
30
90
30
N
1170
AAW 1021
AAW 2014
Admin & Management
(AAW)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
60
180
60
N
1170
FSO 1081
0
N
1
N
2
N
4
Y
7
N
8
N
9
Y
13
Y
15
N
18
15
30
15
N
1170
ASU 1001
Analyze & Plan ASU Mission
ASU 1006
Direct & Manage CDC
During ASU-EX
ASU 1016
ASU 1021
ASU 1025
ASU 1042
EW 1021
AAW 1006
INT 1011
IO 1206
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
30
60
60
N
450
0
N
2
N
5
N
8
Y
26
N
29
N
30
Y
33
N
36
N
40
7
15
10
N
450
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
0
N
2
N
4
N
6
Y
17
N
20
N
24
Y
30
N
33
N
40
7
15
7
N
450
ASU 1031
ASU 1044
0
N
0
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
8
N
9
N
14
Y
20
N
25
15
30
7
N
1170
ASU 1021
ASU 1042
AAW 1021
0
N
0
N
2
N
3
N
5
N
6
Y
7
N
12
N
17
N
20
30
45
45
N
1170
ASU 1025
OTH - Surveillance
/Search/Detect
ASU Aircraft Control - Task
1
AAW 1021
0
Initialize - Configure &
Reconfigure Equipment
Detect, Track and Classify Surface Contacts
E
I-16
30 Jun 14
ASU 1044
ASU 2010
SLEDGEHAMMER
(ASU)
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
5
Y
5
N
6
30
45
45
N
450
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
60
180
60
N
450
ASW 1001
Analyse & Plan for ASW
Mission/Task
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
Y
3
Y
4
N
4
N
6
30
90
30
N
1170
ASW 1007
Underwater communications
Check.
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
1170
ASW 1016
Initialize, Configure &
0
N
2
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
Y
3
Y
4
N
4
N
4
25
45
10
N
1170
ASW 1021
Passive Trackex
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
Y
3
N
3
Y
4
N
5
N
6
N
6
30
90
30
N
1170
ASW 1025
Advanced ASW exercise
with Air, Surf and Subsurface units
ASW 1031
ASW 1053
ASW 1061
ASW 1062
ASW 1063
ASW 2000
ASW 2002
E
ASU 1021
FSO 1081
E
ASW 1061
ASW 1062
ASW 1053
MOB-N
1325
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
20
Y
35
N
35
60
360
60
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
3
Y
4
Y
5
N
6
N
6
25
45
30
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
3
Y
5
N
5
N
6
30
90
30
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
2
N
2
35
90
45
N
1170
E
ASW 1025
MOB-N
1325
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
4
35
90
60
N
810
E
ASW 1025
ASW 1063
MOB-N
1325
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
35
90
60
Y
810
E
ASW 1062
ASW 1025
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
Y
3
N
4
N
4
N
5
30
90
30
N
1170
FSO 1081
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
6
30
60
30
N
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
ASW Aircraft Control
Passive Trackex (MH60R)
Evade / Avoid / Deceive Submarines
Evade / Avoid / Deceive Torpedoes
ASW 1021
Stream NIXIE
(ASW)
Equipment Casualty Control
(CV-TSC)
ASW 2009
Sub Familiarization
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
1
720
1
N
1170
ASW 2010
ASW co-operation with
Inorganic Aircraft
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
2
N
2
360
720
180
N
1170
ASW 1025
EW 1008
Configure and operate JTT
and GALE for OPELINT
Search (Condition III)
0
N
2
N
4
N
6
Y
7
N
8
N
10
N
12
N
14
N
14
15
30
15
Y
1170
EW 1021
I-17
30 Jun 14
EW 1016
EW 1021
EW 1036
EW 1037
Initialize and Configure /
Reconfigure ES System
(Condition III)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
Y
1170
Prosecute ES Contacts Detect, Track and Classify
(Condition III)
0
N
0
N
0
N
4
Y
5
N
6
Y
8
N
10
N
12
N
12
30
60
30
Y
1170
E
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
4
Y
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
N
1170
E
MOB-N
1327
Passive operations
Electronic Intercept
Coordination with Aircraft
EW 1041
EA Operations (Condition III)
EW 1042
BDA (Condition III)
EW 1046
Counter Targeting
(Condition III)
EW 1052
Emissions Control Settings
and Modifications - Alpha
(Condition III)
EW 1053
EW 1054
EW 1055
EW 1057
EW 2000
EW 2001
EW 2002
and Modifications - Bravo
(Condition III)
and Modifications - Charlie
(Condition III)
and Modifications - Delta
(Condition III)
and Modifications Extended Operations
(Condition III)
(EW)
(Condition III)
(Condition I)
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
1041
1042
1043
1048
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
4
N
5
Y
6
N
6
90
180
90
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
4
N
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
N
1170
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
4
Y
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
90
180
90
N
1170
0
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
4
N
4
N
5
Y
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
4
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
6
N
6
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
2
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
6
Y
6
N
7
N
8
N
8
90
180
15
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
90
180
90
N
1170
FSO 1081
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
5
N
6
Y
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
I-18
30 Jun 14
EW 2003
EW 2004
EW 2005
EW 2006
EW 2009
EW 2010
EW 2011
EW 2012
(Condition I)
0
N
0
N
0
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
8
Y
10
N
12
N
12
30
60
30
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
4
Y
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
N
1170
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
4
Y
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
90
180
90
N
1170
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
45
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
Y
5
Y
7
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
30
N
1170
CCC 1011
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
7
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ CS Drill
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
E
Maritime Surveillance
Exercise
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
4
N
5
Y
5
N
6
N
8
N
10
10
20
10
Y
450
E
Intel Support to Force
Protection
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
4
N
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
4
N
5
Y
5
N
6
Y
8
N
10
10
20
10
N
450
E
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
E
EA Operations (Condition I)
BDA (Condition I)
Counter Targeting
(Condition I)
(Condition I)
(Condition I)
(Condition I)
(Condition I)
FSO 1036
SAREX
FSO 2045
- CSTT (Tactical)
INT 1011
OPINTEL Exercise
INT 1012
INT 1025
INT 1031
INT 1032
Intel Briefs
Intel Collection and
Reporting
I-19
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
EW 1021
30 Jun 14
INT 2000
(INT)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
FSO 1081
INT 2001
Intel Team Training (SETT,
AIDTT and FATT)
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
Y
3
N
3
30
60
30
N
1170
INT 1011
INT 1032
Intel support to Strike
operations
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
Y
3
N
3
30
60
30
N
1170
Intel support to ADC (and
other warfare commanders)
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
Y
3
N
3
30
60
30
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
Y
3
N
3
30
60
30
N
1170
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
5
N
5
90
180
90
N
1170
FSO 1081
EW 1021
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
INT 1011
INT 2002
INT 2003
INT 2004
IO 1201
IO 1206
Intel support to DESRON
(SSES)
All-Source Cryptology
Fusion and Analysis
(Condition III)
0
N
0
N
0
N
4
N
7
N
8
Y
12
N
16
Y
20
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
Configure Cryptology
systems and support
systems (Condition III)
0
N
2
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
CRITIC handling (Condition
III)
0
N
4
N
4
N
6
Y
7
N
8
N
10
Y
12
N
14
N
14
45
90
45
N
1170
IO 2013
Cryptology Afloat Messages
(Condition III)
0
N
4
N
8
N
12
Y
15
N
16
N
20
Y
22
N
25
N
25
15
30
15
Y
1170
IO 1206
IO 2014
Cryptology Casualty Control
(Condition III)
IO 1211
IO 1212
E
IO 1206
0
N
2
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
5
Y
6
N
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
1170
IO 1206
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
0
N
0
N
5
N
8
N
10
N
12
Y
15
N
17
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
N
1170
IO 1206
IO 2015
DF Operations (Condition III)
IO 2016
Fusion and Analysis
(Condition I)
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
N
1170
EW 1021
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
INT 1011
CRITIC Handling (Condition
I)
0
N
2
N
4
N
6
Y
7
N
8
Y
10
Y
12
N
14
N
14
45
90
45
N
1170
IO 2016
(Condition I)
0
N
2
N
5
N
6
Y
7
N
8
N
10
N
12
N
15
N
15
15
30
15
N
1170
IO 2016
IO 2017
IO 2018
I-20
30 Jun 14
IO 2019
IO 2020
IO 2021
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
5
Y
6
N
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
1170
IO 2016
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
0
N
0
N
0
N
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
N
1170
IO 2016
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
N
1170
DF Operations (Condition I)
systems and support
systems (Condition I)
MOB-A
1006
(Aviation)
0
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
28
N
30
Y
30
N
36
N
38
N
40
7
15
7
N
1170
MOB-A
1018
Air Traffic Control - Flight
Operations
0
N
0
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
4
N
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
30
90
30
N
1170
E
MOB-A
1016
MOB-A
2026
Aircraft Emergencies
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
3
N
3
N
3
90
360
90
N
1170
E
MOB-A
1011
MOS 1001
Maintain Cultural Awareness
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
1
90
360
90
N
1170
MOS 2000
MOS 2000
Naval Diplomatic Presence
operation/exercise
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
90
180
90
N
1170
MOS 1001
CCC 2015
STW 1001
Analyse and Plan STW
Mission/Task
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
4
Y
5
N
6
30
60
30
N
810
I-21
FSO 1081
30 Jun 14
Figure I-4 Combat Systems (Technical) Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
INTEGRATED
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
VHF LOS Comms System
- Establish and Maintain
Secure Communications
0
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
6
Y
8
N
10
N
12
N
14
15
30
15
Y
450
CCC 1021
HF Comms System Secure DATA/TTY
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
5
Y
6
Y
8
N
10
N
12
15
45
30
Y
450
CCC 1022
HF Comms system Secure voice
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
N
5
Y
6
Y
8
N
10
N
12
15
45
30
Y
1170
CCC 1023
HF Comms system - Non
secure voice
0
N
1
Y
2
N
4
Y
6
N
10
N
14
N
18
N
20
N
22
15
45
30
Y
1170
CCC 1024
HF Comms System - Link
11 Data
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
8
N
10
15
45
30
Y
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
Y
6
N
8
N
10
30
60
30
Y
1170
UHF LOS Comms system
- Secure data/TTY
0
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
8
N
10
Y
12
Y
14
N
16
N
18
15
30
15
Y
450
- Secure voice
0
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
6
N
8
Y
10
N
12
N
14
N
16
15
30
15
Y
450
0
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
6
N
10
Y
14
N
18
N
20
N
22
15
30
15
Y
450
UHF LOS Comms System
- Have Quick (HQ)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
5
Y
6
N
8
N
10
30
60
30
N
1170
E
- Link 11 Data
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
4
N
6
N
8
Y
10
Y
12
N
16
15
30
15
N
1170
E
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
6
N
8
N
9
N
10
15
30
15
Y
1170
E
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
CSTT (Technical)
CCC 1011
CCC 1025
CCC 1031
CCC 1032
CCC 1033
CCC 1034
CCC 1035
CCC 1036
11 Fast Frequency
Change
- Non-Secure voice
- Link 11 Fast Frequency
Change
I-22
Integration
30 Jun 14
CCC 1037
- Link 16 Data
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
4
N
6
Y
8
Y
10
Y
12
N
16
15
30
15
Y
1170
UHF Sat Comms DAMA
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
8
N
12
N
16
N
18
N
22
N
24
15
30
15
N
450
CCC 1042
UHF Sat Comms System
- Non-DAMA ANDVT
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
4
N
6
Y
12
Y
14
N
16
N
18
15
30
15
Y
450
CCC 1043
- KY-58 FM VINSON
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
6
Y
12
Y
14
N
16
N
18
15
30
15
Y
450
CCC 1044
- SATCOM Fleet
Broadcast (NOVEMBER)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
4
N
6
N
12
N
16
N
18
N
18
15
30
15
Y
450
- Link 16 Operations
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
6
Y
10
Y
14
Y
18
N
20
15
30
15
Y
450
EHF Comms System Establish and Maintain
EHF Secure Voice/Data
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
5
N
6
N
8
N
10
15
45
15
N
1170
SHF Comms System Establish and Maintain
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
5
N
6
Y
8
N
10
N
14
N
18
15
30
15
N
450
E
CCC 1061
Analyze & Develop a
Comm Plan
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
6
30
60
30
Y
810
E
CCC 1066
Network System and
Server Administration.
