Volume 27 Issue 4 January 2015 - DuPage County Bar Association

Transcription

Volume 27 Issue 4
January 2015
New Chief Judge Kathryn Creswell
to present State of the Courthouse at
W.M. LAUHOFF & COMPANY
Serving the Legal Profession in DuPage County Since 1963
• Executor • Administrator • Guardian • Bond in Lieu of Probate
• Plaintiffs Replevin • Sheriff"s Indemnity • Bond to Sell Real Estate
• Injunction-Appeal • Lost Securities Bond: For Release or Reissue of
Stocks, Bonds, Life Insurance Policies, Checks,
Bank Books, Mortgage Notes, and Other Valuable Papers.
“LOOK FOR US OUTSIDE
COURTROOM 2009”
BILL LAUHOFF
INSURANCE
COMMERICAL • INDUSTRIAL • PERSONAL
Property Casualty
Life & Health
Employee Benefits
ATTORNEYS
Ask us about our Professional Liability and Office Packages
visit www.insuremyfirm.com or email info@wmlinsurance.com
W.M. LAUHOFF & COMPANY Est. 1945
0N701 Barry Avenue, Wheaton IL 60187
(630) 668-1811 FAX (630) 668-1838
www.wmlinsurance.com
www.insuremyfirm.com
TA BL E OF CON T EN TS
FROM THE EDITOR:
Just Say No by Raleigh D. Kalbfleisch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
www.dcbabrief.org
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE:
“Should Old Acquaintance Be Forgot and Never Brought
To Mind?” by Lynn C. Cavallo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
VOLUME 27, ISSUE 4
JANUARY 2015
NEWS & EVENTS – InBrief7
Raleigh D. Kalbfleisch
DCBA To Welcome New Lawyers With
Their Own Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Christine Olson McTigue
Palm Springs (And CLE) In March — The President’s Trip
Sounds Wonderful by Christine McTigue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Judges’ Nite to be… “Worst Show Ever”
by Steven D. Mroczkowski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
The DuPage County Law Library
Welcomes You by Azam Nizamuddin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
ARTICLES19
The Most Wonderful Time of the Year by Joseph Emmerth . . . . . . 21
The Dance of the Discovery Deposition:
Dealing with Dodges by Sean McCumber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
When One Crime Is Not Enough by Michael R. Hudzik and
Anthony E. Vechiola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Not Just a Facelift: The Amended Illinois
Power of Attorney Power by Kathleen May . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
New Decisions in Family Law
and Trusts & Estates edited by Michael R. Sitrick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
FEATURES39
DCBA UPDATE:
Client v. Customer by Leslie Monahan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
LEGAL AID UPDATE:
Judges’ Nite Silent Auction by Cecilia Najera . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
ISBA UPDATE:
Proposed Legislation by James F. McCluskey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
WHERE TO BE IN JANUARY
DCBA Mega Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Kathleen M. May
Student Articles Editor
Editorial Board:
Anthony Abear
Terrence Benshoof
Erica L. Bertini
Jonathan P. Crannell
Kim DiGiovanni
Joseph F. Emmerth, IV
Christopher J. Maurer
James F. McCluskey
Ross Molho
Steven Mroczkowski
Azam Nizamuddin
John J. Pcolinski, Jr.
Melissa M. Piwowar
Aaron Reinke
Arthur W. Rummler
James L. Ryan
Jordan Sartell
David N. Schaffer
Michael R. Sitrick
Lawrence A. Stein
Eric R. Waltmire
Jacki Hamler
DCBA Liaison/Advertising
Dupli-Graphic
Graphic Design and Printing
JA N UA RY 2 015
1
You know that law firm you call where
everything is always under control?
They’re probably using Smokeball
Your small law firm will love how Smokeball creates an organized,
team-wide, view of all your matters including every relevant email,
document, date and file note. Our automated form and letter library will
save you time, and because Smokeball is cloud-based, your team can work
confidently from anywhere knowing they have access to everything.
Smokeball. It’s the engine behind successful small law firms.
(855) 668-3206
www.smokeball.com
FROM THE EDITOR
Just Say No
BY R A LEIGH D. K A LBFLEISCH
W
ellness. I was looking
over Sean McCumber’s
piece this month from
the Wellness Committee and thought
about the meaning of the term. What
does it bring to mind? Lots of thought
has been given to the ‘wellness’ of
the members of our profession. Is
wellness balance? Is it being physically fit and running marathons? Is
it a weekly regimen of hot yoga? Is it
this is it that? Depends on who you
ask I suppose. Frankly, I think it can
be overwhelming sometimes. We are
bombarded with conflicting messages
all the time. We have to be full-time
lawyers and log those billable hours,
we have to be full-time parents and
attend every activity and school program, we have to work on our physical fitness a minimum of three times
a week just to maintain our current
weight, we have to avoid carbs and
gluten. If any of you are like me and
trying to do everything and please
everyone while eeking out some time
for yourself, trying to be ‘well’ just
makes me want to sit in a corner and
eat chocolate with the music up loud
so I can’t hear anyone ask me to do
something else. Don’t get me wrong.
I think it is important to work hard
at your job, your life and on yourself
but I don’t see how it is possible to be
well or balanced all the time doing all
the things.
Prepare for the soap box. I recently finished the mentoring program and one of the topics for discussion was balance in our lives. I
don’t think it exists. No matter how
many magazine articles or experts
try to tell me that I can organize my
life better and find the time to climb
Mt. Kilimanjaro while simultaneously drafting an appellate brief and
baking vegan brownies for the class
bake sale, I cannot do it. I think life
is generally a group of competing
priorities that individually rise to the
top depending on which is the most
on fire at that particular moment or
which person is yelling the loudest.
Again, I cannot do it all. Yes, I said it.
I cannot do it all and likely nobody
else can either. Something has got
to give. This is where I think the real
wellness comes in; the realization
that nobody, mom or dad, husband
or wife, attorney or judge, can be
all things to all people all the time.
Once you concede to this, it allows
you to stop trying to do and have
it all. You can now pick and choose
the most important things and just
do that one task that needs your attention right now. Doing just one
thing allows you to be totally present for your client or your child or
your spouse or, most importantly,
yourself. You are free to take full
advantage of the DCBA Wellness
Committees offerings. You can
put on a pair of running shoes and
start training for marathons if you
like that sort of thing. You can bake
those vegan brownies for the bake
sale (but you should be prepared to
bring most of them home because,
ewwww, vegan brownies?).
I’m almost done with the soap
box. I just hope that we can all take
the idea of wellness and balance as
recognition that we deserve some
part of our lives for ourselves and
that we don’t have to do it all and it
is alright to do just one thing every
CONTINUED ON PAGE 4
Raleigh is currently a solo practitioner
with a concentration in family law. She
is a graduate of Purdue University and
the Quinnipiac University School of
Law and she spent her last year of law
school as a visiting student at ChicagoKent College of Law. She is an active
member of the ISBA, DuPage County
Bar Association and the Family Law
Committee. She is the Second Vice
President for the DuPage Association
of Women Lawyers, a Director and the
Treasurer for the DuPage County Bar
Foundation and member of the Family
Violence Coordinating Counsel Judicial
and Law Enforcement subcommittee.
JA N UA RY 2 015
3
DuP
AG
E
ION
AT
CI
T Y BAR AS
UN
SO
CO
FROM THE EDITOR
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3
DCBA
Sin
ce 1 879
The DCBA Brief is a publication of the
DuPage County Bar Association
126 South County Farm Road
Wheaton Illinois 60187
(630) 653-7779
Lynn C. Cavallo
President
James J. Laraia
President-Elect
once in a while. It really does lift the
weight of the world off your shoulders when you give yourself permission to have a life and say “no” to
frantic multitasking. This is a good
time to start; it’s the beginning of
a new year and the end of the holiday cookie eating binge. I know I’m
likely to get letters for this but……
as Elsa sang in Frozen “let it go” and
take care of yourself. Ok, I’m off the
soap box. I want to thank everyone
from the Editorial Board for all of
their hard work and contributions so
far this year. I cannot adequately express my gratitude for your patience
while I figure this Editor thing out.
Now go say “no” to someone and
take 5 for yourself; especially if it involves chocolate and loud music. □
Ted A. Donner
2nd Vice President
Gerald A. Cassioppi
3rd Vice President
Patrick B. Hurley
Immediate Past President
Gregory P. Adamo
General Counsel
Mark S. Bishop
On Demand
CLE
Now Offered
Assoc. Gen’ l Counsel
John A. Pleviak
Secretary/Treasurer
Arthur Rummler
Assist. Treasurer
Leslie Monahan
Watch for new programs
at dcba.org
Executive Director
Directors:
Katherine Haskins Becker
Terrence Benshoof
Kimberly A. Davis
Patrick L. Edgerton
Lisa M. Giese
James S. Harkness
Stacey A. McCullough
Wendy M. Musielak
J. Matthew Pfeiffer
Chantelle A. Porter
James F. McCluskey
ISBA Liaison
John Pankau
Legislative Liaison
4
DCBA BRIEF
The DCBA Brief is the Journal of the DuPage County Bar Association (“DCBA”). Unless
otherwise stated, all content herein is the property of the DCBA and may not be reprinted
in whole or in part without the express permission of the DCBA. ©2015 DCBA. Opinions
and positions expressed in articles appearing in the DCBA Brief are those of the authors
and not necessarily those of the DCBA or any of its members. Neither the authors nor the
publisher are rendering legal or other professional advice and this publication is not a
substitute for the advice of an attorney. Publication Guidelines: All submitted materials
are subject to acceptance and editing by the Editorial Board of the DCBA Brief. Material
submitted to the DCBA Brief for possible publication must conform with the DCBA Brief’s
Writers Guidelines which are available at dcbabrief.org. Advertising and Promotions: All
advertising is subject to approval. Approval and acceptance of an advertisement does
not constitute an endorsement or representation of any kind by the DCBA or any of its
members. Contact information: All Articles, comments, criticisms and suggestions should
be directed to the editors at email@dcbabrief.org.
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE
“Should Old Acquaintance
Be Forgot And Never Brought
To Mind?”
BY LY NN C. CAVA LLO
I
n 1788, When Robert Burns, the
national bard of Scotland penned
the poem, Auld Lang Syne, he
could not have imagined that several generations later, it would be the
mantra of New Years Eve, not only for
the Western world, but for the globe.
And for good reason. It resonates with
our humanity and the cyclical nature
of life. Years come and go and in their
passing we choose what is worth preserving, what is critical to our future.
The same can be said for the ideas
that gave birth to the Magna Carta, or
“great charter”. The Magna Carta is
the theme for Law Day, May 1, 2015,
the 800th anniversary of its signing or
sealing is June 15, 2015. The Magna
Carta was signed or sealed by King
John of England on June 15, 1215
or thereabouts. The final agreement,
according to Dan Jones, author of
“The Plantagenets”, was approved
on June 18, 1215 at Runnymeade,
England.
The significance of the Magna
Carta cannot be overestimated, especially by those us who love and revere
the law. It was conceived from the
discontent of the barons for the despotic ways of the King. His power was
unlimited and remained unchecked
until his disgraceful defeat by the
French at Bouvines in 1214. From
his perceived weakness blossomed an
opposition movement which empow-
ered the barons and threatened civil
war. Now in the catbird seat, the
barons were in a position to make
demands. So in some sense the document presented to the King was in
the nature of a peace treaty; as absent
an agreement, civil war was virtually
certain.
In part, the list of demands delivered to the King by the barons was,
as Simon Schama described in “A
History of Britian”, also nostalgic
rather than revolutionary. The kind
and just ways of prior monarchs were
recalled and extolled. Key was a list
compiled by the barons of proscribed
actions on the part of the King. It
included a wide variety of tax reforms
and tax relief from arbitrary imposition of demands for payments inci-
dent to events such as the marriage of
a widow.
Most important in historical
terms though, was that the Magna
Carta defined the law as an entity
in and of itself; not of the King but
