Children, Youth & Families PRACTICE FROM POVERTY TO CHILD WELFARE

Children, Youth & Families
SEPTEMBER 2009
Roxana Torrico, MSW
Senior Practice Associate
rtorrico@naswdc.org
PRACTICEUPDATE
FROM POVERTY TO CHILD WELFARE
INVOLVEMENT: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF
HOUSING IN FAMILY STABILITY
Background
Economic security and safe, stable, and
affordable housing are critical to the
well-being of all children, youth and
families. Poverty places families with
children at risk of experiencing a wide
array of life-changing experiences and
unhealthy outcomes, including
homelessness and involvement with the
child welfare system. Research shows a
link between poverty, homelessness or
substandard housing, and involvement
with child welfare (Courtney, McMurtry,
& Zinn, 2004; Dhillon, 2005). Housing
instability, typically a result of economic
flux, often brings families to the attention
of child welfare and, in many cases, serves
as a barrier to family reunification.
Economic Barriers to the WellBeing of Vulnerable Families
Social workers across the country are
witnessing the impact of economic
hardship and unstable housing on the
well-being of vulnerable children, youth
and families. Families with children are
confronting harsh economic realities –
high rates of unemployment and
underemployment, scarce availability of
jobs, limited support networks, and a
shortage of affordable housing options.
With limited resources, people are facing
the gap between the wages they earn and
local housing costs. In no state can
individuals who are employed full-time at
the minimum wage afford a two-bedroom
apartment at the local fair market rent
(FMR)1 for their family (National Low
Income Housing Coalition, 2009). Not
surprisingly, these harsh economic
conditions, coupled with a lack of income,
have led many children, youth and families
to face periods of housing instability and
homelessness (Torrico & Bhat, 2009).
There are currently more than 37 million
people, including 13.3 million children,
who live below the official poverty level,
which is currently based on $21,203 for
a family of four (Annie E. Casey
Foundation, 2009). Thousands of children
live in poverty, and many others whose
family incomes are just above the poverty
line lack an adequate standard of living.
Despite current federal economic efforts,
these numbers will likely multiply, placing
more families at risk of unhealthy
outcomes.
Families living in or near poverty face
tremendous challenges in meeting their
children’s basic needs. They generally lack
education and transportation options and
work in low-wage jobs without benefits
(e.g., health insurance, sick leave) or
opportunities for career advancement. In
addition, parents’ work schedules, limited
support networks, and affordability issues
narrow their pool of day care options,
sometimes forcing them to make difficult
and unsafe decisions regarding their
children’s care. Sadly, poor families also
face challenges in providing the foundation
to a child’s well-being – safe and stable
housing.
750 First Street NE • Suite 700 • Washington, D.C. 20002-4241
202.408.8600 • www.socialworkers.org
Children, Youth & Families
PRACTICEUPDATE
As many as one out of every 12 poor families face a
period of homelessness each year (National Alliance to
End Homelessness, 2005), and more than 14 million
struggle to afford their current housing (Dhillon,
2005). Poor families are confronting the nation’s
shortage of affordable housing stock with limited
resources. Public housing units and housing vouchers
are in short supply, and any affordable housing units
available quickly disappear (National Alliance to End
Homelessness, 2005). Other housing is expensive, and
incomes are not keeping pace with the increasing costs
of housing. In fact, the national hourly wage necessary
to afford rental housing has increased to $17.84, an
amount beyond the reach of vulnerable families
(National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2009).
Precariously housed and homeless families generally
have incomes that are too low to obtain housing
without a housing subsidy (Rog & Buckner, 2007).
As a result, many of these families are finding
themselves homeless and living in stressful and unsafe
situations such as overcrowded homes, campgrounds,
cars, shelters, and motels.
Families with children represent 34 percent of the
homeless population, and members of racial and
ethnic minorities are overrepresented (National Center
on Family Homelessness, 2009; U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 2007). Currently
more than 1.5 million children and youth experience
homelessness each year; however, the current
economic downturn will likely increase this figure
(National Center on Family Homelessness, 2009).