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
N
6
N
10
N
14
N
20
7
15
7
N
1170
CCC 1071
Emergency Destruction
(EAP)
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
2
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
450
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
6
N
8
N
12
N
18
15
30
15
Y
450
1
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
6
N
8
N
10
N
16
N
20
7
15
7
N
1170
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
N
6
N
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
N
810
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
N
6
N
10
N
14
N
20
7
15
7
N
810
1
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
N
6
N
10
N
14
N
20
7
15
7
Y
450
CCC 1041
CCC 1047
CCC 1051
CCC 1056
CCC 1072
Message Processing
CCC 1091
Information Control INFOCON / RIVERCITY
CCC 1096
E
MOB-S
1252
OTAT / OTAR
CCC 1088
CCC 1092
E
Information Security Intrusion
Countermeasures
Information Assurance Computer Network
Defense (CND) System
Administration
I-23
MOB-D
1203
30 Jun 14
CCC 1122
CCC 2006
CCC 2012
CCC 2013
CCC 2014
CCC 2015
CCC 2017
CCC 2019
(CSRO)
Fleet Synthetic Warfare
Training (FST) system set up & configuration
5 KHZ (if fitted)
Combined Enterprise
Regional Information
System (CENTRIX)
Portable Radio Checks
VHF Portable
Communications
FSO 1093
Training Team
Assessment - CSTT
(Technical)
Hazards from EM
Radiation (HERO, HERP,
HERF)
NCO 1022
1
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
2
N
4
N
5
N
6
45
180
45
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
3
N
3
N
3
120
240
60
N
810
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
N
8
N
10
N
14
N
18
15
30
15
N
450
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
4
Y
4
N
6
N
8
N
10
30
60
30
Y
450
E
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
5
Y
6
N
8
N
10
N
10
15
30
15
N
810
E
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
4
N
6
Y
7
N
8
N
9
N
10
30
60
30
N
810
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
90
180
60
N
1170
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
3
N
3
90
180
60
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
8
N
9
N
10
30
60
30
N
810
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
7
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ CS drill
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
1
180
1
N
450
STW 2010
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
4
N
5
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
AAW 1006
AAW 1021
ASU 1006
ASU 1021
SCI RF Communications.
SCI Network Operations.
NCO 1021
N
Information Assurance Administration/Policy
CCC 2021
FSO 2011
0
Control Combat Systems
Casualty - Electronics
Spaces Preparation for
Battle Readiness
Casualty - Class C Fire in
Electrical Space
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
5
N
6
I-24
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
IO 1206
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
30 Jun 14
NCO 1023
NCO 1024
NCO 1025
NCO 1026
NCO 1027
NCO 1028
NCO 1029
NCO 1031
NCO 1034
NCO 1035
Casualty - Equipment
Casualty Repair
Casualty - Use Electronic
Casualty Control Folder
Casualty - Draw
Emergency Electronic
Spare Parts
Casualty - Use of
Alternate Power
Casualty - Performance of
Casualty Control
Organization/Electronic
Casualty
Control/Electronic
systems spaces
Casualty - Provide
Assistance to Remote
Spaces
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
5
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
E
Casualty - Investigating &
Reporting
Casualty - Provide
Equipment Casualty
Repair During Loss of
Lighting
Casualty - Secondary
Electronics Casualty
Control
Casualty - Electronic
Cooling/Chill Water
Casualty
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
5
N
6
I-25
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
E
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
30 Jun 14
Figure I-5 Damage Control Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
INTEGRATED
CART
ULTRA
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Exp Period
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
Integration
DCTT
FSO 1094
- DCTT
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ DC Drill
MOB-D
1202
(Damage Control)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
30
180
30
N
1170
FSO 1081
MOB-D
1203
MOB-D
1204
Manning Battle Stations
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
16
N
17
Y
18
N
18
N
18
N
20
10
20
14
N
1170
Relief of Vital Station DCRS
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-D
1205
Emergency Interior
Communications (Condition
I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
6
N
7
Y
8
N
8
N
8
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-D
1211
Set ZEBRA (Condition 1)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
6
N
7
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
14
N
1170
E
MOB-D
1212
Set YOKE (Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
6
N
7
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
14
N
1170
E
MOB-D
1214
Set CIRCLE WILLIAM MOPP LEVEL IV
(Condition I)
Fire - Class A (Condition I)
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
1
180
1
N
1170
MOB-D
1221
0
MOB-D
1222
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
E
MOB-D 2000
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
E
MOB-D 2000
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
Fire - Class B - outside
engineering spaces
(Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
I-26
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
MOB-D 1203
30 Jun 14
MOB-D
1223
Fire - Class C (Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
15
30
14
N
450
E
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
45
N
1170
E
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
4
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
14
30
14
N
1170
E
MOB-D 2000
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
MOB-D
1225
Fire - Main Space (JP-5
Pump room - (Condition I)
MOB-D
1231
Flooding - Underwater Hull
Damage (Condition I)
MOB-D
1232
Flooding - Isolation / Pipe
Patching (Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
14
30
14
N
450
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D
1233
Flooding - Plugging
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
30
45
15
N
1170
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D
1234
Structural Damage Shoring (Condition I)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
30
45
15
N
1170
MOB-D
1235
Flooding - outside main
space (Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
6
30
45
15
N
1170
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D
1236
space (Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
21
N
450
MOB-D 2078
MOB-D
1237
Flooding - Main Space
(Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
21
N
1170
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D
1238
Flooding - Magazine
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
30
N
1170
MOB-D 2091
MOB-D
1241
Mitigate Effects of CBRNE
(Condition I)
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
N
1170
MOB-D
1253
Total Ship Survivability
Exercise (TSSE) (Condition
I)
E
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
1170
E
E
MOB-D
1255
Casualty Power (Condition
I)
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
30
N
1170
MOB-D
1261
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Gas (Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
N
1170
MOB-D
1262
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Spill (Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2000
Gas Free Checks
(Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
Y
10
N
11
Y
11
N
12
N
12
N
13
14
45
14
N
450
I-27
MOB-D 1232
MOB-D 1233
MOB-D 1234
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D 2092
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
30 Jun 14
MOB-D
2001
Fire Fighting - Direct Attack
(Condition I)
MOB-D
2004
Fire Fighting - Indirect
Attack through cut access
(Condition I)
MOB-D
2005
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
Y
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
30
45
15
N
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
30
15
N
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
Fire Fighting - Fog Attack
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
30
15
N
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
MOB-D
2006
De-smoking - RAM fan
(Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
Y
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
45
15
N
450
E
MOB-D
2007
De-smoking - BOX fan
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
45
15
N
450
E
MOB-D
2008
De-smoking - Installed
Ventilation (Condition I)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
60
15
N
450
E
MOB-D
2010
Pipe Patching - Soft Patch
(Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
30
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2011
Pipe Patching - EWARP
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
45
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2012
Pipe Patching - Banding
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
45
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2013
Pipe Patching - Jubilee clip
(Condition I)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
7
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
11
15
45
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2014
Ship's Damage Stability
Calculations (Condition I)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
30
60
30
N
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-D
2036
Fire - Class A (Condition II)
450
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2056
MOB-D 2058
MOB-D 2060
MOB-D 2044
1170
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D 2059
MOB-D 2061
MOB-D 2045
0
MOB-D
2037
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
25
45
14
N
Fire - Class A (In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
I-28
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
N
30 Jun 14
MOB-D
2038
engineering spaces
(Condition II)
0
MOB-D
2039
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
45
14
N
450
1170
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D 2059
MOB-D 2061
MOB-D 2045
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
N
450
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2056
MOB-D 2058
MOB-D 2060
MOB-D 2044
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D 2059
MOB-D 2061
MOB-D 2045
Fire - Class C (Condition II)
0
MOB-D
2041
1
engineering spaces (In
Port)
4
MOB-D
2040
N
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2056
MOB-D 2058
MOB-D 2060
MOB-D 2044
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
45
14
N
Fire - Class C (In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2042
Pump Space) (Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
3
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
45
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2043
Fire - Main Space(JP-5
Pump Space) (In Port)
2
N*
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2044
Gas Free Checks
(Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
6
N
7
N
8
Y
8
N
8
N
9
14
60
14
N
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
MOB-D
2045
Gas Free Checks (In Port)
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
14
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
MOB-D
2046
(Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
6
N
7
N
8
Y
8
N
8
N
9
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
MOB-D
2047
(In Port)
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
15
120
15
N
1170
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
MOB-D
2052
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
8
N
8
N
9
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
I-29
30 Jun 14
MOB-D
2053
(In Port)
MOB-D
2054
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
15
120
15
N
1170
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
6
N
7
Y
8
N
8
N
8
N
9
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
MOB-D
2055
(In Port)
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
15
120
15
N
450
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
MOB-D
2056
(Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
7
N
8
Y
8
N
8
N
8
N
9
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D
2057
De-smoking - RAM fan (In
Port)
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
15
120
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2058
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
8
N
8
N
9
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D
2059
procedure (In Port)
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
15
120
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2060
