docKatalog
download 
Report Transcription
Katalog
Pokrovitelji: Grad Beograd, Ministarstvo kulture Republike Srbije, Inženjerska komora Srbije Partneri: EUNIC - European Union National Institutes for Culture (Austrijski kulturni forum, Italijanski institut za kulturu, Goethe institut, Francuski kulturni centar), Magistrat glavnog grada Beča, Ambasada Sjedinjenih američkih država, Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Republički zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture, JP Urbanistički zavod grada Beograda, Društvo urbanista Beograda, Dečji kulturni centar, Opština Vračar, Opština Stari grad, galerija O3one, GRAD kulturni centar, Dom omladine Beograda, Turistička organizacija Beograda — Organisers: Društvo arhitekata Beograda – Association of Belgrade Architects Kulturni centar Beograda – Belgrade Cultural Centre Patrons: The City of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia - Ministry of Culture, Serbian Chamber of Engineers Partners: EUNIC – European Union National Institutes for Culture (Austrian Cultural Forum, Italian Institute for Culture in Belgrade, Goethe Institute, French Cultural Centre), Vienna City Administration, Embassy of the United States of America, Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, State Institute for The Protection of Cultural Heritage, Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, Town Planners Association Belgrade, Children’s Cultural Centre, Vračar Municipality, Stari grad Municipality, Gallery O3one, GRAD Cultural Centre, Cultural Centre Dom omladine, Belgrade Tourist Organization na fotografiji stambena zgrada B–9, blok 21, Novi Beograd autori Lenarčić, Mitić, Petrović i Čanak, foto A. Mirić Organizatori: Društvo arhitekata Beograda Kulturni centar Beograda četvrta beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture — Fourth Belgrade International Architecture Week nedeljaarhitekture.org četvrta beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture od 26. juna do 4. jula 2009. — Fourth Belgrade International Architecture Week from June 26th till July 4th 2009 BEOGRADSKA INTERNACIONALNA NEDELJA ARHITEKTURE − BELGRADE INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURE WEEK Impresum Izdavači − Publishers Društvo arhitekata Beograda − Association of Belgrade Architects Kneza Miloša 7/III, Beograd Kulturni centar Beograda − Cultural Centre of Belgrade Knez Mihailova 6/I, Beograd Za izdavače − Acting on behalf of the publishers Ivan Rašković Društvo arhitekata Beograda − Association of Belgrade Architects Marina Đurđević Kulturni centar Beograda − Cultural Centre of Belgrade Urednik − Editor Ana Janković-Čorbić Lektor − Proofreader Sonja Šoć Prevod − Translation Mila Đurović i Bojan Cimbaljević Dizajn i oprema − Design and layout Aleksa Bijelović i Milica Maksimović petokraka Štampa − Printed by Interprint, Beograd Tiraž − Print run 500 Beograd, 2009. SADRŽAJ TABLE OF CONTENTS IZLOŽBE EXHIBITIONS 23 Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji Naselja INCIS-a u Rimu: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima kurator: Alesandra Čeroti koordinatori: Roberta Đentile i Paola Gvidulji 23 Post-WWII Social Housing in Italy INCIS estates: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima curator: Alessandra Cerroti coordinators: Roberta Gentile and Paola Guidugli – Grad Avr, obnovljen po ideji Ogista Perea kustos: Žozef Abram 26 2 Nagrade za arhitekturu 5 Awards for Architecture – Arhitektonsko-urbanistički konkursi 2008/09. 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 12 14 14 17 17 20 20 Architectural and Urban Planning Competitions 2008/09 – E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten 26 28 28 E2A: Fractions of Reality E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten – Teritorijal ejdžensi Teritorijal ejdžensi 30 Territorial Agency Territorial Agency – RE_fokus Kenc Molo arhitekti 32 RE_focus Könz Molo Architetti – Mladi bečki arhitekti (YO.V.A.²) organizator: Magistrat glavnog grada Beča koncept izložbe: Mihael Dim Young Viennese Architect (YO.V.A.²) organized by: Stadtentwicklung Wien exhibition concept: Michael Diem – Savremena arhitektura u regionu: Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku koordinator: Ivan Kucina kuratori: Konstantin Goađea i Peter Torniov Contemporary architecture in the region: Architecture of Romania and Bulgaria in 21st Century koordinator: Ivan Kucina curators: Constantin Goagea and Peter Torniov – POVRATAK REKAMA – Pokretač života u gradu koncept: Ružica Bogdanović RIVERFRONT RECLAIMED – Charging City Life concept: Ružica Bogdanović 30 32 34 34 36 36 Le Havre, the City reconstructed upon the idea of August Peret curator: Joseph Abram – Procesi REstauracije istorijskog nasleđa organizacija: TRANSEO REstoration processes of historic treasures organization: TRANSEO – Devedeset godina Bauhausa: Knjige o Bauhausu u biblioteci Gete instituta Beograd Ninety years of Bauhaus: Books about Bauhaus in the library of Goethe Institute Belgrade – Beograd - pozlaćeni presek: Valorizacija austrijskog graditeljskog nasleđa na teritoriji Beograda organizator: Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) kurator: Jelica Jovanović Belgrade – the Gilded Ratio: Valorisation of Austrian Building Heritage on the Territory of Belgrade organisation: Young Architects’ Club (KMA) curator: Jelica Jovanović – Extra-mûros – Očaravajuće arhitekture Zavod za arhitekturu i baštinu grada Pariza, Francuska Extra-mûros – Architectures of Delight City of Architecture and Patrimony of Paris, France – Re... Beograd: stari i novi Izložba radova sa studentske radionice Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu Re... Belgrade: Old and New Exhibition of student works from the Design workshop, Faculty of Architecture University in Belgrade PREDAVANJA LECTURES 40 E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti Vim Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten 40 E2A: Fractions of Reality Wim Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten – 42 RE _ fokus Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc, Kenc Molo Arhiteti 42 RE _ focus Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz, Könz Molo Architetti – 44 Ne-misliti Džon Palmezino, Teritorijal ejdžensi 44 un-think John Palmesino, Territorial Agency – 46 REkonstrukcija Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC 46 REconstruction Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC – 48 Šrek siti: Privatni prostor u Bukureštu i druge priče Konstantin Goađea 48 Shreck city: The non public space in Bucharest and other stories Constantin Goagea – 50 Akcija i REakcija: Slika postkomunističke graditeljske kulture u Bugarskoj Petar Torniov 50 Action and Re-action: Picture of the post communist building culture in Bulgaria Peter Torniov – 52 Dobronamerni vanzemaljci u kućama starih ljudi Grac: Savremena arhitektura u istorijskom gradskom ambijentu Markus Cehner 52 Friendly aliens in old peoples’ homes Graz: contemporary architecture in historic townshape Markus Zechner – 54 Centar Graca kao mešavina istorijskih fasada i palata, stalnih postavki umetničkih instalacija i moderne arhitekture Biljana Aranđelović 54 Center of Graz as a mix of historical facades and domes, permanent art installations and modern architecture Biljana Aranđelović 56 Projekti Andreas Bremhorst, Karl i Bremhorst Arhitekten 56 Projects Andreas Bremhorst, Karl und Bremhorst Architekten – 58 Svakodnevni život Zigfrid Los, polar ÷ 58 Every Day Life Siegfried Loos, polar ÷ – 60 TYPUS ili TOPOS: MRLV Arhitekten Hamburg – Projekti i misaone osnove Mirjana Marković, MRLV Arhitekten 60 TYPUS or TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – Design and Contemplative Basis Mirjana Marković, MRLV Architekten – 62 Reinterpretacija slobodnog plana Stanko Gaković 62 REinterpretation of the Open Plan Concept Stanko Gaković – 64 MORFOZIS Tom Mejn 64 MORPHOSIS Thom Mayne TRIBINE DEBATES 68 Srbija na bijenalima arhitekture u Veneciji moderator: Snežana Ristić učesnici: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić 68 Serbia at Architecture Biennales in Venice moderator: Snežana Ristić participants: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić – 70 Šta sa Novim Beogradom? – okrugli sto moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević, Urbanistički zavod Beograda 70 What to do with New Belgrade? – round table moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević, Institute for Urban Planning RADIONICE WORKSHOPS 74 Dečje radionice organizator: Dečji kulturni centar 74 Children’s workshops organized by: Children’s Cultural Centre IV ŠETNJE CITY WALKS 78 Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Bez kontinuiteta nema identiteta vodi: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 80 Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: Without Continuity there is no Identity led by: Marta Vukotić-Lazar – 81 Na potezu od Slavije do Čuburskog parka Izložba radova i instalacija „Pejzažna arhitektura i grad” PUPA - Podmladak udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata 81 On the Stretch from Slavija to Cuburski Park Exhibition of works and installations ‘Landscape Architecture and the City’ PUPA – Youth of the Association of Landscape Architects – 83 Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Istočni Vračar, Savinac i Neimar vodi: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 84 Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: East Vračar, Savinac and Neimar quarters led by: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević – 86 Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: RE... na potezu od Terazija do Kalemegdana vodi: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 86 Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: RE... From Terazije to Kalemegdan led by: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović – 88 Ponoćna šetnja kroz modernu arhitekturu starog Beograda vodi: Ivan Kucina 88 Midnight walk around the modern architecture of old Belgrade led by: Ivan Kucina KONFERENCIJA CONFERENCE 92 REdefinisanje posleratnog kolektivnog stanovanja uvodna reč: Tanja Konli 92 REdefining Post-WWII Housing introduction: Tanja Conley – 94 PROGRAM KONFERENCIJE 95 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME V 96 Pere, Le Korbizije, Zerfus: Rekonstrukcija stambenih naselja – zaštita moderne stambene arhitekture u Francuskoj nakon Drugog svetskog rata Žozef Abram, Univerzitet u Nansiju 96 Perret, Le Corbusier, Zehrfuss: Reconstruction of Grandensambles – the protection of modern housing in France from post-WWII period Joseph Abram, University in Nancy – 98 Makro-strukture i pejzaž: Vrednost i zaštita berlinskih predgrađa iz 60-ih i 70-ih Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper, Tehnički Univerzitet u Berlinu 98 Macro-structures and Landscapes: Value and protection of Berlin’s 1960’s and 1970’s suburban settlements Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper, Technical University in Berlin – 100 Stanovanje u Engleskoj posle 1945. Ilejn Harvud, Ingliš Heritedž 100 Post-1945 Housing in England Elain Harwood, English Heritage – 102 Mesta trezvenosti: Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Holandiji Marike Kajpers, Tehnički Univerzitet u Delftu 102 Sites of Sobriety: Postwar Social Housing in the Netherlands Marijke Kuipers, Technical University Delft – 104 Socijalno stanovanje posle Drugog svetskog rata u Italiji: „Javni grad“ kao laboratorija za moderne teorije o gradu i savremenu perspektivu urbane obnove Paola di Bjađi, Univerzitet u Trstu 105 Post WWII Social Housing in Italy: The “public city” as a laboratory for modern city theories and urban renewal contemporary perspective Paola di Biagi, University of Trieste – 106 Pitanja konzervacije i restauracije u socijalnom stanovanju posle Drugog svetskog rata Naselja INCIS-a: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima u Rimu Alesandra Čeroti, Univerzitet u Rimu 107 Conservation and Restoration Issues in the Post-WWII Social Housing: INCIS Estates Villaggio Olimpico and Decima in Rome Alessandra Cerroti, University of Rome – 108 Density, IntenCity: Stanovanje u Italiji Đovani Kaudo, Univerzitet u Rimu 108 Density, IntenCity: Housing in Italy Giovanni Caudo, University of Rome – 110 E2A: Post-CIAM Rekonfiguracija Pit Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten E2A: Post CIAM Reconfiguration 110 Piet Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten UVOD Beogradska internacionalna nedelje arhitekture 2009. (BINA ’09) - tematski naslovljena prefiksom RE... posvećena je akutnom pitanju odnosa prema postojećem arhitektonsko-urbanističkom okruženju i mogućnosti njegove stalne REprodukcije, aktivno uključene u projekte budućnosti. Naša želja je da pokušamo preispitati tradicionalne koncepte REkonstrukcije i REvitalizacije graditeljskog nasleđa, uglavnom kontrolisane krutim metodologijama umrtvljenih institucija, ukazujući na nove koncepte pomoću kojih već izgrađeni arhitektonski okvir otvara mogućnosti REgeneracije i REintegracije u žive tokove vremena. Tema održivog razvoja i urbane REciklaže već dugo zaokupljaju pažnju struke u tehnološki razvijenim zemljama svesnim da zahuktale snage modernosti moraju biti upregnute u dublje naslojene vrednosti. Nove generacije arhitekata počinju da promišljaju vrednosti prostora kome neposredno pripadaju na delikatniji način nego što se viđa na glamuroznim ostvarenjima „starchitects” koji, poneseni sjajem sopstvenog brenda i zahtevima investitora, često zaboravljaju na kvalitete zatečenog konteksta. Naša želja je da pronađemo i pokažemo razmišljanja i delovanja onih koji se zalažu za REafirmaciju zatečenih resursa u službi kreativnosti i koji imaju sluha za RE… nasuprot zahtevima investitora, zaslepljenih prvostepenim profitom izraženim u kvadratnim metrima i težnjom za „woweffect” arhitekture svojih ulaganja, kao i administrativnim barijerama prevaziđenih normativa koje postavljaju branitelji birokratizovane pseudo-tradicije. Beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture 2009. ponovo okuplja različite struke uključene u promišljanje životnog okruženja, različite generacije koje će ukrstiti stare ideje sa novim, kao i predstavnike različitih zemalja VI koji će osvetliti kretanja i iskustva iz specifičnih sredina. Ambicija ovogodišnje Nedelje jeste da podstakne teorijska razmišljanja i otvorene stručne debate s ciljem da pronađu plodno tlo u realnom delovanju: planiranju, projektovanju i realizaciji. Očekujemo da će ovakva razmena znanja i ideja iskristalisati nove vizije REanimacije i već prisutnog arhitekonskog okruženja i budućih projekata koji će svesno uspostavljati dijalog sa već postojećim. Kao i do sada, Nedelja arhitekture je otvorena ne samo prema struci već i ka široj javnosti kojoj će se, uz specifično ovogodišnju temu RE..., predstaviti i pribiližiti nedavna ostvarenja u oblasti arhitekture i urbanizma u Srbiji i svetu. U program Nedelje, kao i prethodnih godina, biće uključene izložbe, predavanja, tematske šetnje, radionice, projekcije filmova, seminari i tribine. Verujući da će i ova Nedelja arhitekture privući dobronamerne i otvorene učesnike, stručnjake i znalce, a takođe i građane, entuzijaste spremne da podele i prošire opseg svojih znanja, pozivamo Vas da nam se pridružite. BINA 09 tim INTRO Belgrade International Architecture Week 2009 (BINA ’09) – titled simply RE…as an indicator of this year’s theme – is dedicated to the acute question of our relationship to the existing urban and architectural surroundings and the limitless possibilities of its permanent REproduction, actively involved in projects for the future. Our wish is to REquestion the traditional concepts of REconstruction and REvitalization of cultural heritage – mainly controlled by stiff methodologies promoted by lethargic institutions – in search for new concepts that can help REgeneration and REintegration of the existing fabrics into the lively contemporary practice. The theme of sustainable development and urban REcycling have been widely discussed in technologically advanced countries, conscious of the fact that the furious forces of modernity have to be correlated to the inherited values. The new generations of architects have started REthinking the potentials of their immediate surroundings more delicately than could be seen in the glamorous realizations of “starchitects”, who often forget to think about all the layers and qualities of the inherited contest in favor of celebrating their own brands. We wish to find and present a new way of thinking by those who argue for REafirmation of the inherited REsources in service of creativity. We search to promote those who pay attention to RE… in spite of the requests of investors (attracted as much to the easy profit, as they are to getting a “wow-effect”), but also argue against administrative norms invented by promoters of bureaucratized pseudo-traditions. Belgrade International Architecture Week 2009 again gathers various professionals involved in REthinking of the urban and architectural context, various generations ready to share the old with the new ideas, and the VII representatives from different countries across Europe and the USA. An ambition of this year’s event is to encourage theoretical thinking and open public debates in service of a fertile practice within real circumstances of designing, planning and building. We expect that such an exchange of knowledge, experience and ideas would generate new visions for the REanimation of the existing built environment, as well as future projects, open for a dialog with the already built domain. The program of Belgrade International Architecture Week ‘09 includes exhibitions, lectures, guided walking tours, workshops, films, seminars and roundtables. It presents recent accomplishments in the field of architecture and urban planning from the domestic and international scene. Like in previous years, Belgrade International Architecture Week ‘09 is open both to professionals and the broad public. With a belief that our event, as was the case in the past, will gather people of good-will and open attitudes, eager to expand their knowledge and ideas, we cordially invite you to joins us. BINA ‘09 TEAM PROGRAM petak, 26. jun 19.00 Kulturni centar Beograda: Likovna galerija, Knez Mihailova 6 Svečano otvaranje IV beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture – – BINA 2009 nedelja, 28. jun 11.00 Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget Šetnja kroz izložbu E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti Vodi: Vim Ekert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Švajcarska subota, 27. jun 12.00 Okupljanje: Centralni dom vojske Srbije Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda, autobusom: Bez kontinuiteta nema identiteta Vodi: Marta Vukotić-Lazar 11.00 Okupljanje: Cvetni trg, ispred samoposluge Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Istočni Vračar, Savinac i Neimar Vodi: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević 14.00 Okupljanje: Ispred Likovne galerije KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: RE... na potezu od Terazija do Kalemegdana Vodi: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović 13.00 Opština Vračar, hol u prizemlju — Otvaranje izložbe i proglašenje pobednika BINA konkurs za mlade arhitekte Urbanističko-arhitektonsko rešenje slobodne površine na uglu ulica Kneginje Zorke i Mekenzijeve na Vračaru u Beogradu 00.00 Okupljanje: Ispred Likovne galerije KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Ponoćna šetnja kroz modernu arhitekturu starog Beograda Vodi: Ivan Kucina ponedeljak, 29. jun 14.00—17.00 Na potezu od Slavije do Čuburskog parka Pejzažna arhitektura i grad, izložba studentskih radova i instalacija PUPA – Podmladak udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata Postavka traje 27–28. juna 2009. 18.00—21.00 Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget — Predavanja E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti, Vim Ekert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Švajcarska RE_fokus, Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc (Könz Molo Architetti), Švajcarska Ne–misliti, Džon Palmezino (Territorial Agency), Švajcarska Moderator diskusije: Srđan Jovanović Vajs IX 17.00 Likovna galerija KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Dečja radionica: REci REd! Vodi: Dečji kulturni centar 18.00 Galerija Artget — Predavanje REkonstrukcija Zoran Radojičić, Srbija 19.30—21.00 Kulturni centar GRAD — Predavanja Šrek siti: Privatni prostor u Bukureštu i druge priče Konstantin Goađea, Rumunija Akcija i REakcija: Slika postkomunističke graditeljske kulture u Bugarskoj Peter Torniov, Bugarska utorak, 30. jun četvrtak, 2. jul 17.00 Likovna galerija KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Dečja radionica: REži, REndaj! Vodi: Dečji kulturni centar 17.00 Likovna galerija KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Dečija radionica: sREdi REsto! Vodi: Dečji kulturni centar 18.00—19.30 Austrijski kulturni forum — Predavanja Uvodna reč: Markus Pifl, organizacija Transeo, Austrija Dobronamerni vanzemaljci u kućama starih ljudi Grac: Savremena arhitektura u istorijskom gradskom jezgru Markus Cehner, Austrija Centar Graca kao mešavina istorijskih fasada i palata, stalnih postavki umetničkih instalacija i moderne arhitekture Biljana Aranđelović, Austrija 18.00 Francuski kulturni centar — Predstavljanje izložbe Grad Avr, rekonstruisan po ideji Ogista Perea O izložbi govori: Žozef Abram, Francuska 20.00 Dom Omladine, foaje I sprat — Predavanja Svakodnevni život, Zigfrid Los (polar ÷), Austrija Projekti, Andreas Bremhorst (architekten CHRISTOPH KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST), Austrija 18.30 Svečana sala Opštine Stari Grad — Predavanja TYPUS ili TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – – Projekti i misaone osnove Mirjana Marković (MRLV Architekten), Nemačka od 19.00 REinterpretacija slobodnog plana Stanko Gaković, SAD od 20.00 Morfozis Tom Mejn, SAD petak, 3. jul sreda, 1. jul 17.00 Likovna galerija KCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Dečija radionica: REđaj, REđaj! Vodi: Dečji kulturni centar 19.00—20.45 Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget — Razgovor Srbija na bijenalima arhitekture u Veneciji Uvodna reč: Snežana Ristić Učesnici: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić 9.00 – 19.30 Italijanski institut za kulturu u Beogradu KONFERENCIJA: REdefinisanje posleratne stambene arhitekture Uvodna reč: Tanja Konli (Univerzitet u Beogradu) Učesnici: Žozef Abram (Škola arhitekture u Nansiju), Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper (Tehnički univerzitet u Berlinu), Ilejn Harvud (English Heritage), Marike Kajpers (Tehnički univerzitet u Delftu), Paola di Bjađi (Univerzitet u Trstu), Alesandra Čeroti (Univerzitet u Rimu), Đovani Kaudo (Univerzitet u Rimu), Pit Ekert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten) 19.00 Biblioteka grada Beograda, čitaonica odeljenja za umetnost, II sprat — Film Urbana rekreacija, Kongres studenata arhitekture ex Jugoslavije (ASK 09 EXYU) Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) X subota, 4. jul 10.00 Okupljanje: Centralni dom vojske Srbije Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda, autobusom: Superblokovi Novog Beograda Vode: Tanja Konli i Ivan Kucina 17.00 Urbanistički zavod Beograda — Predstavljanje izložbe RE_Beograd: Stari i novi studentska radionica Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu 18.00—19.30 Urbanistički zavod Beograda — Okrugli sto Šta sa Novim Beogradom? Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević IZLOŽBE Kulturni centar Beograda: Likovna galerija Nagrade za arhitekturu i arhitektonsko – urbanistički konkursi u periodu 2008/09. Kulturni centar Beograda: Galerija Artget E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Švajcarska Kulturni centar Beograda: hol ispred galerije Artget Territorial Agency (Territorial Agency), Švajcarska Galerija O3one RE_fokus (Könz Molo Architetti), Švajcarska Dom omladine, foaje I sprat Mladi bečki arhitekti (Young Viennese Architects – YO.V.A.2), Austrija Kulturni centar GRAD, I sprat Savremena arhitektura u regionu: Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku kustosi: Konstantin Goađea, Rumunija i Peter Torniov, Bugarska Koordinator: Ivan Kucina, Srbija XI Kulturni centar GRAD, prizemlje Povratak rekama – pokretač života u gradu Koncept: Ružica Bogdanović, Društvo urbanista Beograda Postavka traje od 26. do 30. juna EUNIC – Italijanski institut za kulturu Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji Naselja INCIS-a u Rimu: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima Kustos: Alesandra Čeroti, Italija EUNIC – Francuski kulturni centar Grad Avr, rekonstruisan po ideji Ogista Perea Kustos: Žozef Abram, Francuska EUNIC – Austrijski kulturni forum Procesi REstauracije istorijskog nasleđa, Austrija EUNIC – Gete institut Devedeset godina Bauhausa: Knjige o Bauhausu u biblioteci Gete instituta u Beogradu Opština Vračar: ulazni hol BINA konkurs za mlade arhitekte Urbanističko-arhitektonsko rešenje slobodne površine na uglu ulica Kneginje Zorke i Mekenzijeve na Vračaru u Beogradu, Pokrovitelj: Opština Vračar Organizator: Društvo arhitekata Beograda Izlozi u ulici Kneza Mihaila Beograd – pozlaćeni presek: Projekat LEGATIO – valorizacija austrijskog graditeljskog nasleđa na teritoriji Beograda Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) BINA izložbeni prostori Extra – mûros: Očaravajuće arhitekture Zavod za arhitekturu i baštinu grada Pariza, Francuska Urbanistički zavod Beograda RE... Beograd: Stari i novi studentska radionica Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu MESTA DEŠAVANJA — VENUES 1 Kulturni centar Beograda: Likovna galerija, Knez Mihailova 6 Galerija Artget, Trg Republike 5/I (radno vreme obe galerije svakog dana od 12.00 do 21.00) 2 Galerija O3one, Andrićev venac 12 (radno vreme svakog dana od 11.00 do 20.00, nedeljom zatvoreno) 3 Dom omladine, foaje I sprat, Makedonska 22 4 Kulturni centar GRAD, Braće Krsmanović 4 (radno vreme svakog dana od 10.00 do 19.00h) 5 Italijanski institut za kulturu, Kneza Miloša 56 (radno vreme od 10.00 do 17.00, vikendom zatvoreno) 6 Francuski kulturni centar, Zmaj Jovina 11 (radno vreme od utorka do petka od 12.00 do 18.00 subotom od 10.00 do 15.00, ponedeljkom zatvoreno) 7 Austrijski kulturni forum, Kneza Mihaila 22/II–III (radno vreme od 8.00 do 16.00, vikendom zatvoreno) 8 Gete institut Beograd, Kneza Mihaila 5 9 Opština Vračar, Njegoševa 77 10 Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Palmotićeva 30 (radno vreme svakog dana od 8.00 do 18.00) XII PROGRAMME Friday, June 26th 19.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery Opening Ceremony of the Fourth Belgrade International Architecture Week – BINA 2009 Saturday, June 27th 11.00 Gathering: Cvetni trg, in front of the supermarket A Walk Through Architecture of Belgrade: East Vračar, Savinac and Neimar quarters Led by: Mirjana Roter–Blagojević 13.00 Vračar Municipality, Entrance hall — Opening of the Exhibition and Award Ceremony BINA Competition for Young Architects: Urban–architectural design for the open space on the corner of Kneginje Zorke and Mekenzijeva St. in Vračar Municipality in Belgrade 14.00 – 17.00 From Slavija to Čuburski Park Landscape Architecture and the City Exhibition of students’ works and installations PUPA – Youth of The Association of Landscape Architects The exhibition is opened from June 27th till 28th 2009. 18.00 – 21.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery — Lectures E2A: Fractions of Reality, Wim Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Switzerland RE_focus, Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz (Könz Molo Architetti), Switzerland un–think, John Palmesino (Territorial Agency), Switzerland Discussion moderator: Srđan Jovanović Weiss XIII Sunday, June 28th 11.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery Expert Guidance Through the Exhibition E2A: Fractions of Reality Led by: Wim Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Switzerland 12.00 Gathering: In front of the Central Army Hall A Walk Through Architecture of Belgrade, by bus: Without Continuity there is no Identity Led by: Marta Vukotić–Lazar 14.00 Gathering: Art Gallery CCB, Knez Mihailova 6 A Walk Through Architecture of Belgrade: RE... From Terazije to Kalemegdan Led by: Ljiljana Miletić–Abramović 00.00 Gathering: Art Gallery CCB, Knez Mihailova 6 Midnight Walk Through Modern Architecture of Old Belgrade Led by: Ivan Kucina Monday, June 29th 17.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery Children’s Workshop: REorder! Led by: Children’s Cultural Centre 18.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery — Lecture REconstruction Zoran Radojičić, Serbia 19.30 – 21.00 Cultural Centre GRAD — Lectures Shreck city: The Non Public Space in Bucharest and Other Stories Constantin Goagea, Romania Action and REaction: Picture of the Post Communist Building Culture in Bulgaria Peter Torniov, Bulgaria Tuesday, June 30th Thursday, July 2nd 17.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery Children’s Workshop: REcut, REgrate! Led by: Children’s Cultural Centre 17.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery Children’s Workshop: REdo the REst! Led by: Children’s Cultural Centre 18.00 – 19.30 Austrian Cultural Forum — Lecture Introduction: Markus Piffl, Organisation Transeo, Austria Friendly Aliens in Old Peoples Homes Graz: Contemporary Architecture in Historic Town Shape Markus Zechner, Austria Center of Graz as a Mix of Historical Facades and Domes, Permanent Art Installations and Modern Architecture Biljana Aranđelović, Austria 18.00 French Cultural Centre — Exhibition Presentation Le Havre, the City Reconstructed Upon the Idea of August Peret Exhibition explanation: Joseph Abram, France 20.00 Cultural Centre Dom omladine, foyer 1st floor — Lectures Every Day Life, Siegfried Loos (polar ÷), Austria Projects, Andreas Bremhorst (architekten CHRISTOPH KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST), Austria 18.30 Formal Hall of the Stari Grad Municipality — Lectures TYPUS or TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – – Designs and Contemplative Basis Mirjana Marković (MRLV Architekten), Germany from 19.00 REinterpretation of the Open Plan Concept Stanko Gaković, USA from 20.00 Morphosis Thom Mayne, USA Wednesday, July 1st Friday, July 3rd 17.00 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery Children’s Workshop: RElay, RElay! Led by: Children’s Cultural Centre 9.00 – 19.30 Italian Institute for Culture in Belgrade CONFERENCE: REdefining Post–WWII Housing Welcome: Tanja Conley (University of Belgrade) Participants: Joseph Abram (School of Architecture Nancy), Gabi Dolff–Bonekämper (Technical University Berlin), Elain Harwood (English Heritage), Marieke Kuipers (Technical University Delft), Paola di Biagi (University of Trieste), Alessandra Cerroti (University of Rome), Giovanni Caudo (University of Rome), Piet Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland) 19.00 – 20.45 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery — Conversation Serbia on Venice Architecture Biennales Introduction: Snežana Ristić Participants: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić 19.00 Belgrade City Library, Department of Art, Reading room 2nd floor — Movie Urban REcreation, The Congress of Architecture Students of former Yugoslavia (ASK 09 EXYU), Young Architects’ Club XIV Saturday, July 4th 10.00 Gathering in front of The Central Army Hall Guided bus tour: Superblocks of New Belgrade Led by: Tanja Conley and Ivan Kucina 17.00 Institute of Urbanism Belgrade — Exhibition Presentation RE_Belgrade: Old and New Student’s workshop Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade 18.00 – 19.30 Institute of Urbanism Belgrade — Round table What Should We Do With New Belgrade? Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević (Institute of Urbanism Belgrade) EXHIBITIONS Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Art Gallery Awards for Architecture and Architectural and Urban Planning Competitions 2008/09 Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Artget Gallery E2A: Fractions of Reality (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten), Switzerland Cultural Centre of Belgrade: Hall in front of the Artget Gallery Territorial Agency (Territorial Agency), Switzerland O3one Gallery RE_focus (Könz Molo architetti), Switzerland Cultural Centre Dom omladine, foyer 1st floor Young Viennese Architects (YO.V.A.2), Austria Cultural Centre GRAD, 1st floor Contemporary Architecture in the Region: Architecture of Romania and Bulgaria in 21st Century Curators: Constantin Goagea, Romania and Peter Torniov, Bulgaria, Coordinator: Ivan Kucina, Serbia XV Cultural Centre GRAD, groundfloor Riverfront REclaimed – Charging City Life Concept: Ružica Bogdanović, Town Planners Association EUNIC – Italian Institute for Culture Post-WWII social housing in Italy INCIS Estates in Rome: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima Curator: Alessandra Cerroti, Italy Coordinators: Roberta Gentile and Paola Guidugli, Italy EUNIC – French Cultural Centre Le Havre, the City reconstructed upon the idea of August Peret, Curator: Joseph Abram, France EUNIC – Austrian Cultural Forum REstoration processes of historic treasures, Austria EUNIC – Goethe Institute Ninety years of Bauhaus: Books about Bauhaus in the library of Goethe Institute Belgrade Vračar Municipality, entrance hall BINA Competition for Young Architects: Urban–architectural design for the open space on the corner of Kneginje Zorke and Mekenzijeva St. in Vračar Municipality in Belgrade, Patron: Vračar Municipality Windows at Knez Mihailova Street Belgrade – the Gilded Ratio: Project LEGATIO – Valorisation of Austrian Building Heritage on the Territory of Belgrade, Serbia Organisation: Young Architects’ Club BINA Venues Extra – mûros: Architecture of Delight City of Architecture and Patrimoine of Paris, France Institute of Urbanism Belgrade RE... Belgrade: Old and New Student’s workshop Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade IZLOŽBE EXHIBITIONS (3) Kategorije: 1) najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo iz svih oblasti arhitekture – Godišnja nagrada i 2) izvedeno delo naših arhitekata koje je realizovano u inostranstvu – Povelja Nagrade za arhitekturu Ovogodišnja BINA, četvrta u nizu, u svoj program uvrstila je jednu novu izložbu: „Nagrade za arhitekturu“. Izložba predstavlja osam nagrada različitih institucija dodeljenih u periodu između prošlogodišnje i ovogodišnje Nedelje arhitekture, od juna 2008. do juna 2009. godine. O nagradama, u tekstu koji sledi, navodimo sledeće podatke: termin dodele nagrade, (1) naziv nagrade, (2) naziv institucije koja dodeljuje nagradu i (3) osnovne propozicije nagrade. decembar (1) NAGRADA RANKO RADOVIĆ (2) osnivač ULUPUDS i Arhitektonski fakultet u Beogradu, Fakultet tehničkih nauka u Novom Sadu – departman za arhitekturu i urbanizam, IAUS, Zadužbina Ilije Milosavljevića Kolarca (3) Nagrada je osnovana sa ciljem da podstiče, razvija i afirmiše kritičko - teorijsku misao u oblasti arhitekture i arhitektonsko stvaralaštvo. Kategorije: 1) kritičko – teorijski tekstovi o arhitekturi 2) televizijske emisije, izložbe ili multimedijalne prezentacije i 3) realizovano arhitektonsko delo. januar (1) VELIKA NAGRADA ZA ARHITEKTURU SAS (2) Savez arhitekata Srbije (3) SAS dodeljuje Veliku nagradu svojim najistaknutijim članovima za celokupni opus. februar (1) GODIŠNJA NAGRADA ZA ARHITEKTURU SAS (2) Savez arhitekata Srbije pod pokroviteljstvom Ministarstva za zaštitu životne sredine i prostorno planiranje 2 — IZLOŽBE mart (1) NAGRADA ZA ARHITEKTURU KOMPANIJE “NOVOSTI” (2) Kompanija “Novosti” a.d. (3) Nagrada se dodeljuje radi podsticanja najviših dostignuća u arhitektonskom stvaralaštvu Kategorije: 1) za najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo realizovano u prethodnoj godini i 2) za najuspešniji projekat studenta arhitekture u prethodnoj godini mart (1) NAGRADA SALONA ARHITEKTURE U BEOGRADU (2) Muzej primenjene umetnosti – odsek za arhitekturu, urbanizam i arhitektonski dizajn (3) U okviru izložbene manifestacije dodeljuju se: Grand prix Salona i Priznanja u sledećim kategorijama: Arhitektura, Arhitektura – projekti, Enterijer, Urbanizam, Gosti Salona – delo u inostranstvu i Publikacije. april (1) NAGRADA GRADA BEOGRADA (2) Skupština grada Beograda (3) Nagrada grada Beograda dodeljuje se za delo koje predstavlja najvrednije dostignuće u umetnosti, nauci, medicini, arhitekturi i urbanizmu, novinarstvu, obrazovanju i sportu, realizovano u prethodnoj godini. maj (1) NAGRADA IZ FONDA ALEKSANDAR ŠALETIĆ (2) ULUPUDS, Majska izložba (3) Nagrada se dodeljuje za najbolja ostvarenja iz oblasti projektovanja enterijera. jun (1) NAGRADA INŽENJERSKE KOMORE SRBIJE (2) Upravni odbor Inžinjerske komore Srbije (3) Godišnja nagrada se dodeljuje: 1) za životno delo, 2) za izuzetno dostignuće u struci iz delatnosti članova Komore i 3) za ostvarivanje izuzetnih rezultata na početku stručne karijere. Milenija Marušić i Darko Marušić Upravno poslovni objekat METALS BANKE, Stražilovska 2, Novi Sad Nagrada Ranko Radović u kategoriji realizovano arhitektonsko delo Društvo arhitekata Beograda i Kulturni centar Beograda (Autori manifestacije: Jelena Ivanović-Vojvodic, Danica Jovović Prodanović, Ivan Kucina, Darko Marušić, Ružica Sarić) III MEĐUNARODNA NEDELJA ARHITEKTURE 2008. Nagrada Ranko Radović u kategoriji televizijske emisije, izložbe, multimedijalne prezentacije Ognjenka Finci IZAJN SISTEMA URBANOG MOBILIJARA I VIZUELNIH KOMUNIKACIJA, Asocijacija arhitekata Sarajeva, 2008. Nagrada Ranko Radović u kategoriji kritičko teorijski tekstovi o arhitekturi, urbanizmu i gradu Dušan Krstić Velika nagrada za arhitekturu Saveza arhitekata Srbije Goran Vojvodić, Gordana Šišović i Dušan Radišić Upravna zgrada “Porše” u Beogradu Godišnja nagrada za arhitekturu Saveza arhitekata Srbije u kategoriji za najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo – godišnja nagrada 31. Salon arhitekture, Priznanje u kategoriji arhitekture Nagrada grada Beograda Vesna Cagić i Ksenija Bulatović Poslovni objekat u Takovskoj ulici u Beogradu Nagrada za arhitekturu kompanije «NOVOSTI» u kategoriji za najuspešnije arhitektonsko delo realizovano u prethodnoj godini Jovan Sarić i Ružica Sarić Stambeno poslovni objekat u Budvi Godišnja nagrada za arhitekturu Saveza arhitekata Srbije u kategoriji za izvedeno delo naših arhitekata koje je realzovano u inostranstvu 31. Salon arhitekture, Priznanje u kategoriji arhitekture Hana Drašković “Kula - hotel i garaža” Nagrada za arhitekturu kompanije «NOVOSTI» u kategoriji za najuspešniji projekat studenta arhitekture u prethodnoj godini Katarina Bosnić Beogradski apartman Nagrada Aleksandar Šaletić za enterijer Branislav Mitrović Nagrada Inženjerske komore Srbije za životno delo Ela Nešić i Danilo Nedeljković Enterijer prodavnice “Prizma” Nagrada Aleksandar Šaletić za enterijer Marija Savković i Marija Milanović Konkurs za idejno arhitektonsko rešenje zgrade Oblasnog centra kontrole letenja na aerodromu “Nikola Tesla” Nagrada Inženjerske komore Srbije za ostvarivanje izuzetnih rezultata na početku stučne karijere Biljana Cvejić i Milan Dimitrijević Hotel “Townhouse 27” u Beogradu Grand prix 31. Salona arhitekture Awards for Architecture This year BINA, fourth in a row, introduced a new Exhibition in its Programme. The Exhibition, entitled “Awards for Architecture”, presents eight awards bestowed by different Institutions in the period between last year’s and this year’s BINA, from June of 2008 until June of 2009. In the follow-up, we present a fact sheet about the Awards, which includes: the time when the award is announced (1) the name of the Award (2) name of the institutions that bestows the Award, and (3) basic description of the Awards. December (1) RANKO RADOVIĆ AWARD, (2) ULUPUDS (Association of Applied Arts Artists and Designers of Serbia), as the founder, together with Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade, Faculty of Technical Sciences in Novi Sad – Department for Architecture and Urbanism, IAUS, The Ilija M. Kolarac Foundation. (3) The Award was established with an aim to support, develop and foster analytical review and theoretic thought in the area of architecture as well as architectural endeavour. Categories: 1) analytic reviews and theoretical texts on architecture 2) television programmes, exhibitions, or multimedia presentations 3) realised work of architecture. January (1) ASSOCIATION OF ARCHITECTS OF SERBIA GRAND PRIX (2) Association of Architects of Serbia (3) AAS awards the Grand Prix to its most prominent members for their entire opus. February (1) AAS ANNUAL ARCHITECTURE AWARD, (2) Association of Architects of Serbia under auspices of the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning (3) Categories: 1) most successful architecture work from all the areas of architecture – Annual Award 2) realised work of our architects abroad – Charter 5 — IZLOŽBE March (1) NOVOSTI COMPANY ARCHITECTURE AWARD (2) Publishing company “Novosti” (3) The Award is bestowed for the purpose of encouraging the highest achievements in architectural endeavour. Categories: 1) most successful architectural work realised in previous year 2) most successful project of a student of architecture in the previous year March (1) BELGRADE ARCHITECTURE SALON AWARD (2) Museum of Applied Arts - Department of architecture, urbanism and architectural design (3) Within the manifestations, the following awards are given: Grand Prix of the Salon and Commendations in the following categories: “Architecture”, “Architecture – Projects“, “Interior Design”, “Town Planning“, “ Guest of the Salon - Work done abroad” and “Publications“. April (1) CITY OF BELGRADE AWARD (2) Belgrade City Assembly (3) The Award of the City of Belgrade is bestowed for a work that represents the most valuable achievement in arts, science, medicine, architecture and urbanism, journalism, education and sport, and was completed in the previous year. May (1) ALEKSANDAR ŠALETIĆ FUND AWARD (2) ULUPUDS, May Exhibition (3) The Award is bestowed for best accomplishments in the area of interior design. June (1) AWARD OF THE CHAMBER OF ENGINEERS (2) Chamber of Engineers Steering Committee (3) The Annual Award is bestowed for: 1) Lifetime Achievment 2) for outstanding achievement in the profession performed by the members of the Chamber 3) for outstanding results at the beginning of a professional career. Arhitektonski i urbanistički konkursi 2008/09. Architectural and Urban Planning Competitions 2008/09 Prikaz godišnje produkcije arhitektonsko-urbanističkih konkursa, stalna je rubrika BINE. Osnovni cilj izložbe konkursnih radova je afirmacija dragocene institucije konkursa i ukazivanje na neophodnost negovanja konkursne tradicije. Neka primetna konkursna oseka, u periodu između proslogodišnje i ovogodišnje BINE, bude i svojevrstan apel Društva arhitekata Beograda nadležnim gradskim institucijama za raspisivanje konkursa. Konkursi su svetski priznata nadmetanja najboljih arhitektonskourbanističkih radova za najkvalitetnija rešenja. Ne postoji brži i jasniji način za unapređenje arhitekture i urbanizma neke sredine. One of the constant headings of BINA is review of the yearly production of the architectural and urban planning competitions. The main goal of the exhibition of the competition works is affirmation of the precious institution of competitions and pointing out to the necessity of cherishing its tradition. Let the noticeable low tide of competitions, between this and last year’s BINA, be a special appeal of the Association of Belgrade Architect, to the competent city administration for competition announcement. Competitions are worldwide accepted way of competing between the best architectural and urban planning works, for the best quality solutions. There is no faster and better way for improving of the architecture and urbanism of a certain envoirment. 6 — IZLOŽBE Re:A.C.T.(Grozdana Šišović, Tanja Bajić i Dejan Milanović) Konkurs za idejno rešenje objekta u Ulici Skadarskoj br. 34 u Beogradu I nagrada Jelena Mandić i Mirjana Todorović Konkurs za idejno rešenje fontane sa partnernim rešenjem prostora ispred poslovne zgrade Jugoimport na Novom Beogradu I nagrada studija. Biro je osvojio prvu nagradu za izradu glavnog projekta za Escher Wyss Areal, najveću industrijsku zonu u Cirihu. Projekat predviđa izgradnju Escher-Terrassen, 60 m visoku zgradu sa apartmanima i pozornicama za probe ciriške Opere, čija je izrada naručena od E2A (planirano je da se radovi završe do 2011). Projekti E2A su objavljeni u brojnim časopisima i knjigama. Godine 2006. izdata je monografija 15 De aedibus. E2A (izdavač: Quart Verlag, Lucern). E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti E2A: Fractions of Reality Izložba radova biroa E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten, Švajcarska exhibition of the buro E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland U svetu sa sve većim brojem izmučenih arhitektonskih uloga, sa sumnjivim kontekstualnim postojanostima, ekonomskim pritiskom, u svetu koji vrtoglavom brzinom stremi ka novim ekološkim standardima, dosežemo granice perfekcionizma. Našim radovima izrazili smo stanje uma koje konceptualizuje arhitekturu i urbanizam kao skladan nesklad, ukazujući na to da nova, moderna mreža povezuje nejednakosti. Modernizacija ne mora biti skladna, ne mora da se nameće čitavom sistemu. Ona postaje sistem osobenosti i neprekidno predviđanje, najzad, kolaž koji može da poveže razlike, polaritete i suprotnosti u jedan pojam mašte. Ona oslobađa otpor sistemu koji je neprijateljski nastrojen prema novim idejama i potrebama za prilagođavanjem, imajući na umu da bi stoga novina trebalo da bude izmenjena na čitavom opsegu „skladne” sfere. Prema tome, savršeni način čitanja naših stvarnosti je onaj koji je nemoguće dovršiti. Izloženo je jedanaest fragmenata protumačenih stvarnosti koji će biti detaljnije obrađeni tokom predavanja. Within a world of increasingly tortured architectural roles, of doubtful contextual stabilities, economic pressure and breathless speed towards new ecological standards, we reach the limits of a perfectionist world. Through our work we have formulated a mindset to conceptualize architecture and urbanism as a systematic incoherence reflecting that a new modern network interlocks inequalities. Modernization does not have to be coherent, does not need a form of imposition on the entire system. It becomes a system of particularities and continuous anticipation, finally a collage that is capable to cast difference, polarities and contrast into one idea of imagination. It frees the resistance of a system hostile to new ideas and to needs of adaptation, bearing in mind that consequently newness would need to be changed on an entire scale of a “coherent” sphere. The ideal reading of our realities is therefore one that is impossible to complete. 11 fractions of interpreted realities are exhibited and will be further elaborated throughout the lecture. — Braća Pit i Vim Ekert otvorili su svoj biro 1997. u Cirihu, koji je 2001. postao E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten. Ovaj biro trenutno zapošljava trideset arhitekata koji rade na petnaest projekata. E2A izrađuje arhitektonske i urbanističke projekte u vidu interdisciplinarnih procesa sa više autora. Konceptualni razvoj je spoj analitičke percepcije konteksta i hipotetičkog, programskog pristupa koji prikazuje jedno tumačenje savremenih uslova. Skorašnji i sadašnji projekti predstavljaju prelaz na širi opseg koji obuhvata više javnih projekata i urbanističkih — The brothers Piet and Wim Eckert established their office in 1997 in Zurich and became E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten in 2001. Currently, the practice employs 30 architects working on15 projects. E2A conceives architectural and urban projects as an interdisciplinary process, as a multiple authorship. The conceptual development is a synthesis of an analytic perception of the context and a hypothetical, programmatic approach outlining an interpretation of the contemporary conditions. Recent and current projects represent a change to a 8 — IZLOŽBE E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten Centar za sluh i jezik, Švajcarska, Cirih konkurs 2003, I nagrada, realizovano 2006 - 2008 foto: Dominik Mark Verli E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten Centre for Hearing and Language, CH-Zurich competition 2003, 1st Prize, realization 2006 - 2008 photo: Dominique Marc Wehrli larger scale, which includes several public projects as well as urban studies. The practice was awarded with the first prize for the Master plan for the Escher Wyss Areal, the largest industrial area in Zurich. The plan foresees the construction of the Escher-Terrassen, a 60m highrise building with apartments and the rehearsal stages of the Zurich Opera, for which E2A was commissioned (completion planned 2011). Projects of E2A have been published in numerous magazines and books. In 2006, the monograph 15 De aedibus. E2A (Quart Verlag, Lucerne) was released. Teritorijal ejdžensi Izložba radova biroa Teritorijal ejdžensi, Švajcarska Međuzavisnost je ključna karakteristika sveta u XXI veku. Transformacije u jednom sistemu utiču na dinamiku u drugim sistemima, a te veze često funkcionišu i na širokim prostorima. Naše naseobine postaju sve povezanije jedna s drugom, što je posledica globalizacije, i sve se više oslanjaju na prirodne prostore u koje su usađene kako bi prosperirale. Territorial Agency postavlja pitanje kako arhitektura može da organizuje koherentan skup širokih teritorijalnih transformacija uz integrisanje postojećih sila i dinamika. Gledano s konvencionalne tačke gledišta, od arhitekture se očekuje da proizvodi prostorna rešenja prema zadatim smernicama. Territorial Agency pokušava da preokrene ovo shvatanje i istraži kako arhitektonsko znanje može da se aktivira kako bi se stvorio zajednički koordinatni sistem za mnogobrojne aktere i zainteresovane činioce koji bi informisao, preoblikovao i transformisao budućnost naših teritorija. Territorial Agency se obraća pitanju kako arhitektura može da postavi kontinuitet promena i angažovanje prirodnih, političkih, kulturnih i ekonomskih snaga kao svoj osnovni stav, nasuprot svom trenutnom modernističkom pristupu pukog rešavanja problema. Izložba sakuplja materijale iz raznih izvora i oblasti kako bi predstavila niz hitnih pitanja o transformacijama savremenih naseljenih teritorija. U opsegu od geopolitičkih transformacija na dalekom severu do pregovora o kulturi urbanih promena u Unutrašnjoj Mongoliji, od klimatskih promena koje preoblikuju urbanu rečnu deltu u Holandiji do institucionalnih demokratskih instrumenata lokalne samouprave u Švajcarskoj, od cirkulacija i novih zbližavanja povezanih sa evropskim migracijama, do 10 — IZLOŽBE hermetičkih i gotovo samoreferentnih krugova proizvodnje znanja i inovacija; od preoblikovanja suverenog prostora kroz rad na terenu nevladinih organizacija do infrastrukturnih mreža Ujedinjenih nacija širokog obima, izložba istražuje kako međusobno delovanje komponenti savremene teritorije, od kojih mnoge nisu oblikovali ljudi, trajno regeneriše i transformiše procese koji su ih i stvorili. Territorial Agency istražuje kako arhitektura redefiniše svoju ulogu, kako se postavlja prema mogućnosti dinamičnog ljudskog okruženja koje je pod stalnim izmenama: jedno nedovršivo angažovanje u čijem je središtu prostor u transformaciji. — Territorial Agency je samostalna organizacija koja na inovativan način promoviše i radi na projektima održivih teritorijalnih transformacija. Territorial Agency radi na jačanju kapaciteta koji se tiču upravljanja prostornim transformacijama u lokalnim zajednicama, ali i na međunarodnom nivou. Territorial Agency se bavi uspostavljanjem instrumenata i metoda kojima se osigurava veći kvalitet arhitekture i urbanizma na savremenim prostorima. Projekti Territorial Agency kanališu dostupne prostorne resurse ka njihovom razvoju u punom kapacitetu. Territorial Agency su osnovali Džon Palmezino i En-Sofi Renskog. www.territorialagency.com Territorial Agency exhibition of the buro Territorial Agency, Switzerland Interdependence is the defining characteristic of the 21st century world. Transformations in one system affect dynamics in other systems, and the connections operate often over wide areas. Our inhabited environments are becoming more and more linked with one another, as an effect of globalisation, and they rely more and more on the natural spaces they are inserted in to flourish. Territorial Agency asks how architecture can organise a coherent set of wide-scale territorial transformations, integrating existing forces and dynamics. Conventionally architecture is seen to produce spatial solutions to defined briefs. Territorial Agency attempts to Sariselka © Territorial Agency — Saariselkä © Territorial Agency reverse this and investigate how architecture knowledge can be activated to generate a shared image of reference for the multiple actors and stake-holders that will inform, reshape and transform the future of our territories. Territorial Agency addresses how architecture can pose continuity of change and engagement with natural, political, cultural, social and economic forces as its fundamental attitude, as opposed to its current modernist problem-solving approach. The exhibition collects materials from a variety of sources and domains to present a series of urgent questions about the transformations of contemporary inhabited territories. Ranging from the geopolitical transformations in the High North to cultural negotiations around urban change in Inner Mongolia, from climate change reshaping the metropolitan delta of the Netherlands to institutional assets of local democracy in Switzerland, from the circulations and new proximities linked to migrations in Europe, to the closed-off and almost self referential circuits of contemporary knowledge production and innovation; from the remoulding of sovereign space through the action on the ground of Non-Governmental Organisations to the sweeping infrastructural networks of 11 — IZLOŽBE the UN, the exhibition investigates how the interplay of the components of the contemporary territory, many of which non-human, continuously regenerate and transform the processes that formed them. Territorial Agency investigates how architecture is redefining its role, addressing the possibility of an ever changing and dynamic human environment: an unfinishable engagement with a space in transformation. — Territorial Agency is an independent organisation that innovatively promotes and works for sustainable territorial transformations. Territorial Agency works to strengthen the capacity of local and international communities in comprehensive spatial transformation management. Territorial Agency works for the establishment of instruments and methods for ensuring higher architectural and urban quality in the contemporary territories. Territorial Agency’s projects channel available spatial resources towards the development of their full potential. Territorial Agency is established by John Palmesino and Ann-Sofi Rönnskog. www.territorialagency.com RE_focus exhibition of the buro Könz Molo Architetti, Switzerland RE_fokus Izložba radova biroa Kenc Molo arhitekti, Švajcarska Pojedinačne aspiracije u vezi sa teritorijom proširile su se taktom motora sa unutrašnjim sagorevanjem: REpeticija (pojedinačnih objekata, pozicioniranih na podjednakim razdaljinama od svojih osa, stvorila je međuprostore bez značenja: nastanak prigradske periferije jeste univerzalan fenomen. Beskonačna REprodukcija „usamljenih“ zgrada slična je autističnom individualizmu. Skoro neograničena dostupnost resursa i energije imala je nesumnjiv uticaj na prirodu i društvenu ravnotežu. Takođe, ne možemo da umaknemo ovom fenomenu – nalazimo se na sredini njegovog razvoja. Ideja individualizma i slobode, u svakom slučaju ljudskog progresa, ne može se razumeti sama po sebi već samo u odnosu na njen kontekst, u širem smislu. Naša namera je da popunimo te međuprostore, da stvorimo veze, prostore koje su u dijalogu: koncentrisane REvolucionare protiv ekspanzije. Tražeći razliku – i što se tiče posebnosti, i što se tiče potencijala nekog mesta – tražimo zgušnjavanje. Pokušavamo da se fokusiramo na ono što je tipično. (RE-fokusirajmo se na tipično, i na osobeno.) Želeli bismo da skrenemo pažnju na tri projekta koji predstavljaju tri tipa stanovanja: 1_ kuća za bračni par 3_ zgrada za tri porodice 72_ objekat za 72 studenta. — Kenc Molo arhitekti, Lugano, Švajcarska. Osnovani 1992. Partneri: Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc www.koenzmolo.ch 12 — IZLOŽBE Individual aspirations for the territory have expanded at the rhythm of an internal combustion engine: the repetition (RE-petition) of single objects, positioned at legal distances from their property lines has produced interstitial spaces devoid of meaning: the invention of the suburban periphery is a universal phenomenon. The reproduction (RE-production) ad infinitum of free standing houses is akin to autistic individualism. The near unlimited availability of resources and energy has brought about an undeniable impact on nature and social equilibrium. We also can’t escape from this phenomenon – we find ourselves in the middle of its growth. The idea of individualism and liberty, in any case human progress, can’t be understood in and of itself but only in relation to its context, in the larger sense. Our intention is to fill these interstitial spaces, to create relationships, spaces with dialogue: concentration rebels (RE_bell) against expansion. Searching for a difference, for a particularity and for the potential of any place, we look for densification. We try to focus on the typical. (RE_focus the typical, peculiar). We would like to present three projects which represent three residential typologies: 1_ a house for a single couple 3_ a building for three families 72_ a building for 72 students — Könz Molo architetti, Lugano, Switzerland. Established in 1992. Partners: Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz. www.koenzmolo.ch Jednoporodična kuća Al Ronco, Lugano Pregassona/TI, 2006-2007 (Foto: Walter Mair) — Onefamily House Al Ronco, Lugano Pregassona/TI, 2006-2007 (Foto: Walter Mair) diskusiju i umrežavanje. Kao konkretan proizvod nastao je zajednički panoramski kolaž sa arhitektonskim intervencijama iz priloga svih timova o aktuelnim pitanjima iz oblasti arhitekture i urbanizma. — Vlasnici Mladi bečki arhitekti (YO.V.A.2), Austrija organizator: Magistrat glavnog grada Beča koncept izložbe: Mihael Dim Radi davanja podsticaja mladim bečkim arhitektama, član Vlade grada Beča zadužen za razvoj grada i saobraćaj, dipl. inž. Rudolf Šiker je 2005. godine pokrenuo projekat „YO.V.A. – Young Viennese Architects“, kao sastavni deo Bečke godine arhitekture. Projekat je nastavljen u jesen 2007. Izložba YO.V.A.2 (na nemačkom i engleskom jeziku) treba da posluži kao platforma za predstavljanje inovativnih kreacija, ideja i koncepata mladih arhitekata. U širokoj i otvorenoj potrazi za učesnicima pronađene su osobe i grupe koje su deo mladog, urbanog i živahnog bečkog arhitektonskog dešavanja. Pravo učešća imali su mladi arhitekti do 45 godina iz arhitektonskih biroa u Beču. Kriterijumi za izbor bili su, između ostalog, inovativni karakter i samostalnost prezentovanih projekata. Žiri sastavljen od predstavnika iz oblasti arhitekture, arhitektonskog obrazovanja, Grada Beča, Komore arhitekata i inženjerskih konzolenata, Austrijskog društva arhitekture i Interesnog udruženja arhitekture, izabrao je učesnike na osnovu projekata koje su predali. Od mnoštva kandidatura izabrano je dvanaest arhitektonskih timova: SUE ARCHITEKTEN, SOLID architecture, nonconform architektur vor ort, t-hoch-n ARCHITEKTUR, Veit Aschenbrenner Architekten, gharkhanzadeh sandbichler architekten zt gmbh, polar, HEIN-TROY Architekten, kiskan kaufmann, CHRISTOPH KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST Architekten, HOLODECK architects i x architekten. Pre izbora ovi timovi su se međusobno samo površno poznavali, pa su pripreme za izložbu iskoristili za stručnu 14 — IZLOŽBE Magistrat glavnog grada Beča Magistratsko odeljenje 18 – Razvoj grada i urbanizam Referat za rad s javnošću i upravljanje znanjem 1, Rathausstrasse 14-16, 1082 Beč, Austrija Telefon: +43-1-4000 88720 Telefax: +43-1-4000 7271 E-mail: info@ma18.wien.gv.at Web: www.stadtentwicklung.wien.at Koncepcija sadržaja dipl. inž. Mihael Dim MA 19 – Arhitektura i uređenje grada Grafika i dizajn Izložba: Schreiner & Kastler Katalog: Schreiner & Kastler Internet: www.wien.at/stadtentwicklung/architektur/yova Young Viennese Architect (YO.V.A.2), Austrija organized by: Stadtentwicklung Wien exhibition concept: Michael Diem Wanting to offer impetus to young Viennese architects, a Vienna City Councillor for Urban Development, Traffic and Transport, Mr. Rudolph Schicker, BE, started the project “YO.V.A”. – Young Viennese Architects – in 2005, as part of the Viennese Year of Architecture. The Project was continued in the autumn of 2007. Exhibition YO.V.A.2 (in German and in English) is supposed to serve as platform for the presentation of innovative creations, ideas and concepts of young architects. In a wide and open search for the participants, the Project found individuals, and groups, who are part of the young, urban and lively Viennese architectural activities. The right to participate was given to young architects aged 45 or less that work in architecture bureaus in Vienna. The criteria for selection were, among others, innovative character and autonomy in realisation of the presented designs. A jury composed of representatives of the areas of architecture and architectural education from the City of Vienna, the Chamber of Architects and Engineers, Austrian Architectural Society and Architects’ Interest Association chose participants based on the designs they entered. From the multitude of entries, twelve architectonic teams were chosen for the Project: SUE ARCHITEKTEN, SOLID architecture, nonconform architektur vor ort, t-hoch-n ARCHITEKTUR, Veit Aschenbrenner Architekten, gharkhanzadeh sandbichler architekten zt gmbh, polar, HEIN-TROY Architekten, kiskan kaufmann, CHRISTOPH KARL + ANDREAS BREMHORST Architekten, HOLODECK architects and x architekten. Before the selection, these teams knew each other just vaguely, so they used the preparations for the exhibition for a professional discussion and networking. As the concrete product of this discussion, a joint panoramic collage was incepted with architectural interventions from all the teams that reference current issues in the area of architecture and urbanism. 16 — IZLOŽBE — Owners City Council of Vienna Municipal Department 18 – City Development and Urbanism Sector for Public Relations and Knowledge Management 1, Rathausstrasse 14-16, 1082 Vienna, Austria Telephone: +43-1-4000 88720 Fax: +43-1-4000 7271 E-mail: info@ma18.wien.gv.at Web: www.stadtentwicklung.wien.at Contents Concept Michael Diem, BE MA 19 – Municipal Department for Architecture and Urban Design Graphics & Design Exhibition: Schreiner & Kastler Catalogue: Schreiner & Kastler Internet: www.wien.at/stadtentwicklung/architektur/yova Contemporary architecture in the region: Architecture of Romania and Bulgaria in 21st Century according to magazines Architectura / Bucarest and Abitare / Sofia koordinator: Ivan Kucina curators: Constantin Goagea (Romania) and Peter Torniov (Bulgaria) Savremena arhitektura u regionu: Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku po izboru časopisa Architectura / Bukurešt i Abitare / Sofija koordinator: Ivan Kucina kuratori: Konstantin Goađea (Rumunija) i Peter Torniov (Bugarska) Izložba Arhitektura Rumunije i Bugarske u XXI veku predstavlja drugi nastavak u seriji izložbi posvećenih savremenoj arhitekturi Balkana. Kao i prethodna – Arhitektura Slovenije, Hrvatske i Srbije – i ova izložba je organizovana tako što su odabrani kuratori, istaknuti mladi arhitekti, iz sredina čija se arhitektura predstavlja. Namera organizatora izložbe jeste da se prikažu radovi koji su realizovani posle 2000. godine i projekti koji tek treba da se realizuju. Izabrani radovi ne predstavljaju opšte stanje već, prema mišljenju kuratora, najnapredniji i najkvalitetniji deo arhitektonske produkcije. Značaj ove izložbe i onih koje će biti prikazane u okviru Beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture jeste u tome što one pružaju mogućnost poređenja i povezivanja iskustava arhitekata iz država Balkana koji, iako teritorijalno i kulturno bliski, nisu imali mnogo prilika da razmene saznanja. A u tranzicionim vremenima, u kojima arhitektura gubi svoja prethodna vrednosna uporišta i pokušava da otkrije nova, razmena naprednih ideja i iskustva postaje neophodnost. 17 — IZLOŽBE The Exhibition about architecture of Romania and Bulgaria in 21st century represents the second continuation in the series of exhibitions dedicated to the contemporary architecture of the Balkans. Same as the previous ones – Architecture of Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia –this Exhibition also engaged curators who are eminent young architects from the countries whose architecture is exhibited. The intention of the exhibition organizers is to show the works realized after the year 2000 and projects that are yet to be realized. The chosen works do not represent the overall situation, but, according to curators’ opinions, the most advanced and quality portion of the architectural production. The importance of this Exhibition and the future ones, which will be presented within Belgrade International Architecture Week, lies in the fact that these exhibitions offer the possibility of comparing and linking the experiences of architects who come from the Balkan states, who did not have many opportunities to exchange their knowledge, even though they are territorially and culturally close. Yet, in transitional times, in which architecture loses its previous bases of value and tries to discover new ones, the exchange of progressive ideas and experiences becomes a necessity. Stambeni blok Ljulin, 2006-2007, Sofija, Bugarska IO Architects — Ljulin Apartment Block, 2006-2007, Sofia, Bulgaria IO Architects Prenoćište 2006-2008, Salciua, Alba district, Rumunija SKBD: Attila Kim, Tiberiu Bucsa, Adriana Diaconu — Boarding House 2006-2008, Salciua, Alba district, Romania SKBD: Attila Kim, Tiberiu Bucsa, Adriana Diaconu 19 — IZLOŽBE sajmište kao nukleus Novog Beograda, izabrani radovi projekta Ada Huja (autori: Dragana Bazik i saradnici, Predrag Milošević i saradnici, Vladan Đokića i saradnici) i projekat revitalizacije Kule Nebojše (autori: Dejan Miljković, Branko Pavić, Jovan Mitrović). POVRATAK REKAMA – Pokretač života u gradu koncept izložbe: Ružica Bogdanović Među mnogobrojnim gradovima na vodi značajna tema o kojoj se govori jeste „vodeni front”. Tokom istorijskog razvoja gradova pokretačke aktivnosti locirane su upravo na obalama koje su, nekada na obodu gradske zone, razvojem i širenjem grada postale deo šireg gradskog jezgra. Privredne zone, najčešće brodogradilišta locirana uz vodene tokove (na primerima evropskih gradova kao što su Bilbao, Geteborg, London, Amsterdam, Dablin...) transformišu se u pokretački mehanizam postindustrijskog grada tercijarnih i kvartalnih aktivnosti – usluga, rekreacije, kulture, zabave. Grad Beograd, sa izuzetnom dispozicijom najužeg gradskog jezgra lociranog u neposrednoj blizini ušća Save u Dunav, nema kvalitetnu vezu s vodenim frontom. Tema priobalja je zastupljena u istraživanjima i analizama, kao i manjim intervencijama (konkursno rešenje i realizacija pristaništa, zatim niz parcijalnih projekata za Savski amfiteatar i Staro beogradsko sajmište, Dorćolsku marinu, Kalemegdansku tvrđavu i objekte donjeg Kalemegdana, Dunavski amfiteatar – područje Ade Huje). Međutim, potrebno je da se zona priobalja integralno i planski definiše, ali je – u nedostatku takvog plana – i bavljenje parcijalnim zahvatima kroz navedene teme dobrodošlo. Izložba Društva urbanista Beograda na Beogradskoj internacionalnoj nedelji arhitekture 2009. prikazuje projekte koji su tokom prethodne dve godine promovisali temu „silaska grada” na reke. Izložba prikazuje postojeće stanje Savskog amfiteatra, Starog sajmišta i Dunavskog amfiteatra, zatim pregled projekata: Analiza Savskog amfiteatra, Izložba Staro 20 — IZLOŽBE — Društvo urbanista Beograda je posvećeno promovisanju, organizovanju i objavljivanju širokog spektra projekata u domenu urbanističkog planiranja u Beogradu. Društvo urbanista Beograda predstavilo je svoju delatnost na Belgrade design Week 2007 prostornom postavkom Riverfront reclaimed, koja je zatim prikazana i tokom međunarodne Nedelje arhitekture 2007. Društvo urbanista Beograda je 2008. godine učestvovalo sa autorskom izložbom multimedijalnih projekata Staro beogradsko sajmište kao staro jezgro Novog Beograda, na Salonu arhitekture 2008, u Muzeju primenjene umetnosti u Beogradu. Sa projektom Staro beogradsko sajmište, 70 godina od otvaranja prvog beogradskog međunarodnog sajma uzoraka, Društvo urbanista Beograda je promovisalo svoju delatnost tokom dana Evropske kulturne baštine 2007. godine. RIVERFRONT RECLAIMED – Charging City Life exhibition concept: Ružica Bogdanović In many cities that lie on water, an important topic of conversation is the “water front”. During the historical development of the cities, the driving force activities have been particularly located on the river banks, which, once on the borders of city zones, today belong to the wider city core, a result of the development and the expansion of the city. Industrial zones, most frequently shipyards located alongside the water flows (as in examples of the cities as Bilbao, Goteborg, London, Amsterdam, Dublin etc) are being transformed into the driving force of the post-industrial city’s tertiary and quaternary activities – recreation, culture, entertainment. The City of Belgrade, with the extraordinary layout of its city core located close to the confluence of the rivers Sava and Danube, does not have a quality connection with the water front. The theme of riverfronts is present in Povratak obalama Beton hala na obali reke Save, Beograd — Riverfront reclaimed Beton hala on the river Sava, Belgrade 21 — IZLOŽBE researches and analyses, as well as minor interventions (competition for the pier, a series of partial designs for the Sava’s amphitheatre and the Old Belgrade Fairgrounds, the Dorcol marina, Kalemegdan Fortress and the lower Kalemegdan, Danube’s amphitheatre – Ada Huja area). However, it is necessary to integrate and define the coastal zone through plans, but, in the shortage of a plan, partial actions relating stated themes are also welcome. The exhibition of the Town Planners Association of Belgrade within the Belgrade International Architecture Week 2009 shows the projects which in the previous two years have promoted the theme of the “city descent” to the rivers, The exhibition shows the existing state of the Sava’s amphitheatre, Old Fairgrounds and the Danube amphitheatre, the review of the project: Analysis of the Sava’s amphitheatre; Exhibition Old Fairgrounds as the nucleus of the New Belgrade; chosen works from the project Ada Huja (authors: Dragana Bazik and associates, Predrag Milosevic and associates, Vladan Djokic and associates) and the project of revitalisation of the Nebojsa Tower (authors: Dejan Miljkovic, Branko Pavic and Jovan Mitrovic). — Town Planners Association Belgrade Town Planners Association Belgrade is dedicated to promotion , organization and publishing of the wide spectrum of projects in the domain of the urban planning in Belgrade. Association of the Belgrade Urban Planners has presented its activity within the Belgrade design Week 2007, with the three-dimensional display RIVERFRONT RECLAIMED, which has later been exhibited within the international Architecture Week 2007. Association of the Belgrade Urban Planners has participated with the author’s exhibition of the multimedia project Old Belgrade fairground as the old nucleus of the New Belgrade, within the Architecture Salon 2008, held in the Museum of the Applied Arts in Belgrade. With the project Old Belgrade fairground, 70 years from the opening of the First international fair of samples, ABUP has promoted its activity during the European cultural heritage days 2007. 