WOMEN`S EDITION
Transcription
WOMEN`S EDITION
THARUNKA UNSW STUDENT PUBLICATION ISSUE SEVEN VOLUME 57 WOMEN’S EDITION Editorial What is the measure of a feminist? Many of us have alluded to this topic in our writing for this edition. Do you have to be female? Are you a better feminist if you have attended fifty rallies or protests than someone who has attended one? Does amount of bodily hair give you some greater authority in feminist discussions? Feminists come in all different shapes and sizes. I have been inspired and continue to be inspired by every feminist I meet, even those I disagree with. We all have different experiences, and therefore very different notions of what feminism is and what aspects of feminism are most important. This causes divisions within the movement. Having to prove your experience, or justify ‘how feminist’ you are is a ridiculous concept. Having criteria is even more so. Elena Jeffries uses my favourite term for this, tragedy porn, feeding off the disadvantage of others by craving the details of such disadvantage. Feminists need to stop condemning other feminists, and broader society needs to stop trying to put feminists into neat little boxes, this is the antithesis of feminism! Women aren’t neat little boxes. Women aren’t necessarily feminists. Consider your assumptions, some of my favourite men are feminists, some of my favourite feminists don’t attend every protest, and some of my favourite feminists have cottoned on to the invention of the razor. Not so neat, we are the ‘difficult’ women and men, as proudly noted by the wonderful Eva Cox. Contents Regulars Comments & Letters Short List Reviews Lizzette the Agony Aunt OB Reports Readings NOWSA Law Firm Sidelines Women Feminism in the Bush When Choices & Realities Don’t Match Up Where are all the Young Feminists? In Defence of Slutwalk The House of Merivale Words Playing Mother 04 06 26 29 30 08 11 12 13 14 16 18 23 27 Fiction Three Poems My Skin Golden Gate Bridge 10 19 22 Images Freak Show 24 Editorial Team Kylar Loussikian, Cameron McPhedran, Elizabeth Stern Guest Editor Kimberley Lowe Designer Cara Mia Maritz Contributors Kimberley Lowe, Jasmin Kelaita, Tim Kaliyanda, Sarah Frazier, Chally, Cameron McPhedran, Bethan Donnelly, Hexy, Jacqueline Palaje, Amber Karanikolas, Anisha Guatam, Tayylor Leon, Emilie Auton, Elizabeth Stern Contact tharunka@arc.unsw.edu.au PO Box 173, Kingsford, NSW, 2032 Office Level 1 Blockhouse, Lower Campus. Office Hours: Tuesday 3 - 5 pm. Tharunka acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land on which the University now stands. Tharunka is published periodically by Arc @ UNSW. The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of Arc, the Representative Council or the Tharunka editing team. i Comments & Letters j Where is the Women’s Room? Why isn’t there a Men’s Space on campus? The Women’s Room is located on the 1st floor of the Blockhouse. The entire campus is a Men’s Space except for this one small room. Removing the Women’s Room or adding a Men’s Space directly attacks the right of women to autonomously organise away from the influence and overpowering voices of men. Women’s Rooms are often the only place where discussions and organising around issues that directly and mostly affect women. Calls for Men’s Spaces have always, in my experience, been raised in a direct opposition to the Women’s Space. What is the Women’s Room? The Women’s Room is a safe space for women on campus to meet and organise campaigns autonomously, to get information related to gendered issues and to generally relax and take a break from the busy and noisy world around us. We have facilities such as a microwave, refrigerator, bed, computer, and hot water for your favourite flavoured tea. Why is there a Women’s Room on campus? Despite many gains, women in 2011 still face oppression and discrimination that are gender based. Until very recently only 93% of military jobs were open to women and many other organisations within Australia are exempt from federal anti-sex discrimination legislation. Women still earn less than men in their fields and in gendered work, overwhelmingly represent victims of violence and sexual abuse, and make up miserable numbers in parliament, on boards, and in managerial roles. The existence of a Women’s Room is a recognition that these structural oppressions still exist. It provides a space for women to autonomously organise in an environment that exists outside of patriarchal constraints. Women can work independently of men and allow their voices to be heard on gendered issues. 04 | Tharunka Why isn’t there a Men’s Officer? While men possess a gender, there are not structures in place that cause them to be oppressed by that gender. We do not see a need for a Men’s Officer for men to autonomously organise around any issue that may affect them. Men can use any space on campus, any men can organise, and there is no need for a Men’s Officer that will detract from the importance of having a Women’s Officer. “If the masses of men in our society have not unlearned their sexism, have not abdicated male privilege, then it should be obvious that a men’s movement led only by men with only males participating runes the risk of mirroring in a different form much that is already oppressive in patriarchal culture.” i Short List j Randwick Council announced a prefeasibility study to consider patronage of a light rail route that would follow Anzac Parade from Flinders Street before turning down High Street, in a move the Sydney Morning Herald reports will influence a state goivernment study that may lead to light rail in the eastern suburbs. Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian had previously announced the Department of Transport was working on a light rail proposal, including an extension through to Dulwich Hill. Eight universities began piloting a project which will see standardised peer reviewing of teaching and disciplines. The Australian reported that ANU, Charles Darwin, Griffith, La Trobe, Macquarie, QUT, Melbourne and UWS took on the project, which involves ‘blind’ peer reviews of student assessments and curriculum, as well as assessment tasks and marking criteria. The Group of Eight universities are trialing a similar scheme. The Australian also reported Melbourne University vice-chancellor Glyn Davis has warned that Australia’s egalitarian culture was holding back universities by limiting their ability to seek work fame and glory. Davis compared the culture at Australian tertiary institutions to those of Korea, China and France, where there is an anxiety on producing world-class universities of note. However, RMIT’s vice-chancellor, Margaret Gardener, told the same universities forum that Australia’s small scale meant a world-class university system would be more meaningful than a world-class university. report showed that one in seven adults have subsequently obtained vocational qualifications after completing a university degree. The LH Martin Institute reported pressure to perform well in research audits and international rankings has meant Australian universities have continued to divert funding from other programs into research areas. The report found research was often subsidised by fees and other income derived from teaching, but was spent instead on research. Further, domestic students and university research are being heavily subsidised by international students. The report attributed this discrepancy to the need to score well in international rankings for the overseas student market. The 2011 James Dyson design award has been awarded to FBE graduate Chris Fox for a self-inflating life jacket. Fox said he realised that he’d be vulnerable if knocked unconscious if kite-boarding kilometres off shore in windy conditions. A new study showed the number of Australians holding at least one postschool qualification has increased from fifty four percent in 2001 to sixty two percent in 2009. The report also showed higher proportions of the population had multiple qualifications, and eleven percent of vocational certificate holders continued into higher education. However, the 05 | Tharunka 12 Calendar FASS’s annual Postgraduate Evening will this year focusing on Masters by Research or PhD applicants. “Challenge Your Mind, Advance Your Career” will include an opportunity to discuss research interests with the faculty staff, amongst other things. “Challenge Your Mind, Advance Your Career” will take place September 19 at AGSM Building G27. For more information contact FASS at 9385 8511. The India Research Network and the Australia India Council present Associate Professor Charu Gupta of Delhi University in a talk entitled “(De) Stabilising Patriarchies: Gender and Hindu Reforms in Colonial India”. The talk will include discussion of reforms revolving around the veil, obscenity, education and widow remarriage in colonial north India.” “(De) Stabilising Patriarchies: Gender and Hindu Reforms in Colonial India” will take place August 9, Morven Brown 112, from 12pm. Evelyn Conlon will read from her works on how we miss places in the Global Irish Studies lecture “The Meaning of Missing”. Conlon, a writer-in-residence at University College Dublin, will also discuss where fiction adds to history, and will look at why she wrote ‘A Glassful of Letters’. She will be introduced by Dr Pamela O’Neill. “The Meaning of Missing” will take place August 19, Robert Webster 327, from 6pm. The Paul Bourke Lecture, hosted by the Academy of the Social Sciences Australia this year presents the topic “Workforce worries: the changing worlds of HIV medicine and general practicioner’s who provide it”. Dr Christy Newman of the National Centre in HIV Social Research, will present the talk on August 19, Scientia Tyree Room, from 6pm. To RSVP and for further information, contact the Academy of the Social Sciences Australia at 6249 1788. The “Emergency Shelters” exhibition will feature pre-made shelters by leading Australian architecture firms, and hopes to bring awareness to the public about the role of the design and construction industry in the aftermath of natural disasters. The exhibition is free, but donations can be made toward reconstruction in Japan. “Emergency Shelters” will be held September 1 to 3 at Customs House, Circular Quay. For more information contact Jun Sakaguchi on 9385 5280. 