Housing Needs Put Children At Risk of
Entering the Child Welfare System
Thousands of homeless children are at risk of entering
the child welfare system because of their family’s
inability to provide adequate housing. Homelessness
and housing instability create disconcerting conditions
for families and put children at risk of unhealthy
outcomes. Children in unstable housing experience
increased rates of chronic and acute health issues,
emotional and behavioral problems, and
developmental delays. They are also more likely
to experience periods of significant educational
interruption; as many as 36 percent of homeless
children will repeat a grade (National Center on
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
Family Homelessness, 2008). Yet housing instability
does not affect children alone – parents also
experience unhealthy outcomes, including high levels
of stress.
Not surprisingly, many of the families experiencing
stress and facing critical challenges in adequately
caring for their children as a result of housing
instability come to the attention of the child welfare
system (White & Rog, 2004). Too often, families do
not receive adequate prevention services in time to
remedy these unhealthy outcomes prior to child
welfare involvement. Limited access to prevention
services, low wages, and narrow housing options put
families and children in a challenging position
economically and emotionally.
A correlation between child maltreatment and
inadequate housing and homelessness has been noted
(Dhillon, 2005). Incidents of abuse and neglect are
more common in low income families. Child
maltreatment can be linked to stress, and poor
families facing housing problems tend to be under
more stress than the average family (National
Coalition for Child Protection Reform, 2008).
Inadequate housing is also a key factor contributing
to the placement of children in foster care (Dhillon,
2005). In many cases, simply addressing a family’s
housing need (e.g., rental or utility assistance, security
deposit, case management or credit counseling) can
help prevent the need for a foster care placement.
A child left in the care of his or her own family will
always fare better than in a foster care placement
(National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, 2007).
Housing Instability Delays Family
Reunification
Like families at risk of entering the child welfare
system, families preparing for reunification also face
housing needs. A permanent home can make
reunification possible for a child who has been
separated from his or her family. Unfortunately, in
many cases limited access to safe, stable, and
affordable housing delays the reunification of families.
As many as 30 percent of children in foster care could
be reunited with their parents if they had access to
safe, stable, and affordable housing (Courtney,
McMurtry, & Zinn, 2004. With intensive wraparound
2
Children, Youth & Families
PRACTICEUPDATE
services addressing housing needs, income supports,
employment, health care, and parenting, families
could be better positioned to care for their children.
Parents working toward reunification typically have
limited time because they are trying to stay afloat
themselves. Much of their time may be focused on
parenting classes and the treatment or therapies
necessary to get their children back in their care.
Therefore, it is important that social workers help
parents obtain safe, stable and affordable housing
as they prepare to reunite with their children. The
well-being of families is not the responsibility of one
primary agency, therefore collaborations across
agencies, such as child welfare and local housing
authorities, is needed to expedite family reunification.
A child’s long-term well-being can be enhanced
through reunification with his or her family even
when the parents are in the process of addressing
their own emotional or behavioral issues (Khadduri
& Kaul, 2008).
What Can Social Workers Do?
Social workers should be aware of the challenges that
families face in obtaining and maintaining safe, stable,
and affordable housing with limited economic
supports. Below are some suggestions to ensure that
families obtain permanent housing and economic
security. Some suggestions are for frontline workers,
and others are for social workers in leadership
positions (e.g., supervisors, managers).
• Plan for housing early. Social workers engaged
with families already involved in the child welfare
system should work with families in developing a
housing plan as they prepare for reunification. In
making these plans, social workers and families
should explore a wide array of housing options,
including housing vouchers, low-income housing
units, and local housing subsidy programs. Many
of these programs have wait lists, so it is
important to plan ahead.
