A history of electioneering apathy
Transcription
A history of electioneering apathy
The sexy new-look TCS You’ve probably noticed the paper’s changed a lot. Yes, this is still TCS . Find out how and why we did it. Impact page 3 Hello boys Making a visual impact, our lavishly illustrated feature on the history of bras. No fakes here. Get excited! Impact pages 6–7 08/03/07 Lent term week 8 of 8 Mark Fletcher, Adam Colligan, Charlotte Richer and Peter Coulthard celebrate election success Peter Wood Slate loses all contested positions Mark Fletcher delighted to win CUSU Presidency on ‘organized and welfare-based campaign’ Amy Blackburn The results of the CUSU elections for 2007/8 have been announced, with Mark Fletcher of Jesus College winning the CUSU Presidency. Fletcher defeated Tom Howard, of Girton College, and Daniel Perrett, of Queens’ College. Fletcher’s victory was decisive. He gained 1,405 votes, in comparison to 896 for Perrett and 266 for Howard. A total of 222 voters wished to re-open nominations, and there were 465 spoiled ballots. “I am absolutely delighted with the result”, the victorious Fletcher told The Cambridge Student. “The result shows that Cambridge students want an organised and welfare-based student union with an experienced and moderate President…. The challenge starts now.” Perrett was standing as part of the “A Little More Action, Please” slate. Early results indicated that the slate was largely unsuccessful in its CUSU election campaign. In addition to Perrett’s defeat, Dan Swain lost the contested Academic Affairs position to Peter Coulthard. Coulthard won by a definite majority, gaining 1,600 votes to Swain’s 891, with only 154 students opting to RON. This means that the slate lost both the contested races in which it fielded candidates. Referring to the slate, Coulthard told TCS, “It’s something which is relatively new and from my perspective, people responded to their ideas. But I stuck to what I believed I could bring to the job and hoped that was what Cambridge students wanted.” He continued, “In Dan (Swain) I had a worthy opponent, and definitely someone who brought ideas from a different ideology and viewpoint to me.” Other election results were gradually announced on Wednesday night and Thursday morning. The sabbatical position of Women’s Officer was won by Elly Shepherd, with 948 votes compared to 77 votes for RON. The new Access Officer is Charlotte Richer, who defeated Daniel Paine by 1,575 votes to 768. The turnout was around 3,300 out of approximately 18,000 students. This is a notable increase from last year’s turnout of 2,800. This demonstrates the increased confidence of Cambridge students in CUSU under the current executive, led by incumbent President Mark Ferguson. The most significant change to the election structure this year has been the introduction of online voting. Paper voting remained available, but throughout Monday and Tuesday almost 2,000 students cast their CUSU election votes online. “Online voting has been a great success, and very popular amongst students and college returning officers”, Ashley Aarons, current CUSU Services Officer, told TCS. “It is time now to consider if we want only online elections in the future, and how we can help JCRs and MCRs hold online elections using our system and programming.” Voters also had to decide whether CUSU should adopt a new constitution. A total of 1793 voters were in favour of the reforms, with only 322 voting against. However, there were 1056 spoiled ballots, so despite a clear majority in favour there were not enough votes to meet the 10% of the University required to change the constitu- tion. The huge number of spoiled ballots indicates that many voters did not vote as they had no idea what they were voting for, despite the motion being passed unanimously at two sessions of CUSU council. At the time of going to press, the winning candidates for the sabbatical positions of Services Officer and Welfare Officer had not been announced. The new occupants of several part-time positions are also yet to be confirmed, namely Mental Heath Awareness Officer, Target Campaigns, Open Portfolio, Green Officer and Higher Education Funding Officer. It is expected that the results for these positions will be announced on Thursday. Dossiers Sexologiques 7 Interview with the Maccabees 28 Lent Bumps 32 2 NEWS\ The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 News in Brief March celebrates forty years of legal abortion To mark the 40th anniversary of the 1967 Abortion Act, which legalised abortion in Britain, hundreds of men and women attended a rally organised by the feminist fightback team in London. On Saturday 3rd of March approximately 300 people attended a torch-lit evening march through London, and then gathered at the University of London Union to hear speeches from various women’s rights activists, including Katy Clarke MP. Muslim-Jewish Centre creates new course The Centre for the Study of Muslim and Jewish Relations (CMJR), situated in Cambridge, has announced that it will begin a postgraduate course entitled “Studies in Judaism, Islam and MuslimJewish Relations”. The course will provide tuition through e-learning as well as on-site in Cambridge. The CMJR was founded and opened in February. Nokia and Cambridge to partner in research Cambridge University’s West Cambridge Site will house research into nanotechnologies by the corporation Nokia. An agreement between the University and Nokia was signed on Tuesday in Helsinki. West Cambridge is the University’s growing new science and technology campus. Correction: Ben Blyth In our page 3 story “Surprise resignation of Christ’s College JCR President” (Thursday 1st March), The Cambridge Student stated that Ben Blyth received 120 emails in support. In fact, he received 120 emails in support of his efforts to keep the bar open during Easter term. Science funding to be cut Government plans to drastically reduce research budgets Sarah Smith The government this week announced plans to make drastic cuts to science research funding. A total of £68 million is to be slashed from the budgets of eight major research councils in order to account for shortfalls in the budget of the Department of Trade and Industry. One of the biggest losses will be felt by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, which is set to lose £29 million in funding. They recently received glowing praise in the International Review of the UK Research Base in ICT, which stressed the need to sustain, even increase, the amount, quality and impact of research funded by the EPSRC. Other councils facing budget reductions include the Medical Research Council, facing a loss of £10.7 million. The Council recently funded pioneering re- search into the relief of crippling Parkinson’s Disease symptoms. The National Environmental Research Council will suffer £9.7 million cuts, and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council’s loss of £6.7 million means it expects to cut the equivalent of 20 research grants. The Arts and Humanities Council will lose £5.3 million, roughly a tenth of its budget. A spokesman for the Department of Trade and Industry defended the decision. “The sum amounts of less than one per cent of nearly £10 billion awarded by the Government to science over the current three year spending period”, he said. “The science budget has nearly doubled since 1997 to £3.4 billion a year, and continues to rise.” It has been suggested that the cuts will lead to scores of academics being denied research grants and PhD students being discouraged from entering academic careers. CUSU’s Graduates Officer, Science research is threatened by new funding cuts Kamiar Mohaddes, condemned the move. “The amount of people doing PhDs could fall as a result of this”, Mohaddes told The Cambridge Student. “Any cuts in funding directly affect postgraduates and academics in particular. Research is one of the main driving factors behind Cambridge University in particular.” It has been estimated that around 3000 UK research grants will no longer be fundable. The problem may not be a solely British concern, however. The funding of sciences in America has also suffered as Congress failed to pass the new budget. NEWS 3 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student “Get that man a taxi”: Panic at the Union Peter Wood The results of last night’s Cambridge Union elections have yet to be announced as TCS went to print after the count was disrupted by electoral complaints. A total of three electoral complaints and four accusations of malpractice by candidates were submitted to the Union’s Electoral Complaints Authority. Of these only two were upheld. The tranquillity of the union bar was interrupted at 10.45pm by the sudden appearance of the Electoral Complaints Authority, who demanded that Churchill College JCR President Richard Erlank appear before them by 11pm or the electoral count would be postponed until the next day. Following the announcement, the sparsely filled bar emptied to the cry of “Somebody call a taxi!”, whilst candidates and supporters immediately fanned out across Cambridge to find the missing student. With Erlank successfully found, the authority continued an analysis of the complaints and appeared at 11.15pm with their conclusions. They announced a total of £30 in fines. Erlank was issued a £10 fine for sending an email reminding Churchill College members to vote in the union elections. Luke Pearce was also fined £20 for “engaging in written canvass- ing”. Both are banned in Union elections. Whilst no results were confirmed, the Union disclosed that there had been approximately 680 votes cast for the 40 candidates running. This is despite the fact that roughly 40% of Cambridge undergraduates are union members. The elections have been dominated by the competition between two opposing slates, pitting candidates Roland Foxcroft and Elena Narozanski against each other for the presidency. James Robinson has been chosen as Vice-President by the standing committee but this appointment has yet to be ratified by a members’ business meeting. Amy Hanna The Union will be opening its doors to a new executive Student petition to oust Oxford Don Alys Brown The row over academic freedom has been reignited in Oxford, as a group of students have tried to remove a Don due to his political beliefs. A student petition has made against Professor David Coleman, a professor of demography at Oxford and co-founder of the think-tank Migration Watch UK. The petition has been launched by Oxford Student Action for Refugees. The group believes that Professor Coleman’s involvement in the think-tank and his fellowship of the Galton Institute, formerly the Eugenics Society, are reasons Oxford should “consider the suitability of Coleman’s continued tenure as a professor of the university”. Colleagues at Oxford University have risen to Professor Coleman’s defense, calling the petition a “student witch-hunt” and arguing that students should debate their views with Coleman, not call to sack him. Oxford University told The Cambridge Student; “the University has not received a petition from any student group about Professor Coleman and so the Press Office can not comment on a petition it has not seen”. However, the University has still entered into the academic freedom debate by issuing the statement that “freedom of speech is a fundamental right respected by the University”. The statement continued, “Academic staff have freedom within the law to question and test received wisdom, and to put forward new ideas and controversial or unpopular opinions, without placing themselves in jeopardy of losing their jobs or privileges.” Professor Coleman has called the petition “a shameful attempt, of the most intolerant and totalitarian kind, to suppress the free- dom of analysis and informed comment that it is the function of universities to cherish.” He goes on to say that he is “ashamed that Oxford students should behave this way. It is the signatories who will bring the university into disrepute, and it is they who should reconsider their membership of this university.” Kieran Hutchinson Dean, who organised the petition, said, “We understand that not everyone is going to agree with our position, but we want to open a debate.” There is support for the student position. One vocal critic of Professor Coleman and Migration Watch UK is anti-rac- ism campaigner Teresa Hayter. She claims that Migration Watch’s statistics had “the clear intention of stirring up racism and hostility towards immigrants”. Hayter has also previously pulled out of an event she was due to attend upon discovering that Professor Coleman would also be appearing there. She has spoken out in favour of the student petition while talking to The Times Higher Education, “I support the petition. I don’t think he should be a professor at the university.” With neither side backing down, the debate looks set to continue for some time to come. Internet used to slander lecturers Catherine Watts An investigation by The Times Higher Education Supplement has revealed students’ widespread abuse of academics by means of the internet. Lecturers have been publicly attacked on networking websites, coming under, sometimes sexually explicit, abuse. Insults to their professionalism and appearance have been broadcast to a potential audience of millions via the web, as lecturers have been attacked online as “useless” and “rubbish”. One has even been branded a ‘waste-of-space bitch’. Numerous examples of academics being filmed during their lectures and seminars were also discovered during an investigation of the video-sharing website YouTube. Footage has been broadcast showing images of students sleeping in lectures, ridiculing the academics’ arguments and disrupting lectures with stunts such as streaking across the lecture theatre. The joint general secretary of the University and College Union (UCU), Sally Hunt, was “appalled” at the findings. She described such student behaviour as “bullying” and stated that “universities must do more to ensure that staff and students are able to work in a tolerant and intimidation-free environment”. The Times Higher investigation comes after recent discoveries at the University of Huddersfield concerning three separate personal attacks on female staff. These were found on the website MySpace, and included comments about lecturers’ personal hygiene and speculation about an academic’s sex life. Bryan Lowes, a senior lecturer at Bradford University, said, “We are all still learning about the opportunities and pitfalls that technology brings to the lecture theatre”, following the discovery of a video broadcasting a student asleep in his lecture. Essex University said that the abuse of one of its academics, which involved the lecturer being filmed repeatedly scratching his crotch, was “regrettable”, but added that many positive depictions of the university are to be found on these sites. Fortunately, Cambridge lecturers in the main have genuine appreciation societies dedicated to them, and naturally this is most evident on Facebook. There are a significant number of groups of admiration for lecturers across all subjects – but none seem to be more popular than the Pete Wothers appreciation society. Dr Wothers’ chemistry lectures have been filmed and broadcast on YouTube, to share the joy created when he pauses lectures to explode items ranging from rice krispies to a nitrate-soaked cotton wool snowman. One enthusiastic Natsci described how his famous snowman lecture was completely full, with people from other years turning up to watch the explosion, which can be viewed on YouTube alongside footage of rapturously applauding students and even a standing ovation for this “legend”. “He needs to be seen/heard to be fully appreciated!” the student gushed. Hopefully, evidence of such widespread appreciation UK Masters degrees placed under threat A photo from the online Pete Wothers appreciation society will restore faith in students concerning attitudes to their lecturers. Universities UK commented on the investigation, “Students and staff will no doubt laugh off much of this as long as the line is not crossed into offensive and defamatory material”. A European agreement named the “Bologna process” will place further strain on our university system, claims the Commons Education Select Committee. “Bologna” aims to create a European Higher Education area by 2010; this will be accomplished by an agreed framework of what different countries’ degrees should look like and how they should be compared. This would involve greater collaboration between universities and ensure increased mobility of students, researchers and staff. It has been suggested that this could threaten the British oneyear Masters course, which currently attracts many overseas students and is extremely lucrative. “Bologna” uses a common template of three years for a first degree, two years for a Masters and three to four years for a PhD. In a recent users’ guide, The European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) has established a system of “credit points” for different degrees. ECTS claims that the maximum number of credit points a student can gain for a one-year Masters degree is 75, thus creating the impression that a British Masters was of less value than those elsewhere in the European Union. A conference of 46 European Education ministers will be held in London this May, to discuss these contentious issues. Higher Education minister Bill Ramell is being pressured to stand up for UK universities. British commentators view our system as independent of government, flexible and high-quality, compared to their more bureaucratic counterparts on the Continent. Continental Masters degrees are often viewed as controlled by the state and unresponsive to students. Tyler Richards, an overseas Graduate studying for his Masters in Cambridge, told The Cambridge Student, “The one year Masters scheme is great. To change it would be a shame for students, like me, who are drawn to it, due to its short duration and intense period of intellectual growth.” If a two-year Masters becomes the norm throughout Europe, the British University system may be left behind unless it follows the trend. Like TCS News? Think you could do better? If you want to edit the section in Michaelmas term 2007, email apply@tcs.cam.ac.uk 4 NEWS\ The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 A history of electioneering apathy Escaping the heat of election week, we disappear into the archives for a look at CUSU elections past. It was interesting, we promise. Peter Wood The dust has yet to settle over the election of Mark Fletcher’s election. With the new president waiting to take the reigns of CUSU, the past front pages of TCS can offer some essential lessons for the running a new executive. In previous years, no sooner have elections ended than questions over the count begins to mount. Questions were raised over the vote for the 2002 Services officer, and again in 2003 over the appointment of the new president. In both events, the election results stood as first announced, but with a shaky start few would desire. After the renewed scrutiny of the electoral committee by Jacob Bard-Rosenberg at last CUSU council and followed by the immediate dismissal of his motion, we can hope that the matter will not resurface. Whilst claims of unjust elections immediately make the front page, the spectre of student apathy has long haunted the halls of CUSU. Light hearted jabs at CUSU highlight the less than reverent stance taken over sabbatical posts. The handwritten manifesto for Welfare Officer by Tim Stanley ran simply: “This is hand written because I was too drunk to write a manifesto. There is no better testament to my character”. He may have even been in with a chance, considering past candidates for President have included the Churchill College mascot, “standing for the power of WOOF” and Dave Chaplin, pledging to supervise the “digging of a large hole”. Swearing to find a new CUSU building he said: “If it comes to it, I’ll build it myself out of cardboard, string and strong sellotape”. Despite the joke, the new CUSU building has still not been finalised, despite the plans to move out this May. The new Executive will be strongly judged on their ability to finish the move, after over 5 years of planning. 2005 saw Presidential candidate Laura Walsh proclaim “This is going to be a Crucial year for CUSU and I feel I’ve got the leadership ability”. In retrospect, this year’s hustings have seen an almost universal desire to move on from the aftermath of Walsh’s administration, and hopefully the 2007 candidates will be able to achieve their manifesto promises for Cambridge Students. Of particular concern to the new CUSU will be the lingering shadow of JCR disaffiliations. 2004 saw Downing vote on whether to remain with CUSU, its students calling a referendum on whether CUSU was “too po- litical”. The debate was triggered by a CUSU motion warning against racism and racist parties, with criticism coming from those who considered it too specifically about the British National Party, too political and possibly illegal. Downing college JCR president eventually suggested CUSU should only involve itself with issues that affect “a significant sized group of students who… will be materially affected,” to the disagreement of outgoing CUSU President Brinded, and President-Elect Wes Streeting, arguing that CUSU was an intrinsically political organisation. After deep divides over the politicization of CUSU in elections again this year, the argument has still not disappeared and will continue to trouble the incoming Executive. Although most presidents have run on platforms of making CUSU more relevant to students, few have won on grounds that openly promote a more politicised CUSU. A reminder to stay relevant to their member’s interests came from the Graduate Union in 2004. Whilst Ruth Keeling was voted in as President, apathy meant that half of the union’s executive positions were left unfilled without a single application for the post. The total turnout for the presidential election was a mere 706 votes for all candidates, including re-open nominations and spoiled ballots. Just over a month before, TCS printed rumours that the Graduate Union was considering merging with CUSU after a build up of financial mis-management and non-attendance at crucial events. Whilst the merger never happened, it remains a reminder of how quickly unions can loose, or gain the trust of the student Tom Hensby The motion at the Union last Thursday was incendiary: ‘This House Believes that Islam is incompatible with Western Liberalism.” In the crowd sat an unusual amount of Muslims, waiting expectantly to see if they were ‘incompatible’ or not, and what was going to be done about it. First up for the proposition was Jonathan Goldberg QC. “Sadly, my conclusion is that they are not compatible,” he said, before going on to list with great relish the evils of Islam. If his central argument wasn’t too shocking, some of his supporting points were: “Not 100% of Muslims are terrorists,” he said, “But 100% of terrorists are Muslims.” At this, some people applauded. In my misery, I saw one student in the gallery – thank you that man! – mime clawing off his own face in frustration. But what is this? The next speaker stands up. He has a nice quiet voice. He has a wispy beard. He has the height and general manners of one of the peaceful tree folk from the Lord of the Rings. It was the phantasmagorical Tim Winters, Lecturer in Islamic Studies at our own Divinity faculty, first speaker for the opposition team. He picked the whole chamber up like so many agitated little hobbits, and took them on an erudite journey through the history and geography of Islam, set to the sound of birdsong and oboes. Islamic fundamentalism was set aside from mainstream Islam: Winters talked of witnessing hundreds of Muslim scholars sign a convention advocating peace and integration (you can see it at www.muslimsforeurope.com) but he explained how the newspapers just weren’t interested in it. The proposition countered in the form of Sam ‘Rock-around-the-clock’ Block! A man to be described with exclamation marks! Because! That! Is how! He spoke! “In saying that Islam! is not compatible, we are not! Making! A moral judgement! Their concepts are just different!” he exploded, knocking several TCS is now accepting applications for the position of Investigations Editor for Michaelmas 2007. E-mail apply@tcs. cam.ac.uk Illustration Tom Hensby Union debates Islam body. The view of one Graduate student at Kings College is a salient point. When asked this week if he knew whether the graduate union was merged with CUSU, he replied “I don’t know and I don’t really care”. The same view would not be hard to find amongst undergraduates. As all candidates have acknowledged, relevancy is essential to the running of the student union. All have professed a desire to fight apathy and keep the student body interested. The coming year will show how well they can do. people over, and blowing those who objected all the way to Mecca. Up next was Baron Norman Lamont of Lerwick, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer under John Major, and owner of some of the most magnificent eyebrows ever seen. He pointed out that some Islamic states are just a decade old, and would mature into liberalism. From the other side of the Chamber divide came Douglas Murray, friend of NeoConservatism, “enemy of PalaeoConservatism (i.e. Norman Lamont). Apart from being an author, it turns out that Murray is a part-time hypnotist: “You want Islam to be compatible,” he intoned, “yes, you WANT it to be compatible…you want it to be compatible, I KNOW that you WANT it to be compatible,” and so on, as he appeared to grow physically larger with each repetition “…but it can’t be.” Having been placed in a trance by Murray, I couldn’t draw him. I found a picture of a Roman Emperor who looks similarly scornful on Wikipedia, and added that in. Anti-libel note: Murray, unlike Caracalla (186-217AD), was not wearing a toga at the Union. One of the delights of covering the Union debates is watching the gestures of speakers, who, in delivering their speeches, go through many kinds of incredible mimes: buttering invisible sandwiches, shooting people in the audience with an invisible pistol, or (particularly in moments of pathos) weighing a really large but invisible Melon of Grief in their hands. Lord David Trimble was one such performance. He was constantly laying invisible bricks on a wall at waist height, fortifying an argument that would eventually win his side the debate. His concluding point was that in all of the propositions speeches, he saw no hope for the future, and that the only hope for the future lay in throwing out the motion. His heartfelt speech paid off, and the motion was finally rejected, with 128 Ayes, 249 Noes, and 98 Abstentions. FOCUS 5 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student Where are the kidnapped Brits? British diplomats and their family members seized in Ethiopia may be at risk The presence of U.S. forces may further destabilize the Horn of Africa. United States Department of Defense Tewodros B. Sile T ourists visit a remote region of a country, inhabited by a fierce nomadic tribe. In a hail of gunfire they are kidnapped and taken over the border into a second country, an enemy of the country from which they have been snatched. These are no ordinary tourists, but diplomats and their relatives from a European embassy. Diplomacy kicks into gear but just in case this fails, elite Special Forces are poised and ready to undertake a daring rescue raid. The above, stripped of names of countries, describes the main details of what has unfolded (and continues to unfold) in the remote Afar region of