22 — IZLOŽBE Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji. Naselja INCIS-a u Rimu: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima kurator: Alesandra Čeroti koordinatori: Roberta Đentile i Paola Gvidulji Izgradnja Olimpijskog sela i Dečime jedan su od najvećih projekata Nacionalnog instituta za stanove državnih službenika (INCIS), čija je uloga bila da civilnim i vojnim državnim službenicima obezbedi rezidencijalne javne stanove pod povoljnim uslovima. Između 1958. i 1965. grupa talentovanih arhitekata (Vitorio Kafjero, Injacio Gvidi, Adalberto Libera, Ugo Lučikenti, Vinčenco Monako i Luiđi Moreti) realizovali su dva rezidencijalna kompleksa po narudžbini državne ustanove, na severu i na jugu Rima. Dakle, kvart Dečima, kojem je bilo namenjeno centralno mesto između Eura i budućih stambenih kompleksa koji će nići na jugoistoku Rima, treba posmatrati i razumeti u odnosu sa njegovim “blizancem”, kvartom Olimpijsko selo, napravljenim za atletičare Olimpijskih igara 1960. u Rimu koji je kasnije, dodeljen državnim službenicima. Pored karakteristične tipologije i sličnog uređenja, Olimpijsko selo je smešteno na liniji Olimpika koja će, po projektu produženja, predstavljati ulicu sa centralnom funkcijom unutar četvrti Dečima. Projektanti su postavili cilj da „izgrade četvrt živih, organskih, nepravilnih formi, koje izazivaju izvesnu radost, čak i ponavljanjem planimetrijskih tipova”. Dva kompleksa čine niz linijski poređanih zgrada, krstastog preseka sa dvorištem, podignutih na pilotise, povezanih ulicama i uronjenih u zelenilo. Naročito prisustvo prizemlja izdignutog na pilotise, čime se izbegava nepovoljan položaj stanova, garantuje ujednačen 23 — IZLOŽBE pregled i dopušta osećaj veće otvorenosti i daha na čitavu kompoziciju. Struktura zgrada je u armiranom betonu, dok je zid od opeke u dvema bojama, pucolana crvene i rimske žute. Ujednačenost urbanističkog karaktera i arhitektonskog kvaliteta koja izbija iz umerenog odnosa između prirodnih i izgrađenih elemenata, od velikog je značaja za rezidencijalne i formalne aspekte. Što se tiče gradskog dizajna, iako postoji kontinuitet u namerama, u Dečimi se primećuje veća zrelost i dovršenost u globalnom izrazu. U svakom slučaju, dve četvrti rađaju se povezane u jednoobraznoj viziji razvoja grada: očigledan je, u oba slučaja, odnos sa savremenim severnoevropskim iskustvom u vezi sa socijalnim aspektima „susedstva”, zatim podela pešačkih i saobraćajno prohodnih prelaza različitim nivoima, kao i projektantski izgled zelenila koje se posmatra kao vezivni prostor. — Alesandra Čeroti diplomirala je arhitekturu na Univerzitetu Sapijenca u Rimu, na kome se i specijalizovala za restauraciju spomenika. Od 2003. sarađuje na laboratorijskom kursu iz arhitektonske restauracije na Arhitektonskom fakultetu „Vale Đulija” i učestvovala je u istraživanjima i na međunarodnim seminarima u Kini i Brazilu, u okviru kojih je priredila brojne publikacije. U svojim studijama bavi se pretežno savremenom arhitektonskom restauracijom; trenutno završava doktorat na Univerzitetu Sapijenca u Rimu na temu javne rezidencijalne gradnje u periodu posle II svetskog rata s obzirom na probleme konzervacije i restauracije. Radi u Rimu a svoje profesionalne aktivnosti usmerila je na restauraciju spomenika. Post-WWII Social Housing in Italy. INCIS estates: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima curator: Alessandra Cerroti coordinators: Roberta Gentile and Paola Guidugli Development of the estates Villaggio Olimpico (Olympic Village) and Decima, is one of the hugest projects undertaken by The National Institute for the Houses of the State Employees (INCIS), whose role was to provide the residential public apartments for the civil and military employees, under the favourable conditions. Between 1958 and 1965, a group of talented architects (Vittorio Cafiero, Ignazio Guidi, Adalberto Libera, Ugo Luccichenti, Vincenzo Monaco and Luigi Moretti) have realized two residential complexes, ordered by this governmental institution, on the north and south of Rome. Therefore, Decima estate, which was planned for the central part between EUR and future residential complexes, built on the south-east of Rome, should be observed and comprehend in the relation to his “twinbrother”, Villaggio Olimpico estate, developed for the athletics who participated in the Olympic games held in Rome in 1960, and later distributed to the government employees. Besides the specific typology and the similar structure, Villaggio Olimpico is settled on the line of via Olimpica which became the street with the central function within the estate Decima, after the completion of the design for the extension. The designers posed the goal to “build the quarter of lively, irregular forms, which can provoke certain delight, even with repetition of the planimetry types”. The two complexes are formed by the line of the 24 — IZLOŽBE buildings, cross-section like with the yard, raised on pilotis, connected with streets and surrounded with greenery. Specially, the presence of the ground floor elevated on pilotis, by which the unpleasant position of apartments is avoided, the unified view is guaranteed and the feeling of the greater openness and the view to the whole composition is allowed. Structure of the buildings is made of reinforced concrete, while the wall is made of brick in two colours – red puzzolane and roman yellow. The unification of the urban character and architectural quality, which emerges from the moderate relationship between natural and built elements, is very important for residential and formal aspects. As far as the city design is concerned, although there is continuity in intentions, the greater maturity and the global expression is shown in Decima. In any case, the two estates were born from the unique vision of the city development: in both cases, the relationship with the contemporary north-European experience with social aspects of “neighbourhood” is obvious, together with the division between the pedestrian and car-accessible approaches to different levels, as well as the design of the greenery seen as the connective space. Villaggio Olimpico, Rim, Italija — Villaggio Olimpico, Rome, Italy 25 — IZLOŽBE za istoriju savremene arhitekture. Predavao je na Arhitektonskom institutu u Ženevi i u Školi lepih umetnosti u Metsu. Deset godina je bio član uređivačkog odbora časopisa Faces. Godine 1999. je objavio „Moderna arhitektura u Francuskoj 1940-1966, od haosa do uspona” (Éditions Picard), a 2002, sa Žan-Luj Koenom i Gi Lamberom „Enciklopedija Pere” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). Izradio je naučnu podlogu zahteva za upis obnovljenog centra Avra na Listu svetske baštine (klasifikacija UNESCO, 2005). Grad Avr, obnovljen po ideji Ogista Perea kustos: Žozef Abram Izložba prikazuje obnovljeni centar grada Avra koji se od 15. jula 2005. nalazi na Uneskovom spisku svetske baštine. Namenjena široj publici, izložba može da zadovolji i stručnu javnost koja zahteva naučnu preciznost, tako i amatere arhitekture. Predstavljen je savremeni identitet ovog grada, njegova vekovna veza lukom i morem kao i aktuelna dinamika njegovog razvoja. Izložba se sastoji od dvadeset panoa koji kroz istorijske planove i fotografije ilustruju formiranje urbane teritorije. Podsećaju nas na stari grad, na njegov izuzetni privredni značaj u prošlosti, na kolevku impresionizma, zatim na rat, bombardovanja i razaranja krajem Drugog svetskog rata, nakon kojih sledi izrada privremenog grada i njegovo postepeno obnavljanje. Veliki deo izložbe odnosi se na arhitektonsku i gradsku baštinu izuzetne vrednosti. Obnova grada najveće je arhitektonsko delo Ogista Perea i škole strukturnog klasicizma. Nekoliko panoa posvećeno je savremenom Avru, aktivnostima luke i velikim ekonomskim i urbanim projektima. Ovi veliki horizontalni panoi u skladu su sa sadržajem: tu su stari planovi, marine, urbani pejzaži, javni prostori, zgrade... Izložba je dopunjena 40-minutnim filmom o izgradnji Avra (na francuskom). Većim delom je posvećen arhivskim snimcima i razvoju savremenog grada, a predstavljeno je i mišljenje lokalnih čelnika. — Žozef Abram, arhitekta i istoričar, profesor je na Arhitektonskoj školi u Nansiju i istraživač na Laboratoriji 26 — IZLOŽBE Le Havre, the City reconstructed upon the idea of August Peret curator: Joseph Abram This exhibition shows the renewed centre of the city of Le Havre, which, since 15th July 2005.has been added to UNESCO’s list of the world cultural heritage sites. Intended to the wider public, the exhibition can satisfy both the expert public, which requires scientific precision, and the amateurs of architecture. It shows the contemporary identity of this city, its century-old relationship with the port and the sea, as well as the current dynamics of its development. The exhibition consists of 20 panels which, through historic plans and photographs, illustrate the formation of the urban territory. They remind us of the old city, its extraordinary economic importance in the past, of the cradle of impressionism, as well as of the war, bombardments and devastations at the end of the WWII, after which the development of the temporary city and its gradual renovation started. A large portion of the exhibition relates to the architectural and city heritage of extraordinary value. The restoration of the City is the greatest work of August Peret and the School of Structural Classicism. A few panels are dedicated to contemporary Havre, its port activities and huge economic and urban projects. These big horizontal panels are in harmony with their content: they show old plans, marines, urban landscapes, public spaces, buildings, etc. The exhibition is complemented with a 40 minute film about the construction of Havre (in French). Its greater part is dedicated to the archive recordings and the Trgovački basen foto: Žozef Abram — Commercial basin photo: Joseph Abram Avenija Foš i Port osean foto: Žozef Abram — Avenue Foch and La porte océane photo: Joseph Abram development of the contemporary city, as well as to the opinions of the local chiefs. — Joseph Abram, architect and historian, is professor at the Nancy School of Architecture and researcher at the Laboratory of contemporary architecture history. He has taught at the Geneva Institute of Architecture and at the Metz School of fine arts. For ten years he has been member of the editorial board of the revue Faces. In 1999 27 — IZLOŽBE he published “Modern architecture in France, 1940-1966, from chaos to growth” (Edition Picard) and in 2002, with Jean-Louis Cohen and Guy Lambert, “The Perret encyclopedia” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). He made the scientific file of the request for the inscription of the reconstructed center of the city of Havre on the World heritage list (classification of the UNESCO, 2005). Procesi REstauracije istorijskog nasleđa, Austrija REstoration processes of historic treasures, Austria organizacija: TRANSEO organization: TRANSEO Na izložbi će biti prikazano nekoliko projekata restauracije koje su ostvarili članovi organizacije TRANSEO (Transnacionalna razmena pri primenjenoj konzervaciji spomenika). Osim fotografija projekata, posetioci će moći da vide i stvarne primerke konzervacije i restauracije. Nakon utemeljenja organizacije različitih disciplina restauracije u arhitekturi, na domaćim i stranim univerzitetima i školama, više od dvadeset pet godina bavimo se zaštitom, brigom i očuvanjem istorijskog blaga. Naš posao je očuvanje lepote i posebnosti objekata koji su nam povereni na čuvanje. Svako remek delo se tretira sa posebnim zadovoljstvom i preciznošću i prvoklasnom veštinom našeg tima. Savršeni tretman istorijskog materijala i veliko znanje o modernim umetničko-tehnološkim metodama garantuju profesionalni tretman svakog objekta. Naše stalno učešće na predavanjima i kursevima nije samo stvar našeg usmerenja već, pre svega, preduslov za ispunjenje sve većih potreba restauracije. This exhibition will show several restoration projects made by members of Organisation TRANSEO (Transnational exchange in applied monument conservation). These projects will be shown mainly by photographs, but the public will be also able to see some real samples of conservation and restoration. After a funded formation in different disciplines of restoration and architecture in domestic and foreign universities and schools, we apply ourselves since more than 25 years to the protection, the care and the maintenance of historic treasures. We have made it our business to preserve the beauty and the particular character of an object entrusted to our care. Each masterpiece is treated with joy and accurateness, and the high- class skill of our team, the perfect treatment of historic material and the profound knowledge about modern art-technological methods guarantee the professional treatment of every object. Our constant participation on lectures and courses is not only a matter of course for us but also a pre-condition to fulfil the evergrowing needs of restoration. — Organzacija TRANSEO i učesnici izložbe: Markus Pifl, diplomirani restaurator za istorijske enterijere od drveta, Grac Markus Cehner, arhitekta, istraživač u oblastima zaštite kulturnog nasleđa i istorijskih objekata, Grac Martin Proske, restaurator istorijskih predmeta od drveta, gipsanih odlivaka i fasada 28 — IZLOŽBE — Organization TRANSEO and participants in the exhibition: Markus Piffl, Diploma restorer for historic wooden interieur, Graz Markus Zechner, architect, heritage care and historic building research, Graz Martin Proske, Restorer of historical wooden objects, gypsum casts and facades Projekat restauracije, TRANSEO — Restoration project, TRANSEO 29 — IZLOŽBE smatra bogatstvom. Goethe-Institut postoji u Beogradu od 1970. godine. Institut poseduje biblioteku sa oko 12.000 naslova, koji se najvećim delom mogu pozajmiti, kao i prostranu čitaonicu sa velikim brojem dnevnih novina, časopisa, magazina, i stručne periodike. Pored toga u Institutu se nalazi i sala za kulturne manifestacije. Devedeset godina Bauhausa: Knjige o Bauhausu u biblioteci Gete instituta Beograd Godine 1919. Valter Gropijus je u Vajmaru (pokrajina Tiringen) osnovao Državnu školu Bauhaus (Staatliche Bauhaus). Osnivanje Bauhausa bilo je usko povezano s osnivanjem Vajmarske Republike. Za nekoliko godina koliko je postojao, od 1919. do 1933. godine, postao je najuticajnija škola dizajna dvadesetog veka. Raznoliki svet oblika kojim Bauhaus pleni − do današnjeg dana ostavio je svoj pečat u našoj svakodnevici, u umetnosti, dizajnu i arhitekturi. Umetnici koji su proistekli iz Bauhausa uživaju svetsku slavu. Jubilej Bauhausa biće proslavljen nizom upečatljivih izložbi i manifestacija u Nemačkoj, pre svega u mestima poznatim po ovoj školi, kao što su Vajmar, Jena, Erfurt, Desau i Berlin, ali i u drugim gradovima. Izlog sa knjigama o Bauhausu predstavlja doprinos biblioteke Gete instituta IV beogradskoj nedelji arhitekture. — Goethe-Institut je kulturna ustanova Savezne Republike Nemačke koja svoju delatnost obavlja širom sveta. Mi potpomažemo i unapređujemo učenje nemačkog jezika u inostranstvu i negujemo međunarodnu kulturnu saradnju. Takođe prenosimo sveobuhvatnu sliku Nemačke putem informacija o kulturnom, društvenom i političkom životu. Mrežom Goethe-Instituta, Goethecentara, kulturnih društava, čitaonica, ispitnih centara i centara za učenje jezika, preuzimamo centralne zadatke obrazovne i kulturne politike Savezne Republike Nemačke u inostranstvu. Prihvatamo kulturnopolitičke izazove globalizacije i razvijamo inovativne koncepte u cilju stvaranja humanijeg sveta, u kojem se kulturna raznolikost 30 — IZLOŽBE Ninety years of Bauhaus: Books about Bauhaus in the library of Goethe Institute Belgrade Ninety years of Bauhaus Books about Bauhaus in the library of Goethe Institute in Belgrade In 1919, Walter Gropius founded The State School of Bauhaus (Staatliche Bauhaus) in Weimar (Thuringia province). The foundation of Bauhaus is closely connected to the foundation of the Weimar Republic. In afew years of its existence, from 1919 until 1933, it became the most influential design school of the 20th century. The Diversity of shapes characteristic to Bauhaus, have left their mark in the contemporary everyday life, in art, design and architecture, up to this day. Artists who originated from Bauhaus have had the world famous reputation. The jubilee of Bauhaus will be celebrated with an array of striking exhibitions and manifestations in Germany, above all at locations renowned by this school, like Weimar, Jena, Erfurt, Dessau and Berlin, but at others, as well. Contribution of the Goethe Institute Belgrade to the Fourth Belgrade International Architecture Week is a window containing books about Bauhaus. — Goethe Institute is cultural institution of the Federal Republic of Germany, which performs its activities worldwide. We support and promote learning of the German language abroad and cherish international cultural collaboration. Also, we transmit the allencompassing picture of Germany through the information about cultural, social and political life. With a network of Goethe Institutes, Goethe Centres, cultural associations, reading rooms, examination centres and foreign language learning centres, we overtake the central tasks of the educational and cultural politics of Federal Republic of Germany abroad. We accept cultural-political challenges of globalization and develop innovative concepts for the 31 — IZLOŽBE purpose of creating the more humanely world, in which the cultural diversity is considered as the richness. Goethe Institute exists in Belgrade from 1970. Institute has the library with approx. 12,000 titles, among many of them could be borrowed, as well as the spacious reading room with many daily newspapers, journals, magazines and professional periodicals. Among these, the Institute has also the hall for the cultural manifestations. Učesnici projekta dobijaju priliku da se, radeći na valorizaciji i revitalizaciji graditeljskog nasleđa, susretnu sa specifičnostima rada u oblasti očuvanja kulturne baštine. Ideja je da se formira savremeni, održivi model revitalizacije graditeljskog nasleđa, koji podrazumeva međusobnu saradnju i participaciju svih aktera i njihovo angažovanje u realizaciji pojedinačnih etapa projekta. Beograd - pozlaćeni presek: Valorizacija austrijskog graditeljskog nasleđa na teritoriji Beograda organizator: Klub mladih arhitekata (KMA) kurator: Jelica Jovanović Beograd je grad kompleksne i slojevite prošlosti, koja se samo delimično može pročitati iz njegove postojeće fizičke strukture. Među mnogim graditeljskim poduhvatima koji su realizovani na teritoriji današnjeg Beograda izdvaja se rekonstrukcija grada koju su sproveli Austrijanci. Deo austrijskih intervencija jasno je uočljiv u gradskoj strukturi – tvrđava, pojedine kuće, pravci ulica, staro jezgro Zemuna. Značajan deo ove celine, međutim, fizički više ne postoji, pa sliku o ovom segmentu našeg nasleđa sklapamo iz raspoložive arhivske građe. Austrijsko nasleđe u Beogradu i u Srbiji ima izvanredan potencijal za kulturno umrežavanje sa zemljama u širem okruženju, ali ono nije u potpunosti revitalizovano u našoj zemlji. Ideja projekta LEGATIO jeste da istraži različite mogućnosti prezentacije ovog nasleđa, a ono što je pred publikom predstavlja samo naš početni korak. Izložba predstavlja segmente materijala do kojeg je, radom na arhivskoj i bibliografskoj građi i radom na terenu, došao tim studenata tokom istraživačke faze projekta LEGATIO. Materijal je obrađen i prezentovan raznovrsnim interaktivnim programima u Knez Mihailovoj ulici i na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu, s ciljem da se uspostavi dijalog sa širim krugom posetilaca izložbe – „korisnicima” arhitekture. LEGATIO je samostalni projekat u okviru Kluba mladih arhitekata koji se bavi proučavanjem i zaštitom prirodnog i kulturnog nasleđa na teritoriji Srbije i u regionu. 32 — IZLOŽBE — Jelica Jovanović je apsolventkinja Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, IG Razvoj i teorija arhitekture i umetnosti. Aktivna je članica Kluba mladih arhitekata od decembra 2006. godine. Učestvovala je u realizaciji projekata Radionica 06, 07 i 08 kao koordinatorka i autorka postavke. Autorka projekta BIG. Saradnica u nastavi na Arhitektonskom fakultetu na studio projektu Arhitektonsko-urbanistički projekat revitalizacije prostora srednjovekovnog grada Rama i njegove okoline i više projektantskih radionica. Organizovala i učestvovala na više kolektivnih strukovnih izložbi. Učestvovala u pilot-projektu radionice Jevrejska umetnost i tradicija Filozofskog fakulteta UB. Polaznica Beogradske otvorene škole. Učestvuje u međunarodnoj razmeni studenata IAESTE. Belgrade – the Gilded Ratio: Valorisation of Austrian Building Heritage on the Territory of Belgrade organisation: Young Architects’ Club (KMA) curator: Jelica Jovanović Belgrade is a city of complex and layered past that can only partially be read from its existing physical layout. Among the many building endeavours that have been realised on the territory of present-day Belgrade, what stands out is the reconstruction of the city done by the Austrians. A portion of Austrian interventions is clearly visible in the city’s structure – the fortress, certain houses, street directions, the old core of Zemun. However, significant parts of this unity no longer physically exist, so the image of this segment of our heritage we can glean only from the available archival sources. The Austrian heritage in Belgrade and in Serbia has an outstanding potential for cultural networking with countries in our wider surroundings, but it still is not fully revitalised in our country. The idea of the project LEGATIO is to research the various possibilities of presentation of this heritage, and what now stands before the audience is just our opening step. The Exhibition unveils segments of material that a team of students, during the research phase of project LEGATIO, uncovered by working on the archival and bibliographical sources, as well as by working in the field. The material was processed and presented in a variety of interactive programs in Knez Mihajlova Street and at University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, with an aim to establish a dialogue with a wide circle of Exhibition’s visitors – the “users” of architecture. LEGATIO is an autonomous project within the framework of the Club of Young Architects that pursues the study of the natural and cultural heritage on the territory of Serbia, and in the wider region. By working on the valorisation and revitalisation of the building heritage, the participants to the Project get a chance to encounter the specificities of working in the area of preservation of cultural heritage. The idea is to create a modern, sustainable model of revitalisation of building heritage, which invariably entails cooperation and participation of all of the stakeholders and their engagement in the realisation of individual stages of the Project. — Jelica Jovanović is senior graduate student of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, Elective Group Development and Theory of Architecture and Art. An active member of the Club of Young Architects since December 2006. Has participated in the realisation of Project Workshop 06, 07 and 08 as a coordinator and author of the exhibitions. The author of the project BIG. Collaborator in teaching at the Faculty of Architecture on a studio project Architectural-Urbanism Project of Revitalisation of Medieval Town of Ram and Its Vicinity and of several project workshops. She has organised and taken part in several collective vocational exhibitions. She has participated in a Belgrade University Faculty of Philosophy pilot project workshop entitled Jewish Arts and Tradition. She is attending Belgrade Open School. Participates in international IASTE student exchange programs. 33 — IZLOŽBE Prikaz Eliasa Beka - austrijska rekonstrukcija Beograda, prva polovina 18. veka — Showing Elias Baeck - the Austrian reconstruction of Belgrade, first half of the 18th century Extra-mûros – Očaravajuće arhitekture, Francuska da promene ugao gledanja, da zaborave predrasude, jer govori o avanturi, inventivnosti i kreativnosti i, samim tim, neprimetno utiče na posetioce da ne posmatraju arhitekturu samo kao zatvoreni svet ili rezervisani posed. Zahvaljujući efektu kritične mase, serija od četrdeset projekata objašnjava nam da takozvana dobra arhitektura i nije toliko retka kao što se čini na prvi pogled, a ako je ne vidimo to je zato što nije tu gde je očekujemo i zato što je jednostavnija i skromnija ili samo manje zabrinuta za svoju besmrtnost nego što zamišljamo. Ova izložba je s velikim uspehom predstavljala Francusku 2007. na prvom Međunarodnom trijenalu arhitekture u Lisabonu. Zavod za arhitekturu i baštinu grada Pariza, Francuska Izložba je koncipirana i ostvarena na osnovu fotografskog i kritičkog inventara savremene arhitekture u okviru Zavoda za arhitekturu i baštinu / Instituta za arhitekturu, u saradnji sa Francuskim institutom iz Diseldorfa. Posebno je adaptirana da bude predstavljena međunarodnoj javnosti u organizaciji CulturesFrance, uz podršku francuskih kulturnih centara u inostranstvu i Odeljenja za arhitekturu i baštinu pri francuskom Ministarstvu za kulturu i komunikacije. Tema i koncepcija izložbe jeste pitanje savremene arhitekture. Ne može se reći da je savremena arhitektura, od pedesetih godina prošlog veka očarala, pa čak ni da je zainteresovala, širu javnost. Smatra se da svaki novoizgrađeni objekat još više ruži okolinu ili, još gore, da učestvuje u rušenju ravnoteže same planete Zemlje. Međutim, iza opšte osrednjosti kriju se mnoga pažljivo osmišljena, maštovita i često poetska ostvarenja. Dovoljno je pogledati oko sebe. Kako, u ovim uslovima, ohrabriti stvaraoce? Prošlost zaista nije idealna ali ne znači da savremenost, zato što je nekad loše protumačena, treba mrzeti. Drugim rečima, potrebno je ponovo zainteresovati ljude za savremenu arhitekturu, zagolicati njihovu maštu i produbiti znatiželju tako što ćemo im pokazati koliko je ova arhitektura zanimljiva, začuđujuća i privlačna. Time ćemo izazvati njihovu želju da otkriju motive, da prošire vidike i stvore mišljenje o savremenoj arhitekturi. Predstavljajući samo arhitekture sposobne da očaraju stvarnost, izložba Extra-mûros nudi mogućnost da se oni koji su oduvek smatrali da je savremena arhitektura nepodnošljiva zainteresuju za nju. Ova izložba ih tera 34 — IZLOŽBE Extra-mûros – Architectures of Delight, France City of Architecture and Patrimony of Paris, France This Exhibition was devised and realised on the basis of photographic and critique inventory of contemporary architecture within the Bureau for architecture and heritage / Institute of Architecture, in close cooperation with the French Institute in Düsseldorf. It has been specially adapted for international display in organisation of CULTURESFRANCE and with support of French cultural centres abroad, together with the aid of Department of Architecture and Heritage with the French Ministry for Culture and Communication. The theme and the concept of this Exhibition deals with the issue of contemporary architecture. Since the 1950s, one cannot assume that contemporary architecture has enchanted, not even interested wider public. The general consideration is that each newly built edifice disfigures the ambience around it even further, or worse, that it participates in the destroying the balance of the planet itself. However, behind the general mediocrity hide many carefully devised, imaginative and often poetic works. One look around you is enough. In such circumstances, how can one encourage designers in their creativity? The past is truly not ideal, but the fact that modern times are sometimes wrongly interpreted does not mean they should be loathed. In other words, what needs to be Bretzel-Pretzel - Žil Eberso i Deni Pegaz Blan © L Pyot H Setsumaa F Demange — Bretzel-Pretzel - Gilles Ebersolt & Denis Pegaz Blanc © L Pyot H Setsumaa F Demange done is to rekindle the people’s interest in contemporary architecture and with that in mind deepen their curiosity, tickle their imagination and arouse their desire for it by showing how this architecture can be interesting, enchanting, attractive, and with this cause a wish to have its motives unveiled, to cause the horizons to expand and a new kind of thinking be created. By its presentation of only architectures that are capable of enchanting the reality around them, Extra-muros exhibition offers a possibility to those who have always thought that contemporary architecture is unbearable to become interested in it. This exhibition forces them to change their perspective, to forget the prejudices, because it speaks of adventure, inventiveness and creativity and by this it seamlessly influences the visitors not to look at architecture either as a closed world, or a dominion reserved. Owing to the effect of critical mass, 35 — IZLOŽBE Rasklopivo drvo - Tetrac & Concept plastique © Philippe Ruault — Dismountable Tree - Tetrac & Concept plastique © Philippe Ruault a series of 40 designs explains to us that so-called ‘good architecture’ is not so rare as it may seem upon first glance, and if we do not see it, it is because it is not located where we expect it and because it is simpler and more modest, or maybe just less concerned about its immortality, than we imagine.This Exhibition represented France with great success at the first International Architecture Triennial in Lisbon in 2007. Re... Beograd: stari i novi Izložba radova sa studentske radionice Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu Podsticaj za pokretanje aktivnosti u okviru Projektantske radionice je želja da se u okviru BINA 09 predstavi studentsko istraživanje i doživljaj istorijskog razvoja, sadašnje situacije i mogućnosti buduće REafirmacije, REvitalizacije, REgeneracije, REkonstrukcije ... bazičnih poteza ukupnog, istorijskog i modernog, graditeljskog nasleđa Beograda. Izložba predstavlja rezultat istraživačkog procesa i saznanja do kojih su studenti, učesnici radnog tima, došli tokom svog rada. Prikazani reprezentatitvni potezi starog Beograda (duž ose Slavija – Cvetni trg – Terazije – Rajićeva ulica), kao i dva reprezentativna pravca Novog Beograda (prvi duž ose Savski most – Staro Sajmište – SIV – Opština Novi Beograd – Fontana i drugi duž ose SIV – Železnička stanica) izabrani su kao dominantne urbane akse jasnog i jedinstvenog identiteta. Ispitane su sa različitih aspekata: istorijskog, političkog, društvenog, socijalnog, kulturnog… Razmatrani su značenje i identitet javnih i privatnih građevina i prostora duž njih, kroz praćenje različitih ideja i realizacija, predlaganih zahvata i ostvarenih transformacija, analizu predlaganih formi i sadržaja u GUP i drugim planovima. Cilj prezentacije ovog značajnog urbanog i arhitektonskog nasleđa jeste da se javnost podstakne na razmišljanje o njemu kao o jedinstvenoj i specifičnoj vrednosti, bazičnom graditeljskom i kulturnom nasleđu, osnovnom utemeljenju identiteta i autentičnosti grada, kao i o neophodnosti njihovog očuvanja i uključivanju u sadašnje i buduće planove transformacije Beograda. 