a power larger than the King. The
rights of individuals were acknowlCONTINUED ON PAGE 6
Lynn C. Cavallo, currently an Assistant
State’s Attorney in the Felony Division,
received her JD from Loyola University
School of Law and was in private practice in DuPage County concentrating
in areas of Real Estate, Estate Planning
and Probate prior to joining the SAO
in 2006.
Benefit Highlight
Discounts on Seminars!
DCBA Members will receive $100 off
the non-member registration fees for
the 2015 Mega Meeting!
JA N UA RY 2 015
5
Wellness
Committee Update
On January 24, 2015, the
Mega Meeting arrives and the
Wellness Committee will again
host a Wellness Expo, featuring
local businesses. The Expo will
offer a host of ways to bring you
a healthier and happier new year.
We will bring the attendees new
opportunities for personal enjoyment as varied as an ‘art night out’
to indoor skydiving to, of course,
health and fitness centers. In the
Spring of 2015, we plan to address
your personal health concerns as
well – from sleep disorders and rest
issues to new stress management
techniques. Of course the new year
also brings Wellness Wednesdays
on the DCBA Twitter account,
offering weekly tips to improve
your practice by improving the
practitioner. Please follow us at
twitter.com/DuPageCountyBar. □
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE
edged including Habeas Corpus —
a staggering constraint on the long
standing authority of the monarch.
More than 500 years later, American
revolutionaries acted on the same
guiding principle; the supremacy
of the law over the monarch. The
supremacy clause of the United
States Constitution embodies this
concept.
This year, in conjunction with
the American Bar Association, the
United Kingdom and the other
Commonwealth nations, we honor
the 800th anniversary of the sealing
of the Magna Carta. A series of continuing legal education programs
and plenary sessions will be presented by the ABA in London from
June 11 through June 14, 2015. The
programs will highlight the original
version of the document, its four subsequent versions and the Charter of
the Forest, a document that limited
the powers of the barons as well as the
King.
The Magna Carta is as vital today
as it was 800 years ago. How amazing it is that the bold demands of a
group of English barons presented to
a despot were preserved and still exist
as a sacred covenant for future generations. Should we sing a chorus or two
of Auld Lang Syne? □
DCBA Brief welcomes members’ feedback.
Please send any letters to the attention of the editor,
Raleigh Kalbfleisch, at email@dcbabrief.org
Deliver Clarity
Skillfully prove your case with complete
forensic solutions for matters in trial,
arbitration, and mediation. Tap into
Sikich’s suite of Dispute Advisory services,
which uniquely mix real-world insights
and best-in class services.
Aim higher at www.sikich.com.
Accounting // Advisory // Technology // Managed Services
6
DCBA BRIEF
NEWS & EVENTS
INBRIEF
9
PLUS:
DCBA TO WELCOME NEW
LAW YERS WITH THEIR OW N DAY
13
PALM SPRINGS (AND CLE) IN MARCH —
THE PRESIDENT’S TRIP SOUNDS WONDERFUL
JUDGES’ NITE TO BE…
“WORST SHOW EVER”
14
14
THE DUPAGE COUNTY
LAW LIBR ARY WELCOMES YOU
16
JA N UA RY 2 015
7
INBRIEF
BY TER R ENCE BENSHOOF A ND K ATIE M AY
I
n case anyone missed it, the fall
season blew through faster than
a snowstorm in Buffalo. And the
DCBA activities and news piled up
almost as fast as the snow that Mother
Nature dumped on them. First there
was the Justinian Society Halloween
Cancer Ball, which raised funds for
the Ronald McDonald House at
Central DuPage Hospital. The guests
arrived in all sorts of costumes, with
cash in hand and a giving spirit. The
event was a huge success, resulting in
donation proceeds of about $21,000.
The newly designed Veterans’
Day breakfast made its entry into the
Fall field. President Lynn Cavallo had
seen the need to truly honor veterans,
not by speeches, but by helping those
veterans most in need. The Midwest
Shelter for Homeless Veterans was the
recipient for this inaugural event, and
a little over $1,200 was raised for that
cause.
Congratulations are due to the
Lawyers Lend a Hand annual coat
drive which collected over 2300 coats,
a record number for this effort. Coats
were collected at the Bar Center in
November, but the biggest contributors came from the County where
the annual departmental competition
is taken very seriously. This year’s department that collected the most was
Housekeeping with a whopping 216
coats!
In the Courts….
Chief Judge Jack Elsner finished his term as Chief, and was succeeded by newly-elected Chief Judge
Kathryn Creswell. Judge Elsner
then surprised everyone by announcing his retirement, and his move to
Chief Counsel of the Forest Preserve
District. Meanwhile, Judge Rod Equi
announced that he, too, planned
to retire at the end of December.
Associate Judges Liam Brennan and
Paul Fullerton have been appointed
Circuit Judges, completing the
terms of retiring Judges Elsner and
Equi. Associate Judge openings will
be announced soon. New Associate
Judges, Robert Rohm and Ann
Celine O’Hallaren were elected in
November following the retirement
of Associate Judges Tom Dudgeon
and Pat Leston. (InBrief hopes you’ve
been studying this, because there will
be a test….).
The Holiday Season….
December was a busy month,
with the DuPage Association of
Women Lawyers Holiday Party on
the 1st starting it off. On December
9th, the DCBA hosted its Holiday
Party, with a toy collection for
needy children as the “entry ticket.”
(Actually, it was for a drink ticket,
but this sounded more Dickensean!)
Then came the DuPage County Bar
Foundation Breakfast on December
18, followed by the Justinian’s
Christmas Party that evening. A week
of strict dieting was next!
CONTINUED ON PAGE 10
JA N UA RY 2 015
9
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
for every artist
there is an instrument
BRANDY L. HARRiNgtoN, CFP®
Wealth Management Services Director
MiCHAEL R. MCMoRRiS, QPA, QKA
Retirement Plan Services Director
DEBoRAH L. SHoEMAKER, CFP®, CtFA
Planning and Fiduciary Services Director
630-545-2200
|
tRuStCoiL.CoM
Wealth ManageMent
Wealth Distribution & trust services
retireMent Plan services
IN BRIEF
CONTINUED FROM
PAGE 9
People, Places….
DCBA members did well in
the November elections, with Dan
Cronin re-elected as County Board
Chairman, and Ron Sandack heading back to Springfield. Wheaton
City Council member Evelyn
Sanguinetti made a big political leap,
being elected Lieutenant Governor of
Illinois.
Bryan Kelsey was one of the
1874 new admittees sworn in this
November. Justice Michael Burke
presided at the ceremonies in Elgin,
where
proud
dad of a newly
minted
attorney, Judge Bruce
Kelsey, seconded
the motion for
admission. Also
admitted
in
November: former DCBA summer
interns Patrick Collins and Kyle
Shires.
Kollias & Giese continues expanding their new firm, most recently adding Lindsay Jurgensen, a
recent new member of the bar, as an
associate.
Brooks, Tarulis & Tibble, LLC,
welcomed Meghen Williams as an
associate with the Naperville firm.
Jessica Wollwage-Rymut has
joined A. Traub & Associates as an associate in October.
Honors….
A couple of “youngsters” over
at Mirabella, Kincaid, Frederick &
10
DCBA BRIEF
Thank you to our 2014-2015 Sustaining Members
David J. Allen
Susan O’Neill Alvarado
Hon. Robert J. Anderson
Thomas J. Anselmo
Hon. William J. Bauer
Katherine Haskins Becker
Margaret A. Bennett
Terrence Benshoof
Erin N. Birt
Richard F. Blass
Aldo E. Botti
Debra J. Braselton
Peter C. Breen
Scott D. Bromann
Hon. Robert E. Byrne
Michael J. Calabrese
Richard J. Caldarazzo
John M. Caluwaert
Matthew T. Caruso
Lynn C. Cavallo
Michael S. Cetina
Harry R. Chiles
Brent M. Christensen
Victor F. Ciardelli
David W. Clark
Franco Coladipietro
Christian S. Collin
Michael P. Connelly
Andrew P. Cores
Vincent F. Cornelius
Daniel A. Cotter
David D. Criter
William F. Cunningham
Mark W. Daniel
Lee A. Daniels
Dion U. Davi
Umberto S. Davi
Timothy M. Daw
Antonio DeBlasio
Joseph de LaVan
Frank J. DeSalvo
Hon. Brian J. Diamond
Marshall N. Dickler
Fred H. Dickson
John F. Donahue
Ted A. Donner
Robert K. Downs
Michael J. Drabant
Brigid A. Duffield
Daniel A. Edelman
Michael P. Edgerton
Terry A. Ekl
Timothy D. Elliott
Joseph F. Emmerth, IV
Hon. Rodney W. Equi
John L. Fay
Richard D. Felice
Cardinal Rabbi Theo S. Fins
John W. Flynn
Joseph R. Fortunato, Jr.
George S. Frederick
Kent A. Gaertner
Mary Gaertner
Glenn R. Gaffney
Hon. Michael R. Galasso
Robert J. Galgan
James A. Geraghty
Godfrey A. Gillett, Jr.
Thomas W. Good
Brian A. Grady
W. B. Martin Gross
Richard M. Guerard
Juli Gumina
John D. Gutzke
Allyson B. Harris
Lyle B. Haskin
Vincent Headington
James D. Healy
Keith A. Hebeisen
Donald J. Hennessy
Terra Costa Howard
Patrick B. Hurley
Carmel R. Huseman
Melanie K. Impastato
Walter R. Jackowiec, III
Ronald L. Jansen
Richard C. Jones, Jr.
Hon. Ann B. Jorgensen
Raleigh D. Kalbfleisch
Ronald M. Kas
Hon Bruce Kelsey
Thomas G. Kenny
Laura M Urbik Kern
David A. King
James H. Knippen, II
Michael R. Konewko
Daniel J. Kordik
Phillip Kosanovich
Mary E. Krasner
Elizabeth L. Krueger
Pamela J. Kuzniar
Rebecca A. Laho
E. Paul Lanphier
James J. Laraia
Joseph M. Laraia
Edward J. Leahy
Hon. Patrick J. Leston
Joseph Loss
Kevin M. Lyons
Maria Tolva Mack
Jeffrey E. Marek
Lee A. Marinaccio
Timothy P. Martin
Mark W. Mathys
Sean McCumber
Colleen McLaughlin
Kevin K. McQuillan
Mary E. McSwain
Steven H. Mevorah
David P. Meyer
Michael Minton
Gary M. Moore
Hon. Lewis V. Morgan, Jr.
Walter W. Morrissey
Sharon R. Mulyk
Wendy M. Musielak
Donald S. Nathan
Paul D. Nordini
Thomas V. O’Connor
E. Lawrence Oldfield
Christine M. Ory
Arthur E. Pape
Louis V. Pavone
Gordon D. Payne
J. Matthew Pfeiffer
Melissa Piwowar
Sarah L. Poeppel
Elizabeth A. Pope
Thomas A. Pyrdek
James M. Quigley
Justice S. Louis Rathje
E. James Raymond
Jay M. Reese
Timothy J. Ritchey
Keith E. (Chuck) Roberts, Jr.
David F. Rolewick
David W. Rosenberg
Steven M. Ruffalo
Patricia Rummer
Arthur W. Rummler
Michael J. Scalzo
Patrick Schauer
William J. Scott, Jr.
Fred P. Serpe
Peter A. Shamburek
Scott Sheen
Christopher A. Sherwin
Junie L. Sinson
Thomas J. Sisul
Maol Murray Sloan
Rickey J. Spiece
Natalie M. Stec
Duane J. St. Pierre
Maureen Sullivan Taylor
Edward N. Tiesenga
Peter P. Tomczak
Dennis R. Torii, Sr.
Angel M. Traub
Jack L. Uretsky
Edward J. Walsh
Douglas B. Warlick
Hon. Hollis L. Webster
Win Wehrli
Michael B. Weinstein
Hon. Bonnie M. Wheaton
Timothy P. Whelan
William P. White, III
Michael C. Wiedel
Frank J. Wiedner
Robert H. Wier
Matthew M. Williams
Patrick J. Williams
Susan Reedy Williams
David J. Winthers
Steven M. Yahnke
Randall J. Yorke
Alonzo H. Zahour
John A. Zrnich
IN BRIEF
Mirabella, LLC, Joe Mirabella and
John Kincaid, were honored for
completing fifty years of practice
as members of the Illinois Bar this
November. InBrief joins the DCBA
membership in congratulating these
fine attorneys as members of our
Association, and on their 44 year
partnership.
Welcome New Members…
Attorneys: Lisa Wesolowski; Robert
Lin, Law Offices of Robert D. Lin,
LLC; Joseph Fonzetti, Jr., Fonzetti
Legal Services, P.C.; Robert Dailey,
Elevance Renewable Sciences, Inc.;
Sheila Maloney; Heather Shea,
O’Hagan LLC.; Kathleen Rowe,
Office of the State’s Attorney;
Christopher Stanton, Office of the
State’s Attorney; Conor McCarthy,
Office of the State’s Attorney;
Adam Frahm, Office of the State’s
Attorney; Nicholas Noble, Office
of the State’s Attorney; Daniel
Kalina; Matt Goodman; Shazan A.
Rizvi; Colleen M. Hurley, Sodberg
Law Group; Stephen Franklin;
Jonathan Thorsness, Lillig &
Thorsness, Ltd.; Jay Kostecki, Kozar
Law Office LLC; Daniel Rosenthal;
Kariann Mackie; Cameron Wall,
Mulherin, Rehfeldt & Varchetto;
Brittney Steele; Corrine Konczal,
Thomas More Society; Shanna
Crafts; Erin Schreiber, Clausen
Miller P.C.; Elizabeth Gilbreath,
Prairie State Legal Services; Zara
Rashid, Law Offices of Wayne and
Jemilo; Kathryn Kolling; Ericka
McFee; Jose Zamora, Santana
Law Office; Anzur Ismail; Jordan
Olejniczak;
Michael
Wendt;
Christian Collin, Collin Law
Offices, P.C.. Affiliate Members:
Tim Coleman, Webb Financial
Group; Jon Hardecopf, Fidelity
National Title Insurance; Michael
McMorris, Trust Company of
Illinois. Student Members: Swapna
Kilani; Olga Castillo, Elzbieta
Pollina. □
LAW PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
& TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE
DCBA is pleased to announce increased member opportunities for Law Practice
Management training. The Law Practice Management & Technology Committee already
has a full MCLE meeting schedule for this year. Also offered will be Hands On Technology
Training Sessions, courtesy of the committee’s sponsor, Smokeball.
Committee Chair: Charles Wentworth
Committee Vice-Chair: Joe Emmerth
2014 – 2015 MCLE Meetings
MCLE Meetings will be held at the Attorney Resource Center

