Nathan Hildebrandt
Transcription
Nathan Hildebrandt
BIM A Journey to Now and into the Future! BrisBIM 21 August 2013 Fulton Trotter Architects Nathan Hildebrandt • Managing Architect – 95% projects • Associate and Project Architect • 67 years in practice • 11 years using BIM Software ‘ArciCAD’ • Medium size – 65 staff • Member Graphisoft Development Panel • Brisbane and Sydney based • ArchiCAD Beta Tester • Aged Care, Cultural, Education and Health • Member of BuildingSMART Why Fulton Trotter embrace BIM • • • • Why embark on BIM unless you benefit from it FTA Clients don’t require BIM FTA are embracing BIM as a process • Efficiencies – quicker production • Quality – less variations • More time for design Future delivery process for all construction projects MacKillop Catholic College Library – Warnervale NSW 2011 < 2007 – Hinkler Project 2011 2003 - 2010 1993 - 2002 >1993 Fulton Trotter’s BIM Journey taken from AIA Incorrect use of BIM Software taken from Graphisoft ArchiCAD 8.1 Project Framework 2004 Case Studies • Hinkler Hall of Aviation • Wongaburra • Tamborine Mountain College • Faith Lutheran College Hinkler Hall of Aviation 3D Shop Drawings • Completed in 2007 • 3D Structural Steel Shop drawings produced in Tekla. • Quick and easy review process • Model reviewed outside of ArchiCAD • 1800 shop drawings produced but not necessary to review in as much detail. Hinkler Hall of Aviation 3D Steel Shop Drawing Feedback Wongaburra • Upgrade of Aged Care Beds and utilising an undercroft space. • 2530 Floor to underside of slab • Habitable Administration Space required • Modeling the answer Wongaburra Tamborine Mountain College Communicating with a Virtual Model • Pilot project using Graphisoft BIMX Software. • Issued to Contractor for trialing on Site. Tamborine Mountain College Faith Lutheran College • Pilot Project for fully coordinated Consultant Team Model • Creation of workflows for multi-platform team Faith Lutheran College Workflow Faith Lutheran College Faith Lutheran College • Cost $10k timecost to test and develop workflows, not a hidden overhead. Now in place a good investment. • Delivered the project with -0.3% in Latent, Authority, Documentation Variations. Client Variations 1.4% • Contractor didn’t embrace technology or 3D shop drawings The Future – where are we heading • Everything is modelled • All notation automated, derived straight from the model • Specification & Schedules generated directly from the model • Model checking software will perform majority of QA tasks • Developing process of communication with our QS • Developing processes with our builders so they benefit File Types – Issuing your Work • Why would you send a native file type? • You don’t send a word or excel file, you issue a PDF. • Disadvantages of sending IFC • Data can be lost or not transferred correctly. • Workflows can require more effort. • Advantages of sending IFC • You control the information you want to issue. • More effort required by your peers to recreate your objects. • Can be opened in many more software packages used by the construction industry. Thank You Tamborine Mountain College – Library Nathan Hildebrandt nathanh@fultontrotter.com.au +61 7 3291 1511
Similar documents
Lysbilde 1
1. Design tools based on open BIM/buildingSMART 2. Robust standard solutions (SINTEF Byggforsk-series) 3. Focus on quality assurance systems
More information