Ventilation (Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
6
N
7
N
8
Y
8
N
8
N
9
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D
2061
Ventilation (In Port)
6
N*
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
N
7
15
120
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2062
Patching (Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
N
450
MOB-D 2064
MOB-D 2066
MOB-D 2068
MOB-D 2070
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D 2065
MOB-D 2067
MOB-D 2069
MOB-D 2071
MOB-D
2063
Patching (In Port)
MOB-D
2064
(Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2065
(In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2066
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2067
(In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2068
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2069
Pipe Patching - Banding (In
Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2070
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2071
(In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
N
1170
I-30
30 Jun 14
MOB-D
2072
Flooding - Plugging
(Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2073
Flooding - Plugging (In
Port)
3
N*
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2074
Structural Damage Shoring (Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2075
space (In Port)
3
N*
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2076
(Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
60
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2077
Flooding - Magazine
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
60
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2078
Calculations (Condition II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
60
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2081
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Gas (In Port)
2
N*
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2082
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Spill (In Port)
2
N*
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2083
Emergency Interior
II)
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
6
N
7
Y
8
N
8
N
8
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
MOB-D
2084
Emergency Interior
Communications (In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2085
DC Support for incidents
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
45
14
N
450
MOB-A 1007
MOB-D 2057
FSO 1056
2
N*
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
9
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
MOB-D
2086
Fire Fighting - co-ordination
with outside activities (In
Port)
MOB-D
2087
Structural Damage Shoring (In Port)
4
N*
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
N
1170
MOB-D
2088
(In Port)
2
N*
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
9
120
30
N
1170
MOB-A 1007
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D
2092
Relief of Vital Station - DC
Central
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
1170
MOB-D 1253
I-31
30 Jun 14
Figure I-6 Engineering Department Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
INTEGRATED
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
Integration
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
#
8
N
9
Y
#
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ Eng Drill
1
N
1
Y#
1
N
2
Y
#
3
N
3
Y
#
3
N
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
60
N
450
FSO 1081
0
N
2
Y#
3
N
4
Y
#
15
N
20
Y
#
20
N
20
N
20
N
20
7
30
7
N
1170
0
N
2
Y#
2
N
3
Y
#
4
N
5
Y
#
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
7
30
7
N
1170
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
10
Y
#
10
N
10
N
10
N
10
7
30
7
N
1170
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
15
Y
#
15
N
15
N
15
N
15
7
30
7
N
1170
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
15
Y
#
15
N
15
N
15
N
15
7
30
7
N
1170
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
9
N
10
Y
#
10
N
10
N
10
N
10
7
30
7
N
1170
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
ETT
FSO 2010
MOB-E 2000
MOB-E 2009
MOB-E 2011
MOB-E 2013
MOB-E 2014
MOB-E 2015
MOB-E 2016
Training Team
Assessment - ETT
Admin and
Management (NonNuclear Engineering)
Steering Gear - Loss
of Steering (Condition
III)
Air Conditioning
System - Clean
Strainer
HPAC/LPAC - Align
and Start
Air Conditioning
System -align/place in
operation
Refrigeration - Ship's
Service align/place in
operation
Lube Oil - Draw
sample
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
MOB-E 2024
MOB-E 2017
Eductor - align/ place
in operation /secure
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
9
N
10
Y
#
10
N
10
N
10
N
10
7
30
7
N
1170
MOB-E 2018
MVHC Station inspect / operate
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
9
N
10
Y
#
10
N
10
N
10
N
10
7
30
7
N
1170
MOB-E 2019
Steering Gear - Align
and Start
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
15
Y
#
15
N
15
N
15
N
15
7
30
7
N
1170
E
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
15
Y
#
15
N
15
N
15
N
15
7
30
7
N
1170
E
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
15
Y
#
15
N
15
N
15
N
15
7
30
7
N
1170
E
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2020
MOB-N 1341
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
Steering Gear - Shift
Steering Unit
(Emergency) - Align
and Start
I-32
30 Jun 14
MOB-E 2022
Fire/Flushing Pump Align/Start/Stop
MOB-E 2023
Fire/Flushing Pump Start and Stop
remotely
Lube Oil - Sample
evaluation
MOB-E 2024
MOB-E 2025
Steering Gear - Loss
of Steering (Condition
I)
0
N
2
Y#
3
N
4
Y
#
5
N
5
Y
#
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
7
30
7
N
1170
MOB-E 2023
0
N
2
Y#
3
N
4
Y
#
5
N
5
Y
#
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
7
30
7
N
1170
MOB-E 2022
0
N
3
Y#
4
N
5
Y
#
10
N
10
Y
#
10
N
10
N
10
N
10
7
30
7
N
1170
MOB-E 2016
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
4
N
5
Y
#
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
60
15
N
1170
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
I-33
30 Jun 14
Figure I-7 Integrated Training Team Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
E
P
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
E
P
FDC
E
P
CART
ULTRA
E
E
P
P
INTEGRATED
TSTA
E
P
FEP
E
C2X
P
E
JTFX
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Exp Period
Learn
Maint
Deg
Perf
MITE
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
Integration
ITT
FSO 1081
Develop Training Plans
and Programs
0
FSO 1091
N
1
N
5
N
8
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
MOB-A 1006
NCO 1531
AAW 2014
ASU 2010
ASW 2000
EW 2000
FSO 2016
INT 2000
IO 1201
MOB-D 1202
MOB-E 2000
FSO 2000
MOB-S 1406
MOB-N 2010
NCO 2003
FSO 1092
FSO 1095
FSO 2045
FSO 1093
FSO 1094
FSO 2010
FSO 1096
FSO 2002
FSO 1097
FSO 1098
Training Team
Assessment - ITT
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 2005
Admin & Management
(Religious Ministry Team)
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
N
1170
FSO 2033
Manoverboard - Muster
Personnel
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
810
I-34
MOB-N 2005
MOB-S 2000
MOB-A 2027
30 Jun 14
Figure I-8 Medical Department Sub-Events (CONUS)
BASIC PHASE
INTEGRATED
Battle E
MAINT PHASE
Integration
FSO 1051
Battle Dressing Stations
Operations
0
N
1
Y
3
N
6
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
15
30
10
N
450
E
MOB-D
1203
FSO 1053
Medical Response Team Dual Response
1
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
4
N
5
Y
5
Y
5
N
5
N
6
15
30
15
N
450
E
FSO 1056
Mass Casualty
0
N
0
N
1
Y
3
N
4
N
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
30
90
30
N
450
E
1
N
1
Y
1
N
3
Y
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
10
N
450
E
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
Basic First Aid - Abdominal
Wound (Stretcher Bearers)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
Basic First Aid - Amputation
(Stretcher Bearers)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
Basic First Aid - Facial
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
Basic First Aid - Electrical
Shock (Stretcher Bearers)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
15
30
10
N
450
E
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Exp Period
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
MTT
FSO 1061
FSO 1062
FSO 1063
FSO 1064
FSO 1065
FSO 1066
FSO 1067
FSO 1068
FSO 1069
Casualty Transport
Basic First Aid - Compound
Fracture (Stretcher
Bearers)
Basic First Aid - Sucking
Chest Wound (Stretcher
Bearers)
Basic First Aid - Smoke
Inhalation (Stretcher
Bearers)
Basic First Aid - Burns
(Stretcher Bearers)
FSO 1096
- MTT
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 2000
(Medical)
1
Y
1
Y
3
N
3
Y
3
N
3
N
3
N
4
N
4
N
5
30
90
30
N
1170
I-35
FSO 106169
FSO 203441
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1056
MOB-A
1007
FSO 1091
+ Med Drill
FSO 1081
30 Jun 14
FSO 2034
Fracture (Dept Medical
Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
Chest Wound (Dept
Medical Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
Wound (Dept Medical
Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
FSO 2037
(Dept Medical Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
FSO 2038
Wound (Dept Medical
Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
Shock (Dept Medical
Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
Inhalation (Dept Medical
Response)
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
FSO 2041
1
N
1
Y
2
Y
4
Y
7
N
8
Y
8
N
9
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
N
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
FSO 2047
Relief of Vital Station -Main
Medical
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
1170
MOB-D
1253
FSO 2035
FSO 2036
FSO 2039
FSO 2040
I-36
30 Jun 14
Figure I-9 Deck Department Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
INTEGRATED
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
Exp Period
Perf
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
0
N
1
Y
2
N
5
N
5
N
9
Y
9
N
11
N
13
N
15
30
60
30
N
450
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
30
N
1170
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
Integration
SNTT (DECK)
FSO 2002
MOB-S 1151
Training Team
Assessment - SNTT
(Deck)
Small Boat Operations day
FSO 1091
+ Deck Drill
MOB-S 1203
Prepare Ship for Heavy
Weather
MOB-S
1252
Abandon Ship
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
180
360
90
N
1170
CCC 1071
MOB-S 1406
(Seamanship)
0
N
1
Y
2
N
3
Y
4
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
25
45
30
N
1170
FSO 1081
MOB-S 1411
Get underway/Moor Pierside
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
8
N
10
N
12
90
180
30
N
1170
MOB-N
1326
MOB-S 1416
Anchoring Operations
0
N
1
Y
3
N
5
N
5
N
7
Y
7
N
8
N
8
N
8
90
180
90
N
1170
E
MOB-N
1351
MOB-S 1422
RAS
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
5
Y
5
N
6
N
6
N
6
90
180
30
N
1170
E
MOB-S
1424
MOB-S 1424
Emergency Breakaway RAS
0
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
4
N
6
Y
6
N
7
N
7
N
7
90
180
30
N
1170
E
MOB-S
1422
MOB-S 1426
FAS Receive - Double
Probe
0
N
1
N
2
N
4
N
4
N
7
Y
7
N
8
N
8
N
8
90
180
30
N
1170
E
MOB-S
1422
MOB-S 1431
FAS Deliver
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
N
3
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
5
90
540
90
N
1170
MOB-S 2000
Recover Man Overboard Boat (Day)
MOB-S 2001
MOB-S 2002
0
N
2
Y
3
N
5
N
5
N
7
Y
7
N
8
N
8
N
8
30
90
30
N
1170
0
N
2
Y
3
N
5
N
5
N
7
Y
7
N
8
N
8
N
8
30
90
30
N
1170
0
N
1
Y
2
N
5
N
5
N
9
Y
9
N
11
N
13
N
15
30
60
30
N
450
Recover Man Overboard Boat (Night)
Small Boat Operations night
I-37
MOB-S
1422
E
MOB-N
2005
FSO 2033
MOB-A
2027 CCC
1091
MOB-N
2005
FSO 2033
MOB-A
2027
CCC1091
30 Jun 14
Figure I-10 Navigation Department Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
E
P
E
P
E
INTEGRATED
CART
ULTRA
TSTA
FEP
C2X
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
JTFX
Exp Period
Perf
P
Exp
Level
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
Integration
SNTT (BRIDGE)
FSO 1097
- SNTT (Nav)
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
8
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ Bridge Drill
FSO 2046
Relief of Vital Station Bridge
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
N
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-A 1017
Launch and Recover Aircraft
- Restricted Waters
Inadvertent Entry to
Restricted Visibility at Flight
Quarters
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
4
Y
5
N
5
15
21
15
N
810
MOB-A 1016
MOB-N 2003
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
N
4
N
4
60
180
60
N
810
MOB-N 1314
MOB-A 1016
0
N
1
Y
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
45
30
N
1170
MOB-A 2025
MOB-N 1301
Plan Navigation
MOB-N 1311
Piloting Exercise.