Feb. 24: Disability & Disaster Planning *

Mar.24: Benefits & Firm Culture *

Apr 28: Marketing Your Firm *
To register for any of these
MCLE Meetings or Hands on
Training Sessions. please
visit www.dcba.org
Hands On Training Sessions
Training Sessions will be held at the Bar Center classroom.
Only the December and February sessions will offer MCLE Credit

Feb. 3: Everyday Email Management *

Mar. 3: Wizardry in Microsoft Word - Level 2

Apr. 7: Productivity Apps for Your Phone

May. 5: A Lawyer’s Guide to Buying Technology Hardware
Attendees are encouraged to
bring their laptops or tablets.
Registration is limited to the
first 60 members.
*DCBA will apply for 1 hour of PRMCLE credit for these meetings
If you have any questions, please contact the DCBA Office at (630) 653-7779 or cgarcia@dcba.org.
12
DCBA BRIEF
O
DCBA To Welcome New Lawyers
With Their Own Day
n January 15, 2015 the
DCBA will roll out the
red carpet to welcome the
newest members of our profession
and get them jump started on their
CLE, skills and networking. The
program will feature a traditional
midday MCLE session (including
pizza) titled “Handling a Domestic
Violence Case: From Bond Court
to Trial” and will be presented
by Judge Karen Wilson, Judge
Elizabeth Sexton, and Assistant
State’s Attorney Amanda Meindl.
After a short break, tours of the
courthouse will be conducted
followed by a roundtable discussion
from 3:45 to 4:45 including
experienced attorneys and local
judges earning participants up
to one hour of PRMCLE. That
evening the DCBA will be holding
a Committee Open House in
the lower level of The Bank in
downtown Wheaton where newer
members will have the opportunity
to learn more about the various
committees of the association and
how lawyers can participate in their
activities. It will coincide with the
January New Lawyers Happy Hour.
“One of the most daunting tasks
younger or newly admitted attorneys
will face is walking into a new
courtroom on a case that they have
just been assigned and stepping up in
front of a judge they have never met.
Between our CLE’s, courtroom tours,
interactions with and advice from
seasoned attorneys and judges, as well
as introductions to new colleagues
and bar association committees at
the open house networking event,
we hope to ease that stress and fear.
The goal of New Lawyer’s Day is to
provide these attorneys with some
knowledge and level of comfort
within the DuPage County legal
community.” Says New Lawyers
Committee Chair Chris Zaruba.
Commenting about the plans,
DCBA President Lynn Cavallo
said, “As established lawyers, we
need to make sure newer lawyers are
welcomed into the profession for
the good of all involved. I am proud
that the DCBA is able to help out
with these MCLE and networking
resources and really hope that we have
a good turn out.”□
JA N UA RY 2 015
13
Palm Springs (And CLE) In March—
The President’s Trip Sounds Wonderful
BY CHRISTINE McTIGUE
T
his year’s President’s trip
will be held at the LaQuinta
Resort & Club in Palm
Springs, California, from Thursday,
March 26th to Sunday, March 29th.
The LaQuinta Resort has something
for everyone: 41(!) pools and 53 hot
spas; multiple golf courses, including
PGA West Tournament courses; seven
incredible restaurants; Spa LaQuinta;
and much more. Please go to www.
laquintaresort.com for further details.
The itinerary includes a welcome
cocktail reception, a group dinner, and
two hours of MCLE. Professor Erwin
Chemerinsky, Dean of the University
of California-Irvine School of Law, will
be speaking. His topic will be Supreme
Court review, specifically, a review of
recent and pending Supreme Court decisions. Professor Chemerinsky is the
author of eight books, including The
Case Against The Supreme Court published in 2014, and more than 200 articles in top law reviews. He frequently
argues cases before the nation’s highest
courts, including the Supreme Court,
and serves as a commentator on legal
issues. Professor Chemerinsky writes a
weekly column for the Orange County
Register and monthly columns for the
ABA Journal and the Daily Journal.
All of the above is available for the
following prices: $255 per night for a
Resort King Casita or $295 per night
for a Deluxe King Casita or Starlight
King Casita. There is also a ten percent discount for treatments at Spa
LaQuinta.
To make a reservation, please call
LaQuinta’s reservation department
at 1-800-598-3828. To obtain the
group rate, mention the DuPage Bar
Association or give the SRP Code
ZDBA. The cut-off date to obtain the
group rate is Tuesday, February 24,
2015. □
Judges’ Nite to be… “Worst Show Ever”
BY STEVEN D. MROCZKOWSKI
W
ho wouldn’t want to be a
part of a show with such
a title? This year marks
the 40th Anniversary of Judges’ Nite
and the show, entitled “Worst Show
Ever” is sure to please. The show
will take place on March 6, 2015,
and once again, will be performed
at the College of DuPage’s Belushi
Performance Hall in the MAC.
This year’s show will be a play on
Mel Brooks’ “The Producers” and will
be directed by Nick Nelson. Nick and
Christina Morrison will be in the ARC
for Donut Thursdays in December,
and will be fielding questions about the
show. Once again, discounted tickets
14
DCBA BRIEF
will be available for new and government attorneys as well as courthouse
staff. Additionally, due to its huge success last year, there will be a silent auction at this year’s show. The legal aid donation doubled last year due to the silent auction so please consider donating
this year as the show hopes to improve
on last year’s numbers. f you have an
item to donate for the auction, please
contact Cindy Allston for information
on where to drop off your donation.
Thinking of joining the cast or donating something for the auction? The
show has a “part” for everyone: stage
crew, costumes, cast, and the band.
For more information generally, and
about joining the show, please email
Christina at cmm@dayrobert.com.
Rehearsals start on January 10, 2015
and run on Saturday afternoons in the
basement of the Bar Center and one
weeknight per week until show time. I
If you are already so excited to see
the show that you can barely stand to
wait for the curtain to rise, rumor has
it that there may be up to three bars
in the lobby of Belushi Hall so come
early and get a good seat. Consider
yourself warned and mark your calendars for March 6, 2015. The 40th
Anniversary show of Judges’ Nite is
sure to be the best, er, “Worst Show
Ever.” □
advantage
100+ lawyers
Hot Opp: Be Prepared
from Ice Miller recognized by
Best Lawyers in America®
The world has changed. Again. And it will change again next
week. Change can be dangerous. But with our experience,
teamwork and strategic thinking, change can be an opportunity.
It’s a new day. Get ahead of it.
icemiller.com
630-955-0555
Chicago
•
Cleveland
•
Columbus
•
DuPage County, Ill.
•
Indianapolis
•
Washington, D.C.
300+ lawyers in
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio
and Washington, D.C.
Ice on Fire
The DuPage County Law Library
Welcomes You
BY AZAM NIZAMUDDIN
L
et’s say you’re at the courthouse
and don’t have time to return to
the office, but need to do some
legal research on some cases or a particular statute before your hearing which
starts in 15 minutes. Of course, you can
always take out your tablet or iPad and
go online to check your legal sources.
But if such technical gadgets are
not at your disposal, what can you do?
Fortunately, the second floor of the
Courthouse at 505 S. County Road
houses the DuPage County law library
which puts a treasure trove of legal resources at your disposal.
The Law Library includes computer terminals for general use as well
as for checking email, sending documents and browsing the web. Printers
and copiers are also available, along
with free Wi-Fi for smart phone and
tablet users.
While the DuPage County Law
Library is open to the general public,
and many people utilize its services, it is
also a useful and efficient space for lawyers to do legal research. It is also a quiet
place to catch up on reading legal periodicals or newsletters. The public often
looks to the library staff for quick resolutions to complicated questions. The
staff directs them to seek legal practitioners through the referral service, find
answers at the Clerk’s office or other
areas of the courthouse as appropriate.
The Law Library is overseen by a
friendly staff including a Director, a
law librarian and a technical assistant.
16
DCBA BRIEF
L to R: Liz Cooper, Juanita Harrell, Sarah Cole.
I have often approached Elizabeth
Cooper, the Director of the Law
Library, for a variety of legal issues
over the years. Elizabeth graduated
from University of Wisconsin Law
School and is familiar with terms and
concepts such as a Rule 23 Opinion,
legislative history, administrative regulations, federal reporters, and statutes
annotated.
The law library provides both electronic legal tools as well as hardcopies
of publications such as as IICLE binders, the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin,
the Illinois Bar Journal, and of course
the internationally acclaimed DCBA
Brief, along with other periodicals in
most areas of the law.
Elizabeth and her staff said that
the legal community seems to be unaware of many of the electronic legal
services now available to lawyers for
legal research. Electronic databases
provide free access to both Lexis
and Westlaw. That’s right, free! The
Westlaw subscription includes access to all 50 states, law journals and
topical legal treatises. For family law
practitioners, electronic terminals
provide access to Finplan and Gitlin
on Divorce. For those practicing consumer protection, there is an entire series published by the Consumer Law
Institute.
The Law Library also provides regular Westlaw training sessions, and sessions on researching legislative history.
Additionally, it has a comprehensive
and user friendly website that provides
further information about legal databases, legal research websites, and a list
of useful legal apps for smartphones
and tablets. All of these resources can
all be found at http://www.dupageco.
org/lawlibrary/. Feel free to contact or make inquiries of the staff at
the DuPage County Law Library at
lawlibrary@dupageco.org. □
DIGIOVINE HNILO JORDAN + JOHNSON LTD.
DIGIOVINE HNILO JORDAN + JOHNSON LTD.
®
®
Certified Public Accountants / Business Valuation Services
Certified Public Accountants / Business Valuation Services
®
®
THE VALUATION OF A BUSINESS IS
THE
VALUATION
OF A BUSINESS IS
MORE
THAN A FORMULA
MORE THAN A FORMULA
Our CVAs spend time with the owners and key personnel to
Our
CVAs spendthe
time
with theIntangible
owners and
key
to
fully understand
business.
value
is personnel
as important
fully
understand
the
business.
Intangible
value
is
as
important
as the tangible, e.g. what is the value of goodwill? We can
as
thewith
tangible,
e.g. what
the value
assist
valuation
workisrelating
to:of goodwill? We can
assist with valuation work relating to:
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
Sale of Business
Sale of Business
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy
Estate and Gift
Estate and Gift
Litigation
Litigation
M&A
M&A
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
Owner Disputes
Owner Disputes
Intangible Accounting
Intangible Accounting
Buy/Sell Agreements
Buy/Sell Agreements
Succession Planning
Succession Planning
Stock Compensation
Stock Compensation
DHJJ PROVIDES YOU AND YOUR CLIENTS
DHJJ PROVIDES
AND YOUR CLIENTS
WITH
CERTIFIEDYOU
CONFIDENCE
WITH CERTIFIED CONFIDENCE
Our business valuation team includes CPAs and Certified
Our
business
valuation
team includes CPAs and Certified
Valuation
Analysts
(CVAs):
Valuation Analysts (CVAs):
♦ Highly qualified business valuation accountants
♦ Highly qualified business valuation accountants
♦ Experienced
♦ Experienced
♦ Impartial
♦ Impartial
♦ Longstanding commitment to the business
♦ Longstanding
community commitment to the business
♦
♦
♦
♦
community
Trusted valuations for over 30 years
Trusted valuations for over 30 years
Expert witness testimony
Expert witness testimony
CONSULT WITH ONE OF OUR CERTIFIED
CONSULT
WITH ONE ANALYSTS
OF OUR CERTIFIED
VALUATION
VALUATION ANALYSTS
Call us to discuss how our team of experts
Call us to discuss how our team of experts
can assist you with your business valuation
can assist you with your business valuation
or forensic accounting needs.
or forensic accounting needs.
Mary Lynn Hoffer,
Mary
CPALynn
/CFF,Hoffer,
CVA
CPAPrincipal
/CFF, CVA
Principal
mhoffer@dhjj.com
mhoffer@dhjj.com
630-420-1360
630-420-1360
www.dhjj.com
www.dhjj.com
Tom Jordan,
Tom Jordan,
CPA/CFF,
CVA
CPA/CFF,
CVA
Managing Director
Managing Director
tjordan@dhjj.com
tjordan@dhjj.com
ARTICLES
THE DANCE OF THE DISCOVERY
DEPOSITION: DEALING WITH DODGES
22
WHEN ONE CRIME IS NOT ENOUGH 26
NOT JUST A FACELIFT:
THE AMENDED ILLINOIS
POWER OF ATTORNEY POWER
32
JA N UA RY 2 015
19
FROM THE ARTICLES EDITOR
The Most Wonderful Time of the Year...
BY JOSEPH EMMERTH
I
have a confession to make: I love this time of year. I
love waking up when it’s still dark out, only to work
all day and find it dark once again when I leave work.
With apologies to those with Seasonal Affective Disorder,
as someone who intensely dislikes the sun, it doesn’t get any
better than this for me. I’m fully aware that this puts me in
a class of people most usually referred to as “odd” (to put it
kindly).
However, I’m a firm believer that this time of year
brings out everyone’s true colors. With the weather usually oscillating somewhere in between ‘chilly’ and ‘arctic
expedition’, and snow delaying our drive time or confounding our best laid plans, our Midwestern resolve gets
triggered. We ‘plow’ ahead, going about our business despite the hindrance of the weather, and doggedly looking
forward to Spring and the promise of more comfortable
times. While some flee to Florida or use up the bulk of
their vacation time, those that remain here in the area
soldier on, not letting dead car batteries, broken shovels,
or faulty furnaces get the best of them. This is the time
of year when we witness charitable giving spike upwards,
when we see neighbors lending a hand to each other, and
when we see the resiliency of our fellow man come to the
forefront.
I believe it is this adversity, this trying period of the
year, that reveals our inner selves. Perhaps it is somewhat
ironic that the long, cold nights act to illuminate who we
really are. The absence of the sun providing the stage upon
which our better parts may shine through. Our frigid,
grey-tinged world revealing a hidden truth: The darkness
is the light.
We have a varied and interesting slate of articles for
you this month. For those civil litigators among us, we
have a timely and detailed article on discovery depositions.
If you’ve ever had to deal with unfair or outrageous behavior during a deposition, Sean McCumber shows you how
to deal with those situations, and discusses the steps and
sanctions available to you.
For those with a more transactional bent, Kathleen
May provides a primer on the recently amended Illinois
Power of Attorney. The new legislation changes this tool
in significant ways. Both the seasoned practitioner and
the novice attorney would do well to examine the ways in
which the amended power now differs from the previous
iteration.
Lastly, we have a long-overdue article dealing with a
rarely discussed facet of family law. What happens when
the state attempts to collect child support from the victim
of a statutory rape? What happens when the victim is held
responsible for the outcome of an act to which they legally
could not have consented? And why is relief available to
one gender but not the other? This fascinating article by
Michael Hudzik and Anthony Vechiola shines a light on
a shameful portion of the law that the legislature should
take steps to correct immediately.
Thanks to all of our authors and to you, the readers
that make this publication possible. Keep your heads up
everyone! Spring is coming, and with it the promise of renewal and a fresh start for all of us. Be well. □
Joseph F. Emmerth is a partner at the Law
Firm of Sullivan, Taylor & Gumina,
P.C., which limits their practice
exclusively to family law in Cook,
DuPage, Will, Kane, Kendall & DeKalb
Counties. Mr. Emmerth serves on the
Judicial Evaluations Committee —
Outside Cook County and the Judicial
Advisory Polls Committee for the Illinois
State Bar Association. He maintains a “10.0” rating on Avvo.
com and was voted an Illinois SuperLawyer in 2015 by his
peers.
JA N UA RY 2 015
21
The Dance of the Discovery Deposition:
Dealing with Dodges
BY SEAN MCCUMBER
T
he everyday American knows the word “deposition,” and has likely either been a deponent or watched a deposition of particular newsworthiness through social media.
Unfortunately, many of the depositions available via the media or through social
sites like YouTube highlight questionable behavior on the part of the participants. Thankfully,
the Illinois Supreme Court has set basic rules for deposition conduct. However, no rule covers
every deposition situation, particularly as it relates to objections.
In March of 2014, Justin Bieber sat for a videotaped
deposition1 that made the rounds through TMZ.com and
many other news sites. Viewers watched Mr. Bieber wink
at the camera, mock the attorney, and question every question asked of him. His behavior fueled the common mantra that pop stars continue to be out of control. However,
what those snippets also showed were the “form” objections made by Bieber’s lawyer, as well as his objections that
essentially stalled the other attorney and provided veiled
guidance to his client, Mr. Bieber. Another deposition that
made some rounds on social media involved an Ohio lawsuit where the word “photocopy” was made to be one of
1
22
This deposition occurred as part of a Florida case where a
photographer sued Justin Bieber and his bodyguards for an
alleged incident wherein Bieber directed his bodyguards
to attack the photographer and obtain the photographic
evidence.
DCBA BRIEF
the most confusing words in history.2 The attorney for the
Recorder of Deeds in that case made countless “form” objections, most of which focused on the “confusing” definition of photocopy. That attorney also made objections as
to the fairness of the question, as well as objections to the
question calling for a legal or factual conclusion, essentially
advising the witness not to answer the question through
his lengthy colloquy. Now, objections are so integral to the
concept of being a lawyer that even the everyday citizen has
a solid understanding of objections and their use.
These cases, among others, call to the light the real
issue: if discovery is designed to lay out the facts of the case,
2
The original mandamus action was filed in the Ohio Supreme
Court, as State ex rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C., et
al. v. Cuyahoga Recorder of Deeds, Case No. 10-2029. The case
involved the Recorder’s fee of $2 per page photocopied. The
Recorder provided thousands of documents by an electronic
CD and attempted to charge $2 for every page on the CD.
search for information that will lead
Sean McCumber