06 | Tharunka FBE presents the next Utzon Lecture entitled “Going Green: Risks and Opportunities”, to be presented by Martin Loosemore. This lecture will include detials on ‘how consulting and contracting firms in the construction and engineering industry, both large and small, can innovate to translate sustainability into improved business performance. It seeks to untangle the rhetoric from the reality of the sustainability debate by exploring both its opportunities and risks. Drawing perspectives from the social and behavioural sciences, psychology, economics, politics and philosophy, the presentation argues that the key to a more sustainable built environment industry is a more balanced debate and a open and collaborative industry which draws from a more liberal knowledge-base and seeks new integrated business configurations through supply and demand chains.’ “Going Green: Risks and Opportunities” will be held August 10, at Keith Burrows Theatre from 7pm. Refreshments will be available at Red Centre West Wing Gallery from 6.15pm. Chalk Horse presents the work of COFA gradates David Capra, John Douglas, Kate Michell and Christian Thompson in a group exhibition entitled “Nothing is True, Everything is Permitted”. The exhibition ‘presents a space where causality and actuality are abandoned in favor of limitless possibilities of action, and will be showing until August 13 at Chalk Horse, 8 Lacey Street Surry Hills, Tuesday to Saturday 11am - 6pm. Tharunka will purchase drinks for the reader who is best at decoding this most ambiguous artist statement into words of meaning. The Paper Mill presents Alia Parker, Laura Pike and Anne-Louise Dadak in an exhibition entitled “Known/Unknown” as part of Sydney Design 2011. Works from these COFA graduates can be seen until August 13 at The Paper Mill, Ash Street near Angel Place, Tuesday to Friday 11am - 6pm, Saturday 11am - 5pm. Sam Smith builds on his video piece “Cameraman” by ‘bringing the objects out from the screen and into the gallery space’. “Cameraman” is on display until August 20 at Grantpirrie, 86 George Street Redfern, Tuesday to Friday 10am - 6pm, Saturday 11am - 5pm. Kudos Gallery presents a group exhibition, featuring the works of David Capra, Katherine Corcoran, Ashleigh Garwood, Adam Gibson, Talitha Klevjer and others. “Art Through the Ages: The Bog From Whence We Came” responds to the idea of art as the everyday, and runs from August 17 to 20 at Kudos Gallery, 6 Napier Street Paddington, Wednesday to Friday 11am 6pm, Saturday 11am - 4pm. “Do The Worm”, a new group show at Kudos Gallery, ‘aims to give audience members a new appreciation of worms and through worms, their own bodies. Artist/pedagogues will create works and experiences for the audience’, and runs from August 24 to 27, Wednesday to Friday 11am - 6pm, Saturday 11am - 4pm. The National Institute for Experimental Arts presents the Experimental Arts Double Conference, showcasing and discussing innovative artrs projects in Australia, ‘including works that have successfully ‘changed the world’ as well as speculative initiatives that radically change the way we think. It will survey the results and potential of Experimental Arts, inviting leaders in the field to discuss how we can extend and support a platform for path-breaking experimentation.’ The conference will be held in Scientia from August 17 to 20. Cost and registration information can be found on the NIEA website, 12 Staying Green with Ivana Stab I must sincerely apologise for my absence in the previous issue of Tharunka. A special, heartfelt apology to my number one fan Gabriella, who has inspired the theme of this issue’s column – repetition. Before I started smoking weed, I expected the experience would lead to a creative orgasm. Like my favourite artists, I would be inspired to the limits of my talents, waking up the morning after to a pile of loose papers scribbled with barely legible text that would catapult me to literary stardom. This was of course when I was a young idealist, years before a politics major killed my ideals and my ambition for anything other than money and power. Weed has now become the great neutraliser. In an attempt to salvage my metaphorical soul from the lure of power suits and incurable cynicism, I’ve taken a break from my studies to enjoy the stoner life. What can I say, I’m dedicated to this column. In any other frame of mind, my current lifestyle choices may have made me think twice. But as it stands, the daily routine of late-afternoon wake-ups, breakfast cones, pre-work joints, postwork cones and bedtime pipes works just fine. Pineapple Express three nights in a row is still as funny, the same pizza from the same pizza place that delivers all night tastes just right, the same column every fortnight is still a good little filler. Kind regards, Karl Lagerfeld 07 | Tharunka NOWSA By Kimberley Lowe T he Network of Women Students Australia was established in 1987, founded on ideals of creating a grassroots, autonomous network concerned with issues that impact women and women students. NOWSA provides a platform for women’s organising across universities and in the wider community through resource, skill and knowledge sharing both in conference and through web branches of the network. The network continues to shift, grow and change, but constantly places feminist agenda at the forefront. Women of all ages, sexuality, ability and experience have the opportunity to be involved. The UNSW SRC Women’s Department bid for the opportunity to host the Network of Women Students Australia Conference for 2011. We were successful in this endeavour and have been hard at work planning, booking key speakers and workshops, and organising some fun-filled evening events. All of our hard work came to fruition in the week of July 11th – 16th. The week kicked off rather lazily as many tired women had travelled from Perth and Albury from Education Conference, Queer Collaborations and Students of Sustainability Conferences. Despite a late start on the opening morning the conference Aunty Ali Golding’s welcome to country ceremony was received warmly, and watching her and Eva Cox play off each other as the opening speakers was an honour and a privilege. Eva spoke of how feminists need to take a leaf out of the book of aboriginal communities in their collective approach to organisation and decision-making. She said the failings of her generation were two-fold: first the lack of organising across different experiences and second the focus on making incremental changes rather than focusing on changing the cultural mindset of Australians on women’s equality. The first day continued successfully with Gabe Kavanagh discussing how to engage more young women in the feminist movement 08 | Tharunka and Penny O’Donnell and Rosarela Meza shocked all participants with the rates of gender-based murders in South America. The workshops were also highly successful, with rave reviews about ‘Writing Feminism’ hosted by Chally (http://zeroatthebone.wordpress.com/). With spirits high we set off to the Whitehouse, now known to every other university woman from across Australia as the hipster-bar, and our only achievement in student life according to the National Union of Students. A jovial night of pizzas, punchbowls and falafel balls were had by all, particularly by our fearless UNSW SRC leader, Osman Faruqi. The second day continued the stream of engaging speakers, with Natalie Lang from the Australian Services Union, Kate Minter of UnionsNSW and Tish Sparkle and Zahra Stardust of Scarlet Alliance. Every woman in attendance became more informed about work choices and the role of unions in pushing the feminist agenda, as well as a highly awaited Scarlet Alliance presentation which focused on women in sex work and the sex industry, and looking at female sexuality in positive ways. The Equality Rights Alliance Youth Advisory workshop, entitled ‘Technology, Social Media and Feminism’, hosted the flavour of the day. Half way into the week and half way into the fun of a student conference. A heavy day focusing on rape, assault, prejudice, and women whose strength have overcome these barriers and advocated for positive attitudes towards our gender. Nina Funnell of NSW Rape Crisis and UNSW PhD student, Tashina Orchiston and Isobelle Barrett-Meyering of Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse, and Annaleise Constable of ACON. This eclectic group of experiences was awe-inspiring. Nina has definitely gained a fan club, with her workshop on ‘Positive Consent’ an absolute hit with university women Australia-wide. A small group of women relaxed after a very thought-provoking day with a movie night featuring Made In Dagenham, a representation of the first female strikes in the 60s at the Ford factory in England. Tired women graciously got themselves out of bed bright and early to get to the second-last day of a mentally exhausting week. Thursday brought to the table discussions about identities and bodies. A number of student activists spoke to experiences of disability and sexuality. The Women’s Abortion Action Campaign spoke about reproductive rights, particularly in a post-Cairns case environment. The standardization of laws pertaining to a woman’s right to choose across all states is an aim of this campaign group. We ended our conference with a night on the town, including delicious food from Chinatown, and even tastier drinks in Newtown. Perhaps the drinks weren’t the best idea for organizers having to host the day on Friday for the grueling process of resolutions and bidding. However, we got through the day with the Network of Women Students Australia agreeing to take more proactive measures to be trans* inclusive, to be more environmentally sustainable, to be more sensitive to caucus groups, to be more inclusive of indigenous Australians, and to take a harsh stance against the aggressive calls for men’s spaces and officers on campus. These will be supported by Women’s Department campaigns and policy in the coming year. To bid farewell to our new friends from far and wide we hosted a vegan BBQ and celebrated an end to a fabulous week again at our favourite hipster bar, the Whitehouse with punchbowls, cocktails and naughty scrabble. To get involved with the Network of Women Students Australia you can visit: www.nowsa.com.au or http://www. facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_10922 2231611&ref=ts 09 | Tharunka Three Poems By Jasmin Kelaita Sickly Swallows The Play In Creative congenial and grey perspectival at best, thick as butter; glued on my face, my skin reels. seated, envelope on the ground, tinsel all through the air. From here after we go. in creative it is assumed of course. your heart sits like a glace cherry on my cake! I eat it all I find I find I find I find I find. and and that is all I have. 10 | Tharunka wont you go? I go and all is well are you well? yes, I am very well and the rest at rest. all