36 — IZLOŽBE — Autori: Bojana Čitaković, Ivana Ibraimov, Ivka Marković, Jelena Grdić, Marija Golubović, Marina Marmelić, Milica Vučković i Tamara Miljanić Izložba RE... Beograd: stari i novi nastala je kao proizvod rada studenata Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, u okviru nastave na predmetu Projektantska radionica, na prvoj godini diplomskih akademskih master studija, u saradnji sa BINA 09 i Urbanističkim zavodom Beograda. Mentori radionice su: doc. dr Mirjana RoterBlagojević, dr Tanja Damljanović-Conley, mr Marta Vukotić-Lazar i asist. arh. Marko Nikolić Re... Belgrade: Old and New Exhibition of student works from the Design workshop, Faculty of Architecture University in Belgrade Exhibition RE... Belgrade: old and new was incepted as a product of students of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, within the framework of the of the course entitled Design Workshop, at the first year of academic master studies, in cooperation with BINA 09 and the Institute of Town Planners Belgrade. The Mentors of the Workshop are: assistant professor Mirjana RoterBlagojević, PhD, Tanja Conley, PhD, Marta Vukotić-Lazar, MA, and teaching assistant, architect Marko Nikolić. Incentive for the start of activities within the Design Workshop was the desire to present, within the framework of BINA 09, a students’ research and experience of historical development, current situation and possibilities for future REaffirmation, REvitalisation, REgeneration, REconstruction… of basic outlines of the overall, historical and modern, building heritage of Belgrade. The Exhibition is a result of a research process and knowledge that the students, participants of the work team, acquired in the course of their work. The shown representative stretches of old Belgrade (along the axis of Slavija Square – Flower Square – Terazije street – Rajićeva street), as well as two representative runs of Novi Beograd (the first along the axis of Sava Bridge –Old Fairgrounds – SIV building – Novi Beograd municipality building – the “Fontana”, and the other along the axis of SIV building – Central Railroad Station) were chosen as dominant urban axes of clear and unique identity. They were examined from different point of view: historical, political social, cultural etc. What was considered is the meaning and identity of public and private edifices and spaces along their sides, through tracking of various ideas and methods of realisation, proposed interventions and exercised transformations, an analysis of proposed forms and contents inside Master Plan and regulative plans. The goal of presentation of this significant urbane and architectural heritage is to give an impetus to the overall public to think about it as a unique and specific value, a basic building and cultural heritage, the foundational root of identity and authenticity of the city, as well as of the necessity of their preservation and introduction into the present and future plans of Belgrade’s transformation. — Authors: Bojana Čitaković, Ivana Ibraimov, Ivka Marković, Jelena Grdić, Marija Golubović, Marina Marmelić, Milica Vučković and Tamara Miljanić 37 — IZLOŽBE PREDAVANJA LECTURES E2A: Fractions of Reality Wim Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland E2A: Fragmenti stvarnosti Vim Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten, Švajcarska U svetu u kome je sve više izmučenih arhitektonskih uloga, sa sumnjivim kontekstualnim postojanostima, ekonomskim pritiskom, svetu koji vrtoglavom brzinom stremi ka novim ekološkim standardima, dosežemo granice perfekcionizma. U svom radu izražavamo stanje uma koje konceptualizuje arhitekturu i urbanizam kao skladan nesklad, ukazujući na to da nova, moderna mreža povezuje nejednakosti. Modernizacija ne mora biti skladna, ne mora da se nameće čitavom sistemu. Ona postaje sistem osobenosti i neprekidno predviđanje, najzad, kolaž koji može da poveže razlike, polaritete i suprotnosti u jedan pojam mašte. Ona oslobađa otpor sistemu koji je neprijateljski nastrojen prema novim idejama i potrebama za prilagođavanjem, imajući na umu da bi stoga novina trebalo da bude izmenjena na čitavom opsegu „skladne” sfere. Prema tome, savršeni način čitanja naših stvarnosti jeste onaj koji je nemoguće dovršiti. Jedanaest fragmenata protumačenih stvarnosti prikazanih na izložbi biće detaljnije obrađeni tokom predavanja. — Vim Ekert (rođen 1969. u Cirihu, Švajcarska) suvlasnik je biroa E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten iz Ciriha. Studirao je arhitekturu na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Cirihu (diplomirao je 1995). Od 1996. do 1997. radio je u Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) u Roterdamu. Sa Pitom Ekertom je 1997. osnovao biro koji je 2001. postao E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten AG. Vim Ekert redovno drži predavanja i radionice u školama i drugim ustanovama. 40 — PREDAVANJA Within a world of increasingly tortured architectural roles, of doubtful contextual stabilities, economic pressure and breathless speed towards new ecological standards, we reach the limits of a perfectionist world. Through our work we have formulated a mindset to conceptualize architecture and urbanism as a systematic incoherence reflecting that a new modern network interlocks inequalities. Modernization does not have to be coherent, does not need a form of imposition on the entire system. It becomes a system of particularities and continuous anticipation, finally a collage that is capable to cast difference, polarities and contrast into one idea of imagination. It frees the resistance of a system hostile to new ideas and to needs of adaptation, bearing in mind that consequently newness would need to be changed on an entire scale of a “coherent” sphere. The ideal reading of our realities is therefore one that is impossible to complete. 11 fractions of interpreted realities, as shown in the exhibition, will be further elaborated throughout the lecture. — Wim Eckert (1969, Zurich, Switzerland ) is Partner at E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Zurich. He studied architecture at the ETH in Zurich (Diploma 1995). From 1996 to 1997 he worked at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) in Rotterdam. In 1997 he established his own office with Piet Eckert, which became E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten AG in 2001. Wim Eckert regularly gives lectures and workshops at schools and institutions. E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten Fondacija Hajnrih Bel, Nemačka, Berlin konkurs 2006, I nagrada, projektovano 2006 - 2007, realizovano 2007 - 2008. foto: Jan Biter — E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten Heinrich Boell Foundation, D-Berlin competition 2006, 1st Prize, project 2006 - 2007, realization 2007 - 2008 photo: Jan Bitter se u Los Anđeles, gde je radila u nekoliko arhitektonskih biroa, putovala zapadnom obalom SAD, i obilazila arhitektonske lokalitete i upoznala dela lend-arta. U Švajcarskoj je radila kao asistent na Federalnoj politehničkoj školi (EPFL) u Lozani i na Akademiji za arhitekturu (Accademia di architettura) u Mendisiju, pre nego što je počela da predaje na školi SCI-arc u Viko Morkoteu, u Švajcarskoj. RE _ fokus Ludovika Molo i Jahen Kenc, Kenc Molo Arhiteti, Švajcarska Pojedinačne aspiracije u vezi sa teritorijom proširile su se taktom motora sa unutrašnjim sagorevanjem: repeticija (RE-peticija) pojedinačnih objekata, pozicioniranih na podjednakim razdaljinama od svojih osa stvorile su međuprostore bez značenja: nastanak prigradske periferije jeste univerzalan fenomen. Beskonačna RE-produkcija „usamljenih“ zgrada slična je autističnom individualizmu. Skoro neograničena dostupnost resursa i energije donela je nesumnjiv uticaj na prirodu i društvenu ravnotežu. Takođe, ne možemo da umaknemo ovom fenomenu – nalazimo se na sredini njegovog razvoja. Ideja individualizma i slobode, u svakom slučaju ljudskog progresa, ne može se razumeti sama po sebi, već samo u odnosu na njen kontekst, u širem smislu. Naša namera je da popunimo te međuprostore, da stvorimo veze, prostore koje su u dijalogu: koncentrisane REvolucionare protiv ekspanzije. Tražeći razliku, i što se tiče posebnosti, i što se tiče potencijale nekog mesta, tražimo zgušnjavanje. Pokušavamo da se fokusiramo na ono što je tipično. (RE-fokusirajmo se na tipično, i osobeno.) — Ludovika Molo je kodirektorka biroa Könz Molo a rchitetti u Luganu, u Švajcarskoj, koji je osnovala 1998. godine zajedno sa Jahenom Kencom. Njihovi radovi su stekli širok publicitet u lokalnoj sredini, na nacionalnom i međunarodnom nivou, i osvajali su brojne projektne nagrade za izvrsnost. Ludovika Molo je rođena u Luganu i diplomirala je arhitekturu na Švajcarskom federalnom institutu za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu. Nakon toga preselila 42 — PREDAVANJA Jahen Kenc je kodirektor biroa Könz Molo architetti. Studirao je na Švajcarskom federalnom institutu za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu i na Federalnoj politehničkoj školi (École Polytechnique Fédérale – EPFL) u Lozani. Pre odlaska u Tičino, gde je 1992. godine osnovao sopstveni biro, radio je u Nemačkoj i u Barseloni. Kenc, koji je stekao i diplomu u oblasti urbanog projektovanja i planiranja 1992. godine, učestvuje u radu različitih švajcarskih odbora za arhitekturu na lokalnom i federalnom nivou. Radio je i kao nastavnik i član žirija u različitim školama visokog obrazovanja u inostranstvu: u Udruženju arhitekata u Londonu (Architectural Association, London), na Švajcarskom federalnom institutu za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu, Akademiji za arhitekturu u Mendrisiju, u Švajcarskoj, u Školi dizajna Rod Ajlenda (Rhode Island School of Design) u Providensu, u SAD, kao i u školi SCI-arc u Viko Morkoteu, u Švajcarskoj. RE _ focus Ludovica Molo and Jachen Könz, Könz Molo Architetti, Switzerland Individual aspirations for the territory have expanded at the rhythm of an internal combustion engine: the repetition (RE-petition) of single objects, positioned at legal distances from their property lines has produced interstitial spaces devoid of meaning: the invention of the suburban periphery is a universal phenomenon. The reproduction (RE-production) ad infinitum of free standing houses is akin to autistic individualism. The near unlimited availability of resources and energy has brought about an undeniable impact on nature and social equilibrium. We also can’t escape from this phenomenon – we find ourselves in the middle of its growth. The idea of individualism and liberty, in any case human progress, can’t be understood in and of itself but only in relation to its context, in the larger sense. Our intention is to fill these interstitial spaces, to create relationships, spaces with dialogue: concentration rebels (RE_bell) against expansion. Searching for a difference, for a particularity and for the potential of any place, we look for densification. We try to focus on the typical. (RE_focus the typical, peculiar). — Ludovica Molo is a principal of könz.molo architects in Lugano, Switzerland, which she founded in 1998 with Jachen Könz. Their work has been published extensively locally, nationally and internationally and has received numerous awards for design excellence. Molo was born in Lugano and gained a degree in architecture at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich. After she received her diploma, she moved to Los Angeles, working in a number of architecture offices and travelling throughout the west to visit architectural and land art sites. Back in Switzerland, she worked as a Objekat za 72 studenta Casa dell’Accademia, Mendrisio/TI, 1998-2006 Foto: Walter Mair — Building for 72 students Casa dell’Accademia, Mendrisio/TI, 1998-2006 Photo: Walter Mair teaching assistant at the École Polytechnique Fédérale (EPFL) in Lausanne and at the Accademia di architettura in Mendrisio, before starting to teach at SCI-arc Vico Morcote in 2003. Jachen Könz is a principal of könz.molo architects in Lugano, Switzerland, which he founded in 1998 with Ludovica Molo. He was trained at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich and at the École Polytechnique Fédérale (EPFL) in Lausanne. Before moving to Ticino, where he eventually set up his own practice in 1992, he worked in Germany and in Barcelona. Könz, who gained a degree also as an urban designer and planner in 1992, is involved in different architecture boards at local and federal level. He was a lecturer and juror in various international schools, including Architectural Association in London, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich, Accademia di architettura in Mendrisio, Rhode Island School of Design in Providence, SCI-arc Vico Morcote. i opštim pitanjima kulture. Njegovi glavni radovi su MUTATIONS (Mutacije), USE – uncertain States of Europe (NED – Nesigurne evropske države), Solid Sea (Čvrsto more). Radovi mreže multiplicity izlagani su na Venecijanskom bijenalu, u Muzeju moderne umetnosti u Parizu, na KW u Berlinu, na Milanskom trijenalu i na izložbi documenta11. Izabran je za jednog od projektanata vile u Unutrašnjoj Mongoliji, kao deo projekta Ordos100. Ne-misliti un-think Džon Palmezino, Teritorijal ejdžensi, Švajcarska John Palmesino, Territorial Agency, Switzerland Ne znati je naš potencijal. Posle stotinu godina ubrzane urbanizacije, arhitektura se našla u neizvesnom polju delovanja. Savremena teritorija je poprište različitih šema transformacije i razvojnih ritmova, kao posledice istovremenih i često različitih interesa koje zastupa sve veći broj aktera. Tokom međusobnog delovanja i takmičenja, oni transformišu, oblikuju, uobličavaju i reorganizuju prostor u kome deluju. Istovremeno, stručno znanje stvara niz jasno ograničenih intervencija i nadležnosti, uz tehnike kontrole i menadžmenta ograničenog obima koje se same nameću. U ovoj evoluciji, savremeni grad ne prati linearno kretanje, u kome je sled elemenata određen i priroda uzroka jasno uočljiva. Dobivši ovu pluralističku prirodu, ponašanje savremenog grada je dinamično i u stalnoj promeni. Kako arhitektura može upisati ne-znanje u svoje aktivnosti u okviru ovih procesa transformacije? Kako može prevazići ono što je već poznato i pri ruci? Not to know is our potential. After one hundred years of rapid urbanisation, architecture finds itself operating in an uncertain field. The contemporary territory is the seat of a multiplicity of transformation patterns and evolutive rhythms, wrought by concurrent and often distant interests, promoted by a growing number of actors. Through their mutual interplay and competition, they reshape, carve, mould and re-organise their spaces of operation. At the same time, expert knowledge is constructing a series of welldelimited boundaries of intervention and competence, contained and almost self-referential circuits of control and management techniques. In its evolution, the contemporary city does not follow a linear movement where the succession of elements is distinct and the nature of the causes clearly identifiable. Given this plural nature, the behaviour of the contemporary city is dynamic and ever-changing. How can architecture inscribe nonknowledge into its operations within these transformation processes? How can it move beyond what is already known and at hand? — Džon Palmezino, arhitekta i urbanista, rođen je u Švajcarskoj. Inicijator je interdisciplinarnog istraživanja neutralnosti kao modaliteta prostorne transformacije i upravljanja, što je bio deo njegovih doktorskih studija u Centru za istraživačku arhitekturu Fakulteta Goldsmit Londonskog univerziteta, gde je takođe i nastavnik. Vodio je i zajednička istraživanja Federalnog univerziteta za tehnologiju (ETH) u Cirihu i „Studija: Bazel - moderni grad“ koja su trajala od 2003. do 2007. godine. Osnovao je međunarodnu istraživačku mrežu multiplicity, koja se bavi savremenom arhitekturom, urbanizmom, umetnošću 44 — PREDAVANJA — John Palmesino is an architect and urbanist, born in Switzerland. He is the initiator of the interdisciplinary research on neutrality as a modality of spatial transformation and control, for his PhD at the Research Architecture Centre, Goldsmiths, University of London, where he also teaches. He has led the researches at ETH Zurich / Studio Basel–Contemporary City Institute between 2003 and 2007. He has co-founded multiplicity, an international research network involved in contemporary architecture, urbanism, arts and general culture. Main works include MUTATIONS, USE uncertain States of Europe, Solid Sea. Multiplicity’s works have been exhibited at the Venice Biennale, at the Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris, at the KW Berlin, at the Triennale di Milano and at documenta11. He has been selected to design a villa in Inner Mongolia as part of the Ordos100 project. Neutralnost – Svet bez granica, 2005 © Territorial Agency — Ordos, Unutrašnja Mongolia, 2008 © Territorial Agency - Gran pri 26. salona arhitekture, 2004. - Nagrada grada Beograda iz oblasti urbanizma i arhitekture, 2003. - Nagrada lista „Novosti”, 2003. - Priznanje 25. salona arhitekture, 2003. REkonstrukcija Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC, Srbija Tipologija i pristup rešavanju problema rekonstrukcije biće prikazani na primeru pet odabranih projekata: 1. Rekonstrukcija Jugoslovenskog dramskog pozorišta (I plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 2. Rekonstrukcija enterijera Narodne biblioteke Srbije (I plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 3. Rekonstrukcija i dogradnja garaže na Obilićevom vencu (II plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 4. Rekonstrukcija Kalenić pijace (III plasman na javnom arhitektonskom konkursu) 5. Rekonstrukcija i dogradnja galerije Čolaković. Razmišljanja i delovanje prilikom rekonstrukcije objekata, rekonstrukcije programa, rekonstrukcije mesta, rekonstrukcije enterijera, kao i valorizacijie zatečenih elemenata, stvaranja i primene programa, intervencija u prostoru, tehničko-tehnološkog unapređenja. — Zoran Radojičić, arhitekta, je rođen 1967. godine u Beogradu, diplomirao je 1993. godine na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu. Od 1994. do 1999. godine radi u HK Energoprojekt, MDD Urbanizam i arhitektura. Godine 1999. godine osniva arhitektonski studio „ARCHTIC“ d.o.o. Dobitnik je većeg broja priznanja za ostvarenja u profesionalnom radu, među kojima su: - Nagrada Inženjerske komore Srbije za izuzetna dostignuća u struci, 2007. - Nagrada lista „Novosti”, 2007. - Priznanje 29. salona arhitekture za izvedeni objekat, 2007. - Nagrada Saveza arhitekata Srbije, 2005. 46 — PREDAVANJA Nagrađen na više od trideset domaćih i inostranih arhitektonskih konkursa. Izlagao je svoje radove i izvedene objekte na više grupnih i samostalnih izložbi u zemlji i inostranstvu (Bijenale u Veneciji, Praško kvadrijenale, Salon arhitekture). Kao gostujući nastavnik, više puta držao predavanja na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu. Član je Inženjerske komore Srbije, Saveza arhitekata Srbije, Društva arhitekata Beograda i ULUPUDS–a. REconstruction Zoran Radojičić, ARCHTIC, Serbia Typology and approach to reconstruction problem-solving will be shown on the example of five chosen projects: 1. Reconstruction of the Yugoslav Drama Theatre (Jugoslovensko dramsko pozorište) (1st place at a public architecture competition) 2. Reconstruction of the interior of the National Library of Serbia (Narodna biblioteka Srbije) (1st place on the public architecture competition) 3. Reconstruction and annexing of the garage at Obilićev venac (2nd place on a public architecture competition) 4. Reconstruction of Kalenić Market (3rd place on a public architecture competition) 5. Reconstruction and annexing of Čolaković Gallery. Thinking and actions when reconstructing the buildings, reconstruction of program, reconstruction of location, reconstruction of interior, as well as revalorisation of found elements, creation and application of programs, intervention on the space, technical and technological advancement. Architect Zoran Radojičić was born in 1967 in Belgrade. He graduated from the Faculty of Architecture at University of Belgrade. From 1994 to1999 he worked in HK Energoprojekt - MDD Urbanizam i arhitektura. In 1999 he founded an architectonic studio ARCHTIC, d.o.o. He is a laureate of a number of awards for his work in the profession, among which are: - Award of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers for outstanding achievements in the profession, 2007. - Award of Novosti newspaper, 2007. - Commendation at the 29th Salon of Architecture for erected building, 2007. - Award of the Association of Architects of Serbia, 2005. - Grand Prix of the 26th Salon of Architecture, 2004. - Award of the City of Belgrade in the area of urbanism and architecture, 2003. - Award of Novosti newspaper, 2003. - Commendation at the 25th Salon of Architecture, 2003. Narodna biblioteka Srbije – CIP/ISBN/ISSN/ISMN agencija — National Library of Serbia – CIP/ISBN/ISSN/ISMN agency He has been awarded at more than thirty domestic and foreign architecture competitions. He has exhibited his works and completed buildings at several group and solo exhibitions in the country and abroad (Venice Biennale, Prague Quadrennial, Architecture Salon). As a guest lecturer, he has held several lectures at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade. He is a member of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers, Association of Architects of Serbia, Association of Architects of Belgrade, and the Association of Applied Arts Artists and Designers of Serbia (ULUPUDS). Šrek siti: Privatni prostor u Bukureštu i druge priče Konstantin Goađea, Rumunija Prilično sam siguran da se svi sećaju animiranog filma Šrek i da je pitanje koje postavljaju opravdano: kakve veze ima magare iz Šreka sa nekim arhitektonskim pojavama? Ima. Naime, kada je reč o gradskim navikama, uvek je bolje opredeliti se za magare nego za ogra. Magare želi da odvrati Šreka od nedruštvene iracionalnosti koja se ispoljava kroz njegovu ljubav prema svemu što je zeleno, prema netaknutoj prirodi koju želi samo za sebe. Što je najgore, on mrzi komšije i, sve u svemu, ništa mu nije potrebno. Očigledno, Šrek nije oličenje poštenog seljaka kome je bliska seoska poslušnost i jednostavan način života već je on, naprotiv, odraz aktuelnog nepristojnog prigradskog mentaliteta. Šrek siti bi mogao biti prikladan pojam za opis nekog sna o izgradnji nekretnina usred prirode, pri čemu ta izgradnja uništava prirodu u ime ljubavi prema prirodi i umesto prirode stvara prostore u kojima vlada društvena izolacija uz odsustvo moralnih obaveza, odsustvo interakcije, raznolikosti i društvene dinamike. Koristim priliku da se zahvalim magaretu iz filma što mi je omogućilo da uvedem ovaj radni koncept – Šrek siti – koji sam tek sada shvatio kao autentičan stav koji se suprotstavlja gradu i ispoljava antipatije prema njemu. „La rue courbe est le chemin des ânes, la rue droite le chemin des hommes” (Krivudavi put je onaj kojim idu magarci, pravolinijski put onaj kojim idu ljudi), rekao je Korbizje. Možda se prevario. S jedne strane, magarci su racionalni jer znaju da odaberu najblažu padinu za silazak, što znači da umeju da štede svoju snagu, a s druge strane, skoro sto godina nakon što je izrečena ova duhovita opaska potreban nam je prostor oslobođen automobila isto toliko koliko nam je potreban vazduh koji dišemo. 48 — PREDAVANJA — Konstantin Goađea od dvanaeste godine radi kao arhitekta i teoretičar, baveći se istraživanjima u oblasti arhitekture. Možda je pravilnije i njega i njegove saradnike nazvati gradskim kritičarima. To je, u najmanju ruku, ono što on radi sve vreme, bilo da je reč o tekstovima ili projektima, izložbama ili konferencijama – i to je razlog što stalno osvaja nagrade. Dakle, preskačući delove biografije, osvojio je prvu nagradu na konkursu za Rimski paviljon na Venecijanskom bijenalu 2006. godine (pod nazivom „remix”), a godinu kasnije i Nagradu za publikaciju na Godišnjoj arhitektonskoj izložbi u Bukureštu za Remiks – fragmente države (Remix - fragments of a country). Već šest godina Konstantin je organizator Rumunskog bijenala arhitekture – što je nacionalna nagrada za arhitekturu u Rumuniji. Bio je kustos na dvadeset pet izložbi, a trenutno se na njegovom radnom stolu nalaze tri projekta u vezi sa rehabilitacijom javnih prostora. Ostatak vremena provodi kao direktor biltena „Arhitectura“, a takođe je i osnivač udruženja „zeppelin“ – koje se bavi umetnošću, arhitekturom, dizajnom i drugim savremenim temama. Shreck city: The non public space in Bucharest and other stories Constantin Goagea, Romania I am preatty sure everybody remembers Shreck, that cartoon film and the question is reasonable: what does Donkey from Shreck have to do with architectural phenomena? Well, it does since on the side of urban habits it is always better to choose the donkey instead of the ogre. The donkey wishes to turn away Shreck’s antisocial irrationality embodied by his love for whatever is green, for a complete nature he wants for himself only. Worst of all, he hates neighbors and on the whole, he does not need anything. Obviously, Shreck is not the image of the good peasant familiar with the village obedience and a simple life style, but he is actually the exponent of current rude suburbanites. Shrek-city would be an appropriate term to describe any dream of real estate development in the middle of nature that destroys nature on behalf of the love for nature and creates instead spaces where social isolation, lack of moral commitment, lack of interaction, diversity and social dynamism reign. I am taking this opportunity to thank the donkey in the Remiks — Remix film for having allowed me to launch this working concept – Shrek-city – which only now I understood as a genuine attitude opposing and showing aversion to the city. Some donkeys-little donkeys across the lecture as you have never seen before. “La rue courbe est le chemin des ânes, la rue droite le chemin des hommes” (A curved road is a way for donkeys, while a straight road is a way for human beings), Corbusier said. Maybe he had been wrong. On one hand, donkeys are rational since they know to choose a way down a smoothest slope, which means they manage to spare their efforts, and on the other hand, nearly hundred years further to this witticism we need carless spaces as much as we need air to breathe. — Constantin Goagea has been working from twelve years as an architect and theorist, making research in the field of architecture. It is more appropriate to call him and his fellows city critics. At least, this is what he does all the time, no matter it is about text or projects, 49 — PREDAVANJA exhibitions or conferences – the very reason for constantly receiving awards. So, going on fast forward, he won the competition for the Romanian Pavilion at Venice Biennale in 2006 (called “remix”), and one year later the Publication Award at the Bucharest Annual Architectural Exhibition for Remix – fragments of a country, he has been organizing from six years the Romanian Bienalle of Architecture – meaning the national professional awards in this field. Constantin has been the curator of 25 exhibitions, and three projects for public place rehabilitation are in pending now on his desktop. In the rest of time, he is the director of Arhitectura review, the founding member of zeppelin association – having again as a subject of interest the art, architecture, design and other contemporary stuff. – nalik su „rajskim ostrvima”, kao reakcija na izostanak infrastrukture. Akcija i REakcija: Slika postkomunističke graditeljske kulture u Bugarskoj Petar Torniov, Bugarska 1. Reakcija. Početak tranzicije – rane devedesete godine XX veka. Potraga za novim identitetom. Političke i društvene promene – takozvana „nežna” transformacija od komunističko-totalitarističkog uređenja u „slobodno, demokratsko” društvo izazvala je razdor i pometnju u društvenom i ekonomskom životu. Ova transformacija dovela je do gubitka identiteta i radikalne izmene sistema vrednosti. Reakcija društva je impulsivna i uslovljena novim, uvreženim „globalnim” vrednostima. Političari, investitori i arhitekte tragaju za novim putevima, zapostavljajući kulturno i društveno nasleđe. Istorijski simboli i zgrade su nepoželjni i nestaju pod pritiskom novog slobodnog tržišta. 2. Repliciranje. Nov način života i rada i novo urbanističko uređenje. Sofija kao prestonica prvi je njegov veliki projekat 2007. godine. Urbanistički razvoj je urađen deo po deo i uglavnom je uslovljen privatnim interesima. Odsustvo vizije i dugoročne strategije doveli su do raznih neobičnih pojava, ne samo u gradovima već i na obali Crnog mora i u planinskim predelima. Stara teška industrija je mrtva a nova se zove „turizam”. Saobraćaj i gustina naseljenosti neprestano rastu a, istovremeno, broj stanovnika opada. Novi stambeni kompleksi su nikli kao zajednice sa ograničenim pristupom. Industrijsko-poslovni parkovi kao zajednice sa ograničenim pristupom, pružaju međunarodnim kompanijama osećaj „da su kod kuće”. Tržni centri – uzdanice globalnog potrošačkog društva 50 — PREDAVANJA 3. Reorijentacija kao reakcija i pokušaji da se poboljša kultura gradnje. Napori, uspeli i bezuspešni, da se izmeni i poboljša kultura gradnje, urbanistički kvalitet i društveni uticaj arhitekture. - Takmičenja i rezultati. - Političke odluke, udruženja građana i javne rasprave. - Međunarodna razmena. - Pozitivni primeri. — Peter Torniov, dipl. inž. arh. rođen je 1970. u Sofiji, Bugarska. Diplomirao je arhitekturu i stekao master diplomu na Tehnološkom univerzitetu u Beču (1999). Radio je kao honorarni saradnik za nekoliko arhitektonskih biroa u Beču i ostvario saradnju sa biroom Kop Himelblau (1999–2000). Od 2001. do 2005. bio je asistent na Tehnološkom univerzitetu u Beču. Godine 2003. osnovao je +architecture ltd u Sofiji, a 2005. je sa svojim partnerom Stefanom Petkovim otvorio i ogranak u Bukureštu, Rumunija. Action and Re-action: Picture of the post communist building culture in Bulgaria Peter Torniov, Bulgaria 1. Reaction. The begin of transition – early 90’s. Searching for a new identity. The political and social changes – the so called “gentle” transformation” from communisttotalitarian system to “free and democratic” society opened a social gap and confusion in the social and economical life. This transformation led to lost of identity and radically break of the value system. The reaction of the society is impulsive and dictated by new imported “global” values. Politicians, investors and architects are searching for new ways, neglecting the cultural and social heritage. Historical Symbols and buildings are unwanted and disappear under the pressure of the new free market. 2. Replication. The new form of living and working and the new urban organization. Sofia as capital became his first Master Plan in 2007. The urban development were done piece by piece and dictated mainly by private interests. The missing of vision and long term strategy led to diverse bizarre occurrences not only in the cities, but also on the Black Sea cost and the mountain regions. The old heavy industry is dead and the new one is named “Tourism”. The traffic and the density are constantly growing and in the same time the population is shrinking. New residential compounds grew up as gated communities. Business parks as gated communities offer international companies the feeling of “being home”. Shopping malls as flagships of the global consumer society are like “paradise islands” as reaction of the missing infrastructure. 3. Reorientation as reaction and attempts to improve the building culture. The efforts, successful and unsuccessful to change and improve the building culture, urban quality and social influence of the architecture. Skijalište Banjsko, Crno more — Bansko Skiresort, Black Sea - competitions and results. - political decisions, citizen organizations and public discussions - international exchange - positive examples. — Peter Torniov was born in 1970 in Sofia, Bulgaria. He got his Master degree and architecture diploma from Vienna University of Technology (1999). He was a freelancer in several architecture offices in Vienna, which led him to his collaboration with Coop Himmelblau (between 1999 and 2000). From 2001 Peter Torniov was assistant professor for four years at the Vienna University of Technology, in 2003 founded +architecture ltd in Sofia and in 2005 a branch in Bucharest, Romania along with his partner Stefan Petkov. temeljne tehničke provere istorijskih zgrada i konsultacija sa profesionalcima koji im nude rešenja za konzervaciju, procenu arhitektonskih prednosti i predračun troškova. U bliskoj saradnji sa austrijskim Državnim odsekom za zaštitu spomenika (Bundesdenkmalamt) poslednjih godina je urađeno preko šezdeset projekata. Od tih projekata, u najuzbudljivija iskustva spada rad na gradu Gracu koji se nalazi na Uneskovoj listi svetske baštine. Dobronamerni vanzemaljci u kućama starih ljudi Grac: Savremena arhitektura u istorijskom gradskom ambijentu Friendly aliens in old peoples’ homes Graz: contemporary architecture in historic townshape Markus Zechner, Austria Markus Cehner, Austrija Grad Grac ima dugu tradiciju u privlačenju ljudi inovativnog duha. Godinama pre 2003, kada je grad imao titulu Kulturne prestonice Evrope, uspostavljena je harmonična koegzistencija novog i starog kao važnog dela lokalne arhitekture. Priča o uspehu moderne arhitekture u Gracu počinje oko 1965. godine pobunom u salama za crtanje Arhitektonskog fakulteta. Dve decenije kasnije, Arhitektonska škola Graca bila je u punom naponu, na veliko iznenađenje savremene međunarodne arhitektonske scene – imala je političku podršku, bila je inovativna i spremna da eksperimentiše. Kunsthaus (Muzej savremene umetnosti) i Ada na reci Mur određeni su za događaje 2003. godine i to su lokacije koje dale glavne impulse za razvoj kulture gradnje u srcu grada. Sprovođenje ideja u istorijskom centru grada pod zaštitom Uneska nije moguće bez široke diskusije koja pokazuje da je dijalog starog i novog zasnovan, pre svega, na sposobnosti komunikacije unutar jednog društva. — Markus CEHNER, dipl. inž. arh., rođen 1967. u Gracu, Austrija. Od 1996. radi u oblasti planiranja projekata konzervacije. Okupio je ekipu nezavisnih, specijalizovanih arhitekata i konzervatora koji su osnovali malu projektantsku kompaniju „ZECHNER Monument Consulting”. Svojim mušterijama - privatnicima, investitorima i državnoj administraciji, pruža usluge 52 — PREDAVANJA The city of Graz has a long tradition in attracting innovative spirits. Years before 2003, when the town was celebrating Cultural Capital of Europe, the harmonious coexistence of new and old was established as an important part of local architecture. The success story of modern architecture in Graz started around 1965 with a rebellion in the drawing rooms of the Faculty of Architecture. Two decades later, the Graz School was in full cry, much to the surprise of the contemporary international architecture scene - politically supported, innovative and very keen on experimenting. The Kunsthaus (Museum of Contemporary Art) and the Island in the Mur were established for the event period of 2003 and gave important impulses to the development of building culture in heart of the city. To realise this ideas in an UNESCO protected historic centre is not possible without a wide ranged discussion showing that the dialog of old and new is first of all based on the conversational ability of a society. — Markus ZECHNER, Dipl.