federal and state court. The video
to other relevant evidence, and otheris a partner at
must specifically address the improwise level the playing field in advance
Sullivan Taylor &
priety of unspecified “form” objecof trial, then why do discovery depoGumina, P.C. in
tions, witness coaching, and excessive
sitions result in the battleground of
Wheaton, Illinois.
interruptions. The lawyer appearing
objections and attempts to obfuscate
He
concentrates
in the video may mention the few
information? United States District
his practice in asjurisdictions that actually require
Court Judge Mark W. Bennett issisted
reproduconly unspecified “form” objections
sued an order, in a civil lawsuit in the
tion and family formation, adoptions,
and may suggest that such objections
Northern District of Iowa, wherein
and juvenile law. He presently serves
are proper in only those jurisdicthe Court sanctioned one side’s atas the Vice-Chair of the Civil Law and
tions. The lawyer in the video must
torneys for conduct that occurred
Practice Committee and the Chair of
state that the video is being produced
during a discovery deposition.3 The
Immigration Law Committee. In adand distributed pursuant to a fedattorneys sanctioned represented
dition to practicing law, he teaches taeeral court’s sanction order regarding
Abbott Laboratories; the Court first
kwondo and has begun learning the art
a partner in the firm, but the lawissued a rule to show cause against
of indoor skydiving.
yer need not state the name of the
the Abbott attorneys, and then ispartner, the case the sanctions arose
sued the sanction, on its own motion, several months after
under, or the court issuing this order. Upon completing
the Court entered the order dismissing the case after a jury
the video, Counsel must file it with this court, under seal,
4
found no liability for Abbott. Judge Bennett hung his rulfor my review and approval…. Counsel need not make
ing on Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(d)(2), which permits the Court to
the video publicly available to anyone outside Counsel’s
impose an appropriate sanction on a person who impedes,
firm.
delays, or frustrates the fair examination of the deponent.
It appears that Judge Bennett struck a chord, for less
Specifically, Judge Bennett found that the form objec- than one month later, United States District Court Judge
tions were an unnecessary waste of time. Furthermore, he
Frederick F. Mumm issued an order directing the attorneys
complains that the form objections did not explain what how to properly conduct a deposition.5 In this patent infringement case, the defense witness evaded questions so
the problem was so that the questioner could cure the problem. His biggest frustration, as evident from his opinion, is deftly that the Court found the behavior strained credulity.
The Court expressed further dismay at the defense attorthat the objections become an excessive interruption to the
neys, stating “hopped on the bandwagon and began interorderly flow of discovery and serve as a means of witness
coaching. The court found that certain objections were posing inappropriate objections that perfectly clear (albeit
broad) questions were vague.” The Court noted that the deused to coach the witness not to answer questions. Judge
Bennett objected to the use of “vague and ambiguous” as fense attorneys’ interposed inappropriate objections, “cluan objection because it was used to coach the witness to ing the witness to ask the questions to be rephrased, and
wasting everyone’s time trying to engage plaintiff’s counsel
refuse to answer on the ground that the question called for
speculation. Judge Bennett objected to objections such as in banter.” The plaintiff’s attorneys filed an ex parte mo“You can answer if you know,” because it essentially dition to compel the deposition, and in granting the motion,
the Court ordered the defense attorneys to not assert any
rected the witness to state that he or she did not know. The
objections other than: 1) privilege, 2) assumption of facts
end result of this lengthy and detailed exposition on the
that are, in good faith, disputed, or 3) mischaracterization
abuses in discovery depositions is this sanction:
of the record. The Court further prohibited the defense atCounsel must write and produce a training video
torneys from interrupting any question other than by the
in which Counsel, or another partner in Counsel’s firm,
permitted objections. Lastly, the Court forbade either side
appears and explains the holding and rationale of this
from engaging in any “banter” with the other side.
opinion, and provides specific steps lawyers must take to
Neither of these situations in Iowa or California are
comply with its rationale in future depositions in any
rare occurrences and neither order is necessarily a first in
3 Security National Bank of Sioux City, Iowa v. Abbott Laboratories,
the field of discovery sanctions. Each decision, though, inNo. C11-4017-MWB (July 28, 2014 N.D. Iowa).
dicates that the Courts have taken notice that behaviors
4
The case involved tainted baby formula and the allegation that
said formula led to certain brain defects and meningitis for a
baby who consumed the formula in question.
5 No. CV13-6089 SJO (FFMx) (Aug. 22 ,2014 C.D. Cal.).
JA N UA RY 2 015
23
in depositions have fallen into disarray. The Courts have
decided that attorneys must be taken back to the beginning and hold themselves to higher standards. The question arises — what should be done when an attorney in
an Illinois case uses and abuses objections in a discovery
deposition so as to coach and advise the witness through
the use of objections or so as to so impede the deposition
process with needless objections that the purpose of discovery is frustrated? Discovery depositions are used for the
purpose exploring a deponent’s knowledge and seeking
information that might lead to other admissible evidence.
However, these depositions also provide the framework
(and even the boundaries of some witness testimony),
making the desire to object bubble up to the surface until
it can longer be contained. Depositions usually fall into a
regular, simple routine. However, some depositions are so
fraught with negative behaviors that the actual case controversy fades into the background.
The Illinois Supreme Court has set basic rules for
deposition conduct, including the very conduct that
Judge Bennett and Judge Mumm controlled with their
respective federal court orders. Unfortunately, no rule
covers every deposition situation, especially as it relates to objections. In Illinois, objections at depositions
shall be concise and shall state the exact legal nature of
the objection.6 Accordingly, the rules appear to speak
against objections to the form of the question or otherwise are simply objections for the sake of objecting. Or,
do they? The rules later state that “[o]bjections to the
form of a question or answer, errors and irregularities
occurring at the oral examination in the manner or taking of the deposition, in the oath or affirmation, or in
the conduct of any person, and errors and irregularities
of any kind which might be corrected if promptly presented, are waived unless seasonable objection thereto
is made at the taking of the deposition.”7 Thus the conflict appears to resume. If the legal basis for the objection must clearly and concisely stated, then “form of the
question” does not clearly and concisely lay the legal
basis for the objection. However, if an objection to the
form of the question is not made during the deposition,
the issue is then waived. It would almost appear that
Illinois attorneys face an impossible conundrum — either object and risk potential sanctions or remain silent
and risk waiving the issue in a later portion of the case.
That becomes important because under current changes
6
7
24
Ill.S.Ct.R. 206(c)(3) (West 2014).
Ill.S.Ct.R. 211(c)(2) (West 2014).
DCBA BRIEF
to the Illinois Supreme Court Rules allow the discovery
deposition of someone other than a controlled expert
witness to be used as evidence at trial in cases where the
deponent is unable to attend or testify because of death
or infirmity.8
With these rules in mind, the objection still stands
as a shield and a sword. If the defending attorney wants
to keep the examining attorney on his or her toes, objections might be used simply to disrupt the flow of the
deposition. More likely, the objection could be used to
“coach” the witness. These speaking objections are familiar — “if you know” or “calls for speculation” — and they
essentially clue the witness to the fact that the defending
attorney wants them to not answer or wants them to answer in a specific way.9 Or, the objections might not be
proper. For instance, is “relevance” truly a proper objection in a discovery deposition? After all, the deposition
itself is part of the discovery process, where disclosure
is designed to find all possible evidence relevant to the
claim, defense or counterclaim.10 For the same reasons,
it may be questionable whether a hearsay objection is
proper in a discovery deposition.
Regardless, just because a defending attorney may abuse
the deposition process through the use of objections, the examining attorney need not join in the behavior. In fact, the
rules make it clear that “errors and irregularities occurring at
the oral examination in the manner or taking of the deposition, in the oath or affirmation, or in the conduct of any person” must be objected to at the deposition, or the objection
to such conduct or behavior is waived.11 That rule makes it
clear – either the attorney objects to the conduct of the defending attorney, specifically stating the basis of the objection to conduct, or the examining attorney cannot argue the
issue later, which would preclude a motion for sanctions as
to this conduct.12 Furthermore, before the examining attorney files the motion for sanctions, that attorney should have
a personal consultation with the defending attorney, in the
spirit of Rule 201(k), in an attempt to resolve the conduct
objected to.13 Because the rules as applied require all of these
8
9
10
11
12
13
Ill.S.Ct.R. 212(a)(5) (West 2014); cf. Berry v American Standard, Inc,
382 Ill App 3d 895, 888 NE2d 740 (5th Dist. 2008).
This article does not critique nor condone these types of
objections, but rather merely uses them as an example for
purposes of this article.
Ill.S.Ct.R. 201(b)(1) (West 2014). Full disclosure is required.
Ill.S.Ct.R. 211(c)(2) (West 2014).
There appears to be no case law on point on this issue. However,
Rule 211(c)(2) has clear waiver language.
Ill.S.Ct.R. 201(k) (West 2014). The parties shall facilitate discovery
under these rules and shall make reasonable attempts to resolve
differences over discovery. Every motion with respect to discovery
actions to occur at the deposition itself, it further lends itself
to bogging down the process.
However, once the record is made for the issue occurring at the discovery deposition, are sanctions appropriate? Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(c), the Court
may sanction violations of the rules relating to discovery
or court orders relating to discovery by orders within its
discretion, including (but specifically not limited to):
1) staying the proceedings until compliance occurs; 2) barring an offending party from filing pleadings relating to
the non-compliance; 3) barring or dismissing the claim or
counterclaim or defense of the offending party; 4) barring
the witness or offending party from testifying; 5) striking
the pleadings of an offending party; or 6) a monetary penalty, with interest.14 Other than that, the rule is rather open
on the issue of sanctions. In Illinois, the case law stands
clear: 1) discovery sanctions reside within the sole discretion of the trial court; 2) the sanction should encourage
discovery to occur, rather than punish dilatory conduct;
and 3) the sanction will not be overturned, absent an abuse
of discretion.15
With that in mind, what might the appropriate sanction for objection abuse and witness coaching in a discovery deposition look like? As noted previously, the rule itself
offers little comment or suggestion. The case law, though
not providing guidance on what to impose, does clarify what is “too far.” A just order of sanctions under Rule
219(c) is one which, to the degree possible, insures both
discovery and a trial on the merits.16 The Court must also
consider the frequency of the violations in relation to the
severity of the sanction.17 Some believe that the inhibition
of the discovery process warrants the ultimate sanction:
the entry of default judgment (or dismissal of the action).
However, the dismissal of a cause of action or sanctions
which result in a default judgment are drastic sanctions
and should only be employed when it appears that all other
enforcement efforts of the court have failed to advance the
litigation.18
14
15
16
17
18
shall incorporate a statement that counsel responsible for trial
of the case after personal consultation and reasonable attempts
to resolve differences have been unable to reach an accord or
that opposing counsel made himself or herself unavailable
for personal consultation or was unreasonable in attempts to
resolve differences.
Ill.S.Ct.R. 219(c) (West 2014).
Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp., 181 Ill.2d 112, 121-22, 692
N.E.2d 290 (1998); Besco v. Henslee, Monek & Henslee, 297 Ill. App.
3d 778, 782-83, 701 N.E.2d 1126, 1129 (3rd Dist. 1998); Harris v.
Harris, 196 Ill. App. 3d 815, 822, 55 N.E.2d 10, 15 (1st Dist. 1990).
Shimanovsky, 181 Ill.2d at 123, 692 N.E.2d 286.
Sander v. Dow Chemical Co., 166 Ill.2d 48, 651 N.E.2d 1071 (1995)
Hartnett v. Stack, 241 Ill.App.3d 157, 175-76, 607 N.E.2d 703 (2nd
In some cases, a monetary sanction might carry sufficient weight so as to encourage compliance with discovery, including following common courtesies during depositions. The Court can, and should, award attorneys’ fees
for the party who seeks the Court’s assistance in obtaining
compliance with the discovery rules, as well as awarding
any costs for the court reporter for any disrupted or derailed depositions. A more extreme sanction would be the
barring of the witness from testifying at trial in the cause
of action. Because every case is fact specific and the actions
occurring in every deposition include a multitude of factors, it is more than likely that the appellate court would
review this sanction with a keener eye. Again, as noted previously, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that the goal
of the sanction is to encourage compliance with discovery
and ensuring a trial on the merits. Barring a witness may
be the appropriate sanction, but the conduct leading to
that sanction very well would have to greatly offend and
inflame the trial court.
The better course of action is avoid the conduct that
might lead to a sanction altogether. Just as Rule 201(k)
applies to the conduct in the deposition, the rule applies
to the entire discovery process. If the deposition seems
to head to an area where the defending attorney is concerned, it would not be unreasonable for that attorney
to request a discovery conference, even off the record,
to attempt solve the problem before the objections arise
and less appealing conduct occurs.19 Most certainly, most
of these deposition situations are avoidable with proper
preparation prior to the deposition. By reviewing the case
facts with the client or witness, to the extent permitted,
the attorney ensures that the witness is not speculating
and is not guessing at the answers. By engaging in a mock
deposition beforehand, the attorney can make those
comments of “if you know” or “if you can answer.” It also
serves as a teaching moment, wherein the client learns
that “I don’t know” or “I don’t recall” are acceptable answers to questions. A deposition is a discovery tool; the
standard is not whether the testimony will be admissible;
the standard is could the testimony could lead to admissible evidence. Any objections should parallel that standard and lead to the resolution of the issue on the merits,
not on procedural technicalities. □
Dist. 1993).
19 The parties shall facilitate discovery under these rules and shall
make reasonable attempts to resolve differences over discovery.
Ill.S.Ct.R. 201(k) (West 2014).
JA N UA RY 2 015
25
Statutory Rape and
the Duty to Pay Child Support
(When One Crime Is Not Enough)
BY MICHAEL R. HUDZIK AND ANTHONY E. VECHIOLA
S
hould all biological parents have a duty to support their offspring? Are there exceptions
where a biological parent should not have to pay child support? Do the rights’ of a survivor of rape outweigh the rights’ of a child born to that rape? This article considers the
results of a young boy who was statutorily raped and is now obligated to pay both current and
retroactive child support for the child born of the statutory rape. This article also reviews some
other unique cases and laws that address a party’s duty to pay child support.
In Arizona, approximately ten years ago, when Nick
Olivas (“Olivas”) was fourteen years old, he had a sexual
relationship with a twenty-year-old woman (“Woman”).1
Under Arizona law, this sexual relationship between
the Woman and Olivas constituted statutory rape.2
Unbeknownst to Olivas, the sexual intercourse resulted
in the Woman’s pregnancy. Thereafter, Olivas’ relationship with the Woman did not continue, and the two parties each went their own way. Olivas continued on with
his life by graduating from high school, attending college,
and eventually becoming a medical assistant. It was not
until approximately two years ago, when Olivas was twenty-two, that he learned that he was the father of a six year
old girl. He learned about his child when he was served
1
2
26
Alia Beard Rau, “Arizona statutory rape victim forced to pay child
support,”Arizona Republic, September 2, 2014.
A.R.S. 13-405.
DCBA BRIEF
with legal documents related to child support.3
When asked about the situation, Olivas stated, “It was
a shock . . . I was living my life and enjoying being young.
To find out you have a 6-year-old? It’s unexplainable. It
freaked me out.”4 Olivas reported to the Arizona Republic
that when he received the legal documents he panicked,
ignored the legal document, and never submitted to the
paternity test. Now, at age twenty-four, Olivas faces a substantial child support arrearage dating back to the date of
birth for the child, plus interest at a rate of ten percent per
annum. According to the State of Arizona, Olivas owes approximately $15,000 as and for his child support arrearage,
plus additional sums for birthing expenses.5 The State of
3Rau.
4 Id.
5 David Moye, “Alleged Statutory Rape Victim Ordered To Pay
$15,000 In Child Support,” The Huffington Post, September 5,
Arizona has seized money from
Olivas’ bank accounts, and his wages
are being garnished in the amount of
$380.00 per month.6
The child support case against
Olivas was initiated when the mother
of their child applied for public assistance.7 Under Arizona law, a parent
seeking public assistance under the
state’s welfare program often must
first seek child support from the