north-western Ethiopia, one of the world’s most inhospitable, yet most fascinating places. Last Thursday, the media began to receive the first details in what has become a complicated story replete with accusations, counter-accusations and a plethora of twists. Yet we are still not closer to finding out the exact details of what happened, who was behind this incident, or indeed even where the missing people are. What we do know is that, on that Thursday, a group of European tourists, including French, British and Italian nationals, together with their Ethiopian guides (guides and armed escorts are advised by the Ethiopian government) went missing in the Afar region, in an area not too far from the border of neighbouring Eritrea. The five Britons amongst the group are all either diplomats at the British Embassy in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, or their relatives. Some suspect Eritrea are behind this incident. The President of Ethiopia’s Afar state, Ismail Ali Sero, said that men in Eritrean military uniform seized the group and marched them over the border to an Eritrean military camp. Ethiopia’s state-run news agency has also noted that five of the Ethiopians with the group were later found near the Eritrean border, something more than coincidental for those who believe in Eritrea’s involvement in the incident. As of Monday, three damaged vehicles, allegedly those of the British party, have been found, bearing the hallmarks of damage by some sort of any explosion or shrapnel. In an added twist to the story, the French tourists who were reported as being kidnapped have returned to the town of Mekele and refuted any claims that they were kidnapped, instead saying that their tour was undisturbed. What might have later become the plotline for an espionage thriller has dominated headlines in the British news media, and the fact that it is UK diplomats and their relatives that are missing has sparked intense diplomatic activity, with Britain sending a ten-member crisis team to the region to help secure their release. Furthermore, the government has issued a Defence Advisory (DA) notice, a formal request to news editors to desist from publishing specific details of the case for reasons of national security, which means that we do not have access to all the case information, such as the name of the missing Britons. This explains why British officials have refused to confirm media reports stating that SAS troops been flown to the neighbouring state of Djibouti, ready to be sent to the region in case they are needed to mount a rescue mission. Kidnapping tourists may be seen as one method of bring attention to the cause of Afar groups The region itself is inhabited largely by the Afar ethnic group, a nomadic group whose territory straddles the border region between Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti. This area is a low-lying, drought-prone and hot region studded with volcanoes, salt flats and scrubland, and is an area of intense interest for a range of visitors. Geologists come to discover and research the breathtaking landscape, whereas archaeologists favour it as the region provides many clues to the origins of human beings; the world’s oldest intact hominid skeleton was discovered here in 1974 and since then many important discoveries of hominid remains and tools have been discovered. It is these kinds of attractions that have made tourists eager to visit the area, and discover more about the landscape and its Afar inhabitants. This explains why the group would have been in the region in the first place. Assessing who is behind this kidnapping incident is however not an easy task, as the truth has been crowded out by a raft of accusations and counteraccusations between Ethiopia and Eritrea, a natural circumstance given their fraught relationship. The remarkable geopolitical complexity of the Horn of Africa makes diplomatic efforts between Eritrea, Ethiopia and the United Kingdom particularly sensitive. Eritrea and Ethiopia fought a two year border war between 1998 and 2000, costing each side an estimated US$1 million a day. Although a peace agreement was signed in December 2000 which set up a commission to demarcate the boundary, when their decision was reported in April 2002, the agreement came unstuck as the symbolic town of Badme, scene of some of the heaviest fighting of the war, was awarded to Eritrea. Ethiopia, which still administers Badme, has expressed its displeasure with the decision and has instead asked for negotiations with Eritrea on certain contentious areas across their shared border, for example to stop villages being separated. Eritrea has however refused to negotiate, citing the “final and binding” nature of the agreement, and the border remains undemarcated, thus posing a possibility that war could break out again. Furthermore their hostile relationship has not been aided by the constant trading of accusations between the two sides and their willingness to host opposition groups from the other side. The official Ethiopian government position has been to keep silent, with Ethiopia’s Ambassador to the UK telling Sky News that “we are not in the business of finger pointing”. However this has not stopped the President of the Afar state clearly implicating Eritrea, and in the last month alone, Eritrea has been accused by the Ethiopian government of being behind a plot to bomb the African Heads of State summit held in Addis Ababa at the end of January and being behind a plan to unleash terror attacks in Ethiopia, using Ethiopian opposition parties as cover. However, the Ethiopian government is not alone in trading accusations, with the Eritrean Information Minister Ali Abdu stating that this current incident could be “some kind of staged drama cooked up” by the Ethiopian government to tarnish Eritrea’s name. We have to also remember that the Afar region has seen this kind of incident before, such as in 1995, when Italian tourists were kidnapped and later released unharmed. The Horn of Africa’s divisive history has created the environment for this sort of incident, and in this previous case the kidnapping was a result of the actions of armed Afar groups seeking to unite their group across the borders of the states which bisect their land. They were especially opposed to the recent independence of Eritrea, which they see as cutting off the Afar homeland from access to the Red Sea. Furthermore, Djibouti has also seen its Afar population rise against the government, although the group fighting there has now signed a peace deal and joined the national government. Kidnapping tourists may be seen as one method of bringing attention to the cause of Afar groups but also provides a forceful reminder to Addis Ababa that this kind of incident will not look good for the Ethiopian tourism industry, especially in a year in which tourist numbers are expected be higher than usual as foreigners flock to Ethiopia to celebrate the ushering in of the year 2000 (according to the Julian Calendar, which is still in use in Ethiopia and which is seven years and eight months behind the Gregorian calendar) in September. This kind of incident does not provide the kind of publicity the Ethiopian tourism sector was looking for, although we have to remember that this is an isolated incident, occurring in a region where increased safety measures are taken by tourists. ...posing a possibility that war could break out again. This leaves us with the question of who is actually behind this. Is it Eritrea acting to humiliate Ethiopia? Very unlikely, especially as kidnapping British diplomats would not help its already fraught relationship with Western countries and would spark a diplomatic backlash against it. Is it Ethiopia acting in order to humiliate Eritrea? It seems like an elaborate and desperate attempt to undertake just to place blame on Eritrea, especially as this could backfire on prospects for the tourism sector in Ethiopia. Local Afar groups seem unlikely to have orchestrated a kidnap, for undertaking the kidnap of diplomats wouldn’t do any favours for their cause and would isolate them from any potential supporters in the international community. This might even be the work of a group of bandits kidnapping for their own personal and material gain rather than for any reason of state. Regardless of who is behind this incident - and we may never find out - what I do know is that the poisonous atmosphere between Ethiopia and Eritrea is not helping efforts to find those who are missing and that the most important thing is their safe return, something everyone must hope happens very soon. TCS is now accepting applications for the position of Focus Editor for Michaelmas 2007. If you will be in Cambridge next year and wish to be considered for this position, please send an e-mail to apply@tcs. cam.ac.uk to request an application form. 6 FOCUS The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Alastair Campbell spins a good yarn Veteran spin doctor addresses Cambridge students Pete Wood I confess I didn’t want to like Alastair Campbell when he came to talk to a packed room of Pembroke students on Monday night. I had lived through the Blair years believing that Campbell embodied everything objectionable in the New Labour government: unmet targets, sexual indiscretion, dodgy dossiers and underhand property deals. My fellow Pembrokeians seemed to have gathered to watch with morbid fascination a freak show in which the media’s political ‘Antichrist’ was the main attraction. He was hard to dislike, however, betraying little to nothing of his personality in a performance worthy of a master spin doctor. His talk was entertaining and wellargued, he (mostly) answered questions with an apparently refreshing frankness, and was also an engaging presence talking to graduates at drinks before dinner: a million miles from the politicianspeak I was expecting. The first spin of the evening was that his talk was not so much about his personal experiences as Blair’s Director of Communications, but the challenges faced by politicians trying to communicate their message to a public through a hostile press. Campbell was open in his dislike of the media (particular venom was reserved for the Today programme) which, he argued, now perceived its job, not as purveying news, but campaigning on political and cultural issues. He thus blamed the press for popular disengagement from politics, which did not benefit politicians, press, or the public: politicians became increasingly isolated from their electors, newspaper circulation fell, and distrust of politicians grew. The result was the breakdown of political culture and the growth of unhealthy political debate. Campbell did spend some time discussing his role in New Labour, admitting, with surprising candour, that there had been some mistakes made in their communications strategy. Primarily, that they had held on to the tactics of opposition after the accession to Number 10, which had caused tension between government and public. Nevertheless, he claimed, the objective of his media management strategy was to communicate directly with the electorate. Consequently, whilst it had, ultimately, been a ‘probably bad’ thing for politics, its aim was noble and that sticking to the strategy and tactics had been necessary to get the message – ‘New Labour, New Britain’ – across. His job had been to make a case for politics and instil an optimistic view of the future amongst electors. He blamed the press for popular disengagement from politics So far, so laudable, but I have a serious reservation with Mr Campbell’s argument (along with being told that ‘Government is not a plebiscite’, but that awaits another column). He claimed that democratic processes had not changed with society and it was thus difficult for government to react to demands made in the press. If Mr Campbell’s bête noir is the media moving the goal posts, politicians should redefine the rules of the game, rather than Alastair Campbell’s legacy in British politics is contested. submitting to journalists’ lead. It is not, therefore, the public’s responsibility to ‘give an indication that they want a raised level of political debate’ in order for the media to reform its ‘endemic culture of hostility’ towards politicians. Surely, it is the politicians’ job to set the agenda for the political debate and en- sure that the public remains engaged with politics. If it is not, as Campbell claimed, a case of politicians doing the ‘old stuff better than before’ in the system we have, it must be about changing the system we have, to match the subtle and complex relationship that has developed between media and public. Railway safety under the spotlight The implications of the recent crash for rail safety O. Glover O A Virgin Pendolino prepares to depart Manchester station. n 23 February, a Virgin Pendolino tilting train derailed over a set of points, between Oxenholme and Penrith at the Lake District, at 95 mph, with 120 passengers on board. One person was killed, and several others remain critically injured. As is normally the case, the crash immediately became the news headline for the next few days, and, until the Rail Accident Investigation Board released its initial report on Monday, speculation on the causes was rife. This initial report has confirmed that a defective set of points was responsible for the crash. This revelation led Network Rail to accept unequivocal responsibility for the accident, and to issue an unreserved apology. It was also revealed that, whilst all other routine inspections had been conducted, an inspection the Sunday before the crash had not been conducted. This has led some to question Network Rail’s stewardship of the industry. Network Rail has responded by pointing out that this has been the first passenger fatality since November 2004, when a motorist presumably intending to commit suicide parked on a railway near Newbury in Berkshire, and the first industry-caused crash since the May 2002 accident at Potters Bar, Hertfordshire. Network Rail’s immediate response over the weekend was to check several hundred sets of points in the area concerned, and a selection of checks nationwide. No defects or problems were found. But what has the media made of Network Rail’s claims? Initial reactions seemed to repeat those seen in response to Hatfield in 2000, or Potters Bar in 2002. Questions were raised about whether the pub- lic could or should trust rail and suggestions were made that such an accident must never be allowed to happen again. Yet, by Tuesday morning, the accident seemed to have passed completely from some headlines. And sensible questions were asked of both John Armitt and Richard Branson, Chairman of the Virgin Group, in interviews on Monday. It seemed that the media was more willing to accept, on this occasion, that this crash may just have been an extremely unfortunate one-off, in the context of a highly safetyconscious industry. What might explain the somewhat more restrained media response? One explanation surely lies in how the railway industry itself responded. In response to the RAIB report, Network Rail immediately apologised and accepted responsibility: this is a different approach to that which was sometimes taken by Network Rail’s predecessor, Railtrack, which involved making excuses and trying to ‘pass the buck’. Indeed, Richard Branson praised Network Rail for its honesty and courage in accepting the criticism. Secondly, whilst extremely unfortunate, fatalities and casualties were far lower than might have been feared, given the high speed of the derailment, and the way the carriages so dramatically slid down the embankment. The sturdy and safety-conscious design of the Pendolino train has been rightly praised in reducing casualties (although claims that the trains which preceded the Pendolino were significantly less crashworthy are exaggerated). Most important is the fact that the railway has seen safety improving enormously in the last 5 years, and indeed, contrary to media portrayal, since privatisation. Passenger and workforce fatalities decline every year, and continue to do so. The average number of fatal train accidents per year was approximately 0.9 in 2005, compared to 2.1 in 1990 and 3.8 in 1975.Perhaps the media and the public have noticed improvements to safety in recent years, particularly given the relative lack of major accidents in the last few years, compared to the series of fatal crashes in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Given these improving safety trends, what can the railway industry learn from the Grayrigg derailment? Firstly, Network Rail needs to cooperate fully with the ongoing investigation, to discover if an oversight by local maintenance teams and management was responsible for the problems with the points at Grayrigg, or if there are more widespread issues with that particular design of points. Following the 2002 crash, it was suggested that this earlier system of points should be redesigned, although serious derailments remain rare. Secondly, debate continues as to whether seatbelts should be introduced to high-speed, long-distance trains. I think the reaction of many people to this will be to ask whether this undermines the whole advantage of rail travel, in terms of freedom to move through the train, and the concept of buffet and restaurant cars. But, if lives could be saved, without exorbitant cost, perhaps it is something the industry could benefit from exploring and researching further. Seatbelts or not, rail remains one of the safest forms of transport around. In the past 5 years, there have been fewer than 100 passenger or workforce deaths on the railway. This compares very favourably indeed to 3,201 deaths in road accidents in 2005 alone, and a situation where road fatalities have remained constant over the past 10 years. It is important that, whilst constantly striving to improve railway safety, such statistics are not forgotten. SCIENCE 7 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student Dossiers Sexologiques The peculiar habits of animal lovers fill out line here fill out line here Mico Tatalovic I was walking around the zoo in Pretoria, South Africa, the other day enjoying seeing the animals on a nice sunny day. There was a man with a small child behind me, and every now and then he would ask me “what’s in there?” as he approached whatever enclosure I was looking at. I was happy to repl,y until I was caught looking in amazement at a couple of cow-like creatures (whose name I cannot remember) having a go at it. The female was walking slowly in a small circle, whilst the male was following her closely. He mounted her three times in the five minutes I spent voyeuristically observing them. She complied, even licking his genitalia at one point. When the man with the child asked “what’s in there?” I just quietly walked away. Female bonobos go for lesbian sex This observation reminded me of stories I heard at the Kalahari Meerkat Project about some cheeky, pleasure-seeking male meerkats, who would use small unsuspecting pups for fellatio. Now this all sounds quite weird – animals enjoying oral sex, even paedophilia. Surely, one might think, animals have sex to procreate and not to enjoy it. Oral sex hardly has a reproductive value. It seems that some researchers are now starting to recognize that animals not only have all sorts of sex, but also do it for pleasure. Dr. Balcombe in Pleasurable Kingdom argues, with support from empirical studies, that most animals have feeling and emotions. One of the chap- ters presents some evidence that animals have sex for pleasure rather than solely for reproduction. The idea behind this is that if reproduction is important for animals, then doing it should be rewarding to the animal, so that it does lots of it. However, once you enjoy having your genitalia stimulated, then, as we see in humans, all sorts of manipulations of the genitalia are used to get that pleasurable feeling. Oral, anal and vaginal sex, masturbation, use of ‘toys’ in masturbation…sound like a porn movie? Well it all happens in nature apparently. A 750-page book from 1999 explores all these behaviours, especially the sexual ones whose primary function is not to reproduce, in greater detail (Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity). I’ll just mention a few here. Walruses masturbate using a flipper. I saw my dog masturbating using his mouth. White-tailed deer arch their back to stimulate their penis using their own ribcage. Male manatees rub their penises and also engage in the pleasures of the position ‘69’, mutually fellating each other. Female bonobos go for lesbian sex-they stimulate each-others genitals the so called ‘gg’ rubbing (genito-genital rubbing). They do so on average once every two hours. Talk about nymphomaniacs! Chimpanzee females also get involved with oral lesbian sex. Males engage in manual, oral and anal sex with other males. They even sometimes have sex with other species. They do so with savannah baboons. Masturbation occurs often and some captive chimps may even fellate themselves. Male gibbons sometimes engage in homosexual incestuous behaviour: father and son often rub their penises together to reach orgasm. Japanese macaque females use males’ tails to stimu- The science of pleasure seeking. Harriet Bradshaw late their clitoris. Bottlenose dolphins use their flippers to provide pleasure to the other individual by slipping flipper into genital slits. They can also use their beak to do this. They will also masturbate; they use inanimate objects to rub their genitalia against. Sometimes they sexually harass sea turtles and sharks by penetrating them. Spotted dolphins also partake in ‘genital buzzing’: they produce sound directed at another dolphin’s genital area…perhaps a sort of ‘dirty talk’ for dolphins? Male deer, caribou and moose can all stimulate their sensitive growing antlers against trees to achieve erection and even ejaculation. In these animals, antlers seem to act as erogenous zones. You name it, they do it. It’s wild out there. Animals do seem to engage in a variety of non-reproductive sexual activities that open up the possibility that they actually have sex for fun and pleasure. Reproduction just happens to sometimes follow. It is a by-product of the animals’ quest for joy. If you think about it, this is very similar to human sexual behaviour. We don’t normally engage in sex to reproduce, but to pleasure ourselves, bond etc. Maybe animals do so for the same reasons. Breakthroughs From walking robots to the causes of early puberty Charlotte Phillips Treatment – Making cancer more vulnerable: The treatment of cancers with chemotherapy is common practice, but equally common are the problems associated with this type of chemical therapy, namely the disease’s resistance to the drugs used. This could soon be history due to the discovery of the mechanism by which cancers defend themselves against chemotherapy. Proteins belonging to the Fanconi/BRCA pathway are responsible for identifying mutations in the body before repairing them. This is one of the body’s modes of defence against cancerous attack. When a tumour is being targeted by therapeutic drugs, these proteins can actually correct for alterations brought about by the drugs, therefore helping the tumour to survive. Adjusting the action of these proteins could prove an effective method for increasing the vulnerability of cancerous growths, saving lives through the subtle enhancement of anti-cancer therapies. Health – Drugs to stave off radiation poisoning: Recent findings by scientists at Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, CA indicate that a particular hormone produced by the adrenal system dramatically cuts death rates in those exposed to radiation. The steroid, referred to as AED, boosts blood platelets, which in turn stimulates the growth of bone-marrow cells. The cause of death due to acute exposure to radiation is caused by the fact that radiation kills both blood cells normally used to fight infection and the marrow cells that would ordinarily be responsible for replacing them. This treatment could be used both pre-emptively, in radiation workers to be exposed to radiation whilst attending the scene of a nuclear incident, or those exposed to radiation through a blast, as long as they were treated soon enough after exposure. A further examination of these findings by the US government is imminent. Robo-technology – From crawling to running: Scientists from a private research facility called Anybots, CA, have built a robot that can now walk, a process it learned to do independently through a process of trial and error. This development came only two days after it learned to stand upright for the first time. This was achieved by the researchers recording the robot’s movements, including the pressure on its’ feet and the angle at which it is tilting, as it tried to perform a particular action before feeding the information back to it. The robot then modified its’ way of moving on the basis of that information. This is a comparative process to human ones, for example that of our inner ears signalling to us the angle at which we are tilting in order to help us keep our balance. This ability to learn through its mistakes makes this robot potentially more advanced than others currently on the market in Japan that are programmed to perform certain tasks, but cannot adapt themselves based on their success or failure in performing them. The application of this type of machine to tasks, and therefore jobs currently performed by workers needing protective clothing may not be far away. Obesity- early onset of puberty for obese girls: Common trends indicate that puberty in girls is ap- pearing earlier in the general population. Recent research by Joyce Lee at the University of Michigan has suggested that this results from increased rates of childhood obesity. 354 girls between the ages of 3 and 12, and of varying weights, were followed. Girls who were 10 kg overweight were 80% more likely to start developing breasts before the age of 9, and to start their periods by 12 years old. The average age for menstruation onset is currently 12.7 in the west. Early puberty is thought to be linked to a number of health problems in the short term, and into adulthood, including teenage depression. The causal relationship is unclear, but Lee suggests that more fat cells lead to greater release of the hormones which trigger puberty. Herman-Giddens of the University of North Carolina called the falling age of female puberty to attention in 1997. She is concerned about the worrying social consequences of this phenomenonnamely children having to deal with being “hit on” by much older men. She has also highlighted a correlation between early puberty and early sexual activity, and also alcohol use. A recent article in New Scientist (February 2007) also hinted at the importance of a girl’s family environment in relation to the age of sexual development- early-onset puberty is more common in girls who grow up without a father at home. Pesticide chemicals, among other factors, are also thought to play a role. Want to edit TCS Science in Michaelmas? Email apply@tcs.cam.ac.uk The robot who walks and balances the same way we do. 8 TRAVEL The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Volunteering in India Rebuilding communities in South India that were struck by the 2004 tsunami Rachel Cherry K ariakal (300km south of Chennai in South India) is one of the 4 districts of the Pondicherry Union which was the worst affected by the 2004 tsunami. 