-Ing. arch., was born 1967 in Graz, Austria. He has been working in the field of planning in conservation projects since 1996. He created a free lanced team of specialised architects and conservators in founding the ZECHNER Monument Consulting as a small projecting company. Private owners, investors and official departments as clients, are supported in having a fundamental check up on their historic buildings and to receive an professional consulting advice forecasting conservation concepts, architectural benefits and costs. In close cooperation with the Austrian State Department for Monumental Care (Bundesdenkmalamt) over 60 projects could be done in the last years. Among that, to work on the UNESCO heritage city of Graz was one of the most exciting experiences. Muzej savremene umetnosti, Grac — Museum of Contemporary Art, Graz Centar Graca kao mešavina istorijskih fasada i palata, stalnih postavki umetničkih instalacija i moderne arhitekture Biljana Aranđelović, Austrija Grac, evropska kulturna prestonica 2003, poznat je ne samo po svom istorijskom centru koji je pod zvaničnom zaštitom Uneska već i po modernoj arhitekturi. U istorijskom centru grada uočavaju se prelepe linije fasada i palata, uglavnom iz vremena baroka i kasnijih perioda. Podjednako su atraktivne i moderne umetničke instalacije i postavke kao sastavni deo projekta gradske vlasti „umetnost na otvorenom prostoru“ kao i moderne arhitektonske građevine. U izlaganju će biti predstavljeni najzanimljiviji urbani detalji savremenog gradskog jezgra. Kao primer umetničke intervencije u urbanoj strukturi navodi se umetnica Sonja Gangle, sa svojom postavkom instalacija na glavnom gradskom trgu pod nazivom „t+4e – think positive forever“ (Razmišljaj pozitivno zauvek), zatim statua pod nazivom Light Sword, visoka 54 m, delo umetnika Hartmuta Skerbiša, kao jedno od poznatijih obeležja i atrakcija modernog Graca. Jedan od primera moderne arhitekture u istorijskom gradskom jezgru je ostrvo na Muri nastalo 2003, kada je dizajner i umetnik iz Njujorka Vito Akonti pozvan da napravi neku vrstu umetničke instalacije na reci, veštačko jezero sa kafe barom i amfiteatrom – binom za izvođenje preformansa. Ovi projekti i dela, zajedno sa mnogim drugim umetničkim instalacijama i modernim arhitektonskim oblicima, najbolji su primeri kako se tradicija i moderno susreću na istom mestu, bez ometanja okoline i rušenja vrednih spomenika iz prošlosti. 54 — PREDAVANJA — Biljana Aranđelović, arhitekta i slikarka, rođena je 1979. u Nišu. Od 2005. živi i radi u Gracu. Studije arhitekture završila je na Građevinsko-arhitektonskom fakultetu u Nišu. Doktorirala je 2008. na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Gracu, na Institutu za urbanizam. Od 2006. je u programu privatne umetničke galerije Art moments iz Graca i, kao deo stalne postavke galerije, učestvuje na međunarodnim sajmovima umetnosti. Izlagala je na samostalnim i grupnim izložbama u Austriji, Srbiji, Grčkoj i Nemačkoj. Godine 2009. izabrana je u zvanje docenta na Građevinsko-arhitektonskom fakultetu u Nišu za užu naučnu oblast Istorija i teorija arhitekture. Center of Graz as a mix of historical facades and domes, permanent art installations and modern architecture Biljana Arandjelovic, Austria Graz, Europe`s 2003 Capital of Culture, is well-known not only because of its historical centre, which became a UNESCO world cultural heritage site, but also because of its modern architecture. Observing the historical centre, the beautiful lines of domes and facades, predominantly of Baroque and later periods could be find, but also modern art at open urban space, as well as modern architecture buildings. In this presentation the most interesting examples of urban details in contemporary Graz would be seen. One of the great examples of art intervention in central urban structure is artist Sonja Gangle with her t+4e (think positive forever) project as main square permanent installation. Then also, 54m high Light Sword statue, made by artist Hartmut Skerbisch, is one of the well known modern landmarks and attractions in Graz. One of the examples of modern architecture in city centre is island in Mur. In 2003, New York artist and designer Vito Acconti was invited to make some kind of art attraction in the river, an artificial island with coffeehouse and the performance stage for contemporary events. Those examples together with many other art installations and architectural buildings are definitely the best example how modern can meet past without disturbing environment and demolishing the valuable historical monuments. — Biljana Arandjelovic, architect and painter, was born in Nis 1979. Since 2005 she lives and works in Graz. She studied architecture at University of Nis, Faculty for Civil Engineering and Architecture. From 2005-2008 she made her Doctoral Thesis at Graz University of Technology at Institute for Urbanism at Faculty of Architecture. Since 2006, she is in program of the Art moments gallery in Graz. She had solo and group exhibitions in Austria, Greece, Germany, Serbia and also participated at art fairs in Innsbruck and Vienna with Art moments gallery. Since 2009 she works as Assistent Professor of History and Theory of architecture at University of Nis, Faculty for Civil Engineering and Architecture. Projekat trajne instalacije na glavnom trgu: t+4e (razmišljaj pozitivno zauvek) — Permanent installation project on the main square: t+4e (think positive forever) spoljne razmere građevine bile što manje, fiskulturna sala se za tri metra spušta ispod nivoa okruženja. Ozelenjeni atrijum razdvaja postojeću građevinu od novoizgrađene, u kojoj se odvijaju fiskulturne radnje i manifestacije. Pogled sa ulaza ka sportskom terenu i od foajea ka uličnom prostoru daje utisak lakoće i transparentnosti zgrade. Projekti Andreas Bremhorst, Karl und Bremhorst Arhitekten, Austrija Analiza zadatka je centar nacrta. Rešenja mogu biti teorijska, praktična, jednostavna, komplikovana ili nemoguća. Ona su ipak uvek skrojena, individualna, vremenski određena. Naše ideje i građevine su ekološki orijentisane, funkcionalne, svrsishodne, jednostavne. Škola „Hertha Firnberg“, Beč Škola je najmanja i najniža zgrada usred ogromnih visokih stambenih građevina u Vinaberg sitiju. Otvoreni prostor se kao pešačka zona prostire duž novog dela grada. Uvučeno prizemlje kompaktne uzduž podignute građevine otvara se staklom ka esplanadi. Otvoreni stepenik vodi ka gornjim spratovima. Široki hodnici u sredini su istovremeno površine za prilaz i pauzu. Spratovi su povezani vazdušnim prostorom a kroz stakleni krov dobijaju sunčevu svetlost. Niše, proseci i vidici variraju konfiguraciju prostora po spratovima. Sve učionice okrenute su ka istočnoj strani koja je sklonjena od saobraćaja. Sa prozora učionica vidi se školsko dvorište i bašta dečijeg obdaništa. Duž ulice planirane su prostorije za snabdevanje i upravu koje su manje osetljive na buku. Tako se zgrada deli na „posluženi“ deo i deo koji „služi“. Sportska sala postavljena je jedan sprat niže. Krovni prostor je centralna terasa za pauzu, jedan atraktivni dobitak prostora na prilično malom zemljištu. Trostruka fiskulturna sala u gradiću Vels-Pernau, Gornja Austrija Trostruka fiskulturna sala Pernau smeštena je na građevinski značajnom mestu – na glavnom ulazu u Vels. Predviđeno mesto za gradnju je precizno izmereno. Da bi 56 — PREDAVANJA Dobrovoljni vatrogasci i trg, Potendorf, Donja Austrija Projekat definiše novi trg, čija je površina podeljena u tri funkcionalne zone. Jedna infrastrukturna osa prostire se preko ove tri zone i čini funkcionalni centar. Zgrada vatrogasaca okrenuta je ka trgu, tako da sa njim može da se uspostavi veza pri održavanju manifestacija. Na gornjem spratu je velika sala, sa pogledom na trg, koja može da se podeli i da se koristi za organizovanje kulturnih događaja. Velike staklene površine treba da podstaknu znatiželju i pruže uvid u delatnost vatrogasaca. — Andreas Bremhorst (1969) je rođen u Viener Nojštatu (Donja Austrija). Maturirao je u BRG Viktring, Klagenfurt i studirao arhitekturu na Akademiji likovnih umetnosti, Beč, u klasi prof. Pentile. Godine 1995, dobio je nagradu Fridrih-Oman na Akademiji likovnih umetnosti, Beč. Od 1999 radi samostalno, a od 2002 u zajedničkom birou sa arhitektom Kristofom Karlom. Projects Andreas Bremhorst, Karl und Bremhorst Architekten, Austria The analysis of the specific task at hand is at the centre of all our designs. Solutions may be theoretical, practical, simple, complicated or impossible, but they are always customised, individual, referenced to their time. Our ideas and buildings take account of the environment, are unpretentious and never lose sight of the underlying purpose. Hertha Firnberg School, Vienna The school is the smallest and lowest building amidst the large-volume, towering housing estates of Wienerberg City. An esplanade traverses the new city quarter axially, providing easy walking access. The recessed ground floor of the compact, longitudinal structure opens up a glazed Škola Vinerberg, Beč I nagrada na konkursu 2003, realizovano 2005. foto: Rupert Steiner — School Wienerberg, Vienna 1st price on competition 2003, realized 2005 photo: Rupert Steiner façade to the esplanade. An open staircase leads to the upper levels. The broad central corridors serve both as access routes and relax zones. The storeys are interlinked by airspaces and receive sunlight through a glass roof. Niches, views across rooms as well as vistas of the world outside vary the spatial configurations of the individual storeys. All classrooms face the eastern front, which is shielded from traffic. From the classroom window, pupils and teachers can enjoy an unobstructed view of the schoolyard and the garden of the daycare nursery. The less noise-sensitive utility rooms and administrative premises are situated along the street. Thus the building is split into a “served” and a “serving” section. The gym is located one storey below. The roof becomes a central terrace to enjoy recess time – an attractive additional space on this limited-size plot. to streetscape endow the building with a lightweight, transparent appeal. Pernau triple gym, Wels (Upper Austria) The Pernau triple gym is situated in an urbanistically prominent point on a main access road to Wels. The plot size is rather limited, so in order to keep the outside dimensions of the building low, the gym was positioned by three metres below the surrounding terrain level. A greened atrium provides a caesura between old and new building stock; the access zone leading to the gym and event space unfolds along this caesura. Visual links form entrances to sports grounds and from lobby — Andreas Bremhorst (1969) was born in Wiener Neustadt (Lower Austria). He graduated from secondary technical school in Viktring, Klagenfurt (Carinthia) and studied architecture at the Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna, at master class of professor T.Penttilä. In 1995, he was awarded with Friedrich Ohmann Award of Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna. Since 1999 he worked in his own studio, and from 2002 in office partnership with architect Christoph Karl. 57 — PREDAVANJA Volunteer fire department and market square, Pottendorf (Lower Austria) This project defines a new market square whose surface is structured into three functional zones. An infrastructure axis spans these three zones and forms the functional centre. The Fire Department building is oriented towards the market square, which creates a clear reference to the square whenever special events take place at the building. The upper storey houses a big sub-divisible hall with a view of the market square, which may also be used for cultural functions. Ample glass panes whet curiosity and offer glimpses of the work of the Volunteer Fire Department. Svakodnevni život Every Day Life Zigfrid Los, polar ÷, Austrija Siegfried Loos, polar ÷, Austria ovo predavanje je o tome kako biti zajedno: biti zajedno kao ljudi biti zajedno kao prostorije biti zajedno kao kuće biti zajedno kao pejzaži ukatko, to znači prostori između koji započinju svoje bivstvovanje kada se nešto spoji. ovo predavanje nije predavanje već priča o ne-događaju, kao najvećem događaju. the lecture is about being together: being together like people being together like rooms being together like houses being together like landscapes in common it means the spaces in between, they start being when something is together. the lecture is no lecture it is a story about the non happening event, as the strongest point. — Zigfrid Los, rođen 1965. godine u Feldbahu, studirao je arhitekturu na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Gracu i Tehničkom univerzitetu u Delftu. Diplomirani inženjer arhitekture, civilni tehničar sa državnom dozvolom, od 1993. godine u partnerskom birou sa Margot Firč (M. Fürtsch). Godine 2002. osnovali su zajednički arhitektonski brend polar÷ u Beču i Bad Glajhenbergu (Bad Gleichenberg). Predavač na Višoj stručnoj školi Joanneum. Direktor radionice za prostorno uređenje Bečke škole umetnosti (Wiener kunst schule). — Siegfried Loos was born in 1965 in Feldbach. Since 1993, he works in the partnership bureau with Margot Fürtsch. In 2002, the co-founded their joint architectural brand polar÷ in Vienna and Bad Gleichenberg. He is a lecturer at the Higher Vocational School Joanneum. He is the Director of the Spatial Arrangement Workshop at the Viennese School of Art (Wiener Kunst Schule). He has studied architecture at the Technical University in Delft. He is a bachelor of architecture, and a state-licensed civil technician. 58 — PREDAVANJA polar÷ Austrija — polar÷ Austria TYPUS ili TOPOS: MRLV Arhitekten Hamburg – Projekti i misaone osnove Mirjana Marković, MRLV Arhitekten Hamburg, Nemačka Slika grada Hamburga je upečatljivija nego njegovi pojedinačni arhitektonski objekti. Građani Hamburga i hamburški arhitekti, neguju taj mit. Početkom devedesetih godina XX veka, počinje diskusija o vrednosti arhitektonskih simbola. U međuvremenu, u Hamburg stižu i svetski arhitektonski nomadi. Koja teorija će dobiti primat – Bilbao- effect ili teorija evropejskog grada? Da li postoji jedan „hamburški put“? Mirjana Marković, Aleksandar Ronai, Vili Litjen, Manfred Fos – MRLV Architekten Hamburg – projektuju i grade u Hamburgu skoro tri decenije. Radove arhitektonskog biroa karakteriše unapred nedefinisani arhitektonski stil – uvek se ponovo generišu koncepti iz duha mesta, materijalnog i nematerijalnog. Ipak, oni nisu tome podređeni već često nude novu definiciju i oblikovnu artikulaciju toposa. Sigurni u funkcionalnoj dispoziciji, konstruktivnim rešenjima, arhitektonskom detalju i energetskim rešenjima, projekti MRLV Arhitekten predstavljaju se kao generativna čestica evropskog grada. — Mirjana Marković, slobodni arhitekta i profesor, studirala je na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Beogradu i Umetničkoj akademiji u Hamburgu. Živi u Hamburgu i bavi se urbanizmom, arhitekturom i enterijerom. Do sada je učestvovala u projektovanju i građenju stambenih objekata i kompleksa, vila, poslovnih objekata, školskih, sportskih i univerzitetskih objekata, kao i u procesima 60 — PREDAVANJA restauracije i dogradnje objekata pod zaštitom. Od 1979, zajedno sa Aleksandrom Ronai, Vilijem Litjenom i Manfredom Fosom, vodi samostalni arhitektonski biro u Hamburgu – MRLV Architekten – koji ima širok spektar stručnog rada, od idejnog projekta do nadzora nad izvođenjem. Osvojila je mnogobrojne nagrade na urbanističkim i arhitektonskim konkursima, kao i više nagrada za izvedene objekte. Objavila je mnoge radove i prikaze o radu biroa u stručnoj štampi. Bila je gostujući profesor na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Hamburg, ETH Zürich, Tsinghua Univerzitetu Peking i Umetničkoj akademiji Hamburg. Aktivna je u stručnim organizacijama, kao BDA (Bund Deutscher Architekten Hamburg – Savez slobodnih arhitekata Nemačke), kojem je bila i prva žena predsednica. Dugogodišnja je članica redakcije časopisa Der Architekt i savetnica DAM Deutsches Architekturmuseum Frankfurt. TYPUS or TOPOS: MRLV Architekten Hamburg – Design and Contemplative Basis Mirjana Markovic, MRLV Architekten Hamburg, Germany The image of the city of Hamburg is more consummate than the city’s individual architectural structures. The citizens of Hamburg and its architects do nurture this trend. By the beginning of 1990s, the discussion on the value of architectural symbols begins. In the meantime, the world’s nomads of architecture reach Hamburg. Which theory will gain primacy – the Bilbao effect, or the theory of the European City? Is there one single “Hamburg’s way”? Mirjana Marković, Aleksandar Ronai, Willi Lütjen, Manfred Voss – MRLV Architekten Hamburg – design and build in Hamburg for almost three decades. The designs of the architecture bureau are characterised by an architectural style not defined in advance – again and again, the concepts are generated from the spirit of the location, both material and immaterial. Yet, the concepts are not subordinate to the existing but frequently offer a new definition and material articulation of the topology. Secure in their functional disposition, constructive solutions, architectonic detail and energy solutions, MRLV Architekten designs are showcased as a generative particle of the European City. — Mirjana Marković, a free architect and professor, has studied at the Faculty of Architecture in Bel-grade and at The Art Academy in Hamburg. She lives in Hamburg and is engaged in urban planning, architecture and interior. So far, she has been involved in designing and building of residential build-ings and complexes, villas, commercial buildings, schools, sports and university buildings, as well as in the processes of restoration and enlargement of the buildings under heritage protection. From 1979, together with Alexander Ronai, Willi Lütjen and Manfred Voss, she leads the independent architectural biro in Hamburg – MRLV Architekten – which provides for a wide spectrum of expert work, from the phases of preliminary design to the construction supervision. She Emporio Hamburg MRLV Arhitekten - Markovic Ronai Voss Copyright www.datenland.de — Emporio Hamburg MRLV Architekten - Markovic Ronai Voss Copyright www.datenland.de has been awarded many times for urban planning and architectural competitions, as well as for constructed buildings. She has published many papers and reviews of the bureau’s work in the professional magazines. She was a guest pro-fessor at the Architectural Faculty in Hamburg, ETH Zürich, Tsinghua University in Beijing and The Art Academy Hamburg. She is active in professional organizations, such as BDA (Bund Deutscher Ar-chitekten Hamburg – Association of the free architects in Germany), where she was the first female president. She is also a long-standing member of the editorial staff of the magazine Der Architekt (The Architect) and the counsellor of DAM (Deutsches Architekturmuseum – German Architecture Museum) in Frankfurt. Reinterpretacija slobodnog plana Stanko Gaković, SAD Savremeni poslovni prostor u Americi je zasnovan na konceptu otvorenog plana. Radna mesta su opremljena sistemskim nameštajem i prostorno definisana lakim pregradama male visine za osnovnu privatnost. Na taj način obezbeđuje se visok stepen fleksibilnosti, tako da se raspored nameštaja i opreme brzo prilagođava novim zahtevima radnog procesa. Kritička analiza američkog savremenog poslovnog prostora odnosi se, pre svega, na ekstremnu funkcionalnost i standardizaciju koji ne dopuštaju varijacije. Fiksna tipologija sistemskog nameštaja i isključivost u primeni organizacionih shema doprinose monotoniji radnog prostora u kome ljudi provode više od jedne četvrtine svog dnevnog ili nedeljnog vremena. U kombinaciji sa minimalnom površinom radnog prostora i nemogućnopšću individualne kontrole mikroklime, ovakva sredina podstiče alijenaciju, bolest i povećano odsustvovanje sa posla. Primena koncepta otvorenog plana danas treba da bude realizovana i u skladu sa sledećim savremenim trendovima: - Pokretljivost zaposlenih u okviru firme na međugradskom i međunarodnom planu, uključujući i rad od kuće. Iz ovog trenda proizlazi potreba za univerzalnim radnim mestima za različite korisnike. - Prosečno radno vreme je sve duže – iako korišćenje kompjutera obezbeđuje veću produktivnost. Duže radno vreme stvara nove potrebe i nove sadržaje za rad i rekreaciju. - Radni prostor koji podstiče neposrednu komunikaciju i saradnju. Upotreba kompjutera promenila je način komuniciranja među zaposlenima. Umesto direktnim 62 — PREDAVANJA razgovorom, komunikacija između susednih radnih mesta ostvaruje se elektronskom poštom. Iz ovog trenda proizlazi potreba za formiranjem ambijenata koji podstiču direktnu komunikaciju. - Ekološki održiv radni prostor. Primenom standarda za zdravu sredinu kroz „Leadership in Energy and - Environmental Design” omogućava se programiranje i planiranje ekološki održive sredine. Radi daljeg usavršavanja poslovnog prostora, na predmetu Advanced Commercial Design, koristimo model grada u procesu planiranja. U istraživanjima gradskih struktura afirmišu se principi kontinuiteta, raznolikosti i konflikta, pa se njihovom primenom postižu dobri rezultati u projektovanju savremenog poslovnog prostora. — Stanko Gaković diplomirao je 1972, a doktorirao 1987. na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Beogradu. Sarađivao sa više firmi na arhitektonsko -urbanističkom projektovanju. Gostujući je profesor arhitekture Fulbrajtovog programa u SAD 1976, a potom nastavnik na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Beogradu do 1992, gde je radio kao vanredni profesor, prodekan za nastavu, urednik Arhitektonike i aktivni učesnik u razvijanju saradnje sa evropskim školama arhitekture. Gostovao u SAD. Njegovi projekti u oblasti arhitekture, urbanizma i dizajna dobili su više nagrada i priznanja na konkursima i izložbama u kojima je učestvovao u autorskom timu ili kao autor. Dobitnik je specijalne nagrade Društva arhitekata Beograda za arhitektonsko ostvarenje u inostranstvu 1996. godine. U Hjustonu, gde živi i radi, osnovao je G! studio u kojem, sa Dankom Gaković, projektuje stambene kuće i manje poslovne objekte. Učestvuje u formiranju novog programa u školi unutrašnje arhitekture za Art Institut, gde radi sa studentima na istraživanju, planiranju i projektovaju poslovnog prostora (Advanced Commercial Design). REinterpretation of the Open Plan Concept Stanko Gakovic, USA Modern commercial space in the US is based on the open plan concept. Workstations are equipped with systems furniture and are partitioned in space with light low-height panels that provide basic privacy. In this way, a high level of flexibility is achieved making the layout of furniture and equipment easily adapted to new requirements of the work process. A critical analysis of modern American commercial space would primarily refer to the extreme functionality and standardization that does not allow variations. Fixed typology of systems furniture and rigidness in the application of organizational layouts both contribute to the monotony of the work space in which people spend more than one quarter of their daily and weekly time. In combination with minimal surface area of the work space, and inability of individual control of the microclimate, such environment encourages alienation, illnesses and increased work absence. At present, application of the open plan concept should also be made in line with the following modern trends: - Mobility of employees within the company on the inter-city and international levels, including working from home. From this trend ensues the need for universal workstations for varying users. - Average working time is getting longer and longer – even though the use of computers provides for increased productivity. Longer working hours create new needs and contents for both labour and recreation. - Workspace that encourages direct communication and cooperation. The use of computers has changed the manner of communication among the employees. Instead of direct conversation, neighbouring workstations communicate by e-mail. This trend indicates a need for creation of ambiences that encourage direct communication. - Environmentally sustainable work space. By applying healthy environmental standards through “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design”, programming and Studija sklopa za poslovni prostor kompanije Facebook Marikruz Miranda — Composition design for Facebook Company business premises Maricruz Miranda 63 — PREDAVANJA planning of environmentally sustainable surroundings becomes possible. To pursue further advancement of commercial space, in the Advanced Commercial Design class, we use a city model in the planning process. In the research of urban structures, we affirm principles of continuity, diversity and conflict, so that their application achieves good results in the design of modern commercial space. — Stanko Gaković graduated in 1972, and received his doctorate at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade in 1987. He has cooperated with numerous companies on architectural and urban designs. He was a Fulbright Program visiting professor of architecture in the US in 1976, and later a lecturer at the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade until 1992, where he worked as an associate professor, vice dean for academic affairs, for teaching, the editor of Arhitektonika magazine and an active participant in the development of cooperation with European schools of architecture. He has professionally visited the US. His architectural, urbanism and design projects have won several prizes and awards at competitions and exhibitions at which he participated either in a team of authors, or as a sole author. In 1996, he was a laureate of a special prize of the Association of Architects of Belgrade for architectural accomplishments abroad. In Huston, where he now lives and works, he founded G! studio, where, together with Danka Gaković, he designs residential housing and small commercial spaces. He participates in the creation of a new program in the School of Internal Architecture for the Art Institute, where he works with students on research, planning and advanced commercial design. u Pomoni, ali je ubrzo, sa još šest svojih kolega, bio otupšten. To je bio početak osnivanja Arhitektonskog instituta u Južnoj Kaliforniji (SCI-Arch) 1972. godine. Vratio se školovanju i dobio diplomu mastera arhitekture (MA) na Harvardu, 1987. Držao je predavanja na univerzitetu Kolumbija, Harvardu, Jejlu, Berlahe institutu u Holandiji i u Školi arhitekture Bartlet u Londonu. MORFOZIS MORPHOSIS Tom Mejn, SAD Thom Mayne, USA … Njegov arhitektonski idiom je vezan za podneblje i kulturnu sredinu iz koje potiče. Jednostavno, klimatske pogodnosti Južne Kalifornije omogućile su mladim arhitektima da eksperimentišu mnogo više nego bilo gde u Americi, uz mnogo manje ograničavajućih faktora i više prostora za projektovanje. „Kako ja vidim, osnova mog umetničkog ostvarenja leži u spontanosti. Ja volim spontanost u rešavanju izazova koje stvarnost nameće. Oduvek sam težio tome da izgradim svoje projekte. Dakle, u mom svetu, u mojoj kreativnoj svesti nastaje arhitektonska vizija u sukobu stvarnosti i individualne sfere. Kroz interakciju i sučeljavanje često suprotnih vrednosti pronalazim pitanja i odgovore. U preseku stvarnog i idejnog nastaje nova realnost – zgrada. Treba proći dug put kroz izazove i utrošiti veliku energiju da bi se ostvarila zamisao.“ …His architectural idiom is connected to the climate and the cultural environment from which he comes. Simply put, with its climate comfort, South California has enabled young architects to experiment much more than anywhere else in America, have less limiting factors and more space for design. “The way I see my artistic realizations is that they have root in spontaneity. I love spontaneity in solving the challenges imposed by the reality. I have always been interested in realizing my projects. Therefore, in my world, in my creative consciousness, the architectural vision arises in the clash of reality and the individual sphere. Through the interaction and confrontation of often opposed values, I find the questions and the answers. In the touch of real and ideological, a new reality is born – a house. It takes a long way through the challenges and a lot of energy to make realization happen”. Iz intervjua sa Tomom Mejnom za časopis Forum+, br. 50. Nenad Stjepanović, jun 2005. — Tom Mejn, dobitnik Prickerove nagrade 2005. godine, osnivač je i vodeći projektant u grupi Morfozis, koja je poznata po beskompromisnom dizajnu i težnji ka prevazilaženju ograničenja tradicionalnih formi i materijala, ali i po radu na otkrivanju nove teritorije, izvan modernizma i postmodernizma. Morfozis su 1972. osnovali Mejn i Džim Staford, a godinu dana kasnije im se pridružio i Majkl Rotiondi i ostao partner do 1991. Tom Mejn je rođen u Vestberiju, Konektikat, 1944, a diplomirao arhitekturu na Univerzitetu Južna Kalifornija, 1968. Svoju profesorsku karijeru započeo je na Cal Poly 64 — PREDAVANJA From the interview of Thom Mayne for the Forum+ magazine, no. 50. Interview conducted by Nenad Stjepanović, June 2005. — Thom Mayne, the 2005 Pritzker Architecture Prize laureate, is a founder and design principal of Morphosis group, which has always been known for uncompromising designs and a drive to surpass the bounds of traditional forms and materials, while also working to carve out a territory beyond the limits of modernism and postmodernism. The firm was founded in 1972 by Mayne and Jim Stafford and one year later Micahel Rotiondi Caltrans District 7 Headquarters Los Anđeles, SAD, 2004. — Caltrans District 7 Headquarters Los Angeles, USA, 2004 65 — PREDAVANJA joined them and remained as partner until 1991. Thom Mayne was born in Westbury, Connecticut in 1944 and received his bachelor of architecture degree from the University of Southern California in 1968. He began his teaching career at Cal Poly at Pomona, but soon he, along with six colleagues, was fired. That was the genesis of the founding of the Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arch) in 1972. He returned to school and received his master of architecture degree from Harvard University in 1987. He has held teaching posts at Columbia University, Harvard University, Yale University, the Berlage Institute in the Netherlands and the Bartlett School of Architecture in London. TRIBINE DEBATES radiofonskih emisija izvedenih na evropskim festivalima, od kojih je jedna i nagrađena na Festivalu dokumentarne i radio drame Prix Marulić na Hvaru 2007. Urednica je redakcije za kulturu Radio Beograda 2. Serbia at Architecture Biennales in Venice Srbija na bijenalima arhitekture u Veneciji moderatorka: Snežana Ristić učesnici: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić moderator: Snežana Ristić participants: Branislav Dimitrijević, Branislav Mitrović, Zoran Erić Prošle, 2008. godine prvi put je raspisan javni konkurs za predstavljanje Srbije na 11. međunarodnoj izložbi arhitekture u Veneciji. Bilo je to važno iskustvo za sve učesnike, stručni savet, učesnike konkursa, Ministarstvo kulture, novinare, javnost… Na tribini će se govoriti o načinu i proceduri izbora našeg predstavnika na Bijenalu u Veneciji, o dosadašnjim iskustvima, o onome što bi trebalo promeniti i onome što bi trebalo zadržati u proceduri izbora, šta našim arhitektima znači učešće na Bijenalu, koliko je ono važno da bismo shvatilio sopstvenu poziciju u arhitekturi ovog trenutka, kako se biraju predstavnici u drugim državama, a kako u regiji… Projekcija fotografija: Bijenale u Veneciji 2008. (dokumentarne fotografije s posebnim osvrtom na paviljon Republike Srbije). Last year, 2008, saw for the first time opening of a public competition for the slot for representation of Serbia at the 11th International Exhibition of Architecture in Venice. This was an important experience for all stakeholders, the expert council, participants to the competition, the Ministry of Culture, journalists, the public... The panel will address the manner and the procedure of how our representative at the Biennale was elected, the hitherto experiences, the things that should be changed and the things that should be kept in the election process, followed by what it means to our architects to participate at the Biennale, how important it is for us to properly understand our own position in the architecture of the day, how representatives are picked in other countries, and in the countries in the region… Photography display: Venetian Biennale 2008 (documentary photographs with a special attention to the pavilion of the Republic of Serbia). — Snežana Ristić je diplomirala na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Beogradu. Bavi se arhitektonskom kritikom, publicistikom i fotografijom. Objavljuje u domaćim i stranim stručnim časopisima, nedeljnicima i dnevnim novinama (Politika, Kvart, Oris…). Autorka je brojnih radio emisija u kojima se bavi savremenom arhitekturom; vodila je intervjue sa nekim od najznačajnijih arhitekata i teoretičara arhitekture (Danijel Libeskind, Bogdan Bogdanović, Kengo Kuma, Adam Tihani, Rem Kolhas, Aron Betski, Dejan Suđić i dr). Koautorka je (sa Radonjom Leposavićem) knjige Šta ste radili u ratu – glasovi