the best thank you, thank you and to create is to create and all falls on the floor pick it up, pile it on and so therefore my friend, conjure up, vomit it all up and write your dwindling notes all day oh no! too rough? don't be gruff, in creative its apparent the time is to play. Law Firm Sidelines Women By Tim Kaliyanda L ast year a study by a leading Sydney newspaper confirmed a revealing truth; Australia’s prestigious law firms remain the stamping ground of old, rich, white men. The study of the nation’s biggest, most powerful law firms found that the proportion of equity partnerships held by women is less than 20%. Yes, that’s right, less than one in five partners in law firms are women, and the numbers are getting smaller. These abominable statistics are more representative of an archaic society where women remain relegated to the status of secondary citizens, than a purportedly advanced, liberal country like Australia. At UNSW, a casual stroll through our Law Building makes two things abundantly clear; the Law Faculty gets way too much funding and 2. women make up a hell of a lot more than twenty percent of law students. So why are there so few women leading law firms despite scores of young female graduates entering the workforce each year? Michael Bradley, managing partner of a city-based law firm, surmises there are “still a lot of unreconstructed chauvinists out there”. You think? Like any industry dominated by males there’s no question of the widespread prevalence of sexist attitudes and personal insecurity, but that certainly can’t be the only reason why the stats are so poor. Bradley thinks it could also be convenience. “It’s just much more convenient to promote people who don’t have other things to deal with, people who don’t have kids or don’t have other interests... who don’t have to go home at 5pm.” The ‘career versus family’ dilemma is borne of traditional attitudes struggling with the changing role of women in work and society. It’s high time concrete steps were taken to ensure that a work-life balance doesn’t remain the unattainable goal it currently is for many women, but becomes a basic legal condition of employment. Even Prime Minister Gillard has acknowledged that she faced a trade off between pursuing her legal and political career and having a family. Hopefully she abandons the empty rhetoric of ‘progressive change’ and takes decisive action on the issue while she can (the latest poll will probably have her poll numbers in the negative by the time this hits the printers!). Recently, the Commissioner for Sex Discrimination, Elizabeth Broderick, boldly suggested that some of the dinosaurs currently running law firms ought to be forcibly dragged into the modern age through quotas, affirmative action and structural reform to redress the serious gender imbalances that exist. Either way, the focus really must be on correcting the flaws of a profession that is so hopelessly trapped in the past. In order to create a level playing field so anyone can rise to the top of his or her field, regardless of gender, we need a family friendly working environment. That is the sort of working environment today’s decision makers, industry leaders and governments should strive to create - an environment worthy of the best and brightest law students UNSW has to offer. Tharunka’s Social Media Cocktail Party 11 | Tharunka Feminism in the Bush By Sarah Frazier I f you had asked me when I was in year twelve if I was a feminist I probably would have replied with scorn and swear words. I would have assumed you were accusing me of being some radical hippie who wears hemp and writes letters to newspapers. Unfortunately I was stuck in a rural community near Tamworth, where feminism is worse than that other f-word. That’s not to say feminism isn’t present in our community. Of course it is, just behind closed doors and in a select few pockets of the community. It’s uncommon for people to openly identify themselves as feminists or speak openly about issues relating to feminism. The most outspoken, independent and progressive woman I know is probably my mother. When I asked if she was a feminist, she told me that she hadn’t really thought about it. This is the common thread within our community; the women who are closely aligned with feminist culture often don’t realise it and therefore don’t associate with it. Unfortunately, these women are a minority within our community; the majority follows the status quo that is the tradition of the country. When I think of a big group of women in the bush getting together and talking about issues, I think of the CWA (Country Women’s Association). Those of you who know the CWA will cringe; those of you who don’t might have seen a representation of it on a commercial for ham recently. What began as a worthy organisation to fight for facilities for regional areas has now disintegrated into baking competitions and idle gossip. Feminism is alive and well amongst 12 | Tharunka these ladies, whose idea of independence is choosing what their husbands eat for dinner. Then there are the charming representations of country life portrayed on our TV screens. There’s that great show that encourages the empowerment of women, “The Farmer Wants a Wife.” Women from the city are bussed in to fight for a farmer’s affection through a series of grueling tasks. But don’t worry, it’s all equal – last year they included a female farmer! Country music isn’t just Slim Dusty and songs about beer. There are countless songs about a woman’s role within the home, but one has certainly stuck with me. “Knocked up, shame shame, I’m going to ruin my family’s name.” What is this saying to young women? One of the most tangible examples of the culture in regional areas is Facebook, especially with our youth. We’ve all got those friends who feel the need to join every group that remotely describes them because it’s so shocking that as a species we occasionally behave the same way. Lucky enough for me, the vast majority of my friends who do this come from the country. This made it rather easy to find some similarities in the pages that they were joining. Most of the females were joining pages that described helplessness when relating to males. A few worthy examples include “Loving you is my favourite mistake,” “Find a guy who calls you beautiful instead of hot” and “I text you because I miss you, when I don’t I’m waiting for you to miss me.” These are bad enough, but the ones the males liked were worse. They included “I dumped my last girlfriend because she made a bad sandwich,” “Not letting a lesbian have a banana because she made her choice” and “Swapping your girlfriend’s tampon with a party popper while she sleeps.” We’ve all joined the odd group because it was ironic, but that’s not the case here. Day after day, people are joining these groups, and it’s always my country friends. Finally, there are the personal experiences that I’ve had in the country. It’s not just the sexist jokes I’ve heard, but the behaviour I’ve witnessed or been subjected to. All to often I’ve seen victim blaming occur. In hindsight I’m shocked by it all, but at the time it seemed normal. There is just a general sense of disrespect towards women by the majority of the youth in our community. After this depressing spiel about the state of the country, where does this leave us? What can we do about it? Now that Oprah’s finished her run on our screens, maybe the women of the country will band together with that extra hour they have after making lunch. Or maybe they’ll just start the washing up sooner. In the country we have two common sayings; “don’t fix what ain’t broke” and “I can’t make a difference.” These attitudes are working against our feminists in the country, but we must challenge them. We can make a difference. I challenge sexist jokes, I’m not silent on victim blaming, I speak about women’s issues. There are changes we can make in our everyday lives that can make a difference. When Choices & Realities Don’t Match Up By Chally A s a feminist activist, I have a governing principle I try to keep in mind: while women have a common cause, our life circumstances are disparate. Feminism, then, can’t be a one size fits all enterprise. It has to take into account the principle of intersectionality, as popularised by US sociologist Patricia Hill Collins. That is, the oppression faced by a queer white sex worker is going to be quite different to that a disabled woman of colour experiences. People are different, and different responses to oppression are necessary. This is why the framing of choice, and just about any part of feminist dialogue, around binaries doesn’t work for women like me. My favourite example of this is the great surname conundrum. If one is a woman marrying a man, as many a feminist will tell you, it’s feminist to keep one’s birth surname. Supposedly, there’s a feminist choice, and there’s a non-feminist choice, and it’s that cut and dried. Simplistic and shallow thinking like that makes me grind my teeth. The thing is, surnames weren’t a feature in my culture until white people decided to force us into their economic structures and social norms. (Not to mention that, well, I don’t really understand how maintaining a patrilineal surname is any more feminist than taking a husband’s, but that’s by the by.) I’ve changed my surname to one of my own choosing – not because I got married! – but it didn’t feel like a particularly powerful action. That’s because I was still participating in an enforced cultural practice. I’d rather not have a surname at all: what does the naming binary opposition have to offer me? And what of the women who change their surnames to their husbands’ in order to escape abusive families? What about queer women who can’t legally get married? Women are not ticky boxes. And when the only “correct” ticky box available caters to the women with the most normative lives, we’ve got to wonder precisely what a social justice movement is doing pushing out the people at the bottom of the pile. In instances like this, feminism is only catering to the most privileged of women, and implicitly framing only some of us as real women worthy of the movement’s time. It’s irritating and upsetting when we’re talking about names, but it’s life-threatening in other situations. I’m thinking particularly of the popular reduction of reproductive justice to abortion rights. Abortion rights are vitally important, but that’s not the whole story. I think about how my non-white and disabled sisters have been forced to have abortions and sterilised because they have been thought to be bad mother material or to have bad genes. Reproductive justice, we should remember, is about the right to reproduce, too. When we reduce the dialogue to just one matter, we erase terrible histories. Specific women are constituted in specific ways. Squashing that diversity doesn’t feel like social justice. It closely replicates the tendency towards normativity that feminists are supposed to be challenging. All up, whether we’re talking names or bodily autonomy, binaristic choice structures aren’t the way to approach feminism. We have whole lives, and we are whole people. 