• Provide basic, concrete assistance. Social
workers can access resources for financial
assistance (e.g., emergency cash for a security
deposit, rent subsidy, or payment of overdue
utility bills) to keep families together when
housing is a major obstacle. For example, new
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
funds through the Homelessness Prevention and
Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) will be
available to prevent homelessness and rapidly
rehouse families at risk of homelessness. Social
workers can also reach out to local human
service or community-based organizations to
see what other funding sources are available to
assist families.
• Link to permanent housing. Social workers
can familiarize themselves with local housing
resources such as housing subsidies, public
housing units, housing grant programs, and
low-income housing units in the community.
For example, some communities have access to
Family Unification Program (FUP) vouchers,
which are used to ensure access to affordable
housing for families involved or at-risk of
becoming involved with the child welfare system.
• Connect to community resources. Social
workers can tap into community resources
for additional support for families. Social
workers can reach out to landlords, religious
organizations, schools or universities, and/or
volunteers to help address the housing needs
of families. For example, housing options for
families could potentially be expanded through
established relationships with landlords.
Landlords are often more willing to work
with families that are affiliated with an agency
or organization.
• Collaborate with other service providers to
fill in the gaps. Social workers can collaborate
on service planning for families who present with
both child protection/safety concerns and housing
issues in an effort to provide appropriate services.
For example, a child welfare worker can work
in partnership with a local housing authority to
ensure stable housing as they prepare to reunify
the family.
• Participate in cross-system training activities.
Social work supervisors or managers from
different systems can establish cross-agency
partnerships in an effort to provide staff with
cross-system training opportunities. Through
cross-system trainings, programs can be
effectively integrated to improve the services
3
Children, Youth & Families
PRACTICEUPDATE
provided to families. Cross-system trainings
allow discussion of agency values, policies, legal
mandates, practices, and opportunities for
collaboration. Systems can work together to
avoid duplication of services and ensure the
well-being of children, youth and families.
reunifications. Preventive services and affordable
housing would allow families to be better equipped
to care for themselves and their children.
_______________________________________________
Fair market rent (FMR) is the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s estimate of what an individual seeking housing would have
to pay for shelter and utilities in the local market. FMR is based on the
generally accepted affordability guideline of spending no more than 30
percent of one’s income on housing costs.
1
• Advocate for funding. Social workers and
agency or program leaders should involve
themselves in their community’s funding
allocation process whenever possible. Social
workers can be very effective in advocating for
more funding for their programs. Partnerships
with other service providers are also an effective
approach in increasing an agency’s or program’s
funding pool.
Conclusion
Stable housing improves the well-being of children,
youth and families. Children and youth residing in
owned or affordable rental homes consistently
demonstrate better health, developmental, and
academic outcomes than their precariously housed
peers (White & Rog, 2004). Parents also benefit from
stable housing; they experience increased parental
satisfaction, improved health, and decreased stress
(Dhillon, 2005). Despite the benefits of stable housing,
the United States continues to experience a shortage
of affordable housing units, placing families at risk
of experiencing homelessness. Unfortunately, families
with children living in or just above poverty will
continue to face critical housing needs unless they
have access to solid economic supports, prevention
services, and safe, stable, and affordable housing.
The impact of homelessness requires immediate action
on the part of the social work profession (NASW,
2009). Social workers can work on both the micro
and macro levels to mobilize innovative, viable
solutions to address the link between economic
security, homelessness, and child welfare involvement.
No one system can bear sole responsibility for all
children, youth and families. However, communities
can foster collaborations to improve the delivery of
services to address economic security, prevent
homelessness, and address housing needs of families
in an effort to avoid the unnecessary removal of
children due to a lack of housing and expedite family
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
Resources
Social workers are key stakeholders in ensuring that
families have access to services. Below is a list of
federal policies and programs that fund services to
support the economic security and housing needs of
families involved with the child welfare system.
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing
Adoptions Act. In October 2008, Congress passed
this substantial child welfare reform law to
promote permanent families through relative
guardianship and adoption, and training
opportunities for staff working with children in
the child welfare system (e.g., social workers,
guardian ad litems, court personnel).