iz crne rupe, Beograd 1999. Koautorka (sa Radonjom Leposavićem) brojnih radijskih emisija, dokumentarnih i — Snežana Ristić received her university diploma from the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade. She practices critique in the realm of architecture, she is a publicist and a photographer. She has published in domestic and foreign professional almanacs, weekly newspapers and daily newspapers (Politika, Kvart, Oris…). She has authored numerous radio broadcasts in which she deals in contemporary architecture; she has interviewed some of the most important architects and theorists of architecture (Daniel Libeskind, Bogdan Bogdanović, Kengo Kuma, Adam Tihany, Rem Koolhaas, Aron Betsky, Dejan Suđić, et al). She co-authored (with Radonja Leposavić) a book entitled Šta ste radili u ratu – glasovi iz crne rupe 68 — TRIBINE (What Did You Do in War – Voices from the Black Hole), Belgrade, 1999. With the same colleague, she also co-authored numerous radio broadcasts, documentary and radiophone broadcasts performed at European festivals, of which one received an award at the Festival of Documentary and Radio Play – Prix Marulić in Hvar in 2007. Srpski paviljon u Veneciji — Serbian Pavilion in Venice 69 — TRIBINE istraživanjima unapređenja sistema planiranja, upravljanja i razvoja gradova, kreativnim sektorom i urbanom reciklažom, koju promoviše od ranih devedesetih godina kroz profesionalni i nevladin sektor i akademiju. Bila je predsednica Društva urbanista Beograda, članica je upravnog odbora Društva arhitekata Beograda i Izvršnog odbora sekcije urbanista IKS. Rukovodila je studijom Financing Metropolitan Governments in Transitional Countries, predstavljajući Beograd u međunarodnom projektu devet glavnih gradova Evrope. Šta sa Novim Beogradom? – okrugli sto moderatorka: Žaklina Gligorijević, Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Srbija Beograd još nedovoljno voli i promoviše Novi Beograd, koga svi gosti iz inostranstva smatraju jedinstvenim živim primerom grada moderne. Osim visokog kvaliteta životne sredine u ovom delu Beograda, sa sve više komercijalnih i javnih sadržaja koji dopunjuju lokalnu urbanu ponudu, ostaje da se profesija opredeli kako će u u budućnosti profilisati razvoj i rast ovog grada. Hoće li dopustiti da se u njega useli visoki poslovni „city”, koji se do danas nije formirao po uzoru na zapadne prestonice, ili će se poštovati izgrađeni identitet i kontekst, ostaje da se rasprai i o tome odlučuje strateškim projektima grada. Svako iskustvo revitalizacije ili unapređenja sličnih gradova i svaki pogled „sa strane” urbanistima i upravi može da bude od velike koristi i da otvori perspektive koje možda još nisu razmatrane. — Žaklina Gligorijević, dipl. inž. arh. direktorka Urbanističkog zavoda Beograda, studirala arhitekturu i magistrirala u Beogradu i Kembridžu, MA. Veliki deo profesionalnog iskustva stekla je u CEP-u, gde je izgradila karijeru od studenta saradnika do rukovodioca projekata i direktora. Jedno vreme bila je koordinatorka kancelarije Gradskog arhitekte grada Beograda za međunarodnu saradnju. U više od dvadeset godina širokog profesionalnog iskustva najviše se bavila urbanim razvojem gradova, a od pre četiri godine uglavnom Beograda. Direktorka je Urbanističkog zavoda Beograda. Potpisala je arhitektonske i urbanističke projekte i prostorne i urbanistične planove u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori, strateške studije i međunarodne projekte, konkurse u zemlji, na Kipru, u Irskoj, Americi, Rumuniji. Bavi se 70 — TRIBINE What to do with New Belgrade? – round table moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević, Institute for Urban Planning, Serbia Belgrade still does not sufficiently like and promote New Belgrade, which is considered to be, according to the views of guests from abroad, a unique living example of a modern city. Apart from high quality environment in this part of Belgrade, with a growing amount of commercial and public amenities that supplement the local urban offering, what remains for the profession is to choose how to profile the development and the growth of this urban area in the future. Will it allow for the high business “city” to move into it, with it still not completely formed in the shape of that in Western capitals, or will it respect the identity and context already built; the question remains to be discussed and decided upon in the strategic plans for the City. Any experience of revitalisation and advancement of cities that are similar, and any look “from outside”, can be of great advantage to the town planners and the city administration and could open some perspectives that may have not been yet considered. — Žaklina Gligorijević, MA, B.Arch, Managing Director of Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, studied architecture and received a magisterial degree in Belgrade, and a Master of Arts degree at Cambridge University. A large share of her professional experience comes from CEP (Centre for Urban Development Planning) where she built her carrer from a student-collaborator to the Project Manager and Director. For a time, she was the coordinator at the Office of City Architect of Belgrade in charge of international cooperation. In more than twenty years of her wide professional experience, she has mostly dealt in urban development of towns and cities, and since four years ago, primarilly with urban development of Belgrade. Currently, she is the Director of the Institute of Urbanism Belgrade. She has signed numerous architectural and urbanism projects and spatial and urban plans in Serbia and Montenegro, strategic studies and international projects, entries for competition in the country, in Cyprus, Ireland, the US, and Romania. She practices research aimed at the development of planning, management and development systems for urban areas. She also deals in creative sector and urban recycling, which she promotes since the early 90s through professional and NGO sectors, and the academia. She was the President of the Association of Town Planners of Belgrade, member of the Steering Commitee of the Association of Architects of Belgrade and the Executive Committee of the Section of Town Planners of the Serbian Chamber of Engineers. She governed a study entitled Financing Metropolitan Governments in Transitional Countries, representing Belgrade at an international project involving nine European capitals. RADIONICE WORKSHOPS centra, dodati delove koji nedostaju i urediti prostor oko objekta. Biće u prilici da zamisle i postave svoj objekat u novo, adekvatno okruženje. Dečje radionice organizator: Dečji kulturni centar Inspirisani ovogodišnjom temom Beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture – RE..., osmislili smo radionice u kojima će deca promišljati o sopstvenom okruženju i gradeći ga iskazati svoje mišljenje. Pružiće im se mogućnost da likovnim izrazom, koristeći različite materijale, rekonstruišu i dekorišu spoljašnji i unutrašnji prostor Dečjeg kulturnog centra Beograd. Učesnici radionica će biti podeljeni u pet grupa i svaka od njih će imati zadatak da preoblikuje, nadogradi i ukrasi deo pripremljene makete Dečjeg kulturnog centra Beograd. Koristići različite likovne i nelikovne materijale, tehnike kolažiranja, modelovanja i oblikovanja osmisliće i izraditi objekat po svojoj želji. Likovne radionice Dečjeg kulturnog centra Beograd osmišljavaju i realizuju Nataša Katalina i Katarina Bunuševac. Nazivi radionica: 1) REci REd! Prvog dana, učesnici radionica će osmisliti i izraditi deo unutrašnjeg prostora Dečjeg centra (galeriju, salu, kafić, hodnik...). 2) REži, REndaj! Drugog dana, deca će ukrašavati unutrašnji prostor ambijenta u kome borave. Svaka grupa će dobiti zadatak da dekoriše jednu prostoriju sa određenom namenom. 3) REđaj, REđaj! U okviru ove radionice deca će osmisliti i izraditi fasadu svoje kuće. Svaka grupa će dobiti deo makete koji će nadograditi i ukrasiti po svojoj želji. 4) sREdi REsto! Na poslednjoj radionici, deca će sklopiti maketu Dečjeg 74 — RADIONICE — Dečji kulturni centar Beograd je ustanova kulture, čiji je osnivač Gradska uprava – Grad Beograd. Od osnivanja, 1952. godine, u njemu se ostvaruju mnogobrojni programi namenjeni deci i mladima. Danas se dnevni programi u Dečjem kulturnom centru Beograd kreiraju u redakcijama za scenske, literarne, likovne, muzičke, dečje zabavne, edukativne programe i za umetničku igru. Pored dnevnih programa, Dečji kulturni centar Beograd organizuje nekoliko značajnih manifestacija za decu. Najveća od njih je „Radost Evrope’’, koja već 38 godina okuplja mališane iz čitave Evrope. Veliki završni koncert prati nekoliko hiljada dece u samoj dvorani i nekoliko miliona gledalaca u direktnom televizijskom prenosu. Od 1997. godine upućuje se poziv deci sveta da učestvuju u likovnom konkursu „Radost Evrope” čija je tema uvek Rečnik prijateljstva. Stručni žiri najbolje nagrađuje medaljama, a tokom manifestacije organizuje se izložba najboljih radova. Svake godine, iz celog sveta, pristigne i do trideset hiljada dečjih radova. Children’s workshops organized by: Children’s Cultural Centre Inspired by this year’s theme of Belgrade International Architecture Week – RE… – we have devised workshops in which the children will contemplate on their own surroundings and, by building it, express their own opinions. With use of various materials, they will be given a chance to reconstruct, and redecorate exterior and interior spaces of the Children’s Cultural Centre by means of art. The participants of the workshops will be divided into five groups and each one will be tasked to reshape, add on and decorate a portion of the ready-made scale model of the Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade. By using different artistic and non-artistic materials, collage, modelling and shaping techniques, they will design and construct a building the way they wish. The Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade art workshops are conceptualised and implemented by Nataša Katalina and Katarina Bunuševac. Names of Workshop: 1) REorder! On day one, participants to the Workshops will devise and fabricate a portion of the internal space of the Cultural Centre (the gallery, the hall, the café, the hallway...). 2) REcut, REgrate! On the second day, the children will decorate the internal space of their ambience. Each group will be tasked to decorate one room with a specific use. 3) RElay, RElay! Within this workshop, the children will conceptualise and fabricate the façade of their home. Each group will get a piece of the scale model that they will add on and decorate as they wish. 4) REdo the Rest On the final workshop, the children will assemble the scale model of the Children’s Centre, add the missing pieces and arrange the space around the structure. They will have the chance to envisage and set their building into a new, adequate environment. Nedelja arhitekture 2008. — Architecture Week 2008 75 — RADIONICE — Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade is an institution of culture, founded by the City Administration of the City of Belgrade. Since its foundation in 1952, it realises numerous programs intended for children and the young. Today, the daily programs in the Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade are created by separate editorial boards for stage, literary, fine arts, music, children’s entertainment, and educational programs, and one for artistic play. Apart from daily programs, Children’s Cultural Centre Belgrade is also an organiser of several important manifestations for children. The largest of them is the “Joy of Europe”, which for 38 years already gathers youngsters from throughout Europe. The grand finale concert is viewed by several thousand children in the arena itself, and several million viewers in live TV coverage. Since 1997, children around the world are invited to send their contribution to the “Joy of Europe” fine art competition, in which the theme is always The Dictionary of Friendship. The jury of experts awards medals to the best entries, and the exhibition of the best works lasts throughout the manifestation of “Joy of Europe”. Each year, up to thirty thousand children’s works arrive from around the globe. ŠETNJE CITY WALKS Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Bez kontinuiteta nema identiteta vodi: Marta Vukotić-Lazar „Stvari nas zovu u pomoć i u nas se uzdaju, ali mi ih možemo spasti samo ako smo ih već prihvatili srcem. Kada se to dogodi, stanujemo u pravom smislu te reči.“ K. Norberg-Šulc Prošlost grada se samo delimično može pronaći u makro i mikro slikama, u njegovoj silueti, vizurama ili slikama frontova ulica. Drugi deo se nalazi u „skrivenoj“ dokumentaciji o njihovom nastanku. Ipak, sveukupni osvrt na razvoj naše moderne arhitekture i urbanizma nije moguć bez materijalnih dokaza trajanja, kao važnih slika u memoriji grada, njegovoj kulturi i identitetu. Šetnja započinje u prostoru nekadašnjeg Novog srpskog Beograda XIX veka, oko raskrsnice ulice Kneza Miloša i Nemanjine. Bavićemo se njegovim urbo-hronološkim slojevima, sa posebnim osvrtom na kompleks zgrada (ul. Kneza Miloša 35 i 37), tzv. Dobrovićevog generalštaba (1954–1963). Simbolika kompleksa zgrada Dobrovićevog generalštaba u Beogradu uklapa se u simboliku izgradnje Novog Beograda, „središnjeg dela budućeg Velikog Beograda”, kojom je do donošenja Generalnog urbanističkog plana 1950. godine rukovodio Nikola Dobrović (1897–1967). Šetnja će se potom nastaviti Nemanjinom i Karađorđevom ulicom, preko Železničkog mosta na levu obalu Save, na mesto gde je nekada bio Stari beogradski sajam. Ova dva vredna prostora u samom srcu Starog i Novog dela Beograda, danas su devastirana do krajnjih granica: Dobrovićev generalštab je urušen u NATO bombardovanju, kada je dva puta bio meta, 1. i 9. maja 78 — ŠETNJE 1999. godine. Ove godine se navršava tačno deset godina od kada su zgrade bombardovane. Kompleks Starog beogradskog sajmišta je prostrano područje koje je fizički i funkcionalno izolovano od ostatka grada, devastirano, naseljeno siromašnim stanovništvom, često i pripadnicima marginalnih, ranjivih grupacija, opterećeno slojevitom i tragičnom prošlošću. Zaboravljeno je da je njihova vrednost i u susretanja dva URBANA MODELA: tradicionalne matrice istorijskog Beograda i funkcionalističke matrice Grada budućnosti, svetske urbanističke avangarde iz 20-ih godina XX veka, koja dominira Novim Beogradom. Potpunim brisanjem ovih kompleksa sa mape gradskog prostora prekinuo bi se istorijski kontinuitet grada i nestale bi uporišne tačke njegovog identiteta. Preko ovakvih javnih prostora specifične tipologije, karaktera i dizajna, grad se u potpunosti ostvaruje. Cilj ŠETNJE je upravo da se razmotri svrhovitost rekonstrukcije kompleksa i analizira način kako da se to učini, primereno njihovoj istoriji i kompatibilno sa budućim razvojem grada, uz čvrsto uverenje da dalje ignorisanje taj problem čini još težim. — Marta Vukotić-Lazar rođena je u Podgorici. Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za istoriju umetnosti, završila je na Univerzitetu u Beogradu, gde je i magistrirala, kod istih mentora, akademika Vojislava Koraća, prof. dr Marice Šuput i prof. dr Aleksandra Kadijevića. Članica je Društva urbanista Beograda i Udruženja primenjenih umetnika i dizajnera Srbije gde je trenutno predsednica Odbora za dodelu Nagrade Ranko Radović. Realizovala je više autorskih izložbi iz oblasti likovnih i primenjenih umetnosti. Bila je selektor i član žirija brojnih likovnih manifestacija u Beogradu. Bavi se i likovnom kritikom. Autorka je više predgovora za kataloge umetničkih izložbi, stručnih studija i članaka o likovnoj i primenjenoj umetnosti. Godine 1996. objavila je knjigu Arhitekta Momčilo Belobrk, a 2002. knjigu Beogradsko razdoblje arhitekte Nikole Dobrovića (1945–1967). Autorka je koncepta Multimedijalnog projekta „Staro beogradsko sajmište, kao staro jezgro Novog Beograda“ u timu Društva urbanista Beograda i urednica pratećeg kataloga. Marta Vukotić-Lazar živi i radi u Beogradu. B.Strugar Kompleks zgrada Generalštaba nakon NATO bombardovanja — B. Strugar Complex of Army Headquarters after NATO bombardment 79 — ŠETNJE Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: Without Continuity there is no Identity led by: Marta Vukotić-Lazar “Things call as to aid and rely on use, but we can save them only if we had already accepted them in our heart. When that happens, we dwell in the true sense of the word.“, C. Norberg-Schultz. The past of the city can only partially be found in macro and micro pictures, in its silhouette, in its views, or images of street fronts. The other part is lodged in the “hidden” documentation about their inception. Yet, the overall retrospection into the development of our modern architecture and town planning is not possible without the material evidence of continuity, as important images in the memory of the city, its culture and identity. The walk begins at the location of the erstwhile New Serbian Belgrade of the 19th century, around the intersection of Kneza Miloša and Nemanjina Streets. We shall deal with its urban and chronological layers, with a special retrospection given to the complex of buildings (Kneza Miloša Street no. 35 and 37), the socalled Dobrovic’s Army Headquarters (1954–1963). The symbolism of Dobrovic’s Army Headquarters complex in Belgrade fits well with the symbolism of construction of Novi Beograd (New Belgrade), the “central part of future Great Belgrade”, construction which, until the adoption of General Urban Development Plan in 1950, was under the helm of Nikola Dobrović (1897–1967) himself. The stroll will then continue down Nemanjina and Karađorđeva Streets, across the Railway Bridge onto the left bank of the Sava river, to a site where Old Belgrade Fairgrounds used to stand. These two valuable spaces in the very heart of the Old and New parts of Belgrade are today ultimately devastated: Dobrovic’s Army Headquarters was demolished in the NATO campaign, when it had been targeted twice, on May 1 and 9, 1999. This year sees the tenth anniversary of their bombing. The Old Belgrade Fairgrounds complex is a spacious area that is both physically and functionally isolated from the rest of the city, devastated, inhabited by underprivileged population, often members of marginal, vulnerable 80 — ŠETNJE groups, burdened by layered and tragic past. Forgotten is the fact that the value of these two sites is in the meeting of two URBAN MODELS: a traditional matrix of historical Belgrade and functionalistic matrix of a City of Future, of the world’s avant-garde in urban planning in the 1920s, which dominates Novi Beograd. The complete removal of these complexes from the city map would interrupt the historic continuity of the city and would dislodge its supporting pillars. Through the likes of such public spaces with specific typology, character and design, the city is realised in its entirety. The goal of the stroll is exactly that, to consider the purposefulness of reconstruction of these complexes and to analyse the ways to do it, in a manner suitable to their history and compatible with the future development of the city, with a firm conviction that further ignoring of this problem makes it ever graver. — Marta Vukotić-Lazar was born in Podgorica. She graduated at the University of Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy, Department of History of Art, where she also completed her magisterial studies, having the same mentors, academician Vojislav Korać, professor dr Marica Šuput and professor dr Aleksandar Kadijević. She is a member of the Association of Town Planners of Belgrade and the Association of Applied Arts Artists and Designers of Serbia, where she currently presides over the Committee for the presentation of Ranko Radović Award. She has had several auteur exhibitions in the domain of fine arts and applied arts. She has been a selector and member of jury to numerous fine arts manifestations in Belgrade. She also pursues art critique. She has written a number of prefaces for art exhibition catalogues and expert studies, as well as several articles on fine arts and applied arts. In 1996, she published a book entitled Momčilo Belobrk, the Architect (Arhitekta Momčilo Belobrk), and in 2002 a book with the title The Belgrade Era of Architect Nikola Dobrović (1945–1967) (Beogradsko razdoblje arhitekte Nikole Dobrovića (19451967). She designed the concept of a multimedia project “Old Belgrade Fairgrounds as the Core of Novi Beograd” (Staro beogradsko sajmište, kao jezgro Novog Beograda), in a team with colleagues of the Association of Town Planners of Belgrade, together with being the editor of the accompanying catalogue. Marta Vukotić-Lazar lives and works in Belgrade. Na potezu od Slavije do Čuburskog parka Izložba radova i instalacija „Pejzažna arhitektura i grad” vodi: PUPA - Podmladak udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata Izložba predstavlja završni projekat radionice studenata završne godine Odseka za pejzažnu arhitekturu i hortikulturu Šumarskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, na temu „Pejzažna arhitektura i grad – oseti razliku!”. Predstavljeni radovi i instalacije su rezultat nastavnog procesa, a bave se višečulnom percepcijom prostora delovanjem pejzažne arhitekture u urbanom okruženju. Radovi ukazuju na potrebu da se „metropolitenski stanovnik“ (Georg Simmel) zaštiti i rastereti od intenzivne nervne stimulacije u urbanom habitatu, na činjenicu da je pejzažna arhitektura u današnjem gradskom okruženje potreba a ne luksuz. Cilj studenata je da ukažu na značaj pejzažne arhitekture u životu gradskog stanovnika u različitim aspektima i nivoima delovanja pejzažne arhitekture – sociološkom, ekološkom, estetskom, funkcionalnom, kulturološkom... Radovi se bave i samom Makenzijevom ulicom i predstavljaju moguća rešenja određenih problema te ulice, uz težnju da se stvori celovitost jednog uličnog sistema i identitet ulice, ukazujući na potencijalnu multifunkcionalnost i uličnog i urbanog ambijenta u celini. Izložba je zamišljena kao interaktivna šetnja u kojoj će posetioci svojim čulima moći da osete razliku između delovanja pejzažne arhitekture i njenog izostanka : razliku između hodanja po travnatom tepihu i hodanja po vrućem asfaltu, da osete razliku između stajanja u senci drveta i stajanja na vrelom letnjem suncu. 81 — ŠETNJE — PUPA (Podmladak Udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata) je studentsko udruženje formirano februara 2008. godine, kao ogranak strukovnog Udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata Srbije (UPAS) radi aktivnijeg delovanja studenata pejzažne arhitekture i hortikulture, razmene znanja i iskustava, lakše međusobne saradnje i saradnje sa stranim studentima, kao i radi promocije same struke. PUPA promoviše pejzažnu arhitekturu kao struku budućnosti, u javnosti, umetnosti, nauci i biznisu, a baveći se ekološkim, sociološkim i estetskim unapređenjem otvorenih prostora posebnu pažnju posvećuje održivom dizajnu. Njenu organizaciju trenutno čine Upravni odbor od desetak članova i tri grupe koje su zadužene za delatnost u tri različite oblasti: ORGANIZACIJA, CREATIVE, MARKETING. Udruženje podržavaju Evropsko udruženje pejzažnih arhitekata (EFLA), Sekretarijat za zaštitu životne sredine, Vladina kancelarija Održivo napred, Šumarski fakultet u Beogradu. On the Stretch from Slavija to Cuburski Park Exhibition of works and installations ‘Landscape Architecture and the City’ led by: PUPA – Youth of the Association of Landscape Architects The Exhibition is the final project of the workshop for students of the senior year of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry, Department of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, with the topic ‘Landscape Architecture and the City – Feel the Difference!’. The exhibited works and installations are a result of the teaching process, as they pursue multi-sensory perception of space by operation of landscape architecture in urban surroundings. The works indicate a need to protect and liberate the “metropolitan inhabitant” (Georg Simmel) from intensive sensory stimulation in an urban habitat, together with the fact that landscape architecture in present-day city environment is a need, not a luxury. The goal of the students is to point out the importance of landscape architecture in the life of a city dweller in various aspects and levels of operation of landscape architecture – sociological, esthetical, functional, cultural… The works also deal with McKenzie Street in Belgrade and unveil possible solutions for the Street, with a tendency to create a unity of a street system and uphold its identity, indicating a potential multi-functionality of both street and urban ambience as a whole. The Exhibition is conceived as an interactive stroll in which the visitors will sense the difference between the operation of landscape architecture, and the lack thereof: the difference between walking on a carpet of grass and walking on hot asphalt, the difference between standing in a shade of a tree, and standing in hot sun of a summer’s day. Senke — Shadows 82 — ŠETNJE — PUPA (Podmladak Udruženja Pejzažnih Arhitekata) or YALA, Youth of Association of Landscape Architects is a students’ association established in February 2008, as a branch of the professional Serbian Association of Landscape Architects (Udruženja pejzažnih arhitekata Srbije) – SALA – for the purpose of more active contribution of students of landscape architecture and horticulture, exchange of knowledge and experiences, facilitation of cooperation and cooperation with foreign students, and for the promotion of the profession itself. PUPA aids landscape architecture as a profession of the future, in public realm, in the art world, scientific and business environments, by practicing environmental, sociological and aesthetical advancement of open spaces while giving special attention to sustainable designing. Its organization currently consists of the Managing Board that has a dozen or so members and three groups that are in charge of activities in the distinct areas: ORGANISATION, CREATIVITY, MARKETING. The Association receives support from the European Association of Landscape Architects (EFLA), the Secretariat for the Protection of the Environment, Government Office ‘Sustainably forward’ (Održivo napred), and the Faculty of Forestry in Belgrade. Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: Istočni Vračar, Savinac i Neimar vodi: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević U želji da se, u duhu osnovne teme ovogodišnje Beogradske internacionalne nedelje arhitekture, REdefiniše naš odnos prema istorijskim ambijentima grada i REafirmišu vrednosti prostora istočnog Vračara, Savinca i Neimara, koji su poslednjih decenija poprište veoma intezivne i agresivne savremene REkonstrukcije, upoznavanje sa istorijskim i arhitektonskim vrednostima ovih istorijskih ambijenata započinje iz parka Manjež, odakle se nastavlja preko Cvetnog trga, danas veoma živog stecišta brojnih žitelja grada. Šetnja će se nastaviti Njegoševom ulicom, pored III beogradske gimnazije, oblikovane u duhu veoma bogate akademske neorenesansne arhitekture. Krajem XIX i početkom XIX veka, beogradska varoš se širila i osvajala prostor van tadašnjeg gradskog rejona. Izgrađuje se prostor od Beogradske ulice ka Kalenića guvnu, tzv. Grantovac. U ovom delu grada danas se posebno izdvajaju ulice Smiljanićeva i Kneginje Zorke, u kojima su sačuvani brojni primeri prizemnih porodičnih kuća u kojima su živeli viđeniji građani. Naspram ovog reprezentativnog dela varoši, na Englezovcu, kao i na Savincu i Čuburi, naseljava se siromašnije stanovništvo, koje je živelo u malim dvorišnim kućama sa jeftinim stanovima. Na kraju šetnje predviđen je obilazak Kotež-Neimara, novog planski formiranog naselja sa porodičnim vilama, koje se izgrađuju tokom tridesetih i četrdesetih godina XX veka po ugledu na primere engleskog vrtnog grada. Obilazak prostora istočnog Vračara, Savinca i Neimara omogućava nam da sagledamo urbani i arhitektonski razvoj perifernih rezidencijalnih delova Beograda s kraja 83 — ŠETNJE XIX i početka XX veka i transformaciju njegove stambene arhitekture. Prostorna struktura i oblikovanje porodičnih kuća, vila i prvih višeporodičnih, višespratnih zgrada u novim rezidencijalnim delovima varoši pokazuju da se inicijalno dosledno sledi evropska akademska arhitektura istorijskih stilova krajem XIX veka i veoma široko prihvata moderna secesijska arhitektura na samom početku XX veka. Nakon toga, u periodu između dva svetska rata, stambena arhitektura ovih delova grada postepeno je poprimila sve elemente savremenog evropskog koncepta prostorne organizacije i oblikovanja u duhu moderne. Relativno retke sačuvane porodične vile i prve višespratnice iz tog perioda svedoče o veoma prosperitetnom i za savremenu arhitekturu veoma značajnom vremenu prvih decenija prošlog veka. One danas predstavljaju bazične elemente autentičnosti i identiteta gradskih ambijenata koji se moraju očuvati. — Mirjana Roter-Blagojević završila je Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, gde danas radi kao docent na Departmanu za arhitekturu i vodi predmete Istorija arhitekture i naseljavanja u Srbiji i Integrativna zaštita graditeljskog nasleđa. Nakon specijalizacije iz oblasti Proučavanje, zaštita i revitalizacija graditeljskog nasleđa (1992), tokom rada na magistarskoj tezi (1994) Arhitektura građevina javnih namena izgrađenih u Beogradu od 1930. do 1900. godine, posvetila se istraživanju i tumačenju arhitekture srpske prestonice. To dugogodišnje proučavanje zaokružila je doktorskom disertacijom (2004) Razvoj stambene arhitekture Beograda u 19. i početkom 20. veka. Objavila je monografiju Stambena arhitektura Beograda u 19. i početkom 20. veka 2006. godine, za koju je dobila Nagradu Pavle Vasić i Priznanje Salona arhitekture 2007. Pored proučavanja i tumačenja transformacije srpske arhitekture tokom XIX i početkom XX veka u evropskom kontekstu, posebno polje njenog interesovanja predstavlja razvijanje i usavršavanje savremene metodologije valorizacije i integrativne zaštite gradske arhitekture XIX i XX veka, kao i urbane i arhitektonske obnove prostornih kulturno-istorijskih celina i istorijskih delova grada. Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: East Vračar, Savinac and Neimar quarters led by: Mirjana Roter-Blagojević In a desire, and the spirit of the theme of this year’s Belgrade International Architecture week, to have our relationship toward the historic ambiences of the city REdesigned and RE-affirm the values of the spaces of east Vračar, Savinac and Neimar, which for the last decades have been sites of a very intensive and aggressive modern RE-construction, getting to know the historic and architectural values of these historic ambiances starts from Manjež Park, wherefrom it continues via Square of Flowers (Cvetni Trg), which is today a quite vibrant meeting point for numerous city dwellers. The stroll will continue down Njegoševa Street, past the III Belgrade Gymnasium, modelled in the spirit of opulent academic neo-renaissance architecture. By the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries, the town of Belgrade kept expanding and conquering the space outside of what the city rayon used to be then. The area around Beogradska Street is developed, toward an empty track that used to belong to Kalenić, the so-called Grantovac. Nnowadays, the most interesting in this portion of the city are Smiljanićeva and Knjeginje Zorke Streets, which preserve numerous examples of ground family houses, inhabited by prominent citizens. Opposite to this representative part of the town, Englezovac, as well as Savinac and Čubura are inhabited by less affluent population, which lived in small courtyard houses with cheap dwellings. The stroll is meant to end with a tour around Kotež Neimar, a newly-designed with family villas, which were being built in the 1930s and 1940s, modeled after the English garden towns. A tour around the stretches of east Vračar, Savinac and Neimar enables us to comprehend the urban and architectural development of 19th and 20th century Belgrade, as well as the transformation of its residential architecture, The spatial structure and modelling of family houses, villas and the first condominium multi-storey 84 — ŠETNJE Kuća braće Nikolić, Njegoševa 11 arh. Branko Tanazević, 1912. — House of Nikolic Brothers, Njegoseva Street No. 11 arch. Branko Tanazevic, 1912. buildings in the new residential quarters of the town, tell us of the initial very consistent adherence to the European historic styles of academic architecture at the end of the 19th century and of the widely accepted modern secession architecture at the immediate beginning of the 20th century. Subsequently, in the period between two World Wars, the residential architecture of these parts of the city has gradually taken on all elements of the modern European concept of spatial organisation and modelling in the spirit of Modernity. Today, relatively rare preserved family villas and first multi-storey buildings from this period testify of a very prosperous and for the modern architecture significant time of the first decades of the 20th century. At present, they represent basic elements of authenticity and identity of these urban ambiences that need to be preserved. — Mirjana Roter-Blagojević has graduated from the Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, where she now works as an assistant professor on the Department for Architecture and runs subjects “History of Architecture and Inhabitation in Serbia” and “Integrative Protection of Architectural Heritage”. Subsequent to specialization in the field of Study, protection and revitalization of architectural heritage (1992), during the work on her magisterial thesis (1994) Architecture of Buildings of Public Uses Built in Belgrade from 1900 to 1930, she devoted herself to research and interpretation of the architecture of the Serbian capital. This long-term study she crowned with the doctoral dissertation (2004) entitled Development of Residential Architecture of Belgrade in the 19th and beginning of the 20th Century. She published a monograph entitled Residential Architecture of Belgrade in the 19th and beginning of 20th Century in 2006, for which she received the Pavle Vasić Award and a Commendation from the Architecture Salon in 2007. Apart from study and interpretation of transformation of Serbian architecture during the 19th and beginning of the 20th century in the European context, the field of her interest is especially marked by the development and harmonisation of the modern methodology of valorisation and integrative protection of urban architecture of the 19th and 20th century, as well as urban and architectural renewal of cultural and historic spatial parts of the city. 85 — ŠETNJE 1. 