13 | Tharunka Where are all the Young Feminists? By Kimberley Lowe O ver 40 years since Germaine Greer published The Female Eunuch and the second-wave rolled across the globe, the image of feminism has descended from a relevant, mainstream social justice movement to a nostalgic memory or an unclear cultural reference point. What’s more is that the perceptions of feminists leave much to be desired and are surely a contributor as to why more young women do not readily identify themselves with this label. Gloria Steinem, a prominent American feminist, commented that feminism “is a revolution, not a public relations movement,” but with such a bad reputation as a movement, particularly in the minds of young people, it feels as though feminists everywhere should be employing the help of a good PR team. So, as a young feminist, I did some social media market research on the topic, and the findings were unfortunately predictable - that feminists everywhere are irrelevant, lonely, lesbian, hairy, bra-burning, manhating spinsters from the 60s. The media has done little to quell this opinion. Elle McPherson, when asked by Guardian reporters what she thought of the word ‘feminist’ explained, “It’s one of those coined phrases that has a lot of innuendo and not much meaning these days.” She furthered this by providing her opinion on equal rights for men and women stating, “I believe men and women are different and they have different needs, therefore the concept of equal rights doesn’t really sit with me in many ways.” As an icon for young women this does not inspire them to fight for equal pay, equal marriage rights, to not allow victim blaming, and a whole canon of social 14 | Tharunka justice issues that feminists of yesteryear have fought for, and feminists today still agitate for. Miss Universe 2009, Stefania Fernandez in the question and answer portion of ‘quality’ television viewing proposed that women have overcome all barriers to equality and have “reached the level men are at.” A young woman, hailing from South America, where femicides (murders based on gender) are committed in the thousands annually, coupled with rape and torture, where women move away from their homes and their children to work in lawless areas for less than minimum wage, and where women are treated as second class citizens in a patriarchal society. It is these opinions of visible females such as Elle and Stefania that send out a clear message to feminists of the past and women of the present, thanks for all the marches, the hours spent on witty placards and the bra-burning demonstrations, but feminism is all a bit archaic and irrelevant these days – the battle is won. This argument creates the constant struggle within feminist groups to engage the wider population, both women and men, in getting gender back on the agenda, and getting more young people to stand up against attacks that are gender based. For many women the workplace is where the question of equality is most clearly manifested. Women make up just over 50% of the Australian population and yet we fall behind abysmally in leadership and decision-making positions, evident in that fewer than 2% of ASX 200 companies have a female CEO and only 1 in 12 board directors are women. But let’s be serious, how many times has a woman traded in skirts for trousers, politeness for aggressive cutthroat behaviour, in a ‘walk like a man, talk like a man’ mentality for success. The trade off of gendered behaviour to get into high positions is hardly a win for our sex. We are fed myths as children, that any person can do anything that they set their mind to. As children we do not consider prejudices and privileges that exist within a patriarchal structure. For young people to actually buy the product of feminism we must recognise there is a structural disadvantage that creates inequality, and that women are still the lesser – the lesser paid, lesser represented, and the lesser role in global political and economic forces. All of these discrepancies in equality and yet young feminists are few and far between. The evidence is in the income, under the last Coalition governments WorkChoices the pay gap increased for the first time in 25 years. Women have been sitting on an 18% discrepancy with their male counterparts since then, which is what the ACTU and ASU are fighting to minimize. Currently NSW is the only state that is not putting money on the table to make changes to improve this situation. All of this may stir you in minimal ways, or perhaps you might sympathise and think that the gendered pay gap is not relevant to a university student, and you would be mistaken. Women in the full time workforce earned on average 82.5% of the wage men in similar positions did last year. Women, making up over 50% of alumni, will on average earn $2000 a year less than their male counterparts once they trade up the essays for employment. This is gendered workplace discrimination, a feminist issue, and an issue for all female students who intend to put their degree to good use in the future. Internationally Australia is lagging behind as indicated by the Global Gender Gap Index between 2006 and 2010. This report measures the gender parity in terms of economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment and political empowerment. In 2006 Australia ranked 15th, in 2009 we slipped dramatically to 20th place behind Lesotho, Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago, and in the latest report we have seen another drop, ranking 23rd, adding Mozambique to the list of countries that have more female political figures, more women in decision-making roles, women earning fairer wages for the work they do, and more women gaining equitable educational opportunities. The report shows a growth in the gender gap over time. This hardly reinforces the argument of ‘the battle is won’ that has been used to shoot down the relevance of current feminism for years. New research is showing it does not get better as we get older either. When women reach retirement age they are not as financially secure as men due to lower levels of superannuation. Elena Rosenmann is currently researching the phenomenon of higher rates of homelessness in elderly women, directly linked to this financial insecurity. Student apathy is something that all young activists are complaining about, however complacency is a factor in why feminism today does not see the successes of our foresisters. The recent SlutWalks, despite many issues raised by feminists, are a prime example of how to shake such apathy. More young people, included young males, marched the streets of Australia to say no to victim blaming. Everyone involved was a feminist, at least for a few hours. It will take many more young women and men to stand up to these injustices and unleash the feminist within to help overcome the barriers of a patriarchal society. These are not women’s issues; they are social and cultural attitudes that must be tackled by the entire human race. So proudly wear those feminist slogan tee’s, don’t be silent when someone normalises traditionally derogatory terms for women, keep an eye out for how to get involved and ensure that you will get equal pay for equal work, that your case will be taken seriously by a police officer if you happen to be one of the 1 in 10 university women that will be sexually assaulted as a student, and that your gender will not determine whether you or your classmate gets the job at the end of your degree. 15 | Tharunka In Defence of Slutwalk By Cameron McPhedran “I demand the independence of women, The right to support herself, To live for herself, To love whoever she pleases and as many as she pleases, I demand freedom for both sexes, Freedom in action, freedom in love and freedom in motherhood,” E mma Goldman, Lithuanian-American anarchist, formative feminist and political dissident. Slutwalk is a global feminist movement which reached Sydney one wet and windy day this Queen’s Birthday long weekend. Like the weather that day, its reception among many eminent social commentators has been cold. In Britain, Gail Dines and Wendy Murphy have argued that Slutwalk has made “life harder for girls who are trying to navigate their way through…adolescence.” Given their belief that the construction of women’s sexuality in terms of a madonna/whore dichotomy is beyond redress, Slutwalk purportedly means these girls will be under greater pressure to actualise the whore archetype. In Australia, Guy Rundle has argued that Slutwalk has detracted from the validity and longevity of the Reclaim the Night movement, which was part of second wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Finally, others have critiqued how Slutwalk has been largely driven by dominant discourses of feminism which have not adequately incorporated the experiences of women of colour, thus further entrenching social difference. In spite of these purported shortcomings, Slutwalk remains indisputably an important political and social movement. Firstly, Slutwalk has served to highlight the institutional shortcomings in the treatment of sexual assault offences. The law acts in symbiosis with social values, and can reinforce or resist dominant social beliefs. Therefore the problematic manner in which sexual 16 | Tharunka assault is dealt with at many stages of the criminal process, such as reporting, investigation and trial, effectively undermines those social campaigns which aim to end the condoning of sexual assault offences. Slutwalk started after a Toronto police officer stated “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimised,” thus normalising the perception that women have to selfregulate their behaviour and dress choices rather than placing the onus on men to respect their sexual autonomy. Indeed, a study by the White Ribbon Foundation found that one in seven teenage boys thought it was okay to hold a girl down and have sex with if she has flirted or ‘led you on.’ Such problematic constructions of sexual behaviour flow through to the low proportion of sexual offences reporting in most Western criminal justice systems and low conviction rates of, as little as 7% in Britain. By bringing these issues into the mainstream media, Slutwalk promotes both law reform and social dialogue in this area. More broadly, Slutwalk also acts to question the manner in which ubiquitous legal paradigms operate. The rule of law attempts to ensure the equal treatment of all individuals before the law while the ‘reasonable person’ standard aims for objectivity in interpreting and applying legal doctrine. However, the treatment of women in the processing of sexual assault suggests that such standards are actually prejudiced by a patriarchal norm. Women are also frequently disadvantaged by the application of the criminal defence of provocation. In the case of Heather Osland, the defendant Osland was convicted of murdering her husband after over thirteen years of rape and abuse while her son was acquitted of all charges despite having allegedly struck the mortal blow. Similarly, it is clear that the law operates in a heterosexist manner. In NSW and Queensland, the homosexual “Words become tools of oppression and we need to draw a line before violence and oppression- that is what we need to stop.” - Lee Rhiannon at Slutwalk Sydney, Monday June 13, 2011. advance defence remains an applicable criminal defence despite the fact that when “defendants who kill in response to homosexual advances are not convicted of murder, courts and juries reinforce the notion that homosexuality is culpable behaviour and that gay men do not deserve the respect and protection of the criminal justice system.” The interconnections of injustice based upon normative gender conceptions revealed here as well as other factors which impact upon social and legal outcomes such as class and ethnicity also show the social relevance of Slutwalk. While the Reclaim the Night movements advocated for by Rundle remain evident today in Australia in places such as the Illawarra, they only allow female participants and have traditionally prescribed certain types of clothing for the marches (typically drab and formless). Hence those women who choose to enact their sexual autonomy differently to these prescriptions as well as male allies have their political voice vitiated. The latter is also pertinent when considering that just as women are victims of sexual violence, so too are those who identify as male, transsexual and intersex. In terms of internal power dynamics, accusations regarding the silencing of social groups such as women of colour in Slutwalk need to be taken seriously and redressed through an internal discourse regarding racial privilege. However, as oppression is both multifaceted and interconnected, including a greater diversity of voices in a dialogue about how to overcome it will ultimately be highly efficacious. Slutwalk Sydney was a successful event in that it empowered and provided leadership to many groups whose voices are generally drowned out in our Anglocentric, patriarchal, heterosexist society. Along with all of the speakers at the rally outside Surry Hills Police Station being female identifying, Scarlet Alliance played a strong role in organising the event. This body represents Australian sex workers, not only a group greatly affected by sexual violence, but one which is all too frequently politically silenced. Lastly, the unifying theme in all these critiques of Slutwalk is paradoxically the most important reason why it should be supported. Social norms regarding gender roles and performativity remain strongly entrenched dynamics well into the 21st century. As noted, they affect how people choose to enact their sexuality, how cultural and legal domains respond to violations of their autonomy and how oppression can be compounded where intersectionalities of disadvantage exist. For these reasons, Slutwalk must be seen as an incipient stage in the revitalisation of feminism, a necessary if not imperfect call for greater discourse and action. Because the responses to this call have been clear, ringing truly in marches in places as far flung as New Delhi, Mexico City, Nicaragua, as well as on the streets of Sydney. 17 | Tharunka The House of Merivale By Bethan Donnelly I f you happen to have walked down to Pitt street mall of late, the throng of people queuing outside a certain international chain store will no doubt have distracted you. It reminds me of another shop called House of Merivale that opened on the same street over forty years ago, which would also draw enormous crowds. This boutique, however, painted a very different picture of retail Sydney. When House of Merivale first opened on Sydney’s Castlereagh Street in 1959 it was a serendipitous moment; it was perfectly poised to succeed by being in the right place at the right time. That was the year the first of the baby boomers would become teenagers, the generation which would rock (literally) the boat of Fifties complacency and capsize society into a torrent of change. In the minds of the empowered young, there was definitely a challenging, if not exactly a changing, of the guard. It was into the zeitgeist of generational divide that House of Merivale stepped. The creation of a niche youth category also represented the newest, largest growing and most spendthrift consumer market. House of Merivale was one of the first institutions in Sydney, and Australia, to recognise the lucrative potential of the baby boom generation. It was the epicentre of “youthquake” fashion (the first place to sell the miniskirt in Australia!) and became firmly established on the radars of the young and trendy. House of Merivale styled itself as the first “swinging” boutique in Australia, representing a connection to the fun and frivolity of Carnaby Street and Kings Road in the heyday of Swinging London. It was established as an alternative to the mainstream for people who, in the words of the Rolling Stones, “can’t get no satisfaction” from the staid and conservative Australian culture. Inspired by the British watershed boutiques Bazaar of Mary Quant and the miniskirt fame, and Barbara Hulanicki’s phenomenal Biba, the boutique emerged as the way to market youth fashion. More than offering new young fashions, 18 | Tharunka John Merivale, clothes designer and owner of young fashion shops, in the Pitt Street John & Merivale shop. the boutique presented them in a new way. In contrast to the neat and polished department stores, boutique style was fashionably disheveled and junky. As the boutique concept spread, they became increasingly ostentatious and fantastical, and boutique shopping became a social leisure activity in itself. Boutiques like House of Merivale were places where emotions could be indulged. The experience of boutique shopping was entirely conducive to the wider cultural desire in the Sixties to be “turned on” in all aspects of social activity, whether through sexual liberation, experimental drugs, or political zeal. House of Merivale created an elaborate, exuberant dream world which mirrored the values and aspirations of its young clientele; decadence, excess, whimsical abandon, and an affectation of bohemianism. Painted black and furnished with dark mahogany timber, the boutique created a seductive atmosphere reminiscent of a bordello. It was decked out with richly coloured drapes, feather boas, peacock feathers and disco mirror balls. All of this transported the young shopper into a “cool” and “kinky” dimension that bore a warped resemblance to Aladdin’s Cave or a Turkish souk. House of Merivale’s theatrical interior design appealed to the senses. The boutique was dimly lit by Tiffany lamps creating a dreamy ambiance; piques of fragrant perfume or cologne hung in the air; and LOUD rock’n’roll music was constantly played in-house, creating a party atmosphere. This, in particular, marked House of Merivale as something “far out”. It was the sound of youth, a stark contrast to the polite pianissimo music of traditional department stores aimed at the middle-aged and middle-class. House of Merivale was the first Australian retailer to shake up the shopping experience in these ways. House of Merivale moved to Pitt Street in 1970. At the height of its success, the company had three outlets on Pitt Street, two in Melbourne and one in Canberra. Partners Merivale and John Hemmes, originally established the boutique as an emporium of young and upcoming Australian designers, like the infamous Prue Acton, Norma Tullo, Trent Nathan and Carla Zampatti. In 1966, Merivale began designing her own eponymous line of clothing. Over time it expanded to include flamboyant menswear under the name Mr. John, bridal wear specially sold in their White department, and tailor made leather garments. From the Nineties onwards the focus of the company became hospitality and entertainment. Today Merivale holds the single largest hospitality portfolio in Australia and is reported to be worth over $500 million. It includes a sleuth of award-winning restaurants, the mega ivy complex, Good Vibrations music festival, among many ventures. The success of the Hemmes family business is undoubtedly based on the foresight and fortune of House of Merivale in the Sixties and Seventies. It is remembered today as an icon of Australian youth fashion and a pioneer in Australian boutique retail. My Skin Churros By Hexy By Jacqueline Palaje This is the spoken word piece Hexy presented at POC the Mic: a person of colour performance night organised as a satellite event to Camp Betty. My skin Makes people say “You can't be Aboriginal!” Makes people ask “How much?” Makes people think “What's the white chick doing speaking at POC the Mic?” But it doesn't make me any less Koori. My skin Speaks of colonisation Stolen Generations And attempts to breed out the black. My skin Gives me a back seat pass to All the racist bullshit white folks say When they don't think there's any blackfellas in the room. My skin Doesn't make me “look white”. I look like Aboriginal people sometimes look. And if you believe otherwise, it's your perceptions of Aboriginality that are broken. My skin Makes white people feel quite comfortable Until I open my uppity blackfella mouth And then they think sticking up for my people is me trying to start a fight. My skin Does not disqualify me from identifying as “black” It is not up to white people to decide what language we can label ourselves with. My skin Comes with a certain certainty. Because I know My country knows And my brothers and sisters know Where I come from, and who I am. So. My skin When combined with my words Should make you question your assumptions. Ingredients 250 ml Milk 100g Unsalted Butter 1 Tablespoon Castor Sugar or Icing Sugar 125 g Flour 3 Egg Yolks 2 Vanilla beans (split and deseeded) Oil for frying (Vegetable oil recommended) Method 1. In a pot, bring to boil the milk, sugar, butter and vanilla beans. 