MOB-N 1313
System Casualty - Loss of
Gyro
MOB-N 1314
Pilotage - Low Visibility.
MOB-N 1315
Pilotage - Mine Swept
Channel.
MOB-N 1325
Conn the Ship - Tactical
Manoeuvres
E
MOB-N 1313
MOB-N 2007
MOB-N 2008
MOB-N 2009
MOB-S 1411
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
2
N
4
Y
4
N
5
N
5
N
5
15
90
30
N
1170
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
60
N
450
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
60
N
1170
E
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
1
180
1
N
1170
E
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
N
4
30
45
30
N
1170
ASW
ASW
ASW
ASW
0
N
1
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
N
1170
MOB-S 1422
MOB-S 1424
EW 1036
MOB-N 1311
MOB-A 2025
1025,
1061,
1062,
1063,
MOB-N 1326
Conn the Ship - Along Side
MOB-N 1327
Conn the Ship - EMCON
Restricted Environment
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
3
N
3
90
180
90
N
1170
MOB-N 1341
Steering
0
N
2
Y
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
Y
5
N
5
N
5
25
45
7
N
810
E
MOB-E 2009
MOB-E 2025
MOB-N 2004
0
N
1
Y
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
45
N
1170
E
MOB-S 1416
MOB-N 1351
Precision Anchorage
I-38
30 Jun 14
MOB-N 1356
Visual Signalling
Communications
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
6
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
N
810
MOB-N 2002
Navigation, Seamanship
and Shiphandling Trainer
0
N
2
Y#
2
N
2
N
8
N
8
N
8
N
8
N
8
N
8
30
360
30
N
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 1314
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
N
2
Y
3
N
3
N
3
60
180
60
N
1170
MOB-A 1017
0
N
0
N
0
N
1
Y
1
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
7
N
1170
MOB-N 1314
Manoverboard - Bridge
manoeuvring
0
N
1
Y
2
N
2
N
5
N
6
Y
6
N
6
N
6
N
6
10
30
15
N
1170
MOB-S 2000
FSO 2033
MOB-A 2027
MOB-N 2007
Display
0
N
2
Y
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
25
45
7
N
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 2008
VMS
0
N
2
Y
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
25
45
7
N
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 2009
Sensor
0
N
2
Y
2
N
3
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
N
5
N
5
N
5
25
45
7
N
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 2010
(Navigation)
0
N
1
Y
3
N
4
Y
4
N
4
Y
4
N
4
N
4
N
4
30
90
30
N
1170
FSO 1081
MOB-N 2003
MOB-N 2004
MOB-N 2005
Conn the Ship –
Constrained Flight Ops
Area
System Casualty - Steering
Engine
I-39
30 Jun 14
Figure I-11 Weapons Department Sub-Events (CONUS)
MAINT PHASE
Sub Event
TITLE
In Port
BASIC PHASE
Crew Prep
FDC
CART
ULTRA
(CONUS)
INTEGRATED
TSTA
FEP
C2X
JTFX
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
Integration
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Engagement with Machine
Gun
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
2
Y
3
N
5
Y
7
N
8
30
90
45
N
1170
ASW 2011
Torpedo Pre-Flight
Assembly
0
N
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
#
4
N
4
N
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
30
N
1170
FSO 1098
- WTT
0
N
1
N
3
N
4
Y
9
N
9
Y
9
N
9
N
9
N
10
10
20
10
N
1170
FSO 1091
+ Wep Drill
MOB-D 1257
Magazine Over-Temp
(Condition II)
0
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
2
N
2
Y
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
90
120
15
N
1170
MOB-D
2085
NCO 1001
Small Arms Weapons
Range
1
Y
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
1
90
30
N
810
NCO 2003
(WEPS)
0
N
1
N
1
N
2
Y
2
Y
#
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
60
180
30
N
1170
STW 2007
Weapons Assembly
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
4
N
4
N
6
Y
*
7
N
7
30
90
30
N
1170
STW 2009
Mine Assembly
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
4
N
4
N
6
Y
*
7
N
7
30
90
30
N
1170
STW 2010
Weapons
Movement/Delivery
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
2
N
4
N
4
N
6
Y
*
7
N
7
30
90
30
N
1170
Learn
Maint
Deg
MITE
Expiration
(days)
WTT
ASU 1031
I-40
ASU 1021
NCO 1511
AAW 1021
FSO 1081
30 Jun 14
Appendix II FDNF TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
1. This appendix should be referenced in conjunction with the
opening text pages of Appendix I which provides detail pertinent
to both CONUS and FDNF ships.
2. This Appendix delineates (in matrix format) the minimum
amount of training and assessments required for the FDNF
Carrier. Because of the unique operating nature, there is no
TSTA/FEP requirement for FDNF; all training requirements are a
continuum of evolutions scheduled on either a cyclic or
periodicity basis. Primary cyclic events are Crew
Certification, Core Training I and II and ULTRA-S. Nothing in
these tables prevents the Commanding Officer conducting more
training than the minimum required, if resources are available
and deemed necessary.
3. Training requirements consist of Experience ‘E’ (when
training is conducted) and Performance ‘P’ (when assessed).
Generating a training Schedule of Events (SOE) must take into
account the requirements for both ‘E’ and ‘P’.
4. The FDNF readiness levels are based on continuous
Sustainment phase readiness. However, the FDNF undergoes an
annual period of Selected Readiness Availability (SRA), during
this time the ‘E’ levels may degrade to roughly 80% of the
Sustainment requirement as described in the SRA column. The P
requirement indicated in the SRA column specifies the minimum
number of events that must be graded for P at the end of the SRA
in order to ensure that the ship is safe to return to sea for
subsequent Core Training. The ‘P’ requirement indicated in the
CORE column specifies the minimum number of events that must be
graded for ‘P’ by the end of CORE Training. CORE ‘P’ grades
will be assessed under MCO conditions. Further ‘P’ grades will
be required during ULTRA-S. ULTRA-S events should be scheduled
and conducted on an ‘as required’ basis depending on the ‘P’
periodicity (in the Operational Sustainment Column). A
Performance grade achieved during Crew Prep cannot be used to
replace the Operational Sustainment requirement for P conducted
during CORE and ULTRA-S as these events must be graded under MCO
conditions.
5. The majority of FDNF Unit Level Events will be assessed by
ATG; where not the case, it is annotated by a # in the table.
Detailed instructions regarding the use of TACs for the conduct
of training and assessments are included in App I. An example
of the FDNF matrix is explained on the next page.
II-1
30 Jun 14
1.EVENT TITLE:
Exact details of
how the event is
conducted, the
conditions to be
met and
Standard required
are found in the
applicable TAC
2. SELECTED READINESS AVAIL:
The FDNF CVN is always ready but each year the CVN
Will conduct a period of SRA when essential Maint.
Is conducted. During this time the levels of training
Experience may be sustained at a lower level than
When deployed.
Experience: In this example the experience required
To be maintained by all watch teams during SRA is 38.
At the end of the SRA the ship will undergo a period of
CT, when the ‘E’ levels will be increased to the
operational standard.
Performance: At the conclusion of SRA, the ship will
conduct Crew Cert. In this example this sub-event is
not required to be graded during crew cert.
3. CORE TRNG:
A ‘Y’ in the CORE column
indicates the sub-event must be
graded for ‘P” by the end
of CORE. CORE events shall be
Graded IAW MCO Conditions.
Performance Grades achieved
during any post SRA Crew Cert
cannot be used to satisfy CORE
Performance requirements
5. MAINTAINING READINESS:
Experience Factor:
- To increase Experience, each sub-event needs to be repeated within the Learn
Interval (7 days)
- To Maintain the experience level achieved , each sub-event must be repeated
Within the Maintain interval (15 days).
- If a sub-event is not repeated within the Maintain interval of 15 days, it will degrade
by 1 and continue to degrade every 7 days until the event is conducted and the
degradation clock is reset..
4. OPERATIONAL SUSTAINMENT:
When not in SRA, The FDNF CVN is required to maintain
The readiness specified in this column.
Experience: A min experience level of 40 must be
Maintained by all watch teams for this event.
Performance: A valid Performance score must be
Maintained at all times in order to achieve readiness.
Readiness: Readiness is calculated daily by Experience
X Performance (E X P).
6. MAINTAINING READINESS:
Performance Factor;
- In order to maintain the ‘P’ factor of readiness
The ship must ensure the P score for each
Sub-event is re-graded every 450 days. If an
Event exceeds the periodicity, the P score
Automatically degrades to zero along with the
Readiness for that sub-event. In this example,
the sub-event must be re-graded every year
during CORE and ULTRA-S.