other parent. In such cases, the Child
Support Services division of the
Arizona Department of Economic
Security will assist the parent seeking
support in the legal proceeding for
child support.8 The State of Illinois
has a similar requirement and offers
similar services for establishing and
enforcing support obligations.9
established a duty of support, the
father of the child born out of marriage had no right to custody, except
if the father initiated an adoption
proceeding.14 Wallace v. Wallace 60 Ill.App.2d 300, 302-303 (Ill.
App.1965). In Wallace v. Wallace,
the court summarized the above statutory provisions as follows, “The father has the duties to his illegitimate
child equal to the duties of a father of
a legitimate child, but he has none of
the rights enjoyed by the father of a
child born in wedlock.”15 This is no
Anthony
E.
longer the standard under current
Vechiola is an
law.16
Being a minor child does not
Associate Attorney
preclude a party from being responat Sullivan Taylor
sible for child support. The Illinois
& Gumina, P.C.
Parentage Act of 1984 provides a
and concentrates
child’s mother or a person found
his practice in the
Parentage and the Duty To Pay
to be the father of a child is not rearea of family law,
Support In Illinois
lieved of support obligations to the
including: dissolution of marriage; child
Statutory provisions regarding
child because he or she is a minor.17
custody and visitation disputes; paterniSimilarly, if a marriage is voidable bethe duty to pay support for children
ty matters; child support; maintenance;
cause the husband is a minor, the obborn out of wedlock have existed
property allocation; and orders of protecligation as a husband may be relieved
in Illinois for over 125 years.10 It is
tion. Anthony is a graduate of the John
a long held principle of Illinois law
but the obligations as a father would
Marshall Law School and Benedictine
that a father’s legal duty to pay supstill be enforceable. 18
University.
Once the obligation to pay support for a child born outside of marport has been determined, the court must determine (1)
riage is purely statutory in nature and may be enforced
the amount of support that should be ordered going foronly in the manner prescribed by the relevant statute. 11
A primary purpose of the statutory duty to provide sup- ward, if any, and (2) the potential application of retroacport to a child born out of the marriage is to prevent the
tive support. In determining child support going forward,
child from being dependent on government subsidies.12
the court is to apply the statutory guidelines set forth in
However, the duty to pay child support for a child born
Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. The
outside of marriage cannot commence until paternity is es- court may find that a deviation from the guidelines is aptablished in a legal proceeding.13
propriate after considering the best interest of the child in
Under previous Illinois parentage law, once paternity
light of the evidence, including, but not limited to, one or
was established, a father had the duty to provide support
more of the following relevant factors:
to the child to the same extent as a father of a child born to
(a)the financial resources and needs of the child;
a marriage. However, even though a finding of paternity
(b)the financial resources and needs of the custodial
parent;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Michael
R.
Hudzik is a graduate of DePaul
University College
of Law. Michael
has past legal experience in family
law, criminal law,
commercial litigation, real estate transactions, and estate planning. Since joining Sullivan Taylor Gumina, P.C. in
2011, Michael has practiced exclusively
in the area of family law.
2014.
Id.
Id.
See https://www.azdes.gov/az_child_support/overview.aspx
See https://www.dhs.state.il.us/page.aspx?item=19612
People ex rel. Wilmers v. Volksdorf, 112 Ill. 292, (Ill. 1884).
Ehorn v. Podraza, 51 Ill.App.3d 816, 817, (Ill.App. 1977).
Id.
People v. Flieger, 125 Ill.App.3d 604, 607 (Ill.App. 3 Dist.,1984).
14
15
16
17
18
Wallace v. Wallace, 60 Ill.App.2d 300, 302-303 (Ill.App.1965).
Id.
750 ILCS 45.
750 ILCS 45/3.1.
Long v. Long, 15 Ill.App.2d 276, 285 (Ill.App. 2 Dist.1957).
JA N UA RY 2 015
27
(c)the standard of living the child would have enjoyed
had the marriage not been dissolved;
(d)the physical, mental, and emotional needs of the
child;
(d-5)the educational needs of the child; and
(e)the financial resources and needs of the non-custodial
parent.19
The deviation provision of the child support statute
is of particular relevance in dealing with a parent that is
still a minor at the time the child support is set. The court
could deviate from statutory guidelines on the basis that
the obligor is still in school and does not have the financial
resources to contribute the full amount of child support
pursuant to statutory guidelines. It would be safe to assume that in some instances the obligor may not have any
income. If the net income cannot be determined because
of default or any other reason, the court shall order support in an amount considered reasonable in that particular
case.20 In such instances, the court has the authority to impute income to the obligor.21
The next issue for the court to resolve is the application of retroactive support. The Illinois Parentage Act of
1984 provides that the court may order child support for
a period prior to the commencement of the child support,
including retroactive support back to the date of the child’s
birth plus reasonable expenses incurred by either parent or
the Department of Healthcare and Family Services related
to the mother’s pregnancy and the delivery of the child.22
Illinois parentage statutes prior to the Illinois Parentage
Act of 1984 did not expressly provide for allowing retroactive support payments.23 In determining the extent to
which payments shall be made for any prior period, the
court shall consider all relevant facts, including the factors for determining the amount of support specified in
the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act and
other equitable factors including, but not limited to:
(1)The father’s prior knowledge of the fact and circumstances of the child’s birth.
(2)The father’s prior willingness or refusal to help raise or
support the child.
(3)The extent to which the mother or the public agency
bringing the action previously informed the father of
19 750 ILCS 5/505.
20 Id.
21In re Marriage of Gosney, 394 Ill.App.3d 1073 (3rd Dist. 2009).
22 750 ILCS 45/14.
23 People ex rel. Causley v. Jackson, 171 Ill.App.3d 464, 467-468 (Ill.
App. 4 Dist.,1988).
28
DCBA BRIEF
the child’s needs or attempted to seek or require his
help in raising or supporting the child.
(4)The reasons the mother or the public agency did not
file the action earlier.
(5)The extent to which the father would be prejudiced by
the delay in bringing the action.24
For purposes of determining the amount of child support to be paid for any period before the date the order for
current child support is entered, there is a rebuttable presumption that the father’s net income for the prior period
was the same as his net income at the time the order for
current child support is entered.25 In arguing against retroactive support, the obligor could once again argue that the
he did not have the financial resources to pay child support
for any period of time during the obligor’s minority.
Other jurisdictions have similar statutory guidelines
that provide a basis for the court to deviate from the statutory guidelines. For example, the Arizona child support
statute provides that the courts are to follow the statutory
guidelines set by the Arizona Supreme Court, unless there
is a basis to deviate when considering several factors, including, but not limited to, the financial resources and
needs of the non-custodial parent.26
How the Law May Require A Victim of Statutory Rape
To Pay Child Support
Many people have expressed outrage over the fact that
a victim of statutory rape can be charged with the duty to
pay child support. First and foremost, the victim is unable
to consent to the sexual activity that resulted in the birth
of the child. Second, the victim is presumably of school age
and unable to earn adequate income to support the minor
child. However, the general consensus of the courts that
have heard the issue at hand has been that the victim of
statutory rape owes a duty of support to the minor child,
regardless of his or her inability to legally consent to the
sexual intercourse that resulted in conception.
In Arizona there is an exception to the rule that a
non-custodial parent has an obligation to pay child support when there is guilty finding for sexual conduct with a
minor child, regardless of the noncustodial parent’s age.27
Under Arizona law A.R.S. 13-405, “[a] person commits sexual conduct with a minor by intentionally or
knowingly engaging in sexual intercourse or oral sexual
24 750 ILCS 45/14.
25 Id.
26 A.R.S. 25-320.
27Rau.
contact with any person who is under eighteen years of
age,” and “[s]exual conduct with a minor who is under fifteen years of age is a class 2 felony.”28
Pursuant to A.R.S. 25-501, “[t]he court may determine that a parent is not obligated to contribute to the
support of the parent’s minor child if maternity or paternity is the result of the parent’s sexual contact with a person
who, as a result of that contact, has been found guilty of
sexual conduct with a minor under section 13-1405 or sexual assault under section 13-1406.” 29
A.R.S. 13-107 provides that class 2 felonies must be
commenced within seven years after actual discovery by
the state or political subdivision having jurisdiction of the
offense or discovery by the state or the political subdivision
that should have occurred with the exercise of reasonable
diligence, whichever first occurs.30
According to the Arizona Republic, Olivas did not realize that pursuing criminal charges was even a consideration, and, therefore, no charges were brought against the
mother and the statute of limitations has passed. Under
Arizona law, a minor cannot consent to sexual relations.
However, unless there is a guilty finding with respect to
sexual assault of a minor, the victim of sexual abuse is obligated to provide support for the minor child that was born
as a result of the sexual abuse.31
Even though Olivas did not have the capacity to consent to the sexual intercourse that resulted in the birth of
his child, he is now obligated to pay child support. Olivas
stated that he wants to be involved in the child’s life, and
he is willing to pay child support going forward. However,
Olivas noted a distinction between retroactive support and
support going forward. He commented on the distinction
between his child support obligation for retroactive support and support going forward by stating that, “Anything
I do as an adult, I should be responsible for. But as a teenager? I don’t think so.”32
In State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, the Kansas
Supreme Court ruled that the victim of sexual abuse can be
ordered to pay child support, regardless of his or her age.
33
Colleen Hermesmann routinely provided care for Shane
Seyer as a baby sitter or day care provider during 1987 and
1988. The two began a sexual relationship at a time when
Colleen was 16 years old and Shane was only 12. The relationship continued over a period of several months and
28 A.R.S. 13-1405.
29 A.R.S. 25-501.
30 A.R.S. 13-107.
31Rau.
32Id.
33 State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 252 Kan. 646 (1993).
the parties engaged in sexual intercourse on an average of
a couple of times a week. As a result, a daughter, Melanie,
was born to Colleen on May 30, 1989. At the time of
the conception of the child, Shane was 13 years old and
Colleen was 17. Colleen applied for and received financial assistance through the Aid to Families with Dependent
Children program from the Kansas Department of Social
and Rehabilitation Services (“SRS”). Thereafter, SRS filed
a petition with the court seeking that Shane reimburse SRS
for all assistance expended by SRS on behalf of the minor
child. In its ruling, the Court stated:
This State’s interest in requiring minor parents to
support their children overrides the State’s competing
interest in protecting juveniles from improvident acts,
even when such acts may include criminal activity on
the part of the other parent. Considering the three persons directly involved, Shane, Colleen, and Melanie,
the interests of Melanie are superior, as a matter of public policy, to those of either or both of her parents. This
minor child, the only truly innocent party, is entitled to
support from both her parents regardless of their ages.34
The Hermesmann Court noted that this was a case of
first impression for Kansas, but referred to several other
jurisdictions to support its ruling that support should
be ordered in such circumstances, including Wisconsin,
Colorado, Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts.
In County of San Luis Obispo, v. Nathaniel J., the
Second District California Court of Appeals reviewed a
case in which a victim of statutory rape was ordered to pay
child support.35
On January 20, 1995, Ricci Jones gave birth to a
daughter. The child’s father, Nathaniel J., was 15 years
old when Jones conceived the child, and Jones was 34
years old at the time. Jones was convicted of unlawful
intercourse with a minor child. The trial court ruled
that paternity was established and reserved an order of
child support. The court stated that presumably when
Nathaniel J. reaches majority or completes his schooling, the court will reassess his ability to provide support.
The trial court’s ruling was affirmed on appeal. In its ruling, the Nathaniel J. Court cited cases from several other
states, including a Minnesota appellate court decision in
which the Minnesota Court stated that the “child’s interests in receiving support supersedes economic consequences minor father suffers from statutory rape.”36
34 Id.
35 County of San Luis Obispo, v. Nathaniel J., 50 Cal.App.4th 842
(1996)
36 Id. citing Jevning v. Cichos (Minn. Ct. App. 1993) 499 N.W.2d 515,
JA N UA RY 2 015
29
In Illinois, the Third District dealt with a case involving a victim of statutory rape who was charged
with a child support obligation. In re J.S.37 On March
23, 1987, the Illinois Attorney General’s office filed a
petition on behalf of the petitioner, Tami Stone, alleging that the respondent, David Williams, was the father
of Stone’s minor son, J.S. Following a hearing, the trial
court entered a judgment finding that the respondent
was J.S.’s father. On March 16, 1989, a hearing was held
regarding Williams obligation to pay support to Stone
as and for support of the minor child. The trial court
ordered Williams to pay weekly child support and medical expenses for the minor child. Williams appealed and
argued that that he should not be required to pay child
support because he was fifteen years old when the child
was conceived. He argued that Illinois public policy
protects minors from the consequences of their improvident conduct. The appellate court disagreed and held
that Williams has a duty to support his child, regardless
of Williams’ age at the time of conception. The court
stated,
We note that contrary to the respondent’s position, Illinois public policy has never offered blanket protection to reckless minors. (See Dawson v.
Hoffmann (2nd Dist., 1963), 43 Ill.App.2d 17, 192
N.E.2d 695 (when a minor engages in an adult activity
he will be held to the same standard as all others who
participate in that activity); Kennedy v. Kiss (1st Dist.,
1980), 89 Ill.App.3d 890, 45 Ill.Dec. 273, 412 N.E.2d
624 (a minor is liable for necessities purchased by the
minor under his own credit); Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 37,
par. 805-4(6)(a) (a 15-year-old minor can be tried as an
adult for the crimes of first degree murder and armed
robbery with a firearm).) At the same time, Illinois
public policy has recognized the blanket right of every
child to the physical, mental, emotional, and monetary
support of his or her parents. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch.
40, par. 2501.1.) The public has an interest in protecting children from becoming wards of the state. In re
Petition of Sullivan (2nd Dist., 1985), 134 Ill.App.3d
455, 89 Ill.Dec. 540, 480 N.E.2d 1283.
In the instant case, we find that the public policy
mandating parental support of children overrides any
policy of protecting a minor from improvident acts. We
therefore hold that the trial court properly found that the
respondent was financially responsible for his child. 38
518
37 In re J.S. 193 Ill.App.3d 563 (3rd Dist. 1990).
38 Id.
30
DCBA BRIEF
The Duty To Pay Support In Other Unique Situations
— Artificial Insemination
The Illinois Parentage Act (not to be confused with
the Illiniois Parentage Act of 1984) provides statutory
provisions that allows semen to be donated for the purposes of artificial insemination. Section 3(a) of the Illinois
Parentage Act provides, in part, that:
If, under the supervision of a licensed physician
and with the consent of her husband, a wife is inseminated artificially with semen donated by a man not her
husband, the husband shall be treated in law as if he
were the natural father of a child thereby conceived.
Section 3(b) of the Illinois Parentage Act further provides, in part, that:
It further provides that the donor of semen provided to a licensed physician for use in artificial insemination of a woman other than the donor’s wife shall be
treated in law as if he were not the natural father of a
child thereby conceived.39
Section 3(b) specifically protects sperm donors from
claims of paterninty and liability for child support.40 The
result of the Illinois Parentage Act is that a party can be the
biological parent of a child but have no duty to support
the child. However, it is is imperative to comply with the
specific language of the statute.
In 2009, William Marotta, a resident of Kansas, donated sperm to a lesbian couple wishing to conceive a
child. Mr. Marotta did not receive any compensation for
his donation and the parties signed agreeements that Mr.
Marotta would have no financial responsibility for the
child. Kansas law, similar to Illinois, requires a physician to
perform the insemintation. Unbenkonwst to Mr. Marotta,
the lesbian couple did not use a physican. Now, years later,
the Kansas District Court has found Mr. Marotta liable to
pay child support for the child produced as a result of his
donated sperm.41
— Misrepresentation
In 1991, the Illinois Second District dealt with a case
with a father who alleged that he was tricked into conceiving a child and constitutionally should not be obligated
to pay child support. The father alleged that the mother
represented to the father that she was taking a drug with
a leading side effect that caused the inability to become
39 750 ILCS 40.
40 In re Parentage of M.J., 203 Ill.2d 526, 534 (Ill.,2003).
41 Chandrika Narayan, “Kansas court says sperm donor must pay
child support,”CNN, January 24, 2014.