2. Strain onto the flour and mix to dough-like consistency. 3. Add egg yolks to the dough. 4. Pour dough into a piping bag with a star nozzle. 5. Pipe into vegetable oil at 180 degrees. 6. Fry until golden brown. 7. Set aside on paper towel to dry off excess oil. 8. Dust with castor sugar or icing sugar. Top Tips When frying, make sure the churros are completely immersed in oil. If you fry one side and then the other they will be very greasy. Another alternative to dusting with castor sugar or icing sugar is cinnamon. Personally, I prefer icing sugar. 19 | Tharunka 20 | Tharunka From the Tharunka Archives: Women’s Edition 1984 From the Tharunka Archives: Women’s Edition 1993 21 | Tharunka Golden Gate Bridge By Amber Karanikolas you told me your favourite place you had ever been to was that big bridge in san francisco. i forget what it is called but i know what it looks like. i have seen it in pictures. i imagined you walking near it. it is 5:03 am. exactly. requiem mass, wind. just you. no one else. no they are still asleep, somnus’s children in beds coffee houses laundromats bars mistress’s beds old abandoned churches. you, who are wordwander, troubadour, hallucinogenic apogee walking in the flickering on off on off neon all morning light of the whole world, purging yourself in fire of the mind’s eye. in a past life you studied sanskrit, stoic, amorphous roots and rocks beneath the water, sweet sad song like triste, triste and now you walk to stop me from repeating myself repeating myself repeatinthis is what I will always think when I hear your name and when i do hear it, you impart on every limb filament of my existence, your ascension untounched unchanged as when I was not your woman, not your charlatan. 22 | Tharunka Words By Anisha Guatam I can only write what I know and what I know is that I can write. I’m a writer both here at University, negotiating the discursive depths of my thesis; and at home, in the belly of the night, birthing a story always-already beyond my understanding. I’m a feminist and a writer. Feminism and writing, for me, are irredeemably intertwined. Although I started writing many years ago – even as a child I wrote almost compulsively in journals and diaries – it is only through feminism that I’ve been able to make a connection between my writings and my sense of self-in-the-world. That is not to reify determinism or ideology. It is neither true that feminism is the only vehicle available for self-actualisation; nor that feminism was always going to be the only option I would take. Rather, in the space/place that is me – within this “I” – feminism and creative expression took root and grew with each other, against each other. My first introduction to feminist writing on writing was through the works of French feminists Hélène Cixous and Luce Irigaray, who taught me that to be marginal is to have a unique perspective, and to have a unique perspective is to have a responsibility to share it. Both feminists, albeit via different sets of theories, make the link between women’s subjective marginality and their textual articulations of anomie and displacement. Instead of seeking to amend this situation, however, they argue that women’s existence beyond culture allows us to break through patriarchal discourse and to make it “fly.” I learnt from these poet-warriors to accept my exemption from the rules of men, to revel joyfully in my ability to write both myself and the world as it is: diverse, dissonant and delightful. Others feminists – feminists of colour, like Gloria Anzaldúa - have taught me what it is to write my occupation of overlapping subject positions and my negotiation, however badly, of the complex interplay of gendered and cultural identities. They have taught me to write of my “colonization” by capitalist, racist, patriarchal discourses, and to understand that I cannot exist separate from my political, historical and cultural context. And they have taught me to recognize and write my privilege. As a woman, as a woman of colour, I may be marginalized. However, I am also a comfortably middle class woman living in a country that routinely locks up “illegal” human beings. I’m a heterosexual woman living in an appalling homophobic world. So, what does this mean, this perpetual displacement, this inhabiting of the shifting borderland zones? It means that the very act of embracing the autobiographical “I” – that moment when I begin to write - is always already an act fraught with the difficulties of articulating a self experienced neither as a fixed, metaphysical presence nor as a series of endlessly multiplying possibilities, but as both at the same time. Both inside and outside at the same time, I am called at various times to adopt a stubborn individualism, a strategic fixity, in the face of racist discourses that seek to dissolve my subjectivity into an amorphous collectivity. At the same time, I have the privilege of experiencing my exclusion from dominant ideology as a playful displacement, ‘marginal by imposition, by choice, by necessity’ (Trinh T. Minh-Ha, When the Moon Waxes Red). Writing, whether or not you intend it to be so, is always political. Words are not “just” words, but entities that are at once empty and excessive – empty because they are never semantically fixed, and excessive because they always contain unacknowledged, unrecognized possibilities of signification. This is what feminism has taught me. This is my feminist reality. 23 | Tharunka y Freak Show z By Tayylor Leon B eing a lesbian, I often feel like I’m part of a freak show. It seems that within society, there is this general perception many have that lesbians are either repulsive or a sexual novelty. I particularly find the latter to be most apparent within the media. There is a great portion of men in this world who thoroughly and eagerly believe lesbians are dying to have a man join in on their sexual activities. This idea is played upon so much in movies and television, and every time I’m faced with it I’m disturbed and irritated, feeling like our identity is forcibly 24 | Tharunka stolen from us. I’m not here to gratify you, gents. I like chicks – and the last thing I want is you watching me or making remarks to your mates about “getting in on that”. As for the “repulsive” perception, the majority of gay people have to face this. When straight people kiss, no one cares. When gay people kiss, however, all eyes are turned. Sure, there’s growing acceptance in this world for gay people, but realistically we’re still the immoral freaks of this planet. To many, our only motives in life are to fuck and to do it right in front of everyone. I have to also wonder though if gay culture contributes to these perceptions. When the gay community is overtly sexual in public (e.g. the Gay & Lesbian Mardi Gras), are we helping our cause for equality? Or could it be possible that we’re helping to distance ourselves from the straight community, effectively alienating a great mass of people who perhaps don’t like sex shoved in their faces? Even I find these sexual displays uncomfortable. We’re not creatures in a freak show – we’re human beings – and I think it’s important straight and gay people remember this. 25 | Tharunka d Reviews c Made In Dagenham Reviewed by Kimberley Lowe Nigel Cole’s Made in Dagenham is an enthralling and inspiring film, despite the female representations echoing those quaint girl-power birthday cards with the 60s woman and slogans about smashing patriarchy, often given to individuals like myself. This movie, based on historical events, begins in 1968 with a group of chatty women sewing upholstery for Ford Motors, in a British factory. We are introduced to the band of Dagenham women, the cheeky and discontent beauty, the adorable but hopeless aspiring model, the older workaholic Connie, and their shy union representative Albert. Amidst this strange tight-knit crew we meet a gentle woman named Rita, a wife and mother of two. This quiet woman becomes the center of a national union movement. In an attempt not to ruin the plot, in the words of Rita, “it’s about equality, equal pay for equal work”. The film tries to be cute and rather polite about women’s demands, but once you get beyond the very ‘Hollywood’ plot and some of the humour markers that actually work against the message of the film, the historical roots and the foundations of sisterhood are stirring. When asked by reporters how the women will cope if they don’t receive the support of government for equal pay Rita responds with “How will we cope? We’re women. Don’t ask such stupid questions.” This summarises the strength and resilence of women in the long fight for social justice that is at the core of this, if not overly, light-hearted attempt to engage wider audiences in the feminist agenda. The Stoning of Soraya M. Reviewed by Kimberley Lowe The film title of The Stoning of Soraya M. speaks for itself when it comes to the subject matter of this movie. Based on a story recounted to French-Iranian journalist Sahebjam rather daringly by Soraya’s grief-stricken aunt Zahra, The Stoning of Soraya M. takes place as a series of flashbacks to events taking place just days before the journalist’s car breaks down at the edge of a small Iranian village in 1986. At times the film breaks down into stereotypical concepts and really focuses on the relationship between a husband and wife in Iran, rather than the overarching political and economic implications from such relationship types. Despite this it is well acted and clearly each performer is passionate about the message of the film. It should be no surprise that the film is a lot to take on board and requires a severe investment of intellectual and emotional self. The audience bears witness to how religious and cultural beliefs lead to the mistaken murder of a young mother and are drawn into the reality of small communities and the behaviours of few, including bystanders. Overall The Stoning of Soraya M. is a brilliant film with enlightening themes for a westernised audience. Com Truise Reviewed by Kylar Loussikian Com Truise, more often called Seth Haley by his mother amongst others, is a designer slash musician. His fulllength debut, Galactic Melt has been described by some as a Com Truise lite, a toned down and less exciting version of Haley’s prodigious online productions. Certainly it sounds like a contemporary reinterpretation of Kraftwork, some tracks (‘VHS Sex’) more than others, and