453 people died in this small district and there was massive damage to housing and infrastructure. Today, two years after the tsunami hit, many people are still living in temporary shelters and in some villages there are no signs of permanent housing being built. Founded in the early 1970’s BUILD (Bombay Urban Industrial League for Development) works towards the betterment of the poor and marginalized in India. BUILD arrived in Kariakal the day after the tsunami struck to assist with the burial of the dead, the provision of food, water and health care and they constructed a walled cemetery to remember the 96 people killed in the village of Chandrapatti. Here 180 houses were fully destroyed and BUILD are now constructing permanent houses 500m from the beach, an impressive improvement from the original huts that were destroyed. After winning an award for the best design of permanent houses, BUILD have now been asked by the government to construct another 1000 in area. Now BUILD have arrived they intend to stay. Unlike most of the 460 NGOs that were registered in Kariakal in the few months after the tsunami, BUILD is one of the 36 that remain. They are now establishing long term development programmes, including health education, women empower- ment through tailoring projects, AIDS awareness, and assistance in orphanages, teaching in local schools and the establishment and running of a day- care centre for pre-school children. While I was there teaching in the school and pre-school, the children slowly grew to trust me and the smiles on their beautiful faces were so rewarding. The school in which I taught had a severe shortage of teachers, large classes, poor textbooks and very basic facilities. Teaching was hard work as the children were so active and desperate for attention, but through stories, drawings and blackboard games relationships were created. The day care centre was a simple hut constructed by BUILD and was open to all castes, so many of the children were from the lowest castes. It provides food, uniform, shoes, toys and games, thus allowing their parents to work during the day and encouraging the children to go on to school. I help the children there create collages from tissue and glitter, paint with stamps, mould people out of play dough and catch balloons. Over the last 6 months the children have gone from shy and scared to happy and outgoing, ready to go to school. Soon BUILD is going to start work on the construction of a permanent larger school building for the centre, complete with community garden. Tamil Nadu is a beautiful state, with palm trees and coconuts, brightly colourful temple towers, girls with fresh orange and white flowers in their hair, flowing rivers and windswept beaches with painted fishing boats. What I loved the most was working with the children of all different ages, Children playing at the day care centre Rachel Cherry through playing word and picture games, painting, creating collages, playing Frisbee, or just interacting and chatting to them. Despite massive destructive and loss of life to this area, life continues and communities are being rebuilt. The whole experience was humbling and I enjoyed every minute of my time in Kariakal. Recovering from the tsunami is a slow process and now 18 months on permanent houses are needed for many families in Tamil Nadu. It is disheartening to see many NGOs have left the area, leaving only fading signboards and empty work huts. However, my time with BUILD India demonstrated, change is occurring and things are improving in small way. My whole trip to India enriched my understanding of the world’s largest democracy on many different levels, but there is a lot more left to discover in this chaotic, multiethnic, multi-lingual, and multi-cultural, beautiful country. I will definitely return. Taking coffee breaks in Croatia Café culture becomes a major part of Mediterranean life Mico Tatalovic C Going for coffee is a major social activity Jel Tovski roatia was a real hit with the British tourists last few summers, and is a very fashionable place to be seen. With its 1,700 islands and uniquely clear blue Adriatic sea, it is an oasis of undiscovered beauty and exotica. Rich history results from centuries of foreign influence (Greek, Italian, Austrian and Hungarian) and is evident at every step. And one of the major parts of Croatian culture on offer to tourists nowadays are cafés (chill-out comfy ones, cocktail bar ones or the beach ones where you can have your ice cappuccino as you are dabbling your feet in the sea water...). In Croatia, there is a huge café culture. Ever since the nineteenth century, when Rijeka was one of the main ports for the import of coffee into Europe, and coffee houses with live music were a popular meeting place, coffee has played an important part in the lives of Croatians. There was a huge boom of cafés in the nineties after the fall of socialistic Yugoslavia, and Croatia’s independence and transition into capitalism. Vienna (famous for its coffee houses) was always a symbol of Western Europe for Croatians, something they strive to, so it is no wonder that cafés are in. Today, new cafés are still opening all the time. Every café has its own personality: there are large, old-fashioned cafés with classical music playing; artsy, smoky cafés where every item is on sale (including the chairs); the modern, funky, colourful cafés; new-millennium minimalist cafés with see-through walls and chairs and overhead projectors playing music videos or fashion shows for you to watch as you’re sipping your latte, macchiato, or cappuccino. Going for coffee is a major social activity, whether it’s a morning coffee in between lectures, lunch time break in town, Sunday afternoon meeting with a friend, or ever a first date: you don’t invite girls for dinner, you invite them for a coffee, and estimate your chances there first. If you’re walking down one of the main pedestrian streets (often called the ‘corso’) or through a town square, if you run into someone you know, it’s an automatic thing to invite them for coffee—and conveniently enough, you’re never more than a few steps away from a café, where coffee is always the cheapest thing on the menu (60p to £1). You can experience a lot of pleasure when walking around town with your friends, trying to decide where to go for coffee that day. Should we go to ‘Corso’-the cafe at the very heart of ancient city of Rijeka with the best ice-cream in town; ‘Nina’-the trendy cafe on a boat with the view of the Adriatic, or ‘Trsat’-the new cafe within the medieval castle on the hill overlooking the entire city and the see today? Do we feel like a great cappuccino, breath-taking view or the best ice cream in town? There are three major daily newspapers in Croatia (‘Novi list’, ‘Jutarnji list’, and ‘Večernji list’) and most cafés have copies of them for you to read, as part of the offer. The only food available in Croatian cafés is usually either ice cream or cakes and biscuits: cafés here are places for coffee, other hot and cold drinks, cigarettes (unfortunately), and papers, not food. On a sunny winter or spring day the café terraces, which often have more seating space than there is indoors, are all packed, and it is the availability of space, rather than your preference, that often determines where you end up going for coffee: a free seat is the deciding factor. Sometimes, you end up waiting in front of your favourite café for twenty minutes, but once you get your seat and place your order, you’re set. You know it was worth it. Observing the world go by over the upper edge of the newspaper you’re pretending to read, you spot all the people and events that may interest and entertain you. An extra-mini skirt, your cousin’s girlfriend, your sister skipping school, a cute dog being chased by a four-year-old with a water gun, all of these pass by your café on the main square, while you enjoy the good music and cosy atmosphere where you sit. While you can spot many people you know, not many people can spot you when you’re sitting in a crowded café, so you can select whom you want to join you. Or maybe you feel like relaxing on your own. So, whether it’s a hot Mediterranean summer day and you stop for an ice Nescafé frappé on your way to the beach, or it’s a freezing December evening and the town is lit up with Christmas lights and you escape the gloomy weather by popping into a cosy, lively café for a hot chocolate, cafés are the way to go in Croatia! As well as some of the best beaches in Europe, Croatia also boasts Roman ruins and medieval relics. TRAVEL 9 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student Chaos, commotion, and communal living in Nicaragua Rowing a local fisherman’s boat to reach remote islands famous for the use of art as a social movement to expect that I would have a digital camera and that she could see herself on the display. The islanders are trying their hardest to improve the tourism infrastructure, but Solentiname is remote and it is not unusual for it to be tourist-free. I enjoyed having the region’s great tourism plans all to myself. I stayed in a family’s spare room and ate meals with people who were as curious about me and my life as I was about them and their lives. Ilana Raburn T here was chaos. And it was all because of me, which in a strange way made me proud. I felt a little like Helen of Troy must have, apart from the obvious facts that we weren’t in a Greek myth and that my stunning beauty wasn’t really relevant. Instead, I was sitting in a small Nicaraguan bus station and the commotion was about how and when I was going to leave the town. The stocky man next to me was shouting at his wife and she was swinging a live chicken at him. The shoeshine boy was adamant that he knew more than everyone else, but – for whatever reason – the person on the other end of his mobile phone disagreed. People were literally jumping around and random passersby were being dragged into the debate. All I had done was ask whether it would be quicker to wait for a direct bus to León or take an earlier one to nearby Chinandega and change. It wasn’t obvious from the map whether either road was paved and the idea of a timetable has never really made sense in Latin America. It was basically a reasonable question and it should have been answered simply. But no. It became the subject of a station-wide debate: about the quickest route to León and about whether or not I ought to go to León (someone had a cousin there, but everyone else seemed to think it was too hot). The person to ask was clearly the old man in the corner. Like old men the world over, he seemed to be the source of all information bus-related, but unfortunately he kept forgetting where it was that I wanted to go. People became impatient; the old man got left out of the ensuing debate and instead fell asleep under his hat. The stocky man next to me was shouting at his wife and she was swinging a live chicken at him. It was decided that it would be “loco” (crazy) for me to take the earlier one and change. But after the usual five minutes of chaos that surrounds the arrival of any bus, I found myself crammed into the old American school-bus bound for Chinandega. My backpack was on the roof, the chicken-waving lady had handed me the bird to hold, and someone was trying to sell me toothpaste. This is the nature of travel in Nicaragua. With journeys like this, travel to some of the more remote places takes a while. Getting to Solentiname, for example, took days. Solentiname is an archipelago of small and largely uninhabited islands very much in the middle of nowhere. The nearest post office is a twice-weekly motorboat ride away, and the nearest ATM is that plus a 15-hour ferry boat ride. Having made it to León (via Chinandega), I needed to take a bus to Granada, from where the 15hour ferry leaves twice a week if the weather is not too bad. The ferry drops you off at 6am in the filthy city of San Carlos that boasts a post office, an archaeology museum and four different places to drink varying strengths of instant coffee. At some point in the late afternoon (when everyone’s ready), a public What started out as a few fishermen and peasants playing around with paint has become a world-famous school of art. Fixing a boat at sunset in Solentiname Ilana Raburn boat leaves for the archipelago of Solentiname. It’s a long journey, but the islets are worlds away from the San Carlos instant coffee and chaos of the bus station the day before. Solentiname is a remote and very quiet place. There are no cars or roads, not least because there would not be room for them. Transport to and from the islands is by motorboat, and only twice weekly. Until the 1960s, the inhabitants of Solentiname lived in abject poverty. They had only hand-carved canoes and making contact with the outside world was hard. Travel between islets was long and exhausting, whilst travel to San Carlos – the nearest town away from the archipelago – was almost impossible. Reaching the closest hospital just didn’t happen and people ate only what they could grow or fish. But then in 1966, Ernesto Cardenal, a poet-gonepriest arrived on the islands and established a contemplative community. He taught the peasants about the gospels in a way that they like to compare to how that the early Christians lived. The peasants were introduced to the idea of community sharing and social justice, but Ernesto Cardenal’s lessons were not limited to the bible. His teachings were based on his belief in community and social development, to the extent that when Pope John Paul II visited Nicaragua, he refused to meet him. The Pope protested that he had taken the idea of liberation theology too far. More famously, Ernesto Cardenal introduced art as a social movement. He brought tubes of paint to the people in the community and gave them some instruction, with which they soon developed a naïve art movement. The people began painting on canvas and balsa wood carvings. What started out as a few fishermen and peasants playing around with paint has now become a world-famous school of bright primitivist painting. With the new art movement and assistance from Ernesto Cardenal, the economy and society was transformed. As they began to sell their work, they received media attention and with it money enough to bring them out of poverty. Their work has been exhibited in countries as far away as Finand and Australia and a few artists have gone on tour with it. Of course, most people still live simply, but the basic quality of life has improved dramatically. The children can go to school and there is enough food to go round. When I was on Solentiname in September, I was the only tourist in the archipelago. I was certainly not the first tourist and far from the fist non-Nicaraguan to be interested in the region. A little girl I met knew The islands are all very small and it is possible to cover them on foot. I was normally offered rides on motorboats between islands, but once I had to hitch a ride with a local fisherman, Alberto. His little wooden boat was handmade and beneath my feet I could see his catch of the day swimming around. Alberto proudly told me that I was the first “chelita” (Nicaraguan slang that translates roughly as “little white girl”) to go in his boat, and then adjusted it to me being the first white person he had spoken to. He let me have a go rowing the boat. Rowing a handmade boat is hard; much harder than the May Bumps course and sun was a lot stronger than on the Cam. Before I had got in, Alberto told me that he’d give me a ride but I would need to pay him. That seemed fair enough to me, but after the hour’s row in the midday sun that was supposed to be his lunch break, he would only accept thew equivalent of 20p. Journeys around Nicaragua might take a long time and they might be chaotic, but then that’s half the point in visiting Solentiname. Anyway, you’ll probably be more than adequately looked after by the locals in bus stations and island-hopping fishermen. This is, after all, a country where when an old lady realised she was on the wrong local bus and did not have enough money to go back, we all made a diversion to take her home. Solentiname is an archipelago of 38 islands, none of which have roads, cars or electricity, and only four of which have village shops. The total population is 800 - about 90 different families. 10 EDITORIAL Editorial The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk Hustings is no reflection on how a candidate will perform once elected. A huge amount of the job, almost all of it in fact, can’t be anticipated and candidates list their CV points or promise to work hard rather than forecast the actual difference between voting for them and voting for someone else. At hustings in 2005, Laura Walsh seemed the best candidate. When she was elected, the TCS editorial predicted she would ‘be able to bring access back into focus’. Those of us who were here last year remember how close the shadowing scheme - the biggest access event of the calender - came to not happening at all under her watch through the access officer’s incompetence. It’s obvious Mark Fletcher has a big job ahead of him - we struggle to think of any Student Union president elect who doesn’t - but people shouldn’t take bets on what’s going to happen next. Fletcher won the election that happens before votes are cast but no one knows what kind of president he’ll be. There was one big surpise though. If people form a group, articulate a plan of action, field candidates for most of the positions and then try to organise as many people as they can to vote for them, they should do quite well. But running on ‘A little less conversation...’ was not enough for Daniel Perrett to beat Fletcher’s CV, nor for Dan Swain to overcome the fact that his enemies dramatically outnumber his allies. Maybe their candidates weren’t up to the fight but they may have been up to the job. Regardless, there may not be another slate in the CUSU elections for some time. But in the Cambridge Union elections, ‘an independent presidential candidate doesn’t stand a realistic chance against a slate’, according to Union secretary and vice president Nicholas Hartman. The Union has a much smaller electorate - this year’s turnout was approximately 680 - and candidates rely on their friends to help get the vote out. In the Union elections, a slate demonstrates a presidential candidate has already a body of supporters who will help orchestrate both a campaign and potentially a presidency. In contrast, ‘A Little Less Conversation’ was poorly recieved from the start. It was a bad idea. Unless someone from your college is standing and their supporters accordingly plaster the walls with posters, the thousands strong electorate in the CUSU elections is largely unexposed to the elections. Regimentation and conformity, or the impression of them, won’t induce anyone to vote who wouldn’t have already - and those people are too interested to merely acquiesce. So we won’t get to see what would happen if three of the six sabbatical team werecommitted to a single agenda. We’ll hazard a guess that it would have been pretty similar to how works anyway. The slate’s manifesto was a series of short statements about broad principles - how would it actually have informed President Perrett’s decisions? Revolutionaries look better outside of power. In office they tend to disagree, bicker and join factions. At least that’s what they tend to do when become leaders of a populous nation. In a Students Union, the slate’s principles probably wouldn’t have been strong enough to overcome a more powerful force - business as usual. Lucy’s Green Tip of the Week Don’t chuck it out ....SWAP IT! Don’t throw away any unwanted stuff, bring it along to the Stuff Swap on Tuesday 13th March 1–4pm in King’s College Munby Room to swap it for different more exciting stuff from somebody else! From Three Seas: Combat Climate Change www.threeseas.org.uk (tess@tessriley.com) IMPACT Relevant and Irreverent The Cambridge Student iIllustration: Ivan Zhao 08/03/07 EASTER: How do you eat yours? ‘Journalism is literature in a hurry’ Matthew Arnold The all new redesign 3 Eggs 9 Minutes with Mariella Frostrup 10 Features 02 IMPACT The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Fancy a F**k? Fifi Dickson pushes the boundaries on 21st century pulling…. I have amnesia, do I come here often? This is just one of the many chat-up lines that we all know don’t work. Right? But how many of us have ever actually used one? Chat-up lines are like age-old jokes nobody takes seriously. I asked several of my friends and they all seemed to have an opinion. Cheesy. Embarrassing. Never actually funny. However, there was one common consensus; none of us had ever actually used one. Time for an experiment. Scouring the internet, I found thousands of chat-up lines. They were all awful and many tasteless. “How do you like your eggs in the morning? Fried, scrambled or fertilised?” And in that case, frankly, just downright cringeworthy Some of them were simply brilliant but would be far too rude and embarrassing to ever use (or print), others involving angels and running through people’s minds just made me want to throw up. Dragging along some accomplices, I decided to try them out. Would the use of chatup lines really be as disastrous as it’s made out to be? Or was I about to discover an updated way to pull? I carefully selected my weapons of choice: “What’s a slut like you doing in a place like this?” That’s an extra special one for the fellas! Also: “you’re ugly but you intrigue me”, “You like sleeping? Me too; we should do it together sometime” is my favourite. Plus “I lost my teddy bear; can I sleep with you instead?” definitely has the ‘aww’ factor. Alternatively, beckon someone over using index finger before saying “I made you come with one finger, imagine what I could do with my whole hand.” A great myth is that if a girl went up to a guy and asked for sex, the gentleman would willingly oblige. I wasn’t sure if it was that simple, but in the name of research it seemed only fair that I should give it a try. It was a rather daunting task- especially as I was relatively sober and my friend had picked a good looking guy for me to try it on. I walked up and tapped him on the shoulder. “Hi, do you want to fuck?” I’d said it now, there was no going back. “Erm well…… that was rather forward.” “So is that a yes or a no”, I responded. “Erm, I dunno, that was so forward.” He was speechless. I’m guessing this is one of those things that people joke about say- ing but no-one actually does. “Your loss then,” I retorted whilst walking off. Having said this, to my surprise, I found that one embarrassing experience aside, the lines worked really well! I got a couple of numbers and the guys were all really pleased I’d gone up to speak to them. (My guy mates have told me this is because I am a girl, but I know it’s because of my unparalleled charm and striking good looks.) Even more surprising was the fact that the most successful line of all was “you’re ugly, but you intrigue me.” I still cannot fathom why! You like sleeping? Me too; we should do it together sometime Unfortunately, my fellow male guinea-pig did not fare so well. As you can imagine, opening any conversation with a reference to the female as a slut goes down like a tonne of bricks. Instead of getting a kiss or a phone number, all he managed to get was an ‘if looks could kill, I’d be peeling your burning flesh off the floor’ type look. He was lucky not to get a slap! Another friend wasn’t so lucky, despite delivering the line in a very smooth Swedish accent. When she glared and replied “A what?” he mistakenly thought she couldn’t hear and shouted back “a slut.” She still couldn’t hear and so he proceeded to spell it out. Literally “A S-L-UT,” saying it loudly and very slowly - sounding a little like Ricky Gervais talking about the lion in Flanimals. “That’s my boyfriend over there,” she said pointing to a large group of males. Her boyfriend, who thought he was quite hard, for some reason didn’t really like the fact his girlfriend had been called a slut. That was a near miss, but perhaps gentlemen might be wise to exercise caution using this line. (Again, there is uncertainty over whether this is due to the fact they have a Y chromosome or because they just couldn’t pull them off). Try a few yourselves! While I can’t guarantee it as a foolproof pulling technique, I know there’s definitely some fun to be had. So, next time you’re in Cindies and you see a hottie, you know what to do. Smile, walk over nice and slow, lean in close and whisper gently in their ear….. “Fancy a fuck?” After you... Victoria Brudenell discusses modern etiquette E tiquette. Totally irrelevant? Maybe, but in a conversation with a group of friends I discovered something surprising; everybody is still aware of it. Whether it’s letting someone through a doorway or using the correct fork, it still has an impact in the 21st century. The topic was brought up over a leisurely lunch in college, prompted by the endless cutlery surrounding our plates. We don’t have footmen in livery standing behind every place but Cambridge remains one of the few places “Don’t live above your income. This only means worry and disgrace.” The Fresher’s Don’t A normal lunch in caff where we have the opportunity to get a glimpse of what living in Gosford Park must really have been like. It’s a well-worn stereotype to portray a lower-class person totally floundering when faced with an array of sparkling silver and crystal glasses, an anachronistic stereotype at that, but doesn’t everyone feel that short stab of panic when you sit at a table with a white cloth and you desperately try and remember what to do? We all decided that, ultimately, the world wasn’t going to end if we picked up the wrong knife but we were more divided on other aspects of etiquette. I admitted something quite odd; although I couldn’t care less, I always notice if a man doesn’t gesture for me to walk through a doorway before him. I’m neither a rampant feminist nor, I hope, a woman subservient to men, so why should I subconsciously register whether a man has made this insignificant gesture? It seems so out of date. But at the same time, I can’t understand why some women are offended at men holding doors open for them; surely it has evolved into mere politeness, and is not some assertion of superiority? My fellow diners also offered seemly antiquated pieces of etiquette that they adhere to. One said that since arriving at Cambridge he is always aware of whether he is walking gutterside of a girl. I personally had never heard of this custom, and neither had he before coming up. According to him, however, some of his female friends here actively move around him to be on the “correct” side. It is quite a charming image; the gentleman protecting his walking partner from the dangers of the road. Charming, that is, if they are in Victorian clothes. And why did he only discover this in Cambridge? I realise the bubble is all-encompassing, but do we really go back in time as soon as our parents drop us off? Apparently this practice is more enduring in mainland Europe; perhaps some girls choose to affect an air of continental graces to make an impact on Cambridge life. Doesn’t everyone feel that short stab of panic when you sit at a table with a white cloth and you desperately try and remember what to do? A more modern issue is that of dinners and drinks. Who pays? We decided that this subject, with its many pitfalls, is a perfect example of our society. The man worries that he’s stingy if he doesn’t offer to pay, even if he’s broke, and women want to appear independent. Yet I don’t know any girls who get embarrassed if they can’t afford to pay, whereas some men feel mortified. On top of that, it’s not as if guys in Cambridge have any more money than the girls. So why this disparity between men and women? And what’s the difference between dinner and drinks? As far as I can tell, a woman can pay for a guy’s drink, but not dinner, or at least certainly not on a first date. Then there’s the added complication of “feelings”. I know some girls who panic that they’re giving out positive signals if they let the guy pay for their gin and tonic, and they’re unwilling to let even their totally platonic friends do so. Why can’t we graciously accept, knowing that there’s no hidden motive except to spend half an hour with a friend? I’ve always found it interesting that in The Thomas Crown Affair, Rene Russo steals Pierce Brosnan’s keys by pretending to be cold, knowing full well that he will be obliged to offer her his jacket, with the keys in the pocket. There’s something romantic about seeing a girl wearing her boyfriend’s jacket, but it’s weird that it is assumed that men have far better circulation than women and don’t feel the cold as much. If you take it as simply an act of love, being willing to freeze for someone else, surely this demonstrates the basic purpose of etiquette? To think of others, doing your one good deed of the day, basically just being polite. I have discovered an amazing pre-war booklet entitled “The Fresher’s Don’t”, a helpful guide to how one should behave in Cambridge. We are all now concerned with the etiquette behind a facebook poke, but the booklet helpfully informs us, amongst other pearls of wisdom “Don’t joke with the waiters in hall. They are apt to grow familiar if encouraged” and “Don’t get too familiar with your landlady’s daughter, as she is probably more clever than you”. Whilst much of the advice is hilariously oldfashioned, some of it remains applicable today. “Don’t join all the societies to which you may be invited” is exactly what I was told by my college parents, although they drew the line at “Don’t hang around other men’s rooms for no purpose. You will get a bad name”. Ultimately, much of etiquette has its origins in the inequality between the sexes. Men had to be seen to be protecting woman as well as being courteous. It is therefore easy to understand why some feminists have problems with etiquette, but this is where I begin to get confused. Surely it is now a sign of respect that someone offers to carry your bags or hold open a door, not that they think you are weak and incapable? I personally think we should rejoice in the modern forms of etiquette; the world would be such a depressing place if everyone was selfish, rude and unwilling to show even basic politeness. 