2. 1. Kuća Janka Šafarika Kneginje Zorke 73, ugao Krunske ulice,1912. — House of Janko Safarik Kneginje Zorke Street No. 73, corner with Krunska Street,1912. 2. Zgrada Društva za ulepšavanje Vračara arh. Milan Antonović, 1901. — The Society for beutification of Vracar building arch. Milan Antonovic, 1901. za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije (1994–1998). Zaposlena kao kustos Odseka za arhitekturu Muzeja primenjene umetnosti u Beogradu (od 2002). Od ranih osamdesetih godina bavi se istorijom srpske arhitekture novijeg doba i autorka je većeg broja radova iz te oblasti. Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda: RE... na potezu od Terazija do Kalemegdana Walk around the architecture of Belgrade: RE... From Terazije to Kalemegdan vodi: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović led by: Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović Šetnja RE... od Terazija do Kalemegdana osmišljena je sa idejom da se zainteresovana publika upozna sa neprekidnim procesom promene arhitektonskog ambijenta centralne beogradske zone. Preispitaće se kvalitet i mogućnosti te stalne REprodukcije u kontekstu vremena sadašnjeg i vremena budućeg. Kulturološka višeslojnost postojećeg arhitektonskog okvira planirane šetnje omogućava da se sagledaju kompleksni tokovi razvoja urbanizma i arhitekture Beograda od sredine XIX veka do danas, ali i da se otvori pitanje njene REintegracije kao nasleđenog konteksta. Ova šetnje će omogućiti drugačiju vizuru na deo grada kroz koji godinama svakodnevno prolazimo, a osim objekata i lokacija osvetliće i REafirmisati ličnosti značajnih srpskih arhitekata poput Alekseja Brkića, Miladina Prljevića, Ratomira Bogojevića, Konstantina Jovanovića, Aleksandra Bugarskog, Andre Stevanovića, Nikole Nestorovića, Danila Vladisavljevića, Milutina Borisavljevića, Vojina Simeonovića, Miroslava Jovanovića, Branislava Mitrovića i drugih. — Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović, istoričarka arhitekture, kustos - muzejski savetnik Odseka za arhitekturu Muzeja primenjene umetnosti u Beogradu, diplomirala i magistrirala Istoriju umetnosti na Filozofskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Beogradu sa temama iz srpske arhitekture XX veka. Radila kao kustos u Muzeju „25. maj” (1982–1992), sarađivala u Institutu za istoriju umetnosti Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu (1992–1994) i Institutu 86 — ŠETNJE The walk named RE... on the Stretch from Terazije to Kalemegdan was designed with an idea to introduce the interested audience with the continuous process of transformation of architectural ambience of the central zone of Belgrade. To be examined is the quality and the possibilities for this constant REproduction in the context of today, and tomorrow. The cultural multi-layered milieu of the existing architectural framework of the planned stroll enables the viewer to perceive the complex flows of development of urban planning and architecture of Belgrade from the mid XIX century until today, but also to open the question of its REintegration as a context inherited. This stroll will enable us to have a different outlook on the part of the city through which we have been traversing for years, and aside from buildings and locations, it will shine light and REaffirm the personalities of significant Serbian architects, such as Aleksej Brkić, Miladin Prljević, Ratomir Bogojević, Konstantin Jovanović, Aleksandar Bugarski, Andra Stevanović, Nikola Nestorović, Danilo Vladisavljević, Milutin Borisavljević, Vojin Simeonović, Miroslav Jovanović, Branislav Mitrović and others. — Ljiljana Miletić-Abramović graduated from and received a masters degree in history of architecture at the University of Belgrade Faculty of Phylosophy on topics relating Serbian architecture of the 20th century. She has worked as a curator of Museum ’25. maj’ (1982–1992), cooperated at the Belgrade Faculty of Philosophy History of Arts Institute (1992–1994) and Architecture and Urbanism Institute of Serbia (1994–1998). She is employed as the curator of the Museum of Applied Arts in Belgrade, Department of Architecture (since 2002). Since the early 1980s she pursues history of Serbian architecture of recent times and is an author of numerous papers on the subject. Aleksej Brkić, zgrada Invest-importa (kasnije Hempro) na Terazijama 1953 –1956. — Aleksej Brkić, ’Invest-Import’ office building (later ‘Hempro’) on Terazije 1953 –1956. Midnight walk around the modern architecture of old Belgrade led by: Ivan Kucina The aim is to observe from a relaxing angle the unexpected values of modern architecture in the centers of old and new Belgrade.The following building will be visited - from KCB (Cultural Center of Belgrade) to MSU (Museum of Contemporary Art): Ponoćna šetnja kroz modernu arhitekturu starog Beograda vodi: Ivan Kucina Želja je da se iz opuštajućeg ugla noći sagledaju neočekivane vrednosti moderne arhitekture u centru starog i novog Beograda. Od Kulturnog centra Beograda do Muzeja savremene umetnosti posetiće se sledeći objekti: - Dom štampe, Ratomir Bogojević, 1957; - Stambene zgrade u Braće Jugovića, Mihajlo Mitrović, 1964; - Filozofski fakultet, Svetislav Ličina, 1967; - Stambena zgrada u Pariskoj, Miroslav Jovanović, 1956; - Jugoslovenska banka u Kralja Petra, Grigorije Samojlov i Borivoje Nanić, 1963; - Stambeni blok u Kralja Petra, Milorad Macura, 1953; - Poslovna zgrada Energoprojekta u Brankovoj, Milica Šterić, 1957; - Zgrada SDK u Pop Lukinoj, Petar Vulović, 1967; - Restoran na Savskom keju, Mihailo Jovanović, 1957; - Muzej savremene umetnosti, Ivan Antić i Ivanka Raspopović, 1961. — Ivan Kucina je arhitekta, docent, član Upravnog odbora Društva arhitekata Beograda i saveta Oktobarskog salona, član Stealth Group iz Roterdama i School of Missing Studies iz Njujorka, inicijator istraživanja, izložbi i radionica posvećenih neformalnim procesima transformacije urbanog sistema Beograda i formalnim procesima reformisanja postojećih institucija. 88 — ŠETNJE - Press House, Ratomir Bogojević, 1957 - Residential buildings in the street of Braće Jugovića, Mihajlo Mitrović, 1964 - Faculty of Philosophy,Svetislav Ličina, 1967 - Residential building in the Pariska street, Miroslav Jovanović, 1956 - Yugoslav Bank in the Kralja Petra street, Grigorije Samojlov and Borivoje Nanić, 1963 - Residential block in the Kralja Petra street, Milorad Macura 1953 - Energoprojekt Business Building in the Brankova street, Milica Šterić, 1957 - SDK Building in the Pop Lukina street, Petar Vulović, 1967 - Restaurant on the Sava quay, Mihailo Jovanović, 1957 - Museum of Contemporary Art, Ivan Antić and Ivanka Raspopović, 1961 — Ivan Kucina is an architect, assistant professor, member of the Board of the Association of Belgrade Architects and the Council of October Salon, member of the Stealth Group from Rotterdam and the School of Missing Studies from New York, initiator of many researches, exhibitions and workshops dedicated to informal processes of transforming Belgrade urban system and formal processes of reforming existing institutions. Muzej savremene umetnosti Ivan Antić i Ivanka Raspopović, 1961. — Museum of Contemporary Art Ivan Antić and Ivanka Raspopović, 1961 KONFERENCIJA CONFERENCE kulture Srbije. Predavala je na Cornell univerzitetu, Univerzitetu u Beogradu, Univerzitetu Teksasa i Karlovom univerzitetu. Odabrane publikacije: Češko-srpske arhitektonske veze 1918–1941 (Beograd: RZZSK, 2004), Valtrović i Milutinović I–III (Beograd: IMUS, 2006–2008) i Capital Cities in the Aftermath of the Empires: Planning in Central and Southeastern Europe (Routledge, 2010). REdefinisanje posleratnog kolektivnog stanovanja REdefining Post-WWII Housing uvodna reč: Tanja Konli introduction: Tanja Conley RE…Konferencija: REdefinisanje posleratnog kolektivnog stanovanja okupiće vodeće stručnjake sa evropskih univerziteta i ustanova zaštite kulturnog nasleđa da daju svoje viđenje o aktuelnom problemu valorizacije i budućeg tretiranja urušavajućih stambenih konglomeracija iz vremena posle Drugog svetskog rata. Bez obzira na rascep između istočne i zapadne Evrope, prouzrokovan ideologijom Hladnog rata, kolosalni projekti kolektivnog stanovanja gradili su se u svim delovima kontinenta tokom druge polovine dvadesetog veka. Kriterijumi vrednovanja i mogućnosti rekonstrukcije ovih, najčešče širokih zahvata, vrlo su površno razmatrani od strane stručnjaka: istoričara arhitekture, konzervatora, urbanista i arhitekata. Zvanične institucije zaštite nemaju jasan stav u definisanju metodologije vrednovanja nasleđa iz bliske prošlosti. Labavo postavljen i komplikovan sistem vlasničkih odnosa nad zajedničkim prostorima i stambenim jedinicama u okviru blokovskih kompleksa, otežava sprovođenje sistematskih akcija s ciljem da se poboljša trenutno loše stanje. Konferencija će dati jedinstvenu priliku za razmenu mišljenja o ovoj slabo razmatranoj temi. Uz prisustvovanje predavanjima, učesnici skupa imaće priliku da doprinesu zaključnoj diskusiji, da se priključe stručno vođenoj šetnji kroz blokove Novog Beograda i daju svoje mišljenje na okruglom stolu “Šta sa Novim Beogradom?” RE…Conference: REdefining Post-WWII Housing will gather leading scholars from European universities and heritage institutes to present their answers to the acute question of valorization and further treatment of the rapidly dilapidating post-WWII housing conglomerations. Regardless of the boundary between the East and the West during the Age of Cold War, the huge-scale housing projects appeared all over Europe in the second half of the twentieth century. Until now, the criteria for evaluation and possible reconstruction of those vast built areas have been vaguely considered by the professionals, including architectural historians, preservationists, urban planners and practicing architects. The official preservationist institutions have been struggling with defining methodologies for the valorization of heritage from the recent past. Loosely structured and complicated systems of ownership over the common areas and private units within housing complexes make difficult to administrate clearly defined and systematic actions for the improvement of the existing conditions. This conference will provide a unique opportunity for sharing different attitudes about the poorly discussed subject of the values of post-WWII housing. In addition to lectures by the invited speakers, the participants in the conference will have a chance to contribute to the discussion, take a guided tour through the impressive housing projects of New Belgrade and give their opinion in the concluding roundtable titled “What Should We Do With New Belgrade?” — Tanja Damljanović-Konli diplomirala je i magistrirala na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Bogradu, a doktorsku tezu odbranila na Cornell univerzitetu. Od 1992. bila je zaposlena u Republičkom zavodu za zaštitu spomenika 92 — KONFERENCIJA — Tanja Damljanović Conley received Architectural Engineer and Master of Technical Sciences degrees from the Faculty of Architecture in Belgrade and a PhD degree from Cornell University. She has been working for the State Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Serbia since 1992, teaching and lecturing at Cornell University, University of Belgrade, University of Texas and Charles University. A selected list of her publications includes Czech-Serbian Architectural Connections 1918-1941 (Belgrade: RZZSK 2004), Valtrović and Milutinović I-III (Belgrade: IMUS, 2006-2008) and Capital Cities in the Aftermath of the Empires: Planning in Central and Southeastern Europe (Routledge, 2010). Stambena zgrada B-9, blok 21, Novi Beograd Autori: Lenarčić, Mitić, Petrović i Čanak Foto: A. Mirić — Residential building B-9, block 21, New Belgrade Authors: Lenarčić, Mitić, Petrović i Čanak Photo A. Mirić PROGRAM KONFERENCIJE 16.00 –17.15 Đovani Kaudo (Univerzitet u Rimu) DenSity – IntenCity: Stambena arhitektura u Italiji Petak, 3. juli 2009. 9.00−9.15 Italijanski institut za kulturu u Beogradu, Kneza Miloša 56 Uvodna reč: Tanja Konli (Univerzitet u Beogradu) 9.15−10.00 Žozef Abram (Škola arhitekture u Nansiju) Pere, Le Korbizije, Zerfus: Rekonstrukcija grand– ensambles: zaštita moderne stambene arhitekture u posleratnoj Francuskoj 10.00−10.45 Gabi Dolf–Bonekemper (Tehnički Univerzitet u Berlinu) Makrostrukture i pejzaži: Vrednost i zaštita berlinskih predgrađa iz 60-ih i 70-ih godina XX veka 17.15 –18.00 Pit Ekert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Švajcarska) E2A: Post CIAM Rekonfiguracija 18.00 –19:00 DISKUSIJA Moderator: Tanja Konli (Univerzitet u Beogradu) Subota, 4. juli 2009. od 10.00 Okupljanje: Centralni dom vojske Srbije, Braće Jugovića 19 Šetnja kroz arhitekturu Beograda, autobusom Superblokovi Novog Beograda vode: Tanja Konli i Ivan Kucina PAUZA 11.15−12.00 Ilejn Harvud (English Heritage) Posleratna stambena arhitektura u Engleskoj 12.00 –12.45 Marike Kajpers (Tehnički Univerzitet u Delftu) Mesta trezvenosti: Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Holandiji PAUZA 14:00 –14:45 Paola di Bjađi (Univerzitet u Trstu) Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Italiji: Javni grad kao laboratorija modernih teorija o gradu i perspektive savremene urbane obnove 14:45 –15:30 Alesandra Čeroti (Univerzitet u Rimu) Pitanja konzervacije i restauracije u posleratnom socijalnom stanovanju Naselja INCIS-a u Rimu: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima PAUZA 94 — KONFERENCIJA 17.00 Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Palmotićeva 30 Predstavljanje izložbe RE_Beograd: Stari i novi Studentska radionica Arhitektonskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu 18.00 – 19.30 Urbanistički zavod Beograda, Palmotićeva 30 Okrugli sto: Šta sa Novim Beogradom? Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević (Urbanistički zavod Beograda) 20.00 KOKTEL CONFERENCE PROGRAMME 16.00 – 17.15 Giovanni Caudo (University of Rome) DenSity, IntenCity: Housing in Italy Friday, July 3rd 2009 9.00 – 9.15 Italian Institute for Culture, Kneza Miloša 56, Belgrade Welcome: Tanja Conley (University of Belgrade) 9.15 – 10.00 Joseph Abram (School of Architecture Nancy) Perret, Le Corbusier, Zehrfuss: Reconstruction of Grand–Ensambles: the protection of modern housing in France from the post–WWII period 10.00 – 10.45 Gabi Dolff–Bonekämper (TU Berlin) Macro–structures and Landscapes: Value and protection of Berlin’s 1960s and 1970s suburban settlements 17:15 – 18:00 Piet Eckert (E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland) E2A: Post CIAM Reconfiguration 18.00 – 19.00 DISCUSSION Moderator: Tanja Conley (University of Belgrade) Saturday, July 4th 2009 10.00 Gathering in front of The Central Army Hall, Braće Jugovića 19 Guided bus tour: Superblocks of New Belgrade Led by: Tanja Conley and Ivan Kucina Coffee Break 11.15 – 12.00 Elain Harwood (English Heritage) Post – 1945 Housing in England 12.00 – 12.45 Marieke Kuipers (TU Delft) Sites of Sobriety: Postwar Social Housing in the Netherlands Lunch Break 14.00 – 14.45 Paola Di Biagi (University of Trieste) Post–WWII Social Housing in Italy: The public city as a laboratory for modern city theories and urban renewal contemporary perspective 14.45 – 15.30 Alessandra Cerroti (University of Rome) Conservation and Restoration Issues in the Post–WWII Social Housing INCIS Estates in Rome: Villaggio Olimpico and Decima Coffee Break 95 — KONFERENCIJA 17.00 Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, Palmotićeva 30 Exhibition Presentation RE_Belgrade: Old and New Student’s workshop Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade 18.00 – 19.30 Institute of Urbanism Belgrade, Palmotićeva 30 Roundtable: What Should We Do With New Belgrade? Moderator: Žaklina Gligorijević (Institute of Urbanism Belgrade) 20.00 RECEPTION treba da bude utvrđena? Predlažem da tokom ove prezentacije analiziramo tri stambena kompleksa koja su izgrađena u nejednakim istorijskim uslovima i koja postavljaju različite probleme očuvanja i adaptacije: zgrade koje je projektovao atelje Pere u Avru, Le Korbizjeova stambena jedinica u Brie-an-Fore (Briey-en-Forêt) i veliki kompleks u četvrti O-di-Lijevr (Haut-du-Lièvre) Bernara Zerfisa u Nansiju. Pere, Le Korbizije, Zerfus: Rekonstrukcija stambenih naselja – zaštita moderne stambene arhitekture u Francuskoj nakon Drugog svetskog rata Žozef Abram, Univerzitet u Nansiju, Francuska Decenije koje su nastupile posle Drugog svetskog rata u istoriji francuske arhitekture predstavljaju period velikih preokreta. Obnovom i stalnim naporima da se kriza stanovanja prebrodi, zemlja pribavlja jedno izuzetno proizvodno sredstvo koje povećanje broja zgrada zasniva na značajnom posredovanju države (Ministarstva za obnovu i urbanizam, zatim raznih ministarstava za izgradnju i opremanje), na koncentrovanju investicija u velika preduzeća (teška montažna izgradnja i ogromna gradilišta), i na sve savršenijem upravljanju zemljištem (komasacija, zatim podela na zone koje imaju prvenstvo u procesu urbanizacije i zone koje se uređuju po dogovoru). Industrijalizacija stanovanja je magična reč u tom periodu. Međutim, smanjenje troškova nije jedina posledica postignutog napretka u oblasti izgradnje. Arhitektura daje svoj doprinos i pojavi masovne kulture. Ona navikava publiku na jedan formalni univerzum koji je prožet stručnošću te epohe. Arhitekti koji su počeli svoju karijeru pre rata (Pere, Le Korbizje, Boduen...) stvaraju svoja najznačajnija dela posle Drugog svetskog rata. Suočena sa izgradnjom kolektivnih stanova i sa velikim aparaturama, mlađa će generacija (Zerfis, Pujon, Dibuison, Voženski, Lanjo...) doneti novine u strogom okviru racionalističkih tema. Ovaj period je stvorio bogatu baštinu. Kako u okeanu izgrađenog izdvojiti značajne elemente koji zaslužuju da budu stavljeni pod zaštitu i čija vrednost 96 — KONFERENCIJA — Žozef Abram, arhitekta i istoričar, profesor je na Arhitektonskoj školi u Nansiju i istraživač u Laboratoriji za istoriju savremene arhitekture. Predavao je na Arhitektonskom institutu u Ženevi i u Školi lepih umetnosti u Metsu. Deset godina je bio član uređivačkog odbora časopisa Faces. Godine 1999. objavio je „Moderna arhitektura u Francuskoj 1940-1966, od haosa do uspona” (Éditions Picard), a 2002, sa Žan-Luj Koenom i Gi Lamberom „Enciklopedija Pere” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). Izradio je naučnu podlogu zahteva za upis obnovljenog centra Avra na Listu svetske baštine (klasifikacija UNESCO, 2005). Perret, Le Corbusier, Zehrfuss: Reconstruction of Grand-ensambles – the protection of modern housing in France from post-WWII period Joseph Abram, University in Nancy, France The decades that came forth after the WWII, represent the period of unexpected turn of events in French architecture. Through the restoration and constant efforts for the overcoming of the housing crises, the country obtains one extraordinary production tool which bases the increasing of the quantity of buildings on the important intervention of the government (Ministry for the restoration and urban planning, as well as the other ministries for development and outfit), the concentration of the investments into the huge companies (through vast prefabrication and huge building sites) and the growing perfection of land management (through redistribution of land, division to the zones with the priority in the urbanization processes and zones which has to be arranged according to the agreement). Industrialization of housing is the magic word in that period. Nevertheless, the cutting of expenses is not the only consequence of the achieved progress in the field of construction. Architecture gives its contribution also to the appearance of the mass culture. It accustoms the public to the formal universe, imbued with the experience of the epoch. Architects who begun their careers before the WWII (Perret, Le Corbusier, Beaudouin etc), produce their masterpieces after the WWII. Confronted with the construction of the social housing and the huge equipments, the younger generation (Zehrfuss, Pouillon, Dubuisson, Wogenscky, Lagneau etc) will bring the innovation in the strict framework of the rationalist themes. This period has created the rich heritage. How can the significant elements which deserve to be put under protection and whose value should be established, be distinguished from the ocean of constructed? I suggest that, during the presentation, we should analyze three housing complexes, which have been built in the unequal historical conditions and which pose different Le Korbizje UNITÉ D’HABITATION DE BRIEY-EN-FORÊT 1958-1960 Fotografija: Žan-Pjer Bourraux, 1960 — Le Corbusier UNITÉ D’HABITATION DE BRIEY-EN-FORÊT 1958-1960 Photo, Jean-Pierre Bourraux, 1960 97 — KONFERENCIJA problem of the protection and adaptation: buildings designed by the Atelier Perret in Havre, Le Corbusier’s housing unit in Briey-en-Forêt and the huge complex in the Haut-du-Lièvre quarter, designed by Bernard Zehrfuss in Nancy. — Joseph Abram, architect and historian, is professor at the Nancy School of Architecture and researcher at the Laboratory of contemporary architecture history. He has taught at the Geneva Institute of Architecture and at the Metz School of fine arts. For ten years he has been member of the editorial board of the revue Faces. In 1999 he published “Modern architecture in France, 1940-1966, from chaos to growth” (Edition Picard) and in 2002, with Jean-Louis Cohen and Guy Lambert, “The Perret encyclopedia” (Monum-Ifa-Le Moniteur). He made the scientific file of the request for the inscription of the reconstructed center of the city of Havre on the World heritage list (classification of the UNESCO, 2005). Posebna pažnja posvećena je zelenim prostorima, sada već razvijenim, koji su sami po sebi kreativna inovacija. Pokazaću primere i ponuditi neke napomene o stručnim procenama i društvenom prihvatanju. Makro-strukture i pejzaž: Vrednost i zaštita berlinskih predgrađa iz 60-ih i 70-ih Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper, Tehnički Univerzitet u Berlinu, Nemačka Kultura i tradicija projektovanja berlinskih predgrađa, seže u dvadesete godine XX veka, do Bruna Tauta, Ota Rudolfa Salvisberga i mladog Hansa Šaruna. Suočavajući se sa izazovom da zamisle strukture gušće od ruralnih, ali manje guste nego urbane, oni su stvorili nove prostorne tipologije, uveli su, oko 1930, koncept velikih naselja u predgrađima, apstraktne kompozicije prostora i objekata (Großsiedlung Siemensstadt 1930/31). Posle 1945, kada je bilo potrebno više stanova nego ikada, oživeo je model većeg naselja u predgrađu , a još kreativnija, politička i tehnička, energija bila je usmerena na razvoj većih i ambicioznijih projekata, koji su izgrađeni tokom pedesetih, šezdesetih i sedamdesetih godina XX veka. Kako je u Zapadnom Berlinu postojala ograničena površina za izgradnju, zahtevana je veća gustina. Apstraktna prostorna rešenja su tada kombinovana sa novim tipovima objekata, ali sa blokovima visokih tornjeva. Hans Šarun, majstor za ne-ortogonalno, stvorio je visoke makrostrukture, potpuno inovativne, kakve do tada nisu viđene. Njegovi saradnici i studenti osmislili su veoma upečatljive pejzaže predgrađa (Vorstadt-Landschaft) u četvrti Märkisches Viertel, sa objektima poput planinskih lanaca i zelenim prostorima poput dolina. Posle perioda oštre kritike i snažnih napada upućenih takozvanoj nehumanoj razmeri, monotoniji i beznađu (Trostlosigkeit), mišljenje publike i stručne javnosti se promenilo, estetika i društvene vrednosti postale su vidljive i mogli su se stvoriti prvi spiskovi i restauracije. 98 — KONFERENCIJA — Gabi Dolf-Bonekemper, istoričarka umetnosti, od 1988. do 2002. konzervatorka u Nacionalnom birou za očuvanje istorijskih zgrada u Berlinu (Landesamt für Denkmalpflege). Od novembra 2001. do januara 2002. gostujuća naučna saradnica u Institutu za konzervaciju Geti u Los Anđelesu. Oko 2003/2004. postala je članica međunarodne ekspertske grupe UNESCO za rekonstrukciju mosta u Mostaru. Od oktobra 2005. redovni je profesor na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Berlinu (TU Berlin), a njena uža specijalnost su spomenici iz skorije prošlosti, ugroženi lokaliteti koji spadaju u arhitektonsku baštinu, savremena umetnost komemoracije, arhitektura XX veka i teorija konzervacije. Macro-structures and Landscapes: Value and protection of Berlin’s 1960’s and 1970’s suburban settlements Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper, Technical University in Berlin, Germany Berlin’s culture and tradition of sub-urban design reaches back to the 1920ies, to Bruno Taut, Otto Rudolf Salvisberg and the young Hans Scharoun. Facing the challenge to conceive structures denser than the rural but less dense than the urban, they invented new spatial typologies, inaugurating, around 1930, the concept of the greater suburban settlement, an abstract composition of spaces and buildings. (Großsiedlung Siemensstadt 1930/31). After 1945, with more demand for housing than ever before, the model of the larger suburban settlement is revived and much creative, political and technical energy goes into the development of ever larger and more ambitious projects, built throughout the 1950ies, 60ies and 70ies. With limited surface available in West-Berlin, more density was required. The abstract spatial layout was then combined with new building-types, nut just with higher tower blocks and slabs. Hans Scharoun, master of the non-orthogonal, creates high-rise macro-structures that are complete innovations, never seen before. His collaborators and pupils will conceive the most striking sub-urban landscape (Vorstadt-Landschaft) in a part of Märkisches Viertel, with buildings like chains of mountains and green spaces like valleys. After a period of fierce critique and heavy attacks, aiming at what was called non-human scale, monotony and desperateness (Trostlosigkeit), the public and expert’s opinions change, the aesthetic and social values become visible and first listings and restorations could be managed. Special attention goes to the green spaces, now well developed, that often were creative inventions Berlinsko predgrađe, Nemačka — Berlin suburbia, Germany 99 — KONFERENCIJA in their own right. I will show examples and offer some reflections on experts’ evaluation and social appreciation. — Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper is an art historian, from 1988 to 2002 Conservator at the Berlin office for the conservation of historic buildings. Nov. 2001 - Jan. 2002 GuestScholar at the Getty Conservation Institute in Los Angeles/ Ca. 2003/2004 member of the UNESCO international experts group for the rebuilding of the Bridge of Mostar. Since October 2005 regular Professor at the TU Berlin, specializing in monuments of recent history, contested sites of heritage, contemporary art of commemoration, 20th century architecture and conservation-theory. Stanovanje u Engleskoj posle 1945. Post-1945 Housing in England Ilejn Harvud, Ingliš Heritedž, Engleska Elain Harwood, English Heritage, United Kingdom Ovo predavanje pratiće istoriju posleratnog stanovanja, kolektivnog i individualnog, i poteškoće sa kojima se susrećemo kada ova naselja treba predložiti za spiskove zaštite, uključujući i naselje Bajker (koje je projektovao Ralf Erskin), Robin Hud Garden (projektovali Alison i Piter Smitson), kao i naselje Span (projektovao Erik Lajons). U Londonu su određenim stepenom zaštite obuhvaćeni objekti koji su uglavnom bili uspešni, a njihovo pojavljivanje u listinzima omogućava dalju džentrifikaciju; u Šefildu je, međutim Park Hil bio predmet programa regeneracije i njegova je sudbina izvesnija. — Ilejn Harvud je istoričarka u institutu English Heritage čija je uža specijalnost arhitektura dvadesetog veka – posebno period posle 1945. godine. Od 1996. do 2005. rukovodila je istraživanjima za period posle Drugog svetskog rata, a trenutno učestvuje u istraživanjima koje sprovodi Institut, kao i u koncipiranju novih istraživanja koja su u planu. Autorka je knjige Engleska, vodič kroz listu posleratnih objekata (izdavač Elipsis, 2000; reizdanje: Batsford 2003) i Pevsnerov vodič grada Notingema (2008). Harvudova trenutno piše knjigu o godinama između 1945. i 1975. za izdavača Yale University Press, pod radnim naslovom „Prostor, nada i brutalizam”, koja se bavi kolektivnim stanovanjem, a radi i na doktoratu čija je tema arhitektura četvrti South Bank u Londonu, na Univerzitetu Bristol. Upravnica je udruženja Dvadeseti vek (Twentieth Century Society) i članica veća udruženja Cinema Theatre. The paper will look at the history of post-war housing, public and private, and the difficulties faced when recommending these developments for listing, including the Byker Estate by Ralph Erskine, Robin Hood Gardens by Alison and Peter Smithson, and Span housing by Eric Lyons. In London the housing that has been listed have been those that are generally successful and the designation has encouraged further gentrification; in Sheffield, however, Park Hill has been the subject of a regeneration programme whose future is more uncertain. 100 — KONFERENCIJA — Elain Harwood is a historian with the English Heritage, and its leading specialist on the architecture of the twentieth century - particularly on the years after 1945. From 1996 until 2005 she was responsible for its post-war research and listing programme, and remains involved in its casework and future research programme. She is the author of ‘England, a Guide to Post-War Listed Buildings’ (ellipsis 2000, revised Batsford 2003) and the Pevsner City Guide to ‘Nottingham’ (2008). Harwood is currently writing a major book on the years 1945-75 for Yale University Press, provisionally entitled ‘Space, Hope and Brutalism’, in which public housing plays a major part, and a PhD on the architecture of London’s South Bank, for Bristol University. She is also a Trustee of the Twentieth Century Society and committee member of the Cinema Theatre Association. 1. 2. 