the press release informs us with apparently no tongue in cheek that the album is “mathy, forlorn, funky and mighty in technical ambition.” This may be the case, or the case may be the man has come into a synthesizer on his way to his favourite bicycle shop or piccolo latte dealer. Cinematic and sexy, the label tells us. Pah! ‘Cathode Girls’ sounds like Jarre, my mother’s favourite, so no, not entirely sexy, while the other tracks are a musical cinescape of a convulsing adolescent foaming at the mouth, and then being immediately crushed under a jet plane. Still, jingoism of media releases aside (which at one point tells us that ‘Truise becomes one with his newfound cosmos, like Pinocchio becoming a real boy), Galactic Melt is not disappointing if you weren’t waiting for much, but whilst much was made of Haley’s EP and other works, this album is probably not the work of any major new artist in the genre of electronic shit. Made In Dagenham, directed by Nigel Cole, and starring Sally Hawkins, Bob Hoskins and Andrea Riseborough, is out on DVD now. The Stoning of Soraya M., directed by Cyrus Nowrasteh, and starring Shohreh Aghdashloo, James Caviezel and Moshan Marno, is out on DVD now. 26 | Tharunka Galactic Melt, an album by Com Truise, is out now through Fuse Music. Playing Mother: Uncovering a New Insight By Emilie Auton L ast month, I was asked to ‘mother’ two children (aged two and four) for nearly a month while their parents traveled around Europe. The experience would afford me an overseas trip later this year. The prospect of looking after two young children did not make me nervous (in fact it made my friends and family more so). My years of nannying and swim teaching had provided me with many child-related experiences, and I was confident that I would cope. The mothering was for an affluent family who live in one of Sydney’s habour view suburbs. I resided at their house alone and took complete responsibility for the two children, a dog and the household. Although I was not their mother, I felt very much like it at times. I felt utter happiness when the youngest, Lucy*, came running towards me and jumped into my arms after daycare, sheer joy at the simple act of blowing bubbles and watching the two little girls chasing them on a sunny afternoon, and laughed with them as we danced around the living room in the evenings. At the same time however, I felt the overwhelming responsibility constantly, the relentless deprivation of sleep, and the feeling of alienation from the outside world. The intensity of these emotions was not something I was used to experiencing on a daily basis. One of the experiences I remember well began one night in the first week of my stay. The four year old, Olivia*, appeared in my room at 11pm screaming, I was unable to contact anyone for a period of time and was panicked and unsure of what to do. At that moment, I did not feel like the innate nurturer women are said to be, and I did not instinctually know how to care for this helpless and totally dependant human being (who’s only manner of communication was a variety of ear-piercing screams at random periods of the night). It was some time before it was apparent that Olivia had an ear infection. The ordeal ended around 8am the following morning when it was time to get up and I received a rather apt call from my mother exclaiming ‘welcome to motherhood.’ Over the next week or two it became clear, through the social environment, that a ‘good’ mother is always available for her children, to teach and emotionally and physically care for them. A ‘good’ mother puts her children’s needs before her own and has total responsibility for them. The rewards of mothering outweigh the low status and lack of financial reward associated with the position. Yet this total devotion resulted in a loss of freedom, individuality, and professional identity. The lack of freedom was perhaps the most devastating; I was unable to go anywhere without the children and my sole purpose was to care for these children. The practicalities of constantly looking after a child made me incredibly aware of the boundaries that had been placed around my everyday life. My life now entailed activities that catered to Olivia and Lucy’s needs, the car radio was even off-limits as the rear seat TV played The Little Mermaid. To be perfectly honest, I found the day-today childrearing activities incredibly dull and robotic, and I longed for something 27 | Tharunka more stimulating. It is perhaps a social taboo to say that child rearing is boring and there appears to be an unwritten rule about expressing this. Yet my status as ‘temporary mother’ afforded me some disclosure. When in conversation with one mother she commented, ‘motherhood is mostly unrewarding’ and ‘I really value the days the kids aren’t here, I have things to do that I can’t get done with them here’. Another told me of the value of a routine, but added ‘the thing about motherhood is that it gets boring once you’re in a routine, thank god mothers have the internet now, it’s a way for them to feel like they are still connected to the world’. Knowledge surrounding the negative aspects of motherhood is often unavailable to women of childbearing age. Acknowledgement of the realities of motherhood is essential in order to reconcile the image of motherhood with the reality. Exposing the idealised myths will hopefully allow women to better prepare for the realities of early parenthood. Although some people acknowledged the difficulties I faced during my ‘mothering’ experience, others told me that 28 | Tharunka motherhood would be different when I had my own; that the love for my own child would override any negative feelings I had. Yet there is a difference between loving a child and actually enjoying parenting them. This is a distinction which is often not elucidated. The experience led me to believe that I would not be satisfied being a fulltime stay at home mother. Prior to this experience I understood that motherhood was difficult, yet understanding what motherhood entails and the reality of the experience are not quite the same. It gave me an opportunity to understand the joys, but also the repetitive and dull nature of motherhood. Recognising that I was not the only ‘mother’ who felt this way, made me realise that I would not be a ‘bad’ mother if I chose not to spend every moment with my child. The experience helped me to appreciate many things about mothering and the role it will play in my life. It has alerted me to the career/childbearing conflicts that I will encounter and highlighted the effective coping strategies available. For example, after childrearing alone, I recognize that it may be desirable to have a willing partner who participates in equal domestic and childrearing chores (although this is not always possible). The experience has also allowed me to face motherhood with a certain degree of confidence after having had a good ‘training’ session, or as my partner phrased it ‘it’s great because we now know that you can look after two kids singlehandedly!’. Following this experience I will be confident to challenge the dominant discourse of motherhood and produce a re-examination of what is considered ‘normal’. While not deterring me from motherhood in the future, this ‘trial run’ has afforded me the opportunity to experience the practical realities of everyday motherhood- in particular the often unmentioned mundane elements, constraints and burdens. *Names has been changed Lizzette the Agony Aunt By Liz Stern and making sure their ‘roots’ aren’t showing. While I can understand the importance of good gardening (or ‘pubic topiary’ as it seems to be called these days, although what that entails I haven’t a clue), I feel mournful that the dream of female equality has been so abandoned in the modern age. Where have all the young women pioneers gone? Dear Lizzette, I don’t know if my new relationship is all it was cracked up to be. I mean, you marry and incredibly famous guy with lots of money, and even if he’s balding, things are meant to go pretty swimmingly from there, right? But all I’ve heard people talk about lately is my sister’s ass, and how I ‘recycle’ my outfits. It’s gone beyond a bloody joke. When does it start being about me again? Princess69, B. Palais. Dear Kate, Perhaps you need to be more edgy? I’d certainly get tired of forever being associated with my deceased motherin-law, if it were me. And everybody is getting rather sick of these ‘crisp clean lines’ you insist on wearing. Would a royal blue strapless skank-dress really be so bad? Why not take a leaf out of Beatrice’s book, and wear the head-wear equivalent of a toilet seat with antlers every now and then? Now that’s memorable. Or else, you could chuck a Fergie – divorce the Prince, put on heaps of weight, lose it again, put it on again, write a tell-all memoir, and never again be invited to a hoity-toity wedding. That might draw attention from Pippa’s butt for a few seconds. Dear Louisa May Alcott, Dear Agony Auntie, How do I decide on a unique baby name for my child? It needs to be one that captures their free spirit, that sounds glamorous and individual, and yet also simultaneously boosts my public profile. Dear Every Single Expecting Celebrity in Hollywood, Dear Agony Auntie, You’ve gotta look at the trends. As much as you want to do something special for your child, you can’t just go for any Tom, Dick or Harlequin that comes to mind. If you really want to be remembered, you’ve got to get as creative as Moon Unit Zappa’s parents. Do you think they cared if they fucked up their child’s life from their drug-induced haze of naming? No! My picks for the season are Bluetit (according to Practical-Parenting.com, bird names are gonna be BIG), Fudge Packer (no-body is going to mess with that kid; look at that surname!), and Reginald. What’s the best way to get chocolate stains out of the chest area of one’s shirts? Dear Miss Lizzette, Dear Nigella, Why bother? Just keep seductively dripping. Alternatively, wipe off the stains quickly with £100 pound notes, then soak slowly with Möet Chandon. And use plenty of delicious, fatty butter – mmm… It seems the world I dreamed of has disappeared irrevocably from public consciousness. Where once young ladies sought to better themselves through their accomplishments and their studies, or at the very least through a good marriage, now they seem more fixated upon who called them a ‘bitch’ last Saturday night, Sad times have indeed fallen upon the ‘fairer sex’, as we were once termed. Once, women dreamt of having it all. Now they’ve got it, what do they do with it? And do they really want