Family Unification Program (FUP). The Family
Unification Program, signed into law in 1990 by
President George H. W. Bush, works through
local-level partnerships between public housing
authorities and child welfare agencies. FUP
provides families with Section 8 housing subsidies
and the supportive services (funded largely out of
child welfare) necessary to reunite with their
children or avoid foster care placement altogether.
In October 2000, Congress added youth as an
eligible population for FUP. FUP provides youth
who are aging out of care with the vital housing
resources they need to avoid homelessness and
make a successful transition to adulthood.
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid
Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act. On May
20, 2009, President Obama signed into law the
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid
4
Children, Youth & Families
PRACTICEUPDATE
Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act to
reauthorize the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development’s McKinney–Vento homeless
assistance programs. The HEARTH Act will
provide communities with new resources and
improved tools to prevent and end homelessness
and increases the priority placed on homeless
families with children.
Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing
Program (HPRP). On February 17, 2009,
President Obama signed the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which included
$1.5 billion for the Homelessness Prevention and
Rapid Re-Housing Program. HPRP aims to
prevent homelessness and rapidly rehouse
individuals and families who are homeless or
at risk of homelessness.
Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program.
Authorized through the Social Security Act,
this program aims to prevent the unnecessary
separation of children from their families, improve
the quality of care and services provided to
children and their families, and ensure permanency
for children through reunification, adoption, or
other permanent living arrangement. Programs
include family support, family preservation,
time-limited family reunification, and adoption
promotion and support services.
References
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2009). Reduce poverty and promote
opportunity. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from
www.aecf.org/~/media/PublicationFiles/BriefPoverty_final.pdf.
Courtney, M., McMurtry, S., & Zinn, A. (2004). Housing
problems experienced by recipients of child welfare services.
Child Welfare, 83, 389–392.
Dhillon, A. (2005). Keeping families together and safe: A primer
on the child protection–housing connection. Washington, DC:
Child Welfare League of America.
National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2005). Family
homelessness in our nation and community: A problem
with a solution. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from
www.endhomelessness.org/content/general/detail/1224.
National Association of Social Workers. (2009). Economic policy.
In Social work speaks (8th ed.). pp. 177-183.Washington,
DC: Author.
National Center on Family Homelessness. (2008). The
characteristics and needs of families experiencing
homelessness. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from
http://community.familyhomelessness.org/sites/default/files/
NCFH%20Fact%20Sheet%204-08_0.pdf.
National Center on Family Homelessness. (2009). America’s
youngest outcasts: State report card on child homelessness.
Newton, MA: Author.
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. (2007). Foster
care vs. family preservation: The track record on safety and
well-being. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from
www.nccpr.org/newissues/1.html.
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. (2008).
Child abuse and poverty. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from
www.nccpr.org/newissues/6.html.
National Low Income Housing Coalition. (2009). Out of reach
2009: Persistent problems, new challenges for renters.
Retrieved August 3, 2009, from
www.nlihc.org/oor/oor2009/oor2009pub.pdf.
Rog, D., & Buckner, J. C. (2007, March). Homeless families and
children. Paper presented at the 2007 National Symposium
on Homelessness Research, Washington, DC. Retrieved
August 3, 2009, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/homelessness/
symposium07/rog/.
Torrico, R., & Bhat, S. (2009). Connected by 25: Financing
housing supports for youth transitioning out of foster care.
Washington, DC: The Finance Project.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office
of Community Planning and Development. (2007). Annual
homeless assessment report to Congress. Retrieved August 3,
2009, from www.huduser.org/Publications/pdf/ahar.pdf.
White, R., & Rog, D. (2004). Introduction [Special section].
Child Welfare, 5, 389–392.
Khadduri, J., & Kaul, B. (2008). Permanent housing for homeless
families: A review of opportunities and impediments.
Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/
homelessness/improving-data08/apc.htm.
©2009 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
5