pregnant. The father further alleged that he made known
to the mother that he did not wish to create a child. Finally,
the father alleged that the mother told the father she would
not ask the father to support the child. The Court found a
child must not be deprived of support because of one parent’s misapprehension of the likelihood of conception.42
— Sexual Abuse in Illinois
Section 6.5 of the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 provides statutory provisions regarding the prohibition of
custody or visitation to men who father a child through
sexual assault or sexual abuse. Section 6.5(c) provides the
following regarding support for a child born through sexual assault or sexual abuse by the father:
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Act, nothing in this Section shall be construed to relieve
the father described in subsection (a) of any support
42 Department of Public Aid ex rel. McFarland v. Thompsen, 218 Ill.
App.3d 1099, 1103 (Ill.App. 2 Dist.,1991).
and maintenance obligations to the child under this
Act. The child’s mother or guardian may decline support and maintenance obligations from the father.
A strict interpretation of the statutory language of
Section 6.5(c) of the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 indicates that the mother or guardian of a child born by sexual
assault or abuse caused by the father allows the mother or
guardian to decline support from the father, thus eliminating the father’s duty of support.
Courts across the United States have consistently
held that the right of a child to receive support from
both parents outweighs any competing interests of either parent regardless of any inequity that may arise for
either parent. This overarching principle is based on the
fact that the child is the only truly innocent party involved, and that there is strong public policy that parents should support their child instead of placing the
financial burden on the state. □
Space left blank intentionally
JA N UA RY 2 015
31
Not Just a Facelift: The Amended Illinois
Power of Attorney Power
BY KATHLEEN MAY
O
ften overlooked in a client’s estate plan, Powers of Attorney can have the most
significant impact on clients’ lives. Estate planning attorneys generally prefer to
focus on the “sexier” topics of estate and income taxes and shaping the client’s leg-
acy. Unfortunately, the portion of the meeting dedicated to the discussion of Powers of Attorney
is comparatively minimal. Yet, attorneys outside the practice of estate planning are often asked
by friends and family members to draft a “simple” Power of Attorney. Even worse, consumers
purchase these documents from Legal Zoom or, gasp, are directed by a financial or health care
professional on how to complete the statutory forms, often in the middle of a health crisis.
The Illinois Power of Attorney Act1 specifies the
guidelines for the Power of Attorney for Property and
the Power of Attorney for Health Care. This statute provides the individual designated as agent the scope and
authority in which to make financial and health care decisions for the principal.2 It also lays out the duty that
agent has to the principal.3 The statute seeks to protect
third parties who rely on these documents in good faith
so that reliance will be assured when the agent is called
to act on behalf of the principal.4
On August 26, 2014, then-Governor Quinn signed
Senate Bill 32285 amending the Illinois Power of
1
2
3
4
5
32
755 ILCS 45.
755 ILCS 45/3-4 and 755 ILCS 45/4-7.
755 ILCS 45/2-7.
755 ILCS 45/2-8 and 755 ILCS 45/4-8.
Illinois S. 3228, 98th Assembly, (May 30, 2014).
DCBA BRIEF
Attorney Act, effective January 1, 2015. This amendment made dramatic changes to the Power of Attorney
for Health Care, leaving the Power of Attorney for
Property unaffected.6 A review of the amended statute will likely lead to a determination of whether these
changes are for the better or for the worse. However, if
asked to draft a “simple” Power of Attorney, be aware of
the amendments and draft the document with an eye
towards these amendments.
Additions and Eliminations to the Definition
Section
In the 2014 Amendment to the Illinois Power of
Attorney Act, the initial change occurs in Section 4-4,
6
Id.
Definitions.7 The term “Health
Kathleen M. May
Attorney. A witness must now be
Care Professional” has been added
is an Associate
eighteen years of age. The list of
to “Health Care Provider” in
Attorney
with
licensed professionals providing
4-4(d), as well as to the list of indiHuck
Bouma,
care to the principal who cannot
viduals who are not allowed to act
P.C. in Wheaton,
serve as a witness now includes: an
8
as an agent. An additional change
IL
concentratadvanced practice nurse, physician
to the definitions section is the ining her practice
assistant, dentist, podiatric phyclusion of “Health Care Agent.” A
in the areas of
sician, optometrist as well as the
Health Care Agent is defined to be
Elder Law and Special Needs planning,
previously listed attending physian individual over eighteen years of
Wealth Transfer and Estate Planning,
cian or mental health provider.13
A relative of any of the listed indiage designated by the principal to
and Estate and Trust Administration.
viduals who are providing care to
make health care decisions and who
Utilizing her background and experithe principal may also not serve as
serves as a personal representative.9
ence in the healthcare industry, Katie
A Health Care Agent cannot be the
a witness.14 The prohibition of an
assists clients and their families navigate
owner or operator of a health care
principal’s physician or health care
the complex system of government benfacility, relative of the principal or
provider, keeping in mind that the
efits as well as to design and implement
the agent from serving as a witness
expansion of “health care provider”
the legacy they wish to create.
remains intact.15 If executing the
now encompasses a health care
10
document at a health care facility because the client is
professional.
These changes expand the limitation on who unable to meet in an office, this additional limitation
can serve as an Agent under a Health Care Power of on who can witness it will become important. Likewise,
Attorney. Section 4-5, Limitations on Health Care
when reviewing the validity of the document, ensure
Agencies, explicitly adds health care professionals to the
the witness is a valid individual.
list of individuals who may not act as agent unless that
individual is not administering health care to that pa- Modified Statutory Form Power of Attorney for
tient.11 That list still includes the attending physician Health Care
and health care provider, with the same stipulation that
An increasingly louder drumroll should now play
the attending physician and health care provider cannot
in one’s mind for the most dramatic change of all: the
serve if he or she is the patient’s care provider.12
statutory form Health Care Power of Attorney itself.
The other prominent change to the definition sec- From the Notice to the Individual Signing the Power of
tion is the elimination of what were previously consid- Attorney for Health Care, to the layout, structure and
ered fundamental definitions. No longer do you find
language of the form, the old form has been entirely
the definition of “incurable and irreversible condition,” scrapped, nothing being quite the same.16
The Notice to the Individual Signing the Power
“permanently unconscious” or “terminal condition.”
These definitions are removed from this section because of Attorney for Health Care is not quite a notice any
they are no longer used in the amended statutory form longer. It now takes the form of a Frequently Asked
Questions section and reads more as an informational
Power of Attorney for Health Care.
pamphlet, approximately four to five pages long, as opposed to the more concise one page notice of the past.
Revised Witness Requirements
The introduction to the Notice provides there are addiFrom a practice standpoint, a notable change was
made to who can witness a Power of Attorney for Health tional information and on-line resources to guide the
conversation on end of life measures, perhaps in a refCare. This will be crucial to note when reviewing a client’s document executed after January 1, 2015, or if erence to the Five Wishes.17 The topics covered in the
traveling to a health care facility to execute a Power of
7
8
9
10
11
12
755 ILCS 45/4-4.
Id.
Id.
Id.
755 ILCS 45/4-5.
13
14
15
16
17
755 ILCS 45/4-5.1.
Id.
Id.
755 ILCS 45/4-10(b).
Id. There is a heated debate among practitioners on the use
of the Five Wishes document. See Koening, III, Ray J. and
Hyde, MacKenzie, Be Careful What You Wish For: Analyzing the
JA N UA RY 2 015
33
Notice range from, “Whom Should I Choose to be My to provide for access to all family, or whatever the client
Health Care Agent?” to “What Do I Do With This Form may need.
Once I Complete It?” and “What If I Do Not Want to
In the form itself, there are many differences to the for18
Use This Form?,” among others.
mat and language of the form when compared to the prior
The information provided under the heading, “What
version. Unchanged, the principal is named first followed
Are The Things I Want my Health Care Agent to Know?,”
by the designation of the agent.21 The designation is folspecifically section (vi), simply discusses other documents lowed by a section which lists four statements outlining
a principal may execute.19 While it is the practice of some the authority of the agent.22 The client, along with his or
attorneys to execute Living Wills
her attorney, should carefully read
along with a Power of Attorney
the four listed provisions to ensure
for Health Care, it is not universal.
the client is agreeable to providThe attorney who does not execute
ing the authority stated in each,
Living Wills with a Health Care
crossing out or amending any that
From the Notice to
Power of Attorney may want to
are not agreeable. If a separate
the Individual Signing
edit this section accordingly.
Disposition of Remains agent is
Perhaps the most troubling
requested, this must be considered
the Power of Attorney
section for drafting attorneys and
with (iv) of this section and may
those who have participated in a
need to be stricken. The effective
for Health Care, to the
family feud regarding the care of
date of the power is then selected
layout,
structure
and
their loved one, is the information
using a check the box approach.23
The essential directions to the
found in the heading, “What If I
language of the form, the
designated agent follows the efDo Not Want to Use This Form?.”
old form has been entirely
fective date in the form of a paraThe statutory language provides,
graph, said paragraph being an
“…any document you complete
scrapped, nothing being
instruction to the agent to conmust be executed by you, desigquite
the
same.
sider the relief of suffering, qualnate an agent authorized by law
ity, and possible extension of life
to serve as an agent, and state the
and the previously stated wishes
agent’s powers, but it need not be
of the principal.24 The form furwitnessed or conform in any other
ther states, “Your agent will weigh
respect to the statutory health care
the burdens versus the benefits of proposed treatments in
power.”20 Wow. This is very powerful language. To what extent litigation will occur over whether or not one sentence,
making decisions on your behalf.”25 A version of this familiar-sounding language was found in the previous statun-witnessed, written on a scrap piece of paper, designating one family member over another is a valid power of utory form which laid out for the principal three choices
of differing authority in the agent to make a decision as
attorney remains to be seen, as will how a medical provider
to life-prolonging measures. These three choices are now
responds when presented with this scrap of paper. What
is the liability then of a facility or medical provider who replaced with two statements that the principal is asked to
designate as best expressing his or her wishes.26 These two
ceases treatment based on this scrap paper or continues
to treat as a result of it? The effects of this statement may statements must be read closely and analyzed as they have
prove astounding if they create any of the numerous sce- very different language than the three choices previously
provided in the statutory form.
narios that one can imagine. However, the statement also
The two statements were rewritten in an attempt to
allows drafting attorneys the freedom to customize and taimake it easier for the general public to understand them,
lor each document to the client’s needs by including provisions regarding religion, the ability to hire a care advocate,
“Five Wishes” Advance Directive, 97 Ill. B. J. 242 (2009), and the
following letter to the editor, 97 Ill. B. J. 274 (2009).
18 Id.
19 Id.
20 Id.
34
DCBA BRIEF
21
22
23
24
25
26
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
and to clarify what the designated agent will have authority
to do. When closely read, the first option requires a physician to believe “…that I will not wake up or recover my
ability to think, communicate with my family and friends,
and experience my surroundings…” before the statement
reads, “I do not want treatments to prolong my life.”27
That ambiguity makes it unclear who is actually making
decisions: the principal through previously directed statements, the agent utilizing the guidance provided by the
principal, or the physician who must first have the stated
beliefs. The second option expresses the sentiment that the
principal wants all life prolonging measures and wishes to
be kept alive in accordance with reasonable medical standards.28 However, the selection of a statement, as written,
is optional and the form can be modified if the principal
is less concerned as to what the physician does or does not
believe or wishes to express some other guidance for the
agent to follow.29
The principal is then able, as he or she previously was,
to limit the authority of an agent in care decision-making
and the power to authorize autopsy or disposition of remains. Although the form in this section only addresses
limitations, this might also be a good place to add any enhanced authorities granted to the agent.30
Immediately after the limitations on authority section, the principal is directed to execute the document.31
The principal’s signature is then followed by a section to be
completed by a witness.32 When reviewing the witness signature, one must now consider the limitations on who can
serve as a witness (as previously discussed). A substantial
change is made to the witness section in that the witness
no longer must actually witness the execution by the principal but can check a box that states, “the principal told
me that the signature mark on the principal signature line
is his or hers.”33 Of course, the amended Act now states
that a Power of Attorney for Health Care doesn’t require a
witness at all if it is executed by the principal, designates an
agent authorized by law to serve as an agent, and states the
agent’s powers.34
After the signature of a witness, the form then provides
for an optional Successor Agent(s) to be named.35 This is
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
different from the prior form in that this designation is
now found after the principal has executed the document
indicating it states his or her wishes and directions. As a
drafting attorney, one must strongly consider moving this
designation to a section before the principal executes the
document to ensure that a name is not added to the form
unbeknownst to or unconfirmed by the principal.
The amendment to the Illinois Power of Attorney
Act and its corresponding changes to the Health
Care Power of Attorney require thoughtful review
by any attorney who is going to draft this document. While
it is much easier to focus on the various documents that
make up a client’s estate plan, or to consider this a “simple”
form, no other single document has a more significant an
impact on a client’s life. While what happens after a client
passes away affects the beneficiaries or the client’s ultimate
legacy, this document controls the type of care the client
receives during perhaps the most vulnerable time in the client’s life. Therefore, it is imperative that drafting attorneys
never take its execution lightly, and begin to give the discussion regarding this document a prominent place in our
process with clients. □
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
JA N UA RY 2 015
35
ILLINOIS LAW UPDATE
New Decisions in Family Law
and Trusts & Estates
EDITED BY MICHAEL R. SITRICK
36
FAMILY LAW
A prevailing party provision in a marital settlement
agreement awarding attorney’s fees is unenforceable
to the extent costs are attributable to litigating matters
relating to children.
In re Marriage of Linta, 2014 IL App (2d) 130862,
2014 WL 4628667 (Sept. 17, 2014)
By Jennifer E. Byrne, Katie C. Galanes, Danya A.
Grunyk, Victoria C. Kelly, Hillary A. Sefton, and Leah
D. Setzen1
In, In re Marriage of Linta, a Nevada court entered a
dissolution judgment incorporating a marital settlement
agreement, which contained a prevailing party provision
with respect to attorney fees. Thereafter, the parties and
their minor children relocated to Illinois, and the Nevada
judgment was registered as an Illinois judgment. Following
various petitions filed by both parties, the trial court denied the wife’s request for attorney’s fees pursuant to the
prevailing party provision.
On appeal, the wife argued that the prevailing party
provision of the marital settlement agreement was binding
on the trial court and that the trial court abused its discretion in denying her petition for fees. However, the Court
determined that, pursuant to Section 502(b) of the Illinois
Marriage and Dissolution Act (“IMDMA”), the prevailing
party provision was unenforceable when applied to issues
relating to the children and affirmed the decision of the
trial court.
It is an abuse of discretion for a court to order the
conveyance of a party’s membership interest in an LLC
to a spouse as part of a dissolution of marriage action
where said order violates the terms of the LLC’s operating agreement.
In re Marriage of Schlichting, 2014 IL App (2d) 140158,
2014 WL 4805241 (Sept. 29, 2014)
D. Setzen2
In In re Marriage of Schlicting, the trial court deemed
the wife’s membership in an LLC to be marital and
awarded the husband, a non-member, the wife’s membership interest, and ordered the husband to pay her $19,500
for her interest. The Court reversed and remanded the decision of the trial court, finding that by awarding the husband the wife’s membership, the order violated the LLC’s
operating agreement. Therefore, the Court found that the
trial court abused its discretion in ordering the wife to convey her share of the LLC to her husband. Specifically, the
LLC’s operating agreement contained a transfer restriction
that prohibited any member from selling to a non-member
absent the unanimous written consent of the other members. Further, the LLC agreement required that the LLC
buy out a divorcing member’s interest. In its order, the trial
