Uncertainties in the calculation of the energy unloaded from

Transcription

Uncertainties in the calculation of the energy unloaded from
Uncertainties in the calculation
of the energy unloaded
from LNG tankers
GERG Academic Network Event
3rd & 4th June 2010
Susana Sanz Barberán
Supervisor: Alberto Gonzalo Callejo
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
1
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
2
1. Introduction
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the world
ƒ 377.4 million m3/year LNG transported by sea
ƒ LNG carrier fleet: 298 vessels
ƒ 20 Liquefaction Plants
ƒ 63 Regasification Plants
LNG carrier
3
Source: LNG Industry 2008, GIIGNL
1. Introduction
Measurement system of the unloaded energy
E = V · D · GCV - Egas displaced
[kWh]
[m3] [kg/m3] [kWh/kg]
VOLUME
ƒ Initial and final liquid level
ƒ Trim / List
ƒ Vapour temperature
DENSITY
ƒ LNG composition
ƒ Liquid temperature
GCV
ƒ
LNG composition
ENERGY gas displaced
ƒ Gas displaced composition
ƒ Gas displaced volume
ƒ Vapour temperature
ƒ Pressure inside the tanks
4
[kWh]
1. Introduction
Importance of proper measurement
331 700 GWh / year LNG
150.000 m3
1.000 GWh
20.5 Million €
1% = 10 GWh
331.700 GWh
6 800 Million €
205 000 €
5
1%= 3317 GWh
6.8 Million €
1. Introduction
Uncertainty of the unloaded Energy
ƒ “LNG Measurement”, N.B.S.
ƒ “LNG Custody Transfer Handbook”, GIIGNL
ƒ Independent companies studies
Do not apply the Law of propagation of uncertainty
Terms confusion related to uncertainty
This project intends to:
Deepen in the field of uncertainty
Establish bases to future work
6
1. Introduction
AIMS
ƒ Study of the energy measurement system
ƒ Development of a mathematical model
ƒ Implementation of the model in a spreadsheet
ƒ Historical study of Barcelona’s terminal unloadings
ƒ Comparison with Custody Transfer
7
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
8
2. Model development
BASIC CONCEPTS
“Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”, JCGM
Expanded uncertainty
Relative uncertainty
U = k ⋅ uC (x)
w( x) =
u ( x)
x
Combined standard uncertainty
2
⎡ ∂f ⎤ 2
- Uncorrelated input quantities uC2 ( x) = ∑ ⎢
⎥ u ( xi )
i =1 ⎣ ∂xi ⎦
N
- Correlated input quantities
Ci
2
N −1 N
⎡ ∂f ⎤ 2
∂f ∂f
2
u C ( x ) = ∑ ⎢ ⎥ u ( xi ) + ∑ ∑
u ( xi , x j )
i =1 j = i +1 ∂xi ∂x j
i =1 ⎣ ∂xi ⎦
N
Standard uncertainty
Type A:
u ( x) =
s ( x)
Type B:
n
u ( x) =
a
3
9
;
u ( x) =
a
6
2. Model development
METHODOLOGY
ƒ Determine the objective variable: Energy
ƒ Seek the sources of uncertainty and determine their values, u(x)
ƒ Express the objective variable in terms of its sources of
uncertainty
ƒ Calculate the combined standard uncertainty, uC(E)
ƒ Determine the expanded uncertainty, U(E)
Sources of uncertainty
Overall uncertainty of the measured energy
10
2. Model development
11
2. Model development
Trim
12
List
2. Model development
Revised
KLOSEK-McKINLEY
method:
13
2. Model development
14
2. Model development
15
Standard deviation
Covariance
2. Model development
Calibration certificates
Enagas application
16
Legistation
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
17
3. Implementation in Excel
18
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
19
4. Application of the model
ENERGY
Different LNG carriers
Same LNG carrier
ENERGY
ENERGY
Correlation
Correlation
Volume
Volume
Density
Density
GCV (mass)
GCV (mass)
-0.10%
-0.05%
VOLUME
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
-0.10%
Different LNG carriers
VOLUME
Final Volume
Final Volume
Initial Volume
Initial Volume
0.02%
0.04%
0.06%
0.08%
0.10%
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
0.10%
0.12%
Same LNG carrier
VOLUME
0.00%
-0.05%
0.12%
20
0.00%
0.02%
0.04%
0.06%
0.08%
4. Application of the model
DENSITY
Different LNG carriers
Same LNG carrier
DENSITY
DENSITY
Correlations
Correlations
Calculation
Calculation
V corrected
V corrected
V ideal
V ideal
M mix
M mix
-0.40%
GCV
-0.30%
-0.20%
-0.10%
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
-0.40%
Different LNG carriers
GCV (mass)
Calculation
Calculation
Correlation
Correlation
M mix
M mix
GCV (mol)
GCV (mol)
-0.30%
-0.20%
-0.10%
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
-0.20%
-0.10%
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
0.20%
0.30%
Same LNG carrier
GCV (mass)
-0.40%
-0.30%
0.30%
21
-0.40%
-0.30%
-0.20%
-0.10%
0.00%
0.10%
4. Application of the model
MAXIMUM CASE
ENERGY
Correlation
Volume
Density
GCV (mass)
-0.05%
0.00%
0.05%
22
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
23
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
ƒ Custody Transfer as reference manual to LNG transactions
ƒ Does not apply the Law of propagation of uncertainty
ƒ Confuses terms as error and uncertainty
Modified
CUSTODY
CUSTODY
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
MÍNIMUM
MÁXIMUM
Volume
0.05%
0.21 %
0.006 %
0.061 %
Density
0.12%
0.23 %
0.059 %
0.058 %
GCV
0.06%
0.30 %
0.015 %
0.015 %
Correlation
-
- 0.039 %
- 0.019 %
ENERGY
0.14%
0.43
%
0.047 %
0.084 %
UNCERTAINTY MODEL
24
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
25
6. Conclusions
ƒ New uncertainty model. Main factors:
ƒ Density
ƒ Volume
ƒ W(E)max = 0.17%.
ƒ Firstly, our model’s values were too far from the Custody
Transfer’s ones. After a detailed analysis, this difference has been
reduced in an important percentage.
ƒ Computer tool developed makes easier the application of the
model.
ƒ This model means an improvement in the determination of
uncertainty and can be used to reduce it.
26
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Model development
3. Implementation in Excel
4. Application of the model
5. Comparison with Custody Transfer
6. Conclusions
7. Future works
27
7. Future works
ƒ Complete the database of ships
ƒ Update the model with future regulations
ƒ Apply the model to all Enagas’ terminals
ƒ Joint Research Project: “Metrology for LNG”
28
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
29