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student IMPACT The Features Team guide you through our redesign Designer Kate Slotover and former Editor-in-Chief Elly Shepherd discuss the redesign. Robert Palmer I f you’re reading this then you’ll have noticed the new look to The Cambridge Student. This week sees the launch of our new design, and we hope it will make TCS fresher, more vibrant, more distinctive and easier to read. Most newspaper redesigns cost hundreds of thousands of pounds, and involve teams of famous-name designers. Not having those kinds of resources, TCS had to think of something else. Luckily, through Harriet Bradshaw – TCS production co-ordinator – we formed a connection with students studying graphic design at the London College of Communication, where Harriet’s father is Dean of the School of Graphic Design. “We’ve got the best writers,’ Harriet told us, “we just needed that touch of design magic. So I screwed up my courage, went up to London and pitched the TCS plight to a boardroom of principle-lecturers, course directors and tutors at one of the best graphic design schools in Britain. Debate opened up about the mammoth task ahead, but there was general agreement that this project would be a fantastic opportunity for their students. I’ve made a number of visits since and in addition to the redesign we’ve received fantastic weekly illustrations and graphics from the students at the school. The project shows how collaboration across different disciplines and between top universities in their fields can have brilliant results.” Tutors on the 2-year FdA graphic design course decided to take up the opportunity, and offer it to their students as a project. Which is how it came about that on a cold evening late in January Vicki Smith and Kate Slotover arrived in Cambridge for a meeting with Harriet and then editor-in-chief Elly Shepherd to discuss the paper. “We’d done some initial analysis and identified problems to do with consistency; things being done slightly differently from page to page,” Slotover says. “There were also some structural issues – things moved around quite a lot, and as readers who didn’t know the paper at all we were often confused about what we were looking at.” In the discussion that followed, the two designers tried hard to find out what TCS was like; what it was that the design needed to communicate. We’ve got the best writers; we just needed that touch of design magic Elly considered her response carefully. ‘I think the problem we had was that TCS gave quite a neutral impression,’ she explains. ‘You looked at the front page and the only thing you’d be likely to think is ‘there’s a lot of text there. It doesn’t look like something I want to read’. And I felt this let the paper down. So many people put in so much effort and work to get TCS the great content it has, and the design was letting it down by giving off a neutral impression. I also think we were trying too hard to be like Varsity, when actually our big strength is that we’re different from them; we have a different ethos and very different content. I wanted a design that would reflect this, and be much clearer and distinct. Most importantly I wanted a design that would give TCS its identity, from the very first moment the reader looks at the front page.” So the designers had their brief: to give TCS an identity that would make it immediately identifiable, distinct from Varsity, and allow the writing to shine through without being hampered by a confusing design. Two weeks later Elly travelled to London to see what they had come up with. “The scarf idea that we developed was a very obvious one”, comments Slotover, “but also quite appealing because of its simplicity and adaptability.” The designers had decided to create an identity for TCS with its own ‘scarf’ colours based around the classic Cambridge blue. “To us, the scarf immediately evokes the Cambridge student world. When we first came here, walking around town we saw students in these stripy college scarves, and we could see how the idea could be used in different ways within the paper. So the design we eventually went with used the main scarf for the masthead, and a system of different colour-coded stripes inside to indicate the different sections of the paper.” It wasn’t easy, however. “No, the masthead was a bit of a nightmare,” Slotover reveals. “We must have looked at hundreds of papers for inspiration. It’s really difficult with a masthead, because what’s important is to come up with something that’s utterly distinctive, so people will recognize your paper as soon as they see it on the stands. And it also has to be in keeping with the style of the paper in general. We started with quite a clean courier-like typewriter font, but it was only when we came across the slightly more ‘grungy’ version that we’re using now, that we felt it began to look right. It had a bit more personality to it.” They chose to incorporate the typewriter font because of its association with words and writing. “I know no-one really uses typewriters any more,” acknowledges Slotover, “but I still felt it conveyed the idea of producing words, the literary process, and typing as an activity is certainly one that all students are more than familiar with.” Back in London the two designers worked on progressing the design. They had liked the idea of the separate Impact section, so gave it a layout that was slightly different, yet recognisably part of the main paper, using a sans serif typeface and a different colour scheme. How are the editorial staff enjoying the new design? Impact Features Editor Rich Saunders comments “the new Impact layout looks a lot more professional and thought-out than it did previously. It’s pretty much what we were trying to do, but didn’t have the ability to design ourselves. Although the design is more in-line with the rest of the paper, I like the fact that Impact still has its own identity”. “For me it has been an amazing experience,” Slotover says. “For a student to get the chance to completely redesign a real-life paper, and to have had as much freedom as we have had has been a fantastic opportunity. It has been a steep learning curve. In order to set up a system of rules for other people you have to completely understand them yourself, so working out the rules of newspaper design, and then writing guides that teach people to apply them has been a real challenge. I’ll be thrilled to see the newlook TCS when it arrives. Most of all, I wish the TCS staff well for the future. It’s their baby now. I hope if we have achieved anything, its to give them a design that is easy to use, and adaptable enough to keep the paper looking fresh and interesting for years to come.” Designer Kate Slotover’s newspaper top-five 1 The Guardian If I’ve learned anything from doing the TCS project, it’s an appreciation of just how well The Guardian is designed. And it’s really hard not to be influenced by what they do, because they do it so well. We’ve tried hard to give TCS something that is unique to them, but there are some techniques you see in newspapers like The Guardian, like the use of bands of colour, that are very useful, just because they work so well. I met Paul Barnes, who designed The Guardian’s typeface, & talked to him about the TCS project. I showed him the early designs, and he had lots of useful advice. So the new-look TCS has actually had some unofficial input from a Guardian designer! Features TCS Reloaded 03 2 The “S’indy” The best-designed of the Sundays. The Observer’s ok, but somehow it’s a bit too ‘in your face’; they don’t have the subtlety that The Guardian has. The Independent on Sunday looks great every week. 3 The Daily Telegraph The Dinosaur: daily broadsheets seem so outdated since The Times & Independent went tabloid sized and The Guardian adopted the smaller Berliner shape. But The Telegraph’s great in that they just have so much space, so they can do really lovely things with pictures and text. And there’s something quite satisfying about unfolding a paper that huge. I wonder how long they’ll keep going with the format. They’ve carved out a niche for themselves now as the only daily that still does it. 4 El Pais I came across this when I was doing research at the beginning of the project. At first I thought it looked really dull; not much use of colour or pictures. Then I realised that it is actually a beautiful model of restraint. While other newspapers clamour for attention, El Pais seems to be content to quietly do its own thing. I don’t speak Spanish, so I have no idea if the editorial matches the design, but if I did, I think I’d probably read it because it looks like something you want to read. That’s the key to good newspaper design, really. 5 Le Figaro I lived in Paris for a while before I started studying graphic design, and I used to buy Le Figaro because I liked the way it was designed. Gradually, as my French improved, I began to be uncomfortable with its politics and switched to Liberation, which looks dreadful but is much less right-wing. Now I’ve forgotten all my French and have gone back to liking it again. Noticed these? Yep, part of the redesign Features 04 IMPACT Worth the Weight? Melissa St. John discusses skinny models V enus: The Roman Goddess of beauty and love who has captured the imaginations of artists for centuries. She is strikingly beautiful with pure, soft skin and sparkling eyes. She would never need botox and her hair is always immaculate.... But she is no size zero. It is a well-established fact that as time passes, things change. The world around us is constantly adapting and evolving, with new inventions and gadgets being created every second. And yet, in the same way that mobile phones are now almost microscopic, our women are also shrinking at an alarming rate. Glancing back through the centuries, it is clear to see that as the years pass, our idea of the ideal woman is getting smaller and smaller. First Rubens’ decadently flabby women adorned the walls of estates and palaces, followed by posters of Marilyn’s curves and now the object of our affections are women who resemble 13 year old boys. Something, somewhere along the line, has gone desperately wrong. Since when did women want to look like pre-pubescent teens? Since when was the idea of youth held in far greater regard than the wisdom that age brings? In our youth-obsessed culture, where looks are everything, what really defines a woman? It appears that the new quest for eternal youth has caused women to seek out a slimmer silhouette…one that defies the presence of any curves and strictly abstains from carbohydrates (two things which seem to go hand-in-hand on the bathroom scales). More and more women are beginning to resemble emaciated lollipops where their head is too big for their stick-like frame, and the term “size-zero” is no longer foreign in Britain. The skinny model debate was sparked a couple of years ago in America and has since developed into a global phenomenon, causing public outcries and private purges alike. Recently, the British Fashion Council announced that it would not impose a ban on the catwalks of London Fashion Week as had been done in Madrid last September but instead merely said that those involved in the fashion industry should do their best to promote a “healthy” body image. Understandably, the national response was one was of outrage and many people feel, myself included, that what is happening on the fashion runways around the world, is highly irresponsible. Diseases such as anorexia have had a devastating effect on today’s youth and there can be no denying that the fashion world and the ‘role models’ they promote are partly to blame. We live in a celebrity-driven world. If you want to sell a car, get a celebrity to promote it. Toothpaste, watches, dresses - the product is immaterial; the only way to sell anything nowadays is through the power of celebrity, which means that fashion-obsessed teenage girls want to be just like the models they see on the catwalk. The less you weigh, the better you are The difference between literature and journalism is that journalism is unreadable and literature is not read (Oscar Wilde) The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 During the holidays I had the privilege (or the terror depending on your level of loyalty to the Spice Girls) of meeting Victoria Beckham in the shop where I was working. There was no doubt about it, on first glance she looked terrific…her skin glowed with a healthy tan, her nails were immaculate and her hair (the infamous ‘pob’) was shining. But on closer inspec- tion she looked downright exhausted. Both her tan and her smile were fake….she looked fedup. Teetering on incredibly high Jimmy Choos she looked so thin and fragile that you were scared to sneeze for fear of knocking her sideways. I noticed that she wasn’t carrying a handbag and with good reason I expect….the weight of the YSL Muse Bag on her tiny arm would be enough to snap it in two. She is famously one of the skinniest women in Britain, having shed her baby-weight after just 2 weeks, plummeting back to her usual skeletal self. Interestingly though, she refuses to use size-zero models to promote her new fashion range and has instead chosen the curvaceous Brazilian supermodel Daniella Sarahyba to represent her brand. But whether Ms Beckham herself will consider expanding her own tiny frame to add a bit of meat to her sinewy limbs, remains to be seen. And yet Posh gives aspiring size-zeros a hope. She was once a slightly chubby dancer from Essex with bad acne and even worse hair (although we can forgive her for that, after all it was the 80’s) and yet she has blossomed into a glamourous mega-star, one half of the world’s favourite celebrity brand. Perhaps the fashion industry itself hasn’t really changed but instead our perceptions of it have shifted. In the past, catwalk models were viewed from afar, regarded as beautiful aliens who somehow ended up at Gucci. But today, models are celebrities in their own right, and celebrities become models. The boundaries have been blurred and the aspiration to live like them and to look like them has fallen within our grasp. Something, somewhere along the line, has gone desperately wrong The desire for a perfect figure is a new extreme version of the plastic surgery delusion, whereby a miserably unhappy woman with an unpleasant life saves up for a nose job she doesn’t need and is astonished to find, three weeks down the line, that her nose may be smaller but her life still sucks. Anyone who reads a glossy magazine has the potential to be taken in by the same thing, to be convinced that owning the perfect Marc Jacobs handbag, having perfect hair and being the perfect (ie: miniscule) size would then make their life perfect. It seems that skinniness and success are now inseparable in the eyes of the world….the less you weigh, the better you are. Certain celebrities (mostly young, usually American and always stupid) have begun to think that it is entirely necessary for them to go through life looking as though they have just stepped out of a magazine, fully airbrushed and ready for anything. They employ a wide range of people (stylists, personal trainers, managers, drug dealers) to help them look good 24/7 and yet although we know that life is really too short to put make-up on for a trip to the newsagents, we start to wonder how we too could look like an emaciated movie-star with an all-year tan, whether we are 14 or 40. The endless supply of new diet books that fill the shelves, the articles in magazines, the images of tiny celebrities on the pages of Heat, have all helped to prompt a weight-loss initiative that has become obsessive. Anorexia is no longer something rare and closeted that people never talk about but has become an epidemic She may have no arms, but she’s still more attractive than a Size Zero. Melissa St. John which is quickly spreading through both men and women of all ages. Figures show that 92% of girls aged between 15 and 17 years are so dissatisfied with their bodies that they would like to change their appearance and unfortunately, rather than simply getting a haircut or buying a new top, these girls are staving themselves, quite literally to within an inch of their life. Last August, the size zero model Luisel Ramos died from a heart attack provoked by her eating disorders as she stepped off the catwalk during the Uruguayan Fashion Week and in November the Brazilian model Carolina Reston died aged 21 due to similar health complications. However, it is not just on the catwalks that the size-zero woman is predominant but now highstreet chains have added the new smaller size to their clothes lines making it accessible to the British public. When you have the equivalent of a size zero on the racks, it normalises this idea of being ultra-thin. It suggests this is something to aspire to and even worse, it makes people think that it is achievable. The typical waist measurement on a size-zero skirt or dress is just 22 inches, which is the average for an eight year old girl. It seems that as the girls on the catwalk get younger and thinner, the women of the country are constantly coming up with new ways to lose both weight and wrinkles, whilst teenage girls are refusing to embrace the curves that adulthood brings in favour of maintaining the androgy- nous physique that fashion now demands. But just possibly, we could be wrong to immediately blame the fashion industry completely. Surely we need to look more closely at the societal problems that have arisen and ask ourselves how we have become so insecure as to believe that starvation is an indicator of beauty. Mothers may tell their daughters the age-old mantra that “Beauty comes from within” but if they don’t truly believe it themselves, what hope does the next generation really have? Perhaps Kate Moss, Victoria Beckham and Nicole Richie really are the new modern-day Venuses. But no planet was named after them, no temples built in their honour, no poems written to describe their beauty. Maybe at the end of the day the Greeks had it right after all: the most beautiful woman in the world was exactly that, a woman….curves included. What do you think? Email us: features@tcs.cam.ac.uk 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student IMPACT Monika Sobiecki interviews local poet Richard Burns R ichard Burns is an internationally acclaimed local poet. Born in London in 1943, he attended Pembroke College and founded the international Cambridge Poetry Festival in the 1970s. He wrote his collection of poems, The Blue Butterfly, on the infamous Nazi massacre in Serbia during the Second World War, that took place just outside the town of Kragujevac. What do you do apart from your writing, day to day? Like most poets I don’t earn my living by writing poetry. Poetry’s an essential activity, but I have to do a lot of other things in order to generate an income. A lot of my time is taken up with money-earning work: I do three or four different things. One of them is working with children, running creative writing workshops in schools from all ages, from little kids to sixth formers. I do teacher training work in that area. I also occasionally do creative writing with adults. Quite often that sort of thing feeds into the writing, and…although it’s quite tiring it’s also exhilarating. I also publish the occasional article here or there and occasionally do a book review, poetry readings of course, lectures…I also travel abroad, do lectures and go to conferences. Do you pick up any cultural things from the countries you have visited? Oh yes, I’d call myself more a European poet... In Serbia, I’m very well known. For example, I picked up, in The Blue Butterfly, themes from “Serbian History”, and in its sister book “In a Time of Drought”, themes that belong to the Serbian-Balkan folk tradition. So when that book was launched over there, people recognised it from within their tradition. It’s happening with “The Blue Butterfly” as well: it’s going to be made into an ‘Oratorio’, a big concert based on this on the anniversary of the massacre. There’ll be hundreds of people, thousands. It’s difficult to conceive of in this country, unless it was someone like Ted Hughes who could pull such crowds. Taking you right back, when did you start to write poetry? I was 13, and I won prizes for it at school. I went on to become editor of the school magazine. I had my first story published in the TransAtlantic Review when I was 16. When you were at Cambridge, did you meet anyone who’s been an influence on your work? There were several phases of my life in Cambridge. I came up to Pembroke College from 1961-4 and read English. The college was very formative…also going on in the college and in the University there was a very rich world of not so much poetry but drama. I have to say that there were intellectual influences at Cambridge…in those days, there was nowhere in the world like it. Leavis was still around, CS Lewis had just moved from Oxford, Steiner was lecturing…I went to lectures with all those people…so it was very vibrant. My second phase of living in Cambridge was when I came back in 69 to work at what was then CCAT (Cambridge College of Arts and Technology). And there was a bunch of poets at CCAT including Ezra Pound’s son, Omar Pound and John James. And I discovered then that there were very interesting things going on in poetry in Cambridge. Out of my reading of that, I set up the International Cambridge Poetry Festival in 1975. In those years, Cambridge was extraordinarily exciting, there was a lot going on. My contribution was to internationalise it…perhaps to Europeanise it. Focusing in on the Blue Butterfly…what really triggered you to bring it out as a collection of your selected writings? What actually happened was that I was standing outside Šumarice museum in 1985, and a butterfly came and sat on my finger. I photographed it. I came back to Cambridge and a poem wrote itself out of me. That’s the title poem. Then the second poem, Nada, came a few days later. At the end of the poem, you have five words for hope: Serbian, Greek, Russian, Spanish and finally German, implying forgiveness…implying we’re all part of one unity…It was the Germans that committed the atrocity, I am a Jew as well. But even then I think I had the notion that this was something big here, I knew that this was one of those very great inspirational moments, perhaps you only get a couple in a lifetime, maybe one. And this was a life-changing moment. And it was that moment…that prompted me to go and live in Serbia. I followed the butterfly. It sounds nuts but it’s true. So you felt somehow compelled to write the collection? I had this sense that the souls of these dead men…were calling me to speak for them. So there was a need to do that, almost a transpersonal need. When I began to live in Serbia and talk about this, people realised that something was going on, and some of the poems I was writing seemed to have an element that they recognised. So I was being a channel for their history – it wasn’t just my self imposed on it or my interpretation pulled out of it. Tell me more about the poem… It’s one big poem. It was conceived as an elegy – my models for a great elegy are Milton’s ‘Lycidas’, Shelley’s ‘Adonais’, Tennyson’s ‘In Memoriam’, and Gray’s ‘Elegy in a Country Churchyard’, about my own college, Pembroke. Now, all of those are for individuals, apart from Gray’s…mine is not for an individual, but for a whole group of people. From what I understand from those models …death through mourning, to acceptance and affirmation. I’m not sure if I’ve achieved that but that’s what I tried. Why did you choose to place the fragments of notes and photographs…historical sources in the back of the collection? One reason is to honour those people. The place of elegy is to honour the dead, as well as talk about them for the living. The other is documentation, historical documentation. The third is my reaction against obscurantism in the modernist tradition. I dislike it very intensely. Pound, if you read the Cantos and you really want to understand it, you’ve got to read the books he read…why should you? All material is available for all of us poets but the game that’s played of intellectual superiority is to interweave your source material in hidden ways that aren’t open to the reader. There’s a kind of superiority over the reader that that implies. And I don’t like that, I’m a democrat. I want to communicate with the reader, so I want them to know what’s going on. The poems stand alone. They’re not dependent on the notes, but the notes enrich it. Culture In Visible Ink 05 What has the reception been to The Blue Butterfly? It’s won two awards, in draft it won the Wingate-Jewish Quarterly Award, in one of the last years that they were giving it to poetry. It’s won the Great Lesson Prize in Serbia, but it hasn’t yet come out...although parts of it have been translated. James Gordon has set some of these as songs, and he will be at the Heffers presentation. Do you have any projects set out for the future? Yes, absolutely, I’ve got so much material. I’m 64 now, I’d like to live a really long life because I feel I’m just starting. I tend to have parallel things going on…I’ve got lots of strands in my work, and I move from one to another. I’ve got a sequence of sonnets…very formal, traditional. I’ll go for what the poem itself calls out of me. There’s a sequence of metaphysical sonnets called ‘Not-ness’…that’s an anagram of ‘Sonnets’. I’m hoping to work with sculptors. I’d love to see something done in stone or metal as a revolving sculpture. Sometimes I cut words up and play with them. I’m working, if you like, from the tiny to the epic. Richard Burns will be attending a signing at Heffers. Join him, along with singer/guitarist James Gordon, on Thursday 15th March at 6.30 p.m. at Heffers, 20 Trinity Street, Cambridge. Tickets are free. To RSVP phone Dan Healy on 01223 568532 or email literature@heffers. co.uk No Straight Lines Camille Ebden on Maggi Hambling at the Fitzwilliam Museum I t is coming up to the end of term, 5th week blues are still slightly in existence and perhaps you are just a bit fed up with Cambridge and its usual recreations. Cindy’s (Ballare), Gardies, formals and your college bar might be just a little too familiar or perhaps, like me, you feel you haven’t really explored Cambridge properly. If this sounds like you then why not pop into the Fitzwilliam Museum to the “Maggi Hambling: No Straight Lines” exhibition. Maggi Hambling is an esteemed if controversial painter and sculptor, who is perhaps most well known for her memorial to Oscar Wilde in Trafalgar Square and her notorious giant scallop shell on the beach at Aldeburgh. She has work in the National Gallery, the Tate and the National Portrait gallery. I was really excited when I heard she was having an exhibition in the Fitzwilliam because I am an admirer of her powerful paintings of the sea. However, I was a little disappointed when I found that one piece I had particularly wanted to see and which had been used to advertise the collection in both the “Explorer” magazine and the Fitzwilliam Museum’s own “What’s On” magazine was not actually in the collection. The rest of the collection, however, more than made up for it. Firstly, I think this collection will appeal to many students because whilst having plenty to absorb oneself in, it is not particularly large. With the end of term approaching and many of us behind on work you probably don’t want to spend too long in a museum. Secondly, I loved the title “No Straight Lines” and how well it fitted in with the collection and her weaving and dynamic style, for you won’t find anything straight here- even the centre piece named “Line” is meandering. Unlike a great deal of modern art which can be difficult to enjoy unless you are a fan of art already and/or know a great deal about it, this collection can be enjoyed by everybody. One piece I would pay particular attention to is the portrait of Stephen Fry. When you look at it really close up it doesn’t seem to make sense and seems to be just a collection of marks. When you look at it from a distance, however, all the marks merge into the context of the others and Stephen Fry melts into view. “Descent of a bull’s head” is excellent as Hambling manages to depict time and movement from a charcoal drawing. Within the one drawing you see snap shots of different moments during a bull’s fatal fall, giving the potent impression of seeing the movement of the actual fall of the bull to its death. “Rhinoceros in Ipswich Museum”, created when she was just 17 and her portraits of her lover, the late Henrietta Moraes, are interesting pieces as is her newest piece, shown for the first time, “Wave approaching”. So pop along if you have a free half an hour or so. If nothing else, you can leave the Fitzwilliam feeling smug that you have now actually been there and can put an end to your mother’s nagging. However, I think you will also enjoy the exhibition and get a great deal of pleasure out of it. ‘No Straight Lines’ is running from Tue 6 February 2007 until Sun 29 April 2007 Octagon Gallery, Fitz Museum, Trumpington Street, FREE Admission If you think you’re cutlured enough to edit this page (and you probably are), e-mail apply@tcs.cam. ac.uk to apply for next term. IMPACT The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student IMPACT 07 Fashion ‘ I was the first woman to burn my bra – it took the fire department four days to put it out.’ Fashion 06 Dolly Parton The Bra: 100 Years of B-Cup Politics It’s been too long: it’s time to bust (chortle) some myths... T Words by Hannah Nakano Stewart he bra first appeared in print in Vogue magazine, 100 years ago. Since then, it has managed to be both innocuous and controversial; commonplace yet politicized. It’s no secret that clothing and fashions across history have reflected implicit truths about the attitudes of societies towards sexuality, hierarchy and gender - but is the bra any different? Firstly, the mythology of the bra needs to be cleared up – even Trivial Pursuit would have you believe that an individual called Otto Titzling invented the bra in 1912, but lost a lawsuit against the Frenchman Philippe de Brassiere, whose name the garment now bears. But have a little think – Tit-zling? The story was invented by Wallace Reyburn in Bust Up: The Uplifting Tale of Otto Titzling and the Development of the Bra, but somehow got believed along the way. In truth, the bra as distinct from the corset had been evolving from the middle of the nineteenth century, and the invention of the first garment resembling the modern brassiere is credited to French feminist Herminie Cadolle in 1889. The term ‘brassiere’ only acquired its modern meaning in the 1920s – and there you have a potted history of the intricate contraption that costs a bloody fortune. Secondly, both mum and grandma would have you believe that if you don’t wear a bra, you’ll lie on your back and fill your armpits in no time at all. This is severely debatable, since there’s no scientific evidence that a bra makes the breasts any stronger, although it does help the larger-titted with issues of maceration and intertrigo. That’s right, big words for ‘rash’. It would be shooting the messenger somewhat to blame the bra for the idea that the natural sagging of breasts is somehow abnormal, but all the same, there’s no real reason to wear a bra if you don’t want to. No matter what Mrs Smith said in Year 8 PHSE. In the vein of myth-busting the bra, there’s the infamous image of bra-burning, for many synonymous of 1960s feminism. This supposedly took place in a protest at the 1968 Miss America pageant, where a group of women bearing plac- ards of ‘Let’s Judge Ourselves As People’ picketed the site. Bras, false eyelashes and other items deemed to constrict and objectify the female body were thrown into the ‘freedom trash can’ – but they were never burned. This was allegedly because the group were unable to obtain permission to have an open fire in public. Nevertheless, it somehow became urban legend that bras were burned. Up until 1992, it was assumed that this was a sexist male press attempting to ridicule the movement, but then Lindsey van Gelder confessed that she was responsible. As a young reporter for the New York Post, she had been sent to write a piece on the protest, and made a reference to a hypothetical bra-burning in an attempt to compare the movement with the draft-card burnings of the Anti-Vietnam demonstrations. Van Gelder maintains that she was attempting to lend the protest more credibility by doing so, but the message was more than misconstrued along the way. Burnt or just thrown in the trashcan, the bra was seen by the feminists of 1968 as another instrument of bodily torture and oppression, similar to Chinese footbinding. In many ways, they’ve got a point. If there’s little to no health need for a bra, then why do we all feel obliged to wear one? It’s not far from everything else in fashion in this respect – the idealised female body image is a problem. Whether it’s perky boobs as a result of the bra, a tiny waist thanks to the corset, or lengthy legs in painful heels, it all raises the sigh of ‘the things we do for fashion…’. It seems a fair point, but all the same, there’s another side to this. The problem is that Germaine Greer, for all her ‘the bra is a ludicrous invention’ statements, also emphasised the fact that to tell a woman not to wear a bra is just the same: it’s forcing the choice and freedom of body image out of the power of the individual. And isn’t this what feminism is all about? Maybe part of the problem is that in 1968, women may have been lumbered with contraptions not much sexier than the Triumph Doreen, and today we have Adriana Lima stomping down the Victoria’s Secret catwalk in creations so delectable that it would be a shame to put outerwear over them. Wearing a bra, like wearing heels, boils down to how it makes the individual feel, and more often than not, sexy underwear and a pair of ridiculous heels make you feel the proverbial million dollars. To turn the bra into a symbol, with all intentions good, simply makes generalisations about women and dictates to the wearer how they should feel about what they wear: it contradicts itself. Wear a bra, or don’t wear a bra. Burn it if it makes you feel better. The bra has no meaning except the one you give it, and if that meaning is that a trip to Rigby and Peller is good for your soul, then go forth and prosper. Images by Harriet Bradshaw Modelled by Hannah, Ilana and Lianne IMPACT The Cambridge Student 03/05/07 Food & Drink 08 Bacalhau Stewart Petty H aving been mugged in the dubious streets of late night Oporto, my surf-eager friends were not too hungry following their hapless encounter. However, once they arrived in Figueira da Foz, the invigorating sea air replenished their appetites. I was ravenous after a challenging day of surfing at Cabedelo beach. A slap-up meal was in order. The young and cheery owners of our hostel (Paintshop) recommended an eatery called ‘Sporting’. On hearing this, I imagined a lagerfuelled pool hall characterised by a fug of fag smoke and mobbish jeers from ASBO-ed morning to witness the frenzy of Figueira’s fish market. The fact that very few locals spoke English here and did not care was bluntly refreshing. However, body language and a spattering of French helped me on my quest to buy some sardinhas, a wad of sour dough and a knobbly lemon. After a few minutes under the grill, lunch was beautifully uncomplicated and utterly satisfying. Bacalhau is Portugal’s national dish. Admittedly, dried codfish did not really arouse my salivary glands. However as the legend goes, there are as many ways to cook this dish as there are days in the year. So, seating amount of the Atlantic whilst surfing, this beverage irrigated my parched tongue most refreshingly. Another reason to fall in love with Portugal is the cheap beer and friendly drunks. (I should note the sober locals were as equally affable.) One example I can recall is where I was lethargically waiting at Carcavelos train station after checking out the surf. A rather sleazy and dreadlocked character with a heavily furrowed brow approached me on the platform. ‘Where you from my friend?’ Immediately I thought that this was another ‘hashish’ hustler. In Lisbon, dealers sell Pride of Portugal cannabis ostentatiously on the streets holding out bags of the plant for all eyes to see. However, my new amigo reached into his rucksack for plastic cups and a large Super Bock beer. I felt guilty for being so suspicious. He simply wanted to share a drink. This gesture of friendship captured the essence of Portuguese friendliness. As we sat slurping beer on a balmy Sunday afternoon, Raoul invited another stranger to join us. Superbock had become a dear friend to my diet over the last few days. Its smooth and yet crisp taste accompanied by malty notes was delicious. Costing a single euro per 330ml in nearly every bar, it was cheaper than bottled water. Cheers to dehydration! Rather like the French, the Portuguese possess an unflinching penchant for less conventional cuts of meat. I can demonstrate this with their porky predilection: it would be strange not to see a pig trotter, ear and even face drooping in the butcher’s window display. Many of the restaurants zealously serve these specialities. Something of a culinary must in Portugal is the exquisite roasted piglet - leitão assado. Its skin is golden and crunchy. Rabbit is also a popular dish. It may not look too pretty on the plate, but its rich intensity of flavour is captivating. If you are squeamish about tripe and wish to overcome your intestinal phobia, seek the aid of tripas à moda do Porto. Unlike offal I have eaten before, its texture was surprisingly addictive. Some critics dismiss the cuisine here as being heavy and oily. However, in my opinion, the quality of the dishes is not to be questioned. I think that the hugely generous portions of food - often complimented with stacks of rice or potatoes - could be to blame for this condemnation. I’m not complaining though. Do not feel obliged to eat everything on the plate. The generosity of the Portuguese extends to the abundant Port producers lining the River Douro. Offering free tours and port, a day crawling around Oporto is sorted. I may not have spent the healthiest time in Portugal, what with endless portions, copious cakes and a vulnerable lack of willpower against oneeuro Superbock. However, I was (nearly) fat and (very) content. Fortunately, intermittent but powerful days of surf obliterated most of the calories. Stewart Petty enjoys a seafood spectacular on the Iberian peninsula, but discovers that the land is equally plentiful... Human vocabulary is still not capable, and probably never will be of knowing, recognizing, and communicating everything that can be humanly experienced and felt José Saramago yobs. Then I remembered that we were not in England. Instead, the clinical but welcoming restaurant was an understated shrine to the football club Sporting Lisbon. What I like about Portuguese restaurants are the copious portions they repeatedly serve. What is odd is the penchant to light these establishments with ASDA-style brightness. A television tucked away in the corner is also an inevitable feature. At Sporting, without persuasion, we chose the nominal six euro menu offering a selection of all-you-can-eat fish… followed by meat. Breezy Figueira da Foz nurtures a healthy fishing economy. The ‘Sporting’ menu epitomized this: sardines, horse mackerel, red snapper, red mullet, sole, chub and octopus were served with earthly majesty. This nosh demonstrates unpretentious simplicity and dedication to what the French would call terroir. Literally two hundred metres away from the restaurant, the fish on our plates would have squirmed from the fisherman’s net earlier that morning. Baked or grilled. Saltsprinkled. Served. Gripped by a newfound infatuation with fruits of the sea, I awoke early the following when prepared sensitively with a suitable accompaniment of vegetables and rice, I am convinced that it can be delicious. I feel no shame in writing that I adopted a two-cakes-a-day ritual during my two weeks in Portugal. Although I am sure that their presence was not so sugar-coated at the time, the Portuguese can say obrigado to their early Moorish occupiers. It was these invaders who introduced confectionary here. In Oporto, Lisboa and Figueira da Foz, the presentation of all things sweet was ravishingly aesthetic. Rows of sugary gems twinkled behind immaculately polished glass. At forty euro cents for a pastel de nata (egg custard), you do not have to be rich to be a fat cat. One of my favourite treats was a chocolate pão de ló topped with walnuts. The party-animal Portuguese are eternally indebted to their Brazilian cousins for the zingy Caipirinha. For less than three euros, the concoction on offer here is far from the feeble excuse for a cachaça-based cocktail that is frequently inflicted upon the bar flies of blighty. One variation of the drink in Lisbon replaced the lime with lychee. Having swallowed a nau- Pão de ló Stewart Petty 03/05/07 The Cambridge Student IMPACT Food & Drink Debonair Drinking Bill Brogan explores the Douro Valley; home to Portugal’s prized Port With cheap flights now the norm, I have visited the Douro three times in the last eighteen months. You can fly to Porto for less than £50.00 return from London Stansted. I normally stay in the Duo Wine Region in the small village of Parada de Gonta. This is very close to Viseu, a very small, charming town about 40 minutes Taylor’s Port Stewart Petty from the University City of Coimbra. Parada de Gonta is 75 minutes from Oporto Airport. The wines in this region are improving after years out in the doldrums. In fact, Quinta de Lemos, near Viseu, is the James Bond of all vineyards. It is the hobby of a Belgian Textile Magnate, who lets his daughter run this new “state of the art” estate. Grapes used in this region include reds such as Alfrocheifo, Jaen and Aragenez. For whites one can expect Bical, Encruzado and Malvesia Fina. The drive to the Douro Valley is truly spectacular and the wine region itself is possibly the most scenic that I have seen in the world. Portugal uses its own native grapes and none more so than in the Douro: the home of Port. The road from the South brings you into the steeply flanked town of Regua. Once here, you need to find the way to Pinhao, a quaint village situated right on the river in the centre of the Douro. Having crossed the river, go to the Vintage House Hotel, a “wine hotel” . Whilst it is not cheap, belonging to Relais and Chateaux, the hotel is beautifully located. Other facilities it offers include a wine shop and museum. If you are interested in getting involved in some local oenology, they run wine courses here: “The Wine Experience” costs from 47.50 to 62.50 euros per person or you could try “The 5 Red Wine Grapes of the Douro” for 47.50 to 62.50 euros per person. Also on offer are port wine tastings. We visited “Quinta de Novel” owned by Axa Insurance Group. It was truly stunning! A lot of investment has been ploughed into the company. Great views complimented the drinking. For red wine, visit “Quinta de Crasto”, winner of “Red Wine of the Year” in the Wine Magazine. This uses the main port grapes including Tourigu Nacional and Tinta Roriz. The most widely planted grape variety is “Tourigu Francesa”. A vineyard that you should certainly visit is Quinta de Ventozela. This is now Spanish owned and some of its vines are over 100 years old. There is a great lodge for visitors to taste wines and from here, we travelled downstream. The trip down to the vineyard in the 4x4’s is an experience in itself. Ending up in Oporto, you come across the port lodges located by the river in the old town. These establishments are flanked by some outstanding restaurants, bars and quirky souvenir shops. For more information: Quinta dos Tres Rios, Parada de Gonta, www.minola.co.uk Vintage House Hotel, Pinhao www.hotelvintagehouse.com Brazil in a nutshell Muireann Maguire gets us all high on selenium Ah, Brazil - the land of fabulous things I can never spell, like capoeira, caipirinhas and Giselle Bundchen. Nothing could be trendier than the Amazon rainforest - especially since it is turning into soya bean oil almost as fast as England’s meadows are becoming rapeseed. Since everything about Brazil is or has been very cool indeed, it won’t be long before Sainsbury’s is offering Taste the Difference piranha pasties or organic fair-trade tapir steaks (hand-reared in Yorkshire piggeries to save on air miles!) Since this column has always resisted trendiness, today I am recommending a tropical delight that’s been under our noses all along - the humble brazil nut. Depending on which side of the fair trade fence you stand on, it is responsible either for protecting the jungle ecosystem through sustainable harvesting (as brazil nut plantations aren’t financially viable, all the nuts we munch are gathered in the jungle) or for keeping poor collective farmers in the grip of big export firms. In any case, once it has used up fifty tonnes of carbon flying over here, we might as well appreciate it. There are plenty of reasons why we should. The brazil nut contains more fat than any other nut (so watch your portion sizes), but with 14% protein it makes a good meat substitute for vegetarians. It contains enough selenium to fly you to the moon and back, besides being a source of other good things like magnesium and zinc. Interestingly, it’s also exceptionally high in radium, so you can use leftover brazil nuts for mood lighting at parties. Most recipes with brazil nuts are dessertbased (they’re delicious combined with sugar, dried cassava, ground almonds, chopped figs and milk and fried in pancakes) but here’s one for Bundchen Brazil Nut Loaf - passed on to me by our lovely Giselle’s granny… Chop one onion and fry in a tablespoonful of olive oil until transparent. Crush a clove of garlic, finely chop four stalks of celery, and add to the onion. Next, grind up 150g of brazil nuts with an equal amount of cashew nuts or almonds. Add to the pan with half a cup of previously prepared mashed potato and 100g of breadcrumbs. Flavour salt, pepper, thyme and cayenne pepper. Stir in up to a glassful of red wine to bind. Transfer half the mixture to a greased baking tin and spread a layer of chestnut puree on top: then add the second half on top of the puree. Bake for 45 minutes, or until firm and crusty on top, at 170˚C. Melt some parmesan or taleggio on the loaf before serving. This dish should be set off by some dramatic in-season vegetables: a beetroot salad, or asparagus spears, or simply buttered spinach. If nut loaf is too lily-livered for you, here’s a more red-blooded variation: Battered Brazil Nut Steaks. Pulverise your brazil nuts and mix with a splash of milk and some olive oil, finely chopped garlic, and herbs and spices to taste. Take some tapir steaks - or pork chops - and roll them in the mixture. Deep-fry and serve with brown rice cooked in coconut milk. Perfect after a tough session of capoeira, accompanied by capirinha on the rocks! 09 Hans Schweitzer Amica Dall RECIPE Queens’ College’s Michelin-starred Master Chef Hans Schweitzer used to own the Barbados restaurant, La Mer. This week, he offers The Cambridge Student one of the restaurant’s tropical treats. Mango Brûlée (Serves 6) Ingredients Six 3-inch ramekins 1 split vanilla bean 2 ripe mangoes 7 egg yolks Half litre of cream 75g white sugar 1 tbsp rum Icing sugar to dust Method Pre-heat oven to 160 C. Peel the mangoes, then cut four even slices for each brûlée and put to one side. Cut off all remaining mango and put into a blender; blend to a smooth puree. Bring the cream and split vanilla bean to boil. Whisk the egg yolk, sugar and rum to a smooth, creamy mixture. Pour in boiling cream and whisk briskly. Add the mango purée ée e and stir. Sieve the mixture through a fine sieve and divide into the six ramekins. Cook slowly for 30 minutes. Take out of the oven. The brûléess should be firm and set but should still have a little wobble within! Leave to cool for 20 minutes. Then place into a fridge and cool for several hours. Sprinkle the mango slices with sugar and caramelize under a hot grill or with a blow torch. When ready to serve, add the caramelized mango slices to the brûlée.. �ust with icing sugar. Enjoy! Giselle Bundchen Claret is the liquor for boys; port, for men; but he who aspires to be a hero must drink brandy Samuel Johnson IMPACT The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 15 Minutes With Mariella Frostrup Columns 10 Cally Squires talks to the broadcaster ever met. He has opinions on everything and theories and plans that actually make sense and work. What couldn’t you live without? Only my children I think is the honest answer to that question. Everything else only seems important in a certain environment, which is something that anyone who travels in the Third World quickly realises about the material things they hold dear. I am just as frivolous and extravagant as the next person but I know I could do without it all. What makes you angry All the usual suspects. Mindless bureaucracy, call centres, excess regulation, the prospect of identity cards, the war in Iraq, the fact that women still don’t enjoy equal pay - as illustrated this week by the furore over councils having to raise their salary bills by 4% in order to make sure all staff are paid equally. Why the bloody hell has it taken 37 years since the introduction of an Act to ensure it was made law? I am always raging about something. Mariella is the presenter of several programmes, both on radio and television. In addition she regularly writes for many of the national papers and has made guest appearances on Have I Got News For You, Absolutely Fabulous and Coupling. Born in Norway, she now lives in London with her husband and children. What would your advice be to anyone wanting a career in journalism or broadcasting? It may look easy and it can certainly be rewarding but if you are pursuing a career just for those reasons you are unlikely to have any long-term success. When I was a kid, fame was not something you aspired to or even thought about. I think in many ways its pursuit is reducing us all to lead less interesting lives. When I was a kid, journalism was about the pursuit of truth against the odds; and certainly against the wishes of the establishment. Nowadays it is all too frequently about rummaging in other peoples underwear, metaphorically of course! What path would you have taken had you not become presenter or writer? When I was eight I really wanted to be an airhostess but maybe I would have gone to college and carried on an academic career. Teaching always seemed to me to be a really important and satisfying job. Sleeping is giving in No matter what the time is (Win Butler) Where do you see yourself in ten years time? I struggle to work out what I’ll be doing next year. Ten years time is way too far ahead! I am all for blogging. Everyone deserves to have their voice heard What has been the most challenging moment you have faced in your career? My first ten years in broadcasting when the presumption was, that because I had blonde hair and an exotic name, I was an imposter trying to seduce my way in to a serious job with no abilities to back up my ambition. I am not the first, or last, woman sadly who will experience that sort of discrimination. It is just not fashionable to talk about it anymore. What has been the most rewarding moment of your career or life? Being asked to join the panel of judges for the Booker Prize, which I know would have made my father so proud; and did make my mother. I am just as frivolous and extravagant as the next person but I know I could do without it all. Do you have any regrets? Not carrying on to University is the only one really. I don’t think when you are young you necessarily appreciate the luxury of spending three years just learning and discussing ideas. Everyone is in such a rush to hit the workplace but once you are there you are trapped forever. College is the most important honeymoon period you could hope for and in many places in the world, especially for women, an almost unattainable dream. What do you know now which you wish you had known when you were younger? I wish I’d had a better idea of what was important and a much stronger sense of my own self worth. In my twenties I was terribly insecure and when I look back now I just wish I’d been more certain of my own potential. It would have saved me from some dreary jobs and some terrible love affairs. Who is the most interesting person you have met? You were speaking for the proposition of the motion “This House Believes Islam is Incompatible with Western Liberalism”. Where do you stand on the issue of women wearing the veil? My husband is the most interesting man I have I think that women have an absolute right to wear whatever they like. That is one of the important rights we enjoy in a liberal western democracy that we would be denied in many Islamic countries. Unfortunately the proposition you were defending was defeated in the debate on Thursday at the