court did not allow the LLC to buy out the wife’s interest.
Instead, it ordered the husband, a non-member, to buy out
her interest.
A court need not consider the income of a party’s
new spouse when determining child support allocations in an action for the modification of a dissolution
of marriage judgment where the record shows that the
spouse of the party seeking the increase pays his or her
own expenses and there is no evidence that they comingle income or assets.
1
2
Grunyk & Associates, P.C., Naperville, IL
DCBA BRIEF
In re Marriage of Pratt, 2014 IL App (1st) 130465,
2014 WL 3907923 (Aug. 12, 2014)
D. Setzen3
In In re Marriage of Pratt, an ex-husband appealed the
trial court’s order increasing his child support and awarding his ex-wife $25,000 in attorney’s fees. The ex-husband
had previously been paying the ex-wife unallocated family
support. The ex-wife filed a motion to modify the ex-husband’s support payments due to the fact that the maintenance portion of the unallocated support terminated, as
she was cohabitating with her new husband, and she requested that the trial court set statutory child support.
On appeal, the Court rejected the ex-husband’s argument that the trial court failed to consider the ex-wife’s
new husband’s income in determining child support because the issue was raised for the first time on appeal, so
said argument was waived. Further, the Court determined
that the ex-wife testified that although the new husband
lived with her and the children, he paid for all of his own
expenses and there was no evidence that the new husband
and ex-wife commingled income or assets.
The Court also determined that a provision contained
in the marital settlement agreement precluding income received from restricted stock and stock options from being
included in calculating income for support purposes was
void, against Illinois public policy, and therefore unenforceable. While the parties may agree to the terms relating
to the children’s support, they may not prevent the trial
court from determining in the future what is in the best
interests of the children when calculating child support
during a modification proceeding. The Court further rejected the ex-husband’s argument that the ex-wife was
double-dipping into his assets and income because the
restricted stock was awarded to him as a property settlement per the judgment, and now he was being required to
pay support on the portion of income received from the
sale of said stock. The Court held that the trial court may
consider marital property as income for child support purposes even if said income comes from vested stock options.
TRUSTS & ESTATES
Appellate court affirms trial court ruling that a trust
does not allow a majority of trust beneficiaries the right
to name a substitute trustee.
Spencer v. Di Cola, 2014 IL App (1st) 121585, as
modified on denial of reh’g (Aug. 21, 2014).
By Neil Goltermann4
In Spencer v. Di Cola, the beneficiaries of a trust appealed a judgment denying their claim that they should
be able to remove an individual trustee and appoint a new
corporate trustee without any proof of cause for removal,
in a manner they argued conformed with the terms of
the trust. The trust in question provided the following
with regard to the appointment and removal of substitute
trustees:
The Trustees shall have power to appoint any bank
or trust company wherever located as substitute
Trustee of any trust, if and as often as the Trustees
deem it advantageous; to give the substitute
Trustee such titles, powers and discretions as the
Trustees deem advisable; to remove a substitute
Trustee; to accept the resignation of a substitute
Trustee; and to give a full release and discharge
to a substitute Trustee, conclusive and binding
on all beneficiaries hereunder, by approving its
accounts. A substitute Trustee, upon its resignation or removal, shall transfer all trust property in
its possession as the Trustees direct. The Trustees’
power to appoint and remove substitute Trustees
may be exercised in their discretion and shall be
exercised if directed in writing by a majority in interest of the beneficiaries of the trust.
Affirming the dismissal of the lawsuit and awarding
attorney’s fees to the trustee, the Appellate Court held that
the trust agreement did not grant the beneficiaries the right
to name the substitute trustee who would be appointed
after a majority of interested beneficiaries had directed the
trustee to remove a trustee.
3
4
Momkus McCluskey LLC, Lisle, IL
If you wish to submit a contribution for inclusion in a future edition of the Illinois Law Update,
please e-mail Michael R. Sitrick, Illinois Law Update editor, at
sitrick.m@gmail.com.
JA N UA RY 2 015
37
The Appellate Court made the following observations
about the language at issue:
1.The language is unambiguous.
2.A trust provision is not ambiguous solely because
the parties do not agree on its meaning.
3.The trust gives the sitting trustee the power to
appoint a trust company as often as the trustee
deems it advantageous.
4.The settlor intended a substitute trustee to be appointed for a particular purpose.
5.The trust gives the sitting trustee the power to give
the substitute trustee whatever titles, powers and
discretions that the sitting trustee, not the beneficiaries, deem advisable.
6.The trust gives the trustee the power to accept the
substitute trustee’s resignation, to remove a substitute trustee, and to release and discharge the
trustee.
7.The plain language demonstrates that the settlor
intended a sitting trustee to continue to exercise
whatever powers were not specifically allocated to
the substitute trustee and to remove a substitute
trustee at the sitting trustee’s pleasure.
38
DCBA BRIEF
8.Reading this provision in its entirety demonstrates
that a substitute trustee is one appointed for a specific purpose and a limited duration.
9.The majority of beneficiaries have the right to require the sitting trustee to exercise the “power to
appoint and remove substitute [t]rustees.”
10.The plain language of the trust does not grant the
beneficiaries the right to name the substitute who
will be appointed.
11.The trust provision does not permit the beneficiaries to require a sitting trustee to exercise the
power to give the substitute trustee specific titles,
powers and discretions.
12.The beneficiary’s argument that the beneficiaries
have the power to direct “who, what, where, when
and how” a substitute is to be appointed would
require the court to “graft new language onto this
provision.”
13.The trust does not grant the beneficiaries the right
to micromanage the sitting trustee or to appoint
someone who will. □
DCBA UPDATE
FEATURES
Client v. Customer
BY LESLIE MONAHAN
I
n your office, are the people
you serve treated like Clients or
Customers? Are they treated like
another case to be handled or like
they may have a lifetime of cases to
be handled and as a referral source? A
couple of recent experiences has this
topic on my mind.
Allison Wood, Principal of Legal
Ethics Consulting, PC provided a
PRMCLE presentation to our members on why solo and smaller firms
have a greater risk of malpractice and
disciplinary complaints. Her presentation was a great reminder of what
clients are thinking and looking for
as they hire attorneys. As I am sure
you know, consumer expectations
are changing. They are less loyal and
savvier using the internet to find alternate answers to their problems.
This means law firms must treat each
client as a customer that must be
sold on the firm’s abilities and given
attention to his or her needs. Allison
shared that 18% of complaints to
the ARDC are for failure to communicate which includes attorneys
not returning their clients’ calls. For
LRS callers, we ask that they give attorneys 24 hours to return their call
before they call us for another referral, does your office have a policy of
returning calls within 24 hours?
Secondly,
Cindy
Allston,
Membership Director, and I have
been visiting many of our member’s
offices. We have been dropping off
“Thanks for your Membership” notes
and candy from Fannie May. (Don’t
worry if we haven’t been to your office yet, we have visits scheduled into
January). For the most part, these
visits have been wonderful. We have
had a great time meeting members,
getting feedback and seeing the
shocked looks as we explain that we
are just there to say thank you, not to
ask for anything! That being said, all
of the welcomes have not been warm.
I get that two professionally dressed
women walking into the office probably looks like a sales call, so we have
learned to be quick in identifying
ourselves. Still, some receptionists
have been short with us or even rude.
I know of several businesses where
the receptionist’s title is “Director
of First Impressions.” Have you ever
considered the first impression your
clients have of your office?
At DCBA, our office has a large
number of calls from the general public related to Driver Improvement
School and the Lawyer Referral
Service. We have some staff rules regarding customer service such as the
number of times the phone can ring
before it is answered and how messages are handled. Here is the rule I
feel is most important:
Remember – the callers do not
know that they are the 5th person
to ask you that question today. Treat
each one like they are the first call
of the day. Most callers aren’t calling here because awesome things are
happening in their lives, usually it is a
negative reason that they call. Be understanding and empathetic to their
situation.
Hopefully, you have experienced excellent service from our office for your needs. If not, please let
me know as it is my philosophy that
member retention begins with the
best customer service. What is your
philosophy for retaining clients? Is
that philosophy shared by all of your
office staff? □
Leslie Monahan is the Executive
Director of the DuPage County Bar
Association and the DuPage County
Bar Foundation. A graduate of
North Central College, she previously
worked with the Promotional Products
Association of Chicago, American
Fence Association and Coin Laundry
Association.
JA N UA RY 2 015
39
LEGAL AID UPDATE
Judges’ Nite Silent
Auction
BY CECILIA NAJERA
Y
ou may recall the Silent
Auction that was held at
last year’s Judges’ Nite.
When co-producer of Judges’ Nite,
Christina Morrison, spearheaded
this fundraiser last year, did she
know this idea would help produce
$10,898 for legal aid?
Maybe or maybe not, but
it was a resounding success and
Christina Morrison is leading the
charge again. Back in November
of last year, Cindy Allston, DCBA
Membership Director, began dispersing solicitation letters to the
2015 Judges’ Nite cast and others to
give to shops or local restaurants requesting donations for our legal aid
program. This year, it was thought
if they started earlier requesting donations, there would be even more
corporations agreeing to give. If you
have been soliciting businesses, let
Christina or Cindy know – I am
told restaurants are highly favored
to bid on. Event tickets, product
items, wine and gift certificates
are wonderful also. Judges’ Nite
is scheduled for March 6 at the
McAninch Center at the College of
DuPage.
The DuPage Legal Assistance
Foundation which administers the
DuPage Bar Legal Aid Program is a
501(c)(3) corporation so contributions are tax deductible. (Consult
your tax adviser for details.) If you
40
DCBA BRIEF
wish to make your own donation of
an auction item or would like solicitation letters to send out, call Cindy
at 630-653-7779 or email her at
callston@dcba.org.
Judge Rodney Equi
The
DCBA
Legal
Aid
Committee meets on the third
Wednesday of every month and
is lucky to have a Judicial Liaison
member who attends the meetings whenever humanly possible.
We have been favored for the past
few years to have as our Judicial
Liaison, Judge Rodney Equi who
has now retired as Presiding Judge
from DuPage County’s Domestic
Relations division. Judge Equi was
committed to civil legal assistance
and to giving individuals who seek
legal relief, access to the court system. He has promised to stick
around after he departs the bench
and we hope he means it.
Like Judge Equi, many judges
may be aware of The Justice Index
produced by the National Center
for Access to Justice (“NCAJ”). The
report was published on February
25, 2014 and is available for review
at www.justiceindex.org.
The study ranked court systems
in all 50 states and Washington
D.C. under the categories of how
many civil legal aid lawyers are
available to the poor, how much
support is given to self-represented
litigants by state-court based systems, what level of language assistance goes from within the court
system to those who do not have a
facility in English and finally how
much help is provided to the disabled when they seek to remedy a
wrong or enforce a right in court.
The disabled category includes
those who are impaired in any area
including mentally, emotionally,
hearing, sight and others. Pro bono
supporters including teams from
law firms, UBS, the University of
Pennsylvania Law School and the
Pfizer Legal Alliance helped compile
the data with the NCAJ which is located at the Cordozo School of Law
in New York. The study is currently
revising these findings because,
after the results were published,
additional research was conducted
A Wheaton native, Cecilia “Cee-Cee”
Najera is a graduate of the University
of Iowa and received her J.D. from
Southern Illinois University. She served
as the DCBA New Lawyer Director
from 2004 to 2009. She has been a
Staff Attorney with DuPage Bar Legal
Aid Service since her admission to the
Illinois Bar in 2001. Additionally, she
has recently enjoyed adding the role of
Wife and new Mom to the mix
and comments and corrections were
received from many states.
To measure attorney access in
each state, the Index determined
how many civil legal aid attorneys
are available per 10,000 population.
The existence of systems of support
for self-represented litigants were
tallied in the research on self-representation category. The presence in
state courts of such things as “certified” interpreters and court forms
translated into languages other than
English were noted in the results for
the language assistance category. To
determine rankings in Disability
Assistance, the team looked for
how much court based support was
given to those with hearing, seeing, mental, emotional and other
impairments.
Illinois ranked 49th with a
composite score of 34.5. For now,
The Justice Index reports Illinois
rankings in the four categories researched as follows:
Disabilities 68.8
Self-Representation 55.4
Civil Legal Aid 10.1
Language Assistance 3.6
The highest ranking states
were Connecticut with a composite score of 73.4 and then Hawaii
and Delaware with 69.9 and 66.7.
Kentucky and Oklahoma scored
lower than Illinois with 33.4 and
23.7 respectively. Washington D.C.
scored 80.9 and our neighboring
states of Wisconsin, Indiana and
Michigan scored 65.2, 36.2 and
50.4 respectively.
You may recall that the Supreme
Court of Illinois, established the
Illinois Supreme Court Access to
Justice Commission in 2012 and
they are working on many of these
issues. Article X of the Supreme
Court Rules sets the parameters of
the Commission.
Jeffrey D. Colman of Jenner
and Block was named by then
Chief Justice Thomas Kilbride
as chair of the Commission and
they declared their purpose to be
making access to justice a high priority to everyone in the legal system particularly the poor and the
vulnerable. Justice Kilbride emphasized that Judges, court personnel,
clerks, attorneys and law schools
should be active in this initiative.
Some tasks they are addressing
are standardized court forms,
assuring self-help centers are effective and accessible, expanding social work and social services
for those with special needs
who require access to justice and
working with law schools to develop
and establish court-based programs.
Other Commissions have been
established in 26 other states and
Washington D.C. □
Do your clients know where to go
when they want to give?
Smart, impactful philanthropy made easy.
The DuPage Community Foundation
is the leader in matching people’s charitable passions
with the needs of our community.
Whether your client wants to give to organizations
inside or outside of DuPage, we make it easy for them
to support the causes that matter most.
We offer a variety of ways for your clients to give now,
leave a legacy or do both, so that they can achieve their
charitable goals in a way that’s simple, comfortable and rewarding.
How We Can Help:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Work with you and your clients to focus their charitable goals
Match client passions with meaningful causes
Provide insight and guidance on the local charitable landscape
Facilitate large and complex gifts and bequests
Streamline your clients’ philanthropy
Develop a charitable plan that will minimize your clients’ costs and
administrative hassles while potentially increasing their tax savings
Talk to your clients about how they can give through the
Foundation to make a difference now, and for generations to come.
It’s Your Community. It’s Your Foundation.
The DuPage Community Foundation
104 E. Roosevelt Road, Suite 204
Wheaton, IL 60187-5200
(630) 665-5556
www.dcfdn.org
JA N UA RY 2 015
41
ISBA UPDATE
Proposed Legislation
BY JAMES F. MCCLUSKEY
T
he Legislation Committee
for the Illinois State Bar
Association has made proposals for introduction into the new
General Assembly in January. The following proposals have been made:
1.99-2 Adoption of the
Uniform Interstate Depositions and
Discovery Act. The proposed legislation adopts provisions of the Uniform
Interstate Depositions and Discovery
Act, which would simplify the procedures for obtaining foreign state discovery and actions pending in Illinois.
This Act establishes a simple clerical procedure for the issuance of subpoenas to deponents in foreign states.
The Act would minimize judicial involvement in the foreign state discovery process and eliminates the need
for letters rogatory to obtain a commission or filing miscellaneous actions, all of which are necessary under
the current law. To issue a subpoena
under this Act, the party must submit
a foreign subpoena to the Clerk of the
Court in the county, district circuit,
or parish in which the discovery is
sought to be conducted. A request for
the issuance of the subpoena under
this Act does not constitute an appearance in the court.
When a party submits a foreign
subpoena to a clerk of the court, the
clerk, in accordance with the court’s
procedure, shall promptly issue a
42
DCBA BRIEF
subpoena for service upon the person to
whom the foreign subpoena is directed.
In applying and construing the
Uniform Interstate Deposition and
Discovery Act, consideration must be
given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among the states that enact
it. In family law cases, out of state
witnesses who possess documents or
other relevant information are beyond the jurisdiction of Illinois trial
courts. The process for obtaining discovery from these witnesses requires
permission from the trial court for orders allowing depositions to proceed