Figure II-1 Example for FDNF Experience and Performance Requirements
II-2
30 Jun 14
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
II-3
30 Jun 14
Figure II-1 Air Department Sub-Events (FDNF)
SUSTAINMENT
Sub Event
TITLE
SRA
CORE
Exp Period
Perf
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
3
N
3
Y
3
90
180
90
450
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
FRTP Requirements for Experience Reporting (Exp) and Performance Assessment (Perf) - FDNF
Integration
ADTT
FSO 1092
Training Team
Assessment - ADTT
MOB-A 1007
Flight Deck CONFLAG
Mass Casualty Exercise
MOB-A 1011
E
Combat Flt Ops
MOB-A 1012
Set FW Alert
MOB-A 1016
Launch and Recover
Aircraft
MOB-A 1020
Recover Aircraft - Tanking
MOB-A 1031
FSO 1091
+ AD Drill
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
810
E
8
N
10
N
10
14
20
14
810
20
N
25
N
25
15
21
15
1170
3
N
3
N
3
20
60
20
810
9
N
11
N
11
15
30
14
1170
E
Helicopter Crash & Fire Flight Deck
MOB-A 1034
Aircraft Fire - Hangar Bay
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
1170
E
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1035
- Flight Deck
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
E
E
E
MOB-A 1011
MOB-A 2025
MOB-A 1011
MOB-A 1036
- Hangar Bay
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1041
(Day)
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1042
(Night)
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1046
Status Light Failure - Day
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1047
Status Light Failure Night
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1051
Emergency Lower JBD
(Day)
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1052
Emergency Lower JBD
(Night)
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1056
Catapult Hangfire (Day)
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1057
Catapult Hangfire (Night)
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1061
(Day)
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1062
(Day)
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
1170
E
II-4
MOB-A 1016
MOB-A 1012
MOB-A 1020
MOB-A 1069
MOB-A 2026
STW 2007
STW 2010
MOB-A 1011
Flight Deck (Phase I)
MOB-A 1033
MOB-A 1031
FSO 1051
FSO 1061-69
MOB-D 2085
MOB-A 2030
MOB-A 2031
MOB-A 2032
E
E
E
MOB-A 2033
30 Jun 14
MOB-A 1063
(Day)
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1066
Fuels System Casualty Pump Room
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 1068
MOB-A 2028
Fuels System Casualty Flight Deck
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1066
MOB-A 1068
MOB-A 2028
Fuels System Casualty Hangar Bay
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
1170
E
MOB-A 1066
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 2028
4
N
5
N
5
30
90
30
1170
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
14
1170
4
N
4
N
4
30
90
45
1170
E
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
14
1170
E
4
N
5
N
5
30
90
60
810
3
N
3
N
3
60
90
60
810
4
N
5
N
5
60
90
60
1170
Fuels System Casualty Filter Room
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 2029
Advanced Arrestor Gear Recovery Control Station
4
N
5
N
5
14
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1016
MOB-A 2030
Flight Deck (Phase II)
8
N
9
N
9
15
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1031
MOB-A 2031
MOB-A 2031
Flight Deck (Phase III)
8
N
9
N
9
15
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1031
MOB-A 2030
MOB-A 2032
CDP Change - Below
Decks (Day)
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1041
MOB-A 2033
CDP Change - Below
Decks (Night)
4
N
4
N
4
15
30
14
1170
MOB-A 1042
MOB-A 2034
Loss (Night)
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
45
1170
MOB-A 2035
(Night)
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 2036
(Night)
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 2037
(Night)
3
N
3
N
3
15
30
15
1170
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 1068
MOB-A 1069
Aircraft Refuelling.
MOB-A 1071
Rig Barricade (Day)
MOB-A 1072
Loss (Day)
MOB-A 1073
Rig Barricade (Night)
MOB-A 2019
Helicopter NVD
Operations
MOB-A 2023
VERTREP
MOB-A 2027
Recover Man Overboard Helo
MOB-A 2028
II-5
MOB-A 1011
FSO 2033
MOB-N 2005
MOB-S 2000 CCC
1091
E
MOB-A 1066
MOB-A 1067
MOB-A 1068
30 Jun 14
Figure II-2 ATTT Sub-Events (FDNF)
SUSTAINMENT
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
E
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Integration
ATTT
FSO 1095
- ATTT
NCO 1501
Surveillance
NCO 1502
Protest
NCO 1503
Entry Control Point
Penetration - Basic
NCO 1504
Pedestrian Carried
Improvised Explosive
Device (PCIED)
Vehicle Borne Improvised
Explosive Device (VBIED)
NCO 1505
NCO 1506
NCO 1507
Alarmed Response (In
Port)
Suspicious Package (In
Port)
NCO 1508
Bomb Threat (Written /
Verbal)
NCO 1509
Active Shooter (In Port)
NCO 1510
Small Boat Probe
NCO 1511
Small Boat Attack
NCO 1512
NCO 1513
Floating Object Improvised Explosive
Device (IED)
Swimmer Attack
NCO 1515
Light Aircraft Attack
NCO 1517
Armed / Barricaded
Hostage (In Port)
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
NCO 1531
(ATFP)
1
N
1
N
1
1
180
30
810
NCO 2002
Entry Control Point
Penetration - Advanced
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
NCO 2004
Alarmed Response
(Underway)
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
NCO 2005
Suspicious Package
(Underway)
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
NCO 2006
Active Shooter (Underway)
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
NCO 2007
Armed / Barricaded
Hostage (Underway)
3
N
3
N
3
90
120
90
810
II-6
FSO 1091
+ AT Drill
ASU 1031
FSO 1081
30 Jun 14
Figure II-3 Combat Systems(Tactical)Sub-Events (FDNF)
SUSTAINMENT
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
16
N
20
N
20
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
15
30
15
1170
Battle E
Integration
CSTT (TACTICAL)
AAW 1001
Analyze & Plan for an AAW
Mission / Task
EW 1021
ASU 1006
INT 1011
IO 1206
AAW 1006
Direct & Manage CDC
during ADEX
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
30
1170
AAW 1016
Initialize and
Configure/Reconfigure
Systems
32
N
40
N
40
7
15
15
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
AAW 1021
Detect and Tracking
Exercise - Air Contacts
AAW 1025
Engage - ESSM/ NSSM
AAW 1026
Engage - RAM
AAW 1027
Engage - CIWS
AAW 1028
Engage - Supersonic Target
AAW 1029
Engage - Low Slow Flier
AAW 1041
AAW 1042
AAW 1043
AAW 1048
AAW 1071
AAW 1072
AAW 1076
AAW 1081
AAW 2011
AAW 2012
AAW 2014
E
32
N
40
Y
40
7
15
7
450
E
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
E
AAW 1021
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
AAW 1021
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
AAW 1021
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
AAW 1021
ASU 1031
20
N
25
N
25
25
45
7
810
AAW 1042
AAW 1043
AAW 1048
20
N
25
N
25
25
45
7
810
AAW 1041
AAW 1043
AAW 1048
20
N
25
N
25
25
45
7
810
AAW 1041
AAW 1042
AAW 1048
20
N
25
N
25
25
45
7
810
AAW 1041
AAW 1042
AAW 1043
32
N
40
N
40
7
15
7
810
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
810
32
N
40
N
40
7
15
7
810
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
60
810
16
N
20
N
20
30
90
30
1170
16
N
20
N
20
30
90
30
1170
AAW 1021
2
Y
2
N
2
60
180
60
1170
FSO 1081
E
Maintain
Link 11 - Intrusion &
Jamming
Maintain
Link Multi Tadil - Establish
& Maintain
Engage – CIWS
(PHALANX)
Engage – Stream Raid for
ASMD
Admin & Management
(AAW)
II-7
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
2012
AAW 1021
E
E
AAW 1021
30 Jun 14
ASU 1001
Analyze & Plan ASU Mission
ASU 1006
Direct & Manage CDC
During ASU-EX
ASU 1016
ASU 1021
ASU 1025
ASU 1042
ASU 1044
ASU 2010
15
N
18
N
18
15
30
15
1170
EW 1021
AAW 1006
INT 1011
IO 1206
3
N
3
Y
3
30
60
60
450
32
N
40
Y
40
7
15
10
450
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
32
N
40
Y
40
7
15
7
450
ASU 1031
ASU 1044
20
N
25
N
25
15
30
7
1170
ASU 1021
ASU 1042
AAW 1021
16
N
20
N
20
30
45
45
1170
ASU 1025
5
N
6
Y
6
30
45
45
450
2
Y
2
N
2
60
180
60
450
Initialize - Configure &
Detect, Track and Classify Surface Contacts
OTH - Surveillance
/Search/Detect
ASU Aircraft Control - Task
1
SLEDGEHAMMER
(ASU)
E
ASU 1021
FSO 1081
ASW 1001
Analyse & Plan for ASW
Mission/Task
5
N
6
N
6
30
90
30
1170
ASW 1007
Underwater communications
Check.