Union. Did you anticipate this? I knew we would be defeated but I am surprised by how terrified people are of decrying the fundamentalist voices in the Islamic world who seem to be silencing all dissenters with a combination of rhetoric and fear. I don’t think when you are young you necessarily appreciate the luxury of spending three years just learning and discussing ideas. Having written for publications including The Guardian, The Observer and Harpers and Queen - do you see “internet blogging” as a vehicle for free speech, or too unregulated and unreliable? Is it difficult balancing motherhood with a demanding career? Yes, but it makes going home in the evening such an exciting thing. Ultimately combining two full time occupations (motherhood and career) is always going to be difficult, but having my children is without question my proudest achievement. In my twenties I was terribly insecure You took part in Comic Relief this year. How did you feel when it was revealed last week that presenter (Terry Wogan) accepts payment to host the show? I hate moral blackmail of any sort. If Terry Wogan is happy to charge for his services, and a charity is happy to pay, then that is their business. Wogan’s presenting skills are what he makes his living from. It is up to him what he does with them and who he offers to perform for free for, as it is for all of us as individuals. People in the public eye are asked to donate their services to various charities every day. The most important thing is to choose the causes you feel strongly about supporting and make sure you know where their money is going. Love the Features Section? Think you can do better? Applications for The Cambridge Student Editorial Team, Michaelmas 2007, are still open. Email apply@cusu.cam.ac.uk to receive an application form 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student IMPACT Columns International Women’s Day Equal rights; for men no more, for women no less T oday is international women’s day and at this very moment there are literally thousands of celebrations and events going on all over the world. This is an occasion which, whilst it transcends national borders, is interpreted by many groups, cultures and individuals in different ways. The one thing these events and the people that run them have in common is that they are feminist in the reassuring, inclusive and simple sense of the word: they advocate equal rights for women, in every respect. This is a fundamental principle that millions of people advocate and hold close to their hearts, myself included. However, for me occasion also prompts some very necessary questions about the position and experiences of women globally, from Cambridge where I focus my energies, to Britain as a whole, to America, Denmark, Darfur, North Korea, Congo and Iraq to name just a few locations that have crossed my mind. Many women’s groups, councils, museums and galleries are hosting events celebrating women’s culture including art, photography and poetry. Many others are campaigning on the issues that affect women all over the world including reproductive rights, stop violence against women, women against rape and women’s healthcare. Whether we are campaigning on these issues or celebrating a tremendous wealth of women’s culture, we are necessarily exploring what it means to be a woman both in our own society and in different parts of the world. This is a complex field that as women we not only contend with today, but everyday. It seems to me that the essence of women’s experience is the process of negotiating our position, whether it is within our society, our political standing or within personal relationships. Some women take their rights for granted – the right to come home to a safe household, the right not to suffer rape or violence, the right to their fair share of economic resources. However, many women are not given these rights; women own less than 1% of the world’s property, and figures compiled by Amnesty International show that hundreds of women across the world experience exceptional cruelty and sexual vio lence on a daily basis. Whilst many women are today discussing women’s rights and culture, MarieTerese Nlandu, a London based lawyer and mother is facing execution in the Democratic Republic of the Congo after becoming the first woman to challenge the election of the president. This is a story that has made headlines, yet there are tens of thousands more women completely unknown to us who are suffering in prison, on the streets and in their own homes. In Darfur, it is widely known that soldiers use rape as a weapon of war, in order to break down communities. Violence against women is not something that is restricted to far flung countries that flash unsettling images across news screens. It exists all over the world and is a massively under reported problem in Britain. The statistics that pass my desk of the horrific experiences of women in this country and across the world are so numbing that it becomes increasingly difficult to comprehend the situation or feel any sense of sisterhood. Sometimes, in our own society, which at least on the surface appears to promote individuality, it can even be difficult to relate to your own neighbour. Yet today at least, we must make every effort to do so. How is she coping with her work load? How is her relationship with her boyfriend? What personal achievements has she managed this term? How well do women really relate to one another even on our doorstep, and, to be honest, how much are men and women as a whole thinking about one another’s best interests? Whether you pick up a white ribbon from one of our stalls in the market square, read a book by a women author or think further a field about women across the world, make sure you mark international women’s day. Vegetarians Rich Saunders L et me get one thing straight. I have nothing against Vegetarians as people. I have nothing against the fact that they don’t eat meat. As far as I can tell most of them are pretty normal people in all but their eating habits. What does get to me is the zealous vegetarians who try and convert you to the way of the lentil at every opportunity. Anyone who’s ever lived with a veggie will know the old arguments inside out by now. Yes it probably is healthier. Less fat, less salt, less cholesterol; sounds good so far. It is undoubtedly better for the environment. The images of swathes of Amazonian rainforest being chopped down to make room for herds of methane emitting cows just so people can sink their teeth into yet another burger are pretty compelling. And yes, by sticking to a meat-free diet you’re pretty safe from BSE, E. Coli, salmonella, bird flu, microscopic parasites that want to eat your brain, and a whole range of other dangers that are potentially lurking within every sausage, steak and fillet. Ok so vegetarians probably are healthier, better for the planet and generally more likely to get into heaven. But this does not mean that every time someone in the vicinity eats anything vaguely meat-based that they have the right to a) go over the reasons above in immense detail, or b) look like they’re about to vomit, calling me a callous murderer before running out the room. It wasn’t me wielding the bolt-gun, calm down… I would love to be vegetarian, I really would. And before you ask I have tried it. For nearly two weeks I felt wholesome, healthy and less guilty about the environmental destruction I was inflicting on the planet. But I was bored. Very, very bored. You can shape Quorn in a many ways as you want; into burgers, fillets, even little towers, but its still made from a fungus and it still tastes of nothing. And let’s be honest, most vegetarians are brilliant hypocrites. Vegetarianism is the “practice of not consuming the flesh of any animal, with or without also eschewing other animal derivatives, such as dairy products or eggs”, and yet several of my vegetarian friends eat fish. Last time I checked a fish was an animal. Living under-water isn’t an exemption clause. And milk, seems to be covered as well. Dry cornflakes anyone? I think Bill Bailey has got it summed up: “I’m a postmodern vegetarian - I eat meat ironically”. So yes, you can sit there across the table looking smug behind your lentil bake, but please let me enjoy my processed lump of ex-animal in peace. Anything you want to get off your chest? Email: features@tcs.cam.ac.uk One of the many marches across the wold in affirmation of women’s rights. c_5 11 I sleep with my hands across my chest, And I dream of you with someone else (Paul Smith) 12 IMPACT The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Listings Theatre Music and Clubs If you loved ‘Woman in Black’ you’ll enjoy this! A plethora of musical talent awaits Cambridge this week... Hound of the Baskervilles Couper-s-Lecons de Tenebre Cambridge Arts Theatre This production marries theatre with cinema...people have travelled miles to see it! Monday 12th - Saturday 17th March 7.45pm £10-£20 Featuring the talents of Elizabeth Heighway, Teresa Pells, Sarah MacDonald and Mary Pells Fitzwilliam Museum (Gallery 3) Sunday 11th March 1.15pm Cambridge Theatre Smorgasboarde Black Comedy by Peter Shaffer Fitzpatrick Hall, Queen’s College 11pm Wednesday 7th - Saturday 10th March Copenhagen by Michael Frayn ADC Theatre Some questions remain long after their oweners have died? Tuesday 6th - Saturday 10th March 7.45pm £5-£8 The Medics Revue present... Happy Fetus ADC Theatre A fast-paced, sketch-based show of slick, original comedy...just what the doctor ordered! Wednesday 7th - Saturday 10th March 11pm £4-£6 ‘People who like this sort of thing will l find this the sort of thing they like’ Richard Nixon Soc-Doc-Soc Garbage Warrior New Tech Art: Breakspaces St. John’s Film presents... Three Colours Blue The Kinki Ball Brought to you by the director Ollie Hodge and the producer Rachel Wexler Umney Theatre, Robinson College Wednesday 14th March 5pm-7pm Needing no introduction, this is Harrison Ford’s first appearance as Indiana Jones, an archaeologist and action hero St. John’s College Sunday 11th March 7 & 10pm Fitzpatrick Hall, Queen’s College A play by on of Spain’s greatest playwrights Tuesday 6th - Saturday 10th March 7.30pm £4 - £7 School of Pythagaros Ghosts is an extraordinary play...” a masterpiece” Tuesday 13th - Friday 16th March 8pm £4/£5 I have no idea what’s happening here. I missed breakdancing the first time around, whenever that was. Raiders of the Lost Ark directed by Stephen Spielberg BATS presents... Yerma by Frederick Garcia Corca Other stuff A complex psychological study of emotional liberty...not for the light hearted The first of Kieslowski’s haunting and poetic trilogy...every shot of feeling and emotion St. John’s College Thursday 8th March 9pm Corpus Christi Playroom The festival celebrating the best of Cambridge new writing...the best we have to offer! date time £price (conc. price) Lady Margaret Players presents... Ghosts by Henrik Ibsen Film Coinciding with Cambridge Science Festival, artist Mark Dixon will be leading a workshop and discussing his use of new technology The Junction Wednesday 14th March Workshop: 3pm-6pm Presentation: 8pm Ballare Tuesday 13th March Easter Ball Club 22 Sunday 11th March BBC Concert Orchestra Regarded by many as ‘the English Brahms,’ Vaughn Williams was a master of symphony, developing the form within his own distinct idiom. It is a compelling style, characterised by rich orchestral colours and sonorous harmonies Cambridge Corn Exchange Thursday 8th March 7.30pm Box Office: 01223 356851 Mastana Handel’s Messiah A collaboration between Christ’s College Music Society and CU Baroque Ensemble Great St. Mary’s Church Saturday 10th March 7.30pm £8 (£4conc) Cambridge Guitar Club St. James Centre, Wulfstan Way Thursday 8th March 8pm U Roy and Junior Murnin Fantastic Double-Header The Junction Thursday 8th March 7pm £16adv/£17on door Goo with Friendly Fires and Futureheads DJ Indie Bands and Disco dancing, now with added rock The Junction Friday 9th March 11pm-3am £6adv/£7on door The largest annual Asian arts show in East Anglia...prepare youselves for an enchanting evening filled with some of the most enthralling, colourful and exotic performances to date Cambridge Corn Exchange Sunday 11th March 7.30pm PUZZLES 23 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student Puzzles Chess Challenge White to play Black has just picked up an important central pawn with …Nxd5. What trap had White prepared? Solution to Chess Challenge: A game from the Second’s Varsity chess match two weekends ago against Oxford, which ended Cambridge 8-2 Oxford. Gonville and Caius’ Ruari Hamlin went up a piece after 17)Rxc8+ Bxc8 18)Qxd5! Qxd5 19)Nc7+ Kf7 20)Nxd5, and converted his extra piece advantage in the ending without difficulty. CU Chess Club meets every Saturday 4–6pm in Trinity Parlour Room http://www.srcf.ucam.org/chess Editor-in-Chief Jack Sommers editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk Editor at Large Elly Shepherd editor@tcs.cam.ac.uk Carolyn Hylton, Jimmy Appleton photos@tcs.cam.ac.uk Rich Saunders, Victoria Brudenell features@tcs.cam.ac.uk Cally Squires interviews@tcs.cam.ac.uk Amy Blackburn, Peter Wood news@tcs.cam.ac.uk Andy Gawthorpe, Preet Majithia focus@tcs.cam.ac.uk Stewart Petty eating@tcs.cam.ac.uk Sam Brett arts@tcs.cam.ac.uk Nina Chang film@tcs.cam.ac.uk Amy Barnes, Lisa Hagan theatre@tcs.cam.ac.uk Jack Dentith, Luke W. Roberts, James Garner music@tcs.cam.ac.uk Hannah Nakano Stewart fashion@tcs.cam.ac.uk Lianne Warr science@tcs.cam.ac.uk Tom Richardson, Chris Lillycrop sport@tcs.cam.ac.uk Ilana Raburn travel@tcs.cam.ac.uk Lisa Hagan listings@tcs.cam.ac.uk Leah Holroyd tcs@cusu.cam.ac.uk (puzzles) CUSU Business Manager Lily Stock business@cusu.cam.ac.uk CUSU Services Officer Ashley Aarons services@cusu.cam.ac.uk TCS Design Concept Vicki Smith & Kate Slotover Production Harriet Bradshaw and Wil Mossop Board of Directors Alice Palmer, Elly Shepherd Lily Stock, Ashley Aarons, Amina Al-Yassin, Rob Palmer, Jack Sommers Features, Literature, Arts, Politics Out Friday 24 THEATRE The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Chimes of bedlum or a dark love story? ‘The Changeling’ takes you into a Catholic world of blurred edges and deepest shadows where you cannot trust that what you see is true Lisa Hagan S tanding in the eerie surroundings of the Round Church we were bewildered by the presence of numerous jugglers…jugglers in a churchyard?! What could these possibly have to do with ‘The Changeling’? Well, we were soon to find out… Upon entering the church we were immediately confronted by the bewildering and spooky materialisation of a man dressed in white. This immediate engagement with the performers of the play unsettled us through their foreboding presences. Tentatively, we made our way to the seats with actors weaving their way in and out in what could only be described as imaginative play…but where to sit? The choice was hardly our own as we were directed into church pews by male actors in white robes who continually made it their aim to direct and appeal to the audiences interests. At times, these so called ‘clowns’ actively encouraged audience participation, and as we sat there, we actually dreaded catching their eyes for fear of being drawn in. The cavernous interior of the church was transformed into a cacophony of noise and movement as musicians, performers and jugglers vied for our attention. Amidst this carnivalesque assault on our senses, the lights dimmed and the air of mystery intensified, and so the play had begun. Director Milly Greene exploited the advantages of the location to great effect. ‘The Changeling’- a play which does not enable you to trust what you see; a compendium of twists and turns, was coherently translated through the distinct staging and spatial arrangements of the set. Audience participation was integral to the piece; with the production necessitating us to move from place to place in order to follow the complexities of the action. Yet surprisingly, this constant movement and engagement with the audience did nothing to hinder the progression of the play or dispel the atmosphere which had been induced. In fact, it served as a means for the audience to be constantly aware of that which was before them. The two opposing arenas of the play were highly complimented by the productive use of lighting, all credit due to Stuart Webb. This challenging production was complemented by a well selected cast, giving us a plethora of theatrical talent, all of whom possessed exceptional stage presence. The striking performances of both Franciscus (Ed Martineau) and Antonio (James Everest) enthralled the audience through their comedic translation of the production, not to mention the continually engaging relationship between the two which provided light relief in a play which was so intense. The evening brought to us a mysterious blend of musicality, drama and dance; invoking emotions of a dark and sinister kind whilst maintaining aspects of humour throughout. This play is an experience not to be missed, with an exceptional cast, an intriguing plotline and an incomparable location… it is a fiver well spent. Be a star! Do you want to be the next Theatre Editor for The Cambridge Student? Email us at apply@CUSU.cam.ac.uk All Cooped Up Pristinely corseted in white and positioned mere feet from the audience, the six initial ‘cagebirds’ immediately transformed the dull Pembroke basement into an eerie asylum-cum-aviary through their chorus of maniacal twittering. The room was lit with a harsh brightness leaving the audience constantly visible: conscious voyeurs, witnesses to the inescapable and egocentric miseries of the cage’s inhabitants: the obsessively preening Gazer (Estella Shardlow), the babbling Gossip (Nadia Manzoor), the morosely gluttonous Guzzle (Catherine Watts), the spiteful and reactionary Thump (Jessica Barker-Wren), the near tearfully neurotic Twitting (Anna Hobbiss) and the hypochondriac Gloom (Alba Ziegler-Bailey). Through the entry of the Wild One (Quin Frey) into this oppressive enclave, The Cagebirds explores the mindforged manacles of the modern world and the potential for political resistance. The play’s disjointed dialogue, contorted with moments of animalistic incoherence, sudden silences and cacophonies of complaints, was severely discomforting, yet more problematically the play’s openly allegorical and absurd nature left little room for significant character development or character interaction. Consequently the performance often lacked pace, and perhaps could have benefited from a few radical cuts. In spite of this, Savage-Hanford and her eightstrong cast dealt skilfully with the material at hand. Quin Frey must be especially commended for her ability to devise new and ingenious ways to mime attempted door unlocking for over 20 minutes, and also for the focus which she brought to the stage as the voice of freedom, reality and rebellion. Jessica Barker-Wren constantly caught my eye due to her crazed gurning and restless and aggressive postures: her grotesque and bloodthirsty enthusiasm electrified the play. Anna Hobbiss excelled through the unostentatious emotional subtly she brought to her character and gave an equally engaging performance throughout. Although David Campton’s work is heavily handed in its didactism, Jessi Savage-Hanford’s production is thoughtful, provocative and superbly executed. Hannah Fair Pablo and Ed gone mad. Milly Green Come one, come all, to see Shakespeare visit the circus! ‘For never was a story of more woe/Than this of Juliet and her Romeo.’ Or not, as the case may be in this HATS production of Shakespeare’s classic tale of love and heartbreak. With directorial assistance from Matt Bulmer, Eberhardt has adventurously transformed ‘Romeo and Juliet’ into a world that blends the carnival with the circus. This made for a pleasing and highly original aesthetic, using brightly coloured flags and clown-like costumes to allow the design concept to permeate through the whole of the production. The staging, which comprised of a raised platform, was obviously meticulously planned out to realise the spaces’ full potential. The productions tight bond to its theme, however, meant that the comedic elements to the play were accentuated too much, and because of this, its essential tragedy was lost. Even the final scene was injected with comedy, albeit subconsciously, by the fact that Romeo’s face was obscured by a white fluffy cushion. Waiting for Guagua OK, how am I supposed to describe this play the in just 150 words? Main term of description? Odd. Rushing towards the cellars, I really hoped I wouldn’t interrupt the more-punctual-than-me audience… but there wasn’t one! A premonition? I think so! Was finally joined by the other four audience members and we sat amongst empty chairs in front of an odd set, inclusive of makeshift, childlike signs and props. I honestly did not follow let alone get into the play itself for a good 15 minutes and even then…. odd. The cast? Well, interesting, but not necessarily in a high quality thespy way. No, quite the contrary to be honest. There are a couple of extra-odd scenes to look out for, especially the slow motion bit which was just epic and regular intervals of Spanish music in the background, which was groovy. But yeah, in a word, this play is… odd! Lyeanne Beckford-Jones This aside, the production did show theatrical talent among its actors. Despite showing some awkwardness in their chemistry at times, Adam Drew (Romeo) and Vivienne Sedgley (Juliet) gave sensitive performances in their roles. The audience was also fairly receptive to the comedy given in the sound characterisations of the Nurse (Tamara Waxman), Capulet (Tom Ovens) and Mercutio (Marieke Audsley), and also to Kiran Gill’s proficiency in her multiple roles. The original score of the play proved to be beautiful and very appropriate to the performance, in particular adding a much needed tinge of tragedy to the final scene. If you are hoping for a classic, weepy version of perhaps Shakespeare’s best-known tragedy, then you are likely to be disappointed. The production is, however, a work of originality and flair that excites the senses, and one to be proud of for a first time director. Stephanie Baxter THEATRE 25 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student Taking our hats off for Yerma BATS mainshow takes culture to new heights Laura Kilbride ‘Yerma’ opens with the twang of the lone Spanish guitar, two dancers dark against the backlit drapes and ends in a silent blackout, as the villagers crowd in and the heroine screams ‘don’t judge me!’. What unfolds in between bears witness to a highly original and imaginative production. Alex Moyet’s well wrought translation of Lorca’s tragedy draws on an equal mix of poetry and dialect, entirely appropriate to the story of a childless woman driven to extremes by the insularity of her culture. The direction does well not to distract from the barren landscape created by the language, keeping only a plain stage with symmetrical furniture, effective in conveying the increasing breach between the couple. The music and choreography are also original to this production and Ed Southall’s setting of the Spanish songs reaches across the language barrier. Katherine Barnes’ solo accompanying the candlelit procession is particularly chilling, as the direction of the second half extracts the dark magic and ritualism of ancient Catholic Spain. Stephanie Bain steals the show as Yerma in her thin mourning dress, successfully enacting the claim that ‘every door is closed to us here’ in her relentless pacing, wavering between violent frus- tration and tenderness towards her crushed husband, played by Ed Rowett . There is a great deal of warmth in the exchanges between the women characters and the conversation and dance of the washerwomen is particularly fun, as is Yerma’s reaction when the Old Woman tells her God doesn’t exist. At points the choreography does not appear completely in time but this rather adds to the naturalness of the action. One of the most successful points of the play is how each of the secondary characters retains a sense of earthy individuality, touching the audience and underpinning the poetry. A rich and atmospheric production, ‘Yerma’ is successful in spanning the barriers of language Real Black Comedy in imaginary darkness Lights out for them, lights up for us. This is the simple concept upon which the whole of ‘Black Comedy’ is founded – when a fuse blows and the lights go down in Brindsley’s house, the stage is in fact lit up for the audience to witness a series of both expected and unexpected guests fumbling and stumbling around in imaginary darkness. Brindsley (a superb Rob Carter) is an artist engaged to upper-class lisping Carol (Alice Edgerley). In the course of the evening, he hopes to both sell some of his work to millionaire collector Mr Bamberger and impress his prospective father-in-law, the Colonel (Giles Reger). Into this rather fragile equation come two people who Brindsley would rather keep in the dark: his fussy, camp neighbour Harold (Ali Welch), and his ex, Clea (Nicky Goulimis), who’s popped up, all lust and legs, in ignorance of the impending marriage. Throw in an electrician with an accent identical to Bamberger’s and a fictional cleaner called Mrs Moussaka and the mess is complete. It’s all to- tally silly, and utterly hilarious. We are treated to all the usual elements of farce – people in and out of doors, misunderstandings and confusion – but along with the added physical comedy of watching the actors crawl and stagger around stage, eyes staring, arms outstretched, bumping into furniture and each other. Rob Carter steals the show, bringing just enough vulnerability to Brindsley so we sympathise with him in spite of the situation being entirely of his own making. Ali Welch also deserves praise for his comic portrayal of the effeminate pedant, Harold. The other characters are largely stereotypes – Carol’s repeated ‘daddypoo’ somewhat grates, as does the Colonel’s blustering manner and Clea’s forced sexuality, and the lines act as mere vehicles for the action. But it really doesn’t matter, this is a brief but welcome interlude of slapstick, a refreshing change from the gravitas of so much Cambridge theatre. Nina Chang and culture, reaching out to the audience whilst keeping its feet firmly in the Navarran dust. ‘Yerma’, BATS Mainshow this week, is showing in the Fitzpatric Hall, Queens College, until Saturday 10th March Emotions run high. Dylan Spencer-Davidson Hubble Bubble Toil and Trouble Macbeth, now showing at the Corpus playroom, spells the toil and trouble taken by its cast, although the fire was not hot enough to make this production bubble. Even though the initial scenes of the witches set the stage for a hair-raising encounter with one of Shakespeare’s darkest and most disturbing creations, the play disintegrated afterwards as detailed portrayal of the principal characters were absent. That they don’t quite deliver enough has more to do with their difficulty in capturing the emotion in the script rather than with matching actors to roles. Natalie Kesterton, who plays the scheming Lady Macbeth, was especially disappointing. Her opening soliloquies were bland and she managed to come across as a character from the Simpsons. Her mad scene, on the other hand, has to be one of the more ‘athletic’ examples of its kind, for she writhes and stretches as though asked to perform an especially demanding gymnastic feat. All in all, Natalie fails to conjure the image of a ruthless woman and the mental agonies she subsequently undergoes when guilt plagues her. Sadly, neither of the principal actors gives us a sense of a mind diseased, for no mind is open to our inspection. What was even more interesting was the fact that Ade