in foreign states whose orders then
require the commencement of proceedings in the foreign state to secure
the discovery from the foreign state
witnesses. This process is unnecessary, cumbersome, time-consuming,
expensive and a waste of the courts’
time. This legislation which calls for
Uniform Interstate Depositions and
Discovery Act would streamline the
foreign state discovery process, save
litigants money, and conserve judicial
resources for more important matters.
This proposal was supported by
the following sections:
•Tort
• Civil Practice
• Commercial Banking
• Construction Law; and
• General Practice
2. 99-4 Change in the Notice
Standard in The Real Estate
Property Code. The State and
Local Tax Section Council proposed
amending this Code to require substantial compliance with a notice
requirement of Section 22-5 of the
Illinois Property Tax Code.
There are two different types of
notices required by the Code. As a
result of the sale of delinquent real estate taxes and tax liens at public auction, the first type are those required
by Section 22-10 through Section
22-25, which require that notices be
served upon all owners, occupants
and parties interested in the real estate between three and six months
before the expiration of the period of
redemption.
The strict compliance standard for
Section 22-10 through 22-25 for the
James F. McCluskey, a principal of
Momkus McCluskey LLC, handles a wide
range of litigation. His areas of expertise
incorporate 30 years of experience in
contract, shareholder disputes, real
estate, partnership dissolution, and
professional liability litigation. He is the
18th Circuit’s Governor of the Illinois
State Bar Association and Past President
of the DCBA.
We Can Save Child’s Inheritance!
If you or one of your clients is concerned about how to properly
put together an estate plan to protect their spend thrift child, selfdestructive child, and/or child with a disability, please contact us.
We know the rules that can make Mom’s wishes come true.
In a recent decision, Community Bank of Elmhurst v. Klein (2014IL
App (2d) 121074) the court allowed a lien against distributions from
a common form book spend thrift clause. Form trust documents do
What an attorney needs to learn from this case is that when you use
a plain, vanilla revocable living trust forms with a basic spend-thrift
provision, a creditor is going to stand in the shoes of the debtorIn this case, Mom, had died and she obligated the trustees to provide
outright but supposedly discretionary distributions to a spend thrift
Here is one more case where a child’ inheritance could have been
saved had Mom established an appropriately restricted receiving
trust on behalf of son. Sure, it’s going to cost more money, but as
this case points out, the investment in having a properly drafted
asset protection trust is certainly far lower than losing 100% of the
$72,980.67 that Mom tried to leave to Junior.
We know the rules! Contact us at ricklaw@lawelderlaw.com.
Rick L. Law, Esq.
ISBA UPDATE
preparation and service makes sense
because they protect the due process
rights of owners, occupants and interested parties but also encourages the
redemption and avoid property forfeitures. In recognition of the substantial burden placed on tax purchasers
to strictly comply with these statutes,
the Code affords tax purchasers all the
time they require to accomplish this by
allowing them to extend the redemption period as necessary up to three
years from the date of purchase.
The second type of notice, required by Section 22-5 is prepared
by the tax buyer but is sent out by the
county clerk within four months and
fifteen days after the tax purchase.
These notices were created to give the
tax buyer early warning containing
sufficient information to encourage
redemptions while still in the first
penalty period.
The two different notices have
different purposes. A professional tax
buying company will likely have to
prepare many Section 22-5 notices
because some of the information required on these notices isn’t available
until months after the tax sale dates,
such as a tax sale certificate number or
redemption amount. Only a very short
timeframe is available to prepare these
notices. Also the information required
on the notices is not easily obtainable,
such as an acceptable property location. The property address might be
simple to fill in on the tax purchase
of a single family residence, but what
if there is a vacant lot or the purchase
of part of a building with multiple addresses, or a strip of land or sliver of
land, or a land locked parcel? These situations present unique problems that
require time and substantial investigation to resolve. When the legislature
44
DCBA BRIEF
enacted Section 22-5, it sought to
limit the new burden imposed on tax
purchasers by providing that only the
last known tax assessee needs to receive
the notice
Until recently, the practice has
been substantial compliance with
the notice requirements. Then, in the
last couple of years, the First District
Appellate Court has reversed custom
and practice by requiring strict compliance with the notice requirements of
Section 22-5. A proposal by the Illinois
State Bar Association requires just substantial compliance with the requirements needed for only the requirements of early warning notice. The redemption period which requires strict
compliance for three to six months
before the expiration of the period of
redemption remains the same.
These two different notices make
sense. The early warning notice does
not forfeit the property and, therefore,
substantial compliance appears to be
the most appropriate compliance standard. However, when the redemption
period is about to expire, the strict
compliance of notice pursuant to
Sections 22-10 through 22-25 requires
that the purchasers give actual notice
to all interested parties in the real estate
and this must be done between three
and six months before the expiration
of the period of redemption. Since failure to redeem property is such a drastic
result, the strict compliance standard
of Section 22-10 through Section
22-25 makes sense.
These two pieces of legislation
will assist the practitioner in maneuvering through the cost of litigation
and improve the efficiency in the
practice of law. The Illinois State Bar
Association is proposing this legislation for the Spring session 2015. □
LRS Stats from
11/1/2014 to
11/30/2014:
The Lawyer Referral &
Mediation Service received a total
of 430 referrals, including 16 in
Spanish (313 by telephone, 5
walk-in, and 112 online referrals)
for the month of November.
If you have questions regarding the service, attorneys please call
Cynthia Garcia at (630) 653-7779
or email cgarcia@dcba.org. Please
refer clients to call (630) 653-9109
or request a referral through the
website at www.dcba.org.
Administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Bankruptcy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Business Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Civil Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Consumer Protection . . . . . . . 13
Contract Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
Elder Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Employment Law . . . . . . . . . . 25
Estate Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Family Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Federal Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Government Benefits . . . . . . . . 6
Health Care Law . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Immigration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Intellectual Property . . . . . . . . . 2
Mediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Mental Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Military Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
Personal Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Real Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
School Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Social Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Tax Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Workers’ Compensation . . . . . . 5
The Law Firm of Momkus McCluskey, LLC has served the DuPage County
community for the past twenty-five years. The firm accepts referrals
and co-counsel relationships in the following areas:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Commercial and General Civil Litigation
Business, Corporate and Transactional
Insurance Litigation and Coverage
Financing, Loans and Commercial Real Estate
Banking Law
Healthcare Law and Regulatory Compliance
Family Law
Estate Planning
Environmental Law
Employment
Appeals
For more information, please contact one of the firm’s members,
Ed Momkus, Jim McCluskey, Jim Marsh, Angelo Spyratos,
Kimberly Davis, or Jim Harkness.
1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 500, Lisle, IL 60532 • Tel: 630.434.0400 • Fax: 630.434.0444 • www.momlaw.com
221 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2050, Chicago, IL 60601 • Tel: 312.345.1955 • Fax: 312.419.1546 • www.momlaw.com
CLASSIFIEDS
EXPERIENCED FAMILY LAW
PARALEGAL/LEGAL ASSISTANT
NEEDED:
Naperville Law Firm seeking experienced
Family Law Paralegal/Legal Assistant with
practice in DuPage, Will and surrounding
counties to assist with:
1. Maintaining attorney’s calendars
2. Drafting correspondence
3. Maintaining client files
4. Drafting initial pleadings
5.Working with clients in gathering and
compiling financial information
6.Drafting discovery documents and responses
7.Drafting parenting plans, support orders of asset/liability spreadsheets
8. Assisting with trial preparation
9.Drafting pleadings and real property
transfer documents
Qualifications include attention to detail,
organization and problem solving, proficiency in Microsoft Word, and knowledge
of court procedure and local rules. The successful candidate also has a desire to work
in family law, verbal and written communication skills, the ability to prioritize, work
independently as well as in a team environment. Compensation is based upon experience. To be considered, please submit
a cover letter and resume. CONTACT
PERSON WILL BE: Junell Williams at
630-961-0060. Email: jwilliams@faylawfirm.com
LEGAL ASSISTANT/PARALEGAL
Civil litigation law firm in Geneva, IL seeks a
full-time legal assistant who is detail oriented and organized, has exceptional computer
skills plus strong interpersonal communications. Duties include dictation transcription, drafting correspondence, pleadings,
and discovery; maintain the firm’s docket
calendar; client contact; file management.
College degree preferred. Five years prior
civil litigation experience is required. Please
send resume to Attorneyresumes70@
gmail.com. All resumes accepted in confidence. We offer a competitive salary plus
full benefits.
LISLE - Executive Conference Room
WHEATON-FOR SALE:
Office condo at 104 E. Roosevelt Road,
Suite 204 across from Mariano’s in two-story building with other attorneys and accountants. 2,632 sq. ft., private offices,
conference room that opens to executive
suite, open area for multiple staffers, kitchen area, ample parking. Near train. Contact
Jeff Walker, J.R. Walker Inc., 630-4620075 or Dave McGowan, The DuPage
Community Foundation, 630-665-5556.
Asking $185/sq. ft. loopnet.com/listing/18746383
Available for meetings, depositions,
seminars, client interviews, etc. Can be
used as a mail drop by
prior arrangement.
• Located in a professional office building
on Rt. 53 in Lisle, next to River Bend Golf
Course
• Close to I-355 and I-88.
• Wireless broadband Internet connection
available.
• Use of common areas, including waiting
room and kitchenette.
• Ideal for attorneys, accountants, and other professionals.
• Terms $25 per hour or $125 per day.
ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE ALSO
AVAILABLE. (630) 960-0500 tman@irstax.com www.irstax.com
County Court Reporters, Inc.
600 S. County Farm Rd.
Suite 200B
Wheaton, IL 60187
www.countycourtreportersinc.net
ccr600@ameritech.net
630.653.1622
630.653.4119 (fax)
For the latest in Classified ads for jobs and office space available as well as resumes, check the website at dcba.org. If you are interested in placing an ad or submitting your resume, please contact Ann Martin at
amartin@dcba.org or call 630.653.7779 for more information.
46
DCBA BRIEF
January 24, 2015 — See page 48 for complete information
ADR Systems welcomes
Hon. F. Keith Brown, (Ret.)
ADR Systems is delighted to add
Hon. F. Keith Brown, (Ret.) to our
panel of mediators and arbitrators.
Former Chief Judge of Kane
County, Judge Brown has
extensive experience in settling
personal injury, workers’
compensation, and other civil
matters. As a mediator, Judge`
Brown is known for his keen
ability to easily connect with
people and promote productive
communications between all
parties. Judge Brown is a beloved
pillar of the community, who has
been recognized numerous times
for his community service.
312.960.2260
www.adrsystems.com
info@adrsystems.com
Hon. F. Keith Brown, (Ret.)
JA N UA RY 2 015
47
WHERE TO BE IN JANUARY
DCBA Mega Meeting
BY RALEIGH D. KALBFLEISCH
I
t’s that time of year again. Register
for the DCBA’s Annual Education
Day and “Mega Meeting”. The
Meeting is a daylong event to be held
on January 24, 2015 at the Sheraton in
Lisle located at 3000 Warrenville Road,
Lisle, IL. The Meeting includes several
programs for attendees and up to 5
hours of MCLE and PRMCLE credits.
The Meeting also offers the opportunity
to meet local exhibitors and network
with colleagues during the breakfast
(7:30 a.m. – 8:30 a.m.)
and Law Expo which
runs from 7:30 a.m. until
12:30 p.m..
The plenary program
from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. is
a presentation by Steven
J. Harper entitled “The
Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis.”
Mr. Harper is an attorney, author,
adjunct professor at Northwestern
University, and a regular contributor to
The American Lawyer — Am Law Daily.
For 30 years he was a litigator at the law
firm of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which he
joined upon graduation from Harvard
Law School (magna cum laude) and
Northwestern University (combined
B.A/M.A. degrees with distinction and
Phi Beta Kappa). He is a Fellow of the
American College of Trial Lawyers and
has been included in Chambers USA:
America’s Leading Lawyers for Business
and The Best Lawyers in America. Mr.
Harper has written four books, his latest, published in April 2013, is THE
LAWYER BUBBLE — A Profession in
Crisis. His award-winning blog, The
Belly of the Beast, was selected by the editors of the ABA Law Blawg as one of
the best blogs of 2010 out of more than
3,000 in its directory.
The morning sessions include
breakfast, the plenary program, two
morning programs and lunch. The
48
DCBA BRIEF
first sessions take place from 9:45 to
10:45 and attendees choose between
Bill Scott’s presentation Changes to
the IMDMA: Maintenance Statute – a
discussion of the recent changes to
the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution
of Marriage Act that goes into effect
in January of 2015, setting guidelines
for maintenance. He will discuss the
changes in the law, the application of
the statute, and its impact on existing
cases and the Honorable John Darrah,
Judge Thomas Hogan and Michael
Cetina’s presentation A Practitioners
Guide to Addressing Discovery Abuse-The
legal panel will discuss the broad implications of discovery abuse, techniques
for combating it, and how to preserve
the trial court record to address sanctions on appeal.
From 11:00 to 12:00 attendees
may choose between Carol Nolan,
Cynthia Hutchins and Katie May’s
presentation Case Studies of Autism and
Dementia and Tim Martin’s presentation Laying Foundations for Criminal
Trials. During lunch, from 12:15
to 1:00, new Chief Judge Kathryn
Creswell will give the State of the
Courthouse address.
The afternoon sessions include
lunch and two afternoon programs.
The first offerings take place from
1:15 to 2:15 and attendees can choose
between Steven Platt’s presentation,
Avoiding Worker Misclassification
Nightmares in Illinois — The recent
Federal Express case holding that all
of its drivers are employees, and not
independent contractors, should
serve as a wake-up call for employers
and independent contractors alike.
Alternately, you may select Allison
Wood’s presentation Five Things You
Must do to Ethically Close Your Law
Practice — The ARDC provides a
very comprehensive guide on what
you need to do (including checklists and forms), to transition your
law practice; and Rule 1.17 speaks
directly to your ethical obligations
in the sale of a law practice. This presentation
essentially draws from
many of these sources to
provide the highlights of
what you need to do to
ethically close or sell a law
practice.
From 2:30 to 3:30, programs offered are Real Estate Case Law Update
by Steven Bashaw and Joseph
Fortunato — In honor of Harold I.
Levine, the speakers will present a
comprehensive update of new case
law important to real estate practitioners. The other offering will be
Technology for the Trial Lawyer by Ed
Walsh — a discussion and demonstration of how technology can promote and enhance efficiency, communication, professionalism and success for the Trial Lawyer, both in the
office and the courtroom. Creative
uses of word processing, PDF document searching, digital deposition
transcript management, paperless
integrated case management, and the
creation, organization and use of digital trial exhibits will enhance your
life and your law practice.
Be sure to log into your DCBA account when registering to receive $100
off the non-member rate at each registration level. No refunds will be given
without 48 hours’ notice. □
3 ,0 0 0,0 0 0 p o l i c i es i n 5 0 y e a r s .
L aw y e r s p r o t e c t i n g c o n s u m e r s .
O n e t r a n s a c t i o n at a t i m e .
In the midst of celebrating our 50th year, we issued our three millionth policy.
Congratulations to homeowners William “Billy” and Jill Thompson of Oglesby, Illinois, and to the ATG
attorney-member who issued the policy, Dick Fiocchi (far left) of Bernabei, Balestri & Fiocchi, Spring Valley,
Illinois. Congratulating Billy and Jill are ATG President Peter Birnbaum (second from left) and ATG Senior
Vice President, Jerry Gorman, far right.
These homeowners and this ATG member represent what we strive for every day:
Protecting the investment of every homeowner,
and preserving the lawyer’s role in the process.
For 50 years.
800.252.0402 | www.atgf.com | atginfo@atgf.com
Presort Standard
U.S. Postage
PAID
Permit #1372
Carol Stream, IL

Volume 27 Issue 4 January 2015 - DuPage County Bar Association

Transcription

Similar documents

Lane Lacoy AUCTION

Accents On-Line - Illinois Council on the Teaching of Foreign

APAPCD - Association of Middle

dauphin county bar association august, 2015 - Dcba

dauphin county bar association july, 2015 - Dcba

DCBA MARCH Newsletter - Dcba

open Office Overview Brochure

dauphin county bar association may, 2015 - Dcba

orl/ii*ot

Consumer Fraud Complaint - Sacramento County District Attorney

It`s The Worst - DuPage County Bar Association