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
1170
ASW 1016
Initialize, Configure &
4
N
4
N
4
25
45
10
1170
ASW 1021
Passive Trackex
5
N
6
N
6
30
90
30
1170
ASW 1025
Advanced ASW exercise
with Air, Surf and Subsurface units
1
N
1
N
1
60
360
60
1170
5
N
6
N
6
25
45
30
1170
5
N
5
N
6
30
90
30
1170
2
N
2
N
2
35
90
45
1170
E
ASW 1025
MOB-N 1325
4
N
4
N
4
35
90
60
810
E
ASW 1025
ASW 1063
MOB-N 1325
2
N
2
N
2
35
90
60
810
E
ASW 1062
ASW 1025
4
N
5
N
5
30
90
30
1170
FSO 1081
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
ASW 1031
ASW 1053
ASW 1061
ASW 1062
ASW 1063
ASW 2000
ASW 2002
E
ASW 1061
ASW 1062
ASW 1053
MOB-N 1325
ASW Aircraft Control
Passive Trackex (MH60R)
Evade / Avoid / Deceive Submarines
Evade / Avoid / Deceive Torpedoes
ASW 1021
Stream NIXIE
(ASW)
(CV-TSC)
5
N
6
N
6
30
60
30
1170
1
N
1
N
1
1
720
1
1170
ASW 2009
Sub Familiarization
ASW 2010
ASW co-operation with
Inorganic Aircraft
2
N
2
N
2
360
720
180
1170
ASW 1025
EW 1008
Configure and operate JTT
and GALE for OPELINT
12
N
14
N
14
15
30
15
1170
EW 1021
II-8
30 Jun 14
EW 1016
EW 1021
EW 1036
EW 1037
(Condition III)
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
(Condition III)
10
N
12
N
12
30
60
30
1170
E
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
1170
E
MOB-N 1327
Passive operations
Electronic Intercept
Coordination with Aircraft
EW 1041
EA Operations (Condition III)
EW 1042
BDA (Condition III)
EW 1046
Counter Targeting
(Condition III)
EW 1052
and Modifications - Alpha
(Condition III)
EW 1053
EW 1054
EW 1055
EW 1057
EW 2000
EW 2001
EW 2002
EW 2003
EW 2004
EW 2005
(Condition III)
(Condition III)
(Condition III)
and Modifications Extended Operations
(Condition III)
(EW)
(Condition III)
(Condition I)
(Condition I)
EW 2009
(Condition I)
EW 2010
N
6
N
6
90
180
90
1170
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
1170
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
1170
4
N
5
N
5
90
180
90
1170
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
45
1170
5
N
6
N
6
30
90
45
1170
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
45
1170
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
45
1170
7
N
8
Y
8
90
180
15
1170
4
N
5
N
5
90
180
90
1170
FSO 1081
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
10
N
12
N
12
30
60
30
1170
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
1170
5
N
6
N
6
60
90
60
1170
4
Y
5
N
5
90
180
90
1170
4
n
4
N
4
30
90
45
1170
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
45
1170
BDA (Condition I)
Counter Targeting
(Condition I)
(Condition I)
1041
1042
1043
1048
5
EA Operations (Condition I)
EW 2006
AAW
AAW
AAW
AAW
II-9
30 Jun 14
EW 2011
(Condition I)
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
45
1170
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
1170
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
3
N
3
N
3
30
90
30
1170
CCC 1011
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ CS Drill
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
E
Maritime Surveillance
Exercise
8
N
10
Y
10
10
20
10
450
E
Intel Support to Force
Protection
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
8
N
10
Y
10
10
20
10
450
E
Intel Collection and
Reporting
5
N
5
Y
6
15
30
15
450
E
INT 2000
(INT)
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
FSO 1081
INT 2001
Intel Team Training (SETT,
AIDTT and FATT)
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
30
1170
INT 1011
INT 1032
Intel support to Strike
operations
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
30
1170
Intel support to ADC (and
other warfare commanders)
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
30
1170
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
30
1170
4
N
5
N
5
90
180
90
1170
FSO 1081
EW 1021
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
INT 1011
EW 2012
(Condition I)
FSO 1036
SAREX
FSO 2045
- CSTT (Tactical)
INT 1011
OPINTEL Exercise
INT 1012
INT 1025
INT 1031
INT 1032
INT 2002
INT 2003
INT 2004
IO 1201
IO 1206
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
EW 1021
Intel Briefs
Intel support to DESRON
(SSES)
Fusion and Analysis
(Condition III)
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
systems and support
systems (Condition III)
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
CRITIC handling (Condition
III)
12
N
14
N
14
45
90
45
1170
IO 2013
(Condition III)
20
N
25
N
25
15
30
15
1170
IO 1206
IO 2014
(Condition III)
IO 1211
IO 1212
IO 2015
DF Operations (Condition III)
IO 2016
Fusion and Analysis
(Condition I)
E
IO 1206
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
1170
IO 1206
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
16
N
20
N
20
30
60
30
1170
IO 1206
1170
EW 1021
AAW 1006
ASU 1006
INT 1011
8
N
10
N
II-10
10
30
60
30
30 Jun 14
IO 2017
IO 2018
IO 2019
IO 2020
IO 2021
MOB-A 1006
MOB-A 1018
CRITIC Handling (Condition
I)
12
N
14
N
14
45
90
45
1170
IO 2016
(Condition I)
12
N
15
N
15
15
30
15
1170
IO 2016
(Condition I)
8
N
9
N
9
30
90
30
1170
IO 2016
NCO 1022
NCO 1023
NCO 1029
NCO 1035
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
1170
IO 2016
4
N
5
N
5
15
30
15
1170
(Aviation)
32
N
40
N
40
7
15
7
1170
Air Traffic Control - Flight
Operations
4
N
5
N
5
30
90
30
1170
E
MOB-A 1016
3
N
3
N
3
90
360
90
1170
E
MOB-A 1011
DF Operations (Condition I)
systems and support
systems (Condition I)
FSO 1081
MOB-A 2026
Aircraft Emergencies
MOS 1001
Maintain Cultural Awareness
1
N
1
N
1
90
360
90
1170
MOS 2000
MOS 2000
Naval Diplomatic Presence
operation/exercise
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
1170
MOS 1001 CCC
2015
STW 1001
Analyse and Plan STW
Mission/Task
5
N
6
N
6
30
60
30
810
II-11
30 Jun 14
Figure II-4 Combat Systems(Technical)Sub-Events (FDNF)
SUSTAINMENT
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
VHF LOS Comms System
- Establish and Maintain
12
Y
14
Y
14
15
30
15
450
CCC 1021
HF Comms System Secure DATA/TTY
10
N
12
Y
12
15
45
30
450
CCC 1022
HF Comms system Secure voice
10
N
12
N
12
15
45
30
1170
CCC 1023
HF Comms system - Non
secure voice
18
Y
22
N
22
15
45
30
1170
CCC 1024
11 Data
8
N
10
N
10
15
45
30
1170
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
1170
- Secure data/TTY
15
N
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
- Secure voice
13
N
16
Y
16
15
30
15
450
- Non-Secure voice
18
Y
22
Y
22
15
30
15
450
- Have Quick (HQ)
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
1170
E
- Link 11 Data
13
N
16
N
16
15
30
15
1170
E
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
CSTT (Technical)
CCC 1011
CCC 1025
CCC 1031
CCC 1032
CCC 1033
CCC 1034
CCC 1035
CCC 1036
11 Fast Frequency
Change
- Link 11 Fast Frequency
Change
- Link 16 Data
8
N
10
N
10
15
30
15
1170
E
13
N
16
N
16
15
30
15
1170
E
UHF Sat Comms DAMA
20
Y
24
Y
24
15
30
15
450
CCC 1042
- Non-DAMA ANDVT
15
Y
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
CCC 1043
- KY-58 FM VINSON
15
N
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
CCC 1044
- SATCOM Fleet
Broadcast (NOVEMBER)
15
Y
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
- Link 16 Operations
16
N
20
Y
20
15
30
15
450
EHF Comms System Establish and Maintain
EHF Secure Voice/Data
8
N
10
N
10
15
45
15
1170
CCC 1037
CCC 1041
CCC 1047
CCC 1051
II-12
E
Integration
30 Jun 14
CCC 1056
SHF Comms System Establish and Maintain
15
N
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
E
CCC 1061
Analyze & Develop a
Comm Plan
5
Y
6
N
6
30
60
30
810
E
CCC 1066
Network System and
Server Administration.
16
Y
20
N
20
7
15
7
1170
CCC 1071
Emergency Destruction
(EAP)
2
N
2
Y
2
90
360
90
450
15
N
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
16
Y
20
N
20
7
15
7
1170
CCC 1072
MOB-S 1252
OTAT / OTAR
CCC 1088
Message Processing
CCC 1091
Information Control INFOCON / RIVERCITY
8
Y
10
N
10
30
60
30
810
Information Security Intrusion
Countermeasures
16
N
20
N
20
7
15
7
810
16
Y
20
Y
20
7
15
7
450
5
N
6
N
6
45
180
45
1170
3
N
3
N
3
120
240
60
810
15
Y
18
Y
18
15
30
15
450
8
N
10
Y
10
30
60
30
450
E
8
N
10
N
10
15
30
15
810
E
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
810
3
N
3
N
3
90
180
60
1170
3
N
3
Y
3
90
180
60
1170
8
N
10
N
10
30
60
30
810
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ CS drill
1
N
1
Y
1
1
180
1
450
STW 2010
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
CCC 1092
CCC 1096
CCC 1122
CCC 2006
CCC 2012
CCC 2013
CCC 2014
CCC 2015
CCC 2017
CCC 2019
Information Assurance Computer Network
Defense (CND) System
Administration
(CSRO)
Fleet Synthetic Warfare
Training (FST) system set up & configuration
5 KHZ (if fitted)
SCI RF Communications.
Combined Enterprise
Regional Information
System (CENTRIX)
Portable Radio Checks
VHF Portable
Communications
SCI Network Operations.