O’Brien (Macbeth) had the same facial expression right throughout the play – from the moment he was crowned king to hearing the death of his queen. Most of the other performances were unmemorable if not very wooden. Feargal McGuinness as Malcolm only managed to elicit yawns from the audience. However, Mark Corbin’s Macduff does stand out. His speech upon learning the savage slaughter of his family strikes exactly the right note of pathos without melodrama, horror without hyperbole. However murky the portrayal is, the hard work put in by the Director (Martin Noutch) is truly illuminating. Try this production of Macbeth if you suffer from insomnia – it might prove a good remedy for your trouble! Ragunanthan Rajagopala Corpus Christi Playroom, 7.30pm until Saturday The Queen is Dead (Apparently) Drawing on the unwritten, yet strictly adhered to commandment “Thou shall not talk to thy neighbour on the Tube” the Freshers’s play of “The Queen is Dead” by Mike Kielty and George Reynolds attempts to use the devastating news of the monarch’s death to break this normally sacrosanct rule. However, what the audience is offered is disappointingly far from the “instant attractions” and “casual betrayals” promised in the programme. Beginning with a journey on the Tube as commuters cram together on their way to work, the intimacy of the Corpus playroom lends itself perfectly to the claustrophobia of the Underground setting up the audience’s hopes for a play that aims to offer a novel and interesting perspective into the banality of city life. However, unfortunately these hopes are soon dashed. The constant rattle of the train in the background, although authenticating the experience of the journey, is unnecessary loud, making it very dif- ficult to hear the actors’s dialogues. Such aural and technical faults also mar the rest of the play, since not only are the scene changes clumsy, but the brief interludes of upbeat, modern music between scenes are entirely at odds with the sombre, pensive atmosphere that Kielty and Reynolds seem to be trying to convey through their writing. Nevertheless, the play is redeemed by some fine moments of acting. In her role as the heartbroken Rebecca, Lizzy Barber epitomises the Bridget Jones generation trying to find love in the capital. Olivia Potts also shines in her role as Sophie, struggling to climb the corporate ladder. The rest of the performances however are comparatively insipid, leaving the audience longing for believable reactions to the Queen’s death. Although based on an interesting premise, the play is regrettably weak in its delivery of intense emotions and drama that would be expected. Sarika Thanki Battling it out on the stage floor fails to excite Macbeth. Victoria Turnock 26 FILM The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Love, intrigue and illusion Victorian magic: is ‘The Illusionist’ just another ‘Prestige’? Emma Dibdin I t’s an unavoidable evil of Hollywood that every once in a while, two films about roughly the same thing are made at roughly the same time, and it’s equally unavoidable that one will end up playing second fiddle to the other. The recent Infamous, following hot on the heels of Philip Seymour Hoffman’s Oscar-winning turn in Capote, is one such example of a film that, perhaps unfairly, never stood a chance, doomed to endless unfavourable comparisons with its esteemed predecessor. The Illusionist might well be seen as suffering a similar misfortune, arriving as it is just after The Prestige, Christopher Nolan’s masterful noir take on the deadly feud between two nineteenth-century magicians. The comparison, however, is a superficial one, and once the apparent thematic similarities are overlooked it becomes clear that the two films actually bear very little in common. Eisenheim (Edward Norton), a celebrated illusionist in Vienna, becomes reunited with his childhood love, the duchess Sophie (Jessica Biel). In the years they have spent apart, she has become engaged to the Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell), who doesn’t respond well to this sudden competition for her affections. Director-screenwriter Neil Burger impressively weaves such ambitious themes as class warfare, social repression, antiSemitism and turn-of-the-century European so- cial upheaval throughout his opus. The scope is at once much wider and much shallower than that of The Prestige, which focused on deep, painfully intimate character drama with little room or consideration for geopolitical context. The story is often intriguing and the film itself elegantly presented, but unlike The Prestige this is fundamentally a romance, and the elaborate cinematography can’t disguise the essential lack of chemistry between the leads. Norton is reliably impressive, his quiet, pensive performance making it almost impossible to know quite what to make of Eisenheim, and Biel is unexpectedly convincing in her somewhat limited role. But the two create no spark on screen together and the lack of anything new or interesting in their dynamic means that the clichéd “star-crossed lovers” plot becomes all the less compelling. The real dramatic substance, what almost certainly attracted a cast of this calibre to the project, comes from the interplay and implicit power struggle between Eisenheim, the vicious Prince Leopold and chief inspector Uhl (Paul Giamatti) who is hired to investigate the inscrutable illusionist. The interaction between the three is consistently gripping, with all three actors on top of their game in each other’s presence. There is no doubt that The Illusionist’s greatest asset is its cast, none of whom put so much as a foot wrong; Sewell’s enjoyably villainous aristocrat provides an excellent foil for Norton’s enigmatic protagonist, and the outstanding Giamatti lends warmth and humanity to the frequently dispassionate Edward Norton as the enigmatic illusionist with Jessica Biel as his childhood love proceedings as the avuncular Uhl. But despite its many admirable parts the film as a whole remains flawed; Burger’s ideas are impressive but he falters in the execution, like a magician still learning his craft. The script is where the deficiency is most obvious, with even Norton unable to redeem such clunkers as “The only mystery I never solved was…why my heart couldn’t let go of you.” The characters are often unconvincing, difficult to relate to or feel much of any- thing for, and while certain moments are moving in their own right, the overall effect of the film remains oddly cold and distancing, not passionless so much as inaccessible. If what you’re looking for is an entertaining, straightforward and visually lush story that won’t keep you up for hours afterwards pondering its mysteries, you will have no complaints after seeing The Illusionist. If you’re looking for anything more than this, consider sticking with Nolan. Who you gonna call? Ghost Rider! Yet another reincarnation of a Marvel superhero sets the screen alight... Sam Law ‘I can help your father…for a price…’ ‘Wh…wh…what price?’ (Long pause) ‘How about YOUR SOUL?’ Y Nicholas Cage takes on the Devil...on a motorbike. es, ladies and gentlemen, Ghost Rider really is a very silly film. Opening with an effects heavy 2 minute prologue about a supposed mythical ‘ghost rider’ who sold his soul to the devil and ended up bounty hunting evil spirits in the wild west on a phantom steed, the film proceeds to retell this story in the present day, dragging it out for a full effects heavy two hours, with the key difference being that the new ghost rider rides a cool stunt bike, not a horse. Essentially if this sounds like a good set-up to you (and it really does to me), you’ll probably like this latest marvel comic adaptation, if not however, you’ll probably rather set your own skull on fire rather than sit it out. A lot of critics have already roasted Mark Steven Johnson’s second attempt at the superhero genre, writing it off as another nonsense popcorn flick in the vein of his previous effort Daredevil and citing the massively delayed production as evidence that it was a bad idea from the outset. In all fairness, this is just another nonsense superhero flick like Daredevil, but that’s not such a bad thing, and the delays weren’t due to anything other than the development of the revolutionary new fire effects used to bring the rider to life. The only real complaint that can be levelled at the movie, bearing in mind that it never sets out to be anything more than a faithful(ly stupid) adaptation of its source material, is that it’s villains are particularly weak; Mephistopheles (original easy rider Peter Fonda) appears completely toothless when confronted by any sort of danger, and pseudo antichrist Blackheart (and his earth wind and water minions) are from the very lowest order of supervillains – though the death effect when they kill someone is spookily cool. However, what sets ‘…Rider’ apart from all of the other shameless popcorn movies in circulation at the moment is its star. Nicholas Cage has always wanted to play Ghost Rider, and now that he has finally gotten the role he would sell his soul for, he does anything but waste it. In spite (or perhaps with the help) of a wig seemingly taken from an oversized set of Lego, he imbues an essentially morally skeletal character with his own characteristic kookiness, swigging jelly beans from a martini glass and soundtracking his home life with the Carpenters. Once again he brings the soul a blockbuster movie, never allowing the action to become uninteresting. So then, be warned, this is by no means a good film, but if you leave your brain at the door and view it all with a sense of humour you’ll still be able to massively enjoy this high order nonsense. FILM 27 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student Welcome to Bollywood... A short introduction to the world’s largest film industry Dunni Alao W hat better way to start this article than to note that I am not Indian, nor am I Hindi, and yet Bollywood films appeal to me just as much as any Western movie would, in some cases even more so. Bollywood is not just for people who identify with Asian culture, but for anyone who has a genuine interest in film in all its diversity. I was first introduced to Bollywood cinema late one night when the 1957 classic Mother India aired for what was quite probably the first time on British terrestrial TV. Innocently flicking channels I was suddenly intrigued by the desperate Radha played by screen legend Nargis as she bemoaned over the social injustices she had endured. Her husband had left her, her son turned against her and she was being cheated out of the fruits of her labour. Relishing my social conscience, I was moved by this woman’s story of betrayal and hope, and I was certainly not the first. The film was nominated for an Academy Award and won 5 Filmfare Awards including one for best actress in 1958. For those that didn’t know, Bollywood is far from new. Did you know: Outside of India, Afghanistan holds the most popular fanbase, despite the Taliban attempts to ban the industry’s imports in the early nineties. Like Hollywood, the industry began around the start of the 20th Century with the first full length feature film Raja Harishchandra, released in 1913. It wasn’t until the 1930s that the industry really took off however, with the first sound film produced in 1931. Alma Ara (The Light of The World) was directed by Ardeshir Irani who intuitively recognised the importance sound was soon to have on cinema, marking the birth of the filmi genre, Indian popular music written and performed for Indian cinema. Alma Ara was to Bollywood what the Jazz Singer was to Hollywood, with production releases increasing rapidly. However, despite some contemporary critics’ belief that the industry has undergone Westernisation, Bollywood is not Hollywood. Nor is it the name for the whole of Indian cinema. Rather, it refers to the mainly Hindi popular Mumbai based film industry. There are very specific elements to a Bollywood film that give it its distinction and garner its popularity. The most important of these is of course the filmi element. What would Bollywood be without its song and dance? Films are not without at least one musical number woven into the script. I must admit, I’m big fan of the spontaneous bursts into song, however even if you detest musicals you can’t help but admire the vibrant and colourful choreography displayed in Bollywood cinema. Every detail is thought out to perfection. From the synchronisation of the dance moves to the complementary costumes, these numbers are often filmed using a large quantity of dancers alongside the leading cast. Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (Something Is Happening) is a perfect example of this, when in one musical scene an entire student body dance around a university campus. The random shifts in location and change of clothing are standard features of the Bollywood film which add to its picturesque and often visually stunning nature. There is quite an apparent element of cheese in the catchy music; however these songs are fine examples of professionalism, being produced using playback singers, electronic instrumentation, and world-class musical composition. More often than not actors will lip-synch to the harmonies of a professional playback singer, stars in there own right. Lata Mangeshkar is amongst the most famous, having literally recorded thousands of songs for a number of Bollywood films. She has her own Western following as well, with her songs being used in films such as Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Amongst the most famous Bollywood stars is Amitabh Bachchan renown for his deep voice and intense eyes. He starred alongside Shahrukh Khan in Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham… (Sometimes A scene from ‘Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham’; a classic example of Bollywood cinema. Happy Sometimes Sad) which won 22 awards and received 43 nominations. The film is considered to be the best of Bollywood and involves a typical story about family values. Khan is quite distinguished in his own right, having won many awards over the years, including some for his role in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai in which he stars alongside Rani Mukherjee and Kajol. Both women are exceptional stars, Kajol being listed amongst the top four Bollywood actresses of 2006, whilst Rani appeared in the closing ceremony of the 2006 Commonwealth games. These names may not be common knowledge in the UK; however there is little doubt that British interest in Bollywood is on the rise, at least for the time being. Shilpa Shetty’s appearance in Celebrity Big Brother has drawn attention to Indian culture; much like Aishwarya Rai (Bride and Prejudice) has done before, whilst the popular cinema chain Cineworld offers a small selection of the latest Bollywood releases. An Asian friend once informed me that her love for Bollywood lay in its reflection of her culture through its moral messages, an element for many as important as the music and one that really sets Bollywood apart from the mindless consumerism of most mainstream cinema industries. The Annual Cinecam Festival Twelve short films, one great prize. Nina Chang C ambridge filmmaking. For many, a little known world, it fails to generate the same level of university-wide interest, enthusiasm and downright high drama (excuse the pun) as our theatrical productions. And yet, as last weekend’s 3rd annual Cinecam festival proved, this is in no way down to a lack of talent. The understated, yet impressive quality of some of the 12 short films showcased on Saturday evening’s competition screening was testament to this. The 12 shown were competing for a range of prizes including a free place at Brighton Summer Film School, awarded by several prestigious judges from the wider filmmaking community. They exhibited an extremely diverse range of style, content and length. First prize went to the longest of these efforts, entitled Flown by Emily Cooper. Although no judge, I must confess to being disappointed by the panel’s choice. In spite of some clever use of special effects, the film seemed to me drawn out, sterile and, at times, plainly bewildering. It centred around a separated couple, portrayed by actors, who, without dialogue, seemed to struggle to evoke any sense of emotion, or arouse sympathy. Amongst the other films which received prizes was The Pool, directed by Cinecam’s own vice-president, Rob Petit. This was a brief piece showing a child diving into a pool, down to the unexpected table and chairs at the bottom. Devoid of the pretension which marred Flown, it was smoothly and skilfully constructed, making excellent use of transitions between under and above water shots, and the beauty of simplicity. Pieces such as Natural Selection, Hansel & Co and The Great Fandango elicited enthusiastic audience response with their use of largely silly, but innovative humour, including, from the first of these, hilarious images of a guy with a giant panda head failing in his various attempts to commit suicide after being jilted at the altar. Unfortunately, the comic films tended to be shorter than their more serious, less effective rivals. After a promising start involving shots of polar bears along with chirpy music, Cinequarium then descended into mind-numbingly slow and condescending narration, basing its central concept on the (rather tenuous) analogy between aquariums and the cinema. Interestingly, the other film with narration, was equally disappointing. And my sling is that of David combined various shots of Havana and Trinidad which somehow completely failed to give any sense of the atmosphere, or character of these places with a lengthy Spanish narration and poorly proof-read subtitles. Ultimately, it was simplicity which seemed to most impress the audience, even if the judges had differing opinions. Despite a couple of weak entries, the films on the whole were remarkable for their originality, quality, and successful melding of pure entertainment value with artistic merit. The jilted panda from ‘Natural Selection’ 28 MUSIC The Cambridge Student 08/03/07 Stop, Fopp, and Roll A serious article with a serious band: The Maccabees The Maccabees mid-set during their instore at Fopp, March 2nd. Onlookers report that they bought literally several Cheech and Chong DVDs. Matt Cottingham James Garner T he Maccabees have been climbing the indie ladder for some time now and when they release their debut album in May you can expect to be hearing a lot more about them. Talking to singer Orlando Weeks and guitarist Felix White they make clear how slow progress has been, with their current tag of overnight successes being three years in the making. “There was no plan” says Orlando, “it was just to play a gig, or then to play a gig where there was some people, to play a gig where there were some people clapping.” This process finally reached my attention in late 2005 when the band put out the now collectable 45 ‘X-Ray.’ Today they have four singles to their name, ‘First Love’ being the first to grace the charts, swiftly followed by ‘About Your Dress’ which has just gone in at #33. “Cambridge? That’s, that’s big, they’ll know if I say anything wrong.” It was the stop-motion video to second single ‘Latchmere’, featured on YouTube and watched 100,000 times that really helped the band take off and Felix explains the importance to the band of keeping control over such things. “We like to keep it localised, the art work, posters, videos … so everything is The Maccabees,” he says. The band followed this through with their last video, a fingerpuppet epic, which they still made themselves despite now being signed to a Universal imprint. I ask the band, if given their desire for control they were worried about losing it in the recording of their album with experienced producer Ben Hillier (Blur, Suede, The Horrors.) “It’s still us playing the instruments” deadpans Felix. Orlando adds, “Ben’s a sweetheart, I needed that, someone to put up with me.” Orlando explains his paranoia about the recording of the album: “Imagine trying to have to decide if that’s the final version of that song that’s gonna be heard…the definitive version.” Felix agrees, “you wanna be proud of it for the rest of your life.” He then adds “We’re still really young, we still don’t know what the fuck we’re doing to be honest.” Yes, he did say that. You see gentle reader, I have been leading you on a merry dance, trying to trick you into believing this was a serious interview, with a serious band, conducted by a serious interviewer. The truth, that I tried to hide from you for the best of reasons, is that Felix wasn’t exactly on the level and Orlando…Orlando was stoned out of his fucking mind. As soon as I arrived the state of the singer’s pupils and speech had immediately raised my suspicions and my eyebrows. These suspicions only increased when I told Orlando I was from TCS and he replied “Cambridge? That’s, that’s big, they’ll know if I say anything wrong.” At this point, before I had been completely convinced that the singer was on the Marrakech Express, Felix intervened in a cover-up effort, offering to join in with the proceedings. Sadly, the guitarist was thwarted when, at that exact moment, the rider arrived. Orlando looked at the Tesco bags. Felix looked at Orlando with concern. Orlando joyously cried “Food! Fooooooood!” Game, set and hash. At first, as with this article, I vainly tried to take it all seriously. I did the influences one (“Roald Dahl, Richard Attenborough, David Attenborough, all the Attenboroughs actually”), probed them about false dichotomies (“Yeah, a bit of both”) and asked clever questions, to one of which Orlando slurred the slow response, “That is a clever question.” Sadly, even in their weakened state, the boys wouldn’t take the opportunity to slate recent tour partners The Fratellis. “Lovely boys” says Orlando, “Charming young men” smiles Felix, the air thick with soft drugs and irony. Eventually I just decide to relax, stop worrying about not having any serious answers and enjoy the presence of two entertaining characters. When I point out to them that come April they will have their own headline show at the Junction, it’s news to them and they react with genuine delight. “The Junction?” questions Felix, “That’s a big venue, that’s gonna be amazing.” “It’s good man” says Orlando, before adding “Bowling! We gotta go bowling.” Pause. “Really? A gig at the Junction?” That gig will be the band’s fourth in Cambridge in six months so I ask them what they think of the city and the interview begins to descend into surreal territory. “I think the Fitzwilliam Museum is wicked” says Orlando, “all that Egyptian shit.” I tell them the story of the guy who knocked over some priceless pots there. “If it was an honest mistake, then I think that’s fine” ponders Orlando “but if he did it to take the piss out of art or history… history matters…I had a badge but it got lost.” He asks me what kind of pots and I reply that I think they were Ming. “Shit man, not Ming!” cries the singer, “That’s a clanger… that’s probably where the word came from.” “We’re still really young, we still don’t know what the fuck we’re doing to be honest.” I ask Orlando if he feels constrained by his swirling, crackling voice that fits his shy indie lyrics so well but might not work with other lyrical focuses. He sees the positives first, “You think my voice matches my lyrics? It’s very nice of you to say, thanks.” He goes on “I’m pigeonholing myself but at the same time, pretty much guaranteeing that I can’t be kicked out of the band.” Felix looks at him and asks why. “Because my lyrics match my vocals.” Felix seems about to argue that he that wouldn’t stop him being thrown out, Orlando realises this and panics, thinking I might be taking this all seriously. “No one’s trying to kick me out,, it’s fine” he assures me. The band have one cover to their name, Richard Hawley’s ‘Just Like the Rain’ that provided a B-Side to ‘First Love.’ It’s a great version that the man himself has given his seal of approval to. Felix starts off the story of how it came about, “We went to see Richard Hawley and he was unbelievable”, Orlando interjects, “Yeah, we knocked on his tourbus window, idiot drunks, and shouted “We’re in a band! We’re gonna cover you! He was like “oh yeah… awright” but he liked it when it came out so that’s OK.” They then digress into talk about cover songs, Orlando picking Nothing Compares 2 U as his favourite before imploring me to download Prince’s acapella version of ‘1999’. I question if the band worry that they’ll slip through the cracks of musical fashion, with their brand of post-punk being overawed by the new rave scene and pub rock revival. “There’s nothing we can do about it” replies Orlando and Felix worries that “if you thought about that, you’d drive yourself insane.” Orlando continues “We can’t write songs on spec…Rob wouldn’t have a fucking cowbell (turning to me) you try and make rob play a cowbell!” I see the band a week later playing an instore show at Fopp. In truth they have no reason to fear about making it. Orlando’s engaging voice, the intertwining guitars of brothers Felix and Hugo and a tight live show mean they stand out as more than just another post-punk Gang of 2004. Finally they somehow got on to talking about rock and roll swagger and why they don’t large it. “This sounds really pretentious but it’s not pretentious” starts Orlando, “rock and roll just means to do what you wanna do, I’ve had it bred into me to be overpolite and paranoid.” Felix goes on, “We love the bands with that swagger like Oasis but you can’t swagger if you don’t actually swagger.” Orlando: “One day I saw Arctic Monkeys and they had that swagger and I thought oooooooh, I dunno about that but then you discover that they deserve that swagger.” Felix: “Maybe you have to earn the swagger, when we play the Junction we’re gonna be “Alright Cambridge!” MUSIC 29 08/03/07 The Cambridge Student We don’t care ’bout young folks John Renbourn & Johnny Dickinson @ The Junction Owen Holland T here are, thankfully, still some people out there for whom guitar-playing is an artform – a craft – and not just another badge to wear. John Renbourn is one of those people. Famous for his pioneering work in the folk-baroque movement during the sixties, he also played in the folk-fusion group, Pentangle, with fellow troubadour Bert Jansch. He is a living legend, using a variety of tunings, dipping in and out of an assortment of traditional styles – Celtic, folk, blues, even calypso-gospel – and he fingerpicks. These are techniques and styles of which your average strummer remains blissfully ignorant. John played in the Shed while, next door, the Junction’s main venue played host to NME’s latest Next Big Thing, for which a few hundred thirteenyear olds had been queuing, having convinced their parents to let them stay out late. Able support was provided by Johnny Dickinson, a delightfully self-deprecating Northumbrian slideguitarist, whose lilting intonation and deft fret-work couldn’t fail to win over audiences from here to, well, Northumberland. Some high-points of Dickinson’s set included ‘Black-Jack Davy’, ‘Courting is a Pleasure’ – his Swing adaptation of a tune widely known thanks to Nic Jones – and finished with T-Bone Walker’s ‘I’m Still in Love With You’, accompanied on the nose-trumpet by a particularly spirited member of the audience. Dickinson is self-evidently an ac- complished and confident slide-player, although some of the more improvisational moments, whilst charming, did seem slightly directionless at times. Nonetheless the set was confident, relaxed and refreshingly interactive. John’s set was, understandably, the more assured of the two. He is a valiant time-travelling explorer of various recondite styles, some songs in his extensive repertoire extending way back the eleventh-century when musical notation hadn’t even been invented. How did he come by these tunes? Plenteous supplies of malt whisky and laudanum. We were given a whistle-stop tour through his eclectic (by which I actually mean eclectic) range of interests: opening with a barn-storming rendition of ‘Sweet Potato’, moving through Celtic and English instrumental ballads, a couple of Booker-T’s blues numbers, before finishing up with a beautiful interpretation of Dylan’s admittedly matchless ‘Buckets of Rain’, joined by Dickinson. The old sea-shanty ‘Lord Franklin’ featured somewhere as well. Both these players have an endearingly intimate stage-manner which can only come from years of experience. Renbourn’s career, it is safe to say, has now reached a phase of venerable and much-respected dotage. He strolled on stage in his socks complaining of creaking limbs and aching joints. I hope to see Dickinson’s reach its peak soon. Walking home I overheard a conversation between two of the twelve-year olds leaving the NME gig: “that was, like, totally fucking awesome!” which the unfortunate interlocutor proceeded to repeat about five times, for emphasis I suppose. Willy Mason If the Ocean Gets Rough The problem with Willy Mason is one of consistency. On the first album, dusky country-folk gems referencing Dostoyevsky snuggle up alongside songs about making sandwiches. On this album, his sophomore effort, those peaks and troughs have been ironed out. It’s sad that on an album called ‘If the Ocean Gets Rough’, there’s so little actual passion. There’s a tired charm to most of these songs, but it’s a slight charm, and on an album that feels strangely short, it’s easy to mistake a whiskey-soaked world-weariness for something more insipid. Fans are desperate for him to live-up to the “new Dylan” tag that gets applied to many a young man with an acoustic guitar, but he won’t achieve it with collections like this. There are a few moments that lift it – ‘When the River Moves On’ has a lazy gospel feel, drifting handsomely on by like the ol’ Mississippi herself, and ‘Riptide’, with its gentle strings, shows what Mason can do when he stretches himself that little bit further. The highlight of the album is the title track’s delicate chorus, but it’s a moment so fleeting that it makes you wish Mason had someone – me, for example – stood by on quality control, telling him what to keep and what to throw away. Apparently at his last gig he played genuinely wonderful breakthrough single ‘Oxygen’ twice – going on this lot, it’s easy to understand why. New single ‘Save Myself’ feels limp-wristed in comparison. Although there are glimmerings of wonder amongst the actual tunes, his lyrics are often what let him down – only the sublime ‘The World That I Wanted’, about the death of someone’s father, has any emotional impact. Conor Oberst could read a shopping list and arouse more feelings than most of these tacks, and that’s a big problem for Mason. In country, if you can’t do emotion, you can’t do nothing. Josh Farrington Renbourn smiles the smile of a man performing without trousers. The Horrors Strange House The Horrors’ blueprint is psychpunk and goth-garage, bands like The Cramps and The Sonics who never scored mainstream success. In keeping with these influences, the album kicks off with a cover of Screaming Lord Sutch’s ‘Jack the Ripper.’ It begins at aptly funereal pace before erupting in a panicked fury of organ grinding, anguished vocals and screams aplenty. A “Bonus Track” is usually some bad, tacked on studio experiment. Not so with ‘Death at the Chapel.’ It crackles and whirrs into action: feedback, riff, signature scream of Faris Rotter. The song is based on the idea of a deranged killer, sick of the idea of perfect love, tracking down characters from 60s pop classics. Yes, it’s as cool as it sounds. The band have become known for their short, sharp twenty minute long sets yet the album outstays its welcome a little with the last three tracks, particularly the dull, five minute instrumental ‘Gil Sleeping.’ For an outfit who made their name with the hundred second smash ‘Sheena is a Parasite’ it’s an odd choice. The best album track is ‘She Is The New Thing’, a catchy, pulsing song driven by strident vocals and sweeping organ. It seems to address The Horrors’ own rise to being the new thing “through no fault of my own.” They are the new thing because they’re playing sonic waves unheard of in some time with their own signature twist. The backlash against the band focused on their conspicuous image and lack of originality but this album, with its full sound and experimental feel, proves the original hype was justified. Rotter asks on ‘She Is The New Thing’, “I wonder how long it will be/ before I am sick of her?” If The Horrors turn out more records as exciting as ‘Strange House’ people won’t be sick of them any time soon. James Alan Smithee-Garner Arcade Fire Neon Bible Neon Bible is just not quite as good as Funeral, Arcade Fire’s almost perfect debut album. That said this is still another great album and a different musical direction from the first, the crunching guitars and tempo of “Neighbourhood #3 (Power Out)” and “Wake Up” have been all but abandoned for organs and even more orchestral navel-gazing. Listening to the first track, “Black Mirror”, one immediately has the feeling that this is an album with big ambitions. But the band have both the musical and lyricalnoustopullthemofftospectacular effect as Neon Bible tackles theIraqwar,evangelicalChristians and the modern middle-class malaise of disillusionment. While the first three tracks are good, the fourth track, “Intervention”, is why we got excited about this album in the first place. When the organ kicks in, even the most jaded hack must get shivers down their spine. Arcade Fire do the elegiac orchestral thing better than everyone else, as Win Butler decries “Working for the Church while your family dies”. “Antichrist Television Blues” is even better. Butler seems to be a man on the brink of destruction, alternately looking to God and his daughter for salvation. “Windowsill” is more restrained but no less powerful as Butler rejects the world he lives in - “I don’t want to fight in the holy war/ I don’t want the salesman knocking at my door/ I don’t want to live in America anymore”. These three songs are the best of the year so far and a blow to the hubris of Kele Okereke or Gerald Way. A couple in the middle are weaker but “No Cars Go” is a giddy pop thrill resurrected from their debut EP, while the title track is a calm critique of Evangelicalism and “My Body Is A Cage” swells to a fitting end to another triumphant work. Shane Murray 30 SPORT The Cambridge Student 03/05/07 Blues enjoy mixed fortunes Women win but men fall just short in Pentathlon thrillers The women’s team posted a record score Vicky Bradley Results: Cambridge Men: 24,000 Oxford Men: 26,976 Cambridge Women: 25,200 Oxford Women: 20,916 Vicky Bradley 2007 marked the 50th anniversary varsity clash in Modern Pentathlon. The last seven years of ladies competition and the last ten of the gentlemen’s competition had been dominated by Oxford, but this year things were going to change. Day one of the competition started with the shooting phase. In the ladies competition Cambridge provided a consummate exhibition of calm precision marksmanship, with Lucy Greenwood winning individually to give the light blues a lead of 1,548 points. Similarly in the ladies reserves, Cambridge thoroughly out-shot their dark blue compatriots by 348 points, with Vicky Bradley winning the individual title. In the men’s competition Cambridge performed admirably with solid scores by all six athletes and personal bests for Ed Moffet, Oli Samuelson and Noel Cochrane. However, Oxford pulled out some very high scoring shoots to take a lead in the overall competition at this stage. In the men’s reserves competition the Cambridge boys provided an adept display and managed to pull into the lead after one event, with Sam Openshaw finishing as individual winner. Moving onto the fencing component, the Cambridge ladies under the watchful eye of their much adored coach Rob Shaw - continued to turn the screw. Solid performances by the whole team, and an individual event win by club president Cat Wilson, saw the light blue lead stretch by another 760 points. Meanwhile in the gentlemen’s competition the boys showed some gritty yet skilful fighting to claw Oxford back to narrow the points gap. The last event of the day was the swim. Strain in the dark blue camp was already bubbling over into open argument, and the Cambridge ladies capitalised on this. With Coach Humphrey Waddington observing his handywork, a stonking personal best by captain Nicky Brooks to win individually continued the light blue domination with a further 368 points added to the lead. The Cambridge ladies reserves followed in their big sisters’ wake and trounced Oxford, with an excellent individual win by Trish Keegan. Next the gentlemen took to the pool and personal bests came from Ed Moffet, whose improvement since October has been incredible. However a dominating Oxford team, lead out by their GB pentathlete Richard HildickSmith, raised the bar of competi- tion and stretched their lead by over 2,000 points. Finally the gentlemen’s reserves, with again some great personal bests against a physically much bigger side, pipped Oxford to the win by just four points. Day two began with the riding phase. The ladies were up first and were led out in some style by Varsity riding winner Emma Kenney-Herbert with a faultless clear round to win the individual title. The chaps then took to the arena. Cambridge all rode extremely well to beat Oxford in this phase and bring themselves back in to contention in the overall title race. Jon “Sausage” Wright provided the round of the day going in last place. And so to the final phase of the competition. The reserves ran first. Lead by Zoe Rutterford, personal bests for all three of the ladies saw them in close contention. Though Oxford claimed the run it was too little too late and the light blue ladies reserves took home a well-deserved victory by over 640 points. The men’s reserves ran their socks off and paced by a storm- ing run by Michael Waldron they claimed the run phase. With that they took the title by 576 points to continue the light blue domination. On to the ladies and with the win almost in their grasp they were now chasing prizes. Lead out by their BUSA cross country champion Oxford managed to scrape a phase victory in the run. However with plucky runs from every light blue lady they ensured a phenomenal victory. Beating Oxford by 25,200 points to 20,916 they set a new Varsity Match record for a Cambridge team and gained themselves each a half blue score. In the men’s run, however, Oxford showed that their strength undoubtedly lies in the two more physical events and pulled ahead of the light blues to take the win by over 1,500 points and seal the overall victory. The 50th Varsity Match saw a much anticipated swing in fortunes for Cambridge and the achievement was thoroughly deserved by a squad with a great depth of talent and an unbreakable team spirit. Cambridge surfer makes new waves Sarah Street makes good impression as first ever CUSA BUSA entrant Sarah Street On a weekend in early March when storms and tragedy hit South West England, hundreds of students from across the country ventured into the big waves of the Atlantic ocean at Fistral Beach in Newquay to compete in the national BUSA Surfing Championships 2007. The event, which is one of the largest of its kind in the world, is made up of seventy-eight teams from universities all across the UK. For over twenty years the event has grown and this year four hundred and thirty five surfers were battling it out for both university and individual titles. Sarah Street, a final year medic from Wolfson College, was Cambridge University’s sole and first ever representative in the history of the contest. Despite this, she managed to put the newly formed Cambridge University Surfing Association (CUSA) firmly on the surfing map. The conditions over the weekend varied from perfect six to eight foot surf on the first day, to some tough onshore waves on day two. On the day of the finals the surf was five to six foot and very ragged due to the strong cross shore winds, and dangerous rip tide that was pulling competitors towards the rocky headland. There were one hundred and thirty-four female competitors entered and five tough rounds to con- test. Five surfers competed at a time, battling it out for twenty minutes. Experienced judges from the British Surfing Association were scoring the waves surfed based on style, technique and difficulty rating. The highest two waves scored by each surfer were then totaled and ranked. The top two surfers from each round then progressed to the next round. Sarah coped well in worsening seas and managed to score enough points to see her into the final Sarah entered BUSA having never competed in a surf contest before, but had the confidence of several years of surfing experience in North Devon and more recently Sri Lanka during her medical elective. Undaunted by the grueling paddle out and five foot, windswept surf that was battering the Cornish coastline, Sarah eased through Rounds One and Two, winning both with some high scoring waves. The final day arrived, with slightly cleaner surf owing to the offshore wind early in the morning and so the ladies quarter finals were quickly underway. Sarah again performed well in the better conditions and won her quarter final. By the time the semi finals were called the wind had really picked up and the storms that had been forecast for the day had most definitely arrived. Sarah, undeterred by this, coped well in the worsening seas and managed to score enough points to see her into the final. Tragically, further round the coast in Cornwall, two people were swept to their deaths from a harbour wall by the fierce waves. Most sensible people would not have considered voluntarily entering the sea at this point, but this was the final of a national surf contest and as such getting back in the sea was never in question. Already feeling a little jaded from the two previous battles with the waves that day, Sarah paddled out for the BUSA Surfing Final against four other surfers, including both the Irish National Surfing champion and the English National Junior Surfing champion. The conditions were tough for everyone, and despite paddling to a safe position for the start of the final round, by the end of it the strong rip tide had pulled Sarah and one other finalist dangerously towards the jagged rocks of the headland. Trying to paddle against it had proved futile and both girls were tiring fast and being swept further round the headland. The event quickly turned from a surfing contest to a survival exercise and luckily for both, the coastguards were in attendance and sent out a jet ski with a rescue board to pick them up and bring them back to safety. Unfortunately, due to the difficult conditions Sarah didn’t score as highly in the final as she had in the previous four rounds and finished fourth overall; still a very respectable position for a national surf contest. In recognition of her achievement Sarah was awarded a BUSA medal, a crate of Cornish beer and some surf clothes! Sarah’s points total over the weekend was enough to put Cambridge University in twelfth position in the Ladies Team competition out of the forty entered. Let’s hope that next year, with over a hundred new members to CUSA, and many surf trips being organised both in the UK and abroad, that Cambridge University will soon be seen as force to be reckoned with in the world of surfing. Sarah performed well on her debut S. Street SPORT 31 03/05/07 The Cambridge Student St Catharine’s triumphant Catz claw back deficit to seize Cuppers crown Result: St Catharine’s: 3 Churchill: 1 Chris Lillycrop Churchill were favourites coming into the Cuppers Final on the 12th of March, having comfortably wrapped up the league title weeks before, but Catz, 3rd placed in the league, looked capable of causing an upset. In the opening minutes, Catz’ midfield dominated the game. Effective tackling, lively passing, and an impressive work-rate were securing the vast majority of possession, and plenty of ball for the Catz forwards. As always, Matt Stock was Catz’ main threat up front, but he was unable to make any clear-cut chances in the opening minutes, and the Churchill defence seemed solid. In their league encounter earlier in the season, Churchill captain Matt Haslett had been the key figure in his side’s attack, but on this occasion, the Catz defence kept him well under control. Centrebacks Joe Powell and David Clinton were strong as always, and ensured that keeper Ed Bonner was never tested. Frustrated, Haslett resorted to mouthing off at his opponents and the referee, and picked up a booking in the process. At half-time, the game was still goalless, and neither side had generated a genuine scoring opportunity. Having dominated the period, Catz must have worried that they had spurned their chance to earn a surprise win. Coming out after the break, Churchill looked far more creative than before. Making good use of the long ball over the top, they repeatedly found their lone striker in space. The Catz defence looked decidedly uncomfortable with this new tactic, and Bonner was forced to make a number of saves. The breakthrough came around the hour mark. A long ball was cut out by the Catz defence, but Matt Haslett caught the man in possession and produced a clinical finish, flicking the ball over the keeper and into the net. Churchill’s fans were massively outnumbered, and had been largely subdued until this point. But they responded to their side’s lead by bursting into song. Catz, meanwhile, were struggling. Their attack still looked unable to pierce the opposition defence, and it seemed that Churchill were just minutes away from claiming the Double. As the remainder of the game began to ebb away, Catz’s fans began to sense the urgency of the situation. Led by some confident trumpeting, the army of claret and pink supporters raised the volume and urged their men to action. The team responded. Pressing forward with greater urgency, Catz won a succession of corners, and with ten minutes of the game remaining, the equaliser came. Churchill failed to clear the ball effectively, and David Clinton was on hand to stab the ball into the net. The regulation ninety ended nervously, with neither team willing to risk conceding, and the game moved to extra time. Once the teams came out after the break, it was clear who had the momentum. The Churchill team seemed tired, while Catz were discovering a new lease of life. Their second goal was a matter of when, not if. Dave Jones, fresh from victory in the Hockey blues game, was on as a substitute, and it was his cool finish with the outside of the boot that gave Catz the lead for the first time. Shortly afterwards, Churchill’s Chris Glover was dismissed for two yellow cards – and the match was effectively over. In the last few minutes, Simon Storey scored Catz’ third, and the Cup was won. Afterwards, captain Joe Powell was understandably elated: ‘I am so proud of my team today; they fought back when the game looked almost over and played unbelievably in extra-time. David Clinton was a colossus for us at the back today and the substitutes made a huge difference. The fans were also superb as they have been all season. We proved today that whatever the league shows, on our day we are the best football side in Cambridge and I am immensely proud of that.’ Star Performer David Clinton (St Catharine’s) Catz exultant. C Lillycrop I’m an LBC, get met out of here! As boat clubs across Cambridge prepare for elections, one boatie tells her story Steph Hampshire One sunny, pre-bumps afternoon in early June, a whole horde of lycra clad boaties gather at Christ’s boat house. The bbq is slowly smouldering and there’s silence as hungry rowers tuck into some much deserved post-outing grub. My stomach is churning though.... boat club elections and I’m standing for Women’s Lower Boat Captain. I didn’t really understand even what this meant until the week before, let alone exactly what it would entail. So there I was, questions being fired left, right and centre, but I make it through and the result is good. Someone mutters something about it being a tough job and I naively brush it aside telling myself it can’t be THAT hard to organise a bunch of novices........ Four months later, and the beginning of a new term: fresh rosey faces, fresh enthusiasm (even for early mornings) and of course fresh blisters! There are 30 keen beans from the freshers fair signed up to come down to the boathouse for tubbing, erging and a general reconnoitre of the facilities; 30 out of 45 women freshers ain’t bad. It’s all going well with the LBCs and Kat Astley, our Boatwoman on hand, and the women seem to be picking it up quite quickly - one keen novice even asks if we can have six outings a week! After about what seems like a million emails later, where three of them can’t make wednesdays and only five can do Saturday at 3pm, and of course sieving through all those horrible facebook tag emails from the boat club cocktail party, finally we get them out in eights. Better late than never as they say! Several crabs later and several scratched barges, (enduring the wrath of the barge owners on the bank is no mean feat!) we get the boats moving in maybe sixes or if were lucky a few strokes of eight. “It will all be ok”, I keep telling myself and, I keep telling them “just put the blade in the water and you’ll be fine!” The morning outings were probably one of the highlights - pushing off at 7.30am and racing up from Christ’s boat house trying to get out past the Chesterton footbridge. However most of the time we failed to make much improvement due to the shear volume of boat traffic and of course a little bit of zigzagging; if you’re reading this and you aren’t a boatie, then you ain’t seen nothing! One cold morning the first novice women managed to almost bisect a scull with their eight leaving some poor bloke from Caius somewhat startled and were lovingly given the nickname ‘The Caius Killers’. I take my hat off though - the Christ’s second novice men definitely deserve a mention here. They get the award for managing to almost write off their boat in Clare Novices; isn’t it funny how concrete blocks can just jump out of nowhere and smack into you?! The Queens’ ergs competition was a definite experience for me That sweaty hall, the cheesy music blaring, the ergs roaring and eight people with about two weeks rowing experience giving a gutsy pull on an erg handle for about two minutes, or at least until we literally pick them up and push the next person on. Cameras are flashing and James Jones, the Vice Women’s LBC, and I are bright red screaming our heads off. If I was a novice, I’m sure all this commotion would have made me run a mile - they must be a tough bunch to endure that! Despite some trialing times, there have been many moments of shear joy and excitement. Clare Novices and Fairbairn’s really brought out the best in all the novice crews and there was exponential improvement in just one week. One of the most important things that got them through it all was their amazing crew spirit - even when they had to endure gale force winds and torrential rain. And, the most proud moment.... the novices becoming seniors or at least in Cambridge terms. Growing from fluffy novice ducklings to bright fully fledged (or almost!) senior swans. So rather sadly, my job is over for the most part, but maybe I’ll get a chance row in a boat this term. Although once you’ve seen the river from the bank for a while, it is strangely enticing not to go back! Training for success: Christ’s women relax post race Steph Hampshire 32 SPORT The Cambridge Student 03/05/07 Ivan Zhao Blues row to Boat Race victory Cambridge win the 153rd University Boat Race by more than a length, but fail to press home their physical and technical superiority Tom Richardson Cambridge Crew: Kristopher McDaniel Dan O’Shaughnessy Peter Champion Jake Cornelius Tom James Kieran West Sebastian Schulte Thorsten Engelmann Rebecca Dowbiggin Favourites Cambridge came from behind to win the 153rd university boat race last month, avenging the shocking loss suffered by the light blues the previous year. After repelling a succession of Oxford attacks, Cambridge crossed the finish line one and a quarter lengths ahead of their rivals. Cambridge were rocked by a late change when cox Russ Glenn was replaced by Rebecca Dowbiggin only ten days before Boat Race. Glenn was demoted to Goldie after a disappointing performance in the Molesey race a few days previously. It was also believed that the rowers favoured Dowbiggin’s calm style. Dowbiggin’s inclusion capped a remarkable rise through the ranks of Cambridge rowing. Having never stepped into a rowing boat before arriving at Cambridge, she became only the thirteenth female cox in Boat Race history. The Thames was like a millpond as the two crews lined up at the start, ruling out the possibility of a repeat of last year’s waterlogging incident. Having won the toss, Oxford president Robin Ejsmond-Frey handed Cambridge the Middlesex station. Cambridge burst out of the blocks at a high stroke rate that signalled their intention. Oxford were able to maintain parity however, displaying great technical ability at the start and then nudging slightly ahead at Craven Cottage. By the milepost, the dark Blues were half a second ahead, but Cambridge clawed back level at Harrods depository. A minute later Oxford cox Nick Brodie called for a first push, and his crew increased their stroke rate accordingly. Oxford pulled ahead once more, this time by half a length, and the two crews came together. With the crews’ blades overlapping, the umpire had to intervene to prevent a decisive clash. Indeed, it was miraculous that it had not already occurred. After nine and a half minutes the race umpire again intervened, this time formally warning Cambridge for moving too far across. Dowbiggin looked to be following a strong line, however, pulling the light blues level after the Surrey bend. It was always going to be hard for Oxford having failed to capitalise on this advantage. When Cambridge led by 0.3 seconds at Chiswick steps, Oxford cox Brodie sensed that his crew needed to make another move, and soon. Oxford were unable to cope with the musclepower and fitness of their rivals, however, and the light blues went ahead by a length at the band stand. Cambridge maintained a loose and confident rhythm from there on in, eventually crossing the line three seconds ahead of Oxford. As his team mates celebrated the university’s seventy-ninth win, Kieran West provided the enduring image of the race, standing up, arms aloft, and lifting his head towards the perfectly blue sky. Popular Cambridge president Tom James, three times a Boat Race loser, was delighted to finally come out on top: “It’s absolutely amazing. I can’t believe it. We knew it was going to be tough with Oxford on the Surrey side – we just told ourselves to stay loose to stay relaxed and trust each other.” The post-race consensus seemed to be, however, that Oxford had performed above themselves. Cambridge, of course, were only able to beat the Oxford crew that turned up on the day, and that they did. But the narrow margin of victory did not do justice to the manifest superiority of the Cambridge crew. Questions raised by the light Blues’ unexpected loss in 2006 will not have been entirely eradicated by this year’s victory. Cox Rebecca Dowbiggin gets a soaking C. Morris