1. Naselje Brenč Hil Hampsted, London Borough of Camden (Benson i Forsajt) 1972-9 — Branch Hill Estate Hampstead, London Borough of Camden (Benson and Forsyth) 1972-9 2. Naselje Alton Vest (Rohempton Lejn) London County Council 1953-61 — Alton West (Roehampton Lane) Estate, London County Council 1953-61 101 — KONFERENCIJA Mesta trezvenosti: Posleratno socijalno stanovanje u Holandiji Marijke Kajpers, Tehnički Univerzitet u Delftu, Holandija Prilikom planiranja i proizvodnje socijalnog stanovanja u Holandiji, kao odgovor na veliki nedostatak stambenih objekata posle destrukcije u Drugom svetskom ratu, postojale su tri glavne prekretnice: prva – snažno angažovanje države u planiranju (finansiranje, kontrole i smernice); druga – ideja o „jedinicama susedstva“, prikazana u precizno planiranim proširenjima gradova u kojima je dominiralno jednoporodično stanovanje, i treća – opšta prihvaćenost prefabrikacije, standardizacije i blokova visokih objekata. Nova susedstva sa svojim kompaktnim stambenim jedinicama u Zeilenbau, svojim rasporedom oko javnih zelenih površina, postali su ideal slobode i zajedništva. Oni oličavaju „ostvarivo društvo“, u kome svaki deo ima svoje mesto. Umerenost je propagirana kao neophodno sredstvo koje treba da pobedi opšteg neprijatelja – nedostatak stanova. Danas su ovakvi ideali prošlost. Holandska stambena politika se, favorizovanjem privatnog stanovanja, iz osnova promenila, posebno nakon neoliberalizma iz devedesetih godina XX veka. Korporacije socijalnog stanovanja bile su primorane da se privatizuju i okrenu ka komercijalnoj delatnosti. Nasleđe socijalnog stanovanja postalo je problematično usled demografskih promena, mešavine interesa i novih paradigmi. Ministarstvo stanovanja je planiralo veliki program radikalne urbane obnove, a Ministarstvo socijalne politike stimuliše renoviranje ili zamenu kuća za starije; oba ministarstva imaju nameru da postignu više standarde životnog komfora i uštedu energije, uprkos mnogim protestima protiv tako velikih 102 — KONFERENCIJA razmera destrukcije vrednog kulturnog nasleđa. Kao posledica toga, razvijeni su novi instrumenti da bi otvorili oči urbanističkih i arhitektonskih kvaliteta novijeg nasleđa. Za neka važna, ali ugrožena područja (kao što je Frankendael u Amsterdamu i celina Lijnbaan u Roterdamu), procedura proglašenja je počela da dobija zakonsku zaštitu. To je podstaklo Ministarstvo kulture da razvije listing-program za posleratno nasleđe, čiji je rezultat lista prvih stotinu posleratnih spomenika (2007), ali je još uvek neizvesno da li će sve nominovane lokacije biti konzervirane. — Marike Kajpers, istoričarka arhitekture, od 1977. članica je niza državnih agencija za konzervaciju u Holandiji i bila je uključena u identifikaciju, evaluaciju i prezervaciju arhitektonskog nasleđa dvadesetog veka. Trenutno je vanredna profesorka na predmetu Kulturno nasleđe na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Tehničkog univerziteta u Delftu (nakon sličnog položaja na Fakultetu umetnosti i društvenih nauka na univerzitetu u Mastrihtu, od 2000. do 2008). Pored toga, ona je potpredsednica Internacionalnog komiteta za registraciju pri organizaciji DOCOMOMO (Documentation and conservation of buildings, sites and neighbouhoods of the modern movement – Dokumentacija i konzervacija objekata, lokacija i susedstva modernog pokreta). Sites of Sobriety: Postwar Social Housing in the Netherlands Marieke Kuipers, Technical University Delft, Netherlands Both in the planning and the production of social housing schemes three major turns got shape in the Netherlands in response to the immense housing shortage after the destructions of World War II. Firstly, the strong State involvement in the schemes (financing, control and guidelines). Secondly, the wide spread idea of ‘neighbourhood units’, represented by precisely planned town extensions in which one-family housing dominated. Thirdly, the broad acceptance of pre-fabrication, standardization and towerblocks. The new neighbourhoods with their compact housing units in Zeilenbau arrangements around public greens represented the ideals of freedom and community. They embody the ‘makeable society’ where every part had its own place. Sobriety was propagated as a necessary tool to tackle the common enemy of housing shortage. Nowadays such ideals are past. Especially since the neoliberal 1990s, the Dutch housing policy has fundamentally changed in favour of private housing. The social housing corporations were forced to privatize and have turned into commercial organizations. The inheritance of social housing has become problematic due to demographic changes, mixed interests and new paradigms. The Ministry of Housing has scheduled a huge programme of radical urban renewal and the Ministry of Social Affairs stimulates to renovate or replace the homes for elderly people; both intend to achieve higher standards of living comfort and energy saving, in spite of various protests against such large-scaled demolition of a valuable cultural heritage. Therefore, new evaluation instruments are developed to open the eyes for the urbanistic and architectural qualities of this recent heritage. For some important Frankendael, Amsterdam, Holandija — Frankendael, Amsterdam, Netherlands though endangered sites (like Frankendael at Amsterdam and the Lijnbaan ensemble in Rotterdam) an assignment procedure has been started to obtain legal protection. This urged the Minister of Culture to develop a listing programme for post-war heritage and resulted in a ‘top 100 list’ of postwar monuments (2007), but it is still uncertain if the nominated sites will be all conserved. — Marieke Kuipers is trained as an architectural historian; since 1977 she has been affiliated with the successive state Agencies for Conservation in the Netherlands and been involved in the identification, evaluation and preservation of 20th architectural heritage. At present she is a parttime Professor of Cultural Heritage at the faculty of Architecture of the Technical University of Delft (after a similar occupaton with the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Maastricht University, 2000-2008). Besides, she is vice-chair of the International Specialist Committee on registers of DOCOMOMO. Socijalno stanovanje posle Drugog svetskog rata u Italiji: „Javni grad“ kao laboratorija za moderne teorije o gradu i savremenu perspektivu urbane obnove Paola di Bjađi, Univerzitet u Trstu, Italija Socijalne stambene četvrti u Evropi dvadesetog veka, izgrađene da bi se porodicama, koje ih nisu mogle sebi priuštiti po tržišnim cenama, obezbedili zdravi i pristojni stanovi, danas se mogu tumačiti kao delovi šireg i kompleksnijeg „javnog grada”. Takozvani javni grad je urbana forma, u kojoj su svoje mesto pronašli određeni principi modernog pokreta: od pažnje ka osnovnim ljudskim potrebama do prava na stanovanje. Tokom konstrukcije „javnog grada“ smišljeni su i isprobani drugačiji vidovi građenja kao alternativa tradicionalnom načinu stanovanja, dok su veliki broj i raznolikost urbanih prostora (posebno otvorenih prostora i prostora sa društvenim sadržajima) često bili predloženi kao sredstva izgradnje novih građanskih zajednica. Danas „javni grad“ leži između savremenih urbanih prostora, zadržava svoje razlike, pokazujući raznolike forme i probleme. Iako se u određenim četvrtima socijalnog stanovanja kvalitet urbanog plana još može prepoznati, mnoge od njih su za kratko vreme propale i fizički i u društvenom smislu. Štaviše, ovakve uslove često pogoršavaju široko rasprostranjene predrasude i u društvu i među stručnjacima. Ipak, ukoliko oslobodimo našu percepciju predrasuda i potražimo potencijale i sredstva koja ova velika naselja mogu da ponude savremenom gradu, ne može nam promaći centralna i strateška uloga koju ove 104 — KONFERENCIJA socijalne stambene četvrti imaju (ili bi mogle imati) u metropolitenskom prostoru, urbanim politikama, stručnim debatama i procesima transformacije. U tom smislu, današnje četvrti socijalnog stanovanja mogu se interpretirati kao prostorne figure ne samo modernizma već i savremenog grada, modernog nasleđa ali i sredstva za obnovu urbanih predgrađa. Oni mogu postati laboratorija savremenih planerskih i projektantskih procesa, u kojima se može testirati sposobnost transformacije da se udruži sa zaštitom ovih naselja izgrađenih i otvorenih prostora, gde različiti i integrisani istraživački putevi mogu podržati početak projekata i strategija za procese šire urbane regeneracije i nove prostorne i društvene ravnoteže. S ciljem da se prikažu navedeni argumenti, prezentacija će prvo ilustrovati neke studije slučaja, odabrane kao reprezentativne za različite periode posleratnog italijanskog „javnog grada“, a potom prikazati rezultate Nacionalnog istraživačkog programa „Javni grad kao projektantska laboratorija. Stvaranje smernica za održivu obnovu urbanih predgrađa“, koju su izveli univerziteti u Trstu, Rimu, Palermu, Napulju, i politehnike u Milanu i Bariju. — Paola di Bjađi je redovna profesorka urbanizma na Arhitektonskom fakultetu u Trstu, predavala je i na Univerzitetu IUAV u Veneciji, držala seminare i konferencije u Italiji i u inostranstvu. Bavi se proučavanjem i projektovanjem savremenog grada, pri čemu posebnu pažnju poklanja društvenoj gradnji i javnom prostoru. Autorka je više publikacija, među kojima su Italijanski urbanisti (priredila zajedno sa P. Đibelini), Laterza, Rim 1992; Velika rekonstrukcija. Plan Ina-Casa i Italija pedesetih godina, Donzelli, Rim 2001; Javni grad. Društvena gradnja i prekvalifikacija gradskog prostora u Torinu, Allemandi, Torino, 2008; Umetnost i grad. Dela i umetničke intervencije u gradskom prostoru (priredila sa L. Carlini i L. Safred), Univerzitet u Trstu, Trst, 2008. Post WWII Social Housing in Italy: The “public city” as a laboratory for modern city theories and urban renewal contemporary perspective Paola di Biagi, University of Trieste, Italy XXth century social housing districts, built in Europe to provide those families who could not afford market prices with healthy and decent dwellings, can today be read as part of a larger and more complex “public city”. The so called “public city” is an urban form, where some principles of the Modern Movement have found “place”: from the attention to fundamental human needs to the right to inhabit. Through the construction of the “public city” alternatives to traditional ways of building and living the city have been devised and tried out, whereas the large amount and variety of urban spaces (in particular of open spaces and social equipments) have often been proposed as means to build new citizens’ communities. Today the “public city”, laying in-between contemporary urban spaces, maintains its differences, showing manifold forms and problems. Even though in some social housing districts the quality of urban layout can still be recognized, many of them have been quickly plagued by spatial decay and social unease. Moreover, such conditions are frequently worsened by a widespread stigmatization both in social and disciplinary imagination. Nonetheless, if we free our perceptions and approaches from common places and look for the potentialities and resources these large settlements can offer to the contemporary city, we cannot miss the central and strategic role that social housing districts play (or could play) in metropolitan space, urban policies, disciplinary debate, transformation processes. In this sense, today social housing districts can be interpreted as spatial figures not only of Modernity, but also of the contemporary city; as both a Modern heritage and a resource for the renewal of urban outskirts. They can become a laboratory for new planning and design processes, where transformation can test its capacity to combine with the protection of this estate of built and open spaces; where different and integrated research paths can support the start of projects and strategies for wider urban regeneration processes and new spatial and 105 — KONFERENCIJA social balance. In order to demonstrate the aforementioned arguments, the presentation will first illustrate some case studies selected as representative of different periods of post XXII Italian “public city”, then show the results of the National Research Programme “The ‘public city’ as a design laboratory. The construction of guidelines for the sustainable renewal of urban outskirts” developed by the Universities of Trieste, Rome, Palermo, Naples and the Polytechnics of Milan and Bari. — Paola Di Biagi is Professor of Urban Planning at the Faculty of Architecture Trieste, she taught at the University of Venice IUAV and carried out activities of teaching, seminars and conferences in Italy and abroad. Deals with the study and designing of the contemporary city, with particular attention to issues public housing and public space. Among her publications: Urbanisti italiani, with P. Gabellini, Laterza, Rome 1992; La grande ricostruzione. Il piano Ina Casa e l’Italia degli anni cinquanta, Donzelli, Roma 2001; La città pubblica. Edilizia sociale e riqualicazione urbana a Torino, Allemandi, Torino 2008; Arte e città. Opere e interventi artistici nello spazio urbano, edited by L. Carlini and L. Safred, Published by University of Trieste, Trieste in 2008. Pitanja konzervacije i restauracije u socijalnom stanovanju posle Drugog svetskog rata Naselja INCIS-a: Villaggio Olimpico i Decima u Rimu Alesandra Čeroti, Univerzitet u Rimu, Italija Izgradnja četvrti Olimpijsko selo i Dečima deo je šire aktivnosti Nacionalnog instituta za izgradnju kuća državnih službenika (INCIS), koji je nastao Kraljevskim dekretom br. 1165, od 28. aprila 1938, s namerom da za civilne i vojne državne službenike obezbedi, uz povoljne uslove, stanove javne rezidencijalne gradnje. Iako su pripadala rezidencijalnoj javnoj gradnji u posleratnom periodu, u odnosu na objekte sagrađene zahvaljujući programu INA CASA (Nacionalnog instituta za osiguranja), arhitektonska ostvarenja INCIS-a predlažu formalno zrelije projektantske karakteristike, verovatno zbog raznolikosti budućih stanara, državnih funkcionera i službenika. U suštini, iako su negovala istu pažnju prema ambijentalnom aspektu, ova arhitektonska ostvarenja delovala su dovršenije, a upotrebi materijala i tehnološkim rešenjima konstruktivnih detalja bila je posvećena veća pažnja . Dva INCIS kompleksa, sagrađena krajem pedesetih i tokom šezdesetih godina, prema projektu grupe sposobnih arhitekata, među kojima su bili Adalberto Libera i Luiđi Moreti, iako su nudili osetne razlike, bili su, svakako, osmišljeni istim arhitektonskim jezikom: sastojali su se od brojnih zgrada u nizu, sa dvorištem i krstastog preseka, podignuti na pilotise, povezani prohodnim ulicama i pešačkim stazama i uronjeni u zelenilo. Jedinstveni urbani krarakter i arhitektonski kvalitet 106 — KONFERENCIJA nukleusa proizlaze iz odmerenih odnosa između prirodnih i izgrađenih elemenata, a zbog slaganja sličnih elemenata i ponovljivih oblika, ali uvek u različitim perspektivama, ne postoji rizik od jednoličnosti. Sinergija malo raspoloživih izvora ilošeg održavanja koja traje duži niz godina uzrokovala je propadanje arhitektonskih ostvarenja i arhitektonskih elemenata oba kompleksa. Postavlja se, dakle, sve ozbiljnije pitanje: kako očuvati ovu arhitektonsku baštinu i kako delovati na njoj.. Poseban je problem to što njena kompleksnost ne dozvoljava jednostavni odabir intervencija (srušiti, očuvati, iznova sagraditi), bez odgovarajućih procena. Naime, ta baština se može posmatrati sa upotrebne tačke gledišta, s obzirom njenu kulturnu vrednost, vrednost simbola i pamćenja, budući da je reč o istorijskom nasleđu, ali tek nakon pažljive analize tih vrednosti može da se odredi tip intervencije, od najradikalnijeg do najkonzervativnijeg, kao i načini izvršenja. U tom smislu, odabiru tipova intervencije treba da se posveti velika briga i – a to je faza koja sledi i koja je direktno povezana sa prepoznavanjem vrednosti (arhitektonske, urbane itd.) – nepogrešivo razlikujući dva termina koja su često i pogrešno korišćena: obnovu i restauraciju, čije nerazumevanje ima dramatične posledice na polju delovanja. Iz ove perspektive je, dakle, neophodno znanje kako da se upravlja promenama na delu i poznavanje neophodnih procesa održavanja, uz prethodno jasno definisanje i usaglašavanje karakteristika njihove realizacije. — Alesandra Čeroti diplomirala je arhitekturu na Univerzitetu Sapijenca u Rimu, na kome se i specijalizovala za restauraciju spomenika. Od 2003. sarađuje na laboratorijskom kursu iz arhitektonske restauracije na Arhitektonskom fakultetu „Vale Đulija”. Učestvovala je u istraživanjima i na međunarodnim seminarima u Kini i Brazilu, u okviru kojih je priredila brojne publikacije. U svojim studijama bavi se pretežno savremenom arhitektonskom restauracijom; trenutno završava doktorat na Univerzitetu Sapijenca u Rimu na temu javne rezidencijalne gradnje u periodu posle II svetskog rata s obzirom na probleme konzervacije i restauracije. Radi u Rimu a svoje profesionalne aktivnosti usmerila je na restauraciju spomenika. Conservation and Restoration Issues in the Post-WWII Social Housing: INCIS Estates Villaggio Olimpico and Decima in Rome Alessandra Cerroti, University of Rome, Italy Development of the estates Villaggio Olimpico (Olympic Village) and Decima, is a part of the wider activities of The National Institute for the Houses of the State Employees (INCIS), which has been proclaimed by the Royal decree No. 1165, from 28th April 1938, with the intention to provide the residential public apartments for the civil and military employees, under the favourable conditions. Even though they belonged to the residential public development in the post-WWII period, compared to the objects built with the support of the program INA CASA (National Institute for Insurance), the architectural achievements of INCIS suggest formally more mature design characteristics, probably because of the diversity of the future residents, state officials and employees. Basically, even though they have given as much attention to ambient aspect, these architectural achievements seemed more complete, and more attention was given to the use of material and technological solutions of the structural details. The two INCIS estates, built at the end of 50’s and during the 60’s, according to the design of the distinguished architects, among whom was Adalberto Libera and Luigi Moretti, even though they offered some notable differences, were, by all means, concieved by the same architectural language: they consisted of the numerous buildings forming rows, with the yards and crosssection like, raised on pilotis, connected with streets and pedestrian paths and surrounded with greenery. The unique urban character and architectural quality of nucleus, emerges from the moderate relationships between natural and built elements. Because of composing of similar elements and repeating of shapes, but always in different perspectives, there is not risk of monotony. Synergy of low availability of resources and poor maintenance of long duration, has caused the decay of the architectural achievements and elements of the both estates. 107 — KONFERENCIJA A serious question could be posed: how to preserve this architectural heritage and how to affect it? A particular problem is that its complexity makes no allowance for a simple choice of interventions (to pull down, preserve, rebuild), without appropriate evaluations. Namely, this heritage could be observe from the utilitarian point of view, due to its cultural value, symbolic and memory values, since it is historical heritage. But only after the careful analysis of these values, it is possible to determine the type of intervention, from the most radical to the most conservative, as well as the means of realization. In this sense, much attention should be given to the selection of the intervention types – the successive phase directly connected with the recognizing of the values (architectural, urban etc) – unmistakably differentiating the two terms, often misused: recuperation and restoration, whose misunderstanding has dramatic consequences in the field of action. From this perspective is, therefore, necessary knowledge of how to manage the changes in action and necessary maintenance, with the previous clear definition and harmonization of the conditions for their realization. — Alessandra Cerroti has graduated architecture at the University La Sapienza where she further specialized in restoration of monuments. From 2003 she collaborates on the course Laboratory for the architectural restoration on Faculty of Architecture in Valle Giulia and has participated in researches and international seminars in China and Brazil, within which she prepared many publications. Her field of interest are mainly the problems of contemporary architecture restoration: she is finishing PhD studies at University of Rome La Sapienza on postWWII social housing related to conservation issues. She works in Rome and her professional activities are aimed to restoration of monuments. Međutim, nijedna od ovih površina nije iskorišćena na takav način da zadovoljava standarde. Radi se o pravom pravcatom rasipanju zemljišta. 1 Pier Paolo Pasolini, Il fronte della città, Vie Nuove, Roma, 1958. 2 Isto. 3 SLOAP (Space Left Over After Planning – prostor izostavljen iz planiranja), Leslie Ginsburg, Architectural Review, 1973. Density, IntenCity: Stanovanje u Italiji Đovani Kaudo, Univerzitet u Rimu, Italija Grad Rim i dan-danas raste i razvija se, a lice grada1 obuhvata sve veći prostor. Dve trećine urbanizovanog zemljišta Rima izgrađeno je u poslednjih pedeset godina – to bi bio, vremenski posmatrano, najnoviji korpus grada.. U ovom procesu razvoja grada značajnu ulogu imale su četvrti kolektivnog stanovanja. I upravo izgradnja prostranih stambenih kompleksa na osnovu zakona 167 predstavlja, i kvantitativno i kvalitativno, specifičnost Rima. Tako se, na razne načine, učvrstio korpus grada kakav je danas. Ali taj organizam nije stabilan, nije konačan, on i dalje podrazumeva „sve ozbiljniju i opasniju zbrku, neizvesnost, jer je predstavljen kao udobnost, kao manje zlo, dok bi, naprotiv, bilo još toliko toga da se uradi”.2 Na Rim, „grad svojih žitelja”, najveći grad koji je izgrađen u Italiji, spustila se neka vrsta zaborava, nemara. U pitanju su, zapravo, delovi grada sa velikim potencijalom za promenu. To je ono što nazivamo periferijom – prostor kojim se rasipa, neiskorišćene površine, međuprostori, bezoblični ostaci bez definisane svrhe koji ispunjavaju teritoriju, infiltriraju se kao ničija zemlja, dok razdvajaju, rasparčavaju delove metropole.3 Za više od trideset godina opština Rim stekla je javne površine na prostoru od oko 7.000 ha, za koje su izrađeni prostorni planovi. Od te površine, skoro tri hiljade hektara namenjeno je za javne objekte i ulice. Proces njihove realizacije, često dug, mučan i pun kontradiktornosti, učinio je da mnoge od ovih površina i danas stoje neiskorišćene ili se koriste na pogrešan način, a u nekim slučajevima su čak i zaboravljene. Simulacija koja se sprovodi u tri stambene četvrti (Serpentara, Valmelaina, Torsapienca) beleži momentalnu raspoloživost zemljišta na 128.000.000 m². 108 — KONFERENCIJA — Đovani Kaudo, arhitekta, rođen je 1964. godine u Fjumefredu na Siciliji, u italijanskoj provinciji Katanja. Diplomirao je s najvećim počastima na arhitektonskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Rimu, 30. oktobra 1991. Živi i radi u Rimu. Istraživač je u Laboratoriji za urbano planiranje na rimskom univerzitetu Tre (Roma Tre Universitá degli Studi), gde je takođe nastavnik urbanog planiranja u okviru trogodišnjeg nastavnog programa arhitekture, a radi i kao koordinator doktorskih studija na temu Regionalna politika i lokalno planiranje. Dr Kaudo trenutno radi na istraživanju aspekata procesa odabira planova za implementaciju i planiranja gradova i urbanog okruženja. Bavio se istraživanjem planerske prakse u različitim urbanim kontekstima (planovi za gradove južne Italije i strateško planiranje) direktnim nadzorom planerske prakse i dokumenata, kao i istraživanjem urbanog konteksta u procesu transformacije, posebno u oblastima u kojima se sprovodi javna izgradnja i koje su podvrgnute procesima destrukcije i povećanja gustine. Njegove aktivnosti kao profesionalnog arhitekte (projekti i urbanistički planovi) i učešće na konkursima (između ostalih, Shrinking Cities Berlin i unapređenje urbaniteta oblasti Via della Lega Lombarda u Rimu) odnose se najviše na urbano planiranje, temu koja čini središte njegovih istraživačkih interesovanja, i predstavljaju koristan način da iskustvo koje je stekao u naučno-istraživačkom radu bude na najbolji način provereno u praksi. Density, IntenCity: Housing in Italy Giovanni Caudo, University of Rome, Italy The city of Rome still grows and develops, the city frontline1 is in constant growth. Two-thirds of the urbanized terrain of Rome has been built in the last 50 years: that is the newest corpus of the city in its temporal sequence. In this process of development of the city, the housing quarters played a very important role. This development of the spacious housing complexes based on article 167 of the Constitution, represent a specificity of Rome, both a qualitative and quantitative one. That is how, the today’s corpus of the city was formed, using various trajectories. But this organism is not stable or final; it still is in a state of “serious and dangerous confusion, uncertainty, for it presents itself as a bonanza, as something less bad, while, on the contrary, there is so much more to be done”.2 Upon Rome’s public spaces, biggest ever built in Italy, a kind of oblivion, negligence has descended. Those are, actually, part of the city with huge potential for change. This is the corpus of the city that we call the periphery – space which is wasted, unused surfaces, space gaps, amorphous residues that fill the territory, without defined purpose, infiltrating as no-man’s land, while dividing the parts of the metropolis.3 For more than 30 years, the Municipality of Rome has been acquiring public areas in the amount of 7,000 ha, for which spatial planes were developed. From this area, almost 3,000 ha is intended for the public structures and streets. The process of their realization, often long, tedious and full of contradiction, has made many of these surfaces to still stand unused or misused till today, and in some cases even to become forgotten. The simulation conducted in the three housing quarters (Serpentara, Valmelaina, Torsapienza), shows immediate availability of 128 million square meters of land. However, none of these surfaces is used in a way that complies with the standards. We are indeed dealing with wasting of land. 1 Pier Paolo Pasolini, Il fronte della città, Vie Nuove, Roma, 1958. 2 Ibid. 3 SLOAP (Space Left Over After Planning), Leslie Ginsburg, Architectural Review, 1973. — Giovanni Caudo, architect, was born in 1964 in Fiumefreddo in Sicily, in the Province of Catania. He graduated summa cum laude in Architecture at the University of Rome on 30 October 1991. He now lives and works in Rome. He is a Researcher in Urban Planning at Rome Tre University (Roma Tre Universitá degli Studi), where he lectures in the Urban Planning Laboratory in the three109 — KONFERENCIJA year degree course in Architectural Sciences, and coordinates the teaching of the PhD in Regional Policies and Local Planning. Dr. Caudo’s research in progress concerns aspects of the process of selecting a plan for implementation and of designing cities and the urban environment. In particular he has carried out research activities into planning practices in various Italian urban contexts (plans for cities in South Italy and strategic planning) through direct observation of planning practices and documents; and research (in progress) on urban contexts in the process of transformation, especially in districts affected by public building and that are involved in processes of demolition and increasing density. His activities as a professional architect (project work on executive town plans) and his participation in competitions (among these: Shrinking Cities Berlin, and the Via della Lega Lombarda Urban Upgrade in Rome) have covered topics of urban planning that are linked to his research interests, and have been useful in verifying empirically or putting into practice the experience developed in the course of his academic research. E2A: Post CIAM Reconfiguration Piet Eckert, E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Switzerland E2A: Post-CIAM Rekonfiguracija Pit Ekert, E2A Ekert Ekert Arhitekten, Švajcarska Urbanističko planiranje se ostvaruje u tananom prelazi od zamišljenog ka ostvarenom. Često se manjak ostvarenog ostavlja u nasleđe narednoj generaciji arhitekata i projektanata koji se suočavaju sa novim kompenzacijama i provokacijama prethodno stvorenog. Na osnovu primera vezanih za CIAM (Međunarodni kongres moderne arhitekture), raspravljaće se o očiglednom propadanju rezultata projekata iz 60-ih godina prošlog veka, o očekivanju da će širom Evrope doći do masovnog porasta stanovništva, o trenutnim poražavajućim javnim procenama koje sumnjaju u „mega i nadstrukture” i strahovanja da će projektu izrađenom u prirodnoj veličini nedostajati identitet. Predavanje će obuhvatiti poređenje sa sličnim iskustvima u urbanističkom planiranju, primere i predloge koje je E2A nedavno izneo kada je suočen sa zadatkom da preuredi suvišne i preostale urbane lokalitete. — Pit Ekert (rođen 1968. u Mumbaiju, Indija) suvlasnik je biroa E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten iz Ciriha. Studirao je arhitekturu na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Cirihu i na Arhitektonskom fakultetu Kolumbija univerziteta u Njujorku (diplomirao je 1994). Od 1995. do 1997. radio je u Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) u Roterdamu. Godine 1997, zajedno sa Vimom Ekertom, osniva biro koji je 2001. postao E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten. Pit Ekert redovno drži predavanja i radionice u školama i drugim ustanovama. Predavao je na Tehničkom fakultetu u Delftu, Holandija, i na Tehničkom univerzitetu u Cirihu. Bio je član raznih akademskih žirija u Evropi i van nje. 110 — KONFERENCIJA Urban planning operates along a sensitive transition from the imagined to the realized. Often the lack of the realized is passed to a next generation of architects and planners dealing with new compensations and provocations of the previous. The obvious decay of CIAM related planning results of 1960s, its European wide forecasted expectation of massive population growth, the currently devastating public estimations disbelieving in “mega- and superstructures”, fearing the lack of identity of the large scale composed plan, will be discussed along examples. The lecture will include cross-references to analog urban planning experiences, examples and recent proposals of E2A dealing with a task of reprogramming redundant and residual urban sites. — Piet Eckert is Partner at E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten, Zurich. He studied architecture at the ETH in Zurich and at the Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture in New York (Diploma 1994). From 1995 to 1997 he worked at the Office for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) in Rotterdam. In 1997 he established his own office with Wim Eckert, which became E2A Eckert Eckert Architekten in 2001. Piet Eckert regularly gives lectures and workshops at schools and institutions. He has taught at the Technical University of Delft in the Netherlands and at the ETH in Zurich. He has been a member of several academic juries in Europe and elsewhere. Wallisellen, Švajcarska, 2007. — Wallisellen, Switzerland, 2007 PREZENTACIJA PRESENTATION EURODOM je firma koja se bavi uvozom i distribucijom keramičkih i sanitarnih proizvoda renomiranih proizvođača iz Italije. Iza imena kakva su Cerim Ceramiche, Floor Gres Ceramiche, Rex Ceramiche Artistiche, Casa Dolce Casa, Casa Mood, Appiani i Sicis, stoje decenije iskustva i stalnih inovacija u programima keramičkih i granitnih keramičkih proizvoda.Ponuda sanitarija i armatura obuhvata proizvode renomiranih proizvođača, kao što su Ceramica Flaminia, Catalano, Vitruvit, Gessi, Hansgrohe i drugi, a linija, stil, funkcionalnost i „predviđanje“ želja su specifičnost ovih proizvođača. Tu je i prateća galenterija Gessi i Geesa koja svojim dizajnom upotpunjuje sliku savremenog i modernog kupatila. Iz programa hidromasažnih kada, hidromasažnih tuš kabina i kombinovanih hidromasažnih sistema, nudi se program kompanije Jacuzzi, firme koja je pre pedeset godina osmislila i proizvela prvu hidromasažnu kadu i koja kvalitetom svojih proizvoda i danas zauzima prvo mesto u svetu u ovoj oblasti. U ponudi su saune i tursko kupatilo italijanske firme Effegibi, kao i tuš kabine italijanske firme Cesana. — Cilj nam je da budemo adekvatna podrška arhitektama, od faze idejnog projektovanja do nadzora nad izvođenjem objekta. Naši kapaciteti Vam stoje na raspolaganju od dostavljanja arhitektonskih kataloga, džepnih uzoraka, gotovih blok crteža u AutoCAD-u, 3D modela, keramičkih slogova, tehničkih karakteristika i detalja određenih sanitarnih rešenja, kako bi Vas uputili na evropske i svetske trendove u uređenju enterijera i eksterijera. Pravovremenom distribucijom, kvalitetom koji garantuju sertifikati EU i evropski standardi, dugogodišnjim iskustvom u implementiranju i servisiranju selektovanih keramičkih i sanitarnih rešenja, ostajemo podrška i sigurnost za dugogodišnju saradnju. EURODOM is a company whose scope of works is importing and distribution of ceramic and sanitary equipment produced by renowned companies from Italy. There are decades of experience and permanent innovations in ceramic and granite programs of ceramic products, behind the names such as Cerim Ceramiche, Floor Gres Ceramiche, Rex Ceramiche Artistiche, Casa Dolce Casa,Casa Mood, Appiani and Sicis. This company offers sanitary equipment and accessories produced by renowned producers, such as Ceramica Flaminia, Catalano, Vitruvit, Gessi, Hansgrohe etc. Line, style, functionality and “anticipation” of the client’s wishes, are characteristics of these producers. Among other products, there are accessories Gessi and Geesa, which complete the image of contemporary and modern bathroom, by its design. From the program of hydro massage tubs, shower cabins and combined hydro massage systems, this company offers the products produced by company Jacuzzi, which has invented and produced the first hydro massage tub, and which is still the number one company in the world in their field, by the quality of their products. The selection of the company includes also saunas and Turkish bathrooms of Italian company Effegibi, as well as shower cabins produced by Italian company Cesana. — Our goal is to offer adequate support to architects, from the phase of preliminary design up to the supervision of executing the works. Our capacities are placed to your disposal, with submitting of architectural catalogues, pocket samples, pre-designed AutoCAD drawings, 3D models, ceramic patterns, technical characteristics and details of the certain sanitary solutions, in order to refer you to European and world interior and exterior decoration trends. We are offering our support and security for the long cooperation, by providing the distribution of products in time, quality guaranteed by EU certificates and standards, long-term experience with implementation and servicing of the selected ceramic and sanitary solutions. Web: www.eurodomsaloni.co.yu Email: eurodom@eunet.rs Showroom: Nikole Grulovića 71e +381 11 3046 462 Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 388 +381 11 3808 393 Ruzveltova 16 +381 11 3809 543 Contact: Bojan Vujičić, project division mob +381 63 342 859 Goran Ivić, project division mob +381 63 1165 035 Predrag Šarac mob +381 63 1165 037 Beogradska internacionalna nedelja arhitekture Belgrade international architecture week Organizatori – Organisers Društvo arhitekata Beograda – Association of Belgrade Architects Kulturni centar Beograda – Belgrade Cultural Centre Uređivački odbor – Board Jelena Ivanović-Vojvodić, Danica Jovović-Prodanović, Ružica Sarić, Tanja Konli, Darko Marušić, Ivan Kucina Društvo arhitekata Beograda, Projekat BINA – Association of Belgrade Architects, Project BINA Društvo arhitekata Beograda, konsultanti – Association of Belgrade Architects, Consultants Ivan Rašković, Bojan Kovačević, Ana Kovenc-Vujić, Vasilije Milunović, Dejan Miljković, Mustafa Musić, Branimir Popović, Branislav Redžić, Aleksandar Stjepanović, Žaklina Gligorijević, Milan Đurić, Borislav Petrović, Zorica Savičić, Jelena Stojkov, Srđan Jovanović Weiss Stručni saradnici – Programme Assistants Davorka Tolić Milosavljević Zorana Đaković Kulturni centar Beograda – Belgrade Cultural Centre Tehnička Podrška – Technical Support Branko Tošić, Ana Glavički, Vanja Enbulajev Društvo arhitekata Beograda – Association of Belgrade Architects Vizuelni identitet – Visual Identity petokraka Dizajn izložbe u Likovnoj galeriji – Art Gallery Exhibition Design petokraka, Aleksa Bijelović, Milica Maksimović i Una Momirović Pokrovitelji − Patrons Grad Beograd − The City of Belgrade Ministarstvo kulture Republike Srbije − Republic of Serbia - Ministry of Culture Inženjerska komora Srbije − Serbian Chamber of Engineers Partneri − Partners EUNIC – European Union National Institutes for Culture: Austrijski kulturni forum − Austrian Cultural Forum Italijanski institut za kulturu − Italian Institute for Culture in Belgrade Gete institut − Goethe Institute Francuski kulturni centar − French Cultural Centre Magistrat glavnog grada Beča − Vienna City Administration Ambasada Sjedinjenih američkih država − Embassy of the United States of America Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu − Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade Republički zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture − State Institute for The Protection of Cultural Heritage JP Urbanistički zavod grada Beograda − Institute of Urbanism Belgrade Društvo urbanista Beograda − Town Planners Association Belgrade Dečji kulturni centar − Children’s Cultural Centre Opština Vračar − Vračar Municipality Opština Stari grad − Stari grad Municipality Galerija O3one − Gallery O3one GRAD kulturni centar − GRAD Cultural Centre Dom omladine Beograda − Cultural Centre Dom omladine Turistička organizacija Beograda − Belgrade Tourist Organization Sponzori − Sponsors Eurodom Tarkett Konkav Konvex Gemax Porcelanosa Xella Srbija Potisje Kanjiža Tondach Telekom Srbija Alukönig Stahl - Schüco - Jansen Trimo Rukkii Uslužni sponzori − Technical sponsors Grafix Heineken Zelena jabuka Građevinska knjiga Medijski partneri − Media partners A10 new European architecture Kvart Bus TV Media Max Time Out Beograd AG Nekretnine