FSO 1093
Training Team
Assessment - CSTT
(Technical)
Hazards from EM
Radiation (HERO, HERP,
HERF)
NCO 1021
AAW 1006
AAW 1021
ASU 1006
ASU 1021
Information Assurance Administration/Policy
CCC 2021
FSO 2011
MOB-D 1203
Casualty - Electronics
Spaces Preparation for
Battle Readiness
II-13
IO 1206
30 Jun 14
NCO 1022
Casualty - Class C Fire in
Electrical Space
5
NCO 1023
NCO 1024
NCO 1025
NCO 1026
NCO 1027
NCO 1028
NCO 1029
NCO 1031
NCO 1034
NCO 1035
Y
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
Casualty - Equipment
Casualty Repair
Casualty - Use Electronic
Casualty Control Folder
Casualty - Draw
Emergency Electronic
Spare Parts
Casualty - Use of
Alternate Power
Casualty - Performance of
Casualty Control
Organization/Electronic
Casualty
Control/Electronic
systems spaces
Casualty - Provide
Assistance to Remote
Spaces
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
E
Casualty - Investigating &
Reporting
Casualty - Provide
Equipment Casualty
Repair During Loss of
Lighting
Casualty - Secondary
Electronics Casualty
Control
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
5
N
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
Casualty - Electronic
Cooling/Chill Water
Casualty
5
N
6
Y
6
II-14
15
30
14
450
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
E
AAW 1016
ASU 1016
ASW 2002
EW 2001
EW 2012
FSO 2030
IO 2014
IO 2019
30 Jun 14
Figure II-5 Damage Control Sub-Events (FDNF)
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
SUSTAINMENT
Integration
DCTT
FSO 1094
- DCTT
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ DC Drill
MOB-D 1202
(Damage Control)
5
Y
6
N
6
30
180
30
1170
FSO 1081
MOB-D 1203
Manning Battle Stations
16
Y
20
N
20
10
20
14
1170
MOB-D 1204
Relief of Vital Station DCRS
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-D 1205
Emergency Interior
I)
8
Y
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
MOB-D 1253
8
Y
10
N
10
10
20
14
1170
E
8
Y
10
N
10
10
20
14
1170
E
1
N
1
N
1
1
180
1
1170
MOB-D 1211
Set ZEBRA (Condition 1)
MOB-D 1212
Set YOKE (Condition I)
MOB-D 1214
Set CIRCLE WILLIAM MOPP LEVEL IV
(Condition I)
Fire - Class A (Condition I)
MOB-D 1221
5
MOB-D 1222
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
E
MOB-D 2000
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
E
MOB-D 2000
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
MOB-D 2000
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
engineering spaces
(Condition I)
5
MOB-D 1223
Y
Y
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
Fire - Class C (Condition I)
MOB-D 1225
Pump room - (Condition I)
MOB-D 1231
Flooding - Underwater Hull
Damage (Condition I)
MOB-D 1203
5
Y
6
Y
6
15
30
14
450
E
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
45
1170
E
5
N
6
N
6
14
30
14
1170
E
MOB-D 1232
MOB-D 1233
MOB-D 1234
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D 1232
Patching (Condition I)
5
Y
6
Y
6
14
30
14
450
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D 1233
Flooding - Plugging
(Condition I)
5
N
6
N
6
30
45
15
1170
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D 1234
Structural Damage Shoring (Condition I)
5
N
6
N
6
30
45
15
1170
MOB-D 1235
space (Condition I)
5
Y
6
N
6
30
45
15
1170
II-15
E
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D 2014
30 Jun 14
MOB-D 1236
space (Condition II)
3
N
3
Y
3
30
60
21
450
MOB-D 2078
MOB-D 1237
(Condition I)
3
Y
3
N
3
30
60
21
1170
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D 1238
Flooding - Magazine
(Condition I)
3
N
3
N
3
30
60
30
1170
MOB-D 2091
MOB-D 1241
Mitigate Effects of CBRNE
(Condition I)
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
1170
MOB-D 1253
Total Ship Survivability
Exercise (TSSE) (Condition
I)
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
1170
E
E
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
MOB-D 1231
MOB-D 2014
MOB-D 2092
MOB-D 1255
Casualty Power (Condition
I)
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
30
1170
MOB-D 1261
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Gas (Condition II)
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
1170
MOB-D 1262
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Spill (Condition II)
2
Y
2
N
2
30
90
15
1170
MOB-D 2000
Gas Free Checks
(Condition I)
11
Y
13
Y
13
14
45
14
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
(Condition I)
9
Y
11
Y
11
30
45
15
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
9
N
11
Y
11
15
30
15
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
(Condition I)
9
N
11
Y
11
15
30
15
450
MOB-D 1221
MOB-D 1222
MOB-D 1223
(Condition I)
9
Y
11
Y
11
15
45
15
450
E
(Condition I)
9
N
11
Y
11
15
45
15
450
E
9
N
11
Y
11
15
60
15
450
E
MOB-D 2001
MOB-D 2004
MOB-D 2005
MOB-D 2006
MOB-D 2007
MOB-D 2008
(Condition I)
Ventilation (Condition I)
MOB-D 2010
(Condition I)
9
Y
11
N
11
15
30
15
1170
MOB-D 2011
(Condition I)
9
N
11
N
11
15
45
15
1170
MOB-D 2012
(Condition I)
9
N
11
N
11
15
45
15
1170
MOB-D 2013
(Condition I)
9
N
11
N
11
15
45
15
1170
MOB-D 2014
Calculations (Condition I)
4
Y
5
N
5
30
60
30
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-D 2036
Fire - Class A (Condition II)
450
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2056
MOB-D 2058
MOB-D 2060
MOB-D 2044
1170
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D 2059
MOB-D 2061
MOB-D 2045
4
MOB-D 2037
Y
4
Y
4
25
45
14
Fire - Class A (In Port)
4
N
4
N
4
II-16
9
120
30
30 Jun 14
MOB-D 2038
engineering spaces
(Condition II)
4
MOB-D 2039
Y
4
30
45
14
450
1170
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D 2059
MOB-D 2061
MOB-D 2045
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
450
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2056
MOB-D 2058
MOB-D 2060
MOB-D 2044
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2057
MOB-D 2059
MOB-D 2061
MOB-D 2045
Fire - Class C (Condition II)
4
MOB-D 2041
4
engineering spaces (In
Port)
4
MOB-D 2040
N
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2056
MOB-D 2058
MOB-D 2060
MOB-D 2044
N
4
Y
4
30
45
14
Fire - Class C (In Port)
4
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2042
Pump Space) (Condition II)
3
Y
3
N
3
45
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2043
Fire - Main Space(JP-5
Pump Space) (In Port)
2
N
2
N
2
30
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2044
Gas Free Checks
(Condition II)
8
Y
9
Y
9
14
60
14
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
6
N
7
N
7
14
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2037 MOB-D
2039 MOB-D 2041
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
60
15
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
6
N
7
N
7
15
120
15
1170
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
8
N
9
Y
9
30
60
15
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
6
N
7
N
7
15
120
15
1170
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
(Condition II)
8
N
9
Y
9
30
60
15
450
MOB-D 2036
MOB-D 2038
MOB-D 2040
(In Port)
6
N
7
Y
7
15
120
15
450
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
MOB-D 2056
(Condition II)
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
60
15
450
MOB-D 2057
De-smoking - RAM fan (In
Port)
6
N
7
N
7
15
120
15
1170
MOB-D 2058
(Condition II)
8
N
9
Y
9
30
60
15
450
procedure (In Port)
6
N
7
N
7
15
120
15
1170
MOB-D 2045
MOB-D 2046
MOB-D 2047
MOB-D 2052
MOB-D 2053
MOB-D 2054
MOB-D 2055
MOB-D 2059
Gas Free Checks (In Port)
(Condition II)
(In Port)
(Condition II)
(In Port)
II-17
30 Jun 14
MOB-D 2060
Ventilation (Condition II)
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
60
15
450
MOB-D 2061
Ventilation (In Port)
6
N
7
N
7
15
120
15
1170
MOB-D 2062
Patching (Condition II)
4
Y
4
Y
4
30
60
15
450
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
1170
(Condition II)
4
Y
4
N
4
30
60
15
1170
MOB-D 2065
(In Port)
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2066
(Condition II)
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
1170
MOB-D 2067
(In Port)
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2068
(Condition II)
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
1170
MOB-D 2069
Pipe Patching - Banding (In
Port)
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2070
(Condition II)
4
N
4
N
4
30
60
15
1170
MOB-D 2071
(In Port)
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2072
Flooding - Plugging
(Condition II)
3
Y
3
N
3
30
60
15
1170
MOB-D 2073
Flooding - Plugging (In
Port)
3
N
3
N
3
15
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2074
Structural Damage Shoring (Condition II)
3
Y
3
N
3
30
60
15
1170
MOB-D 2075
space (In Port)
3
N
3
N
3
15
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2076
(Condition II)
2
Y
2
N
2
60
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2077
Flooding - Magazine
(Condition II)
2
N
2
N
2
60
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2078
Calculations (Condition II)
3
Y
3
N
3
60
120
30
1170
MOB-D 2081
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Gas (In Port)
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
1170
MOB-D 2082
HAZMAT / HAZWASTE Toxic Spill (In Port)
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
1170
8
Y
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
Emergency Interior
Communications (In Port)
4
N
4
N
4
9
120
30
1170
(Condition II)
4
N
4
Y
4
30
45
14
450
2
N
2
N
2
9
120
30
1170
4
N
4
N
4
15
120
30
1170
(In Port)
2
N
2
N
2
9
120
30
1170
MOB-A 1007
MOB-D 2057
Relief of Vital Station - DC
Central
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-D 2063
MOB-D 2064
MOB-D 2083
MOB-D 2084
MOB-D 2085
MOB-D 2086
MOB-D 2087
MOB-D 2088
MOB-D 2092
Patching (In Port)
Emergency Interior
II)
Fire Fighting - co-ordination
with outside activities (In
Port)
Structural Damage Shoring (In Port)
II-18
MOB-D 2064
MOB-D 2066
MOB-D 2068
MOB-D 2070
MOB-D 2065
MOB-D 2067
MOB-D 2069
MOB-D 2071
MOB-A 1007
MOB-D 2057