it? Certainly Louisa, there are many modern day fighters for women’s rights, and women who succeed in all fields all around the world. But they also spend their time cooking, cleaning, being fabulously well dressed, being fantastic mothers, being sex goddesses, writing books about the aforementioned, and generally doing so many things that they have heart attacks before they’re 30, or nervous breakdowns, or both. To lighten the mood (as women are also supposed to be natural peacemakers – wtf?), here is a joke: Two nuns are out driving late one night in Transylvania. Everything seems very dark and eerie, and impending doom is in the air. Suddenly, a vampire leaps from nowhere, and lands on the car bonnet, panting for blood. The nuns screech to a halt. ‘What do we do?’ cries the first nun. ‘Show him your cross, show him your cross! It’s the only thing they fear!’ says the other nun. So the first nun jumps out of the car, turns and faces the vampire, and says, ‘You naughty, stupid, foreign bugger! You scared us half to death! Who do you think you are, leaping out of nowhere in the middle of the night? Why, I’ve got a good mind to…’ This is one of my mum’s favorite jokes. See the pun? I fear mum may have had her nervous breakdown already… 29 | Tharunka SRC President: Osman Faruqi srcpresident@arc.unsw.edu.au One of the most rewarding parts of being President of the Student Representative Council has been the exposure to different social movements, progressive ideas, campaigns and the debates within them. Those of you who have been regular readers of my reports for the past eighteen months (yes, I’m sure there’s plenty of you...) will know that I’ve been lucky enough to attend last year’s “F Conference” as well as the Melbourne Feminist Conference a few months ago. F Conference was the first feminist conference to be held in Sydney in a decade and I’m quite proud that the UNSW SRC provided funding to help it get off the ground. It was one of my first experiences with the feminist movement and while initially I was a bit apprehensive about attending it ended up kick starting my interest in gender issues and the debates within the movement. I’ve been lucky enough to work with three different Women’s Officers at UNSW – Lucy Geddes, Jessica Mobbs and Kim Lowe. They are among the hardest working, most passionate and most dedicated student advocates that I know. I owe a lot of my own personal growth to each of them as well as my growing interest in feminism, which has just seen me enrol in my first gender studies course this session. I hope you enjoy reading this year’s Women’s Tharunka and I think its fantastic evidence, along with the whole Women’s Department and the entire Student Representative Council, of the benefits of a strong student organisation on campus. International Collective: Mike Han Lin & Samantha Shuang Guo international@arc.unsw.edu.au After two weeks of intense planning, the International Week 2011 is now ready for its final countdown. The following is the summary of our events in Week 4: Int’l Students Liaison Group Meeting: Held in a Q&A format, provides an opportunity for international students to directly interact with the chiefs of university, including Pro-Vice Chancellor Professor Joan Cooper. Tuesday August 9, from 12 - 2pm at the Club Bar, Roundhouse. Travel Concession Campaign + Free BBQ: In response to National Union of Students’ (NUS) campaign of ‘Concession Tickets for All Students’, which also benefits international students 30 | Tharunka if succeeded, petitions will be collected during this event. Wednesday August 10, from 12 - 2pm on the Library Lawn. IELTS Workshop: IETLS is a ‘must-sit’ test for all international students intending to further their study or apply for immigration. A postgraduate student, who has nine years of IELTS teaching experience, will be invited to give a free coaching lesson.. Wednesday August 10, from 5 - 6pm at Training Room 1, Blockhouse. Migration Seminar: One of the major concerns of international students of all time – migration policy changes, will be interpreted in depth by experts from our old friend Acacia Ltd. Thursday August 11, from 5 - 7pm at Club Bar, Roundhouse. Martial Arts Workshop: Intriguing and spectacular, the arts of Wing Chun, Judo, Taekwondo, Karate and Kickboxing are a vivid illustration of their respective cultures. UNSW sports clubs will be invited to demonstrate their understandings of the “Arts”. Friday August 12, from 12 4pm at Main Room, Roundhouse. In addition, we have reached the consensus that the traditional grand finale – International Night Market will be postponed to Week 9, which therefore will not be included in the International Week. Queer Collective: Tim, Ray & Squish queer@arc.unsw.edu.au Hey all Queer and Queer friendly folk! We’ve had a very eventful winter break and have plenty more activities and events coming up in the lead up to….. drum roll please…..QUEER PRIDE WEEK! Being held in Week 8 of semester 2. Over the July break, we had a bunch of 7 us head over to Perth for the annual Queer Collaborations conference. It was a very successful event, and everybody who attended had a wonderful time and made many new network connections. Next year’s QC conference will be a held a little closer to home in Adelaide, so we anticipate an even higher attendance :) The Queer Space has also been undergoing some plastic surgery over the break, and FM Assist is almost ready to give it back to us – once they’re done, we will have another small room for all of our junk, which will leave space for us to create one big room filled with lounges and beanbags – the perfect place for any queer collective group meeting / party or event. We can’t wait to see what it will look like when it’s finished! Stay tuned for our next issue, we will then fill you in on all the exciting events coming up for Queer Pride Week in Week 8. Raymond, Tim & Squish. Education Collective: Tim Kaliyanda education@arc.unsw.edu.au Hi there! Hopefully, your Semester’s off to a great start! This week, spend some of the time you would have otherwise wasted lazing around on having a look at the new UNSW Advantage program. The program is designed to help you make the most of your time at UNSW by letting you know about internships, volunteering and student ambassadorships on campus, and it gives you official recognition for your work on your Australian Higher Education Graduation Statement (AHEGS) certificate when you graduate. You can try something different, be inspired and build your confidence. The program allows you to improve skills by involving you in stuff you wouldn’t usually come across if you merely came to uni for class and that it. So make the most of your time at UNSW, log onto www.advantage.unsw. edu.au and check out what’s happening on campus. Or you could just join Arc! You won’t regret it! Ethnic Affairs Department: Sandra Kaltoum ethnic@arc.unsw.edu.au Hi There, This semester the Ethnic Affairs Collective is pledging support for International Student Concession Cards and Fairer Fares. In conjunction with the International Collective we will be lobbying government to get fairer fares for all students who use public transport. A Free BBQ will be held on the Library Lawn on Wednesday the 10th of August at 12-2pm. A petition will be available for signing to show support for a more equal transport concession scheme. Transport costs are a significant issue for most students. Currently travel concession cards are only valid within restrictive conditions and can exclude students who study part time, work casually, travel interstate, or who are on international student visas. This petition will aim to combat these restrictions on fairness and create a more central system for concession cards that promotes better welfare outcomes for all students. If you are interested in being involved in the campaign or would like more information please email me on s.kaltoum@arc.unsw.edu.au. Welfare Department Sarah Frazier welfare@arc.unsw.edu.au Hi everyone, I hope you’re all settled into semester 2 by now. I made a mistake in my last report - the free breakfasts are actually Mondays at 9am in front of the library. I’m looking forward to working with our International Officers Sam and Mike in the coming weeks on the Fair Fares campaign. We’re fighting for student fares on public transport for international students who are currently missing out. This is a big issue for international students who are already paying uni fees, living away from home and trying to support themselves. I’m hoping international students and domestic students alike will join us and sign the petition at our upcoming barbecue. I’m also looking for input from college students on what they’d like to see in my upcoming survey. Feel free to email me with any ideas or concerns. Environment Collective: Ben Gregory environment@arc.unsw.edu.au The Enviro Collective has been quite busy recently, with our campaign for recycling at UNSW coming to a head towards the end of last semester. Thanks to all the students who voiced their opinion on the absence of recycling at UNSW. The Recycling@UNSW forum came about largely due to your feedback. Recycling is now firmly on the agenda and is expected to commence towards the end of this semester. Unfortunately the Waste Tender Committee managed to skirt detailing the expected outcomes of negotiations with waste management companies. Such negotiations have subsequently been underway during the mid-year break. After the hectic conclusion to last semester, the Students of Sustainability Conference (SoS) was a much appreciated time for chilling out and having lots of thought-provoking conversation. SoS is an annual five day camping conference, hosted in a different state every year. This year it was held in Albury and had about 300 attendees. It involved workshops and forums on a range of sustainability topics; and of course, plenty of opportunities for getting to know new friends. It was a great experience, as those who attended will testify. The Sustainable Movie Nights last semester were quite a success, with between 5 and 20 people turning out to watch films such as: End of the Line, Capitalism a Love Story, Garbage Warrior, GasLand, Addicted to Plastic and HOME. We will be continuing with the Sustainable Movie Nights this semester, with a selection of documentaries on: Climate change, capitalism, nature, and more. Our first screening will likely be on Wednesday of week 3, but keep an eye on the Facebook page for more info. For more Enviro goss, sign up to our Facebook group: UNSW Environment Collective. CONTRIBUTE tharunka@arc.unsw.edu.au 31 | Tharunka