FSO 1056
MOB-D 2037
MOB-D 2039
MOB-D 2041
30 Jun 14
Figure II-6 Engineering Department Sub-Events (FDNF)
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
SUSTAINMENT
Integration
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Training Team
Assessment - ETT
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ Eng Drill
(Non-Nuclear
Engineering)
3
Y#
3
Y
3
30
90
60
450
FSO 1081
16
Y#
20
N
20
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
ETT
FSO 2010
MOB-E 2000
MOB-E 2009
Steering Gear - Loss of
Steering (Condition III)
MOB-E 2011
Air Conditioning System Clean Strainer
4
Y#
5
N
5
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2013
HPAC/LPAC - Align and
Start
8
Y#
10
N
10
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2014
Air Conditioning System
-align/place in operation
12
Y#
15
N
15
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2015
Refrigeration - Ship's
Service align/place in
operation
Lube Oil - Draw sample
12
Y#
15
N
15
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2016
8
Y#
10
N
10
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2017
Eductor - align/ place in
operation /secure
8
Y#
10
N
10
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2018
MVHC Station - inspect /
operate
8
Y#
10
N
10
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2019
Steering Gear - Align and
Start
12
Y#
15
N
15
7
30
7
1170
E
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
12
Y#
15
N
15
7
30
7
1170
E
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
12
Y#
15
N
15
7
30
7
1170
E
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2020
MOB-N 1341
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-E 2024
Steering Gear - Shift
Steering Unit
(Emergency) - Align and
Start
MOB-E 2022
Fire/Flushing Pump Align/Start/Stop
4
Y#
5
N
5
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2023
MOB-E 2023
Fire/Flushing Pump - Start
and Stop remotely
4
Y#
5
N
5
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2022
MOB-E 2024
Lube Oil - Sample
evaluation
8
Y#
10
N
10
7
30
7
1170
MOB-E 2016
MOB-E 2025
Steering Gear - Loss of
Steering (Condition I)
4
Y
5
N
5
15
60
15
1170
MOB-E 2019
MOB-E 2020
MOB-E 2021
MOB-N 1341
II-19
30 Jun 14
Figure II-7 Integrated Training Team Sub-Events (FDNF)
SUSTAINMENT
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
E
CORE
P
E
P
Exp Period
Exp
Level
Learn
Maint
Perf
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
Integration
ITT
FSO 1081
Develop Training Plans
and Programs
8
FSO 1091
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
MOB-A 1006
NCO 1531
AAW 2014
ASU 2010
ASW 2000
EW 2000
FSO 2016
INT 2000
IO 1201
MOB-D 1202
MOB-E 2000
FSO 2000
MOB-S 1406
MOB-N 2010
NCO 2003
FSO 1092
FSO 1095
FSO 2045
FSO 1093
FSO 1094
FSO 2010
FSO 1096
FSO 2002
FSO 1097
FSO 1098
Training Team
Assessment - ITT
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 2005
Admin & Management
(Religious Ministry Team)
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
90
1170
FSO 2033
Manoverboard - Muster
Personnel
2
Y
2
N
2
90
360
90
810
II-20
MOB-N 2005
MOB-S 2000
MOB-A 2027
30 Jun 14
Figure II-8 Medical Department Sub-Events (FDNF)
FRTP Requirements for Experience Reporting (Exp) and Performance Assessment (Perf) -
FDNF
SRA
Sub Event
CORE
Exp Period
TITLE
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
SUSTAINMENT
Integration
MTT
FSO 1051
Battle Dressing Stations
Operations
8
Y
10
Y
10
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1053
Medical Response Team Dual Response
5
Y
6
Y
6
15
30
15
450
E
FSO 1056
Mass Casualty
4
N
5
Y
5
30
90
30
450
E
FSO 1061-69
FSO 2034-41
FSO 1061
Casualty Transport
5
Y
6
Y
6
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
FSO 1062
FSO 1063
Fracture (Stretcher
Bearers)
Chest Wound (Stretcher
Bearers)
MOB-D 1203
FSO 1064
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
FSO 1065
(Stretcher Bearers)
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
FSO 1066
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
FSO 1067
Shock (Stretcher Bearers)
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
FSO 1068
Inhalation (Stretcher
Bearers)
(Stretcher Bearers)
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
8
Y
9
Y
9
15
30
10
450
E
FSO 1056
MOB-A 1007
FSO 1069
FSO 1096
- MTT
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ Med Drill
FSO 2000
(Medical)
4
Y
5
N
5
30
90
30
1170
FSO 1081
FSO 2034
Fracture (Dept Medical
Response)
Chest Wound (Dept
Medical Response)
Wound (Dept Medical
Response)
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
FSO 2035
FSO 2036
FSO 2037
FSO 2038
FSO 2039
FSO 2040
Wound (Dept Medical
Response)
Shock (Dept Medical
Response)
Inhalation (Dept Medical
Response)
FSO 2041
8
Y
9
Y
9
30
90
30
450
FSO 1056
FSO 1053
FSO 2047
Relief of Vital Station -Main
Medical
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
1170
MOB-D 1253
II-21
30 Jun 14
Figure II-9 Deck Department Sub-Events (FDNF)
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
SUSTAINMENT
Integration
SNTT (DECK)
FSO 2002
Training Team
Assessment - SNTT
(Deck)
Small Boat Operations day
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
12
Y
15
Y
15
30
60
30
450
MOB-S 1203
Prepare Ship for Heavy
Weather
2
Y
2
N
2
30
90
30
1170
MOB-S 1252
Abandon Ship
2
Y
2
N
2
180
360
90
1170
CCC 1071
MOB-S 1406
(Seamanship)
4
Y
4
N
4
25
45
30
1170
FSO 1081
MOB-S 1411
Get underway/Moor Pierside
10
N
12
N
12
90
180
30
1170
MOB-N 1326
MOB-S 1416
Anchoring Operations
10
Y
12
N
12
90
180
90
1170
E
MOB-N 1351
MOB-S 1422
RAS
5
N
6
N
6
90
180
30
1170
E
MOB-S 1424
MOB-S 1424
Emergency Breakaway RAS
6
N
7
N
7
90
180
30
1170
E
MOB-S 1422
MOB-S 1426
FAS Receive - Double
Probe
7
N
8
N
8
90
180
30
1170
E
MOB-S 1422
MOB-S 1431
FAS Deliver
4
N
5
N
5
90
540
90
1170
MOB-S 2000
Recover Man Overboard Boat (Day)
7
Y
8
N
8
30
90
30
1170
7
Y
8
N
8
30
90
30
1170
12
Y
15
Y
15
30
60
30
450
MOB-S 1151
MOB-S 2001
MOB-S 2002
Recover Man Overboard Boat (Night)
Small Boat Operations night
II-22
FSO 1091
+ Deck Drill
MOB-S 1422
E
MOB-N 2005
FSO 2033
MOB-A 2027 CCC 1091
MOB-N 2005
FSO 2033
MOB-A 2027 CCC1091
30 Jun 14
Figure II-10 Navigation Department Sub-Events (FDNF)
SUSTAINMENT
Sub Event
SRA
TITLE
CORE
Exp Period
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Perf
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
Battle E
Integration
SNTT (BRIDGE)
FSO 1097
- SNTT (Nav)
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ Bridge Drill
FSO 2046
Relief of Vital Station Bridge
2
N
2
N
2
90
360
90
1170
MOB-D 1253
MOB-A 1017
4
N
5
N
5
15
21
15
810
MOB-A 1016
MOB-N 2003
4
N
4
N
4
60
180
60
810
MOB-N 1314
MOB-A 1016
MOB-N 1301
Launch and Recover Aircraft
- Restricted Waters
Inadvertent Entry to
Restricted Visibility at Flight
Quarters
Plan Navigation
4
Y
4
N
4
30
45
30
1170
MOB-N 1311
Piloting Exercise.
MOB-A 2025
MOB-N 1313
Gyro
MOB-N 1314
Pilotage - Low Visibility.
MOB-N 1315
Pilotage - Mine Swept
Channel.
MOB-N 1325
Conn the Ship - Tactical
Manoeuvres
E
MOB-N 1313
MOB-N 2007
MOB-N 2008
MOB-N 2009
MOB-S 1411
4
Y
5
N
5
15
90
30
1170
2
N
2
Y
2
30
90
60
450
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
60
1170
E
1
N
1
N
1
1
180
1
1170
E
4
N
4
N
4
30
45
30
1170
ASW
ASW
ASW
ASW
2
N
2
N
2
30
90
15
1170
MOB-S 1422
MOB-S 1424
EW 1036
MOB-N 1311
MOB-A 2025
1025,
1061,
1062,
1063,
MOB-N 1326
Conn the Ship - Along Side
MOB-N 1327
Conn the Ship - EMCON
Restricted Environment
3
N
3
N
3
90
180
90
1170
MOB-N 1341
Steering
4
Y
5
N
5
25
45
7
810
E
MOB-E 2009
MOB-E 2025
MOB-N 2004
E
MOB-S 1416
MOB-N 1351
Precision Anchorage
2
Y
2
N
2
90
180
45
1170
MOB-N 1356
Visual Signalling
Communications
5
N
6
N
6
15
30
15
810
MOB-N 2002
Navigation, Seamanship
and Shiphandling Trainer
7
Y#
8
N
8
30
360
30
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 1314
2
N
2
N
2
60
180
60
1170
MOB-A 1017
2
N
2
N
2
90
180
7
1170
MOB-N 1314
Manoverboard - Bridge
manoeuvring
5
Y
6
N
6
10
30
15
1170
MOB-S 2000
FSO 2033
MOB-A 2027
MOB-N 2007
Display
4
Y
5
N
5
25
45
7
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 2008
VMS
4
Y
5
N
5
25
45
7
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 2009
Sensor
4
Y
4
N
5
25
45
7
810
MOB-N 1311
MOB-N 2010
(Navigation)
4
Y
4
N
4
30
90
30
1170
FSO 1081
MOB-N 2003
MOB-N 2004
MOB-N 2005
Conn the Ship –
Constrained Flight Ops
Area
System Casualty - Steering
Engine
II-23
Figure II-11 Weapons Department Sub-Events (FDNF)
SRA
Sub Event
CORE
TITLE
Exp Period
Perf
Battle E
SUSTAINMENT
Integration
E
P
E
P
Exp
Level
Engagement with Machine
Gun
7
N
8
N
8
30
90
45
1170
ASW 2011
Torpedo Pre-Flight
Assembly
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
30
1170
FSO 1098
- WTT
8
N
10
N
10
10
20
10
1170
FSO 1091
+ Wep Drill
MOB-D 1257
Magazine Over-Temp
(Condition II)
2
N
2
N
2
90
120
15
1170
MOB-D 2085
NCO 1001
Small Arms Weapons
Range
1
N
1
N
1
1
90
30
810
NCO 2003
(WEPS)
2
N
2
N
2
60
180
30
1170
STW 2007
Weapons Assembly
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
30
1170
STW 2009
Mine Assembly
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
30
1170
STW 2010
Weapons
Movement/Delivery
6
N
7
N
7
30
90
30
1170
Learn
Maint
Deg
Expiration
(days)
WTT
ASU 1031
II-24
ASU 1021
NCO 1511
AAW 1021
FSO 1081
COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCES
(COMNAVAIRFOR)
AIRCRAFT CARRIER
TRAINING READINESS MANUAL
(CVN TRAMAN) COMNAVAIRFORINST
3500.20D
CH 3

COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCES (COMNAVAIRFOR

Transcription

Similar documents

ordering instructions mail order

u.s.s. PIEDMONT AD-17 At that time, if I amnot mistaken, the ship

Wreck Discovery - Read the SCUBA article

catering rating (cr)

layout 1 - All Celebrity Travel

Experience

shipboard catering management course (scmc)

Ship Builders

California based merchants with consistent 4.9 shipping DSRs

Edwards, Stan - USS Frank E Evans Association